Devin FoleyandPaperclip
0b62c736a0
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Apps connections give agents controlled access to external services. > - Daytona provides sandbox, file, command, Git, and account APIs. > - Operators need to assign this access without exposing a server credential. > - A small task-specific tool list cannot serve general Daytona work. > - This pull request adds the published HTTP actions through the existing connection gateway. > - Operators keep control of identity, agent access, and each action. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** Paperclip has a Daytona sandbox provider for its own execution infrastructure. It lacks a normal Apps connection for agents to manage an operator's Daytona account. Reusing the server's provider credential would bypass normal connection ownership and action permissions. **Proposed solution** Add a Daytona connection with personal or shared vault credentials. Generate its action catalog from the official platform and Toolbox API specifications. Use the existing run-bound gateway, grants, action policies, approvals, revocation, and audit paths. Sandbox IDs come from Daytona; tools need no Paperclip task or lease ID. **Alternatives considered** A four-action diagnostic subset cannot support general provider work. Launching the provider CLI would expose host filesystem behavior. Native OAuth is not included because a supported third-party registration path was not verified. The native method uses an organization API key. Existing Composio setup is a separate possible OAuth route and is not qualified by this change. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the existing Apps and Connections provider coverage in `ROADMAP.md`. It uses that system's credential and permission model. GitHub searches found no existing Daytona Apps connector PR or issue. ## What Changed - Add the Daytona catalog entry, provider source override, official theme logos, permission review, and setup documentation. - Generate 274 HTTP actions: 169 platform and 105 Toolbox operations. Record two WebSocket upgrades separately; do not advertise them as HTTP tools. Record source URLs and hashes. - Add provider-focused execution for sandboxes, snapshots, volumes, files, Git, commands, computer use, and account resources. Provider authority still limits which endpoints accept an organization key. - Validate action arguments. Resolve Toolbox targets through the fixed platform API. Check sandbox identity and organization before using an approved Daytona proxy. Keep normal guarded network requests and vault resolution. - Transfer file bytes without reading or writing host files. Share one caller deadline across prerequisite reads, dispatch, and response reading. Bound requests and responses. Do not automatically retry writes with unknown outcomes. Redact the selected credential from results and errors. - Classify credential access, access changes, interactive input, command execution, file permissions, and deletion (including TTL and auto-delete) as destructive actions. Keep new and changed actions under catalog review. - Upgrade saved catalogs and retire the earlier diagnostic names. Hide retired actions from the UI and agent discovery even when provider refresh fails. Preserve existing action choices and historical records. Reject stale same-name contracts during agent discovery and dispatch before a board refresh. - Add database-backed gateway and catalog-upgrade regressions, schema generator tests, a browser setup check, and both capability map updates. ## Verification - Passed on the review-fix head: 57 focused Vitest cases (18 Daytona database/client cases, five HTTP boundary cases, and 34 shared catalog cases), four generator tests, `pnpm -r typecheck`, and `pnpm build`. The five HTTP cases use a real local server through the pinned production transport. The normal browser setup check and 17 generator/artwork cases passed on the initial PR head; those UI and artwork paths are unchanged. - Passed on this branch: brand asset validation, token gates, map structure checks, and `git diff --check`. All latest-head GitHub checks pass on `ea979ccb3a64dc9508807823540f935c4316ea35`. Apex is 5/5, with all five findings addressed and zero unresolved threads. The branch has no merge conflicts. - The initial catalog-generation command could not find the external research corpus. The supported `--definitions-only` mode regenerated the definitions successfully. Unrelated generated drift was excluded. - An earlier full local Vitest attempt on the preview branch failed when bundled PostgreSQL could not start on macOS. After replay onto current master, all three unchanged event-sequencing cases pass with bundled PostgreSQL; the earlier startup cause remains uncertain. - The first full-suite command on this branch used my external test database override. Chat fixtures require a current migrated schema and failed because `agents.lifecycle_state` was absent in that disposable database. A focused comparison reproduces failure with the override and passes with normal setup. That attempt was stopped, and the full suite restarted without the override. Focused Daytona cases use their own migrated PostgreSQL 16 databases. - The clean local full-suite attempt recorded embedded PostgreSQL startup failures in two unchanged native-runtime cases and two failures in unchanged Git fixtures. It was stopped after these failures were isolated; no full local suite pass is claimed. The 15 matching native-runtime cases pass separately. The Git cases fail with the local `init.defaultBranch=main` setting and pass with `GIT_CONFIG_COUNT=1 GIT_CONFIG_KEY_0=init.defaultBranch GIT_CONFIG_VALUE_0=master` limited to the test command. No global Git setting was changed. Full Linux CI is green. - Fixtures use real database persistence and run-bound gateway sessions with provider responses replaced by fixtures. They cover personal/shared vault ownership, reads and writes, file bytes, Off policies, revocation, organization mismatch, untrusted proxy rejection, output bounds, saved catalog upgrades, failed refresh, and permission preservation. - The first Apex review found five valid issues: multipart transport compatibility, destructive classification, caller deadlines, audit filters, and stale saved contracts. All five were fixed with regressions before the second review. A typecheck then found the nullable saved schema hash; admission now accepts that stored type and rejects null as stale. - The browser check covers setup controls without submitting a provider key. No real Daytona account, provider write, native OAuth flow, or agent model run is qualified. Live provider read/write proof remains pending a test account. ## Risks - Daytona keys have broad Toolbox authority, including keys with no selected resource scopes. Only assign this connection to trusted agents and review its action permissions. - Remote writes or commands can continue after a timeout. Calls do not automatically retry an uncertain outcome. - The bridge targets Daytona Cloud. Proxy hosts are restricted; an unrecognized future regional host fails closed. - Files and responses have an 8 MiB bound. Each action has one caller deadline, capped at 30 seconds across all provider requests and response reading. Interactive WebSocket sessions are not exposed as HTTP actions. - The generated JSON snapshot exceeds 1,000 lines because it holds the provider input contracts. Generator logic and execution code remain in separate small modules. Updates require explicit regeneration and catalog review. - No database migration or lockfile change is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The runtime identifies the model family but does not expose the exact backend model ID or context window. Used reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, shell tools, database verification, and browser tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Paperclip feature map
Start here when reproducing a user-facing bug, verifying a change, or deciding which surfaces a fix must cover. Each recipe describes what a person can do, where they can do it, the expected result, and the evidence needed to verify it. Product behavior is still governed by the implementation spec.
The sibling agent access map records APIs, agent entry points and permission boundaries for the same capability IDs. Follow the shared map contract when maintaining either map.
Browse features
Open the published Storybook guide for the assembled feature and capability index. The Markdown recipes in this directory are the authored source. Each has a same-named agent-access companion.
Run node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs to generate local navigation in
maps/generated/feature-map.md, maps/generated/agent-access-map.md, and the
Storybook guide. A new recipe is discovered automatically; do not register it in
this README or maintain counts here.
Before driving a journey
- Use this checkout's isolated test drive for manual product checks. It creates a temporary instance and prints its URL and data directory. Do not guess that a server on port 3100 belongs to you.
- Record the commit, URL, company, login role, relevant experimental settings, adapter, runtime mode, and live versus simulated dependencies. Use disposable tasks and provider resources. A fresh test drive creates a company and CEO, but no task or first run.
- Use the current navigation and company prefix. Paths in recipes omit that prefix. Record whether the streamlined or production shell is selected; Agent Chat, chat connectors, and the combined Inbox/Tasks view have separate gates. A hidden surface is an unmet prerequisite, not a successful test.
- Run the smallest relevant test first. Vitest commands below run from the repository root after installing dependencies. Playwright recipes use their named configuration and its isolated environment, not an unrelated running instance. Reserve expensive runner/provider tests for the behavior at issue.
- Exercise the actual user action, inspect its result, reload, and verify the persisted state or continuation. Use read-only API checks to corroborate UI evidence; creating state through the API does not prove the creation UI.
For agent-driven acceptance work, start with the Paperclip verification skill for an isolated launch, ownership/readiness checks, browser driving, evidence, and cleanup. It uses this directory as its feature map. The existing dev-workspace run/verify skill and evaluation skill describe runtime ownership and evidence handling. Reuse them; this map introduces no environment launcher, credentials, scheduled job, or second test framework.
Evidence contract
Report each entry point as passed, failed, blocked (with its missing prerequisite), or not run. Include the feature filename and entry-point ID, commit/environment, user action, expected and observed result, command/exit code, and evidence links. Screenshots or traces should show both the action and the discriminating result. Include task/run/request IDs when relevant, without secrets.
A fix is verified across its affected surfaces only when each has evidence or an explicit reason it does not apply. Shared code alone does not prove parity. Keep product regressions visible; do not change the recipe to bless a failure. For Paperclip-assigned work, attach evidence through the artifact workflow.
Inventory and remaining depth
The generated maps/generated/coverage.json lists the current non-test TSX page
modules and the recipes that directly reference each one. An unreferenced module
is a documentation candidate, not proof that its feature is absent or untested.
Remaining workflow limits live in each recipe. Inventory and example associations
describe documentation scope, not runtime health.
Maintaining the reference
The map documents user journeys. It does not execute them automatically; generated inventories record documentation scope rather than live test health.
When maintaining a recipe, compare its entry points and expected results with
the current source. Check that linked tests still exercise the stated behavior
and that local references still exist. Keep the same-named agent access companion
and stable sub-feature IDs aligned when behavior or access changes. Source-only
access inventory remains distinct from live verification. Run
node scripts/check-maps.mjs after map edits for structural/reference checks;
follow the shared contract for the source and behavioral checks it cannot perform.
Each recipe starts with a small frontmatter navigation record, then an H1:
---
navigation: {"section":"Tasks and conversations","sectionOrder":20,"order":10}
---
The H1 supplies the feature title, and the first paragraph supplies its summary. Orders are local to the section; leave gaps for additions. Equal orders use the stable filename as a tie-breaker. Keep a section's name/order consistent across its recipes. A new feature or capability needs only its recipe and companion.
Optional ### Storybook verification guidance lives inside the recipe's Gotchas
section. Each level-four heading contains a backtick-quoted capability key and
has Scope (ui, cli, or browser),
Storybook, Production, and Sources fields. These are verification instructions
and intentional scope limits, not run results or a required story for every API.
The generated gap report combines this guidance with current story associations.
After frontmatter, each recipe starts with an H1 and a user-visible description, then exactly:
- Sub-features — stable backticked IDs and observable behavior/states.
- How to get to it (user POV) — one H3 backticked entry-point ID per surface.
- Driving it with — starts with
Preconditions:; repeat each entry-point H3, withAutomated:andManual:paragraphs. Name test scope and gaps honestly. - Gotchas — misleading look-alikes, feature gates, and invalid evidence.
New or updated entries follow
Poteto's feature-map examples.
Existing entries with a Driving it heading can adopt the named harness when
their recipes are updated. The original format was inspired by
Omnigent's feature map.
Paperclip's recipes and checks follow its own task model and test infrastructure.