mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-13 07:12:00 +01:00
cf1def0ca62ade260eae155a2f34c2bfdca91ca1
437
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
156453fe7c |
fix(recovery): continue runs that a server restart or replacement ended, without spending the failure budget (#21019)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A deploy replaces the server. The old server stops its running legacy runs at SIGTERM (`server_shutdown_interrupted`). The new server finds runs whose owner died without that drain (`process_lost`, "server may have restarted"). > - Each of these runs got its follow-up from the bounded transient retry. That retry spends the failure budget (2 attempts) and waits 30 to 60 seconds. > - So the first deploy spent one failure retry. A run that was already the last automatic retry got no follow-up at all. The task then rested on a manual Retry. > - A deploy is routine. An interruption by the server is not a failed attempt, and it must never leave a task waiting for a person. > - This pull request moves these runs to their own `server_restart` retry lane. The lane never spends the failure budget, starts the first continuation at once, and has its own bound. > - The benefit is that a task continues by itself through several deploys a day, and a real loop still stops and shows why. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A zero-downtime deploy replaced a hosted server. In the 11 minutes around the swap, 11 legacy runs ended with `server_shutdown_interrupted` and 7 ended with `process_lost`. At least 7 tasks were left with no follow-up run and no scheduled retry, so each needed a manual Retry. Two of the stranded runs were already automatic retries. **Expected behavior** Each interrupted run continues once, automatically, on the surviving server, with its original wake. **Paperclip version or commit** Core commit |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5cd5adfccc |
fix(native): link a person-owned agent blocker to the agent's open question whatever owner kind the model reports (#20969)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - #20931 lets a person's answer continue a task that its agent blocked
while it waited for that answer
> - That link is recorded only when the blocker's unblock descriptor is
bound to the board
> - Codex reports such a wait as `paperclip_block` with `owner: {"kind":
"user", "name": "Board"}` and scope `task_wide`. The evidence classifier
treats only `kind: "board"` (not a PRP owner kind) as board-owned, so
the arbiter binds this person-owned blocker to the reporting agent, and
no link is recorded
> - So every Codex W2Q task still loses the answer
(`issue_not_in_progress`) and needs Retry
> - This pull request classifies a `user` owner as a person
(board-bound) and records the link from the reported owner kind, not
from the spelling of the owner
> - The benefit is that the person's answer reaches the agent whatever
owner shape the model uses
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #20931
**What happened?**
Restart-chaos wave w-20261111T230717-s5201 on master
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d1e4109df1 |
fix(runner): keep a connected adopted Runner through a failed liveness probe (#20965)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - After a controller restart, the controller adopts the remote Runner
that kept running in the sandbox. A monitor then checks the Runner's
liveness every 250 ms through the environment plugin.
> - #20940 and #20945 made a stalled plugin probe "unknown" for the
launched Runner's monitor, reattachment and launch. The adopted Runner's
monitor still failed the run on the first probe that failed without an
answer.
> - A short plugin stall after adoption therefore failed a healthy run
with `native_adopted_runner_identity_unverifiable`.
> - This pull request uses the evidence that is available: while the
adopted Runner holds its authenticated connection to the controller, a
liveness check that fails without an answer does not fail the run, for
at most the reconnect grace.
> - The benefit is that a healthy adopted Runner survives a short plugin
stall. A check that reports the process gone still fails the run at
once.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #20940, #20945
**What happened?**
`#watchAdoptedRunner` in
`packages/paperclip-runner/src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.ts` called
`failTransport("native_adopted_runner_identity_unverifiable: runner
liveness could not be revalidated")` on the first `isAlive()` rejection.
For a remote adopted Runner, `isAlive()` is a plugin
`environmentExecute` RPC. A plugin stall makes it reject, even while the
Runner holds its authenticated connection and works normally.
**Expected behavior**
A rejection is not an answer. While the Runner holds its authenticated
connection, the monitor keeps checking. The bound is the reconnect
grace. A check that returns `false` (the process is gone) still fails
the run at once.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Adopt a remote Runner after a controller restart.
2. Stall the plugin worker, so that the liveness probe rejects.
3. Within 250 ms the run fails with
`native_adopted_runner_identity_unverifiable`.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
827bd21017 |
fix(recovery): retry lost-lease preparations instead of holding them for reconciliation (#20936)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Run recovery restarts work that stops for infrastructure reasons,
and keeps saved files safe
> - A legacy Runner run can lose its controller lease while it prepares
the workspace, before any provider work starts (`controller_lease_lost`
with `executionRecovery: { kind: "bootstrap", providerWorkStarted: false
}`)
> - Such a run has no unsaved provider state, but recovery still blocked
the task: either a saved-files hold that ends in `source_unavailable`,
or an immediate "No live execution path" block after one failed
continuation retry
> - Recovery must work without a person, and a shown Retry must work
> - This pull request lets lost-lease preparations use the existing
interrupted-preparation settlement, and lets the bounded stranded-task
sweep retry a continuation that failed before provider work
> - The benefit is that these tasks retry automatically, and tasks that
an older release already blocked recover after deploy
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #20924 (fixes the lease renewal starvation that caused the lost
leases; this PR fixes what recovery did afterwards).
**What happened?**
A staging burst of lost controller leases stopped many legacy Runner
runs while they prepared the workspace. No provider work started. Most
of the affected tasks then became blocked. One shape kept a saved-files
hold (`legacy_execution_requires_reconciliation`). Its file recovery
ended `exhausted` with `source_unavailable`, because the workspace had
already retired the prepared epoch back to the last save. The hold never
settled. The other shape was a continuation retry that also lost its
lease. The release path blocked the task at once with "No live execution
path", although `controller_lease_lost` is a transient cause with a
3-attempt budget in the stranded-task sweep.
**Expected behavior**
A run that fails before provider work starts retries automatically,
within a bounded budget. It never needs reconciliation. If the prepared
workspace is gone, the task continues from the last committed save.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Start a legacy Runner run with a remote workspace.
2. Make the controller lose its lease while the run prepares (before
provider dispatch).
3. Let restore recovery record a saved-files hold, and let the workspace
retire the prepared epoch.
4. See that the hold stays `resolved/blocked` with `source_unavailable`,
and the task stays blocked.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
9c56e5465c |
fix(native): keep the agent's own unanswered question open after a turn ends without a report (#20934)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - An agent can ask the person a question and wait for the answer. Native task status comes from the server's status arbiter, not from model prose > - When a native turn ends without `paperclip_finish`, the Runner sends a default report: `done`, objective satisfied, with the agent's final message as the only evidence > - A later comment from the person moves an open question into history (#15392), so the question no longer gates completion > - Together these close a task as `done` while the agent is still waiting for its own answer and has produced nothing. No Retry appears and nothing flags it > - This pull request keeps such a task `in_review` on the agent's own unanswered question when the only completion evidence is the agent's final message > - The benefit is that a "waiting for your answer" turn can no longer become a silent false completion ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15392 **What happened?** Restart-chaos wave on master |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
6cfb1f3d87 |
fix(environments): resume a warm sandbox that its finished predecessor is still releasing (#20953)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A warm Paperclip Runner session keeps its Daytona sandbox between runs. The next run of the same task resumes that sandbox through a `reuse_by_environment` lease. > - Acquisition only resumes a lease that is `released`, `retained`, or held by the same run. A finished run releases its lease only after it saves its instruction and workspace files, which takes several seconds. > - A board wake that arrives in that window does not see the warm lease. It creates a fresh sandbox. The session's durable backup cannot be restored there, because its source lease is still held. The run fails with `native_session_recovery_failed: runner_harness_state_mismatch: backup_without_reusable_lease` and the task needs Retry, which starts a new provider session. > - This pull request makes acquisition wait, for a short bounded time, for a lease that a recently finished predecessor is still releasing, and then resume it. > - The benefit is that the follow-up continues the same warm session in the same sandbox, with no Retry, no restore and no lost provider context. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Restart-chaos wave `w-20261111T205259-s6301` (Codex, Daytona warm, volume-free server, `--ephemeral-server` from #20930), task t01. The board re-wake run `e7129ec7` started at 20:57:44. Its predecessor `5cf8c306` reported `run.terminal` at 20:57:38 but saved its instruction copy until 20:57:51, so its warm lease was still `active`. At 20:57:53 the new run recorded `startup reuse: environment (fresh)`. It then failed with `runner_harness_state_mismatch: backup_without_reusable_lease` (error code `native_session_interrupted`). Recording the `workspace_finalize` operation then failed with a Postgres deadlock, and the run settled `native_finalization_missing`. Retry run `79aa18ec` worked with a fresh provider session. The K1 restart in that wave was at 20:55:32 and is not the cause: six warm runs after it reused the sandbox normally. **Root cause** `reusableLeaseCanBeResumed` in `server/src/services/environment-runtime.ts` excludes an `active` lease held by another run. That rule is correct for a running predecessor. For a predecessor that has already ended, the `active` state is a short release tail. The new run creates a sandbox, and `retiredSourceAuthorizesNativeBackupRestore` (`native-retired-backup-source.ts`) correctly refuses to restore the backup from a source lease that is not yet `released` or `retained` (`idleWarmSourceRetiresBackup`). The executor's last branch (`native-session-executor.ts`, host preparation, created allocation) then throws `backup_without_reusable_lease`. **How often** Seen in 2 of 361 retained wave result directories on this machine (`s6301` today, `s5201` earlier). It needs a board wake within a few seconds of the predecessor's terminal event, so it is timing dependent. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/environment-runtime.ts`: add `waitForSettlingReusableLease`. Before the plugin and built-in sandbox paths select a reusable lease, acquisition polls (250 ms) for up to 20 s while a matching `reuse_by_environment` lease is `active` under a different run that is `succeeded`, `failed`, `cancelled` or `timed_out` and finished in the last two minutes. It then continues with the normal selection, which resumes the released lease. - A running predecessor causes no wait (unchanged: the new run gets a new sandbox). A predecessor that ended more than two minutes ago and never released causes no wait. - `server/src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts`: two red/green cases (succeeded and failed predecessor release the lease 400 ms after the successor starts acquiring) and one case for an old unreleased lease (no wait, new sandbox, old lease untouched). - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describe the wait next to the existing warm-reuse rules. ## Verification - Red on master: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts -t predecessor` fails both cases with `expected 'warm-2' to be 'warm-1'`: the successor created a second sandbox instead of resuming the first. - Green: the same command passes (3 tests). `environment-runtime.test.ts`, `plugin-warm-tasks.integration.test.ts` and `environment-run-orchestrator.test.ts` pass (288 tests). Server `tsc --noEmit` passes. - Not verified in a chaos wave. The window is a few seconds wide and appeared in 2 of 361 waves, so one wave cannot show the change. ## Risks - A successor can start up to 20 s later when its predecessor's release is slow. Creating a sandbox and restoring a backup takes longer, and failing needs a Retry. The two-minute bound keeps a stuck, never-released lease from delaying every later run. - If a caller held a lock that the predecessor's release needs, the wait ends at 20 s and acquisition behaves as before. - Compared with #20863 (fresh-sandbox fallback) and #20811 (unsaved provider state marker): this change does not alter either. It reduces how often a warm continuation reaches the fresh-sandbox branch. The backup restore proof is unchanged, so an unproven backup still fails closed with a working Retry. - The `workspace_finalize` deadlock in the same run is a separate defect and is not fixed here. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edit, test runs). Default context window, extended reasoning on. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
757a20d2f1 |
fix(runner): keep remote recovery and launch through a short plugin RPC stall (#20945)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - A remote run starts `paperclip-runnerd` in a sandbox. The controller
reads and controls it through the environment plugin
(`environmentExecute`).
> - #20940 made a stalled supervision probe "unknown" while the Runner
stays connected. Other callers still turn the same plugin stall into a
terminal failure.
> - During restart reattachment, the saved-state read, the
identity-marker read and the process check share a 30-second budget. One
plugin RPC that stalls for 40 seconds uses all of it, so a short stall
fails a reattachment to a healthy Runner.
> - At launch, a stalled launch call or identity read fails the run with
`runner_process_termination_unconfirmed` or
`runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable`, although the runner may be
healthy.
> - This pull request treats a plugin RPC timeout as "unknown" and
retries the read-only call within a bounded stall budget. A stalled
launch call is not repeated: the controller reads the launch nonce's
identity marker instead.
> - The benefit is that a short plugin stall during recovery or launch
no longer fails a healthy run. Every positive answer from the sandbox
keeps its meaning, and the bound still fails closed.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #20940, #20909
**What happened?**
A plugin `environmentExecute` RPC stall of more than 40 seconds makes a
remote recovery read fail. Plugin RPCs time out at the requested timeout
plus a 30-second overhead, so a 10-second probe can take 40 seconds. The
reattachment read budget is 30 seconds. One stalled read therefore
failed reattachment with `probe_transport_failed` or `probe_timeout`. At
launch, a stalled launch call rejected the run with exit unconfirmed. A
stalled identity read (20-second wait, 2-second reads that can take 32
seconds) failed the run with
`runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable`.
**Expected behavior**
A plugin RPC timeout is a stall of the plugin, not an answer from the
sandbox. Read-only recovery reads retry within a bound. A launch call
that stalls is not repeated. The launch nonce's marker decides whether
the one runner was launched. At the bound, the run fails closed and
Retry works.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Start a remote (Daytona) run.
2. Restart the controller so that the run reattaches, or start a new
run.
3. While the controller reads the sandbox, stop the plugin worker for 45
seconds.
4. The reattachment or launch fails.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
228b0169be |
fix(dispatch): let the answer to the agent's own question continue the task it blocked on (#20931)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - An agent can ask the person a question (`request_human_input`) and wait for the answer > - A later comment from the person moves an open question into history (#15392). The agent still needs the answer, so it reports a blocker and the task becomes Blocked > - The person then answers. Dispatch cancels the answer's continuation with `issue_not_in_progress`, because only a dependency-blocked task may take an answer while Blocked > - The task rests Blocked with a failed run and a Retry. The answer is lost until a person clicks Retry > - This pull request lets the answer continue the task when the same agent blocked it to wait for that answer, proven from durable records > - The benefit is that the person's answer always reaches the agent that asked, without a Retry ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15392, Refs #20872 **What happened?** Restart-chaos waves with no fault injected fail every W2Q task on every provider (Claude, OpenCode, Codex) with `R3:retry_needed`. For Claude task t03 on master |
||
|
DottaandClaude Fable 5.2
|
b01959cb15 |
fix(recovery): release a handed-off run's saved-files hold for the person it handed the task to (#20941)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - An agent can hand its own task to a person for review. With #20884, a native run that does this keeps running and finishes its turn. > - A restart can land between that hand-off and the end of the same turn. Restart recovery then settles the run as failed and keeps its unsaved sandbox files, so no work is lost. > - Automatic workspace recovery saves those files. But the workspace-repair hold then stayed on the person's task, because the hold only released for a newer agent owner. > - This pull request releases that hold for the person who received the task through the stopped run's own recorded hand-off, once the files are saved. > - The benefit is that the person's task rests in review with no stale "Saved work recovered" hold, and the agent's files are still saved first. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Follow-up to #20884 (merged). It was reviewed there as a known limit: "Restart blocks the person's task". It uses the `resultJson.humanSelfHandoff` record that #20884 added. Related: #19184, which released the same hold for a newer agent owner. **What happened?** A native run handed its own task to a person, and a restart landed before the run finished its turn. Restart recovery settled the run and retained its files. After automatic recovery saved them, the task still had a workspace-repair hold ("Saved work recovered. Send a message to continue."). The person had nothing to do with that run's work, and nothing released the hold. **Expected behavior** The hold protects the workspace until the files are saved. After that, the task rests with the person and has no execution blocker. **Steps to reproduce** 1. A native run records a hand-off to a person, and the task is now `in_review` with that person. 2. A restart settles the run as failed, with its prepared remote workspace retained. 3. Automatic workspace recovery completes. 4. Before this fix, `getExecutionBlocker` still returns the run's workspace-repair hold. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/execution-blocker.ts`: `restoreHoldReleasedForCurrentOwnerPredicate` now also releases a recovered file-preservation hold in one more case. The task must be assigned to a person, and the stopped run's `resultJson.humanSelfHandoff` must name that task and that person. The existing proof is still required: the completed-recovery receipt bound to the action, and a copyback rather than a snapshot-only save. Until the files are saved, the hold stays. - `server/src/services/workspace-recovery-admission.test.ts`: two embedded-Postgres tests. - The hold blocks the person's task before recovery and releases after it. - A hand-off recorded for a different person keeps the hold. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: one sentence on the restart case. ## Verification - Red: with the `execution-blocker.ts` change removed, `releases a handed-off run's recovered files hold for the person it handed the task to` fails. `getExecutionBlocker` still returns the hold after `recoverRetainedWorkspace`. - Green: `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery-admission.test.ts src/__tests__/interrupted-preparation-hold-settle.test.ts src/services/explicit-native-continuation.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-human-self-handoff.test.ts`. All 617 tests pass. The server typecheck passes. - Chaos: the H2 workload from #20884 covers the hand-off with a K1 restart after it. Locally the runs had no unsaved files, so no hold appeared. This PR's case needs a remote sandbox with unsaved files. **No Daytona wave was run.** ## Risks - The release applies only when the stopped run's own record names the current person and task, and only after the completed-recovery receipt. Other holds, snapshot-only saves and unsafe archives are unchanged. - No schema change. A run without the record behaves as before. - This branch is rebased onto master after #20884 merged. The only conflict was an adjacent import line. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, through Claude Code with tool use and code execution. The session does not expose the context window or reasoning mode. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.2 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
48d23d1530 |
fix(runner): keep a connected remote Runner through a stalled plugin supervision probe (#20940)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - A remote run starts `paperclip-runnerd` in a sandbox. The controller
monitors the process with a health probe that goes through the
environment plugin (`environmentExecute`).
> - A stall of the Daytona plugin worker makes that probe RPC time out
after 40 seconds. The monitor treated the timeout as "process
supervision failed".
> - The transport then failed closed with
`runner_process_termination_unconfirmed`. The run ended
`notification_transport_failed`, `recoverable: false`, and the close
path suspended a healthy Runner. The task rested blocked with Retry.
> - Nothing was wrong with the sandbox, the Runner or the provider. The
Runner held its own authenticated connection to the controller during
the full stall.
> - This pull request makes a failed or timed-out probe "unknown". While
the Runner stays connected on its own channel, the monitor keeps the
same runner and turn and probes again, for a bounded time.
> - The benefit is that a short plugin stall no longer kills a healthy
run. The fail-closed cases stay the same.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #20909 (chaos cell CR3, which reproduces this failure)
**What happened?**
A 45-second stall of the Daytona plugin worker killed a healthy run.
Chaos cell CR3 reproduced it 2 of 2 times (OpenCode and Claude,
Daytona). A staging run had the same failure with no deploy: a plugin
`environmentExecute` RPC stalled for more than 40 seconds. The run
failed with "Notification transport failed closed:
runner_process_termination_unconfirmed: runnerd process supervision
failed: RPC call \"environmentExecute\" timed out after 40000ms". The
close path then sent `runner.suspend`, and the healthy Runner suspended
and exited. The task rested blocked with Retry.
**Expected behavior**
A probe that times out or fails in transport is not proof that the
process stopped. While the Runner stays connected on its own channel,
the run continues. If supervision cannot come back within a bound, the
run rests with a working Retry. A probe that positively reports the
process gone still starts the existing recovery.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Start a remote (Daytona) run with a T1 workload.
2. Send SIGSTOP to the server's Daytona plugin worker for 45 seconds,
then SIGCONT.
3. The run fails `notification_transport_failed` about 40 seconds into
the stall.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Fable 5.2
|
b2779054d4 |
fix(issues): let a native run hand its own task to a person without cancelling itself (#20884)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A task has one assignee. An agent often finishes its work by handing its own task to a person for review. > - The task update route stops the outgoing run before it saves a reassignment. > - Since #16082, a legacy run that hands its own task to a person is exempt, so it finishes its turn. Native runs were not exempt. > - On staging, a native run (ACPX Claude, 11.5 minutes of work) sent `PATCH /api/issues/{id}` to hand its task to a person. The route cancelled that run with `issue_reassigned`. The agent saw `api_transport_failure`. The task moved to the person, but it kept a stale execution blocker ("Saved work recovered. Send a message to continue."). > - The native runtime assumes a running run still owns its task. So widening the exemption alone is not enough: the run then fails after its result is accepted, and its finalizer can act on the person's task. > - This pull request applies the exemption to native runs and makes the native terminal fence, restart recovery and finalizer handle a run that gave its task away. > - The benefit is that an agent can hand its task to a person and finish normally, with no blocker on the person's task. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #16082 (legacy exemption). Related: #20541 (agent-to-agent self handoff) and #18293 (agent key handoff). Those PRs cover other actors and targets. This PR covers native runs that hand their task to a person. **What happened?** A native agent run handed its own task to a person (`assigneeAgentId: null`, `assigneeUserId`, status `in_review`) through its signed run token. The route cancelled the run that sent the request (`issue_reassigned`, "Cancelled before issue reassignment"). The cancelled native run then went through workspace recovery. The person's task kept an execution blocker with `restore_failed`. **Expected behavior** The run that hands its own task to a person keeps running and finishes its turn. The task rests `in_review` with the person. No execution blocker or recovery action stays on the task. The outgoing run cannot change the task after the hand-off. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a native agent on its assigned task. 2. From that run, send `PATCH /api/issues/{id}` with `assigneeAgentId: null`, a person's `assigneeUserId`, and status `in_review`. 3. Before this fix, the route cancels the run with `issue_reassigned`. **Why the exemption was legacy-only** #16082 limited the exemption to the run shape of its incident and kept a verified stop for every other case. The new H2 chaos workload showed why native needed more than the route change. With only the route widened: 1. The run's terminal fence `assertCurrentWakeCommentsRead` requires the run to still own the task. It threw `native_current_wake_comments_binding_changed` after the result was accepted. The run then failed with `native_session_lease_lost`, and its finalizer recorded `workspace_finalization_failed` as an agent-owned recovery on the person's task. 2. A restart after the hand-off left the run `running`, because restart recovery refused it with `issue_execution_lock_changed`. 3. The native finalizer only superseded a `done` decision. A `needs_review` report moved the person's task back to `in_progress` and queued a continuation for the outgoing agent. 4. The REST guard against the outgoing run's later mutations (`issue_handed_off`) applied to legacy runs only. ## What Changed - `server/src/routes/issues.ts`: the signed current-run human self-handoff exemption now applies to native runs. All other checks stay: exact run, agent, company and task, `agent_jwt` source, human recipient. For a native run the route first records the hand-off on the run (`resultJson.humanSelfHandoff`, new `native-human-self-handoff.ts`). Board reassignment, agent keys, and handoffs to an agent or to nobody still stop the outgoing run. - `current-wake-comments.ts`: the terminal fence accepts a run whose recorded hand-off matches the person who now owns the task. Without the record (for example a board reassignment), or after a later reassignment, it still refuses. - `native-restart-recovery.ts`: after a restart, a handed-off run is not resumed. It passes the execution-lock check and is then settled by the existing ownership gate (`task_ownership_or_status_changed`) without changing the person's task, instead of staying `running`. - `status-arbiter.ts` and `native-run-finalizer.ts`: `supersedeHandedOffDecision` keeps the person's task status and strips retries, continuations, owner wakes, recoveries, blockers and reviewer bindings, also from decisions that already preserve the status. Two effects stay: a governed request's interaction, and the workspace-finalization repair, so saved work is not lost. Review runs are not affected. - `server/src/run-task-ownership.ts` (renamed from `legacy-run-task-ownership.ts`): `assertHandedOffRunTaskOwnership` rejects later task mutations from the outgoing legacy or native run, in the route and under the update transaction's locks. - `tests/restart-chaos/`: new opt-in workload `H2`. The agent saves a brief, then hands the task to its creator in review as its last step. The oracle requires the task to rest `in_review` with the creator, every run to settle without `issue_reassigned`, readable non-empty run history, and no execution blocker or active recovery action. - Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md`, task feature map and agent access map, chaos README. ## Verification - Red on `origin/master` (same tests, master source): the route cancels the native run (500, and 409 `runner_goal_reassignment_stop_unconfirmed`); the finalizer moves the person's task to `in_progress` with a continuation for the outgoing agent; a late `done` from the outgoing native run closes the person's task. - Red chaos wave on master's server (`--server-from` a master checkout, `--adapters claude --workloads H2 --faults K1 --matrix`): 0/2 pass. Both runs ended `cancelled` / `issue_reassigned` (`T:handoff_did_not_cancel_run`). - Green focused tests on this branch: - `native-human-self-handoff.test.ts` (embedded Postgres): hand-off through the real issue service; the run stays `running`; `done`, `needs_review` and failed-turn reports leave the task `in_review` with the person, with `getExecutionBlocker` null and no recovery action; the terminal fence accepts only the recorded hand-off; a late change from the outgoing run fails with `issue_handed_off`; pure policy cases. - `issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts`: native and legacy self-handoffs persist without `cancelRun`, and native records the hand-off before the update. Board, agent key, other run, task, agent and company still stop the run. - Native runtime suite (restart recovery, wake comments, arbiter, stale-owner completion), `issues-service`, `low-trust-red-team-routes`: pass. Server and restart-chaos typecheck pass. `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passes. - Green chaos waves on this branch (local, `--adapters claude --workloads H2`): - `--matrix --faults K1 --seed 4459`: 2/2 pass (K0 baseline and a K1 crossing). - `--tasks 3 --faults K1 --fault-after-seconds 60` and `--fault-after-seconds 100`: 3/3 pass each. In the first, all three restarts landed after the hand-off while the runs were live; the runs settled and the tasks stayed with the person. - The final waves ran on the pre-rebase head `8a2a3b6a74`. The rebase onto master only merged the chaos workload lists (`types.ts`, `config.ts`, `journeys.ts`). No Daytona wave was run. ## Risks - The outgoing native turn keeps running after the person owns the task. Its native task tools already require the run to own the task, so they refuse (`paperclip_runner_tool_binding_not_authorized`). Its REST mutations are rejected with `issue_handed_off`. - A restart after the hand-off settles the run as failed (`native_restart_recovery_blocked`) instead of resuming it. The person's task is not changed and needs no Retry. - The finalizer rule covers any native run whose task belongs to a person at finalization, not only a self-handoff. Before this change such a run could still move the person's task and queue its own continuation. - Saved state: `resultJson.humanSelfHandoff` is a new optional run key. An older server ignores it, so a run handed off on the new server and finished on an old one fails its fence as today. No schema change. - No API shape change. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, through Claude Code with tool use and code execution. The session does not expose the context window or reasoning mode. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.2 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
c1edb9ec02 |
fix(native): keep an unreachable remote Runner alive when a failed run closes (#20923)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native runs on a remote sandbox (Daytona) start a detached `paperclip-runnerd`. After a recoverable failure, the server resumes the same run and reattaches to that Runner > - On staging, `runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable` was the most frequent failure. The tasks stayed blocked until someone clicked Retry > - In 31 of the 34 failed runs the reattachment found the Runner gone with an unsettled `ready` journal (`runnerSettled: false`). The Runner was not lost by accident. The controller's own close stopped it with `SIGKILL`: close could not prove suspension within its 10 s budget, so it force-stopped the Runner in the middle of a turn > - The server then scheduled a same-run reattachment that could never succeed, because the close had just removed the Runner it needed > - This pull request keeps an unreachable remote Runner alive when a failed run closes. A Stop, a cancelled turn and a `stop_cleanup` recovery still stop it > - The benefit is that the same-run reattachment finds the live Runner. The Runner then settles into a `suspended` journal, which the existing relaunch path resumes. The task continues without Retry, and no provider work is replayed ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20853, #20907 **What happened?** Remote native runs failed with `runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable` and error code `native_continuation_requires_reconciliation`. The tasks were left blocked. In the failed runs the first attempt failed with a recoverable transport error, for example `provider_transport_failed: PRP command turn.start timed out`, `native_session_interrupted` or a server restart. The run log then showed `runner did not prove durable suspension before checkpoint` and `runner shutdown failed: Error: Durable recovery runner timed out.` The second string comes from `waitForProcess`, which sends `SIGKILL` when its deadline passes. The same-run reattachment ran 20–60 s later and reported `process_verification` / `process_not_running` with `runnerLifecycle: ready` and `runnerSettled: false`. Most of these runs had done provider work before the failure (turns and tool calls), so the automatic Retry correctly refused them (`provider_turn_unsettled`). **What did you expect to happen?** When a run fails for a reason that the server resumes on the same run, the close does not destroy the Runner that the reattachment needs. The reattachment adopts it, and the run continues without Retry and without a repeated tool effect. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a remote native run and let a turn start. 2. Make the Runner unreachable (a broken transport or a slow event pump), so that the turn fails and the close cannot prove suspension within its budget. 3. The close sends `SIGKILL` to the Runner. The same-run reattachment then fails with `runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable`, and the task is blocked. **Relation to open PRs** - #20853 covers the 3 runs whose journal was a settled `ready` cut (`runnerSettled: true`). This PR does not change that path. - #20907 makes the Runner's exit reason visible. It does not change recovery. This PR does not overlap with it. ## What Changed - `runnerd-codex-transport.ts`: `close(reason, { retainUnsettledRemoteRunner })` accepts a new option. When the option is set, the Runner is remote (a process launcher or an adopted Runner), the close is not a `stop_cleanup`, the Runner is still alive and suspension is not proven, the close does not stop the Runner. It skips the `waitForProcess` kill, the adopted-runner `SIGKILL` and `forceKill`. It still releases the controller route, writes the unsettled checkpoint and throws `NativeSessionCloseUnrecoverableError`, so the session stays quarantined and is never reused. The settlement diagnostic records `runnerRetained: true`, and a new diagnostic records `remote runner left alive unsettled for same-run reattachment`. - `HarnessNativeSession.close` asks for retention only when the session was not explicitly cancelled. After `cancel()` (Stop), it asks for the old behavior, so Stop still stops the Runner. - `CodexHarnessSession.close` passes the option to the transport. `HarnessSession.close` and `CodexAppServerTransport.close` accept the optional field. Callers that do not set it keep the old behavior. - Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md` and `doc/run-log-events.md` describe the rule and the `runnerRetained` field. How the run continues: the reattaching controller adopts the live Runner. The Runner then completes the `runner.drain` and `runner.suspend` that the failed close queued, and exits with a settled `suspended` journal. That attempt fails as `native_runner_process_exited`, which the server resumes on the same run. The next reattachment finds the process gone with a settled `suspended` journal and relaunches the Runner over it (the existing path from #19745). If the Runner was only slow, it suspends by itself and the first reattachment relaunches. ## Verification - Red, on `master` with only the tests added: `runnerd-codex-transport-remote-retention.test.ts` fails 2 of 5 (`expected 'gone' to be 'alive'`): the close killed the Runner. `harness-driver-backend.test.ts -t "retain an unsettled"` fails 2 of 2. - Green with the fix: `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/live/runnerd-codex-transport-remote-retention.test.ts src/backends/harness-driver-backend.test.ts`. - The staging shape: a real `paperclip-runnerd` started through a process launcher, a turn in progress, the Runner frozen with `SIGSTOP` during close. The close throws `NativeSessionCloseUnrecoverableError` with `runnerRetained: true`, the Runner stays alive, and its journal stays `ready`. - A second controller attaches through `adoptExistingRunner` (no duplicate launch). The Runner settles into `lifecycle: suspended` with an empty outbox and no pending terminal delivery, then exits. - An explicit cancellation, a caller that does not ask for retention, and a `stop_cleanup` close still stop the Runner. - Also run: `src/backends`, `src/drivers/codex`, `src/drivers/acpx/codex-acpx-driver.test.ts`, `src/drivers/acpx/codex-runtime-adapter.test.ts`, `src/native-session-runtime.test.ts` (1045 tests pass; 2 `spawnSync ETIMEDOUT` under full-parallel load pass alone), and all of `src/live/` (files that timed out under full-parallel load pass at `--maxWorkers=2`). - `npx tsc --noEmit -p packages/paperclip-runner/tsconfig.json` is clean. - `pnpm verify` selects a broad plan (exit 2) because `doc/execution-semantics.md` is a global CI input. CI supplies that coverage. - Not run: a live Daytona run. The fix is in the controller library that runs on the server, so it needs no new Runner image. ## Risks - Medium. A failed close now leaves an unreachable remote Runner alive instead of killing it. This is the same state a restart detach leaves today, and the same-run reattachment or a Stop cleanup owns it. - If the server does not resume the run on the same Runner, the Runner stays alive until something reattaches or the sandbox is released. Remote Runners have no reconnect deadline (`runnerProcessReconnectGraceMs: null`). Before this change they were killed. The close still quarantines the session, so it is never released for reuse. - Stop is unchanged: an explicit cancellation, `settleCancelledTurn` and `stop_cleanup` close without retention, so they still stop the Runner. - Previous-release story: this change adds and changes no persisted state. State that an older release left (a killed Runner with an unsettled `ready` journal) keeps its current handling: the named refusal `runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable` and a working Retry. Tasks already blocked on staging keep their Retry button. A deploy during a run changes nothing, because the decision is made in the closing process. - No wait is added before `turn.start`. The change only affects the failure path of close. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs, read-only staging API reads). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
fc14f1ade2 |
fix(execution): keep resumed native runs alive past a stale finalization deadline (#20920)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The execution control reconciler bounds how long a run may spend
settling after its provider work ends
> - A run deadline from one attempt stayed on the run row after the run
was handed to a same-run resume or a restart claim
> - The reconciler then failed the resumed, live run with
`execution_finalization_deadline_exceeded` and told a person to inspect
the provider
> - This breaks two product rules: recovery must work without a person,
and users must not get operator instructions
> - This pull request makes a live native owner or a scheduled same-run
resume the owner of the run, and it replaces the operator text with
plain wording and Retry
> - The benefit is that runs that recover after a restart keep running,
and a genuine expiry shows plain words and one working Retry
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public issue exists. This is the bug description, in the fields of
`.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml`.
**What happened?**
On a hosted deploy, 11 tasks became blocked with
`execution_finalization_deadline_exceeded` in two hours. Three runs had
the same sequence. The native session failed or the server restarted. A
same-run resume or a restart claim then took the run. The new controller
held a live native lease and prepared the run again. The reconciler then
found the earlier attempt's run deadline and failed the run. The
recorded original failure code was empty, so no real failure caused the
block. The run error told a person to inspect the failed run and verify
that its provider stopped.
**Expected behavior**
A run that a live controller owns, or that has a scheduled same-run
resume, continues. A deadline that really expires shows plain wording
and a working Retry. Users do not get operator instructions.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Save a running native run with an `executionControlDeadlineAt` in the
past.
2. Give its finalization row a live lease (a restart claim), or phase
`retryable_failure` with no lease (a scheduled resume).
3. Run `reconcileAbandonedExecutionControl`.
4. The run fails with `execution_finalization_deadline_exceeded`, and
its error tells a person to inspect the provider.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
7e8901aa60 |
fix(recovery): let Retry and the person's answer continue a held task with a pending decision (#20872)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - A native run on a remote sandbox can lose its Runner process.
Recovery then saves the sandbox files and puts an execution hold on the
task
> - The hold offers Retry. A person can also continue the task with a
new message
> - Many held tasks also have a pending decision: the question that a
parked turn asked, or an older connection request
> - Continuation admission refuses every continuation while a decision
is pending ("decision_pending"). The answer to that decision is not a
message, so admission defers it behind the hold ("execution_recovery")
> - So Retry waits for the answer and the answer waits for the hold. The
task shows a Retry that does nothing, and nothing continues it
> - This pull request lets a person's Retry pass an open question, and
lets the person's own answer continue the task through the hold
> - The benefit is that a task with a lost Runner and a pending decision
always has a control that works
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
On staging, the same-run retry of six remote native runs found the
Runner process gone (`process_not_running`, lifecycle `ready`). Each run
failed with `runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable`. Saved-work
recovery then recovered the sandbox files, and the task showed "Saved
work recovered. Retry or send a message to continue." with `canRetry:
true`. Four of these tasks also had a pending decision: the question
that the parked turn asked, or an older pending connection request. For
those tasks, Retry is deferred with `decision_pending`, and an answer to
the decision is deferred with `execution_recovery`. No control continues
the task.
**What did you expect to happen?**
Retry starts one new run. The person's answer to the pending decision
also continues the task.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. A remote native run asks the user a question and parks the turn.
2. The Runner process exits. The same-run retry fails with
`runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable`.
3. Saved-work recovery recovers the files. The task offers Retry.
4. Click Retry: the Retry waits with "A pending approval or question
must be resolved before this message can start."
5. Answer the question: the answer waits with "Waiting for execution
recovery. Your message is saved."
Refs #20838, #20853
## What Changed
- `admitExplicitNativeContinuation`
(`server/src/services/explicit-native-continuation.ts`): a task Retry is
no longer held by a plain pending question (`ask_user_questions`) or
connection request (`connection_intent`). Any interaction with approval
semantics still holds Retry: a plan review (`issue_document` target), a
governed tool action, a secret proposal, a connection authorization, and
other confirmations. A pending approval still holds every continuation.
A new message supersedes a plain question, as on master, and waits for a
decision with approval semantics.
- `admitExplicitNativeContinuation`: the person's own resolution of an
interaction (`mutation: "interaction"`, answered/accepted/rejected,
resolved by the same user) is explicit user input. It continues the held
task like a new message: a fresh session, the hold resolved as
`explicitUserContinuation` with the `interactionId`, and
`issue.execution_recovery_settled` activity. It never replays the failed
run. Governed tool-action confirmations are excluded. The existing
`readQueuedInteractionResponse` reads the answer.
- `heartbeat/queue.ts`: both admission calls pass the wake payload to
the admission.
- `buildExecutionContinuation`
(`server/src/services/execution-continuation.ts`): dispatch rechecks the
user authorization. It accepted an interaction receipt only through a
saved interrupt queue, so the answered successor failed with
`continuation_user_authorization_missing`. It now also accepts the
person's own answer: the interaction named by the durable authorization
was resolved by that user and not by an agent, and the authorization
names this successor run. The check does not depend on the run's current
trigger, so a later answer that replaces the trigger cannot invalidate
it.
- New API-level test
`server/src/services/governed-wait-runner-loss.test.ts` with the two
staging shapes (a parked question from the failed run; an older
connection request on a monitor wake). It checks that Retry starts
exactly one run and leaves the decision pending, that the person's
answer starts exactly one run and settles the hold, and that an answer
resolved by a different user keeps the hold.
- `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describes the rule.
## Verification
- `cd server && pnpm exec vitest run
src/services/governed-wait-runner-loss.test.ts`: 5 passed. The answer
tests now also build the successor's continuation as dispatch does and
check that the agent receives the answer.
- Red for dispatch (first head,
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8eabb13ebd |
fix(recovery): retry a system-woken run once when it lost its runner before any turn (#20873)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - A native run on a remote sandbox can lose its Runner process before
its same-run retry reattaches. The run then fails with
`runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable`
> - After saved-work recovery, the server requests one Retry by itself,
but only for user wakes. System wakes (monitors, automatic assignments)
rest on the visible Retry
> - On staging, a monitor wake's run lost its Runner before it started
any provider turn. Nothing it did could be repeated, but the task stayed
blocked until a person clicked Retry
> - This pull request lets that one case continue automatically, once,
under the run's responsible user
> - The benefit is that a system-woken task whose run never reached a
provider turn continues without a person
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
On staging, a monitor wake (`issue_monitor_due`) started a remote native
run. Its `session.snapshot` command timed out before any turn. The
same-run retry found the Runner process gone (`process_not_running`,
lifecycle `ready`) and the run failed with
`runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable`. The run had no turn event
and no tool event. Saved-work recovery recovered the files, but
`requestInterruptedNativeTurnRetry` refused with `not_user_request`, so
the task stayed blocked on a manual Retry.
**What did you expect to happen?**
When the run proves that it did no provider turn, the server requests
the Retry once by itself, as it does for user wakes.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. A system wake starts a remote native run.
2. The run fails before any turn event, and the same-run retry finds the
Runner gone.
3. Saved-work recovery completes. No Retry is requested; the task waits
for a person.
Refs #20872, #20853
## What Changed
The rule that changed, exactly: in `requestInterruptedNativeTurnRetry`
(`server/src/services/heartbeat/restart-interrupted-turn.ts`), a run
whose wake was not requested by a user used to stop with
`not_user_request` in all cases. Now it requests the task Retry only
when all of these are true:
- the run failed with one of the existing reattachment-loss codes
(unchanged gate);
- a positive durable record proves that no turn was ever issued: the
run's last `native.remote_runner_recovery_failed` event carries
`remoteRunnerRecovery` with `stage: process_verification`, `reason:
process_not_running` and `providerTurnIssued: false`;
- the run also recorded no turn event and no tool event;
- the run has a `responsibleUserId`; the Retry runs under that user;
- the run is not itself a `task_retry` run;
- the task is still open and assigned to the same agent (unchanged
gate).
An absence of run events is never enough: a turn can reach the provider
before its events are stored (Greptile, first review).
- New `withRemoteRunnerTurnProof` (`native-session-executor.ts`): when a
same-run reattachment is refused because the sandbox proved the Runner
process gone (exit 45, not an unreachable sandbox), the executor reads
the run's controller journal. The controller records each turn command
there before it sends it. Only when
`runnerdStateProvesNoRemoteProviderTurn` holds (just
`run.prepare`/`session.open` and maintenance commands such as
`session.snapshot`, and only session-open events) does it add
`providerTurnIssued: false` to the diagnostic. This is the same proof
that restart recovery already uses for `bootstrap_incomplete`.
`RemoteRunnerRecoveryDiagnostic` keeps the field only as `false`.
- Which staging shapes this covers: a run whose journal holds no turn
command. Whether c14bab19 (the `session.snapshot` timeout) qualifies
depends on its controller journal, which staging does not expose; if its
journal held a `turn.start`, it stays on the manual Retry floor.
32376b3a (`turn.submitted`, then a `turn.start` timeout) always stays on
the floor.
- Everything else about system wakes is unchanged: without the journal
proof, with any turn or tool event, or without a responsible user, a
system wake still rests on the visible Retry.
- Bounded: the Retry uses the existing idempotency key
`restart-interrupted-turn:<runId>`, so it is requested at most once per
run. Its successor is a user-attributed `task_retry` run, so if that run
also loses its Runner, the existing `automatic_retry_used` rule leaves
it on the visible Retry. No loop is possible.
- Attribution: `requestTaskRetry` records `issue.retry_requested` with
actor `restart-recovery` on behalf of the run's responsible user.
Admission keeps every gate (saved-work recovery, stop proof, approvals,
pause, budget, ownership).
- Tests in
`server/src/services/workspace-recovery-retry-copyback.test.ts`: a
positive case (monitor wake, Runner proven gone, journal proof),
including the second-loss `automatic_retry_used` check. Negative cases:
no run events but no journal proof (the Greptile shape), a settled turn,
a tool event, no responsible user.
- New
`server/src/services/native-runtime/remote-runner-turn-proof.test.ts`:
the proof is recorded only for a journal of session commands; not for a
`turn.start` command, a committed turn event, an unreadable journal, or
an unreachable sandbox (`probe_transport_failed`).
- `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describes the rule.
## Verification
- `cd server && pnpm exec vitest run
src/services/workspace-recovery-retry-copyback.test.ts`: 83 passed.
- Red on master (product hunk removed): the positive case fails with
`expected { requested: false, … } to match object { requested: true }`.
- Red on the first head (
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Fable 5.2
|
ffe05b1b7c |
fix(heartbeat): retry every pre-provider lease acquisition failure and rest it on Retry (#20857)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A task run takes an environment lease (for example a Daytona sandbox) before the agent starts. No provider work happens before that lease exists. > - Only a provider HTTP status or a connection errno counted as a transient lease failure. #20828 (merged while this was open) added the Daytona acquisition deadline. A database error while the lease was recorded, a plugin RPC deadline, and an unfinished provisional creation still did not count. > - Those failures became a generic `setup_failed` with no bounded retry. And when the bounded retries of any `environment_provider_unavailable` failure were used up, recovery still put the task on a board-owned `stranded_assigned_issue` action. > - A hosted instance saw this for six runs in 45 minutes when concurrent runs rose from about 8 to about 20. Two tasks stayed blocked and waited for the board. > - This pull request classifies every lease acquisition failure that has structured transient evidence as `environment_provider_unavailable`. When the bounded retries are used up, the task rests on a system-owned action and a working Retry. > - It also adds the restart-chaos fault EP1, so the harness covers lease acquisition failures from now on. > - The benefit is that a busy or slow sandbox provider no longer strands tasks on the board. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. **What happened?** Five runs failed with `Failed to acquire lease for environment "Paperclip Sandbox" (sandbox): Daytona lease acquisition timed out; allocation cleanup is pending` after 5 to 6 minutes in `preparing`. One run failed with `Database query failed (lease_acquire_failed)` within 10 seconds. Every run recorded `executionRecovery: { kind: "bootstrap", providerWorkStarted: false }`, but the error code was `setup_failed`. No run got a bounded retry. Two tasks were left `blocked` with a board-owned `stranded_assigned_issue` recovery action. **Expected behavior** A lease acquisition failure happens before any provider work. The run must retry with a bounded, visible backoff. When the bound is used up, the task must rest with a Retry that works, and no board-owned recovery action. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Make lease acquisition fail with the provider's acquisition deadline (the validated acquisition diagnostic that the environment runtime records), or with a database driver error. 2. Let the run start. 3. Before this change, the run fails with `setup_failed`, no retry is scheduled, and recovery creates a board-owned `stranded_assigned_issue` action. ## What Changed **How this PR and #20828 divide the problem.** #20828 (merged) makes the Daytona plugin end a stuck create early and classifies the acquisition-deadline envelope as `environment_provider_unavailable`. This PR does not change the Daytona plugin or that deadline path. It adds only what #20828 leaves out: - a lease-acquisition failure that is not a create timeout: the plugin RPC deadline (`-32003`) and an unfinished provisional creation recorded for this run; - a transient database error while the lease is recorded; - the exhausted state: a system-owned recovery action and Retry instead of a board-owned `stranded_assigned_issue`, for every `environment_provider_unavailable` cause (including #20828's); - the chaos fault EP1 (EP1, EP1N, EP1D). - `readTransientLeaseAcquisitionFailure` (`server/src/services/environment-provider-unavailable-error.ts`) classifies a lease acquisition failure as transient when it has structured evidence: the provider status or errno (as before), the run's own validated acquisition diagnostic (deadline or unfinished provisional creation), the plugin RPC deadline, or a transient database error (a postgres.js connection code, or SQLSTATE class 08 or 53, 57P01-57P03, 57014, 55P03, 40001, 40P01). A deterministic SQL error (syntax, schema, constraint) is not retried. A definite non-transient status (for example HTTP 401 or 404) is still `setup_failed`. Message text is not parsed. - `environment-run-orchestrator.ts` uses this classifier, so these failures get `environment_provider_unavailable` and the existing bounded bootstrap retry (30 s, then 60 s, with jitter). The task shows "retry scheduled" while it waits. - When the retries are used up, recovery uses the cause `environment_provider_unavailable` with a system-owned action and no board routing. The notice says "Retry when ready" and does not ask for a board decision. The task's Retry starts a new acquisition. - Restart-chaos fault EP1: a test-mode server seam (`environment-lease-fault-injection.ts`, read from `PAPERCLIP_CHAOS_LEASE_FAULT_CONTROL`, ignored in production) throws the staging error shapes before any provider call. `tests/restart-chaos/env-provider-wave.ts` runs EP1 (deadline twice, then success), EP1N (deadline forever, then Retry after disarm) and EP1D (database error once). The oracle fails on any `setup_failed` run, any board-owned recovery action, a wrong retry count, or a task that does not complete. - Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md` and `tests/restart-chaos/README.md`. ## Verification - RED on `origin/master` (`1d67e309e0`, before #20828): the three new tests in `heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` ("transient sandbox provider refusal during lease acquisition") fail with the staging result: `expected [ [ 'failed', 'setup_failed' ] ] to deeply equal [ [ 'failed', 'environment_provider_unavailable' ], [ 'scheduled_retry', null ] ]`. On current master the deadline now retries (#20828), but the exhausted case still rests on a board-owned `stranded_assigned_issue` action (the existing HTTP 502 exhaustion test showed `ownerType: "board"` before the recovery change), and the database error is still `setup_failed`. - GREEN: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts -t "lease acquisition"` passes 5 of 5. This includes the deadline and the database error that retry once and then complete, and the deadline that never clears. That task rests `blocked` with a system-owned action, `canRetry: true`, no execution blocker, and Retry completes it. - Unit tests: `environment-provider-unavailable-error.test.ts` + `environment-lease-fault-injection.test.ts` (56), `tests/restart-chaos/env-provider-faults.test.ts` (6) pass. - Related suites pass: `environment-run-orchestrator`, `task-interruption-query`, `issue-recovery-actions`, `issue-recovery-deadlines`, `stranded-notice`, `heartbeat-native-resume-lease-failure`. - `server` and `tests/restart-chaos` typecheck pass. - Chaos waves (local, Codex `gpt-6.1-sol`, head `1bd387e98f`; the later head changes only database classification and the notice), all pass: - EP1 `w-20261111T171803-s71-ep`, 2 tasks: each had exactly 2 `environment_provider_unavailable` runs, then succeeded with no user action, no board-owned recovery action, brief oracle pass. - EP1D `w-20261111T172850-s73-ep`, 1 task: 1 failed run on the database error, then succeeded. - EP1N `w-20261111T173346-s74-ep` (and `w-20261111T162752-s72-ep` before the rebase): 3 failed runs, the task rested `blocked` with `canRetry: true` and no board-owned action; after disarm, Retry completed it. - No Daytona wave was run. The fault is injected in the server before the provider call, so a local instance reaches the same retry and recovery code. ## Risks - More failures now retry, all bounded. Only transient SQLSTATEs retry. The staging database error recorded no SQLSTATE. If it was a deterministic SQL error, it still fails `setup_failed` and goes to the board as before; that is intended, because a retry cannot fix it. - Each retry is a new creation attempt with its own creation record. A provisional allocation whose cleanup is pending stays with its record and the creation reconciler, as before. - The retry bound is the shared bootstrap bound (two retries). A provider outage longer than about 15 minutes still rests on Retry, but no longer on a board action. - The fault seam reads a file only when the environment variable is set, and never when `NODE_ENV=production`. - Saved state from the previous release: no persisted shape changes. A task already stranded on a board action keeps it (`preserveExistingOwner`). New failures use the new cause. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic) through Claude Code, model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.2 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
a52f622be8 |
fix(native): retry a remote provider startup failure once its runner exit is proven (#20874)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Native runs on a remote sandbox (Daytona) start a Runner in the
sandbox, and the Runner opens the provider session
> - When the provider rejects `session.open` at startup, no provider
work began
> - #20808 ends every such remote rejection at once with Retry, because
restart recovery could not prove that the failed runner was gone. A
fault that clears by itself therefore needs one human click
> - The Runner transport already settles the failed runner on close and
observes its exit. That is the missing proof
> - This pull request records that proof on the failure and lets the
same-run bootstrap retry use it. It stops a startup error that repeats,
so an image fault that a retry cannot fix does not loop
> - The benefit is that a transient remote startup failure recovers
without a person, and a permanent one still rests at once with a working
Retry that names the error
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #20808
Refs #20832
Refs #20820
**What happened?**
A remote (Daytona) native run whose provider rejected `session.open` at
startup ended as `native_provider_startup_rejected` with Retry. This
happened even when the Runner had settled and exited, and no provider
session, event or checkpoint existed. A person had to click Retry for a
fault that the durable record proves did no provider work.
**Expected behavior**
With a proven runner exit and no provider work, the run retries its
bootstrap on the same run automatically. A startup error that repeats on
the next attempt stops at once with Retry and names that error. Failures
saved without the proof keep today's behaviour.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. `cd server && npx vitest run
src/services/native-runtime/native-startup-rejected-retry.integration.test.ts
src/services/native-runtime/native-runner-restart-recovery.integration.test.ts
-t "remote startup rejection|session.open rejection"`
2. On master, 3 cases fail: the proven remote rejection is
`terminal_failure`, the repeat does not name its error, and restart
recovery holds the proven failure on
`ambiguous_remote_recovery_evidence`.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
c8ae02e5ce |
fix(native): start a fresh session when an accepted run's provider state was not saved (#20811)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A native run in a per-turn remote sandbox saves a provider state backup after its result is accepted. The sandbox is then released, so the backup is the only copy of the provider session. > - When that backup fails to save (for example, #20772: storage throttling), the run keeps its accepted result. Nothing records that its checkpoint can no longer be resumed. > - The next run on the session rebinds that checkpoint and asks the Runner to resume. The Runner has no state and refuses (#20757). With the normal policy, the run opens a replacement session after that failed attempt. With a governed-wait or unfinished-goal checkpoint, the run fails with `native_provider_state_incompatible`, and only Retry or the next message starts fresh. > - The server already knew the state was gone when the backup failed. The failed resume is wasted work. > - This pull request marks the accepted run's checkpoint as not resumable at the moment the backup fails. The next run then starts a fresh provider session directly. > - The benefit is that a lost backup no longer costs a failed run or a failed resume attempt before the task continues. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20757 (the missing-state refusal that the next run reaches today). Refs #20772 (the throttled backup upload that loses the backup). Refs #20809 (a related fix for governed-wait follow-ups that reach the missing state; this PR stops most of them from reaching it). **What happened?** 1. A native run in a per-turn sandbox finished, and its result was accepted. 2. `harness_state.backup.persist` failed. The run recorded `native.post_result_failure`. Its run row kept a normal `sessionCheckpoint`. 3. The sandbox was released. 4. The next run on the same session selected that run as its resume source, and `rebindNativeSessionCheckpoint` returned the checkpoint. 5. The Runner found no saved state and refused with `PRP provider resume state is unavailable`. The run then opened a replacement session after the failed attempt, or (governed-wait or unfinished-goal checkpoint) failed with `native_provider_state_incompatible`. Retry or the next message then started fresh. **Expected behavior** The next run starts a fresh provider session at once, because the server already knows the saved state is not there. The accepted result and the task outcome stay as they are. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Give a run row an accepted result and a normal `sessionCheckpoint`. 2. Make its close checkpoint fail in a per-turn sandbox (`reusableLeaseConfigured: false`). 3. Select the next run's resume source with `findNativeSessionResumeRun` and call `rebindNativeSessionCheckpoint`. 4. On `master` it returns the checkpoint, so the next run tries to resume state that does not exist. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `556b249897`. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-provider-state-unsaved.ts` (new): `markAcceptedRunProviderStateUnsaved` adds `nativeProviderStateUnsaved: { code: "native_provider_state_incompatible", reason: "harness_backup_not_saved" }` to the run's `runnerProfileJson`. One conditional `UPDATE` writes it only when the run's coordinator holds a result with `schema_status = 'accepted'`. `clearRunProviderStateUnsaved` removes it. - `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.ts`: the remote close checkpoint (`checkpointRemoteRunner`) now wraps the existing body. When the checkpoint throws in a sandbox without a reusable lease, it calls the marker, writes one run-log line, and throws the original error. A marker or log failure cannot replace that error. If a later checkpoint of the same run saves, it clears the mark. - `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-resume.ts`: `rebindNativeSessionCheckpoint` returns `null` for a source with the mark, as it already does for `errorCode = native_provider_state_incompatible`. `findNativeSessionResumeRun` projects the new key. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: one additive paragraph. - Tests in `native-session-resume.test.ts` and `native-session-executor.test.ts`. Guard conditions. The mark is written only when all of these are true: - The close checkpoint threw before the durable backup was stored (after the upload's own bounded retries). A later local publication, stamp or cleanup failure does not mark the run. - The target is a remote `sandbox` with `reusableLeaseConfigured !== true`. A retained sandbox or an SSH host keeps the live state, so its resume path is unchanged. - The run holds an accepted result. A failure before acceptance changes nothing. Saved state from the previous release: run rows without the key keep today's resume path. An older server that reads a row with the key ignores it, and so it behaves as it does today. No schema change. User-visible: the next run's transcript shows "Paperclip session started" instead of "resumed", with a new session id. The source run's log shows `provider state was not saved after the accepted result; the next run starts a fresh provider session`. The fresh session gets the full task context, as for other fresh starts. ## Verification - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-resume.test.ts -t "not resumable only after|provider state was not saved"`: 9 pass (6 pure, 3 embedded Postgres). - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts -t "marks the provider state unsaved|uses the bundled Linux image authority for remote opencode-new-durable"`: 8 pass. They include a durable store failure (marked) and a local publication failure after the store (not marked). - Red on `master` (source files reverted, tests kept): the 3 "starts the next run in a fresh provider session directly" cases fail (`expected {…} to be null`), the DB "accepted" case fails the same way, and the executor per-turn case fails (`mark` called 0 times). - Guard removal checks: - Sandbox guard replaced with `true`: the "retained sandbox" case fails (`mark` called once). - `!checkpointBackupStored` removed: the "publish-failed" case fails. - `schema_status = 'accepted'` removed from the marker: the "rejected" case fails (`expected true to be false`). - Negative cases that pass: no result, rejected result, retained sandbox, records without the key or with another code (all three recovery policies), and a later save that clears the mark. - `cd server && npx tsc --noEmit -p .`: clean. - Not related to this change and failing on `master` in this worktree too: `runtime-selection.test.ts` connector skill cases (missing `.claude/skills/*/SKILL.md`) and `native-session-resume.test.ts` "archives a damaged prior epoch" (`ENOENT … authority-epochs`). Required CI is the authority for those suites. ## Risks - Low. The change only skips a resume that cannot succeed. The fresh session uses the same workspace and full task context, like a Retry after `native_provider_state_incompatible`. - If the backup failed but the provider state were still somewhere recoverable, the next run would lose provider context. For a per-turn sandbox without a reusable lease, the restore path uses only the backup, so this does not apply. Retained sandboxes and SSH hosts are excluded. - One extra conditional `UPDATE` runs only on the failure path. The normal path before `turn.start` has no new waits or work. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` is also edited by #20809. The paragraphs are at different places; whichever merges second rebases. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edit, test execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
1b39cf1794 |
fix(native): retry a contended provider-pack admission write (#20850)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A native OpenCode run on a remote sandbox must save a provider-pack admission receipt on its run row after the provider session opens. Artifact retention refuses to continue without it. > - The admission write locks the coordinator row (`native_run_finalizations`) and then the run row, each with a 1000 ms `lock_timeout`. The runner's durable checkpoint writes lock the same coordinator row for the whole checkpoint transaction. > - On a loaded database one checkpoint transaction can outlast one lock wait. The admission write then fails with `55P03`, the state stays `pending`, and artifact retention fails the run as `native_provider_artifacts_admission_unverified` before the first turn. The task rests blocked. > - #20682 fixed the same symptom for a run-event append on the run row. This is the coordinator-row half. > - This pull request retries a contended admission write a bounded number of times, each in a new transaction that re-proves the claim. It also names the database cause in the run log and adds a chaos option that makes every fresh sandbox take the pack upload and admission path. > - The benefit is that a healthy fresh sandbox is no longer failed and blocked by ordinary lock contention. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20682 (same symptom, run-row lock; this is the coordinator-row lock). **What happened?** On a hosted staging instance, an OpenCode run on a fresh Daytona sandbox found no matching preinstalled provider pack (`provider_pack.select` reason `cached_packs_unverified`). It uploaded and verified the pack (61 s), started the runner, and the runner authenticated to the durable control plane. 3.4 s later the run log shows `native provider-pack admission receipt could not be saved`. `nativeProviderPackAdmissionState.state` stayed `pending`. The run failed with `native_provider_artifacts_admission_unverified` before any provider turn. The task rests `blocked` with no Retry. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a native run that waits for its claim (`waitForClaim: true`, as a fresh run with artifact storage does). 2. Hold its `native_run_finalizations` row `FOR UPDATE` in another transaction for 1.6 s, as a checkpoint write does. 3. Call `recordNativeProviderPackAdmission`. It fails with `canceling statement due to lock timeout` (`55P03`). **Expected behavior** The admission waits out the checkpoint write within a bound, re-proves the claim, and saves the receipt. ## What Changed - `recordNativeProviderPackAdmission` retries a write that waits for its claim when it fails with `55P03`, `40P01` or `40001`, up to 5 attempts with 100–400 ms back-off. Each attempt is a new transaction with the same checks (claim, run, epoch, receipt). A stale claim still returns `false`. Other errors still throw. A write that does not wait for its claim keeps its `NOWAIT` refusal. - New `nativeProviderPackAdmissionFailureCode` reads the SQLSTATE from the error or its cause. - The executor's run-log line now ends with `(cause=<SQLSTATE or native_* code>)`, so a lost admission is diagnosable. It carries no paths or secrets. - Restart chaos: `--daytona-pack-mismatch <image@sha256:…>` starts sandboxes from another image while the controller keeps `--daytona-image`'s runnerd and pack. Every fresh sandbox then takes the upload and admission path, which the matched-image check made unreachable. Config validation and README updated. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the bounded retry. ## Verification - RED on `origin/master` (`1d67e309e0`): `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-provider-pack-admission.test.ts -t "checkpoint write holds"` fails with `canceling statement due to lock timeout` (`55P03`), the staging error. - GREEN: the same file, 39/39 pass, including the existing fence tests (`cannot publish while another transaction holds the coordinator claim`, revoked-claim recheck) and the new bound test (`gives up after the bounded retry window while the claim stays held`, under 15 s). - `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/restart-chaos/vitest.config.ts tests/restart-chaos/scheduler.test.ts`: 34/34 pass, including the new option test. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit` and `tsc --noEmit -p tests/restart-chaos/tsconfig.json` pass. - Not run: a Daytona chaos wave with `--daytona-pack-mismatch`. It needs a runner image built at this revision. The staging cause is inferred from the timing and the code path; the original error was swallowed, which is why this PR adds the cause to the run log. ## Risks - Low risk. The normal path has no contention and makes one attempt. Under contention the write waits at most about 11 s before the first provider turn. Without this change that case failed the run. - A retry cannot widen authority: every attempt re-checks the coordinator claim, lease expiry, run status and admission epoch. - When admission still fails after the retries, the run fails as before. This PR does not change that recovery path. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, read-only staging API reads). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
57f1afdf19 |
fix(daytona): retry a sandbox create that timed out before any agent work (#20828)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - On a Daytona sandbox environment, every new task run first creates a fresh sandbox > - When one Daytona create did not start, the plugin waited the full 300 s acquisition budget > - The run then failed `setup_failed` with `lease_acquire_failed`. No agent work had started, but nothing retried it > - On staging this hit two agents in 15 minutes. Each attempt used about 5 minutes, and the task stopped until a person pressed Retry. The manual Retry then got a sandbox in 28 s > - This pull request ends a stuck create early, adopts a create that started late, and routes the timeout to the bounded bootstrap retry that already exists for transient provider refusals > - The benefit is that a stuck create costs about 90 s and recovers by itself. The task shows Retry only after the bounded attempts are used up ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20626 (bounded resume of a reusable sandbox), Refs #20212 (wait out a Daytona state change), Refs #20609 (force a stuck stop). **What happened?** A run on a Daytona sandbox environment failed after 307 s with `Failed to acquire lease for environment "Paperclip Sandbox" (sandbox): Daytona lease acquisition timed out; allocation cleanup is pending`. The run recorded `errorCode: setup_failed`, `failureCause: lease_acquire_failed`, and `executionRecovery: { kind: "bootstrap", providerWorkStarted: false }`. The task became blocked with Retry. No automatic retry was scheduled. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use a Daytona sandbox environment with the default `timeoutMs` (300,000). 2. Start a run while Daytona keeps the new sandbox in `creating`. 3. See that the run waits 300 s, fails `setup_failed`, and is not retried. **Expected behavior** A create that has not started before provider work must not cost 5 minutes. The run must retry by itself within bounds. A late sandbox that has started must be used. A sandbox that was abandoned must be removed. **Root cause** - `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona/src/plugin.ts` (`onEnvironmentAcquireLease`): the only bound on the create step was the whole acquisition budget (`timeoutMs`, default 300 s). - `server/src/services/environment-provider-unavailable-error.ts` (`readTransientEnvironmentProviderFailure`): only an HTTP status or errno on the create call counted as transient. The timeout envelope carries neither, so the run fell through to generic `setup_failed`, which `isTransientWorkspacePreparationCode` does not retry. ## What Changed - Daytona: one fresh acquisition is now capped at 180 s. A create that has not returned after 90 s is looked up once by its creation name. A sandbox in `started` is adopted, and setup continues. A sandbox in `pending_build`, `building_snapshot`, or `pulling_snapshot` keeps waiting inside the cap. Any other state ends the attempt with the existing cleanup envelope and an acquisition diagnostic whose elapsed time reached the expired budget. - Daytona: a late SDK failure no longer runs the compensating delete for a sandbox that was adopted. - Host: `readTransientEnvironmentProviderFailure` reads the validated acquisition diagnostic. An acquisition whose first failure was its own deadline is transient. The run fails with `environment_provider_unavailable`, category `timeout`, and uses the bounded bootstrap retry (30 s, then 60 s). An earlier setup failure stays `setup_failed`. Message text is never parsed. - Host: the task reason for this case is plain: "The sandbox for ... did not finish starting in time. No agent work had started. Paperclip retries automatically ...". - Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md` and `doc/plugins/SANDBOX_PROVIDER_CAPABILITIES.md`. ## Verification Red before the fix, green after: - `server/src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts` "routes a fresh sandbox create that timed out through bounded bootstrap recovery" uses the staging error shape through the orchestrator. Red: `errorCode` was `setup_failed`. Green: `environment_provider_unavailable`, category `timeout`, bounded retry scheduled. The `started` and `early_failure` cases stay `setup_failed` with no retry. - `server/src/services/environment-provider-unavailable-error.test.ts`: deadline diagnostic is transient (red, then green). An early failure is not. The task message is plain. - `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona/src/plugin.test.ts`: "ends a create still pending at 90 seconds" (red: still pending at 90 s; green) and "adopts a create that started by 90 seconds" (red; green, and a late SDK rejection does not delete it). "keeps waiting for a create that is still preparing its snapshot" is a safety case. - Existing tests that encoded the 300 s acquisition budget now use the 180 s cap. Commands run locally: - `npx vitest run src/plugin.test.ts` (Daytona): 414 passed. - `npx vitest run src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts src/services/environment-provider-unavailable-error.test.ts src/__tests__/environment-acquisition-diagnostics.test.ts src/__tests__/task-interruption-query.test.ts`: 229 tests passed. The run-completion file reports an `afterAll` embedded-Postgres teardown timeout. The same timeout occurs on unchanged `origin/master`, so it is a local platform fault. - Daytona plugin `pnpm typecheck` and server `pnpm typecheck`: pass. - `pnpm verify`: asked for broader CI coverage, because `doc/execution-semantics.md` is a global CI input. Required CI supplies that coverage. Upgrade safety: nothing new is persisted. A task already blocked by this failure keeps `canRetry: true`. Its Retry starts a new run with a new creation record, and that run uses the new path. On staging, the manual Retry of the affected task got a fresh lease in 28 s. The creation record of the earlier attempt stays with the creation reconciler. Not verified: a live Daytona create that stays in `creating`. That cannot be forced on demand. ## Risks - A legitimately slow create that stays in `creating` or `starting` for more than 90 s now ends the attempt and retries. Snapshot preparation states still wait inside the 180 s cap. Staging creates normally take about 20 to 30 s. - An abandoned create is removed by the creation reconciler. It can stay alive until that reconciler settles the record (the existing settle window). This PR does not change that window. - Other sandbox providers get the host classification only when they send the same acquisition diagnostic. ## Model Used Claude Opus 5.5 (claude-opus-5-5), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser for read-only staging API reads). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
889b33da72 |
fix(native): apply a saved accepted result on Retry instead of a new turn (#20819)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A native run on a remote sandbox can finish with an accepted result, and then fail to save its workspace. Saved-work recovery saves the files again from the retained sandbox, with no provider turn. > - #20758 made a save that finds the sandbox disk full stop at once as `sandbox_disk_full` and hand the task to the board with a Retry. > - When the user frees space and presses Retry, the save now succeeds. But the Retry then started a new agent turn (`strategy: continue`). That turn repeats work that already finished and spends provider budget again. The accepted result was not applied (`replacementDenied: explicit_user_continuation`). > - The decision for this case: when a durable record proves that the run's result was already accepted, Retry applies that saved result and starts no new turn. > - This pull request makes Retry admission wait for the run's saved-work holds and then applies the accepted result through the existing preserved-result finalization. > - The benefit is that a Retry after a failed save finishes the task from the work that was already done, with no repeated provider work or spend. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20758 (full-disk save rests as `sandbox_disk_full` with a Retry), Refs #20810 (chaos fault DF1 for a full disk on the final workspace save) **What happened?** A native run had an accepted, succeeded result. Its workspace save failed because the sandbox disk was full, and the task rested at `sandbox_disk_full` with a Retry. The user freed space and pressed Retry. The save succeeded, and then Retry admission started a new run with `strategy: continue`. The accepted result stayed unapplied (the finalization coordinator stayed in `terminal_failure`). Two paths caused this: 1. Retry admission let the Retry through as soon as the saved files were verified. That can happen before preserved-result finalization runs: the recovery worker dispatches the Retry right after one hold settles, while the hold that Retry added for the same run is still scheduled. On master this is deterministic in that order, and a race otherwise. 2. Preserved-result finalization reads the newest saved-work hold of the run. While that hold was still scheduled, it declined, and nothing held the Retry back. **Expected behavior** After the save succeeds, and a durable record proves that the run's result was already accepted, Retry applies that result. The run and task finish from it. No new `turn.start` and no new provider spend. If the save fails again with a full disk, the task keeps the `sandbox_disk_full` rest and a working Retry. If there is no proven accepted result, Retry keeps the previous behaviour and starts one run. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Give a native run an accepted, succeeded result whose copy-back failed (`native_workspace_sync_out_retry_exhausted`). 2. Make the saved-work recovery save fail with `remote_workspace_sandbox_disk_full`. The hold goes to the board. 3. Free space. Press Retry. Let recovery save the files, then dispatch the Retry before preserved-result finalization runs. 4. On master, a new run starts with `previousRunId` set to the source run, and the accepted result is not applied. ## What Changed - `preserved-result-finalization.ts`: the eligibility checks move into one read (`readPreservedResult`). They are unchanged: an accepted, succeeded result of this run, a completed saved-work recovery with a verified receipt, no Stop, no newer run, no current execution, and no applied generation. A new read-only `canResumePreservedResultFinalization` uses the same read without locks. `resumePreservedResultFinalization` keeps the finalizer's lock order (coordinator first) and takes the issue and run rows with NOWAIT, so it cannot deadlock with the finalizer, owner-stop confirmation or Retry dispatch; a busy row is retried briefly, and the last attempt waits for its locks. It also writes an activity entry, `issue.saved_result_finalization_resumed`, when it applies a result. - `explicit-native-continuation.ts`: Retry admission holds an accepted Retry (`evaluate`) of a run whose saved files are verified and whose accepted result is still held, with the wait `finalizing_saved_result`. It holds while a saved-work hold of that run is still `scheduled`, `running` or `awaiting_evidence` and the result is otherwise applicable (no Stop, newer run, other owner or current execution), or once `canResumePreservedResultFinalization` is true. In every other case admission is unchanged. - `heartbeat/run-control.ts` (`resumeTaskRetry`): after dispatch, if admission held the Retry with `finalizing_saved_result`, it calls `resumePreservedResultFinalization`. That coalesces the Retry into the source run with `strategy: finalize_result` and re-arms finalization. This is one key read after admission; the resumption runs only for a held Retry. The recovery worker already calls the same function after each saved hold, so either path finishes the work. - Tests: `workspace-recovery-disk-full.test.ts` now proves the new Retry behaviour (red on master), a dispatch that lands while another hold of the run is still saving (red on master), a Retry while the disk is still full, and three negative cases that keep one new run. `workspace-recovery-preparation-gates.test.ts` (s12 and RC-50b) and `explicit-native-continuation.test.ts` (copy-back + `task_retry`) encoded the old "new run" result for the same situation. They now expect the saved result to be applied. A fixture helper `recoverRunHolds` runs the recovery steps for every hold of a run, as the worker does. - `ui/src/components/WorkspaceExportRecovery.tsx`: at the `sandbox_disk_full` rest, the retained-file panel no longer shows its own "Recover saved files" button and no longer hides the task's Retry. Before, the API said `canRetry: true` and the note said "Retry saves the files again", but the board showed only "Recover saved files" (seen in the DF1 chaos wave). The panel now says to free space and use Retry. A new UI test covers it. `pnpm check:token-gates` is clean. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: documents the Retry behaviour and its conditions. ## Verification Red/green (`cd server && npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery-disk-full.test.ts`): - On master source with the new tests: 3 failed, 3 passed (the 3 negative cases pass on master, as they should). Each failure shows a second heartbeat run (the new agent turn): `expected [ …(2) ] to deeply equal [ Array(1) ]`. - On this branch: 7 passed. A fourth negative case (an operator Stop while a hold is still settling keeps one new run) was added after review; it also passes on master. - Guard removal 1: with the `canResumePreservedResultFinalization` check replaced by `true`, the negative test "an operator Stop recorded on the run" fails (`expected [] to have a length of 1 but got +0`: the Retry waits forever instead of starting its one run). - Guard removal 2: with the "hold still saving" check removed, the test "holds a Retry dispatched while another saved-work hold of the run is still settling" fails (a second run starts). Related suites pass on this branch: `workspace-recovery-disk-full`, `workspace-recovery-preparation-gates`, `workspace-recovery-admission`, `native-exhausted-finalization-retry`, `explicit-native-continuation` (641 tests). On the first revision, `task-retry`, `workspace-recovery-retry-copyback`, `workspace-recovery-warm-handoff`, `preserved-native-response-wait.integration`, `deferred-execution-wait` and `deferred-execution-receipt-work` passed (317 tests). Other retry and recovery suites were not run locally; required CI `general_tests` covers them. After the review fixes, the five related suites above passed again (642 tests). `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` is clean. `pnpm verify --explain` selects a broad plan (exit 2) because `doc/execution-semantics.md` is a global CI input. Required CI supplies that coverage. ## Risks - Behaviour change: an accepted Retry of a terminal run with an accepted, succeeded result and verified saved files now applies that result and starts no run. Before, it started one new run. This is the intended change. It also covers the s12 and RC-50b recovery-handoff cases, which used to start a new run. - A held Retry waits while any saved-work hold of the run is still saving. The recovery worker drives those holds to `complete` or `exhausted`. When a hold ends `exhausted` or the records do not prove the result, the wait ends and the Retry starts one run, as before. A hold that stays in `awaiting_evidence` keeps the Retry waiting with "Paperclip is finishing the saved result." - Upgrade-safe: no persisted shape changes. The checks read existing records (`native_run_results`, `native_run_finalizations`, the recovery action evidence, workspace receipts). A record written by an older server that lacks any required fact keeps the old behaviour. An older server that reads the new state sees a coalesced Retry and a re-armed finalization, which it already handles. - No new work before `turn.start` on the normal path. Admission adds the eligibility read only when it has already proven an accepted result and verified saved files for a Retry of that run. `resumeTaskRetry` adds one key read after admission. - Lock order: `resumePreservedResultFinalization` keeps the finalizer's order (coordinator, then issue, then run). Because it can now run beside Retry dispatch (which locks the issue first), it takes the issue and run rows with NOWAIT. A busy row ends the attempt, and it retries up to 9 times at 100 ms. The 10th attempt waits for its locks, as this resumption always did, so a recovered result is never left unapplied. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file editing, test execution) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Fable 5.2
|
39442400b7 |
fix(native): let a saved governed wait settle on its own same-run resume (#20838)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native runs can save a governed wait (a question or confirmation for a person) and park the provider turn > - If shutdown of the retained execution cannot be confirmed in time, the run keeps its checkpoint, records `native_governed_wait_settlement_pending`, and schedules a same-run resume that settles the saved wait (#20336, #20494, #20519) > - That failure writes an active recovery action for the run. Its cause is in `EXECUTION_RECONCILIATION_CAUSES`, and its wake policy resumes that same run > - When the run is a resolved-interaction continuation, its dispatch gate checks execution blockers. The gate read the run's own resume action as a hold and cancelled the resume with `execution_reconciliation_required` > - The task then stayed blocked with no Retry and no continue control, and the saved question could not wake the agent > - This pull request makes the gate skip only the run's own scheduled-resume action > - The benefit is that a saved governed wait settles by itself, with no person involved ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20494, #20519, #20809 **What happened?** A staging Codex run on a remote sandbox was a continuation after an answered question. The agent saved a second governed wait (a confirmation). Shutdown confirmation of the retained execution was still pending, so the run recorded `native_governed_wait_settlement_pending` and scheduled its exact-checkpoint resume. The resume reattached to the remote runner and started. 32 s later it ended `cancelled` with `execution_reconciliation_required`. No person cancelled it. The lifecycle event of the cancel carried the run's own recovery action id. The task showed `blocked` with `canRetry: false` and `canContinue: false`, and no later run started. **Expected behavior** The same-run resume settles the saved governed wait. The task waits for the person's answer. No run is cancelled and no recovery action needs a person. **Steps to reproduce** 1. A native run starts as a resolved-interaction continuation (context `mutation: interaction`, `interactionStatus: answered`). 2. The run saves a governed wait, and shutdown confirmation does not arrive in time (`native_governed_wait_settlement_pending`). 3. The coordinator schedules the same-run resume. At dispatch, `decideCurrentRunStaleness` calls `getExecutionBlocker`, which returns the run's own active action, and `cancelStaleRunInTx` cancels the run. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/execution-blocker.ts`: `getExecutionBlocker` takes `resumingNativeRunId`. For that run it skips only the active action whose wake policy is `resume_native_run` for the same run and whose evidence names that run. Workspace-restore holds and all other actions still block. - `server/src/modules/run-dispatch/adapters/postgres.ts`: the dispatch staleness decision passes the native run id. - `server/src/modules/run-dispatch/adapters/postgres.test.ts`: the failing case and two controls (an action for another run, an action without a resume policy still cancel). - `tests/restart-chaos`: new opt-in workload Q4 (a second saved question asked by the first answer's continuation run). Provider-fault rules take `occurrence`; Q4 rules use 2, so PV1/PV2 hit the second governed wait. Codex shim and ACPX tap both honor it. README documents Q4. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: states that the run's own scheduled resume is not a hold against it. ## Verification - Red on master: `postgres.test.ts -t "saved governed wait"` fails with `{ dispatched: false, status: "cancelled", errorCode: "execution_reconciliation_required" }` (the staging error code). - Green: the same test passes; the two controls still cancel. - Focused: `postgres.test.ts`, `explicit-native-continuation.test.ts`, `native-preclaim-continuation.test.ts`, `workspace-recovery-preparation-gates.test.ts`; server typecheck. - Harness: `question-handoff.test.ts`, `provider-faults.test.ts`, `acpx-provider-faults.test.ts`, `journeys.test.ts`; harness typecheck. - Chaos: `--adapters codex --workloads Q4 --faults PV2 --tasks 1 --seed 111` on master and on this branch (results in a comment below). ## Risks - Low. The exemption is exact: same run id in the wake policy and the evidence, status `active`, only for a native run being dispatched. A recovery action that names another run, has no resume policy, or is resolved keeps its current effect. - Saved state from older versions: actions already written have the same shape, so a resume that is still scheduled settles after deploy. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.2 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
fd1460bb24 |
fix(native): continue a governed-wait follow-up in a fresh session when its saved provider state is gone (#20809)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The restart chaos harness (`tests/restart-chaos/`) runs real agent tasks and breaks the control plane on purpose, so failures show up before staging users see them > - A census of 48 hours of staging failures found runs whose result save-back failed because the sandbox disk was full (class F). The harness never filled a sandbox disk, so it missed that class > - #20758 made a full-disk save end recovery at once with cause `sandbox_disk_full` and a Retry. Nothing in chaos exercised that path end to end > - A real full disk cannot be made on demand. The owner chose a test-only hook that makes the save report a full disk, not a small disk > - This pull request adds the hook at the save's sandbox boundary and a DF1 fault that arms it, clears it, and grades the result > - The benefit is that every wave can now check the disk-full rest, the Retry offer, and that Retry works after space is freed ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20758 (product behaviour under test), #20678 (finalization hands a full-disk copy-back to recovery) **What is the problem?** The chaos harness had no fault for a full sandbox disk during result save-back. Staging saw this failure (census class F in `doc/plans/2026-11-11-staging-failures-vs-chaos-coverage.md`), and chaos could not reproduce it. **What is the expected behaviour?** A wave can schedule DF1. While DF1 is armed, the task's final workspace saves fail as a full disk. When DF1 is cleared, saves succeed again. The task must rest with `sandbox_disk_full` and a Retry, and that Retry must finish the task. **Why does it matter?** Without a fault, a regression in the disk-full path (no Retry, a wrong cause, or a Retry that does not work) reaches staging users before chaos sees it. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/sandbox-disk-full-fault.ts` (new, test-only): `sandboxDiskFullFaultTarget` wraps the target of a final save only when the harness armed that save. The capture commands then exit 1 with the exact message the in-sandbox script writes on ENOSPC, and the provider download fails with `No space left on device`. The gate follows `@paperclipai/shared/crash-points`: `PAPERCLIP_DISK_FULL_FAULT_CONTROL` is read once at import and ignored under `NODE_ENV=production`. Disarmed, the hook is one comparison and returns the save's own target. - `server/src/services/remote-workspaces.ts`: the capture call in `saveRemoteWorkspace` passes its target through the hook. No other product change. `workspace-recovery.ts` is not touched. - `tests/restart-chaos/disk-full-faults.ts` (new): the DF1 kind, the control-file seam (atomic writes), the rest evidence (`activeRecoveryAction.evidence.systemRecovery.failure.cause.label`), the `disk_full_fault` T check, and the DF1 R3 rule (one expected Retry that must finish the task). - Harness wiring: `--faults DF1` (refused without `--env daytona`, with a storm, or with PV faults), no scheduled restart, arm at launch, clear at the first rest just before the Retry click, receipts in `<wave>/disk-full-faults.jsonl`, and ledger fields `diskFull: { faultedSaves, restedDiskFull, retryOffered, retryWorked }`. - Docs: a "Sandbox disk full (DF1)" section in `tests/restart-chaos/README.md`, and the census plan marks DF1 as built. ## Verification - `cd server && pnpm exec vitest run src/services/sandbox-disk-full-fault.test.ts`: the gate is off by default and under `NODE_ENV=production`, the save's own target comes back when disarmed, only a listed final save is faulted, the product capture turns it into the named disk-full failure, and clearing the file disarms the next save. - `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/restart-chaos/vitest.config.ts tests/restart-chaos/disk-full-faults.test.ts tests/restart-chaos/grader.test.ts tests/restart-chaos/scheduler.test.ts tests/restart-chaos/provider-faults.test.ts`: planning, the control file, and grading. - `node scripts/typecheck-test-projects.mjs tests/restart-chaos` and the server `tsc --noEmit`: clean. - Live wave: a Daytona DF1 wave is running. Its result is added here before merge. ## Risks - Low risk for production. The hook reads its variable once at startup and is ignored under `NODE_ENV=production`. Without the variable it does one comparison and returns the same target object. - The hook fails every sandbox command of an armed capture, including the read-only fallback's inventory. A real full disk can let that inventory succeed and fail later at the download. The outcome is the same (`sandbox_disk_full`), but the fallback's inventory step is not exercised under DF1. - DF1 runs only with `--env daytona`. A local run has no sandbox workspace save, so the harness refuses DF1 there. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic, model ID `claude-opus-5-5`), in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, GitHub CLI). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
fa3cd6f330 |
fix(native): end provider startup rejections with Retry instead of an ownership hold (#20808)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The Paperclip Runner starts Codex for native runs. On a remote
sandbox such as Daytona, the sandbox is the OS boundary.
> - A Codex planning run on Daytona failed in `session.open`. Codex's
read-only sandbox helper could not set up loopback in the container
(`bwrap: loopback: Failed RTM_NEWADDR`), and Codex loads `AGENTS.md`
through that helper.
> - The server treated that definite provider rejection as an
interrupted transport. Its same-run bootstrap retry went through remote
restart recovery and stopped on `ambiguous_remote_recovery_evidence`.
The task showed "Recovering saved work…" and no Retry, although no
provider work was done.
> - This pull request gives such startup rejections a named, permanent
outcome with a working Retry, and pins ask and standard runs to the
external sandbox policy.
> - The benefit is that a provider startup refusal ends as a clear
failure with Retry, never as an ownership hold.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A Codex planning run on a Daytona sandbox failed in `session.open` with
`error creating thread: failed to load AGENTS.md instructions ... bwrap:
loopback: Failed RTM_NEWADDR: Operation not permitted`. The server
recorded `native_session_interrupted` with recovery mode
`bootstrap_retry`. Thirty seconds later, remote restart recovery blocked
the run with `native_restart_recovery_blocked` /
`ambiguous_remote_recovery_evidence`. No server restart happened. All
default-mode Codex runs on the same image succeeded that day; only the
planning run failed.
**Expected behavior**
A provider startup failure with no provider work must end as a clear
failure with a working Retry, or get a bounded automatic retry that also
ends with Retry. It must never become an ambiguous-ownership hold.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. `cd server && npx vitest run
src/services/native-runtime/native-startup-rejected-retry.integration.test.ts`.
On master the deterministic case is `retryable_failure` /
`native_session_interrupted`.
2. `npx vitest run
src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts -t "provider
itself rejected"`. On master the new code is not produced.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
4c04c20c9e |
fix(recovery): wake a parent whose refused completion waited on dependencies that later clear (#20803)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A parent task that waits on blocker tasks resumes through the `issue_blockers_resolved` wake > - A periodic dependency sweep sends that wake when a blocked task's dependencies become ready and no wake covers the current blocked cycle > - The sweep skips a task that its own agent blocked, because that agent waits on something outside the blocker graph > - A native completion that Paperclip refuses for unresolved dependencies is also recorded as a block by the agent's own run (`durable_dependency_blocker_bound`). The sweep treated it as a self-block. It woke the task only if a blocker later completed or finalized on its workspace > - When readiness cleared another way, nothing woke the task. It stayed `blocked` with no next action > - This pull request makes the sweep treat that refusal as a dependency wait, and count a "Recover saved files" finalize without a workspace as the blocker settling > - The benefit is that a blocked task is not a silent dead end: it resumes once, automatically, when its dependencies clear ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20728 **What happened?** A parent task had three done child tasks that block it. One child was still listed as "saving its files", because a "Recover saved files" finalize had no workspace. The parent's agent tried to finish. Paperclip refused the completion because dependencies were unresolved and set the parent `blocked` (`durable_dependency_blocker_bound`). After #20728 was deployed, the parent's dependencies were ready. But the task stayed `blocked` with no wake, no Retry, and no next action. A person had to post a comment to wake it. **Expected behavior** When the last blocker of a blocked task clears, by status or by finalize settlement, Paperclip wakes the assignee once. This also applies to tasks already blocked before a deploy that changes readiness. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Block a task on a done blocker whose workspace finalize is still pending. 2. Let the assignee agent's native run report the task done. Paperclip sets the task `blocked` with `durable_dependency_blocker_bound`. 3. Make the blocker settle without a later blocker completion or a finalize on its workspace (for example, a recovery finalize with no workspace, or a deploy that changes the readiness rule). 4. Run the dependency sweep. Before this fix it reports `selfBlockedSkipped: 1` and sends no wake. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/recovery/service.ts` (`wasBlockedByAssigneeAgent`): a native block with reason `durable_dependency_blocker_bound` is not a self-block. The dependency owns its wake. Other native blocks and agent blocks keep the self-block rule. - The same function counts a later succeeded `workspace_finalize` with `owningService: workspace_recovery` and no workspace as the blocker settling, which matches the readiness rule from #20728. - `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-issue-liveness-escalation.test.ts`: regression tests for the refused-completion shape (one wake, no second wake), the recovery finalize without a workspace, and a safety case for a different native block reason. - `server/src/services/workspace-recovery-dependency-finalize.test.ts`: a characterization test that a real "Recover saved files" signals the dependency sweep for the company. This path already existed; the test keeps it. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: documents when the dependency sweep wakes after the last blocker clears. ## Verification - Red (unfixed `service.ts`): `npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-issue-liveness-escalation.test.ts -t "refused for unresolved|still holds a native block|recovery finalize without a workspace"` fails 2 of 3 tests with `selfBlockedSkipped` 1 instead of 0. - Green (fixed): `src/__tests__/heartbeat-issue-liveness-escalation.test.ts` passes 44 of 44. - Related suites pass: `src/__tests__/issue-dependency-wakeups-routes.test.ts`, `src/__tests__/heartbeat-dependency-scheduling.test.ts`, `src/services/workspace-recovery-dependency-finalize.test.ts`, `src/__tests__/issue-recovery-dependencies.test.ts` (43 tests). Server `tsc --noEmit` passes. - `pnpm verify` exits 2 because a doc change is a global CI input. Required CI supplies broad coverage. - Staging evidence (read only): the affected parent's activity shows `native-status-committer` set it `blocked` with `durable_dependency_blocker_bound`, and no later blocker completion or finalize. ## Risks - Previous-release story: no persisted shape changes. Tasks already `blocked` with `durable_dependency_blocker_bound` and ready dependencies are picked up by the existing dependency sweep after deploy (it visits every blocked task at startup and on recovery signals). No migration. - Bounded: the wake uses the cycle-aware ready-state key, so one blocked cycle gets one wake. The sweep keeps its live-run, queued-wake, pending-interaction, and pause-hold checks. - No loop: if the woken agent blocks the task again while its dependencies are ready, the reason is not `durable_dependency_blocker_bound`, so the self-block rule applies. - The recovery finalize rule only applies to a finalize on the blocker task itself with `owningService: workspace_recovery` and no workspace. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, code search, test execution, read-only staging API inspection). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
f125b823f4 |
fix(recovery): release a parent's Retry once a done child's recovered files are saved (#20728)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A parent task waits for its done child tasks to save their workspace files before it runs again (the workspace-finalize barrier) > - "Recover saved files" saves the retained work of a done child and records a successful `workspace_finalize` > - That finalize row had no `execution_workspace_id`. The barrier reads finalize rows by the blocker's workspace, so it never saw the row > - The parent's saved Retry then waited forever with "Saving its files" on a child that had already saved its files > - This pull request lets the barrier accept the recovery's own finalize for the recovered task's finished operations of the same run. It does not make the recovery finalize a workspace-wide save > - The benefit is that recoveries work by themselves: the parent's dependency wait releases and its saved Retry starts on the next dependency pass, with no migration ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A parent task had three done children. One legacy child shared the parent's execution workspace. The operator pressed "Recover saved files" on that child. The recovery saved the files and marked the old run succeeded. The operator then pressed Retry on the parent. The server accepted the Retry, but the parent stayed on "Retry is waiting for a finished task this one depends on to save its files" for more than 15 minutes. `blockerAttention.pendingFinalizeBlockerIssueIds` named the recovered child. The child had no active recovery action and no execution blocker. The workspace was clean (`dirty: false`, `writerRunId: null`). The child's workspace operations showed the cause. The latest operation on the workspace was a succeeded `workspace_recovery`. The recovery's succeeded `workspace_finalize` existed, but with `execution_workspace_id = NULL`. Earlier finalize attempts of that run had failed. `pendingFinalizeBlockerCondition` only looks at operations on the blocker's workspace, so it found no successful finalize after the recovery. **Expected behavior** When "Recover saved files" saves a done child's work, the child must stop holding its dependents. The parent's saved Retry must start without another operator action. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Let a child task finish as `done` with a retained remote workspace whose finalize failed. 2. Run "Recover saved files" on the child, so recovery saves the remote workspace snapshot. 3. Block a parent task on the child. The parent can share the child's workspace. 4. Read the parent's dependency readiness. Before this fix it reports the child in `pendingFinalizeBlockerIssueIds` forever. **Paperclip version or commit** Seen on staging at `a46b9ac7`. Reproduced on `master` at `e039be9202`. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/issues.ts` (`pendingFinalizeBlockerCondition`): the blocker task's latest workspace operation is settled when a succeeded recovery finalize (`owningService: workspace_recovery`) from the same company, task, and run started at or after that operation finished. The operation must be finished (`succeeded`, `failed`, or `skipped`). The recovery finalize can have no workspace (all rows written so far) or this workspace. - The rule is scoped to the blocker task and its run. It does not change the workspace-wide `finalized_at`, so other tasks that share the workspace keep their own barrier. - `server/src/services/workspace-recovery-dependency-finalize.test.ts`: new regression tests that run the real remote "Recover saved files" path, make the child `done`, and block a parent that shares the child's workspace. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: documents how the recovery finalize settles the dependency barrier. ## Verification - Red (unfixed `issues.ts`): `npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery-dependency-finalize.test.ts` fails 3 of 4 tests. The parent stays not ready with the recovered child in `pendingFinalizeBlockerIssueIds`. - Green (fixed): the same file passes 4 of 4 tests: - a real recovery releases the parent in `getDependencyReadiness` and in the issue list `blockerAttention`; - snapshot-fallback shape: the preservation receipt has no workspace and the child's latest operation is the run's failed finalize. The parent is released; - safety: a sibling task that started work on the shared workspace while the recovery waited for teardown still holds the parent; - safety: child work that starts after the recovery still holds the parent. - Focused suites pass: `src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts`, `src/services/workspace-recovery-admission.test.ts`, `src/services/task-retry.test.ts`, `src/services/saved-bootstrap-continuation.test.ts`, `src/services/remote-workspace-recovery-receipt-fallback.test.ts`, `src/__tests__/issue-dependency-wakeups-routes.test.ts` (414 tests with the new file). - `pnpm verify` exits 2 (a doc change is a global CI input), so required CI supplies broad coverage. Server `tsc --noEmit` passes. ## Risks - Previous-release story: no persisted shape changes. Recovery finalize rows already saved (with no workspace) are read by the new rule. Affected parents become dependency-ready on the next read, with no migration or backfill. The deferred-receipt and dependency backstop passes then start the saved Retry. - The barrier keeps its protection. Unfinished operations, operations from another run, operations that start after the recovery finalize, and other tasks on a shared workspace still wait for their own save. - No schema change and no write-path change. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, code search, test execution, read-only staging API inspection). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
1ac8b6a711 |
fix(workspaces): stop re-saving a retained sandbox whose disk is still full (#20758)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - After a native run on a remote sandbox, Paperclip saves the sandbox workspace back to durable storage. When that save fails, saved-work recovery saves the files again from the retained sandbox, with no provider turn. > - A staging census of the last 48 hours (`doc/plans/2026-11-11-staging-failures-vs-chaos-coverage.md`, class F) found saves that failed because the sandbox disk was full. > - #20678 already ends finalization at the first full-disk copy-back and hands the work to saved-work recovery. Recovery then deletes inactive tool caches that it can prove safe, and saves again. > - When that save still found the disk full, recovery recorded a transient `export_interrupted` failure with cause `provider_error`. It then saved again on its automatic schedule (up to 5 retries in 30 minutes). Nothing frees space in a stopped, retained sandbox between those attempts, so each attempt failed the same way. The task showed "Recovering saved work…" and no Retry while this went on. > - This pull request ends the recovery generation at the first such failure with a named cause, `sandbox_disk_full`, and hands it to the board with a Retry. > - The benefit is that the task does not spend 30 minutes on saves that cannot succeed, the user sees why, and one Retry saves the files and starts one run. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20678, #20695 (named sandbox disk-full failures for copy-back and restore) **What happened?** A native run on a remote sandbox finished, and its workspace copy-back hit a full sandbox disk. Finalization handed the task to saved-work recovery (#20678). Recovery's own save also hit the full disk. Recovery classified this as `export_interrupted` / `retry_transient` with cause `provider_error`, so it scheduled more automatic saves of the same sandbox. Each one failed the same way. The task showed "Recovering saved work…" with no Retry until the 30-minute window ran out. **Expected behavior** A save that still finds the disk full after the safe cache cleanup is not repeated automatically. The recovery ends at once with the cause `sandbox_disk_full`, and the board gets a Retry. The workspace keeps its previous saved version, and the run's unsaved files stay in the retained sandbox. One Retry saves the files once there is room and starts exactly one run. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Give a native run an accepted result whose copy-back failed (`native_workspace_sync_out_retry_exhausted`). 2. Make every save from its retained sandbox fail with `remote_workspace_sandbox_disk_full`, with no inactive tool cache to delete. 3. Run saved-work recovery. Before this change, it records `export_interrupted` with cause `provider_error` and schedules another save. ## What Changed - `workspace-recovery.ts`: a save that fails with `remote_workspace_sandbox_disk_full` after a confirmed cache cleanup (or with nothing to clean up) now fails the generation with `export_interrupted`, retry class `user_action_required`, and cause `{ label: "sandbox_disk_full", code: "ENOSPC" }`. That class is not retried automatically, and it is not a permanent-source class, so recovery never falls back to the last save and never drops the run's unsaved files. The next sweep hands the hold to the board. - A cleanup whose outcome is unknown (lost acknowledgement, interrupted journal) keeps the existing scheduled retry, because its journal resumes on the next attempt and can still free space. - `retained-provider-cache.ts`: `reclaimInactiveNativeProviderCache` returns `{ changed, confirmed }` instead of a boolean, so the caller can tell "nothing to delete" from "outcome unknown". It has one caller. - `system-recovery-state.ts`: the board handoff text for this cause says that the sandbox disk is full, that Paperclip deletes only inactive tool caches it can prove safe, and that Retry saves the files again. - New `workspace-recovery-disk-full.test.ts` covers the whole path: one failed attempt, no further automatic saves, the board handoff text, the previous saved version unchanged, the agent's files still in the sandbox, no unfinished in-sandbox capture attempt, a Retry offered in the task presentation and blocker, `POST /issues/:id/retry` accepted (202), the files saved after Retry, and exactly one run started (also with a replayed dispatch). - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: documents the behavior. ## Verification - Red on master: `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery-disk-full.test.ts` fails. The recovery state is `scheduled` with cause `provider_error` instead of `exhausted` with cause `sandbox_disk_full`. - Green on this branch: the same command passes. - Related suites pass: `workspace-recovery-retry-copyback.test.ts` (79 tests, including the 8 cache-cleanup resume tests that need the scheduled retry after an unconfirmed cleanup), `system-recovery-state.test.ts`, `workspace-recovery-capture-policy.test.ts`, `workspace-recovery-fallback.test.ts`, `workspace-recovery-stop-proof.test.ts`, `native-run-finalizer-telemetry.test.ts` (167 tests in all). - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` is clean. - `pnpm verify`: exit 2 (broader verification required), because `doc/execution-semantics.md` is a global CI input. The focused checks above pass. Required CI supplies the broad coverage. ## Risks - Low. The change touches only the saved-work recovery path when its save fails with the exact full-disk message. - Upgrade-safe: the failure code (`export_interrupted`), the retry class (`user_action_required`) and the cause label all pass the earlier release's recovery schema. An earlier release that reads this state shows its generic "Retry to try again" text. - A full-disk failure no longer gets automatic retries in its 30-minute window. If space became free by itself in that window, the user must now press Retry. Nothing in a stopped, retained sandbox frees space by itself, so this is expected to be rare. - No Runner (Rust) change, so no new sandbox image is needed. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file editing, test execution) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
ea25af759e |
fix(native): name a resume that finds no saved Runner state, so Retry starts a fresh session (#20757)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A native run can continue the provider session of the previous run on the same task. In a remote sandbox, the Runner keeps the session state inside the sandbox, and the server saves a harness backup after each run. > - On staging, five runs in 48 hours failed with `native_session_recovery_failed: Error: PRP provider resume state is unavailable` (class P in `doc/plans/2026-11-11-staging-failures-vs-chaos-coverage.md`). > - In each case we read, the previous run had an accepted result, but its `harness_state.backup.persist` failed. Its per-turn sandbox was then destroyed. The next run started in a new sandbox with no Runner state for the session. > - The Runner transport threw an untyped error. The runtime could not tell it apart from a transport drop. A governed-wait or same-session checkpoint ended as a generic `native_session_interrupted` with an "ambiguous state" hold that said not to open a replacement session. > - This pull request types that refusal and lets the driver classify it as `provider_state_incompatible` when nothing is in flight. The existing recovery policy then decides. > - The benefit is that the run ends with the permanent named code `native_provider_state_incompatible`. Retry, or the next message, continues in a fresh provider session in the same workspace. No provider turn or tool call can be repeated, because the follow-up never started a turn. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20712, #20723 (the same classification for a moved remote workspace root). Refs #20691 (fixes the `provider_identity_incomplete` part of class P). **What happened?** 1. Run A on a chat task finished. Its result was accepted. Its harness backup failed to save (`harness_state.backup.persist` failed, `native.post_result_failure`). 2. Run B started for the next chat message in a new sandbox. It rebound run A's checkpoint with `providerRecoveryPolicy: allow_replacement_after_governed_wait`. 3. The Runner found no control-plane state and no archived authority epoch. It threw `PRP provider resume state is unavailable` as a plain `Error`. 4. The runtime refused a replacement for the governed-wait policy and failed run B with the generic `native_session_recovery_failed`. The task stayed blocked with an "ambiguous state" hold. **Expected behavior** The run ends with a permanent named code and a working Retry, as it does for other deterministic refusals. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a Runner transport that resumes a saved provider session from an empty state directory. 2. Request `thread/read`. On `master` it rejects with a plain `Error`. 3. Recover a saved Codex, OpenCode or ACPX session through the driver when the transport fails that way. On `master` the result has no `failureClass`. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `9574065a28`. ## What Changed - `packages/paperclip-runner/src/contracts/harness-driver.ts`: add `NativeRunnerResumeStateUnavailableError` (same message as before) and `isRunnerResumeStateUnavailable`. - `packages/paperclip-runner/src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.ts`: throw the typed error at the three branches where the control-plane state is absent. The branch with no PRP identity and the quarantine branch are unchanged. - `packages/paperclip-runner/src/drivers/codex/codex-app-server-driver-impl.ts`: classify the typed error as `provider_state_incompatible` when the saved session has no turn or runtime request in flight. Extract the in-flight test that the moved-root check already used, without changing it. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describe the new classification (additive). - Tests: a transport test (local and external Runner state), driver tests for Codex, OpenCode and ACPX Claude, in-flight cases that stay unclassified, and a server case that shows the blocked task offers Retry and that one click starts exactly one fresh-session run. ## Verification - `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/backends/native-backend-factory.test.ts -t "no saved state"`: 5 pass. With the driver change reverted, the 3 "reports … as provider state incompatible" cases fail (no `failureClass`). - `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/live/runnerd-codex-transport-cold-restore.test.ts`: 5 pass. On `master` the error is a plain `Error`. - `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/backends/native-backend-factory.test.ts src/drivers/codex/codex-app-server-driver.recovery.test.ts src/live/runnerd-codex-transport-cold-restore.test.ts src/native-session-runtime.test.ts`: 410 pass. - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery-retry-copyback.test.ts -t "does not continue automatically"`: 5 pass, including the new case. It checks `canRetry: true`, an accepted Retry, exactly one queued successor, and `forceFreshSession: true`. - `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx tsc --noEmit -p .`: clean. - `pnpm verify`: exit 2 (broader verification required) because `doc/execution-semantics.md` is a global CI input. The focused checks above pass. Required CI supplies the broad coverage. ## Risks - Low. The change only adds a class to a failure that already failed. A checkpoint with `allow_replacement_after_resume_failure` already replaced the session for this failure, and still does. - For `same_session_only` and `allow_replacement_after_governed_wait`, the run now ends with `native_provider_state_incompatible` instead of a retryable `native_session_interrupted`. Same-run retries stop at once. They could not succeed, because the state is absent. - A session with a turn or runtime request in flight keeps the old unclassified behavior. This PR does not change it. - The server code path is unchanged. The Rust Runner is unchanged, so no new runner image is needed. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edit, test execution) and read-only staging API reads. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
1143abaf92 |
fix(recovery): give due exhausted holds their own fair lane in the recovery worker (#20725)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The workspace recovery worker saves the files of failed runs. It also re-arms exhausted holds under the rules of #20295, #20569, #20641 and #20648 > - After #20680 and #20661 were deployed to staging, the worker still re-armed none of 29 exhausted holds in 36 minutes. One hold's id sorts in the first percent of all candidates, so the restart starvation that #20680 fixed was not the only cause > - The worker skipped every obligation while any unfinished save was selectable. Discovery is instance-wide. A save that another server owns stays unfinished on every run, so obligations never ran. The obligation pass also put due holds behind hundreds of settled holds whose saved input waits, at two per run. A completed pass never revisited a hold that became due by time alone > - This pull request gives due exhausted holds their own lane, and it shares the worker's slots fairly between unfinished saves, due holds and the obligation pass > - The benefit is that every due hold is reached within a few runs of the worker, whatever its other load. The holds save their files and free their tasks without a person ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20680 Refs #20661 Refs #20648 Refs #20641 Refs #20569 Refs #20295 **What happened?** On staging, 36 minutes after a deploy that included #20680 and #20661, the workspace recovery worker had touched none of the 29 exhausted holds of the company (22 capture-policy holds and 7 stop-proof or fallback holds). They had no `stopProofRecovery` or `capturePolicyRecovery` marker, no re-arm activity, and `updatedAt` from Nov 2 to Nov 10. The worker did run manual "Recover saved files" requests: one stop-proof hold saved its files 57 seconds after the request. So the worker was alive and the stop proof was available. The holds were not reached. **What did you expect to happen?** The worker reaches each exhausted hold whose re-arm or fallback is due, re-arms it, and saves the files, within a bounded time. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a scheduled save whose run's finalization lock another database session holds (another server owns the run). 2. Create an exhausted stop-proof hold and an exhausted capture-policy hold, in the evidence shape that the Nov 4 and Nov 10 releases saved. 3. Start the real workspace recovery worker. 4. The worker retries the busy save on every run and never re-arms either hold. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.ts`: `reconcileRetainedWorkspaces` draws candidates from lanes. Each lane is a page that its own cursor advances: unfinished saves; for the worker, exhausted holds whose re-arm or fallback is due; and the obligation pass. Before, the obligation pass ran only when no unfinished save was selectable (the gate at `const unfinished = rows.length > 0; if (!rows.length) { ... }`). - Each lane with work takes one free slot before any lane takes a second. The lane that goes first rotates on each run, so with one free slot (a long local export holds the other) each lane still gets it in one run of three. Actions of a run that one lane took join that run's job without another slot. - The due lane wraps at its tail. A hold that becomes due by time alone (a lease expiry or a re-arm backoff) is reached after the obligation pass completed with no committed change. - `retainedWorkspaceCandidates` takes a `dueOnly` filter (due re-arm or fallback of an exhausted hold). The obligation filter uses the same condition. One `now` is used for the whole query. - The startup sweep (no worker sweep state) also shares its slots between unfinished saves and its general pass. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the lanes and the fairness rule. - New `workspace-recovery-passive-fairness.test.ts` with four real-Postgres regressions. ## Verification - Red on `origin/master` ( |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
08ea18085e |
fix(workspaces): restore a saved workspace into one copy of sandbox disk (#20695)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A task on a remote (Daytona) sandbox continues from its saved workspace. Before the agent starts, the server uploads the saved archive into the sandbox and a sandbox script extracts it. > - The extraction wrote a full second copy of the workspace beside the uploaded archive. A 7.5 GB workspace on a fresh sandbox then needed about 15 GB, and the restore failed with `stage=extract code=ENOSPC disk=full`. > - The failure was classified as retryable, so every automatic retry and every Retry repeated it on a same-size sandbox. The task could not continue. > - On a retained sandbox it is worse: the old root, the archive, and the new tree all share the disk. > - This pull request makes the restore need about one copy of the workspace. The sandbox removes only data that control-plane storage already holds durably, and it never removes a root whose save the server did not prove. > - The benefit is that a workspace that fits once on the sandbox disk restores. A disk that is too small for one copy now gets a named failure that does not loop. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A saved remote workspace of about 7.5 GB could not be restored on a new Daytona sandbox. The run failed with `remote_workspace_restore_failed: step=sandbox_restore; remote_workspace_operation_failed: operation=restore exit=1; remote_workspace_restore_failed: stage=extract code=ENOSPC disk=full exit=1`. The run marked the failure as retryable, and each retry failed the same way. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Save a remote workspace whose archive is larger than half of the free sandbox disk. 2. Start the next run on another sandbox, so that the server restores the saved archive. 3. The upload succeeds. The extraction writes the second copy and fails with ENOSPC. **Expected behavior** A workspace that fits once on the sandbox disk restores. A disk that cannot hold one copy gives a specific failure that is not retried automatically, and Retry works after the sandbox has more space. **What the disk holds during a restore (from the code)** - The uploaded archive (`<parent>/.paperclip-runtime/workspace-snapshots/<operation>/workspace.pcws`, about the workspace size, because the archive is not compressed). - The extracted tree (`<root>.restoring-*`, the workspace size). - On a retained sandbox only: the old root, which stayed until after the new root was published. - After a restore that died: its partial tree and its archive, which no later attempt removed. Refs #20678 (the save side of the same full-disk class). ## What Changed - `workspaceArchive` restore has a `consumeArchive` mode. It creates the directories and symlinks first, then writes the file bodies from the last to the first. After it verifies each file against the manifest hash, it truncates the archive behind that file. The archive and the tree together need the workspace size plus the largest file. The default mode, which the server uses for local restores, does not change. - The sandbox restore script uses that mode on a private rename of the uploaded archive. A later upload to the same path cannot change the file that is being consumed. The script removes the consumed file when it stops. - The helper's own staging is now inside the root-specific `<root>.restoring-*` folder, not in a shared `.workspace-restore-*` sibling. - While it holds the root's restore lock, and after the epoch fence, the script removes leftovers of an earlier attempt on the same root that died: `<root>.restoring-*` folders, `.consuming` archives in its own staging, and archive staging folders that a `restore-target.json` binds to the same root. Each restore writes that binding after the reclaim step. - When the server proved that a retained root is its own earlier, fully saved allocation (`replaceRetiredRoot` and a Paperclip receipt, as before), the script removes the root's files before the extraction, not after the publish. The receipt and `.paperclip-runtime` stay, so an interrupted restore proves the same root again and continues. - A full disk at any restore stage reports `reason=sandbox_disk_full`. The existing named-refusal rule makes it non-retryable, so it goes to the board recovery action and does not loop. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the disk need, the reclaim, the early removal, and the new reason. ## Verification - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspace-transport.test.ts src/services/remote-workspace-snapshot-archive.test.ts` (287 passed). - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts src/services/remote-workspace-lifecycle.test.ts src/services/remote-workspace-archive-worker.test.ts src/services/remote-workspace-snapshot-archive-environments.test.ts` (122 passed, 16 skipped). - `cd server && npx tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.json` (pass). - The new tests run the real sandbox scripts against a folder with a byte capacity. A `--require` preload makes each file write fail with ENOSPC when the folder would exceed the capacity. - Red on `origin/master`, green with this change: - Fresh sandbox, room for the archive plus one file: master fails with the exact production error `stage=extract code=ENOSPC disk=full exit=1`. The fix restores every byte and leaves only the restored files. - Retained root that the server proved, room for the old root, the archive, and one file: master fails with ENOSPC. The fix restores and keeps the runner state. - Too small for one copy: the failure is `stage=extract reason=sandbox_disk_full`, with no partial tree or archive left. A retry with more space then restores. - Both sandbox processes are killed mid-extraction (a restart): a retry with the same identity and a retry with a new identity and epoch both reclaim the leftovers and restore into the same capacity. - The command dies right after it removed a proven root's files: the next restore proves the root again from its kept receipt, restores, and keeps the runner state. - Integration test through `prepareRemoteWorkspace`: a full disk gives `retryable: false` with `reason=sandbox_disk_full`. On master the same case is `retryable: true`. - Guards (pass on master and with the fix): a retained root without the server proof, or without a Paperclip receipt, is refused with `reason=occupied_root`, and none of its files are removed. - Previous-release story: the archive format and the saved state do not change. A partial `<root>.restoring-*` tree from the previous release is reclaimed (test). Archive staging from the previous release has no binding, so it is kept (test). The previous release's shared `.workspace-restore-*` siblings cannot be bound to a root, so they are kept. ## Risks - The consumed archive cannot be read again. Each restore uploads a new copy from control-plane storage, and the early-return path for an already restored root does not read the archive. Every file is still checked against the manifest, and the manifest is checked against the saved digest. - The reclaim step removes data only under the root's restore lock and after the epoch fence. It removes only names that a restore of the same root creates. Staging that names another root, or no root, is kept. - The early removal of a retained root depends on the existing server proof (`isRetiredOwnAllocation`) and the receipt check. If a restore fails after the removal, the saved version in storage is the source of truth, and the next restore proves the same root again. - Files in a lower overlay layer of a resumed sandbox image do not free space when they are removed. Such a sandbox can still be full. - A workspace that is larger than the free disk after the upload, plus its largest file, still fails. It now fails with the named, non-retryable `reason=sandbox_disk_full`. - No change to `packages/paperclip-runner`, the database schema, or the API. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
4baff83225 |
fix(chat): never batch messages of two chat conversations into one wake (#20697)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Chat channels let a linked user talk to an agent from GitHub, Slack and other platforms. Each external thread is a chat conversation. Many conversations can share one task. > - A reviewed chat run attests exactly one conversation. #17054 keeps each conversation in its own wake batch, but it compares only the conversation that a wake records. > - The work-intent outbox saves unanswered user messages as a plain comment wake. That wake records no conversation, even when its messages are chat messages. A wake with no recorded conversation matched every conversation, so a message from another conversation merged into it. > - The promoted run held messages of two conversations. The binding check correctly refused it (`reviewed_chat_execution_binding_not_authorized`, `binding_denied`), and the task needed Retry. > - This pull request compares the conversations of the queued messages themselves. Wakes of different conversations never merge. Each conversation gets its own run, in order. > - The benefit is that replies in several threads of one task each get an attested run, without a failed run or a Retry. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17054 (the earlier per-conversation batching fix). Refs #20689 (a different shape of the same error). **What happened?** On staging, a GitHub pull-request review task had two runs fail with `setup_failed` / `reviewed_chat_execution_binding_not_authorized` (`reviewedChatBinding.denialReason: binding_denied`). Each failed run held the same two older saved messages plus one new message. The two runs recorded two different `chatConversationId` values. The work-intent outbox had saved the older messages as plain deferred wakes with no conversation. A new message from each conversation then merged into one of these saved wakes. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Bind two chat conversations to one `in_review` task. 2. Let the outbox save an unanswered message of conversation B as a deferred wake while a run is active. 3. As the linked user, send a message in conversation A while the run is still active. 4. See that the message of A merges into the saved wake of B. The promoted run fails the binding check. **Expected behavior** The saved message of B runs as its own wake. The message of A runs after it, in its own attested run. ## What Changed - New `server/src/modules/wake-queue/adapters/chat-conversation-batch.ts`: reads the inbound chat links (`chat_message_links`, direction `inbound`) of queued messages and finds messages of a conversation other than the expected one. - Deferred-wake lookup (`findExistingDeferredWake`): when the incoming wake has a conversation, a saved wake qualifies only if none of its queued messages is an inbound message of another conversation. This is one more predicate in the same query (no new round trip). It uses the existing `chat_message_links_company_comment_idx` index. - Coalescing into the active run (`coalesceIntoActiveExecutionRun`): returns no merge when the merged batch would hold messages of a conversation other than the one it records. The wake is then saved behind the run, which is the existing fallback. - Release drain (`findNextDeferredWake`), upgrade repair: a saved chat wake that older code already merged across two conversations is split. The other conversation's messages move to a plain saved wake (the outbox shape), ordered just before it. The original wake keeps its conversation and its own messages. The drain then reads the queue again. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describe the comparison and the upgrade repair. - New test `chat-wake-conversation-batch.test.ts` (embedded Postgres, real admission and release code, real `authorizeChatConversationForBoundRun`). ## Verification - Red on `origin/master` (test file only): `pnpm --dir server exec vitest run src/modules/wake-queue/adapters/chat-wake-conversation-batch.test.ts` gives 4 failed, 6 passed. The 4 failures are the bug: the new message merges into the other conversation's saved wake (`[[earlier, reply]]`), two conversations cross-merge, a message coalesces into a queued run of another conversation, and the old merged shape stays merged. The 6 passing cases pin unchanged batching. - Green with the fix: 10 of 10 pass. Each separated wake passes `authorizeChatConversationForBoundRun` for its own conversation. The old merged shape fails it with `paperclip_runner_chat_attachment_binding_denied` before the split. - Batching that stays the same (pinned, pass before and after): comment wakes with no conversation merge; messages of one conversation merge; an outbox-saved wake of the same conversation still absorbs the reply; a chat message and plain comments merge in both orders; same-conversation messages still coalesce into a queued run; two recorded conversations stay apart. - Related suites pass locally: `src/modules/wake-queue`, `src/modules/run-dispatch`, `chat-run-milestone-work`, `durable-chat-wakeup`, `heartbeat-comment-wake-batching`, `heartbeat-reviewed-chat-binding.integration`, `slack-conversation-lifecycle`, `queued-comment-consumption`, `issue-queued-comments-routes` (23 files, 1037 tests). `heartbeat-process-recovery`: see the comment below. - `tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` passes. ## Risks - Low risk. No schema change and no migration. - Behavior change only for chat messages: a message no longer joins a saved wake or a run that holds another conversation's inbound messages. It gets its own wake behind them, and it runs after them. Before this change, that batch always failed the binding check. - Board comments have no inbound chat link, so they belong to no conversation. Wakes without a conversation, wakes of one conversation, and mixed board-comment and chat wakes batch exactly as before. - Ordering: the deferred queue still promotes one wake per release, oldest first. The second conversation waits for the issue execution lock. Single-assignee and atomic checkout are unchanged. - Upgrade: a saved wake that older code merged across conversations is split at promotion. No message is dropped or delivered twice: each message id moves to exactly one wake. A run that older code already promoted in the merged shape is not changed; it fails the binding check as before and keeps its existing Retry path. - No wait is added before a turn starts. Admission adds one predicate to an existing query. Coalescing adds one indexed read only when the merged batch has a chat conversation. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, GitHub CLI). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
a46b9ac724 |
fix(native): wait out an ACP usage limit's reported reset, then Retry the task (#20692)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Native runs (Paperclip Runner with an ACP harness, such as Claude)
can stop because the provider account runs out of its usage allowance
> - The ACP harness reports this as a "terminal limit failure".
Paperclip blocked the task behind a board hold that called the session
state ambiguous, and the only way forward was a manual Retry
> - The provider also says when the limit resets, for example "resets
Nov 12, 6pm (UTC)" for a weekly limit. Paperclip read only clock-only
resets ("resets 2am"), so the agent-level wait fell back to one hour.
Each later wake for the agent then hit the limit again and blocked
another task
> - This pull request reads calendar resets, says on the hold when the
limit resets, and requests the task's Retry itself at that time when the
reset is reported and bounded
> - The benefit is that a usage limit no longer needs a person to click
Retry, and the agent's other tasks wait instead of failing one by one
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A native ACP run failed with `native_provider_usage_limit` ("ACP agent
reported a terminal limit failure. You've hit your weekly limit · resets
Nov 12, 6pm (UTC)"). The task went to `blocked` with a board-owned hold.
The hold said "Inspect the original provider failure and explicitly
resolve the ambiguous session state". Nothing resumed the task after the
reset. The agent-level `provider_limit_wait` recorded "no reset time was
reported, so Paperclip waits one hour", so every hour another wake
dispatched, hit the limit, and blocked another task. In one 48-hour
window on a staging instance, this blocked 7 tasks for one agent.
**What did you expect?**
When the provider reports a bounded reset, the task waits and continues
after the reset, like the existing `provider_limit_wait` path. When the
reset is unknown, the task fails with a clear message and a working
Retry.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run a native ACP agent until its provider reports a weekly or session
limit with a reset time.
2. Look at the task: it is blocked with an "ambiguous session state"
hold.
3. Wait past the reported reset: the task stays blocked until a person
clicks Retry.
Refs #20666 (other recovery work in the same staging census; not changed
here)
## What Changed
- `provider-quota-reset.ts`: parse calendar resets such as "resets Nov
12, 6pm (UTC)", "resets Jul 17th at 4:30 PM (America/Chicago)" and
"Resets on August 2, 9am (UTC)". A past date rolls into next year. An
impossible date (Nov 31) is refused. Clock-only parsing is unchanged.
This also fixes the agent-level `provider_limit_wait` reset and the
legacy `provider_quota` reset for these messages.
- New `native-runtime/provider-limit-resume.ts`:
- `readNativeUsageLimitReset` reads the reset only from the run's own
durable events. The last turn event must be a provider-observed
`turn.failed` with a `rate_limit` or `quota_exhausted` provider failure,
and the reset must be at most eight days out.
- `requestProviderLimitResumeRetry` asks for the task's Retry
(`requestTaskRetry`, `initiatedBy: "provider_limit_reset"`) on behalf of
the user who requested the run, or the run's accountable user for
automatic wakes. It is idempotent per run and records its outcome on the
hold. At most three automatic Retries follow one another without a
successful run.
- `registerProviderLimitResumeWork` is a scoped deadline owner (shared
work scheduler, no polling). Each active usage-limit hold is due at its
reset. Startup rebuilds it from the holds, and the executor notifies it
in the hold's transaction.
- `native-session-executor.ts`: for a terminal usage limit, the hold and
run failure detail say when the limit resets and whether Paperclip
retries then, instead of "ambiguous session state". The evidence records
`providerLimitResetAt`.
- `task-retry.ts`: accept `initiatedBy: "provider_limit_reset"`. Its
activity is recorded as system actor `provider-limit-reset` on behalf of
the user, like `restart_recovery`.
- `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the wait and its limits.
Previous-release story: holds saved by the previous release carry
forward. At startup the owner reads each active
`native_provider_usage_limit` hold. It rewrites the hold's message with
the reset when the reset is known and still ahead, and it requests the
Retry at the reset. Holds whose reset is unknown, more than a day in the
past, or that have no accountable user keep their Retry and are recorded
as not requested, so they are not read again.
## Verification
- `npx vitest run server/src/services/provider-quota-reset.test.ts` — 4
tests. Three fail on `origin/master` code (calendar resets return
`null`), all pass with this change.
- `npx vitest run
server/src/services/native-runtime/native-provider-capacity.integration.test.ts`
— 5 tests on embedded Postgres:
- the existing usage-terminal test (both replay modes) still blocks with
a Retry, and no automatic Retry is requested without a reported reset;
- "waits for a reported usage-limit reset and then requests the task's
Retry once": the hold says when the limit resets, an old-release hold is
rewritten, nothing starts before the reset, one Retry receipt is created
for the accountable user at the reset, and a second pass does nothing.
Fails on `origin/master` executor code;
- "starts the Retry from the hold's own deadline": a real delivery
coordinator rebuilds the deadline from the hold and calls Retry dispatch
once, after the reset;
- "leaves a visible Retry when no user is accountable for the run".
Fails on `origin/master` executor code.
- Focused regression suites pass (642 tests): `task-retry`,
`quarantined-task-retry`, `heartbeat-native-restart-suspension`,
`native-startup-retry.integration`, `provider-failure-classification`,
`heartbeat-provider-limit-wait`, `deferred-execution-receipt-work`,
`chat-run-publications`, `native-runner-restart-recovery.integration`,
`native-remote-retry-admission`.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit` passes.
- `pnpm verify` selected a broad run (exit 2, because the docs file is a
global CI input). CI supplies the broad coverage.
## Risks
- The automatic Retry uses the accountable user's authority for
automatic (system) wakes. It is the same Retry the hold already offered
that user, and dispatch still checks Retry authority, stop proof, saved
work and action reconciliation. It is never broader than a click.
- A provider that keeps reporting resets that do not restore capacity
gets at most three automatic Retries in a row; then the Retry stays
visible.
- The deadline owner reads all active usage-limit holds at startup
(limit 500 rows). The number of such holds is small.
- Not changed: the agent-level wait still holds new wakes for at most
one day, as before.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with
tool use (shell, file edits, read-only staging API reads). Extended
reasoning enabled.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
69c69e4c20 |
fix(recovery): finish the passive recovery pass before restarting it (#20680)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The workspace recovery worker saves the files of failed runs. One passive pass of the worker visits holds with obligations: saved input that waits, cleanup, and due re-arms and fallbacks of exhausted holds > - #17741 restarts that pass after each committed workspace-recovery change, so new work is found quickly > - On staging, changes commit continuously (stop receipts, new holds, recovery progress). Every pass restarted from the first candidates, which are settled holds whose saved input waits behind another hold, and it never reached later candidates > - After #20295, #20569 and #20661 were deployed, no due re-arm ran: five stop-proof holds and about twenty capture-policy holds kept their exhausted state, with no marker and no activity > - This pull request restarts the pass only after it reaches its tail, and it continues an unfinished pass on the next run > - The benefit is that every candidate is visited on a busy instance, so the exhausted holds re-arm, save their files and free their tasks without an administrator ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17741 Refs #20295 Refs #20569 Refs #20661 **What happened?** Exhausted workspace holds were not re-armed on staging, even after the fixes that add their re-arm were deployed. Their recovery actions stayed unchanged for days (`updatedAt` on Nov 5 or Nov 10). No `stopProofRecovery` or `capturePolicyRecovery` marker and no `issue.workspace_recovery_rearmed` activity was recorded. The worker did process new restore holds, which are selected by its unfinished pass. **What did you expect to happen?** The worker's passive pass reaches every hold with a due re-arm or fallback, re-arms it, and saves the files. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create several settled holds with saved user input that waits, with action ids that sort before an exhausted stop-proof hold. 2. Start the real workspace recovery worker. 3. Commit a workspace-recovery notification every 50 ms, as stop receipts and new holds do on a busy instance. 4. The worker never re-arms the exhausted hold. Without the notifications, it re-arms the hold. ## What Changed - `workspace-recovery-work.ts`: a committed change marks the passive pass for restart (`restart`). It no longer resets the cursor. While a restart is pending, an unfinished pass that made progress continues on the next run. - `workspace-recovery.ts`: when the passive cursor passes the last candidate and a restart is pending, the same run starts a fresh pass from the first candidate, so a new change is not delayed by another run interval. Without a pending restart the pass records `complete` and does not wrap, so paused input does not keep the worker active. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document that a pass is never restarted midway. - `workspace-recovery-stop-proof.test.ts`: add a real-worker regression in the staging shape (six earlier settled holds with waiting user input, one exhausted stop-proof hold, continuous notifications). ## Verification - Red: on master, the new test "re-arms the hold on a busy instance whose passive sweep keeps selecting earlier settled holds" fails (`stopProofRecovery` stays undefined). Control: the same test without the notifications passes on master. This shows that the restarts cause the starvation. - Green: with the fix, the test passes. These suites pass: `workspace-recovery-stop-proof` (12), `execution-control-work` (27), which includes "visits a newly committed earlier Retry during a busy recovered-source pass, then becomes quiet", plus `workspace-recovery-capture-policy`, `workspace-recovery-preparation-dispatch`, `workspace-recovery-warm-handoff`, `workspace-recovery-preparation` and `server-startup-feedback-export` (279). The timing-sensitive `heartbeat-observed-workspace-preservation` suite passed 6 of 6 runs (an earlier revision that restarted only on the next run made it flaky). - Staging evidence (read-only GET requests): the 28 exhausted holds of the company have no re-arm marker and no fallback check. Many blocked tasks with settled holds have deferred wakes. ## Risks - A change committed during a pass is now picked up at the next pass, not at once. Unfinished physical work still uses its own pass first, so new recoveries are not delayed. Saved input in a passive obligation can wait up to one full pass. - Previous-release story: no persisted state changes. Holds saved by earlier releases are selected on the first full pass after deploy, with no migration. - Quiet behavior stays: a completed pass with no new change keeps the worker idle. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use (shell, code editing, browser GET reads) in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
06af074452 |
fix(native): deliver the retry after a failed native turn, once per chain (#20681)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The native runtime decides a task's next status after each run, through the status arbiter and the status-decision committer > - When a native turn fails without a classified provider error, the arbiter keeps the task's status and asks for one retry (`schedule_retry`) > - The native-status wake dispatcher refused that retry wake, because its provenance check accepted only `enqueue_continuation` effects > - So the task stayed `in_progress` with no live run, no queued wake and no visible cause, until a person noticed it > - This pull request lets the dispatcher accept the committed retry effect, keeps the retry on its chat route, and limits the automatic continuation to one per chain > - The benefit is that a failed turn always ends with either queued work or a blocked task with a working Retry ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native run that ends with a failed turn and no classified provider error leaves its task stranded. Examples: an OpenCode server that the sandbox killed with SIGKILL during a turn (`opencode_server_exited`), or an OpenCode turn that ended without an answer (`opencode_empty_response`). The run's accepted result is finalized as `run_failed_partial_evidence_preserved`. The committer queues a `schedule_retry` wake. The dispatcher then skips the wake with `chat_control_recovery_proof_unresolved`. The task stays `in_progress` with no run, no wake and no blocker. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a native task. Make the provider turn fail with `opencode_server_exited` or `opencode_empty_response` and an accepted `needs_review` result. 2. Finalize the run. 3. Run the native-status wake dispatcher. 4. See that the retry wake and its dispatch receipt are `skipped`, and that no run starts. **Expected behavior** The task gets its automatic continuation. If that continuation fails the same way, the task is blocked with a clear board blocker and a Retry that starts a new run. **Paperclip version or commit** `origin/master` at |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
6e524d8a69 |
fix(workspaces): stop retrying a copy-back that hit a full sandbox disk (#20678)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - After a native run, Paperclip copies the agent's sandbox workspace back to durable storage. This is finalization. > - The copy-back builds an archive inside the sandbox. When the sandbox disk is full, the copy-back fails with `remote_workspace_sandbox_disk_full`. > - Finalization treated that failure as transient. It retried three times. Each attempt took about 15 minutes for a large workspace, and nothing freed space between attempts. > - Saved-work recovery already reclaims the retained sandbox's inactive provider cache when a save hits a full disk. It runs only after finalization ends. > - This pull request ends finalization on the first full-disk copy-back failure, with the accepted result kept, so saved-work recovery starts at once. > - The benefit is that the task gets its files saved sooner, and the user sees what happened instead of "failed after 3 attempts". ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19619 (related: records why the read-only capture fallback failed; this PR does not change that path) **What happened?** On staging, a native run finished its turn and its result was accepted. The workspace copy-back then failed three times with `remote_workspace_sandbox_disk_full` (about 7.5 GB of workspace, about 6 GB free). The three attempts spanned about one hour across deploys. Finalization then ended as `native_workspace_sync_out_retry_exhausted`. Saved-work recovery reclaimed the inactive provider cache (about 3 GB freed) and saved the files. **Expected behavior** A full sandbox disk is recognised on the first failure. Paperclip does not spend the finalization budget on attempts that cannot succeed. The agent's result is kept. The user sees that the disk is full and that Paperclip saves the files again without another provider turn. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a native task on a remote sandbox whose workspace is larger than the free sandbox space. 2. Let the provider turn finish. 3. Observe three copy-back attempts that each fail with `remote_workspace_sandbox_disk_full`. ## What Changed - `recordRetryableFailure` treats a workspace failure whose cause starts with `remote_workspace_sandbox_disk_full:` as an exhausted budget on the first attempt. The code stays `native_workspace_sync_out_retry_exhausted`, so the existing export hold, saved-work recovery, and export Retry apply unchanged. - The run error for that case says that the sandbox disk is full and that Paperclip saves the files again without repeating the agent's work. It no longer says "after 3 attempts". - Other copy-back failures keep their bounded retry. - `captureRemoteWorkspaceArchive` rethrows the read-only fallback's own failure when that fallback only lost its connection (`transport_closed`, `provider_unavailable`, `provider_rate_limited`, `sandbox_state_transition`). That failure is not disk-full, so finalization keeps its bounded retry for it. Other fallback failures keep the disk-full code. - `remoteWorkspaceFailureCause` records the server-built read-only capture failure, so a failed save names where the fallback stopped. - The transport exports `REMOTE_WORKSPACE_SANDBOX_DISK_FULL_CODE`. The finalizer and tests use it. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the new rule. ## Verification - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-run-finalizer-telemetry.test.ts src/services/remote-workspace-transport.test.ts` (195 pass). - New test "hands a full sandbox disk to saved-work recovery on the first copy-back failure" fails on `origin/master` (the failure stays `retryable_failure`) and passes with this change. It completes an accepted result first and checks that the result stays linked and that no agent wakeup is created. - New transport test "keeps a full disk only when the read-only fallback did not just lose its connection": the two dropped-connection cases fail on `origin/master` and pass with this change. - New test "keeps other copy-back failures on their bounded retry" passes before and after. - `cd server && npx tsc --noEmit` passes. `pnpm verify` selected 2504 test files because the finalizer is widely imported; its first selected batch passed, and required CI supplies the full run. ## Risks - Low risk. The terminal state is the same state that three failed attempts produce today. Only the timing changes. - A sandbox whose disk frees space by itself between attempts now waits for saved-work recovery instead of the next finalizer attempt. Saved-work recovery repeats the save with its own bounded attempts, so this does not lose work. - Upgrade safety: a run saved by an older release in `retryable_failure` with this cause ends on its next full-disk failure. No migration is needed. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use (shell, file edits) in Claude Code. Extended reasoning was not configured. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
cec903c6f0 |
fix(native): retire a finished remote owner whose gone Runner left a delivery unacknowledged (#20677)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A native follow-up run on a remote sandbox first proves that the previous per-turn owner finished. Then it retires that owner's controller journal and starts a new Runner. > - The proof requires a settled journal. A command that the Runner did not acknowledge holds the owner. > - On staging, a per-turn owner committed its result and its Daytona sandbox was destroyed after the turn (`paperclip_runner_destroy_after_turn`, cleanup `success`). Its journal still held a `run.attach` or a `semantic_tool.result` that the Runner never acknowledged. > - The next run failed with `prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate; retirement_refused=journal_commands_unsettled(run.attach.pending)` (or `semantic_tool.result.pending`). A Retry or a new message gets the same journal, so it fails the same way. The task stays blocked. > - Retirement already excuses the Runner's own lifecycle commands when the prior sandbox lease ended on another sandbox. This pull request applies the same rule to deliveries that only that gone Runner could receive. > - The benefit is that these follow-ups start by themselves. Commands that carry user intent still hold the owner. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A census of staging failures (48 h, Nov 9–10) found 6 failed runs with `prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate` and `retirement_refused=journal_commands_unsettled(run.attach.pending | semantic_tool.result.pending)`. The last one was at 18:56 UTC on Nov 10. In two examples that I checked: - The previous run succeeded. Its result was committed and its coordinator lease was released. - Its lease policy was `ephemeral`. The lease is `expired`, with `failureReason=paperclip_runner_destroy_after_turn` and `cleanupStatus=success`. - The follow-up got a new sandbox (a different provider lease) and refused in about 11 s. It started no Runner. The task became `blocked`, and the next action was "Send a message to continue". **Expected behavior** When the record proves that the previous Runner is gone, an undelivered attachment, tool answer or read cannot run. The follow-up retires the finished owner and starts a new Runner. Retirement replays no command. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Finish a per-turn remote native run whose controller journal keeps a `run.attach` or `semantic_tool.result` command in `pending`. 2. Let the sandbox lease of that run end (`expired` or `released`) on its own sandbox. 3. Start a follow-up run that gets a new sandbox. 4. Observe `retirement_refused=journal_commands_unsettled(run.attach.pending)`. **Paperclip version or commit** Staging builds of Nov 10. The refusal still reproduces on `master` at `48c6e996da` (the new tests fail there). ## What Changed - `native-session-executor.ts` (`readSettledRunnerdProjection`): when the prior run's sandbox leases ended on another sandbox (`remoteRunnerGone`, the existing proof), unfinished `run.attach`, `semantic_tool.result`, `session.snapshot` and `session.goal.get` commands no longer hold the retirement. These join the lifecycle commands that the rule already excused. - In the same case, a journaled `semantic_tool.result` answers its `semantic_tool.input`. The controller journals the answer after the tool ran. Only its delivery was outstanding. - No other proof changes. The prior run must still be terminal, with a committed result, a released coordinator lease, no recovery state, a stopped or fenced controller, a delivered `run.terminal`, and no live work after it. Quarantine copies must pass the same checks. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describe the rule. ## Verification - `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-recovered-owner-followup.test.ts` (real Postgres): - New: "retires a finished remote owner with an unacknowledged pending-attach / pending-tool-result when its sandbox lease ended on another sandbox". It fails on `master` with the exact staging errors `journal_commands_unsettled(run.attach.pending)` and `journal_commands_unsettled(semantic_tool.result.pending)`. It passes with this change, and the log shows the retirement. - Held cases stay held: a lease that is still retained, a lease on this run's sandbox, no lease record, and a tool input with no journaled answer (`journal_tool_input_unanswered`). - New: "keeps a stopped local owner held by an unacknowledged run.attach". A local Runner is not gone by record. - Whole file: 95 passed. - Neighbouring suites pass: `explicit-native-continuation.test.ts` and `native-controller-recovery.integration.test.ts` (460 tests). - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` passes. - `pnpm verify` exits 2: a global CI input changed (`doc/execution-semantics.md`). Required CI supplies the broad coverage. - Live proof: not done. The redeploy chaos scenario (K15) is not on `master` yet. Tests only. ## Risks - The rule applies only when every sandbox lease of the prior run is `released` or `expired`, has a release time, and names a different provider lease than this run's. A reusable sandbox that this run resumed keeps the existing hold. - A command that carries user intent (`turn.start`, `turn.steer`, `request.resolve`, `interaction.receipt`, `external_provider.operation`, `session.goal.set`/`clear`, `session.close`, `run.cancel` and others) still holds the owner. - Retirement archives the old journal under `continuity-breaks` and replays nothing, as before. - No persisted shape changes. Old saved journals are read by the same rule. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
c14f2fe45d |
fix(native): read the scheduled-resume evidence the resume reconciler claimed (#20656)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - #20645 lets a local same-run scheduled resume send the one same-conversation continuation for a turn lost on restore. It applies only when durable records prove three facts: the previous runner stopped, the attempt was admitted within the budget, and it is the same checkpointed conversation. > - It read the third proof from the coordinator's saved `failure_detail` while the phase was `retryable_failure`. > - In production, the resume reconciler (`claimNativeSessionResumptions`) claims the run first. It moves the coordinator to `observed` and clears `failure_detail`. So the executor never saw that evidence, and #20645 refused every real scheduled resume. > - The restart-chaos L7 wave showed this live. Codex B5 TM2 hit the exact path (`runner.drain` timeout, scheduled resume, `provider_turn_lost_on_restore`), sent no continuation, and needed Retry. > - This pull request makes the reconciler record that evidence durably when it claims the run, and makes the executor read it from there. > - The benefit is that #20645 works on the real path. The proof rule is unchanged. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20645 **What happened?** Wave `w-20261110T212307-s9107` (L7, seed 9107, local, master plus #20645), task codex B5 TM2: - `native_session_recovery_failed: runner_local_connect_failed: PRP command runner.drain timed out`; - `retryable_failure` with `recoveryMode: "exact_checkpoint_resume"`, `recoverable`, `providerSessionEstablished` and `checkpointExists` all set; - `native.local_process_stopped`; - attempt 2 started; - `turn.failed` with `provider_turn_lost_on_restore` for the same turn ID that the checkpoint was running. No continuation was sent. The run failed with `native_provider_terminal_failed` and was preserved with `uncertain_provider_action`. **Expected behavior** The proven scheduled resume sends the single continuation. **Steps to reproduce** The new integration test below. The live path is timing-dependent (the L7 command in #20645). ## What Changed - `native-finalization-reconciler.ts`: when it claims a same-run resume, the reconciler appends one `same_run_resume` entry to `recovery_history`. The append is bounded like other history writes, and it runs in the same update that clears the failure. The entry copies `recoveryMode`, `recoverable`, `providerSessionEstablished`, `checkpointExists`, `successorRunId` and `replacementDenied` from the saved failure, with the controller boot and provider attempt. - `scheduled-resume-continuation.ts`: the evidence for the third proof now comes from either of two durable records: - the saved failure, when the executor claims a `retryable_failure` coordinator directly (unchanged); or - a reconciler claim: an `observed` coordinator whose last history entry is a `same_run_resume` entry naming the executor's own controller boot. The two other proofs are unchanged: the stop receipt, and an admitted attempt from 1 to 3. - `native-session-executor.ts`: passes the coordinator's last history entry and the controller boot to the decision. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describes the recorded evidence. Readers of `recovery_history` that look at the last entry do so only for restart claims, Stop recovery and shutdown suspension. Restart recovery's previous-claim lookup skips non-claim dispositions, so a `same_run_resume` entry does not change those paths. **Still refused** (tested): - every #20645 case; - the last history entry is not the resume claim, or there is no history; - the resume claim was recorded by another boot; - the claimed evidence is a bootstrap retry, has no checkpoint, or records a replacement; - a reconciler-claimed resume without a stop receipt. ## Verification - `native-scheduled-resume-continuation.integration.test.ts` now also runs through the real reconciler claim (`claimNativeSessionResumptions`) before `executePaperclipNativeSession`. On master the reconciler-claimed allowed case fails (`resumeInterruptedTurn` is false). With this change it is true, and the claim admits attempt 2. A reconciler-claimed resume without a stop receipt still passes false. - `scheduled-resume-continuation.test.ts`: decision cases for the reconciler-claim entry. - `native-session-resumption.test.ts` passes. 54 tests pass across the three files. - `cd server && npx tsc --noEmit` passes. - Live: not yet. The failing wave above is the reproduction. A rerun is timing-dependent. ## Risks - One more `recovery_history` entry per scheduled resume, inside the existing 20-entry bound. - The proof rule itself is unchanged. This only reads the same evidence from the record where it now survives. - No schema change. A run claimed by an earlier build has no `same_run_resume` entry, so it keeps the existing failure: refused, with Retry offered as today. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs). Extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
48c6e996da |
fix(native): continue a task whose quarantined completed turn's holds settle (#20662)
<!-- Write all pull request text in Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100): short sentences, one instruction per sentence, simple approved vocabulary, and the active voice. --> ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Before a remote run starts, workspace preparation attaches the verified saved work of earlier runs of the same task. > - Preparation failed with `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid` when any earlier run had a recovery receipt that it could not verify. > - A refusal cannot change the saved state, so every Retry failed in the same way, and the task stayed blocked. Recoveries must fall back automatically. > - This pull request skips an unverifiable source. It attaches nothing unverified and starts from the workspace's newest verified save. > - The benefit is that Retry and continuations start again, while strict receipt checks still decide what is attached, and no saved work is changed. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20631 **What happened?** On staging, after the deploy that included #20631, a user pressed Retry on a task whose previous run failed with `native_controller_recovery_missing_evidence:runner_not_settled`. The new run failed in setup in under a minute with `setup_failed` / `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid` (`executionRecovery: bootstrap`, `providerWorkStarted: false`). The task stayed blocked. Another Retry would fail the same way. #20631 accepted one shape of this refusal (a source that saved only the snapshot its own restore loaded). This task had a different shape. **Expected behavior** A Retry starts. A source whose receipt cannot be verified is not attached, and its saved state stays intact for workspace recovery. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Let a remote native run fail before provider work and leave a recovery receipt or restore hold that does not verify (for example a receipt on an unsaved reference, a receipt from another epoch, or a saved reference without a receipt). 2. Press Retry on the task. 3. See the new run fail in setup with `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid`. **Paperclip version or commit** Staging deploy that includes `e3bc4ca798`. The gap remains on `master` at `a3b34a9d88`. ## What Changed - `attachPreservedRemoteWorkspaceSnapshots` no longer throws for an unverifiable source. Each of the five refusal shapes now skips the source and logs `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid` with a reason: `receipt_without_reference`, `reference_unreadable`, `receipt_on_unsaved_reference`, `receipt_unverified`, and `receipt_snapshot_missing` (was `remote_workspace_recovery_snapshot_missing`). - `retainRemoteRecoveryAttachments` no longer throws for a retained recovered copy that it cannot verify. It does not publish that copy again. The files stay in the workspace. - The writer check (`remote_workspace_recovery_writer_changed`), the workspace access check, and snapshot read and digest failures still refuse. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the fallback rule. ## Verification - Red on unfixed code: `remote-workspace-recovery-receipt-fallback.test.ts` (moved out of `workspace-recovery-preparation.test.ts` to keep that file under 1,000 lines) "starts a Retry from the newest verified save when a predecessor has %s" (6 shapes: `receipt_without_reference`, `unreadable_reference_with_hold`, `receipt_on_prepared_reference`, `superseded_snapshot_with_hold`, `receipt_from_other_epoch`, `receipt_for_other_run`). All 6 failed with `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid`. The source is a native run that failed with `runner_not_settled`, and the writer is a Retry (`retryOfRunId`, `taskRetryRequestId`) that follows the real ancestry query. - Green: the same 6 tests pass. They also assert that nothing is attached, and that the source run row, its workspace operations, and its snapshot row are unchanged. - Updated safety tests: the canonical-attachment fault matrix now expects no attachment for receipt faults, and still expects a refusal for a missing or corrupt archive and for a wrong company or task. The retained-history test expects an unverifiable retained copy to be left out of the published list, while verified copies stay published. - `npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspace-recovery-receipt-fallback.test.ts src/services/workspace-recovery-preparation.test.ts`: 91 passed. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` passes. - `pnpm verify` returns exit 2, because a global doc input changed (`doc/execution-semantics.md`). Required CI supplies the broad coverage. - Not verified live on Daytona. I could not read the staging rows for this task: the browser had no free tab. The tests cover every refusal shape of this function, so the exact staging shape is one of them. ## Risks - Previous-release state: the rule reads the same rows as before (run reference, result hold, workspace operations, recovery actions, snapshots). Rows that earlier releases saved carry forward. No migration. A blocked task recovers on its next Retry or wake. - A Retry can now start without files from an unverifiable source. Those files are not lost: the source's snapshot, restore hold, receipts and recovery action stay unchanged, and workspace recovery still owns them. The skip is logged with a named reason. - A retained copy that fails verification is dropped from the published list. Its directory stays in the workspace and is no longer retired automatically. - A missing or corrupt snapshot archive still refuses. A permanently lost archive therefore still blocks attach. This PR does not change that. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits). Extended reasoning enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8f6ca25976 |
fix(workspaces): skip unverifiable recovery sources instead of failing Retry (#20666)
<!-- Write all pull request text in Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100): short sentences, one instruction per sentence, simple approved vocabulary, and the active voice. --> ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Before a remote run starts, workspace preparation attaches the verified saved work of earlier runs of the same task. > - Preparation failed with `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid` when any earlier run had a recovery receipt that it could not verify. > - A refusal cannot change the saved state, so every Retry failed in the same way, and the task stayed blocked. Recoveries must fall back automatically. > - This pull request skips an unverifiable source. It attaches nothing unverified and starts from the workspace's newest verified save. > - The benefit is that Retry and continuations start again, while strict receipt checks still decide what is attached, and no saved work is changed. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20631 **What happened?** On staging, after the deploy that included #20631, a user pressed Retry on a task whose previous run failed with `native_controller_recovery_missing_evidence:runner_not_settled`. The new run failed in setup in under a minute with `setup_failed` / `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid` (`executionRecovery: bootstrap`, `providerWorkStarted: false`). The task stayed blocked. Another Retry would fail the same way. #20631 accepted one shape of this refusal (a source that saved only the snapshot its own restore loaded). This task had a different shape. **Expected behavior** A Retry starts. A source whose receipt cannot be verified is not attached, and its saved state stays intact for workspace recovery. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Let a remote native run fail before provider work and leave a recovery receipt or restore hold that does not verify (for example a receipt on an unsaved reference, a receipt from another epoch, or a saved reference without a receipt). 2. Press Retry on the task. 3. See the new run fail in setup with `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid`. **Paperclip version or commit** Staging deploy that includes `e3bc4ca798`. The gap remains on `master` at `a3b34a9d88`. ## What Changed - `attachPreservedRemoteWorkspaceSnapshots` no longer throws for an unverifiable source. Each of the five refusal shapes now skips the source and logs `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid` with a reason: `receipt_without_reference`, `reference_unreadable`, `receipt_on_unsaved_reference`, `receipt_unverified`, and `receipt_snapshot_missing` (was `remote_workspace_recovery_snapshot_missing`). - `retainRemoteRecoveryAttachments` no longer throws for a retained recovered copy that it cannot verify. It does not publish that copy again. The files stay in the workspace. - The writer check (`remote_workspace_recovery_writer_changed`), the workspace access check, and snapshot read and digest failures still refuse. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the fallback rule. ## Verification - Red on unfixed code: `remote-workspace-recovery-receipt-fallback.test.ts` (moved out of `workspace-recovery-preparation.test.ts` to keep that file under 1,000 lines) "starts a Retry from the newest verified save when a predecessor has %s" (6 shapes: `receipt_without_reference`, `unreadable_reference_with_hold`, `receipt_on_prepared_reference`, `superseded_snapshot_with_hold`, `receipt_from_other_epoch`, `receipt_for_other_run`). All 6 failed with `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid`. The source is a native run that failed with `runner_not_settled`, and the writer is a Retry (`retryOfRunId`, `taskRetryRequestId`) that follows the real ancestry query. - Green: the same 6 tests pass. They also assert that nothing is attached, and that the source run row, its workspace operations, and its snapshot row are unchanged. - Updated safety tests: the canonical-attachment fault matrix now expects no attachment for receipt faults, and still expects a refusal for a missing or corrupt archive and for a wrong company or task. The retained-history test expects an unverifiable retained copy to be left out of the published list, while verified copies stay published. - `npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspace-recovery-receipt-fallback.test.ts src/services/workspace-recovery-preparation.test.ts`: 91 passed. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` passes. - `pnpm verify` returns exit 2, because a global doc input changed (`doc/execution-semantics.md`). Required CI supplies the broad coverage. - Not verified live on Daytona. I could not read the staging rows for this task: the browser had no free tab. The tests cover every refusal shape of this function, so the exact staging shape is one of them. ## Risks - Previous-release state: the rule reads the same rows as before (run reference, result hold, workspace operations, recovery actions, snapshots). Rows that earlier releases saved carry forward. No migration. A blocked task recovers on its next Retry or wake. - A Retry can now start without files from an unverifiable source. Those files are not lost: the source's snapshot, restore hold, receipts and recovery action stay unchanged, and workspace recovery still owns them. The skip is logged with a named reason. - A retained copy that fails verification is dropped from the published list. Its directory stays in the workspace and is no longer retired automatically. - A missing or corrupt snapshot archive still refuses. A permanently lost archive therefore still blocks attach. This PR does not change that. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits). Extended reasoning enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
686893636d |
fix(recovery): release a lapsed owner of a finished coordinator so stop-proof holds re-arm (#20661)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Workspace recovery saves the files of a run whose copy-back failed, and it holds the shared workspace until the save is done > - #20295 re-arms a save that was exhausted with `agent_stop_unconfirmed`, so the run's stop is proven again and the files are saved without a person > - On staging, four holds of this shape were never re-armed. Their runs ended six days ago, their sandbox leases are released with a provider stop receipt, and the servers that ran them were replaced many times. Their tasks stay blocked, and so do the parent tasks that wait for them > - The finished coordinator of each run still names a lease owner whose lease lapsed. Discovery treats that owner as "waiting for the abandoned-owner settlement", but that settlement handles only observed (unfinished) coordinators. Nothing ever releases the owner, so the worker never selects the hold, the re-arm refuses it, and the attempt's stop check refuses it too > - This pull request makes a lapsed owner of a finished coordinator count as stopped. The re-arm releases it in the same transaction, and then the new attempt proves the sandbox stop and saves the files as #20295 designed > - The benefit is that these holds settle on the worker's next pass after deploy, without a migration and without an administrator ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20295 **What happened?** An exhausted workspace save (`native_workspace_sync_out_retry_exhausted`, last failure `agent_stop_unconfirmed`) stayed blocked for six days. The task showed "Paperclip tries again automatically", but no re-arm was ever recorded (no `stopProofRecovery` marker, no `issue.workspace_recovery_rearmed` activity), and the shared workspace stayed held by the failed run. **What did you expect to happen?** The recovery worker re-arms the save once the run is provably over, saves the dirty files, and frees the workspace so the task and its parent can continue. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Exhaust a workspace save with `agent_stop_unconfirmed` (one attempt, window spent). 2. Leave a lease owner on the run's `terminal_failure` coordinator with an expired lease (or no expiry), as a finalizer pass of a replaced server does. 3. Run the workspace recovery worker. `nextWorkspaceRecoveryAt` returns null, discovery does not select the hold, and `rearmExhaustedStopProof` refuses it. ## What Changed - `workspace-recovery-stop-proof.ts`: add `lapsedFinishedCoordinatorOwner` and `releaseLapsedCoordinatorOwner`. A lease owner on a finished coordinator (committed, terminal failure, applied) whose lease lapsed, or that has no expiry, does not block `sourceRunProvablyOver`. The stop-proof re-arm clears that owner with a compare-and-swap in its locked transaction, and records `releasedLapsedOwner` in the marker and the activity. - `workspace-recovery-capture-policy.ts`: the capture-policy re-arm uses the same rule, because it shares the same check and discovery clause. - `workspace-recovery-fallback-discovery.ts`: the discovery clause still waits for the abandoned-owner settlement for a stale owner of an unfinished coordinator, but it no longer excludes a hold whose finished coordinator has a lapsed owner. A live lease still defers the re-arm to its expiry. - `system-recovery-state.ts`: add `FINISHED_COORDINATOR_PHASES`. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the rule. - Tests: two red-then-green regressions in the staging shape (an expired finalizer lease, and an owner without an expiry saved by an older release), one strictness case (a live lease on a finished coordinator keeps the hold and is not released), and the existing stale-owner case now uses an observed coordinator, which still waits for the abandoned-owner settlement. ## Verification - Red before the fix: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery-stop-proof.test.ts` failed the two new staging-shape cases (`nextWorkspaceRecoveryAt` returned null: the worker was never woken for the hold). - Green after the fix: `workspace-recovery-stop-proof.test.ts` and `workspace-recovery-capture-policy.test.ts` pass (15 tests). The staging-shape cases assert that the hold is re-armed, the save completes, the dirty files are saved, the workspace hold is free, and the lapsed owner is released. - `pnpm verify`: exit 2 (broader verification required, because `doc/execution-semantics.md` is a global CI input). Focused suites pass: `workspace-recovery-stop-proof`, `workspace-recovery-capture-policy`, `workspace-recovery-fallback`, `workspace-recovery-retry-copyback` (113 tests). Required CI supplies the broad coverage. - Staging evidence (read-only GET requests): the run is `failed`, finished six days ago, `controllerLeaseExpiresAt` is null, its only lease is `released` with `cleanupStatus: success`, a `stopped` termination receipt and a stop-and-retain receipt. The action's evidence has no re-arm marker, and four holds of the same shape were not touched after #20295 was deployed. ## Risks - Previous-release story: rows saved by earlier releases carry the lapsed owner and no marker. They are selected and re-armed on the worker's first pass after deploy. No migration. - Strictness stays where an owner could be live: a live lease on any coordinator defers the re-arm to its expiry, and a stale owner of an unfinished (observed) coordinator still waits for the abandoned-owner settlement, which proves its controller stopped. The new attempt still requires a provider stop receipt for the allocation before it reads files. - Clearing a lapsed owner matches the existing token-lease contract: an expired finalizer or cleanup lease is free for the next claim, and a holder's later write fails its token compare-and-swap. - Low risk otherwise: the change is limited to the two exhausted-hold re-arms and their discovery clause. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use (shell, code editing, browser GET reads) in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
4f33bb3578 |
fix(workspaces): release the Blocked status of a sibling-settled no-replay hold (#20648)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - When a remote workspace save fails, recovery actions hold the task until the run's files are saved > - #20641 lets a resolved no-replay hold settle when a sibling action of the same run saved the files > - Review found that the settlement did not release the task's Blocked status, and that a settled hold with a historical source stayed selectable > - A new test with the waiting user comment also showed that the worker skipped the second hold of the same run in every pass, so it never settled > - #20641 was merged before these fixes were pushed > - This pull request completes #20641 with those fixes > - The benefit is that the task leaves Blocked and continues without a person ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20641, Refs #20569 **What happened?** #20641 merged at its first head. The review follow-ups for it were pushed later and are not on master: - A settled no-replay hold that owned the task's Blocked status (`nativeFailureBlock`) left the task `blocked`. - A hold settled by a sibling stayed selectable through `workspaceRecoverySourceEligible` when it named a `historicalWorkspaceSource`. - With saved user input waiting, the export hold stayed selectable and came first in each worker pass. `reconcileRetainedWorkspaces` skipped the other hold of the same run, so the no-replay hold never settled. **Expected behavior** After the save, the no-replay hold settles in the same or next pass. The task returns to `todo` when that hold owns its Blocked status. The settled hold is never selected again. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use the staging-shape test in `workspace-recovery-capture-policy.test.ts`, with a waiting "try again" comment. 2. Run the worker until nothing is due. 3. On master, the worker never goes idle and the no-replay hold stays `resolved`/`blocked`. ## What Changed - `workspace-recovery-fallback.ts`: new shared `holdOwnsBlockedStatus`, used by `continueFromLastSavedWorkspace` and `settleSiblingRecoveredHold`. A settled no-replay hold that owns the Blocked status returns the task to `todo`. A newer decision's Blocked status is kept. An export hold's status stays with its own result finalization. - `workspace-recovery-source.ts`: `workspaceRecoverySourceEligible` excludes a resolved hold that carries `siblingWorkspaceRecovery`. - `workspace-recovery.ts`: `reconcileRetainedWorkspaces` runs several holds of one run one after another in that run's job, instead of skipping the later ones. - `workspace-recovery-capture-policy.test.ts`: the staging test now has the waiting comment, and a variant with `nativeFailureBlock` and `historicalWorkspaceSource`. It checks `todo`, no re-selection, and no repeat handoff in a later pass. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: documents these rules. ## Verification - Red, with each rule disabled: the status stayed `blocked`; the settled hold was selected again; the worker never went idle (starvation). - Green: `npx vitest run --root server` on 14 workspace recovery suites (including `workspace-recovery-capture-policy`, `-fallback`, `-admission`, `-source`, `execution-blocker-read`, `preserved-native-response-wait.integration`): all passed. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json`: clean. ## Risks - Several holds of one run now run in sequence in one job. Concurrency per run is unchanged (one job per run). - A no-replay hold releases the Blocked status only when it still owns it. Otherwise the status is kept. - Previous-release story: no new persisted state. Holds saved by earlier releases are handled on the first worker pass after deploy. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used through Claude Code with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
805531cc71 |
fix(native): never leave a cleanup-gated task without Retry or an owner (#20639)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Native runs close their provider session at the end of each attempt.
When close cannot prove that the runner stopped, the runner keeps a
cleanup gate (`native_session_cleanup_quarantined`) in server memory
> - #20572 hid Retry for every gated run and said "Paperclip finishes
the cleanup automatically". Only a remote environment release settles
the gate. A local gate that needs an operator never settles, and a
server restart loses it
> - A restart-chaos wave on master found two tasks that rested blocked
with no Retry, no scheduled retry and no recovery owner. A person could
not continue them
> - This pull request makes the run's own recovery retire the gate when
the host proves the old processes stopped. It also offers Retry whenever
nothing settles the gate, and it makes that Retry work
> - The benefit is that a cleanup-gated task either continues by itself
or shows a Retry that starts. It never rests without both
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #20572, #20578
**What happened?**
Restart-chaos wave `w-20261110T185144-s9107` (local, claude, fault TM2:
the server is paused with SIGSTOP for about 33 s). Tasks t04 and t05
completed their provider turn. The runner checkpoint owner lapsed while
the server was paused (`native_runner_checkpoint_owner_lost`). The
session close then failed with `native_session_close_unrecoverable:
runner did not durably suspend before checkpoint`. The provider had
drained and no tool call was pending. The runner kept an
operator-required cleanup gate. Thirty seconds later the run's own
same-run recovery verified that the runner process and group had stopped
(`native.local_process_stopped`). The gate still refused the recovery,
and the run ended `failed` with `native_session_cleanup_quarantined`.
The task showed `canRetry: false` and a cleanup wait until the deadline.
Nothing owned that wait.
**Expected behavior**
When the old runner and provider processes are proven stopped, the run's
own recovery continues. When nothing settles the gate, the task offers a
Retry that starts.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run restart-chaos L7: `--env local --adapters codex,claude
--workloads A1,B5,C1 --faults TM1,TM2,TM3 --time-age-hours 1
--concurrency 3 --tasks 6 --seed 9107`.
2. Observe a claude TM2 task rest `blocked` with `canRetry=false`,
`retryWait=true` and no scheduled retry.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
37c50f70c2 |
fix(native): continue a turn lost on restore in a proven same-run resume (#20645)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A native run keeps its provider conversation when its local runner dies. When the restored runner finds that the active turn was lost, it reports `provider_turn_lost_on_restore` and does not invent a result. > - After a control-plane restart, the admitted restart attempt may send one continuation in that same conversation (#15297). The agent then reconciles unfinished work. The task is not resent. > - A runner can also be lost without a server restart, for example when `runner.drain` times out. The run then resumes itself after the retry delay from its exact checkpoint. That path never allowed the continuation, because the executor passed `resumeInterruptedTurn` only for a `resume_dead_runner` restart claim. > - So the lost turn failed with `native_provider_terminal_failed`, automatic replacement was refused (`uncertain_provider_action`), and the user had to click Retry. > - This pull request allows the same single continuation for that resume, but only when durable records prove the same three facts that a restart claim proves. > - The benefit is that a runner lost mid-turn continues in the same conversation with no Retry. No case that is refused today becomes allowed without that proof. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15297, #20625 **What happened?** Restart-chaos wave L7 (seed 9107, local), task codex B5 TM2, run on master after #20625. A TM3 restart resumed the run (attempt 1). During the TM2 freeze the TS runtime lost its runner: `native_session_recovery_failed: runner_local_connect_failed: PRP command runner.drain timed out`. The executor saved `retryable_failure` with `recoveryMode: "exact_checkpoint_resume"`. After the delay, recovery verified the runner process stopped (`native.local_process_stopped`). The same run then resumed as attempt 2 (`native.process_start_requested`, `providerAttempt: 2`). The restored runner reported `turn.failed` with `provider_turn_lost_on_restore` (`recoverable: true`). No continuation was sent. The run failed with `native_provider_terminal_failed`, recovery stopped with `uncertain_provider_action` / `preserve_without_replay_v1`, and the task needed Retry. **Expected behavior** The run sends the one same-conversation continuation, exactly as it does after a restart claim, and finishes without Retry. **Steps to reproduce** `node cli/node_modules/tsx/dist/cli.mjs tests/restart-chaos/main.ts --env local --adapters codex,claude --workloads A1,B5,C1 --faults TM1,TM2,TM3 --time-age-hours 1 --concurrency 3 --tasks 6 --seed 9107` (timing-dependent: the drain timeout must land during an active turn). ## What Changed - New `server/src/services/native-runtime/scheduled-resume-continuation.ts`. It decides whether a same-run scheduled resume may continue a lost turn. Each of the three proofs comes from a durable record: 1. **The previous runner is stopped.** The latest process record of the run in `heartbeat_run_events` (`native.process_start_requested`, `native.process_identity_recorded`, `native.local_process_stopped`) must be `native.local_process_stopped`. Its `processPid` must equal its `processGroupId`, and neither the pid nor the group may be alive now. This is the existing `readNativeLocalProcessStop` check, read in the claim transaction before this attempt records its own `native.process_start_requested`. 2. **The attempt was admitted under the bounded budget.** The executor's claim moves `native_run_finalizations` from phase `retryable_failure` to `observed`. It charges a provider attempt, and the claim refuses any attempt above 3 (`native_session_retry_exhausted`). The decision also requires `1 <= attempt <= NATIVE_PROVIDER_RECOVERY_ATTEMPT_LIMIT`. 3. **It is the same provider conversation.** The saved `failure_detail` must show `recoveryMode: "exact_checkpoint_resume"`, `recoverable: true`, `providerSessionEstablished: true` and `checkpointExists: true`, with no `successorRunId` or `replacementDenied`. At run time the existing runtime guards still apply: the backend must recover the checkpointed session (`recovered`, not a continuity-break replacement), and the lost turn must equal the checkpoint's `activeTurnId` and the snapshot's interrupted turn. The provider kinds stay codex, acpx and opencode, with no compaction, goal control, held result or pending runtime request. - `native-session-executor.ts`: computes that decision in the coordinator claim. It passes `resumeInterruptedTurn` when either the restart claim is `resume_dead_runner` (unchanged) or the decision allows it. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describes the rule and the refused cases. **Cases that stay refused** (each has a test in `scheduled-resume-continuation.test.ts`): - a restart-recovery claim (it keeps its own existing rule); - a remote execution target; - a coordinator that is not `retryable_failure`, including a fresh run; - `recoveryMode` `bootstrap_retry` or `ambiguous_state`, or no saved failure detail; - a failure that is not recoverable; - no established provider session; - no checkpoint; - a recorded replacement (`successorRunId` or `replacementDenied`); - an attempt outside 1..3; - no stop receipt, a stop receipt superseded by a newer launch, a stopped process that is still alive, or a run that never had a process. The runtime-side refusals are unchanged and already covered by `native-session-runtime.test.ts`: real provider errors, historical error-null failures, and no restart permission. ## Verification - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/scheduled-resume-continuation.test.ts`: 22 tests, covering the decision table and the stop receipt in embedded Postgres. - `cd server && npx tsc --noEmit` passes. - Live: not proven. An L7 wave on this branch (seed 9107) did not reproduce the drain-timeout path, so this pull request has unit and database tests only. In that wave the same cell (codex B5 TM2) needed Retry for a different reason: TM2 aged its restart-recovery claim lease before dispatch, and budget admission refused with `Native recovery no longer owns provider dispatch`. This pull request does not change that path. Four other tasks passed. Claude C1 TM2 rested blocked without a Retry button, which is a separate cleanup-quarantine issue. ## Risks - This allows one more path to send the same-conversation continuation. It is limited to local runs. It needs the same proofs as a restart claim, and it uses the attempt the resume already charged. It does not change the generation cap or `restartResumeKeepsAttempt`. - A rolling deploy reads `failure_detail` and stop events written by earlier releases. Those fields and events already have this shape, so an older saved failure is judged by the same rule. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs). Extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
4398a723c0 |
fix(native): settle tool callbacks and holds that a server restart orphaned (#20628)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Native runs send provider tool calls to the server as durable
semantic inputs. The server runs the tool and saves the result in the
controller journal
> - Close must prove that every admitted tool call has a saved result.
Otherwise it reports `native_session_settlement_incomplete` and the
runner holds a cleanup gate (`native_session_cleanup_quarantined`)
> - A server restart in the middle of a tool call leaves its input
without a result. The new controller asks the tool authority for a
receipt. Tools without a receipt (assigned app tools,
`connections_search`) return nothing, so the input stays pending forever
> - Runs that already failed this way kept no-replay holds for a turn
that had completed. The task stayed blocked with no Retry and no
continuation
> - Restarts are normal. Work that a restart interrupts must settle by
itself, not wait for a person
> - This pull request settles such a callback as interrupted, with an
unknown outcome, when its owner is provably gone, and settles the holds
that earlier releases left once their controller is gone. It never runs
the tool or the turn again
> - The benefit is that close drains after a restart, and tasks that
earlier releases blocked this way continue on their own
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #20572 (that PR fixed the presentation of this quarantine. Its
Risks section names this runner drain rule as a separate follow-up.)
Refs #20641 (it settles a resolved no-replay hold when a sibling action
saved the run's files. This PR covers a different case: the hold's own
recovery saved the files, and its run's turn completed. Both use the
same recovery receipt, `completedWorkspaceRecoveryCondition`.)
**What happened?**
A remote native run started an assigned app tool call. The server
restarted 3 seconds later. The new server adopted the runner, and the
provider turn completed about 9 minutes later. The tool call never got a
saved result. Close reported `native_session_settlement_incomplete` with
`runnerSuspended: true`, `providerDrained: false` and one pending
callback. The session quarantined, and the same-run recovery was refused
at admission. A second run showed the same shape with a
`connections_search` callback after a later restart.
The first run then had two resolved-but-blocked holds with
`preserve_without_replay_v1` and an unknown action outcome: the
cleanup-quarantine hold, and a continuation hold whose workspace
recovery saved the files. The task view said "Saved work recovered. Send
a message to continue." with no Retry and no continuation. The task
waits on a child task and stays blocked.
**Expected behavior**
After a restart, a tool call without a saved result settles
automatically. A durable receipt is replayed. Without a receipt, the
agent is told that the outcome is unknown. Close proves the drain, and
no cleanup gate is left. Holds that earlier releases left for a
completed turn settle without a person, and the task continues when its
own wait ends.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Start a native run and call an assigned app tool.
2. Restart the server while the tool call runs.
3. Let the adopted turn complete, then close the session. Close reports
`native_session_settlement_incomplete` and quarantines. The task stays
blocked by the no-replay holds.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d06f43b14f |
fix(workspaces): settle a resolved no-replay hold once a sibling saved its files (#20641)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - When a remote workspace save fails, recovery actions hold the task until the files are saved > - One failed run can have two holds: its export hold, and a no-replay hold that a later "try again" opened for the same run > - The no-replay hold is recorded resolved-but-blocked, and it is the task's execution blocker > - #20569 lets the export hold retry under the new symlink capture policy and save the files > - The sibling settlement that should then release the no-replay hold only looked at active holds, so the task stayed blocked with no working Retry > - This pull request lets the sibling settlement and its discovery include resolved no-replay holds > - The benefit is that the task continues without a person once the files are saved ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20569 **What happened?** On staging, a native run on a Daytona sandbox failed to save its workspace (`remote_workspace_archive_unsafe_symlink`). Its export hold (`native_workspace_sync_out_retry_exhausted`) was exhausted after 6 attempts and handed to the board. A user comment then opened a second hold for the same run (`native_continuation_requires_reconciliation`, `preserve_without_replay_v1`). That hold also failed 6 times and was recorded `resolved` with outcome `blocked`. The task's execution blocker is this second hold. **Expected behavior** After #20569 is deployed, the worker re-arms the export hold and saves the files. The no-replay hold of the same run then settles, and the task is no longer blocked. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create both holds with the exact staging evidence (see the new test `stagingIncident`). 2. Run the recovery worker until nothing is due. 3. Before this change, the export hold completes, but the no-replay hold stays `resolved`/`blocked` and `getExecutionBlocker` still returns it with `canRetry: false`. ## What Changed - `workspace-recovery-fallback.ts` (`settleSiblingRecoveredHold`): a resolved no-replay hold (`isRetainedFileHold`) can now settle when a verified receipt of a sibling action saved its run's files. Settling removes `automaticRecovery`, so the hold stops blocking the task. It starts no turn. - `workspace-recovery-fallback-discovery.ts`: the worker discovers such a resolved hold when a sibling of the same run is recovered. - New test in `workspace-recovery-capture-policy.test.ts` with the exact staging shape of both holds: board owner, `active_run_watchdog`, system recovery policy version 1 without a capture policy version, stage `restoring_files`, `export_interrupted` with cause `provider_error`, 6/6 attempts, `historicalWorkspaceSource` and `workspaceRestoreRecovery` lease ids. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: states that a resolved no-replay hold also settles from a sibling save. ## Verification - Red before the fix: the new test failed. The no-replay hold stayed `resolved`/`blocked`, and it stayed the execution blocker. - Green after the fix: `npx vitest run --root server src/services/workspace-recovery-capture-policy.test.ts` (3 passed). The test drives the worker's own discovery (`nextWorkspaceRecoveryAt` + `reconcileRetainedWorkspaces`) until nothing is due. It checks: the export hold is re-armed once and saves the files; the no-replay hold is `resolved`/`restored` by the sibling; `getExecutionBlocker` returns null; the continuation hook ran when the task was free; no new run was created; the worker goes idle. - Related suites: `workspace-recovery-fallback`, `-admission`, `-stop-proof`, `-source`, `-preparation`, `-preparation-gates`, `execution-blocker-read`, `preserved-native-response-wait.integration`: 409 passed. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json`: clean. - `pnpm verify` exits 2 (global doc input), so CI supplies the broad coverage. ## Risks - A resolved no-replay hold is now released when another action's verified receipt saved the same run's files. The receipt check is unchanged, so an unverified sibling still does not release it. - Settling starts no turn. Waiting input and the run's own result continue the task through normal admission, which still checks every other hold. - Previous-release story: holds saved by earlier releases need no migration. The worker discovers them on its first pass after deploy. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used through Claude Code with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
e3bc4ca798 |
fix(native): settle warm follow-ups that a restart left behind (#20631)
<!-- Write all pull request text in Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100): short sentences, one instruction per sentence, simple approved vocabulary, and the active voice. --> ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native warm runs on a remote sandbox continue the saved session of the previous run. Admission first proves what happened to the previous Runner. > - A deploy restarted the staging server while warm Runners were idle. Three follow-up runs then failed before provider work, each with a different refusal, and their tasks stayed blocked. > - The refusals asked for proof that a restart had made impossible. A restart is a product failure, so recovery must settle it automatically and keep the strict checks for real uncertainty. > - This pull request accepts the proof that the restart leaves behind, in three places: the warm owner on a replaced sandbox, the suspended Runner with an undelivered suspend receipt, and the restore hold of a run that saved nothing new. > - The benefit is that these follow-up runs start, and state saved by older releases carries forward without a migration. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20567, #20346 **What happened?** On staging, a deploy replaced the webserver process at about 18:04 UTC on 2026-11-10 (lease controller boot `348ec0bb` on one deployment, then boot `3e84c195` on a new deployment that started at 18:04:16). Three runs of one Codex agent on Daytona failed between 18:08 and 18:15: 1. A warm follow-up got a newly created sandbox. The previous warm Runner stayed `ready` in its own retained sandbox. Live adoption denied it with `runner_state_identity_mismatch: prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate` (`remote-warm-session-recovery.ts:127`), because only a resumed sandbox may be adopted. The per-turn retirement path refused warm owners (`lifecycle_not_per_turn`). 2. A warm follow-up resumed the same sandbox and directory. The previous Runner had been suspended by the shutdown, but the controller stopped before it acknowledged the suspend result. The Runner kept its terminal fence (`pendingTerminalDelivery` for `runner.suspend`). The read refused it with `native_controller_recovery_missing_evidence:runner_not_settled` (`native-session-executor.ts:7032`). 3. A continuation into a fresh workspace failed with `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid` (`remote-workspace-recovery-attachments.ts:60`). Its predecessor had restored the committed save, failed before provider work, and kept a restore hold with no recovery receipt. Its saved reference named the snapshot it restored. **Expected behavior** After a restart, the next run continues. It retires a finished owner that nobody can adopt, reads a finished suspension, and skips a source that left no unsaved files. Real uncertainty still refuses with a named reason. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a warm native Codex turn on a reusable Daytona sandbox and let it commit. 2. Restart the server (deploy) while the Runner is idle. 3. Start the next turn. Get a new sandbox (case 1), or resume the same sandbox after the shutdown suspended the Runner (case 2). 4. For case 3, continue a task whose previous run restored the last save and failed before provider work, into a fresh workspace. **Paperclip version or commit** Staging before `2e3cbe57` (the runs predate that deploy). The gaps remain on `master` at `9b21dcbd`. ## What Changed - `inspectRemoteWarmSessionRecovery` returns `null` when this run's sandbox is `created` or `replacement`. Such a sandbox holds no Runner to adopt. The caller then uses ordinary admission. - `inspectFinishedPerTurnRunnerdOwner` also retires a **warm** owner on a remote sandbox runner when this run's sandbox is `created` or `replacement`. It uses all the existing proofs: terminal run, committed result, released coordinator lease, stopped or fenced controller, settled journal, and quarantine copies. Local warm Runners and resumed sandboxes keep the live path. - `restoreRemoteSuspendedRunnerCheckpoint` accepts a suspended Runner whose only open fence is its own undelivered `runner.suspend` receipt. The fence must name `runner.suspend` with lifecycle `suspended`, it must be the last controller command, and the restored journal must not name that command differently. A provider cleanup, unsent events, a turn's terminal fence or a warm transition still refuse with `runner_not_settled`. A later authorized Runner process reconciles the receipt, as the Runner already does. - `attachPreservedRemoteWorkspaceSnapshots` skips a source with a receipt-less restore hold when its saved reference names the exact committed snapshot that its own succeeded `remote_workspace_restore` loaded at the same epoch. Any other saved snapshot still needs the canonical receipt. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the three rules. ## Verification - Red (unfixed code), each in the exact staging shape: - `native-recovered-owner-followup.test.ts` "retires a finished warm owner left behind by a restart when this run's sandbox is created/replacement" failed with `runner_state_identity_mismatch: prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`. - `native-controller-recovery.integration.test.ts` "defers a remote warm continuation…" failed: live adoption rejected a created/replacement sandbox with the same error. - `native-controller-recovery.integration.test.ts` "reads a resumed sandbox's suspended Runner with an undelivered suspend receipt" failed with `native_controller_recovery_missing_evidence:runner_not_settled`. It reads through a sandbox runner that refuses paths outside the workspace base. - `workspace-recovery-preparation.test.ts` "decides a receipt-less restore hold of a source that restored_unchanged" failed with `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid`. - Green: the same tests pass. Focused files pass: `native-recovered-owner-followup.test.ts` and `native-controller-recovery.integration.test.ts` (104 tests), `workspace-recovery-preparation.test.ts` (85 tests). - Safety cases (strict checks stay strict): - A warm owner on a resumed sandbox is not retired. - A warm owner with an unsettled journal (pending command, unanswered tool input) stays held and names `retirement_refused=journal_…`. - A warm owner whose finalization lease is still held stays held. - A turn terminal fence, a provider cleanup, unsent events, a fence behind a later command, or a journal that names the command differently still fail with `runner_not_settled` and cache nothing. - A restore-hold source that saved another snapshot, whose restore did not succeed, or whose restore was at another epoch still fails with `remote_workspace_recovery_receipt_invalid`. - Neighbouring suites pass: `native-session-executor.test.ts`, `plugin-runner-release-resume.integration.test.ts`, `explicit-native-continuation.test.ts` and `native-harness-filesystem-independence-continuation.integration.test.ts` (1786 tests). The last one asserted the old warm refusal on a created sandbox. It now shows that the warm follow-up resumes the same provider session for the new run. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` passes. - `pnpm verify` returns exit 2, because a global doc input changed (`doc/execution-semantics.md`). Required CI supplies the broad coverage. ## Risks - Previous-release state: all three rules read state that earlier releases already save (lease outcome, coordinator rows, Runner state in the sandbox, journal commands, run results and workspace operations). Rows saved by older releases carry forward. No migration. - Case 1 starts a new Runner for a warm session whose old Runner may still exist, idle, in its retained sandbox. Its controller is gone and its result is committed, so it can accept no new commands. The provider session follows the existing resume-or-replace policy. - Case 2 trusts a suspend fence only in the exact shape that the Runner writes before it sends the result. Other fences still refuse. - After case 1, a warm follow-up resumes from its own warm checkpoint. That checkpoint carries no replacement policy, so a failed provider resume is still reported as `native_session_recovery_failed` and is not replaced. This is the existing warm behavior. - Case 3 skips a source only when it provably saved nothing beyond a committed snapshot. That snapshot stays in its own workspace. - The three tasks that already failed stay blocked until their next wake or a user message. This PR does not add an automatic continuation for a completed no-replay hold. A follow-up can add that. - `native-runner-restart-recovery.integration.test.ts` (runs only with a runner container) no longer probes a replacement sandbox, because that probe now retires the owner by design. - Not verified live on Daytona. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, read-only browser access to staging). Extended reasoning enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
24661683db |
fix(recovery): bootstrap a remote follow-up that a restart cut before its Runner launched (#20642)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - After a control-plane restart, restart recovery classifies each claimed native run: reattach a live Runner, resume from a checkpoint, or bootstrap again when durable records prove no provider work > - A follow-up run on a continued session gets a rebound admission checkpoint. It names the new run, but it keeps the previous turn's provider session ID > - Recovery read that copied provider session as this run's provider work. A follow-up killed after `native.process_start_requested` but before its remote Runner launched was classified `reattach_remote_runner` > - The reattach then had no Runner to find, failed with `native_continuation_requires_reconciliation`, and the task needed Retry > - This pull request stops the copied session from counting as this run's work, and keeps the existing durable proofs as the authority > - The benefit is that these restarts bootstrap again by themselves and do not repeat provider work ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20561, #20555 **What happened?** Two Daytona restart-chaos tasks needed a Retry click: - Wave `w-20261110T173243-s9202` t02 (claude C1, K2): the follow-up run was killed at `stage.asset.home`, after `native.process_start_requested`. Recovery chose `reattach_remote_runner`. Verification failed with `native.remote_runner_recovery_failed {stage: runner_state, reason: state_read_failed}` (`runner_remote_state_unavailable: exit=1`): `runner-state.json` did not exist because the Runner never launched. The storage fault window (ST7) had ended 30 s before, so it was not the cause. - Wave `w-20261110T174930-s9205` t04 (codex C1, RR1): the scheduled retry of a `process_lost` run was killed at `session.checkpoint.restore`, after `native.process_start_requested`. Recovery chose `reattach_remote_runner`. Verification failed with `native_remote_recovery_lease_mismatch: stage=runner_verification field=identity_run_id`: the local Runner identity belonged to the previous run, because this run's Runner never started. **Expected behavior** A run whose durable records prove that no Runner received a provider turn bootstraps again without a person. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a remote follow-up run on a continued session (for example, a comment after a completed turn). 2. Kill the server after `native.process_start_requested` and before the remote Runner launches. 3. Observe `reattach_remote_runner`, a failed verification and a Retry banner. **Paperclip version or commit** master close to `6d6b2d0e` (waves); still reproduced by the new tests on master `90dd864bff`. ## What Changed - `native-restart-recovery.ts`, no controller checkpoint for the run (`remote_runner_never_received_commands`): a follow-up with `sessionIdBefore` qualifies when it carries only its continued-session checkpoint, and a predecessor's settled Runner identity (`carriesInheritedRunnerIdentity`) no longer disqualifies it. A recorded process identity, a Runner-sent event, a provider event or a pending request still keeps the run held. - `native-restart-recovery.ts`, controller checkpoint exists: the existing Postgres proof (`nativeRunnerCheckpointRemoteBootstrapProof`) now also runs when the run carries only a rebound checkpoint whose provider session a settled earlier run of the same session saved (`carriesSettledPredecessorSession`). The copied provider session then does not count as this run's provider evidence. The controller checkpoint stays the authority: any turn command or turn event keeps the run held. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describe the rule. ## Verification - `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-runner-restart-recovery.integration.test.ts` (real Postgres): - "restarts a follow-up whose controller never saved a checkpoint (s9205 t04)" and the variant "with its predecessor's remote runner identity": red on master (`reattach_remote_runner`), green now. - "restarts a follow-up whose saved controller checkpoint proves no provider turn (s9202 t02)": red on master, green now. - Held cases stay held: own recorded Runner identity, a carried active turn, a provider session that no settled earlier run saved, a `turn.start` command, a projected `turn.started` event. - Whole file: 171 passed. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server` passes. - The executor's existing `bootstrap_incomplete` path handles both shapes: a scoped root that belongs to the previous run goes through the existing prior-owner verification, and a root of this run restored from the controller checkpoint goes through `runnerdStateProvesIncompleteBootstrap` / `runnerdStateProvesNoRemoteProviderTurn`. ## Risks - A run with any recorded Runner process, Runner-sent event, provider event, turn command or pending request keeps today's reattach or hold. - A bootstrap claim charges one provider attempt, as today. The bounded limit (3) still applies. - No persisted shape changes. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
fd6e71a7ff |
fix(native): restore a warm backup when its source sandbox is idle (#20627)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native runs on remote sandboxes keep a warm sandbox and a verified harness backup so the next run continues the same provider session > - A run that starts while the previous run's workspace export is still saving gets a new (created) sandbox lease, because reuse skips an exporting sandbox > - When that run prepares the harness, it finds a backup but no recorded reusable lease, and it fails closed with `runner_harness_state_mismatch: backup_without_reusable_lease` > - #20278 accepted a destroyed source and a settled restore hold as retired backup sources, but not an idle warm source that is still `retained` for reuse > - This pull request accepts an idle warm source under the same proofs, claims it so it is never resumed again, and covers the resumed lease that the failed run leaves behind > - The benefit is that these recoveries continue the same session automatically instead of blocking the task ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20278 **What happened?** A monitor wake started about 90 seconds after the previous run on the same task finished. The previous run's warm sandbox lease was `retained` with policy `reuse_by_environment`, but its workspace export was still saving. Reuse skipped it and created a new sandbox. Workspace realization waited for the export (about 136 s) and restored the saved files. Then harness preparation found the previous run's backup (its lease stamp names this exact manifest, and no provider work followed it). The source lease was not destroyed and was not a restore hold, so the run failed with `native_session_recovery_failed: Error: runner_harness_state_mismatch: backup_without_reusable_lease` and the task was blocked. **What did you expect?** The run continues the same provider session. The idle source sandbox holds exactly the backed-up state, so restoring the backup into the new sandbox is safe. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Finish a warm native run on a remote sandbox. Its workspace export is still saving. 2. Start the next run on the same task before the export settles. 3. Reuse skips the exporting sandbox and creates a new lease. Harness preparation fails with `backup_without_reusable_lease`. 4. A retry resumes that new lease, which has no harness state, and fails with `resumed_unavailable`. ## What Changed - `native-retired-backup-source.ts`: an idle warm source is a third retired backup source. It must be `released` or `retained` with policy `reuse_by_environment`, its own run must be terminal and not the current run, and it must have no cleanup in flight, no restore hold or pending shutdown settlement, and no pending native workspace export. The backup stamp, single-owner chain, and later-provider-work checks still apply. - Before the restore, the idle source is claimed with a compare-and-swap on the checked row. The claim moves its `reusableSandboxLease` scope into a `reusableSandboxLeaseSuperseded` receipt. Reuse never resumes that older state again, and the next acquisition treats it as obsolete and destroys it. If a run resumed or changed the source first, the claim matches no row and the backup is not restored. - `environments.ts`: a cross-run reuse handoff now requires that the source row has no superseded receipt. The supersede claim and the handoff compete on the same row, so an acquisition that selected the source before the claim cannot resume it afterward. - The proof now rejects a backup whose source is the target allocation itself (`targetProviderLeaseId`). - `native-session-executor.ts`: a resumed lease whose sandbox has no harness state at all (`unavailable`) restores the backup under the same proof. This recovers the lease that the failed run left behind, so rows saved by older releases recover after deploy without a migration. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: documents the idle-source rule, the supersede claim, and the resumed stateless lease. ## Verification - Red before the fix, green after: - `native-session-executor.test.ts` "restores a warm backup into a created lease only when an idle warm source finished its run and its export" failed with `backup_without_reusable_lease`. - "... a resumed lease never held the session and the warm source is idle" failed with `resumed_unavailable`. - `native-retired-backup-source.integration.test.ts` (real Postgres) "authorizes an idle retained/released warm source and claims it as superseded" failed (returned false). - Integration test "refuses a reuse handoff of a source superseded while its provider resume was pending" fails without the handoff guard and passes with it. - Safety rows stay refused: source run still running, workspace export pending, cleanup in flight, restore into its own allocation, stamp names another checkpoint, provider work after the backup, two host leases for one allocation, claim lost to another run, and a resumed lease that lost its own state. Existing destroyed-source and restore-hold rows are unchanged. - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-retired-backup-source.integration.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/remote-warm-session-recovery.test.ts` passes (1408 tests). - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` passes. - `pnpm verify` exits 2 because a global CI input (`doc/execution-semantics.md`) changed. Required CI supplies the broad coverage. ## Risks - Previous-release story: no persisted shape changes. Lease rows saved by earlier releases carry forward. The new `reusableSandboxLeaseSuperseded` metadata key is additive. - The idle source is destroyed at the next acquisition for its workspace. Its state is the verified backup, which the restored lease now holds, so no work is lost. - Not covered: when the source cannot be proven retired or idle (for example a live owner or later provider work), the run still fails closed with the same named code. An automatic fresh-session fallback for that case is not in this PR. - The root trigger (reuse skips a sandbox while its export saves, then waits for that export) is unchanged. This PR does not change the reuse lookup. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, with tool use and code execution in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
76c787fffc |
fix(runner): report monitor notes length limits (#20604)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents use task monitors to resume a future check. > - The monitor schema limits notes to 500 characters. > - The field description did not state the limit. Rejection showed only the schema path. > - This pull request adds the limit to the description and to safe length errors. > - Agents can correct notes before they retry a rejected call. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related prior fix: #16868. **What happened?** A native `set_task_monitor` call with 501 characters in `monitor.notes` failed with a path that ended in `notes/maxLength`. The error did not state 500. The schema already had `maxLength: 500`, but the field description did not state it. **Expected behavior** State the limit in the field description and in the rejection. Accept 500 characters. Reject 501 characters before dispatch. Preserve a saved monitor when a replacement is invalid. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Supply a future `monitor.nextCheckAt` and 501 characters in `monitor.notes`. 2. Read the native provider error. 3. Before this fix, it shows the constraint path without the maximum. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `7368a0b15c2f02107778a961144d86e2eb59a952` in a Linux source checkout, with Node 25.9.0 and Rust 1.97.1. ## What Changed - Use one local value for the published notes limit and its description. The server test checks agreement with the persisted shared validator. Keep the standalone Runner package boundary. - Read the numeric maximum from the authorized JSON Schema validation error. Keep submitted values private and preserve the 512-byte feedback bound. - Test the published schema and real bridge dispatch path at 500 and 501 characters. Test saved contents and rejection without monitor changes with real PostgreSQL. - Refresh generated contracts and document the limit. - Sync two SDK proof lock identities after the reviewed master lock refresh in #20615. This fixes the remaining CI proof mismatch. Keep compiler, parser, Zod, and all rejection checks unchanged. ## Verification - Final head: `bac60234ab3a8fc7043a90c7f9c81b02e250428b`. - Red: the server regression failed because the field description omitted `500`. The Rust regression failed because the error omitted `maximum 500 characters`. - Local passes after the final base update: 44 PostgreSQL monitor/scheduler tests, 14 real-source Rust bridge tests, 11 cache/Docker guard tests, and 56 SDK proof tests. Runner TypeScript build and generated contract checks pass. - The focused Rust check compiles the actual source in a small Cargo workspace. The full Rust CI suites also pass on Linux and Windows. - Final-head [PR CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42881633978) passes. This includes typecheck, build, Runner support, Runner Rust and Vitest, server tests, serialized tests, and all eight e2e shards. - Final-head [Windows Rust run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42881633419) passes. - Greptile: 5/5 on the final head, with no open findings. There are 61 successful checks and five conditional skips. The separate Paperclip Review remains queued; its comment says work is paused. No CI or test check is pending or failed. - `pnpm verify` returned exit 2 and selected broader CI. The full local suite was not run. Final-head CI supplies that coverage. Earlier failed attempts were repaired and are not counted as passes. ## Risks - Low risk. The existing 500-character bound, scheduling semantics, and permissions stay in place. - Length feedback uses only a schema path and numeric bound. It does not print submitted text. - The Runner binary and tool contracts must reach an instance for the new guidance to apply. This PR does not deploy or merge. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
38944cff1a |
fix(environments): retry and safely replace a reusable sandbox that will not resume (#20626)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A task that runs on a reusable (warm) cloud sandbox resumes the same sandbox on the next wake > - When a follow-up arrives while the provider is auto-stopping or archiving the idle sandbox, the resume can fail > - Each failed attempt waited the provider's whole five-minute start deadline and then failed with `reusable_sandbox_resume_failed`, even when the workspace was saved and nothing lived only on the sandbox > - Two such runs in a row made a user wait for many minutes and recorded two failed runs > - This pull request bounds the resume, retries a state change inside the run, and replaces the sandbox from the saved snapshot when that is safe > - The benefit is that recovery works automatically and the first turn is not delayed by minutes ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Two consecutive runs failed before provider dispatch with: `Reusable sandbox lease "<id>" could not be resumed (cause=provider_error); the lease was preserved and no replacement was created.` Each run took about 5.5 minutes (320s and 330s) in preparation. The third run resumed the same sandbox from `stopped` in 4.7 seconds after the provider settled. The previous run had ended with a clean final save and a verified harness backup. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Let a task's reusable sandbox go idle so that the provider auto-stops or archives it. 2. Send a follow-up while the provider still reports the sandbox as changing state. 3. The Daytona worker waits in `ensureSandboxStarted` until its 300s start deadline and throws "is still <state> at its start deadline". The host does not classify that as transient and it has no safe fallback, so the run fails. **Expected behavior** The run retries briefly. If the sandbox still cannot start and nothing lives only on it, the run continues on a replacement sandbox that restores the saved workspace. **Root cause** `server/src/services/environment-runtime.ts` (reusable resume block, about line 1820): the resume deadline was the provider's full start deadline (300s plus RPC margin), the transient classifier did not recognize a state transition, and the catch always threw `ReusableSandboxResumeError`. #20212 waits out a state change inside the same 300s start deadline, so it covers the start but not the time budget or the fallback. ## What Changed - Add `server/src/services/reusable-sandbox-resume-replacement.ts`: - `REUSABLE_SANDBOX_RESUME_BUDGET_MS` (90s): the total resume time for one run, retries included. - `sandboxStateTransitionFailure`: "state change in progress" and "is still <state> at its start deadline" are transient. - `retireUnresumableReusableSandboxLease`: replace only when the lease is `released`/`retained` with no live owner, the task workspace is clean with a committed saved snapshot and no other writer, and a `paperclip_runner` session has a verified lease-bound harness backup. Access refusals (401/403) and an unavailable worker stay strict. After the replacement lease (which carries the harness backup) is recorded, the old lease moves to `pending_cleanup` (reason `resume_failed`) in one guarded write, so the existing cleanup sweep destroys the old sandbox and no provider delete runs before the first turn. A failed creation or a restart before that write leaves the old lease `retained` for the next attempt. - `environment-runtime.ts`: cap the resume deadline at the budget, treat a state transition as transient, and call the replacement policy before failing. A replacement records `sandboxLeaseAcquisition: { outcome: "replacement", reason: "resume_failed" }`; workspace preparation then restores the saved snapshot. - `remote-workspace-transport.ts`: add the closed failure label `sandbox_state_transition`, so a strict failure names the cause instead of `provider_error`. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the budget, the in-run retry, the replacement conditions, and the strict cases. - Update the two slow-start tests: the resume RPC timeout is now 90s instead of 330s/150s. A 61s start still resumes the same sandbox. ## Verification - Red before the fix (new file `server/src/__tests__/environment-runtime-reusable-resume-replacement.test.ts`, staging shape: lease created by the real acquisition path, then retained after a clean save with a backup stamp, 300s provider deadline, worker refusal with no status): 3 tests failed with `could not be resumed (cause=provider_error); the lease was preserved and no replacement was created.` - Green after the fix: 10/10 pass, including a case where the replacement creation fails and the next run replaces the sandbox with the backup carried forward. The safe case replaces the sandbox, keeps every resume RPC at or below 90s, makes no synchronous destroy call, and moves the old lease to `pending_cleanup`. A single state-change refusal resumes the same sandbox inside the run. Six strict cases keep the lease and fail with `cause=sandbox_state_transition`: unsaved work, no saved version, an uncommitted saved version, a live owner, no verified backup, and a 403. - `pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts` (197 pass), `heartbeat-retry-scheduling`, `legacy-execution-recovery`, `remote-workspace-transport` (251 pass). - `tsc -p server/tsconfig.json --noEmit` passes. - `pnpm verify` exits 2 (a doc change is a global CI input). Required CI supplies the broad coverage. - Not run: a live Daytona run on staging. The provider message is kept off the run record, so the exact transition state on staging (stopping or archiving) is inferred from timing, not observed. ## Risks - A strict resume now gives up after 90s instead of 300s. The provider start continues in the background, and the bounded bootstrap retry resumes the same sandbox. A stopped sandbox resumes in seconds and an archived one in about 25s on Daytona, so 90s leaves headroom. - A replacement leaves the old sandbox to the cleanup sweep. If the old start finishes later, the sweep still destroys it. The guarded write only claims a `released`/`retained` lease with no live owner. - Upgrade safety: no new persisted fields are required. Leases saved by older releases are read with the same rule; one without a verified backup stays strict. The replacement reason `resume_failed` already exists in the acquisition outcome. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use and code execution in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |