mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-18 15:39:47 +02:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
0cf06c8fa1
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip stores and controls secrets through server services > - The secret service tests check that concurrent writes use one lock at a time > - Fixed sleep times do not prove that a provider write started or stayed queued > - This pull request uses provider-write signals and measured waits to test lock behavior > - The benefit is stable test results and stronger detection of lock failures ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The secret write-serialization tests used fixed 20 ms sleeps. The sleeps sometimes ran before a provider write or after a queued write entered. The tests then failed or missed a broken lock. **Expected behavior** The tests must wait for real provider-write events and must detect a queued write that enters before the first write finishes. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/secrets-service.test.ts`. 2. Repeat the test file under sustained load. 3. Remove the write lock and run the concurrency tests. 4. Observe intermittent timing failures or missed lock failures. **Paperclip version or commit** `13bff0adee0216ee9ec67c843e9ead94aa788c68` **Deployment mode** Local dev (`pnpm dev`) **Installation method** Built from source (`pnpm dev` / `pnpm build`) **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific (core test) **Database mode** Not database-related **Additional context** This pull request changes tests only. It does not change production code. ## What Changed - Wait for a deferred signal when the first operation reaches its provider write. - Measure an uncontended provider-write duration and use a safety multiple for the queued-write check. - Release the test gate in a `finally` block so failed assertions do not leave a write active. - Throw when the measurement helper does not observe the provider write. ## Verification - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` reports no errors in the changed file. - `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/secrets-service.test.ts` passes 90 of 90 tests. - The engineer ran the test file five times under sustained load, and all runs passed. - Full CI must pass after this pull request starts. ## Risks Low risk. The change affects test code only. The measured wait can expose a real lock regression, but it does not change runtime behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, tool use and code execution. The exact context window and reasoning mode are not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>