Files
PaperClipAI/packages/paperclip-runner/src/drivers/codex/codex-app-server-driver.ts
T
Dotta 06f8773097 feat(runner): add Codex session driver (#12371)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The package now has bounded Codex transport, security, question,
diff, value, and thread helpers
> - Those isolated boundaries can now be composed into one provider
session lifecycle
> - The driver must preserve controller-owned identity, results,
terminals, and recovery invariants
> - Unsupported or mismatched provider traffic must fail closed without
weakening legacy adapters
> - This pull request adds only the Codex app-server driver and its
package-local tests
> - It does not expose or enable the Paperclip Runner adapter

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

`packages/paperclip-runner` Codex app-server session driver.

**Problem or motivation**

The runner needs a production-shaped Codex session implementation that
turns provider facts into canonical PRP events while keeping task
identity, semantic completion, runtime input, and recovery under
controller authority.

**Proposed solution**

Compose the previously reviewed transport and normalization boundaries
into a Codex-only harness driver with session open/resume, turns,
streaming events, semantic tools, structured questions, goals, lineage,
usage, cancellation, reconciliation, and deterministic persisted
snapshots.

**Alternatives considered**

Keeping the full implementation in one initial transport pull request
would obscure the trust boundaries. Adding the deferred ACPX or OpenCode
paths here would also broaden the provider scope beyond the Codex-first
series.

**Roadmap alignment**

This implements the Codex provider slice inside the package. It does not
enable the runner adapter or change any existing direct adapter path.

## What Changed

- Added the Codex app-server harness driver and session lifecycle.
- Added controller-bound semantic completion and terminal handling.
- Added runtime requests, structured questions, goals, lineage, usage,
steering, interruption, and recovery.
- Added workspace diff and file-reference projection.
- Connected bounded/redacted provider data and notification identity
checks.
- Kept deferred provider identities and replacement behavior out of the
Codex-only driver.
- Added 62 focused driver cases covering lifecycle, security, recovery,
and protocol failures.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner test:typescript` (34
files, 337 tests)
- `pnpm -r typecheck`
- `pnpm build`
- The focused Codex driver suite has 62 passing cases.

## Risks

The main risks are accepting provider events from the wrong session,
duplicating terminal facts, retaining unsafe provider data, or resuming
a different session. Tests cover pre-turn, cross-thread, stale-turn,
post-terminal, duplicate-result, cancellation, transport loss, provider
identity, workspace, redaction, structured input, and recovery cases.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex with GPT-5.6 and repository tool use.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-08-30 01:39:42 -05:00

10 lines
467 B
TypeScript

export { parseCodexTurnDiff } from "./codex-turn-diff.js";
export {
createIsolatedCodexAppServerArgs,
createSkilllessCodexThreadConfig,
} from "./codex-security-config.js";
export { normalizeCodexQuestionSet } from "./codex-question-adapter.js";
export { CodexAppServerDriver } from "./codex-app-server-driver-impl.js";
export type { CodexAppServerDriverOptions } from "./codex-driver-types.js";
export { codexSemanticToolSpecs } from "./codex-driver-values.js";