4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
DottaandPaperclip	d9d2147171	fix(auth): keep Cloud tenants on the Cloud sign-in flow (#14407) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Cloud owns human identity and passes a verified identity to each tenant. > - The tenant can report no session while the Cloud session is still valid. > - The access gate and direct `/auth` route then show the instance password form. > - This pull request sends those users through the configured Cloud entry endpoint. > - Cloud can renew the tenant session or show its login page, then return to the original task. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A Cloud tenant can display the self-hosted email/password form after an instance session check returns no session. This gives Cloud users the wrong login method. **Expected behavior** An active Cloud session renews tenant access automatically. A signed-out user signs in through Cloud. Staging and production use their own configured Cloud origins. Self-hosted instances keep their instance login form. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a Cloud tenant task or an `/auth?next=...` link. 2. Keep the Cloud session active but make the instance session check return 401. 3. Observe the instance password form instead of Cloud session recovery. **Deployment mode** Cloud-managed authenticated instances. No database or server API changes. Searched related authentication PRs. Native self-hosted OIDC support in #10411 is a separate feature; this change uses the existing Cloud entry contract. ## What Changed - Wait for deployment metadata before showing an instance login form. - Use the health response's Cloud origin and stack slug for session recovery. - Preserve the tenant path, query, and fragment. Reject external and recursive login return targets. - Limit automatic recovery per tab. Show a manual Cloud retry after failed recovery. Show service failures as errors. - Keep self-hosted login and local trusted access. Add focused tests, browser regressions, deployment documentation, and an unavailable-state design example. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. - UI typecheck and `pnpm check:token-gates` passed after the final UI edits. - All UI tests passed: 639 files, 6,777 tests. - 63 focused Vitest tests passed across Auth, CloudAccessGate, Cloud links, and recovery coordination. - `pnpm exec playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts tests/e2e/cloud-auth.spec.ts`: 5 passed. The tests use the real tenant UI and database with a simulated Cloud HTTP endpoint. They cover both Cloud origins, direct auth/task links, no password-form flash, preserved URLs, reload, and self-hosted login. - Hands-on browser test used the real Cloud gateway and a fresh tenant build with disposable local data. Active Cloud session plus a forced missing instance session returned to the task. An expired tenant cookie also renewed automatically and returned to the task. Removing both sessions reached the real Cloud email/social login UI. Persistent failure stopped at the retry screen; retry succeeded after removing the injected fault. The fixture used a loopback transport adapter and a simulated signed-out OIDC issuer. No production session or deployment was changed. - The default local browser startup hit the host's embedded PostgreSQL resource limit. The passing run used a separate disposable database on the test PostgreSQL process. - The full local `pnpm test:run` sweep was stopped after about 31 minutes once CI completed the full suite. It had reported 33 failures in the unchanged runner API unit/integration files; both files pass in isolation (1,749 + 28 tests). The local sweep did not reach the later workspace/serialized groups. CI completed all of those groups successfully. - Greptile reviewed commit `d603fd4e39455de44da9dae81b72197096c0e1e8` at 5/5 with its only thread resolved. All CI gates are green on this commit, including all general/serialized server groups, workspace tests, Runner checks, typecheck, build, and all eight browser shards ([run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36446230697)). ## Risks - Recovery depends on valid Cloud origin and stack metadata. Incomplete metadata shows an unavailable message instead of a password form. - Browsers with session storage disabled use the manual Cloud link, since automatic retries cannot be bounded across documents. - The external identity provider's email/social login was not completed in this local test. Existing Cloud authentication owns that flow. - No migration, credential format, membership rule, or production deployment changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The exact served variant and context-window limit are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser testing. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-09-28 13:45:27 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	6f204605ad	fix(ui): show source SHA for unreleased builds (#9508) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to manage AI-agent companies > - Operators need to identify the exact build running from the persistent account menu > - Formal releases already have a concise public version, but source builds include a long derived version string > - The derived version identifies a commit but does not expose the source branch or a direct path to inspect the code > - Server Git metadata is auth-sensitive, so the UI must also refresh it when the current session changes > - This pull request shows linked branch and commit metadata for source builds while preserving `v<version>` for formal releases > - The benefit is faster build diagnosis with correct metadata across sign-in and sign-out transitions ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### Pre-submission checklist - [x] I searched existing open and closed issues and found no duplicate implementing this exact account-menu behavior. - [x] The behavior reproduces on `master`. - [x] The behavior originates in Paperclip's core UI, not an adapter, provider, or local configuration. ### What happened? Source builds displayed the full derived version, such as `2026.626.0+58.git.518fc71ce`, without linking the operator to the corresponding source branch or commit. ### Expected behavior Source builds should show the concise branch and short commit SHA with links to GitHub, while formal releases should continue showing their public version. Auth transitions should refresh the health metadata that supplies those Git details. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Run Paperclip from a commit after a release tag. 2. Open the account menu. 3. Inspect the build label beneath the user identity. 4. Sign in or out and reopen the menu. ### Paperclip version or commit Any source build whose server version uses the `<version>+<count>.git.<sha>[.dirty]` format. ### Deployment mode Local dev (`pnpm dev`) or authenticated deployments. ### Installation method Built from source. ## What Changed - Detect source-derived version strings and render the source branch plus seven-character commit SHA in `SidebarAccountMenu`. - Link source branches and commits to the canonical `paperclipai/paperclip` GitHub repository. - Extend server Git metadata with the full SHA and expose it through health/OpenAPI contracts. - Refresh auth-sensitive health metadata after sign-in and every sign-out entry point. - Preserve the existing `v<version>` label for formal releases and add focused regression coverage. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/Auth.test.tsx src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx src/components/SidebarServerInfo.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/health.test.ts src/__tests__/server-info.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `git diff --check public/master...HEAD` ## Risks - Low risk: formal release rendering retains the existing fallback behavior when the source-version pattern does not match. - Source links assume the build came from the canonical public repository; fork-only branches or commits may not resolve there. - Health metadata is invalidated after auth transitions, adding one bounded refetch so the displayed Git details match the new session. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex using GPT-5.4 with medium reasoning, repository/tool access, shell execution, and code editing; context-window size was not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-07-13 20:55:54 -05:00
3 people	8ddd735a7a	feat(ui): theme toggle on unauthenticated auth page (supersedes part of #3732) (#5874) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Operators sign in via the `/auth` page, which renders before any session exists > - The signed-in app has a theme toggle inside `SidebarAccountMenu`, but the signed-out `/auth` page has none — first-time visitors are stuck in whichever theme was hardcoded at boot > - Master's existing toggle was inline inside `SidebarAccountMenu.tsx` as a `MenuAction` row, not exported as a reusable widget; round-1 of this PR added a standalone `ThemeToggle` but punted on unifying the two surfaces > - This pull request makes `ThemeToggle` the canonical theme widget (one source of truth for label, icon, and toggle behaviour), used both as a compact icon button on `/auth` and as a full-width menu row in `SidebarAccountMenu` > - The benefit is a working pre-auth theme switch and zero risk of the two call sites drifting out of sync as the theme model evolves ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No existing issue covers this directly — problem described in-PR (feature-gap shape): - The signed-in app has a theme toggle inside `SidebarAccountMenu`, but the signed-out `/auth` page has none — first-time visitors are stuck in whichever theme was hardcoded at boot. - The existing toggle lived inline in `SidebarAccountMenu.tsx` as a `MenuAction` row, not exported as a reusable widget, so the two surfaces could drift apart as the theme model evolves. - This PR supersedes part of PR #3732 (the auth-page toggle slice); no standalone issue was filed for it. Duplicate-PR search: related open theme PRs #2769 and #4666 add in-app three-state system-theme toggles — different surface from this PR (unauthenticated auth page); sibling PR in this series: #5873. ## What Changed - **`ui/src/components/ThemeToggle.tsx`** — accepts `variant: "icon" | "menu-action"` (default `"icon"`) and an `onAfterToggle` callback. Both variants share `useTheme` and the same label/icon derivation. The `menu-action` variant matches the existing `MenuAction` row styling. - **`ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.tsx`** — drops its inline `useTheme()` + `MenuAction`-for-the-theme-row in favor of `<ThemeToggle variant="menu-action" onAfterToggle={() => setOpen(false)} />`. Sun/Moon icon imports and theme state move with it. - **`ui/src/pages/Auth.tsx`** — unchanged from round 0; renders `<ThemeToggle />` at top-right of the `/auth` page (already using the default `icon` variant). - **`ui/src/components/ThemeToggle.test.tsx`** (new) — covers both variants, the `onAfterToggle` callback, and the label/icon flip across themes. - **`ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx`** — unchanged; its `ThemeContext` mock still works because `ThemeToggle` uses the same hook. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui run typecheck` — clean. - `npx vitest run src/components/ThemeToggle.test.tsx src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx` — 5 passed (4 new + 1 existing). - Manual: launched `pnpm dev` for the UI, mocked `/api/auth/get-session` 401, navigated to `/auth` — toggle is visible top-right, click flips light/dark. Screenshots committed. ## Risks Low. The change is structural — both call sites render the same widget that already worked on each surface independently. `SidebarAccountMenu`'s popover behaviour is preserved via `onAfterToggle`, and `ThemeContext` is untouched. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context), extended thinking mode. ## Checklist - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] Thinking path traces from project context to this change - [x] Model used specified - [x] Checked ROADMAP.md — not in conflict with planned core work - [x] Tests run locally and pass - [x] Added tests for the new ThemeToggle component (both variants) - [x] UI change — before/after screenshots in `docs/pr-screenshots/pr-5874/` - [x] No documentation updates required (purely internal refactor + new component) - [x] Documented risks above - [x] Will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before merge Supersedes part of #3732. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@paperclip.ing>	2026-06-12 12:59:14 -07:00
DottaandClaude Opus 4.8	139cdebe51	[codex] Improve login accessibility and password-manager metadata (#7660) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Human operators sign in through the main auth page and through invite acceptance flows. > - Those forms need to be understandable to assistive technology and password managers. > - The login fields did not consistently expose stable names, ids, autocomplete hints, required state, and error relationships. > - That made it easier for password managers such as 1Password to miss the username/password pairing and harder for screen readers to associate validation errors. > - This pull request tightens the auth and invite form metadata while keeping the visible flow unchanged. > - The benefit is a smoother login and invite-acceptance experience without changing server-side auth behavior. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No matching GitHub issue found after searching `login accessibility 1Password username password` in `paperclipai/paperclip` issues and PRs. ## What happened? Login and invite auth fields were missing password-manager and accessibility metadata, including stable field identifiers, autocomplete hints, required semantics, and error-region relationships. That made it easier for password managers such as 1Password to miss the username/password pairing and harder for screen readers to associate validation errors. ## Expected behavior Auth fields should be discoverable as username/password fields, distinguish sign-in and sign-up password autocomplete behavior, and expose validation errors through an alert region referenced by invalid inputs. ## Steps to reproduce 1. Open the main `/auth` form or an invite auth form. 2. Inspect the email, password, and sign-up name field attributes. 3. Trigger a validation/auth error and inspect whether invalid inputs reference the displayed error text. ## Paperclip version or commit Prior to this PR on `master`. ## Deployment mode Board UI, all deployments using these forms. ## What Changed - Added stable `id`, `name`, `required`, `aria-required`, `aria-invalid`, `aria-describedby`, and autocomplete metadata to the main auth form. - Added invite auth field metadata so invite sign-up uses `new-password`, invite sign-in uses `current-password`, and the email field is recognized as `username`. - Added alert regions for auth and invite auth errors so invalid fields can reference the displayed error text. - Added focused Vitest coverage for the main auth form and invite auth flow metadata/error behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/Auth.test.tsx ui/src/pages/InviteLanding.test.tsx` passes: 2 files, 16 tests. - `pnpm build` passes locally. - PR CI is green on head `3531d1900`, including Build, Canary Dry Run, Typecheck + Release Registry, e2e, general/serialized test shards, policy, commitperclip review, security checks, and aggregate `verify`. - Greptile Review is passing on head `3531d1900`; the P2 alert/live-region review thread was fixed and resolved. - Rebasing onto `public-gh/master` completed cleanly; current base ref is `e50666e4c`. - Confirmed the branch diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`, `.github/workflows`, migrations, or design/image assets. - No screenshots attached: this is a form metadata/accessibility change, and the task specifically asked not to add design screenshots or images unless they are part of the work. ## Risks Low risk. The change is limited to UI form attributes and error wiring. Main risk is password-manager/browser interpretation differences, covered by asserting the emitted DOM metadata rather than a specific vendor integration. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding model with repository tool use and shell execution. Exact hosted model ID/context window are not exposed in this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-06 11:40:59 -05:00