## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Direct Runner evals retain evidence across model configurations. > - Evalbook already has a grid and a read-only Runner Lab chat viewer. > - Public projection stripped the view and selected a second plain result page. > - This change uses the existing viewer for public and private results. > - The data access differs, but the presentation does not. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12931, #12945. Related open runtime-contract PR #11634 does not contain this report-only change. **What happened?** The public direct-eval campaign opened plain result pages. The access-controlled artifact used the chat viewer. Users could not follow the same recorded interaction from the published grid. **Expected behavior** Every newly generated Runner Evalbook opens the existing chat viewer. The grid and durable run history remain. Public evidence has explicit redactions. **Steps to reproduce** Open campaign gha-34062394019-1 from the direct-eval history. Click a result, then compare its plain page with the corresponding Actions artifact. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced at83987210d6. **Deployment mode** Static GitHub Actions artifacts and S3/CloudFront publication. Companion site-theme renderer: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-evals/pull/19. This removes the Python light theme and links the same built stylesheet. ## What Changed - Add a closed public chat projection. Require mock isolation evidence before publishing recorded text. Scrub private references and withhold tool payloads, reasoning and provider state. - Validate public HTML against the exact trusted viewer shell and asset bytes. Validate the public DTO and local links. Keep CSP restrictions on outbound requests and forms. - Make the workflow render both data projections with the canonical viewer. Pass a viewer-only artifact to the trusted publisher. Reject an old renderer pin before paid execution. - Fix report-only start position, missing-state inspector, read-only controls and redaction labels. Tool evidence links select and highlight the Evidence tab even when reopened. Runner execution and the full-stack E2E workflow are unchanged. - Add a no-model report refresh command. Preserve original campaign identity, measurements and immutable history; label report revisions. - Document the single presentation and public/private evidence boundary. - Use one Runner Lab stylesheet and local fonts for the grid, Latest, test design, inventory, server gate and S3 history index. Keep static styles scoped away from live chat. - Emit exact published report/history URLs to the Actions summary and job outputs only after successful upload. Set the deployment link from that output. - Switch public Eval and Evidence panes without rendering both at once. - Add all-run history with like-for-like pass-rate and cost timelines, regression/recovery lists, exact commit links, source refs and Actions links. - Record all-attempt costs including retries. Keep provider list cost separate from estimates. Label missing coverage and historical final-only costs. - Retain all run records beyond 200, backfill a separate derived analytics projection, and exclude report refreshes from measurements. ## Verification - Focused report/publishing/projection/workflow/adapter tests: 29 passed. - Workflow Evalbook adapter tests: three passed. - Viewer unit tests: eight passed; Vite viewer build passed. - Companion renderer tests: 59 total, 57 passed, two inventory tests skipped because the expected sibling checkout is absent. - Re-rendered all 375 retained attempts from the completed campaign and validated the public bundle. Zero new model calls; 356/358 selected cells still pass. - Browser walkthrough: grid to failed chat; prompt, named tool calls, correct blocked status, visible assertions, no loading spinner or composer. Public payload redactions are explicit. - Full typecheck and build passed locally. test:run ended with 17 failed files and 19 failed tests in unrelated server/worktree areas (3772 tests passed). Latest-head CI is the final merge gate. The browser sources also typecheck with a temporary TypeScript-7-compatible path configuration; the checked-in browser config still uses removed baseUrl options and is unchanged here. - Real Chromium verification passed for passing, failing and missing-recording attempts in both the full and public bundles. It checks tool expansion, navigation, reload, read-only controls, narrow viewport visibility and the public no-network boundary. Future publications run it automatically. - Fresh live proof: three gpt-5.4-mini native Codex cases passed on the first attempt (get-task-context, create-child-task, workflow-context-document-progress); estimated total $0.00632625. Generated the full canonical report and verified all three file:// pages, all seven DevTools tabs, and evidence cross-links in Chromium. Private screenshots remain local. - Follow-up99697c2c5: viewer build, eight unit tests, browser token gate and browser-source typecheck (existing TS7 configuration workaround) passed. Added repeated tool-to-evidence navigation to the publication browser gate. - Site-theme follow-up: 26 publishing/security tests, 59 Python tests (57 passed, two existing skips), eight viewer unit tests and the viewer build passed. Chromium verified shared colors and grid/test-design/Latest navigation. - Re-rendered all 375 retained attempts with the shared site theme, without new provider calls. - Successful hosted publication: [refreshed Evalbook](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-protocol-evals/campaigns/gha-34062394019-1-report-site-theme-v3/index.html) and [themed history](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-protocol-evals/index.html). Real browser verified grid → test design → chat → All results and history → run. - Full maintained live suite completed on AWS: [Actions run 34074939112](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34074939112), Paperclip856813ba3a, evals 34e1846c06a39e641182dadce5de7ea739f657f1. All 358 cells across 11 configurations ran; 355 passed (99.2%), two behavior failures and one infrastructure failure. Nine configurations are entirely green. All 360 retained attempts were rendered using the new design and published as an immutable, zero-provider-call report refresh: [full Evalbook](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-protocol-evals/campaigns/gha-34074939112-1-report-history-v1/index.html). The trusted master workflow ran the models; this PR's viewer rendered their results afterward. - Remaining live failures: native Codex mini did not emit the expected discovery event for lazy-unauthorized-undisclosed (no mutation occurred); GLM 5.3 scheduled a wake before approval in workflow-governed-wait; GLM 5.3 timed out on create-task-document on both attempts. No scoring rules were relaxed. - Retry-inclusive recorded estimated model cost is at least $7.067692, with usage for 357/360 attempts. Provider-reported list cost is a separate alternative (at least $14.002806), not an additive cost. Missing usage is unknown, not zero; AWS compute is excluded. - [Production history](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-protocol-evals/index.html) now contains nine model runs and two separately labeled report refreshes. Matching full-suite comparison reports three newly failing cells and two recoveries versus the previous run. This is observed run-to-run variation, not proof of a deterministic code regression. Live HTTP checks verify the newest report link, shared theme, exact source SHAs and cost analytics. - The new full report passed Chromium checks for passing, failing and missing-recording chat pages, tool-to-Evidence links, grid/design/Latest navigation, reload, read-only controls and narrow layouts. The Mac was locked during final hosted verification; the new hosted history was checked by HTTP and generated-page browser checks, not a fresh interactive desktop walkthrough. - History follow-up: 31 publishing/security/metrics tests pass. Viewer build passes. Chromium checks desktop and narrow history pages with no document-level horizontal overflow. ### Visual verification Generated from the scrubbed completed campaign; no private provider identities or raw tool payloads are included. Full private pages were also browser-tested, but their private metadata is not published as screenshots.    Latest shared-theme proof:     ## Risks - Public chat text is newly visible, but only for the isolated mock boundary. The producer excludes raw payloads and the publisher fails closed on unknown fields, secrets, shell changes and asset substitutions. - Requires the companion canonical renderer revision and an updated RUNNER_PROTOCOL_EVALS_SHA after merge. Old pins fail before paid execution. - Existing published campaigns remain immutable. A report refresh is a separate history entry, not a new model qualification. - Successfully published the immutable site-theme refresh with the configured report-bucket SSO profile. Original run records and qualification pointers are preserved. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent with reasoning, shell and browser tools. Exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green oncad99dbf04- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups oncad99dbf04- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
16 KiB
Direct live Runner protocol evals
One Evalbook presentation
Every new report uses the canonical Evalbook grid and the existing Runner Lab
chat viewer for attempt drill-downs. There is no plain-HTML attempt fallback.
The grid, Latest, test-design, inventory and server-gate pages load the same
built stylesheet and fonts as the chat viewer. The long-term S3 history index
references that stylesheet inside an immutable campaign, so every page keeps
the same dark theme. Static site styles live in
devtools/issue-thread/src/evalbook-site.css, scoped to .evalbook-site;
colors and typography come from the Runner Lab token layer.
Missing recordings show a notice in the same viewer; missing viewer builds
fail generation. Build with
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner build:issue-thread and provide
--viewer-root or PAPERCLIP_EVAL_VIEWER_ROOT to the canonical Python renderer.
The Actions artifact contains full evidence. S3 uses the same viewer with a closed public DTO: only isolated mock-run conversation text, scrubbed private references, named tool outcomes, and checks. Tool arguments/results, reasoning, provider identities, and company snapshots stay private. The public notice explains these redactions. An unverified isolation boundary yields no public conversation, not a guessed reconstruction.
Public attempts use inert JSON and one shared viewer asset directory. The
publisher verifies each shell and asset against the exact same-run viewer build,
checks the public payload contract and local links, and rejects other scripts.
The CSP prohibits network calls, forms and external resources. Supply
PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_PROTOCOL_EVAL_VIEWER_DIR to the publisher. The workflow sends
a viewer-only artifact to that job; raw attempts and provider secrets stay out.
After publication succeeds, the publishing job writes Open this run's
Evalbook and All eval runs links to the Actions summary. Its deployment
URL also points to the exact immutable report, not to the downloadable ZIP.
Failed publication does not advertise a successful deployment.
Before uploading, the report job runs the actual built application in Chromium
against representative passing, failing and missing-recording pages in both
reports. It checks initial rendering, tool expansion, read-only controls,
navigation, reload, a narrow viewport and the public no-API-request boundary.
In full-evidence reports, a tool's View in Evidence link selects the Evidence
tab and highlights its record, including when reopening that same record after
switching tabs. The browser check exercises this cross-link too.
Run the same check locally with
node packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/verify-runner-evalbook-viewer.mjs --report-root /path/to/report.
Add --screenshots /path/to/proof for visual evidence. Public screenshots are
retained in the aggregate Actions artifact, not added to the public report's
closed file allowlist.
These screenshots are generated acceptance-test evidence from the scrubbed completed campaign, not a separate report design:
Refresh a completed report without calling models
Download the aggregate Actions artifact, then:
node packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/refresh-runner-protocol-eval-report.mjs \
--source /path/to/downloaded-aggregate \
--evals-root /path/to/paperclip-evals \
--viewer-root packages/paperclip-runner/dist-issue-thread \
--output /path/to/new-refresh-directory \
--revision chat-v1
Publish the returned reportRoot with the normal history publisher. The new ID
is gha-RUN-ATTEMPT-report-chat-v1. Original reports remain immutable; history
adds a labeled refresh and retains the source campaign, original measurement
timestamp, renderer digest, and providerCalls: 0. Scores and evaluated source
revisions do not change. This is not a new model qualification run. Future live
runs create chat reports automatically.
Refreshes are ordered by their render time in the history list, but keep the
original measurement timestamp and never replace the latest or latest-green
qualification identities. The HTML history links each measurement to its newest
presentation, while retaining every original bundle and listing refreshes separately.
Refreshes also recover retry-inclusive estimated and provider-list costs from the
retained attempt records. They never add another model-cost measurement.
This is the provider-backed, one-turn protocol qualification layer in
paperclipai/paperclip-evals/evals/paperclip-runner. It is intentionally
separate from both the browser full-stack model E2E and the stress-derived
workflow schedule in runner-workflow-evals.md.
The canonical unit of work is one live roster plus one authored case. A full
campaign selects every enabled lane declared by
campaigns/live-direct-full.json at one immutable paperclip-evals commit.
That includes the complete 35-case provider rosters and the smaller ACPX Codex
control roster. A disabled roster remains available for an explicit diagnostic
selection, but is never inferred into a paid all run from the files present
on disk. The native resume reliability gate is not a normal one-turn roster:
it requires its separately governed external-resource campaign and remains
opt-in.
Managed-provider evidence identifies the immutable deployed provider artifact: Claude Managed uses its Agent version, while AgentCore uses its qualification revision. Transport API or beta versions remain separate protocol metadata and must not replace that runtime identity in a report.
Hosted campaign
Use the Runner Direct Live Protocol Evals workflow. Dispatch the workflow
from the default branch and provide:
target_branch: the Paperclip branch to build and test;evals_sha: an exact 40-character commit frompaperclipai/paperclip-evals;rosters:allfor every enabled lane in the canonicallive-direct-full.jsoncampaign, or a comma-separated diagnostic subset. Disabled lanes remain available only through an explicit diagnostic selection;allnever spends against a lane that the eval program has marked disabled;max_infrastructure_retries: zero through three, applied only when an attempt explicitly reports a retryable infrastructure failure.
The authorization job resolves the Paperclip branch to a commit and verifies
the supplied eval commit before any checkout. A short-lived bot token generated
from COMMITPERCLIP_KEY authorizes each checkout of the private eval repository;
the token is masked and is never forwarded to a provider process. The workflow
uses the same numeric actor
allowlist, protected runner-e2e-paid environment, RunsOn fleet selector, and
RUNNER_E2E_MAX_PARALLEL ceiling as the full-stack E2E workflow. Two balanced
GitHub matrices keep each matrix below GitHub's 256-job limit while keeping
their combined concurrency at or below that shared ceiling. Runner TypeScript,
the native daemon, provider dependencies, and the attempt viewer are built
once and reused by every cell. Because the complete suite requires two matrix
shards, this workflow accepts a shared concurrency ceiling from 2 through 100.
The reused provider runtime is created with pnpm deploy --prod from the
frozen workspace lock. That preserves the repository's qualified dependency
versions and patched ACP server bytes. Do not replace this step with a fresh
npm install of the packed Runner tarball: npm cannot apply the workspace's
patchedDependencies, so the resulting ACPX executables no longer match their
qualified digests.
The direct eval CLI also materializes a minimal immutable native runtime
context in each isolated attempt workspace. This keeps the direct layer on the
same paperclip.native-execution-input.v3 contract as production, including
the AgentCore HarnessSkill upload path, without borrowing any browser E2E
setup.
The direct CLI resolves native Codex from the pinned Codex ACP dependency, as
the browser E2E launcher does; no globally installed codex is required.
Its isolated fixture sessions explicitly use unattended ACPX approve-all
permissions, matching the full-stack ACPX test profiles. OpenCode retains its
existing semantic-only permission boundary.
The seeded mock control plane still enforces tool grants, company boundaries,
and governance checks. These test-only choices do not change production
permission defaults and are not a qualification of interactive approval UI.
AgentCore eval admission waits up to 125 seconds, capped by the configured whole-turn timeout. Its network worker already allows 120 seconds for cold invocation delivery; the generic 30-second facade wait must not cut that delivery short during parallel fleet startup. Other providers retain their existing admission timeout.
The runtime instructions distinguish the fixture's finish_task/block_task
state changes from native paperclip_finish/paperclip_block run-result
reporting. This layer has no production server to apply a reported run result
to a task. Its completion cases still require the actual semantic operation
and durable mock-state change; reporting success alone does not pass them.
The current turn request defines the requested work. Shared seed descriptions,
old eval notes, or past accepted interactions are background state, not a
replacement objective or proof that a newly requested action is already done.
Finishing the provider turn does not authorize an unrequested mock task-state
change or completion comment. These harness instructions keep single-operation
cases bounded while leaving their operation and state-effect assertions intact.
ACPX accounting uses the qualified server's billable token semantics: Claude and Codex already include reasoning in output, and Codex has no cache-write billing category. Other missing categories remain unknown. ACPX stores Codex's terminal prompt-response usage without streaming it, so the sidecar forwards the single newly persisted receipt bound to that exact turn before its terminal event. It never substitutes a previous turn's receipt or context occupancy for billable usage. These receipt corrections also apply to non-eval ACPX sessions. The durable redactor preserves these known numeric token-counter fields; string/object values under the same names remain redacted as sensitive data.
all means the maintained enabled campaign, not every matching file in the
roster directory. A missing campaign file fails closed. Within an enabled
lane, a missing remote profile or unavailable provider is retained as an
infrastructure result; it is not silently omitted. The current ACPX Pi roster
is declared disabled because its Runner security profile is not qualified, so
it runs only when selected explicitly for diagnosis. Use a roster subset only
for diagnosis, not to claim the full maintained campaign is green.
A provider turn that reaches a durable failed, interrupted, or otherwise non-completed terminal still produces an attempt artifact and is scored as a behavior result. It is an infrastructure failure only when the harness cannot produce usable evidence, such as an unavailable provider, invalid profile, or transport failure. Automatic retries therefore never rerun a measured behavior failure merely to improve its score.
Required protected configuration
The paid jobs read only the credential selected for each roster:
OPENAI_API_KEYfor native Codex and ACPX Codex;ANTHROPIC_API_KEYfor ACPX Claude and Claude Managed;OPENROUTER_API_KEYfor native OpenCode and ACPX Pi;- short-lived GitHub OIDC workload identity for AWS AgentCore.
Claude Managed also requires the four nonsecret
PAPERCLIP_CLAUDE_MANAGED_* profile variables. AgentCore requires the
nonsecret PAPERCLIP_AWS_AGENTCORE_* profile variables, including
PAPERCLIP_AWS_AGENTCORE_EXECUTION_ROLE_ARN and the immutable
PAPERCLIP_AWS_AGENTCORE_QUALIFICATION_REVISION; the eval fails closed when
that deployed revision differs from the pinned roster config. The currently
qualified context-aware harness revision is
aws-agentcore-harness-context-v2. The workflow
writes the GitHub OIDC token to a mode-0600 file and never forwards long-lived
AWS access keys.
Provision the AgentCore stack with --github-oidc-provider-arn so that scoped
role admits only the paperclipai/paperclip repository's protected
runner-e2e-paid environment as its web-identity subject.
Scheduled runs additionally require RUNNER_PROTOCOL_EVAL_NIGHTLY_ENABLED=true
and the pinned RUNNER_PROTOCOL_EVALS_SHA repository variable.
Reports and history
Each cell uploads its immutable run directory to an access-controlled Actions artifact. The trusted report job merges all expected cells, represents missing cell artifacts as infrastructure failures, and invokes the report program from the pinned eval commit. The full artifact contains the canonical Evalbook grid, read-only Runner issue-thread attempt pages, and raw immutable run records.
Public publishing uses a separate projection and a separate trusted OIDC job.
The projection retains model/config identity, status, usage totals, and check
outcomes and scrubbed mock conversation, but removes provider session identifiers, semantic-tool
payloads, state revisions, traces, remote profile identities, and raw failure
text. The same Evalbook report command renders that projection, so the public
grid, test pages and chat viewer have the standard Evalbook layout. The publisher rejects
untrusted scripts, remote resources, symlinks, unknown paths, broken links, raw session
fields, and credential-shaped values.
S3 publication is additive:
runner-protocol-evals/
index.html
history.json
latest.json
latest-green.json
campaigns/
gha-<run-id>-<run-attempt>/
index.html
latest.html
inventory.html
tests/*.html
attempts/*.html
campaign.json
bundle-manifest.json
Campaign files use immutable cache headers and a digest manifest. Reusing a campaign ID with different bytes fails closed. Only the root history and pointer files are mutable, and the publisher never deletes objects. The root history retains all run records; it no longer drops entries after 200 campaigns.
The history index includes:
- Pass-rate and cost timelines, grouped by identical cell/model/driver membership and eval-suite SHA. Different suites and subsets cannot silently share a baseline.
- Regression and recovery lists against the previous matching run, linking to the affected tests. Infrastructure failures stay distinct from behavior failures.
- Estimated cost and provider-reported list cost, shown separately, never added.
New campaigns include all retained attempts (including retries). Backfilled old
campaigns with only final-cell usage are labeled historical final attempts only.
Missing usage is unknown, not zero; partial totals use
≥and display coverage. - Exact Paperclip and eval-suite commit links (full SHA on hover), the source ref, and the GitHub Actions run. These identify the code evaluated, not merely the commit used to render an old report.
- A separate report-refresh list, excluded from trend points and model-spend totals.
history.json stores a versioned, derived analytics projection separately from
immutable campaign records. The publisher backfills missing analytics from each
original campaign.json; a refresh may enrich costs using retained raw attempts
only when its source metadata and scores still match the original record.
The publishing job uses dedicated RUNNER_PROTOCOL_EVAL_HISTORY_* variables
when present and falls back to the existing Runner E2E history role, region,
bucket, and public base URL. Its default top-level prefix is
runner-protocol-evals, distinct from runner-e2e. The AWS role must allow
additive writes and reads for that prefix.
Local publisher checks
These tests make no provider or AWS calls:
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner test:runner-protocol-eval-publish
To inspect the catalog without executing it, point the command at a local evals checkout:
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner \
report:runner-protocol-eval:catalog -- \
--evals-root /path/to/paperclip-evals \
--campaign-id gha-1-1 \
--output /tmp/runner-protocol-eval-catalog.json


