Files
PaperClipAI/packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/run-runner-live-eval-schedule.mjs
Dotta af8439a70b feat(runner): restore direct live eval campaigns and reports (#12909)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The Runner executes agents through native and managed provider
drivers.
> - The direct live eval layer had drifted from the current Runner
contracts.
> - The old local workflow did not provide a complete parallel campaign
or durable report history.
> - The Runner also needed current native OpenCode and OpenRouter
qualification.
> - This pull request restores the direct campaign, corrects the runtime
gaps that the campaign found, and adds safe hosted Evalbook history.
> - The benefit is repeatable model comparison against an immutable
Runner and eval source revision.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #11297
Refs #11634

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

This improves the direct live `paperclip-runner` eval workflow, provider
execution contract, and static Evalbook reporting path.

**Current behavior**

The direct evals do not have one maintained full campaign on current
`master`. OpenCode has no qualified multi-model OpenRouter roster.
Parallel provider bursts can compact committed events before the
transport observes them. Local reports do not have a separate safe S3
history index.

**Proposed behavior**

Run one immutable roster-plus-case matrix. Use the shared paid AWS
runner fleet. Keep raw artifacts access-controlled. Publish a sanitized
canonical Evalbook report under the separate `runner-protocol-evals` S3
prefix. Keep immutable campaign directories plus root history, latest,
and latest-green pointers.

**Reason and benefit**

Maintainers can compare native Codex, native OpenCode, ACPX, Claude
Managed, and AWS AgentCore behavior over time. They can inspect failures
without mixing this direct protocol layer with browser full-stack E2E.

**Breaking changes**

None. The new workflow and S3 prefix are additive. The existing Runner
full-stack E2E workflow and report remain separate.

## What Changed

- Added a trusted two-shard direct live workflow for up to 393
roster-plus-case cells.
- Reused the numeric actor allowlist, protected paid environment, and
RunsOn fleet controls from Runner full-stack E2E.
- Added immutable Runner and eval revision resolution, exact credential
boundaries, bounded retries, and cost ceilings.
- Added a public report projection that removes sessions, transcripts,
tool payloads, state, traces, raw failures, remote profile identities,
and credential-shaped values.
- Added additive S3 history under `runner-protocol-evals`, with
immutable campaigns and mutable root index pointers.
- Added native OpenCode model injection and current OpenRouter pricing
contracts.
- Fixed direct eval completion, workflow execution, semantic discovery,
warm-attach state reset, executable binding, and event-burst handling.
- Kept Runner browser full-stack E2E behavior and publication separate.
- Documented local and hosted direct eval operation.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner
test:runner-protocol-eval-publish` — 15 passed.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner build:typescript` —
passed.
- `actionlint .github/workflows/runner-protocol-live-evals.yml
.github/workflows/runner-full-stack-e2e.yml` — passed.
- Local current matrix at the revision in
[paperclip-evals#17](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-evals/pull/17)
— 323 cells across 10 enabled configurations completed.
- Final local current matrix — 269 passed, 11 behavior failures, and 43
expected macOS-only ACPX platform failures.
- Targeted Runner checks — 13/13 eval-session tests, 15/15
publisher/security tests, and package typecheck passed; complete PR CI
is green, including all browser E2E shards.

## Risks

- Paid live campaigns can consume provider budget. Actor authorization,
exact per-cell ceilings, protected environments, and explicit schedule
enablement bound this risk.
- Public reports can leak provider data. The workflow publishes only a
separately projected report and validates every file before upload.
- The new workflow cannot publish until it is present on the default
branch. This pull request does not change the existing
`runner-full-stack-e2e` publication path.
- The campaign is large. It uses two GitHub matrices and caps combined
concurrency at the shared fleet limit.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex on GPT-5. The exact deployment ID and context-window size
are not exposed. The model used reasoning, code editing, browser
inspection, repository tools, and live provider execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-09-05 20:18:11 -05:00

314 lines
10 KiB
JavaScript

import { createHash } from "node:crypto";
import {
mkdir,
readFile,
readdir,
rm,
stat,
writeFile,
} from "node:fs/promises";
import { resolve } from "node:path";
import { renderRunnerWorkflowWithCanonicalEvalbook } from "./render-runner-workflow-evalbook.mjs";
const packageRoot = resolve(import.meta.dirname, "..");
const evals = await import(resolve(packageRoot, "dist/eval/index.js"));
const packageManifest = JSON.parse(
await readFile(resolve(packageRoot, "package.json"), "utf8"),
);
const modeIndex = process.argv.indexOf("--mode");
const mode = modeIndex < 0 ? "nightly" : process.argv[modeIndex + 1];
const execute = process.argv.includes("--execute");
if (mode !== "nightly" && mode !== "chaos")
throw new Error(`unsupported workflow eval schedule mode: ${mode}`);
const now = process.env.PAPERCLIP_EVAL_GENERATED_AT ?? new Date().toISOString();
const rotationDay = Number(
process.env.PAPERCLIP_EVAL_ROTATION_DAY ?? evals.runnerLiveRotationWeek(now),
);
const seed =
process.env.PAPERCLIP_EVAL_SCHEDULE_SEED ?? "runner-live-seven-week-v1";
const outputDirectory = resolve(
packageRoot,
".paperclip-local/evals/workflows",
);
const historyDirectory = resolve(
process.env.PAPERCLIP_EVAL_HISTORY_DIR ?? resolve(outputDirectory, "history"),
);
await mkdir(outputDirectory, { recursive: true });
function selectorValues(flag, environmentName) {
const values = [];
for (let index = 0; index < process.argv.length; index += 1) {
if (process.argv[index] !== flag) continue;
const value = process.argv[index + 1];
if (!value || value.startsWith("--")) {
throw new Error(`${flag} requires a comma-separated value`);
}
values.push(value);
}
if (process.env[environmentName]) values.push(process.env[environmentName]);
return [
...new Set(
values.flatMap((value) =>
value
.split(",")
.map((entry) => entry.trim())
.filter(Boolean),
),
),
];
}
function selectionLimit() {
const index = process.argv.indexOf("--limit");
const raw =
index < 0 ? process.env.PAPERCLIP_EVAL_LIMIT : process.argv[index + 1];
if (raw === undefined || raw === "") return undefined;
const value = Number(raw);
if (!Number.isSafeInteger(value) || value <= 0) {
throw new Error("--limit must be a positive integer");
}
return value;
}
const selection = {
candidateIds: selectorValues("--candidate", "PAPERCLIP_EVAL_CANDIDATE"),
caseIds: selectorValues("--case", "PAPERCLIP_EVAL_CASE"),
limit: selectionLimit(),
};
const selectionActive =
selection.candidateIds.length > 0 ||
selection.caseIds.length > 0 ||
selection.limit !== undefined;
function safeBundleId(schedule) {
const runnerBuild =
process.env.PAPERCLIP_EVAL_RUNNER_BUILD ?? packageManifest.version;
const identity = JSON.stringify({
runnerVersion: packageManifest.version,
runnerBuild,
promptPolicyId: "runner-live-workflow-v1",
seed: schedule.seed,
candidates: schedule.candidates.map(
({ id, adapter, model, reasoningEffort }) => ({
id,
adapter,
model,
reasoningEffort,
}),
),
...(selectionActive
? {
selectedExecutions: schedule.entries.map(
(entry) => entry.executionId,
),
}
: {}),
});
return `runner-live-v2-${createHash("sha256").update(identity).digest("hex").slice(0, 16)}`;
}
function qualificationFailure(entry, candidate, evalCase) {
const missing = candidate.qualification.requiredEnvironment.filter(
(name) => !process.env[name],
);
if (missing.length === 0) return null;
return evals.unavailableLiveRunnerWorkflowObservation({
entry,
candidate,
evalCase,
classification: "skipped",
code: "qualification_environment_missing",
category: "qualification",
retryable: false,
message: `Required credential reference unavailable: ${missing.join(", ")}`,
});
}
async function readCompatibleHistory(bundleId) {
const names = await readdir(historyDirectory).catch(() => []);
const reports = [];
for (const name of names.filter((value) => value.endsWith(".json")).sort()) {
try {
const report = JSON.parse(
await readFile(resolve(historyDirectory, name), "utf8"),
);
if (
report?.schema === evals.RUNNER_WORKFLOW_REPORT_SCHEMA &&
report?.bundle?.id === bundleId
)
reports.push(report);
} catch {
// A malformed historical artifact is ignored; it cannot affect the current candidate score.
}
}
return reports.slice(-7);
}
async function retainHistory(report) {
await mkdir(historyDirectory, { recursive: true });
const stamp = report.generatedAt.replaceAll(/[^0-9A-Za-z.-]/g, "-");
await writeFile(
resolve(historyDirectory, `${stamp}-${report.bundle.id}.json`),
`${JSON.stringify(report, null, 2)}\n`,
);
// Candidate sets alternate, so seven compatible weekly baselines require
// roughly fourteen weeks of history. Keep a little extra scheduling margin.
const expiry = Date.now() - 120 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1_000;
for (const name of await readdir(historyDirectory)) {
if (!name.endsWith(".json")) continue;
const metadata = await stat(resolve(historyDirectory, name));
if (metadata.mtimeMs < expiry) await rm(resolve(historyDirectory, name));
}
}
if (mode === "nightly") {
const fullSchedule = evals.buildRunnerLiveEvalSchedule({
seed,
rotationDay,
generatedAt: now,
});
const coverage = evals.runnerLiveScheduleCoverage(seed);
if (!Object.values(coverage).every(Boolean))
throw new Error(
`live schedule coverage failed: ${JSON.stringify(coverage)}`,
);
const schedule = selectionActive
? evals.selectRunnerLiveEvalSchedule(fullSchedule, selection)
: fullSchedule;
await writeFile(
resolve(outputDirectory, "nightly-schedule.json"),
`${JSON.stringify({ schedule, coverage, selection: selectionActive ? selection : null }, null, 2)}\n`,
);
if (!execute) {
process.stdout.write(
`Runner live eval schedule ready: ${schedule.expectedExecutions} executions, rotation week ${schedule.rotationDay}. Use --execute to run providers.\n`,
);
process.exit(0);
}
const campaignCostLimit = evals.parseRunnerLiveCampaignCostLimit(
process.env.PAPERCLIP_EVAL_MAX_CAMPAIGN_COST_USD,
);
let observedCampaignCost = 0;
const observations = await evals.executeRunnerLiveSchedule(
schedule,
async (entry, candidate) => {
const evalCase = evals.runnerWorkflowCase(entry.caseId);
const unavailable = qualificationFailure(entry, candidate, evalCase);
if (unavailable) return unavailable;
if (observedCampaignCost >= campaignCostLimit) {
return evals.unavailableLiveRunnerWorkflowObservation({
entry,
candidate,
evalCase,
classification: "skipped",
code: "campaign_cost_ceiling_reached",
category: "orchestration",
retryable: false,
message: `Campaign cost ceiling reached before this execution (${campaignCostLimit} USD)`,
});
}
const observation = await evals.executeLiveRunnerWorkflow({
entry,
candidate,
evalCase,
});
observedCampaignCost += observation.metrics.costUsd ?? 0;
return observation;
},
(entry, candidate, error) =>
evals.unavailableLiveRunnerWorkflowObservation({
entry,
candidate,
evalCase: evals.runnerWorkflowCase(entry.caseId),
classification: "infrastructure_failure",
code: error.code,
category: "provider",
retryable: error.retryable,
message: error.message,
}),
);
const bundleId = safeBundleId(schedule);
const results = observations.map((observation) => ({
scenarioId: observation.caseId,
candidateId: observation.candidateId,
observation,
scorecard: evals.scoreRunnerWorkflow(observation, { bundleId }),
}));
const providerVersions = Object.fromEntries(
schedule.candidates.map((candidate) => [
candidate.id,
`${candidate.adapter}:${candidate.model}`,
]),
);
const report = evals.buildRunnerWorkflowEvalReport({
source: "live",
bundle: {
id: bundleId,
runnerVersion: packageManifest.version,
runnerBuild:
process.env.PAPERCLIP_EVAL_RUNNER_BUILD ?? packageManifest.version,
promptPolicyId: "runner-live-workflow-v1",
providerVersions,
scheduleSeed: schedule.seed,
},
results,
generatedAt: now,
});
const history = await readCompatibleHistory(bundleId);
const comparison =
history.length === 0
? null
: evals.compareRunnerWorkflowReports(report, history.at(-1));
const alerts = evals.runnerWorkflowAlerts({
current: report,
history,
baselineReady:
process.env.PAPERCLIP_EVAL_BASELINE_READY === "true" &&
history.length >= 7,
});
await Promise.all([
writeFile(
resolve(outputDirectory, "live-report.json"),
`${JSON.stringify({ report, alerts, comparison }, null, 2)}\n`,
),
writeFile(
resolve(outputDirectory, "live-report.md"),
evals.renderRunnerWorkflowMarkdown(report),
),
writeFile(
resolve(outputDirectory, "live-report.junit.xml"),
evals.renderRunnerWorkflowJUnit(report),
),
writeFile(
resolve(outputDirectory, "github-live-summary.md"),
`${evals.renderRunnerWorkflowGitHubSummary(report, alerts)}\n## Previous compatible bundle\n\n${comparison === null ? "No compatible prior bundle is available." : `Pass-rate delta: ${comparison.passRateDelta}; overall delta: ${comparison.overallDelta}.`}\n`,
),
]);
await renderRunnerWorkflowWithCanonicalEvalbook({
packageRoot,
outputDirectory,
report,
caseForId: evals.runnerWorkflowCase,
});
await retainHistory(report);
process.stdout.write(
`Runner live evals complete: ${report.aggregate.passed}/${report.aggregate.scoreable} scoreable passed; ${report.aggregate.infrastructureFailures} infrastructure, ${report.aggregate.skipped} skipped, ${alerts.length} alert(s). Open ${resolve(outputDirectory, "index.html")}.\n`,
);
} else {
const payload = {
schema: "paperclip.runner.chaos-eval-schedule.v1",
generatedAt: now,
seed,
scenarios: evals.RUNNER_CHAOS_SCENARIOS,
};
await writeFile(
resolve(outputDirectory, "chaos-schedule.json"),
`${JSON.stringify(payload, null, 2)}\n`,
);
process.stdout.write(
`Runner chaos eval schedule ready: ${payload.scenarios.length} scenarios.\n`,
);
}