Files
PaperClipAI/server/src/__tests__/issue-document-restore-routes.test.ts
DottaandPaperclip 4b6de5327e Remove cheap model profiles (#12683)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents that use different model providers and
adapters.
> - Paperclip must keep agent execution rules clear and predictable.
> - The cheap-model profile added a second execution mode across
adapters, task recovery, APIs, and the UI.
> - That mode increased configuration and recovery complexity.
> - This pull request removes the cheap-model profile as a product
feature.
> - The benefit is one model-selection path for normal work and recovery
work.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

This change simplifies model selection across agent configuration, task
execution, recovery, and adapter capabilities.

**Current behavior**

Paperclip exposes cheap-model profiles in adapter metadata, agent
runtime configuration, task overrides, recovery rules, APIs, and the
board UI. Recovery work can select a different model profile from the
agent's configured model.

**Proposed behavior**

Paperclip uses the agent's configured model for normal work and recovery
work. Status-only recovery stays limited to coordination work. The API
rejects legacy model-profile configuration. A migration removes stored
model-profile values from existing agent, issue, and historical revision
records.

**Reason and benefit**

One model path reduces configuration, API, UI, and recovery complexity.
It also prevents status recovery from becoming a separate product-level
model-routing feature.

**Breaking changes**

This change removes model-profile fields and adapter capability
metadata. Existing stored model-profile values are removed by an
idempotent migration. The validators reject new legacy profile values
with clear errors.

## What Changed

- Removed model-profile types, adapter capabilities, API fields, and
model selection logic.
- Removed cheap-model controls from agent and task UI surfaces.
- Kept status-only recovery limited to coordination context while normal
continuations use the configured agent model.
- Added an idempotent migration that removes stored model-profile values
from agents, issues, and configuration revisions without changing issue
update timestamps.
- Updated tests and product documentation for the single-model behavior.

## Verification

- `pnpm check:token-gates` passes.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` passes.
- `pnpm build` passes.
- `pnpm test:run` completed with 5,607 passing tests and 8
environment-sensitive failures in unrelated fixed-port and
database-deadlock suites. The same failures repeated in an isolated
rerun. CI is the final clean-room result.

## Risks

- This is an intentional breaking change for clients that send
model-profile fields.
- The migration changes legacy agent, issue, and configuration-revision
JSON. It is idempotent and preserves unrelated fields and issue update
timestamps.
- The change is cross-cutting because the removed feature existed in
adapters, shared contracts, the server, plugins, and the UI.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex with `gpt-5`. Reasoning and tool use were enabled. The
runtime did not expose the context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-01 14:57:38 -05:00

394 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const issueId = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
const companyId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockDocumentsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
listIssueDocuments: vi.fn(),
listIssueDocumentRevisions: vi.fn(),
restoreIssueDocumentRevision: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
canUser: vi.fn(),
decide: vi.fn(),
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}));
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
})),
getExperimental: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
getGeneral: vi.fn(async () => ({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt" })),
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => [companyId]),
}));
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}));
const mockIssueThreadInteractionService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
expirePendingInteractionsForTerminalIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
}));
const planDocument = {
id: "document-1",
companyId,
issueId,
key: "plan",
title: "Plan",
format: "markdown",
body: "# Plan",
latestRevisionId: "revision-2",
latestRevisionNumber: 2,
createdByAgentId: null,
createdByUserId: "board-user",
updatedByAgentId: null,
updatedByUserId: "board-user",
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:10:00.000Z"),
};
const systemDocument = {
...planDocument,
id: "document-2",
key: "system-plan",
title: "System plan",
};
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/agents.js", () => ({
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/documents.js", () => ({
documentAnnotationService: () => ({ remapOpenThreadsForDocument: async () => [] }),
documentService: () => mockDocumentsService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/heartbeat.js", () => ({
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/issues.js", () => ({
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/routines.js", () => ({
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
companyService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1" })),
}),
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
companySkillService: () => ({
completeTestRunForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
}),
documentAnnotationService: () => ({ remapOpenThreadsForDocument: async () => [] }),
documentService: () => mockDocumentsService,
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
feedbackService: () => ({}),
goalService: () => ({}),
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueReferenceService: () => ({
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
addedReferencedIssues: [],
removedReferencedIssues: [],
currentReferencedIssues: [],
}),
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
syncComment: async () => undefined,
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
}),
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
listActiveForIssues: vi.fn(async () => new Map()),
}),
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
issueThreadInteractionService: () => mockIssueThreadInteractionService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
projectService: () => ({}),
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
workProductService: () => ({}),
}));
}
function createRunContextDb(contextSnapshot: Record<string, unknown>) {
return {
select: vi.fn(() => ({
from: vi.fn(() => ({
where: vi.fn(() => ({
then: async (resolve: (rows: unknown[]) => unknown) =>
resolve([{
id: "run-1",
companyId,
agentId: "agent-1",
contextSnapshot,
}]),
})),
})),
})),
};
}
async function createApp(
actor: Express.Request["actor"] = {
type: "board",
userId: "board-user",
companyIds: [companyId],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
},
db: unknown = {},
) {
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = actor;
next();
});
app.use("/api", issueRoutes(db as any, {} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
describe("issue document revision routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/agents.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/documents.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/heartbeat.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/routines.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/instance-settings.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/issues.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockAccessService.decide.mockResolvedValue({
allowed: true,
action: "issue:read",
reason: "allow_test",
explanation: "Allowed by test mock.",
});
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: issueId,
companyId,
identifier: "PAP-881",
title: "Document revisions",
status: "in_progress",
});
mockDocumentsService.listIssueDocuments.mockImplementation(
async (_issueId, options: { includeSystem?: boolean } | undefined) =>
options?.includeSystem ? [planDocument, systemDocument] : [planDocument],
);
mockDocumentsService.listIssueDocumentRevisions.mockResolvedValue([
{
id: "revision-2",
companyId,
documentId: "document-1",
issueId,
key: "plan",
revisionNumber: 2,
title: "Plan v2",
format: "markdown",
body: "# Two",
changeSummary: null,
createdByAgentId: null,
createdByUserId: "board-user",
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
},
]);
mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision.mockResolvedValue({
restoredFromRevisionId: "revision-1",
restoredFromRevisionNumber: 1,
document: {
id: "document-1",
companyId,
issueId,
key: "plan",
title: "Plan v1",
format: "markdown",
body: "# One",
latestRevisionId: "revision-3",
latestRevisionNumber: 3,
createdByAgentId: null,
createdByUserId: "board-user",
updatedByAgentId: null,
updatedByUserId: "board-user",
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:10:00.000Z"),
},
});
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockHeartbeatService.reportRunActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({});
mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral.mockResolvedValue({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt" });
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue([companyId]);
mockRoutineService.syncRunStatusForIssue.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
});
it("returns revision snapshots including title and format", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp()).get(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/plan/revisions`);
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toEqual([
expect.objectContaining({
revisionNumber: 2,
title: "Plan v2",
format: "markdown",
body: "# Two",
}),
]);
});
it("filters system documents by default on the document list route", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp()).get(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents`);
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toEqual([expect.objectContaining({ key: "plan" })]);
});
it("passes includeSystem=true through for debug document listing", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp()).get(
`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents?includeSystem=true`,
);
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toEqual([
expect.objectContaining({ key: "plan" }),
expect.objectContaining({ key: "system-plan" }),
]);
});
it("restores a revision through the append-only route and logs the action", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/plan/revisions/revision-1/restore`)
.send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
issueId,
key: "plan",
revisionId: "revision-1",
createdByAgentId: null,
createdByUserId: "board-user",
});
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.document_restored",
details: expect.objectContaining({
key: "plan",
restoredFromRevisionId: "revision-1",
restoredFromRevisionNumber: 1,
revisionNumber: 3,
}),
}),
);
expect(res.body).toEqual(expect.objectContaining({
key: "plan",
title: "Plan v1",
latestRevisionNumber: 3,
}));
});
it("blocks status-only recovery runs from restoring issue documents", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValueOnce({
id: issueId,
companyId,
identifier: "PAP-881",
title: "Document revisions",
status: "todo",
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
});
const res = await request(await createApp(
{
type: "agent",
agentId: "agent-1",
companyId,
runId: "run-1",
source: "agent_jwt",
},
createRunContextDb({
recoveryIntent: "status_only",
allowDeliverableWork: false,
allowDocumentUpdates: false,
resumeRequiresNormalModel: true,
}),
))
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/plan/revisions/revision-1/restore`)
.send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("Status-only recovery runs cannot update issue documents");
expect(mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects invalid document keys before attempting restore", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/INVALID KEY/revisions/revision-1/restore`)
.send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(400);
expect(mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});