mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-06 10:48:12 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Governed MCP access spans contracts, runtime enforcement, adapters, UI surfaces, and operator verification > - The parity reference PR #9534 is too large for effective automated or human review > - The feature therefore needs a linear stack whose individual diffs stay below the 100-file review limit > - This pull request is split 1/8 and focuses on fixture and demo MCP servers > - The benefit is a standalone, testable review boundary while preserving byte-for-byte parity at the top of the stack ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Related parity reference: #9534 - Problem: Developers need deterministic local MCP fixtures and visible demo servers without pulling in the governed production runtime. - Proposed solution: Adds the Google Sheets and KV demo MCP packages, fixture catalog/servers, smoke harness, guide, and the root smoke/typecheck registration hunks. - Alternatives considered: keeping #9534 as one 403-file review, or rewriting the feature to manufacture seams; both were rejected in favor of path extraction plus compile-driven boundary moves. - Roadmap alignment: this advances the existing governed MCP/tool-access work already represented by #9534; it does not introduce a separate roadmap initiative. - Stack position: base branch is `master`. - Merge policy: merge bottom-up, in order, only after the complete eight-PR stack has been reviewed and the top-of-stack parity gate remains empty. - Requested review: QA for fixture and smoke coverage; Greptile on every PR. ## What Changed - Adds the Google Sheets and KV demo MCP packages, fixture catalog/servers, smoke harness, guide, and the root smoke/typecheck registration hunks. - Keeps this PR below 100 changed files and independently typecheckable. - Preserves the final tree from #9534 when combined with the other seven stack levels. ## Verification - `pnpm typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/google-sheets-mcp-server test` — 27 tests passed - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/kv-demo-mcp-server test` — 12 tests passed ## Risks - The new packages add dependencies that are intentionally not committed to `pnpm-lock.yaml`, per repository policy. - Stack risk: merging out of order can expose incomplete layers; mitigate by following the documented bottom-up merge policy. - Parity risk: later edits to an intermediate branch can drift from #9534; mitigate by re-running the empty top-of-stack diff before merge. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.4`; runtime-managed context window; medium reasoning with repository, shell, Git, GitHub CLI, and code-execution tools enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] Internal references are omitted except the execution-plan link explicitly required for this coordinated split stack - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge ## Stack Coordination - Internal execution plan: [PAP-13874](/PAP/issues/PAP-13874#document-plan) - Parity reference: #9534 - Stack: #9556 → #9557 → #9558 → #9559 → #9560 → #9561 → #9562 → #9563 - Merge bottom-up only after full-stack review and an empty parity diff at #9563. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
90 lines
3.0 KiB
JavaScript
90 lines
3.0 KiB
JavaScript
#!/usr/bin/env node
|
|
import { createInterface } from "node:readline";
|
|
import {
|
|
MCP_FIXTURE_PROTOCOL_VERSION,
|
|
createFixtureState,
|
|
executeFixtureTool,
|
|
listTools,
|
|
} from "../catalog.mjs";
|
|
|
|
const state = createFixtureState();
|
|
|
|
function mcpToolResult(result) {
|
|
return {
|
|
content: [{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(result) }],
|
|
structuredContent: result,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function handleJsonRpcRequest(request) {
|
|
if (request.method === "notifications/initialized") return null;
|
|
if (request.method === "initialize") {
|
|
return {
|
|
jsonrpc: "2.0",
|
|
id: request.id ?? null,
|
|
result: {
|
|
protocolVersion: "2024-11-05",
|
|
capabilities: { tools: {} },
|
|
serverInfo: { name: "paperclip-smoke-lab-stdio-fixture", version: "1.0.0" },
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
if (request.method === "tools/list") {
|
|
return {
|
|
jsonrpc: "2.0",
|
|
id: request.id ?? null,
|
|
result: { tools: listTools({ schemaVariant: state.schemaVariant }).filter((tool) => tool.transport === "stdio") },
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
if (request.method === "tools/call") {
|
|
const params = request.params && typeof request.params === "object" ? request.params : {};
|
|
const response = await executeFixtureTool(params.name, params.arguments ?? {}, state, {
|
|
secrets: process.env,
|
|
});
|
|
if (!response.ok) {
|
|
return {
|
|
jsonrpc: "2.0",
|
|
id: request.id ?? null,
|
|
error: { code: -32000, message: response.error?.message ?? "Fixture tool failed", data: response.error },
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
return { jsonrpc: "2.0", id: request.id ?? null, result: mcpToolResult(response.result) };
|
|
}
|
|
return {
|
|
jsonrpc: "2.0",
|
|
id: request.id ?? null,
|
|
error: { code: -32601, message: `Unknown method ${request.method}` },
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function handleRequest(request) {
|
|
if (request.jsonrpc === "2.0") return handleJsonRpcRequest(request);
|
|
if (request.method === "health") {
|
|
return { id: request.id ?? null, ok: true, protocol: MCP_FIXTURE_PROTOCOL_VERSION, transport: "stdio" };
|
|
}
|
|
if (request.method === "list_tools") {
|
|
return { id: request.id ?? null, ok: true, tools: listTools({ schemaVariant: state.schemaVariant }).filter((tool) => tool.transport === "stdio") };
|
|
}
|
|
if (request.method === "call_tool") {
|
|
const response = await executeFixtureTool(request.params?.name, request.params?.input ?? {}, state, {
|
|
secrets: process.env,
|
|
});
|
|
return { id: request.id ?? null, ...response };
|
|
}
|
|
return { id: request.id ?? null, ok: false, error: { code: "unknown_method", message: `Unknown method ${request.method}` } };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const rl = createInterface({ input: process.stdin });
|
|
|
|
rl.on("line", async (line) => {
|
|
let id = null;
|
|
try {
|
|
const request = JSON.parse(line);
|
|
id = request.id ?? null;
|
|
const response = await handleRequest(request);
|
|
if (response) process.stdout.write(`${JSON.stringify(response)}\n`);
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
process.stdout.write(`${JSON.stringify({ id, ok: false, error: { code: "bad_request", message: String(error?.message ?? error) } })}\n`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|