Files
PaperClipAI/packages/paperclip-runner/spec/prp-v1-expressiveness-crosswalk.json
Dotta 560e7e48b5 feat(runner): add SDK and developer tooling (#12608)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The runner package already provides the production protocol and
execution spine.
> - Contributors still need stable SDK surfaces, deterministic test
tools, and local inspection tools.
> - Those surfaces share generated contracts and must change as one
package boundary.
> - This pull request adds the package-local SDK, labs, examples, and
drift checks.
> - The benefit is a reviewable developer platform that does not change
application execution selection.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

`packages/paperclip-runner` — runner SDK, conformance tools, and
developer tooling.

**Problem or motivation**

The production runner spine is present, but package consumers cannot
build deterministic integrations, inspect sessions, or verify
provider-neutral behavior through supported surfaces.

**Proposed solution**

Add browser, React, standalone, live-session, scenario, conformance, and
evaluation surfaces. Add generated contract inventories and
package-local verification scripts. Keep production application routing
unchanged.

**Alternatives considered**

We considered splitting each generated catalog, SDK surface, and demo
into separate pull requests. Those changes share exports, fixtures, and
drift gates. Splitting them would create intermediate package states
that do not build.

**Roadmap alignment**

No overlapping item appears in `ROADMAP.md`. This work extends the
runner package that is already on `master`.

## What Changed

- Add browser, React, standalone, live-session, and issue-thread SDK
surfaces.
- Add deterministic mock control-plane, scenario, conformance, replay,
and evaluation tools.
- Add bounded Codex, OpenCode, and ACPX development transports and
fixtures.
- Keep deferred managed-provider execution fail-closed. Persisted
compatibility data remains readable.
- Add generated capability inventories with their source files and drift
checks.
- Add examples, package documentation, browser checks, and
clean-consumer checks.
- Preserve the reviewed protocol bounds, replay compatibility aliases,
process environment isolation, and semantic redaction limits.
- Update the ACPX package patch that the existing workspace patch
registry already tracks.
- Do not change `pnpm-lock.yaml`, repository workflows, server runtime
selection, or the application UI.

## Verification

GitHub Actions is the verification authority for this pull request. The
repository CI, package TypeScript and Rust checks, package tests,
generated-output drift checks, browser checks, security scans, and
Greptile review must pass on the exact head.

Local test suites were not run because this series uses parallel GitHub
Actions for verification.

## Risks

This is a large greenfield package change. The main risks are public
export drift, generated-output drift, and optional React consumer
compatibility. Package boundary checks, clean-consumer checks, and
browser tests cover those risks. Production adapter selection and server
execution are outside this pull request.

## Stack

1. **This PR:** runner SDK and developer tooling.
2. [Codex production server
integration](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12616).
3. [Provider-neutral task-thread
UI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12617).

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, high-reasoning mode, with tool use and code
execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the feature request
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-08-31 21:33:11 -05:00

105 lines
6.5 KiB
JSON

{
"$schema": "./prp-v1-expressiveness-crosswalk.schema.json",
"version": 1,
"facts": [
{
"id": "semantic-tool-exposure",
"classification": "direct_v1",
"wire": "capabilities.schema.json",
"evidence": ["capabilities.schema.json#/properties/semanticTools", "protocol/fixtures/replay/semantic-tool-unknown-optional-envelope.json"],
"invariant": "Advertised operations are a typed operation-id set with availability, required claims, and redaction disposition; generic_api_request never counts as coverage."
},
{
"id": "semantic-tool-call-result",
"classification": "direct_v1",
"wire": "event.schema.json",
"evidence": ["event.schema.json#/allOf", "semantic-tool.schema.json", "protocol/fixtures/replay/semantic-tool-artifact-happy-path.json"],
"invariant": "Each semantic invocation has one call id, operation id, safe input digest, and exactly one typed result receipt."
},
{
"id": "semantic-tool-denial-and-redaction",
"classification": "direct_v1",
"wire": "semantic-tool.schema.json",
"evidence": ["semantic-tool.schema.json#/properties/authorizationBoundary", "protocol/fixtures/replay/semantic-tool-denial-redaction.json"],
"invariant": "A denied operation yields a typed safe receipt naming the failed boundary; secret values and hidden identifiers are absent."
},
{
"id": "optimistic-write-conflict",
"classification": "direct_v1",
"wire": "semantic-tool.schema.json",
"evidence": ["semantic-tool.schema.json#/properties/currentRevision", "protocol/fixtures/replay/semantic-tool-conflict-duplicate-retry.json"],
"invariant": "A mutation receipt carries operation id, idempotency key, outcome, stable code, retryability, and safe current revision when applicable."
},
{
"id": "artifacts-and-deliverables",
"classification": "compositional_v1_with_invariant",
"wire": "semantic-tool.schema.json + result.schema.json",
"evidence": ["semantic-tool.schema.json#/properties/artifactRefs", "result.schema.json#/properties/artifacts", "protocol/fixtures/replay/semantic-tool-artifact-happy-path.json"],
"invariant": "Every artifact ref is produced by a typed semantic receipt or registered work product and remains linked to the terminal result by run id."
},
{
"id": "governance-links-and-interactions",
"classification": "compositional_v1_with_invariant",
"wire": "semantic-tool.schema.json + request.schema.json",
"evidence": ["semantic-tool.schema.json#/properties/targets", "protocol/fixtures/replay/semantic-tool-governance-wake-monitor.json"],
"invariant": "Interaction and approval targets are immutable revision or decision references carried in a typed target envelope."
},
{
"id": "blockers-monitors-and-wakes",
"classification": "compositional_v1_with_invariant",
"wire": "semantic-tool.schema.json + result.schema.json",
"evidence": ["semantic-tool.schema.json#/properties/causalRefs", "result.schema.json#/properties/continuation", "protocol/fixtures/replay/semantic-tool-governance-wake-monitor.json"],
"invariant": "A blocked or yielded result names a bounded continuation; wake routing remains a control-plane decision and emits only safe causal identifiers."
},
{
"id": "budget-cost-stop-reason",
"classification": "direct_v1",
"wire": "terminal.schema.json",
"evidence": ["terminal.schema.json#/properties/stopReason", "stop-reason.schema.json", "protocol/fixtures/replay/budget-cost-stop-reason.json"],
"invariant": "A budget or cost stop includes a typed reason, observed limit class, safe usage aggregate, and control-plane decision id."
},
{
"id": "audit-and-idempotency-receipts",
"classification": "direct_v1",
"wire": "semantic-tool.schema.json",
"evidence": ["semantic-tool.schema.json#/properties/operationReceiptId", "protocol/fixtures/replay/semantic-tool-conflict-duplicate-retry.json"],
"invariant": "Source-event and semantic mutation idempotency are distinct; an exact semantic retry reuses its stable operation receipt and records the duplicate link."
},
{
"id": "capability-negotiation-and-unsupported",
"classification": "direct_v1",
"wire": "capabilities.schema.json",
"evidence": ["capabilities.schema.json#/properties/semanticTools", "protocol/fixtures/replay/semantic-tool-unknown-optional-envelope.json", "protocol/fixtures/replay/semantic-tool-unsupported-required-version.json"],
"invariant": "The controller binds behavior to negotiated typed capability versions, accepts optional extensions, and rejects unknown required versions fail-closed."
},
{
"id": "end-to-end-causality",
"classification": "compositional_v1_with_invariant",
"wire": "event.schema.json + semantic-tool.schema.json + terminal.schema.json",
"evidence": ["event.schema.json#/required", "semantic-tool.schema.json#/properties/correlation", "protocol/fixtures/replay/semantic-tool-governance-wake-monitor.json"],
"invariant": "Run, session, turn, item, source-event, governed-target, wake, monitor, decision, and receipt identifiers form an inspectable trace to terminal disposition."
},
{
"id": "control-plane-local-lifecycle",
"classification": "control_plane_local",
"wire": "none",
"evidence": ["docs/capability-disposition.md", "spec/capability/capabilities.yaml"],
"invariant": "Checkout and release, wake routing, budget enforcement, audit persistence, run persistence and replay, assignment, and monitor management are not runner tool calls."
},
{
"id": "future-cross-company-and-destructive-admin",
"classification": "breaking_v2_work",
"wire": "none",
"evidence": ["docs/capability-disposition.md", "docs/capability-future-binding-boundary.md"],
"invariant": "Cross-company discovery, broad audit access, destructive document lifecycle, and company administration require separately governed contracts; v1 rejects rather than tunnels them."
},
{
"id": "existing-fixture-and-doc-coverage",
"classification": "direct_v1",
"wire": "protocol/fixtures/replay",
"evidence": ["src/protocol/replay-contract.test.ts", "runner/crates/runner-core/src/replay.rs", "docs/protocol-compatibility.md"],
"invariant": "Every accepted additive correction ships golden replay, duplicate and retry, redaction and denial, optional-extension, and unknown-required-version conformance coverage."
}
]
}