Files
PaperClipAI/packages/paperclip-runner/src/eval/eval-slice.test.ts
T
Dotta 5458940a6e feat(runner): add offline evaluation tooling (#12653)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Paperclip Runner needs repeatable evaluation contracts.
> - Evaluation code must stay separate from provider launch and
production orchestration.
> - Offline fixtures need stable compatibility, scoring, traceability,
and report rules.
> - Published Runner consumers need only the supported evaluation
contract surface.
> - This pull request adds offline evaluation tooling and a
workspace-private matrix kernel.
> - The benefit is deterministic evaluation without credentials or paid
provider calls.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #11297

This pull request extracts the offline evaluation unit from the earlier
aggregate Runner work.

## What Changed

- Add a workspace-private, provider-neutral evaluation matrix kernel.
- Add the public `@paperclipai/paperclip-runner/evals` compatibility and
native execution contracts.
- Add fail-closed runnerd artifact and protocol compatibility checks.
- Add deterministic workflow catalogs, scoring, traceability, and report
generation.
- Add sanitized Codex, OpenCode, and ACPX fixtures.
- Add package-boundary and clean-consumer checks.
- Add the eval package manifest to the Docker dependency stage.
- Add the generated protocol fixture digest without changing the
lockfile.

## Verification

GitHub Actions must run:

- Runner TypeScript and Rust type checks.
- Runner unit and protocol tests.
- Evaluation kernel tests.
- Workflow traceability checks.
- Clean-consumer and package-boundary checks.
- Repository test, type-check, build, policy, and security gates.

No local test command was run. The repository owner requested
GitHub-only verification.

## Risks

This is a large greenfield review surface with 51 files. The code does
not launch a live provider or load credentials. Package and protocol
drift fail closed. The workspace lockfile remains under the existing
CI-owned process.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex with the GPT-5 agent model. The work used high reasoning,
repository inspection, tool use, and parallel code review.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-09-01 05:19:47 -05:00

91 lines
3.6 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import type { EvalBundle } from "./eval-bundle.js";
import type { EvalObservation } from "./eval-scoring.js";
import { buildEvalSliceReport, renderEvalSliceMarkdown } from "./eval-slice.js";
function bundle(): EvalBundle {
return {
schema: "paperclip.runner.eval-bundle.v1",
provider: { runtime: "runnerd", transport: "codex-app-server", protocolVersion: "prp.v1" },
model: { id: "gpt-5-codex" },
launchContext: { workingDirectoryClass: "ephemeral-fixture", scenarioId: "slice", turnTimeoutMs: 60_000 },
promptPolicy: { id: "exact-single-call", callTemplate: "Call {op}.", restraintTemplate: "No tools." },
grants: ["discovery:tasks:read"],
runner: { package: "@paperclipai/paperclip-runner", binary: "paperclip-runnerd", version: "0.0.0" },
controlPlaneAdapter: { kind: "mock", contract: "paperclip.capability.control-plane.v1" },
faultInjection: [],
};
}
const trace = { runId: "r", sessionId: "s", turnId: "t", itemId: "i", receiptIds: ["rc"], terminalPresent: true };
function green(caseId: string): EvalObservation {
return {
caseId,
controlPlaneOwned: false,
expectedCalls: ["finish_task"],
observedCalls: ["finish_task"],
forbiddenCalls: ["checkout_task"],
finalState: { expected: "mutated", observed: "mutated" },
authorization: { expected: "allowed", observed: "allowed" },
trace,
};
}
function gateFail(caseId: string): EvalObservation {
return { ...green(caseId), observedCalls: ["finish_task", "checkout_task"] };
}
describe("buildEvalSliceReport", () => {
it("aggregates scorecards and content-addresses the bundle", () => {
const report = buildEvalSliceReport(bundle(), [green("a"), gateFail("b")]);
expect(report.bundle.id).toMatch(/^evb-[0-9a-f]{16}$/);
expect(report.aggregate.caseCount).toBe(2);
expect(report.aggregate.passed).toBe(1);
expect(report.aggregate.gateFailures).toBe(1);
expect(report.aggregate.dimensionMeans.semantic_outcome).toBe(1);
// Every scorecard carries the report bundle id.
for (const entry of report.cases) expect(entry.scorecard.bundleId).toBe(report.bundle.id);
});
it("is deterministic", () => {
const a = buildEvalSliceReport(bundle(), [green("a")]);
const b = buildEvalSliceReport(bundle(), [green("a")]);
expect(JSON.stringify(a)).toBe(JSON.stringify(b));
});
it("refuses to build a report from a secret-carrying bundle", () => {
const leaky = { ...bundle(), grants: ["not-a-grant"] };
expect(() => buildEvalSliceReport(leaky, [green("a")])).toThrow();
});
it("does not persist free-form bundle declarations", () => {
const candidate = bundle();
candidate.promptPolicy.callTemplate = "Unique instructions that stay in memory.";
const report = buildEvalSliceReport(candidate, [green("a")]);
const serialized = JSON.stringify(report);
expect(report.bundle.declaration.promptPolicy.callTemplateSha256).toMatch(
/^sha256:[0-9a-f]{64}$/,
);
expect(serialized).not.toContain(candidate.promptPolicy.callTemplate);
});
it("scans the final serialized report before returning it", () => {
const observation = green("Bearer abcdef0123456789abcdef");
expect(() => buildEvalSliceReport(bundle(), [observation])).toThrow(/bearer-token/);
});
});
describe("renderEvalSliceMarkdown", () => {
it("renders an inspectable table with no secrets", () => {
const md = renderEvalSliceMarkdown(buildEvalSliceReport(bundle(), [green("a"), gateFail("b")]));
expect(md).toContain("Runner eval slice");
expect(md).toContain("| a |");
expect(md).toContain("| b |");
expect(md).toContain("FAIL");
expect(md).not.toContain("sk-");
});
});