Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 cbd636d652 fix(evals): wait for rendered replies, bound runs by role and grade chat outcomes structurally (#20685)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The chat-feature eval catalog runs real chat journeys and grades
saved state, rendered links and run ledgers.
> - The second full-cohort run on master `9296c74e8d` failed 15 cases
where the product did the right thing and the harness did not.
> - The causes were three harness classes: links read before the reply
rendered, raw run counts that rejected product-caused follow-up runs,
and keyword graders on free-form replies. Four browser locators also
targeted retired controls.
> - This pull request fixes those harness layers. It does not change the
product.
> - The benefit is that these cases measure the feature again: correct
behaviour passes, and the relevant broken behaviour still fails.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened**
In the second full-cohort chat-eval run on master `9296c74e8d`, these
cases failed although the reply and the saved state were correct:
`agents.choose-primary`, `cases.case-history`,
`budgets-costs.set-budget` (links read about 2s before the reply
rendered); `task-coordination.independent-review`,
`cases.update-case-facts`, `routines.manage-other-owner`,
`questions-and-approvals.review-plan` (a legitimate continuation or the
product's completion follow-up exceeded a raw run count or was
cancelled); `cases.cases-disabled`, `inbox-search.find-design`,
`navigation-preferences.broken-link`, `cases.browse-cases` (keyword or
clause graders rejected correct replies); `agent-chat.conference-room`,
`workspaces.inspect-git`, `task-coordination.block-on-design`,
`skills.author-skill` (browser steps used stale settings or controls).

**Expected behavior**
A correct reply and correct saved state pass. A wrong outcome, extra or
duplicate agent work, a substitution or a missing route still fails.

**Steps to reproduce**
Run `runner-full-stack-e2e.yml` with `cadence=manual`, `all=false` and
an `id` list of the cases above against master `9296c74e8d`. Read
`result.json` and `snapshots/` in each cell's evidence.

Refs #20600

## What Changed

- `chat-rendered-links.ts`: `collectConversationLinks` waits (at most
10s, once per reply per page) for the latest saved lead reply to render
when its conversation is open. A page that does not show the
conversation does not wait. `observeInternal` and the flow conversation
read use it.
- `budgets-costs.set-budget`: waits for the rendered reply before it
reads anchors. It fills the budget only after the form shows the saved
cap, and checks that the typed value stays.
- New `chat-catalog-domains/run-roles.ts`: identifies a run by role (a
worker woken by a comment that a named run saved on the task; the CEO's
chat completion follow-up).
- `task-coordination.independent-review`: admits one Morgan continuation
woken by the CEO's authorization comment and one Riley review run. The
review request may come from that continuation's native status decision.
Other runs still fail.
- `cases.update-case-facts`: a phase settles when its CEO turn and at
most one Morgan continuation woken by that turn's task comment finish. A
new `role-bound-runs` check rejects any other run. `terminal-counts`
gets an optional `maximumTerminalStatusCounts`.
- `routines.manage-other-owner`: admits one Morgan run on a task that
the CEO created for Morgan. A schedule change must be Morgan's own write
from that run. The ownership check is structural (a linked owner task,
or a link to the routine or Morgan's page). The keyword checks on the
reply are removed.
- `questions-and-approvals.review-plan`: after the stale-review check,
lets the product's completion follow-up settle before final run custody.
The existing grader already validates it.
- `cases.cases-disabled`: the negation-blind false-claim regex is
removed. The case passes with a reply link to the Experimental settings
page (the scripted person follows it and sees the Cases control) or a
pending choice card. Saved state still proves that nothing was created.
- `inbox-search.find-design`: the per-clause regex is removed. The first
task link in the reply must be the task with the approved revision.
- `navigation-preferences.broken-link`: a link to the similar task fails
only when its label names the original (identifier or exact title). A
separate mention passes.
- `cases.browse-cases`: an excluded case must not be a result row. When
the reply has no result list, every case link is a result, so an
excluded case must not be linked.
- Browser steps: `conference-room` reloads after the fixture enables the
flag. `inspect-git` and `block-on-design` open the panel with "Show
properties" and pick the tab from the side panel launcher.
`author-skill` does not repeat the full inspection in `verifyResult`
when `act` already inspected the same saved version.
- Each changed case has a new `oracleVersion`.
`chat-catalog-descriptors.json` is in sync.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts <119
affected test files> --testTimeout=180000`: 1673 passed, 3 skipped. One
file (`chat-factual-query-input.test.ts`) did not load in the local
worktree because `@paperclipai/plugin-sdk` is not built there. It does
not import changed code. CI runs it.
- `chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts` passes (242 descriptors).
- `npx tsc --noEmit -p tests/runner-e2e`: no errors in changed files.
- `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`:
no pin change.
- `node --test` on the three `chat-full-catalog-testops-*.test.mjs`
files: 40 passed.
- Calibration against retained evidence: the retained replies and run
shapes of cases-disabled, browse-cases, find-design, broken-link,
independent-review, update-case-facts and manage-other-owner now pass.
Broken variants fail (closed case as a result row, earlier design linked
first, original label on the similar task's link, unprompted or
duplicate worker runs, a second review run, a routine change outside the
owner's run, no route link).
- Paid runs on this branch: see the PR comments.

## Risks

- Low risk. Only eval harness code changes.
- The structural graders do not read reply wording. A reply that words
the outcome wrongly but links the right records can pass. A person reads
the reply.
- `navigation-preferences.sidebar-order` is not changed. The shipped
sidebar has no per-project order or collapsible Agents section, so the
case premise needs an owner decision.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), tool use and code
execution in Claude Code.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-10 20:24:41 -06:00
f4337bb5fb test(evals): land the chat catalog eval harness on master (#19614)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The chat-feature evals measure whether agents complete real chat
requests through the product
> - The chat catalog eval harness and its repairs live on the
`chat-eval/master-candidate` branch, not on master
> - Today's work made 139 of 242 chat evals pass in verified single-case
live runs. Each product fix landed on master as its own pull request
> - The eval-side changes (setups, graders, fault seams, evidence
capture) still exist only on the candidate
> - This pull request lands the harness on master. Master stays the
source of truth for product behavior
> - The benefit is one tree: evals run against master commits, and
product fixes reach the evals as soon as they merge

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19441, Refs #19599, Refs #20270, Refs #20334, Refs #20342, Refs
#20344, Refs #20354, Refs #20360, Refs #20373, Refs #20382, Refs #20409

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The chat catalog eval harness and the product it evaluates live on a
long-running branch outside master. Eval fixes do not reach master, so
master-based eval runs use old setups and graders.

**Subsystem affected**
`tests/runner-e2e` chat catalog harness, plus a small set of product
changes that exist only on the candidate.

**Proposed change**
Land the harness on master. Every product fix from this eval work
already merged to master as its own pull request. Conflicts keep
master's product behavior.

## What Changed

- Most of the diff (808 of 851 files) is under `tests/runner-e2e/`:
chat-catalog domains, scenarios, descriptors, the TestOps manifest,
private evidence tooling, and their tests.
- Graders now check saved state, setup literals and rendered or clicked
links. Many keyword and regex checks on free-form replies are removed.
Each changed grader has a bumped `oracleVersion` and calibration tests
(a valid reply, a reworded valid reply, and broken variants that must
fail).
- The shared link helper `hasLink` no longer treats a list link (for
example `/COM/issues?view=mine`) as a link to every task without a URL
key.
- Setup fixes build real state through supported product routes: routine
history, agent grants through the board grant route, budget holds with a
real cap, and a storage-layer archive fault for
`inbox-search.archive-partial-failure`.
- Browser boundary journeys (sign-in, chat-disabled, onboarding) now
write the standard pass evidence files.
- Retargeted cases, approved by the maintainer:
`agent-chat.chat-disabled` (Conference Room gate),
`agents.restore-instructions` (no saved instruction history),
`access.manage-membership` (member permission edits stay board-only).
- The private evidence trusted files (`manual-private-handoff.ts`,
`manual-private-retention.ts`, `manual-private-report-assets.ts`) are
byte-identical to master.
- Product files outside `tests/` (43 files, +1,328 −49) carry
candidate-only changes that master does not yet have. Most are tests.
The main code changes are in `request-human-input.ts`,
`heartbeat-run-summary.ts`, `native-completion-feedback.ts`,
`native-run-finalizer.ts`, `openapi.ts`, `secrets.ts` and
`IssueChatLongThreadPerf.tsx`.

## Verification

- `pnpm vitest run chat-catalog-domains chat-catalog-contract.test.ts
chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts unit-launcher.test.mjs
--testTimeout=180000` in `tests/runner-e2e`: 269 files pass, 3,550 tests
pass.
- `node --test chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs`: 10 pass.
- `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`:
no change.
- `tsc` for `server` and `tests/runner-e2e`: clean.
- Live single-case verification: 139 of 242 cases passed on paid runs,
and a person read the saved evidence for each. These are single-case
runs, not one full-cohort run.

## Risks

- Large diff. Most of it is test-only, but the 43 non-test files change
product code paths. Review those files first.
- Some graders are now less strict on reply wording. A person must read
replies for meaning on those cases.
- 42 cases need disposable outside accounts (Notion, Slack, GitHub,
Daytona and others) and stay blocked. `access.invite-teammate` stays
failing until local agent isolation lands, because the runner's durable
state keeps a live invite token.
- The paid workflow compares the trusted private-evidence files with
master. They are unchanged, so this risk is low.

## Model Used

Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with tool use and code
execution, in Claude Code. Subagents used the same model.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-10 08:02:11 -06:00