mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-06 20:05:57 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Governed MCP access spans contracts, runtime enforcement, adapters, UI surfaces, and operator verification > - The parity reference PR #9534 is too large for effective automated or human review > - The feature therefore needs a linear stack whose individual diffs stay below the 100-file review limit > - This pull request is split 7/8 and focuses on Apps/Gateways UI and feature-flagged activation > - The benefit is a standalone, testable review boundary while preserving byte-for-byte parity at the top of the stack ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Related parity reference: #9534 - Problem: The standalone UI foundation needs feature-flagged routes, navigation, app detail flows, gateways, Storybook scenarios, and QA configuration. - Proposed solution: Adds Apps/Gateways pages and components, navigation/route activation, remaining page integrations, Storybook stories, and QA Vite configuration. - Alternatives considered: keeping #9534 as one 403-file review, or rewriting the feature to manufacture seams; both were rejected in favor of path extraction plus compile-driven boundary moves. - Roadmap alignment: this advances the existing governed MCP/tool-access work already represented by #9534; it does not introduce a separate roadmap initiative. - Stack position: base branch is `pap10341-split/06-ui-tools-foundation`. - Merge policy: merge bottom-up, in order, only after the complete eight-PR stack has been reviewed and the top-of-stack parity gate remains empty. - Requested review: UXDesigner sanity pass on Apps/Gateways flows and flag-off behavior; Greptile on every PR. ## What Changed - Adds Apps/Gateways pages and components, navigation/route activation, remaining page integrations, Storybook stories, and QA Vite configuration. - Keeps this PR below 100 changed files and independently typecheckable. - Preserves the final tree from #9534 when combined with the other seven stack levels. ## Verification - `pnpm typecheck` - `pnpm check:token-gates` — all gates clean - Focused UI Vitest run with `NODE_ENV=test` — 17 files, 147 tests passed ## Risks - Navigation or flag regressions could expose incomplete experiences; activation remains controlled by existing experimental settings. - Stack risk: merging out of order can expose incomplete layers; mitigate by following the documented bottom-up merge policy. - Parity risk: later edits to an intermediate branch can drift from #9534; mitigate by re-running the empty top-of-stack diff before merge. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.4`; runtime-managed context window; medium reasoning with repository, shell, Git, GitHub CLI, and code-execution tools enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] Internal references are omitted except the execution-plan link explicitly required for this coordinated split stack - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge ## Stack Coordination - Internal execution plan: [PAP-13874](/PAP/issues/PAP-13874#document-plan) - Parity reference: #9534 - Stack: #9556 → #9557 → #9558 → #9559 → #9560 → #9561 → #9562 → #9563 - Merge bottom-up only after full-stack review and an empty parity diff at #9563. ## UI Evidence QA captured these from the live Garden MCP split stack at 1440px and verified clean rendering:    --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
68 lines
1.8 KiB
JavaScript
68 lines
1.8 KiB
JavaScript
import path from "path";
|
|
import { fileURLToPath } from "url";
|
|
import { defineConfig } from "vite";
|
|
import react from "@vitejs/plugin-react";
|
|
import tailwindcss from "@tailwindcss/vite";
|
|
|
|
const __dirname = path.dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
|
|
const BACKEND = "http://paperclip-dev:3100";
|
|
|
|
// Mock the /tools/gallery endpoint (which only exists on PAP-10341 branch)
|
|
// so we can visually test the "recognized domain" shortcut against a populated gallery.
|
|
const MOCK_GALLERY = {
|
|
apps: [
|
|
{
|
|
key: "zapier",
|
|
name: "Zapier",
|
|
tagline: "Automate things",
|
|
authKind: "api_key",
|
|
urlPatterns: ["https://zapier.com/*", "https://*.zapier.com/*"],
|
|
logoUrl: null,
|
|
credentialFields: [
|
|
{ configPath: "credentials.authorization", label: "API key", required: true },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const galleryMockPlugin = {
|
|
name: "qa-mock-gallery",
|
|
configureServer(server) {
|
|
server.middlewares.use((req, res, next) => {
|
|
if (req.url && /\/api\/companies\/[^/]+\/tools\/gallery(\?|$)/.test(req.url)) {
|
|
res.setHeader("content-type", "application/json");
|
|
res.end(JSON.stringify(MOCK_GALLERY));
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
export default defineConfig({
|
|
plugins: [galleryMockPlugin, react(), tailwindcss()],
|
|
resolve: {
|
|
alias: {
|
|
"@": path.resolve(__dirname, "./src"),
|
|
lexical: path.resolve(__dirname, "./node_modules/lexical/Lexical.mjs"),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
server: {
|
|
host: "0.0.0.0",
|
|
port: 5179,
|
|
strictPort: true,
|
|
proxy: {
|
|
"/api": {
|
|
target: BACKEND,
|
|
ws: true,
|
|
changeOrigin: true,
|
|
configure: (proxy) => {
|
|
proxy.on("proxyReq", (proxyReq) => {
|
|
proxyReq.setHeader("origin", BACKEND);
|
|
});
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|