## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The runner package already provides the production protocol and execution spine. > - Contributors still need stable SDK surfaces, deterministic test tools, and local inspection tools. > - Those surfaces share generated contracts and must change as one package boundary. > - This pull request adds the package-local SDK, labs, examples, and drift checks. > - The benefit is a reviewable developer platform that does not change application execution selection. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** `packages/paperclip-runner` — runner SDK, conformance tools, and developer tooling. **Problem or motivation** The production runner spine is present, but package consumers cannot build deterministic integrations, inspect sessions, or verify provider-neutral behavior through supported surfaces. **Proposed solution** Add browser, React, standalone, live-session, scenario, conformance, and evaluation surfaces. Add generated contract inventories and package-local verification scripts. Keep production application routing unchanged. **Alternatives considered** We considered splitting each generated catalog, SDK surface, and demo into separate pull requests. Those changes share exports, fixtures, and drift gates. Splitting them would create intermediate package states that do not build. **Roadmap alignment** No overlapping item appears in `ROADMAP.md`. This work extends the runner package that is already on `master`. ## What Changed - Add browser, React, standalone, live-session, and issue-thread SDK surfaces. - Add deterministic mock control-plane, scenario, conformance, replay, and evaluation tools. - Add bounded Codex, OpenCode, and ACPX development transports and fixtures. - Keep deferred managed-provider execution fail-closed. Persisted compatibility data remains readable. - Add generated capability inventories with their source files and drift checks. - Add examples, package documentation, browser checks, and clean-consumer checks. - Preserve the reviewed protocol bounds, replay compatibility aliases, process environment isolation, and semantic redaction limits. - Update the ACPX package patch that the existing workspace patch registry already tracks. - Do not change `pnpm-lock.yaml`, repository workflows, server runtime selection, or the application UI. ## Verification GitHub Actions is the verification authority for this pull request. The repository CI, package TypeScript and Rust checks, package tests, generated-output drift checks, browser checks, security scans, and Greptile review must pass on the exact head. Local test suites were not run because this series uses parallel GitHub Actions for verification. ## Risks This is a large greenfield package change. The main risks are public export drift, generated-output drift, and optional React consumer compatibility. Package boundary checks, clean-consumer checks, and browser tests cover those risks. Production adapter selection and server execution are outside this pull request. ## Stack 1. **This PR:** runner SDK and developer tooling. 2. [Codex production server integration](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12616). 3. [Provider-neutral task-thread UI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12617). ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, high-reasoning mode, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the feature request template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge
5.3 KiB
Codex: Run the Skillless Codex Driver
What this phase is
Codex connects the mock core to a real Codex app-server session.
Codex gets one small task envelope. Codex does not get the Paperclip skill. Codex does not get a Paperclip API key or API instructions.
What this phase proves
This phase proves that a real Codex session can create a file, stream typed events, return one checked result, and replay the same result.
It also proves that steer, interrupt, resume, and unsupported-operation paths keep clear session identities and safe diagnostics.
Before you start
- Run commands from the repository root.
- Install Node.js 20+, pnpm 9+, Rust, and the
codexCLI. - Sign in to Codex with the normal local Codex setup.
- Do not add a Paperclip or OpenAI API key for this tutorial.
Check the installed harness:
codex --version
codex app-server --help
Run the real-Codex steps from an ordinary operator shell with a workspace that
has no AGENTS.md in that directory or any ancestor. A child directory of this
repository is not skillless because Codex discovers the repository
AGENTS.md. In a Paperclip-managed agent run, PAPERCLIP_WORKSPACE_CWD also
prevents mktemp -d from selecting a directory outside the assigned workspace;
use a separate clean operator workspace rather than bypassing that guard.
Step 1: Run the focused conformance checks
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner typecheck:typescript
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run \
src/drivers/codex/app-server-transport.test.ts \
src/drivers/codex/codex-app-server-driver.test.ts
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:forbidden-imports
Confirm that the driver tests pass and the package boundary check says
Standalone boundary check passed.
Step 2: Run the safe real Codex task
Choose a temporary directory and trace file:
codex_workspace="$(mktemp -d)"
codex_trace="$codex_workspace/trace.json"
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner trace:codex -- \
--working-directory "$codex_workspace" \
--output "$codex_trace"
Confirm:
- the result is
done; - every printed assertion says
PASS; - the file has the exact text:
test "$(cat "$codex_workspace/hello.txt")" = "hello from Codex runner"
Step 3: Inspect the exact model boundary
jq '.context | {
protocolVersion,
codexVersion,
model,
modelProvider,
workingDirectory,
sandbox,
approvalPolicy,
baseInstructions,
instructionSources,
instructionPolicy,
environmentKeys,
dynamicToolNames,
modelInputKinds,
envelope
}' "$codex_trace"
Confirm:
instructionSourcesis empty;- all three instruction-policy values are
false; modelInputKindscontains onlytext;- the semantic tools are
paperclip_finishandpaperclip_block; - no environment value is present;
- the requested permission profile denies root and host-home access, exposes read-only minimal runtime files, grants write access to the assigned workspace, and disables network access;
- the returned legacy sandbox facts are inspected separately because Codex may
add provider-managed state roots such as
~/.codex/memorieseven when memory instructions are disabled; - command
HOMEandCODEX_HOMEare absent; - the envelope contains only this safe task and its completion criteria.
Check that no control-plane route or bearer credential appears:
if rg -ni 'authorization: bearer|paperclip_api_key|/api/issues/' "$codex_trace"; then
echo "FAIL: forbidden control-plane context found"
exit 1
fi
Step 4: Inspect canonical events and replay
jq '[.events[].eventType] | group_by(.) | map({type: .[0], count: length})' \
"$codex_trace"
jq '.assertions' "$codex_trace"
Confirm:
- session and turn lifecycle events exist;
- model, command/tool, usage, verification, result, and terminal events exist;
exactlyOneTerminalResultistrue;liveReplayParityistrue;- source sequence and item identity assertions are
true.
The focused test suite supplies deterministic file-change and runtime-request events because a real model may choose a shell command instead of a file patch and may not need human input for this small task.
Step 5: Try steering
Use a new directory:
codex_steer_workspace="$(mktemp -d)"
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner trace:codex -- \
--working-directory "$codex_steer_workspace" \
--steer "Keep the answer short and verify the exact file text."
Confirm that the same driver and provider session IDs are printed and the task still returns one result.
Step 6: Try interruption
Use a new directory:
codex_interrupt_workspace="$(mktemp -d)"
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner trace:codex -- \
--working-directory "$codex_interrupt_workspace" \
--interrupt
An interrupt can win before the file is created. That is expected. Confirm that the trace still has one session identity, one semantic result, and one terminal event. It must not create a replacement session.
Step 7: Run the package verification path
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner verify
This command is the package acceptance path. The real Codex example remains a separate command because automated environments may not have a signed-in Codex session.