mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-06 10:48:12 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Governed MCP access spans contracts, runtime enforcement, adapters, UI surfaces, and operator verification > - The parity reference PR #9534 is too large for effective automated or human review > - The feature therefore needs a linear stack whose individual diffs stay below the 100-file review limit > - This pull request is split 1/8 and focuses on fixture and demo MCP servers > - The benefit is a standalone, testable review boundary while preserving byte-for-byte parity at the top of the stack ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Related parity reference: #9534 - Problem: Developers need deterministic local MCP fixtures and visible demo servers without pulling in the governed production runtime. - Proposed solution: Adds the Google Sheets and KV demo MCP packages, fixture catalog/servers, smoke harness, guide, and the root smoke/typecheck registration hunks. - Alternatives considered: keeping #9534 as one 403-file review, or rewriting the feature to manufacture seams; both were rejected in favor of path extraction plus compile-driven boundary moves. - Roadmap alignment: this advances the existing governed MCP/tool-access work already represented by #9534; it does not introduce a separate roadmap initiative. - Stack position: base branch is `master`. - Merge policy: merge bottom-up, in order, only after the complete eight-PR stack has been reviewed and the top-of-stack parity gate remains empty. - Requested review: QA for fixture and smoke coverage; Greptile on every PR. ## What Changed - Adds the Google Sheets and KV demo MCP packages, fixture catalog/servers, smoke harness, guide, and the root smoke/typecheck registration hunks. - Keeps this PR below 100 changed files and independently typecheckable. - Preserves the final tree from #9534 when combined with the other seven stack levels. ## Verification - `pnpm typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/google-sheets-mcp-server test` — 27 tests passed - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/kv-demo-mcp-server test` — 12 tests passed ## Risks - The new packages add dependencies that are intentionally not committed to `pnpm-lock.yaml`, per repository policy. - Stack risk: merging out of order can expose incomplete layers; mitigate by following the documented bottom-up merge policy. - Parity risk: later edits to an intermediate branch can drift from #9534; mitigate by re-running the empty top-of-stack diff before merge. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.4`; runtime-managed context window; medium reasoning with repository, shell, Git, GitHub CLI, and code-execution tools enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] Internal references are omitted except the execution-plan link explicitly required for this coordinated split stack - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge ## Stack Coordination - Internal execution plan: [PAP-13874](/PAP/issues/PAP-13874#document-plan) - Parity reference: #9534 - Stack: #9556 → #9557 → #9558 → #9559 → #9560 → #9561 → #9562 → #9563 - Merge bottom-up only after full-stack review and an empty parity diff at #9563. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
97 lines
3.3 KiB
JavaScript
97 lines
3.3 KiB
JavaScript
#!/usr/bin/env node
|
|
import http from "node:http";
|
|
import {
|
|
MCP_FIXTURE_PROTOCOL_VERSION,
|
|
createFixtureState,
|
|
executeFixtureTool,
|
|
listTools,
|
|
} from "../catalog.mjs";
|
|
|
|
const state = createFixtureState();
|
|
const port = Number(process.env.PORT ?? 0);
|
|
const host = process.env.HOST ?? "127.0.0.1";
|
|
|
|
function sendJson(res, statusCode, body) {
|
|
res.writeHead(statusCode, { "Content-Type": "application/json" });
|
|
res.end(JSON.stringify(body));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function readJson(req) {
|
|
const chunks = [];
|
|
for await (const chunk of req) chunks.push(chunk);
|
|
const body = Buffer.concat(chunks).toString("utf8");
|
|
return body ? JSON.parse(body) : {};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function mcpToolResult(result) {
|
|
return {
|
|
content: [{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(result) }],
|
|
structuredContent: result,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function sendMcpError(res, id, code, message, data = undefined) {
|
|
sendJson(res, 200, {
|
|
jsonrpc: "2.0",
|
|
id: id ?? null,
|
|
error: { code, message, ...(data === undefined ? {} : { data }) },
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const server = http.createServer(async (req, res) => {
|
|
try {
|
|
const url = new URL(req.url ?? "/", `http://${host}`);
|
|
if (req.method === "GET" && url.pathname === "/health") {
|
|
sendJson(res, 200, { ok: true, protocol: MCP_FIXTURE_PROTOCOL_VERSION, transport: "http" });
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
if (req.method === "GET" && url.pathname === "/catalog") {
|
|
sendJson(res, 200, { ok: true, tools: listTools({ schemaVariant: state.schemaVariant }).filter((tool) => tool.transport === "http") });
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
if (req.method === "POST" && url.pathname === "/mcp") {
|
|
const body = await readJson(req);
|
|
const params = body.params && typeof body.params === "object" ? body.params : {};
|
|
if (body.method === "tools/list") {
|
|
sendJson(res, 200, {
|
|
jsonrpc: "2.0",
|
|
id: body.id ?? null,
|
|
result: {
|
|
tools: listTools({ schemaVariant: state.schemaVariant }).filter((tool) => tool.transport === "http"),
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
if (body.method !== "tools/call" || typeof params.name !== "string") {
|
|
sendMcpError(res, body.id, -32601, "Method not found");
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
const response = await executeFixtureTool(params.name, params.arguments ?? {}, state, {
|
|
secrets: process.env,
|
|
});
|
|
if (!response.ok) {
|
|
sendMcpError(res, body.id, -32000, response.error?.message ?? "Fixture tool failed", response.error);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
sendJson(res, 200, { jsonrpc: "2.0", id: body.id ?? null, result: mcpToolResult(response.result) });
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
if (req.method === "POST" && url.pathname === "/tools/call") {
|
|
const body = await readJson(req);
|
|
const response = await executeFixtureTool(body.name, body.input ?? {}, state, {
|
|
secrets: process.env,
|
|
});
|
|
sendJson(res, response.ok ? 200 : 422, response);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
sendJson(res, 404, { ok: false, error: { code: "not_found", message: `${req.method} ${url.pathname}` } });
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
sendJson(res, 500, { ok: false, error: { code: "fixture_error", message: String(error?.message ?? error) } });
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
server.listen(port, host, () => {
|
|
const address = server.address();
|
|
process.stdout.write(`${JSON.stringify({ event: "ready", host, port: address.port })}\n`);
|
|
});
|