mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-10 12:37:55 +01:00
f0ddccff71f3bbda975cac8a86053a67c5d554f3
7726
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
54643f501d |
test(evals): reject unsafe personal question placeholders
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
78d36b0899 |
fix(evals): inspect rendered secret-question placeholder
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
039e0dad2c |
Connect TestOps protocol plans to verified GitHub attempts (#18985)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people coordinate agent work through a governed control plane. > - Runner protocol evals test real provider sessions against a seeded mock control plane. > - The saved TestOps protocol plan has no GitHub executor. Its dashboard shows historical results. > - A current one-case attempt also failed before any tool call or provider output. Its retained public-safe snapshot withheld the error cause. > - This pull request connects selected cases to the existing trusted workflow and retains closed operator failure facts. > - Each selected case receives a current result. Missing evidence remains broken. Existing assertions and machine grades remain unchanged. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Current behavior** The saved protocol plan cannot start a GitHub qualification attempt. Historical dashboard results can be mistaken for current execution. A failed provider turn can also lose its failure category when the live snapshot applies public evidence redaction. **Proposed behavior** The existing workflow accepts TestOps service inputs, validates exact case identities before provider work, runs the selected cases, and verifies their published statuses. Eval artifacts retain only validated failure phase, category, HTTP status, and retryability. **Reason and benefit** Operators can run the standing plan from TestOps and inspect current, source-bound results. A targeted pass cannot stand in for full-plan coverage. A failed startup can be diagnosed without publishing provider messages or request identifiers. ## What Changed - Add optional TestOps selection and protected reporting jobs to the existing Runner protocol workflow. - Keep the current actor, source, provider credential, and controlled accounting gates. TestOps retains the explicitly selected controlled or legacy mode and a separate 41-case Claude roster. Controlled mode preserves its existing reviewed policy, immutable bindings, tracing and zero-retry admission. Its paid workers explicitly use GitHub-hosted runners, matching the current manifest admission contract even when the legacy AWS fleet is enabled. - Bind the exact standing plan, workflow, job run, source revisions, selected cases, and saved statuses. Accept only verified workflow URL aliases. - Create a closed Allure projection inside the report job. Transfer only fixed case identities, check verdicts, numeric usage and statuses to the reporting environment. Controlled raw/chat/controller evidence remains private. - Publish one result for every selected case. Retain missing execution/report evidence as broken. Reject unsupported passes, model mismatch and source drift. Preserve the evidence schema literal, stop publication on cancellation, and retain closed API error codes/statuses. - Tag full selections separately from targeted attempts. Add bounded ingestion observation. Apply the exact TestOps filter before the unchanged controlled provider/cell-capacity check, so a one-cell registration fits a one-cell reviewed policy. - Retain up to eight eval-only closed provider failure records before board evidence redaction. Forward the original notifications unchanged. - Add selection, reporting, privacy, and admission regression controls. Document scope and remaining acceptance. ## Verification - Direct Node protocol publication, projection, metrics, and security tests: 56 passed. Focused controls exercise both mode admissions, missing controlled policy/retries/source rejection, closed result transfer, exact metadata, and missing-result handling. - `actionlint .github/workflows/runner-protocol-live-evals.yml` and `git diff --check` passed. - A proposed one-cell controlled policy passed the actual hosted validator with a synthetic prepared request and zero provider calls. The actual 41-case catalog filter selected case194/get-task-context and the real hosted admission accepted it under maxCells1. Negative controls rejected the unfiltered41, unsupported provider, source, selection, origin, expiry and lock drift. This does not verify provider auth, a runtime build or TestOps publication; final merged source/lock binding is still required. - The actual diagnostic TypeScript module passed positive, negative, secret-exclusion, and unchanged-notification controls through the existing tsx runtime. A local actual-CLI startup serializer probe passed with closed facts, secret exclusion, exit status and read-only fixture cleanup. This used an isolated resolver into the existing dependency cache; canonical exact-dependency CI remains required. - Prior-head CI passed typecheck, Runner static/Rust/native-server checks and 4946 Runner package tests. One new serializer fixture failed during Linux read-only directory cleanup; this head applies the existing neighboring cleanup pattern. Unrelated chat E2E and CLI import timeouts remain retained. Latest-head required gates are pending. - Original current-source one-case attempt: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41860234840 . It failed with no tool calls or output. That failure remains retained and is not a passing qualification claim. - Diagnostic candidate attempt: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41863410602 . It retained the new closed field but still failed before output with category unknown. This disproves the claim that typed retention alone identifies the cause. - The earlier passing run https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40627274706 used controlled Braintrust routing. Both current failures used direct legacy credentials, a different auth path. Next acceptance is one explicitly controlled case with a reviewed current policy, followed by TestOps registration and a fresh full plan. None is claimed complete by this PR body. ## Risks The TestOps contract currently binds the existing 41 cases and one recorded Claude Sonnet 5 profile. Catalog changes fail closed until reviewed. This does not qualify other providers. Admission and execution qualify only the selected accounting mode; a controlled pass does not prove direct credential health. Model-request readiness retains pending operating reconciliation. TestOps ingestion can fail independently; persisted results are checked, and missing evidence is never accepted as a pass. The new failure field contains closed facts only; raw messages, identities, credentials, and tool payloads are excluded. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact hosted model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, and tool execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used and the available capability details - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs - [x] I have described the issue with the enhancement template field labels - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket ID - [x] I have run the available targeted local checks and reported the remaining checks - [x] I have added relevant positive and negative regression controls - [x] I have updated the authoritative protocol documentation - [x] I have considered and documented the risks - [ ] All required Paperclip CI gates are green on the latest head - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open actionable feedback on the latest head - [x] I have addressed all current review feedback --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b99dd57c82 |
test(evals): run Product regression from TestOps (#18983)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work through governed product workflows. > - Product E2E tests check those workflows through the real app and runner. > - The saved Product regression plan has 20 imported case identities. > - The plan has no live executor, so historical baseline rows do not qualify its current behavior. > - The existing paid full-stack workflow already owns all 20 required journeys. > - This change binds TestOps selection and reporting to that workflow without changing the product oracle or paid admission. > - Maintainers can run the plan and inspect current case verdicts and retained evidence. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The standing Product regression plan has no executor. Its dashboard points at a historical 355-result snapshot across several suites and revisions. **Expected behavior** A TestOps plan run must select the intended existing full-stack cells, execute them on GitHub, and report their original case IDs, assertions and source revision. Missing evidence must remain a visible failure. **Steps to reproduce** Open the Product regression plan and inspect Executors. There is no live job. The existing full-stack workflow accepts exact cell IDs but has no TestOps selection or reporting path. **Paperclip version or commit** The branch includes reviewed master correction |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
6364fa7327 |
fix(heartbeat): wait for retry predecessor cleanup (#18989)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and preserves its task ownership. > - Heartbeat admission controls when a queued run can start. > - A failed run can still own workspace saving and environment cleanup. > - Automatic recovery can transfer the task execution lock to its queued retry before that cleanup finishes. > - The old queue check then sees the retry itself and misses the predecessor's remaining work. > - This pull request checks the exact retry predecessor before claiming the queued run. > - Existing cleanup notifications can then resume that same run through normal admission. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18898 and #18691. The first repair covers canonical connected-task retries with a native source. The second covers live remote workspace writers. This change covers ordinary automatic continuation when the predecessor failed before native runtime selection. The search found no open repair for that path. **What happened?** A preparation failure saved a terminal legacy run row while its remote workspace save and environment cleanup were still active. Generic continuation created one queued successor and moved the task execution lock to it. The queue checked that current lock but did not check the successor's predecessor. The new run started and failed at the existing unfinished-writer guard. **Expected behavior** Keep that same successor queued until its exact predecessor finishes execution and cleanup. Check company, agent and task identity before using retry provenance as a wait condition. Preserve Stop, reassignment, failed cleanup and independent recovery gates. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Save a failed legacy preparation run with an active environment lease. 2. Queue its ordinary automatic continuation and bind the task execution lock to the successor. 3. Claim the queued run before the predecessor finishes cleanup. 4. The old code starts the successor. The fixed code retains it in the queue. 5. Commit successful cleanup through the existing cleanup owner. The ordinary dispatcher starts that same run once. **Paperclip version or commit** The causal regression fails on master `86814c6550f52e99ede150a883bdc773cbb540e3`. **Deployment mode** Source checkout on macOS arm64 with disposable PostgreSQL, the assembled heartbeat service and the production work coordinator. The adapter boundary is controlled. No hosted provider replay or deployment is claimed. ## What Changed - Check the current task execution owner and the retry's exact predecessor under the existing task claim lock. - Use the saved native task binding, ordinary task binding and historical context fallback in that order. Ignore unrelated retry provenance. - Reuse the existing live-executor and pending-cleanup checks. Reuse committed cleanup notifications and the existing dispatcher. - Add real PostgreSQL claim controls and assembled cleanup-event acceptance. Keep the original source failure, saved files and current task ownership intact. - Document the queued predecessor-cleanup rule. ## Verification - RED: the unchanged queue claimed the successor and wrote a new controller lease while its legacy predecessor retained an active remote environment lease. The regression expected the successor to remain queued. - GREEN: the same regression passes after the change. The complete queue suite passes all 71 tests. - The assembled heartbeat suite passes all six tests. The added cases cover one continuation after committed cleanup, saved-file reuse, final task lock release, board Stop, reassignment and failed cleanup. - Scope controls cover a deleted source after scan, another company, another task, another agent, canonical native task binding and the existing current-owner hold. A failed cleanup and a still-live local executor retain the wait. - Node 24.19.0 and pnpm 9.15.4. Module boundaries and `git diff --check` pass. - Initial fixture attempts failed on database constraints and observer timing. The final fixtures use valid immutable bindings, the board Stop attribution and a completed real dispatcher call after reading the exact committed lease state. Production ownership guards were retained throughout. - Full low-memory repository typecheck passed at `5cddb49322`. The sync to master `04a24f4e06` adds only the independent retained-allocation test fixture from #18984; production code is unchanged. - Full `pnpm build` passes on current head `c7c2bcf08ffd05be5ce714683ae1dcfe6f5b49f1`. - The post-sync run executes all 80 behavior assertions successfully across the queue, assembled cleanup and updated upstream retention suites. Its queue `afterAll` then exceeds the existing 30-second database shutdown hook. That failed suite result is retained. The controlled post-build queue rerun passes all 71 tests with normal teardown. The earlier shutdown cause remains undetermined. Its owned queue-test PostgreSQL process has exited. The separate local default `pnpm test:run` was intentionally stopped after full unfiltered CI passed on the exact head. Four local chat partitions completed before that stop; this is not a local full-suite pass. The verified owned process group and its PostgreSQL fixture have exited. Logs and retained fixture data remain available. The timeout has not been increased. - Full unfiltered CI passes on current head `c7c2bcf08ffd05be5ce714683ae1dcfe6f5b49f1`: all 12 server shards, all six internal chat partitions, all nine serialized server shards, the workspace groups, native Runner lanes, typecheck, build and browser E2E. Both required [ci / verify](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41866478617/job/126711606613) and [ci / e2e](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41866478617/job/126711263146) pass. The file selector is skipped, so this is the full CI test matrix. The head has 55 successful checks and three expected skipped checks. The ready-for-review contributor trust and security scan also pass. - Current-head Greptile is 5/5, its check is successful, and no inline review threads remain. The ordinary review check also passes. No merge, deployment or original task retry was performed. ## Risks - A predecessor with unfinished cleanup keeps its successor queued. Its existing cleanup owner remains responsible for settlement. - A task claim reads at most one additional predecessor row. A matching source also uses the existing ownership and cleanup queries. The change adds no timer, schema, credential, provider or model policy. - A committed cleanup signal only requests normal admission. Current ownership and independent execution gates still apply. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code editing, tool use and PostgreSQL verification. The session does not expose a more specific serving model ID or context-window limit. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — focused suites pass; the separate local full-suite attempt is explicitly incomplete above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
aaea05e158 |
fix(native): preserve backups when completed warm sessions retire (#18986)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native Runner keeps provider history when a warm session ends. > - Object storage must preserve that history before the sandbox is released. > - A completed turn releases its live controller lease. > - The backup owner lookup rejects that released lease and stops the next task preparation. > - This pull request uses the existing completed-run checkpoint fence for backup storage. > - The next turn can prepare after the previous provider state is saved. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #18932, #18011, #18984. **What happened?** A warm Codex turn completed and kept its provider session alive. The next turn stopped during preparation with `native_harness_storage_owner_missing`. The backup lookup required a live lease after normal completion had released it. **Expected behavior** Save the completed session under its retained controller generation and committed result. Keep the existing owner and successor checks. Do not start another provider turn during the save. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a warm native session with object-backed provider backups. 2. Commit the first turn and release its controller lease. 3. Start the next task preparation and retire the previous session. 4. Observe the backup owner error before provider work starts. **Paperclip version or commit** The regression is present at `86814c6550f52e99ede150a883bdc773cbb540e3`. **Deployment mode** A hosted server with a remote native Runner and S3 storage. ## What Changed - Accept a released backup owner only when its exact controller record has a committed result. - Reuse the checkpoint owner policy for same-controller preparation and native successors. - Recheck the controller generation, committed result, and released state after upload. - Preserve live-owner rejection and the rule that a late upload cannot replace a newer conversation backup. - Add real PostgreSQL storage and restore regressions. Document the completed-run backup rule. ## Verification - On 2026-11-04, two new regressions failed on the unchanged source with `native_harness_storage_owner_missing`. These covered an idle completed session and a same-controller preparing successor. - After the fix, 54 selected tests passed: 30 durable backup tests and 24 existing early-retirement checkpoint tests. After the fixture-only upstream sync, all 58 selected storage, checkpoint, process, and affected fixture cases passed again. - The storage cases use real PostgreSQL, encrypted archives, object transfer, and restoration. They cover invalid completion evidence, foreign or expired successors, active predecessors, changed generations, changes during upload, and newer backup publication. - Command: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/native-runtime/native-harness-backup-storage.integration.test.ts server/src/services/native-runtime/native-runner-restart-recovery.integration.test.ts -t 'released|backup|early retirement|durably retires an accepted warm Runner'`. - An independent source review found no outstanding code issue. - Full repository typecheck passed with `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs` before the upstream fixture-only sync. Production source is unchanged across that sync. - An assembled process probe passed with the Runner binary built from this head and a fake Codex protocol peer. It started real processes, committed a result, released the source lease, claimed the next controller, and completed the source stop, drain, and suspend commands. It recorded one provider turn start and kept the task bound to its successor. - Command: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/native-runtime/native-runner-restart-recovery.integration.test.ts -t 'durably retires an accepted warm Runner'`. - CI exposed the old allocation-readiness test setup in three cases. The branch now includes the merged #18984 fixture correction. The same three cases passed locally after that sync. - An earlier CI test shard was cancelled after its runner received a shutdown signal. Its log was retained before one rerun. Another old-head shard reported failure with no retrievable job log or annotations; its cause remains unknown. Current-head CI must pass independently. - Local `pnpm build` passed at this head. All 1,904 chat cases passed across the supported local shards; the earlier shards used byte-identical source before the fixture-only sync. The interrupted default command is retained and is not reported as a pass. - The local bulk server run had separate enrollment acknowledgment, environment-run status, monitor-settle, idle-history teardown, and repository-rehome failures. In isolation, idle-history passed all 75 tests and the unchanged repository cases passed with their original limits (4.9s large files, 6.4s refs). The remaining four local failures reproduced on unchanged master `04a24f4e06` under the same environment and limits. Their causes remain unproven. Logs and the baseline comparison were retained; the local full suite is not claimed as passed. - Current-head CI first hit the unchanged repository-rehome large-file case's 15s timeout. The same isolated case passed in 4.9s. After source/call-path comparison, one bounded failed-shard retry passed all 115 executed suites; no assertion or timeout was changed. The original timeout remains recorded. - Local verification uses macOS 26.5.2 arm64, Node 26.4.0, pnpm 9.15.4, PostgreSQL 18.1, and Cargo 1.97.1. The current tested head is `622f69f76ff68c71eacdcbcbc6ab4d4c6eb83bf9`. - The full unfiltered [PR workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41868587974) passed at `622f69f76ff68c71eacdcbcbc6ab4d4c6eb83bf9`: all 12 general server, 3 chat, 9 serialized, workspace, native Runner, build/typecheck, E2E, and final verify lanes. The file selector was skipped, so this was the complete fallback matrix. - Greptile reports 5/5 on this exact head with no open review threads. Disposable local test processes were cleaned up and the source tree is clean. - The real hosted Codex and S3 workflow has not been rerun because the local verification environment has no remote provider credentials. The original task remains unchanged. ## Risks The main risk is a stale controller publishing provider history after a new owner starts. Both storage transactions keep the company, run, boot, and generation fence. A released owner must keep its committed result. Existing successor checks and the newer-backup publication guard remain in force. The live checkpoint writer still requires a non-null lease. No migration or API change is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks; separate baseline broad-suite failures are disclosed above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9b17aa2c98 |
test(evals): declare company addressed-human acknowledgement v4
Exercise canonical anyone audience and safe optional-note affordance while retaining enumerated answers and saved-reference proof. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
0af00a9024 |
fix(evals): admit actionable personal secret acknowledgements
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
639ddf3ad8 |
fix(evals): honor addressed human question authority
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
afbc5a885b |
fix(workspaces): save partial and shallow Git checkouts offline (#18990)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their workspaces. > - A completed remote run must save its files before finalization can release its source. > - A shallow Git mirror uses upload-pack and can omit objects that exist only in the index. > - A filtered source can also fail when that mirror requests blobs the source never downloaded. > - Fetching missing history is not required to preserve an existing partial checkout. > - This change saves the available object stores and their existing shallow, sparse, and promisor state. > - The benefit is an offline save that preserves accepted work and remains readable by the existing archive reader. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #16727, #18705, and #18935. These changes cover managed clones, streaming capture, and safe diagnostics. This change repairs Git snapshot contents. **What happened?** Remote workspace capture invokes a mirror clone before it saves the archive. A shallow filtered sparse checkout with a missing promised blob fails that clone and surfaces `remote_workspace_operation_failed`. An ordinary shallow checkout can also lose an index-only object during the mirror transfer. **Expected behavior** Capture preserves the objects already available in the checkout, including staged work. It preserves partial, shallow, and sparse semantics without remote hydration. Corrupt or unsupported state must keep its source and receive no successful save receipt. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a real Git repository with two paths and commit history. 2. Clone it with `--filter=blob:none --depth=1 --sparse`, then select one path. 3. Stage a change, edit it again, and add an untracked file. 4. Remove access to the original repository and capture the workspace. 5. The base capture fails before transfer. The changed capture restores the available work after the original source is removed. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `86814c655`. The same transport/archive sources are present in `76e43852a`. ## What Changed - Preserve existing object files for shallow and partial repositories, including their original promisor pack markers. - Preserve shallow boundaries and the selected sparse settings and patterns. - Validate available object contents with full Git fsck. Reject unknown corruption instead of creating new promises. - Deny Git network protocols during capture. Keep the ordinary mirror's explicit local file transport. - Exclude ambient Git location, index, object-store, config, and template overrides. Disable templates for init and clone. - Keep the existing archive format, source fences, path guards, credential allowlist, and failure retention. - Add real command and reader regressions for full, shallow, filtered, sparse, corrupt, and unsupported repositories. ## Verification - Red: the compiled Node 24 transport completed helper installation, then failed capture with the same generic operation error and no transfer. Dirty source bytes remained intact. - Red: the new full/shallow/partial transport-to-reader cases exposed both filtered upload-pack failure and a missing staged-only object. Independent review then reproduced accepted corrupt object bytes and ambient template config/hook copying. - Green: all 110 transport/archive cases pass after those repairs. They cover staged, dirty, and untracked work; ordinary and forged-promisor corruption; malformed filters; alternate stores; unsafe links; credential redaction; and template isolation. An initial linked-worktree config regression was fixed before this complete passing run. - A compiled new capture restored through both the unchanged earlier reader and the new reader after source removal. HEAD, status, work bytes, sparse/shallow state, and the same missing promised object were preserved. Full Git fsck passed. No remote protocol was permitted. - Full repository `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass at `91ca00a8327216def91303e19940e92ffe07c08f`. The build stamp names that exact head. - The [complete current-head CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41865961403/attempts/2) is green: all 58 checks are terminal with no failure or pending check. Three expected skips and one neutral review remain those states. - Preserve the [first CI attempt](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41865961403/attempts/1): one browser case reached its 5-second heading deadline while the conversation pane was loading; a chat worker reported shutdown; another browser worker lost communication and its log blob was absent. A failed-job-only retry passed at the same source head. No test deadline, assertion, or source change was made for that retry. - The complete local `pnpm test:run` passed all 1,904 chat cases across six partitions. Its later general-server phase timed out two unchanged tool-access cases at 15 seconds. That known-red command was stopped before completion. Both cases then passed unchanged in a fresh isolated process. The original timeout cause remains unknown; this is not a full local-suite pass. - [Greptile reports 5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18990#issuecomment-6635931211) at the current head with no actionable finding. The product review's loose-object cost advisory was [answered with local measurements and resolved](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18990#discussion_r4470261833). There are no unresolved review threads. - Original service acceptance remains unverified. Recorded checkout text is mechanism-compatible narrative evidence, not proof of its physical Git state or original failure cause. This PR includes no deployment or additional live recovery. ## Risks - Full object validation and copying available metadata use CPU and temporary space proportional to the local object store. - The offline path rejects alternate object stores and unsupported partial filters. Such sources remain protected. - Promised objects remain missing. Later work still needs ordinary repository access to request them. - There is no archive format or schema change. Existing readers restore standard Git files, and existing full snapshots remain covered. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, shell execution, and local verification. The host does not expose a more specific serving model ID or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e968131efa |
test(evals): pin reviewed outcome and native handoff repairs (#18976)
## Thinking Path > - The catalog must measure the original human requests through ordinary product controls. > - The latest four-case run exposed two oracle false negatives and a real suppressed native handoff. > - Preserve those original failures and fix only their demonstrated causes. > - Keep the reviewed company-selector successor and add the accepted timeline, approved-replay and personal-completion corrections. > - Select native standing-chat terminal answers by authority while preserving governed waits and ordinary-task behavior. > - Bind the resulting immutable candidate and its three changed oracle versions through the existing manifest and descriptor snapshot. > - The next personal-secret attempt must prove the complete secure-entry and worker journey before company selection or a final ten-case regression. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18971, #18967, #18968, #18972, #18977. Follows #18974. The latest four-case run retained original failures for timeline, approved tool replay and personal-secret setup. Team installation independently passed. The personal native run had actionable final directions, but presentation selected an earlier ordinary comment and suppressed that answer. This pin makes the reviewed corrections available; it does not regrade those attempts or claim a new native pass. ## What Changed - Pin immutable candidate `5f5e2ca8f18063d051c3d948105f0049562fe4ce` on `codex/chat-catalog-four-outcome-repairs-20261104`. - Refresh the existing descriptor snapshot and matching manifest metadata: timeline v5, app-review v5 and personal-secret v4. Company v3 is retained. Preserve the prior reviewed company recipient correction. - Include the reviewed structural standing-chat response selection and finished-turn recovery, preserving earlier comment history, governed interaction ownership and no-final fallback. The superseded prose classifier is absent. - Preserve all 244 identities, original queries, provider/model, human and native counts, clocks, launcher bytes, private evidence limits and qualification holds. The existing SDK registry/compiler proof is unchanged. - The infrastructure change is three metadata files. No product fix is merged by this PR; its owning core PR remains separate. ## Verification - Exact final candidate: 510 owning tests passed across 19 suites, including catalog contract/consistency and lazy declaration loading. The candidate declares 242 cases plus two existing legacy tasks; no fixture callbacks execute during admission. - Candidate response summary suite: 96 tests passed. The owner separately reports 103 summary/notice controls and 14 recovery PostgreSQL controls; these are distinct from candidate results. - Candidate PostgreSQL scope/recovery controls: four passed (three native/ordinary/legacy caller scopes and the new server-finished yielded unknown-channel recovery). The focused filter left 52 unrelated controls unselected. Earlier setup attempts failed before assertions due missing native library links and plugin-sdk output; package-cwd shipped hydration and one owning SDK compiler build enabled this final actual run. No source workaround, timeout change or acceptance weakening was used. - Two deliberate baseline joins preserve the frozen candidate: the caller test adds only its required `issueComments` import; recovery adds only current-conversation matching yielded result/terminal with no owned interaction, retaining all existing succeeded/completed/session/ownership/authorization guards. The test adds only `statusDecisions` and needed fixture options. Fresh-master ordinary `needs_review` behavior and unrelated imports were not copied. - All 131 existing pin, TestOps contract/API, adapter, reconciliation and streaming controls passed. The descriptor snapshot exactly matches the candidate declaration bytes. Diff whitespace checks passed. - SDK source guard: 506 inputs, `changed: false`, `runtimePinsChanged: false`, registry `efa70621e9fb42aa185f7ee616a1a726aa3eccb367e67e28817cedf26ef2ade8`. The local compiler invocation supplied missing ignored test output; it is not a renewed SDK qualification or runtime certificate. - Existing reporting-lock guard returned `already-reviewed`. Fresh protected master `86814c6550f52e99ede150a883bdc773cbb540e3` has admitted lock `60f4c06bca47af3ab9d74281f2ef2e1ff559d566b862ba51c2fbe6c8e5bac35b`. Repeat the existing serving-master guard after merge and before a new Submit. - The earlier pin run exposed a pre-existing remote-failure-retention fixture failure. Normal protected merge #18984 repaired that baseline on master `04a24f4e06da68043378bdf3646f50292efd5316`; its 47 real jobs and aggregates succeeded despite delayed GitHub UI/API status projection. This branch normally merges that actual master. Its three pin metadata files are byte-identical to prior reviewed head `dec78737cc520ce6d489fb8bfccafb460b79e870`, with the same immutable candidate, descriptor bytes and model/count/clock/provenance fields. No baseline fixture patch was duplicated in this PR. - On updated head `bd5402d4688e690ffd9f1f80081577733ceeda25`, the existing 131 controls pass, reporting lock is already reviewed, and existing `selectedCases` admits exactly case 580 without execution. Fresh actual master lock remains admitted. - Exact-head normal CI run 41865757115 has completed its full actual job set: 48 succeeded and one legitimate selector skip, including `ci / e2e` and `ci / verify`. RunsOn completion records and exact GitHub aggregate logs corroborate the results. Windows run 41865757064 completed SUCCESS; its exact log reports all executed Rust test results as passing. GitHub UI/API/check-rollup projections still contain stale queued/in-progress rows, as independently observed during #18984; this is not a claim that those displayed rows are green. A normal protected merge must be accepted by GitHub without override. - Fresh exact-head Greptile is 5/5, the current Paperclip assessment explicitly says 5/5 and Ship, all review threads are resolved (zero threads), and the security scan succeeded. Earlier company-only checks are not used to qualify this head. Full repository build/typecheck/test were not repeated locally for this metadata PR; owning source checks and ordinary hosted CI provide the relevant gates. - No model run, dispatch, retry, cancellation, secret mutation or merge was performed by this update. ## Risks The structural correction changes final-answer selection only for admitted native standing conversations; it still needs a new real secure-entry journey. Oracle corrections can admit previously rejected wording, so retained positive and negative controls remain required. Original failed and unknown attempts are immutable. Company selection remains gated on actual personal-secret secure-entry/worker proof, and all 244 cases remain unqualified as a whole. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex. Capabilities used: source analysis, isolated integration and local checks. The host does not expose the context-window limit. The evaluated model remains OpenCode/OpenRouter `deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017`. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — manifest and expected-pin assertion agree - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — actual job/aggregate results passed; stale UI/API projection is disclosed above - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1104.0-canary.10 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
04a24f4e06 |
test(recovery): align retained allocation fixture with readiness (#18984)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Restart recovery must preserve the original remote allocation and its files. > - #18934 readies that same retained allocation before preparation. > - The older #18936 failure fixture rejects every readiness call. > - It stops before the intended preparation-failure boundary. > - This change updates only that fixture and checks the original allocation identity. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The three remote preparation retention cases fail after #18934. Their driver stub throws `Reattachment must not resume the allocation`. The production code now calls readiness on the same validated lease before preparation, so the test never reaches its intended execution failure. **Expected behavior** The fixture should allow readiness of the original allocation. It must reject replacement acquisition and retain its preparation-error, ownership, saved-file and retention checks. **Steps to reproduce** Run `src/__tests__/heartbeat-native-remote-failure-retention.test.ts` on master `86814c6550`. All three cases stop at the stale readiness stub. Refs #18934 and #18936. This one-file baseline correction is split from #18970 so it can unblock the shared failure also observed on #18977. It carries no core API change or evaluation source pin. ## What Changed - Return the original lease from the fixture readiness stub. - Assert exactly one readiness call for the original company, environment, run, workspace, provider allocation and remote path. - Assert that no new allocation is acquired. Keep all existing preparation failure, ownership and retained-work assertions. ## Verification - Before #18934, the three existing cases passed locally. On the actual merged #18934 contract, they reproduced the three CI failures in 18.06 seconds. - With this fixture correction, all three passed in 11.83 seconds. Production runtime code and the original 60-second case deadline are unchanged. - The corrected test blob and its relevant production/helper blobs match the already-tested merged-source proof. Current master still has the same stale test blob; this isolated PR applies only the identical fixture correction. - Command from `server/`: `node ../node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --config vitest.config.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-native-remote-failure-retention.test.ts`. - `git diff --check` passes. Full repository typecheck/build were not rerun for this one-file fixture split; fresh normal CI and review are pending. - [Original failing CI job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41855440307/job/126665077718). It remains failed; no remote retry was used as proof. ## Risks - Low scope: test fixture only. A readiness call for a replacement or wrong allocation fails the identity assertions. - This does not alter production recovery, permissions, cleanup policy, evaluation deadlines or grading. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with reasoning, repository inspection, code editing and tool execution. The host did not expose the model context-window limit. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
5f5e2ca8f1 |
test(heartbeat): retain mutable recovery event fault fixture
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
225145192e |
fix(heartbeat): preserve server-finished conversation replies
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
2a74888341 |
fix(evals): distinguish unbound roles from different actors
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
3ab4c99afa |
style(evals): keep credential exclusion rationale in review
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e4d6f9bc8f |
style(evals): keep personal handoff rationale in review
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
855b98e005 |
chore(evals): remove added company credential comment
Keep the company helper executable source unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
57509a283b |
chore(evals): remove added shared credential comments
Preserve baseline comments and executable source while following the contribution requirements. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f3d21b7456 |
style(e2e): keep tool review rationale in the PR description
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
3159a9ccd5 |
style(evals): keep timeline rationale in review description
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
2692048d16 |
fix(evals): distinguish timeline dates from explicit runners
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
3a6ced46b0 |
fix(heartbeat): keep native chat compatibility fallback closed
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f14e6a2a62 |
fix(heartbeat): select native conversation finals by authority
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a9c7c53724 |
fix(evals): preserve timeline structure across soft wraps
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
07b67a517b |
test(evals): version personal confirmation semantics explicitly
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
2b19fc60ab |
fix(evals): distinguish own-value completion from permission answers
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
1c92458033 |
fix(heartbeat): deliver final handoff after progress promises
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
34d8e441a4 |
test(e2e): match the approved replay provider error contract
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
5409a10bad |
fix(evals): retain quoted timeline bullets as milestones
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
86814c6550 |
fix(recovery): ready retained sandboxes before preparation (#18934)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work performed by AI agents. > - Restart recovery must preserve each run's workspace and execution owner. > - A retained remote lease can refer to an archived sandbox. > - The reattachment path returned that lease without making it ready. > - A short project-authentication command then had to start the sandbox. > - This PR resumes and verifies the exact retained allocation before preparation. > - Recovery keeps the recorded workspace and preserves saved work if resume fails. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native run resumed after a controller restart. Its saved sandbox had been archived. Reattachment returned its lease without a provider lifecycle resume. The next project-authentication probe tried to start that sandbox with its 15-second command budget. The start failed before the probe could inspect project settings. The heartbeat reported a configuration conflict and stopped work. **What did you expect to happen?** Make the exact retained sandbox ready through the existing bounded lifecycle operation. Verify its allocation before running short preparation commands. Keep the validated lease and recorded working directory. Never acquire a replacement in this path. **Steps to reproduce** Hold the provider's exact-lease resume pending and call remote reattachment for an active ephemeral lease. Before this change, acquisition returns immediately. The added tests hold acquisition until resume completes and reject missing, changed or expired allocation evidence. Provider compatibility cases retain the recorded workspace when resume omits directory metadata or returns the allocation root. **Deployment mode** Native Runner in a sandbox with a retained workspace and managed AI connection. The observed provider was Daytona. Refs #18910, which restores selection of retries using current remote workspace storage. This change repairs the next preparation boundary. Related #17421 and #18559 change project-file inspection; they do not make retained sandbox leases ready. ## What Changed - Resume the exact validated sandbox lease before returning it to preparation. - Require the receipt to confirm the original provider allocation without reporting expiration. - Keep the original database lease and recorded directory. Resume metadata can describe the allocation root. - Pass the existing typed resume-directory input through the runtime facade. - Preserve retained E2B sandboxes when resume timeout setup or workspace inspection fails. Keep new-allocation cleanup and explicit release/destroy behavior. - Preserve plugin-task reattachment and lease identity checks. - Update the Stop-accounting fixture to confirm exact-allocation resume before cleanup, with its budget, ownership and no-paid-work assertions intact. - Document the ordering and add readiness, receipt, failure and ownership regressions. ## Verification - Red: seven initial retained-lease cases failed before the readiness change. Two receipt-compatibility cases and four E2B preservation cases failed before their fixes. - Green: all four runtime, workspace-preparation, heartbeat-recovery and orchestrator suites pass: **442 tests**. - The Stop-accounting CI failure reproduced locally. All **five** integration cases pass with the exact-allocation resume fixture. - All **22 E2B tests**, the standalone plugin typecheck and its build pass. - **13 Daytona safety cases** pass, including recorded directories, allocation sentinel rejection, saved-file reads and no replacement creation. The SDK boundary is simulated; the saved-file case uses real files and a POSIX shell. - These focused checks cover **482 passing cases**. - Full recursive typecheck, final server typecheck and full workspace build pass on macOS arm64 with Node 24.22.2 and PostgreSQL 18.1. - Greptile is **5/5** on head `32f915a475275680bcf2a2aa43ae0c72f4e4b1db`. Both original review threads are resolved. - All current-head CI gates pass. The check rollup has 54 successful checks, three skipped checks and one neutral check. - The separate Paperclip Review check remains queued. Its public response says work is paused and the request is saved. The review task is waiting for saved-file recovery, so no Paperclip assessment of this head is claimed. The branch-required gate has passed. - A read-only deployed trace showed an archived sandbox start fail at the short probe's 15-second deadline. Actual provider reattachment with this revision has not been exercised. Live recovery remains unverified until rollout. ## Risks Recovery now makes one bounded lifecycle call before short preparation commands. A missing resume capability or a missing, changed or expired allocation receipt holds recovery. The existing runtime and provider retain allocation and sentinel verification. The path does not acquire, release, replace or reseed the lease. Warm providers can return their existing allocation. E2B retains the existing sandbox if resume setup fails; explicit lifecycle cleanup still owns its removal. No background polling, credential-policy change, migration, workflow change or lockfile change is added. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, source inspection, tool use and code execution. The exact backend snapshot and context window were not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9e087f06dc |
test(evals): distinguish deployment credential purpose from recipients
Normalize only the bound deployment key and its display name before named-recipient checks; retain foreign consumer rejection and saved-binding gates. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
1d1589ce89 |
test(evals): bind named company secret completion recipients
Port only the reviewed company selector and focused controls from the e757 candidate successor. Keep ordinary completion language and the existing saved-binding proof. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
32e5eada06 |
test(evals): pin reviewed attribution and secure question repairs (#18974)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip must complete work through ordinary human and agent controls. > - The remote chat campaign exposed observer and setup defects as well as product discovery gaps. > - Case 466 rejected a valid handoff that used headings, pronouns and inline HTML. > - Case 487 seeded three daily runs although its declared journey needs six. > - Secure-entry replies used a real bound question card that the observer did not support. > - Team installation omitted its existing strict request schemas from the API search result. > - This PR pins the reviewed coherent repairs and keeps their metadata in sync. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18921. Refs #18964. Refs #18967. Refs #18968. Refs #18970. Refs #18971. Refs #18972. The previous launch remains unchanged. Case 53 passed its latest native attempt. Cases 466, 487, 580 and 610 still retain their prior failures. The next representative run must test the repaired conditions. The company-secret case follows only after the personal-secret journey proves real secure entry and worker use. Its separate case-local follow-up is held for a later pin; case 578 is excluded from the next four-case selection and has no pass credit. ## What Changed - Pin immutable candidate `e757e447371c4781a3eff3a0ea9dc9c4eceb060a` and its existing descriptor snapshot. - Record the explicit oracle versions and source-file changes for timeline attribution, review fixture allowance, and bound personal/company secret questions. - Keep all 244 case identities, human requests, original run and action counts, time allowances, provider/model, private evidence limits and broader qualification holds unchanged. - Preserve the actual request-body schema affordance for team preview and installation, existing response links and prior help. ## Verification - The final integrated candidate passed 442 owning checks across 18 suites. All 242 declarations loaded with zero fixture callbacks; the existing manifest joins those declarations and two legacy tasks into 244 cases. - The team service fixture passed 29 tests. The frozen candidate API consumer passed 2045 tests after the three-line schema exposure change. These are component controls, not a new native pass. - The stale inventory expectation reproduced one failure with 16 passes. Its unchanged derivation traces five previously reviewed YAML corrections. Updating only the expected constant passed 17 controls, and the existing definition-drift and catalog-tamper negatives still passed. No scenario YAML changed in this candidate. - The existing SDK guard confirms all 506 inputs are unchanged and the reviewed registry remains `efa70621e9fb42aa185f7ee616a1a726aa3eccb367e67e28817cedf26ef2ade8`. No compiler build or registry renewal was needed. - The existing pin, TestOps contract, adapter, reconciliation and streaming controls passed locally. Current master also passed the existing reporting-lock guard with its actual current lock. - The final source includes the reviewed immediate-actor/consecutive-pronoun controls and checks every rendered question title, header and submit label for unsafe instructions. The remaining fixed scanner reasons are diagnostic only. The combined source passed 442 checks; all 131 pin/contract/API/streaming controls passed. - Fresh exact-head [normal CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41847423336) passed: 48 successful jobs and one selector skip, including both required aggregates. Greptile reports 5/5 for this head, with no actionable findings or unresolved review threads. The current optional Paperclip review is queued and is not credited as an assessment pass; its prior-head 5/5 remains historical. The finite source peer review found no material issue and did not claim native execution. The prior CI attempt is retained. No new native pass is claimed by this PR. ## Risks The new source repairs observation and setup, but it does not prove the next native outcome. The secure-entry accounting records one real chat request and one authenticated UI answer as the two declared human actions; it keeps the raw comment count separate. The question path requires the bound pending card, actual resolver audit and delivery facts. Ordinary cases retain their existing accounting. Private scans and archive limits can still reject evidence. Prior failed and unknown attempts remain immutable. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex. Capabilities used: source analysis, integration and local checks. The host does not expose the context-window limit. The evaluated model stays OpenCode/OpenRouter `deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017`. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
84e9c8f364 |
fix(retry): wait for admitted source cleanup before dispatch (#18898)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connected-task Retry keeps the original request and its current authority. > - One durable Retry can already own a queued successor. > - The old native environment can still have pending cleanup before that successor starts. > - The task execution lock points to the successor, so the old cleanup can escape the queue claim check. > - Dispatch then refuses the source state and fails the new run before provider work. > - This pull request keeps that same run queued and wakes dispatch when cleanup changes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18845, #18853, #18860, #18877, #18882 and #18932. These repairs cover preservation binding, interrupted preparation, old native ownership, manual native holds or other setup guards. This change covers an already admitted connected-task Retry whose native predecessor still owes cleanup. It uses the shared cleanup predicate so the manual-hold repair remains with its existing owner. Search found no duplicate queued-source cleanup repair. **What happened?** A board Retry saved its exact chat request and admitted one queued successor. The source lease was still pending cleanup when that successor reached dispatch. A retained stop receipt did not settle the full cleanup contract. The queue checked the task's current execution owner, which was already the successor. The native authorization guard then rejected the predecessor state and failed the new run before provider dispatch. **Expected behavior** Keep the same canonical Retry and queued run while the exact source cleanup is pending. After authoritative settlement, submit that run through normal dispatch once. Do not infer safe execution from a stop-and-retain receipt alone. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Retry an authorized connected request from a failed native run. 2. Admit one successor while capacity keeps it queued. 3. Leave or restore the source lease to pending cleanup with a matching retained stop receipt. 4. Release capacity and resume the ordinary queue. 5. The old claim path starts the successor and the native source guard refuses it. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against master at `f77499283270d2e966aabd58493f9d35c6bbdf5f`. **Deployment mode** The regression uses the real HTTP route, chat authorization, queue claims, disposable PostgreSQL and the production work coordinator on macOS arm64. A controlled adapter supplies the final result. No hosted provider replay or deployment is claimed. ## What Changed - Validate the exact canonical Retry, chat action, company, task, agent, source and successor before testing source cleanup. - Keep the successor queued under the existing issue claim lock while the shared cleanup predicate remains pending. - Wake only the scoped queued-dispatch worker after cleanup or exact workspace-owner release commits. Add no timer or background scan. - Verify pending cleanup at intake, later cleanup invalidation, one final execution, idempotency, Stop, changed input, unknown stop receipts, a different live controller and signed sandbox absence followed by owner release. - Document the queued-wait contract. No schema, endpoint, credential, model or provider policy changes are required. - Align five native preparation acceptance fixtures with the existing workspace publication contract. Use the real reservation and publication owner. Retain a raw-root refusal case with no provider launch and preserved files. ## Verification - Latest master sync at `e26cad76b8f20ba823d702ed60e7b7294f8f5a7c` includes master `396b7fc62a0a4b1d8aadbda8221c05879d54177c`. The shared test helper preserves #18944's canonical retained-directory default, the real publisher for the five fresh-workspace cases, and the explicit raw-root refusal. Independent remerge review found no dropped upstream behavior, guard or assertion. - The latest head passes the focused six cases, all 580 complete workspace/continuation tests, all 38 selected HTTP Retry cases, fresh full recursive Node 24.22.2 types and full build. No affected tests skipped. An initial cached test-layer attempt read old budget declarations; regenerating them resolved all seven errors without test/mock or production-export changes. - All current-head CI is green at `e26cad76b8f20ba823d702ed60e7b7294f8f5a7c`, including required [ci / verify](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41846304017/job/126636751314) and [ci / e2e](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41846304017/job/126636638086). Greptile and Paperclip Review both rate this exact head 5/5, with no findings or open review threads. - Master sync at `3e4f266c2da172a84afd0b9cb4a91ea3b95f3c0d` merges master `b891e69bd23d6dab8ce536569e15bc4a7a31c35c`. The only conflicts were adjacent queue imports and two HTTP Retry test matrices. Both imports and both complete matrices remain unchanged. Independent review found no relaxed guard or assertion. - Node 24.22.2 and pnpm 9.15.4: all 38 selected real HTTP Retry cases, 194 queue/cleanup/finalizer cases, module boundaries, recursive types and build pass at `3e4f266c2da172a84afd0b9cb4a91ea3b95f3c0d`. - That sync head's [server check](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41838741852/job/126604742761) failed five native acceptance cases in CI and locally with `remote_workspace_published_path_invalid`. The test fixture supplied a raw directory instead of a fresh publisher-generated workspace. The guard from #18932 remains unchanged. The same five cases passed earlier Linux CI before that guard was present. - The test-only alignment at `dcdee1bb6c2e2e6dd494382499d17c23a3ce71a8` obtains the saved authority, path and run reference from real `reserveRemoteWorkspace` and `prepareRemoteWorkspace`. All five original cases and a raw-root no-launch/no-result/files-preserved control pass. Their native result, file, catalog and single-execution assertions remain intact. An initial setup attempt was refused for a noncanonical allocation root; the fixture now resolves that owned root before publication. - At previous fixture head `dcdee1bb6c2e2e6dd494382499d17c23a3ce71a8`, the generated server test-layer typecheck passed. All 580 tests in the complete workspace/continuation family pass, with no skips. That test-only commit left production files byte-identical to the sync head. - Previous published-head CI was green at `dcdee1bb6c2e2e6dd494382499d17c23a3ce71a8`, including required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`. The [Linux Node 24.22.2 server shard](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41842665765/job/126618334638) executed all five original acceptance cases and the new raw-root refusal case successfully. Its whole workspace recovery file passed all 245 tests. - Greptile reviewed previous published head `dcdee1bb6c2e2e6dd494382499d17c23a3ce71a8` at 5/5, with no findings or open review threads. No unchanged-job rerun was used for the reproduced sync-head failure. - Causal red: the real HTTP regression started and failed the successor at the native source-state guard while cleanup remained pending. A second red proved that signed sandbox absence followed by copyback-owner release lacked a queued-dispatch wake. - Green: seven HTTP/PostgreSQL cleanup cases, the exact confirmed-owner release notification control and seven existing retry lineage controls pass. The real coordinator resumes from committed cleanup or workspace-owner release, without a manual queue restart. One controlled adapter execution produces the result after settlement. - Earlier branch verification passed full repository `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, module boundaries and `git diff --check`. - The full stale-queue file control passed all 64 cases with unchanged observer/hook limits. The initial broader affected run had 192 passes and one non-assignee native-owner case miss its existing five-second adapter observer while already running with no error. The isolated case passed; the unchanged base passed all 64 cases but hit its existing 30-second teardown timeout. Those original results are retained. The new queue hint has no dispatch consumer in that fixture. - Earlier-head CI was green: 54 success, three skipped and two neutral checks at `6adb9f1ba682282c512d5e751ba2aa663f614ca2`. One chat job was cancelled by an external runner shutdown; its single unchanged-job rerun passed. No source was changed to obtain that result. - Greptile and Paperclip Review both rated earlier head `6adb9f1ba682282c512d5e751ba2aa663f614ca2` 5/5 with no findings or unresolved threads. These results do not qualify the master-sync head. - At initial verification, a complete local `pnpm test:run` was not repeated while the related setup repair's full local run was active. The full earlier-head CI suites passed. A full local suite has not been repeated for the mechanical master sync. Local verification uses the affected HTTP, producer, lineage and queue suites. No full local-suite pass is claimed. - The fresh clone's missing plugin SDK links were repaired with the repository's own postinstall helper before verification. The embedded PostgreSQL package's own symlink helper was also required. - No staging task was submitted again with this repair, and no deployment is claimed. ## Risks - A pending source cleanup can keep the queued run waiting. Its cleanup owner still owns reconciliation and its existing limits. - Stop, changed source, unknown termination and live ownership retain their existing authority checks. A cleanup notification grants no execution authority. - A new cleanup change after claim still faces the existing final dispatch guard. - Cleanup notifications can change dispatch timing in a running controller. The real coordinator cases verify commit-bound wakeups; the broader current queue-file control passed all 64 cases. The earlier loaded-run and baseline teardown failures are retained in verification. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code editing, tool use, PostgreSQL and browser verification. This session does not expose a more specific deployment model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
5d226ca08a |
perf(chat): reuse bound-run authorization query templates (#18966)
This PR depends on #18969. Merge that fixture-only prerequisite first, then retarget this PR to master. No merge or deployment is requested in this work. Its base is `codex/fix-recovery-published-workspace-fixture`; the six-line recovery fixture repair is excluded from this diff. ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - External chat authorization binds each run to current messages and conversation policy. > - Review wait and attention-retention paths repeat the same four-table read. > - Each call rebuilt the Drizzle query even when its SQL shape stayed the same. > - This pull request reuses the compiled template for the exact database handle and lock mode. > - Fresh parameters and current database reads preserve authorization while reducing Node CPU work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The `authorizeChatConversationForBoundRun` links read used by external chat waits and attachment reuse. **Current behavior** At baseline `e54f9fbf828e06e385e0c62dc381ccb46190aa30`, each call rebuilt and serialized a four-table query. The observed staging shape accounted for 16.2% of sampled SQL serialization CPU across 32 samples. This is a share of query compilation CPU, not total server CPU. **Proposed behavior** Compile each read, blocking-lock or NOWAIT variant once per exact live database or transaction object. Bind new company, issue, agent, provider and comment IDs on every execution. Continue all current database reads and authorization checks. **Reason and benefit** Repeated authorized service calls used 26.91% less Node process CPU in the matched local fixture. All seven CPU pairs improved. This reduces repeated compilation on the shared service path. Related: #18896 retains task Retry intent through identity contention. It changes a different workflow and does not reuse this query template. A public issue and PR search found no duplicate template change. ROADMAP.md has no conflicting planned feature. ## What Changed - Keep compiled queries in a `WeakMap` keyed by the exact supplied database or transaction object. Create only the requested lock variant. Never cache a result or authority decision. - Bind the comment list as `ANY(uuid[])`. This supports changing list sizes with only three templates per live handle. Keep all joins, selected fields, policy checks and lock clauses. - Add real PostgreSQL regression tests, a reusable fixture, an actual service benchmark and a dated performance note. ## Verification - Passed 17 real PostgreSQL tests: `node node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/prepared-chat-authorization.integration.test.ts server/src/services/native-runtime/chat-attachment-reuse.test.ts`. - After rebasing, seven selected existing external-chat-wait integration cases passed (266 deselected). They cover small current review waits, answered-chat identity advisory locks, connection-disable serialization and contended endpoint proof retry. - New tests cover changed parameters and list sizes, duplicate/empty inputs, invalid UUID errors, company/agent/provider binding, current setup generation and credential fingerprints, root/transaction/savepoint isolation, rollback, read mode during a held row lock, blocking timeout and NOWAIT contention. - Actual service benchmark: `node --import ./server/node_modules/tsx/dist/loader.mjs server/scripts/benchmark-bound-chat-authorization.ts --baseline-ref=e54f9fbf828e06e385e0c62dc381ccb46190aa30`. Node 24.22.2, macOS arm64, real PostgreSQL, 500 warmup calls per implementation, seven alternating pairs of 500 calls. Every result matched. - Pinned measured treatment `8386eb78d118faaf6c2fd7f7471b38c0f4b2ef54`. Its source is unchanged after rebasing onto master. Median Node CPU per 500 calls: 379.033 ms to 277.048 ms, down 26.91%. Every CPU pair improved by 13.54–33.52%. Median wall time: 742.109 ms to 648.005 ms. One wall pair increased by 0.51%. - A separate diagnostic after timing found five SQL compilations per baseline call and four per warm treatment call. All five database reads still run. - The final four-test PostgreSQL authorization suite passed again after rebasing and strengthening the lock proof. It holds only a message-link row, so principal advisory contention cannot mask a missing joined-query lock. - Independent source review found no correctness issue in exact-handle ownership, fresh binding or the three lock variants. - Preserve setup failures: the first test attempt lacked plugin SDK build output. Shared and SDK builds fixed it. Later attempts could not start embedded PostgreSQL because its local dependency directory lacked bundled native-library aliases. `DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH` did not fix it. Restoring package-local aliases fixed the environment; the final 17 tests then passed. No dependency or lockfile change is included. - The first full typecheck found new test-only errors: PostgreSQL transaction handles lack the root database `$client` type, and runtime setup test data includes fields outside the saved setup interface. Commit `40a4645750` uses the existing explicit transaction test cast and SQL JSON fixtures. No production contract changed. The full check also found local plugin SDK link prerequisites, which the coordinator is repairing separately. - Preserve the first Linux CI failure: [server shard 9](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41837775564/job/126602280304) failed the new setup-fence fixture's allowed case. The fixture supplied a client `processedAt` while PostgreSQL supplied default `receivedAt`; this could violate the required processing order. The test now uses explicit ordered timestamps and no wall-clock window. The four-test PostgreSQL suite passed again in 19.93 seconds. Production guards were not weakened. - [Server shard 2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41837775564/job/126602280291) also failed five workspace-recovery cases with `remote_workspace_published_path_invalid`. Those failures reproduced on both pure master and the exact CI merge with the chat optimization removed. #18969 fixes the canonical path in that separate fixture, with five failing cases before and five passing after. This PR is stacked on that independent repair for final CI. - The additional Paperclip review reported a node-postgres statement-name collision and requested explicit pool cleanup. This repository uses postgres-js; locked Drizzle 0.45.2 accepts the Drizzle label but does not use or forward it. [The review response](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18966#issuecomment-6632666599) links primary driver source and the database factory. Commit `c5d0d84f36` adds explicit pool teardown in `try/finally` and a real same-transaction `read → blocking → nonblocking → read` case. All five authorization tests passed in 6.47 seconds. The original separate row-lock test remains. Production SQL and code did not change. - Final combined local validation at `4ab58ff70b` passed full `pnpm -r typecheck` (39.864 seconds) and 35 real PostgreSQL cases across the chat, GitHub and shared prepared-query suites (11.378 seconds). Full `pnpm build` passed earlier with byte-identical production source; later changes affect tests only. The production file SHA matches the benchmark and this PR. The original full `pnpm test:run` was interrupted after all six chat shards passed and general tests had partly run, so it is not a full local pass. Final current-head CI provides the broader coverage. A sandbox retry failed with EPERM before assertions; the identical escalated commands then passed. Final head passed CI in [workflow 41843806060](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41843806060), including all build, typecheck, general, serialized and e2e test gates. The previous head `40a464575009dfc3cce7afa1eb4fffa5540dcaf6` passed Greptile 5/5, security review, typecheck, build and canary validation. The prior stacked head `74cb36370162750f8e135ed091603d3629d23b0d` passed full CI, Greptile 5/5, policy and security checks. Final head `c5d0d84f369d897a66d9b6441bab10cb79f593b9` passed a fresh Greptile 5/5 review with no actionable findings, security and PR policy checks. Its complete [current-head CI workflow passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41843806060). All 54 required CI, Greptile, policy and security checks passed. The optional Paperclip Review check is queued for this head; no current-head score is claimed. Production source SHA-256 remains `72ce9d2317e5c97b36e299e24e30fc1aa63020d8c266e495fc45dbfdd5331e93`, identical to the measured code. ## Risks - `ANY(uuid[])` relies on postgres-js array binding and UUID casting. Real PostgreSQL tests cover single and multiple valid values and invalid UUID errors. - A new transaction or savepoint pays its first compilation cost. The weak cache cannot reuse a root session for it. This benchmark covers repeated calls on one root handle. - The team paused other work during the benchmark. Unrelated Rust compilation was active elsewhere on the host. Process CPU excludes those processes, but host contention can affect caches, scheduling and wall time. This source-mode local result does not prove production request latency or whole-server CPU savings. - No migration or API contract changes. No deployment or merge is included. Monitor authorization failures and lock-contention behavior after an authorized rollout; revert the narrow service change if those regress. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, tool use and test execution. The host did not expose a context-window size or deployment snapshot ID. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
2cbfc35a07 |
perf(github): reuse the inherited review wait query template (#18965)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - External review waits check current GitHub review and publication bindings. > - The GitHub service rebuilds the same seven-table Drizzle query on each check. > - A sampled production window attributed 6.3% of SQL serialization CPU to this query shape. > - This pull request prepares that query once per exact database or transaction object. > - Each call still reads current provenance, review, connection and publication state. > - The local service benchmark reduces median client CPU per read by 24.35%. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Repeated `readInheritedGitHubReviewWait` calls from external review wait reads and attention retention. **Subsystem affected** Server GitHub chat review waits. **Current behavior** Every call constructs and serializes the same joined SELECT. The database driver already supports prepared statements. That setting does not reuse the JavaScript query template. **Proposed behavior** Compile the existing selector once for each supplied database, transaction or savepoint object. Bind company, issue, agent and comment IDs on each execution. Keep every current database read and check. **Reason and benefit** Remove repeated query construction and serialization CPU. Do not cache rows or authorization decisions. Exact open-PR searches found no duplicate query-template change. ## What Changed - Add an exact-handle `WeakMap` for the GitHub review selector and execute it with fresh placeholders. - Preserve the SQL projection, joins, JSON types, latest-review order and all current authority checks. - Extend real PostgreSQL tests for new bindings, warm-cache revocation, latest heads and transaction/savepoint rollback. - Capture prepared executions in the existing test helper. - Add an actual-service benchmark and a report with every timing sample and setup failure. ## Verification - `github-review-wait.test.ts`: 16 tests passed on real PostgreSQL. - `external-chat-wait.integration.test.ts -t 'reads small current external review waits without saved prompts'`: four affected cases passed; 269 unrelated cases skipped. - Pinned baseline: `e54f9fbf828e06e385e0c62dc381ccb46190aa30`. Final source SHA256: `fe647e7fe2aed82609e8f1d66a0109e7a10ee28313ae2ef218ba3ab39b5cd105`. - Exclusive-window benchmark: 500 warmups per version, nine alternating pairs of 100 complete service reads on disposable PostgreSQL. Median client CPU: 1.00336 → 0.75908 ms/read (24.35% less). Median wall time: 2.87089 → 2.38731 ms/read (16.84% less). CPU excludes the PostgreSQL process. - Every generated SQL statement, parameter, query count and complete result matched. Warm joined-selector compilations per ten service reads: 10 → 0. - See `doc/performance/2026-11-04-prepared-github-review-wait.md` for reproduction, all samples and measurement limits. - Setup record: loopback required execution outside the sandbox. The fresh embedded-Postgres dependency lacked macOS dylib aliases; aliases to existing identical bytes restored the fixture. The SDK import needed a current workspace SDK/shared build. A broad external-chat suite run was interrupted and replaced by the affected test filter. Those attempts are not counted as passing suites. - Greptile: 5/5 on current head `d2e6ae8814c3a56c380bd5d60c47e6f98642f085`, with no actionable issues or inline comments. - Current-head CI is green at `d2e6ae8814c3a56c380bd5d60c47e6f98642f085`: 52 successful checks, three intentional skips and the successful Snyk status. This includes typecheck, build, the full test matrix, end-to-end shards and the aggregate gate. - Combined local validation at `4ab58ff70b` includes both measured production templates and final test fixes. Full recursive `pnpm -r typecheck` passed in 39.864 seconds. Three real PostgreSQL files passed 35/35 tests (five chat cases, 16 GitHub review cases and 14 shared prepared-query cases). The combined build passed earlier with the same production template bytes. - The initial combined typecheck failed on a separate chat test typing error and build setup. The later passing run resolves that attempt. The original full local `pnpm test:run` was deliberately interrupted after six chat shards passed and partial general tests ran; it is not a passing full local suite. Each PR has independent current-head CI for broad coverage. The initial loopback sandbox restriction was resolved by an escalated run of the same source. - Local benchmark/test dependencies were locked at the baseline; the rebase adds the upstream lockfile refresh and UI paste fix only. ## Risks - A prepared query captures its session. The exact supplied handle is the cache key so transactions and savepoints do not borrow the root session. - Placeholder mistakes could cross bindings. Tests alternate independent company/issue/agent/comment fixtures on the same handle. - The benchmark has one synthetic eligible fixture with warm sequential reads. It does not predict production endpoint latency or whole-server CPU savings. - No schema, index, database driver setting or public API changes. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex. The context-window size is not exposed by the session. Used reasoning, tool calls, source editing and code execution. Independent Codex review found no correctness issues. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
76e43852ac |
test(recovery): publish fixtures under the owned workspace path (#18969)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip preserves agent workspace files before it retries stopped work. > - A saved workspace must use the directory owned by its workspace ID. > - The recovery test helper saves files under a generic `remote` directory. > - New tests from #18908 restore that fixture into a new allocation. > - The existing path validator rejects the fixture before the intended checks. > - This pull request gives the fixture the same published path as real workspaces. > - The tests can then verify native continuation and current repository denials. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18908, which added the five native provider boundary cases. **What happened?** Five `workspace-recovery.test.ts` cases fail with `remote_workspace_published_path_invalid`. The fixture saves real files at `<allocation>/remote`. A cold restore requires `<allocation>/.paperclip-workspaces/<workspaceId>` so it can preserve the workspace-owned directory name. **Expected behavior** The fixture must satisfy the existing path contract. The complete case must start one native continuation. The four catalog cases must reach their repository access and warning checks. **Steps to reproduce** Run the selected five cases on master `0eaabe5c0b37c99d827f78a1a8598e7b3534078a`. They fail before their intended assertions. The same five failures reproduce on exact CI merge `dd508ded616ae0dd6062ddb03572f8b08a79c10c` with `chat-attachment-reuse.ts` restored to its pre-optimization `55d7df2bad` bytes. The failure is independent of the prepared-query change in #18966. **Paperclip version or commit** Master `0eaabe5c0b37c99d827f78a1a8598e7b3534078a`. The path validator predates the new cases; commit `b5b0dbb03f` introduced it. **Deployment mode** Local source tests with real PostgreSQL, temporary filesystem archives and a controlled native provider boundary. ## What Changed - Move the helper's real files into `.paperclip-workspaces/<workspaceId>` before recording the existing target, lease and workspace bindings. - Keep all production path validation and all native execution, archive and current-access assertions. ## Verification - RED: the five selected cases fail on current master without either prepared-query patch. - Causal RED: the five cases also fail on the exact CI merge with only the chat production module restored to its pre-optimization bytes. All five report the same invalid published path. - GREEN: the same five cases pass with this fixture-only change. The other 239 cases were skipped in this focused run. - Command from `server/`: `pnpm exec vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts -t 'dispatches the recovered failed-preparation Retry once through the native provider boundary'`. - Node24.22.2 and real embedded PostgreSQL. The complete case reads restored `saved.txt`, writes `continued.txt` and completes through the real finalizer once. The controlled backend does not make a live provider call. - The first attempted baseline on the older `81b01bcc16` checkout skipped all 188 cases because the selected tests did not exist there. That attempt is not a baseline proof. - Greptile reviewed current head `4ca1487ddfafe868daeef5e1cf7a3b1c504e9b32` at 5/5, with no actionable findings. Current-head CI is green: 51 successful checks, two intentional skips and the successful Snyk status. [Workflow 41840916418](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41840916418) completed successfully on attempt 3. No duplicate full local build was run for this test-only change. - Initial CI attempt: the unrelated task-reload browser case timed out waiting five seconds for its heading after Reload page. Its assertion snapshot shows Loading conversation; the later retained screenshot shows the expected heading, saved comment and composer. The cause is unknown. The later Cloud-auth task case in shard 3 had the same five-second heading timeout: its assertion snapshot also shows Loading conversation, and its later screenshot shows the expected heading and composer. Both unchanged UI tests passed in the stacked #18966 run. Shard 7 passed its one same-source retry: 20 passed, one skipped; the previously failing task-reload case passed in 4.1 seconds. Its checkout remained `da8190914f2d5b77c127f6a8b0cdd2250f009611`. Shard 3 passed its one actual retry: 41/41 tests passed in 7.8 minutes; the previously failing Cloud-auth case passed in 6.9 seconds. Its checkout also remained `da8190914f2d5b77c127f6a8b0cdd2250f009611`. Passed jobs were preserved. These successful retries establish recovery on unchanged source; they do not establish the timeout causes. The original failure remains part of the verification record. ## Risks - Low risk. This changes only a test helper. The helper now relocates its files before it records all existing bindings. - Production path validation, workspace ownership and current repository access remain enforced. - The focused run covers five cases. Current-head CI must cover the rest of the shared helper's callers before review is complete. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex. Context-window size is not exposed. Used reasoning, tool calls, source editing, real PostgreSQL tests and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1104.0-canary.9 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e757e44737 |
test(evals): report remaining fixed private scanner reasons
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
5d91105991 |
fix(evals): inspect all rendered credential question instructions
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
6b38cf596c |
fix(evals): preserve immediate timeline pronoun attribution
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
1d2d8f732f |
fix(evals): accept concise bound personal setup confirmations
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
3ad264635a |
test(evals): accept completed company setup acknowledgements
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8b5f90326d |
test(teams): provide company lookup in catalog service fixture
Match the saved-resource link lookup already present in the candidate. Preserve the missing-company rejection before import. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c153d14f12 |
fix(evals): bound timeline pronouns to their immediate actor
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d4ca3a80a0 |
test(evals): opt company secret proof into human answer accounting
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
912a1e1df1 |
test(evals): accept bound company-secret question handoffs
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
5e8e36958b |
fix(evals): scope question accounting to canonical credential cases
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
244facf29d |
fix(evals): verify secure answers from resolver audit and delivery
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
3fcf06adc8 |
test(evals): account for authenticated secure-entry question answers
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |