2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
3 people	0f6f0a3fee	fix(server): schedule issue monitors without heartbeat polling (#17863) ... <!-- entire-trail-link-start --> https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/-/trails/56/changes/paperclip/56 <!-- entire-trail-link-end --> ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Issue monitors save a future check on an existing issue. > - The heartbeat timer still scans monitors on every tick, even when none are due. > - The saved deadline and claim already provide durable scheduling state. > - This pull request gives monitors their own deadline worker and connects state changes to it. > - Idle monitor work stops querying. Existing admission and recovery rules remain in force. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17840, #16325. Related: #17171 addresses rearming a monitor after its admitted run fails. This PR changes when monitor inspection runs and follows the merged routine prerequisite. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Issue-monitor scheduling and idle database use. **Current behavior** Heartbeat ticks call the combined agent and monitor sweep. The existing next-deadline query only retains future monitors. Polling covers overdue leftovers, stale claims, and changes that make a saved monitor eligible. **Proposed behavior** Use the shared deadline worker. Retain overdue work with bounded retries. Wake after committed changes to monitor state, issue eligibility, company state, or native ownership. Keep legacy agent ticks separate for the next slice. ## What Changed - Add monitor-specific sweep and deadline methods to the existing scheduling owner. Keep the manual combined method. - Include overdue work and the strict five-minute claim fence. Exclude active native owners until their state changes. - Register monitors with the shared deadline worker. Heartbeat ticks wake only the legacy agent timer worker. - Connect direct issue-state writers and existing execution-control notifications to monitor work. Checkout uses a short transaction around its existing CAS. Provider work stays outside it. - Add real database lifecycle tests and retain routine, startup, admission, execution-control, and native-projection coverage. - Record the obligation, producer inventory, recovery behavior, and limits in `doc/plans/2026-10-27-issue-monitor-sleep-audit.md`. ## Verification - **1,233 passing cases in 35 complete files**, no skips, on accepted source `c24aadfc91e9394d73c799f9e05fc67202160557`. Coverage includes real monitor scheduling/admission, native settlement, committed producers, retained routines and all shared deadline consumer integration suites. - Database build, production server typechecking/build, module boundaries, target migration order and Runner profile identity pass. Twenty-four fresh PostgreSQL 17 schemas plus per-file fixtures applied all 412 journal entries through index 413; every selected source hash and temporary fixture import was restored exactly. - Normal parent reconciliation preserves master's admitted-wake result and scoped issue deletion while keeping committed monitor notifications. All other paths match the automatic merge; packages remain byte-exact to the qualified parent. The final routine-parent publication changes only its audit. - Historical failures and corrections remain in [the monitor audit](doc/plans/2026-10-27-issue-monitor-sleep-audit.md). Old delegated-Slack rate and Runner drain CI failures are retained; the current inherited clock fixture and package source are byte-identical to merged #17835. Fresh final-head CI remains required. - No full local repository-suite, live provider, deployed suspend/wake, external-alarm, production-load or fleet-savings claim. Final-head CI/security, exact-head Greptile 5/5 and actionable Ponytail findings remain separate merge gates. ## Risks - A missing producer notification can strand a monitor after polling is removed. The audit covers ordinary writes, direct status/assignment writers, recovery, and native ownership changes. - The writer model is process-local. Independent SQL writers and other replicas need a supported notification or reconciliation contract. - Overdue work uses the configured heartbeat interval as a retry floor for the monitor worker. New notifications during that backoff wait for its next pass. Normal state-change bursts coalesce for one second. - Notification fanout can inspect monitors during other active work. An unchanged idle subsystem has no recurring monitor scan. - The legacy agent timer still polls. Cloud sleep proofs and external alarm coverage are unchanged. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6-based coding agent), using repository inspection, ordinary Git merges, composition proofs, PostgreSQL fixtures and complete local integration suites. No subagents were used in this reconciliation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>	2026-10-29 08:40:56 -05:00
3 people	50fe32684d	fix(server): wake committed native run projection from durable changes (#17752) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A native run has separate result acceptance, task decision, run status, and resource settlement steps. > - A task decision can commit before its run status is saved. > - Recovery currently revisits committed decisions through the periodic orphan pass. > - This PR gives the existing run projection repair its own transaction-driven worker. > - Existing records reconstruct unfinished work after restart. Completed history becomes quiet. > - Other completion and resource obligations keep their existing recovery paths. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17748 (stack parent: accepted-result commit), #17734 (workspace finalization), and #17717 (retained session cleanup). Related #17614 preserves terminal notifications. This slice is prepared on current parent #17748 at `b2efdb2dbbbef5b2227ffa2bd2a9a6cfe3867fe2`; the parent has merged as `28e38da7e6bdd6af4092dda56bc2be05bed47af5`. **Current behavior** The native recovery pass revisits committed decisions to repair the heartbeat-run status and metadata. A crash between decision and run writes creates real work, but periodic scanning also revisits retained history. **Proposed behavior** Wake projection repair after committed producer changes. Reconstruct mismatches on startup and settings activation. Retry concrete failures through the shared scheduler. Keep the run projection before resource settlement. **Reason and benefit** The repair worker performs no recurring SQL after its work settles. A real decision, effect settlement, or ownership release reactivates it. This is one worker migration; it does not establish host or database suspension. ## What Changed - Extract the existing projection predicate and write into their native-runtime owner. The finalizer keeps initial metadata enrichment and task decision authority. - Discover accepted, committed, mismatched run projections with company, issue and run bindings. Exclude pending status effects and held runner ownership. Read narrow fields instead of whole result payloads. - Use existing transaction hints, scoped delivery scheduling, failure backoff and lifecycle handling. Add no tables or per-feature timers. - Require issue/run scope for ordinary finalization fanout. Routine company-only hints leave dormant projection quiet; explicit settings and dedicated producer signals keep their existing contract. - Connect finalization, pending effects, lifecycle status writes, issue changes and worktree execution activation. Preserve outer transaction commit and rollback behavior. - Lock the current run before deciding which terminal event and completion time to save. Concurrent live and recovery projection must not announce the same transition twice. - Delegate only already-committed projection from the periodic pass. Its candidate scan uses the same pending predicate to defer remaining consequences and cleanup until projection finishes. - Add real PostgreSQL producer, race and lifecycle tests plus an owner audit. ## Verification - Current local source `a83b9449233a275176e637c765059f414305d7c1` incorporates the parent with a normal merge. All 1,208 parent-only, seven owned-only and ten automatic shared paths are preserved. The only manual conflict keeps new projection fanout inside the ordinary issue/run guard. The complete package tree matches parent profile 80 byte-for-byte. - Controlled real-database regression: the original projection-only unscoped fanout produces three candidate SELECTs for routine company hints. The same zero-query assertion passes with scoped fanout. A real committed result then repairs the run and emits one terminal event before returning to quiet. Production bytes restore exactly in both phases. Twenty cases outside that focused pattern are not counted as passing there. - The complete main command passes **1,830 cases in 19 files**, without skips, in 301.14 seconds. It includes all 21 projection cases, 85 startup cases, required quality review and heartbeat run lifecycle, plus physical-work and result-commit consumers. Separate process recovery passes 410 in 163.58 seconds and external-chat response passes 273 in 53.26 seconds. Total: **2,513 distinct passes in 21 complete files**, with no skips. Normal merge `d4b46fd29cb23126d556cc3aeb883e6b41f1a8a5` adopts the actual parent squash with this entire tested child tree unchanged. - Production server typecheck, build, module boundaries, migration order and source identity checks pass. Seventeen dedicated PostgreSQL 17 databases use the unchanged migration 413 schema. Embedded-only calls use the existing fresh-per-call recovery helper. All temporary imports restore byte-exact and all 21 selected test hashes match after completion. No assertion or timeout is relaxed. - Parent package acceptance remains applicable: 130 passing installation/compatibility/transport cases, 22 installed ACPX/Grok contract cases and 26 native-provider Rust cases. One pre-existing opt-in closed Pi snapshot case is skipped because its distribution root is not configured. No live provider qualification is claimed. - The owner audit at `doc/plans/2026-10-26-native-run-projection-sleep-audit.md` retains prior failures and their disposition. Current-head acceptance: all 57 checks are clean, including protected CI and security. Greptile gives 5/5 on `a49a2dac13b0e1c19da5d3d6b435c781703b1c0b`, with no actionable findings. Old scores do not substitute. No Ponytail verdict is present under the authorized missing-review policy. - These checks do not claim a full local repository suite, deployed suspension, expanded Cloud wake coverage or measured cost savings. ## Risks - Process-local signals cover instrumented application writers. Independent SQL writers and replicas without supported ingress are not newly covered. Durable startup reconstruction remains enabled. - Projection must precede remaining committed resource settlement. The real reconciler test proves the periodic path defers cleanup while projection is pending and resumes it after repair. - Status decisions, external conversation settlement, watchdog resolution, Muse reconciliation and resource release keep their own authority and recovery. A committed result alone is not proof of completed cleanup. - Candidate discovery uses narrow bounded pages. There is no large-fleet performance or deployed sleep claim. Existing Cloud wake coverage and sleep blockers remain unchanged. - Parent #17748 has merged. This PR targets master at `28e38da7e6bdd6af4092dda56bc2be05bed47af5`. Current-head CI and review must pass before the authorized protected merge. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with repository tools and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. No subagent was used for this slice. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>	2026-10-29 05:10:16 -05:00