mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-10 12:37:55 +01:00
fcf5dc2395ffc9eaa53b25807cd7877d50b37e59
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
b8e8ab4641 |
fix(recovery): continue saved input after a recovered sandbox stops, not after its destroy (#19224)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A board user can stop or interrupt a native run and send a message for the next turn > - When the stop leaves sandbox files unsaved, automatic recovery saves them, re-stops the sandbox, and the saved message continues > - For agents whose sandbox is destroyed after each turn (an ephemeral lease), recovery then queues the destroy. That step removed the lease's stop receipt > - The continuation gate waits for a stop receipt, so the message waited for the destroy and its cleanup retry, about 5 to 8 minutes > - Agents with retained sandboxes continued within seconds, so the delay looked agent specific > - This pull request keeps the verified stop on the cleanup lease and lets the continuation and the next remote writer accept it > - The benefit is that a redirect, Retry or interrupt continues right after its files are saved, for every lease policy ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19206 **What happened?** On hosted staging, a Stop or `interrupt: true` comment on a native run left a follow-up turn that started 5 to 8 minutes later for some agents, and 25 to 40 seconds later for others. The slow agents use ephemeral sandbox leases. In each slow case, the stopped run's lease was released by `pending_cleanup_retry` about 5 minutes after recovery, and the saved message started one second later. The fast agents use retained leases, which recovery releases at once. **Expected behavior** The saved message continues right after recovery saves the files and the sandbox is stopped. The destroy of a stopped sandbox is resource cleanup and must not hold the next turn. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use an agent whose sandbox lease is ephemeral (destroy after each turn). 2. Interrupt or stop its native run so that recovery must save the sandbox files. 3. Post a message. See the follow-up start only after the sandbox destroy finishes. **Paperclip version or commit** Hosted, at `56517dda`. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.ts`: `scheduleRecoveredWorkspaceCleanup` keeps the verified stop receipt as `workspaceRecoveryCleanup.stopReceipt` when it queues the destroy. - `server/src/services/remote-execution-termination.ts`: new `hasRecoveredCleanupStopReceipt(lease)`. It is true only when the lease has recovery cleanup for its own run, was released, and the carried receipt matches the lease, run, provider and provider lease id. - `server/src/services/explicit-native-continuation.ts`: the `remote_cleanup` gate accepts that receipt. - `server/src/services/execution-blocker.ts`: `hasPendingRunCleanup` ignores a lease with that valid receipt, so a saved native interrupt send (and Retry or fresh-workspace checks) does not wait for the destroy. Other cleanup holds are unchanged. - `server/src/services/remote-workspaces.ts`: the next remote writer accepts that receipt for the ended writer's lease. - `server/src/services/execution-blocker.ts` (from #19206 review, not in the merged head): pre-turn evidence uses the exact startup lifecycle event list, so turn-scoped events such as `workspace.diff.recorded` count as provider work. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describes the rule. ## Verification - Red before the fix, green after: `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts -t "admits the interrupt redirect"`. An interrupted native run with recovered files and a queued destroy blocked the user message with `remote_cleanup` before the fix. After the fix the message is admitted. A lease without the stop receipt, or with a receipt for another run, still blocks with `remote_cleanup`. The test runs the same input as a plain message and as a saved native interrupt send (`queuedCommentInterruptId`); `hasPendingRunCleanup` was true before the fix and blocked the interrupt send with `cleanup_pending`. - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspace-reservation.test.ts -t "ended writer"`: the next writer reserves the workspace from an ended writer whose recovered lease awaits destroy; a missing or foreign receipt still blocks. Removing the new branch fails the positive case. - Updated `saves the authoritative remote workspace after native failed ...`: Retry now continues before the destroy, and the cleanup lease carries the stop receipt for its run and lease. - `workspace-recovery.test.ts -t "provider work cannot be excluded"` includes `workspace.diff.recorded` as provider work. - Related suites pass: `workspace-recovery.test.ts`, `explicit-native-continuation.test.ts`, `remote-workspace-reservation.test.ts`, `remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts`, `remote-workspace-lifecycle.test.ts`, `task-retry*.test.ts`, `native-cancelled-workspace-preservation.test.ts`, `workspace-recovery-source.test.ts`. `cd server && npx tsc --noEmit` passes. - Hosted evidence (read only): slow cases have ephemeral leases released by `pending_cleanup_retry` about 5 minutes after `issue.workspace_recovered`, with settlement one second later. Fast cases have retained leases released by recovery. ## Risks - Low to medium. The next turn can start while the old stopped sandbox is still being destroyed. The receipt proves that the sandbox was stopped after the files were saved, and an ephemeral successor uses a new sandbox. A destroy failure stays with the existing cleanup retry. - Leases without the carried receipt behave as before. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use and code execution in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
60a99307b3 |
fix(server): settle cleanup after reusable sandbox destruction (#18633)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A web-server replacement must preserve work and let completed cleanup become idle. > - Several task turns can use one remote sandbox through recorded lease handoffs. > - The last owner can destroy that sandbox while an earlier owner still waits for its own termination receipt. > - A completed agent-file cleanup can also retain a retry deadline from a competing callback. > - This pull request resolves confirmed destruction through the existing handoff contract and settles obsolete cleanup retries. > - The benefit is correct cleanup recovery without deleting history or weakening sleep checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #18554. Related work: #14695 handles warm agent-file ownership; #13291 handles interrupted conversation continuation. This PR fixes cleanup recovery after confirmed final destruction. It does not change provider process reuse or start a new run. **What happened?** After ten qualified staging web-server replacements, a bounded database-idle check failed. Completed native runs still owned pending agent-file cleanup. Normal workspace archive confirmed final sandbox destruction. An earlier lease in the same recorded handoff chain remained unresolved. Two completed cleanup receipts also kept stale retry deadlines. **Expected behavior** Resolve an earlier owner's cleanup only when the complete recorded handoff chain leads to an exact provider-confirmed destruction receipt. Clear a retry when its cleanup is already complete. Keep real or uncertain work pending. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Complete a remote run, reuse its sandbox for a second run, then archive the completed workspace. 2. Recover agent-file collection for the first run after the final lease confirms destruction. 3. Separately, reconstruct a completed cleanup receipt that still has a retry deadline. 4. Observe that both records remain unfinished without this fix. **Paperclip version or commit** Observed on `1a6017d6460267ad89d7e1784e2b521c28d8e9ac`. The changed source was unchanged in master `97c4dc969e13364464765ffbde74955005bf44d3`, which is this branch's base. **Deployment mode** A managed ephemeral web server with PostgreSQL, object storage and a remote sandbox. Regression tests use local PostgreSQL and no live provider or model calls. ## What Changed - Resolve remote termination at read time through the existing strict reusable-lease handoff validator. Require one final owner and a valid destruction receipt. Preserve historical lease rows. - Use the same proof in agent-directory cleanup and remote-stop inspection. Keep stopped, ambiguous, broken and cross-company chains blocked. - Reconcile completed cleanup receipts with stale retry deadlines through the existing deadline worker. Compare the receipt before clearing a deadline. - Add recovery, refusal, restart quietness and concurrent-obligation regressions. - Document the cleanup contract and preserve deployment evidence, failed checks and remaining acceptance work in the existing plan. ## Verification - Both owning service suites passed 169 tests before the final receipt comparison was added. - The seven-case selection passed again after the release-race review fix: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/agent-directory-working-copies.test.ts -t 'stale retry|destroyed successor chain|stale-deadline settlement'`. - Repository-wide `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on final review fix `7935d99bed`. The full `pnpm test:run` is still running. Latest-head CI has 55 successful checks, three skips, and one neutral review result. Greptile is 5/5. The Paperclip reviewer’s race finding is fixed; its optional query-deduplication suggestion is documented and the fresh lock-boundary checks are retained. - The reviewer identified an early return after a lost receipt comparison. The strengthened race regression failed before the fix and passed afterward: release now acts on the returned authoritative row, completes the new cleanup obligation, and preserves canonical files. - The first focused attempt failed the new stale-deadline test because the public release guard skipped settlement. That guard was fixed. The original failure is retained. A sandboxed typecheck could not fetch pnpm signature metadata; the normal network-enabled command passed without changing verification policy. - Prior deployed evidence: ten Railway replacements, 12,521 reads, 1,566 verified saves, 34 matching file hashes, no HTTP failures, actual browser reconnects of 1.16–1.29 seconds, and one remote execution retained across replacement. Two harness false alarms were separately adjudicated without redeploying those steps. - That deployment evidence predates this PR. Current-image natural idle, automatic sleep/wake browser return and the isolated production canary remain unverified. Production has not changed. ## Risks - Cleanup authority must not cross a company or allocation boundary. The existing validator checks the entire recorded chain; stopped successors and unexpected owners remain unresolved. - Confirmed destruction permits no-save cleanup. It does not claim that uncollected agent files were saved. - Read-time resolution adds a scoped lease-history query only for expired reusable leases without direct termination proof. No new recurring worker or polling cadence is added. - The deadline update must not erase new work. It requires the same cleanup receipt and preserves concurrent changes. - No schema or public API changes are included. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution and test tools. The precise backend revision and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
663c44cb2b |
fix: continue conversations after confirmed remote runner stop (#13254)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Users can stop a run and send another message on the same task.
> - Remote runners need evidence from their sandbox provider that
execution stopped.
> - Local process checks cannot prove that a remote process exited.
> - This pull request records provider stop receipts and uses them for
conversation admission.
> - New user messages can proceed after confirmed cleanup without
repeating interrupted actions.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #13237 and #13239. Related: #13163 covers app-restart recovery;
this change covers an explicit stop followed by a new user message.
**What happened?**
A stopped remote Claude ACP task kept its execution hold after Daytona
cleanup succeeded. Native runners also rejected remote process
identities and retained stale session cleanup gates. A message sent
during cleanup could stay deferred after the sandbox stopped.
**Expected behavior**
After the provider confirms that the old execution stopped, a new user
message starts a fresh turn. Pending user messages must not need another
message to trigger admission. Prior action outcomes remain recorded.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Start a long-running task in Daytona with a legacy Claude ACP or
native ACP runner.
2. Cancel the run while its tool is active.
3. Send a new message immediately, or after cleanup completes.
4. Observe the execution hold despite the old sandbox having stopped.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Reproduced on master at
|