mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-21 08:22:20 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for autonomous AI companies, where work must end with a clear disposition rather than ambiguous agent liveness. > - Recovery currently detects stalled or missing-next-step issues, but source issue recovery can become split across child recovery issues, blockers, and comments. > - That makes it harder for operators and agents to see who owns recovery and what exact action is needed on the original issue. > - Source-scoped recovery actions give the original issue a first-class active recovery state with owner, evidence, wake policy, and resolution outcome. > - This pull request adds the recovery-action data model, backend reconciliation and resolution APIs, and board UI indicators/actions. > - The benefit is clearer stalled-work recovery without losing source issue context or relying on comments as the liveness path. ## What Changed - Added the `issue_recovery_actions` schema, shared types/constants/validators, and an idempotent `0084_issue_recovery_actions` migration ordered after current `master` migrations. - Updated stranded/missing-disposition recovery to create source-scoped recovery actions, wake the recovery owner on the source issue, and avoid locking the source issue for recovery-action wakes. - Added API support for reading active recovery actions on issue detail/list surfaces and resolving them with restored, blocked, cancelled, or false-positive outcomes. - Require blocked recovery resolutions to have an unresolved first-class blocker, and removed the UI shortcut that could mark recovery blocked without a blocker selection path. - Surfaced recovery indicators/actions in the issue UI, blocker notices, active run panels, issue rows, and Storybook coverage. - Updated docs and focused tests for recovery semantics, ownership, races, stale comments, and UI behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueBlockedNotice.test.tsx ui/src/api/issues.test.ts` — 5 files, 72 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` — passed, including migration numbering check. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - Follow-up verification after blocker-resolution guard: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx ui/src/api/issues.test.ts` — 3 files, 27 tests passed. - Follow-up `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - Follow-up `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - UI states are available in `ui/storybook/stories/source-issue-recovery.stories.tsx`; screenshot capture helper is `scripts/screenshot-recovery-card.cjs`. ## Risks - Medium: recovery behavior changes from child recovery issue ownership toward source-scoped actions, so operators may see stalled-work state in new places. - Migration risk is mitigated by using the next migration slot after `master` and making the table/constraints/index creation idempotent for anyone who previously applied the old branch-local `0082_dizzy_master_mold` migration. - Existing child recovery issue paths are still guarded for already-created recovery issues, but new source-scoped flows should be watched in CI and Greptile review. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool use enabled for shell, Git, GitHub, and local test execution. Context window not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
321 lines
9.5 KiB
TypeScript
321 lines
9.5 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import { MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH } from "../index.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
addIssueCommentSchema,
|
|
createIssueSchema,
|
|
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema,
|
|
respondIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
|
|
suggestedTaskDraftSchema,
|
|
updateIssueSchema,
|
|
upsertIssueDocumentSchema,
|
|
} from "./issue.js";
|
|
import { createAgentSchema } from "./agent.js";
|
|
|
|
describe("issue validators", () => {
|
|
it("passes real line breaks through unchanged", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
title: "Follow up PR",
|
|
description: "Line 1\n\nLine 2",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.description).toBe("Line 1\n\nLine 2");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts null and omitted optional multiline issue fields", () => {
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Follow up PR", description: null }).description)
|
|
.toBeNull();
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Follow up PR" }).description)
|
|
.toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(updateIssueSchema.parse({ comment: undefined }).comment)
|
|
.toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("normalizes JSON-escaped line breaks in issue descriptions", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
title: "Follow up PR",
|
|
description: "PR: https://example.com/pr/1\\n\\nShip the follow-up.",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.description).toBe("PR: https://example.com/pr/1\n\nShip the follow-up.");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("normalizes escaped line breaks in issue update comments", () => {
|
|
const parsed = updateIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
comment: "Done\\n\\n- Verified the route",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.comment).toBe("Done\n\n- Verified the route");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows false-positive recovery resolutions to atomically restore the source issue status", () => {
|
|
expect(
|
|
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.parse({
|
|
outcome: "false_positive",
|
|
sourceIssueStatus: "in_review",
|
|
}),
|
|
).toMatchObject({
|
|
outcome: "false_positive",
|
|
sourceIssueStatus: "in_review",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.safeParse({
|
|
outcome: "false_positive",
|
|
sourceIssueStatus: "blocked",
|
|
}).success,
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.safeParse({
|
|
outcome: "false_positive",
|
|
}).success,
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows cancelled recovery resolutions to atomically restore the source issue status", () => {
|
|
expect(
|
|
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.parse({
|
|
outcome: "cancelled",
|
|
sourceIssueStatus: "in_review",
|
|
}),
|
|
).toMatchObject({
|
|
outcome: "cancelled",
|
|
sourceIssueStatus: "in_review",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.safeParse({
|
|
outcome: "cancelled",
|
|
sourceIssueStatus: "blocked",
|
|
}).success,
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.safeParse({
|
|
outcome: "cancelled",
|
|
}).success,
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects recovery outcomes that are not supported by the source-scoped resolution endpoint", () => {
|
|
expect(
|
|
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.safeParse({
|
|
outcome: "delegated",
|
|
}).success,
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.safeParse({
|
|
outcome: "escalated",
|
|
}).success,
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("normalizes escaped line breaks in issue comment bodies", () => {
|
|
const parsed = addIssueCommentSchema.parse({
|
|
body: "Progress update\\r\\n\\r\\nNext action.",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.body).toBe("Progress update\n\nNext action.");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts structured issue comment presentation and metadata", () => {
|
|
const parsed = addIssueCommentSchema.parse({
|
|
body: "Paperclip needs a disposition before this issue can continue.",
|
|
authorType: "system",
|
|
presentation: {
|
|
kind: "system_notice",
|
|
tone: "warning",
|
|
title: "Needs disposition",
|
|
},
|
|
metadata: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
sourceRunId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
sections: [
|
|
{
|
|
title: "Evidence",
|
|
rows: [
|
|
{ type: "key_value", label: "Cause", value: "successful_run_missing_state" },
|
|
{ type: "issue_link", label: "Source issue", identifier: "PAP-3440" },
|
|
{ type: "run_link", label: "Run", runId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.presentation?.detailsDefaultOpen).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(parsed.metadata?.sourceRunId).toBe("11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111");
|
|
expect(parsed.metadata?.sections[0]?.rows).toHaveLength(3);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects arbitrary issue comment metadata", () => {
|
|
const parsed = addIssueCommentSchema.safeParse({
|
|
body: "Hidden details",
|
|
metadata: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
transcript: "raw log dump",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("normalizes escaped line breaks in generated task drafts", () => {
|
|
const parsed = suggestedTaskDraftSchema.parse({
|
|
clientKey: "task-1",
|
|
title: "Follow up",
|
|
description: "Line 1\\n\\nLine 2",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.description).toBe("Line 1\n\nLine 2");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("normalizes escaped line breaks in thread summaries and documents", () => {
|
|
const response = respondIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
summaryMarkdown: "Summary\\n\\nNext action",
|
|
});
|
|
const document = upsertIssueDocumentSchema.parse({
|
|
format: "markdown",
|
|
body: "# Plan\\n\\nShip it",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(response.summaryMarkdown).toBe("Summary\n\nNext action");
|
|
expect(document.body).toBe("# Plan\n\nShip it");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("clamps oversized requestDepth values on create", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
title: "Clamp request depth",
|
|
requestDepth: MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH + 500,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.requestDepth).toBe(MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("defaults omitted create status to todo when an assignee is present", () => {
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
title: "Assigned work",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
|
|
}).status).toBe("todo");
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Unassigned work" }).status).toBe("backlog");
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
title: "Deliberately parked",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
|
|
status: "backlog",
|
|
}).status).toBe("backlog");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("defaults issue work mode to standard and accepts planning", () => {
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Plan first" }).workMode).toBe("standard");
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Plan first", workMode: "planning" }).workMode).toBe("planning");
|
|
expect(updateIssueSchema.parse({ workMode: "planning" }).workMode).toBe("planning");
|
|
expect(suggestedTaskDraftSchema.parse({
|
|
clientKey: "planning-child",
|
|
title: "Plan child",
|
|
workMode: "planning",
|
|
}).workMode).toBe("planning");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects unknown issue work modes", () => {
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.safeParse({ title: "Plan first", workMode: "normal" }).success).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(suggestedTaskDraftSchema.safeParse({
|
|
clientKey: "bad-child",
|
|
title: "Bad child",
|
|
workMode: "analysis",
|
|
}).success).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("clamps oversized requestDepth values on update", () => {
|
|
const parsed = updateIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
requestDepth: MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH + 1,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.requestDepth).toBe(MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts the cheap model profile in issue assignee adapter overrides", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
title: "Run a cheap heartbeat",
|
|
assigneeAdapterOverrides: {
|
|
modelProfile: "cheap",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.assigneeAdapterOverrides?.modelProfile).toBe("cheap");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects unknown issue model profile keys", () => {
|
|
const parsed = updateIssueSchema.safeParse({
|
|
assigneeAdapterOverrides: {
|
|
modelProfile: "fast",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("validates agent runtime cheap model profile config without rejecting other runtime fields", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createAgentSchema.parse({
|
|
name: "Coder",
|
|
adapterType: "codex_local",
|
|
runtimeConfig: {
|
|
heartbeat: { enabled: true },
|
|
modelProfiles: {
|
|
cheap: {
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
label: "Cheap Codex",
|
|
adapterConfig: {
|
|
model: "gpt-5.3-codex-spark",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.runtimeConfig.modelProfiles?.cheap?.adapterConfig).toEqual({
|
|
model: "gpt-5.3-codex-spark",
|
|
});
|
|
expect(parsed.runtimeConfig.heartbeat).toEqual({ enabled: true });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("validates cheap model profile env bindings like top-level adapter config", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createAgentSchema.safeParse({
|
|
name: "Coder",
|
|
adapterType: "codex_local",
|
|
runtimeConfig: {
|
|
modelProfiles: {
|
|
cheap: {
|
|
adapterConfig: {
|
|
env: {
|
|
API_TOKEN: 123,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects unknown agent runtime model profile keys", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createAgentSchema.safeParse({
|
|
name: "Coder",
|
|
adapterType: "codex_local",
|
|
runtimeConfig: {
|
|
modelProfiles: {
|
|
fast: {
|
|
adapterConfig: {
|
|
model: "gpt-5-mini",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|