991 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5	e1332b997f	fix(plugins): align tool run context and interaction input types (#19493) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Plugins add tools and issue-thread interactions through `@paperclipai/plugin-sdk` > - The SDK types are the public contract between the host and plugin authors > - Two parts of that contract do not match what the host does at runtime > - First, `ToolRunContext.projectId` says it is always a project UUID. The tool gateway sends an empty string when a run has no project. The direct tool route rejects such runs with 400 > - Second, three interaction helpers ask for the parsed output type, so plugin authors must pass fields that the host fills in with defaults > - This pull request makes the types and both tool paths agree with the runtime > - The benefit is that agents with no project can run plugin tools, and plugin authors can omit the fields that have defaults ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #3273 Related: #3274 removes the `projectId` requirement from the route. That change alone is not enough today: the route now also looks up the project to check its company, and that lookup needs a value. This pull request also skips that lookup when the run has no project. It gives plugins one value for "no project" on both tool paths. The new test typecheck in #18739 and #18839 also listed both problems as possible product problems. ## What Changed - `server/src/routes/plugins.ts`: `POST /api/plugins/tools/execute` accepts a `runContext.projectId` that is missing, `null`, or an empty string. It passes an empty string to the plugin, the same value that the tool gateway sends. It checks the project's company only when a project ID is present. A `projectId` that is not a string returns 400. - `server/src/routes/openapi.ts`: the request schema marks `runContext.projectId` as optional and nullable. - `packages/plugins/sdk/src/types.ts`: - The `ToolRunContext.projectId` comment says the value is an empty string when the run has no project. - `suggestTasks`, `requestConfirmation` and `requestCheckboxConfirmation` take `CreateIssueThreadInteractionInput`, as `askUserQuestions` already does. The host parses this input with the schema, so the defaults apply. - `packages/plugins/examples/plugin-kitchen-sink-example/src/worker.ts`: the example passes `undefined` instead of an empty project ID to `issues.create`. - `doc/plugins/PLUGIN_SPEC.md` (section 13.10): documents the empty project ID. - Tests: - `server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts`: tests a run with an empty, missing, or `null` project ID, which skips the project lookup. Also tests that a project ID that is not a string returns 400. - `packages/plugins/sdk/tests/testing-actions.test.ts`: removes the cast that the output type required. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts packages/plugins/sdk/tests/testing-actions.test.ts`: 3 files, 81 tests pass. - `cd server && pnpm typecheck`: passes. This includes the source layers and the three test-tree shards. - `tsc --noEmit` passes for `packages/plugins/sdk` (`tsconfig.json` and `tsconfig.test.json`) and for the kitchen-sink example. - Not run locally: the full `pnpm test:run` and the root `pnpm build`. Required CI covers them. ## Risks - Low risk. The direct tool route now accepts calls that it rejected before. It still checks that the agent and the run belong to the company. With no project ID, there is no project to check. - A plugin that reads `runCtx.projectId` can get an empty string on both tool paths. The tool gateway already sent this value before this change. Only the documentation is new. - The SDK parameter types are wider. Existing plugin code still compiles. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edits) and extended thinking. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-06 16:25:43 +00:00
DottaandPaperclip	70d23612dd	fix: offer Interrupt when queued-message steering is unavailable (#19450) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage work performed by AI agents. > - Task chat saves follow-up messages while an agent runs. > - A native runner can accept Steer only after an active provider turn exists. > - During preparation, or with an unsupported provider, the queue showed a disabled Steer button and no delivery action. > - The server also rejected Interrupt for ordinary native queues. > - This change offers an explicit Interrupt fallback and uses the existing cancellation and admission path. > - People can send their saved messages while Stop confirmation, cleanup, and execution gates remain enforced. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #15865 covers mixed legacy queues. #15030 covers steering acknowledgements. This change covers native queues without available steering. **What happened?** A queued message had a disabled Steer button while the native runner was still preparing. Clicking it did nothing. The server returned HTTP 409 for an explicit Interrupt request against the same native queue. **Expected behavior** Offer Steer when the provider can accept same-turn input. Otherwise offer Interrupt, labeled with its actual effect. Preserve saved messages until the previous execution stops and normal admission accepts the successor. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a task with the Paperclip Runner adapter. 2. Submit a follow-up while the run is preparing, before its provider turn opens. 3. Observe the disabled Steer button above the composer. 4. With this change, click Interrupt. The existing Stop path cancels the previous execution and submits the saved queue through normal admission. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced locally on master at 523818ea9b. The branch is rebased on 2f9d3d43c3. ## What Changed - Offer Interrupt for unavailable or unsupported native steering when the parent supplies an interrupt callback. - Keep Steer for an available provider turn. - Accept explicit Interrupt for a deferred native queue and record its run target. - Bind native continuation to the exact Interrupt queue, run, actor, and cancellation receipt. This lets one click send the messages after Stop completes. - Add component, task-thread, real PostgreSQL route, and continuation authorization regressions. - Close the route fixture database pool before disposing its PostgreSQL instance. - Document the fallback and its Stop and admission requirements. ## Verification - Red: two component cases failed because Interrupt was absent. Two route cases returned HTTP 409, `This queue does not support interruption`, before the repair. - Red: stronger delivery assertions also caught `send_predates_stop` after the first repair. The admission fix covers both the freshness exception and later eligibility check. - Green: both route regressions now wait for preparation settlement, then deliver both saved messages exactly once without a second click. The complete route suite passes 119 tests. The complete continuation suite passes 376 tests, including wrong actor, queue, target, and missing-receipt cases. - UI: task-thread and queued-message suites pass 394 tests, with one existing skip. The issue-page suite also passes (the earlier three-suite run passed 644 tests before the final three UI cases). - Token gates and `git diff --check` pass. - Full workspace build and low-memory typecheck pass. The initial typecheck caught a missing `membershipRole` in an unrelated fixture; the rebase picked up the correction already on master, and the complete typecheck then passed. - The full local `pnpm test:run` passed all six chat shards (1,931 tests). It was stopped during general-server validation after the final commit passed all PR CI gates. The complete local suite is not claimed as a pass. - Earlier route-suite teardown timed out with an open database pool. Closing that pool fixed teardown; the complete route suite then passed. - All final-head CI gates pass: 52 successful checks and two intentional skips. Greptile is 5/5 on the same head with no unresolved review threads. ## Risks Interrupt stops the previous execution and starts a successor; it is a different action from same-turn steering. The UI labels that action explicitly. Cleanup or execution gates can keep the messages queued. Existing company access, board permissions, queue revision, run target, cancellation proof, and admission checks remain in place. No schema migration is needed. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact model ID and context window are not exposed by this client. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-06 07:11:38 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	21d2a577bb	feat: show and change routine responsible users (#19128) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Routines create tasks for repeated work. > - Each routine has a responsible person. > - The Overview did not show this person or permit a change. > - People need to see who will be responsible for automatic tasks. > - This pull request adds a small name picker beside Default agent. > - Authorized people can adopt a routine or transfer it to an active company member. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The routine Overview and the routine update API. **Subsystem affected** UI, server, and shared contracts. **Current behavior** The routine stores a responsible user. The Overview does not show that person. The update API cannot change that person. **Proposed behavior** Show Responsible user beside Default agent. Click the name to search active company members. Save only the new person and the current revision ID. **Reason and benefit** People can see who owns future automatic tasks. An authorized person can adopt a routine without making a new routine. **Breaking changes** The detail response adds an optional actor-specific field. The update API adds an optional responsible user ID. Existing requests keep their current behavior. Related: #17368 covers local Board ownership migration. This change adds the routine control and explicit transfer. ## What Changed - Show a quiet, searchable person picker beside Default agent. - Explain that automatic tasks use this person. Manual runs use the person who starts them. - Permit human operators with `tasks:assign`, instance administrators, and local operators to transfer responsibility. - Check active company membership inside the update transaction. - Save a revision and record the old and new person in the activity log. - Keep existing task responsibility and ownership during revision restore. - Show errors for failed saves and stale revisions. - Add tests for permissions, company boundaries, transfers, inheritance, and picker states. - Keep the picker disabled until saved data is refreshed. Refresh the activity list after a transfer. - Capture the actual previous person under the update row lock for the activity record. - Use shared query error handling and retain cached people during a connection failure. ## Verification - Focused checks cover 145 tests in 5 files. The first post-fix run passed 144 tests. One existing Fireflies route test timed out during the first import while the UI typecheck also ran. The same test passed in the pre-fix run. The isolated route suite then passed all 21 tests with no source change. - The new tests reproduce slow detail refreshes, activity refresh, and two concurrent transfers without a base revision. The concurrency test uses PostgreSQL row locks. - UI and server TypeScript checks passed at commit `1df9587eb`. - The UI production build passed for the updated head. - The branch includes master through `26391707f`. - Design token gates, query-error policy, and Git whitespace checks passed. The query-error policy reports zero findings. - Local browser checks passed on desktop and mobile for the initial feature commit. Search, selection, reload persistence, and revision creation passed. No page errors or horizontal overflow were found. The follow-up does not change the normal layout. - Earlier full local checks could not finish: Cargo was absent, and concurrent full test/build checks exceeded the 8 GiB memory limit. These attempts are not passes. - The first CI run failed on two error-rendering policy findings. That failure is fixed locally. The three findings from the first Greptile review are fixed and their threads are resolved. - Greptile reviewed `1df9587eb2d3e034c2769b1f6955ac52323c95bb` and scored it 5/5. It confirms all three prior findings are addressed. There are no open review threads. - [CI attempt 1](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42046369415/attempts/1) passed 53 checks. The server 8/12 shard failed only because the existing `history-http` runtime fixture did not become ready within 10 seconds (99 refused connections). The fixture and runtime source are unchanged from the merged master. That case passed locally on the same PR head with no source change. Its full 75-test suite also passed locally. The cause of the CI failure remains unknown. - [CI attempt 2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42046369415/attempts/2) passed on `1df9587eb`: 54 successful checks, 3 skipped, and 1 neutral. No failed or pending checks remained. The original fixture-readiness failure remains recorded above. - A later review found that viewers with an explicit `tasks:assign` grant could see an editable picker even though writes were denied. Commit `8b95ee707` now mirrors active-membership and viewer restrictions in the GET capability flag. Instance-admin and local-operator behavior is preserved. - Three membership regressions failed on the incorrect editable flag before the fix. After the fix, all 43 routine-route and company-access cases passed (`--testTimeout 60000` accommodated this sandbox's cold route imports; no repository timeout was changed). The first pre-fix run timed out during the cold import in one case; the second pre-fix run reproduced all three assertion failures. - Layered server typechecking and whitespace checks passed after the permission fix. - [Fresh CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42057752313) passed on `8b95ee7075417527687b4a86cbaf63ba87408364` without a retry. Greptile reviewed this exact head, scored it 5/5, and added no new findings. All four review threads are resolved. The security status is also successful. - The separate Paperclip Review check is still queued because its assigned review worker requires runtime recovery. This is the remaining check before completion; the CI workflow itself passed. ## Risks - A transfer changes the person used for future automatic tasks. Existing tasks keep their current person. - Only people can transfer responsibility. The server checks the permission again on every write. - A stale revision rejects the save. The user must reload before retrying. - No database migration is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact runtime model ID and context window are not exposed to this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (CI passed; separate Paperclip Review check pending) - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-06 05:47:30 -06:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	7e3caa7bac	fix(tree-control): resume work a pause gate refused after release (#19421) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The board can pause an issue tree. A pause stops work. Resume or release must continue that work once. > - PR #19394 made release re-dispatch a run that a pause Stop cancelled. > - That rule covers only a run that an operator Stop ended and that the hold snapshot named. > - A scheduled retry that comes due during a pause is not stopped. The dispatch gate cancels it with `issue_paused`. The release did not see it as owed work, so the task stalled with no run. > - This pull request makes every gate that refuses work for a pause record the covering hold. Release then re-dispatches that work exactly once. > - The benefit is that a paused task with a parked retry or a queued run continues after release, with no manual wake. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19394 **What happened?** A child task had a `workspace_busy` scheduled retry. The board paused the parent tree. The retry came due during the pause. The scheduled-retry gate cancelled it with `issue_paused` ("Scheduled retry suppressed because the issue is held by an active subtree pause hold"). The board released the hold. Four minutes later the child was still `in_progress` with no run, no execution blocker, and no new activity. **Expected behavior** Release (or `mode: "resume"`) re-dispatches the refused work exactly once. No reconciliation and no user message are necessary. Stranded-issue recovery does not add a second run. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Give an assigned child task a parked `workspace_busy` scheduled retry. 2. Pause the parent tree. 3. Let the retry come due while the pause is active. The gate cancels it with `issue_paused`. 4. Release the pause. No run starts for the child. **Paperclip version or commit** master at 4d49a31286 (includes #19394). **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific (core bug). ## What Changed - `issue-tree-control.ts`: add `ISSUE_PAUSED_ERROR_CODE` and `pauseSuppressionResult()`. A gate records `treeHoldSuppression: { holdId, rootIssueId }` on a run that it refused for a pause. - `findOwedPauseResume` now treats the latest run as owed when it is an `issue_paused` cancellation under a pause hold. It uses the recorded hold. For an unmarked run (a scheduled retry cancelled before this change), it uses a snapshot pause that was active at cancellation. The operator Stop rule does not change. - Scheduled-retry gate (`run-dispatch/adapters/postgres.ts`, `cancelSuppressedRetryInTx`): locks the pause row `FOR SHARE` and records the covering hold. A concurrent release either sees the refusal, or the retry sees no pause and runs normally. - Queued-run claim gate (`heartbeat/queue.ts`): cancels with `issue_paused` and the hold marker, after the agent start lock is released. Before, the cancel re-entered that lock from inside it, and the agent's queue stalled until the 30-second stale-lock timeout. After the refusal is saved, the gate re-checks the hold and resumes the task itself if release already finished (`resumeIfPauseAlreadyReleased`). - Release (`issue-tree-resume.ts`, route): revisits the snapshot members and every task with a run refused for that hold, also when `wakeAgents` is set. This covers tasks created under the tree after the snapshot and tasks moved out before release. - `packages/db`: partial index `heartbeat_runs_tree_hold_suppression_idx` (migration 0436, `CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY`, registered as a top-level migration) for that lookup. - Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md` (gate-refused work, race handling, non-assignee and pre-fix scope) and `doc/DATABASE.md` (index). ## Verification - Red before the fix, green after: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/issue-tree-pause-resume-run.test.ts` (21 tests). - "resumes a parked retry the pause suppressed exactly once after release / resume / legacy": before, `expected [] to have a length of 1` (no resumed run). After, one `issue_tree_resumed` run with `interruptedRunId` = the suppressed retry, no execution blocker, and the task finished. `reconcileStrandedAssignedIssues` added no run during the hold or after release. - "resumes a queued run the claim gate refused during the hold exactly once": before, the test timed out at 15 s (start-lock re-entry). After, the run is cancelled with `issue_paused` and the hold marker, and release re-dispatches it once. - "resumes a refused retry on a task moved out of the paused tree before release" and "... on a task outside the snapshot when release also wakes members": review findings, one resume each. - "leaves a due retry parked when the pause is released while the gate refuses it": the test waits until the gate blocks on an uncommitted release. The retry is not cancelled and runs once. Without the `FOR SHARE` lock the gate does not wait and the test fails. - "resumes work a gate refused after the release that should have resumed it had finished": the late-refusal re-check resumes once, and a repeated check does not dispatch again. - "does not resume a paused-code cancellation that no pause hold covered": negative case. - Related suites pass locally: `src/__tests__/issue-tree*`, `src/modules/run-dispatch`, `src/services/heartbeat/queue.test.ts`, `heartbeat-dependency-scheduling`, `heartbeat-workspace-busy`, and `packages/db` `client.test.ts`. - I did not run a live staging check here. Staging APIs are not reachable from this environment. ## Risks - Migration 0436 adds a partial index on `heartbeat_runs`. It is built concurrently and covers only cancelled runs with the marker, so it is small. - The scheduled-retry gate now takes a `FOR SHARE` row lock on the pause hold before it cancels. Release updates that row, so the two serialize briefly. Release does not lock issues or runs, so the lock order cannot deadlock with the gate's issue-then-run locks. - The queued-run claim gate now records `issue_paused` in place of the generic `cancelled`. Stranded recovery already classifies `issue_paused` as non-retryable. The pause resume owns that work, so recovery does not add a second run. - Scope limits (documented): a non-assignee run refused by a pause is not replayed, the same as non-assignee wakes that admission drops during a hold. Among pre-fix rows, only scheduled retries carry `issue_paused`, so only those fall back to the snapshot. A pre-fix row whose hold is already released does not self-recover; the staging task that showed this bug needs one manual wake, or a new pause and release. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, test execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-06 03:03:15 -06:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	e7fb554647	test(server): load setup-token route modules during suite setup (#19398) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The setup-token login route lets an owner sign in to Claude for a sandbox environment > - The route suite `server/src/routes/setup-token-route.test.ts` fails on CI in pull requests that do not touch it > - The first test in the suite times out at 15000 ms, and the other 29 tests pass > - The first test pays the one-time import cost of the agent route graph inside its own test budget > - This pull request moves that import to suite setup, which has a 30000 ms hook budget > - The benefit is a stable server shard with no change to what the tests prove ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A survey of failed `PR` workflow runs found intermittent failures of one test in pull requests that do not touch this area: ``` FAIL src/routes/setup-token-route.test.ts > company-and-environment setup-token route — full path > drives start, status, prompt, code, and completion with no agent id Error: Test timed out in 15000ms. ``` Examples: jobs 127423956746 and 127457298585 (shard `general-server-without-chat` 12/12). The survey counted 5 such failures. **Expected behavior** The full-path test passes on every run. The test budget measures the route behavior, not the module import. **Steps to reproduce** Run the unchanged suite on master while all CPU cores are busy: ```sh cd server node load.mjs 24 pnpm exec vitest run src/routes/setup-token-route.test.ts --reporter=verbose ``` `load.mjs` starts 24 busy-loop Node processes and runs the command. The first test fails at 15005 ms. **Root cause** `createApp()` called `vi.importActual("../routes/agents.js")` and four other modules on each call. The first call loads and transforms the full agent route graph. I timed it: `createApp()` took 11670 ms of the 11698 ms test on an idle machine. The HTTP steps took less than 30 ms. On a loaded CI runner the import alone crossed the 15000 ms test budget. Later tests reused the module cache, so only the first test failed. ## What Changed - Add `loadRouteModules()`, which imports the route and logger modules. - Call it once in the suite `beforeAll`, after `vi.resetModules()` and the mock registration. The hook budget is 30000 ms in `server/vitest.config.ts`. - `createApp()` now reuses the loaded modules. Each test still builds a fresh Express app, a fresh transport, and a fresh log capture. - This follows the pattern in `server/src/__tests__/agent-skills-routes.test.ts` (#16396). - No timeout changes, no retries, no skips. ## Verification Red, on master, with 24 busy-loop processes on an 18-core machine: ``` × ... drives start, status, prompt, code, and completion with no agent id 15005ms ``` Also red on an idle machine on 1 of 3 runs (15006 ms; the other runs took 11790 ms and 13748 ms). Green, with this change: - Idle, 3 runs: 30/30 tests pass. The first test takes 42 to 46 ms. - With 24 busy-loop processes: 30/30 tests pass. The first test takes 40 ms. The file takes 19.4 s in total. ```sh cd server pnpm exec vitest run src/routes/setup-token-route.test.ts --reporter=verbose ``` `tsc --noEmit -p server` reports no errors in this file. ## Risks - Low risk. The change touches one test file only. - The import cost now counts against the 30000 ms hook budget. Locally it is 12 to 15 s idle. The mocks register before the import, as before, so each test sees the same mocked services. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 22:23:35 -06:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	5c185db77c	fix(tree-control): resume work a subtree pause interrupted (#19394) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Task tree control lets the board pause a task tree and then resume it. > - A pause stops the runs that are active in the tree. The release must then continue the work that was pending. > - A child task whose run was active at pause time did not start again after release. The child became blocked and asked for a user message. > - A pause is an operator hold, not a failure. It must not strand work, and it must not require reconciliation for a run that never started. > - This pull request re-dispatches interrupted work one time on release, and it settles a legacy Stop that never entered the adapter. > - The benefit is that pause and resume keep a task tree moving without manual recovery, and real safety gates stay in force. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A parent task delegated two children. One child's run was active (in host workspace preparation, before the adapter started) when the board paused the parent's tree. The pause cancelled that run. After the board released the hold, no new run started for that child. The child became `blocked` with the execution blocker cause `legacy_execution_requires_reconciliation`. Later the next action became "Send a message to continue." A sibling child that had no active run at pause time resumed normally. **Expected behavior** A run that a subtree pause cancels is an operator hold. On release, the pending work starts again one time, automatically. It does not go through execution reconciliation when the run never entered its adapter. It does not wait for a user message. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a parent task and a child task that is assigned to an agent. 2. Wake the child. While its run is in host preparation (or queued), call `POST /api/issues/:parentId/tree-holds` with `{ "mode": "pause" }`. 3. Call `POST /api/issues/:parentId/tree-holds/:holdId/release` without `wakeAgents`. 4. Before this change, no new run starts, and `getExecutionBlocker` reports `legacy_execution_requires_reconciliation` for the child. **Root cause** - (a) The pause records each interrupted run in the hold member snapshot (`activeRunId`). Nothing used that record on release. - (b) Release woke tasks only when `metadata.wakeAgents === true`. Without it, release relied on stranded-issue recovery. That recovery stands down when the latest run was cancelled by an operator (`isOperatorCancelledRun`). So the interrupted child had no owner. - (c) The pause Stop of a legacy run in preparation is written directly as `cancelled`. Legacy terminalization classifies a cancelled run with no bootstrap evidence as an unknown outcome. It records `legacy_execution_requires_reconciliation`, although the gated dispatch never entered the adapter. - Native runs: the verified native Stop does not create the reconciliation hold, but gap (b) applies to native runs too. The release change is runtime-independent. ## What Changed - `issueTreeControlService.findOwedPauseResume` decides if a task is owed one resume. The task's latest run must be an operator Stop that a pause hold member snapshot names, recorded while that hold was active. The task must still be executable by the same agent, and no pause may still cover it. The obligation belongs to the run, so overlapping pauses keep it until the last covering release. - New `services/issue-tree-resume.ts` re-dispatches owed work with wake reason `issue_tree_resumed` (`holdId` and `interruptedRunId` in the context). A compare-and-set claim (`treeHoldResume`) on the interrupted run makes the resume happen at most once. A failed wake returns the claim. - Pause release and `mode: "resume"` call it for every member of the released hold, also without `wakeAgents`. When `wakeAgents` is true, the existing loop wakes every executable member. - A task that still has an execution blocker is not replayed. The release writes `issue.tree_resume_wake_skipped`, the blocker stays visible, and the obligation stays unclaimed. - `releaseHold` updates only an `active` hold. A repeated release gets `409`. - `settleCancelledLegacyPreparation`: when the executor that owned a cancelled legacy run proves that dispatch never entered the adapter, it records bootstrap evidence and resolves that run's `legacy-execution:<runId>` hold as `false_positive`. It also corrects an automatic no-replay disposition and restores a `blocked` status only when that disposition made the change. Then it re-dispatches owed work, for a release that happened while the Stop was unwinding. It requires a requested Stop with no existing recovery receipt, and no process, session, native finalization, unreleased lease, or execution-start event. - `settleUnrecoverableExecutions` waits while a legacy executor still holds its controller lease, and records a `legacyCancellationBlock` receipt when it blocks a task for a cancelled legacy run. - Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md` and `doc/composer-stop.md` describe the resume rule. ## Verification - New regression `server/src/__tests__/issue-tree-pause-resume-run.test.ts` uses embedded Postgres, the real heartbeat, and the real tree-control routes: - A run paused during preparation: nothing runs during the hold, there is no blocker, and release creates exactly one `issue_tree_resumed` run that succeeds. A second release returns `409` and creates no run. - Release before the stopped preparation finishes unwinding (with the periodic disposition run in between): exactly one resumed run after the executor settles. - An automatic no-replay disposition that ran first: the blocker clears, the status returns to `in_progress`, and release resumes once. - Overlapping child and parent pauses: no resume while the parent pause remains, then exactly one resume after it is released. - A queued run cancelled by the pause: release creates exactly one resumed run. - A task reassigned to a user during the hold: no resume. - A mid-turn legacy Stop with unknown outcome: no replay, the reconciliation blocker remains, and `issue.tree_resume_wake_skipped` is logged. - Red before each fix: the first 4 cases failed on master; the 3 review cases failed on the first PR commit. All 7 pass now. - Also passed locally: `issue-tree-control-routes`, `issue-tree-control-service`, `heartbeat-workspace-busy`, `heartbeat-undispatched-execution-wait`, `execution-control-work`, `legacy-workspace-restore-recovery`, `legacy-continuation-authority`, `task-retry`, `legacy-execution-recovery`, `agent-conversations`, `heartbeat-retry-scheduling`, `satisfied-connection-intents`. - Not verified here: a live staging pause/resume. Re-check on staging after deploy. ## Risks - Behavior change: release now starts the work that the pause interrupted, also without `wakeAgents`. Before, that work stayed idle. Other idle tasks still wake only with `wakeAgents`. - The settlement trusts the executor's adapter-entry flag. The flag is set only inside the atomic dispatch gate, which refuses a cancelled run. The settlement also requires no process, session, lease, or execution event. - A native run whose Stop has not finalized at release time is not a target. Stranded recovery and explicit wake still apply. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edit, test execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 22:08:01 -06:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	6ca7b151f7	feat: compact an agent's context from the task Properties panel (#19378) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A task's Properties panel shows the assignee agent's context window (paperclipai/paperclip#19273) > - The board can see that the context is nearly full, but it cannot act on it > - A full context makes the agent compact at an unplanned time, often in the middle of work > - This pull request adds "Compact now" to the Context hover card > - The benefit is that the board can compact the agent's context between runs, at a time it chooses ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs paperclipai/paperclip#19273 **Problem** The Context row shows how full the agent's context window is. The board cannot ask the agent to compact it. **Proposed solution** A "Compact now" button in the Context hover card. It runs the harness's own compaction: Codex `thread/compact/start`, and Claude's `/compact` command through ACP. **Alternatives considered** A separate PRP `session.compact` command. Both harnesses run compaction as a turn, so a compaction turn keeps the existing durable turn binding, interruption, and recovery. A separate command needs a second turn lifecycle. ## What Changed - UI: the Context hover card shows Compact now with three states: available, Compacting…, and unavailable with a reason (agent mid-run, harness unsupported, task closed). The Storybook story shows each state. - Server: `POST /api/issues/:id/context/compact` (board only, `decideIssueAccess` `issue:mutate`, activity log `issue.context_compaction_requested`). It queues a short run marked by `contextSnapshot.contextCompactionRequestId`. `GET /issues/:id/context-usage` returns the `compaction` state. - Server: a compaction run does no task work. The native status arbiter preserves the task status. The lifecycle skips handoff, liveness continuation, review-path disposition and the issue comment, as it does for goal-control runs. - Runner TS: `startTurn({ compact: true })`. The Codex harness session sends `thread/compact/start`. The runnerd transport maps it to PRP `turn.start` with `compact: true` (Codex) or `text: "/compact"` (Claude/ACPX). The native runtime option `sessionCompaction` requires a resumed session and settles with a synthesized yielded result. - Runner Rust: `turn.start` accepts `compact: true` for Codex. `CodexProvider::start_compaction_turn` sends `thread/compact/start` and binds the turn from the `turn/started` that follows the empty response. - Fix (from #19273): Codex emitted `context.compacted` on both the start and the end of one compaction item. It now emits it once, and the count is distinct by `compactionId`. - Fix (from #19273): the conversation event view dropped `context.compacted`, so a finished run never showed the divider. The view now keeps compactions, plus context readings for runs that compacted. A finished run's compactions show as thread dividers. - Fix: the Codex harness stamps before/after sizes on the compaction event. Codex reports the compacted size before the compaction item ends, so the old neighbour-based guess showed the wrong size. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, `pnpm check:token-gates`, `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs`: pass. - New tests: `server/src/__tests__/context-compaction.test.ts`, `status-arbiter.test.ts`, `issue-context-usage.test.ts` (duplicate compaction counts once), `ui/.../context-usage-row.test.tsx`, `native-session-runtime.test.ts` (context compaction), Codex driver and runnerd transport tests, Rust `codex_compaction_turn_binds_the_turn_reported_after_its_empty_response`. Rust `codex_provider` suite: 115 passed. - `pnpm test:run` locally: one failure in `chat-channels.integration.test.ts`. It reads `.claude/skills/slack/SKILL.md` from the main checkout, which is not present in this worktree. It is not related to this change. - Live, local worktree instance, Codex agent on the Paperclip runner: clicked Compact now. The run succeeded. Context went from 35k to 9.4k tokens, and later 9.4k to 9.2k. The task stayed In Review. The thread shows "Context compacted · 9.4k → 9.2k tokens" and the meter dropped. - Live Claude proof: pending. The local Claude agent needs an Anthropic API key. claude-agent-acp handles `/compact` as an echo-less turn, and the runner already maps its "Compacting completed." notice to `context.compacted`. ## Risks - A compaction run resumes the agent's session. If the session cannot resume, the run fails with `native_context_compaction_unavailable` and the task is unchanged. - Compact now is not available while the agent runs on the task, because compaction interrupts the active turn. - The conversation view now returns context readings for runs that compacted. Runs that never compacted return the same events as before. - An old runner binary ignores `compact` and rejects the `turn.start` because it has no text. It does not start an ordinary turn. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, through Claude Code with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 22:07:12 -06:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	958f9aa9f3	feat(issues): limit agent-created task trees to parent and child (#19312) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents split work into tasks. A task can have a parent task. > - Today agents can nest tasks to any depth: parent, child, grandchild, and deeper. > - Deep agent-made trees are hard to follow, and an agent that works on a child task makes grandchildren by default. > - This pull request limits agent-created trees to two levels: a top-level task and its children. > - A request for a grandchild does not fail. The server puts the new task beside the requester and tells the agent. > - Board users keep full control. They can still nest to any depth. Existing deep trees stay valid. > - The pull request also records which task created each new task, so the audit trail stays complete when the parent changes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. This is the feature description. Related: #16853 (budgets that include descendant work) also reasons about task trees; this change does not alter its traversal. **Subsystem affected** Issues (tasks): create, child create and move in the issue service and routes. Agent tools, chat suggestions and creation provenance use these paths. **Problem or motivation** Agents create subtasks as deep as they want. An agent that runs on a child task gets that child as the default parent, so its follow-ups become grandchildren. The trees become deep and hard to read. The parent link is also the only record of which task created a follow-up, so that record is lost when the parent changes. **Proposed solution** Limit agent-created trees to a parent and its children. When an agent asks for a grandchild, put the new task under the requester's parent and return `parentAdjusted`. Do not reject the request. Keep board users unrestricted. Record the originating task in a new server-set `origin_issue_id` column. Keep `origin_run_id` as the originating run. **Alternatives considered** Reject grandchild requests with an error. We did not do this, because agents then fail mid-task. Add a database constraint. We did not do this, because existing deep trees must stay valid and nesting can return later. ## What Changed - Add `MAX_AGENT_TASK_HIERARCHY_DEPTH` (2) and the `IssueParentAdjustment` type in `packages/shared`. - Add `resolveNewTaskParent` and `planIssueParentChange` in `server/src/services/issues.ts`. `create`, `createChild` and `update` use the agent limit by default (`parentDepthPolicy: "flatten"`). - The issue create, `/children` and PATCH routes pass `allow_nested` for board users. For agents, the routes check authorization against the parent that the server actually writes. - The requester keeps its behavior when the server moves a task beside it: `blockParentUntilDone` blocks the requester, and the new task inherits the requester's workspace and privacy. - The server never moves a task above a low-trust boundary root that contains the requester. - These subsystems keep any depth, because they find their work by parent: watchdog reviews, monitor recovery, email-channel placement, and routines that a person configured. - An agent move of a task that has children skips only the parent change and returns `reason: "has_children"`. - Add `issues.origin_issue_id` (nullable, `on delete set null`, indexed) in migration `0434`. Only the server sets it. The `createdFrom` detail field, the `createdFromIssueId` filter and task-creation provenance read it first. - Chat prompts now let a chat agent create one task, a task with children, or separate tasks. The conversation is never a parent. - The runner `create_task` tool accepts an optional `parentTaskId`. A chat agent can create a top-level task and then put subtasks under it. The run must be able to read and change the parent. A conversation is never a parent. The depth limit still applies. Project tools map the field to `parentId` through the issue route. The protocol manifest, semantic contracts and eval fixture are regenerated. - Watchdog runs that have an active watchdog keep their requested parent on all create paths, because their access is limited to the watched subtree. - Fix a bug that the test drive found: the chat (MCP) `create_task` ignored the requested `status`, so a `backlog` task became `todo` and started to run. It now uses the same rule as the native tool. - Update `skills/paperclip`, `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, and add the plan `doc/plans/2026-11-05-two-level-task-hierarchy.md`. ## Verification - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/agent-task-hierarchy-depth.test.ts src/__tests__/agent-task-hierarchy-depth-routes.test.ts`: 19 new tests for service and route behavior, all pass. - Related suites (64 files: issues service, thread interactions, privacy, watchdogs, provenance, runner tool authority, decisions, routines, project tools): 1208 tests pass. Two tests changed because of the intended behavior and pass now. Two `email-channels.integration` tests fail locally because the test cannot find a bundled skill file from this worktree path. This change does not touch that code. - `packages/db`: migration safety, snapshot drift and journal tests pass. - Typecheck passes for `server`, `packages/shared`, `packages/db`, `cli` and `ui` (local `ui` errors come only from generated Storybook catalog files that are absent). - Local test drive on an isolated instance with real Claude agents: 29 of 29 use cases pass, including an agent on a child task (follow-ups placed beside it, with the notice) and a chat that creates a top-level task with three subtasks. - I did not run the full `pnpm test:run` or `pnpm build` locally. CI runs them. ## Risks - Behavior change for agents: some follow-ups that were grandchildren are now siblings. The parent of the requester is woken when all its children finish, which now includes these tasks. - The runner `create_task` input contract adds one optional field, so the protocol manifest and the pack contract change. The tool output does not change: it shows the actual `parentId`, and the activity log records `parentAdjusted`. - Migration `0434` adds a nullable column, a foreign key and an index. It does not backfill rows. - `IssueCreationSource.run` is now nullable. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edits, local test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 21:22:33 -06:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	8f79a32898	fix(connections): keep agent access consistent through setup and permission changes (#19352) ... Task-hosted tool setup kept requester-only defaults, and audience edits could leave runtime installations restricted after permission bindings were widened. Large provider catalogs could also fail before creating an access card. Use the normal agent audience defaults for new tool setup, preserve explicit selections through verified OAuth and draft resumption, and synchronize permission bindings and runtime installations atomically. Enforce agent-edit authority and preserve existing access during additive account reuse. Validation: 915 focused regression tests, typechecks, and builds passed. All 54 CI checks passed and Greptile Apex scored the reviewed head 5/5 with no unresolved threads. Broad local test failures, recoveries, and incomplete heartbeat coverage are documented in the PR. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-05 17:38:32 -08:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	de1143448b	fix(queue): clear interaction receipts a run already delivered (#19376) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents ask people for input through thread cards: questions, confirmations, plan approvals and connection requests > - When a person resolves a card, Paperclip queues the response for the agent. The task chat shows it above the composer as a read-only receipt, for example "Answered: Questions" > - A second wake can carry the same receipt. One example is a recovery continuation that raced the response's own wake. The agent receives the response from the first run, but the second wake stays deferred > - The composer then shows a receipt that the agent already has. The user cannot edit, discard or clear it. The same receipt also blocks the agent's handback with `interaction_response_queued` > - This pull request treats a receipt as pending only until a run that carries the interaction has started > - The benefit is that an answered card leaves the queue once the agent has it, for every card kind ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. A hands-on onboarding test on a staging cloud workspace (Claude subscription path) found this bug. **What happened?** During onboarding, a queued item stayed above the task-chat composer. It said "Answered: Questions", but the user had already answered the questions. Later items also stayed after the interview answers and after the user connected GitHub. The user could not trash, steer or edit them. Evidence from the staging workspace (interactions, wake diagnostics and run records for the onboarding task): - The first questions card (no title, so its label is "Answered: Questions") was answered at 17:37:48. - Run `ba3bc7d6` (`issue.interaction.respond`) delivered that answer from 17:37:48 to 17:38:27. - A recovery wake (`issue.interaction_continuation_recovery`) for the same card was requested at 17:37:48 too. It stayed deferred behind `ba3bc7d6` and then ran again as `cacb095d` (17:38:33 to 17:39:17). During that time the composer showed the stale "Answered: Questions" receipt. - The plan approval had the same pattern from 17:42:06 to 18:20 (fixed at its source by #19332). The declined Slack connection receipt sat behind that chain. **Expected behavior** A receipt leaves the composer queue as soon as a run has received it. The agent can hand back the task after it has received the response. **Steps to reproduce** 1. An agent asks a question card on a task. 2. A user answers it. The response wake starts a run that carries the answer. 3. A second wake for the same card is deferred behind that run or a later run. 4. `GET /api/issues/:id/queued-comments` returns the second wake's receipt as an immutable entry until it runs. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/queued-interaction-response.ts`: `readQueuedInteractionResponse` returns no receipt when a run for the same issue has started with this interaction in its context and is `running` or `succeeded`. A cancelled or failed run does not count, so that response is still owed. `hasQueuedInteractionResponse` (the handback guard) uses the same rule. - `server/src/routes/issues.ts`: `findQueuedCommentWake` skips a delivered receipt, so a later undelivered receipt can still show. - `server/src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts`: red/green tests for every card kind and outcome: answered questions, accepted and rejected confirmation, accepted plan (checkbox) approval, connected and declined connection. Each runs with a `succeeded` and with a `running` delivering run. Controls check that an undelivered receipt still shows, that a later undelivered receipt shows instead of a delivered one, and that the handback guard ignores a delivered receipt. - N-02 (hover shows raw JSON): `master` already shows only the one-line summary in the label and hover (`queuedMessageLabel`). This PR does not change the UI. ## Verification Red, on `master` code with only the new tests added: ``` $ cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts -t "receipt" × clears a ask_user_questions answered receipt once a succeeded run already delivered it 1309ms × clears a ask_user_questions answered receipt once a running run already delivered it 1041ms × clears a request_confirmation accepted receipt once a succeeded run already delivered it 1436ms × clears a request_confirmation accepted receipt once a running run already delivered it 829ms × clears a request_confirmation rejected receipt once a succeeded run already delivered it 666ms × clears a request_confirmation rejected receipt once a running run already delivered it 776ms × clears a request_checkbox_confirmation accepted receipt once a succeeded run already delivered it 1179ms × clears a request_checkbox_confirmation accepted receipt once a running run already delivered it 4227ms × clears a connection_intent accepted receipt once a succeeded run already delivered it 1954ms × clears a connection_intent accepted receipt once a running run already delivered it 1634ms × clears a connection_intent rejected receipt once a succeeded run already delivered it 1505ms × clears a connection_intent rejected receipt once a running run already delivered it 1064ms × shows a later undelivered receipt instead of an earlier delivered one 480ms × does not hold agent handback for a receipt the agent already received 1272ms ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Failed Tests 14 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ AssertionError: expected [ 'Answered: Questions' ] to deeply equal [] AssertionError: expected [ 'Accepted: Approve hiring 2 agents' ] to deeply equal [] AssertionError: expected [ 'Rejected: Approve hiring 2 agents' ] to deeply equal [] AssertionError: expected [ Array(1) ] to deeply equal [] AssertionError: expected [ 'Connected: GitHub connection' ] to deeply equal [] AssertionError: expected [ 'Declined: Slack connection' ] to deeply equal [] AssertionError: expected [ Array(1) ] to deeply equal [ 'Declined: Slack connection' ] AssertionError: expected true to be false // Object.is equality Tests 14 failed | 11 passed | 85 skipped (110) ``` Green, with the fix: ``` $ cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts -t "receipt" Tests 25 passed | 85 skipped (110) ``` Neighbouring suites, with the fix: - `issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts` (full file, on current `master`): 110 passed. - `question-response-delivery`, `queued-comment-consumption`, `issue-thread-interaction-routes`, `satisfied-connection-intents`, `issue-comment-reopen-routes`, `issue-execution-policy-routes` together with the queued-comments file: 494 tests passed. One run hit an embedded-Postgres `afterAll` cleanup timeout under 7-file parallel load. The same file passed alone twice. - `heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts -t "plan approval|accepted interaction|answered question|answered interaction|onboarding first task"`: 14 passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`: passes. ## Risks - Low risk. The change only hides a receipt that a started run already carries. An undelivered receipt keeps its current behavior. - The redundant wake itself is not cancelled here. It still runs later as a normal continuation, but it no longer holds the composer queue or blocks handback. #19332 removes the main source of these duplicate wakes. - Each receipt read adds one indexed-by-company lookup on `heartbeat_runs` for the issue. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser inspection of the staging workspace API). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 19:28:45 -06:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	7440cfc9b1	fix(issues): accept queued Send while the previous run has not started (#19370) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A task chat queues a message while the agent is busy. The queued-message bar shows a Send button when no turn is running. > - Send calls `POST /issues/:id/queued-comments/interrupt` with no target run. > - The issue can hold an execution run that has not started yet (`queued`) or that waits for a retry (`scheduled_retry`). The GET response then shows a deferred queue with no target run, so the UI shows Send. > - The interrupt route refused that click with 409. The UI then showed "Couldn't send. Message is still queued." > - This pull request saves the click as interrupt intent in that state. The queue is delivered when the previous run stops. > - The benefit is that the button the UI offers now works, and the message goes next. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Cloud onboarding test, Codex subscription path (N-06): the tester clicked Send in the onboarding task. The UI showed "Couldn't send. Message is still queued." **Expected behavior** Send is accepted. The message stays in the queue and is delivered next, when the previous run stops. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Have an issue whose execution run is `queued` (not started) or `scheduled_retry`. 2. Post a message. It is deferred behind that run. 3. Click Send on the queued message. 4. The route returns 409: "This queue does not support interruption" (paperclip_runner) or "The previous run has not stopped" (legacy adapters). **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at b68f69a801. Root cause: `GET /queued-comments` resolves the target run from running runs only, so the UI offers Send. `POST /queued-comments/interrupt` locks `issue.executionRunId` at any status. It accepted only a terminal run or no run. A queued or retry-waiting run fell between those two rules. Relation to other fixes: #19331 (declined connection receipt) changed which wake the queue projects. It does not touch this check, and current `master` still fails. The sibling N-07 problem (steering a queued message on Codex) uses the `/steer` route. This PR does not change that route. I found no shared cause. Evidence limits: the tester's notes are the only evidence. The staging company that I could read uses the Claude subscription path, so I could not see the Codex run's status at the time of the click. The reproduced state is the only server path that gives "Couldn't send" for a Send click with no running turn. A slow-starting or retrying Codex run gives that state. ## What Changed - `server/src/routes/issues.ts`: the interrupt route no longer refuses a Send when the issue's run is `queued` or `scheduled_retry`. For paperclip_runner queues, a run that is not running is handled like a stopped run. The legacy "previous run has not stopped" 409 is removed. The route saves `queuedCommentInterrupt` intent, does not cancel the not-yet-started run, and returns the queue in the `deferred` state. The UI already shows "Messages are still queued. They will send when the task is ready." for that response. - `server/src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts`: new route test for native and legacy queues, with `queued` and `scheduled_retry` runs. It checks that GET offers Send, that the POST is accepted without a run cancel, that the intent is saved, and that the queue is delivered to one successor run after the previous run stops. ## Verification Red, on `master` (new test, before the fix): ``` pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts -t "accepts Send while" × accepts Send while the previous native run is queued and delivers it once that run stops × accepts Send while the previous native run is scheduled_retry and delivers it once that run stops × accepts Send while the previous legacy run is queued and delivers it once that run stops × accepts Send while the previous legacy run is scheduled_retry and delivers it once that run stops AssertionError: {"error":"This queue does not support interruption"}: expected 409 to be 200 AssertionError: {"error":"The previous run has not stopped"}: expected 409 to be 200 Tests 4 failed | 90 skipped (94) ``` Green, after the fix (same command): ``` Test Files 1 passed (1) Tests 4 passed | 90 skipped (94) ``` Neighbouring suites: - `server/src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts` (complete file): 94/94 passed. - `server/src/__tests__/agent-conversations.test.ts`, `server/src/services/issue-queued-comment-queue.test.ts`, `ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatQueuedMessages.test.tsx`: passed. - When I ran the two embedded-Postgres route files in one Vitest process, every test passed. Then the queued-comment file's `afterAll` database cleanup timed out after 30 s, which is a local resource limit. The file passes when it runs alone. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`: passed. - I made no UI changes, so I did not run `pnpm check:token-gates`. ## Risks - Low risk. Send was refused only for `queued` and `scheduled_retry` runs. Now that click is saved and the run is not cancelled. A running turn is unchanged: paperclip_runner still steers it, and legacy still interrupts it. - When a run waits for a retry, a saved Send waits for that retry to finish. The route does not skip the retry. This matches how the queue already works for messages without a click. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser for read-only staging evidence). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 18:59:16 -06:00
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5	0f2c01b63a	fix(server): retry one Cloud portfolio connection reset (#19033) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - On Cloud instances, `GET /api/cloud/stacks` gets the user's stack portfolio from the Cloud control plane. > - The route sends one `fetch` to `/v1/tenant/portfolio`. It has a 10 s deadline. > - The Cloud edge can reset a pooled keep-alive connection when the request is written. The request then fails in a few milliseconds and the user gets a 502. > - The diagnostics from #15340 now show this failure mode on staging. > - This pull request retries the idempotent GET one time for a pre-response connection reset, inside the same deadline. > - The benefit is that a transient connection reset no longer shows an error to the user. Real Cloud failures and deadlines are still reported. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15340 (bounded portfolio diagnostics). Refs #10850 (portfolio proxy). I searched the open and closed PRs for "portfolio". No other PR fixes this failure. **What happened?** On the hosted staging pool stack, one `GET /api/cloud/stacks` returned 502. The diagnostics were `phase: fetch`, `networkCode: ECONNRESET`, `upstreamStatus: null`, `elapsedMs: 19`. The Core process had started about 7 minutes before. CPU and memory were normal. The Railway HTTP logs for the Cloud harness show no failed or missing portfolio request at that time. All portfolio requests in a 12-minute window returned 200 in 15–91 ms. The next Core portfolio fetch, 0.4 s later, reached Cloud and returned 200. Thus the failed request did not get to the Cloud application. The connection was reset between Core and the Cloud edge. This failure is different from the older stalls on the same stack. Those failures had `DEADLINE_EXCEEDED` after more than 60 s, during whole-process freezes. This change does not retry those failures. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start an HTTP server that resets (or closes) the socket for the first request and returns JSON for the second request. 2. Set `PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_API_ORIGIN` to that server and call `GET /api/cloud/stacks` with the native `fetch`. 3. Before this change, the route returns 502 with `networkCode: ECONNRESET` (or `UND_ERR_SOCKET`). Native `fetch` does not retry. **Expected behavior** The route retries the idempotent GET one time when the connection is reset before a response. The retry uses the same 10 s signal. Other failures stay unchanged. ## What Changed - `server/src/routes/cloud.ts`: If the fetch phase fails with `ECONNRESET` or `UND_ERR_SOCKET`, the route sends the same GET one more time. The retry uses the same `AbortSignal.timeout(10_000)`. The total time stays at or below 10 s. - The route classifies the first error with the existing bounded `CloudPortfolioError` diagnostics. Thus a reset after the deadline stays `DEADLINE_EXCEEDED` and gets no retry. - The first reset gets a warning log with the same safe fields (`Paperclip Cloud portfolio connection reset; retrying once`). It does not send a Sentry event. Thus the logs still show how frequently this occurs. - A second reset, a deadline, HTTP error statuses, body failures, `ECONNREFUSED`, `ENOTFOUND`, connect timeouts and unknown errors behave as before: one report and no retry. Failures are still not cached. - `server/src/__tests__/cloud-routes.test.ts`: The old test "classifies a fetch reset without retrying" now expects one retry. New tests cover a second reset, the codes that get no retry, a reset after the deadline, and two real-socket cases. `doc/observability.md` describes the diagnostic context. Its fields and semantics do not change. Per `CONTRIBUTING.md`, the change adds no code comments; the retry rationale is in this description. ## Verification - Red before the fix: with the old route and the new tests, `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/cloud-routes.test.ts` gave 5 failed, 19 passed. The failures were the two mocked retry cases, the second-reset case and the two real-socket cases. Thus native `fetch` on Node 25.9 does not retry these resets itself. - Green after the fix: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/cloud-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/cloud-portfolio-error.test.ts` gave 31 passed. - Real dependency: the real-socket tests use `node:http` and the native global `fetch`. `socket.resetAndDestroy()` gives `ECONNRESET`. `socket.destroy()` gives `UND_ERR_SOCKET`. Each test makes sure that the second request reaches the server with the same authorization, the route returns 200, and no Sentry event occurs. - The second commit only removes the four-line comment that Greptile flagged. It has no runtime effect; a syntax check passed locally and CI reruns the suite. - Not run locally: `server/src/__tests__/sentry.test.ts` fails to load in my sandbox on the unchanged base and with this change. The error is the same: `Failed to resolve entry for package "@paperclipai/plugin-sdk"`. The workspace packages were not built. The full `tsc -p server` was stopped by the 8 GB sandbox memory limit. A typecheck of only the changed files gave the same output on the base and with this change, apart from a 5-line offset. CI runs the full typecheck and test suite. - Remaining limit: the staging evidence shows that the request did not reach the Cloud application. It does not show if the reset socket was a reused keep-alive connection or a new connection. The retry is correct in both cases. ## Risks - Low risk. The retry applies only to an idempotent GET that has no side effects on Cloud. It occurs only for a fetch-phase reset before a response. - The worst case is one more portfolio request to Cloud for each reset. The deadline is the same as before. - If the Cloud edge resets all connections, the user sees the same 502 as before, after two fast attempts. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), through Claude Code, with tool use (shell, code execution, Sentry, Railway and GitHub connectors). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 15:39:18 -08:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	002455ea06	fix(issues): finish a reassignment whose native stop settles after the request (#19354) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A user can stop or interrupt a running native task and then send a message to give new direction > - When the stopped run left a workspace hold, the dispatch gate withholds the follow-up run until recovery saves the work > - The gate must save the user's message on its receipt so that the deferred-receipt worker continues it after recovery > - Two conditions made the gate skip the message instead of saving it, so the task stayed in progress with "Saved work recovered. Send a message to continue." although the user already sent one > - This pull request saves the message in both conditions > - The benefit is that the message the user already sent continues once, automatically, after recovery ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** After a user stopped or interrupted a native task with an isolated sandbox workspace and sent a message, the follow-up run was cancelled with `execution_reconciliation_required`. Its error said "Saved work recovered. Send a message to continue." Nothing re-woke the task. In the interrupt case, a periodic sweep started a run about four minutes later. In the case where the follow-up first waited for the stopped run's workspace save (`workspace_busy`), each later retry parked on the same resolved recovery action, and the task did not continue. **Expected behavior** When the recovery that the follow-up waited on resolves, the message that the user already sent continues once, automatically. The product does not ask for a second message. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a native task in a managed sandbox with an isolated workspace. 2. Stop the run (or send a comment with interrupt), then send a message while the stop and workspace save are still settling. 3. Wait for the workspace recovery to resolve. 4. See that the follow-up run is cancelled with `execution_reconciliation_required` and that no run continues the message. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` before this change. **Root cause** `deferUnstartedUserComment` (run dispatch) refused to save the withheld message in two cases: 1. It compared the message time with the source run's `finishedAt`. A native run finishes only after its provider stop and workspace save settle, which takes seconds. A message written after the Stop request but before that settlement was treated as input written before the Stop. The receipt was marked `skipped`. 2. It required the run's own receipt to be user-owned. A workspace-busy retry or an admission retry carries the user's message under a system-owned receipt, so the message was dropped with the retry. ## What Changed - Add `userStopBoundaryAt(run)` in `run-cancellation.ts`. For a run cancelled by a user Stop or interrupt, it returns the recorded Stop request time (`cancellation.recordedAt`) when that is earlier than `finishedAt`. For all other runs it returns `finishedAt`. - Use this boundary in the dispatch gate's message deferral, in native explicit-continuation admission, and in the remote-Stop continuation check, so the three places agree on "message written after the Stop". - When the withheld run is a system-owned retry, walk a bounded chain (max 8) of retries that did not reach the provider (`workspace_busy` with `providerWorkStarted: false`, or a verified pre-dispatch `execution_reconciliation_required`) to the originating user receipt. Save the message on that receipt with the user's original wake context. Mark the retry's system receipt `skipped`. - Update the "input written before the Stop" test so that the Stop request, and not only the settlement, comes after the message. ## Verification - New regressions in `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts` (`continues a message ... without a second message, after recovery already resolved`): a direct follow-up and a workspace-busy retry. Each runs recovery to completion first, then lets the gate withhold the follow-up, then runs only the deferred-receipt worker. Each asserts that exactly one successor run is queued with the user's message and the user's authority, and that no provider work starts. - Red before the fix: both tests fail because the receipt is `skipped` instead of `deferred_issue_execution`. Green after the fix. - `npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts` (384 passed). - `npx vitest run src/services/explicit-native-continuation.test.ts src/modules/run-dispatch src/services/execution-continuation.test.ts src/services/run-cancellation.test.ts` (581 passed). - 19 more heartbeat, retry, queued-comment, and native recovery suites (1272 passed). One failure, `heartbeat-process-recovery > redacts opaque environment-bound credentials from Sentry diagnostics: result`, also fails on unchanged `master` and is not related. ## Risks - A message written after the Stop request but before the stopped run settled now continues. The stopping run cannot consume new input after its Stop request, and admission still removes comments that a run already delivered (`undeliveredLegacyUserCommentIds`). All admission gates (holds, stop proofs, approvals, budget) still apply. - Only user Stops and interrupts move the boundary. Other cancellations keep `finishedAt`. - The retry walk is bounded, stays in one company, agent, and issue, and accepts only retries without provider work. It revives a user receipt only from `cancelled` or `skipped`, so a second retry cannot save the same receipt twice. - Not in scope: a run that fails during native preparation with no user message (for example `runner_state_identity_mismatch: prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate; retirement_refused=unexpected_root_entry` on a system wake). After its recovery resolves, the task still waits for a user message. That is a separate root cause in the native session executor's prior-owner retirement proof. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, local test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 17:02:39 -06:00
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5	f9d366acdf	fix(runner): require a managed AI connection for plugin Runner-task environments (#19341) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A plugin can provide Runner execution through an environment driver that declares `supportsTasks: true`. Agent computers use this path. > - Core let an agent without a managed AI connection run on that path. The run then used the account that was installed on the plugin's execution host. > - That is not a supported credential source. When the host Runner did not match, the run failed three times, 30 seconds apart, and then blocked the task with a generic error. The error did not name the fix. > - The plugin cannot refuse these runs itself. `describe` has no connection data, and Core replaces plugin error text before the user sees it. > - This pull request makes a managed AI connection a requirement for every plugin Runner-task environment. Core refuses a run without one before it acquires a lease or calls the plugin. > - The benefit is one clear notice that tells the operator to choose an AI connection, and no wasted retries or plugin work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19326. That pull request makes a Runner revision mismatch retry. It noted that runs without a managed AI connection reach the Runner check on a different path, which still blocks after 3 attempts. This pull request removes that path for plugin Runner-task environments. **Problem or motivation** A `paperclip_runner` agent with no managed AI connection can run in a plugin environment that provides Runner tasks. The run uses the account installed on the execution host. If the host Runner does not match, the native session retries 3 times and then blocks the task with "Plugin-provided Runner execution operation unavailable". The operator cannot tell what to fix. **Proposed solution** Refuse these runs in Core before any lease, plugin call, secret resolution, or provider work. Use one stable reason, `ai_connection_required`, for run admission, the setup probe, and agent verification. Show a task notice that names the fix. **Alternatives considered** A refusal in the plugin. It cannot see the connection at `describe`, which runs first. Its error text is also replaced twice before the user sees it. A new structured plugin error code would still not cover `describe`. ## What Changed - Add `server/src/services/plugin-runner-ai-connection.ts`. It holds the `ai_connection_required` code and message, the probe result, and the manifest lookup for a Runner-task driver. The lookup moves here from `agent-runner-selection.ts`, so run admission and runner selection use the same rule. - `heartbeat/execution-configuration.ts`: refuse a new `paperclip_runner` run in a Runner-task environment when it has no managed AI connection. This also applies when `homeMode: "preconfigured"` drops the connection. The run fails as `configuration_incomplete` with reason `ai_connection_required` and an action URL to the agent's runtime settings. The check runs before observability, secrets, the managed runtime, the workspace, and the lease. A resumed native run keeps its admitted contract. - `recovery/stranded-notice.ts`: add an "AI connection required" task notice. - `run-failure-report.ts`: treat this pre-dispatch refusal as an owner action, not an unexpected failure. - `adapters/registry.ts`: the unmanaged probe for a Runner-task target now returns a failed `ai_connection_required` check. It calls no task operation. Managed probes still go through `testManagedEnvironment`. - `agent-harness-verification.ts` and `agent-lifecycle/application/failure.ts`: classify the check as `ai_connection_required` with a fixed message. Verification waits for the configuration to change instead of retrying. - Docs: `PLUGIN_RUNNER_EXECUTION.md` states the requirement. `PLUGIN_ENVIRONMENT_TASKS.md` no longer mentions installed accounts. `agent-config-ui.md` notes the requirement. - Tests: the "plugin-owned account" heartbeat test described the behavior that this change removes. It now checks the assembled heartbeat refusal: no plugin call, no native boundary, no adapter, no workspace files. ## Verification - `npx vitest run` in `server/` for these files. All tests passed: - `src/__tests__/heartbeat-execution-configuration.test.ts`. New cases: refused without a connection, refused for a preconfigured home, managed passes, resumed native input passes, non-task plugin driver passes. The refused cases also check that observability, secrets, and the managed runtime did not start. - `src/__tests__/heartbeat-plugin-environment.test.ts`. One test, "inherits the instance default environment across companies…", also fails on unmodified `master` in my environment. This change does not touch it, because its driver does not declare `supportsTasks`. - `src/adapters/registry.test.ts`, `src/__tests__/agent-harness-verification.test.ts`, `src/modules/agent-lifecycle/__tests__/diagnostics.test.ts`, `src/services/recovery/stranded-notice.test.ts`, and `src/services/__tests__/run-failure-report.test.ts`. - 17 more suites that use plugin Runner-task environments, with 705 tests: `plugin-runner-task.integration`, `plugin-warm-tasks.integration`, `task-creation-recovery.integration`, `native-startup-cleanup-recovery`, `environment-task-authority.integration`, `plugin-task-credential-writeback`, agent-lifecycle `lifecycle`, `setup`, and `environment-plugins`, `workspace-preparation`, `agent-runner-selection`, `agent-harness-verification-provider-api`, `agent-harness-verification-remote`, `plugin-environment-driver-seam`, `environment-task-runtime`, `agent-test-environment-routes`, and `adapter-registry`. - `pnpm typecheck` in `server/` reported no errors in the changed files. Its only errors came from sandbox-provider packages that my local install did not link. - Not run: `plugin-runner-probe.test.ts`, because it needs a Cargo build. This change does not modify `probePluginRunnerEnvironment`. Also not run: the full `pnpm test:run` and `pnpm build`. CI runs them. ## Risks - Behavior change: an agent in a plugin Runner-task environment with no managed AI connection now stops before dispatch. Before, it ran with the host's installed account. The agent's owner must choose an AI connection. This includes agents with `homeMode: "preconfigured"` in these environments. - Runs that were already admitted and resume from saved native input are not refused. They keep the earlier behavior until they finish. - The check reads the plugin manifest on each new run admission for plugin environments. This is the same lookup that runner selection already does. - This pull request and #19326 both edit `stranded-notice.ts` and `failure.ts`. The changes are additive, but whichever merges second needs a small rebase. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, in Claude Code with tool use (file edits, shell, test runs). Default context window, extended thinking on. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 14:59:40 -08:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	bf10bc695a	feat(task): show the agent's context window in task properties (#19273) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run through a harness (Codex app-server, or Claude through ACPX), and the runner turns harness events into Paperclip events > - Both harnesses report how full the model's context window is. Codex sends `modelContextWindow` with its token usage. Claude sends `used` and `size` in ACP `usage_update` > - Paperclip dropped both values. The task view could not show how close an agent is to compaction, and a compaction left no visible mark in the task chat > - This pull request carries the context-window occupancy through the runner, stores it with the existing usage events, and shows it as a "Context" row in the task Properties panel > - It also shows a "Context compacted · 230k → 38k tokens" divider in the task chat when the agent compacts its context > - The benefit is that operators can see when a long task is near its context limit and when the agent lost detail to a compaction ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 (same pattern: a canonical harness event turned into task-chat UI). Refs #19267 (status notices; it turns Claude's compaction banner into a notice, and this PR reads that notice too). **What existing behavior does this improve?** The task view shows no context-window information, and a compaction is invisible in the task chat. **Subsystem affected** Runner usage normalization (Rust and TypeScript transport), the PRP usage schema, a read-only issue API, the task Properties panel and the task-chat transcript. **Current behavior** Codex `modelContextWindow` and ACP `used`/`size` are dropped in the runner. `context.compacted` always has null sizes, Claude compactions emit no `context.compacted` event at all, and the live runner turn hides every marker except "interrupted". **Proposed behavior** `usage.reported` carries an optional `context {usedTokens, windowTokens}`. The task Properties panel shows a Context row ("10% of 258k") with a hover breakdown (tokens used, input and cached input, output, cost, compactions). The transcript shows a compaction divider, with sizes from the usage before and after the compaction. **Reason and benefit** Operators can see when a long task is close to its context limit, and they can see where the agent's earlier context was summarized. **Breaking changes** None. The new schema field is optional, and the new endpoint is read-only. ## What Changed - PRP `usage.schema.json`: add an optional `context {usedTokens, windowTokens}` object. Regenerate the schema bundle and the protocol manifest. - Rust `provider_events.rs`: add `codex_context_usage` (last request `totalTokens` and `modelContextWindow`) and `acpx_context_usage` (ACP `used`/`size`). ACPX `usage_update` now sets `context`. - Rust `provider_backend.rs`: Codex `thread/tokenUsage/updated` sets `context` on live (non-historical) usage. - Rust `provider_events.rs`: emit `context.compacted` for the completed `context_compaction` provider notice that #19267 produces from Claude's compaction banner. Only this path marks a Claude compaction, so the server counts each compaction once. - `runnerd-codex-transport.ts`: `rehydrateRunnerdUsageNotification` keeps a valid `context` on `tokenUsage`, so it reaches the stored `item.completed` usage item. - Server: new `GET /api/issues/:id/context-usage` (issue read access is required) and `issueContextUsage` service. It reads only the assignee's current session (the session of its newest usage report), and returns that session's latest context reading, non-zero totals, cost, and the count of compactions across all of the session's runs. Added to OpenAPI. Shared type `IssueContextUsage`. - DB: migration 0432 adds two partial indexes on `heartbeat_run_events`, built concurrently. One indexes usage items by run and time. The other indexes `context.compacted` events by company and session. `EXPLAIN` shows that both lookups use them. - UI: new `ContextUsageMeter` (bar, percentage, hover card) and `IssueContextUsageRow` in the Execution section of Properties. The row refreshes every 8 s while a run is active, and once more when the run ends. - UI transcript: `native-run-events.ts` maps `context.compacted` to a `context` activity entry with pre/post sizes from neighbouring usage items. `transcript-adapter.ts` turns it into a new `context_compacted` marker variant. The live runner turn keeps that marker as its own timeline row. - Storybook: `task-context-window.stories.tsx` (Properties panel in a task, all states, hover breakdowns, divider). ## Verification - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib provider_events` (new tests: ACPX context, Codex context, banner compaction, notice compaction) - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts` - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/components/ContextUsageMeter.test.tsx src/components/transcript src/components/task-chat src/components/issue-properties` - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/issue-context-usage.test.ts` (embedded Postgres) - `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`, `pnpm check:token-gates`, `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner run check:protocol-types` - Live check on a local worktree instance through the runnerd path: - A Codex `gpt-5.5` task showed "10% of 258k" (27k of 258k, input 77k with 49k cached, output 1.1k). - A Claude Sonnet 4.6 task showed "17% of 200k" (34k of 200k). - Storybook: Tasks and conversations / … / Task chat / Context window. - Not verified live: a real compaction. The divider is covered by unit tests through the same projector path the task chat uses. ## Risks - The schema field is optional, and older runners omit it. The UI renders nothing until a harness reports a window. - Migration 0432 builds two partial indexes concurrently on `heartbeat_run_events`, which is a large table. The indexes cover only usage items and compaction events, so they stay small. They add a little write overhead to those events. - Claude in-progress usage rows still record zero tokens with `requests: 1`. The final turn usage is correct. This PR does not change accounting. - A "Compact now" action is out of scope. It needs a compaction-only run that does not produce a run result. It will come in a follow-up. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, in-app browser for Storybook and the live instance). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 16:54:27 -06:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	00c7738513	fix(task-chat): keep messages sendable after a declined connection request (#19331) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The task chat composer shows a queue of saved input that waits for the agent's next turn > - When a person declines a connection request (for example Slack), the server queues a read-only receipt so the agent learns the outcome > - The composer showed that receipt with its raw JSON receipt in hover text, and the receipt hid the person's next message > - The next message could not be edited, discarded, or sent, so the chat looked stuck after a simple "Decline" > - This pull request shows a readable status for receipts and keeps the person's own later messages visible and actionable > - The benefit is that declining a connection resolves cleanly and the conversation continues ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** During an onboarding test on staging, a person declined the agent's "Connect Slack" request. A queued steering item then stayed above the composer. It could not be edited. Its hover text showed raw JSON. Sending the next message produced an error. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Give a task to a Paperclip runner agent whose run is active or waits on a busy workspace. 2. Let the agent request a connection, then decline it. 3. See the queued item "Rejected: Connect Slack". Hover it: the title is the full JSON receipt. 4. Send another message. The message never appears in the queue. Its row controls stay disabled. Send or Interrupt on the receipt queue returns `409 This queue does not support interruption`. **Expected behavior** A declined connection request resolves cleanly. It shows a readable status. The next message can be sent. **Evidence (staging wake diagnostics for the test task)** - 17:52:09: the decline wake for the Slack request. It stayed deferred, was never claimed, and was skipped at 18:21. - 17:52:10: a later retry wake for the plan-approval continuation. - `GET /issues/:id/queued-comments` projects the oldest matching wake. From 17:52 to 18:21 the composer showed the Slack receipt. Refs: related to the separate plan-approval queued-message fix, which changes the recovery sweep. This PR only touches the queue projection and the receipt label. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/queued-interaction-response.ts`: add `queuedInteractionSummary()`. A receipt now has one readable line, for example `Declined: Slack connection`, `Connected: GitHub connection`, or `Accepted: Build the app`. The entry `source.summary` carries it. The steering body for the agent still includes the typed JSON receipt. - `server/src/routes/issues.ts` (`findQueuedCommentWake`): a queued user-message wake now takes precedence over a receipt wake. A receipt shows only when it is the only queued input. The receipt wake itself is unchanged and is still delivered to the agent. - `server/src/modules/wake-queue/adapters/postgres.ts` (`findExistingDeferredWake`): skip interaction-receipt wakes when a new message picks the deferred wake it merges into. Before, the receipt was the oldest deferred wake, the merge was skipped, and every later message started its own wake. Only the first message then appeared in the queue. Receipts still never absorb user input. - `packages/shared/src/types/issue.ts`: add the optional `summary` field to `IssueQueuedCommentEntry.source`. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatQueuedMessages.tsx`: add `queuedMessageLabel()`. The row text, the hover title, and all aria-labels use the summary. They never use the raw steering body. ## Verification Red/green tests were written first and run against the unchanged code. New tests: - `server/src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts` - `shows a declined connection receipt as a readable status, not its JSON` - `keeps the next message visible and actionable after a declined connection (running run | stopped run)`: declines Slack, posts the next message, and asserts that the queue lists that message with `canEdit`/`canDiscard`, that the discard works, and that the receipt wake is still pending for the agent. - `queues every later message together after a declined connection (legacy run | stopped run)`: two messages after a decline both appear in one editable queue, and the receipt wake keeps no message ids. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatQueuedMessages.test.tsx` - `shows a declined connection request as readable text, never its raw JSON receipt (BUG-08)` **Red (unchanged code):** ``` server: × shows a declined connection receipt as a readable status, not its JSON AssertionError: expected { kind: 'interaction', …(3) } to match object { …, summary: 'Declined: Slack connection' } server: × keeps the next message visible and actionable after a declined connection (running run) server: × keeps the next message visible and actionable after a declined connection (stopped run) AssertionError: ["Declined: Slack connection"]: expected undefined to match object { canEdit: true, canDiscard: true } (the queue lists only the receipt; the new message is missing) Tests 3 failed | 85 skipped (88) ui: × shows a declined connection request as readable text, never its raw JSON receipt (BUG-08) AssertionError: expected 'Reorder queued message: Rejected: Con…' not to contain '{' Tests 1 failed | 23 skipped (24) ``` An exploratory probe on the unchanged code also showed the send error on this path: `POST /queued-comments/interrupt` on the receipt queue with a running native run returns `409 {"error":"This queue does not support interruption"}`. The exact UI text that the tester saw was not available. Second commit (review follow-up), unchanged `findExistingDeferredWake`: ``` server: × queues every later message together after a declined connection (legacy run) AssertionError: expected [ Array(1) ] to deeply equal [ …(2) ] Tests 1 failed | 1 passed | 88 skipped (90) ``` With the change: `Tests 2 passed | 88 skipped (90)`. **Green (with this change):** ``` pnpm --filter server exec vitest run src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts Test Files 1 passed (1) Tests 90 passed (90) server: heartbeat-comment-wake-batching + src/modules/wake-queue Test Files 11 passed Tests 322 passed (322) server: retry-scheduling, wake-diagnostics, question-response-delivery, comment-wake-batching, dot-runner, responsible-user-invariant, stale-queue-invalidation, queued-comments routes Test Files 8 passed Tests 357 passed (357) pnpm --filter ui exec vitest run src/components/task-chat/TaskChatQueuedMessages.test.tsx src/lib/issue-queued-comment-queue.test.ts Test Files 2 passed (2) Tests 31 passed (31) server: question-response-delivery, connection-intents-service, satisfied-connection-intents Test Files 3 passed Tests 199 passed (199) ``` A first full run of the route file hit a 30s `beforeAll` timeout while embedded Postgres started on a loaded machine. One new stopped-run case was also flaky, because the agent could dispatch the new message before the assertion. I fixed the flake: the test now occupies the agent on another task (`maxConcurrentRuns: 1`), which is the existing pattern in this file. I confirmed again that this test fails without the route fix. Typecheck: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck`, `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`, and `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` pass. `pnpm check:token-gates`: all gates clean. I did not run the full `pnpm test:run` or `pnpm build` locally. CI runs them. ## Risks - Behavior change: when a receipt and a user message wait at the same time, the composer now shows the message queue. The receipt is no longer shown there until it is the only queued input. The receipt wake and its delivery do not change. The resolved card in the thread still shows the outcome. - The first line of the steering body for connection receipts changes from `Rejected: Connect Slack` to `Declined: Slack connection`. The JSON receipt for the agent does not change. - Out of scope (unchanged on master, reproduced without any receipt): while a native run is running, each new message gets its own queued run, and the queue shows only the first one. Messages that join a `scheduled_retry` run's context also do not appear in the queue projection. - Overlap: the plan-approval queued-message fix (BUG-03) changes the recovery sweep, not this code. Both fixes touch the same symptom area. They do not edit the same functions. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, browser inspection of staging, test execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 21:03:37 +00:00
Svetlana ZolotenkovaandPaperclip	1b0f78100d	fix(access): return membershipRole in the company user directory (#15183) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents often check a human approval. The check must confirm the role of the approving user in the company. > - An agent can read the company user directory. The directory removes the membership role from the server record. > - The admin member list requires `users:manage_permissions`. An approval check must not need that permission. > - This pull request returns `membershipRole` in the existing user directory and keeps all access limits. > - The benefit is that agents can verify an approver's role without admin permissions. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** `GET /api/companies/{companyId}/user-directory` returns active users without `membershipRole`. An agent that checks the authority of an approving user cannot tell an `owner` from other roles. `/members` requires `users:manage_permissions`. **Expected behavior** The directory returns the exact `membershipRole` from `companyMemberships`. A missing role stays `null`. Reading this field does not require admin permissions. Member management keeps its current limits. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use a company with an active `owner` user and an active user without a role. 2. Call `/user-directory` with an agent key. 3. Before this change, neither record has `membershipRole`. After this change, the field is `owner` and `null`. 4. The same agent still cannot read `/members` or change a member. ## What Changed - Add `membershipRole` to the select and result of `loadCompanyUserDirectory`. - Test the exact `owner`/`null` values, agent read access, denied admin read and change, denied other company, and denied unauthenticated request. - Keep the existing `assertCompanyAccess` and the company, user type, and active filters. - The client type includes a nullable `membershipRole`. The management test rejects only `users:manage_permissions` and checks the exact calls. The first review findings are fixed in a0d1ad3. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`: pass. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server build`: pass. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`: pass. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/company-user-directory-route.test.ts server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/access-routes-hidden-floor.test.ts`: 16 passed, 17 skipped. `ui/src/lib/company-members.test.ts` is added. - The regression test fails on the old `access.ts` because `membershipRole` is missing. It passes after the change. - `git diff --check`: pass. ## Risks The directory response gets one more field. There are no migrations. The role comes directly from the server record, with no `owner` fallback. User management permissions do not change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with shell tools, code editing, and test runs. The environment does not expose the exact model identifier. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-05 14:43:02 -06:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	d807887534	fix(ui): use one status glyph mapping for every task view (#19329) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task status is the main signal on every task surface: sidebar rows, the task header, the status menu, lists, the inbox, pills and chat cards. > - One task state rendered different status icons in different views. A blocked task that waits on an active sub-task showed the blue "in queue" glyph in the task header. The status menu, the chat chip and the sidebar rows showed the red "Blocked" glyph for the same task. > - The cause: each view passed its own subset of the presentation fields to `StatusIcon`. Many views dropped `blockerAttention` and some dropped `externalConversationState`. The status menu rendered its current row from the bare status. The summaries API did not return `blockerAttention`, so the recent-task sidebar could not know the state. > - This pull request puts the state-to-glyph/label mapping in one resolver and makes every task view pass all of its fields. > - The benefit is that the same state uses the same icon and label everywhere. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue. Found in a hands-on onboarding test on a staging cloud workspace. **What happened?** The sidebar and the task pane/status menu showed different status icons for the same state. On the test task (blocked, waiting on an active sub-task), the task header and the status button showed the blue "in queue" glyph. The selected "Blocked" row in the status menu showed the red blocked glyph. The coordinator sidebar "Recents" and project rows also showed the red blocked glyph, and the chat "Subtask created" chip showed a red "Blocked" chip. **Expected behavior** The same underlying state uses the same icon and label everywhere. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a task with a sub-task. Block the parent on the sub-task, and let the sub-task's agent run (the parent is "blocked, covered"). 2. Open the parent task. The header shows the blue "in queue" glyph. 3. Open the status menu. The current "Blocked" row shows the red glyph. 4. With the coordinator sidebar on, look at the task in Recents or in its expanded project. It shows the red glyph. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at 03eb49053f. ## What Changed - Add `ui/src/lib/task-status-presentation.ts`. `resolveTaskStatusPresentation()` is the one mapping from `status`, `displayStatus`, `externalConversationState` and `blockerAttention` to glyph, label and accessible copy. `taskStatusIconProps()` picks all four fields from a task record. - `StatusIcon` and `IssueStatusBadge` use the resolver. The status menu draws the current row with the trigger's presentation (in queue, idle, monitoring). - `IssueStatusBadge` now accepts `blockerAttention`. `taskStatusVar.in_queue` maps to the existing in-progress chip hue, the same as the existing `--status-task-icon-in_queue` icon token. - Task call sites spread `taskStatusIconProps(task)`: coordinator sidebar recents and project rows, classic recent tasks, lists, rows, columns, inbox, blocked inbox, my issues, dashboard, properties, relation pills, search, sibling navigation, chat chips, case summaries, status cards and user profile. Step/check statuses in protocol cards stay unchanged because they are not task statuses. - `GET /api/companies/:companyId/issues/summaries` returns `blockerAttention` for blocked rows (at most five IDs, through the existing `listBlockerAttention` service). `IssueSummary` gets the optional field. - Recent-task snapshots store and refresh `blockerAttention`. Sidebar project rows request the `rows` projection, which includes blocker state (the `index` projection skips it). - Storybook: the Foundations/Status Language story gets a "Same state, every view" section. ## Verification Red on `master` (tests written first, then run against the unchanged code): ``` cd ui && npx vitest run src/components/StatusIcon.picker.test.tsx src/components/CoordinatorSidebar.test.tsx src/lib/recent-tasks.test.ts × keeps the covered-blocker state so the sidebar shows the same queued glyph as the task pane (BUG-07) × marks the current row with the same glyph as the trigger for a covered-blocked task × marks the current row with the same glyph as the trigger for a waiting review and a monitored task × shows a covered-blocked recent task with the same queued glyph and label as the task pane × shows project tasks with their full status presentation FAIL StatusIcon.picker.test.tsx > ... covered-blocked task AssertionError: expected 'var(--status-task-icon-blocked)' to be 'var(--status-task-icon-in_queue)' FAIL StatusIcon.picker.test.tsx > ... waiting review and a monitored task AssertionError: expected 'var(--status-task-icon-in_review)' to be 'var(--status-task-icon-backlog)' FAIL CoordinatorSidebar.test.tsx > ... covered-blocked recent task ... AssertionError: expected 'var(--status-task-icon-blocked)' to be 'var(--status-task-icon-in_queue)' FAIL CoordinatorSidebar.test.tsx > ... project tasks with their full status presentation AssertionError: expected "vi.fn()" to be called with arguments: [ 'company', ObjectContaining{…} ] FAIL recent-tasks.test.ts > ... keeps the covered-blocker state ... AssertionError: expected undefined to deeply equal { state: 'covered', …(7) } Tests 5 failed | 32 passed (37) cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/issue-summaries-routes.test.ts × projects the covered-blocker state so every task view picks the same queued glyph (BUG-07) AssertionError: expected undefined to match object { state: 'covered', …(2) } Tests 1 failed | 14 passed (15) ``` Green with this change (same commands): ``` Test Files 3 passed (3) Tests 37 passed (37) Test Files 1 passed (1) # server summaries route Tests 15 passed (15) ``` Neighbouring and broader checks: - `StatusIcon`, `StatusBadge`, `StatusGlyph`, picker, sidebar and recent-task suites: 73/73 pass. - Full UI Vitest run: 11106 pass, 1 skipped. Three `IssuesList.test.tsx` tests timed out at 5 s under full-suite load. The same file passes 73/73 when run alone. - `tsc --noEmit` for `ui` and `server`: no errors in changed files. Remaining errors are pre-existing (unbuilt `@paperclipai/paperclip-runner`, generated Storybook catalog). - `pnpm check:token-gates`: all gates clean. Screenshots. The staging task before the fix: the status button is blue, the current "Blocked" row in the menu is red. | Staging task (before) | Staging status menu (before) | | --- | --- | |  |  | Storybook "Same state, every view" (Foundations/Status Language). Before uses the `master` `StatusIcon`/`StatusBadge`; after uses this branch. | Before (master) | After (this PR) | | --- | --- | |  |  | Before: the row glyph is blue, but the chip and the current menu row are red. After: the row glyph, the chip and the current menu row are all the blue "in queue" glyph. Review follow-up (commits 1d3a1a0a9e, d5c798ec53): blocker state on summaries, search and case responses is glyph-only (state, reason, counts). Blocker titles and IDs are never returned; a sampled identifier stays only when the actor can read that blocker. Producer-level tests failed before the follow-up and pass after it (\`task-created-items.test.tsx\`, \`CoordinatorTaskCommitment.test.tsx\`, \`company-search-service.test.ts\`, \`cases-routes.test.ts\`, private-blocker case in \`issue-summaries-routes.test.ts\`). Before merge, the branch was test-merged locally with current \`master\`: typecheck clean, 1095 UI and 80 server tests in the affected suites pass. ## Risks - Low risk. Presentation only. Status mutations still use the canonical `status`. - The summaries endpoint now runs the blocker-attention query for blocked rows. The endpoint accepts at most five IDs and runs the query only when a row is blocked. - Sidebar project rows use the `rows` projection instead of `index`. This adds the blocker and review attention reads for at most 12 rows, and only when a person expands a project. - `IssueStatusBadge` shows the blue "in queue" chip for covered-blocked tasks where callers pass `blockerAttention`. The label stays "Blocked" and the full reason is in the tooltip. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`, Anthropic), through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser). Default context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 14:42:11 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	55389554c2	fix(runner): paginate workspace discovery before journal persistence (#19311) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native agents discover reusable workspaces through `list_workspaces`. > - The tool returned every authorized workspace in one result. > - A large inventory exceeded the durable command journal limit. The result stayed pending, and session cleanup blocked the next turn. > - This pull request limits discovery in SQL and returns explicit continuation metadata. > - Agents can inspect every authorized workspace without sending the full inventory in one command. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #15749 introduced the task workspace tools. No duplicate pagination fix was found. **What happened?** A native workspace discovery call returned a multi-megabyte inventory. Persisting its result failed with `command_payload_too_large`. The preceding answer could still be saved, but cleanup retained the unsettled tool call. A later turn failed before provider work with `native_session_cleanup_quarantined`. **Expected behavior** Workspace discovery must return a manageable page. Agents must be able to request the remaining authorized rows. Existing visibility checks and journal integrity checks must stay effective. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create 2,000 task-selectable workspaces with ordinary repository paths. 2. Call `list_workspaces` from an admitted native run. 3. On the old code, the real API regression returns 869,781 bytes. The command journal allows about 510 KiB. 4. On the repaired code, follow `nextCursor` to inspect all rows. Pages contain at most 100 rows and fit within 128 KiB. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on source commit `7351a9d74f` before the repair. **Deployment mode** Isolated source checkout with real PostgreSQL and authenticated native agent APIs. Hosted deployment and incident recovery remain separate. ## What Changed - Validate workspace list limits and UUID cursors with a JSON Schema pattern supported by strict validators. Return `workspaces`, `limit`, `returnedCount`, `hasMore`, and `nextCursor`. - Apply company, visibility, lifecycle, and cursor conditions before the SQL limit. Order pages by workspace ID. Fetch one extra row to detect continuation without a count query. - Fit encoded pages within 128 KiB, including JSON escaping and Unicode. If one summary cannot fit, return explicit string previews with `truncatedFields`. The authorized detail API retains its full record. - Keep existing unpaged summary callers on their array response and recent-use order. - Update the native tool descriptor, generated contracts, catalog fixture, and execution documentation. - Add regression coverage for large inventories, complete pagination, stable pages, private and foreign rows, invalid inputs, and legacy summary behavior. Add an opt-in two-turn live Codex acceptance check. ## Verification - Red before repair: `task-workspace-api.test.ts -t "pages a large authorized workspace inventory"` failed because the result was 869,781 bytes instead of below 128 KiB. The transport regression also failed at 2,284,671 bytes. - Green after repair and review changes: 120 tests passed across the workspace API, transport, routes, native authority, coordinator, historical-question, and Codex vertical-slice suites. They cover complete discovery, byte-sized pages, oversized individual summaries, full detail retrieval, private/foreign/lifecycle exclusions, and strict schema compatibility. - Journal safety: two focused durable control-plane tests passed. Oversized result rejection and lossless valid result delivery remain effective. - Tool catalog and reconciliation: 30 tests passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed again on final commit `bc10880da6`. Server typecheck also passed after the review changes. The original affected suites passed on the rebased first commit (31 tests), and the expanded review regression set passed afterward (120 tests). - Real provider acceptance passed again on final commit `bc10880da6`: local macOS arm64, rebuilt native Runner, `gpt-6.1-sol`, high effort, per-turn lifecycle, and 2,000 persisted workspaces. Both turns succeeded. Persisted call inputs and results prove that the second page uses the first result’s cursor, both calls succeed, their IDs do not overlap, and the encoded results stay within 128 KiB. The second turn kept the provider conversation and file. Both task locks were clear after completion, and no recovered execution failure was recorded. Duration: 166.92 seconds. - Full local `pnpm test:run` stopped in the chat shard: 330 tests passed and one Slack registration test failed with `socket hang up`. That exact test passed in isolation without changes, and the final-head CI chat shards passed. A broader local managed-Slack follow-up produced no result after about eight minutes and was interrupted; it is not counted as a pass. The original full-suite failure remains recorded. - The first CI head failed native tool-schema compilation because strict validators did not recognize `format: uuid`. The revised descriptor uses a UUID pattern. The previously failing coordinator, native vertical-slice, authority, and history suites now pass locally. The stronger live cursor-receipt acceptance check passed. Final-head CI completed on `bc10880da6`: 57 checks passed and five optional checks were skipped, with no failures or pending checks. Greptile reviewed that commit at 5/5; both prior findings are resolved. - Dependency cost: paged discovery runs the existing visibility-scoped summary query with an ID cursor and at most 101 returned rows. It adds no count query, filesystem scan, provider call, or background worker. ## Risks - Native `list_workspaces` now returns a page object instead of an array. Individual summaries can be explicit previews when a single record exceeds the byte budget. Its advertised descriptor and generated contracts change together. Agents must follow `nextCursor` until null for a complete inventory. - Each page rechecks current visibility. Concurrent insertions, deletions, or access changes require a fresh scan when a complete point-in-time inventory is needed. - No migration or journal-limit change. An existing cleanup quarantine still requires normal recovery after deployment; this PR does not bypass it. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, shell tools, code editing, and test execution. The exact served model revision and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-05 13:24:52 -06:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5	5498db1072	fix(interactions): relay a verified reply to a self-requested human-only confirmation (#19243) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents ask users to approve proposals and plans with confirmation cards, and users often answer in the conversation > - `resolve-from-comment` lets the responding agent record that verified reply on the card > - Native agents often create their own proposal or plan confirmation as `human_only`, because the `request_human_input` schema offers only that value > - `resolve-from-comment` then refuses with `interaction_human_only`, and the plan and onboarding gates keep the task in `in_review` or `blocked`, although the user explicitly approved > - This pull request adds one narrow relay for that case and keeps every other human-only gate on its card > - The benefit is that an explicit conversational approval works again, and governed, company-capped and quality-review approvals keep their existing controls ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19073 **What happened?** TestOps launch https://paperclip.testops.cloud/launch/2694 (GitHub run https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41915965118) failed three Product regression cases for the same reason: `continuation/revision-preserves-approval`, `first-task/clarify-propose-accept` and `first-task/revise-accept`. In each case the agent created a `request_confirmation` with `resolverPolicy: human_only` (`effectiveResolverPolicySource: requested`). The user replied "I approve…" or "Yes, I accept that proposal". The agent's `resolve-from-comment` call returned 403 `interaction_human_only`. The task stayed `in_review` (plan gate) or became `blocked` (onboarding decision gate). **Expected behavior** When the agent itself asked for a human-only answer, the verified latest reply of the user it serves is that human answer. The agent can record it. Company-capped, governed-action, issue-review and quality-review gates still require the human to use the card. **Steps to reproduce** 1. A native agent calls `request_human_input` with `interactionKind: confirmation` and `resolverPolicy: human_only`. 2. The conversation user posts an explicit approval comment. 3. The agent calls `POST /api/issues/{id}/interactions/{interactionId}/resolve-from-comment`. Before this change it gets 403. ## What Changed - `issue-thread-interaction-resolution.ts`: the agent actor gets an optional `relayedHumanUserId`. A human-only decision is allowed as `allow_relayed_human` only when all of these are true: - the stored policy is `human_only`, its source is `requested` and its provenance is `explicit` - the resolving agent created the card (`createdByAgentId` matches) - no governed action applies - no additional restriction (issue review) applies - any named addressee user is the relayed user Company caps, the `governed_action` source and legacy rows with an unknown source are still denied. - `confirmation-comment-resolution.ts`: the service sets `relayedHumanUserId` only after its existing comment checks pass: user-authored, not agent-attributed, posted after the card, the latest user message, the same conversation session. It also requires that the author is the card's addressee, the conversation user or the run's responsible user, that the card is not a quality review, and that the company's current cap for the kind is not `human_only` (a tied cap keeps the source `requested`). The same actor goes into the locked accept/reject re-check. The activity entry adds `resolverPolicy: "human_only"` and `resolution: "relayed_human_decision"`. - `routes/issues.ts`: the route pre-check passes the candidate comment author. The service still re-verifies everything under its locks. - `issue-thread-interactions.ts`: carries the relay field into the service's own audience re-check. - Docs: the first-task skill and `api-reference.md` describe the narrow relay. The guidance still says not to add `human_only` to ordinary proposals. ## Verification - `server/src/__tests__/confirmation-comment-resolution.test.ts` (embedded Postgres): 72 pass. - Green: relay through a conversation user and through a run's responsible user. The card is `accepted`, `resolvedByAgentId` and `resolvedByRunId` are set, `resolvedByUserId` stays null, and the audit records `relayed_human_decision`. - Negative controls, each with the card still pending and no audit: agent-authored comment, earlier comment, wrong user, unbound issue/run, `company_cap` source, `governed_action` source, `qualityReview`, `toolAction`, `connectionAuthorization`, issue-review `human_only` restriction, another addressed user, human-created card, another agent's card, inherited company default, and a real capped card created through `svc.create` with a tied cap. The tied-cap test fails as expected when the cap is removed. - Existing negative controls are unchanged, including `human_only` without a bound user and the "rechecks narrowed permissions" retry. - Red check: with the three service files reverted to `master`, the two new green tests fail and the negative controls pass. - `server/src/services/issue-thread-interaction-resolution.test.ts`: 21 pass, including the pure evaluator relay rules. - `server/src/services/native-runtime/confirmation-comment-api.integration.test.ts`: 11 pass. The real route accepts the relayed reply and refuses another user's comment with 403. - Also pass: `issue-thread-interaction-routes`, `onboarding-first-task-admission`, `paperclip-runner-tool-authority`, `runner-api`, `onboarding-first-task-assets` and `company-skills-service` (2,474 tests in total). - Changed files typecheck cleanly. - Live verification: Product regression single-case runs of the three cases are pending after merge. ## Risks - This touches an approval gate. The relay is limited to cards whose creator chose `human_only`. All existing reply-evidence checks still apply, plus a bound-user requirement. Company caps, governed actions, quality reviews, issue-review restrictions and named addressees still deny the relay. - Attribution does not change: the resolver is still the agent and run. The human's comment is kept as `result.commentId` and in the audit. - Legacy rows with a null policy source are not relayed. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-05 08:31:31 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	47027e7ba5	fix(routines): retain authenticated agent responsibility on creation (#19222) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Routines save work for later execution under a responsible person's authority. > - An agent can create a routine through its normal REST or native API tools. > - The create route kept the agent creator but dropped the authenticated responsible user. > - The service then selected a parent task's user or a company default, even when the source run had a different user. > - This pull request passes the authenticated responsible user separately from creator attribution. > - Future automatic runs then use the authenticated responsible user saved in the routine revision. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An authenticated native agent created a routine without a parent task. The stored responsible user became a different company owner. An unrelated parent task could also replace the authenticated user. The defect changes the identity saved for future automatic work. **Expected behavior** Creation must use the server-resolved responsible user from the authenticated run or API key. The agent remains the creator. A person who clicks Run now still supplies that manual run's identity. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create an active company member and a different company owner. 2. Initialize a native agent run with the member's identity. 3. Use `call_api` to create a paused, self-assigned routine without a parent. 4. Read the routine and its first revision. Before this fix, both use the company owner. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master `56517dda6c5b32bc901b7dbf1605eaaa041c5fba`. **Deployment mode** Local source integration with real HTTP routes, agent authentication, native tool authority, and embedded PostgreSQL. No provider turn is needed for the reproduction. Related work: [#19128](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19128) adds board controls for saved responsibility. [#15207](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15207) repairs synthetic identities from built-in installers. Neither fixes this authenticated create path. ## What Changed - Pass the authenticated agent's responsible user as a separate internal actor field. - Select the board user first, then the agent’s server-resolved responsible user, before the existing parent and company fallback. - Keep creator attribution, initial revision attribution, manual dispatch identity, and existing records intact. - Add real native API, HTTP, and PostgreSQL regressions for identity selection, replay, client spoofing, stale claims, revoked membership, cancellation, cross-company calls, API keys, and fallback behavior. - Document the creation and manual dispatch identity rules in the execution contract. Correct the obsolete responsibility sentence in the agent access map. - Make the existing live-retry route fixture wait for its committed comment’s durable wake before draining. Keep all process and saved-owner assertions. ## Verification - Captured a failing native `call_api` test before changing production code. The persisted responsible user was the unrelated company owner. - The same real route and database boundary passes after the fix. - Initial affected routine and identity checks: 131 passed. The existing pending-AI-card fence also passed. - Follow-up routine checks: 118 passed. The owning scheduled-retry suite passed all 31 tests. - Initial CI serialized shard 7/9 failed with a `23503` wake-to-agent foreign key error during test cleanup. A controlled real-route/PostgreSQL pause reproduced that exact error on unchanged base `56517dda6c`. The drain returned before the route registered its deferred comment wake. The same pause passed after the fixture waited for the actual commentId’s durable wake receipt. The original failure is preserved. - Affected server typecheck after the fixture query change: passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - `pnpm test:run`: still running as supporting coverage. The worktree changed during the run: map cleanup, then the six-line fixture wait. Production and routine-test files stayed unchanged. This is mixed-working-tree coverage, not an immutable full-suite pass for a commit. Exact next-head CI remains required. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check`: passed. - Exact head `a12e3f6c42b8ad5826fd58faa3cd9553ea251e09`: all CI gates passed. Greptile and the native substantive review both gave 5/5 with no open findings. The native reviewer did not run tests or exercise shadow-mode authorization. - Live provider execution remains unverified. This change does not grant access to another person's AI account. ## Risks New agent-created routines now use their authenticated responsible user before a parent or company default. This is the intended behavior change. The service keeps its fallback when no bound identity exists. Missing agent-key identity still fails authentication. Missing personal AI configuration still blocks execution. Existing routines, revisions, tasks, grants, and manual dispatch behavior do not change. The fixture waits for a persisted wake record before draining; its original live-process and saved-owner assertions remain. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The host did not expose the context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-05 06:15:25 -06:00
Nicky Leach	53937be283	fix(agents): select environment plugins only for agents on that environment (#19173)	2026-11-04 20:59:02 -08:00
3 people	19c710fe93	fix(issues): record an interrupt comment as the user's Stop (#19149) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A board user can interrupt a running agent with a comment (`interrupt: true`) to redirect the work > - An interrupt is a Stop plus a message, but it did not record the user's stop identity the way the Stop control does > - The release path therefore treated an interrupted native run as a failed run: it blocked the task and took the finalization lease from the runner that was still settling > - Workspace preservation then stopped the sandbox under that live runner, so the runner reconnected for about 6 minutes and the stop could not be verified afterward > - The redirect message stayed saved, but it waited on workspace repair that could not finish > - This pull request records the board user's stop identity on interrupts, the same as the Stop control and terminalization stops > - The benefit is that an interrupt now settles like a Stop and the redirect can continue ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19122 (the Stop-then-redirect fix for the dispatch gate; this PR covers the interrupt-comment path). **What happened?** A board user posted a comment with `interrupt: true` on a task with a running native run (Daytona sandbox). The run was cancelled with `operator_interrupted` and the native cancel was acknowledged. Within a second, the task went to `blocked` and a `native_continuation_requires_reconciliation` hold was created. The runner transport then logged `state=reconnecting` for about 6 minutes, and the run ended with `runner_process_termination_unconfirmed: ... Daytona sandbox lease ... is no longer active`. Workspace recovery started about 10–17 minutes later and failed with `agent_stop_unconfirmed` / `provider_unavailable`. The redirect comment stayed saved as a deferred wake waiting on `workspace_repair_required`. No follow-up run started. **Expected behavior** An interrupt behaves like Stop followed by a message. The stopped runner settles normally. The task is not blocked as a failure. The saved message continues once the previous execution has stopped. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a native run on a remote sandbox. 2. Post a board comment with `interrupt: true`. 3. Observe the task become `blocked` with a `native-continuation:<runId>` hold, and the run's finalization row rewritten to `terminal_failure` with no lease owner while the executor is still settling. 4. Observe workspace preservation stop the sandbox, the runner transport reconnect until its grace ends, and recovery fail to confirm the stop. **Root cause** `recordNativeTerminalRecoveryIfNeeded` (`server/src/modules/wake-queue/adapters/postgres.ts`) skips intentional stops through `isAcknowledgedNativeStop`. That check requires `resultJson.cancelledByActorType === "user"` and `cancelledByUserId`. The Stop control and terminalization stops record these fields. `operatorInterruptCancelOptions` (`server/src/routes/issues.ts`) recorded only `interruptedByActorType` / `interruptedByActorId`. So an acknowledged interrupt took the failure branch. That branch blocks the task and sets `nativeRunFinalizations` to `terminal_failure` with `leaseOwner: null`. Cancelled-workspace preservation then saw a terminal row with no owner and stopped the sandbox while the runner was still settling. **Paperclip version or commit** Seen on staging at 69dea878c0. The touched code is unchanged on current `master`. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific (core bug). Seen with the Paperclip runner adapter on a Daytona sandbox. ## What Changed - `operatorInterruptCancelOptions` now records `cancelledByActorType: "user"` and `cancelledByUserId` for a board user, in addition to the existing interrupt fields. All three interrupt call sites (comment POST, issue PATCH, queued-comment interrupt) use it. - Route regression in `issue-update-comment-wakeup-routes.test.ts`: an `interrupt: true` comment on a running native run sends these fields, and the route's actual fields satisfy `isAcknowledgedNativeStop` with an acknowledged native stop receipt. - Release-path regression in `wake-queue/adapters/postgres.test.ts`: an acknowledged interrupt Stop, while the executor still owns finalization, releases the task without blocking it, creates no recovery hold, keeps the finalization lease owner, and keeps the saved redirect deferred. ## Verification - Red before the fix: - The route test failed because `cancelRun` received no `cancelledByActorType` / `cancelledByUserId`. - The release-path test failed with the old interrupt fields: the task was blocked, a hold was created, and the finalization owner was cleared. - Green after the fix: - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/issue-update-comment-wakeup-routes.test.ts src/modules/wake-queue` - Related suites: `acknowledged-native-stop`, `issue-queued-comments-routes`, `issue-comment-reopen-routes`, `issue-execution-policy-routes`, `explicit-native-continuation`, `heartbeat-process-recovery`. - The staging incident was read through the read-only run, event, log, recovery-action and wake diagnostics APIs. - Not done: a live staging reproduction at the fixed revision. Deployment is out of scope. ## Risks - An interrupt now counts as the user's Stop everywhere the Stop control does. This includes case-handoff supersession in `cancelRun`: an interrupt supersedes a pending case handoff, like Stop. - Only board users get the stop identity. Agent actors cannot use `interrupt: true` (the route returns 403). - Runs interrupted before this change keep their old fields. They are not migrated. - Not changed here, and suitable for follow-ups: - `recordNativeTerminalRecoveryIfNeeded` can still clear a live finalization `leaseOwner` for other failed native runs. - The runner PRP ingress reconnect loop (`server/src/realtime/runner-prp-outbound.ts`) does not stop early when the sandbox lease is closed. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, subagent code tracing, browser for read-only staging diagnostics). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-04 21:58:51 -06:00
4 people	4ea53f9eb5	fix(server): resolve issue identifiers in file-resources routes (#16352) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents and the board read task workspace files through the `/api/issues/:issueId/file-resources/*` routes > - Clients can identify a task by its UUID or by its human identifier, for example `ABC-230` > - The issues router changes identifiers to UUIDs, but the file-resources router does not > - Thus an identifier goes into a `uuid` comparison, Postgres rejects the query, and the route returns 500 > - This pull request resolves identifiers in the file-resources router and returns 404 for malformed ids > - The benefit is that identifier links work, and bad ids give a correct 404 and no server error ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A request to `GET /api/issues/ABC-230/file-resources/list` returned 500. The server log showed `invalid input syntax for type uuid` from `workspaceFileResourceService.getIssue`. Sentry recorded this error on hosted staging. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a task that has an identifier, for example `ABC-1`. 2. Send `GET /api/issues/ABC-1/file-resources/list?workspace=project`. 3. The server returns 500. The same request with the task UUID returns 200. **Expected behavior** The route accepts the identifier, as the other `/api/issues/:id` routes do. An unknown or malformed id returns 404. ## What Changed - Added `resolveIssueId` to `WorkspaceFileResourceService`. It changes a task identifier to the task UUID. It does not check visibility. `getIssue` still does the privacy-scoped read. - Added a `router.param("issueId")` handler to the file-resources router. It calls `resolveIssueId`, the same as the issues router does for its routes. - `getIssue` now returns 404 before the query when the id is not a UUID. This stops the Postgres cast error for all callers. - Added a regression test for identifier, lowercase identifier, private task, unknown identifier, and malformed id on the `content`, `list`, and `availability` routes. - Updated the test service fakes with the new method. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run src/__tests__/file-resources.test.ts src/__tests__/file-resources-git-scan-load.test.ts` in `server/`: 55 passed. - Without the source change, the new test fails with `expected 200 "OK", got 500 "Internal Server Error"`. This reproduces the production error. - I did not run a full local `tsc` because the sandbox did not have sufficient memory. CI runs the typecheck. ## Risks - Low risk. The change adds one indexed lookup on `issues.identifier` (unique index) only when the path value has the identifier format. - The identifier lookup does not check visibility. `getIssue` then applies the privacy-scoped read, so a private or unknown task gives the same 404 as before. The route does not show if a task exists. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edit, test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 12:30:26 -08:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	edb9d29942	fix(recovery): preserve Retry authority and reopen cross-task cases (#18997) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Tasks keep execution identity and saved workspace files separate from control-plane updates. > - A scanner can have permission to reopen a case while its run cannot restore that case's files. > - Retry can also follow a preparation failure that has no recovery-action record. > - Both paths can accept valid work but leave the target unable to run. > - This change restores files under the target executor and saves admitted Retry authority on the canonical receipt. > - Existing workspace, user, source and successor checks still apply. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An authorized agent updates another closed task. The route tries to restore the target workspace under the caller's run identity and returns `403 Task workspace run identity is unavailable`. A separate failure occurs when a normal board Retry follows a pre-provider preparation failure. Admission has no recovery-action row on which to save continuation authority. Dispatch then fails with `continuation_user_authorization_missing`. **Expected behavior** Accept the authorized task update. Restore its terminal workspace when the target's admitted executor starts. An admitted Retry must retain its exact dispatch authority even when the predecessor has no recovery-action record. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Complete a task with an isolated workspace. From a different running task, use an authorized comment or PATCH with `resume: true` on that closed task. 2. Separately, fail native preparation before provider work starts, with no recovery-action row. Submit board Retry, admit its successor, and build the execution continuation. 3. Before this change, the first path returns 403 and the second rejects its admitted authority. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against `e968131efa7e63d321f3bcca8d47a62513c2efb4`. Rebased onto `afbc5a885b5`. **Deployment mode** Server-managed native task execution. Tests use real PostgreSQL and temporary workspace files. Related PRs: #16927 covers terminal workspace races. #17916 retains exact native export sources. Neither covers these route and Retry receipt failures. A GitHub search found no duplicate. ROADMAP.md was checked; this is a recovery bug fix. ## What Changed - Defer workspace restoration only for authorized cross-task comments and updates from a live run. Checkout keeps its existing workspace identity checks. - Restore the target's selected terminal workspace under its own admitted run. Preserve its saved files and existing source checks. Leave manually archived workspaces unchanged. - Store server-created continuation authority on the canonical admitted Retry receipt when no source recovery-action record exists. Existing action records remain authoritative. Read the fallback only after matching the company, task, agent, user, source, generation and successor. - Add route and PostgreSQL regression tests. Document both paths. ## Verification - Red: both cross-task route tests returned the observed 403 before the route fix. - Red: the target executor could not reuse its archived terminal workspace before the restoration fix. - Red: an admitted preparation Retry with no recovery-action row failed with `continuation_user_authorization_missing` before the receipt fix. - Green: 419 recovery and continuation tests pass, plus 183 focused route, environment and Retry tests. The assembled heartbeat test starts the agent in the same terminal worktree and verifies both its unpushed commit and uncommitted file bytes. It fails before the restoration fix. - Negative cases reject wrong Retry runs, users, source runs, generations, unadmitted receipts and missing authority. The original failed run stays unchanged. Workspace tests verify saved file bytes. - Full `pnpm build`, `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm check:module-boundaries` and `git diff --check` pass. - The full suite found an existing assembled chat authority regression: clearing a recovery-action record could be bypassed by the new fallback. The fix now writes the fallback only when that source has no action record. That assembled regression passes with the original test unchanged. - Full `pnpm test:run` is running again. Its first attempt also hit an unrelated ancestor skill-root lookup for a missing Slack skill. The rerun uses a temporary untracked link to the repository's own bundled skills. This link is excluded from the PR. Full-suite completion and hosted CI are pending. - Hosted CI has multiple runner interruptions. E2e shard 1/8, server shards 3/12, 8/12 and 12/12, and workspaces-a shard 1/2 show runner shutdown signals. E2e shard 5/8 and server shards 1/12 and 2/12 have GitHub annotations reporting lost runner communication; their logs return 404. The `ci / verify` assertion failed because the general-test matrix was cancelled. GitHub rejected job and failed-workflow reruns while this workflow is still running. Rerun the interrupted checks after it settles. - Greptile reviewed exact head `a1e3929aedb1ee3bfcd001f4ebb1510106bf4070` at 2026-11-04 17:37 UTC: 5/5, with no new blocking findings and no unresolved review threads. ## Risks - A deferred workspace restore can still fail at target admission. The run keeps the existing workspace failure path; this change does not bypass file recovery or provider stop checks. - Retry receipts now store server-created authority. Existing action receipts remain valid. No schema migration is required. - Local regression tests establish the software behavior. The new revision has not been deployed to a hosted instance. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through the Codex harness in T3 Code, with xhigh reasoning, repository inspection, tool use and code execution. The context-window size is not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 11:55:16 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	e54f9fbf82	fix(secrets): expose secure human entry in native discovery (#18927) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Some tasks need a company credential or the current person's credential. > - Paperclip already has secure human entry forms for these values. > - Native connection guidance did not distinguish storing a credential from connecting an external service. > - Native API search also omitted the existing secure entry route from secret operation help. > - This change makes that route discoverable while preserving human and owner authority. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18780. Related #18921 corrects a separate observer false positive. Neither PR owns this production guidance change. **What happened?** A request to store an existing company or personal credential could lead to an unnecessary external provider question. Native API search did not explain the existing human entry surface. **Expected behavior** An agent can find the existing secure form, direct the human to the matching entry, and verify the result through its authorized interfaces. The agent must not ask for values in chat or act as the human. **Steps to reproduce** Search the native API for a company credential or personal publishing credential. The result should name the supported Secrets settings route and its human authority boundary. Open a known personal definition link and confirm that the existing Set my value action appears. ## What Changed - Distinguish Paperclip credential storage from external connection discovery in shared native guidance. - Describe the existing Secrets settings route, secure entry actions and current-person boundary in OpenAPI help. Qualify definition detail links as admin-only; other members use My secrets and Set my value. - Exercise discovery through the actual OpenCode MCP bridge and native API catalog. - Retain agent denials for personal definition and value routes. Exercise the real Secrets UI definition link. ## Verification - Focused local checks: four suites, 78 tests passed. These cover native discovery, secret-route permissions, shared guidance and the Secrets UI. - The new discovery test fails against unchanged master OpenAPI help. It passes with this change. - Token gates and diff checks passed. - Full workspace typecheck passed. The first attempt found missing SDK links after script-free installation; the existing root postinstall helper restored them. An unprivileged retry also hit the local tsx IPC sandbox restriction. The corrected owned setup passed without source changes. - Full local workspace build passed. The full local test run stopped in chat shard 2: one Discord receiver-lease test failed during initial configuration. That shard passed 263 tests; the first shard passed 310. The test and owning lease/configuration sources are unchanged from master. One focused isolation passed without code changes. Its cause remains unknown; this is not a complete local test pass. No unrelated Discord code was changed. [Normal hosted CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41773266687) passed on exact head `0abb8b722779368109b9639f68122d7df02a8ab1`. - Fresh Greptile review reports 5/5 on the exact current head; all review threads are resolved. Paperclip Review remains in progress. The optional Superagent scan is neutral/inconclusive: Security Graph context retrieval returned HTTP 503 and assessment did not start. It supplies no security PASS credit. - A retained representative native attempt with this guidance produced the correct definition-scoped secure-entry link. Its observer then rejected an explicit warning against chat entry. That failed result remains unchanged. Human entry, saving the value and worker delivery were not exercised. This PR claims no complete product-eval pass. ## Risks This changes agent guidance and search ranking. It grants no new permission and changes no secret resolution or owner checks. Broader service-connection discovery still applies when a task needs a connection. The secure human forms are unchanged. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex, with repository tools, code execution and test analysis. The host does not expose the context-window limit. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — the 78 owning controls pass; the broad local failure remains disclosed above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — normal CI passed; optional review states are disclosed above - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 07:01:57 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	5b50c6b32c	fix(teams): return saved resource links after catalog installation (#18923) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Catalog installation creates agents, projects, and routines in one company. > - The install result includes saved IDs but no links to those resources. > - A chat agent can describe a partial installation without giving the operator a way to inspect it. > - This change returns canonical links for saved resources and documents them for API discovery. > - The operator can use the returned links to inspect the actual installation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A catalog install can create the intended resources and report skill warnings, while its response leaves callers to construct board URLs from IDs. A native chat attempt described the resources and warned about an incomplete skill, but omitted resource links in both its initial and repeat replies. **Expected behavior** The installation response should provide canonical company-scoped links for its saved agents, projects, and routines. It must preserve warnings and omit links for rows without saved IDs. **Steps to reproduce** Install a catalog team through the API. Inspect its saved resource rows and response. Before this change, the response has IDs and names but no resource links. **Paperclip version or commit** Parent `e7549ab613` from master. Related #16495 changes comment authorization metadata in the same OpenAPI file; it does not address team installation responses. No duplicate team-link PR was found. ## What Changed - Add typed `resourceLinks` entries with resource kind, saved ID, name, and canonical company-scoped href. - Read the company prefix with one bounded primary-key query before import. Encode URL segments and use saved IDs, including IDs returned for reused resources. - Preserve the portability import result, skill preparations, warnings, permissions, and collision behavior. - Document the response and add service, native API wire, OpenAPI, and real database regression coverage. ## Verification - Parent service regression: 1 failed, 28 passed. The new failure was the missing resource-link response. - Owning service/native wire, route authorization, and OpenAPI suites: 72 passed. - Real PostgreSQL catalog-install suite: 4 passed. Returned links match persisted agent IDs and the company prefix. - Shared and server TypeScript checks passed. Fresh shared/SDK builds and the owning Runner TypeScript prerequisite passed. - UI typecheck, Storybook catalog check, 30 catalog/map controls, and token gates passed. - Actual CI found an omitted required `resourceLinks` field in the existing Storybook install fixture; that fixture is now synchronized. The earlier response-status review correction is also retained: install schema and wire control use actual HTTP 201. Final head `0bca72cf1f7641fd842a04c5a75cae4bcc274f05` passed all 48 normal CI jobs, including `ci / verify`: [run 41773413940](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41773413940). Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved review threads. The optional Paperclip review remains queued and its comment says work is paused. The Superagent security scan is neutral; neither supplies completed assessment credit. - `git diff --check` passed. - Setup failures were retained: incorrect test working directory, sandbox listener denial, missing built SDK/Runner declarations, and native library aliases not hydrated from the package directory. Corrected setup used the owning build and shipped hydration script. No assertions or deadlines were relaxed. - Repository-wide tests/build were not run locally; the full normal CI suite passed. A new native chat attempt has not run for this change. The earlier chat attempt remains failed for missing links. Local response coverage does not prove that a model will include the links in its next reply. ## Risks - This is an additive JSON response field. Manually constructed TypeScript install results must include the new typed field. - The query adds one company-prefix lookup per installation. It selects one scalar by company primary key and runs before mutation. - Supplying links reduces URL construction work but does not guarantee model use. Native qualification is still required. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, and tool execution. The host did not expose the model context-window limit. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All required normal CI gates are green; optional incomplete/neutral assessments are disclosed above - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-04 07:01:08 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	dcc0878b32	perf(agents): save healthy account settings without a runtime probe (#18690) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The agent runtime page saves account, model, and environment settings. > - The save handler starts a computer and runs a live account test before it writes the edit. > - A slow computer or provider can make a healthy account save take tens of seconds. > - Saved account health, access, installation, and compatibility can be checked without a runtime test. > - This pull request uses those checks for ordinary configuration saves. > - Legacy adoption, task adoption, and Copilot model checks keep live verification. > - The benefit is a fast save while Test and execution retain runtime checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Saving a new AI account selection on an existing agent can take 20–30 seconds. Model edits can take the same path. The configuration PATCH acquires a computer, prepares account credentials, runs a provider/runtime probe, and releases the computer before it saves. **Expected behavior** A healthy installed account can be saved after current access and compatibility checks. A save confirms persistence. Test verifies the runtime. An unverified legacy account must still pass live adoption checks. **Steps to reproduce** Run the PostgreSQL regression with a 20-second controlled delay at computer allocation. On the original route, a successful save takes 20,191 ms and calls allocation and the runtime probe once. With the first patch, the same fixture takes 51 ms; with the environment-guard correction, it takes 37 ms and calls neither operation. Each timing has one sample. This is a local fault experiment with real HTTP and PostgreSQL. It is not a hosted latency measurement. Related: #17760 addresses binding comparison and prospective probe environment resolution. This change deliberately removes the live probe from ordinary healthy-account saves. It keeps live checks for legacy and task adoption. #17965 fixes the result of an explicit managed Runner test. Neither change removes this save-time wait. #18687 optimizes a different Apps configuration read. ## What Changed - Replace the internal probe boolean with explicit none, legacy, and always modes. - Use legacy mode for ordinary configuration saves. Keep current account health, access, installation, compatibility, environment, audit, and revision checks. - Keep the environment company check before the live-probe branch. Keep the live task-adoption transaction and Copilot model checks. - Add twelve real PostgreSQL save-route regressions, including company-bound environment checks. Keep the existing inherited-sandbox adoption fixture for legacy and task adoption. - Cover healthy and legacy settings changes separately. Keep provider rejection and reconnect tests on the legacy save path. - Update the specification and feature/access maps to distinguish saving from runtime verification. The configuration route owns this policy. The account service still owns account access and health. The existing environment test service still owns live probes. No new endpoint, migration, dependency, background job, or provider protocol is added. ## Verification Base: `3f8ebfff8aa9febd0733c6f65b07485dcadfd0e2`. - Original route with initial regressions: three failures and two passes. Healthy saves reached computer allocation. The controlled 20-second baseline saved successfully but failed the no-allocation assertion. - Initial save/adoption/Copilot selection: 21 passed. The name filter excluded 141 unrelated tests. The seven new cases cover persistence, revision and activity records, model edits, roster edits and stale retries, missing installation, revoked grants, legacy verification, and controlled allocation latency. - Explicit Test-route suite: 55 passed. The first attempt reached the 30-second import hook limit. The same suite passed with a 90-second hook limit. - Saved harness preflight suite: six passed. Account revocation, compatibility, probe failure and target release checks remain. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check`: passed. - Review revision: both full save/account suites passed, 96 tests total. The controlled save took 37.08 ms with zero computer allocations and zero provider probes. The five new environment checks passed after the three foreign-environment cases failed against the first patch. - Local full `pnpm -r typecheck`: unavailable because cargo is missing. - Local full `pnpm build`: unavailable at the verified Copilot runtime prerequisite. Server typecheck preparation also reaches missing cargo. - Local full `pnpm test:run`: stopped after concurrent broad checks exceeded the container memory limit. No full-suite pass is claimed. Direct server TypeScript checking and its bounded retry were also killed by the container memory limit. The first remote Typecheck + Release Registry check passed; the next head still requires fresh CI. Reproduce the controlled timing: ```sh cd server PAPERCLIP_CONFIG_SAVE_PROFILE_DELAY_MS=20000 pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/agent-configuration-save.test.ts --hookTimeout 90000 ``` The fixture keeps real Express, authorization, account selection, PostgreSQL persistence, revisions and audit writes. Only remote allocation and the provider probe are controlled. The default tests do not contact a provider. Successful configuration saves no longer depend on either controlled operation. A later explicit Test or task must still verify the actual runtime. Review follow-up: the first Greptile review found that the new healthy-account path skipped the environment company guard. The corrected route checks the effective environment before it decides whether to probe. Five real PostgreSQL cases cover foreign, same-company and global environments, inherited defaults, and an existing account binding. Against the first patch, the three foreign-environment cases returned 200 and failed their expected 403 assertions; the two allowed cases passed. Initial fixture attempts hit unique environment constraints; the fixture now uses distinct sandbox rows and names. The first CI server shard found 11 tests that required a live probe for every save. Those expectations are changed to the documented healthy/legacy split, with additional healthy-selection cases. The build and Runner jobs were cancelled after this test failure. Their logs show no separate compile or test verdict. No cancelled check is counted as a pass. Latest commit `6257e9e67f289e1c650a8b4c2b818fcca37e2800`: [CI run 41542980091](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41542980091) passed typecheck, build, all test shards, Runner checks, and E2E. All 55 check runs are complete: 52 passed and 3 were skipped by their workflow conditions. The commit status check also passed. [Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18690#issuecomment-6590555746) is 5/5 for this commit with no new findings. The earlier environment ownership thread is resolved. These remote results complete the checks that the local tool and memory limits prevented. The earlier local failures remain recorded above. ## Risks A healthy saved account can become invalid at the provider before the next runtime use. Ordinary saves no longer detect that through a live test. They still reject unhealthy, revoked, incompatible, or uninstalled accounts in current storage. Explicit Test and execution retain provider authentication and project-authentication checks. Legacy-account adoption, task connection adoption, and Copilot account-specific model checks keep their existing live validation. There is no migration. Reverting the route change restores the earlier synchronous probe behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with repository tools and code execution. This runtime does not expose the exact model ID, context-window size, or reasoning setting. Those values are not inferred. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites; full-suite limits are above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 16:56:11 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	683fa4725e	fix(evals): refresh native runtime and pin reviewed catalog repairs (#18780) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people inspect and manage their agents’ work. > - The timeline must report canonical ownership history, and OpenCode tool failures need bounded diagnostics. > - The measured candidate also had independently reproduced question-navigation and oracle defects. > - This change promotes the reviewed production fixes and pins one immutable, qualified source composition. > - Original queries, model, counts, clocks, privacy controls and qualification holds remain intact. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18775, #18777, #18779, #18711, #18713, #18718, #18699, #18798, #18799. **What happened?** The measured candidate predates merged native-runtime fixes and contains fixture defects. The timeline omitted recorded reassignment/removal history. Finish-input errors lacked a closed correlation and shape witness. **Expected behavior:** project recorded ownership transitions without inventing facts, distinguish successful native execution from failed verification steps, and retain content-free finish diagnostics. **Steps to reproduce:** repeat an unchanged assignee while editing another field; then reassign or unassign it. Only recorded transitions should appear. Invalid OpenCode finish input should produce a correlated rejection witness without values or schema text. Related #18699 adds gated company OTLP diagnostics. This change uses the existing local callback; it adds no exporter or capture policy. ## What Changed - Promote canonical timeline creation, reassignment and removal projection from #18777. Initial child ownership requires a recorded fresh-creation receipt; delegation requires a readable recorded parent. Unknown legacy facts fail closed. User actors/owners require active company membership; agent actors/targets must exist in that company. Spans, events and edges share that admission filter. Remove the introduced all-history absence query and use guarded indexed UUID lookups. - Add the shared/OpenAPI `unassigned` event kind, preserving newer main contracts and issue-route/service code through reviewed semantic joins. Existing UI consumers remain generic; no new visual marker is claimed. - Add bounded OpenCode finish diagnostics: schema digest, hashed call identity, closed shape enums and validation category. A throwing sink does not change admission or cancellation. - Pin immutable candidate `fd5e3b1e5a379524c0d1651ed8273e75ffd86541`, composed from combined #18777 source `b734393eff0d7ef85b7ad8abd556d2a66ca3a4e6` plus the reviewed MCP diagnostic delta. It preserves actually merged #18775 `97c07d149b5670088faf15317dcf603c75e2af87` and #18779 `a352c057d475067b4fe67375f06785287dfbe0ce`, and merged runtime fixes #18711, #18713 and #18718. - Qualify narrative handling for adjacent repair/verification sentences, intervening native-failure wording, and negated repair objects. Questions, denials and hypotheticals retain their controls. Preserve Previous question beside the qualified Entity type import; separately restore the already-called `internalResultLink` goal helper binding. That import is a runtime fixture repair, not a type-only change. - Include the narrow older-baseline CI typecheck closure and causal heartbeat test observers in the candidate. All four default typecheck projects execute. Main already includes the protected upstream tooling and newer heartbeat fixture, so neither is overwritten with an older candidate file. - Preserve all 244 identities, original queries, model, native/human counts and clocks, including the explicit prior Studio accounting exception. The full catalog stays on its candidate branch; the 196/244 gate and historical SDK runtime holds remain. ## Verification The primary’s f478 retry repeated the real composer-hidden five-second assertion (1 failure,18 passes,1 skip). Investigation established a setup readiness gap: an outer route response can delay mounting the chat thread beyond the assertion. The successor adds the existing real-thread `aria-busy="false"` readiness barrier before the unchanged composer assertion. The original120-second scenario and digest, unread, source-link, history, and reply checks are unchanged. The full owning browser scenario passed naturally in10.2s and with its first real chat response held6000ms in12.0s. This synchronizes fixture setup; the underlying AWS late-mount latency remains unproved. **Current main gates passed:** exact head `823dab49fcd8470140c178771e5c0c6b78725e97` has [successful normal CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41724620555), including both required aggregates, fresh Greptile 5/5 and zero unresolved review threads. Paperclip Review is neutral with a completed substantive 5/5 and no actionable defect. The current optional Superagent Security Scan is neutral/inconclusive: Security Graph context retrieval returned HTTP503, so its assessment did not start. That result supplies no security PASS credit. The primary source PR retains its separate current-head gate before Root sequences normal protected merges. - Reviewed MCP controls: 130 on main and 129 on the older candidate. Meaningful parent comparisons failed before implementation/correlation correction. Controls cover actual offered schema identity, null/omitted admission, bounded rejection categories and throwing-sink cancellation. - Exact unchanged production postimages retain 63 Postgres/public-route controls, nine plan controls and the focused index-plan proof. Owner OpenAPI passes 32 controls; main’s newer contract passes 33. Earlier setup/sandbox failures remain recorded; unchanged database controls were not replayed. - Narrative owner controls pass 216, retaining all prior 207 controls. The independent peer passes 144 balanced cases; earlier 108 and 39-case matrices remain retained. Actual consumer parent failures reproduced the review findings before repair. - Main’s server NoEmit passed on its protected baseline; only two pin files changed afterward. The candidate’s prior full server and four-project checks passed. All server/package/script/root-lock inputs remain byte-identical; the changed Runner project’s guard passes on the current source. Compatibility driver controls pass 47 and six owning suites pass 82. The one explicitly reviewed Docker-only unit omission concerns an unimported image-build feature; all four intended project guards still execute. - Pin/adapter/contract controls pass 47. All 242 expanded declarations, the two legacy dispatch rows, and all 244 singleton private policies retain their authenticated identities. Descriptor, launcher and private-protocol bytes remain exact; declaration loading invoked zero fixture callbacks. - All 506 SDK input blobs match the meaningfully compiled `6abe5739` source vector. Prior real shared/SDK builds measured declaration/map changes and zero runtime-JavaScript changes; a compiled consumer accepts the new kind and rejects an unknown kind. The reviewed registry remains unchanged. Default source proof, 51 SDK controls, 20 custody controls and 16 UI consumer controls remain qualified; runtime/compiler/parser/Zod/canary pins and held runtime grades are unchanged. - The full Mac heartbeat run on prior observer source retained **58 passes / six failures in 802.78s**. Two nonassignee controls subsequently pass focused checks. Four late timeout causes remain unresolved locally; no flakiness/infrastructure cause or complete local pass is claimed. [Actual AWS CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41712023737/job/126182620050) ran this exact heartbeat file with **64 passes in 107.209s**. Its server/package inputs are unchanged in the current narrative-only successor. The source-identical f478 heartbeat file also passed all64 AWS tests in105.812s; source inputs remain unchanged. Current main ordinary CI passed; the primary source PR must independently close its latest-head ordinary CI gate. - Historical main [run 41713049555](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41713049555) recorded six synchronized runner-shutdown failures and cancellations; the shutdown cause is unknown. A separate chat passive-control assertion observed one `db.transaction` call where zero was expected. Finite local probes passed 2+2 but did not establish a cause or late stack. No external publication, cleanup cause, source fix or flakiness is inferred. The primary’s separate composer-visibility CI failure also remains an inconclusive historical result; no guessed fix is credited. No old-head retry was used. - Earlier UI/inbox fixture failures and the CLI startup timeout remain historical. UI/inbox repairs are now upstream in #18799/#18798 and main preserves those files verbatim. The CLI timeout cause remains unknown. Broader local repository/Rust qualification is not claimed; fresh hosted CI supplies broader coverage. - All four actual repair merges, an exact merged-tree/diagnostic source join, and fresh controller/source/private-policy/active-run guards precede the ten-case TestOps measurement. No paid or model eval was launched for this PR; the original three passes/seven failures remain unchanged. ## Risks The next ten-case model result is unproved. Earlier MCP timeout and continuation-shape causes remain unknown; diagnostics provide future evidence without relaxing validation or rewriting grades. Prior local/CI failures are retained, including the unresolved chat assertion and local heartbeat timeouts. Initial ownership requires canonical in-window audit facts. Missing legacy facts remain unknown. The additive `unassigned` contract is synchronized across shared/OpenAPI/server consumers, with no new UI marker. SDK runtime holds and the broader 196/244 qualification gate remain. Normal protected merges require fresh checks and resolved feedback; no CODEOWNER or branch-protection bypass is authorized here. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex. Capabilities used: repository analysis, code changes, source validation, and local test execution. The context-window size is not exposed by this harness. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — current focused/type/pin controls pass; the prior full Mac heartbeat failures remain disclosed and receive no local PASS credit - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — current main normal CI and required aggregates passed; optional neutral reviews and separate primary gate are disclosed above - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups — exact current main head; full thread pagination verified - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 16:17:51 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	f187de99aa	Preserve domain deadlines across owned idle sleep (#18656) ... Reviewed and verified at 9b4acc456d. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 15:40:56 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	5877d751c0	feat(server): bind idle credential eligibility to incoming wake proof (#18639) ... Reviewed and verified at d1e3afa4af. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 14:30:07 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	1f55073f96	fix(cursor-cloud): support API-only controllers on managed stacks (#18310) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents at work. > - Cursor Cloud hosts execution behind its API. > - Product setup still expected a Paperclip Computer. > - Managed-only tenants therefore rejected valid setup. > - This admits the validated API-owned controller. > - Authority, Stop proof, budgets and cleanup remain enforced. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18068 and #18069; both dependencies have merged. **What happened?** Managed-only setup still requested a Computer. Live tests exposed missing Cursor Stop proof and duplicate replay. **Expected behavior** Use Cursor’s API controller. Verify provider/controller termination and replay each log identity once. **Steps to reproduce** Enable native Runner/managed-only. Configure Cursor model/repository/key without a Computer, then Test, finish setup, run and Stop. ## What Changed - Derive API-only placement from validated native Cursor configuration; reject placement/command/workspace/home overrides and keep Kubernetes-only execution closed. - Skip Computers/checkout/workspace realization. Keep scoped tools, completion, private staging, budgets, leases and recovery. Persist placement; reject contradictions. - Align Cloud cards, Test, Save and Finish setup; hold unready drafts. Legacy keeps its Computer, credential and policy checks. - Verify Stop from exact API ownership, audited intent, provider-terminal proof, no Computer/process ownership and controller retirement. Recheck immediate/deferred retirement; wake existing recovery on durable evidence. - Clear warnings when the actual stopped target later has authoritative confirmation. Keep missing/other-run negatives and the existing predicate. - Publish safe status refresh after full-proof ACK. Retain bounded native/physical cancellation history; add no poller or weaker proof path. ## Verification Core merged as `3910352c923a`; Product merged as `27d35314be8e`. Public branch `5f86eb66b081` has tree `67344151d303`. Its exact-head Greptile summary is 5/5; the fresh audit found zero unresolved threads and complete pagination. The controlled workspace retry and required summary passed. All 59 current-head contexts are terminal and clean. Prior green-36 evidence keeps its identity. [Current CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41680511731) first failed workspaces-a 1/2: the CLI company-import/export beforeAll 30-second runtime-info/child-PID/HTTP readiness wait expired. All 431 UI files/4,714 tests and 285 other CLI tests passed (one skip). The cause remains UNKNOWN. Child output records startup recovery complete, but buffered CI prefixes do not establish its relation to the waiter deadline; runtime-file/PID/last-health state was not captured. Both unchanged local probes were RED. The second observed dependency preflight still pending at the deadline; observer overhead was not quantified. Neither proves the CI cause. After all functional jobs finished, only the queued metadata summary was cancelled; the other 48 records stayed unchanged. Attempt 1 retains 46 successes, the original failure, one skip and the cancelled summary. One same-head debug retry was admitted at 18:42 UTC on November 3. Its workspace job passed at 19:23 UTC on the same checkout: UI 431 files/4,714 tests and CLI 33 files/286 tests, including company import/export. Test caching was disabled. The new `ci / verify` summary passed; workflow attempt 2 completed SUCCESS. Required `ci / e2e` also passed. The final check at 19:53 UTC on November 3 found all 59 current-head contexts terminal and clean: zero pending and zero failing. The 47 inherited completed/skipped rows are not new executions. No code, assertion or timeout changed; success does not explain the original failure or erase the local REDs. CI checkout is `1ea9d8608ced`/tree `78cb1ec13d59` (parents `2e37c73c05fe`, 5f86); both workflows use 2e37. Its 20 extra paths add low-memory build/Rust task-memory. Scripts cohere; later matrix changes only labels, with no newer debug-cache steps. Static audit found no blocker. Supported API arguments omit the memory flag: no default monitor/instruction changes. Flagged external launchers can change Cursor instructions/digests and remain unqualified. The merge added 41 master-identical paths, retained the green-36 inbox hunk and found UI fixtures matching upstream. Startup/backup, recovery projection, sleep diagnostics and binary backup change production. Static audit found eight Stop/ACK owner blobs and 37 sleep-work SQL templates unchanged, with sleep fences/single-flight accounting intact. Exact precommit tree: 416/416 across eight server files, binary backup 1/1, server types PASS; repeated scopes are not summed. The deferred-retirement P1 reproduced three real-DB/owned-process failures; missing proof stayed unverified. Recovery passed 47 process cases/33 proof negatives. Warning repair binds actual targets to same-run proof. Validation passed 729 scoped UI cases, a separate 359-case thread run, 111 backend cases (84 CAS, 6 assembled, 21 activity/privacy), types/tokens. Proof validators/predicate are unchanged; no new poller or increased timeout. The d8d3 attempt stays FAILED: 45 passes, two workspaces-a failures, derived verify failure and one skip. Both shards shared three failures: two successful mocks omitted the account guard’s required userId. The two-line fixture repair changed no guard, assertion or timeout. Three failures reproduced; 54 access/auth tests then passed, including account-change/denial negatives, plus UI types/tokens. The 69285 attempt stays FAILED: 49 jobs, 46 passed, serialized shard 9 failed, its verify aggregate failed and one selection job skipped. The shard passed 575/576 cases. Its aborted-snapshot case expected nine computes but saw eight: a final HTTP 200 coalesced while seven ordinary reads had not proved the aborted compute settled. Earlier CI and the unmodified local baseline passed with a miss; no local RED is claimed. The repair awaits the snapshot, allows exactly one extra GET if coalesced, then requires a miss and retains nine computes/all HTTP429 assertions. No production code, hook, loop, sleep or timeout changed. Six inbox and seven cache/admission cases passed locally, plus server types; 30 unrelated cases were filtered. Green 36 passed 576/576 without taking the extra-GET branch; local runs also missed that schedule. Current CI event merge 1ea9 now passed 576/576 and naturally exercised the former failure: coalesced (count 2, 1ms), then exactly one fresh miss (count 1, 16ms), with strict nine-compute/HTTP429 assertions intact. No instrumentation or retry was added. Earlier compatibility passed scoped remote/inbox, routine, API-placement and UI tests, plus types/migrations/snapshots/maps/tokens. The 89-path adoption restored fleet routing without workflow overrides or added skips. Each result retains its source identity. Live qualification remains actual `9af1a5de42a2`: unchanged Artifact grader PASSED 17/17 and active-Stop grader PASSED 21/21. All three provider test resources were deleted canonically with GET404; post-delete download returned the exact 27 bytes. Histories stayed stable (Artifact 121 and Stop 67 canonical identities), with 21 company runs, zero active work and no accounting/cancellation/reservation debt or integrity findings. Saved settings reopened; no-prompt Test/Linux admission passed with `claude-sonnet-4-5`. No new Save is claimed. The first Stop sampling case stays FAILED on a 10.373-second gap. Unchanged retry kept all 24 samples: 35.076 seconds quiet, maximum gap 4.584 seconds, plus a separate CANCELLED/artifact-absent read after 180 seconds. Initial grading rejected locator spelling before functional checks; metadata changed only after same-file/inode/byte proof, with raw evidence/oracles unchanged. Original Question/Plan/reconnect and historical deleted-artifact results keep their identities. Git trees verified 11 history-only conflicts and six earlier mainline paths. Hosted 9af to the public BRANCH differs in 222 paths; 13,500 other mode/blob leaves match. Runner runtime implementations and six observer/driver pins match 9af on that branch only; inherited `drivers/acpx/runtime-host.test.ts` differs. No all-Runner/src, CI/latest-master runtime or image equality is claimed. Later static audits through `8ab89f41e499` found no concrete API-only blocker. That base adds completed-history sleep proofs and an MCP cleanup migration; protected Stop/ACK owners are unchanged. These later changes are outside this CI and have no live qualification here. Host duplicate-card and later recovery/UI repairs retain separate proof, not deployed 9af identity. Direct-key coverage requires absent aiConnection; API-only placement skips inherited remote-workspace disk-full paths, and config-read gates match their parent. Other retained failures: stale fixture 132/133; E8 48/135 with 87 reset-hook failures; Mac 17 SQL failures/skips; title/startup/custody/Stop/deletion unknown causes and bounded recoveries; superseded warning/50 duplicate identities; pre-repair ACK/Core CI failures. Fixture RED/GREEN passed 7/7 browser and 121/121 shutdown tests with a failing broken-unsubscribe control; stable WSP wrapper passed 128 after physical teardown failure. No full local-suite pass is inferred. All paid attempts remain recorded; vendor dollar cost is UNKNOWN. ## Risks Experimental: Cursor independently acknowledges neither the effective model nor instruction digest before the first prompt. Explicit values are submitted and behavior checked live; unpriced provider dollar cost stays UNKNOWN. The placement exception applies only to validated native Cursor API execution. Other local work remains denied under managed-only policy. Missing/stale Stop or cleanup proof stays pending; damaged archives remain failed. Explicit Legacy keeps its existing policy owners. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex/GPT-6 family: tools, execution, browser checks, delegated review. API ID/context window unavailable. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used and the limits of available model metadata - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have linked public issues or described the issue in this PR - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch describes the change and contains no internal ticket ID - [x] I have run the scoped local tests reported above; retained failures are stated separately - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented the risks - [x] All required CI gates pass on the current head - [x] Fresh Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved findings on the current head - [x] I will address all reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 13:55:39 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	ccc63ea458	fix(server): prove completed history before idle sleep (#18646) ... Reviewed and verified at 592bce69c6. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 12:37:25 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	1423d745e8	feat(server): expose owned sleep blocker diagnostics (#18632) ... Reviewed and verified at 26e5a22b3c. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 10:45:10 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	b8f8b904fa	feat(routines): preserve automation ancestry through webhooks (#18772) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Routines let external services start agent tasks through a normal webhook. > - A repair routine must recognize failures from work that it created. > - The receiver added in #18714 put Sentry payload parsing and repair policy in core routine intake. > - This pull request replaces that receiver with verified creation provenance on normal routine calls. > - Sentry can filter the resulting tags before it sends a normal routine webhook. > - The benefit is reusable provenance and loop prevention without a provider-specific route. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** A Sentry repair alert can start another repair when its own work fails. The dedicated receiver in #18714 solved this through a Sentry-specific payload contract. Ordinary routine webhooks also need a trusted way to retain the automation that created their tasks. **Proposed solution** Use the existing public `/fire` route and its current authentication. An optional source run credential proves a live Paperclip caller. Store the caller separately from webhook JSON. Follow recorded task creation links and export bounded ancestry tags on run-failure events. Let Sentry alert filters exclude repair-origin work. **Alternatives considered** Keep the dedicated Sentry receiver, accept sender-supplied origin IDs, or filter only the immediate routine. The first couples core intake to one provider. The second accepts unverified claims. The third misses child tasks, standalone follow-ups, and calls through another routine. **Roadmap alignment** This improves the shipped Scheduled Routines and Activity log capabilities. It does not add a new scheduler or incident system. Related work: #18714 is the implementation replaced here; #9727 adds source-task navigation and UI attribution; #10206 proposes exception-led routine dispatch. This PR uses existing task creation records and does not implement either of those broader proposals. ## What Changed - Remove the Sentry-only route, parser, authentication exception, and payload-specific tests and documentation from #18714. - Add optional `X-Paperclip-Source-Run-Token` support to normal routine webhooks. Validate the standard run JWT, company, instance, agent, live run, and cancellation state. Authenticated routine API calls also retain their validated caller. - Add nullable `routine_runs.created_by_run_id`. Keep the reference after source-run deletion so missing history becomes unknown. Separate callers during coalescing, including legacy open tasks. - Follow company-scoped routine receipts, creator runs, task parents, and legacy creation activity. Mark missing, foreign, cyclic, private, or excessive ancestry for safe alert filtering. - Add event-local `automation_origin_status`, `automation_routine_ids`, and `task_shareable` tags through the existing Sentry SDK hook. Cap ancestry at 32 reads and share a 750 ms deadline across metadata and ancestry lookup. Keep the SDK one-second wait and eight-lookup concurrency bound. Redact the source credential from HTTP logs and Sentry request headers. - Preserve unexpected database failures as server errors without rejection bookkeeping in an aborted transaction. Document 409, 415, and 422 responses for the normal webhook. - Keep `routineScopedRunId` as generic opt-in `X-Paperclip-Idempotency-Scope: routine` support. Default trigger receipts and timestamped HMAC replay protection retain their current scope. - Add [the Sentry repair tutorial](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/routine-creation-provenance/docs/guides/board-operator/sentry-run-failure-repairs.md), API documentation, OpenAPI headers, and capability-map updates. ## Verification At commit `0f4a0051528edd1367a921a76a8050c3fd087872`: - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed for the full workspace. Migration numbering and safety checks passed. - The focused service, route, Sentry, redaction, and OpenAPI suites passed 228 tests in five files. The database Sentry resolver and OpenAPI invocation passed 33 tests in two files. These are separate invocations with some overlap. - The full routine HTTP suite passed all 15 tests. The authenticated API case failed before the caller-wiring fix and passed after it. The fixture loads the real route-owned services. No test deadline was raised. - The real `@sentry/node@10.71.0` suite passed all 12 tests. It uses an in-memory transport and sends no events to Sentry. It covers terminal failures, saved-message interruptions, event isolation, and source-token redaction. - Regression tests also cover forged, expired, foreign, and cancelled caller credentials; payload spoofing; inherited routine ancestry; legacy coalescing; deleted history; private work; cycles; query and time limits; database error causes; and routine-wide receipts. The new error and budget cases failed before their fixes. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check` passed. The map check covers 35 areas and 192 capabilities. - The full local Vitest command was stopped for a required master merge after four chat shards passed 1,278 tests. No full local pass is claimed. An earlier combined HTTP run hit an existing malformed-ID timeout whose original cause is not established; the final full HTTP suite passes. An extra local run of the unchanged heartbeat scheduling file passed 12 of 13 tests and failed a readiness-status assertion. Its logs also reported a missing fixture user membership. The same 13-test file now passes in current-head CI. - All GitHub Actions checks pass on this commit. Three jobs initially lost their self-hosted runners. One server shard initially failed while deleting a company in an unchanged heartbeat test because of a `company_skills` foreign key. One retry passed all affected jobs without code changes. That server shard passed all 499 tests, and all eight browser shards passed. - Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 on this commit. All six review threads are resolved. The separate Paperclip Review check remains queued. Its bot reports that work is paused. A maintainer must resume the assigned review work to complete that check. No full green check state is claimed while this external gate is pending. - Live Sentry configuration and deployment are outside this PR's acceptance evidence. The tutorial describes setup, a controlled failure, and a repair-origin exclusion check for operators to run after deployment. ## Risks - Normal app webhooks retain the sender's full JSON in company-readable routine history and the execution task. Alert filters and task visibility are not content scrubbers. Operators must scrub sensitive event data in Sentry before forwarding it and keep connection tests in setup mode. - Existing users of `/sentry-run-failures` must move to `/fire` and add the documented Sentry filters before enabling repair intake. The old route is removed. Stored tasks and receipts remain. - The additive migration uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS`. It does not rewrite historical tasks or infer missing provenance. - Unknown or unshareable ancestry is excluded by the tutorial's alert rule. Missing history, an enrichment timeout, or more than five routine IDs can therefore suppress a repair webhook while retaining the Sentry error. - An external webhook without a verified source credential starts a new receiving-routine origin. Its JSON cannot establish upstream Paperclip ancestry. Sentry must not store a Paperclip run credential. - Routine-wide receipt reuse needs a stable sender key. A static Sentry custom header is not a per-event key. The tutorial keeps delivery deduplication separate from loop prevention. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 model family, with reasoning, repository access, code editing, and test execution. The session does not expose the exact model variant or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 09:33:17 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	b40e6edaea	perf(inbox): combine startup reads and reduce refetch pressure (#18790) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Mine shows the work and failures that need the viewing user's attention. > - A reload waits for account access, task rows, parent captions and failure state. > - Those reads form several browser request stages before useful rows appear. > - Live invalidations can also restart the same task-list request more than once. > - This change supplies startup data together and removes redundant refresh work. > - It preserves current authority, failure presentation, archive state and row stability. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18645. Related: #18642. This change implements the read-receipt behavior independently on current master. It does not use that PR's branch or patch. **What happened?** Mine starts its primary request after the session, company and board-access reads. It then requests parent captions and rich failure context. Four observed loads spent another 0.45–0.70 seconds after the primary rows arrived. One slower load waited 1.71 seconds for parent context. The same run observed two HTTP 429 responses. These timings identify request waits; they do not attribute the delay to SQL or Node CPU. Read receipts also invalidate general task collections and dashboards. Overlapping parent and child invalidations can start two requests and abort the first. **Expected behavior** The initial page should use one account-safe startup projection and one complete Mine response. A read receipt should refresh the affected viewer's inbox state. Each invalidation batch should refresh a covered query once. Required captions and current failure state must be ready before first reveal. Existing rows should remain usable during a transient refresh error. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a populated Mine inbox with parent tasks outside the visible index and a current failed run. 2. Reload with browser HTTP cache retained and application query state empty. 3. Inspect the session, company, board access, task-index and context request sequence. 4. Open or mark a task read and inspect the unrelated collection refetches. **Paperclip version or commit** Baseline: `44a9a043b80c18314d8dd89556f444dae696d3d6`. **Deployment mode** Authenticated board UI. Local proof uses the real APIs and database with a synthetic session resolver. No hosted candidate deployment is claimed. ## What Changed - Add optional, same-user `boardBootstrap` data to the existing session response. Seed account-keyed company and board-access reads from it. Keep ordinary endpoint reads for fallback, retry and live reconciliation. A returning account cannot reuse revoked cached access. Cache collection and later real refetches remain effective. - Add the board-only Mine snapshot endpoint. Reuse the canonical issue selector, private-task filtering, run-read decisions, secret redaction and interruption/recovery presentation. Assemble the fixed 100-task page, parent captions and bounded 200-run failure window on the server. Start independent reads together. Optional source errors keep successful task rows usable. - Keep array-shaped source caches for archive and undo. Key Mine source, context and reveal state by account. Validate the response's user stamp before committing it. Remove array-only cross-tab Mine broadcasts, which cannot carry its paired failure context. The server retains authenticated in-flight coalescing. - Scope read-receipt invalidation to the affected viewer's inbox, badges and chat unread state. Keep company and task audit views fresh. Preserve genuine task mutations, run updates and subscription-gap reconciliation. - Remove covered scalar-prefix invalidations within a batch. Preserve predicates, exact matches and different query/refetch constraints. A later event can still refresh again. - Retire Mine in-flight reuse after local company activity or run lifecycle changes. A post-archive read starts fresh. Old work keeps its admission slot until it settles, even if every HTTP client aborts. The eight-compute limit stays in place. - Add API, component and browser regressions. Extend the production timing harness with matching API/UI artifact receipts, retained-cache reloads, request status counts, layout checks and optional controlled network latency. Update API and verification documentation. ## Verification - Full `pnpm -r typecheck` passes. - Full `pnpm build` passes. - Token gates, map checks and diff whitespace checks pass. - 72 Inbox component tests pass. Startup-specific checks pass, including account switching, revoked cached access, malformed/absent bootstrap data and cache collection. The canonical authenticated bootstrap route also passes against real PostgreSQL. - Six real PostgreSQL Mine route cases pass, including full equivalence with legacy authorized projections, privacy, fixed bounds, membership revocation, coalescing, archive freshness and aborted-client admission. Four focused legacy coordinator controls pass. Six assembly tests pass. - Refetch and invalidation regressions pass. Meaningful pre-fix tests observed two request starts and one abort for overlapping invalidations; the fix produces one start and no abort. The archive race test observed the post-archive GET joining the old body before the fix. - All 11 existing startup browser checks pass, including Tasks/Mine code loading, desktop/mobile bounds, non-streamlined Coordinator, task navigation, failed preloading and Back position. The nine focused startup, fallback, partial-source error, rate-limit recovery, archive/undo and geometry cases also pass. The 429 cases use the inherited retry window. Archive and keyboard undo are corroborated through the real API and reload. Authentication and failure fault injection in these cases are explicitly simulated. - Matched production before/after timings are complete. Full aggregate Vitest coverage is left to CI. At 15:15 UTC, the final-head runner gate and `review` workflow pass. The 45 build/test/policy jobs are queued; the Build job has no `ubuntu-latest` runner assigned and has executed no steps, so remote aggregate results remain unverified. Paperclip Review and Superagent Security Scan are in progress. Superseded runs for this PR were cancelled. No current-head check has reported a failure; the CI checklist remains open. The remaining step is runner allocation and completion of those external checks; persistent queueing needs the repository CI owner's attention. - Greptile completed on final head `ecde295565309275c4f2fae903caf6892f1eaafd` at 5/5. The map-scope finding is fixed and resolved; there are no open review threads. ### Matched browser timings Five alternating baseline/candidate pairs per network scenario, measured serially in headful Chrome 156.0.8078.80 on Apple silicon with Node 24.22.2 and a 1440×900 viewport. Both production UIs use their matching real API revision against one fixed disposable PostgreSQL fixture: 34 tasks, 31 visible task rows, one paused agent and one terminal failure. No active agent/provider work. HTTP cache is retained; each initial sample reloads the document and clears application query state. Warm navigation and Back retain query state. CPU and throughput are native. The 100ms scenario uses CDP minimum request-to-response-header latency without request interception. It is a controlled request-dependency experiment, not a staging reproduction. Values are median milliseconds with min–max in parentheses. Paired saving is baseline minus candidate for each alternating pair; its median differs from the difference of arm medians. Positive saving favors the candidate. | Network / journey | Baseline | Candidate | Median paired saving | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Native / initial rows | 187.6 (128.9–208.5) | 191.7 (130.3–210.9) | −23.3 | | Native / Recent → Mine | 100.17 (99.90–101.87) | 100.07 (99.88–101.37) | −0.16 | | Native / task → Back | 70.45 (56.63–72.02) | 66.64 (56.52–67.71) | +4.94 | | 100ms / initial rows | 930.3 (914.1–1015.7) | 799.0 (697.1–826.0) | +211.8 | | 100ms / Recent → Mine | 100.09 (97.73–100.16) | 100.18 (96.65–100.98) | −0.02 | | 100ms / task → Back | 74.97 (62.77–75.82) | 75.47 (61.51–76.19) | +0.35 | The controlled-latency initial pairs all improve, saving 108.3–217.0ms. Native initial pairs have mixed signs (−67.5 to +78.1ms), so they establish no reliable native page-speed improvement. Warm and Back timings are effectively unchanged. Median primary-request start is 110.4→135.2ms natively and 497.8→480.9ms with 100ms latency; these runs do not establish a large startup-only timing gain. API requests through the two-second post-reveal window fall from median 32 (32–37) to 27 (25–28) natively, and 37 (33–38) to 30 (25–32) with 100ms latency. All 20 samples preserve the same ordered 31 task links, first-row DOM identity and geometry. All recorded API responses are HTTP 200; zero unfinished requests, 429s or JavaScript errors. Lower 429 incidence on staging remains unproven. Measured source: baseline `44a9a043b80c18314d8dd89556f444dae696d3d6`, candidate `4c12b2ef0ecf0754676e99bd6b9399e84408646c`. Final head `ecde295565309275c4f2fae903caf6892f1eaafd` changes only two feature-map files and existing browser test expectations since that measured candidate; production executable inputs are identical to the measured candidate. Asset hashes, API health revision receipts and every raw sample were retained. These results do not claim hosted-page improvement or deployment of this PR. ## Risks - Startup enrichment adds work to the session read. Failure of this optional projection falls back to the ordinary company and access endpoints. It does not invalidate a valid session or replace per-request server authorization. - Account changes, stale cache entries and same-company navigation can expose old presentation data. Account keys, principal stamps, reveal scopes and canonical bootstrap replacement have dedicated negative cases. Permission failures hide cached task rows; transient network, 429 and 5xx failures preserve them. - Current failure state can differ from the historical failed run. The snapshot uses the existing canonical rich projection and verified missing-ID coverage. Partial context failures retain an explicit retry path. - Mutation retirement follows events delivered to the current server process. This adds no cross-replica invalidation protocol or distributed read-after-write guarantee. - New UI assets require the matching API. Older UI/session consumers retain their existing response and endpoint behavior. There is no database migration, provider call or deployment change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, code execution, browser automation and delegated source review. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed by this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 09:28:57 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	27d35314be	feat: connect experimental Cursor Cloud to native Runner (#18069) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents at work. > - Native Runner owns execution and task authority. > - Operators need an explicit native Cursor Cloud choice. > - Tools/files need company, task, session and run scope. > - This connects setup and lifecycle to Runner Core. > - Legacy agents retain their selected runtime/history. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Depends on #18068. Managed-only API placement and API-owned Stop containment are in #18310. Refs #5664, #11803, #17299, and #17471. No duplicate native integration was found. ## What Changed - Add explicit native setup, Test, saved settings and dispatch with no-prompt account/catalog/callback checks. - Scope MCP to company, agent, task, session and run through authenticated HTTPS. Register verified artifacts/work products; preserve unpriced accounting, completion and budgets. - Connect Question/Plan continuation, cold handoff and admitted fresh sessions; recheck waiting admission under the task lock. - Present audited Stop intent while preserving physical containment proof; bound typed Stop metadata. Preserve title edits through preference/navigation readiness. - Select one live/history representation per run to prevent duplicate settled cards. Integrate upstream task/read-state/retry/schema contracts and repair two test fixtures. ## Verification Core #18068 merged normally as `3910352c923a`. Product head `5a60f541c982` has passing repository CI/build/browser checks, including required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`, plus a fresh exact-head Greptile 5/5 review with zero unresolved threads. Two non-required external app checks remain pending: Paperclip Review is queued waiting for its assigned agent; Superagent Security Scan is reviewing the diff. These are not claimed completed. The normal merge endpoint enforces the repository rules; no policy or status override is used. The dependent Top PR is addressing its fresh deferred-Stop review finding. Product `5a60f541c982` passed 270 UI and 20 selected Cloud/native/disk-full tests, UI/server typechecks, tokens and maps. Top’s clean normal merge passed tokens/maps/diff checks; its matrix is pending. Earlier receipts retain Core’s 47 Rust, 4 compiled-native retirement and 19 settlement controls, normal Runner build, and runtime 9af build/recursive typecheck. Reproduced loading/shutdown CI fixture failures passed 7/7 browser and 121/121 unit tests, including a broken-unsubscribe negative control. No timeout/oracle was relaxed. The actual-parent restack adopts 75 mainline paths, including schema/permission and generic runtime changes, beyond the prior two fixture repairs and client projection fix. The full difference from hosted `9af1a5de42a2` is therefore larger than four files; backend source also differs. The merged config-read checks match Core391, and the Cursor placement/runtime/relay/selection modules match frozen9af; selected affected regressions pass. Paid proof keeps its actual 9af source/image identity. The separately tested live/history card fix is not claimed deployed on that host. On 9af, original saved settings survived reopening and fresh no-prompt Test authenticated catalog/model/binding; no new Save is claimed. Fresh Linux admission passed. With `claude-sonnet-4-5`, Artifact downloaded exact 27 bytes and matched 121 canonical identities in complete S3-served history. First Stop’s strict quiet FAILED on a 10.373-second gap despite independent cancellation/no late artifact. One targeted unchanged-sampler retry retained all 24 samples: 35.076 seconds quiet / maximum gap 4.584 seconds, 67 ordered canonical identities, and separate CANCELLED/artifact-absent status after the original 180-second deadline. The pre-reload duplicate settled card is disclosed. Exact-ID cleanup for the three new provider agents is awaiting authorization, so full grades and the fresh Artifact’s post-cleanup download remain blocked. A historical deleted-provider artifact was newly downloaded on 9af; original F226 Question/Plan/reconnect and cleanup proof keep their identities. Retained failures: stale fixture 132/133; E8 48/135 with 87 reset-hook failures; Mac 17 SQL failures/skips; earlier title/startup/custody/Stop/deletion failures with unknown causes/bounded recoveries; `dea023` Stop’s warning/50 duplicate identities; pre-repair ACK and original Core CI failures. WSP’s 251-assertion, 7/8-suite attempt failed physical PostgreSQL teardown; the unchanged wrapper rerun passed 128. Retry alone establishes no cause or full local-suite pass. All paid attempts remain recorded; vendor dollar cost is UNKNOWN. ## Risks Experimental: Cursor independently acknowledges neither the effective model nor instruction digest before the first prompt. Explicit values are submitted and checked through behavior; unpriced provider dollar cost stays UNKNOWN. Callbacks need authenticated reachable HTTPS. Scope, revocation, budgets, completion and cleanup remain authoritative. Operator Stop intent is separate from physical containment. Saved legacy agents retain their selected runtime. Prior shared title-save/deletion failures remain disclosed. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, assisted with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, browser verification, and delegated code review. The serving model’s exact API ID and context window are not exposed. No value is inferred from the model catalog. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used and the limits of available model metadata - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have linked public issues or described the issue in this PR - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch describes the change and contains no internal ticket ID - [x] I have run the scoped local tests reported above; pending gates are stated separately - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented the risks - [x] All required CI gates pass on the current head - [x] Fresh Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved findings on the current head - [x] I will address all reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 09:01:39 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	86b365f992	feat(auth): add independent agent configuration read permission (#18766) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents need to inspect configuration and instructions when they set up teammates. > - Configuration reads currently depend on configure or suggestion grants. > - Legacy standard agents did not receive those newer grants. Some self-read routes also lose the target agent identity. > - This pull request adds an independent read grant and applies only that grant to eligible existing agents. > - The benefit is that agents can inspect and verify configuration without new write authority. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15283. Related earlier proposals: #8064 and #12050. Those proposals target older authorization code; this change uses the current configure/suggest model and adds a read-only rollout for existing agents. Related bounded peer metadata proposal: #14160. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Agent configuration, configured skill, instruction, and revision reads through the existing APIs and native instruction tools. **Current behavior** An agent needs `agents:configure` or `agents:suggest-changes` to inspect a peer. Older standard agents can hire a teammate but cannot verify the saved instructions. Configuration and revision routes also reject self-reads because they authorize a company resource instead of the target agent. **Proposed behavior** Add `agents:read` for redacted configuration and instruction reads. Keep `agents:configure` as read/write and preserve suggestion-grant compatibility. Standard new agents receive the read grant. A one-time migration grants only reads to eligible existing standard agents. Individual routes authorize the target agent and grant scope. **Reason and benefit** Read access can be granted without configuration changes, rollback, or environment probes. Legacy agents can verify teammates without receiving new write permissions. ## What Changed - Add `agents:read` to the shared permission contract and standard-agent defaults. - Accept read, configure, or suggestion grants for configuration reads, with target scope and the responsible-user ceiling. - Fix target-aware self and scoped configuration, skill, and revision reads. - Add an audited data migration. Skip low-trust, built-in, inactive, pending, terminated, setup, and scoped configuration/suggestion cases. Preserve existing read scopes and later revocation. - Update the specifications, default-permission documentation, and agent access map. ## Verification - Focused acceptance: 276 tests passed across seven suites on commit `a37314df88`: authorization, real-key HTTP access, route authorization, canonical instructions, default grants, migration replay, and lifecycle configuration. - The HTTP journey uses a real hashed agent API key and a disposable PostgreSQL database. It verifies redaction, scoped reads, denied edits and rollback, cross-company isolation, and both agent and responsible-user revocation. - New read-grant regressions failed before the authorization change. A realistic paused/pausing/resuming migration fixture also failed before the lifecycle filter correction and passed afterward. Setup-held paused agents stay excluded. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on the rebased branch; the final lifecycle migration correction also passed the database package typecheck and build. The latest commit changes only a test assertion. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db check:migrations`, `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, and `git diff --check` passed. - Full current-head [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41641531426) passed: typecheck, build, all general and serialized test lanes, Runner checks, all eight browser shards, canary dry run, policy, and aggregate gates. The local full-suite attempt was stopped after exposing the outdated cross-company 403 assertion; interrupted local full-suite attempts are not counted as passes. ## Risks The migration deliberately expands redacted configuration and instruction visibility for eligible existing standard agents in the same company. An absent older write grant does not deny the new read capability. It adds no write grant. Scoped configure/suggestion grants and all existing read-grant scopes stay intact. Administrators can remove the independent read grant after the one-time rollout; ordinary updates and startup do not restore it. Configure and suggestion grants still imply reads within their own scopes. Cross-company configuration/history reads now return 404 through the common target-aware helper. No schema change or credential-value disclosure is added. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. The host does not expose a more specific runtime model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 07:26:27 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	dc9f387edc	fix(api): surface existing skill source import in discovery (#18757) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents discover supported API operations through the public OpenAPI catalog. > - Importing existing skill content must retain its source provenance. > - A normal source-import query misses the applicable operation on its first page because that operation has little search metadata. > - This pull request describes the existing import operation and its source boundaries. > - The benefit is clearer discovery without changing search scoring or import authority. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** `search_api` does not return `POST /api/companies/{companyId}/skills/import` in the first ten results for `import skill from source SKILL.md`. Source-management operations rank ahead of the import operation. The import entry has only the summary “Import a skill.” **Expected behavior** Ordinary source-import discovery should surface the existing operation. Its documentation should explain that imported content retains provenance and remains subject to company policy and source checks. **Steps to reproduce** Call `searchRunnerApi({ query: "import skill from source SKILL.md", limit: 10 })`. Inspect the operation IDs on the first page. The new regression sends this result through the real bounded MCP serializer. Related: #18717 clarifies the separate `create_skill` tool. This change covers the existing source-import HTTP operation. Neither PR is merged by this work. ## What Changed - Expand only the source-import OpenAPI summary and description. Describe allowed local skill directories, supported remote sources, retained provenance and existing access checks. - Add a first-page discovery regression through the actual authenticated MCP bridge and serializer. Keep non-import lookup, company/mode refusal and denial forwarding controls. - Update the feature and access maps with the test scope and its limits. ## Verification - Parent regression: the controlled loopback MCP response lacked the applicable import operation on the first page. - Focused current checks: 2,060 tests pass in `skill-import-discovery.test.ts` and the existing `runner-api.test.ts` owner. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passes. This checks map structure only. - The first head had one server test job cancelled after a runner shutdown signal. The reason for the shutdown is unknown. The reviewed successor removes only two test comments required by contribution rules; its four focused controls pass. The remaining obsolete CI run was cancelled after that successor was published. No same-head retry was used. - The new test is under `server/src/__tests__`, which the production server typecheck excludes and the server Vitest suite includes. - No local app, database, native agent or provider model was run. Normal PR CI on `a4aaae8e320fb1d56cdbff9f376ec832a634a5da` passed with 48 successful jobs and one skipped job, including the required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e` checks. No completed agent-import journey or reliability result is claimed. - Greptile is 5/5 on the current head with no unresolved threads. The optional Paperclip Review check remains queued. This is not merge authorization. - Keep this core PR open and unmerged. Do not enable auto-merge. ## Risks The expanded metadata can change where this operation ranks for related queries. Search weights, request schemas, HTTP routes, source parsing, authorization and company skill policy are unchanged. The synthetic 403 control proves denial forwarding; it does not qualify the real policy or source-import route. A live import still needs separate acceptance. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, through Codex with reasoning, source review and code execution tools. The exact context-window size is not exposed by this environment. A separate agent reviewed the source and contract before publication. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 06:29:13 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	ef5b98594f	Explain the human primary-agent control in API discovery (#18747) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets a person manage a company of AI agents. > - A primary agent is that person's company preference. > - Only the person's board session can change it. > - Native API discovery explains that restriction but omits the real human control. > - An agent can then suggest a Chat-picker setting that does not exist. > - This change describes the existing profile crown and replacement confirmation. > - It adds no agent authority and no new tool. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** API discovery for the personal primary-agent preference explains board-only access. It does not explain the supported profile control. A retained native response gave a correct board API alternative but also suggested a primary setting in the Chat picker. The picker only opens conversations. **Expected behavior** The discovered operation should direct the person to the chosen agent's profile, the crown control labeled Set as my primary, and the replacement confirmation. It must keep the current person's board authority and the agent denial. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Search the native API for set primary agent. 2. Read the primary-agent operation's description. 3. Compare its guidance with the profile crown and the Chat picker. 4. The current description has no supported UI path. **Paperclip version or commit** Master `7b8aa60b6d` and the retained evaluated application have this metadata gap. The profile control was checked in both sources. A scoped open-PR search found no matching primary-discovery fix. ## What Changed - Add general profile/crown/confirmation guidance to the existing GET and PUT operation description. - Clarify that the Chat picker does not change the preference. - Keep all other OpenAPI bytes, authority, schemas and handlers unchanged. - Update the two existing capability maps. ## Verification - The actual API search result passes through the existing authenticated OpenCode MCP bridge and its bounded JSON serializer. The parent fails because the delivered description has no profile control. The new result retains the full guidance, board-only actor and original schema. - The existing API client keeps its agent bearer/run identity and propagates a mocked board403. This is client propagation proof, not a new real-route claim. - Initial selected controls:997PASS,1061 intentionally unselected. After relocating the same test into the existing server `__tests__` directory, both complete owning files pass:2058 controls. These are static/protocol controls, not native journeys. - The first normal CI head failed with TS6059 because the test imported Runner source outside the server build root. The successor moves only that test to the already-excluded test directory and adjusts four relative imports. An independent source peer confirms identical test bodies; `--listFilesOnly` confirms build-program exclusion. The failed head is retained. Corrected-head CI41599277833 passed48 jobs/1skip on attempt2 at08:17:23UTC. Attempt1 had46passing jobs but a server4 runner-shutdown cancellation; exactly that job and dependent verify were rerun once on the unchanged head. - Maps and diff checks pass. The initial loopback listen EPERM was a setup failure; the controlled transport test then reached the actual assertion RED. - No Paperclip app, database, browser, model, external provider or real credential ran locally. Full typecheck/build passed in corrected-head normal PR CI. Fresh Greptile5/5 is tied to that exact head, with zero unresolved threads. ## Risks The added description can affect API search ranking. It changes guidance only. It does not impersonate a person, change permissions or automatically select an agent. Future model behavior remains unqualified. The prior mixed failed journey is retained; its separate versioned grading work is not part of this PR. Keep this core PR unmerged. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` with reasoning, source inspection and tool use. Context-window size was not exposed by the host. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-03 06:28:57 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	1e3ab690b0	fix(routines): prevent recursive Sentry run repairs (#18714) ... Validate Sentry failed-run alerts before routine dispatch. Reject repair-generated provenance and private sources. Deduplicate source runs through stable primary-key receipts, including setup retries and suppressed deliveries. Verified with 166 focused tests, server typecheck and build, generated-reference checks, passing required CI, and Greptile 5/5. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 21:37:11 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	36df8933f0	fix(slack): resolve manager grants during bot setup (#18707) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Slack chat connections let people start and continue work with an agent. > - Managed setup reuses a personal Slack workspace authorization to create and install the bot. > - The provisioning route passed that Slack grant ID to the generic tool-grant lookup. > - A valid workspace therefore failed with a 404 before provisioning started. > - This pull request selects the existing Slack grant resolver for provisioning and validates the request-body ID. > - The benefit is that saved Slack setup can continue while company and personal ownership checks remain enforced. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #15679, which introduced managed Slack setup. **What happened?** Continuing a saved managed Slack draft returned `Connection management resource not found`. The workspace list and endpoint read both succeeded. The provisioning POST returned 404. **Expected behavior** Continue should use the selected personal Slack manager grant and create or resume the bot once. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Authorize a Slack workspace for managed bot setup. 2. Create or resume a managed Slack chat connection. 3. Select the saved workspace and choose Continue. ## What Changed - Select the Slack manager-grant resolver for the managed provisioning route. - Accept a validated grant ID from the route parameter or request body. Enforce the current user's ownership for both board and agent requests. - Run the existing duplicate-install regression through the HTTP route. Add HTTP rejection cases for missing, malformed, foreign-company and other-user grants. - Document the grant boundary and update the matching feature and agent-access maps. The shared authorization guard owns resource resolution and company checks. Its existing Slack resolver previously handled only the revocation route parameter. This change extends that resolver to the provisioning body's grant ID. Generic tool-grant resolution and deployments without managed Slack keep their existing path. ## Verification - Before the fix, the HTTP installation regression failed with the same 404 as the browser walkthrough. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/chat-channels.integration.test.ts -t 'managed Slack'` — 31 passed. Uses real PostgreSQL, production routes and provider fixtures. The board actor is a fixture; this does not qualify live Slack or agent authentication. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check` — passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` — passed. Full local Vitest is running. [All CI gates passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41561466277) for commit c04b426e60. Greptile and Paperclip reviews are 5/5 with no required changes. Deployed Slack acceptance remains pending. ## Risks - Low risk. The guard must select the correct grant registry. Tests cover valid ownership, duplicate requests and rejected IDs. - Board requests now receive the ownership denial in the guard. The Slack service already required the same owner. - No schema, credential format, provider scope or runtime transport changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository editing, browser use and command execution. The runtime does not expose a more precise model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 19:55:29 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	58308a3e63	perf(apps): scope sidebar review counts to one connection (#18688) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their governed app access. > - The Apps sidebar displays a Review badge for one connection. > - It polls the full company attention service every 30 seconds to get two counts. > - That service also loads every profile, rule and active catalog entry. > - This pull request adds an authorized connection read for only those counts. > - The same badge now avoids unrelated profile evaluation and database result decoding. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Current behavior** The contextual sidebar polls company-wide attention. It needs only one connection's signed pending action count and whether any catalog entries are quarantined. **Proposed behavior** Both sidebar variants poll a connection-scoped count endpoint with existing connection read authority. The full attention API stays unchanged. **Reason and benefit** The retained 200-profile fixture performs seven service queries and returns 80,115 rows for this badge. The new reader performs one query and returns one row. This reduces local service CPU and avoids unnecessary decoded profile/rule data. Related merged evaluator fixes are already in the baseline: Refs #18673, Refs #18681. A search found no existing PR for this scoped count reader. ROADMAP.md contains no duplicate planned work. ## What Changed - Add the narrow shared DTO, typed client, guarded REST/OpenAPI route and catalog-owned reader. - Count independent aggregates with both company boundaries and exact signed-argument semantics. Keep archived counts at zero. - Update both contextual sidebar variants. Keep the exact badge, 30 second interval and existing attention-prefix invalidation. - Add PostgreSQL differential tests, authenticated HTTP tests, sidebar tests, a repeatable benchmark and access documentation. ## Verification - Baseline: `3f8ebfff8aa9febd0733c6f65b07485dcadfd0e2`, including both merged evaluator fixes. Service treatment: `0827f7d0b3`; route/fixture refinement: `230c42ee15`; final local existence gate: `390a218254`. - Passed: focused PostgreSQL differential test; assembled HTTP test with board session and agent JWT; 14 sidebar component tests; token gates; map checks; diff check. - Fixture: 200 profiles, 76,000 rules, 1,900 active tools, 695 removed references, 12 agents, a sibling connection and 2,000 unrelated historical invocations. Complete normalized two-count results are equal on both paths. - Quiet local measurement: seven alternating warm pairs after two warmup pairs, Node 24.22.2, macOS, real disposable PostgreSQL. Legacy/new service CPU median: 213.891/1.680 ms; ranges: 209.329–228.552/0.515–6.137 ms. Wall median: 156.867/1.248 ms; ranges: 151.739–162.289/1.115–1.386 ms. Queries: 7/1. Returned rows: 80,115/1. - Run `cd server && node --expose-gc --import ./node_modules/tsx/dist/loader.mjs scripts/benchmark-connection-review-counts.ts`. See `doc/connection-review-counts.md` for scope and failure history. Byte-volume accounting runs outside timing; no HTTP payload reduction is claimed. - Initial raw scalar SQL failed with ambiguous columns. Typed subqueries fixed it and passed real PostgreSQL equality. Initial fixture agents lacked permissions and correctly received 403. The final fixture grants explicit authority and tests revocation. An initial benchmark included byte serialization in timing; the reported run excludes it. - Passed required local `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`. The initial sandbox typecheck could not open the tsx IPC socket; the escalated rerun passed. Full monolithic `pnpm test:run` was not run locally: repeating a 15–25 minute suite serially across both performance PRs adds no distinct evidence. Broad suite acceptance uses final-head CI, which runs the same general/serialized test partitions and the native Runner lane. Final-head CI is in progress. - Passed built-static Chromium journey on an owned local-trusted server and disposable PostgreSQL: Review 3 appears, only scoped counts are requested by this sidebar, resolving requests/clearing quarantines then reloading removes the badge, and archived counts are zero. The first ad hoc launcher omitted required decision-service options and failed at startup; using the normal no-op wake callback fixed that harness. - Greptile identified an invalid resolved-request fixture label. Corrected `denied` to the declared `rejected`, then reran the real PostgreSQL differential test. The count SQL and non-pending exclusion are unchanged. - The first final-head CI failed the static cross-tenant existence-oracle guard because the new explicit resource company assertion had no nearby `hasCompanyAccess` gate. Existing management admission already rejects foreign resources with 404. The route now also follows the standard local two-step gate. The unchanged guard plus authenticated HTTP negative cases passed (3 tests). No allowlist or test was weakened. - These local service measurements do not prove hosted performance. No deployment is included. ## Risks Low risk. New read admission reuses existing current-authority checks. The old attention API is unchanged. Counts still require database work over relevant pending/catalog rows. No cache, schema migration or telemetry is added. Roll back this PR if the badge differs or scoped reads deny previously permitted users. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` (Sol 6.1), with reasoning, tool use and code execution. The host does not expose the configured context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 17:12:22 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	554a770c6f	perf(apps): scope connection profile configuration reads (#18687) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Apps Permissions page reads saved access profiles for one connection. > - The page fetched every company profile, rule, and binding. > - It used only the app profile and eligible task-granted profiles for that connection. > - This pull request adds a saved configuration read owned by the profile service. > - The route keeps current connection and per-profile management checks. > - The benefit is fewer database rows, less Node work, and a smaller response for the same displayed configuration. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Server profile configuration reads and the Apps Permissions and Review data caller. **Problem or motivation** One connection page loaded and serialized unrelated company profiles. In the local fixture, this produced a 32.35 MB response with 76,001 rule rows. **Proposed solution** Select the displayed connection's app profile and exact eligible connection-intent profiles before loading their entries and bindings. Return an explicit configuration DTO with complete selected arrays. Keep summary and pending-review work on the existing full API. **Alternatives considered** Filtering the full response in the browser retains the database and Node cost. Truncating the full API would break other clients. Filtering entries to the connection would lose selectors and bindings needed by saves. **Roadmap alignment** This improves the existing governed Apps capability. It does not add a new access policy. Related merged work: #18673 and #18681. Related harness cleanup: #18683. Public PR searches found no duplicate connection configuration projection. ## What Changed - Add `ToolProfileConfiguration` and `GET /api/tool-connections/{connectionId}/profile-configuration`. - Select `app:<connectionId>` at any status and exact active, correctly bound `connection_intent` profiles. Run the existing per-profile visibility filter before configuration queries. - Preserve complete ordered entries and bindings. Keep all save behavior, empty-binding install fallback, and the existing full profile API. - Switch AppDetail and AgentConnectionAccess to the configuration DTO. Use a distinct cache key below the existing profiles prefix so mutation and reconnect invalidations still refresh it. - Add real PostgreSQL differential and authenticated HTTP tests, UI caller coverage, a reproducible benchmark, and access-map documentation. ## Verification Baseline: `3f8ebfff8aa9febd0733c6f65b07485dcadfd0e2`, after both #18673 and #18681. Final head: `b40c1ed7c0833d403e20ee8a5ff9d09f1bad6d22`. Current implementation and reproduction details are in [the performance note](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/b40c1ed7c0833d403e20ee8a5ff9d09f1bad6d22/doc/performance/2026-11-02-connection-profile-configuration.md). - AppDetail: 79 tests passed. Existing access/action saves, install fallback, grant removal, errors, and refresh cases use the new caller. - Real PostgreSQL differential: passed. Full ordered selected configuration equals the old full-list selection. Cases cover extra bindings, sibling selectors, wrong source/key/status/binding, null and non-string agent metadata, fresh mutations, empty app bindings, visibility filtering, and company scope. - Production HTTP authentication: API key and run JWT cases passed. Hidden personal accounts omit spanning profiles. Private connection reads fail. Restored ownership restores visibility. Revoked management grants deny fresh calls. Final UID canonicalization and foreign-company 404 assertions passed on the current head. - Map structural check, token gate, and `git diff --check`: passed. - Required local `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`: passed on the current head. `pnpm test:run` was started once. Its first chat shard passed (337 tests, 151.87 seconds); the second shard was intentionally interrupted after the complete final-head CI suite passed. This partial local attempt is not a full local test pass. The same stable-runner general and serialized partitions and Runner lanes passed in [final-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41538805231), including aggregate `ci / verify`. No local assertion failures were observed before interruption. - Final-head focused acceptance: four files, 85 tests passed. Full token gates, maps, and module boundaries passed. - Actual browser acceptance passed on the current checkout with isolated real PostgreSQL and a local trusted board. An action saved as Off persisted after reload. Both app agent bindings stayed intact. Removing an agent-only task grant persisted after reload. Requests used only the narrow profile endpoint. No browser exceptions occurred. No responses were mocked. No provider calls or hosted changes were made. The helper stopped the owned runtime and database after the check. - Final exact-head checks: 54 success, one clean neutral Paperclip Review, three skipped, zero pending or failures. Legacy Snyk status: success. No inline review comments. - Greptile reviewed exact head `b40c1ed7c0833d403e20ee8a5ff9d09f1bad6d22`: 5/5, no findings, completed successful check. Five alternating unprofiled pairs ran with real PostgreSQL on macOS/arm64, Node v24.22.2, and forced GC. The fixture has 210 profiles (200 heavy profiles plus ten eligibility cases), 76,001 rules, 1,900 active tools, 695 removed tools, and 12 agents. The selected configuration has two profiles and 1,391 rules. Each pair asserts complete ordered selected DTO equality. | Measurement | Full list | Configuration read | | --- | --- | --- | | Service wall ms, median [min, max] | 200.927 [193.319, 213.390] | 6.414 [5.508, 6.973] | | Node CPU ms, median [min, max] | 262.751 [246.727, 271.573] | 27.525 [22.576, 29.308] | | Select queries / returned rows | 7 / 78,139 | 3 / 1,397 | | Actual response JSON bytes | 32,353,534 | 592,233 | | Serialization wall ms, median [min, max] | 90.714 [88.715, 99.304] | 1.644 [1.637, 1.745] | | Serialization CPU ms, median [min, max] | 90.644 [88.569, 96.778] | 1.654 [1.637, 1.807] | Reproduce: `node --expose-gc --import ./server/node_modules/tsx/dist/loader.mjs server/scripts/benchmark-connection-profile-configuration.ts 5`. The benchmark measures the service and actual response JSON separately. It excludes HTTP and authorization work through an identity visibility callback. Node CPU does not include PostgreSQL CPU. No hosted or foreground-under-load improvement is claimed. Preserved failures: offline install lacked a locked tarball; frozen online install passed. Sandbox localhost and tsx IPC restrictions blocked initial DB/typecheck attempts; permitted retries use the same checks. The first HTTP suite needed the unbuilt plugin SDK; its owning build helper fixed setup. Shared typecheck caught a missing barrel export, now fixed. A broad typecheck inherited the host's unpinned nested pnpm executable; the owned stalled process was stopped and restarted with pinned pnpm 9. The complete current-head CI suite and aggregate verify passed. The separate Paperclip agent review published 5/5 with no findings at this head and completed with a clean neutral conclusion. An added foreign-company assertion expected 403; the existing guard correctly returned 404. Only the test expectation changed. The first real browser attempt saved and reloaded the action correctly, but grant deletion returned 422: the stress fixture had a company binding, which makes that profile the company default. The UI showed the existing deletion error. The second browser seed used the production agent-only intent shape and passed removal and reload. This does not change the stress fixture or product deletion gates. Initial external browser script attempts also needed an ESM extension and the correct dependency path. Logs, first-failure screenshots, traces, and result files are retained in the local evidence directory. ## Risks - SQL selection must stay aligned with connection-intent eligibility. Differential fixtures cover the exact current predicate. - A selected connection can still have many rules. This change preserves all selected configuration. - Per-profile authorization still reads current selected resources and can add work. Connection visibility does not bypass that check. - No migration, default-allow, effective-access, policy-review, provider, or deployment behavior changes. The old endpoint remains available. Rollback restores the old AppDetail caller and removes the additive endpoint. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, `gpt-6.1-sol`, with code execution and repository tools. The host does not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 16:55:56 -06:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	49b3804830	fix(connections): load permissions and show AI account identity (#18653) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their access to saved connections. > - The Permissions page loads account details and permitted agent choices. > - Company-wide AI accounts repeat retained installation checks for every candidate agent. > - This makes target checks grow with the square of the roster size. > - The browser waits without a deadline, and connection names do not identify the provider login. > - This pull request batches direct AI checks and bounds loading with recovery controls. > - Account details load separately and show a provider email or an explicit profile-permission limit. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Opening a saved AI account can leave Permissions on “Loading AI account…” for minutes. The account itself can be connected. The existing capability batch excludes AI connections, so a company-wide install repeats checks for every installed agent for every candidate. Saved names and Paperclip ownership also do not establish which provider login a credential uses. **Expected behavior** Direct AI accounts reuse retained-target checks within one descriptive request. The page shows loaded account controls or a bounded failure with Retry. Permissions shows the provider email and organization when the selected credential permits profile access. An unavailable profile must not block maintenance or disconnect a working inference credential. Writes still authorize current permissions. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Save an AI account in a company with several agents. 2. Install the account company-wide. 3. Open its Permissions page. 4. Delay the account-list or grants response to exercise the loading failure. The maintained benchmark reproduces database work with synthetic local data. Refs #17945, which added batching for non-AI connections. Searches found no open PR for this AI-account loading fix. ## What Changed - Include direct AI accounts in the existing board capability batch. Referenced pool members, delegated actors, complex selectors, and mutation authorization keep their existing evaluator. - Add opt-in per-caller GET deadlines to the API client. A timed-out caller detaches the stuck coalesced request so Retry starts a fresh fetch. Other callers retain their own cancellation and results. - Apply a 15-second deadline to AI account lists and grants reads. The permissions view retries transient failures once and reports other failures immediately. - Share the parent Permissions grants query with AI account details. Keep loaded controls visible after a background error and offer Retry. - Add a grant-scoped identity GET and OpenAPI contract. The service checks current membership and credential audience before it reads the selected credential. It projects only the provider email and organization; provider IDs, tokens, and raw errors stay private. - Show account details independently of maintenance controls. Anthropic profile denial has an explicit message and preserves connected status. Transient profile failures have a separate Retry action. Observations are cached for five minutes under the company, connection, grant, and grant revision. - Extend real PostgreSQL and authenticated HTTP coverage, client/component regressions, map guidance, and the existing benchmark's AI mode. - Address the Apex file-size finding by moving gallery identity lookup into the existing app display helper module. `AppDetail.tsx` is 984 lines; lookup behavior is unchanged. ## Verification Local source checkout on macOS, Node 25.6.1, pnpm 9.15.4, and disposable PostgreSQL 18.1. Provider calls use fixtures. No hosted deployment or provider qualification is claimed. - Passed `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`. - Passed all 87 tests in `connection-management.integration.test.ts` and all 33 tests in `connection-install-capabilities.test.ts`. - Passed 196 AI connection, identity-provider, and OpenAPI tests: `ai-connections.test.ts`, `ai-account-identity.test.ts`, and `openapi-routes.test.ts`. - Passed 107 focused UI/client tests: `client.test.ts`, `ManagedAiConnectionDetails.test.tsx`, `AiConnectionAccountDetails.test.tsx`, and `AppDetail.test.tsx`. - After the Apex extraction, passed UI typecheck/build and 106 component tests across `AppDetail.test.tsx`, `AppNotConnected.test.tsx`, `ManagedAiConnectionDetails.test.tsx`, and `AiConnectionAccountDetails.test.tsx`. - The authenticated HTTP tests compare complete grants responses across human roles, for tool and AI connections. They verify a real install mutation succeeds before revocation and fails afterward. - A company-wide personal AI fixture checks 20 targets instead of 400. Pool-member permission loss still denies the complete pool description. - UI states covered: shared cached grants, stuck account/grants fetches, one automatic retry, terminal failure, manual recovery, authorization failure, background failure with retained controls, and unmount cancellation. Client tests also cover stalled response bodies and independent coalesced callers. - Identity coverage includes actual bearer-key/JWT reads, private-user and cross-company denial before provider access, revoked credentials, provider 401/403/429/500, and grant-change isolation. A real local HTTP fixture stalls the response body, verifies the shared 15-second deadline, and keeps unrelated HTTP requests responsive. The test shortens the native deadline to 100 ms. Profile permission denial leaves the saved account connected. - Passed `pnpm check:token-gates`, `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs`, and `git diff --check`. - The full local `pnpm test:run` started with the loading-only change. All six chat shards passed. It recorded one failure in the unchanged `heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts` quota-rejection case. That exact case passed a focused rerun on the final head. The initial failure cause remains unconfirmed and its local log is retained; this is not a full local-suite pass. The redundant local run was stopped with SIGINT after final-head CI completed successfully. - [Final-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41515556725) passed on `ead8d276d4a2023614fff54b3e9a858f28c3178b`: typecheck, build, all 12 server shards, all 3 chat shards, workspace suites, all 9 serialized suites, all 8 end-to-end shards, Runner checks, and the aggregate verify gate. Security checks passed. Optional Storybook checks were skipped by workflow policy. GitHub reports the branch mergeable without conflicts. - Apex reviewed head `ead8d276d4a2023614fff54b3e9a858f28c3178b` at 5/5, confirmed the extraction resolves its earlier file-size finding, and has no unresolved review threads. The existing benchmark ran for the loading-only change now recorded in commit `5f725b36fa52002545241a5a8b7a10602f0cc0ce`, with `--purpose=ai --baseline-ref=026fd9e3452`. The identity follow-up leaves that batch source unchanged. Two warmups and five alternating samples exercise each of eight fixture shapes. Complete positional capabilities, reasons, and operations match the baseline in every sample. | AI fixture | SQL calls before → after | Target reads before → after | | --- | ---: | ---: | | 1 agent, company install | 9 → 9 | 1 → 1 | | 32 agents, company install | 5,248 → 164 | 1,024 → 32 | | 100 agents, company install | 50,400 → 504 | 10,000 → 100 | | 100 agents, partial install | 13,175 → 503 | 2,575 → 100 | These counts measure the real service over local PostgreSQL. They do not predict hosted page latency. To reproduce the standalone benchmark, use a checkout of commit `5f725b36fa52002545241a5a8b7a10602f0cc0ce` and run the command below. Its isolation check intentionally rejects the later identity follow-up's additional runtime changes. ```sh node --import ./server/node_modules/tsx/dist/esm/index.mjs scripts/benchmark-connection-install-capabilities.ts --purpose=ai --baseline-ref=026fd9e3452 ``` Run the final-head regression suites from the repository root: ```sh cd server pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/connection-management.integration.test.ts src/__tests__/connection-install-capabilities.test.ts src/__tests__/ai-connections.test.ts src/services/ai-account-identity.test.ts src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts cd ../ui pnpm exec vitest run src/api/client.test.ts src/components/ai-connections/ManagedAiConnectionDetails.test.tsx src/components/ai-connections/AiConnectionAccountDetails.test.tsx src/pages/apps/AppDetail.test.tsx ``` ## Risks Descriptive permissions reuse retained facts within one request. A concurrent change can leave a displayed choice stale; the next request and every write still authorize fresh. Pools with referenced members retain their existing cost. The account and grants clients now bound each caller's wait. A browser abort does not cancel an authorization read already admitted by the server. The independent profile request uses a fixed Anthropic origin, a bounded body, no redirects, and a 15-second deadline. Inference-only credentials can return no email; that is reported without guessing from a Paperclip owner or changing connection health. Profiles are fetched only for the caller's authorized selected grant. No ambient CLI identity, persistent identity cache, background polling, or billing-identity change is added. Other API reads keep their existing behavior. No migration is required. Staging has not been redeployed. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through the Codex harness in T3 Code, with xhigh reasoning, code editing, execution, and test tools. The host does not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 12:29:03 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip	946735d03a	Persist task sorting in URLs and show newest routine tasks first ... Save task sort choices in URLs across task views. Open routine tasks by creation time, newest first, with stable sorting before pagination. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <Paperclip-Paperclip@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-11-02 13:32:40 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	40b8075916	feat(ui): show scheduled task waits as Monitoring (#18624) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task indicators tell an operator whether work is active, waiting, or complete. > - An agent can yield until a saved monitor checks CI or another external result. > - The task currently keeps the In Progress icon between those runs. > - Changing the stored status would affect monitor admission and recovery. > - This pull request adds a read-only Monitoring display state with a blue clock. > - Operators can see and filter scheduled waits while execution keeps its existing rules. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Task status indicators, task collection filters, board columns, and search facets. **Current behavior** A task that waits for a scheduled monitor shows the same In Progress icon as active work. **Proposed behavior** Show Monitoring with a static blue clock when an agent-owned task has a saved ordinary monitor and no active run, execution lock, review participant, or active recovery action. Return to the normal task indicator when the check starts. Preserve review, blocked, terminal, and quota-recovery states. **Reason and benefit** Operators can distinguish scheduled waits from current agent work without reading the task history. **Breaking changes** None to stored task statuses or execution rules. Task reads gain optional displayStatus. Collections and search gain a separate read filter. Existing status filters keep their lifecycle meaning. Related historical work: #4396 covered a monitoring label exemption. This change uses the saved monitor and a read projection. ## What Changed - Add one SQL projection for task detail, compact lists, summaries, relations, search results, and display-status counts. - Show the blue clock in shared task icons and chips, task detail and breadcrumbs, properties, references, list rows, recent navigation, and agent task cards. - Add Monitoring to task filtering, grouping, sorting, board columns, and search facets. Prevent a drag from creating this derived state. - Keep stored lifecycle statuses, monitor scheduling, checkout, recovery, permissions, and agent status filters unchanged. - Add database and UI regression coverage, full-page Storybook examples, and product and access-map documentation. ## Verification - Passed `pnpm -r typecheck`. - Passed `pnpm build`. - Passed `pnpm check:token-gates` and the map/catalog structural checks. - Ran the new database suite on a disposable PostgreSQL 17 database. It covers read surfaces, filter pagination/counts, queued/running checks, rescheduling, completion, retained monitors, review, and recovery holds. - Ran existing search, list, board, sidebar, task status, and filter tests. Corrected board queries use displayStatus and eight columns. - The full local `pnpm test:run` stopped in a chat integration shard: 12 failures (four timeouts and eight FIFO publication assertions). That run spanned a rebase. A focused rerun on the current source passed all 21 selected cases without assertion or timeout changes. The original cause is not established; this does not claim the full local suite passed. Final-head required CI passed (ci / verify and ci / e2e, run 41488267209). - Passed 82 tests for task API summaries, recovery precedence, search, and optimistic updates; 54 tests for status cards, database reads, and board moves; and 27 tests for blocker relations and recent-task cache updates. One intermediate database setup hit its 20-second hook timeout; the serial rerun passed. - Greptile is 5/5 on d003ea672d. All review threads are resolved. The separate optional Paperclip Review ended early and returned neutral; GitHub rejected a direct rerun request with HTTP 404. It is not counted as a completed review. - Review fixes cover escalated recovery, is:open, optimistic status changes, blocker-summary projection, and recent-task dedupe. - Reviewed 15 screenshots from production pages and components with isolated Storybook API fixtures: task detail/properties/breadcrumb, list, groups, status filter, board, search/results/filter counts, reference pills, sibling navigation, agent cards, picker, dashboard, inbox, profile, watched status-card tasks, light theme, and mobile. This does not claim deployed staging verification. ## Risks - Read projections must stay consistent across full, compact, summary, and search responses. Tests cover those paths. - Monitoring is not a writable lifecycle status. The board does not accept drops into its Monitoring lane or onto a monitored card. This prevents a drag from implying a scheduled check. Move work into In Progress through that lane instead. - The read projection adds run/recovery existence checks. Existing heartbeat_runs_company_issue_created_idx and issue_recovery_actions_company_source_status_idx indexes cover the company/task lookup. It adds no worker, timer, recurring query, migration, or provider call. No production load benchmark is claimed. - Older clients can ignore displayStatus. Existing lifecycle status filters keep their behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser tools. The exact backend model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 11:35:30 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	0748b90062	fix(server): stop goal-less native runs before board task closure (#18616) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A task owns its active run and its tool access. > - A board user can close a task while that run is still working. > - The task update route stopped native runs only when they had an active session goal. > - Providers without goals kept running after the route cleared task ownership. > - This pull request stops those native runs before a board closure releases ownership. > - The benefit is an orderly stop instead of tool denials and failed finalization. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A board user marked a task Done while its native OpenCode run was active. The route cleared its execution lock without stopping the provider. Later tool calls failed with `paperclip_runner_tool_binding_not_authorized`. The final wake fence then failed with `native_current_wake_comments_binding_changed`, leaving workspace finalization in retry. Cancelled also released ownership before its later Stop call. **Expected behavior** A board closure must confirm native Stop before it releases task ownership. A failed Stop must leave the task open. The provider does not need to support session goals. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a native task with a provider that has no active session goal. 2. Mark the task Done while its run is active. 3. Observe that the old route updates the task without cancelling the run. ## What Changed - Reuse the existing audited cancellation path before a board user marks an active native task Done or Cancelled. - Keep the existing 409 response when Stop is unconfirmed. - Record the board user in the Stop metadata. The existing acknowledged-Stop policy then leaves queued input and recovery quiet until a later explicit wake. - Inspect additional runs only when a task has an execution owner; tasks without a run lock keep their existing completion path. - Keep native semantic completion, legacy completion, and goal control behavior. - Add route regressions for stop ordering, failed Stop, and legacy completion. - Update the execution contract and task maps. ## Verification - Red before the fix: three regressions failed. Done had no Stop; Cancelled stopped after the update; an unconfirmed Stop allowed Done. - A second red proved that a Stop receipt without the route's operator metadata was not recognized by the real recovery policy. Both cases pass after the metadata repair. - Final local result on macOS arm64 / Node.js 26.4.0: **348 tests pass across eight suites**. These cover the route, native self-completion authority, cancellation, acknowledged Stop, recovery queues, dependency wakeups, and completion telemetry. - CI found seven sibling route failures from an unnecessary active-run lookup on tasks without execution ownership. Those cases failed locally before the correction and pass afterward. - Earlier concurrent local runs hit a module-load hook timeout and one watchdog socket hang-up. The isolated watchdog case and the complete final eight-suite run pass with a 90-second startup budget. No assertion was removed. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check`: pass. - `pnpm build` and `pnpm -r typecheck`: pass. Server build and typecheck also pass after the Stop metadata change; the final server build includes the lookup correction. - `pnpm test:run`: attempted; the unchanged chat shard selector failed before executing its selected tests (`No test found ... in lines ...`). This is separate from the PostgreSQL startup failure. CI supplies full-suite verification. - PostgreSQL integration and live-provider acceptance did not run locally. Embedded PostgreSQL failed before app startup with `could not create semaphores: No space left on device`. No usable isolated local database runtime was available. CI supplies the PostgreSQL regression environment. The full live OpenRouter workflow remains unverified. - The first final-head CI pass hit a 15-second timeout in the unchanged `attention-retention-work.test.ts` blocker-history fixture. Cleanup then deadlocked and later inserts reused IDs. This service test does not call the changed route. The original log is [retained here](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41476191754/job/125384289220). The one allowed rerun also failed on the same commit: the `running` case exceeded 15 seconds again ([rerun log](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41476191754/job/125393915025)). The rerun otherwise passed 2,346 tests. No retention source or assertion was changed. This repeatable failure is the remaining CI gate; the PR is **not ready to merge**. The next step is to isolate that retention fixture/query in a usable PostgreSQL environment and repair its cause before rerunning CI. - Greptile reviewed final commit `b3cb41af2d911e9ced219e846cada3ecec835dbf` at **5/5**, with no unresolved review threads. Greptile is green. CI is blocked by the repeated retention test timeout described above. - CI native cancellation evidence: all 16 tests in `server/src/__tests__/native-cancellation-request.integration.test.ts` pass ([job log](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41476191754/job/125384289222)). - CI PostgreSQL wake-queue evidence: all 96 tests in `server/src/modules/wake-queue/adapters/postgres.test.ts` pass ([job log](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41476191754/job/125384289470)). ## Risks Board closure now waits for native Stop even when the provider has no goal. A failed or uncertain Stop keeps the task open. The change uses the existing cancellation and workspace-preservation path. It adds no retry loop, credential access, schema change, or publication authority. Direct service updates and agent semantic completion retain their existing paths. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, shell execution, and browser inspection. The exact serving snapshot ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 10:41:44 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	006d5691a6	feat(server): support volume-free web server handoff (#18518) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Its web server also owns controller admission and user commands. > - A rolling deployment starts a replacement before the old server exits. > - Shared database state alone does not preserve local agent files, browser chunks, or in-process commands. > - This pull request adds an opt-in ephemeral server contract and a local overlap test. > - The benefit is a web server that can relinquish traffic and local files without losing acknowledged work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18403, #18327, #18335, #18341. **Current behavior** The control-plane web server still has local agent-file authority and local command targets. A new container can miss saved bytes or send a command to the wrong process. An existing browser tab also needs chunks from its original build. **Proposed behavior** Eligible servers share only PostgreSQL, object storage and stable secrets. A replacement waits for readiness. The old server drains admitted requests, keeps owner commands available through handoff, and releases controller leases. Explicit maintenance adopts existing files before the volume is removed. **Reason and benefit** This is the application prerequisite for rolling app-only deployments. Schema migrations and permanent multi-replica operation are outside this change. ## What Changed - Store agent-file manifests in PostgreSQL and immutable bytes in S3. Treat local roots as disposable projections. Preserve existing permission checks and edit conflicts. - Add an explicit migration, eligibility and object-retention command to the production runtime bundle. - Add `/api/ready`, admitted-request drain, browser restart signaling and retained immutable UI chunks. - Carry transaction-aware work hints across controllers during handoff and active execution. Keep listeners closed when idle. - Deliver durable Stop and runtime responses to the execution owner. Recheck request lifecycle and access before response dispatch. - Reject local-only configuration in ephemeral mode. Keep the feature disabled for existing installations by default. - Add an isolated PostgreSQL/S3/proxy/browser deployment harness with independent server homes and retained failure evidence. ## Verification - All CI checks pass on `ce17b95019d3cf1cabd357d19b6d37f96782cc5c`: workspace typecheck, build, Runner checks, server/general tests and browser shards. Greptile reviewed the runtime changes at 5/5 with all findings resolved; the final commit updates maps and the plan. - Local targeted checks passed: coordinator 27; Stop/recovery 33; PostgreSQL command delivery 6; route/workspace regressions 8; bootstrap Stop 1; restart recovery 75. PostgreSQL command tests simulate the provider edge. - Local browser proof passed 91 reads and 19 saves; reconnect took 1,013ms. The tab opened Audit from S3 after deletion of A's whole home/build. This uses compiled workspace code and local-trusted auth, not released containers or live agents. - Local workspace typecheck/build passed; current server and runtime bundle passed. The earlier broad local suite was stopped after three hours and is not a passing receipt. Its retained failures and isolated reruns are documented in the plan. - Stacked #18526 adds stricter graceful-exit proof, an unready replacement control, live Runner qualification and a Stop handoff correction. Hosted enablement remains gated on those results and Cloud #1096. No hosted stack has been enabled. ## Risks - Apply migration 0422 before enabling the feature. Existing data must pass each owner's migration and eligibility checks. Do not discard a volume based on a single migration page. - Durable manifests remain authoritative after the opt-in is disabled. Rolling back to a binary that ignores them is unsupported. - Cold directory restoration and complete shutdown timing still need qualification before enabling a hosted stack. - Retained UI assets must cover the supported browser and rollback window. Cleanup is explicit; no new idle maintenance polling is introduced. - This change does not claim production zero downtime or authorize a fleet-wide enablement. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact serving model ID and context-window limit are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, code editing, shell execution and browser automation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-01 01:58:54 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	e09f40888a	fix(recovery): preserve native task access during resolution (#18489) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip controls agent execution and task ownership. > - A native run needs its task binding until it reports its result. > - Direct task updates already reject self-status changes that remove this binding. > - Recovery resolution can also change the source task status. > - That route did not use the same protection. > - This change rejects the unsafe status change before the task or recovery receipt changes. > - The run can then use semantic completion while normal recovery permissions remain effective. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18411. **What happened?** A running native owner can resolve an older recovery action with `sourceIssueStatus: "in_review"` or `"done"`. The request succeeds and changes its own task status. That can release the execution binding before the run reports. Later task tools fail with `paperclip_runner_tool_binding_not_authorized`. **Expected behavior** Return a conflict before the task status or action receipt changes. Tell the run to report through `paperclip_finish` or `paperclip_block`. Preserve unchanged-status resolution, Board recovery, legacy-agent behavior, and the existing conversation and handoff rules. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Give a running native owner the task execution lock and an older recovery action. 2. Call `POST /api/issues/{id}/recovery-actions/resolve` as that run. Use `outcome: "restored"` and `sourceIssueStatus: "in_review"`. 3. Before this fix, the route returns 200 and changes the status. After this fix, it returns 409 with `native_run_status_reported_by_finish` and makes no task or action mutation. ## What Changed - Reuse the existing native self-status guard inside recovery resolution's source-task transaction. - Let the guard receive the requested status from either route contract. - Add HTTP route regressions for rejected review/completion transitions and continued task editing after rejection. - Cover unchanged-status native resolution, Board recovery and legacy-agent resolution. - Update execution semantics and both recovery maps. ## Verification - Baseline `91fdf02`: the two new rejection cases fail because the real Express route returns 200. Three safety cases pass. - Fixed source: all 198 tests in `server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts` pass. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passes. This is structural evidence. - Greptile and Paperclip Review both give the integrated head 5/5 with no actionable findings. - Full recursive typecheck, full build, and a repeat of all 198 route tests pass at integrated head `0fa104dfb240500acd01303cd446363ea39c6c75`. All current-head CI gates pass (55 successful checks/statuses; no failed or pending checks). - The full local `pnpm test:run` command fails in chat-test line selection with `No test found`, before assertions. This also occurs with the unchanged master chat test file. It is not a passing full local suite. - The route tests use the real route, validation and guard. They mock service and database boundaries. The observed hosted failure establishes the original mechanism. Fixed-source live provider acceptance remains unverified. No deployment or merge is part of this PR. ## Risks - A native owner now receives a conflict for a previously accepted recovery status change. It must use the existing semantic result path. - This prevents a new binding loss. It does not prove that an old remote executor stopped or recover missing provider state. - Board, legacy, conversation and handoff behavior retains existing authority. The regression includes representative allowed paths. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools and code execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific snapshot ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (198 focused route cases; the full local command has the recorded selection failure) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 22:06:08 -05:00