PaperClipAI

0 Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git synced 2026-10-19 01:46:15 +02:00

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
DottaandPaperclip	ce08872dfb	refactor(heartbeat): extract instruction working-copy lifecycle (#15984 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip runs agent tasks and preserves their managed agent files. > - Heartbeat must prepare a private copy, collect stopped-provider edits, and retain ownership during warm-session handoff. > - That lifecycle is spread across preparation, adapter callbacks, and cleanup. > - A per-run controller can own the copy and receipt while the executor retains teardown ordering. > - This PR moves that coordination into a dedicated module. > - Live getters preserve updated state and partially acquired resources. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Maintenance of heartbeat instruction preparation. This is the second and final PR in this batch, originally stacked on #15980. That dependency is now merged; this PR is rebased onto its squash merge with an identical patch and identical touched-file contents. Related-PR search found no duplicate extraction. Current behavior After #15980, `heartbeat.ts` has 4,215 lines and 173,657 bytes. It coordinates instruction-copy preparation, save receipts, warm handoffs, and deferred cleanup inline. Proposed behavior `heartbeat/instruction-working-copy.ts` owns the per-run lifecycle in 233 lines. `heartbeat.ts` becomes 4,055 lines and 162,520 bytes. The executor retains the outer release order, unavailable-copy reporting, and environment/service cleanup policy. Reason and benefit The copy, save receipt, and warm ownership are readable together. The remaining executor names preparation and dispatch phases without obscuring teardown decisions. Breaking changes None intended. All 140 named public heartbeat exports remain unchanged. ## What Changed - Extract copy preparation, save/checkpoint callbacks, warm reservation/adoption, prompt guidance, and the deferred-release closure. - Read the executor's current run row through a callback; expose current copies, receipts, and acquired cleanup handles through live getters. - Keep cleanup handles available after preparation failure, and preserve release-before-retry on invalidated warm reuse. - Add four public-path characterization tests with real disposable PostgreSQL and files, plus four direct boundary tests. - Add isolated browser acceptance with a real process that edits instructions, completes its task, and reads the saved bytes on its next task. - Document the boundary and opt-in acceptance command. ## Verification - Before extraction: four new public-path tests pass on the original implementation, as do 108 existing instruction-copy/directory/native-cleanup tests. The two-task browser journey also passes on the baseline server. - After extraction: all 112 baseline tests pass; all four new boundary tests pass; 12 selected native-session ownership/retirement cases pass (the other 670 cases were outside this focused selection). - Browser acceptance: the fresh extracted-code server passes the full two-task journey (25.9 seconds): real child-process edits, saved/unchanged receipts, canonical bytes through the agent-file API, next-task restore, completed task UI, and copy cleanup. - `pnpm -r typecheck`, final server typecheck, and `pnpm build` pass. Module-boundary and public-export checks pass. - Normalized syntax comparison confirms all moved bodies and the reconstructed executor match the base, accounting explicitly for live run getters and delegation. - Final rebased head: `a08872c97e587a21ffc0fc6b78f34b81e484e7b0`. Combined entry-point and boundary regressions pass again (12/12); fresh Greptile review is 5/5 with no findings. All 55 current-head checks pass (two configured skips), including the hosted full-suite tests, build, typecheck, and all eight browser shards. There are no open review threads. ## Risks - Acquisition can succeed before preparation throws. Boundary tests verify that both the reservation and a transferred copy remain visible to the cleanup owner. - Callbacks can replace copy/save state during execution. Public tests verify saved receipts; direct tests verify the current run row, warm checkpoint receipt, and permission-root preservation. - Missing edit authorization and cleanup failure must remain nonfatal. Characterization tests revoke actual membership after dispatch admission and inject a cleanup error while preserving the saved result. - The browser uses a test-launcher-only instruction-capable wrapper around the real process adapter. Production adapter capabilities are unchanged. No live provider calls are made; native warm ownership is covered by focused module and native-session tests rather than a live provider browser run. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with reasoning, code edits, tool execution, and verification. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 10:52:32 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	1e0cfcb4fc	test: retire redundant suites and consolidate owner coverage (#15978 ) Retire duplicate ACPX and Codex proof after migrating unique assertions to their behavioral owners. Consolidate repeated fixtures and exact case matrices while preserving lifecycle, protocol, company, credential, approval, and ordering contracts. Remove the unused runtime-controls compatibility path and document test ownership and preservation evidence. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 10:44:02 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	94e4218310	refactor(heartbeat): extract runtime service coordination (#15980 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Heartbeat runs start workspace services and receive service reports from adapters. > - Service context updates and readiness notices are spread through the executor. > - These steps share a clear responsibility, while process and lease ownership already live elsewhere. > - This pull request puts service coordination in one module. > - The executor retains the same dispatch and cleanup order. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Maintenance of heartbeat execution. This is the first of two final focused extractions after #15973. Related #15653 changes runtime callback origins; this PR preserves that policy. Current behavior `heartbeat.ts` has 4,372 lines and 178,459 bytes. It validates service intents, starts services, persists adapter reports and primary URLs, and posts readiness notices inline. Proposed behavior `heartbeat/runtime-services.ts` owns those steps in 212 lines. `heartbeat.ts` becomes 4,215 lines and 173,657 bytes. Process registries and leases stay in `workspace-runtime.ts`. The executor still releases services in its original cleanup path. Reason and benefit Service coordination has named preparation and result phases. The execution path is easier to read without changing service lifetime or moving cleanup policy. Breaking changes None intended. All 140 named public heartbeat exports remain available, including `postWorkspaceReadyComment`. ## What Changed - Move service-intent validation, startup, adapter-result persistence, and readiness notices into one module. - Preserve mutable run context, primary URL selection, notice error handling, and release ordering. - Add four public-path tests using disposable PostgreSQL, real HTTP service processes, and a fixture adapter. - Extend browser recovery acceptance to fetch the actual service URL, check the readiness notice, and verify listener cleanup. - Update the module map and acceptance instructions. ## Verification - Before extraction: all five tests pass, including the four new characterization cases and existing notice formatting test. - After extraction: all 17 tests pass across service coordination, notice formatting, output recording, and runtime authorization. - Structural comparison confirms that all moved bodies and the reconstructed executor match the baseline. Module boundary checks pass. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. - Extended isolated browser acceptance: 2/2 pass (3.7 minutes), covering actual service readiness, recovery, bounded failure, and cleanup. At `8e33e2032de681082f128470eb8ab0711b382afe`, all 55 current-head checks pass (two configured skips), including hosted full-suite tests. Greptile is 5/5 with no findings or review threads. ## Risks - Service context must be persisted before adapter dispatch and before run completion. The tests inspect both phases and preserve the first service URL when adapter reports arrive. - Notice failures must remain nonfatal. The public-path test checks both startup and result notices. - Shared services must survive run cleanup; ephemeral services must stop after success or failure. Tests use actual processes and HTTP requests. - The fixture supplies UUID service report IDs, as required by the database. The existing generated-ID fallback for reports without IDs is outside this extraction. - Test adapters and services are local fixtures; these tests make no live provider calls. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with reasoning, code edits, tool execution, and verification. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 10:40:42 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	914b70572c	refactor(heartbeat): extract execution configuration (#15973 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Heartbeat turns task, agent, environment, and account settings into an executable run. > - The executor still assembles scoped credentials and skill configuration inline between environment selection and session preparation. > - That phase has a clear input/output boundary, but credential acquisition must remain visible to cleanup even when later setup fails. > - This pull request extracts configuration assembly and immediately notifies the executor of acquired resources and redaction state. > - The executor retains admission, dispatch, and cleanup, with the same statement ordering and explicit busy-account deferral. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Maintenance of heartbeat execution. This PR follows #15969 and #15966, both now merged. The branch is rebased onto `master`; `git range-diff` confirms that the extraction patch is unchanged. Current behavior `heartbeat.ts` has 4,561 lines and 188,950 bytes. Configuration assembly mixes workspace overrides, secrets, managed AI preparation, and skill delivery into the executor. Proposed behavior `execution-configuration.ts` owns this preparation phase in 269 lines and 16,204 bytes. The executor calls it between environment and session preparation and retains immediate cleanup ownership. `heartbeat.ts` becomes 4,372 lines and 178,459 bytes. Reason and benefit The execution path exposes another named phase, with tests that exercise its effective configuration, resource lifetime, failure diagnostics, and busy-account result through public heartbeat dispatch. Related work: #11827 changes pre-dispatch secret refresh and #15355 changes GitHub delegation; this extraction preserves current policies. Breaking changes None intended. Public exports remain available, and the original helpers keep their modules. ## What Changed - Move configuration merging, scoped secret resolution, managed AI acquisition, runtime skills, connector instructions, and managed identity preparation into one typed module. - Notify the executor immediately when failure-redaction values, managed credentials, and identity redaction become available. Returning resources only after all preparation succeeds would lose cleanup on partial failure. - Preserve the live failure-secret getter for later runtime environment changes. Return an explicit deferred result for busy accounts. - Add four real-database characterization tests through `heartbeat.wakeup`, using actual credential files and cleanup with a fixture adapter. - Update the developer module map. ## Verification - Before extraction: all 45 tests pass across the new public-path tests and existing project-environment tests. - After extraction: 47 tests pass across execution configuration, project environment, and runtime skills. No skips. - Two additional real-process managed identity tests pass; nine unrelated cases are deliberately filtered out. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. - Normalized syntax comparison confirms the moved body and reconstructed executor match after accounting for immediate ownership callbacks and the explicit prepared/deferred result. - Isolated browser acceptance: 2/2 pass (3.9 minutes). A real process worker completes after Git recovery, with persisted stdout and matching final output byte counts. Persistent failures stop after three attempts. Both outcomes survive reload. The disposable server was shut down after verification. - All eleven new public-path characterization cases across the three-PR stack pass together on the final commit. - All 140 named public exports from the batch baseline remain available. - CI initially failed the legacy-continuation message browser case: periodic recovery escalated the issue, then queue admission cancelled the run with `execution_reconciliation_required` before configuration preparation. The unchanged predecessor shard passes, and the exact case passes locally (5 seconds in the browser). The original failing case passed on its single rerun (8.2 seconds), but GitHub then shut down the runner during a different test (`The runner has received a shutdown signal`). The separate infrastructure restart completed: 24 browser cases passed, with two existing optional cases skipped. Assertions and timeouts are unchanged. - Greptile: 5/5 on `27ab7e3df64c157ba1f00c5757db812ff7a4e5aa`, with no actionable findings. Hosted full-suite CI passes on this exact commit: all 54 check runs and the additional commit status are successful. - Merge preparation: all eleven characterization tests pass after rebasing onto `master`. Fresh full CI passes for `1758673f87eaa76a8b2c520eac4b631ada5d9ba1`: 55 successful checks and two optional Storybook skips, including all eight browser shards, typecheck, tests, and build. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact commit with zero review threads. All heartbeat source, tests, documentation, and browser assertions are identical to the previously reviewed final stack. ## Risks - A failure after AI acquisition must still remove the disposable credential home. The new public-path failure test proves actual filesystem cleanup and diagnostic redaction before the external reporting sink. - The baseline exposed an existing gap: arbitrary exception text in the local `run.error` field can contain a credential even though the failure reporter redacts it. This behavior is unchanged and merits a separate fix; the test does not claim the local error field is sanitized. - Account-busy deferral must return without dispatch while retaining its scheduled retry. The new test checks the durable run states. - Browser acceptance uses a real process fixture and disposable data, without live provider calls. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with reasoning, code edits, tool execution, and verification. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 10:01:00 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	37913e4907	refactor(heartbeat): extract run output recording (#15969 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Heartbeat runs stream adapter output and persist execution results. > - Output recording currently sits inside the executor beside admission and cleanup. > - Log handles, sequence numbers, progress writes, and excerpt buffers share one attempt lifetime. > - This pull request moves that state and its callbacks into a per-attempt recorder. > - The executor keeps dispatch and finalization visible, while finalization reads live output values. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Maintenance of heartbeat execution. This PR follows #15966, which is now merged. The branch is rebased onto `master`; `git range-diff` confirms that its extraction patch is unchanged. Current behavior `heartbeat.ts` has 4,740 lines and 195,258 bytes. It directly owns log handles, excerpt buffers, output sequence numbers, progress flushes, and adapter event callbacks. Proposed behavior `run-output.ts` owns the per-attempt recorder. The main file has 4,561 lines and 188,950 bytes; the recorder has 209 lines and 7,757 bytes. Reason and benefit Output state has one explicit lifetime and interface. The shared log store and finalization policy retain their original owners. Related open output work includes #12539 and #15524; this PR does not change redaction policy. Breaking changes None intended. Public flush constants and log formatting exports remain available from `heartbeat.ts`. ## What Changed - Move log initialization, redaction, excerpts, progress persistence, live delivery, and adapter callbacks into `createHeartbeatRunOutput`. - Preserve the acquired log handle if later setup fails. Bind callbacks to the execution-start run row. - Pass live excerpt getters to success and failure completion so output arriving during finalization remains visible. - Add three real-database public-path tests. Extend browser acceptance to inspect persisted worker stdout and output byte counts. - Update the module map. ## Verification - Before extraction: 23 tests pass, including all three new output characterization cases. - After extraction: 45 tests pass across output, log formatting, event sequencing, and run completion. No skips. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. - Normalized syntax comparison confirms the moved bodies and reconstructed executor match. Reviewed the factory ownership, callback binding, getter wiring, and constant re-exports separately. - Isolated browser acceptance: 2/2 pass, including persisted worker stdout and matching final byte counts. The process worker completes after recovery; persistent timeouts stop after three attempts. Both terminal states survive reload. - Hosted full-suite CI passes on `d32c8fc40e72b9766bdd9e191d777e8dc554e3f2`; all 55 reported checks are successful. Greptile is 5/5 with zero review threads. - The initial chat shard timed out waiting for GitHub mention admission. Its fixture mocks heartbeat wakeup and never calls the output recorder. Both parameterized cases passed locally; the unchanged shard passed on one rerun. No test or timeout changes. - Merge preparation: all seven session-preparation and run-output regression tests pass after rebasing onto `master`. Fresh full CI passes for `60e2a49ce2879645a9f618a801e0ba0903ede161`: 55 successful checks and two optional Storybook skips, including all eight browser shards, typecheck, tests, and build. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact commit with zero review threads. ## Risks - A stale excerpt snapshot could lose output that arrives while finalization awaits I/O. Passing-before/passing-after tests exercise this for both successful and failed runs. - Per-attempt state must not become service-wide. Each executor constructs its own recorder and keeps the existing shared store. - Browser acceptance uses a real process fixture and disposable data; it makes no live provider calls. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with reasoning, code edits, tool execution, and verification. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 09:51:17 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	d497d1ccec	refactor(chat): extract failed-run retry coordination (#15845 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and sends results back to chat. > - A failed chat run can be retried only while its original source remains authorized. > - That decision includes persisted source evidence and native runtime state. > - Retry claims also share in-flight promises and depend on service shutdown. > - This PR groups retry authorization, execution and notices in one module. > - The service retains the live admission, runtime and shutdown boundaries. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15844, #15836, #15834 and #15823. Stack slice 5 of 5, based on `codex/chat-publication-replacement`. Merge each predecessor first, then retarget this PR. Do not merge the stack out of order. Stack order: #15823 (provider messages) → #15834 (resource reconciliation) → #15836 (identity links) → #15844 (publication replacement) → #15845 (failed-run retries). GitHub native stack merging preserves this order and automatically restacks the remaining branches. ## What Changed - Extract failed-run retry admission and coordination while keeping the in-flight map, cursor, error class and authority registrations scoped to one chat service. - Move the exact Teams uncertain-file continuation proof into `microsoft-teams/file-transfer-source.ts`. - Pass the existing transaction, explicit source identifiers and denial factory. Return only the proven publication ID. - Keep committed-result, complete source-batch, ancestor and other-uncertain-effect checks in shared `failed-run-retry.ts`. - Keep native execution recovery together; its provider references describe runner backends, not chat channels. - The retry coordinator is 1,825 lines and the Teams proof is 149 lines. Restack on revised #15844 and record the reassessment. ## Verification - Baseline: 59 retry cases and six negative Teams authority cases passed. The combined 65 cases passed after the move. - Cases cover retry ownership, service restart/lifetime, ambiguous Teams receipts, sibling unknown effects, changed source authority and active attempts. - Teams guard, joins, locks, attempt checks and selected ID match after explicit input substitutions. The shared coordinator retains its state and cleanup ownership. - Server typecheck, module-boundary and whitespace checks passed. - Integration uses disposable databases and fixture provider transports; no live third-party execution is claimed. - Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 on `4f7151409717458717633aa270441a8faf33664e`, with a successful check and no open review threads. - Final-stack `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed at `57ec5ba94aecd860471f9b14db46f99120c7c790`. - All CI checks passed on `57ec5ba94aecd860471f9b14db46f99120c7c790`. - Full local `pnpm test:run` stopped in the general-server group: 18,763 passed, 105 skipped, and one test timed out after 20 seconds in unchanged `workspace-runtime.test.ts` ("does not accept an occupied allocated port when listener ownership is unavailable"). The same case passed in an isolated rerun without code, assertion or timeout changes (1 passed, 175 excluded). The original timeout is retained as a failed full run; later workspace and serialized groups were not reached. The full local gate remains unverified. - Merge verification on the restacked tree: 118 focused identity, publication, Photon and retry integration tests passed; server typecheck and module-boundary checks passed. GitHub’s rebased trees exactly match the previously reviewed file contents. - All current-head required checks passed on `4f7151409717458717633aa270441a8faf33664e`: full CI; Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved threads. ## Risks - Authorization must remain fail-closed across committed output and retry admission. The helper proves only the Teams transfer; the caller still checks the complete source and result in the same transaction. - In-flight promises, error-class identity, registration cleanup, cursor state and the live shutdown getter must remain per-service. Their code is unchanged by this channel-folder move. - This PR depends on #15844. Merge and retarget in stack order. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and repository tools. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. No separate agent was used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 09:49:34 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	5a72061ccc	refactor(chat): extract publication replacement decisions (#15844 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip publishes agent progress and results back to chat. > - Some updates replace an earlier message while others need a new message. > - The current outbound link and task generation determine that authority. > - These decisions are spread through the large chat service. > - This PR groups publication replacement and supersession decisions in one module. > - Reviewers can follow those decisions without reading provider transport code. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15836, #15834 and #15823. Stack slice 4 of 5, based on `codex/chat-identity-links`. Merge the predecessor first, then retarget this PR. Do not merge the stack out of order. Stack order: #15823 (provider messages) → #15834 (resource reconciliation) → #15836 (identity links) → #15844 (publication replacement) → #15845 (failed-run retries). GitHub native stack merging preserves this order and automatically restacks the remaining branches. ## What Changed - Extract shared publication replacement and supersession queries from the large service. - Keep exact outbound ownership, run/wake scope, consumed progress, interaction replacement and retained-source authorization together. - Put the iMessage typing-versus-progress policy in `imessage-photon/publications.ts`. - Preserve endpoint lookup timing and all ownership query bodies. The multi-provider close allowlist remains shared dispatch metadata. - Restack onto the revised #15836 and record why this boundary remains mostly shared. ## Verification - The same 49 existing publication and Photon integration cases passed before and after the provider-policy move. Other cases were excluded by the filter. - Cases cover close-owned progress, ambiguous delivery, interleaved Slack control, Telegram confirmation, FIFO replacement and Photon channel behavior. - Server typecheck, module-boundary and whitespace checks passed. Only the iMessage predicate/reason moved; ownership queries are unchanged. - Historical server shard 2 hit a cleanup deadlock; its unchanged [isolated rerun passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38134431077/job/114457999409). [Original failure](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38134431077/job/114455332022). - Tests use disposable databases and fixture provider transports, not live third-party execution. - Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 on `8e2da97b6dc11eb446128b61c789edb529c50d5a`, with a successful check and no open review threads. - Final-stack `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed at `57ec5ba94aecd860471f9b14db46f99120c7c790`. - Historical pre-restack CI failed on `ci / General tests (server (11/12))` and its aggregate `ci / verify`. All 1,255 tests passed, but worker-exit cleanup in unchanged `server/src/__tests__/setup-supertest.ts:32` failed with EACCES removing a temporary `paperclip-vitest-home-*` directory. The [original job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38256549828/job/114836065382) and the [single unchanged rerun](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38256549828/job/114839735273) failed the same way. No further reruns were requested. After GitHub automatically restacked the branches, the full cumulative run on #15845 passed this server shard. This middle PR uses the repository’s policy-only stack CI scope; the top PR runs all suites. - The final full-local-suite outcome for this cumulative stack is recorded in #15845; do not infer that gate from the focused tests above. - Merge verification on the restacked tree: 118 focused identity, publication, Photon and retry integration tests passed; server typecheck and module-boundary checks passed. GitHub’s rebased trees exactly match the previously reviewed file contents. - All current-head required checks passed on `8e2da97b6dc11eb446128b61c789edb529c50d5a`: policy CI (middle-stack scope; full cumulative suites passed on #15845); Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved threads. ## Risks - Splitting shared ownership queries per channel would duplicate authorization rules. They remain in the shared module. - Preserve the issue-to-run lock order and retained-source callback. The factory creates no worker or mutable state. - This PR depends on #15836. Merge and retarget in stack order. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and repository tools. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. No separate agent was used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 09:49:34 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	de79750939	refactor(chat): extract identity linking (#15836 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip connects provider identities to company members. > - A confirmed identity determines whose permissions apply to chat messages. > - Token consumption and membership checks must remain atomic. > - These operations currently share the large chat channel service. > - This PR moves identity linking into one module with explicit runtime callbacks. > - Reviewers can inspect the complete identity-link flow together. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15834 and #15823. Stack slice 3 of 5, based on `codex/chat-resource-reconciliation`. Merge the predecessor first, then retarget this PR. Do not merge the stack out of order. Stack order: #15823 (provider messages) → #15834 (resource reconciliation) → #15836 (identity links) → #15844 (publication replacement) → #15845 (failed-run retries). GitHub native stack merging preserves this order and automatically restacks the remaining branches. ## What Changed - Extract company-scoped identity linking into shared `identity-links.ts`. - Move Slack connect receipt queries, access requests and confirmation-notice staging into `slack/identity-links.ts`. - Move GitHub identity fields into `github/identity-links.ts`. - Preserve shared token consumption, link locks, membership checks and revocation. - Stage the Slack notice inside the original confirmation transaction. Schedule delivery after commit. Keep runtime and public URL callbacks live. - Restack on the revised resource PR #15834 and record the architectural reassessment in the plan. ## Verification - Four existing service integration cases passed before and after. The Slack connect case covers discovery, preview, access requests, duplicate requests, member confirmation, provider notice, consumed tokens and endpoint isolation. - Receipt queries, the access-request transaction and notice payload match the previous implementation with explicit parameter substitutions. - Server typecheck, module-boundary and whitespace checks passed. - These are local database and fixture transport tests, not live Slack execution. - Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 on `7b44962f09fe8043c77ed40e05f761f31c64b33c`, with a successful check and no open review threads. - Final-stack `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed at `57ec5ba94aecd860471f9b14db46f99120c7c790`. - All CI checks passed on `62ee045a4728da2d756be3d2e40d13e592a0b5a9`. - The [original workspace shard](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38256203686/job/114834873234) timed out waiting for the CLI import/export test server health endpoint. Its [single unchanged rerun passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38256203686/job/114838954081). The original timeout remains part of the evidence. - The final full-local-suite outcome for this cumulative stack is recorded in #15845; do not infer that gate from the focused tests above. - Merge verification on the restacked tree: 118 focused identity, publication, Photon and retry integration tests passed; server typecheck and module-boundary checks passed. GitHub’s rebased trees exactly match the previously reviewed file contents. - All current-head required checks passed on `7b44962f09fe8043c77ed40e05f761f31c64b33c`: full CI; Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved threads. ## Risks - Confirmation must retain transaction and token ownership. The Slack helper receives the existing transaction and stages the same effect; scheduling remains after commit in the shared coordinator. - This PR depends on #15834. Merge predecessors and retarget before merging this PR. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and repository tools. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. No separate agent was used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 09:49:33 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	848e659bc6	refactor(heartbeat): extract session preparation (#15966 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Heartbeat execution prepares a provider session before dispatch. > - The same executor also owns workspace setup, admission, cleanup, and recovery. > - Session freshness and compaction form a separate responsibility with explicit inputs and results. > - This pull request moves those two session phases into one module and keeps their order around workspace preparation. > - The benefit is a shorter executor with unchanged session behavior. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Maintenance of heartbeat execution. This continues the extraction series after #15872. Current behavior `heartbeat.ts` has 4,989 lines and 206,650 bytes. Session config fingerprints, resume selection, credential compatibility, and compaction are embedded in the executor. Proposed behavior The executor calls `prepareHeartbeatSession` before workspace preparation and `resolveHeartbeatAdapterSession` after it. `heartbeat.ts` has 4,740 lines and 195,258 bytes. The new cohesive module has 385 lines and 19,518 bytes. Reason and benefit A reviewer can find session policy in one module. Runtime acquisition, admission gates, and cleanup remain in the executor. Related open work includes #15787 and #15142; this PR does not change either policy. Breaking changes None intended. Existing public helper exports remain available. ## What Changed - Move 267 lines into `server/src/services/heartbeat/session-preparation.ts` with typed task, config, workspace, and session inputs. - Keep config fingerprints and context mutations on the same objects. Return compaction and adapter-session results to existing consumers. - Add four real-PostgreSQL characterization tests through heartbeat wakeup and adapter dispatch. - Document the two session preparation phases. ## Verification - Before extraction: four new characterization tests pass; 180 existing workspace/session tests pass. - After extraction: 205 tests pass across session preparation, workspace/session policy, managed-account session compatibility, and accepted-plan refresh. No skips. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. - Normalized syntax comparison: both moved blocks and the reconstructed executor, including public exports, match the base. - Isolated browser acceptance: 2/2 pass. A real process worker completes after automatic recovery; persistent timeouts stop after three attempts. Both terminal states survive reload. - All hosted CI gates pass on `d33f8506a7`, including the complete test shards, typecheck, build, and browser suites. The duplicate local `pnpm test:run` was interrupted after hosted CI passed; it is not claimed as a full local pass. - Greptile: 5/5 on this head, with no review threads. ## Risks - Session freshness can alter provider context if a dependency is omitted. Typed inputs and passing-before/passing-after dispatch tests cover unchanged resumes, model changes, tool refresh, and compaction. - The module acquires no runtime resource. Workspace preparation still occurs between the two phases. - Live external providers are not exercised; browser acceptance uses a real process fixture in a disposable app. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with reasoning, code edits, tool execution, and verification. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 09:40:09 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	3a213ab987	refactor(chat): extract resource reconciliation and availability (#15834 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Chat resources control which provider destinations can admit that work. > - Inventory updates and lifecycle callbacks must preserve company scope and operator choices. > - These rules share a large service with runtime and credential ownership. > - This PR extracts resource reconciliation and its availability transaction. > - Reviewers can inspect resource changes together while the service retains runtime control. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15823 (merged). Slice 2 of 5 now targets `master`. Remaining order: #15834 → #15836 → #15844 → #15845. ## What Changed - Extract shared resource inventory, audited selection and availability settlement from the large service. - Put GitHub repository parsing, rename/transfer repair, webhook recovery and listing in `github/resources.ts`. - Put Telegram group migration in `telegram/resources.ts`, using the coordinator's existing transaction and timestamp. - Put Slack labels, Teams IDs and Photon participant parsing in their channel folders. - Keep lease assertions, delivery settlement and the resource upsert between Telegram migration steps in the shared coordinator. - The shared module is 598 lines; provider resource modules total 409 lines. Update the dated plan with this reassessment. ## Verification - On updated master, 15 existing resource integration cases and one Telegram migration case passed before this folder move. The same 16 cases passed after. Other cases were excluded by the filter. - Eight moved declarations and three transaction blocks match the prior implementation. The GitHub provider guard remains in the caller. - Server TypeScript, module-boundary and whitespace checks passed. Rebuilt plugin SDK types after rebasing onto current master. - Historical browser shard 8 timed out on inbox retry; its unchanged [rerun passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38134430238/job/114457529315). [Original failure](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38134430238/job/114455332214). - Tests use local disposable databases and fixture provider transports. No live third-party execution is claimed. - Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 on `e914f532ca66c429125492c1723df38afc6e13d7`, with a successful check and no open review threads. - Final-stack `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed at `57ec5ba94aecd860471f9b14db46f99120c7c790`. - All CI checks passed on `e914f532ca66c429125492c1723df38afc6e13d7`. - The final full-local-suite outcome for this cumulative stack is recorded in #15845; do not infer that gate from the focused tests above. ## Risks - Resource identity and migrations depend on lock and write order. Provider modules use the original transaction; statement order and credential fencing remain unchanged. - Shared selection and availability still contain provider dispatch predicates. They coordinate common state transitions and should remain shared. - Full local tests and current-revision CI remain required for a green handoff. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and repository tools. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. No separate agent was used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 09:39:51 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	fb21a3f30a	refactor(chat): extract provider message normalization (#15823 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and keeps their work attached to company tasks. > - Chat providers deliver messages and corrections into those tasks. > - The chat channel service has grown to 39,155 lines. > - Provider message normalization has no database or worker ownership of its own. > - This pull request moves that responsibility into one module while preserving the service body. > - Reviewers can now find provider identities, timestamps, and edit revisions together. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Maintenance of inbound chat message normalization in the server. Subsystem affected Server chat channels. Current behavior Provider message parsers and identity rules share a 39,155-line file with credentials, runtime ownership, database admission, and publication workers. Proposed behavior Move provider message normalization into `chat-channels/provider-messages.ts`. Keep service exports and runtime behavior unchanged. Reason and benefit This creates a clear first boundary for an incremental refactor. A dated plan ranks the next four larger extractions. No duplicate chat refactor was found in the GitHub title search. Breaking changes None intended. No schema, endpoint, transport, or public service API changes. Stack order: #15823 (provider messages) → #15834 (resource reconciliation) → #15836 (identity links) → #15844 (publication replacement) → #15845 (failed-run retries). Merge in this order; retarget each child after its predecessor lands. ## What Changed - Move provider message parsing into `chat-channels/telegram/messages.ts`, `slack/messages.ts`, `discord/messages.ts`, `microsoft-teams/messages.ts` and `github/messages.ts`. - Keep shared actor normalization, actor data and the inbound text limit in `chat-channels/message-lifecycle.ts`. These six modules total 566 lines / 19,534 bytes. - Import provider modules directly. Follow this provider-folder convention for future extractions. - Preserve exact actor IDs, edit hashes, timestamp provenance, and Telegram message identity rules. - Narrow two input types to the Teams parser method and the retained delivery fields actually read. - Reduce `chat-channels.ts` from 39,155 lines / 1,509,090 bytes to 38,643 lines / 1,491,703 bytes. - Record five ranked extraction candidates and verification evidence in the dated plan. ## Verification - The original extraction passed complete CI and 5/5 review at `cbba30a526`. Those results are historical; the updated head is `90ac517e6c310c8cf194dbbd668006f740e58f3a`. - Structural comparison: all 21 moved declarations match the base after normalizing exports and two type-only changes. All remaining non-import declarations, including the complete service body, match the base. - Provider-folder update: the same 48 public service integration cases passed locally before and after the move on PR #15823. They cover Slack/Discord revision identity, Teams edits, GitHub edits, Telegram rich messages and provider chronology. - All 22 message declarations retain identical bodies; the service changes imports only. The four dependent extractions rebased without conflicts. - Final-stack workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. Module-boundary and whitespace checks passed. - Final-stack `pnpm build` passed. The fresh `pnpm test:run` was interrupted after PostgreSQL startup failures recurred. An isolated `native-status-arbiter-corpus.test.ts` run failed during database initialization after five attempts; all 45 tests skipped. All 32 host shared-memory slots were occupied. The full local gate remains unverified; only the task-owned run was stopped. - Greptile rated updated head `90ac517e6c310c8cf194dbbd668006f740e58f3a` 5/5 with no inline review threads. - Updated-head CI passed: 53 successful checks and two skipped checks, including all chat integration shards, typecheck, build and browser suites. - Tests use disposable databases and fixture provider transports. No live third-party execution is claimed. ## Risks - A wrong module import or changed revision identity could affect message admission. Existing service-path tests and the declaration comparison cover those risks. - Authentication, company-scoped transactions, leases, background workers, and shutdown remain in the original service. - The service closure remains large. Resource reconciliation is the recommended next extraction. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, local code execution, and repository tools. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. No separate planning or review agent was used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 08:21:46 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	ce15fe7c73	refactor(heartbeat): extract task context preparation (#15872 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Heartbeat execution prepares task context before it selects an environment and starts an adapter. > - This preparation still occupied 319 lines inside the executor after the earlier extractions. > - It combines continuation summaries, comments, prompt variants, communication guidance, and redaction. > - This pull request moves that responsibility into one typed module under `services/heartbeat/`. > - The executor keeps admission, resource ownership, dispatch, and cleanup ordering together. > - The result makes the preparation phase easier to find and test without changing execution behavior. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15825, #15807. This continues the incremental heartbeat extraction series. A search found no duplicate task-context extraction. What existing behavior does this improve? Maintenance and review of heartbeat task context preparation. Current behavior The executor assembles prompts and trust-filtered context inline. This hides its execution phases among preparation details. Proposed behavior Call `prepareHeartbeatTaskContext` at the same point in execution. Preserve statement order, prompt contents, public exports, and the shared run context object. ## What Changed - Move task context assembly to `server/src/services/heartbeat/task-context.ts`. Inputs group task state, policy, and two existing service methods. Results preserve the continuation and wake values used by later runtime selection and dispatch. - Keep company-scoped loading, quarantined-content filtering, secret redaction, and revision hashing in their original order. Add no execution resource acquisition. - Add four public-path integration tests before the move. Cover prompt variants and redacted revisions, quarantined summaries/comments, a mixed-company wake batch, and stale caller fields. - Extend the real process worker in the opt-in browser suite to check persisted prompt variants and the description revision before it completes its task. - Update the module map and acceptance-test documentation. - Reduce `heartbeat.ts` from 5,314 lines / 220,784 bytes to 4,989 lines / 206,650 bytes. The new module has 376 lines / 15,912 bytes. ## Verification - Before the move: 11 existing prompt tests and all four new characterization tests passed against the inline implementation. - Normalized syntax comparison passed for all 319 moved lines and the remaining orchestrator, including public exports. Imports and the typed boundary were reviewed separately. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - The clean post-move focused run passed all 26 tests in five files, with no skips: task-context characterization, task-markdown, Slack invitation, accepted-plan workspace refresh, and run-preparation. - The local `pnpm test:run` attempt was interrupted after database failures while the Mac exhausted its shared-memory slots. All 15 affected native warm-ownership database cases passed in an isolated rerun after the browser instance stopped; the other 666 cases in that file were excluded by the test-name filter. The interrupted command is not a full-suite pass. Full CI passed on `6bf86cfdc07e7fe34015f7b719218639f4232510`: 55 successful checks and two optional Storybook checks skipped. Greptile reviewed the latest commit at 5/5; its one earlier worker-test finding is fixed and resolved. - Browser E2E passed both scenarios on the final code: persistent timeouts stop after three runs and survive reload; one timeout recovers without manual Retry, verifies task-context prompt variants/revision and preserved workspace files in a real process, then completes through the run-scoped API. The first recovery attempt exposed an incorrect new test assertion because the fixture title equals its description. The worker now checks the description section specifically; the corrected recovery scenario passed in 55.9 seconds. The original failure trace was preserved. These tests use a deterministic process adapter and make no live model calls. ## Risks This is a behavior-preserving extraction. The main risks are changed closure bindings, missing return values, or changed preparation order. Typed inputs, public-path tests, and syntax comparison cover those risks. The run context is still the same mutable object. The helper acquires no leases or processes. It introduces no schema, API, or prompt policy changes. The first post-move database run skipped cases due to host resource exhaustion. All 26 focused cases passed on the subsequent clean run. Browser E2E passed after the worker assertion fix. The full local suite remains incomplete. All 15 native warm-ownership database cases passed on their isolated rerun; The full CI test suite passed on the final commit. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and test tools. The host does not expose the exact deployment model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 08:15:21 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	762d680daf	feat(ui): upload files directly in task artifacts (#15964 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage agent work and retain its context. > - Task documents and attachments keep that context with the task. > - The Artifacts panel showed output but could not accept a new file. > - Uploading through a message can require resuming a paused task. > - Existing document and attachment APIs can save files directly. > - This PR adds direct uploads and a drop target to the task panel. > - People can add context while keeping work paused and unassigned. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? The task Artifacts panel and its existing document and attachment APIs. Subsystem affected ui/ — React board UI. No server, schema, or API changes. Current behavior The Artifacts panel cannot upload a file. It also excludes files uploaded by people. The message composer can require a task to resume before it submits attachments. Proposed behavior Use the upload icon or drop files anywhere in the open Artifacts panel. The target includes the header, padding, and existing cards. Files save directly to the task without a message or a pause change. Reason and benefit People can prepare a handoff on a paused, unassigned task without starting agent work. Markdown becomes a task document. Other supported files use attachment storage. Breaking changes Files from people now appear in Artifacts alongside agent output. Promoted attachments still appear once. A repeated Markdown filename creates a separate document instead of replacing an existing revision. Existing APIs and limits stay the same. Additional context Related upload API work: Refs #7472 and Refs #7248. This PR adds the missing task-panel entry point. ROADMAP.md lists Artifacts and Work Products as available; this is a scoped UI improvement. ## What Changed - Add an upload icon with no visible label or background. - Accept file drops across the full task panel, including the desktop portal header and mobile tabs. - Show per-file progress and inline Retry and Dismiss actions. - Import Markdown under a new document key and retain existing revisions. - Include files from people in Artifacts and dedupe promoted attachments. - Add component and task-journey stories for empty, populated, loading, error, mobile, and drag-over states. - Add real browser tests for persistence, pause preservation, duplicate document names, full-panel drops, and partial failure recovery. ## Verification - Five Playwright tests passed against an isolated instance started by the source `test-drive` command. The document API, attachment storage, pause holds, downloads, and task UI were real. Only the explicit upload failure was injected. - The browser tests verified desktop and mobile uploads, document reading, persistence after reload, no task comments or runs, header drops, preservation of original and hidden internal documents, reserved filename handling, and upload retry. - 163 focused UI tests passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - The full Vitest suite is running after repair of an exhausted local PostgreSQL shared-memory pool. The initial run failed to initialize PostgreSQL. Six unattached segments had no living creator or last-user process; removing them restored free slots. - CI and the current-head Greptile review are pending. ## Risks - Artifacts now includes user files, so existing tasks can show more cards. - Uploads retain the server's authorization, file-type, size, and revision checks. No migration is needed. - Binary attachment uploads use the existing API. A transport failure with an unknown save outcome can retain the existing API's retry ambiguity. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The exact runtime snapshot ID and context-window size were not exposed to this session. The model used repository inspection, code editing, shell tools, and browser automation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 08:11:31 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	db2f00947b	fix(runner): include Claude ACP in the server package (#15912 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The server ships a copy of Paperclip Runner for native agent execution. > - The Claude ACP bridge is a runner dependency, but it was absent from the server package. > - The runner resolves this bridge dynamically, so the import-based packaging check missed it. > - A Claude session then failed before startup and showed a generic connection error. > - This pull request ships the qualified bridge and reports a missing runtime with repair steps. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A server install with the vendored runner could not load `@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/package.json`. The runtime test suggested checking the model or provider connection. The task reported an interrupted runner session. Expected behavior The server package includes its qualified Claude ACP runtime. A missing bundled runtime reports an installation error and explains how to repair it. Steps to reproduce 1. Use a server install with the vendored runner and no Claude ACP bridge. 2. Select the Paperclip Runner ACP harness and the Claude provider. 3. Run the runtime test or open a session. 4. Observe a missing-module failure before Claude starts. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on `e733bddc45`. This branch is based on current master. Deployment mode Self-hosted server built from source. Related: #15224 upgrades the Claude bridge. This PR fixes its omission from the server package and keeps the current qualified version. A future bridge upgrade must update the server pin too. ## What Changed - Add Claude ACP `0.73.0` to the server dependencies and bundled dependencies. - Pin the qualified Claude SDK and bridge dependencies in the npm bundle producer graph. Publish its native packages as consumer optional dependencies instead of shipping the producer executable. - Bind source-built vendored runners to the shared pnpm dependency store while retaining the server manifest as the provider authority. Keep published npm and self-rooted deployment roots unchanged. - Include dynamically resolved Claude and Codex bridges in the vendor dependency check. - Preserve the missing-package category through the sidecar, Rust transport, and native session executor. Stop automatic retries for this installation failure. - Show Runtime missing in the runtime test and task thread. Explain the reinstall or rebuild, server restart, and runtime test steps. - Add regression tests and document the repair procedure. ## Verification - Red/green comparison with the production sidecar: the same missing-package setup returns a raw require-stack error on the original code and an actionable, non-retryable missing-runtime error on this branch. - The rebuilt server's vendored Claude installation probe passes using the source-server authority selected by the launcher, without starting a provider or making a model request. - Focused server verification: 830 tests passed. Runner installation and sidecar error tests: 83 passed, with 6 platform-specific skips. Packaging tests: 28 passed. Rust transport tests: 7 passed. - Source/deployment authority tests: 3 passed. Red/green packaging tests include a Linux-produced Claude SDK bundle, actual npm pack, and closed executable admission on Linux x64 and macOS ARM64/x64. - Full UI suite: 8,113 tests passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on the rebased branch. - Full current-head CI passed, including all general and serialized test lanes, Runner Rust/Vitest verification, typecheck, build, and all eight e2e shards. Greptile reviewed `d6a2741834ff922956560f2f689382827bbaf9e0` at 5/5 with no unresolved threads. - Local full-suite limitation: an earlier parallel attempt hit Postgres startup failures and timeouts; the affected server tests and a database fixture passed in isolation. The subsequent serial `pnpm test:run` was stopped while still running after complete CI passed. Focused local tests, full UI tests, typecheck, and build completed as listed above. - Token gates and `git diff --check` passed. ## Risks - Bundling the Claude bridge increases the server package size. The producer graph retains the qualified SDK version and existing isolation patch. Native platform declarations move to the published server manifest, while the runtime keeps its exact version, declared-slot, no-follow, and executable digest checks. - The new failure category is permanent. Operators must repair the server installation before they retry the task. - Existing failed runs retain their recorded error. The clearer message applies to new runtime tests and runs. - No database schema or migration changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The system reports the model family; the exact deployment ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, browser inspection, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-12 06:51:22 -05:00
Devin Foley Codex Paperclip	1b4c803816	fix(costs): preserve usage attribution and explain unavailable run costs (#15948 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The cost ledger records usage and controls agent budgets. > - Some runs lose the selected model or API billing category before their usage reaches the ledger. > - The dashboard reports missing costs but does not identify the affected runs or the available actions. > - This pull request preserves usage attribution and adds a compact view of cost gaps grouped by agent. > - Operators can inspect runs, open agent settings, and record saved costs without starting new agent work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15634, #11938, #15879. This follows the merged subscription reporting in #15634. The older proposal in #11938 addresses part of ACP model attribution. This change also rejects conflicting models across a turn, fixes credential-backed billing capture, and explains cost gaps in the existing dashboard. The Pi receipt recovery work in #15879 covers a separate adapter recovery path. This PR preserves unresolved receipts and does not recover provider usage or reprice past entries. What happened? ACP results use the requested model even when the runtime selects a model. Native and OpenCode API runs can report unknown billing despite a matching API credential. The dashboard shows notices without links to the affected runs. These gaps make API and subscription totals harder to interpret. Expected behavior Record the model selected by the runtime. Identify API billing only from a matching credential. Keep costs unresolved when reliable usage or pricing is absent. Show the affected agents and runs. Offer an accounting retry only when saved evidence is ready. Steps to reproduce 1. Run an ACP agent with its model left unset, or use a matching API credential with a native or OpenCode agent. 2. Inspect the recorded model and billing category for the run. 3. Open Costs Overview for a period with unpriced usage or terminal runs awaiting receipts. 4. Inspect the notice and try to find the affected run or the relevant agent settings. Paperclip version or commit Current master at `657e71584a0`. The patch is rebased on that commit. Deployment mode Self-hosted server and local development. The cost detail tests use a disposable PostgreSQL database. ## What Changed - Preserve the runtime-selected ACP model in checkpoints and final results. Conflicting models across one turn remain unpriced. - Share credential-backed API billing checks across native and OpenCode results. Keep unknown billing when the provider and credential do not match. - Add company-scoped cost detail and accounting retry endpoints. Board viewers can read details but cannot retry. Agents and foreign companies are denied. - Limit each detail category to 25 entries. Use one consistent database snapshot and sparse indexes matching the filters and sort order. Add the unknown-billing count to the existing summary query. - Replace the notice with an expandable count line. Group entries alphabetically by agent. Show the saved blob icon, link each name to configuration, and put run and retry links beside the date. - Preserve estimate and unavailable-price labels on Providers and Billers; keep retry confirmation after the resolved notice disappears. - Fetch details only while expanded. Retain the last loaded details after a refresh error. Retry saved accounting only; do not rerun the agent. - Add capture, database, authorization, UI, and Storybook coverage. Update the implementation contract and cost reporting guide. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed after rebase. - `pnpm build` and `pnpm build-storybook` passed after rebase. - `pnpm check:token-gates` and `git diff --check` passed. - 1,086 focused tests passed across 17 files. These cover ACP, native and OpenCode capture, PostgreSQL reports, route authorization, OpenAPI, Costs UI, and existing accounting regressions. - Desktop and mobile browser checks passed during UI review. They cover lazy expansion, alphabetical groups, loaded blob icons, configuration and run links, keyboard retry, and layout overflow. - `pnpm test:run` was attempted with command-scoped `init.defaultBranch=master` for Git fixtures. It was stopped after a native session recovery failure reproduced on unchanged base `657e71584a0` (`archives a damaged prior epoch before completing guarded same-task replacement with real runnerd`). An MCP upload case failed in the broad run but passed in isolation on both the base and PR branch. These local limitations do not affect the 1,086 passing focused tests. - Current-head CI is green, including all unit test lanes, serialized server suites, runner checks, typecheck, build, policy, and eight browser shards. Apex re-review is 5/5 on `56de60effdb`; all four original findings are addressed and every review thread is resolved. - PostgreSQL applies migration `0333` in the integration fixtures. EXPLAIN ANALYZE on the production detail statements uses the new sparse indexes behind 5,000 healthy records in each table. - Ten provider/biller card cases cover missing and estimated prices; the retry test covers row removal and notice unmount. A live Storybook browser check verifies the confirmation and updated count. - Run `pnpm storybook`. Open Costs / Subscriptions / Cost Data Quality Details to inspect the production page with representative fixtures. ## Risks - Model and billing metadata change for future runs. Estimates still require complete usage and a supported price. No past cost amount is rewritten. - A missing final receipt remains unresolved for budget checks. The display changes after fifteen minutes; that time limit never authorizes settlement. - Accounting retry is a write action. It retains the existing company checks, receipt fences, idempotency, and audit logging. - Detail reads are bounded and run only after expansion. They poll every 30 seconds while open. No provider probe or new summary query is added. - Migration `0333` adds two partial indexes; it changes no stored cost amounts or table columns. Index creation scans the existing tables and may briefly block writes during deployment. No lockfile or workflow change is included. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with repository inspection, code editing, browser checks, and test execution. The exact serving model ID, reasoning setting, and context window were not exposed to this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-11 22:48:29 -07:00
Devin Foley Paperclip Agent Claude Opus 5.5	4611d6e95a	fix(restore): retry sandbox copy-back before holding the task for repair (#15920 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Legacy sandbox runs copy the agent's workspace files back to the host when the run settles. > - When this copy-back fails one time, the server keeps the sandbox and puts a board-owned repair hold on the task. > - The hold blocks new messages. Only an operator API runbook can clear it. The board shows that runbook text, so users do not know what to do. > - Many copy-back failures are transient: a dropped transfer, a provider error, or a merge lock that another restore holds. > - This pull request retries those failures automatically while the run still has its merge baseline and before any host file changes. > - The benefit is that most failures repair themselves, and the remaining holds explain the situation in plain language. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #14590 (related: no-replay recovery holds) What happened? A legacy sandbox run finished its work, but one workspace copy-back attempt failed. The task then showed "Recovery needed" with operator-only steps ("verify its exact stop receipt … record workspaceRepairEvidence"). Messages from the user stayed saved and were not delivered. What did you expect? Paperclip retries a transient copy-back failure automatically. If a repair is still necessary, the task says clearly what happened and who must act. Steps to reproduce 1. Run an agent in a legacy sandbox environment. 2. Make the workspace copy-back fail one time, for example with a dropped transfer or a held merge lock. 3. Open the task. It is blocked behind a repair hold, and new messages wait. Additional context Separately, distinct live events can render toasts with the same title and body (for example, two runs of the same agent that both succeed). The toast list showed both, and the desktop app forwards each one as a notification. ## What Changed - `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.ts`: retry the workspace copy-back up to three times in total, with a 2 s and then a 5 s backoff. A retry occurs only when the failure is `restore_failed` or `restore_lock_timeout` and no host workspace file was written. The merge now marks the first host write in `beforeApply`, which runs under the merge lock before any write. - Unsafe archives, permission failures, and failures after the merge started writing are never retried. Each retry uses a new temp directory and a new imported Git ref. - New optional `workspaceRestoreRetryDelaysMs` input, so tests can shorten the backoff. Nested repository restores receive the same value. - `ui/src/components/ExecutionBlockerNotice.tsx`: for a workspace repair hold, the notice now says what happened in plain language. The stored operator runbook text moves under "Technical details". - `ui/src/context/ToastContext.tsx`: also dedupe toasts on their visible tone, title, and body inside the existing 3.5 s window. - `doc/workspace-restore-locks.md`: document the automatic retry. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils exec vitest run src/sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts src/workspace-restore` (218 tests pass). New tests cover: - a retry after a dropped transfer, - a retry after a merge-lock timeout, - a stop after three attempts, - no retry for an unsafe archive, a permission failure, or a failure after the merge started writing. - The existing step-diagnostic test now uses failures that persist across retries. It still expects one diagnostic per failed step. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/context/ToastContext.test.tsx src/components/ExecutionBlockerNotice.test.tsx src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider` (120 tests pass). - `tsc --noEmit` for adapter-utils passes. `node scripts/check-token-gates.mjs` is clean. - Not fully run: the full adapter-utils suite has two failures in `github-launcher*.test.ts`. They read the managed GitHub credentials of the local sandbox environment and do not touch restore code. UI `tsc -b` reports five errors in `PluginOrganizationSwitcher.tsx`, which is not changed here, because the plugin SDK is not built in a fresh install. ## Risks - A copy-back that fails before the merge can take about 7 s longer before it reports a failure. Lock timeouts can take up to about 97 s in total (three 30 s lock waits plus backoff). Settlement already waits for the copy-back. - The retry logic depends on `beforeApply` running before the first host write in `mergeDirectoryWithBaseline`. That is true today, and a comment marks it. - A Git bundle import before the merge can leave unreferenced Git objects after a retry. They are harmless, and the existing ref cleanup still runs on each attempt. - Content-based toast dedupe can hide a second toast with identical text inside 3.5 s. That is the intended behavior. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`, Anthropic) in the Claude Agent SDK, with tool use (shell, file edit, code search) and a subagent for code exploration. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip Agent <agent@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-10-11 21:44:11 -07:00
Devin Foley Devin Foley Claude Opus 5.5	657e71584a	fix(daytona): record provider state when lease creation hits its deadline (#15946 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents can run in Daytona sandboxes. The Daytona plugin acquires a lease before each run. > - Some acquisitions time out. The report then says `environmentAcquisitionPhase=create` and that the whole 300 s budget was used. > - The Daytona SDK create timeout is equal to the acquisition budget. The outer timer always fires first. Thus the report never shows the state that Daytona left the sandbox in. > - Without that state, we cannot choose a fix. A stuck snapshot pull, a slow start, and a missing allocation need different fixes. > - This pull request adds one bounded, read-only provider lookup at the create deadline. It records a fixed-enum provider state in the existing acquisition diagnostic. > - The benefit is that the next timeout identifies where the provider stopped. Retry, budget, and cleanup behavior do not change. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15736 (bounded Daytona acquisition failure observations). This pull request extends those observations. What happened? A Daytona lease acquisition timed out with `Daytona lease acquisition timed out; allocation cleanup is pending`. The run-failure report gave `environmentAcquisitionPhase=create`, `environmentAcquisitionElapsedMs=300004`, and `environmentAcquisitionBudgetMs=300000`. The report did not show the Daytona sandbox state. The SDK create timeout is equal to the outer budget, so the outer timer always fires first. The SDK never reports the stuck state. Expected behavior When creation is still pending at the deadline, the report should show where the provider left the allocation. Examples are `pulling_snapshot`, `starting`, `error`, or `absent`. Steps to reproduce 1. Configure a Daytona environment. 2. Start a run when Daytona does not finish create and start within the acquisition budget. 3. Inspect the setup-failure report. Only the phase, the elapsed time, and the budget are present. Paperclip version or commit `master` at `ba04968`. ## What Changed - `packages/plugins/sdk`: Add an optional `providerState` field to `PluginEnvironmentAcquisitionDiagnostic`. The values are a fixed enum: `absent`, `creating`, `pending_build`, `building_snapshot`, `pulling_snapshot`, `starting`, `started`, `error`, `build_failed`, `other`, `unavailable`. The reader omits an unknown value and keeps the other fields. Old envelopes stay valid. - `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona`: When the acquisition deadline fires while `client.create` is still pending, make one `client.get` of the provisional `paperclip-create-<attempt>` name. The lookup has a 5 s bound, inside the host's 30 s RPC margin. Report the state only when the name and all ownership labels match. Otherwise report `unavailable`. A not-found error reports `absent`. - The lookup does not delete. It does not set `observedProviderLeaseId`. It does not change retries, budgets, or the cleanup envelope. - After the deadline, only the timer settles the call. A late create result cannot replace the timeout error before the lookup completes. A test proves this guard. - `server`: Project the value to `run_execution.environmentAcquisitionProviderState`. It uses the same private, run-scoped receipt as the other acquisition fields. - `doc/observability.md`: Document the new field and its limits. ## Verification - `cd packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona && npx vitest run --config vitest.config.ts`: 392 passed, 6 skipped. - `npx vitest run packages/plugins/sdk/tests/environment-creation-cleanup.test.ts server/src/services/__tests__/run-failure-diagnostics.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-acquisition-diagnostics.test.ts server/src/__tests__/run-failure-sentry-real-sdk.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts`: 302 passed, 11 skipped. - `tsc --noEmit` passes for `packages/plugins/sdk` and `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona`. - New tests cover state mapping, `other` for unlisted states, `absent`, `unavailable` for lookup failure and label mismatch, a hung lookup bounded to 5 s, no deletion, an unchanged cleanup envelope, and a late create that settles during the lookup. - A mutation check removed the late-settlement guard. The late-create test then failed. - The local server `tsc` was killed by the sandbox memory limit. CI must confirm the server typecheck. The server change is one line. ## Risks - Low risk. The timeout rejection can come up to 5 s later, and only for a create-phase deadline. The host RPC margin is 30 s. - The lookup is one extra read-only Daytona API call for each create-phase timeout. - This is a diagnostic. It does not fix the upstream cause. The next timeout report must show the state before a fix is chosen. - This is a Sentry run-failure report change. It is not a Telemetry change. The new value is a fixed enum. It does not contain provider IDs, causes, URLs, or paths. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edit, test runs). Context window and reasoning configuration are set by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-10-11 21:22:39 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	d49cbf4c4f	Permit idle sleep with consumed retries and passive worktrees (#15907 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Idle sleep must wait for accepted work and durable cleanup. > - The retry dispatcher keeps its due date after it promotes a retry. > - Finished retries and passive local directories can therefore look like pending work. > - This pull request requires completion proof and permits known passive directory records. > - It retains the records and keeps real work and unknown state awake. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #15897 and #15851. The open runtime-service work in #13413 retains its separate service and ingress guarantees. This patch does not change those checks. What happened? Idle sleep treats a consumed retry date as pending work. It also blocks on every retained execution workspace, including a local directory without runtime activity. Steps to reproduce 1. Promote a scheduled retry, then finish its run without accounting debt. Retain its scheduled retry date. 2. Retain a local primary directory or Git worktree without runtime configuration, commands, or cleanup due. 3. Request an owned idle safety report. The report returns `present` for this history. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on master at `4b59e2a2ec`. Deployment mode Server with PostgreSQL. The regression tests use embedded PostgreSQL. ## What Changed - Permit terminal runs with a finish time at or after their retry date and no accounting debt. Apply that proof to linked wake, answer-delivery, and verified failed-lease history. - Permit known passive local primary directories and Git worktrees. Keep due cleanup, commands, runtime configuration, shared project runtime inheritance, pending reopen, runtime owners, and unfamiliar state awake. - Retain retry dates, workspace records, files, and metadata. Document the proof and retention limits. ## Verification - Passed all 200 tests in `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/idle-sleep-safety.test.ts` against embedded PostgreSQL. - Passed the 52 retry dispatcher tests. - Passed `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`. After the provider correction, server typecheck and build passed again. - Full CI is green for commit `0510669439e855b90a4e03a2fc7827503cea507f`, including all test shards, typecheck, build, and browser end-to-end tests. One browser test initially raced its comment write; the failed jobs passed on retry without a source change. - Local `pnpm test:run` recorded 18,721 passed, 105 skipped, and four failures in existing AI-login, Git-fixture, and native runner-recovery tests; it exited before the remaining workspace and serialized groups. The AI-login test passed alone. Both Git fixtures passed with command-scoped `init.defaultBranch=master`. The native recovery failure also occurs on the parent revision on this Mac. These suites pass in CI. - Greptile Apex scored the final commit 5/5. Its provider-coverage comment was addressed and the review thread resolved. - Reviewed the diff for secrets, private data, generated files, and unrelated changes. ## Risks - Missing finish times, later retry dates, active children, and accounting debt continue to block sleep. Failed lease history still requires an exact provider termination receipt. - Future cleanup eligibility can wait for the next wake. Due cleanup blocks sleep. Storage must remain attached across sleep and keep its backup policy. - Shared directories with a project workspace and unfamiliar providers, strategies, modes, or configuration remain conservative blockers. - No migration, provider teardown, retry scheduling change, or tenant data deletion. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with repository tools and code execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific model snapshot or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused tests pass; the full local run has the environmental failures documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-11 12:27:51 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	0ba88d2195	fix(opencode-local): preserve deadlines in Daytona process sessions (#15905 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work done by AI agents. > - The OpenCode adapter can run its CLI in a provider sandbox. > - A long CLI run must remain observable until it exits or the host stops it. > - The legacy main command does not request a provider process session. A launch without an active run step uses one synchronous command request. > - That request can lose its response before the resolved execution budget ends. > - This PR requests the existing asynchronous session path for the main Daytona OpenCode command. It also carries the resolved command deadline through the host and provider contracts. The host still applies the effective capability gate. > - The change removes that synchronous request from eligible sandbox runs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related reporting fix: #15789. A search of open and closed GitHub issues and PRs found no duplicate transport fix. What happened? A hosted Linux legacy OpenCode run retained a gateway-timeout response about one hour after CLI startup. It had a four-hour resolved budget and recent agent output. The earlier reporting fix correctly kept the configured policy separate from the timeout message. The original response owner and specific timer were not retained, so this PR does not claim to prove that provider cause. Expected behavior A Daytona target that supports persistent process sessions should dispatch the long agent command asynchronously. Paperclip should observe its output and exit through the existing session path. A single command HTTP request should not need to stay open for the full agent run. Steps to reproduce 1. Use legacy OpenCode with a Daytona sandbox target and a four-hour execution budget. 2. Launch outside an active measured step. The current main CLI call does not request a persistent process session. 3. In the SDK fixture, make the synchronous command request return a provider timeout before the budget ends. Keep the asynchronous session healthy for more than one hour. 4. The regression tests require session dispatch, incremental output, one command dispatch, a real exit result, and session cleanup. 5. Set a shorter command deadline and stall dispatch, a status read or a log snapshot. The command must return a timeout at its own deadline. Healthy output must not extend that deadline. Paperclip version or commit Observed source: `e733bddc45e00efb1819fffa8677f7b0d07802c5`. PR base: `4b59e2a2ecc67e98b336b8eb4c09959681672d54`. Deployment mode Hosted Linux server, legacy OpenCode adapter, Daytona sandbox. The host gate retains the old path when a provider cannot keep process sessions. ## What Changed - Add an optional sandbox session choice to the shared process helper. Leave the choice absent for existing callers. - Request that session only at the main Daytona OpenCode CLI invocation. Keep probes, preparation and other providers on their existing paths. - Carry a separate optional command deadline through the shared runner, host service and plugin SDK. Existing session callers can omit it. Zero leaves the command deadline disabled. - Bound dispatch, live output and recovery observations with one command timer. Clear it on settlement. Fence late stream callbacks. Remove deadline listeners after each read and clear interrupted polling waits. Preserve a known exit code if only the final logs time out. A timeout result does not claim that the process stopped. - Add adapter and process-helper regression coverage. Test the existing Daytona session for a virtual run beyond one hour, without command replay, with release cleanup. - Document transport selection and the limits of the timeout evidence. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed on Node 25.6.1 and pnpm 9.15.4 with the command deadline changes. - `pnpm build` passed with the updated contracts. The separately installed Daytona package also passes its own typecheck and build against the pinned SDK 0.203.0 and TypeScript 5.9.3. - Five focused process, adapter, host and provider suites passed all 349 tests. They cover a run beyond one hour, five stalled observation phases, healthy-stream deadlines, zero/absent budgets, late callbacks, session release, SSH and capability fallback. - The real environment-runtime forwarding tests passed: 19 selected tests, including the separate command budget and forced session flag in the worker RPC. - An earlier full local `pnpm test:run` began before a clean build and overlapped the correction. That mixed-version run was stopped and is not passing evidence. After the build, the two previously uncollected suites pass (1,659 tests). Two unchanged workspace fixtures fail with this machine's Git default branch `main`; both pass with a test-process-only `master` override. One unchanged native recovery fixture fails on both this branch and an independently installed and built checkout of base `4b59e2a2ecc67e98b336b8eb4c09959681672d54`, with the same terminal-result mismatch. It is not introduced by this change. The full local suite is not claimed green. These limitations do not replace fresh hosted CI. - Final head `8e96638cdef8ca6e91f7a42a52c83a075180c137` passes all hosted checks: 54 passed and 2 expected Storybook skips. Greptile reviewed this exact head at 18:12 UTC and scored it 5/5. Both actionable findings are fixed and resolved. GitHub reports no conflicts and a clean merge state. Earlier-head results are not used as final-head proof. - The standalone provider test command passes 373 tests, with 14 expected live-probe skips. - SDK tests use a controlled virtual clock. No live provider experiment, task replay, manual deployment, or public PR merge was performed. ## Risks The main legacy OpenCode command uses Daytona's existing session route when the effective capability gate permits it. A quiet log stream can use the existing status and snapshot fallback. Those observations add provider reads. The new optional command budget is separate from each read's timeout and returns a timeout without the host RPC's extra 30-second allowance. Existing session callers that omit it keep their previous lifetime. Callback bridge control commands retain their explicit session bypass. The capability gate retains the previous path for unsupported targets. Other providers, local and SSH execution keep their existing path. Retry policy, Stop acknowledgement and lease ownership rules stay the same. The SDK exposes no cancellation handle for an abandoned stream; existing Stop and lease teardown still own command termination. This fix does not establish the original gateway owner or prove recovery in a live environment. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools and code execution. The exact backend identifier and context window size are not exposed by this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (changed paths; the independently reproduced local baseline failure is documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-11 12:08:45 -07:00
Devin Foley Bender Claude Fable 5.1 devinfoley	85f4205de3	perf(test): reuse a migrated embedded Postgres template across suites (#15861 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Pull requests to this repository run a large CI matrix. The slowest check sets the time a contributor waits for a green run. > - After #15853, the twelve `server (n/12)` shards are the slowest check in every fully green PR run created since its merge (518s to 548s; `Build` is 482s to 504s). Each shard is about 60s of setup and 454s to 490s of Vitest, with one worker, so its wall time is the sum of its suites. > - From two shard logs, 22 to 24 of the 71 to 74 suites in a shard start an embedded Postgres cluster. Each one runs `initdb`, starts the cluster, and applies all 331 migrations before its first test. The smallest such suite takes 6s with one or two trivial tests. On top of that, the `getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport` probe starts and stops a second throwaway cluster at import time in 19 of those suites, which is why their per-file import overhead is 3.5s to 4.1s against 0.9s to 1.0s for suites without Postgres. > - A cluster data directory that was shut down cleanly can be copied and started again as an independent cluster, and the migrated schema is the same for every suite. > - This pull request builds one migrated cluster per host, publishes its data directory as a template under the OS temp directory, and starts every later suite from a copy of it. The probe reuses the template instead of starting a cluster. > - The benefit is about 7s to 8s per Postgres suite on the CI runners (measured 3.2s to 0.35s per start and 0.75s to 0.03s per probe locally), about 120s to 170s per server shard, and a faster local test loop for every suite that uses the fixture. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? The `server (n/12)` PR checks are the slowest check in every fully green PR run since 2026-10-11 05:27Z. Their Vitest step runs suites one at a time, and about a third of each shard's time is embedded Postgres setup that produces the same migrated cluster every time. Subsystem affected Test infrastructure: the embedded Postgres test fixture in `@paperclipai/db` (`packages/db/src/test-embedded-postgres.ts`), used by 349 server suites, the db package suites, and the CLI suites. Current behavior `startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase` runs `initdb`, starts the cluster, creates the database, and applies all 331 migrations for every suite. `getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport` starts and stops a second throwaway cluster once per test file, because the module-level cache does not survive Vitest's per-file isolation. Measured locally: 3.2s per suite start plus 0.4s cleanup, and 0.75s per probe. On the CI runners the smallest Postgres suite takes 6s and the probe adds 2.5s to 3s of import time per file. Proposed behavior The first caller on a host builds one migrated cluster, stops it, and renames its data directory to `$TMPDIR/paperclip-embedded-postgres-templates-<uid>/<key>`. Every later caller copies the template (about 90 MB) and starts Postgres on the copy, then still runs `ensurePostgresDatabase` and `applyPendingMigrations`, which are no-ops on a current template. The probe treats a published template as proof that the host can run the cluster. The key hashes the embedded-postgres version, the initdb flags, the user, and the name and content of every migration file plus the journal, so a changed migration builds a new template. `PAPERCLIP_TEST_POSTGRES_TEMPLATE=0` bypasses the cache. Any template failure falls back to the fresh path. A template is a Postgres data directory, and starting it executes its configuration, so the cache is private to the current OS user: the root name carries the uid, the root is created with mode 0700, and both the root and each template are used only when `lstat` shows a real directory (not a symlink) owned by the current user with no group or world write bit. A root that fails those checks (for example one pre-created by another user in a shared `/tmp`) is left alone and the process uses fresh clusters. Reason and benefit The slowest check decides the wall-clock time of every PR run. Measured locally, a template start takes 0.3s to 0.4s instead of 3.2s, cleanup 0.15s instead of 0.43s, and the probe 0.03s instead of 0.75s. Four server suites that passed in both modes dropped by 3.4s to 6.0s each; the db `backup-lib` suite dropped from 42.7s to 20.9s. The CI runners are about twice as slow, so the expected saving per server shard is 120s to 170s. Breaking changes None. The returned database is fully migrated in both paths, each suite still gets its own cluster and data directory, and a failure on the template path falls back to the existing fresh path. ## What Changed - `packages/db/src/test-embedded-postgres.ts`: adds the template cache. `computeEmbeddedPostgresTemplateKey` hashes the inputs that determine a migrated cluster. `buildEmbeddedPostgresTemplate` starts a fresh cluster through the existing bounded retry, creates the database, applies migrations, waits for the real `stop()` (30s bound), and publishes the data directory with an atomic rename; a concurrent builder that loses the rename discards its copy. `startEmbeddedPostgresFromTemplateWithRetry` copies the template into a fresh temp directory, sets mode 0700, and starts the cluster with the same per-attempt port and directory rotation as the fresh path. `startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase` tries the template first and falls back to the fresh path with one warning per process. `probeEmbeddedPostgresSupport` returns supported when a template exists or can be built, and keeps its throwaway-cluster path for the case where the template could not be published. Templates for other keys are pruned after seven days. The connection strings and initdb flags move into shared constants; no other behavior changes. - `packages/db/src/test-embedded-postgres.test.ts`: two unit tests for the key (stable for identical inputs; changes with migration content, a new file, flags, version, or user; hashes this package's real migrations directory) and two real-cluster tests (the published template is complete and private, a suite starts from it in `template` mode with migrations up to date, a table written to one copy is not visible in the next copy, and `PAPERCLIP_TEST_POSTGRES_TEMPLATE=0` runs the `fresh` path). The real-cluster tests skip on hosts without embedded Postgres, like every other fixture suite. - `doc/DEVELOPING.md`: a short section under Test Commands describing the template, its key, and the bypass variable. Review fixes (second commit), one per finding: - Private cache root (Greptile P1, Superagent P2). The root is `$TMPDIR/paperclip-embedded-postgres-templates-<uid>` (user name on Windows), created with mode 0700. `prepareTemplateRootDir` and `isUsableTemplate` both reject, via `lstat`, anything that is a symlink, not a directory, owned by another uid, or writable by group or others; a rejected root logs one warning and the process uses fresh clusters. A root created by the first commit with a wider mode is narrowed to 0700 if this user owns it. - Template failures never skip suites (Greptile P1). `getEmbeddedPostgresTemplateDir` no longer rejects. A build or root failure resolves `null` with one warning, and `probeEmbeddedPostgresSupport` then runs the throwaway-cluster probe, so only a cluster that cannot start reports `supported: false`. A migration that cannot apply fails the suite on the fresh path instead of being hidden by `describe.skip`. - Idle-based pruning (Greptile P2). Each reuse refreshes the template's timestamp with `utimes`, so the seven-day prune measures idle time. A template that disappears after a process resolved its path is not retried five times: `startEmbeddedPostgresFromTemplateWithRetry` checks the template before each copy and throws at once, the suite falls back to a fresh cluster, and the fallback forgets the path so the next caller in that process rebuilds the template. - The template-path test enables the cache for itself and restores the original `PAPERCLIP_TEST_POSTGRES_TEMPLATE` value afterwards (Greptile P1), so the suite passes under `PAPERCLIP_TEST_POSTGRES_TEMPLATE=0` as well. - Eight new tests: `isUsableTemplate` accepts a private cluster directory and rejects a missing `PG_VERSION`, a leftover `postmaster.pid`, a symlink, and (POSIX) group- or world-writable modes; a world-writable pre-created root and a symlinked root both fall back to fresh clusters, publish nothing, log one warning, and still report `supported: true` from the probe; a ten-day-old template is refreshed on reuse; a pruned template is rebuilt on the next start; and a template build that fails after the cluster started falls through to the fresh probe. The tests that need an empty cache point `os.tmpdir()` at a scratch directory (`TMPDIR`, `TEMP` and `TMP` together, so the redirect holds on Windows as well) and restore it. Review fixes (third commit, `e8f8e9c8`), one per finding: - Fallback test on Windows (Greptile P1). `useScratchTmpdir` set only `TMPDIR`, which Windows `os.tmpdir()` ignores, so the one scratch-root test that runs on every platform would assert on paths outside the scratch root there. The helper now sets and restores `TMPDIR`, `TEMP` and `TMP` together, and that test asserts `os.tmpdir() === scratch` before it checks any path under it. - Timestamp test runs on its own (Greptile P2). The test assumed an earlier test had published a template; under `PAPERCLIP_TEST_POSTGRES_TEMPLATE=0` the probe does not, so a name-filtered run threw `ENOENT` from `utimes`. It now starts and cleans up one suite first, which builds the template when nothing has, and asserts `isUsableTemplate` before ageing it. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db exec tsc --noEmit`: clean (both commits). - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db exec vitest run src/test-embedded-postgres.test.ts`: 15 pass (12 new across both commits) with the template root absent (first run builds it), with it present, and with `PAPERCLIP_TEST_POSTGRES_TEMPLATE=0`. - After the review fixes: `client.test.ts` and `backup-lib.test.ts` (29 tests) pass on the template path, and `agent-action-audit-routes.test.ts` and `status-cards.test.ts` (36 tests) pass through the server route harness. The second commit's CI run ([38121021162](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38121021162)) passed every check: `server (n/12)` jobs 277s to 425s, Vitest `Duration` 219s to 365s, no fallback warning in any shard. - Third commit: reproduced the Greptile P2 on the old file first (`PAPERCLIP_TEST_POSTGRES_TEMPLATE=0 vitest run src/test-embedded-postgres.test.ts -t "refreshes the template"` on an empty cache root fails with `ENOENT … utime`), then with the fix the same command passes, and the full file passes 15/15 on a cold cache, a warm cache, and with the bypass set. `tsc --noEmit` clean. Measured on this PR's first CI run ([38117892083](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38117892083)), which ran the branch's fixture in every server shard: \| \| Before (runs 38114982393, 38115279131, 38115459196) \| This PR's run \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| Vitest `Duration` per `server (n/12)` shard \| 454s to 490s \| 224s to 337s \| \| `server (n/12)` job \| 518s to 548s \| 286s to 401s \| \| Slowest check in the run \| a server shard \| `Build`, 453s \| No shard logged a fixture fallback warning, so every Postgres suite in the run started from the template. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db exec vitest run src/status-card-migrations.test.ts src/nested-skill-folders-migration.test.ts src/chat-github-migration.test.ts src/question-response-delivery-migration.test.ts src/client.test.ts`: 5 files, 24 tests pass on the template path. These suites drop indexes, re-run migration files, and create extra databases on the cluster, so they cover the semantics the template must preserve. - Four server suites run with `PAPERCLIP_TEST_POSTGRES_TEMPLATE=0` and then with the template, all passing in both modes: \| Suite \| Fresh path \| Template path \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| `server/src/__tests__/agent-action-audit-routes.test.ts` (11 tests) \| 17.9s \| 14.6s \| \| `server/src/__tests__/status-cards.test.ts` (25 tests) \| 22.2s \| 18.6s \| \| `server/src/__tests__/plugin-managed-routines.test.ts` (3 tests) \| 18.2s \| 14.3s \| \| `server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts` (106 tests) \| 19.0s \| 12.9s \| \| `packages/db/src/backup-lib.test.ts` (9 tests) \| 42.7s \| 20.9s \| - Per-operation timings on the same host: fresh `initdb` + start + create database + 331 migrations 3.2s, cleanup 0.43s; template copy 0.20s to 0.23s, start from copy 0.03s to 0.04s, `ensurePostgresDatabase` 0.013s, `applyPendingMigrations` fast path 0.03s to 0.04s, stop 0.03s. Probe with the template on disk 0.03s (was 0.75s). Template size 87 MB, 3215 files. - This PR's own server shards run the branch's fixture, so their Vitest `Duration` lines show the saving directly. Expected on this PR's run: `server (n/12)` about 330s to 430s (was 440s to 548s on runs 38114982393, 38115279131 and 38115459196), and the slowest check moves to `Build` (482s to 504s). Measured on the three fully green `master` PR runs created after #15853 merged (slowest server shard logs): \| Run \| Server shards \| Vitest `Duration` (slowest shard) \| Postgres suites in it \| Their reported duration \| Their import overhead \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| 38115459196 \| 476s to 548s \| 483.8s (tests 72%, import 24%) \| 22 of 71 \| 197s \| 83s \| \| 38114982393 \| 409s to 518s \| 452.8s (tests 65%, import 30%) \| 24 of 74 \| 264s \| 98s \| ## Risks - Low risk to correctness. The template is a cleanly stopped cluster produced by the same `initdb` flags and the same migration runner as the fresh path, and each suite still runs `ensurePostgresDatabase` and `applyPendingMigrations` on its copy. Each suite gets its own copy, its own port, and its own data directory, so isolation between suites is unchanged. - A stale template is prevented by the key. If a migration file, the journal, the embedded-postgres version, the initdb flags, or the user changes, the key changes and a new template is built. Even if a stale template were used, `applyPendingMigrations` on the copy would bring it up to date. - Concurrent first use (for example the file-parallel db project) can build the same template twice. The rename is atomic, so one copy wins and the other is discarded; a template that exists is always complete. The loser pays one extra fresh start, which is what every suite paid before. - The template root lives under the OS temp directory and holds about 90 MB per key. Keys that have not been used for seven days are pruned when a new template is built; each reuse refreshes the timestamp. - A template is executable configuration, so the cache is only used when the root and the template are private directories of the current user (ownership, no symlink, no group or world write bit). On a host where another user pre-created the path, the process logs one warning and uses fresh clusters. Windows has no uid, so there the check is directory-only; its temp directory is already per user. - Any failure on the template path (root checks, build, copy, start, publish) falls back to the fresh path and logs one warning per process, so a broken cache can make a suite slower but never fail it or skip it. The guard tests assert the mode, so a silent fallback on CI would fail `test-embedded-postgres.test.ts` rather than hide. - Hosts that cannot run embedded Postgres still get `supported: false` with the real Postgres output, now from the throwaway probe: a failed template build is one warning, then the probe decides. On such a host the probe costs one extra failed start attempt cycle per file compared with the first commit; every suite on that host skips anyway. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-fable-5-1`, running as a Paperclip agent through the Claude local adapter with tool use (shell, file edits, GitHub CLI). The agent collected the CI data, made the change, ran the tests, and wrote this description. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green (53 checks green on both run 38117892083 and run 38121021162; the third commit re-runs them) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (1/5 on the first commit, 4/5 on the second; every finding so far is fixed and answered, and Superagent confirmed its fix; re-review of the third commit pending) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Bender (Fable) <bender-fable@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-10-11 11:19:13 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	4b59e2a2ec	fix(server): allow idle sleep with saved AI auth and verified lease history (#15897 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Automatic idle sleep must preserve accepted work, cleanup and recovery. > - Saved AI login connections are configuration without independent workers. > - Failed ephemeral leases can remain after their resources have stopped. > - Detached subscription observations and quota refreshes can outlive a response. > - This pull request distinguishes inert configuration and verified history from unfinished work. > - The benefit is safe idle eligibility while keeping credentials and audit history. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? An active saved AI login blocks idle sleep after its login and agent runs finish. A failed ephemeral lease also blocks after successful cleanup and provider termination. The connection guard currently hides detached quota and subscription work that can outlive the request that started it. Expected behavior An idle instance can sleep with saved AI credentials and verified failed-lease history. Accepted refresh work, recovery journals, unfinished login sessions, pending cleanup and run accounting must still block. Steps to reproduce 1. Save an AI connection with purpose `ai`, transport `runtime_auth` and status `active`. 2. Finish login and all agent work, then acquire an owned idle drain. 3. Read the idle safety report. The saved connection alone reports background work. 4. Repeat with a failed ephemeral lease whose exact provider termination and finished run are recorded. Its history also reports background work. Paperclip version or commit Based on `0bbd586a2f6`, after updates from master. Deployment mode Single-process managed or self-hosted server using the owned idle-drain protocol. Related work: #15522, #15761 and #15851. Searched open and closed pull requests for related idle-sleep changes. The open accounting recovery work in #15879 is separate; this change does not settle or discard accounting debt. ## What Changed - Exempt active saved AI runtime-auth configuration from the connection sleep check. Other connection types and unknown states keep their existing checks. - Track detached subscription discovery and provider observations until their actual promises settle. - Track underlying quota work through an HTTP timeout, including an OAuth exchange and the save of its replacement credential. - Inspect the credential-recovery directory without reading credential bytes. Journals, probes, temporary files, unexpected entries and read failures keep sleep blocked. Empty company directories left by successful recovery permit sleep. - Exempt a failed ephemeral lease only after successful cleanup, a release timestamp, an exact company/run/lease/resource termination receipt, and a finished run without retry or accounting debt. Export and cleanup intents still block. - Use the same failed-lease proof when checking finished login-session cleanup. - Add PostgreSQL and filesystem regression tests and document the behavior. ## Verification - Four focused suites passed: 186 tests covering durable guard decisions, local recovery, detached subscription work and quota timeouts. - `pnpm build` passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server build` and a final server TypeScript check passed after the directory-scanner cleanup. - The final directory-scan recheck passed all 18 tests. - The original-base `pnpm test:run` attempt found three local failures. It was stopped before completion to update the branch after two master changes. All three also reproduce on unchanged master `e733bddc45e`: two Git default-branch fixtures in `workspace-runtime.test.ts` and one native runner recovery fixture in `native-session-resume.test.ts`. - Both Git fixtures pass with a command-scoped `init.defaultBranch=master` setting. The native fixture fails with the same result on both branches. No global Git setting was changed. - All CI gates passed on the final head `ff63497d9bef40f5f00567bc729fb17536cfe136`: [complete CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38156312722). The only skipped checks are the two path-gated Storybook jobs. - Greptile Apex scored the final head 5/5 with no actionable findings and no unresolved review threads. The branch has no merge conflicts with master. - After the master update, `pnpm build` and `pnpm -r typecheck` passed again. All four focused suites passed again: 186 tests. - Staging deployment and live sleep/wake verification are pending the Core merge and the verified private Cloud build. No production rollout has been started. ## Risks - The failed-lease exception is deliberately narrow. Older records without exact termination evidence or a complete run receipt continue to block. - Pending OAuth recovery blocks sleep until it is recovered. No credential, history, cleanup obligation or accounting receipt is deleted. - The existing owned drain, ingress fence, local-work generation checks, plugin drain and backup checkpoint remain required. - No schema migration or provider mutation is introduced. Roll back to the previous application release to restore the conservative guard behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with repository inspection, code editing, test execution and read-only provider analysis. No additional model version or context-window size was supplied by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked existing issues or described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run focused tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved comments - [x] I will address all reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-11 10:01:57 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	0bbd586a2f	fix(server): wait for workspace restore before shutdown lease release (#15857 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Server shutdown must stop agent execution and preserve its files. > - Legacy adapters export workspace and instruction changes during settlement. > - Shutdown released their sandbox leases before this export finished. > - The provider closed command access, so the later Git export failed. > - This change stops an owned adapter through its cancellation control and waits for settlement before release. > - A bounded timeout retains the exact sandbox source behind the existing repair gate. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A server restart interrupted a remote legacy run. Shutdown began releasing its sandbox lease while the adapter was still stopping its provider and restoring files. The sandbox provider closed command admission. The adapter's later Git export failed with `workspaceRestoreFailure: restore_failed`, leaving the task held for workspace repair. Expected behavior Shutdown keeps the exact lease available through provider stop, instruction collection, and workspace restore. Cleanup follows adapter settlement. A restore that exceeds the bounded deadline keeps its exact source for repair before later execution. Steps to reproduce 1. Start an owned legacy adapter with a sandbox workspace. 2. Send SIGTERM to the server while the adapter is active. 3. Delay adapter settlement until after the shutdown terminal write. 4. On the base branch, shutdown releases the lease without cancelling or joining the adapter. Its later export can encounter closed provider admission. Related: #14311 defines the provider-stop boundary for file collection. #15042 closes run admission during shutdown. This fix orders sandbox release after the adapter's existing file settlement. ## What Changed - Cancel each owned legacy adapter and join all affected runs within one shared 30-second window. - Commit a durable fence on the exact sandbox before exposing interruption. Other cleanup workers defer while export is pending. - Permit the exact aborted owner's stop-only request so shutdown does not block provider termination. - Reload current execution evidence after settlement. Release leases even when the adapter's ordinary terminal write wins the shutdown race. - Claim the current fence before recording timeout retention. An old snapshot cannot create a repair hold after successful settlement. - Recover fenced sources after controller loss, including released stop receipts. Block reuse or destruction of the physical allocation while file recovery is required, including direct resume and destroy calls with historical lease snapshots. Convert failed ordinary cleanup into stop-only recovery after its existing attempt settles. - Allow 90 seconds for shutdown in shipped Compose services. Preserve native runner restart ownership and unregistered process behavior. - Add database regressions for restore order, timeout, concurrent cancellation, another cleanup worker, controller loss, stale snapshots, stop-only settlement, and completion races. Document the shutdown order. ## Verification - The original ordering regression failed on the base implementation. - Latest recovery and environment runtime suites: 190 tests passed. The other four focused suites passed 136 tests, covering run control, shutdown, file repair, server startup, and environment runtime. - Server typecheck passed. Full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on the latest head. - `pnpm test:run` was run locally. Its general-server group passed 18,559 tests and failed seven, with one unhandled error. The long run started before the review fixes, then loaded newer regression cases against older transformed modules. The current focused suites pass in a fresh process. The damaged-prior-epoch native-session-resume failure also reproduces on unchanged base commit `de9ab8e7e0`. An isolated rerun of the Google Workspace connection case passed. Later full-run groups did not run because general-server stopped on failure. - The prior CI startup import failure is fixed: expiry loads the terminal recorder only when it needs to pin recovery. Its focused startup suite passes. - Apex reviewed commit `c564320b16` at 5/5. All review threads are resolved. All latest-head CI gates passed. The branch has no merge conflicts. ## Risks Owned legacy adapters share a 30-second shutdown window. The wait is bounded. Timeout cleanup uses the existing stop-and-retain and workspace repair paths. A timeout can require manual file verification even if a late restore succeeds. No database migration or API change is needed. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository inspection, code editing, shell execution, and test tools. The session identifies the model family as GPT-6. It does not expose a more specific runtime model ID or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites; full local limitations are listed above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-11 09:30:59 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	5847f047c7	fix(connections): retire requests for already available tools (#15856 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connection cards let users provide the access an agent needs. > - Users can complete setup in Apps while an earlier card stays pending. > - A stale card can then cancel recovery despite valid existing access. > - This change verifies existing access and expires the obsolete request. > - It records a system outcome and sends one durable continuation. > - Approval, identity, permission, and workspace recovery gates remain in place. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? An ordinary tool connection request stayed pending after the addressed user connected the service in Apps. A later conversation retry was cancelled with `issue_waiting_for_response`. Expected behavior A request expires when the same user and requesting agent already have usable access. The agent gets a durable tool refresh. The system records no new human approval. Steps to reproduce 1. Have an agent request a tool connection on an active task. 2. Connect the service through Apps with the addressed user's existing grant, agent install, and allowed tools. 3. Let a conversation run stop and retry. The pending card still blocks the retry on the base branch. Related: #12345 introduced the connection request flow. This fix uses its existing access checks and delivery queue. ## What Changed - Verify company, task ownership, user identity, membership, health, grants, installs, and task tool policy before expiring an ordinary request. - Preserve AI account, channel, additional permission, and upstream provider requests on their existing paths. - Save the system outcome, audit event, and continuation in one transaction. Notify an idle delivery worker when a request commits. - Recheck access and other questions or approvals before delivery, retry, final dispatch, and native projection. Refresh system observations for an authorized replacement account. - Rearm delivery when access changes before provider work starts. Verify the host's admission receipt against execution evidence before allowing retry without a repair incident. - Require the current delivery claim when marking an attempt complete. An old completion cannot overwrite a rearmed continuation. - Add embedded-Postgres regressions for permissions, policy, concurrency, restart, replacement accounts, both dispatch gates, and the delivery race. Keep genuine workspace repair holds blocking. ## Verification - Latest-head connection, wake-context, dispatch, and legacy recovery suites: 124 tests passed. The connection suite includes 44 real-Postgres cases. - Server typecheck passed. Full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on the latest head. - `pnpm test:run` was run locally. Its general-server group passed 18,583 tests and failed 20. That long run started before the review fixes, then loaded new test cases against modules transformed before those fixes. The affected latest-head suites pass in a fresh process. - One full-run failure also reproduces on unchanged base commit `de9ab8e7e0`: native-session-resume's damaged-prior-epoch replacement case. It is outside this change. Full-run groups after general-server did not run because that command stopped on failure. - Apex reviewed commit `96b96297f4` at 5/5. All review threads are resolved. All latest-head CI gates passed. The branch has no merge conflicts. ## Risks A false readiness result could retire a request too early. The fix reuses the runtime access selection rules, makes no new grants, and rechecks access at delivery. Ordinary expired requests do not authorize continuation. A failed workspace restore still requires repair through the existing gate. No schema migration is needed. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository inspection, code editing, shell execution, and test tools. The session identifies the model family as GPT-6. It does not expose a more specific runtime model ID or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites; full local limitations are listed above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-11 09:30:45 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip	e733bddc45	perf(chat): stop polling provider action and session sync queues (#15822 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Chat stores pending provider actions in durable database rows. > - Three action queues still scan every second when empty. > - These scans keep idle databases active. > - This pull request wakes those queues after a commit or at their next deadline. > - Empty queues stop querying while existing recovery rules remain in place. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15808, #15802, #15625. Related sleep work: #15750, #15757. What existing behavior does this improve? Provider messages and notices, accepted GitHub webhook receipts, and Slack session status synchronization. Current behavior Chat maintenance scans these three queues every second. It also rechecks paused Slack sync rows every 30 seconds. Proposed behavior Reuse the transaction-aware action workers and existing chat_actions rows. Wake after commits. Restore unfinished work on startup. Use stored retry and stale-claim deadlines. Stop scanning when empty. Park paused Slack sync rows until an endpoint change. ## What Changed - Add three topics to the existing action worker registration. No tables, migrations, triggers, or external services. - Signal producers, claims, retry updates, terminal settlements, and operator resolution inside their owning transaction. Provider I/O remains outside transactions. - Share pending-state and deadline predicates between dispatch and scheduling. Exclude terminal history and uncertain provider sends. - Preserve GitHub receipt attempt fences and provider-send quarantine. Preserve Slack's 30-minute refresh while a session is processing. - Remove these workers from periodic app maintenance. Update the sleep inventory and add regression coverage. ## Verification - Passed: 13 focused tests across scheduler, app wiring, and real PostgreSQL integration. Covers actual commit wakes with deferred fast paths disabled, GitHub retries and startup recovery, stale-send quarantine, Slack publication-to-sync delivery, paused deadlines, and idle queues. - Passed: pnpm typecheck. - Passed: full chat integration and related coordinator suites, 1,274 tests across five files. - Passed: pnpm build. - Greptile: 5/5, no actionable findings, completed on `dc284cd275e5f6df624d60b27954421f2bcdbee2`. - Hosted CI: 54 checks passed, two intentionally skipped Storybook checks, no failures or pending checks on `dc284cd275e5f6df624d60b27954421f2bcdbee2`. Provider responses are simulated. PostgreSQL, transactions, service dispatch, and scheduling are real. No live Slack or GitHub App was used. ## Risks - Writers must emit the existing process-local transaction signal. Independent database clients and direct SQL still need explicit integration or startup recovery. - Accepted GitHub receipts are covered. Finding callbacks GitHub never delivered still uses the separate provider recovery lane. - Other chat maintenance and persistent transports still run. This does not establish whole-instance sleep. - Existing claim, revision, credential, and authorization checks remain authoritative during concurrent foreground and scheduled dispatch. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), with repository inspection, code execution, and automated tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-11 06:08:05 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	30e338fba6	refactor(heartbeat): extract environment selection (#15825 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Heartbeat execution selects an environment before it prepares a workspace and starts an agent. > - Workspace preparation now has its own module, but its selection policy still occupies the executor. > - Environment defaults, recovery bindings, chat isolation, and workspace contention must retain their order. > - This pull request moves that selection phase behind one typed function. > - The executor keeps dispatch gates and lease cleanup. Tests cover the public path and the new boundary. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15807. This continues the heartbeat extraction series after workspace preparation. Current behavior The 5,599-line heartbeat service contains a 301-line environment selection phase inside run execution. Proposed behavior Move that phase to `heartbeat/environment-selection.ts`. Keep the same policy, statement order, errors, and public exports. Reason and benefit Readers can find selection policy in one module and follow the executor's phases without reading each policy branch. ## What Changed - Add `selectHeartbeatEnvironment` with typed run, task, policy, configuration, and service inputs. Return the values needed by configuration and workspace preparation. - Preserve native recovery bindings, environment precedence, managed sandbox enforcement, Kubernetes provisioning, native chat isolation, and shared workspace contention. - Reduce `heartbeat.ts` from 5,599 lines / 234,599 bytes to 5,314 lines / 220,784 bytes. The new module is 402 lines / 18,215 bytes. - Add six public-path characterization cases before moving production code and six boundary cases. Repair plugin-test teardown to drain active execution and call the database cleanup helper. - Assert the selected local environment in the browser fixture's real worker and document the new boundary. ## Verification - Before the move: 71 tests passed, including all six new public-path cases. Three plugin tests skipped when the host could not start their database probe. - After the move: all 112 focused tests passed across eight files, with no skips. These cover environment policy, local and plugin execution, contention, recovery bindings, workspace preparation, chat isolation, and low-trust directories. - Passed `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`. - A normalized TypeScript AST comparison confirms the 301 moved lines and remaining executor statements are unchanged, apart from the new call and imports. - Browser acceptance: the task UI recovered automatically and the worker verified its selected local environment, preserved uncommitted files, and completed the task. The persistent-failure case passed in isolation: three total runs, then a blocked task that remained blocked after reload. - The first persistent-failure browser attempt missed the retry banner within five seconds, despite a persisted scheduled retry. Its unchanged isolated rerun passed. The trace is retained; the intermittent UI failure is not yet attributed to a root cause. No assertion or timeout was relaxed. - Greptile reviewed `20953dd164decb565bc8d85081aad31a23fd33e5`: 5/5, no actionable findings. - Hosted CI passed on `20953dd164decb565bc8d85081aad31a23fd33e5`: 52 successful checks and two intentionally skipped Storybook checks, with no pending or failing checks. This includes all general and serialized test groups, Runner verification, eight browser shards, typecheck, and build. - The duplicate local `pnpm test:run` was interrupted after hosted CI completed. It is not reported as a local full-suite pass. Local completed checks are the 112 focused tests, typecheck, build, and browser cases described above. ## Risks - This selection phase enforces execution restrictions. A wrong input or import could select the wrong environment or change retry behavior. Public-path tests cover refusal, redirect, contention, and dispatch; boundary tests cover recovery and isolation. - The helper can provision a managed environment row and add concurrency notes to the supplied task context. It acquires no execution lease. The executor retains its catch/finally boundaries and resource ownership. - Kubernetes selection is tested with real database state and bootstrap settings. These checks do not claim execution against a live Kubernetes cluster or hosted sandbox provider. - No schema, migration, API contract, or intended behavior change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), with repository inspection, code editing, compiler checks, database integration tests, and browser automation. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-11 06:04:31 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	b36960b758	fix(server): permit verified question-delivery history to sleep (#15851 ) Treat completed question-response deliveries as history only after their exact same-company handoff finishes. Preserve missing evidence, retries, accounting debt, and idle-sleep fences. Add a concurrent all-state question history index with interrupted-build repair. Keep migrations serialized without waiting snapshots that deadlock concurrent index builds. Validated by 118 focused sleep tests, six migration/snapshot tests, full repository typecheck, all CI gates, and Apex 5/5. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 21:47:55 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	07f3536e37	fix(connections): discover Sentry OAuth through its MCP resource (#15837 ) Correct Sentry OAuth discovery and cover new and saved client registration. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 17:10:23 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	4f680bc85c	fix(release): retry verified canary tarball 404s (#15768 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Canary releases test the published npm packages through a clean onboarding install. > - A package can be announced in registry metadata while a fresh install gets a tarball 404. > - The existing ETARGET retry does not cover that distinct error. > - This pull request retries only a verified public canary tarball acquisition failure. > - Permanent errors still fail, and onboarding runs once after acquisition succeeds. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #15743 What happened? The [Release run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37998601578) published canary `2026.1009.0-canary.17`. Its registry verification and publisher install passed. The separate fresh onboarding install then failed with a final npm E404 for that exact `@paperclipai/server` tarball. The tarball was available on a later read. This is a separate failure from ETARGET; it does not prove the cause of the registry visibility difference. Expected behavior Allow a bounded acquisition retry when the effective registry is public npm and fresh primary metadata announces the exact released canary tarball. Keep other E404, authentication, configuration, and onboarding errors fatal. Steps to reproduce 1. Run the offline helper fixture with a first-attempt E404 for an allowlisted package at the requested canary version. 2. Return canonical effective npm registry configuration and matching primary metadata. 3. Make the second install succeed. Confirm two installs and one onboarding invocation. 4. Keep the tarball unavailable. Confirm three installs, a final failure, and no onboarding invocation. Paperclip version or commit The observed run used commit `ce024457f3d747657501fbcfe8eac71f6772150f`. This fix builds on the merged acquisition helper and current master. Deployment mode Other: the published npm canary onboarding check in release CI. ## What Changed - Add a canary-only classifier for one unambiguous final E404 at the canonical tarball URL of a CI-published package from the existing release manifest. - Query effective npm registry configuration in the failed install's prefix, environment, and working directory. Keep bounded configuration output in memory without logging it. Respect scoped registry precedence. - Require fresh primary metadata to match the package, version, tarball URL, and valid SHA512 integrity syntax. Reject redirects, conflicting errors, truncated logs, other artifacts, and unknown or custom effective registries. - Share one five-second configuration and metadata deadline within the existing two-minute acquisition budget. Keep three install attempts, refreshed retry metadata, process cleanup, and one onboarding invocation. - Bound metadata header and body waits even if transport abort propagation stalls. Cancel the reader and any late response body without waiting for cancellation acknowledgements. - Preserve the existing ETARGET classifier and its character-based stderr tail. Add offline subprocess, actual npm configuration, body cancellation, budget, identity, and failure tests. Document the scope and limits. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs scripts/cloud-source-verification.test.mjs scripts/standard-image-contract.test.mjs`: 73 passed, no skips, under Node 22 on the PR head. - `pnpm test:release-registry`: 153 passed, no skips, on the PR head. This includes the existing real Playwright cleanup and startup timeout tests. - [Hosted CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38011028296) passed on this head. The rollup has 53 successful checks and two expected Storybook skips. This includes typecheck, build, the full general and serialized test suites, E2E, and Canary Dry Run. - The new tests use fixture-owned npm configuration and local HTTP servers. No published canary tarballs were downloaded or installed for this change. No release or deployment was triggered. - `pnpm test:run` was not run locally. The full split test suites passed in hosted CI. Independent source checks on this head passed 46 committed tests, 22 boundary checks, and six negative controls. Greptile scored this head 5/5 with no unresolved threads. - The source diff and PR text were checked for secrets, private identifiers, and unintended artifacts. ## Risks - The new retry is conservative. A configuration capture over 4 KiB, metadata over 64 KiB, or a check that exceeds five seconds denies retry. A persistent tarball failure still fails after three installs. - Matching primary metadata proves the announced artifact identity and integrity syntax. It does not independently verify tarball bytes. The subsequent npm install retains its integrity check. - Registry checks use npm's resolved global and applicable scope values. They do not add credentials or change npm configuration. Existing ETARGET behavior, onboarding assertions, and overall startup deadlines remain unchanged. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex). The exact model variant and context window are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, code execution, offline fixtures, and GitHub API tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 16:49:15 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	40701adecf	fix(release): preserve pinned master identity for canary publishing (#15770 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A master push publishes a canary from its exact source commit. > - The publisher now checks out that commit by SHA. Git leaves HEAD detached. > - The release script requires the local branch name to be master. > - This pull request verifies the trusted push and source before attaching local master at the same commit. > - The canary can pass the existing branch guard without following a newer master tip. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #15712 pinned the publisher checkout and bound the smoke lockfile to its source. I searched open PRs and issues for canary, detached HEAD, and checkout fixes. No overlapping fix was found. #15768 addresses a later tarball visibility error and does not change this branch guard. What happened? The canary publisher checks out the exact push SHA. The checkout is detached. `release.sh canary --skip-verify` then fails because the local branch is not master. Publication does not start. The [failed master run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38008956836) shows this failure. Expected behavior The trusted master publisher must keep the exact verified push commit and pass the existing local master guard. It must not follow a newer branch tip. Steps to reproduce 1. Check out a master push commit by its full SHA. 2. Confirm that HEAD is detached. 3. Run the real `require_on_master_branch` helper from `scripts/release-lib.sh`. 4. Observe the detached-HEAD rejection. The tests reproduce this without calling a publisher. Paperclip version or commit `baa94bbea58919bcc6cf247a708f04e6e1002679`. Deployment mode The GitHub Actions master canary publishing lane. ## What Changed - Add one step immediately after the pinned publisher checkout. - Require the canonical repository, a push event, and the master ref before changing any Git ref. - Validate the full source SHA and require the checked-out HEAD to match it. - Attach local master to that exact SHA and recheck HEAD. Do not fetch or select a floating branch. - Preserve release scripts, local branch guards, package authentication, other publishing lanes, and source-named lockfile artifacts. - Add disposable real-Git tests for a pinned source behind local and remote master, rejected trust and SHA inputs, unchanged refs on rejection, and the original branch guard. Document the branch handoff. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs scripts/cloud-source-verification.test.mjs scripts/standard-image-contract.test.mjs scripts/release-lib.test.mjs` passed all 82 tests on Node 25.6.1. Twelve new cases include eleven real-Git fixtures and one workflow invariant check. The tests run the actual workflow shell and the unchanged release guard. - `actionlint -shellcheck= .github/workflows/release.yml` passed. ShellCheck passed for the new shell. Full local actionlint reports four pre-existing advisories in other steps; their text matches the base exactly. This change adds no advisory. - Workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on Node 25.6.1. The local tests cover the changed release flow; the full application test suite runs in hosted CI. - [Hosted full CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38011530698) passed all 47 jobs at commit `ffff774a2629663fa71e2fad5143da0696afc5e6`. This includes policy, typecheck, release registry, build, runner tests, application tests, browser tests, and the canary dry run. Hosted policy ran all 12 new guard tests and passed all 67 source-policy tests. - Greptile scored the same commit 5/5 with no actionable issues. There are zero review threads. Separate source review approved all three changed files and 32 dependencies. It passed 82 tests and caught four broken variants. - The supply chain scanner returned neutral with zero annotations. It cannot verify this inline workflow change and reports limited coverage for existing action references. Manual review confirmed that all action references and pins are unchanged. The security, Socket, and Snyk checks passed. - No live canary install, registry publication, Docker image operation, workflow rerun, or deployment was performed. Tests use disposable Git repositories and local fixtures. ## Risks Low risk. The new step changes only local Git state in the trusted canary publisher. A wrong event or source fails before ref changes. The original release and authentication guards remain in place. The exact checkout and artifact source stay unchanged. Revert the new step to restore the previous behavior. No runtime or database change is required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. Used repository inspection, code execution, Git and Bash fixtures, and independent agent review. The runtime does not expose a more specific model snapshot or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 13:33:34 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip	b1ebe3de3c	perf(chat): wake action queues from commits and deadlines (#15808 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Chat keeps durable rows for provider actions and setup messages. > - Five action queues still scan the database every second when empty. > - Empty scans add idle database traffic and prevent cost savings from sleep. > - This pull request wakes these queues when their writes commit or their next deadline arrives. > - Existing rows retain retry and restart recovery. Empty queues stop scanning. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15802, #15625, #15750, #15757. Related allocation work: #15153. What existing behavior does this improve? Idle chat reconciliation for Slack Board messages, Slack slash-command task starts, Slack setup verification messages, receipt reactions, and Slack session stops. Current behavior The app runs these five queue scans through chat maintenance every second, including when no work exists. Proposed behavior Each queue has an independent worker on the existing scheduler. Producers and foreground claim/retry/settlement writes announce work inside their database transaction. The worker wakes after the outer transaction settles. Startup restores durable work. Shared dispatch and deadline predicates select real retries and abandoned claims. Empty queues disarm. Subsystem affected Server chat services. No schema or migration changes. ## What Changed - Register five action workers alongside the three delivery workers from #15802. Remove their scans from periodic app maintenance. - Share action eligibility between dispatch and deadline selection. Park paused Board messages and task starts until endpoint changes. Preserve uncertain-send quarantine. - Wake setup verification after account, welcome, registration, or authenticated callback changes. Exclude prerequisites that need another event. - Persist a retry time for failed provider-confirmed task admission. Its own commit notification cannot cause an immediate retry loop. - Reuse the existing transaction signals and scheduler registration code. Provider calls remain outside database transactions. - Update the instance-sleep inventory and add scheduler and PostgreSQL regression coverage. ## Verification - Passed: 37 scheduler, coordinator, and app-wiring tests, including an idle hour with no further scans or timers. - Passed: seven focused PostgreSQL chat cases. These cover deadline eligibility, startup recovery, outer-commit wakes, actual producer signals, and signed-callback verification without maintenance polling. - Passed: `pnpm typecheck`. - Passed: full chat integration suite and related publication/coordinator tests, 1,278 tests across six files, including 1,228 chat integration cases. - Passed: `pnpm build`. - After the review fix, seven focused PostgreSQL integration cases and the server typecheck passed again. Deadline and dispatch queries now exclude completed action history. - Greptile: 5/5 on `35a979fce6bb9ab910fab3373ec8e537fc2d01a9`, with the prior finding resolved and no new findings. - Fixed a CI timing failure in the GitHub mention integration test: asynchronous admission now has an explicit ten-second assertion deadline instead of the default one second. The failure reproduced locally; all five mention variants and all 398 cases in the matching CI shard pass after the fix. - Hosted CI passed on `35a979fce6bb9ab910fab3373ec8e537fc2d01a9`: 54 successful checks, two intentionally skipped Storybook checks, no failures or pending checks. Provider responses are simulated in the integration suite. PostgreSQL, transactions, service dispatch, and scheduling are real. No live Slack workspace was used. ## Risks - Every producer that changes runnable state must emit a transaction signal. This change covers the five queues and their foreground dispatch/retry paths. Direct SQL and independent DB owners still need explicit integration or startup recovery. - Missing retry or claim deadlines can strand work. Tests compare the dispatch and deadline behavior, including paused and uncertain states. - Other provider maintenance, sockets, and scheduled jobs remain. This change does not establish full instance sleep. - No new tables, migrations, or provider credentials are required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), with repository inspection, code execution, and automated tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 13:14:23 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	a7dd5284b5	feat: add company fast-response acknowledgements (#15748 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Human messages start agent work through task, chat, and external-channel intake. > - Agent startup can delay the first visible response. > - A small direct model call can acknowledge the request while normal work starts. > - This response must remain separate from evidence that the agent answered or completed work. > - This pull request adds optional company-wide fast responses with durable receipts, access checks, and cost accounting. > - Users receive prompt acknowledgement without changing the agent execution path. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Subsystem affected Cross-cutting: database, shared contracts, server orchestration, connections, and UI. Problem or motivation Users can wait for an agent to start before they receive a contextual response. Generic progress messages do not confirm what the user asked. An acknowledgement must not falsely complete work or satisfy an unanswered turn. Proposed solution Add a disabled-by-default experimental fast-response model using an existing shared API connection. Generate one short acknowledgement for each accepted human turn. Use the existing agent identity and external publication outboxes. Retain platform provenance and account for the inference independently. Alternatives considered Running the acknowledgement through the agent runtime adds startup latency. Restricting implementation to OpenRouter leaves other existing API connections unsupported. This change supports all existing API connections and uses OpenRouter for live verification. Roadmap alignment This extends existing agent communication and connection settings. ROADMAP.md and open pull requests were checked. No duplicate fast-response implementation was found. The maintainer supplied the feature plan directly. ## What Changed - Add Experimental fast responses to instance settings. Keep the feature off by default. Enforce the flag at intake, dispatch, and publication. - Move Decision model and Fast response setup to company Settings → Connections when the experiment is enabled. Place Connections below Environments. Separate the model sections with clear headings and a divider. Keep Decision model in General when the experiment is off. Route Costs setup links to the available settings page. - Make the acknowledgement prompt a multiline template string. Ask for a brief, positive response in the user’s language. - Add settings, connection/model selection, sponsorship, fixed-sample testing, and Costs history. - Add a Vercel AI SDK text service for existing native, routed, Bedrock, and local API connections. - Add durable per-turn requests, a bounded worker, a three-second admission deadline, and one inference attempt. - Integrate task creation, task and agent chat, steering, queued follow-ups, experimental board chat, shared chat intake, and email. - Preserve receipt provenance and exclude receipts from completion, recovery, interaction resolution, and agent wakeups. - Recheck authorization, source validity, real replies, budgets, and destination binding before publication. Preserve accounting for suppressed or uncertain outcomes. - Add provider contracts, database race tests, channel outbox tests, UI tests, Stories, and documentation. Keep decision-model execution unchanged. ## Verification - Local `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and UI token gates pass after rebase. The UI typecheck and build also pass after the final navigation fixes. All 37 focused navigation tests pass. The first full local `pnpm test:run` invocation reported seven chat failures. All seven passed in isolated reruns after fixture updates and host cleanup. This invocation was stopped after the full final-head CI suite passed. - Initial local database tests hit macOS shared-memory exhaustion. A diagnostic confirmed `shmget: No space left on device` with the system limit of 32 IDs. Three abandoned, unattached PostgreSQL IPC headers were reclaimed. The isolated rerun passed all 31 fast-response and channel tests. The two additional Slack regression cases also passed in a separate rerun. No active database was stopped. - UI token gates pass. Provider contract tests cover all supported API connection types. Fast-response tests cover uniqueness, authorization, budgets, expiry, cancellation, restart, real-reply races, and the experimental flag. - The test drive verified that disabling the experiment hides Connections and redirects its direct URL. Enabling it restores the saved OpenRouter setup. After restart on the final commit, the OpenRouter settings sample returned “Sure, I’ll take care of fixing the border around the settings panel.” in 428 ms. It used 260 input and 31 output tokens and recorded $0.0000576 in reported cost. - Earlier live OpenRouter verification produced a receipt in 1.013 seconds for a new task. The real agent then supplied its substantive answer. A separate settings test took 1.34 seconds, used 246 input and 23 output tokens, and recorded $0.0000361. - Live Slack verification on final commit `24016fa525961ebc7a4acffdc5019ce123970549` passed for a fresh initial task and a follow-up in a disposable bot DM. The initial acknowledgement appeared 2.405 seconds after the Slack message and 1.413 seconds after durable acceptance; the follow-up appeared in 2.322 seconds and 1.160 seconds respectively. The recorded generation/settlement durations were 898 ms and 697 ms. The initial call used 291 input / 39 output tokens and cost $0.00006705; the follow-up used 281 / 47 and cost $0.00007035. - The Slack acknowledgements retained the assigned agent identity and `origin: fast_response`, source-turn references, and no fabricated run ID. A status snapshot after the initial receipt showed the task still `in_progress` with its real execution run. The agent then read the CSV fixture and correctly reported two ready items, two blockers, and their owners. Both replies stayed in the originating DM, and no duplicate generic working message followed the delivered contextual acknowledgements. The `new` command started a fresh conversation session without generating a fast response. - An earlier eligible Slack turn generated a response but suppressed publication. Its reported cost was retained, generic progress remained, and the real agent completed the requested result. This is recorded separately from the two delivered acknowledgements; the history did not expose a precise suppression reason. - Slack verification used real signed provider events, the existing intake/publication paths, and a user-approved temporary webhook-only HTTPS tunnel. Subscriptions were limited to direct-message events. The test bot was paused and the tunnel stopped afterward. Live channel/group-thread and GitHub journeys remain unverified; their mocked tests cover intake, destination binding, publication, and continued underlying work. - Greptile reviewed final commit `24016fa525961ebc7a4acffdc5019ce123970549` at 5/5. Both new review findings are fixed and all threads are resolved. [Final-head CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38060015730) passed. This includes grouped server/chat/workspace tests, serialized suites, runner checks, browser journeys, typecheck, build, release registry, policy, and the canary dry run. - Manual check: enable Experimental fast responses. Open company Settings → Connections. Select a shared API connection and model. Save and use Test response. Submit a task message and confirm that its receipt does not complete the task. ## Risks - The migration adds receipt and configuration tables plus accounting references. It uses idempotent statements and follows the current migration sequence. - A slow provider, authorization change, or real-agent reply can suppress an acknowledgement. Existing progress feedback remains available. - Unknown provider billing retains a reservation until reconciliation. External deliveries with uncertain outcomes must not be blindly repeated. - Live Slack initial-task and follow-up DM journeys pass. Live Slack channel/group-thread and GitHub journeys remain unverified. The PR remains a draft and records these gaps. Final-head repository CI and automated review pass. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser interaction. The runtime does not expose an exact model snapshot ID or context-window size; these are not asserted. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 13:09:17 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	07fee85eaf	refactor(heartbeat): extract workspace preparation (#15807 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The heartbeat service prepares the workspace and dispatches each agent run. > - After the runtime extraction, `heartbeat.ts` still had 6,417 lines. > - Workspace setup occupied one contiguous 857-line block inside `executeRun`. > - This pull request moves that block into one workspace preparation module. > - The executor keeps dispatch gates and terminal cleanup. Reviewers can inspect workspace setup as one phase. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15803 and #15578. This continues the heartbeat refactor series. The search found no open duplicate workspace preparation extraction. What existing behavior does this improve? It makes heartbeat workspace preparation easier to maintain. It does not change the workspace policy or execution behavior. Current behavior `executeRun` contains workspace resolution, freshness decisions, provisioning, persistence, issue binding, environment acquisition, and realization inline. Proposed behavior `prepareHeartbeatWorkspace` owns that sequence in `server/src/services/heartbeat/workspace-preparation.ts`. `heartbeat.ts` calls it at the same point and uses its returned workspace, lease, target, and metadata. Reason and benefit The main file falls from 6,417 to 5,597 lines. The workspace phase has a typed boundary and direct regression tests. Breaking changes None. There are no schema, API, feature-flag, or execution-policy changes. ## What Changed - Extract the 857-line workspace preparation block without changing its operations or their order. - Preserve native recovery bindings, workspace persistence failure cleanup, issue rebinding after realization, and the cloned restore lease. - Keep environment selection, dispatch admission, terminalization, and final lease release in `heartbeat.ts`. - Add 12 boundary tests with disposable PostgreSQL, real Git repositories, and real local environment leases. - Make the existing Stop and plan-only recovery tests await executor completion instead of short polling deadlines. Assert exactly one continuation for the specific plan-only source run. - Keep server-only Node preload hooks out of the deterministic process adapter used by Stop browser acceptance. - Refresh workspace recovery browser acceptance for the current task composer, and give its disposable test-drive an explicit 10-second snapshot deadline. Production snapshot settings stay unchanged. - Document the workspace preparation boundary in `doc/DEVELOPING.md`. ## Verification - AST comparison: all 857 moved lines match the original block. The remaining module body differs only at the extraction call. - `pnpm build`: passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - Focused regression coverage: 651 distinct cases across eight suites passed across targeted runs, including all 12 new boundary tests. The complete 400-test recovery suite passed together on the final commit. - Workspace bootstrap browser acceptance: both journeys passed (4.2 minutes), including preserved source edits, ignored-file exclusion, bounded retries, and persistence across reload. - Stop/queue browser acceptance: both process and native runner journeys passed (2.2 minutes), covering queueing, Stop, subtree pause/cancel, resume, and unrelated-task isolation. - [Full repository CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38062408589): all 47 jobs passed, including the general and serialized test suites, eight browser shards, build, typecheck, native runner checks, and canary dry run. - The local `pnpm test:run` was interrupted to prioritize the recovery regression; the complete repository suite was verified in CI. - Greptile: 5/5 on `c28e698b885cf5fd12f36f7b4052e7a2e6f879d7`, with no open review threads. ## Risks - This code writes durable workspace bindings and acquires environment leases. A changed operation order could break recovery or cleanup after partial setup. The extraction preserves the original statements and exception boundaries. - The new tests cover creation, reuse, immutable recovery bindings, persistence failure, acquisition and realization failure, controller ownership loss, isolation, execution policy, and lease snapshot independence. - Browser acceptance uses real application services with deterministic local workers and a fake Codex protocol provider. It does not qualify live cloud providers. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with code editing, shell execution, and test tools. The exact serving model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 10:30:17 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	19e9facc5b	perf(chat): wake delivery queues from commits and deadlines (#15802 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Chat connectors store incoming messages and outgoing publications in durable queues. > - The app checks these queues every second, even when they are empty. > - Empty scans keep the database active and hinder instance sleep. > - This pull request wakes three queue workers after transactions settle and at known retry or recovery deadlines. > - Empty queues stop scheduling checks. Existing rows retain their ordering, retry, and recovery rules. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Idle database activity from incoming chat deliveries, outgoing publications, and Slack upload receipt recovery. Subsystem affected `server/` — chat delivery and background work scheduling. Current behavior The app's one-second chat timer scans the three queues together with provider and action maintenance. Empty queues continue to query PostgreSQL. Proposed behavior Register three independent workers with the existing delivery coordinator. Producers announce work inside their database transactions. Commit wakes the corresponding worker. Startup restores outstanding work; persisted retries and stale claims supply the next deadline. An empty queue has no recurring scan. Reason and benefit Remove avoidable queue reads without requiring a new table, an external scheduler, or a persistent PostgreSQL listener. Breaking changes No schema or public API change. Work notifications are scoped to the app's shared database owner. Direct SQL and independent database roots do not send these notifications; startup still scans durable work. Additional context Refs #15625, #15750, and #15757 for the preceding sleep work. Related: #15153 reduces chat query allocation while retaining polling. This PR changes when the three queue workers run; it does not add query caching. ## What Changed - Register independent incoming delivery, publication, and Slack receipt workers on the shared scheduler. - Add transaction work signals at queue writes, endpoint state changes, and action transitions that unblock publications. Keep provider I/O outside the added transactions. - Restore deadlines from durable retry times, abandoned claims, and publication lease expiry. Share publication and receipt eligibility rules between dispatch and deadline queries. Respect incoming conversation order and lifecycle dependencies. - Exclude publications blocked by unresolved Slack tool sends. Wake them when the tool receipt changes. - Wake publication dispatch when an endpoint send finishes so free slots refill. Preserve per-endpoint concurrency, conversation order, and conservative handling of uncertain sends. - Wake receipt recovery when a stale publication becomes `delivery_unknown`, and wake queues when a provider connection recovers. - Commit interaction publications with their callback tokens so dispatch cannot see an incomplete card. - Keep provider runtimes, other action outboxes, milestone and wake-notice projection, Teams protocol maintenance, GitHub recovery, and Slack session synchronization on their existing maintenance cadence. This PR does not make the whole chat subsystem idle. - Update the instance sleep inventory with this partial migration and its remaining work. ## Verification - All 1,225 PostgreSQL chat integration cases passed across the three hosted chat shards. These cover retry and lease deadlines, blocked followers, unresolved Slack sends, provider recovery, commit visibility, and endpoint slot refill. - 32 local app-wiring, queue-worker, and delivery-coordinator tests passed after updating the wiring assertion for event-driven dispatch. Fake timers cover an hour of idle time without queue scans. - Related publication, interaction, receipt, and wake-notice tests passed locally. The 13 interaction integration cases include atomic rollback when callback-token storage fails. - Local `pnpm typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and final server typecheck passed. All hosted checks passed on the final commit, including build, typecheck, test shards, release registry checks, and the canary dry run (54 successful checks; two Storybook checks skipped for this backend change). - The last local PostgreSQL rerun was skipped because the embedded database startup probe failed after five attempts. The hosted PostgreSQL cases ran successfully; their skips only partition cases across shards. - `git diff --check` passed. Greptile is 5/5 on the final commit with no unresolved findings. ## Risks - Every producer that makes queued work eligible must send a transaction work signal. The tests exercise commit visibility, concurrent wakes, worker failures, and restart recovery. Future direct SQL writers must participate in this contract. - The existing database work-signal layer reconciles uncertain transaction outcomes. This PR adds no work-signal table or schema migration. - Provider and action maintenance still polls. Further changes are required before an idle chat-enabled instance can sleep. - Tests use real PostgreSQL with simulated provider responses; they do not send messages through live provider accounts. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 09:13:44 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	1fb3f9746e	refactor(heartbeat): extract prepared runtime execution (#15803 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Heartbeat prepares, dispatches, and completes each agent run. > - After the runtime-selection extraction, the main service still had 7,295 lines. > - Provider dispatch and workspace finalization formed one large block with shared cleanup rules. > - This pull request moves that block into a typed runtime-execution module. > - The service now has 6,417 lines. Readers can follow admission and outer cleanup without reading the provider execution details. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Follow-up to #15746. I searched open heartbeat PRs and issues. I found no competing runtime-execution extraction. What existing behavior does this improve? The organization and test coverage of native and legacy heartbeat execution. Current behavior The heartbeat service contains a 912-line block for provider dispatch, usage capture, workspace finalization, and instruction cleanup. Proposed behavior Move that block to `server/src/services/heartbeat/runtime-execution.ts`. Keep the atomic dispatch gate, admission, terminal run status, and outer lease cleanup in the service. Preserve run behavior. Reason and benefit This gives runtime execution a named boundary and direct tests. It removes 878 lines from the main service in one bounded change. Breaking changes None intended. There are no schema, API, or policy changes. ## What Changed - Add `executeHeartbeatRuntime` for prepared native and legacy execution, usage capture, workspace finalization, and gateway/instruction cleanup. - Return an explicit dispatch result. Update outer ownership state through immediate callbacks, including before exceptions. Read instruction state through live getters. - Move the two internal recovery error classes with their existing behavior. The caller imports the same classes for `instanceof` checks. - Add 15 database-backed execution tests. Keep the existing heartbeat regression suites. - Repair the native Stop acceptance fixture: installed Codex now takes precedence over `PATH`. A test-only loader pins the fake provider. An isolated home and dummy key keep readiness offline. Add four loader tests. - Document the module boundary and fixture setup. ## Verification - Passed: eight focused heartbeat suites (483 distinct tests, including 15 new execution tests). The boundary suite passed again after adding the failed-restore retention case from review. - Passed: `node --test tests/e2e/fixtures/composer-stop-codex-loader.test.mjs` (four tests). - Passed: `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`. - Passed: AST comparison of all 912 moved lines after the explicit boundary substitutions. SQL template text, recovery class bodies, public exports, and the rest of the executor match the baseline. - Passed: browser Stop journeys for legacy process and native Paperclip Runner (two tests). The native fixture log proves provider `turn/start` before Stop and `turn/interrupt` after Stop. - Passed: all three ACP continuation browser journeys (same-session queued input, no replay of an interrupted write, and a new direction after composer Stop). Five relevant browser journeys passed in total. - Passed: the full CI test groups, including all server, chat, workspace, serialized-server, runner, and browser shards. - Local full-suite limitation: `pnpm test:run` first hit the macOS shared-memory segment limit while starting embedded PostgreSQL. After releasing only this task’s unused acceptance-server segments, the retry progressed without reported failures. I stopped that duplicate run after the full CI test groups passed. - Passed: all 56 PR checks/statuses on `8694c116e8d43ed8ac11bc4c58623ea3af34a675`. Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved review threads. ## Risks - Cleanup depends on state written before an error. The module reports dispatch, retention, and recovery ownership immediately. Tests cover early returns and exceptional cleanup. - Instruction callbacks can replace saved metadata during execution. Live getters preserve those changes. - Native acceptance uses a real server, database, browser, and Rust runner with a deterministic provider. It does not verify a live provider service. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and repository/tool access. The exact serving model ID and context-window limit were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 09:10:53 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	2a2071340d	refactor(server): extract heartbeat runtime selection (#15746 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Heartbeat execution prepares a runtime, dispatches work, and records the result. > - Earlier refactors separated workspace services, scheduling, and completion. > - The executor still builds native inputs and records runtime selection inline. > - This preparation must preserve admitted inputs and serialize with Stop. > - This pull request moves that phase into a typed runtime-selection module. > - Reviewers can inspect runtime preparation separately from dispatch and cleanup. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #15732. What existing behavior does this improve? Maintainability of heartbeat runtime preparation and selection. Subsystem affected server/ — orchestration services. Current behavior The main heartbeat service has 8,128 lines. `executeRun` builds or restores native inputs, selects sessions and sandbox lifecycle, and records native or legacy selection inline. Proposed behavior Move this phase into `server/src/services/heartbeat/runtime-selection.ts`. The executor calls `selectHeartbeatRuntime` at the existing boundary and receives an explicit selection result. The main file becomes 7,275 lines, a reduction of 853 lines. Reason and benefit This gives runtime selection its own typed boundary and direct tests. It preserves existing decisions, database transactions, and cleanup ordering. Breaking changes None intended. All public heartbeat exports remain available. ## What Changed - Move native input assembly, completion contract selection, checkpoint lookup, runtime persistence, and native workspace-sync preparation into `selectHeartbeatRuntime`. - Preserve the row lock and controller lease check that serialize native selection with cancellation. - Report lifecycle and ownership changes to the executor immediately, including when a later preparation step throws. - Move sandbox lifecycle and model fallback helpers with compatible public re-exports. - Add 12 database-backed boundary tests. Update the existing session-recovery source test and developer guide. ## Verification - Structural AST comparison against current `master` confirms the 784-line selection block, moved helpers, and remaining service bodies are unchanged after normalizing boundary callbacks. All 140 public exports are preserved. - On final head `2eddaa485f`, all 12 new database-backed tests and 83 existing lifecycle, selection, fallback-warning, and session regression tests pass (95 total). - Five executor integration cases passed before the rebase. Their final-head rerun could not start because the local checkout was removed during verification; no assertions ran in that last attempt. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` both pass on final head. - Local verification limitations: the full `pnpm test:run` was attempted, then stopped after database/process startup timeouts in concurrent local runs. Two unchanged optional real-runner session cases timed out on the initial run and one isolated retry; they were excluded from the 95-test focused run. CI also skips those two binary-dependent cases. - All CI gates pass on final head `2eddaa485f`: typecheck, build, general and serialized tests, runner checks, E2E, and canary dry run. - Greptile reviewed final head at 5/5 with no actionable findings. ## Risks This boundary controls native admission and cleanup ownership. Losing an update after a later exception could change resource cleanup. Immediate callbacks preserve those updates. Tests cover Stop races, lost controller leases, immutable admitted inputs, competing runtime selection, and workspace-sync failures. The change adds no schema or API behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, code editing, and command execution. The session does not expose the exact model variant or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (95 focused tests on final head; broader local limitations documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 07:31:15 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	d6e6d1c78a	Stream OpenCode immediately, scope reasoning to turns, and deduplicate instructions (#15708 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and observe their work. > - The native runner carries provider output into the task transcript. > - OpenCode sends incremental text in `message.part.delta` events. > - The driver ignored those events and waited for a full part snapshot. Accepted chats also waited after lifecycle verification was complete. > - This pull request forwards each valid chunk as it arrives and removes unnecessary isolated startup work. > - Valid chunks reach Paperclip sooner without changing completion or permission rules. The matched browser experiment below does not establish a reliable end-to-end latency improvement. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? The native OpenCode driver withheld text until OpenCode sent a full snapshot. A local delayed-provider probe with the pinned OpenCode 1.18.34 runtime showed a 1,496 ms gap between the first native text delta and the first Paperclip text delta (1,510 ms from provider text). Expected behavior Forward valid assistant text and reasoning deltas immediately. Preserve repeated identical tokens, message roles, turn ownership, and final response selection. Steps to reproduce Send an empty text part, then text deltas, and withhold the final full snapshot. The new fixture requires the consumer to acknowledge its first text delta before releasing the snapshot. The previous driver cannot pass this handshake. Paperclip version or commit Baseline: `011e5669bad61c435a4745fb10812bef70376841`. The patch is rebased onto current master. Deployment mode Local native OpenCode 1.18.34 on macOS arm64. Live diagnostics use `openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731`. These are narrow diagnostics, not full Product E2E qualification. ## What Changed - Keep the macOS verified OpenCode launch pathname until child exit, with guarded reuse and cleanup on failed launches. This fixes a reproduced asynchronous executable-lifetime failure. - Dispatch accepted queued chats immediately after lifecycle readiness commits, through normal scheduler admission. Preserve ready state if dispatch fails. - Validate native OpenCode model access with the real hello probe without a redundant catalog scan. Keep legacy adapter discovery unchanged and isolate unspecified native probe directories. - Map incremental text and reasoning to the existing canonical event path, using observed part and message identities. - Keep additive chunks without IDs distinct. Preserve ID-based event deduplication. - Clear current streaming part metadata when a new turn starts. Reject mismatched session/message identities and unknown parts or fields. - Disable automatic updates, remote model refreshes, and default plugins in each isolated OpenCode process. Keep assigned MCP tools and default model reasoning intact. - Retain the latest cumulative text/reasoning part while its message role is unknown, including completion metadata after more than 100 chunks. - Expose `startTurn({ message, reasoningMode: "disabled" })` for one OpenCode/OpenRouter turn. Carry the selection in the durable command through Rust and the proxy. An omitted/default option restores provider defaults on the next turn, including warm and recovered sessions. There is no environment-level setting or automatic selection policy. - Group optional Rust turn inputs in `CodexTurnOptions` and dispatch through `start_turn_with_options`; retain `start_turn` for defaults. Future turn settings can be added without another feature-specific method. - Expose a native-session capability for per-turn reasoning and reject explicit unsupported selections before dispatch, including direct ACPX and Codex backends. Runnerd checks the durable selected model as well as the provider. - Remove duplicate agent instructions from the shared OpenCode proxy task envelope for all users. Send one system copy on every turn, including prepared and resumed turns, because OpenCode reads the latest user message’s system field. Preserve task constraints and completion contracts. - Document startup and streaming behavior. Add regression coverage for role ordering, repeated chunks, final snapshot deduplication, and stale turns. ## Verification ### Lower-load browser retry — 2026-10-10 All 8/8 trials succeeded. In this batch, median Send → first visible reply fell from 30.586 s to 12.476 s (59.2% lower). Four fresh-agent trials per variant, phase order before/after/after/before with two trials per phase. Every adjacent-phase pair favored the candidate, although one difference was only 0.301 s. This is evidence for the readiness/probe changes on this host, not a production percentile or a guarantee across providers. \| Phase/trial \| Variant \| Send → reply (s) \| Observed ready → run (s) \| Session open → turn start (s) \| Model requests \| \|---\|---\|---:\|---:\|---:\|---:\| \| 0/0 \| before \| 45.042 \| 25.337 \| 3.629 \| 2 \| \| 0/1 \| before \| 13.689 \| 0.000 \| 2.443 \| 2 \| \| 1/0 \| after \| 14.696 \| 0.000 \| 2.526 \| 1 \| \| 1/1 \| after \| 13.389 \| 0.000 \| 2.470 \| 2 \| \| 2/0 \| after \| 10.871 \| 0.000 \| 2.706 \| 2 \| \| 2/1 \| after \| 11.564 \| 0.004 \| 2.443 \| 2 \| \| 3/0 \| before \| 41.582 \| 21.518 \| 2.376 \| 2 \| \| 3/1 \| before \| 19.589 \| 9.753 \| 2.707 \| 1 \| Observed ready-to-run median: 15.636 s → 0 s; zero means execution began by the first ready observation, not literally zero latency. Polling interval is nominally 250 ms plus HTTP time. Session-open-to-turn-start includes controller handling, not just child startup. All eight ran within the existing startup timeouts; no timeout or reasoning policy was changed. Host load at fixture creation stayed 5.47–8.73 on 18 CPUs, versus 68.9–100.8 in the prior campaign. No builds/tests ran concurrently with measurement. Same merged source b0a0158729a7913882a0e756fe7e27228d72bf53, release runner, rebuilt static UI, OpenCode 1.18.34, model openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731, provider-default reasoning, and empty isolated workspaces in both variants. Only the readiness worker and explicit-model verification source were toggled; the launch-lifetime fix and all proxy streaming changes were held constant. Thus this does not separately measure the original streaming changes. One browser per phase, two fresh companies/agents/chats per phase. Measurement begins at capture-phase Send click and ends on visible Hi text plus two animation frames. Status/thinking is excluded; emoji can arrive just after the first text. Successful screenshots inspected. Each variant had three two-request turns using `paperclip_finish` and one one-request turn; no status lookup was observed. Reported usage includes settlement after the first visible reply. Runner SHA-256 `57f658c220eecd2370ffd3333cd7e5d06d16bb2798af0cf43c84e01c8207c1c3`; proxy `bcc02fda2bf35b38a116cd880841aa6c534f6e0b497a96d97369a1e06dcc72ac`; rebuilt UI tree `eee238f2eda628c4e8c3660707986da4f8dd9100c814e26938fce3756df2eae4` (sorted relative path, NUL, binary per-file SHA-256). Worker/probe variant source hashes are unchanged from the preserved comparison below. Measured turn cost $0.00612574, plus verification probes not included in that figure. All eight attempts retained; all source/proxy files restored and test supervisors exited. Current commit validation: 53 successful CI checks, 4 skipped, zero failing; Greptile 5/5 on `b0a0158729` with no actionable findings. The previous 20 targeted post-merge tests passed. No source edit was made for this rerun. Earlier failed and inconclusive cohorts below remain historical evidence and are not pooled with this batch. ### Master update and failure diagnosis — 2026-10-09 Merged `origin/master` at `417db14e7d` into this branch without conflicts; pushed merge commit `b0a0158729a7913882a0e756fe7e27228d72bf53`. The incoming changes do not alter OpenCode process startup or its timeout budgets. Historical measurements below remain attributed to their original commits. The four last-campaign failures never issued `turn.start`, so these were cold-session admission failures, not model replies failing. Two retained `session.open` commands eventually completed after controller timeout/cleanup had begun. The other two ended with the inner `thread/start` response timeout, and their diagnostics recorded OpenCode startup retries. Startup event timestamps are buffered publication times and must not be interpreted as exact process-spawn times. On the merged source, two credential-free startup-only checks used the real pinned OpenCode 1.18.34, empty temporary workspaces, a placeholder key, and no model turns: - Existing pinned executable: spawn at 1.083 s; failed health attempt/retry at 11.311 s and 21.914 s; third process healthy at 32.210 s; session opened at 35.168 s. - Verified private executable path: snapshot preparation took 0.497 s; process spawned at 1.588 s; healthy at 9.967 s; session opened at 11.120 s. These are sequential diagnostic samples, not evidence that one executable path is faster. Host load was 56.5–64.5 on 18 logical CPUs. The local health wait permits 10 s per attempt and the driver retries up to three times; the outer controller's cold admission budget is 30 s, and the Rust facade also waits 30 s for a response. Thus retries plus setup/session creation can outlast the caller's budget. The isolated 35.168 s success demonstrates that a session can eventually open yet fail the app's admission deadline. Heavy load aggravates the timing; its exact contribution is not isolated. No timeout was increased and no new model-latency claim is made. Merge validation: 20/20 targeted lifecycle-policy and heartbeat run-completion tests passed, including temporary PostgreSQL cases. The first sandbox invocation skipped database cases; the authorized local-DB rerun executed all 20. The package-manager launcher could not verify its version via the unreachable registry, so validation used the already-installed Vitest binary. Full CI/review subsequently passed on this merge commit; see the October 10 retry above. Older results below apply to their named commits. ### Follow-up: reproduced macOS launch failure — 2026-10-09 The retry exposed a startup bug rather than only host-load noise. The macOS proxy deleted the private verified executable path immediately after asynchronous spawn. A credential-free test of the actual pinned OpenCode `--version` reproduced a fast SIGKILL and a 15-second timeout in three immediate-cleanup attempts; three deferred-cleanup controls succeeded. The timeout was killed by the diagnostic's own deadline. This experiment does not establish the OS-internal reason for the fast SIGKILL. Commit `c30451e0ebf3f74e9ef70d37bbe4d9fe7fb56359` retains the private launch path until child exit, cleans failed spawns, and waits for forced shutdown before reuse. Source descriptor authentication, ownership, mode, inode checks, and the prohibition on ambient executable fallback remain. Overlapping reuse fails closed. The existing synchronous shell test was changed to exercise the actual asynchronous boundary. Verification: 59 focused proxy/driver tests passed; runner TypeScript check passed. All six subsequent real OpenCode version launches succeeded without timeout (4.11, 4.33, 5.73, 6.91, 4.95, 6.70 seconds). The native Rust binary is unchanged from the retry; no model calls were made by these diagnostics. Retained interrupted retry: before 42.56/18.69 seconds; after one 180-second timeout (`provider_process_exited` / health SIGKILL) and one 37.33-second success. The latter overlapped the credential-free diagnostic and is not a clean matched timing. The next phase was stopped before Send to diagnose the reproduced bug. Reported measured-turn cost: $0.0016874, verification probes additional. These attempts are not pooled with other campaigns. <!-- launch-fixed-proof:start --> Completed retry, stopped by the declared failure rule after 6 of 8 planned trials. No reliable end-to-end speedup demonstrated. At commit `c30451e0ebf3f74e9ef70d37bbe4d9fe7fb56359`, the launch fix above was held constant in both variants; only the readiness handoff and explicit-model verification path changed. Planned phase order: before/after/after/before, two fresh agents/chats per phase, one new browser per phase. The second after phase had two consecutive failures, so the final before phase was not run. \| Phase/trial \| Variant \| Send → first visible reply \| Observed ready → run \| Outcome \| \|---\|---\|---\|---\|---\| \| 0/0 \| before \| No reply within 180 s \| 2.777 s \| session.open timeout \| \| 0/1 \| before \| 47.654 s \| 9.383 s \| Succeeded \| \| 1/0 \| after \| 50.051 s \| 0.087 s \| Succeeded \| \| 1/1 \| after \| No reply within 180 s \| 0.151 s \| session.open timeout \| \| 2/0 \| after \| No reply within 180 s \| 3.337 s \| session.open timeout \| \| 2/1 \| after \| No reply within 180 s \| 1.434 s \| session.open timeout \| Both successful screenshots show “Hi 👋”. Timing starts at the browser's capture-phase Send click and ends at the first visible answer text plus two animation frames; the first fragment can be “Hi” before the emoji arrives. Thinking/status text is not counted. All four failures were `runner_local_connect_failed: PRP command session.open timed out` (`native_session_interrupted`), before a reply; none reported the earlier health-stage SIGKILL. They are retained, not discarded as outliers. One success per variant does not support a speedup estimate or median comparison. Observed ready-to-run median was 6.080 s before (n=2) vs 0.793 s after (n=4); this is sampled every nominal 250 ms plus HTTP latency and is a lower bound, not precise tracing. Host load at fixture creation ranged 68.9–100.8 on 18 logical CPUs, a substantial confound that worsened over the campaign. No local build/test was run concurrently with this campaign. Provenance: pinned OpenCode 1.18.34, model openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731, default reasoning in both variants, empty synthetic workspaces and isolated probe homes. Release runner SHA-256 `57f658c220eecd2370ffd3333cd7e5d06d16bb2798af0cf43c84e01c8207c1c3`; current proxy SHA-256 `bcc02fda2bf35b38a116cd880841aa6c534f6e0b497a96d97369a1e06dcc72ac`; built UI tree SHA-256 `7f0c2b7f586cb753408351574b2239e22311944add99af4f6f3562cd6d47bbcb`. This holds the rebuilt runner and static UI constant. Provider-reported measured turn cost $0.00120649; verification probes are additional. Including the earlier interrupted retry, this follow-up reports $0.00289389 in measured turn usage; missing usage is not assumed free. Prior cohorts remain separate below. Validation on `c30451e0e`: 59 focused tests passed, runner TypeScript check passed, 6/6 real credential-free pinned OpenCode launches passed, fresh Greptile 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. CI: 51 success, 4 skipped, 1 failed. The failed native compilation job never reached compilation: Docker's auth endpoint timed out during Buildx setup, then failed the same way on one retry ([job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37994181674/job/114039737503)). Full local checks were not rerun while measuring. The PR remains draft: the launch defect is reproduced and fixed, but cold session startup still exceeds the controller's admission budget on this host. Raising that budget would not establish a faster first response. <!-- launch-fixed-proof:end --> ### Readiness investigation and live rerun — 2026-10-09 Measured queue fix; no reliable end-to-end speedup claim. Keep this PR in draft. Accepted chats could wait for the periodic queue sweep after verification had already committed `ready`. The lifecycle worker now dispatches through the existing scheduler immediately after that commit. The normal company, pause, budget, concurrency, and task-ownership checks still apply. Dispatch failure preserves readiness and leaves recovery to the queue sweep. Native OpenCode verification also avoids enumerating the full model catalog before running its real hello request. Identifier validation remains. Authentication failures, unavailable models, and timeouts still prevent readiness. An unspecified local probe directory uses an empty temporary directory. Queue-only experiment: four before and four after attempts, in before/after/after/before server phases, two fresh agents per phase. Median observed ready-to-start delay fell from 19.429 s to 0.058 s. State polling was nominally 250 ms plus HTTP time, so the latter means within observation resolution; it is not a precise 58 ms latency claim. After timings were 100.20, 65.29, 63.78, and 76.97 seconds. Before had one 59.65-second success and three 120-second response timeouts (one provider health SIGKILL, one late success, one still running after settlement and canceled). These censored results do not support a success-only median speedup comparison. Focused tests overlapped the last baseline phase, which further limits total-time interpretation. Reported measured-turn cost: $0.0055383; verification probes and incomplete/canceled usage are additional. Final matched experiment: built static UI in both variants to avoid pre-Send Vite compilation; current proxy, release runner, selected model, default reasoning, and explicitly isolated empty probe cwd/HOME/XDG held constant. Both worker handoff and model-probe changes vary. Fresh browser/company/agent/chat per attempt. ABBA order, two attempts per variant, 180-second response limit declared before the batch, four-turn bound. Same Send-to-rendered-Hi metric as the earlier experiment. \| Order \| Variant \| Send → visible Hi \| Created → execution \| Observed ready → execution \| Outcome \| \| --- \| --- \| ---: \| ---: \| ---: \| --- \| \| 1 \| Before \| 62.66 s \| 23.467 s \| 2.830 s \| Succeeded \| \| 2 \| After \| >180 s \| 14.200 s \| Within polling resolution \| Provider health SIGKILL \| \| 3 \| After \| >180 s \| 13.877 s \| Within polling resolution \| Provider initialization timeout \| \| 4 \| Before \| >180 s \| 144.256 s \| 14.067 s \| Still running after settlement; canceled \| Only one of four attempts produced a timed reply. There is no valid overall speedup estimate from this batch. The dispatch delay is removed, but provider startup failures and heavy shared-host load remain. A recorded host sample was load 93.55 on 18 logical CPUs. This is a confound, not proof that every failure was caused by host load. Provider-reported measured-turn cost was $0.00032752, with no reported usage for the other three attempts; verification probes are additional. Retained earlier setup attempts: one shared-memory startup failure before model calls, and a separate development-UI batch with a 60.06-second baseline followed by a navigation timeout before Send. These attempts are retained separately, not counted as successful response timings. No live attempts were silently dropped. Provenance: source base `53580f8fbd40b963f3fb7ba5172ff3ede2e9ef1f`, measured patch committed as `40b54eafb`, then rebased as `c590770dcc2bb1debce14037935a7031e5c3c1ac`. These live timings predate the rebase. Source and binary hashes are retained below. The inner harness label `after` selects the identical current proxy in every attempt; the outer campaign handoff label is the actual before/after variant. Owned benchmark processes stopped and original proxy restored. <!-- readiness-check-status:start --> Post-rebase validation at `c590770dcc2bb1debce14037935a7031e5c3c1ac`: - Full local `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed, including the native release build (1,098.6 seconds on the loaded host). - Focused lifecycle and adapter tests: 26 passed. The 14 database integration tests did not run locally because their hard-coded 20-second database setup hook timed out. A retry with a CLI timeout override encountered the same explicit hook limit. The earlier pre-rebase focused batch passed 77 tests; these results are not substituted for post-rebase execution. - Local `pnpm test:run` was started, then stopped to avoid duplicating CI on the saturated host. Local `pnpm build` was not run separately. Current-head CI passed Typecheck + Release Registry, Build, all general and serialized test groups, Rust checks, both runner Vitest groups, and all eight browser E2E shards. The last general shard passed 1,179 tests (72 files). - Fresh [Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15708#issuecomment-6085742217): 5/5, reviewed this exact head, no actionable defect. - Final CI rollup: 49 success, 4 skipped, 4 failure. The failures are [Compile isolated native Runner](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37990274515/job/114024329242), [Docker context integrity](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37990274623/job/114024196511), [Canary Dry Run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37990274623/job/114024196424), and the dependent `ci / verify` aggregate. All three root failures are Docker Hub HTTP 429 / unauthenticated pull-rate limits while fetching Node base images. The native-image job was retried once and hit the same limit. No source compiler/test failure was reported by those gates. CI maintainers need authenticated pulls or to rerun after the registry limit clears. - Owned benchmark servers stopped. Local validation commands completed or were stopped. The PR remains a draft: user-visible speed/reliability is not qualified, and the Docker-dependent CI gates are not green. <!-- readiness-check-status:end --> <details><summary>Sanitized readiness evidence with all attempts and source hashes</summary> ```json {"campaign":{"order":["before","after","after","before"],"trialsPerPhase":1,"maxMeasuredTurns":4,"maxCampaignUsd":1,"sourceHead":"53580f8fbd40b963f3fb7ba5172ff3ede2e9ef1f","reasoning":"provider default, no override","proxySha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","purpose":"Final matched comparison of both optimizations; distinct from earlier queue-only campaign.","responseTimeoutMs":180000,"timeoutRationale":"Declared before this final campaign because earlier unchanged baselines sometimes exceeded 120 seconds; earlier timeouts remain retained.","ui":{"mode":"built static UI","treeSha256":"7f0c2b7f586cb753408351574b2239e22311944add99af4f6f3562cd6d47bbcb"},"priorCampaign":"combined-proof stopped after a development-UI navigation timeout before Send; no failed attempts erased."},"complete":true,"statistics":{"before":{"attempted":2,"successfulMeasurements":1,"medianTtfrMs":62657.2000002861,"rangeTtfrMs":[62657.2000002861,62657.2000002861],"medianObservedReadyToRunMs":8448.5,"medianRunStartToVisibleMs":37290.199951171875},"after":{"attempted":2,"successfulMeasurements":0,"medianTtfrMs":null,"rangeTtfrMs":null,"medianObservedReadyToRunMs":0.0,"medianRunStartToVisibleMs":null}},"measuredTurnCostUsd":0.00032752,"costCoverage":"Provider-reported measured chat turns only; harness verification probes are additional and not included.","readinessMetricLimit":"First observed ready state sampled every 250 ms plus HTTP duration; clamped to zero if execution started before the observation. This is a lower bound on ready-to-start delay, not a precise sub-millisecond metric.","results":[{"phase":0,"trial":0,"handoff":"before","ttfrMs":62657.2000002861,"answer":"Hi","statuses":["succeeded"],"error":null,"runErrorCode":null,"providerHealthKilled":false,"queueMs":23467.0,"queuedBeforeObservedReady":true,"observedVerificationMsAfterFixture":26390.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":2830.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":37290.199951171875,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00032752,"costUsdExact":"0.000327520","inputTokens":26864,"outputTokens":46,"cachedInputTokens":0,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326"},{"phase":1,"trial":0,"handoff":"after","ttfrMs":null,"answer":null,"statuses":["failed"],"error":"TimeoutError: page.waitForFunction: Timeout 180000ms exceeded.","runErrorCode":"provider_process_exited","providerHealthKilled":true,"queueMs":14200.0,"queuedBeforeObservedReady":true,"observedVerificationMsAfterFixture":24028.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":true,"runStartToVisibleMs":null,"usage":[{}],"workerSha256":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7"},{"phase":2,"trial":0,"handoff":"after","ttfrMs":null,"answer":null,"statuses":["failed"],"error":"TimeoutError: page.waitForFunction: Timeout 180000ms exceeded.","runErrorCode":"provider_initialize_timeout","providerHealthKilled":false,"queueMs":13877.0,"queuedBeforeObservedReady":true,"observedVerificationMsAfterFixture":18107.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":true,"runStartToVisibleMs":null,"usage":[{}],"workerSha256":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7"},{"phase":3,"trial":0,"handoff":"before","ttfrMs":null,"answer":null,"statuses":["running"],"error":"TimeoutError: page.waitForFunction: Timeout 180000ms exceeded.","runErrorCode":null,"providerHealthKilled":false,"queueMs":144256.0,"queuedBeforeObservedReady":true,"observedVerificationMsAfterFixture":136901.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":14067.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":null,"usage":[{}],"workerSha256":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326"}],"hostLoadSample":{"at":"2026-10-09T20:48:40.031Z","parallelism":18,"load":[93.546875,82.68017578125,75.9091796875]},"measuredChangesCommit":"40b54eafb","postRebaseCommit":"c590770dcc2bb1debce14037935a7031e5c3c1ac","postRebaseLimit":"Live benchmark predates the rebase. No post-rebase live result is claimed.","variantSourceHashes":{"before":{"server/src/modules/agent-lifecycle/application/worker.ts":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326","packages/adapters/opencode-local/src/server/test.ts":"4c10bacb55f2c7589e7b5c79d74781206ae075db8955f5b998065d6db3c0335a","server/src/adapters/registry.ts":"4a858763f69947d5745c7b8cb251a62fa404bc9683ade0ffb76282ed12761394"},"after":{"server/src/modules/agent-lifecycle/application/worker.ts":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7","packages/adapters/opencode-local/src/server/test.ts":"cd2ea3d51c3f1b4fb42261be701fb7f6b85704ad8e641e6db73d7c58e47364d3","server/src/adapters/registry.ts":"4a858763f69947d5745c7b8cb251a62fa404bc9683ade0ffb76282ed12761394"}},"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","prompt":"Reply with Hi and an emoji and nothing else.","runnerBinary":{"profile":"release","sha256":"6134c17debda14a76da69ac9631a2d10dad482ebd58dbc9a4e4480ed652211c4"},"probeIsolation":"Explicit empty cwd and HOME/XDG folders under the synthetic fixture workspace in BOTH variants. No server checkout or ambient provider home is used for the hello request.","comparisonLabelNote":"Inner run.mts variant after selects the identical current proxy in every trial; outer campaign readinessHandoff controls before/after source changes."} ``` Queue-only campaign: ```json {"campaign":{"order":["before","after","after","before"],"trialsPerPhase":2,"maxMeasuredTurns":8,"maxCampaignUsd":1,"sourceHead":"53580f8fbd40b963f3fb7ba5172ff3ede2e9ef1f","reasoning":"provider default, no override","proxySha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04"},"complete":true,"statistics":{"before":{"attempted":4,"successfulMeasurements":1,"medianTtfrMs":59654.5,"rangeTtfrMs":[59654.5,59654.5],"medianObservedReadyToRunMs":19429.0,"medianRunStartToVisibleMs":8843.5},"after":{"attempted":4,"successfulMeasurements":4,"medianTtfrMs":71128.7000002861,"rangeTtfrMs":[63778.90000009537,100195.59999990463],"medianObservedReadyToRunMs":58.0,"medianRunStartToVisibleMs":26542.849975585938}},"measuredTurnCostUsd":0.0055383,"costCoverage":"Provider-reported measured chat turns only; harness verification probes are additional and not included.","readinessMetricLimit":"First observed ready state sampled every 250 ms plus HTTP duration; clamped to zero if execution started before the observation. This is a lower bound on ready-to-start delay, not a precise sub-millisecond metric.","results":[{"phase":0,"trial":0,"handoff":"before","ttfrMs":59654.5,"answer":"Hi 👋","statuses":["succeeded"],"error":null,"queueMs":50590.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":25709.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":8843.5,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00087852,"costUsdExact":"0.000878520","inputTokens":25644,"outputTokens":264,"cachedInputTokens":28416,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326"},{"phase":0,"trial":1,"handoff":"before","ttfrMs":null,"answer":null,"statuses":["failed"],"error":"TimeoutError: page.waitForFunction: Timeout 120000ms exceeded.","queueMs":41651.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":14656.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":null,"usage":[{}],"workerSha256":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326"},{"phase":1,"trial":0,"handoff":"after","ttfrMs":100195.59999990463,"answer":"Hi 🙂","statuses":["succeeded"],"error":null,"queueMs":65893.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":116.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":33243.60009765625,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00075782,"costUsdExact":"0.000757820","inputTokens":27014,"outputTokens":175,"cachedInputTokens":26368,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7"},{"phase":1,"trial":1,"handoff":"after","ttfrMs":65288.60000038147,"answer":"Hi 👋","statuses":["succeeded"],"error":null,"queueMs":43511.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":true,"runStartToVisibleMs":21227.60009765625,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00085326,"costUsdExact":"0.000853260","inputTokens":25166,"outputTokens":250,"cachedInputTokens":28160,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7"},{"phase":2,"trial":0,"handoff":"after","ttfrMs":63778.90000009537,"answer":"Hi 👋","statuses":["succeeded"],"error":null,"queueMs":39218.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":true,"runStartToVisibleMs":23479.89990234375,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.000839,"costUsdExact":"0.000839000","inputTokens":27068,"outputTokens":238,"cachedInputTokens":26368,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7"},{"phase":2,"trial":1,"handoff":"after","ttfrMs":76968.80000019073,"answer":"Hi 👋","statuses":["succeeded"],"error":null,"queueMs":46257.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":185.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":29605.800048828125,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00030582,"costUsdExact":"0.000305820","inputTokens":24694,"outputTokens":32,"cachedInputTokens":1792,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7"},{"phase":3,"trial":0,"handoff":"before","ttfrMs":null,"answer":null,"statuses":["succeeded"],"error":"TimeoutError: page.waitForFunction: Timeout 120000ms exceeded.","queueMs":100979.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":3872.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":null,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00190388,"costUsdExact":"0.001903880","inputTokens":25524,"outputTokens":852,"cachedInputTokens":55808,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326"},{"phase":3,"trial":1,"handoff":"before","ttfrMs":null,"answer":null,"statuses":["running"],"error":"TimeoutError: page.waitForFunction: Timeout 120000ms exceeded.","queueMs":129391.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":24202.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":null,"usage":[{}],"workerSha256":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326"}]} ``` </details> ### Matched live browser latency evidence — 2026-10-09 Conclusion: the overall first-response speedup is not established. Twelve successful real browser runs produced a lower after median, but the updated path won only 3 of 6 adjacent pairs. Median paired improvement was -0.17 seconds (effectively tied). Do not treat the deterministic streaming-forwarding improvement as proof that this PR fixes end-to-end first-response latency. - Actual path: local Paperclip browser → real server/database → current optimized Rust runner → pinned OpenCode 1.18.34 → OpenRouter `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731`. Default reasoning in both variants; no disabled-reasoning override. - Prompt: `Reply with Hi and an emoji and nothing else.` Fresh company, agent, chat, and per-turn native provider process for each trial; same QA fixture instructions and selected model. - Comparison: current product/runner at `53580f8fbd40b963f3fb7ba5172ff3ede2e9ef1f` held constant. The baseline substitutes the exact `opencode-app-server-proxy.ts`, `opencode-proxy-task-envelope.ts`, and `opencode-server-driver.ts` contents from pre-PR `41fec8c8921f9fb19c13fe11e2c9b71bf1017317`. This isolates those changed modules; it is not an entire old-checkout comparison. - Metric: browser capture-phase Send click to a rendered `Hi` markdown answer plus two animation frames, with a screenshot of the answer. Thinking, tool labels, and status indicators do not count. This is a DOM/render measurement, not instrumented compositor pixel timing. - Order/bound: predeclared `before, after, after, before` repeated three times; six trials per variant; 120-second response timeout; $1 campaign guard. All 12 measured trials returned `Hi` and an emoji and finished successfully; none omitted. - Result: before median 48.08 s (37.42–66.40); after median 42.50 s (27.68–63.32). The 11.6% lower median alone is not persuasive evidence of a reliable improvement given the mixed paired results and broad overlap. - Remaining delay: retained queue timestamps for 10/12 trials show 9.76–41.65 seconds from run creation to execution start. This is before the OpenCode path changed here. Its cause is not established by this benchmark. The final two queue reads were unavailable after automatic server shutdown; all twelve primary browser timings were retained. - Cost: $0.010517369 provider-reported across the 12 measured turns; $0.011371499 including the successful setup pilot. This is separate from the older diagnostics listed below. - Retained setup attempts: two failures before Send (composer locator and transpiler helper); one baseline startup failure before any observed model request (`SIGKILL` while probing OpenCode health); one successful current-code pilot whose selector missed the visible reply. These are retained separately, not silently included/excluded as valid timings. The measured batch used the corrected selector and the same release binary for both variants. - Limits: local development server and headless Chromium on macOS arm64, small sample, variable queue timing/provider routing/cache. This does not qualify production/cloud performance or isolate the contributions of each changed module. Server, browser, and owned runs were stopped; original proxy build artifact restored; no product source files changed for this experiment. \| Pair \| Before: Send → visible Hi \| After: Send → visible Hi \| Faster variant \| \| --- \| ---: \| ---: \| --- \| \| 1 \| 66.40 s \| 27.68 s \| After \| \| 2 \| 37.42 s \| 28.00 s \| After \| \| 3 \| 39.75 s \| 55.22 s \| Before \| \| 4 \| 47.32 s \| 63.32 s \| Before \| \| 5 \| 48.85 s \| 29.79 s \| After \| \| 6 \| 51.31 s \| 61.07 s \| Before \| <details> <summary>Sanitized measurement records, source/binary hashes, usage, and retained attempt classification</summary> ```json {"manifest":{"candidate":"53580f8fbd40b963f3fb7ba5172ff3ede2e9ef1f","baseline":"41fec8c8921f9fb19c13fe11e2c9b71bf1017317","comparison":"Same current product and runner; replace the three OpenCode proxy/driver source modules with exact pre-PR contents for baseline. Reasoning uses defaults in both.","model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","prompt":"Reply with Hi and an emoji and nothing else.","samplesPerVariant":6,"order":["before","after","after","before","before","after","after","before","before","after","after","before"],"maxTurnMs":120000,"maxCostUsd":1,"variants":{"before":{"sources":{"src/cli/opencode-app-server-proxy.ts":"e9b46c937d7ce3b51dc44181a2a3ad82befda9ebe184adf80c0a6b30da140fd6","src/cli/opencode-proxy-task-envelope.ts":"fc23f8a515c2c4d1551f6b95e5b38e6254849dec23f7396e76b646e170a6e006","src/drivers/opencode/opencode-server-driver.ts":"99de415e8fc3bb5fb6f8d7512d751c4c37d2aa77a18b0546b9fb232f1a6fb6c5"},"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b"},"after":{"sources":{"src/cli/opencode-app-server-proxy.ts":"fa800e9bccce02f05f1af83e225d3b5a1300d0a7d4c35ac548f400d6c0a83f79","src/cli/opencode-proxy-task-envelope.ts":"5c387614fc9832322686326b8482eb00d88699d491b05cf59cadcd94a41194ea","src/drivers/opencode/opencode-server-driver.ts":"a944f3bf7f1bf897daec3a5dc2aa34ee9d1a2133efcb3cf150b002095a0ec586"},"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04"}},"runnerBinary":{"profile":"release","sha256":"6134c17debda14a76da69ac9631a2d10dad482ebd58dbc9a4e4480ed652211c4"},"metric":"Browser Send capture-phase click to visible Hi answer, sampled on animation frames, plus two paint opportunities. Excludes reasoning/tool/status text.","setupAttempts":["setup-failure-1","setup-failure-2","startup-failure-3","pilot-selector-failure"]},"summary":{"before":{"attempts":6,"measured":6,"medianMs":48083.050000190735,"minMs":37420.5,"maxMs":66397.69999980927,"totalCostUsd":0.004945229,"toolCalls":[4,1,0,0,0,1]},"after":{"attempts":6,"measured":6,"medianMs":42504.049999952316,"minMs":27680.099999904633,"maxMs":63320.90000009537,"totalCostUsd":0.00557214,"toolCalls":[0,1,0,4,0,1]},"medianReductionPercent":11.602841334350234,"medianPairedImprovementMs":-168.59999990463257,"reportedCampaignCostUsdIncludingPilot":0.011371498999999998},"pairs":[{"indices":[0,1],"beforeMs":66397.69999980927,"afterMs":27680.099999904633,"improvementMs":38717.59999990463},{"indices":[2,3],"beforeMs":37420.5,"afterMs":27997,"improvementMs":9423.5},{"indices":[4,5],"beforeMs":39751.60000038147,"afterMs":55217.199999809265,"improvementMs":-15465.599999427795},{"indices":[6,7],"beforeMs":47318.90000009537,"afterMs":63320.90000009537,"improvementMs":-16002.0},{"indices":[8,9],"beforeMs":48847.2000002861,"afterMs":29790.900000095367,"improvementMs":19056.300000190735},{"indices":[10,11],"beforeMs":51311.7000002861,"afterMs":61072.40000009537,"improvementMs":-9760.699999809265}],"trials":[{"index":0,"variant":"before","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:15:23.172Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":66397.69999980927,"domMs":66390.59999990463,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.002612595,"costUsdExact":"0.002612595","inputTokens":55962,"outputTokens":1344,"cachedInputTokens":83456,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b","toolCalls":["paperclip_get_task_context","paperclip_comment_on_task","paperclip_finish","paperclip_finish"],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"tool.execution.started":4,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:15:58.194Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:15:58.311Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:15:59.063Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:16:36.039Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:16:36.118Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[42915.0]},{"index":1,"variant":"after","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:16:36.598Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":27680.099999904633,"domMs":27636.599999904633,"answer":"Hi","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00030429,"costUsdExact":"0.000304290","inputTokens":26845,"outputTokens":28,"cachedInputTokens":0,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","toolCalls":[],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"item.delta":3,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:17:00.717Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:17:00.841Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:17:01.508Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:17:05.934Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:17:06.205Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[14435.0]},{"index":2,"variant":"after","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:17:08.762Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":27997,"domMs":27984.599999904633,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00101016,"costUsdExact":"0.001010160","inputTokens":27544,"outputTokens":366,"cachedInputTokens":26624,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","toolCalls":["paperclip_finish"],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"tool.execution.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:17:26.192Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:17:26.305Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:17:26.936Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:17:40.688Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:17:40.826Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[17763.0]},{"index":3,"variant":"before","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:17:41.376Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":37420.5,"domMs":37364.40000009537,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.000693018,"costUsdExact":"0.000693018","inputTokens":24236,"outputTokens":282,"cachedInputTokens":27648,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b","toolCalls":["paperclip_finish"],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"tool.execution.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:18:12.381Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:18:12.616Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:18:13.441Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:18:21.746Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:18:22.262Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[29216.0]},{"index":4,"variant":"before","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:18:23.000Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":39751.60000038147,"domMs":39705.7000002861,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.000265747,"costUsdExact":"0.000265747","inputTokens":26123,"outputTokens":77,"cachedInputTokens":0,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b","toolCalls":[],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:19:01.000Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:19:01.163Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:19:01.893Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:19:07.169Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:19:07.384Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[15843.0]},{"index":5,"variant":"after","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:19:10.050Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":55217.199999809265,"domMs":55204.89999961853,"answer":"Hi 🙂","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00030421,"costUsdExact":"0.000304210","inputTokens":4294,"outputTokens":28,"cachedInputTokens":22543,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","toolCalls":[],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:19:59.877Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:19:59.990Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:20:00.713Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:20:07.290Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:20:07.658Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[15104.0]},{"index":6,"variant":"after","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:20:09.550Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":63320.90000009537,"domMs":63313.09999990463,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00260723,"costUsdExact":"0.002607230","inputTokens":137971,"outputTokens":951,"cachedInputTokens":1024,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","toolCalls":["paperclip_comment_on_task","paperclip_get_task_context","paperclip_comment_on_task","paperclip_finish"],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"tool.execution.started":4,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:20:59.730Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:20:59.859Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:21:00.501Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:21:19.416Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:21:19.608Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[26519.0]},{"index":7,"variant":"before","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:21:20.519Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":47318.90000009537,"domMs":47246.800000190735,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.000257965,"costUsdExact":"0.000257965","inputTokens":4700,"outputTokens":71,"cachedInputTokens":21407,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b","toolCalls":[],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:22:03.924Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:22:04.439Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:22:04.772Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:22:09.915Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:22:10.343Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[16702.0]},{"index":8,"variant":"before","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:22:11.124Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":48847.2000002861,"domMs":48802.59999990463,"answer":"Hi 🎉","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.000327654,"costUsdExact":"0.000327654","inputTokens":44796,"outputTokens":32,"cachedInputTokens":0,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b","toolCalls":[],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:22:57.182Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:22:57.281Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:22:57.988Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:23:02.915Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:23:03.035Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[9541.0]},{"index":9,"variant":"after","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:23:03.579Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":29790.900000095367,"domMs":29748.800000190735,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00034054,"costUsdExact":"0.000340540","inputTokens":24710,"outputTokens":59,"cachedInputTokens":1792,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","toolCalls":[],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"item.delta":2,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:23:28.840Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:23:28.954Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:23:29.666Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:23:35.306Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:23:35.531Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[12732.0]},{"index":10,"variant":"after","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:23:37.247Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":61072.40000009537,"domMs":61061.300000190735,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00100571,"costUsdExact":"0.001005710","inputTokens":25307,"outputTokens":368,"cachedInputTokens":28160,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","toolCalls":["paperclip_finish"],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"tool.execution.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:24:33.721Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:24:33.832Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:24:34.601Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:24:43.135Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:24:43.278Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[17387.0]},{"index":11,"variant":"before","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:24:44.710Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":51311.7000002861,"domMs":51300.5,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00078825,"costUsdExact":"0.000788250","inputTokens":24316,"outputTokens":356,"cachedInputTokens":27648,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b","toolCalls":["paperclip_finish"],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"tool.execution.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:25:31.347Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:25:31.463Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:25:32.208Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:25:39.405Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:25:39.563Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[15446.0]}],"additionalAttempts":[{"attempt":"setup-1","stage":"before_send","result":"non-editable composer locator","modelRequestObserved":false},{"attempt":"setup-2","stage":"before_send","result":"transpiler helper absent in browser","modelRequestObserved":false},{"attempt":"startup-pilot-before","runnerProfile":"debug","result":"no visible reply within 120s; OpenCode health startup SIGKILL; retained infrastructure failure","modelRequestObserved":false},{"attempt":"selector-pilot-after","runnerProfile":"debug","result":"Hi reply succeeded; browser selector missed it; no valid TTFR","providerReportedCostUsd":0.00085413}],"queueTimingCoverage":{"measuredTrials":10,"totalTrials":12,"records":[{"index":0,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:15:28.998Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:15:53.558Z","queuedMs":24560.0}]},{"index":1,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:16:38.520Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:16:54.157Z","queuedMs":15637.0}]},{"index":2,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:17:10.587Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:17:23.561Z","queuedMs":12974.0}]},{"index":3,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:17:43.807Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:17:53.564Z","queuedMs":9757.0}]},{"index":4,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:18:28.113Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:18:54.011Z","queuedMs":25898.0}]},{"index":5,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:19:12.343Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:19:53.993Z","queuedMs":41650.0}]},{"index":6,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:20:14.258Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:20:53.866Z","queuedMs":39608.0}]},{"index":7,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:21:23.019Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:21:54.298Z","queuedMs":31279.0}]},{"index":8,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:22:14.671Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:22:53.933Z","queuedMs":39262.0}]},{"index":9,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:23:06.155Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:23:23.941Z","queuedMs":17786.0}]}],"limitation":"The server shut down before a final API read; queue timing is retained for the first ten trials only."},"conclusion":"No reliable end-to-end speedup established. The after median is lower, but only three of six adjacent matched pairs were faster; median paired improvement is approximately zero. The deterministic streaming-forwarding fix remains separately supported.","limitations":["Local dev server and headless Chromium on macOS arm64; six fresh chats per variant; not a production/cloud latency guarantee.","Current product and current release runner held constant; only three OpenCode modules replaced by their exact pre-PR contents for baseline.","Default model reasoning unchanged; no no-reasoning override or decision policy.","Upstream routing/cache and queue time vary; trials run serially in predeclared counterbalanced ABBA order.","Render proxy: capture-phase Send click to visible nonempty Hi markdown, then two animation frames; screenshot verifies the rendered answer. This is not instrumented compositor pixel timing.","Two setup-only failures, one startup failure, and one invalid-measurement successful pilot are retained separately, not silently treated as successful timings."],"reproducibility":{"harnessSha256":"f93996b306c7d31c19bfcb9cc197653f867944ffb900d81a23a34f831e17c0c5","variantBuilderSha256":"4e88a7bbdc0de5d72601194ebe3b96d9c6f6eda5a33d8e0f00cf2d5d14db34c2","analyzerSha256":"2d129177a1b8033f768aad3c82dc8fff70ba0ba76e7270b2d8612ee760d4aaf4"}} ``` </details> - Latest options-struct refactor: 33 provider tests and 86 backend tests passed. Four port-dependent fixtures initially failed inside the sandbox and passed with loopback access. Latest check snapshot: 51 successes, 4 skips, and 2 failures (`ci / e2e` and `ci / e2e shard (5/8)`). This latency experiment does not make the PR merge-ready. - Focused TypeScript suites passed: OpenCode driver, per-turn reasoning, prepared-context recovery, proxy envelope, live sessions, Codex context control, and native instruction measurements. The real runnerd/proxy integration test confirms disabled followed by default in the same session. A stale staged binary initially hid the new parameter; rebuilding the release runner resolved it. - Capability-guard regression suites passed all 53 tests; the real runner/proxy boundary still accepts the per-turn selection. Both OpenRouter and non-OpenRouter real runner/proxy cases passed, along with 62 existing OpenCode fixture tests. Runner TypeScript build passed after the final correction. - Affected Rust modules passed: 33 provider tests and 86 durable backend tests. Malformed or unsupported reasoning selections do not dispatch a provider turn or poison admission state. - Pinned OpenCode 1.18.34 with a local OpenRouter-compatible fixture sent three successive provider requests with reasoning omitted, `enabled: false`, then omitted. Each request contained one copy of the agent instructions. No paid provider call was needed. - The reconstructed first-turn task envelope shrank from 4,356 to 460 characters. This is a payload-size measurement, not a claimed token or latency reduction. Existing stored conversation history is not rewritten. - Prior head `8c07fe2e70267a7c8a3118f1071eca73ecdc6c8a`: all 53 checks passed, with four intentional skips. Greptile is 5/5 with no open findings. One bounded retry cleared first-test timeouts, a legacy signoff lease failure, and CI runner shutdowns. The timed-out suites also passed locally (14 auth-signal tests, 40 device-login tests, and the runner resume case). - Known reported diagnostic usage totals about $0.0029. Two prematurely closed baseline warm-turn attempts are excluded from latency comparisons and their usage is not fully captured; background provider usage is also not fully accounted. No further paid runs are active. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. Runner TypeScript typechecks and build also passed after the review correction. - `pnpm test:run`: attempted and stopped after a reproducible failure in the untouched Codex recovery test `archives a damaged prior epoch before completing guarded same-task replacement with real runnerd` (`server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-resume.test.ts:1072`). It returns `needs_review` / failed instead of done / succeeded, including when rerun alone. The broad local suite is not green. The two initial collection failures disappeared after building; their isolated rerun passed all 1,565 tests. - `pnpm build`: passed. - Pinned real OpenCode plus a delayed local provider: first native delta to Paperclip delta fell from 1,496 ms to less than 1 ms at millisecond measurement resolution. This isolates forwarding delay, not network/model inference. - Two live driver samples after the patch reached first text in 2.28–2.62 seconds including session startup. Baseline first responses took 12.37–13.43 seconds. Small unmatched samples had different reasoning/cache outcomes, so these are observations, not an attributed speedup ratio. - Full compiled runnerd protocol diagnostic: completed with `Hi 👋`; first assistant delta at 9.19 seconds and cleanup complete at 9.44 seconds. The seeded mock-control-plane harness used 27,512 input tokens across two provider requests, split into 13,521 and 13,991. The extra `answer_status_question` call posted `Hi 👋` to the mock task in 12 ms, then caused another model request. A reconstruction contains 25 tools (35.3k JSON characters), 12.8k system characters, and a 4.4k task envelope; 3.9k instruction characters appear in both system and task context. Provider-reported cost was $0.00073976; the pricing-table estimate was $0.00395332. This is one integration diagnostic, not a production latency claim. - A separate full-runner sample with existing lazy tool discovery also completed, but took 14.64 seconds through cleanup and called `paperclip_finish`. Its usage ledger recorded 12,888 input and 11,776 cached-input tokens, with $0.00096344 provider-reported cost. This did not establish a latency improvement, so the default tool exposure was not changed. - Four direct OpenRouter requests separately measured default reasoning at 2.45/3.90 seconds to first text and disabled reasoning at 0.66/0.53 seconds. Default reasoning remains unchanged; disabling it requires the explicit per-turn option. ## Risks - Immediate readiness dispatch changes scheduling timing. It uses existing admission checks and preserves the periodic sweep as recovery. - Native model verification relies on the real request rather than catalog enumeration. The final live batch had provider startup failures; overall speed and reliability are not qualified. - Incremental chunks without IDs cannot safely be deduplicated by content. Repeated identical chunks are valid. Known-ID duplicates remain suppressed. - OpenCode uses its bundled model catalog plus the explicit selected-model entry. New remote catalog metadata will not refresh during isolated startup. - Default provider plugins are disabled. This runner supplies credentials and assigned MCP tools through its own controlled configuration. - Disabled reasoning is supported only on the OpenCode/OpenRouter path and requires a compatible model. It applies to one turn and is not an automatic latency policy. - The matched live browser sample is small and does not establish a reliable end-to-end improvement. It includes local queueing/startup and browser rendering, but does not qualify production or remote sandbox latency. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex). Tool use, code editing, and command execution were used. The session does not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. Live diagnostic target: DeepSeek `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731` through OpenRouter and OpenCode 1.18.34. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 07:15:41 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	35511366dc	perf(server): schedule browser cleanup only while sessions exist (#15757 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Hosted instances must become quiet when they have no work. > - Browser Use queried its session table every three seconds, even when empty. > - Existing session rows already store the next poll time and cleanup lease. > - This pull request uses commit signals and those saved deadlines to schedule cleanup. > - Empty instances stop browser database scans. Live sessions keep their safety checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Browser Use background cleanup and recovery. This follows #15625 and #15750. Subsystem affected server/ — REST API and orchestration services. Current behavior The app scans for due sessions every three seconds, including instances that have never used Browser Use. Proposed behavior Scan once at startup. Wake after session creation, provider-create settlement, stop requests, or credential-removal cleanup. Schedule the next check from `nextPollAt` and `leaseUntil`. Stop scheduling when all sessions are terminal. Reason and benefit Remove empty database traffic so idle stacks and their database connections can become quiet. Breaking changes No API or schema change. Running and idle sessions retain provider polling, cost accounting, access checks, expiry checks, and cleanup retries. ## What Changed - Register browser cleanup with the existing work coordinator. Remove the app's three-second interval. - Signal existing session transactions before writes. No new tables or provider infrastructure. - Restore deadlines from live sessions and their leases. Wake after a credential-removal sweep releases its lease. - Wait for concurrent cleanup instead of returning while it still runs. Drain and standby preserve deferred work. - Add scheduler tests and database-backed commit and restart coverage. Update the connector guide and sleep inventory. ## Verification - Passed: focused browser worker and shared coordinator tests, 17 tests. - Passed: browser lifecycle, route-scope, viewport, and transport tests, 50 tests. The lifecycle suite uses real local Postgres and a simulated provider. - Passed: `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`. - Passed: all hosted test groups for this commit. Started full local `pnpm test:run`, then stopped its duplicate serial run after the complete hosted sharded suite passed; no full local-suite pass is claimed. - Passed: direct server TypeScript check. Greptile reviewed `99c3217a2dea505be94081e729941e542e6fbc03` at 5/5 with no findings. All 54 applicable hosted checks passed; the two Storybook checks were skipped because this PR has no UI changes. ## Risks - Process-local signals cover services that share the instrumented database owner. Independent processes and direct SQL writes require startup recovery; this does not add cross-process notification. - Live sessions still poll. This removes empty scans; it does not make a running hosted browser sleep. - Cleanup uses the existing provider protocol and lease fences. Tests simulate the provider; no paid live browser was created for this scheduling change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 07:06:31 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	7e10dbe652	fix(server): retain stopped ephemeral workspaces after failed copy-back (#15790 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work performed by agents. > - A remote adapter must copy workspace changes back after execution. > - Cancellation can stop and release an ephemeral sandbox before copy-back fails. > - The recovery recorder previously considered only active or already held leases. > - This change carries the original host lease into the recorder and checks both stop receipts. > - The exact stopped source receives a board repair obligation without replaying work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A legacy remote run can report `workspaceRestoreFailure` after its dedicated stop has released the source lease. The recorder misses that source and does not create its file-repair action. Related prior work: #15637 adds bounded transfer diagnostics; #15718 protects native accepted finalization. This change addresses the separate legacy recording order. Expected behavior Preserve the exact eligible source and record the existing board repair obligation. Preserve cancellation, later task progress, and newer execution ownership. Steps to reproduce 1. Acquire an ephemeral remote lease for a legacy run. 2. Complete the dedicated stop-and-retain lifecycle and persist both stop receipts. 3. Report a workspace copy-back failure from the original adapter invocation. 4. Observe that the old recorder omits the released source. The PostgreSQL regression reproduces this order. Paperclip version or commit `de042e79ef`. Deployment mode Server with PostgreSQL and a sandbox provider. The regression uses disposable local PostgreSQL and synthetic provider receipts. ## What Changed - Clone the realized host lease before adapter dispatch and carry it into restore recording. - Admit a released source only when its original and current policies are ephemeral, its full ownership and workspace identity match, and its dedicated retention receipt agrees with the independent stopped-execution receipt. - Reject reusable, expired, destroyed, rebound, competing, or insufficiently proved sources. Preserve release state and receipts when recording the existing no-replay repair action. - Cover the actual stop-before-copy-back lifecycle, cleanup retries, built-in dispatch, rollback, repeated recording, newer owners, and ownership/receipt failures. Document the narrow scope. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/legacy-workspace-restore-recovery.test.ts server/src/services/legacy-execution-recovery.test.ts`: 80 passed. - Existing Grok confirmed-stop/copy-back boundary test: passed. - The new PostgreSQL regression fails on the baseline because the recovery marker is absent. - Guard-removal controls fail when either the ephemeral-policy gate or original-source identity checks are removed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`: passed. - Additional competing-owner/lifecycle checks: 6 passed, including older stopped and destroyed allocation owners. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`: passed. - Independent review approved the final source. The exact ephemeral regression fails on the baseline; policy/identity guard-removal controls fail their intended assertions. - Compatibility with #15789 was checked in a disposable combined checkout: both commit orders yield the same tree. The earlier broad run passed 136 cases; the final guard/SDK delta passed 9 cases. - Greptile: 5/5 on the current head, with no review threads. - Exact-head CI: 53 successful checks and 2 expected skips; no failures or pending checks. This includes all test shards and Canary Dry Run. - The duplicate local `pnpm test:run` aggregate was stopped after full CI passed. It is not reported as a completed local suite. - No live provider calls, historical data repair, run replay, or deployment was performed. ## Risks No schema or API change. A qualifying source remains held for manual file repair and eventual removal, which can retain provider storage longer. This fix does not recover historical files or establish that the provider still holds the bytes. Reusable sources remain excluded from this new path because provider resume can start before the database handoff. Existing active-source and previously recorded recovery behavior is unchanged. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, and independent agent review. The exact model revision and context-window size are not exposed to this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 01:27:03 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	caa7895f9a	fix(opencode): report timeouts without claiming deadline expiry (#15789 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The OpenCode adapter reports the outcome of a local or remote execution. > - A provider can report a timeout before the configured execution deadline. > - The adapter treated every timeout as proof that the configured deadline expired. > - This pull request uses a generic timeout message and retains the resolved policy. > - Operators can compare the run duration with its actual configured limit without a false cause claim. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A remote execution can return `timedOut: true` after a short interval while the sandbox policy is four hours. OpenCode reported `Timed out after 14400s`. It also dropped the resolved policy on that result. Run finalization then used the raw `timeoutSec: 0` configuration, so diagnostics incorrectly reported an unlimited timeout. Expected behavior Keep the timeout outcome. Report the resolved policy separately from the failure message. Do not infer which timer fired from the provider's boolean or stderr. Steps to reproduce Call the OpenCode adapter with a sandbox execution target and `timeoutSec: 0`. Return a timed-out process result before four hours. Inspect the message and the policy that finalization sends to the run-failure collector. The new tests reproduce this with local fixtures and an in-memory Sentry transport. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on `de042e79efbb7bb88e9716835407882e3ebab188`. Deployment mode Legacy OpenCode execution on a local instance or remote sandbox. Refs #14832 for related timeout result preservation; this PR does not change session state. Related PRs #14964, #15659 and #15715 cover silent-run limits, gateway requests and OpenCode v2 support. They do not fix this policy/message path. ## What Changed - Retain the complete existing timeout resolution on both OpenCode result branches. - Report `OpenCode execution timed out` without copying provider output into exception text. - Document that configured policy and the existing `timeoutFired` outcome field do not prove timer origin. - Test policy overrides, sandbox defaults, opt-out, ordinary exits, real local timer expiry, cleanup and real Sentry SDK delivery. ## Verification - 142 focused adapter, stop-metadata and diagnostic tests passed on Node 25.6.1. - The real Sentry SDK contract suite passed 11/11 with the audited optional peer 10.71.0 and an in-memory transport. The new test runs the actual adapter, finalization policy merge and collector. It verifies that raw HTML and credential canaries stay out of the event and unrelated captures stay isolated. - Full workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. All hosted CI checks passed on `f4df5cba1d2223d444559de960bbf88dfa985bbf` (54 passed, 2 expected skips). - The local aggregate is not a pass: 15 existing PostgreSQL fixture cases initially failed because this fresh macOS install lacked bundled ICU symlinks. The dependency's existing hydration script repaired the isolated install; all 15 affected cases then passed with real PostgreSQL. No test or production source was changed for that setup issue. The aggregate was stopped after hosted test coverage passed; it is incomplete, not a local full-suite pass. All owned test processes exited. - Greptile scored this exact head 5/5 with no review threads. Independent review found no issues. It ran 58 positive cases and adapter typechecking. Three negative controls failed as expected when it restored the old producer, removed timeout policy, or copied raw stderr into the message. ## Risks The timeout message changes for local and remote OpenCode runs. The resolved policy is additive result data. The numeric timeout, grace period, process result, retry rules, session handling, cleanup and recovery behavior are unchanged. This fixes reporting and does not identify or fix an upstream provider timeout. No schema change or migration is required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools and independent agent review. The exact service model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-10 01:18:17 -07:00
Devin Foley devinfoley Claude Fable 5.1	32745f4e84	feat(issues): keep follow-up parents and show the creation source (#15762 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents delegate work by creating follow-up tasks through the issue API, the CLI, and the chat `create_task` tool > - An agent can omit `parentId` when it creates a follow-up from an ordinary execution task. The API accepts the task as a top-level task. The task hierarchy does not show where the task came from, even though the run provenance is recorded > - The operator must read run history to learn why the task exists. This is slow and it hides delegated work from the parent task > - This pull request keeps the parent link for delegated follow-ups by default, keeps intentional standalone tasks possible, and shows an access-checked "Created from <task> by <agent>" note on the task page from the recorded run provenance > - The benefit is that each agent-created task shows its source without log inspection, while structural parentage, provenance, and blockers stay separate concepts ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13241 (shows tasks created from a task on the source task page; this PR shows the reverse direction on the created task) Refs #9727 (open proposal for creation provenance tracking) What existing behavior does this improve? Issue creation by agent runs, and the task detail page. Subsystem affected Server (`POST /api/companies/:companyId/issues`, `GET /api/issues/:id`), shared types, UI task detail page, CLI `issue create`, Paperclip skill docs. Current behavior When an agent run bound to an execution task creates a task and omits `parentId`, the task is created with no parent. The task page shows no source. The operator must inspect the run log to find the task that the agent was working on. The source run and the privacy parent are recorded, but the UI does not use them. Proposed behavior - When an agent run bound to an ordinary execution task omits `parentId`, the server sets `parentId` to that task. The `issue.created` activity records `parentDefaultedFromRunIssue: true`. - An explicit `parentId: null` keeps the task standalone. Conversation runs (chat handoffs), board or user creates, watchdog follow-ups, a run task the agent may not mutate, a default parent that would cause a delegation cycle, and a default parent the agent may not create a child under (for example a protected assignment policy without a grant) also stay standalone. The server runs the same `tasks:assign` decision with the defaulted parent in scope before it accepts the default. No request that succeeded before now fails. An explicit `parentId` is still checked as before. - `GET /api/issues/:id` returns `createdFrom` with the source task, the run, and the agent. The server resolves it from `origin_run_id`, or from the recorded creation activity for historical rows. It returns `null` when the viewer may not read the source task or the run, when the run is from another company, or when provenance is missing. - The task page shows "Created from <task> by <agent>" in the classic breadcrumb area and in the streamlined Tasks tab. The note is not a blocker and it is shown with or without a parent. - The CLI `issue create` command gets `--standalone`, which sends `parentId: null`. Reason and benefit Operators see why a task exists on the task itself. Delegated follow-ups stay inside the parent task tree, so parent completion and child wake-ups keep working. Private and cross-company sources stay hidden. Breaking changes None for the API schema. Agents that create tasks from a run and relied on the omitted `parentId` to mean "top-level" must now send `parentId: null` (CLI: `--standalone`). The skill and the spec document this. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/issue-creation-source.ts` (new): resolves a task's creation source from the origin run or the creation activity, scoped to the company, and loads the run-bound task by UUID or identifier. - `server/src/routes/issues.ts`: `POST /companies/:companyId/issues` defaults `parentId` to the run's task when the body omits it (with the exclusions above) and records the default in the activity log. `GET /issues/:id` adds the access-checked `createdFrom` field. - `packages/shared/src/types/issue.ts` and index exports: new `IssueCreationSource` type and the optional `createdFrom` field on `Issue`. - `ui/src/components/task-detail/IssueCreatedFromNote.tsx` (new), `TaskDetailTasksPanel.tsx`, and `IssueDetail.tsx`: show the creation source in both task page layouts and count it in the Tasks tab badge. - `cli/src/commands/client/issue.ts`: `issue create --standalone`. - Docs: `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, `doc/CLI.md`, `skills/paperclip/SKILL.md`. - Tests: `server/src/__tests__/issue-creation-source-routes.test.ts` (new), `TaskDetailTasksPanel.test.tsx`, `IssueDetail.test.tsx`. ## Verification Run the new server route test (embedded Postgres): ```sh cd server && pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/issue-creation-source-routes.test.ts ``` It covers: ordinary delegation gets the parent and `createdFrom`; explicit `parentId: null` stays standalone but still shows the source; conversation handoff and board create stay standalone; a would-be delegation cycle falls back to standalone; a protected source task without a grant falls back to standalone while an explicit parent still returns 403; an explicit cycle still returns 409; historical provenance from the creation activity; missing provenance, a private source for an outsider, and a cross-company run all return `null`. Related existing suites that passed locally (11 files, 313 tests): `issue-created-from-routes`, `issue-create-deduplication-routes`, `issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes`, `chat-project-tools`, `issue-assignee-invokability-routes`, `issue-watchdogs-routes`, `issue-dependency-wakeups-routes`, `public-mcp`, `native-runtime/task-creation-backlog`, `issue-access-grants-routes`, `issue-list-assignee-filter-routes`. UI: ```sh cd ui && pnpm exec vitest run src/components/task-detail/TaskDetailTasksPanel.test.tsx src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx pnpm check:token-gates ``` Manual check: as an agent run bound to a task, `POST /api/companies/:companyId/issues` with only a title. The response has `parentId` set to the run's task. Open the new task; the page shows "Created from <task> by <agent>". The related server suites pass locally (`issue-created-from`, `issue-create-deduplication`, `issue-agent-mutation-ownership`, `chat-project-tools`, `issue-watchdogs`, `public-mcp`, `task-creation-backlog`, `issue-access-grants`, `permissions-upgrade-boundary`). The full `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm test:run`, and `pnpm build` were not run locally because the sandbox has a 4 GB memory limit and the TypeScript compiler is killed on the server project; the CI gates on this PR cover them. ## Risks - Behavior shift for agent clients: a run-created task without `parentId` now becomes a child of the run's task. Clients that want a top-level task must send `parentId: null`. The watchdog, conversation, and board paths are excluded, and the default never adds a blocker. - The default parent inherits the parent's execution workspace, which run-created tasks already inherited from the run's task. - `createdFrom` adds one run lookup, one issue lookup, one access decision, and one agent lookup to the task detail request. It is skipped when the task has no origin run and no creation activity with a run. - Privacy: the field returns `null` unless the viewer can read the source task and the run, so a private source is indistinguishable from missing provenance. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5.1 (`claude-fable-5-1`), Anthropic, run through Claude Code in a Paperclip-managed execution workspace with tool use, shell execution, and a local embedded Postgres for tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-10-10 00:40:08 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip	3ec7309d91	feat(voice): add experimental Speko task connection runtime (#15727 ) First PR: runtime. UI: #15728. Qualification: #15729. ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work through tasks and governed connections. > - Chat connections already bind external conversations to those tasks. > - Speko handles voice and telephony, while the selected Paperclip agent does the work. > - A call needs durable session authority, ordered follow-ups, and safe result delivery. > - This PR adds an explicit voice transport to the existing connection runtime. > - The UI and qualification suites follow in linked PRs. Speko stays experimental. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Problem or motivation Phone and browser voice conversations cannot use the chat connection task lifecycle. A separate voice runtime is needed to preserve task authority, retries, and reply history. Proposed solution Add company-scoped voice sessions, signed callbacks, durable replies, inbound intake, and an agent-facing outbound-call tool. Reuse existing tasks, queues, secrets, and publications. Roadmap alignment This extends the experimental chat connector entry points under Agent Chat and Connected Apps. The project owner requested this feature. Refs #11418 for the original provider catalog proposal. This implementation uses the newer chat connection infrastructure rather than an MCP catalog-only integration. Refs #15721 for remote OpenCode startup. ## What Changed - Add additive voice schema, shared contracts, session APIs, and provider callbacks. - Bind browser, inbound, and outbound sessions to an endpoint, task, and selected agent. - Add low-trust guest intake in an explicitly selected sandbox and keep ordinary approval rules. - Submit task work through session-scoped tools and push approved replies through Speko POST /v1/calls/{id}/messages. - Distinguish provider acceptance from confirmed spoken playback. Reconcile reports without downloading recordings. - Add protocol, migration, persistence, provider, and delivery-diagnostic tests. ## Verification - Master `3389bea708` is integrated. Database/shared builds, server typecheck, migration upgrade/replay checks, and 46 communication-guidance/provider/protocol tests passed. - The final persistence suite passed 85 real-database tests. Five focused native continuation/authorization regressions passed. Five callback ownership/rotation tests passed after the last runtime repair. - Review repairs cover reconnect ownership, current caller authority, duplicate delivery, multipart answers, task-page answers, guest question handling, and saved sandbox recovery. - A real OpenCode/OpenRouter DeepSeek task ran in Daytona and saved a correct disk-space answer. This did not establish live-call playback. - Full local typecheck/build passed before the final repairs; focused typechecks passed after them. Latest-head CI runs the repository gates. - The separate integrated browser qualification passed two journeys and failed browser answer retrieval. The feature remains experimental. The report in #15729 records this failure and outstanding real-provider acceptance. - No lockfiles are included. Speko migrations follow master as 0324–0330. ## Risks - Voice sessions add migrations and provider-dependent lifecycle behavior. Migrations preserve existing chat and AI transports. - Callback origins must be reachable HTTPS. Provider keys and signing secrets remain vaulted. - Unverified callers receive task-scoped low-trust authority. Caller ID does not grant private task access. - Outbound telephony incurs provider charges. Provider acceptance is not proof that the caller heard an answer. - Keep the feature behind the existing experimental chat setting until the real browser, inbound, outbound, and delayed-result acceptance matrix passes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with tool use and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-09 21:54:11 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	3389bea708	fix(recovery): surface exhausted review-path repair (#15764 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - An issue in review needs a saved path to its next action. > - A consumed review path starts one automatic repair run. > - The repair run can finish with only a promise to check later. > - The old code skips another wake but records no recovery action. > - This change records a board decision when that repair also leaves no saved path. > - The issue lock protects a new monitor, a changed owner, or newer work from stale finalization. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? An agent waiting for an external build said it would check again soon. Its one-shot monitor had already fired. The automatic review-path repair also finished without saving another monitor. The task stayed in review with no future wake or recovery card. Expected behavior The repair must save a monitor or another review path. If it cannot do so, Paperclip must show an explicit recovery action and stop automatic retries. Steps to reproduce 1. Leave an agent-owned issue in review after consuming its last monitor or interaction. 2. Let the source run finish without saving another review path. 3. Let the single automatic repair run also finish without saving a path. 4. Before this change, the task stays in review without a scheduled follow-up. After this change, it is blocked with a board-owned recovery action and an inline notice that links the repair run. Related work: Refs #14757 (preserve active review during stale recovery), Refs #11925 (review-path liveness). This PR handles exhausted repair wakes; it does not change path aging. ## What Changed - Return an explicit exhausted result after the single review-path repair attempt. - Record the recovery action, blocked state, notice, and activity in one transaction. Preserve the original assignee. Keep implicit service reads on the transaction connection. - Recheck the company, owner, saved review paths, and latest issue run before escalation. Publish activity after commit. - Tell the repair agent to save a one-shot monitor and report its check time when an external check remains pending. - Retry missed escalation from the saved terminal repair run during the stranded-issue sweep. Cover restart recovery and rollback with a one-connection pool. - Preserve valid due and claimed monitors for dispatch while the owner permits on-demand wakes. Surface overdue monitors after those wakes are disabled. Keep the future-only liveness classifier unchanged. - Cover monitor repair, stale finalization, company boundaries, duplicate finalization, and failed repair. Document the behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/recovery/review-path-recovery.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-issue-liveness-escalation.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-liveness.test.ts` — 62 tests passed, including PostgreSQL integration tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit` — passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` — passed. - `pnpm test:run` — 18,144 passed, with three unrelated local fixture failures. Two Git fixtures pass when run with their expected initial branch (`master`); this machine defaults to `main`. The native same-task replacement fixture also fails on an unchanged checkout of master. No unrelated production behavior was changed to accommodate those fixtures. - Apex review — 5/5 on commit `3aca7059848`, with no unresolved review comments. - Latest-head CI — all required checks passed, including test shards, typecheck, build, browser checks, and canary dry run. No merge conflicts. - Repeat the steps above. Confirm that the issue has one recovery notice, one board-owned action, and no second automatic repair wake. Save a monitor during repair and confirm that the issue stays in review. ## Risks - A review repair that exhausts its one attempt now moves the task to blocked and asks the board to act. This is an intentional behavior change. - The check uses the current review-path classifier. A path that the classifier treats as healthy still suppresses escalation. - No schema, API, or UI contract changes are required. Existing recovery controls render the action and notice. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with tool use and code execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (62 tests for this change; full-suite fixture limitations are listed above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-09 18:56:20 -07:00
Dotta	8f13ec4d51	fix(slack): link created tasks in default reply guidance (#15579 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their tasks. > - Slack agents use shared guidance to write their replies. > - A reply can show a task ID without a link. > - The person must then search for the task. > - This change tells the agent to link each task it creates. > - People can open the task directly from the reply. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Default communication guidance for Slack agents. Current behavior The guidance does not require a link when an agent creates a task. Proposed behavior Require a clickable link to each created task. Use its identifier or title as the link text. Use a public URL supplied by Paperclip. Report when no public URL is available. Reason and benefit People can open the task without a separate search. Related work: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13760 introduced the guidance. https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15576 adds account connection instructions and does not cover task links. ## What Changed - Add task link instructions to the shared Slack communication guidance. - Document the default and the existing conversation snapshot behavior. - Add regression coverage for the guidance in channels and DMs. ## Verification - Passed: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/chat-communication-guidance.test.ts` (10 tests). - Passed: `git diff --check`. - Local full typecheck and build could not finish: the container killed compiler processes (exit 137; cgroup reports OOM kills). The full test run was stopped after this resource limit. CI results are pending. - Added checks for task links, public URL sources, and missing URLs in Slack channels and DMs. ## Risks - Low risk. This changes prompt text only. - Existing conversations keep their original guidance snapshot. New conversations receive the new default after deployment. - This is agent guidance. It does not force a link into provider output. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The runtime did not expose an exact model revision or context window size. Used reasoning, code inspection, file editing, and command execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-10-09 20:23:18 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	baa94bbea5	Fix idle sleep checks for finished login and wake history (#15761 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agent work and keeps a durable record of each run. > - Automatic idle sleep must wait for accepted work and provider cleanup. > - The current sleep check treats every saved login session as active work. > - It also treats every coalesced wake request as pending work. > - These records can remain after their work and cleanup finish. > - This pull request checks the cleanup and linked-run evidence before it treats these records as history. > - The change lets otherwise idle instances sleep and keeps uncertain work awake. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A finished login session blocks idle sleep after its provider resource has been removed. A consumed coalesced wake also blocks sleep after its linked run finishes. Expected behavior Finished history should permit sleep when cleanup or run completion is confirmed. Active work, missing evidence, retry debt, and pending accounting must still block sleep. Steps to reproduce 1. Create a finished login session with a retained provider reference. 2. Record a successful release for the same resource, company, and environment. 3. Check idle sleep safety under an owned, quiet admission hold. 4. The current check reports background work. The new check treats the session as history. 5. Repeat with a finished coalesced wake linked to a finished run in the same company and agent. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on master at `98e3cec78e`. Related work: #15522, #15599, #15629. A search of open and merged idle-sleep PRs found no duplicate. ## What Changed - Permit finished login history only after its promotion claim is cleared. A retained resource reference needs successful cleanup, a release timestamp, and the same company and environment. Conflicting cleanup evidence still blocks sleep. - Permit a finished coalesced wake only after its exact linked run finishes without a retry or pending cost accounting. - Keep the lease UUID column unchanged. Convert only valid UUID-shaped session references so both existing lease indexes remain usable. - Add real PostgreSQL tests for safe history and missing, active, or conflicting evidence. Cover text references, UUID references, and conflicting internal/external matches. - Document these checks. Image-setup history still blocks sleep because its terminal state does not confirm cleanup. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/idle-sleep-safety.test.ts`: 84 tests passed, including the PostgreSQL cases. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` also passed after the index fix. - Full default test coverage was exercised through the supported shard runner. The initial run was not green. Fixture-permission, local PostgreSQL startup, socket, route timeout, and Git stress failures passed controlled rechecks with normal permissions, one database worker, or isolated runs. - All route suites, UI/CLI suites, and all shared, database, adapter, and SDK projects were exercised. One damaged-session recovery test in `native-session-resume.test.ts` still fails and also reproduces on unmodified base `98e3cec78e8`. Full-suite green status is not claimed. - `pnpm build`: passed in an isolated checkout of the initial commit. The build and full Paperclip CI also passed on final head `d61b489c26b`: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38005908398. Both required branch-protection checks passed. The optional Superagent security scan is still running and has not returned findings. - A local PostgreSQL query-plan probe used 10,000 lease rows and 200 finished login rows with mixed internal and external references. The actual sleep query used both the primary-key and provider-reference indexes. Execution took 1.63 ms in this synthetic fixture. - A read-only comparison on a controlled staging instance found login history as the current check's sole durable-work blocker. The new query found no durable-work blockers. This comparison did not authorize or perform provider shutdown. - The current owned sleep controller refused sleep and released its hold. The instance remained healthy. Existing backup archives were unchanged. ## Risks - Missing schema, missing cleanup evidence, stale claims, and unfinished linked runs fail closed. - The change preserves history and provider references. It does not delete records or release resources. - Image setup, other durable work, plugin draining, in-flight work, and backup checks retain their current behavior. - No schema migration or new API is required. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. Used repository inspection, code execution, and test tools. The exact deployment model identifier and context-window size were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run the tests for this change locally and they pass. The broader local baseline failure is described in Verification. - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-09 17:25:02 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	e9dae72c0c	ci: use a Docker Hub mirror for image builds (#15756 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Image workflows build the exact source selected for a release. > - BuildKit fetches the Dockerfile frontend and base images from Docker Hub. > - Docker Hub token failures can stop these builds before application code runs. > - BuildKit supports a public image cache with canonical Docker Hub fallback. > - This pull request configures that cache in the two affected image builders. > - The build inputs and publication gates stay the same. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? [Docker run 37995539183](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37995539183) failed before application builds started. The AMD64 job received HTTP 504 from the Docker Hub token endpoint while it fetched `docker/dockerfile:1.20`. The ARM64 job fetched the frontend, then received the same error while it resolved `node:24-trixie-slim`. [Release preview run 37992058052](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37992058052) also failed while it fetched the frontend. Expected behavior Use the supported public cache when it has the requested Docker Hub image. Retain canonical Docker Hub fallback when the cache has no usable copy. Preserve build and publish failures. Steps to reproduce Run either affected image builder during a Docker Hub token failure. The unconfigured BuildKit container contacts Docker Hub for the frontend and base image. It cannot use a host Docker daemon mirror for those build requests. Paperclip version or commit The observed Docker run used `00d944f96c8c4aba8332ce224df2be73a601228a`. The preview used `b6b3cb3761dabd1bd668054e7a99a245d53707c4`. Deployment mode GitHub Actions image builds. No application runtime change. The public PR and issue search found no matching open registry-mirror change. #15743 addresses a separate npm canary dependency publication failure. ## What Changed - Add the official `docker.io` to `mirror.gcr.io` BuildKit configuration to the public Docker build matrix and the release preview image builder. - Keep all existing action references, image sources, targets, build arguments, platforms, credentials, cache settings, outputs, permissions, triggers, and publication gates. - Extend the existing dependency-free workflow tests to check mirror placement, verified HTTPS, both native platforms, preview isolation, and publication access. - Document cache eviction, tag freshness, canonical fallback, and builder bootstrap limits. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs scripts/cloud-source-verification.test.mjs scripts/standard-image-contract.test.mjs`: 43 passed on the final source. No dependency install required. - Six offline controls removed each builder's mirror, changed the registry or cache host, enabled insecure transport, or added preview registry login. Each control failed the new check as expected. - `actionlint -shellcheck='' .github/workflows/docker.yml .github/workflows/release.yml`: workflow validation passed. With optional ShellCheck enabled, the ten diagnostics match the unchanged base exactly. This PR changes no shell scripts. - A real TOML parser accepted the inline configuration. Removing the new block from each workflow produced byte-identical base files. - Read-only registry metadata checks confirmed matching raw bytes and SHA256 values for the current Node24 index and both native manifests. The Dockerfile frontend index and both native manifests also match Docker Hub and Google. No image config blobs or layers were fetched. - Full application tests, typecheck, and build were not repeated locally because application source is unchanged. [Hosted CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37998739440) passed the full required checks on `25fd57f`, including all test shards, build, typecheck, policy, E2E, and canary dry run. - The supply-chain advisory returned neutral because it cannot verify these infrastructure edits. It reported zero annotations. Independent review confirmed all action references, Dockerfiles, package files, and lockfiles are unchanged. The other 53 checks passed; two Storybook checks skipped as expected. - Independent review approved all four changed files and the workflow graph. Greptile scored the same source 5/5 with no unresolved comments. - No Docker build, workflow rerun, image publish, or deployment was started for verification. A normal image workflow after merge must prove full image acquisition. ## Risks Google is a cache, not an outage guarantee. It can evict images. Mutable tags can lag upstream changes or deletions. Matching manifests now does not prove future tag freshness or blob availability. A cache miss can still fail when Docker Hub is unavailable. The initial `moby/buildkit:buildx-stable-1` bootstrap uses the host Docker daemon before this configuration takes effect and remains dependent on Docker Hub. The registry mirror applies to image pull and resolution only. GHCR publication and cache writes keep their existing routes. See [Docker's supported configuration](https://docs.docker.com/build/ci/github-actions/configure-builder/#registry-mirror) and [Google's cache limits](https://docs.cloud.google.com/artifact-registry/docs/pull-cached-dockerhub-images). ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning and code execution tools. The exact service variant and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-09 17:15:50 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	935fb63ed5	fix(release): retry incomplete canary dependency publications (#15743 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Release checks must test the exact package that a new user installs. > - The canary onboarding smoke uses a fresh npm dependency graph. > - An upstream package can reference a dependency before that version is available. > - The smoke then exits before Paperclip onboarding starts. > - This pull request retries only that npm acquisition failure within the existing startup limit. > - Onboarding still runs once, and all other errors remain visible. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? [Release run 37986221440](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37986221440) published `2026.1009.0-canary.13`, then failed the onboarding smoke. The retained server log contains npm `ETARGET` for `@aws-sdk/credential-provider-env@^3.972.73`. The upstream parent package was published before this dependency. The missing version became available during the smoke startup. Paperclip onboarding never ran. Expected behavior Retry a short dependency publication window before onboarding starts. Stop on a permanent install failure. Never repeat onboarding to hide a startup failure. Steps to reproduce 1. Start the exact-version canary smoke with an empty npm cache. 2. Make the first npm install return `ETARGET` because a dependency version is not available. 3. Make the next install succeed after registry metadata changes. 4. Confirm that onboarding starts once. Repeat with permanent `ETARGET` and an unrelated failure; onboarding must not start. Paperclip version or commit The observed release source was `cb291bf1298ab484a2792c05eb977f3440f1f351`. Deployment mode Linux release CI. The change affects the canary smoke harness. Related: #15712 fixes a separate lockfile mismatch in the smoke's repository dependency install. This change covers the fresh published-package npm install. ## What Changed - Separate npm package acquisition from the onboarding command. - Retry only the final npm `ETARGET` error, up to three attempts with online metadata and clean temporary prefixes. - Share a two-minute acquisition budget across attempts and backoff. Keep the existing five-minute Playwright startup limit. - Run the installed exact-version CLI once. Preserve authentication, network, lifecycle, and onboarding failures. - Stop owned process groups on cancellation and remove owned install prefixes. Keep server logs and instance data for diagnostics. - Keep dependency-free helper subprocess tests in the required policy lane. Run real Playwright lifecycle tests in the required release-registry lane after its dependencies are installed. - Document the bounded behavior in the release runbook. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs`: 24 passed in a clean source snapshot with no `node_modules`. These cover transient and permanent missing versions, other npm errors, nested error codes, onboarding failure, deadline expiry, and cancellation. - `pnpm test:release-registry`: 153 passed, including real Playwright teardown with a descendant that ignores SIGTERM and startup-timeout cleanup of a detached npm installer. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - `pnpm test:run`: deliberately stopped after complete hosted CI passed; this is not a local full-suite pass. The run's 15 warm-runtime real-DB cases failed before assertions because the local macOS PostgreSQL package lacked library symlinks after installation with `--ignore-scripts`. After running the package's local hydration step, all 15 affected cases passed in a targeted rerun. The remaining aggregate was stopped with exact owned-process cleanup. - [Hosted CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37994486323) is complete and green at `1c80e6f`: all tests, build, typecheck, policy, release registry, E2E, and canary dry run passed. Greptile scored the same head 5/5 with no unresolved comments. - Independent review covered all seven changed files and the exact policy and release-registry commands. It also used real npm 11.9 against a loopback registry: a required version was absent, then became available. The retry refreshed metadata and started the installed exact-version CLI once. The one-attempt negative control failed. - The new subprocess tests use local npm and CLI fixtures. They do not contact a registry or start a real Paperclip instance. - The patch preserves the exact-version clean-install check. It adds no dependency pins, credentials, or workflow reruns. ## Risks The install phase now has a two-minute budget inside the existing five-minute startup limit. An unusually slow valid install can still fail the smoke. Permanent missing versions remain failures after the bounded retry. The lifecycle tests cover the Linux release runner behavior; Playwright does not support graceful SIGTERM on Windows. No application, database, or deployment behavior changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning and code execution tools. The exact service variant and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-09 17:15:02 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	23b9aaa8e6	fix(release): reuse publisher lockfile for canary smoke (#15712 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Every master push publishes an exact canary and tests its onboarding flow. > - The publisher resolves dependencies before building, while the smoke job checks out the committed lockfile again. > - Patch or manifest changes can land before the separate lockfile refresh, so the smoke fails before testing the published app. > - This pull request passes the publisher's resolved lockfile to the same-source smoke job. > - The smoke keeps frozen dependency validation and tests the exact published canary version. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #10393, #13689. Related work: #13690 documents lockfile drift; #12115 addresses refresh-PR check triggering. This change addresses the canary smoke handoff. #15678 only refreshed the opencode importer. #15164 incidentally corrected the earlier patch hash on master. What happened? Canary publication succeeded, but the fresh onboarding smoke install failed with `ERR_PNPM_LOCKFILE_CONFIG_MISMATCH` on sources `0b80ea17ef` and `ab8dcab809`. The committed `acpx@0.13.1` hash no longer matched its patch. A later run on `6080daf262` failed with `ERR_PNPM_OUTDATED_LOCKFILE` after an `opencode-ai` manifest addition. The current master lockfile has since caught up; the workflow still permits this race on future changes. Expected behavior The exact published canary reaches the onboarding smoke with test dependencies resolved for its source. A mismatched or missing lockfile must fail validation. Steps to reproduce Check out either affected source and run `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` with pnpm 9.15.4. The smoke fails before a browser starts, although the publisher already installed that source with a resolved lockfile. ## What Changed - Pin both canary publisher and onboarding smoke checkouts to the triggering SHA. - Save the publisher's resolved lockfile before restoring tracked files or rewriting release versions. - Restore that same-run, source-named artifact before the unchanged frozen smoke install. - Add offline real-pnpm regressions for patch-hash and manifest drift, plus wrong-source rejection and workflow binding checks. - Document artifact retention and job reruns. No manifest or committed lockfile changes. ## Verification - Focused release workflow, exact-source verification and image-contract tests: 45 passed. - Negative control: both new real-pnpm fixture cases fail against the original workflow with their respective original lockfile errors; both pass with the handoff. - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` passed on the current source. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed after reclaiming disposable build-cache space. - The browser onboarding smoke passed against exact published `2026.1009.0-canary.7`: 1 test passed using a fresh temporary instance. - Full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted twice. The first hit disk exhaustion; the second reported one chat integration failure and then a Vitest worker `ENOTCONN` crash before completing. This is not a full-suite pass. The named chat case passed in isolation without changes. All full sharded PR CI checks passed on the final head. - Independent source review and a clean-checkout run also passed all 45 focused tests, with separate real-pnpm negative controls. - The supply-chain scan is neutral because managed intelligence could not scan the pinned official `download-artifact` action. It reported no defect; independent review inspected the action source, same-run scope and v4/v4 compatibility. - Reviewed the diff for secrets, personal data and generated artifacts; none found. ## Risks - The smoke now depends on a same-run GitHub artifact retained for 14 days. A missing artifact intentionally fails instead of resolving a different dependency set. - A publisher rerun replaces its source-named artifact; a smoke-only rerun reuses the retained artifact. - Frozen validation and the exact published version remain required. The source app and publication logic do not change. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with tool execution and parallel independent review. The exact serving variant and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-09 17:14:32 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip	ce024457f3	perf(server): wake email work from commits and deadlines (#15750 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Email connects agent tasks to durable incoming and outgoing messages. > - The email worker scans the database every second, even with no inboxes. > - These queries prevent idle database connections from closing. > - This pull request wakes email work from committed writes and known deadlines. > - Empty email installations stop polling. Existing delivery and catch-up guarantees remain. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15625. Related standby work: #15314. What existing behavior does this improve? The AgentMail background worker and its database traffic when idle. Current behavior Every instance queries active email endpoints each second. Active inboxes also scan delivery queues each second even when no work is due. Proposed behavior Scan once at startup. Wake after endpoint and queue transactions settle. Restore the next retry or catch-up deadline from existing rows. An instance with no active inboxes has no recurring email queries or timer. Reason and benefit Thousands of empty instances should not keep their databases awake to discover that email is still unconfigured. ## What Changed - Use the shared transaction-aware coordinator for email work, including changes made by separate service objects on the same database owner. - Signal endpoint activation and control changes, incoming events, and outgoing sends inside their transactions. - Add an optional deadline to the coordinator. Email uses persisted retry times, mailbox catch-up times, and socket reconnect times. Only the first pending send in each conversation determines its send deadline. - Preserve startup recovery, lease fences, idempotency, standby suppression, idle drain, and shutdown. - Update the sleep inventory and add quiet-idle, commit, activation, retry, and lifecycle tests. ## Verification - Focused coordinator, email idle, and warm standby tests: 20 passed locally. - Database-backed email integration suite: 41 passed locally with real PostgreSQL and a simulated AgentMail provider. - After review, the updated delayed-reply regression passed separately: 1 selected test passed, 40 intentionally filtered out. It verifies no scans before the first reply deadline and delivery of both replies in order. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed locally. - The local `pnpm test:run` was interrupted after its checkout was removed externally. Completed local checks above are preserved. The [final-commit hosted CI matrix](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37997072212) passed: 54 successful checks, 2 expected Storybook skips, no failures. It includes the full general and serialized test matrix, runner checks, browser tests, build, typecheck, and canary packaging. - Greptile: 5/5 on `ec98f3b86ee476d75e0edf3366b357377ea09d69`, with no actionable findings. ## Risks - New email producers must register work inside their write transaction. No new tables or migrations are required. - Signals are local to one database owner and its dedicated pools. Independent processes and direct SQL do not emit them. Startup recovers existing work; configured inboxes also retain their recovery deadline. - Active inboxes still catch up each minute. WebSocket mode still renews its lease every 20 seconds. This change does not provide external waking or make active sockets sleep. - Provider calls were simulated in tests. No live email was sent. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and test tools. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-09 17:19:41 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	26d71d8def	Fix human author identity and viewer-relative alignment in task chat (#15494 ) Preserve human author identity in task chat and align only the current viewer on the right. Show other humans and agents on the left with their own identity. Include mixed-author Storybook journeys and regression coverage. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-09 17:04:20 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	ed2c22ea8c	feat(connections): simplify dedicated GitHub App setup (#15416 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and the tools each agent can use. > - GitHub bots need their own App identity and restricted repository access. > - Manual App configuration and repeated setup gates make that connection hard to finish. > - GitHub can create an App from a manifest, but people must approve creation and repository access. > - Each Paperclip stack should own configuration, credentials, signature verification, and task admission. > - This change uses Cloud as an encrypted callback and event gateway, then completes setup in the stack. > - GitHub review bots have their own experimental setting. Chat connector opt-in does not control them. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Dedicated GitHub App setup, bot settings, and task-scoped GitHub replies. Current behavior Users must configure an App, copy credentials, repeat repository selection, and complete manual verification gates. Review settings are hard to scan. Mentions in descriptions can be missed, and automatic completion text can produce an extra GitHub comment. Proposed behavior Choose an agent and connect GitHub under a personal account or organization. GitHub asks for creation and installation consent. Paperclip resumes the same draft, stores secrets locally, imports access, verifies delivery, and opens Settings. Each accepted request has one editable App-owned comment for progress and results. Review assessments produce deterministic checks for the reviewed commit. Breaking changes GitHub bots require their own default-off experimental opt-in. The setup-method and delegated-agent screens are removed. Per-person automatic-run flags remain readable but are replaced by author filters. Existing connections, direct webhooks, saved restrictions, and manual existing-App recovery remain supported. Companion gateway: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/pull/688 (merged). The roadmap and related PRs were checked; no duplicate dedicated-App wizard was found. ## What Changed - Add an independent GitHub review bots setting across the catalog, routes, identity admission, and task controls. Existing bots continue running when the UI setting is off. - Replace setup with Choose agent and Connect GitHub. Support personal and organization owners, inline low-trust conversion, saved drafts, known organization suggestions, automatic completion, and same-App recovery. - Keep manifests, OAuth PKCE, credential exchange, vault storage, installation verification, and original webhook-signature validation in the stack. Use the Cloud sealed gateway for public callbacks and outbound local delivery. - Add resumable owner metadata in migration 0323. Retry a failed registration renewal through the same durable replacement rather than creating another App route. - Support authorized mentions in issue and PR bodies, comments, inline comments, and review summaries. Preserve attachments, edited-source identity, duplicate protection, and lifecycle invalidation. Filter requests explicitly addressed to another connected bot. - Give agents task-scoped review, comment, and update tools. Update one working comment through progress and final output. Close coalesced requests and recover delayed acknowledgements, including deleted earlier working comments. Preserve automatic replies for legacy connections without saved review configuration. Preserve partial publication evidence and quarantine uncertain automatic fallbacks without blocking Board messages or questions. - Reorganize Settings and Access with rich slash-skill instructions, numeric passing scores, clear automation controls, formal-review tooltips, member and contributor sections, and verified App branding links. Preserve invalid score drafts and automation choices across tabs. - Paginate repositories in 20-row batches with search and a true connection-wide toggle. Batch verification at GitHub's 500-ID token limit. Keep saved repository overrides while hiding their editor. - Give each review a detail URL that remains usable beyond the newest 100 records. Synchronize the manager OpenAPI contracts and add recovery, authorization, UI, and browser regressions. - Reconcile the current master branch and retain its agent avatar, feature catalog, and extracted heartbeat preparation code. Preserve a saved test-drive port and recover from an occupied high port. ## Verification - Focused UI, independent experimental-setting, and CLI tests: 199 passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. The broad local Vitest attempt was interrupted after resource timeouts and stale expectations; the affected regressions passed focused reruns. The latest-head full CI matrix passed, including all browser shards, server/chat suites, builds, typechecking, canary packaging, and Docker context integrity. A Docker Hub 429 required a CI retry; it passed without changing the code. - Final review repairs: 127 attachment/event tests and server typecheck passed. All 13 final integration regressions passed under the normal CI timeout, covering legacy reply compatibility, deleted coalesced comments, inline-only review completion, progress edits, and native final recovery. Restart-safe description/review attachments passed the attachment suite. - Final regressions: four reply/lifecycle tests, both native GitHub wait tests, 171 feature-gate/reply-contract tests, the routed review preview, and five scheduler/reply regressions passed. The final fixture repair also passed all six setup-continuation cases and all three complete chat-test shards in CI, covering terminal receipts and retries under the normal CI timeout. One loaded-host receipt run exceeded its local timeout; the exact case passed in an isolated rerun and the complete CI shard. - GitHub integration tests cover personal and organization setup, retry recovery, edited mentions, attachment provenance, coalesced requests, delayed acknowledgements, partial review writes, old review URLs, and company boundaries. - Browser qualification: both GitHub journeys, all five provider setup/management journeys, and the GitHub uncertain-send recovery journey passed. GitHub setup, reconnect, and task replies run with chat disabled; chat enabled alone cannot expose GitHub bots. The disposable qualification database was removed after testing. - Earlier live qualification verified App-owned issue replies, native slash-skill invocation, progress comment edits, and a 5/5 PR review with a passing current-head check in the dedicated permissions-smoke repository. These live checks did not use personal credentials as bot execution authority. ## Risks - Deploy the merged Cloud gateway protocol before the stack update. Each callback and encrypted event must retain the original instance and tenant binding. - Migration 0323 uses idempotent column additions for test installations that already applied the earlier draft migration number. - A verified connection does not prove runtime isolation or a completed review. Runtime checks remain separate. - Required merge checks must be configured in GitHub. A passing numeric score does not formally approve a PR; approval and request-changes tools remain opt-in. - Existing-App credentials cannot silently renew an uncertain manifest exchange. Recovery preserves the existing App, draft, connection, and agent. - Repository changes save immediately. Global toggles affect all currently available repositories, including unloaded rows, without granting new installation access. - A failed or uncertain tool write suppresses automatic fallback text; the governed outbox retains its evidence. Deleted or replaced response comments are not recreated through a personal credential fallback. - GitHub logo upload remains an optional human action in GitHub App settings. Runtime provisioning, delegated setup, screenshot publication, and production push delivery remain deferred. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with tool use and code execution. The exact runtime model identifier and context size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites; complete test matrix is checked in CI) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-09 17:01:20 -05:00

1 2 3 4 5 ...