Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Dotta 82dd3bb702 Preserve unstarted queued turns during offline enrollment (#18887)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Existing-volume enrollment moves server files to durable object
storage.
> - Enrollment stops application deployments before it changes file
authority.
> - A task drain keeps unstarted turns queued in the database.
> - The migration rejected every queued row, so a busy instance could
never finish enrollment without discarding requests.
> - This change preserves unstarted queue intent and continues to reject
running or previously started executions.
> - Users keep their pending turns and saved files through the
conversion.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A preserving enrollment found queued turns after task admission stopped.
The workspace, instruction-file, and historical-log guards treated these
rows as live writers. The drain also prevented the rows from starting,
so waiting could not satisfy the migration guard.

**Expected behavior**

After every old deployment has stopped, maintenance can move files while
unstarted queued turns remain unchanged. The replacement claims those
turns through normal admission. Actual executions and retained execution
ownership continue to block migration.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Queue a turn behind another task.
2. Start a task drain and let the current task finish.
3. Stop the application deployments and run offline enrollment.
4. Observe `active_execution_requires_drain` for the unstarted queued
turn.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced on the migration contract through #18864. This branch starts
at `ab2d2098a2764c511978d1c3e7a3fc5dfcef07f4`.

Related: #18826, #18835, #18841, #18864. Searches for queued enrollment
and queued migration found no duplicate fix.

## What Changed

- Share one offline execution predicate across workspace, agent-file,
and historical-log migration.
- Reuse the existing pre-dispatch evidence predicate; queued turns with
execution markers, saved checkpoints, source events, coordinators, or
environment leases remain blockers.
- Keep task bindings and normal live-migration restrictions unchanged.
- Exercise normal replacement admission after deleting the old
filesystem: the same queued run reads restored workspace bytes and
instructions, completes its original wake, and cannot execute twice.
- Document the offline boundary and queued-turn behavior.

## Verification

- **111 tests passed** across the final 110-case migration suite and
assembled queued-turn heartbeat proof, with real PostgreSQL and local
S3. This includes workspace/log migration, queued ownership blockers,
ordinary agent-file controls, and the actual bundled maintenance
process.
- The maintenance process preserves the queued row while archiving
historical output. The new assembled heartbeat test creates a normal
wake under drain, migrates without changing either row, deletes the
original filesystem, and resumes through normal admission. It reads
saved workspace bytes and the restored instruction bundle, persists one
successful native result, completes the same wake, and verifies a second
sweep does not duplicate execution. Only sandbox transport/provider
execution are scripted; no live model or Daytona calls.
- An earlier optional run-evidence worker integration invocation was
skipped without its dedicated environment; it is outside the changed
offline path.
- Server typecheck, server build, and runtime bundle passed.
- The first maintenance test exposed the separate agent-file guard; that
guard now uses the same offline predicate and the test passes.
- Initial local typecheck attempts lacked CLI dependency links in this
isolated checkout. Restoring dependencies fixed setup without source
changes.
- Full repository checks run in CI. The first head lost spot runners in
Build and serialized tests; one unchanged idle-deadline fixture crossed
UTC midnight and failed its timestamp assertion. Final-head CI passed on
run 41744678994 after retrying a spot-runner shutdown. Greptile reviewed
the exact final head at 5/5; all inline findings are resolved. The
separate Paperclip Review app remains queued. Hosted enrollment remains
pending release qualification and compatibility verification for the
existing provider configuration.

## Risks

The offline predicate relies on Cloud stopping every old application
deployment. It does not make online migration safe. Running executions
always block. Requeued executions with retained ownership also block. No
queued request, task binding, or recovery state is removed or rewritten.
No database schema changes.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 based, with reasoning and tool-assisted code
execution. The exact deployed model identifier and context-window size
are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-11-03 18:33:41 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 0ab3ce7a03 fix(workspaces): preserve legacy recovery across storage migration (#18841)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages durable tasks and agent work through the control
plane.
> - An ephemeral web server needs existing workspace files in shared
storage.
> - Failed historical runs can still own recoverable sandbox files or
unfinished coordinator state.
> - Moving local files must preserve those obligations without replaying
the old agent turn.
> - Migration journals the exact source and fences old copyback; the
recovery owner saves verified sandbox files separately.
> - New user input can continue only after matching preservation
receipts and independent execution-stop checks.
> - Accepted results retain their finalization owner and must have its
durable workspace receipt before storage moves.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Builds on merged #18826 and #18835.

**What happened?**

Existing workspaces with failed native copyback could not migrate to
remote storage. Simply changing their storage authority would let later
recovery target a retired local directory, lose child-task attachments,
or leave a recovered task unable to accept a new turn.

**Expected behavior**

Preserve local files, exact sandbox provenance, task bindings,
checkpoints, and unresolved history. Recover surviving sandbox files
into immutable task-scoped attachments after migration, and let a new
authorized user turn use those files without replaying the old
execution.

**Steps to reproduce**

Create a terminal native run with a prepared copyback descriptor and a
retained sandbox. Migrate its local workspace, remove the old host
filesystem, recover the sandbox, and submit a new user turn. Also
exercise a child task reusing its ancestor's workspace and an expired
observed coordinator.

## What Changed

- Journal exact legacy run, task, descriptor, and unfinished coordinator
bindings during offline migration. Descriptor-free runs retain the
complete declared lease/allocation/directory identities; publication
locks and revalidates them.
- Publish a run-scoped fence that prevents automatic restart or copyback
into the retired local authority.
- Release only the exact journaled expired coordinator lease under the
offline deployment fence and locked revalidation, recording the prior
owner in recovery history. Preserve phase, checkpoint, result, and run
status.
- Save recovered sandbox files through the existing immutable snapshot
owner, retaining allocation and provider-stop checks.
- Attach recovered files using the current task's identity when a child
reuses an ancestor workspace.
- Accept matching migration and snapshot receipts for workspace-repair
admission and explicit new-user continuation. Changed coordinator
bindings and invalid receipts remain blocked.
- Require the finalizer's successful workspace_finalize operation before
moving a workspace whose accepted result has finalized copyback; the
existing owner can then finish assessment/status effects.
- Document unresolved workspace-policy, task-ownership, and
missing-provenance cases as separate owner actions that block
detachment.

## Verification

- 569 tests across migration, retained recovery, and explicit
continuation passed on ffcde13f57.
- The final saved-result follow-up passes all 75 migration tests. Four
receipt cases cover prepared copyback, a successful finalization
receipt, a missing receipt, and a failed receipt. The successful case
invokes the actual finalizer after migration and completes the existing
saved operation.
- Five real-file journeys cover a retained host, removed host,
child-task reuse, an expired observed coordinator, and a descriptor-free
run with two separate sandbox allocations. They recover sandbox files,
clear the repair blocker, admit an explicit /new user comment, reserve a
new remote workspace, and verify recovered attachment contents.
- Negative cases reject changed coordinator phase/owner, invalid
migration fences, changed source sets and allocations, mismatched
task/allocation/action receipts, malformed archives, and unfinished
snapshot operations. Descriptor-free continuation requires every
journaled source; one missing archive keeps the hold.
- Twelve PostgreSQL/S3 and maintenance-service tests pass on the exact
final rebuilt runtime, including a plain-Node bundled process,
authenticated original-key export, overlapping task-folder restore, and
complete predecessor filesystem removal. The final server and runtime
bundle builds also pass.
- Head 9ab6a38fa4 passed all 573
migration/recovery/continuation tests, server typecheck, server build,
runtime bundle, and 12 PostgreSQL/S3/bundled-maintenance tests.
- Verification caught an expired-owner continuation rejection (160
recovery cases passed, one failed); the admission fix and subsequent
569-test run passed. Earlier fixture failures and the parent PR's
unrelated full-suite failure remain documented in their verification
history.
- Greptile and Paperclip Review both scored final head
fa58d4a5ce 5/5, with no remaining
findings.
- CI exposed 15 blocker-read projection regressions: descriptor-free
checks performed an extra full run read for ordinary unmigrated tasks.
The follow-up gates the lookup on the migration marker, includes that
marker in the bounded blocker projection, and selects only recovery
fields. All 31 blocker-projection and real-file journey cases plus
server typecheck pass. Final-head CI passed all 52 successful checks,
including repository typecheck, build, server tests, and browser suites.
- Preserved CI failure: the unchanged Runner package had one Cursor
Cloud Stop/checkpoint timing failure (4,903 cases passed). All four
focused local cases passed. Retrying only the failed job and its
verification gate passed without source changes.
- This PR does not claim tenant enrollment or a hosted rolling-deploy
result.

## Risks

Cloud must stop every predecessor deployment before enabling the offline
migration contract. Migration preserves uncertain work; it does not
certify provider termination, invent a completed result, or authorize
sandbox deletion. Missing or ambiguous sources remain held. Preserved
attachments are separate files rather than an automatic merge into newer
task edits. Parallel shared-write policy, stale task ownership, missing
task provenance, and accepted results without a successful finalization
receipt remain enrollment blockers. Original folders and the original
volume remain retained.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. This session does not expose a more specific serving model ID
or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used with available version and
capability details
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR using the bug template
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local issues or links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task
ID
- [x] I have run the focused tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added tests for the changed behavior
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented risks
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address reviewer findings before merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 16:17:13 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 2a16dcf629 fix(workspaces): preserve shared directory trees during enrollment (#18835)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - A volume-free web server needs existing task files in durable object
storage.
> - Historical workspace records can share a physical folder or contain
other task folders.
> - A task-level migration hold cannot fence every alias, and capturing
a parent recursively duplicates nested task data.
> - Offline enrollment imports children first and verifies their durable
coverage before omitting them from a parent archive.
> - Snapshot retention preserves those child versions for as long as a
covering parent depends on them.
> - Existing files, task bindings, and archived states remain intact
through the storage migration.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Builds on merged #18826.

**What happened?**

The per-workspace importer could capture a shared project folder while
another workspace record still owned the same path. It also recursively
included runtime-created nested task workspaces in each parent import.
Packaged enrollment rejected existing workspace data instead of invoking
its migration owner.

**Expected behavior**

Require offline maintenance for overlapping paths. Import nested tasks
before their parents, verify every excluded directory against its saved
snapshot, preserve dependencies through retention, and resume
interrupted imports without replacing existing remote authority.

**Steps to reproduce**

Create a project workspace and another task workspace below its
`.paperclip/worktrees/` directory. Try importing either while ordinary
writers are running, then run offline enrollment. Interrupt a parent
import after upload and resume it.

## What Changed

- Add physical-overlap admission checks and an offline entry-point
guard, including global running and queued executions.
- Import pending records in leaf-first pages through the existing
migration owner.
- Verify nested snapshots by downloading, restoring, and comparing the
original source before and after parent upload; check transitive
dependencies.
- Publish parent dependency receipts under child snapshot row locks.
Retention pins those children and revisits them when the parent is
deleted.
- Index imported-child dependency lookups with a partial GIN index; a
PostgreSQL query-plan regression covers 2,500 unrelated snapshots.
- Propagate cancellation through capture and object storage operations
and preserve existing retry journals.
- Wire workspace migration into packaged maintenance and document its
preservation contract.

## Verification

- The original overlap and duplicate-parent regressions failed before
implementation.
- 73 migration and retention tests pass against real PostgreSQL and
files, including interrupted uploads, resumed batches, equal-path
aliases, changed or missing child data, nested descendants, and active
or queued executions.
- Six S3-compatible storage integration tests pass, including migration
through the maintenance owner and restoration of both parent and child
after deleting the original filesystem.
- The standalone process case was initially skipped because the worktree
had no bundle. After rebuilding the server and runtime bundle, that test
passed against PostgreSQL and S3: authenticated ready/export receipts,
preserved decision secret, blocked application routes, and clean SIGTERM
shutdown.
- Server typecheck, server build, runtime bundle build, and
module-boundary checks passed. Full repository CI passed on
97136a20b9 after targeted retries of
infrastructure-interrupted jobs.
- Review fixes resolve physical paths through symlinked ancestors and
persist each parent journal’s original capture scope, including
pre-change journals. All three new regressions failed before their
fixes. An initial abort/retry test exposed JSON object-key ordering in
the saved scope; deep equality fixes that case, and the full migration
suite passed.
- Three new fixtures initially omitted required workspace fields; one
also omitted its task binding. The fixtures now satisfy the existing
contract; production validation was not relaxed.
- The parent PR's full local suite stopped on a chat retry-notice
timeout and a following fake-timer failure. All four relevant cases
passed separately without source changes; this is not a claim that the
full local suite passed.
- No staging enrollment or live rolling-deploy result is claimed by this
PR.

## Risks

The offline flag is an internal maintenance contract: Cloud must
actually stop every predecessor deployment before starting the process.
Deep or large trees require additional object downloads and source
comparisons and may exceed one maintenance window; import journals
support retry. Dependency lookups are company-scoped and event-driven,
with no added idle polling. Unavailable archived sources and unresolved
recovery/copyback still block migration and require separate owner work.
Unsupported local providers and cleanup_failed workspaces deliberately
remain enrollment blockers: filtering them from both the batch and
eligibility would abandon local files when the volume is detached. Two
regression tests prove that rejected records keep their files and do not
acquire remote authority. Original folders and the original volume
remain retained. The additional review request to ignore parallel-write
policy, stale task ownership, or a missing task binding in offline mode
is intentionally not applied: stopping deployments does not establish
those semantics. #18841 documents the separate owner actions and adds
three offline regressions preserving their files and blocking detach.
The batch reports the first failed workspace and supports journaled
retry; it does not promise aggregate diagnostics.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. This session does not expose a more specific serving model ID
or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used with available version and
capability details
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR using the bug template
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local issues or links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task
ID
- [x] I have run the focused tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added tests for the changed behavior
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented risks
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address reviewer findings before merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 14:50:14 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 2035118526 fix(workspaces): preserve archived data during remote migration (#18826)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Remote workspace storage lets the web server run without a
persistent volume.
> - Existing deployments also contain archived and historical task
workspaces.
> - Retention can remove their folders while preserving encrypted
restore points or Git reconstruction records.
> - The importer rejected those records and only accepted the task's
current workspace.
> - This pull request imports verified saved data without reopening or
rebinding tasks.
> - The benefit is preservation of existing work during an explicit
storage migration.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18403 and #17472.

**What happened?**

An explicit remote-workspace import rejected archived records,
historical task bindings, and removed folders with valid retained data.

**Expected behavior**

Import the recorded files or exact Git commit. Preserve archived state
and the task's current binding. Refuse missing, expired, corrupt, or
changed sources.

**Steps to reproduce**

Archive a task directory with a restore point, remove its folder, and
run the remote-workspace import. Repeat with a Git restore point
containing an unpushed commit and staged and unstaged edits. The
previous importer reports an inactive workspace or missing source.

## What Changed

- Preserve lifecycle state and current task binding while importing
archived and historical records. Recheck the binding before publication
and on resume.
- Expose the task-directory owner's validated restore-point reader.
Reuse it for ordinary restoration and migration.
- Restore archived directories and Git data into private scratch space.
Support saved Git recipes and exact legacy branch-deletion receipts.
- Recover pruned unpushed Git commits from the encrypted bundle and its
explicit prerequisites.
- Keep independent snapshot download, restoration, source checks, writer
guards, encryption, and atomic publication.
- Document the supported import sources and the remaining
tenant-enrollment gaps.

## Verification

- Before production edits, two new regressions failed on archived status
and historical task binding.
- Final focused verification: 58 tests pass across remote-workspace
migration and isolated task-directory restoration.
- Real PostgreSQL, Git repositories, encrypted storage, and restored
file bytes cover cold restoration after removing the old folder and
source object, pruned unpushed history, index and worktree edits,
corrupt/missing/expired sources, binding changes, and source-folder
races.
- A Git fixture initially lacked runtime ownership metadata. Correcting
the fixture made the valid retained-source case pass; no production
validation was weakened.
- Full repository typecheck and build passed. Full `pnpm test:run`
stopped in chat integration shard 2 after two failures: a retry-notice
timeout and a subsequent fake-timer error. All four cases in that
retry-notice group passed in a separate focused rerun without source
changes; the complete suite has not passed locally. All exact-head CI
jobs passed. The separate Paperclip Review app check is still queued;
all existing review threads are resolved. Server typecheck passed after
the review fixes.
- Both review findings were reproduced: the real cleanup owner's
verified-tip receipt was rejected, and a lost upload reply for a legacy
Git source failed with `operation_content_changed`. The fixes accept the
owner's scoped receipt metadata and rebuild reconstructed Git indexes
from their staged trees. Both regressions now pass, including retained
staged and unstaged edits.
- Additional coverage restores from a fresh HTTP clone after deleting
the original repository, imports a nested local checkout with encrypted
settings, and rejects an unapproved nested source without publishing
remote authority.
- This PR does not claim a completed tenant enrollment or a new
zero-downtime deployment proof.

## Risks

Imports can fail when old receipts or repository objects are
unavailable. They retain their migration journal and leave the original
state intact. Operators must resolve pending writers and recovery before
importing. Shared physical roots, nested worktrees, and unresolved
sandbox recovery require separate migration work. This change does not
remove those blockers or alter automatic retention.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. This session does not expose a more specific serving model ID
or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either linked existing issues or described the issue in-PR
following the relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task
ID or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run the focused tests locally and they pass; full
typecheck/build passed and the full-suite failure is documented
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 13:36:22 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 5e4cc01073 feat(workspaces): keep remote files off the webserver disk (#18403)
Keep native sandbox workspace files independent of the webserver disk. Use encrypted saved versions and Postgres ownership so a replacement server can recover files and continue work. Enable the path by default for new eligible workspaces when durable storage is configured.

Preserve explicit opt-outs and existing host workspaces. Include safe snapshot repair, Files access, import, migration and retention. Bound saved-Files resources, preserve imported Git recovery, reject unfinished Git operations, publish immutable concurrent captures, and verify permanent object-version deletion.

Validated 471 targeted local controls, build/typechecks, all 40 CI partitions, fresh Greptile 5/5 and security review. The PR records original failed attempts and scoped retries.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-31 14:54:01 -05:00