2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
DottaandPaperclip	2e340d6235	fix(ui): show unread message counts in agent chat pickers (#19627) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - People switch between agent chats to read replies. > - The agent picker does not show how many messages are unread. > - People need that count before they select a chat. > - The chat list already has the viewer's read state. > - This pull request adds numeric badges from that shared list. > - People can find unread replies without extra requests for each agent. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The chat header agent picker and the secondary sidebar's Add chat picker. **Subsystem affected** Agent Chat UI, shared task types, and the chat read-state service. **Current behavior** The pickers do not show the unread message count for each agent. **Proposed behavior** Show the unread count beside each agent. For example, show 3 for three unread agent messages. Hide the badge when the count is zero. Keep switching available while chat data loads. **Reason and benefit** People can see which chats need attention before they switch. The count uses the existing shared request and cache. **Breaking changes** The chat response gains an optional `unreadMessageCount` field. Existing fields and read receipts keep their behavior. There is no database migration. **Additional context** Related: #19425 changes chat structure. This change adds counts to the current agent pickers. The duplicate search found no PR for these count badges. ## What Changed - Count unread agent comments in the existing grouped read-state query. Keep company and viewer scope. - Exclude human messages, deleted comments, system notices, and fast-response receipts. - Pass memoized count maps to both agent pickers. Use a direct lookup for each row. - Show numeric badges and accessible singular or plural labels. - Test count changes, account isolation, cached opens, search, and large agent lists. - Update the chat stories, fixture data, and development guide. - Make the Slack owner retry-deadline test deterministic after reproducing its CI failure. ## Verification - On current head `05f5fa6201`, the [main CI workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42305845930) passed, including build, typecheck, all applicable test shards, browser shards, and final verification. The prior server shard 2, 6, and 7 failures do not recur. - [Greptile's current-head review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19627#issuecomment-6696161631) is 5/5, its check succeeded, and both previous review threads are resolved. Current head check inventory is complete: 55 successful checks, three intentional skips, and no pending or failed checks. The Paperclip application review summary reports paused; no new completed Paperclip review is claimed. Its existing findings are resolved, and the independent current-head Greptile review is 5/5. - Current head `05f5fa6201` merges master `8621bcf53e` to resolve an import conflict. Master now includes the same model-default test repair. This branch keeps its upstream import, so that file no longer differs from master. - After this merge: all 21 server tests in the Slack owner and model-default suites pass, all 22 tests in the three picker/sidebar suites pass, and token gates pass. The standard preflight still cannot build Rust because `cargo` is absent. Fresh CI must supply the broad checks. - Head `7d125fb8c7` replaces the Slack owner test's real timer wait with the worker's existing clock input. It checks that the intent stays pending one millisecond before the retry deadline and clears at the deadline. All 15 Slack owner integration tests pass locally. Runtime retry behavior is unchanged. - On `4cfb1e9d55`, both review checks gave 5/5. CI [server shard 2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42302458830/job/128183671349) failed the Slack credential-lease retry test. The same assertion failed in an unchanged local run. A diagnostic run with added logging passed; the exact timer deviation was not captured. The new test removes the real-time wait assumption and checks the clock boundary directly. The earlier model-default and cleanup failures did not recur in that CI run. - On `a3378dfc40`, both Greptile and Paperclip Review gave 5/5 with no open findings. Typecheck, build, all eight browser shards, and most test shards passed. - That CI attempt failed two server shards. The model-default test still expected `gpt-5.6-sol`, while the current default is `gpt-6.1-sol`. I reproduced both failures locally. Commit `4cfb1e9d55` uses the exported default-model constant; all six tests in that suite now pass. Production model selection does not change. - The retained-cleanup backlog test exceeded its 15-second limit in [server shard 6](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42299858777/job/128175193320). The unchanged test passes locally with the same limit. Its CI timeout cause is not established. No assertion or timeout was changed. The fresh CI run must recheck it. - Review repair: commit `0db631b215` keeps the existing-chat and unread-agent arrays stable when chat data and the active agent do not change. A new 500-agent test fails before the repair and passes after it. The test also checks count refreshes. - The first CI typecheck failed on duplicate `IMAGE_ONLY` and `TESTOPS_REQUESTED` keys in `tests/runner-e2e/workflow-target.test.ts`. This was present in upstream code. Master commit `e482f0f632` removes the duplicate keys. This branch now includes that commit. All nine workflow-target tests pass locally. - After the latest master merge: all 22 tests in the three affected picker/sidebar suites pass. Before that merge, all 38 focused UI tests passed. - The current head is `05f5fa620134ad199a3d85b66fb2eb93d3bb6077`. All current status checks are complete, the aggregate verify gate succeeds, mergeability is CLEAN, and no unresolved review threads remain. The maintainer has instructed normal merge after checks pass. - After merging current master: 37 focused UI tests pass across AgentChatPicker, CoordinatorAgentSwitcher, AgentConversationsSidebar, useAgentChatRead, and SidebarAgentChats. - After merging current master: all 38 proactive-chat integration tests pass with a real disposable PostgreSQL database. They check counts of 2, 1, and 0 at exact read cutoffs. - The prior revision passed UI typecheck and build, shared build, isolated low-memory server typecheck, token gates, and 30 map/catalog tests. - The 500-agent test bounds index work and count lookups. Search does not rebuild the existing-chat index. - Browser checks used production components with simulated API data. Dark, light, mobile, and Add chat cases passed. Counts of 3 and 12 stayed visible through search. Read agents had no badge. Cached opens made no chat API requests. - Twenty local cached opens took 34.5–57.6 ms, with a 38.4 ms median. This is an unthrottled fixture measurement. - Earlier full local checks could not complete because Rust cargo is absent and the workspace has limited memory. The standard worktree preflight also stops at missing cargo. Required CI must supply broad checks for this PR head. - The first server typecheck ran out of memory while Storybook was active. Its isolated low-memory retry passed. No visual baseline comparison or live provider delivery is claimed. ## Risks - Low risk. The count replaces a boolean aggregate in the same grouped query. Very long chat histories still need that existing scan. - A count can be stale until the existing chat-list cache refreshes. Read receipts still control the unread cutoff. - The change adds no polling, per-agent history request, database migration, or permission change. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with code editing, terminal tools, and browser verification. The runtime did not expose a more specific served model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-06 17:10:56 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	8ff812cdde	feat(chat): deliver proactive task messages to agent chats (#18374) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent Chat gives each person a persistent conversation with each agent. > - Tasks and routines produce results outside that conversation. > - Those runs need a safe way to bring a requested result back to the person. > - The server must select the agent's own chat and check the source task's access rules. > - This pull request adds proactive chat messages and unread indicators. > - People can see the result, open its source task, and reply in the same chat. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Server, native runner tools, shared contracts, database, and UI. **Problem or motivation** An agent can report progress on a task or comment on an authorized task. It cannot send a routine result to its own standing chat with the responsible person. A morning review routine therefore cannot leave a visible digest in that person's chat. **Proposed solution** Add `send_chat_message({body, idempotencyKey})` and `POST /api/agents/me/chat/messages`. The server selects the company, agent, and responsible person from the active run. It saves an attributed comment and audit record in one transaction. The chat shows a source-task link and per-person unread state. **Alternatives considered** A destination parameter on a generic comment tool would expose unnecessary routing authority. A new delivery worker would add another durable delivery path. This change uses a dedicated tool and the existing comment and live-event paths. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the experimental Agent Chat capability in `ROADMAP.md`. The existing `enableAgentChat` setting controls it. Related public work: Refs #13282, Refs #13283, and Refs #14408. Searches for proactive chat and unread chat found no duplicate PR. ## What Changed - Add a focused messaging service shared by the native tool and HTTP route. It checks current run ownership, execution mode, recipient membership, task access, and task privacy. - Reuse the canonical company/agent/person conversation. Save the comment and audit record together. Keep task completion and chat execution separate from delivery. - Add source-task provenance and source-scoped retry keys. Identical retries return the saved receipt. Changed content returns a conflict. - Enforce the conversation's fixed agent at the shared comment-write boundary. Keep normal reply cancellation and session checks. - Add chat unread state, accessible agent dots, aggregate Chat indicators, and visible-message read cutoffs. Refresh through existing live events. - Add the request-key constraint, native tool contracts, documentation, capability maps, stories, and regression coverage. ## Verification - Local delivery/security proof: all 38 proactive-message cases pass. Eight credential-scope regressions and four quota regressions fail against the prior source. The repaired delivery and canonical cross-issue cap suites pass all 49 cases; all 31 OpenAPI tests, server typecheck, and capability-map checks pass. The shared per-run cap covers native and HTTP sends, mixed ordinary mutations, concurrent last-slot contention, and retry/recovery without double charging. - Credential tests preserve the authenticated person and authorizer; reject bridge/test credentials and persisted skill-test runs after task-mode changes; and recheck API-key revocation, scope, and responsible person after destination locking. The earlier delivery/native-authority suites passed all 74 cases before the four quota additions. - Four PostgreSQL contention cases cover native and HTTP sends plus retries during a native chat mutation. All four deadlock against the earlier source and pass with destination-before-source/run locking. Recovery and human-reply delivery enqueue only the human comment; a proactive digest never wakes the chat agent. - Passed 108 companion conversation, native-authority, and OpenAPI tests; 112 runner catalog/workflow-report tests; 47 completion-delivery tests; and 25 project-handoff tests. Focused runner tests cover native tool availability without generic API tools. - All 327 affected UI tests, UI typecheck, token gates, and catalog checks pass. The read hook retries at most three times, respects server retry delay, coalesces only seen cutoffs, recovers on reconnect, and cancels on scope changes. - Real browser journeys with a deterministic process agent verify routine-to-chat delivery, first-chat creation, unread state across reload, the source link, secondary chat navigation, and a follow-up reply referring to the digest. This does not qualify live GitHub retrieval or model output quality. - The Storybook showcase uses production components with deterministic network fixtures. Rendered interactions pass for the landing, ordinary read success, transient read recovery, and persistent failure after bounded retries. Both Chat navigation variants update from two unread chats to one while only Kodi's dot clears. Mobile and light variants were reviewed. The existing Coordinator Recents label contrast finding is unchanged; no Linux visual baseline archive exists. - Current master's independent sandbox migration retains 0418. Regenerated the feature migration as 0419 from the combined schema and retained exactly the newest five snapshots; numbering/safety, replay, and schema-drift checks pass. - Workspace typecheck and build passed before PR preparation; canonical server/UI typechecks passed again on the combined tree. Migration `0419_slippery_impossible_man.sql` passes safety and schema drift checks on disposable PostgreSQL, including interrupted index repair, concurrent migrators, one-time owner read-state backfill, preserved receipts, and two SQL replays. A default five-second local snapshot comparison timed out; a diagnostic 30-second run passed without drift. - Earlier failures are retained in the record: full local `pnpm test:run` and broad shards encountered embedded-PostgreSQL startup, timing, and provider-recovery failures. Thirteen selected external-channel cases pass in isolation on the original and changed sources; an unordered comment-row assertion now explicitly orders both reads. The earlier route registry, native tool count, runner catalog, and accessible Chat badge-name failures were fixed and passed full remote CI on `920b3bb7db`. - Repeated managed-skill server8 failures came from CI's newer synthetic merge: its Cloud guard correctly rejected the old local-disk fixture. Master independently repaired the fixture in #18385; this branch keeps that repair unchanged. All 57 managed-skill and Cloud prerequisite cases pass on the combined tree, and that fixture has no remaining PR diff. - Current reviewed head `dc16f314739a6d977bed21cb1446d0e80a541578`: Greptile 5/5 with no findings, Superagent security assessment passed, advisory Paperclip Review 5/5 with no findings, and zero open review threads. All 55 current-head check runs pass, with five expected skips and the advisory review neutral at 5/5; Snyk also passes. No checks are pending or failing. Protected squash auto-merge is enabled and is waiting for required code-owner approval. A normal exact-head merge was refused by the base-branch policy; no admin bypass was used. The previous head's Superagent quota finding is fixed and covered above. ## Risks - Chat remains company-visible. Delivery rejects a source task with private-task, project, or ancestor restrictions. - Read state uses a comment timestamp cutoff. The server retains database precision and never moves a read receipt backward. - The new unique constraint changes comment query planning. An existing regression now uses an explicit row order. The migration builds the unique index concurrently, then takes a brief table lock to attach it. It uses the existing top-level migration and interrupted-index recovery path. - The upgrade backfills missing chat-owner read-state rows at the latest existing agent comment. Existing read receipts remain intact. New chats can still be unread before the human participates. - Quota observation commits atomically with delivery. A rejected send rolls back its attempted denial audit row and any first-chat creation; the canonical warning remains in server logs, and previously spent quota remains enforced. Identical/conflicting retries and receipt recovery spend no extra slot. - This version delivers in-app only. It adds no external-channel, push, or email delivery. - Local full-suite acceptance remains limited by the failures recorded above. The feature stays behind `enableAgentChat`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex. PR preparation and CI work used `gpt-6.1-sol` with tool use and code execution. The earlier implementation also used Codex, but its exact model ID was not recorded in the visible session. The context-window size was not provided. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run focused tests locally and they pass; the broad local failures are recorded above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-30 21:39:07 -05:00