2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	391dd15ff2	fix: recover deferred messages and completed unblock waits (#16673) ... Recover accepted deferred messages through the latest finished issue run and recognize exact completed agent unblock notifications as passive idle waits. Preserve assignment handoffs, pause and Stop, failed outcomes, and cleanup ownership. Honor local and SSH release contracts and atomically settle cleanup claims. Add PostgreSQL recovery, concurrency, and interruption regressions. Validation: recursive typecheck and build pass; 678 focused tests pass; full CI passes; Apex review is 5/5 with no unresolved findings. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-17 16:53:29 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	35b3345033	fix(server): support issue monitor deadlines in idle sleep reports (#16325) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work for companies and AI agents. > - Hosted workspaces can sleep when their required work has a safe wake path. > - The current idle check treats every open issue as background work. > - Backlog, unassigned and human-waiting records can therefore keep an idle process running. > - Future automated monitors still need their saved check time and execution claims. > - This PR adds a signed host capability for passive issues and verified monitor deadlines. > - The host can save one alarm for the earliest required routine or monitor time. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A quiet workspace with a backlog or unassigned todo issue reports background work as present. A future issue monitor also prevents sleep even when the host can save a durable wake alarm. **Expected behavior** Proven passive records can sleep. A validated future monitor can sleep only after the host saves its alarm and validates the same owned report. Active, unknown and unresolved work stays awake. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a quiet workspace with an unassigned todo issue and no other work. 2. Acquire a bounded, signed Cloud idle hold. 3. Request the routine-only safety report with `scheduledWake=1`. The issue blocks sleep. 4. Request the new capability with `scheduledWake=2`. A passive issue can now report no work. 5. Add a valid future monitor to an assigned in-progress issue. The second capability returns its saved deadline for host acknowledgement. **Paperclip version or commit** Base: `c30fb7d2b75ea30f72d63656b2a7cfff7fe0929d`. **Deployment mode** Cloud-managed authenticated instance. Local scheduling remains in the existing scheduler. Related protocol: [#16215](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/16215). Open scheduler and monitor PRs were checked for overlap. This change leaves monitor admission, dispatch and quota recovery with their existing owners. The roadmap already includes scheduled work; this is a focused idle-safety extension. ## What Changed - Add signed scheduling capability `2`; capability `1` retains the routine-only rules. - Allow untouched onboarding prompts with idle assignees to sleep using the same awaiting-user predicate as recovery; typing, answering the opening card or a prior run removes the exemption. - Inspect passive issue state and future monitors in the same bounded, read-only snapshot as other work. - Check ownership, company scope, known states, claims, policy/deadline agreement, attempts, timeout and dependency repair. - Combine routine and monitor deadlines into a known proof kind and catalog generation. - Preserve other sleep blockers, including task watchdogs, conversations, live runs, external credentials and recovery. - Update the protected route, OpenAPI contract, documentation and PostgreSQL regression tests. ## Verification - Full workspace typecheck and build passed. Final server typecheck and full build passed after the final guards. - Initial safety, scheduling, protected-route and control-authentication checks: 326 tests passed. - Final safety and heartbeat scheduling checks: 253 tests passed. Includes reporting a future deadline, restoring scheduling from PostgreSQL and one dispatch across competing schedulers. - Local general server checks: 20,260 passed; UI: 8,460 passed; CLI: 534 passed, including isolated reruns of two embedded-PostgreSQL startup failures. All remaining workspace groups and 158 serialized suites passed. The suite was completed in groups after the isolated infrastructure retries; the final onboarding change also passed the focused 674-test recovery/safety run. Earlier unchanged Git fixtures failed under Xcode's system `init.defaultBranch=main`, reproduced on the clean base and passed with a test-scoped fixture default; no source or machine configuration was changed. - Rebased issue, protected-route and scheduler checks: 115 tests passed; server typecheck passed. - The expanded change passed 674 idle-safety, scheduling and recovery regression tests, including six onboarding admission/invalidation cases. Final server typecheck and build passed. - Current-head Apex is 5/5 with no unresolved threads. All 54 current-head checks passed, with two expected skips. Four jobs were interrupted by runner shutdowns or lost communication on their first attempts; their targeted reruns passed. Live hosting qualification awaits the verified master release and matching host capability. ## Risks This intentionally covers a limited set of passive states and valid future monitors. Assigned active tasks without a proved waiting path, unknown states, claimed monitors and quota recovery still block sleep. It does not make every open issue safe to sleep. A matching host must recognize `routines_and_issue_monitors`, acknowledge the durable alarm and revalidate the exact owner, generation and deadline before stopping. The report alone grants no stop authority. Older hosts retain capability `1`. Independent database writers remain outside the admission contract. Existing scheduler claims and execution authority are unchanged. No schema migration is required. Roll back host negotiation to capability `1` to restore conservative admission, while retaining alarm delivery until outstanding alarms have been handled. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with repository editing, command execution and GitHub tools. The exact deployment ID and context-window metadata are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-14 15:39:46 -07:00