Commit Graph
7726 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Dotta 9414380536 test(evals): retain closed remote Docker qualification diagnostics 2026-10-27 10:00:17 -05:00
Dotta 28bdd1ee39 Retain Spot database qualification refusal as separate operation 2026-10-27 09:59:28 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 663fe667d6 fix(recovery): reconstruct missing native workspace obligations (#17877)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - A failed native run can still own prepared files in a remote
sandbox.
> - Cleanup must preserve those files before another executor can start.
> - Older failure producers can omit the preservation record.
> - A saved message then waits for cleanup without a recovery owner.
> - This change reconstructs that record during user continuation and
orphan cleanup.
> - The existing worker saves the files, verifies stop, and returns
input to normal admission.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A failed native run retained a prepared workspace and an active sandbox
lease. It had no file-preservation obligation. Cleanup protected the
files. The next user message waited for a stop receipt that no worker
owned.

**Expected behavior**

A new message registers the missing maintenance work at once. Existing
orphan cleanup recovers historical saved input. Ordinary Retry remains
available. Saved input can start once, after verified preservation and
containment.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Persist a failed native run with an exact prepared remote workspace
and its active lease.
2. Leave its finalizer terminal and unowned. Omit the workspace recovery
record.
3. Send a user comment or run orphan cleanup.
4. Observe that no preservation worker starts and the comment remains
deferred.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced on `bd382eee536f4ada680072b1cc19100163c3d04a`.

**Deployment mode**

Native Runner with a remote sandbox. Local verification uses disposable
PostgreSQL 18 and real temporary workspace files.

Refs #17788 and #17800. Those fixes preserve future deadline failures
and register historical preservation on Retry. This change adds
automatic recovery for new and saved messages. Refs #17839 for the
separate restart-failure producer repair.

## What Changed

- Register missing preservation before an authenticated continuation
waits for remote cleanup.
- Reconstruct the same exact-source obligation during the existing
orphan lease sweep.
- Notify the existing preservation worker in the registration
transaction. Do not add a timer or history scan.
- Test ephemeral and reusable sources, live owners, active executors,
mismatched sources, rollback, lock contention, Retry and saved-input
delivery.
- Document the recovery contract and feature-map behavior.

## Verification

- Red: both new orphan-recovery cases fail on unchanged production code.
Four ownership and source negative controls pass.
- Red: a new comment starts no preservation work without the admission
repair.
- All 461 test cases across five affected suites pass across the local
runs. One existing 30-second timing case timed out under concurrent
verification; its isolated rerun passed with the same deadline and
assertions.
- The three final-head entry journeys pass again: HTTP Retry, HTTP
comment creation, and historical saved-input recovery.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass on final head
`8fab8b2ba9049f640fd884094a2007a69465e6da`. The affected server
typecheck and build also pass.
- The integration journey holds the provider stop reply, checks that no
successor starts, preserves real files and newer host edits, and checks
one saved-input successor.
- Module-boundary checks, map checks and `git diff --check` pass.
- Native macOS PostgreSQL cannot start because host semaphore capacity
is exhausted. Database verification uses separate disposable PostgreSQL
databases for each suite. An earlier shared-database attempt caused
fixture interference and is not counted as a pass.
- Greptile gives 5/5 with no findings or unresolved threads on
`8fab8b2ba9049f640fd884094a2007a69465e6da`. All final-head GitHub checks
are settled: 55 passed, two Storybook checks skipped, and one neutral
Paperclip review. Full CI test, build, typecheck, Runner and browser
lanes pass. No full local `pnpm test:run` pass is claimed. The fix is
not deployed. This PR makes no claim of a live hosted model turn or
recovery of the original incident.

## Risks

- Registration grants maintenance authority only. Existing coordinator,
descriptor, allocation, stop, file-receipt and execution gates remain
effective.
- A locked source remains held. Its one-second lock timeout does not
prevent an unrelated source from registering recovery.
- New preservation writes wake existing work. Settled sources produce no
new recurring work. Historical discovery uses the existing orphan
cleanup lifecycle and its backoff.
- Provider lifecycle is simulated in local integration. PostgreSQL, HTTP
routing, file export/merge, the worker and queue admission are real.
- No schema, credential, model, trust, retry-budget or assignment
change.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository inspection, tool
use and code execution. The runtime does not expose the exact model ID
or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1027.0-canary.6
2026-10-27 09:50:50 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip b8f6d9b23f docs: clarify delegated connection feature and access maps (#17882)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The feature and agent access maps describe user journeys and their
permission boundaries.
> - PRs #17737 and #17739 added delegated connection setup across
several existing areas.
> - The maps include those operations, but some recipes and board-only
statements are stale.
> - This PR adds usable setup recipes and corrects the access
descriptions.
> - The benefit is a clearer verification path that preserves human and
agent authority boundaries.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #17737, #17739.

Related: #17862 changes connection setup advice and catalog choices.
This PR only clarifies the existing maps.

**Issue type**

Outdated and missing documentation.

**Where is the issue?**

The paired connection setup, app permissions, chat channels, model
accounts, and gateway maps under `maps/`.

**What's wrong?**

Delegated setup guidance sits under Gotchas without a matching driving
recipe. Some model-account text still groups supported account sign-in
with board-only host controls. A few callback, privacy, and native
admission descriptions omit important limits.

**Suggested fix**

Add the missing recipes. State the current route and service boundaries.
Keep existing capability IDs and distinguish source review, fixture
tests, and live provider proof.

## What Changed

- Add paired entry points and driving recipes for delegated setup,
permission changes, and managed AI sign-in.
- Describe Google consent restoration, GitHub requested credential
fields and saved rotation, and Vercel personal credential attribution.
- Correct the Vercel callback state checks and chat
conversation/test-status privacy scope. Name the separate GitHub
registration handoff endpoint.
- Replace blanket board-only AI login wording with the specific
managed-account and host/session boundaries.
- Link the five access maps to shared native admission and work-mode
limits. State the permitted self-targeted policy administration
boundary.

## Verification

- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passed: 35 paired areas and 192 stable
capability IDs. This checks structure and references.
- `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs` passed. Generated output remains
ignored.
- `git diff --check` passed.
- Eleven selected cases in
`server/src/__tests__/connection-management.integration.test.ts` passed
on source `db70c5acd9`, the unchanged base of this documentation commit.
They use a fresh PostgreSQL database, actual agent keys/run JWTs, human
sessions, and deterministic provider fixtures. The other 61 cases were
not selected.
- The selected cases cover connection/profile creation, Google saved
choices, native API entry points, Slack caller/target policy, GitHub
import and identity confirmation, durable gateway authority, AI
accounts/pools, saved human handoffs, revocation, scope, trust, and
Ask/Plan denial.
- Read-only source reviews checked all five areas. The disposable
database was removed after the run.
- Full workspace typecheck, build, and test sweep were not rerun for
this Markdown-only change. Live provider login and browser journeys were
not run. Per-operation source-only/not-run labels remain unchanged.

## Risks

Low risk. Incorrect documentation could misstate a permission boundary
or imply broader verification. The changes cite the owning routes and
services and retain fixture and live-provider limits. No runtime,
schema, lockfile, or workflow files change.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution, and read-only source-review agents. The session does not
expose a more specific deployment ID or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — existing fixtures
verify this documentation-only change
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green — CI is running and Paperclip
Review is queued on the current head
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups —
exact head `4d16f101968d6908f90f72b6ff6ecbb79037f168`
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 09:40:41 -05:00
Dotta 4a0d4252dd Record remote host refusal without consuming case initials 2026-10-27 09:30:39 -05:00
Dotta 4e93c384ed Validate remote chat cell provenance before campaign import 2026-10-27 09:19:17 -05:00
Dotta 6175603fd3 fix(evals): validate exact remote PostgreSQL artifact tuples 2026-10-27 09:10:02 -05:00
Dotta e439748839 feat(evals): gate remote chat on verified Spot and amd64 PostgreSQL 2026-10-27 09:06:20 -05:00
Dotta 279af36535 Close historical local campaign and record remote execution steering 2026-10-27 09:04:27 -05:00
Dotta 9079e0f20d evals: select OpenCode DeepSeek for remote chat catalog 2026-10-27 08:55:33 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip db70c5acd9 fix(runner): retain startup Stop and exhaust reconnect recovery (#17812)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Operators must be able to stop a remote runner while it starts.
> - Remote artifact staging can finish after the transport's bounded
cleanup wait.
> - The launcher discarded an early Stop request and could dispatch
after staging.
> - A separate path missed the runner's plain-text reconnect expiry
receipt.
> - This change retains startup cancellation and ends an exhausted
reconnect incident.
> - Public package imports and a source-bound profile keep the
regressions buildable and admission checks intact.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related work: Refs #16835, Refs #16843, Refs #16855.

**What happened?**

The HTTP Stop route returned 200 and recorded a cancelled run. After
bounded bootstrap cleanup, releasing artifact staging still dispatched
one launch RPC. A separate reconnect test accepted a replacement after
the runner reported that its grace period had expired.

The first PR head also failed CI. The HTTP regression imported Runner
source across the server TypeScript boundary. Its event receipt mock
read a field that is not present on both event forms. The changed
transport also invalidated the pinned Copilot source identity.

**Expected behavior**

A cancelled launch must remain cancelled after staging. An exhausted
reconnect receipt must end that incident. Regression tests must use
public package contracts. The source identity must cover the changed
transport without replacing historical profile bytes.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Hold the remote launcher's artifact staging promise.
2. Call the board Stop route and let bootstrap cleanup reach its
preparation deadline.
3. Release staging and count launch RPCs.
4. For reconnect expiry, end an owned runner with its coded or
plain-text expiry message.
5. Run the server typecheck and the Copilot profile identity check.

## What Changed

- Retain cancellation through staging, trace publication and an
in-flight launch RPC.
- Apply a deferred signal through the existing identity checks when the
launch identity arrives.
- Preserve an earlier KILL request when a later TERM request arrives.
- Recognize both coded and plain-text reconnect expiry receipts.
- Test the real board Stop route and heartbeat cancellation with
PostgreSQL. Use public Runner exports and handle both event receipt
forms.
- Generate source-bound Copilot profile v65 after integrating current
master. Preserve exact published v62, v63 and v64 fixtures, retain the
earlier v63 reconnect candidate as historical evidence, and reject
historical profiles for a current launch.
- Document process evidence, retained uncertainty and the limits of
cleanup and continuation evidence.

## Verification

- At current integration head
`2b96ee3adcb3be642c538436113e1159d92f843d`, launcher and HTTP Stop
regressions: 21 passed. This includes the existing process-generation
and exact-exit safety cases on the integrated base. The HTTP case
includes bootstrap expiry; it is not isolated Stop-only settlement
proof.
- At current integration head, reconnect expiry regressions: 2 passed,
for coded and plain-text receipts.
- At current integration head
`2b96ee3adcb3be642c538436113e1159d92f843d`, the Copilot installation and
identity suite passed all 63 tests and the canonical generator check
passed. Before regeneration, the merged-tree admission test failed with
a transport source hash mismatch and the generator reported a stale
identity. Published v62, v63 and v64 bytes remain unchanged; the prior
reconnect candidate is preserved separately. The v62 fixture SHA-256
remains
`faa4d1b35267b54e134a8e0c84586fe1196d8fad5525cb53aa195aae53ca6e83`.
- Current integration head passed all 86 focused tests, the full
recursive repository typecheck and the root repository build. The normal
server typecheck also passed, including its full Runner release rebuild.
- Historical full recursive repository typecheck and the root repository
build passed at `187bb85b4fa1fbd2ffaec992650a1c8557df9ebe`. Server
typecheck also passed through the normal package script and a direct
full server TypeScript check. The prerequisite full Runner release build
passed.
- The historical HTTP baseline returned 200 and dispatched one late
launch RPC. The repair returned 200 and dispatched zero in the bounded
fixture.
- Earlier failures remain part of the evidence: the first head failed
TypeScript package boundaries and source identity. One local HTTP run
failed before migrations; it passed after the disposable test database
received normal migrations. Earlier sandbox-wide checks ran out of
memory or lacked Cargo. Those runs did not pass.
- Historical head `187bb85b4fa1fbd2ffaec992650a1c8557df9ebe` received
Greptile 5/5 with no actionable findings and all hosted gates passed in
run `40412261957`: 53 successful check runs, four expected skips and a
successful legacy Snyk status. Those results predate the master
integration and do not establish current-head readiness.
- Current integration head `2b96ee3adcb3be642c538436113e1159d92f843d`
includes master `bd382eee536f4ada680072b1cc19100163c3d04a`. All
current-head hosted gates passed in run `40512885858`: 53 successful
check runs, four expected skips and a successful legacy Snyk status,
with zero pending or failed checks. Build passed at 13:42:36 UTC and the
final `ci / verify` aggregate (job `122224566238`) passed at 13:43:00
UTC on 2026-10-27. Greptile reviewed exact head
`2b96ee3adcb3be642c538436113e1159d92f843d` at 5/5 (updated 2026-10-27
13:36:41 UTC), with no actionable findings and no open inline threads.
The hosted partitions passed full-suite verification, including browser
and release gates. The wider qualification limits below remain in force.
- Local setup on current master initially failed frozen install with
`ERR_PNPM_LOCKFILE_CONFIG_MISMATCH` because `patchedDependencies`
differs from the lockfile. Pinned pnpm 9.15.4 hydrated dependencies with
`--no-frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts`; its generated lockfile change
was restored. This PR changes no lockfile or workflow.
- Reproduce the Stop tests from `server`: `pnpm exec vitest run
src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts -t 'remote
runner process supervision|HTTP Stop during remote runner staging'`. The
test accepts a guarded disposable `_test` database through
`PAPERCLIP_TEST_DATABASE_URL`, or starts its normal embedded database.
- Reproduce reconnect tests from `packages/paperclip-runner`: `pnpm exec
vitest run src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts -t 'does not restart
an exhausted reconnect'`. Build the normal test runner first.
- Reproduce profile checks from `packages/paperclip-runner`: `node
scripts/copilot-profile-identity.mjs --check` and `pnpm exec vitest run
src/drivers/acpx/copilot-installation.test.ts`.

## Risks

- The wider qualification is incomplete. Verified-stopped replacement
and concurrent recovery plus Stop each entered two physical provider
processes. Both fail the original requirement of at most one physical
provider entry. Passing fixture assertions do not make all incident
scenarios accepted.
- HTTP concurrent recovery, shared provider-attempt accounting,
server-admitted restored continuation, live-provider behavior and
product cleanup settlement remain unrun or unproved.
- Accepting a deferred signal is not proof that a dispatched process
stopped. The existing monitor remains authoritative.
- The HTTP test uses the real route, heartbeat cancellation and
PostgreSQL state. Execution lease and event ports, plus the launch RPC,
are controlled fixtures. Bootstrap expiry participates in this case.
- The local incident matrix uses an installed runner binary and a
scripted provider. It does not qualify a live provider. Local fixture
teardown does not certify product cleanup settlement.
- This change does not authorize historical turn replay. It does not
change ownership, pause, approval or provider-attempt gates.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The runtime does not expose the exact
serving model ID or context-window size. The agent used reasoning,
repository inspection, shell execution and connected GitHub tools.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 08:45:00 -05:00
Dotta c911d97f4a fix(evals): deliver selected status card context and current blocker facts 2026-10-27 08:44:44 -05:00
Dotta 23a561cbd8 fix(evals): accept grounded stale-card wording paraphrases 2026-10-27 08:39:41 -05:00
Dotta e29c9cce65 fix(evals): scaffold preview plugins through the owned source CLI 2026-10-27 08:35:37 -05:00
Dotta 23ca3f56a5 Record 146 processed initials and qualified private-input handoff 2026-10-27 08:31:44 -05:00
Dotta 9660347073 fix(evals): follow scoped runtime session and retry controls 2026-10-27 08:30:57 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip fa25178f36 test(evals): accept genuine descriptive pending secret proposal cards
Do not misclassify absent duplicate prose as a false completion claim. Require the actual visible human-only source-run-bound proposal card, exact secret/consumer/reference identity, and independent absent binding before either human decision. Contradictory prose, missing authority or wrong-card evidence still fail.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 08:27:38 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip bd382eee53 fix(recovery): explain retained source verification failures (#17773)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Workspace recovery must prove the identity of retained work before
it uses an allocation.
> - The verifier rejects several different contracts with the same
`source_binding_invalid` code.
> - A saved Retry can therefore stop before file preservation without
enough evidence for a safe repair.
> - Operators need a bounded observation of the selected source without
another attempt or weaker guards.
> - This pull request records closed failure reasons and adds an
explicit read-only inspection on the run page.
> - The benefit is a precise next diagnostic step while the saved work,
intent, and ownership fences remain intact.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #17741, #17053. This is a diagnostic follow-up. It does not change
recovery admission or the retained-source acceptance policy.

**What happened?**

A retained-source recovery exhausted in `verify_execution` with only
`source_binding_invalid`. Run and task diagnostics could not distinguish
an invalid reference, lease policy, source binding, or reopened
allocation. The normal recovery-actions read can also revalidate
recovery state, so it was not a safe substitute for a current read-only
inspection.

**Expected behavior**

Record an allowlisted reason at the rejected guard. Allow a reader to
inspect one exact task/run/action without changing its attempts, saved
input, receipts, or ownership. Clearly separate the recorded failure
from current identity observations.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Prepare a terminal native run with a retained-source action and a
lease policy of `reuse_by_environment`.
2. Attempt source verification. The guard must still reject that policy.
3. Open the failed run and choose Inspect recovery, then Inspect current
source. The diagnostic should name `lease_policy_not_retained` and the
allowlisted policy.

## What Changed

- Split existing source-binding guards into closed reason codes. Keep
each acceptance predicate and physical recovery action unchanged.
- Persist validated, path-free reason/policy detail with future system
recovery failures. Keep historical generic records compatible.
- Add an explicit query on the existing task recovery-actions GET. Exact
company/task/run/action selection bypasses read revalidation. Run
selection lists at most 20 actions; inspection stops before per-lease
lookup when a record has more than eight sources.
- Add a manual inspection control on native export-failure run pages.
Keep resolved retained actions inspectable. Show recorded failure and
current recorded-source identity separately.
- Update execution semantics and feature/access recipes. The shared type
is the normalized server/UI contract; it contains no provider payload or
secret.

## Verification

- RED: the prior verifier failed both reason assertions for rejected
warm policy and foreign-run lease binding. GREEN: the final focused
source/HTTP, system-state, and UI suites pass 23 tests. The UI follow-up
passes 8 tests after the review fixes.
- HTTP tests prove exact selection, cross-company denial,
resolved-action access, reused-allocation rejection, redaction, and
unchanged actions, runs, leases, tasks, wakeup receipts, workspace
operations, and activity. A nine-source case proves bounded inspection
while the existing worker verifier still accepts all nine valid sources.
- Review follow-up: show allowlisted saved detail beside a changed
current observation, preserve all listed actions, and follow
exact-action selection in verified/limited/error tests. The prior
component fails the saved/current drift regression in an in-memory RED
control; the current component passes. UI typecheck/build pass again.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. Token gates, maps, module
boundaries, and `git diff --check` pass.
- Rebased onto master `46de15ff4b` without conflicts. Range-diff proves
both diagnostic commits are unchanged. On new head
`a7e2bc87fcea75e76b6b736304d1287257f71174`, all 23 focused tests, full
typecheck/build, token gates, maps, and module checks pass again. Both
fresh reviews are 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. Final exact-head
GitHub status is CLEAN: 55 success, 2 skipped, 1 neutral, no pending
checks or failures. The [ci / verify
aggregate](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40387002325/job/121802415824)
passed in eight seconds. All test/build/typecheck/E2E lanes passed.
- Existing full workspace recovery suite: 56/56 pass (103.5 seconds)
before the byte-equivalent rebase. `pnpm test:run` hit repeated embedded
PostgreSQL initialization failure before database-suite assertions and
was stopped. No full local suite pass is claimed. The owned external
`_test` database provided the focused HTTP/source verification. The
prior browser attempt also stalled at Network.enable before its click;
that attempt did not establish browser acceptance.
- Current-head local browser acceptance passes through the actual run
page: Inspect recovery lists the exact action, Inspect current source
shows recorded generic failure separately from the current rejected
policy, and reload resets inspection to the explicit control. Explicit
selection works again after reload. The app used isolated data, an empty
inherited environment, a paused synthetic agent, and no provider
credentials. Final state remains failed/exhausted with zero attempts,
zero wakeup receipts, zero workspace operations, and unchanged original
generic failure. The local app and temporary tab were stopped. This
proves the diagnostic journey, not the deployed source's actual lease
policy or its recovery.
- Final merge verification at
`a7e2bc87fcea75e76b6b736304d1287257f71174`: GitHub reports CLEAN and
mergeable. Both repository-required checks, `ci / verify` and `ci /
e2e`, pass, as does the exact-head Greptile check (5/5, zero unresolved
threads). The separate [Entire
trail](https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/paperclip/trails/7) has no
recorded reviewer approval; no such approval is claimed. It is not a
configured GitHub merge gate.
- Initial local setup failures were distinct from product assertions:
localhost sandbox EPERM required scoped local access; a browser harness
import path was corrected. A test UUID type inference error and
historical native-export UI selection gap were corrected before the
green run. The live task remains blocked; this diagnostic does not claim
it recovered.

## Risks

- This change improves evidence. It does not prove provider termination,
local descriptor integrity, or successful file preservation, and it does
not repair the original source.
- Current inspection spans multiple database reads. It is an
observation, not a historical cause or execution authority. It performs
no provider/filesystem calls and starts no retry or executor.
- The optional persisted detail is backward compatible. Unknown values
and extra fields are excluded. Oversized source lists remain uninspected
through this explicit diagnostic path; physical recovery rules do not
change.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex based on GPT-6, with code execution and browser tools. The
exact serving model ID and context window were not exposed in this
session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 08:21:28 -05:00
Dotta 0ae0fc89ba fix(evals): qualify routine prerequisites and selected webhook context 2026-10-27 08:21:10 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 0c9d10d695 feat(connections): complete saved setup guidance and coverage maps (#17739)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Product and agent access maps describe the same capability IDs.
> - Agent connection management changes the callable operations and
permission boundaries.
> - Reviewers need an operation inventory that distinguishes API access,
human handoffs, and fixture evidence.
> - This pull request adds saved setup screens and updates the maps for
#17737.
> - The benefit is that users and contributors can inspect the coverage
and remaining boundaries.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Product and permission documentation, saved authentication setup UI and
consent metadata, and product/agent access maps.

**Problem or motivation**

The current maps describe board-only management paths. They need to
match delegated connection management and distinguish administration
from ordinary tool execution.

**Proposed solution**

Record route operations, required grants, responsible-user limits,
transport, saved authentication handoffs, provider-fixture evidence, and
explicit local-operator boundaries for every connection family.

**Roadmap alignment**

This is the documentation companion to #17737. It covers existing
Connected Apps, governed MCP gateways, chat channels, and
personal/shared AI accounts. It uses existing server setup operations
and adds their saved handoffs to the existing UI.

## What Changed

- Show saved AI sign-in and connection setup handoffs in the existing
UI.
- Open GitHub import and rotation links at the required human step.
Resume a committed rotation after reload without asking for another
secret.
- Restore saved Google service choices for the addressed user while
preserving newer consent. Successful direct/cloud consent records its
own timestamp, independently of refresh or lease writes; existing
refresh paths preserve it.
- Update product, implementation, and permission-default documentation.
- Reconcile app permissions, connection setup, chat channels,
profiles/gateways, and model account coverage.
- Use matching capability IDs in the product and agent access maps.
- Label source-reviewed operations separately from fixture-tested
operations and live provider setup.

- Preserve catalog creator attribution under the responsible user, with
the actual agent still recorded. This follow-up moved from the
implementation to keep both reviews below 100 files. This companion now
changes 38 files, including the preserved Vercel personal-credential and
OAuth callback attribution follow-ups alongside consent and catalog
ownership.

- Name the addressed-human browser-session and consent step for Slack
managed authorization and installation. Preserve source-only evidence
for those individual operations.

## Verification

- Current companion head: `04d40cdd605452d91cf4931476eb292a210825af`,
including implementation `2ecd6451d0` and master `ea727dc3c2`, 38 files.
All intended companion files survive: 35 are byte-identical to the
previous companion; two chat maps and qualification add current
evidence. Exact-head Superagent passed and Paperclip Review supplied an
actual neutral5/5 assessment with no findings and explicit
no-independent-runtime/live/current-CI verification limits. Exact-head
Greptile also completed at5/5 with no findings; both formerly failed
shards and their verification aggregate passed on attempt2; full
exact-head Linux CI workflow40446969603 completed SUCCESS. All current
checks and statuses are terminal clean, with no unresolved findings.
This PR remains dependent on #17737 and needs fresh checks after its
required post-squash replay. The preceding 605 head’s reviews are
historical after this update. Older b0ea Linux workflow success after
its single rerun also remains historical.
- Earlier preserved-stack verification passed **2,165 tests**: 70
assembled-server actual-auth scenarios, 27 OpenAPI contracts, 2,022
native API tests and 46 saved GitHub wizard cases in fresh PostgreSQL.
The parent also passed **141 existing gateway/policy tests**. Workspace
typecheck/build, maps and token gates passed. The initial typecheck IPC
denial and all material intermediate regressions remain in the
qualification record; no full local sweep or live provider setup is
claimed.
- Operation maps now cover issuer/target gateway policy intersection and
post-approval revocation, bounded activity pagination through
private-only windows, and native local-login encrypted receipts. The
companion preserves the Vercel OAuth callback ownership change with its
existing credential ownership follow-up.

- Parent CI has one retained connection-intent e2e failure from a
periodic-recovery timing race. GitHub refused the first job-rerun
attempt while its workflow was nonterminal. Once completed, the single
failed-job rerun was accepted as attempt 2 and passed, including the
full parent Linux workflow.

- Companion Linux server shard 4/12 retained a cleanup-idleness timeout
in `login-cleanup-work.test.ts` (active work was still 1 after its
five-second wait). The same unchanged cleanup suite passed all 16 cases
in the parent Linux job 121950185096 and all 16 cases locally against a
fresh disposable PostgreSQL database. Relevant cleanup/reaper/scheduling
runtime code is unchanged. The single unchanged-code failed-job rerun
was accepted as **attempt 2** on the previous `b0ea3c940f` head
(workflow 40431671705). The failed shard and complete Linux workflow
passed on attempt 2; no additional unchanged-code rerun was used for
this failure. The first local attempt failed the existing dedicated
`_test` database-name guard before running tests; the correctly named
fixture passed without weakening the guard.

- **Earlier 82 GitHub UI tests passed**. All three new replacement cases
were red before the fix. A confirmed unchanged generation preserves the
earlier copy; a changed or unreadable generation blocks copying and
reconnecting. An explicit status check can restore the copy when it is
still current. All earlier import, rotation, verification, and retry
states remain covered.
- The complete stack passed **82 API/OpenAPI tests** in fresh
PostgreSQL, including 55 scenarios with real agent keys, run JWTs, human
sessions, production defaults, persistence, and deterministic providers.
The parent also passed **60 Copilot installation tests**, preserving
published v62 and binding combined guidance as v63.
- **Earlier 10 focused Google/OAuth tests passed**: eight picker cases
and two local-HTTP protocol cases proving consent metadata survives
concurrent token refresh. The refresh and legacy UI cases were red
before the fix. These protocol fixtures use the existing injected board
actor and do not count as agent-authenticated proof.
- Workspace typecheck/build passed after the consent change; normal
migration generation reported no SQL changes for the additive JSON
metadata. The parent's latest caller-authorization correction passed
server typecheck/build. Map validation and token gates passed. Maps
cover 35 areas and 192 capability IDs. The specification names migration
`0380_broken_aqueduct.sql`.
- The test-call operation maps now record the full caller/target tool
access decision (profiles, policies, and explicit grants), credential
identity for every auth label, approval, and rate checks. The
profile-only precondition was removed after the new permitted-access
cases failed; those cases and the no-auth identity regression now pass.
Saved test status requires its originating principal and current
linked-task access; actual key/JWT privacy-denial evidence is recorded.
- Tool-connection activity is now operation-verified: 100 events over
two tasks require two capability decisions and at most two run captures
(previously 100/102), preserve private-event filtering, and deny the
next request after audit revocation. The regression was red before the
fix.
- Cloud enrollment creation and callback entries now name
instance-administrator and company/principal checks. The callback is a
browser return with HTML or a 303 redirect. Status reads retain their
separate board-actor rule.
- Operation maps identify the API, transport, authorization, evidence,
and human/operator boundaries. Structural checks do not establish live
provider behavior. Earlier failures and fixture corrections remain in
`doc/plans/2026-10-13-connection-api-parity.md`.
- An earlier companion head (`26edbe17`) received an actual Paperclip
Review assessment of 5/5 with no actionable findings, published with
neutral status. That review did not run tests or confirm CI, and it is
historical for this new head. The prior incomplete execution result is
not counted as a passed assessment. Fresh review remains pending. The
duplicate enrollment findings have explanatory replies and are resolved.
- The latest implementation correction passed all 55 actual-auth
scenarios and 27 OpenAPI contracts (separate commands). It repairs
unavailable old credential material, preserves fresh import versus
configured reconnect links, and distinguishes credential field
sets/completion modes in handoff keys. The new fresh-link and collision
cases were red before the fix. All 41 GitHub wizard tests now pass,
including filling the fresh saved handoff and asserting App import
rather than reconnect; UI typecheck, maps and token gates also pass.
Qualification retains the earlier failures and an incorrect OpenAPI
filename that selected only the integration module before the correct
separate contract run.
- Configured GitHub credential-entry links carry canonical requested
fields and all/any mode. The form displays and submits those values
through human reconnect while retaining other saved credentials. Two
webhook/client-secret cases were red before the fix; combined all/any
and legacy-link cases also pass. The current UI fixes the old bf760912
baseline referenced by the duplicate main review finding.
- After merging master baec3abd67 and regenerating migration0380, the
complete stack passed **128 tests** (55 actual-auth, 27 OpenAPI and 46
GitHub wizard cases), workspace typecheck/build, maps and token gates.
Eight current Google UI cases also passed. The two local-HTTP OAuth
cases could not initialize embedded PostgreSQL in this fresh attempt, so
that attempt is not a protocol pass; the earlier ten-case evidence is
historical and fresh Linux CI remains required.
- The reproduced Linux automatic-Slack challenge failure is fixed by
retaining verification only for the same signing fingerprint and
callback URL; all eight neighboring provider compatibility cases pass.
Qualification also retains the uncommitted GitHub field variant that
failed initial-secret compatibility before the extension was narrowed to
reconnect, and the first unmigrated external-database diagnostic.
Upstream 0379 remains intact; normal generation/pruning produced
additive/idempotent 0380, with repeated application verified.
- Both PRs must ship together. The user authorized merging when checks
pass. Merge #17737 first, replay only this companion's changes onto
master, retarget this PR, and require fresh current-head CI and review
before its squash merge.

- The updated maps distinguish authorized bot-token/API-key setup from
human verification-key entry and forbid generic channel secret-reference
replacement. Actual key/JWT security baselines were red before both
guards; all 82 API/OpenAPI cases, eight native receipt protections, and
49 policy-service tests now pass. The qualification record preserves the
initial lifecycle/fixture/union-assertion diagnostics and the preceding
Linux CI assertion failures. Maps pass on this updated stack. Fresh
exact-head CI and reviews remain required.

- The parent now preserves a per-field credential-change boundary before
retiring saved credential-entry cards. Old health, unchanged entry,
unrelated repair and retries cannot bypass it. Current authority is
checked before and inside credential persistence; a real provider-time
revocation regression was red before the fix. Final 82 API/OpenAPI
tests, four neighboring lifecycle cases, and server typecheck/build
pass. Maps pass, and qualification retains the hidden-metadata fixture
failure and the measured minute-boundary rate-test failure. Production
rate behavior is unchanged; only the relevant test Date clock is fixed.

- After the current master/parent refresh, all **341 affected UI
cases**, combined workspace typecheck/build, maps and token gates pass.
The updated parent also passed **97 actual-auth/OpenAPI cases**, **141
gateway/policy cases** and **61 profile installation cases**. Published
upstream Copilotv62/v63 remain unchanged; combined guidance is now v64
(`sha256:22e31f95ef972bcead98a4a707c9f33433558fd111e390e027a2bbb4346e112a`).
Qualification retains the initial source-identity failure and fixture
port/migration setup failures. No full local sweep, fresh local OAuth
protocol run or live acceptance is claimed; fresh Linux CI must qualify
this successor.

- Latest review follow-up: the parent fixes caller-policy bypass in
Slack tests/invitations and premature identity-handoff completion. The
maps now name caller/target Block/Ask/rate intersection, one charge for
a shared bucket, and the addressed human’s exact current identity link.
Parent verification passes all **99 actual-auth/OpenAPI tests**,
typecheck and build. The preserved combined companion passes the four
focused tests (including twelve Slack policy/recipient combinations and
the actual human OAuth confirmation path), workspace typecheck/build and
maps. The 50 embedded-PG continuation cases were skipped locally because
their database could not start; fresh Linux CI remains required. All
material red/intermediate results and corrected-fixture evidence are
retained in the qualification record.

- Current `04d40cdd60` CI workflow40446969603 retained two new failures:
server1/12 `workspace-runtime.test.ts` could not reach a fixture
subprocess’s health endpoint within its ten-second readiness window
(job122001926052), and chat2/3 `wakes Slack session sync from
publication commit and leaves settled action queues quiet` observed one
select after its idle predicate (job122001925936). Both same cases
passed in parent `2ecd6451d0` Linux jobs122001920494/122001920581. The
runtime and queue implementations are unchanged by this companion. Both
failing cases also pass unchanged locally: two real-subprocess runtime
readiness/reuse tests and the exact Slack quietness assertion against a
fresh migrated PostgreSQL database. Logs:
`/tmp/parity-04d-server1-failure.log`,
`/tmp/parity-04d-chat2-failure.log`,
`/tmp/parity-2ecd-server1-green.log`,
`/tmp/parity-2ecd-chat2-green.log`,
`/tmp/parity-04d-runtime-qualified.log`,
`/tmp/parity-04d-chat-quiet-qualified.log`. The single standard
unchanged-code failed-job rerun was **accepted as attempt2** on the
unchanged exact head at `2026-10-27T04:24:30.513973+00:00` after the
workflow completed. Both new failure retry allowances are now
**consumed**; both failed shards and the complete Linux workflow have
now passed on attempt2, including the verification aggregate. No
additional unchanged-code rerun will be requested for either failure. No
timing, assertion, idle-work guard or policy was weakened. If either
case fails again, investigate/fix rather than rerun again. The older
5b/b0ea rerun allowances remain consumed and separate.

## Risks

- Saved handoff links depend on the API changes in #17737, including the
nonsecret credential-generation metadata. Both PRs must ship together.
- A map can overstate operation coverage. Entries identify their
evidence and retain human authentication and trusted-host limits.
- Structural map checks do not prove live provider behavior.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific deployment ID or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — focused UI/guidance and
map checks
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — saved setup UI
tests and map validation apply
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — exact `04d40cdd60` full Linux
CI completed SUCCESS on attempt2; all current checks/statuses are
terminal clean, with an actual neutral5/5 Paperclip assessment
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups —
exact `04d40cdd60` review completed with no findings
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 08:21:02 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 13709b4c7a feat(connections): let agents configure connections within delegated authority (#17737)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Connections provide governed tools, chat channels, model accounts,
and gateways.
> - Several management routes require a human board actor even when an
agent has the required grant.
> - Default agents must configure these resources within the responsible
user's authority.
> - This pull request adds a shared authorization path to the existing
REST and native API surface.
> - Human authentication, execution approvals, and local host boundaries
remain enforced.
> - The benefit is that a standard agent can complete authorized setup
with a bounded human handoff.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Server authorization, connection services, shared contracts, native API
discovery, database schema.

**Problem or motivation**

Connection administration is available in the web app but often
unavailable to agents. Agent grants, responsible-user authority,
credential ownership, and actor attribution need separate checks.
Opening gateway-token creation also requires preserving the issuing
agent's delegated authority during token use.

**Proposed solution**

Use the existing authorization evaluator for every connection family.
Enforce current responsible-user authority, effective trust, grant
scope, resource visibility, and target-agent access. Keep existing agent
grants unchanged. Expose authorized configuration through default
`search_api` and `call_api`. Save human authentication steps and let
agents continue after completion.

**Roadmap alignment**

This change completes the API access path for the existing Connected
Apps, Personal & Shared AI Accounts, and governed MCP Gateway
capabilities in `ROADMAP.md`. It follows the maintainer's requested
design. Related work: #11899 enforces connection execution access and
creator/manager rules; this PR extends agent management across
connection families. It does not replace that execution-policy work.

## What Changed

- Add shared connection management context and mandatory
responsible-user, trust, scope, and target checks.
- Allow authorized agents to configure tool, chat/email, GitHub/Slack,
AI, profile, and gateway resources through existing routes.
- Preserve human credential ownership and record the actual agent,
responsible user, and run or key in audit data.
- Preserve saved browser authentication handoffs and callback session
checks.
- Bind agent-issued durable gateway tokens to their responsible user and
recheck delegated authority at use.
- Add explicit REST transport and management capability metadata,
built-in guidance, and sensitive-response handling.
- Intersect caller and endpoint-agent Slack test/invitation policies,
including independent and shared rates. Require the addressed human’s
current endpoint identity link before completing identity handoffs.
- Add production-authenticated integration scenarios. Companion #17739
contains the saved setup UI (including the required human
import/rotation step), product and permission documentation,
catalog/Vercel credential and callback ownership, and operation maps to
keep each review below 100 files. Both PRs must ship together; merge
this implementation first, then its companion.

## Verification

- Current implementation head:
`2ecd6451d0d0c8d82121a4e3fa4ce94c5befbbd6`, including master
`ea727dc3c2`, 99 files. The latest follow-up fixes the two valid
findings from the preceding f9 review. Exact-head Greptile has completed
at5/5 with no findings and Superagent passed. Full exact-head Linux CI
workflow40446606056 completed SUCCESS; only the queued external
Paperclip Review remains pending; earlier Linux passes do not qualify
this successor.
- Latest preserved-stack verification passed **2,165 tests** in fresh
PostgreSQL: **70 actual-auth scenarios**, 27 OpenAPI contracts, 2,022
native API tests and 46 saved GitHub wizard cases. **141 existing
gateway/policy acceptance tests** also passed. Workspace
typecheck/build, maps and token gates passed. The first workspace
typecheck was blocked by sandbox tsx IPC permissions; its authorized
rerun passed. This is focused local evidence; the full Linux CI matrix
is still required.
- Issuer/target gateway policy regressions were red before the fix. Both
decisions now intersect, including Block/Ask first/rates, same
credential identity and current token/user/agent authority after
approval. Invocations retain their token and actual requesting agent;
deleted tokens fail closed. Thirteen actual-auth cases cover revocation,
narrowed scope, approvals, shared rates and board compatibility.
Intermediate missing-token attribution, review-context and
implicit-session actor failures remain in the qualification record; all
final cases pass.
- Activity pagination now retains a bounded cursor across private-only
windows. The actual-JWT regression reaches three older readable events
after 27 private ones without exposing private details. A native
device-login regression was red for plaintext receipts; local check and
test-call results now use existing protected-response handling. The
passing actual-auth case proves encrypted persistence, exact replay,
redacted history and no response asset.

- Previous-head `5b55195593` Linux CI initially failed e2e shard 4/8 in
the existing connection-intent continuation test: periodic recovery
queued a repair at 01:21:47, the scripted journey completed the task at
01:21:48, and the extra queued run was cancelled at 01:21:49 because the
task was terminal. The assertion selected that latest cancelled run.
GitHub refused the first attempt while the workflow was nonterminal.
After completion, the single evidence-supported failed-job rerun was
accepted as **attempt 2** on the same head (workflow 40431202466). The
failed shard and final E2E aggregate passed on attempt 2, and the
complete Linux workflow for that head is successful. The original
failure remains part of qualification. No additional unchanged-code
rerun will be used for this failure.

- Companion CI also has an unchanged login-cleanup idleness timeout,
retained in its qualification record. That same 16-case suite passed in
this parent Linux run and a fresh local database. Both preceding
workflows passed after their single failed-job reruns as attempt 2; the
original failures remain recorded. No additional unchanged-code rerun
was used.

- Migration `0380_broken_aqueduct.sql` was regenerated through the
repository workflow after master took 0379 for project Git
authorization. It adds the responsible-user column with `IF NOT EXISTS`,
preserves upstream migrations, and satisfies snapshot retention and
migration safety checks.
- Upstream published Copilot v62 and v63 identities remain byte-for-byte
unchanged. The combined guidance is now v64, digest
`sha256:22e31f95ef972bcead98a4a707c9f33433558fd111e390e027a2bbb4346e112a`.
The normal shared TypeScript/Rust identity check and **61 Copilot
installation tests passed**. The old source-identity assertion first
failed against unchanged published v63; regenerating a new v64 preserves
the published release.
- Workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`, map validation, and UI
token gates passed on the final combined stack after the upstream merge.
Node 24.22.1 / pnpm 9.15.4 were used.
- **Earlier 82 API/OpenAPI tests passed** in fresh PostgreSQL 18: 55
assembled-server scenarios and 27 contracts. They use real persistent
agent keys, run JWTs, human sessions, production defaults, and
deterministic provider fixtures. No actor injection establishes access.
- The new email regression was red before per-account scope filtering.
The Arcade regression was red before human ownership and inventory-key
fixes; it also verifies actual-agent audit identity and a human-session
inventory read. The activity regression measured **200 authorization
checks before the fix and one afterward** for the same one-item page.
- **82 GitHub UI tests passed**, including all three new
failed-replacement regressions that were red before their fix. The UI
preserves an earlier copy only after confirming its committed
generation. Changed or unreadable results block copying and reconnecting
until reconciled. Human-only secret responses now include their
nonsecret committed generation.
- Private test status now rechecks the originating principal and linked
task, including mandatory agent/responsible-user privacy. Cross-agent
tests require the full caller tool access decision and the same
credential identity, regardless of auth label; caller and target
policies/approvals and rate limits apply before execution and after
human approval. A profile-only precondition was found to reject valid
allow-policy and scoped-grant access and has been removed. Both
permitted-access cases and a no-auth-label identity regression were red
before the correction; caller-specific Block still prevents provider
execution. The private-status regression was also red before its fix.
- The tool-activity regression measured 100 capability decisions and 102
run captures on a 100-event page before the fix. It now uses two task
decisions and at most two captures while retaining the same 50 visible
events, private-event filtering, and 403 after audit-grant revocation.
The regression was red before request-context reuse and task-decision
sharing; final server typecheck/build also pass.
- Generic chat configure/reconnect now hands agent-supplied verification
credentials to the addressed human before provider work or vault
changes. Actual key/JWT regressions were red for Slack signing-key
replacement and generic channel secret-reference rebinding. They now
prove unchanged refs and vaulted signing value, human setup, permitted
agent bot-token repair, and governed test messages. All 82 API/OpenAPI
cases pass in fresh PostgreSQL. Eight native receipt protections and
final server typecheck/build also pass.
- The preceding review found that old healthy state could retire a
credential-entry card before a human changed anything. The actual-JWT
regression was red. Saved field generations now change only with
protected values and commit with refs plus a verification fence; retries
retain the baseline. Old health, bot-token repair and unchanged entry
stay pending. New signing verification and current authority permit
continuation. A separate red race proved that user revocation during
provider authentication could return 403 after refs changed; authority
is now checked before persistence and inside the credential transaction.
The final 82 API/OpenAPI cases, four neighboring real-database
Slack/GitHub lifecycle cases, and final server typecheck/build pass.
- A preceding full run crossed a rate-window boundary. Database rows
prove one consumed slot at 23:35 and another at 23:36 for the same
policy/bucket. Only Date is frozen in the rate test cases; transport and
asynchronous timers remain real. Production rate behavior is unchanged,
and the final full run passes. An intermediate fixture failure that
overwrote hidden generation metadata with an API projection is retained
in the qualification record.
- Linux CI on an earlier head found two rate-admission assertions that
omitted the newly persisted bucket key. The failures were reproduced
locally; both assertions now verify the exact actor/tool bucket and all
49 policy-service tests pass. The companion qualification record retains
the initial and intermediate failures. Catalog creator attribution is
preserved in the companion to keep this implementation review at 99
files.
- The latest review reproduced three regressions before repair: complete
human replacements failed on unavailable old signing secrets, fresh
GitHub links incorrectly selected reconnect, and different
credential-entry requests shared an idempotency key. Each old protected
ref now has a narrow known-unavailable fallback; unexpected resolver
failures and company/scope violations still abort. Fresh imports keep
their credential form, configured endpoints keep reconnect, and
canonical field sets/completion modes distinguish handoffs while
matching retries retain their baseline. All 55 actual-auth scenarios and
27 separately run OpenAPI contracts pass, as do server typecheck/build.
Companion #17739 also passes all 41 wizard tests including actual
fresh-form submission, UI typecheck, maps and token gates. Earlier red
results and a mistyped OpenAPI filename are retained in qualification.
- The configured GitHub handoff regression was red in the
browser-component tests and actual-auth link/persistence tests. Saved
links now name requested fields and all/any completion mode; the
companion form submits those supplied fields through reconnect and
retains other saved credentials. Webhook/client-secret reconnect remains
human-only; first-setup secret restrictions remain. All 46 wizard tests
pass, including combined modes and legacy links. A duplicate review
referenced the older companion bf760912; the current form is already
fixed, linked in the reply, and its thread is resolved.
- Linux CI on bf760912 failed automatic Slack provisioning because vault
persistence cleared an already verified manifest-update challenge. The
same regression was reproduced locally. The provider-owned helper now
preserves proof only for the current signing fingerprint and callback
URL. Eight existing compatibility cases pass, including this case and
initial GitHub secret rejection. The first uncommitted GitHub-field
variant also failed that initial boundary and was narrowed to reconnect;
both failures remain in qualification.
- The upstream merge conflicted only in generated migration metadata.
Upstream 0379 is preserved, normal generation/pruning produced 0380, and
two repeated applications of the idempotent additive SQL passed. The
final combined stack passed **128 tests** (55 actual-auth, 27 OpenAPI
and 46 wizard cases) in fresh PostgreSQL. Eight Google UI cases also
pass; the two protocol cases could not initialize embedded PostgreSQL in
this fresh local attempt. Their earlier passing evidence remains
historical; fresh Linux CI must execute them. Vercel personal credential
attribution is preserved in companion #17739 with its other
ownership/consent follow-ups, keeping this PR at 99 files.
- The suite covers fresh defaults, restricted users/agents, scopes,
personal isolation, token revocation, human handoffs, callback replay,
execution approvals, authorized self-targeted policy changes,
self-approval denial, and current authority before commit. Reproduce API
checks with `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/connection-management.integration.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts`, using a fresh database
through `PAPERCLIP_CONNECTION_MANAGEMENT_TEST_DATABASE_URL` or the
default embedded test database.
- Companion #17739 also records consent separately from token refresh so
saved Google choices survive refresh. Its eight service-picker and two
local-HTTP OAuth tests pass; both new UI cases were red before the fix.
Normal migration generation confirms no SQL change is needed for the
additive JSON metadata.
- The integration module shares one assembled server, authentication
factory, and provider lifecycle to preserve the
HTTP-to-vault-to-task-continuation proof. A reused external database
caused a Slack fixture identity conflict; the fresh final run passed.
Earlier fixture/transport and contract-update failures remain in the
companion qualification record.
- The broad local `pnpm test:run` attempt remains blocked by macOS
embedded PostgreSQL's host semaphore limit. It is not a clean pass. The
fresh Linux CI matrix must complete. Provider fixtures do not prove live
setup or an empirical LLM success rate.
- A current-head completed Paperclip assessment is not yet recorded. Its
earlier external recovery boundary has not been bypassed, and no
incomplete assessment is reported as passing. The user authorized both
merges when checks pass; merge this implementation first, then replay,
retarget, and requalify companion #17739 against the squash-merged
master.

- After the master refresh, local workspace typecheck/build, **97
actual-auth/OpenAPI cases** and **141 gateway/policy cases** pass. The
original fixed database port was occupied; Docker assigned a free
localhost port. The first neighbor setup command could not resolve root
`tsx`, leaving its schema uninitialized; the built database package
migrated the separate fixture and all unchanged cases passed. Both setup
failures are retained in qualification. Fresh Linux CI remains required;
no full local test-sweep pass is claimed.

- The f9 Greptile review scored **2/5** for two reproduced findings:
Slack test sends skipped the caller’s tool policy, and healthy App
credentials completed an unconfirmed identity handoff. Both are fixed in
this head and have resolved evidence threads
([Slack](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17737#discussion_r4384927765),
[identity](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17737#discussion_r4384927895)).
Actual key/JWT cases cover twelve Slack caller/target/recipient
combinations; the human-session GitHub OAuth callback alone remains
pending until explicit confirmation. All **99 API/OpenAPI tests** (72
actual-auth + 27 contracts), workspace typecheck and build pass. On the
combined companion, all four focused cases (including the twelve Slack
combinations), typecheck/build and maps also pass. The continuation
suite’s 50 embedded-PG cases were skipped because its database could not
start locally; fresh Linux CI must run them. Initial fixture
credential-collision and audit-projection assertion failures are
retained with the red reproductions in the companion qualification
record. No full local sweep or live consent is claimed.

## Risks

- The maintainer explicitly confirmed authorized policy administration,
including self-targeted changes that loosen controls. These writes
require management grants and the responsible user’s current authority.
Agents cannot approve their own governed action requests or edit their
own principal permission grants. The actual-auth regression exercises
both permitted administration and those denials.
- This is a broad authorization change. Incorrect scope or owner
resolution could deny permitted setup or expose another user's
resources. Integration cases cover both permitted and denied requests
with actual authentication.
- The additive nullable gateway-token column does not infer identities
for legacy clients or backfill agent grants. Legacy agent tokens without
a responsible user fail closed.
- Provider fixtures test supported setup and callback contracts. They do
not prove live provider availability.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific deployment ID or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — focused suites above;
full local sweep remains blocked as documented
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green — exact `2ecd6451d0` Linux CI
completed SUCCESS; external Paperclip Review is still queued
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups —
exact `2ecd6451d0` review completed; both f9 findings have resolved
evidence replies
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1027.0-canary.5
2026-10-27 08:20:24 -05:00
Dotta 2880e3e6fc test(evals): minimize repository observation metadata 2026-10-27 08:18:09 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 6c09422364 test(evals): review governed tools in actual composer takeover
Open the exact persisted pending interaction and verify the selected synthetic app/action in the production takeover section. Scope all decisions to that review instead of waiting for a nonexistent dialog; preserve actual approval and provider-call oracles.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 08:13:17 -05:00
Dotta ccb6133d64 fix(evals): bind post-stop readiness to the actual source workspace 2026-10-27 08:07:17 -05:00
Dotta 74558fb8c0 feat(evals): project conservative retained campaign stage proofs 2026-10-27 08:01:40 -05:00
Dotta 96b4ec91cf test(evals): support qualified owned Docker instance operations 2026-10-27 07:54:19 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 420e7fcc6e test(evals): scope boundary manifest fingerprints to frozen scenario
Bind the selected canonical scenario projection while excluding mutable campaign attempt and usage metadata. Preserve actual executable dependencies, conservative unknown-source closure, descriptor and boundary target identity.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 07:52:12 -05:00
Dotta 3cdf48f17a test(evals): preserve 124 processed initial checkpoint 2026-10-27 07:49:25 -05:00
Dotta 643447b54d fix(evals): consume search probe response bodies once 2026-10-27 07:44:09 -05:00
Dotta 8565913082 fix(evals): supply the selected historical developer lab link 2026-10-27 07:41:42 -05:00
Dotta e74b11e800 fix(evals): preserve historical import data and denied inbox paths 2026-10-27 07:39:36 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 699c9a4b4e test(evals): observe public scoped gateway rotation handoffs
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 07:32:20 -05:00
Dotta 9bc325b481 test(evals): retain 118 processed initial checkpoint 2026-10-27 07:29:52 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip ab6e73f078 test(evals): deliver selected secure account as factual human context
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 07:24:02 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip a6dd3301b8 test(evals): decline the actual addressed Notion card
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 07:21:21 -05:00
Dotta 78d113f3a7 fix(evals): preserve supported CLI task status and owned feedback gate 2026-10-27 07:17:18 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 70e39f41f3 test(evals): isolate source funding from Morgan budget incidents
Prepare only company and source-agent public funding before incident prehistory. Independently preserve Morgan policy, incident and pause context and verify the canonical source has no extraneous funding gate.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 07:16:50 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip fb23a1ee76 test(evals): qualify budget prerequisites and company package upload
Preserve the original failures while distinguishing nonretryable native billing debt and stopping before a human action can mask unauthorized budget changes. Admit only the exact declared company-preview human upload with existing independent receipt checks.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 07:15:41 -05:00
Dotta aa86725867 docs(evals): record 110 processed initial checkpoint 2026-10-27 07:15:16 -05:00
Dotta 00a3a05b22 fix(evals): deliver factual antecedents through human query attachments 2026-10-27 07:08:05 -05:00
Dotta 2c907c0941 fix(evals): qualify case permissions and cancelled-run accounting 2026-10-27 07:07:22 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 3032aa27d1 test(evals): follow precise named board test handoffs
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 06:57:10 -05:00
Dotta ff31d399e8 Correct task-bound runtime gates and reviewed boundary evidence 2026-10-27 06:54:11 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip beca0672fb test(evals): isolate private device authorization browser steps
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 06:51:00 -05:00
Dotta 30f854b0bc test(evals): retain twelve independent initial outcomes 2026-10-27 06:49:37 -05:00
Dotta 5f92b5a730 docs(evals): preserve device privacy stop checkpoint 2026-10-27 06:48:36 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 7b1ce36f33 test: fingerprint spawned supervisor and source entrypoints
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 06:45:37 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 06ddb87a9a test: quarantine invitation enrollment before unsafe token-path acceptance
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 06:42:29 -05:00
Dotta 155cf4ce15 fix(evals): separate commentary reader and run evidence owner 2026-10-27 06:33:57 -05:00
Dotta 413de52360 Record authorized independent initial continuation and strict invitation quarantine 2026-10-27 06:19:01 -05:00