Commit Graph
65 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DottaandPaperclip 3bd709df8b Operationalize Product E2E accounting, tracing, and scheduling (#17009)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and the work they perform.
> - Product E2E tests exercise real agents, tools, setup and cleanup.
> - Repeated runs need retained costs and traces, including failed
attempts.
> - A passing retry must not hide earlier spending or feedback.
> - Recurring work also needs admission limits, private reports and
failure detection.
> - This change supplies those controls while keeping paid activation
behind existing gates.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #16996 and #17158. This is the consolidated landing of the reviewed
eval operations stack: #17019, #17024, #17025, #17027, #17030, #17033,
#17035, #17038, #17043, #17044, #17048, #17050, #17051, #17092, #17096,
#17100, #17107, #17109, #17112, #17115, #17117, #17121, #17123, #17127,
#17130, #17133, #17134, #17137, #17140, #17143, #17154. The repository
permits squash merges only. A local rehearsal showed that squashing each
slice into master causes repeated conflicts in dependent slices. This PR
preserves their commits and lands their combined implementation in one
reviewed integration. Superseded slices will close after this merge.

## What Changed

- Retain every attempt's cost receipt, including setup, failures,
interruptions and retries. Separate reported amounts, estimates, missing
costs and reserved capacity in reports and dashboards.
- Add bounded request admission, exact model pricecards, gateway error
accounting, cache policy and reconciliation evidence. Refuse unsupported
routes and requests that cannot fit the allowance.
- Integrate Braintrust gateway traces and OTLP correlation, with secret
filtering and experiment imports. Record phase timing, including setup,
feedback capture and cleanup.
- Collect complaint and suggestion evidence after each attempt,
including recovery after failures. Retain explicit review dispositions
independently from the product grade.
- Add gated daily and weekly selections, measured forecasts,
setup/readiness checks, wall-time limits and retained monitor
notifications. Include declared non-model overhead in admission while
reporting the existing subscription separately.
- Keep recurring history private, bound uploads and retention, and use
isolated archive environments. Keep public publication an explicit
operation. Report and publication jobs install only the committed
lockfile, with scripts disabled and isolated stores; stale pins fail
closed.
- Integrate current master, preserve its Product E2E journey billing and
privacy checks, and test that shared setup receipts do not double-count
estimated agent usage. Preserve upstream fixture repairs.

## Verification

- Complete integration baseline
`0649a5ce7544ab20825c2183d2f421157db49f24` includes master
`a3e1d915a7110a4e115b46396a3f79e6dfb4d05e` and every original stack head
as ancestors.
- On that integration baseline, `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit`: 4,012
Vitest tests passed, two skipped, across 193 files; all 137 Node
source-contract tests passed.
- Focused billing and Product E2E journey contract checks: 24 tests
passed. They cover estimates, unknown receipts, single-owner setup
costs, browser-only execution and private publication guards.
- Monitor and workflow wiring: all 96 Node tests passed. `node
scripts/check-token-gates.mjs`: all gates clean.
- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck` passes after the standard Runner
TypeScript build refreshed local declarations. The first attempt
rejected the new master `runner_prepared_launch` union member because
this checkout retained an older generated declaration; the source union
already contained that member.
- Current head `492b0708a1c531a023d9ac10f0f3dc6383cc1754` removes
dependency re-resolution from archive-authorized reporting jobs after
the security scan flagged it. All 15 workflow-security tests pass after
updating the old two-install assertion.
- Hosted [CI run
39965460180](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39965460180)
passes on the current repaired head, including typecheck, build, general
tests, Runner checks, browser shards and canary dry run. Greptile is 5/5
on this exact head with no unresolved threads. The security scan passes
after the fixed lockfile-resolution thread was resolved.
- Paperclip Review returned a terminal neutral check but an incomplete
0-file assessment on the repaired head: its platform blocked both diff
responses as prompt-injection content. This is not a successful code
review. No bypass or fabricated pass was attempted; current-head
Greptile, security and hosted CI are independent gates.
- No paid test, reservation release or recurring-run activation
accompanies this landing. Live route qualification and invoice
reconciliation remain separate evidence.

<details>
<summary>Retained earlier validation failures</summary>

Earlier broad local runs had two 15-second test timeouts (CLI poll
cadence and Retry validation), one embedded-database setup timeout, and
later PostgreSQL semaphore exhaustion. The exact timed-out tests passed
separately without larger timeouts; the broad-run causes were not
established. Those local failures remain distinct from subsequent hosted
CI results. The independent #17158 fix records its Muse fixture
collision, its UUID correction and hosted verification. Local Muse
execution was also blocked by macOS embedded-PostgreSQL startup. No
historical failure is treated as a successful paid qualification.

</details>

## Risks

- Admission is a local control, not a provider invoice cap. Missing
provider receipts or resource charges retain unknown amounts and holds;
estimates do not become billed dollars.
- The bounded path admits only documented local suites and provider
routes. Ordinary legacy or separate Runner protocol campaigns have
different controls. Merging this code does not qualify additional
routes.
- Recurrence still needs the existing enable gates and current
qualification/allowance evidence. Archive permissions and resources must
match the documented private-environment contract.
- Legacy reports may lack complete attempt or phase evidence. Reports
preserve that limitation and do not infer zero usage from missing data.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools and code
execution. The exact deployment variant and context-window size are not
exposed by this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (targeted checks;
full-suite host limitation disclosed above)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-23 07:18:37 -07:00
Nicky Leach 2cd6eb27c7 fix(runner): record the plugin-prepared working directory (#17243) 2026-10-22 20:42:26 -07:00
eece07a747 fix: repair the complete projectless repository setup chain (#17088)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets people manage agents that do useful work.
> - A projectless task can prepare an authorized repository in its
retained workspace.
> - Setup must hand work to a later run without user supervision.
> - Real task attempts exposed gaps across admission, completion, and
queue dispatch.
> - A successful provider exit did not prove that the requested result
was delivered.
> - This PR repairs the existing lifecycle and checks the complete
repository journey.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #17047. This PR includes the preserved repairs from #17049, #17052,
and #17082.

**What happened?**

A projectless native task could stop after requesting a repository. It
could also continue through a timer or generic recovery path and lose
its saved conversation lineage. The latest real Codex and Claude
attempts delivered correct files, but the native continuation had been
folded into the finishing predecessor. Both attempts remain failed
measurements.

**Expected behavior**

Prepare the authorized repository, retain the original context, and
dispatch one saved continuation after its predecessor finishes. Deliver
the verified result in the originating conversation. Stop, current
access, approval, and real blocker rules remain authoritative.

**Steps to reproduce**

Run the explicit automatic-repository suite for native Codex or Claude.
Inspect the downloaded result, original context artifact, both committed
run records, and continuation receipts. The suite uses one attempt and
does not widen the default paid selection.

## What Changed

- Resolve the retained local-board identity through current company
membership and workspace authority.
- Prepare required source dependencies before the isolated server
imports native tool authority.
- Explain the saved repository continuation in production completion
tools. Correct only the exact pending-checkout blocker backed by a live
receipt. Reject an unfinished response wait without a real response
source.
- Preserve the persisted task-session workspace source and its explicit
absence of root repository context. Permit Git's exact no-repository
result only for a validated plain task directory. Keep other Git errors
and linked metadata strict.
- Revalidate server-resolved same-agent continuation values against
current ownership and the saved kind, summary, and key. Carry this shape
through the internal bridge schema. Keep provider-facing schemas
restrictive.
- Preserve terminal result authority after a correlated successful
controller response. Controller rejection creates no result authority.
Bind the shared guidance and transport source in Copilot v55 and
preserve historical identities.
- Admit native status wakes with the existing no-coalescing contract.
The existing deferred queue retains a distinct future dispatch instead
of retagging the finishing run.
- Recover deferred conversation lineage through the actual admitted
dispatch. Accept a null outbox run binding only with matching decision,
effect, dispatch actor, idempotency, task, company, agent, and requester
evidence. Reject a conflicting nonnull binding.
- Independently grade retained random context, actual checkout bytes and
HEAD, accessible output, distinct continuation receipts, and admission
order.

## Verification

- Real database and Git regressions fail before their repairs. Prior
focused cohorts cover local-board authority, optional repository waits,
plain task directories, and first/reused workspace provenance.
- The new valid decision/effect-backed assembled-heartbeat regression
reproduces coalescing into its active predecessor before the queue
repair. With the repair, it dispatches one successor after the
predecessor finishes. Duplicate sweeps create no extra run.
- The deferred-outbox conversation regression fails before its repair.
The repaired test also rejects a conflicting predecessor binding.
- The current queue, continuation, publication, cancellation,
stale-admission, and domain cohort passes 344 checks across 11 suites.
Server and Product E2E typechecks pass. The strengthened
automatic-repository oracle passes 34 calibration checks.
- Three omitted/null/resolved forms pass through the compiled Rust
runner and controlled provider. The prior shared bridge cohort passes
492 TypeScript checks and 399 Rust core checks. Runner source identity,
TypeScript, Rust formatting, and locked Rust typechecks pass.
- Six real local development cells passed ordinary repository,
conversion, and necessary-question journeys. Independent artifacts and
rendered question/result evidence agree. They do not qualify staging or
Slack.
- Both latest automatic-repository attempts delivered correct files but
failed the strict continuation check. They remain failures. A fresh
replay of this queue repair is pending.
- On the combined candidate `380047f4b923807a8c4f7ef6016e4fe130ab4a3a`,
`pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. Product E2E support passes
3,525 checks with two existing skips, plus 128 source checks. The
complete local `pnpm test:run` is running and is not yet a pass.
- The first replay selection failed catalog validation due to an
operator profile-ID error. A second selection used the wrong
default-model suite and was cancelled before any provider job existed.
Both setup attempts remain recorded. The corrected campaign selects the
recorded GPT-6.1 and Opus 5.5 models plus the local Stop/resume journey.
- Exact-head CI, review, and deployment acceptance remain pending.
GitHub reports delayed PR updates and webhook delivery; the current head
and checks have now propagated. No earlier-head green badge establishes
acceptance of this commit.

## Risks

This changes several boundaries of repository setup. Full product and
deployment acceptance remain required. The queue uses the existing
deferred admission and delivery contracts. Batch deduplication remains
in place. The provenance repair requires the actual bound dispatch and
does not grant publication authority. Current authorization is still
checked at publication. No accepted provider result is rewritten, and
completed provider work is not rerun to repair persistence or delivery.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with repository tools and code execution.
The runtime does not expose its exact deployment ID or context-window
size. Those values are not inferred.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <paperclip@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-21 11:21:55 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 505e1a5582 feat(cases): add persistent workflows with same-task agent handoffs (#16959)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - An agent workflow needs persistent facts and a safe way to transfer
work.
> - Creating a task for each phase splits the objective, discussion,
workspace, and review policy.
> - A case can retain the facts while one primary task moves between
agents.
> - Transfers must survive process failure and preserve private access,
budgets, and completion gates.
> - This pull request adds durable case handoffs, native case tools, and
read-only case pages.
> - Prompts describe the workflow. Existing task controls decide when
work can run and finish.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Problem or motivation**

Prompt-driven agent teams need a persistent record that can move through
triage, implementation, verification, and correction. Ordinary
reassignment does not provide a durable instruction, safe release
barrier, or recoverable delivery receipt for an agent handing off its
own running task.

**Proposed solution**

Extend standalone cases with one primary task, a descriptive phase,
retained access sources, and a handoff ledger. Apply assignments after
source execution and workspace settlement. Deliver each transfer through
the existing durable wake queue. Provide `create_case`, `read_case`,
`update_case`, and `handoff_case` in the native runner. Creation
requires kickoff and explicit workflow text. An explicit handoff to
`done` closes the case when normal task completion is accepted.

**Alternatives considered**

Do not add a workflow engine, filesystem queue, configured state graph,
or one task per phase. The workflow document combines transition prose
with an optional Mermaid `stateDiagram-v2` map. The server does not
execute the diagram. The Pipelines experiment removed on master stays
removed.

**Roadmap alignment**

This extends Agent Reviews and Approvals, Enforced Outcomes, Bounded Run
Recovery, and Activity Log attribution. Existing approval, review,
budget, privacy, workspace, and responsible-user rules remain
authoritative.

Related work: [ordinary handoff wake
recovery](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15019). This
feature adds a separate persisted case-handoff receipt and release
barrier.

## What Changed

- Add case routing fields, retained access sources, durable handoff
history, delivery leases, and replay-safe migrations.
- Keep the same primary task across agent phases. Preserve each
returning agent's own session and the task's workspace.
- Fence outgoing mutations, wait for provider and workspace release, and
recover delivery without duplicate task comments or runs. Recheck
current assignment permissions as the original caller before applying a
delayed transfer. Scope a run Stop to that run’s own handoff intents, so
repeated old Stop requests preserve newer work. Cancelling terminal
intent without a source run also requires fenced current task ownership,
including native retries and preparation with an old checkout. For Cloud
callers, revalidate current stack membership with an uncached Cloud RPC
and derive owner elevation from the current managed setting.
- Keep case reads, documents, assets, Audit, and live events inside
retained task/project permissions.
- Add native case creation/read/update/handoff tools. Store required
workflow text and initial documents on the first task. Page oversized
case facts and referenced document bodies through the dedicated tool
with bounded UTF-8 JSON, current routing versions, snapshot conflicts,
and current source authorization on every page.
- Add read-only case lists and detail pages, task-style list controls,
compact dotted field tables, linked handoff tasks, and case filters in
Audit.
- Add native/legacy integration tests, migration/restart tests, browser
coverage, and bounded live receipt fixtures. Extend the trusted sandbox
condition to cover the new subscription fixture profile.
- Hide obsolete paused-agent warnings on completed or cancelled task
threads.
- Synchronize the company-switch settings test with React effects after
a CI failure. Preserve its security assertions and production remount
behavior.

## Verification

The branch directly includes master `9ef434fe79`. The required `ci /
verify` and `ci / e2e` gates pass on head `765fccd67c`. [Current-head
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39464348614)
passes typecheck, build, tests, and all eight browser shards. Security
checks pass. [Greptile gives this exact head
5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/16959#issuecomment-6291156549),
with no unresolved review threads. The optional Paperclip Review check
remains queued because its assigned agent is paused. It is not a
required branch check. No check result was overridden.

Local workspace typecheck and build pass after the master merge, along
with database migration checks, token gates, map checks, Storybook
catalog checks, and the Copilot profile identity check. Standard builds
refresh Runner vendor output. Focused checks pass 2,008
API/paging/context tests and 7 strict case protocol tests. The final
commit changes one test fixture only; its ten tests, UI typecheck, and
token gates pass. No production source changed in that commit.

On current head `765fccd67c`, all **194 critical workflow tests**
executed and passed with no skipped tests in those files:

- 38 Stop/ownership tests, including board completion intent, native
retries, stale Stop, and preparation with an old checkout.
- 2 actual legacy process/HTTP handoff tests, including scratch failure,
a closed-stdio child that continues writing, and recovery through a
fresh worker after the process group stops.
- 5 migration tests, including SQL column metadata, preserved null
authority context, and all six prior-numbering receipts.
- 3 process-settlement and 5 scratch tests.
- 88 handoff-service, 18 heartbeat handoff, and 21 native case-tool
integration tests.
- 7 bounded case/document-read projection tests and 7 strict
protocol-contract tests.

The current CI checkout was `fed65d49`, merging `765fccd67c` into master
`9ef434fe79`. Its new document regressions reconstruct exact
Unicode/escaped bodies and revisions through real native authority and
authenticated HTTP with generic API tools disabled. They cover
case-owned, primary-task, and linked-task documents; routing on every
page; stale document snapshots; access loss and unlinking;
unrelated/foreign/private sources; system documents; and quarantined
content. Active-task document tools retain their existing behavior.
These are current-head test results from the first CI attempt; the
browser-only retry did not rerun these suites.

The full `64fdd3403f` CI failed one separate settings test: after a
company switch, it observed an unsettled API-key draft. The production
component and test were unchanged from prior green source. Production
switches remount both keyed settings layers; the test directly reused an
unkeyed view and used a timer tick instead of waiting for React effects.
The final commit replaces that fixture synchronization with React `act`.
The exact secret-clearing assertions and all timeouts remain unchanged.
The original assertion failure remains recorded; no unchanged retry was
used. The narrow unchanged baseline and fixed fixture each pass 10
tests.

The upstream result-paging merge preserves case capture namespaces and
current asset privacy. Its API integration suite executed 39 of 41 tests
successfully, with two skipped; the optional assigned-result PRP
integration test was skipped. Neither skipped suite is counted in the
194 critical tests or as live provider proof.

All 361 upstream migration entries and SQL bodies remain unchanged. Six
case migrations follow master as 0363–0368 with identical SQL hashes.
Official Drizzle generators produced the combined metadata and five
retained snapshots. Generation reports no schema changes, and the
snapshot drift test passes. The earlier `ce361ae5d0` CI passed on
attempt 1, including its then-current 179 critical tests. Fresh review
later identified unusable document references with generic API tools
disabled; the bounded document reads and ten additional authenticated
HTTP tests address that finding.

The full local `pnpm test:run` attempt was cancelled after this Mac
exhausted PostgreSQL semaphore capacity; it is **not** counted as a
pass. Later database attempts also stopped before assertions or skipped,
including one sandbox socket denial. Two original stale-Stop regressions
did reproduce the bug against the old source. A REST serialization
assertion passed after two preserved database-startup failures. No test
timeout was increased. All 194 assertions listed above executed and
passed in current-head CI. The complete 385-file, 3,963-test UI shard
also passed after the fixture repair.

A configured-provider receipt workflow passed 13 backend checks across
triage → implementation → verification → correction → done, using one
task and four work runs. The saved receipt is revision 2 with total 6
USD; case and task both closed. The original canonical attempt remains
failed because its browser assertion confused the terminal destination
with completed-task tooltips. The corrected full browser verifier passed
on the same retained database and original runs, with no additional
provider calls. The last clean-build browser readback is on
`6a86c54a53`; later changes affect recovery, authorization, bounded
reads, and settlement. Accounted work cost is a $1.010574 rate-card
estimate; provider billing and setup-probe usage are unavailable.

Copilot profile 49 passed the unchanged seven-fixture private protocol
pack (46/46 checks, no retries) and the product file-edit canary after
master's completion-replay change. All 60 bound implementation hashes
remain unchanged on the current source. Historical profile-47/48
identities and results remain intact. See the [profile-49 compatibility
record](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/persistent-case-handoffs/doc/plans/2026-10-20-copilot-completion-recovery-compatibility-v49.json).
This is bounded compatibility evidence, not a fresh full matrix,
installed-package product test, or Daytona rollout.

Preserved CI failures and retries:

- On `20662930ac`, Slack managed setup failed a five-second success
assertion after reload. Its test/application path was unchanged from a
prior green head. One unchanged-source retry passed all 25 tests in that
shard; no source or timeout changed.
- On `9402b4f17a`, two CI workers received shutdown signals at 15:24:19
UTC. Neither log had an assertion failure before interruption. One
unchanged-source retry of each passed all Runner static checks and all
32 tests in browser shard 6; both aggregates passed. The next head,
`7b4374edaf`, passed all CI without retries.
- On `295f289b5a`, serialized shard 9 timed out during its first
device-login test, then the next test found an active login lease.
Direct login/test paths were unchanged from a prior green head. Cold
import plus a timed-out async body using the next test's mutable
actor/store is the supported fixture-race explanation; no request trace
proves that sequence. The original failure remains recorded. One
unchanged-source retry passed all 294 tests in 19 files, including all
41 device-login tests. No login source or timeout changed. The
subsequent `ce361ae5d0` CI passed without retries.
- On `64fdd3403f`, one company-switch settings assertion observed an
unsettled draft. The final test-only commit uses React `act` without
changing assertions, timeouts, or production code. On `765fccd67c`, all
ten settings tests and the complete 385-file, 3,963-test UI shard
passed.
- On `765fccd67c`, browser shard 3 completed the split-handoff
assertions, then cleanup received HTTP 500 from run cancellation after a
one-second PostgreSQL row-lock timeout. The extra chat run was reporting
completed work while teardown began. Cleanup stopped before restoring a
global experiment flag, causing a later assertion to fail. Relevant
production and test paths are unchanged from an earlier green commit.
Stop's lock order is consistent, and no nested self-lock was found; the
exact PostgreSQL blocker was not recorded. One unchanged-shard retry
passed. The original failure, trace, and downstream flag failure remain
recorded. No Stop implementation, cleanup assertion, or timeout changed.
The retry supports intermittent cleanup contention; it does not identify
the original blocking transaction.


## Risks

- Local process transfers require host-owned PID/group absence. Missing
or uncertain termination evidence keeps delivery pending, independently
of scratch setup.
- Handoff admission and task cancellation share execution ownership. New
regression tests cover temporary holds, late source writes, and
uncertain provider termination.
- Retained private sources use an intersection of existing permissions.
This intentionally fails closed when a source is missing or an existing
task cannot preserve that boundary.
- Migrations add tables and indexes. They preserve master history and
can replay over prior feature installs. Migration 0368 adds nullable
internal authorization provenance with no default or authority backfill.
Historical transfers still awaiting release without this context fail
closed; an operator must cancel them and request a new handoff.
- Delayed Cloud handoffs depend on the current Cloud membership RPC. An
unavailable, ambiguous, expired, or mismatched response holds the
handoff for retry; it does not reuse cached authority or grant access.
- Bounded reads reload and reauthorize the selected projection per page.
Underlying work grows with the data size and number of pages. Changed
data or routing requires restarting from offset zero without the old
snapshot.
- Phase names and workflow diagrams remain advisory. They do not satisfy
review or approval gates.
- This is a large, cross-cutting PR. The maintainer requested one PR for
the whole feature; the commits separate data, runtime, UI, and
qualification work.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with tool use, code execution, and delegated
code review. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size were
not exposed in the session. Live fixture agents used the explicitly
configured provider model recorded in their test evidence.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-20 12:46:14 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip d855e550ad Finish Copilot native runtime on current master (#15701)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Paperclip Runner controls provider processes, permissions and task
completion.
> - Copilot needs its pinned distribution, native message identities and
accepted semantic completion receipts.
> - The release must preserve saved-token access and task lifecycle
guarantees.
> - This pull request will keep the current completion and recovery
fixes while adding the Copilot runtime.
> - The benefit is a reviewable part of the Copilot production release.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #14434. Supersedes the runtime work in #15560. This is the first PR
in the stack; #15703, #15705 and #15706 follow. Related alternative
adapter work: #15881. This change uses the shared Runner path.

## What Changed

- Pin Copilot CLI 1.0.88 and bind the integrated implementation as
profile45.
- Keep native instruction, permission, receipt, process ownership and
cancellation boundaries.
- Preserve current master completion continuation and remote
verification behavior. Other provider release identities stay unchanged.

## Verification

Final reviewed source
[`4f3f1af807d2ed21adabb04c2f27f4df9c4bc8d5`](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/commit/4f3f1af807d2ed21adabb04c2f27f4df9c4bc8d5)
includes master `cde944ed75648adfb569e86133adc8b118b55dd6`. The combined
four-part PR tree matches it except for the CI-owned lockfile. Every
prior public PR head remains an ancestor. Released master migrations
remain unchanged; Copilot adds migration361. No unrelated provider is
enabled.

Copilot CLI1.0.88 and profile47 retain digest
`sha256:55044aa235e88b3fe36ec8a556ee1e3382590870aab907e4462ef7d64af49cea`.
The pending qualification marker is removed. The [qualification
record](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/4f3f1af807d2ed21adabb04c2f27f4df9c4bc8d5/doc/plans/2026-10-20-copilot-qualification-v47.json)
reports **20/20 Product cells,154 assertions;7/7 protocol cases,46
assertions** against frozen installed application
`c2616370800f5f6df45246b0890ba35a7cd2faab`. Both environments use the
exact authenticated model `gpt-5.6-luna`. Every passing Product case
confirms cleanup. Automatic behavior retries are disabled. Original
failed attempts remain recorded.

The ordinary installed remote journey passed saved-token selection,
authenticated model discovery, normal UI save/reopen, metadata-only
Test, task completion, accepted receipt and an exact19-byte browser
download. An open model catalog caused no new discovery requests
during117seconds. Actual installed runtime smokes passed on macOS ARM64,
macOS x64 under Rosetta and native Linux x64 on Daytona. Raw token
browser entry was not exercised; the encrypted connection was created
through the normal API.

The original Daytona file attempt timed out during delayed semantic
dispatch. Its precise stalled layer remains unresolved. Independent
ordinary delivery and the other19 cells passed before one instrumented
recheck passed8/8 with unchanged source,prompt,assertions and deadlines.
No causal latency repair is claimed.

After current-master reconciliation,129 connection tests,59 runner
tests,72 shared eval tests and88 recovery/workspace tests pass.
Migration generation/safety, unchanged profile identity and UI token
gates pass. Prior required CI was green. Fresh exact-head required CI
and E2E are green for all four updated heads. Each has a fresh
Greptile5/5 review and zero unresolved review threads. The [final
normal-package cloud
build](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39414239704)
is running. Recursive typecheck,full CI test shards,build and all8
browser shards pass. These checks cover the final source; no additional
local full-suite pass is claimed.

The [frozen image
build](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39334401638)
and [original normal package
build](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39334407471)
passed. The exact image is published and independently retrieved
anonymously. No separate full-image scan is claimed. All18 original
normal archives were scanned with zero selected credentials. Docker
builds run in the cloud. Provider USD remains unknown and
GitHub-attributed.

**Qualification is complete on the recorded frozen build. Normal
protected merge, automatic master canary publication and final
shipped-package local/Daytona canaries remain. No production deployment
is claimed.**

## Risks

Shared Runner behavior can affect active tasks. Exact profile admission
rejects stale runtime identities. The final campaign and installed
canaries remain release gates.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6. The exact serving model ID and context
window are not exposed in this task. Used for code changes, review and
tool-assisted verification.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-20 06:31:47 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip ac9459bae3 feat: configure company agent observability (#16874)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Companies use several agent harnesses and execution environments.
> - Operators need one place to select where native agent logs and
traces go.
> - An inference proxy would add a dependency to the agent request path.
> - This pull request supplies native OpenTelemetry settings to managed
Codex and Claude Code processes.
> - Company secrets protect destination credentials. Export failure does
not change the task result.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Company settings, shared contracts, database, server, adapters, and
runner.

**Problem or motivation**

An operator cannot configure a company destination for native agent logs
and traces. Manual harness configuration is hard to apply across local
and remote execution.

**Proposed solution**

Add one company destination: Braintrust or a custom OTLP HTTP/protobuf
endpoint. Apply a transient snapshot when execution preparation starts.
Keep credentials out of API reads, task environment manifests, recovery
files, and command arguments. Replace a warm process when its export
settings change and preserve its conversation.

**Alternatives considered**

Multiple destinations can use a user-operated collector for fan-out.
This change does not add a collector, an inference proxy, or transcript
scraping.

**Roadmap alignment**

This extends company settings, secret management, and support for
multiple harnesses. The maintainer requested this implementation.
Searches for observability and Braintrust found no duplicate company
destination feature. Related infrastructure tracing work in #16236 has a
separate content-free contract.

## What Changed

- Add strict schemas, revision checks, encrypted secret storage,
activity records, and board-only settings routes.
- Add explicit synthetic logs and traces tests with a bounded HTTP
request and sanitized results.
- Supply native Codex configuration and Claude Code environment values
through local and remote launch paths.
- Preserve Codex login refresh through the existing managed credential
link. Retain unsaved drafts across background reads. Require complete
custom header re-entry when the endpoint origin changes.
- Separate process export compatibility from conversation identity.
Isolate generated Codex configuration and preserve resumable sessions,
including remote home refresh after export changes.
- Advance the immutable Pi/Copilot source attestations for shared
environment and sidecar code changes. Keep their provider payloads
unchanged and retain prior identities for decoding.
- Redact destination credentials throughout launch diagnostics and HTTP
logs.
- Add the production settings form, Storybook states and journey,
documentation, and feature/access map entries.

## Verification

- Real managed local Codex 0.160.0 and Claude Code 2.1.286 tasks
exported to Braintrust. API readback and the Braintrust UI showed the
test records. A real remote Daytona Codex task exported through the
legacy `exec` path.
- Live tests exercised content capture off, export disabled, warm
conversation reuse, and a destination that accepted connections but
never replied. Agent work succeeded and export requests stopped at the
configured three-second timeout. The UI connection test returned “Test
payload accepted”; the saved API key stayed masked after reload.
- All current-head CI test lanes, typechecks, packaging/build checks,
and required aggregates passed on
`71e994b2be9c8fb6d6e938a4ad7cf4c95fdafe31` ([CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39319194318)).
Greptile completed on that exact commit at 5/5, with zero unresolved
review threads. The additional optional Paperclip Review check remains
queued waiting for its assigned agent.
- Local workspace typecheck and build passed. Focused verification
included 239 combined runner tests, 789 API/native-session tests, 107
Codex home/ACP/sandbox-site tests, 204 feature/privacy tests, and the
affected Rust suites. Migration, token, map, Storybook catalog, and
Storybook build checks passed during acceptance. These checks ran at the
relevant implementation or merge boundary; the current-head CI is the
complete final gate.
- Managed AI credential projections now receive enabled and disabled
company export settings; genuine caller-owned Codex homes remain
untouched. Two regressions reproduced the skip before the repair. All
276 engine/lifecycle tests and adapter-utils typecheck pass afterward.
The launched TOML retains provider/MCP settings, credential continuity,
and redaction.
- Settings saves, removal, and the real company-deletion owner acquire
secret mutation ownership before database locks. PostgreSQL NOWAIT
probes cover all three paths; concurrent save/rotation/removal/deletion
requests settle correctly. The affected suites passed 137 tests,
followed by all 32 service/connection cases after expanded deletion
coverage. Server and Codex adapter typechecks pass.
- Codex source profiles use the effective CLI argument list. A spawned
fixture CLI reproduced both ignored-argument failures; all three
precedence/fallback cases now pass.
- Real tar staging reproduced remote conversation loss in both API-key
and subscription modes before the repair. Both now pass: changing
managed settings preserves sessions, archives, native indexes, and
refreshed subscription credentials. A corrupt upload preserves the prior
config and conversation.
- Preserved failure evidence: initial CI caught stale Pi/Copilot source
attestations, a missing test-harness helper, and packaging fixture/probe
mismatches; those were corrected and covered by focused checks.
Superseded heads had intermittent attachment-composer timeouts despite
successful uploads; [the original trace and screenshot remain
available](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39309701089/artifacts/12215109203).
The same attachment case passed on the final head: [25/25 tests in shard
3](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39319194318/job/118288637051).
- A connection-fault fixture also exposed a stale pooled socket after
its hang case; closing fixture responses isolated scenarios and the full
affected suite passed.
- The broad local test run was not clean: database resource failures,
timeouts, an older cached module graph, and a stale optional-resource
manifest assumption were recorded. Focused checks passed after the
documented fixes. This does not establish a clean full local pass.
- Native remote Codex, remote Claude, and the full ACPX Codex bridge
remain unqualified. The direct Codex resume test does not establish full
bridge acceptance.

## Risks

- Native exporters perform network requests from each execution
environment. A server connection test does not prove remote
reachability.
- Prompts, assistant responses, and tool content are enabled by default
when supported. Native caps and harness-specific controls still apply.
- Caller-owned Codex homes are unsupported for automatic configuration
and remain untouched.
- Native harnesses and their tool processes can inspect export
credentials. The settings form and documentation advise using
ingestion-scoped credentials. Retained headers remain bound to their
saved scheme, host, and port; changing origin requires fresh values or
removal.
- Migration 0357 adds a company-scoped row and secret reference. It is
safe to reapply. Secret removal and company deletion use the existing
secret lifecycle.
- Slow or unavailable destinations must not block task settlement.
Export settings take effect at the next execution preparation boundary.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and
browser verification. The exact serving model ID and context window size
are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-19 15:36:04 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 95672307f4 feat(runner): carry acknowledged Claude effort through native resume (#15994)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - The native runner must carry each supported agent setting.
> - Claude effort must reach its ACP session before a prompt and after
resume.
> - Installed Claude setup must find the owning server package without a
qualification override.
> - This PR adds those shared contracts and preserves historical
readers.
> - The Claude default change can then use the same runner path.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #15683. This prerequisite follows the actual Codex squash
`adb69e8f09852c772d9901ae270e5b2d66e39c77`. Consumers: #15993 and
#15997. Related scope: #15422, #13978 and #15224.

## What Changed

- Add native-input v9 for Claude effort. Preserve v1–v8 readers,
including v7 explicit home modes, v8 Muse, Dot and Grok Bot.
- Preserve prepared task input and constraints through the newer
contracts, including completion-only continuation without wrapping
compact model input again.
- Carry effort through daemon/sidecar admission; require provider
acknowledgment before prompting and after resume.
- Find installed server package authority through the verified canonical
layout. Retain package-integrity, digest, architecture and no-follow
checks.
- Return Claude startup cancellation promptly while retaining unfinished
settings writes and the lifetime lease through cleanup. Preserve merged
Codex close/cleanup behavior.
- Retain both independently authored historical Pi profile-24
declarations. Combined master/Claude source attestations use Pi profile
27; pending Copilot remains profile 22. This does not expand either
provider's qualification boundary.

- Avoid a spare verified executable snapshot when Claude effort control
reuses its initialized provider. Preserve cold-control snapshot renewal
and acknowledged effort.

## Verification

- Reconciled with master `9179d8dcc3e908c217fde4f63c9d08ccf8132eeb`,
retaining its task-loading, progress, skill-retention, permission and
OpenRouter changes.
- Final focused protocol/provider checks passed 155 tests (one skipped),
the updated Pi attestation check passed 18 (one skipped), and 91
evaluation/catalog checks passed. Generated TypeScript/Rust profile
checks and Rust formatting pass. The integrated consumer's
TypeScript-only runtime build also passes.
- Earlier branch checks passed 369 protocol tests (one skipped), 72
catalog checks and TypeScript checks/build; their source identities
remain historical. No Rust compilation or Docker build is needed locally
for this proof.
- Current-head cloud CI is green. All three stack PRs have fresh
Greptile 5/5 reviews and zero unresolved review threads. Required
typecheck, test and build gates ran in cloud CI; Docker work stayed
remote. Earlier failed checks remain in their original runs.
- [Earlier four-target package
qualification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39267321383)
passed on source `04e0202ca81387b17cbe7fd094a8338648356fe9`; it is not
relabeled as proof for the final merge. Existing failures and
unknown-cost holds remain preserved.
- Current-head cloud CI is green. All three stack PRs have fresh
Greptile 5/5 reviews and zero unresolved review threads. Required
typecheck, test and build gates ran in cloud CI; Docker work stayed
remote. Earlier failed checks remain in their original runs.

- Latest-application manual continuation passed in 37.942 seconds on
`695e5c005a85bddc8711d3fcddcaf6b7e1fb64d0`, with High effort, native
Opus 5.5, Anthropic API attribution, the same resumed Claude session, an
independently checked 635-byte file and persisted Done status. It uses
the earlier verified Mac daemon; the preceding-source package
qualification passed at `dca62c7aeb4b45f0dd91a8e18d386a16a2658ef8`. That
package run predates the small TypeScript startup fix and is not
relabeled as qualification for it.
- Upgrade limitation: changed compiled sidecar identity rejected old
durable launch state and recovery hit session-open bounds before
eventually resuming. That attempt was operator-cancelled and retained;
the successful manual continuation does not qualify seamless upgrades.

- Local latency profile, Opus 5.5/High unchanged: three alternating
real-ACP loopback samples per variant reduce median provider-ready time
from 5.081s to 4.034s. The matched real API task startup improves from
5.533s to 4.348s, but total reply time changes from 17.933s to 20.221s
because agent work varies. This establishes a startup saving of about
one second, not a consistent total-reply speedup. A real candidate
follow-up passed in 20.146s and resumed the same saved session. The
loopback fixture makes no external model requests; failed initial probes
remain retained.
- The startup change passes 107 focused runtime/effort/lease tests, 53
profile checks (one skipped), TypeScript checking and the
TypeScript-only runtime build. Native hire fixture checks pass 70 tests;
their first local run retained a socket-hangup failure and stale
OpenCode expectation, both accounted for before the passing rerun.
Broader required checks run in cloud CI.

## Risks

- Explicit Claude effort needs a daemon and sidecar that support input
v9. Historical readers stay available; downstream builders and
permission-pin transport checks must also use v9.
- Source-bound profile changes may require reopening older Pi/Copilot
sessions. Copilot remains pending and executable package closures remain
unchanged.
- This prerequisite changes shared runtime behavior; Claude default
selection remains in #15993/#15997. No database migration or Codex
default change is introduced.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution and browser testing. The exact serving model ID and
context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-19 13:31:09 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 3858d2341d fix(recovery): default saved-monitor waits and keep task recovery quiet (#16686)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - A task must keep a durable path to its next action.
> - A provider can save a task monitor, then fail to yield because it
omits internal continuation fields.
> - An interrupted provider-pack check can then be reported as permanent
artifact incompatibility.
> - The task asks its user to certify recovered workspace files, even
though this is an operator responsibility.
> - This pull request derives the saved monitor continuation, bounds
verification retries, and removes that task form.
> - Normal recovery stays quiet. Unresolved holds retain inspection and
the existing safety checks.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A yielded completion without `continuation` is rejected even after the
provider saves an eligible monitor on the task. Repeated attempts cannot
finish. Remote verification also treats timeouts and missing exit status
as artifact incompatibility. The task recovery notice exposes raw
diagnostics and asks the task user to certify infrastructure files.

**Expected behavior**

Use current persisted task state to fill routine continuation fields.
Retry interrupted verification reads within a fixed bound. Keep normal
recovery in the working state. Show a compact notice only when work
cannot safely continue.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Save an eligible monitor on the active task.
2. Call `paperclip_finish` with `reportedWorkDisposition: "yielded"` and
omit `continuation`.
3. Return a timed-out remote provider-pack command with empty stderr
during recovery. Inspect the resulting task notice.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Source baseline: `aaeff418cf` (master integrated with its current task
visibility and saved-source reconstruction rules).

Related changes: #15824, #16104, #16451, #16493, #16690. This fix
complements saved-result recovery and verified pack reuse. It does not
replace their workspace ownership checks.

## What Changed

- Allow omitted or null continuation at the provider input boundary.
Read current authorized task context and fill a monitor continuation
only for the bound run and an eligible saved monitor. Keep accepted
results strict. Apply this to Codex, OpenCode, both direct and
production-sidecar ACPX paths, and external drivers. Reserve the
semantic call identity during the saved-context read and reject
cancellation or a changed run/turn.
- Bind the shared completion change and continuation helper in a new
Copilot v21 source declaration. Preserve v20 history and its decoder
support. Qualification stays pending.
- Expose the eligible continuation in task context. Completion admission
still checks persisted monitor state. No schedule is created or renewed
by the default.
- Retry read-only provider verification at most twice per command. Hold
exhausted reads with a distinct verification-unavailable cause.
Reattachment cannot renew the read budget through an unchanged
provider-attempt counter. Keep completed verification failures and wrong
versions incompatible.
- Remove the task file-certification form. Hide the notice only for a
matching durable recovery path without an unknown-action replay hold.
Keep missed retries, unsafe outcomes, and unresolved file holds visible.
- Add production-component stories for automatic recovery, blocked and
expired holds, reader access, persisted repair decisions, source
reconstruction, queued continuation, and mobile. Preserve master’s
guarded saved-source reconstruction choice after confirmed source
destruction. Update the execution contract and access maps.

## Verification

- Completion, helper, Codex, OpenCode, ACPX, and profile regressions
pass. After the sidecar review fix, 271 tests across the production
sidecar and three provider suites pass, plus 72 helper/profile tests.
The real sidecar MCP bridge tests cover saved-monitor acceptance,
no-monitor refusal, cancellation, duplicate call identity, and
raw-versus-forwarded semantic receipt hashes. The OpenCode tests also
cover eligible-monitor acceptance and refusal without one.
- The fresh full native executor suite passes all 743 tests. Four
profile, installation-integrity, and ACPX driver suites pass all 168
tests. The earlier CI fingerprint failure required a new immutable
source declaration; its follow-up Docker failure required the matching
context allowlist entry. Both fixes are verified locally. Targeted
server monitor, tool authority, and provider verification suites pass.
The probe tests include a real timed-out subprocess, an unrelated
responsive timer, transport errors, and completed integrity rejections.
- All 90 tests in the merged task notice, reconstruction choice,
recovery display, and lineage suites pass. They cover reader access,
live/missed/mismatched recovery, unknown outcomes, saved messages, retry
refusal, and removal of the file form. Both review findings have
failing-baseline/passing-treatment regressions: identical polling across
retry expiry, and a failed refresh after cached running activity.
- Browser walkthrough passed for automatic recovery, unresolved details,
a 390px mobile story, and the merged saved-source reconstruction and
queued states. The reconstruction control starts disabled and normal
automatic recovery shows only Working. The stories use production
components and fixture API data. They do not prove live cloud recovery.
- Token gates, map checks, and Storybook catalog generation pass. The
exact Docker context integrity command passes locally after adding the
new build declaration to its allowlist.
- Workspace typecheck and build pass on the final source, including the
versioned identity update. The final server and UI guards pass their
focused tests, typechecks, builds, and token gates. The final standalone
Storybook builds. The saved-monitor default retains master’s stricter
child-task visibility filter. Re-review caught an additional
production-sidecar validator before forwarding; the fix now defaults at
that boundary and has passing regression controls. After preserving
master’s new reconstruction capability, 68 targeted reconstruction,
tool-authority, and provider-verification server tests pass. The
current-master integration at `2a80050a0d` has a fresh 5/5 review with
zero unresolved threads. Its complete CI matrix, including Runner tests,
is the merge acceptance record.
- On the final master integration, local typecheck, build, and all 90
recovery UI tests pass. A concurrent runner run hit five 5-second
sidecar startup timeouts; an isolated sidecar run passed 86 tests and
timed out in the unrelated unsupported-bootstrap case. Those local
deadline failures remain recorded; the canonical CI Runner lanes use
their normal deadlines and pass. The unsharded local full-suite attempt
did not complete. It spanned source edits; the fresh native executor run
above passes. An unrelated workspace fixture timed out once and then
failed to reserve 32 contiguous ports on this host. Its unchanged-base
control and CI server suite pass. Full-suite acceptance uses the fresh
latest-head CI matrix; this PR does not claim a passing unsharded local
run.

## Risks

The default applies only to an eligible persisted monitor. An explicit
invalid continuation still fails validation. The added read occurs only
when a yielded report omits its continuation. Admission rechecks current
state after that read.

An interrupted verification command can add one extra 30-second probe.
Completed rejections stay closed. These probes do not change the pack,
launch provider work, or replay external tools. Two inconclusive reads
hold the original run. They do not schedule another reattachment with an
unchanged provider-attempt counter.

This PR’s pending Copilot v21 declaration binds the changed shared
contract, resolver, direct driver, and production sidecar sources. The
previous v20 declaration is immutable and remains decodable, but launch
requires the new exact identity. Qualification remains pending.

Task users lose the file-certification form. Board-authorized
source-only repair remains available through the resolution API with the
original evidence and stop-receipt requirements. This branch does not
deploy or recover historical held runs.

> This is a bug fix and UI polish within existing recovery behavior.
ROADMAP.md was checked.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, `gpt-6.1-sol`, xhigh reasoning, with tool use and code
execution. The host does not expose the context-window limit.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (changed-area suites; the
full local run limitation is recorded above)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-18 21:43:15 -05:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip 6f8ad3d77b Add verified session-local stdio MCP transport to Runner (#16526)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agent runs and their tool authority.
> - Runner supplies provider sessions with assigned MCP connections.
> - The current native connection binding supports an HTTP gateway only.
> - Execution hosts also have private local tools with stdio MCP
interfaces.
> - Those tools need session-local registration and safe concurrency.
> - This pull request adds verified local stdio assignments beside the
existing gateway.
> - Providers receive the existing tool schemas and image content.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Problem or motivation**

Runner can supply a native provider session with an HTTP MCP gateway,
but cannot also assign a verified local stdio MCP server without
persistent provider configuration. Execution hosts need a session-local
transport for local MCP tools, coordination for calls sharing a
resource, and native schema/image delivery. The pinned native Codex
client drops MCP images when `structuredContent` is also present.

**Proposed solution**

Add general stdio MCP transport support using host-assigned executable
digests, arguments, environment and a private Unix socket identifying
the shared resource. Tool implementations supply their own schemas and
responses; Runner forwards their native MCP schemas and content.
Register the transport for the current provider session. Serialize calls
across processes, keep unknown outcomes fenced, and authorize assigned
native Codex tools without a new prompt while routing explicit tool
confirmations through existing PRP permission requests. Retain the HTTP
gateway and applicable permission policy.

**Alternatives considered**

Reimplementing tools or translating their actions into provider-specific
APIs would tie the transport to individual tool implementations. Global
provider config would leak session assignments. Shell commands alone do
not deliver native MCP images or preserve MCP approval requests.

**Roadmap alignment**

This completes the existing Runner transport boundary. Related: #10690
(operator config for the legacy ACPX engine), #11605 (gateway delivery
of installed stdio connections), #16486 (preconfigured provider homes).
This change assigns local tools on the execution host and leaves those
administration paths intact.

## What Changed

- Add reserved, verified stdio bindings for native Codex and through the
shared ACPX runtime. ACPX clients must support stdio MCP assignments.
Read-only sessions omit the binding. No home/project config is
rewritten.
- Run the backend with only its assigned environment through the
verified executable launch path.
- Serialize all calls sharing a private Unix socket across sessions.
Metadata remains responsive. Queued cancellation prevents execution;
active calls remain fenced until acknowledgement. Unknown outcomes
require a resource restart.
- Authorize host-assigned native Codex tools without a new per-call
prompt, matching existing execution-host shell utilities. Preserve
explicit tool deny/prompt rules. Route requested MCP tool confirmations
through one-time PRP approvals, bound to the active thread and turn.
Keep shell escalation disabled and existing tool deny rules effective.
ACPX adapters retain their applicable ACPX permission policy.
- Preserve schemas and image blocks. For native Codex 0.160/0.162,
retain structured metadata as MCP text on image-bearing results to avoid
the client's image-loss bug. ACPX adapters receive the original
response.
- Document transport authority, cancellation and recovery limits.

## Verification

- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed with pnpm 9.15.4 and Rust
1.97.1 on macOS arm64.
- Before Apex, full `paperclip-runner-core` Rust tests passed. After the
fixes, all 379 library tests and eight subprocess tests using a generic
stdio MCP fixture pass. Those subprocess tests cover schema/image
passthrough, assigned-only environment, executable drift, call
serialization, cancellation and unknown outcomes. The native Codex suite
passed 91 tests with two intentionally ignored;
`receipt_limit_rejects_the_call_and_keeps_polling_when_interrupt_fails`
timed out waiting for `turn.interrupted`, including an isolated retry.
The unchanged pre-fix commit `80917b301a2309f7966a466cf0c198a2112be2d5`
reproduces the same timeout in isolation; this local native-suite run is
not claimed as fully passing.
- All 252 native controller tests pass against the final narrowed
approval branch. Focused TypeScript transport/permission suites passed
(298 tests); final binding, read-only host, policy and adapter checks
passed (105 tests).
- **Provider-client smoke coverage:** pinned Codex 0.160.0 through
native Runner and Claude SDK 0.3.286 used local stdio MCP servers and
loopback model API fixtures without live model credentials. These
clients define the smoke-test coverage; this is not an exhaustive
adapter compatibility test. Image responses reached the next model
request as typed image blocks. Native Codex checks also verified
unattended execution without approval requests, explicit per-tool prompt
denial without backend execution, disabled-tool rules, and stale-turn
approval rejection.
- Two Greptile concurrency findings were reproduced with failing
subprocess tests and fixed: pending cancellation under output
backpressure, and a ctime-based fence reset after chmod. Initial checks
exposed Codex CLI option-scope and key-quoting errors, which were
corrected. The existing ordinary elicitation regression also exposed an
overly broad request branch; the final branch handles explicit tool
approvals only.
- `pnpm test:run` was attempted. The broad local server suite hit
persistent embedded PostgreSQL startup failures and unrelated local Git
fixture failures; it was stopped with the failure log retained. Those
local results are not claimed as passing. Hosted Linux CI gates passed
on the reviewed runtime commit, as recorded below.
- First Apex review found three additional defects, now fixed with
regressions: keep the resource-lock socket snapshot instead of sampling
the socket twice; project native permission requests with durable
turn/item IDs while retaining provider IDs in details; validate provider
response conversion before marking a request as settling. The retry
regression failed before the fix. Focused Codex request/adapter checks
pass (23 tests), server permission projection passes (16 tests), and all
379 Runner library tests pass. The broader database-backed bridge suite
was attempted but its local PostgreSQL setup timed out; 29 tests did not
execute. This local failure is retained, not claimed as passing.
- Runtime acceptance before the documentation clarification, on
`bd4fccae001157beb5bc76ff17c1920a5db3105a`: standard Greptile 5/5, then
Apex 5/5 with no unresolved threads; all 60 checks complete successfully
or intentionally skip. Ten CI jobs were interrupted by the same runner
shutdown, including one stale job that required cancellation before
retry; the same-commit retry passed. Hosted Rust tests also pass,
including the native suite with the local baseline timeout noted above.
- `git diff --check`, map validation, and pre-push secret/PII scan
passed.

## Risks

- No live model account or deployment isolation qualification was run.
The loopback fixture proves the actual vendor-client request format, not
model interpretation.
- Stdio MCP support uses the current host-assignment contract: each
binding requires a verified executable and a private Unix socket
identifying the serialized resource. Other platforms retain the HTTP
path. No provider version was upgraded.
- A lost acknowledgement blocks subsequent calls until the host restarts
the assigned resource. Direct shell calls are outside this MCP fence and
retain the existing shell policy.
- Preconfigured Claude remains unattended and denies interactive
approval requests. Host assignment authorizes native Codex local tools;
it must be supplied only for sessions already authorized to use the
resource.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning and repository/tool execution. The
session does not expose a more specific model identifier or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 10:39:38 -07:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip fa9f3f8a08 feat(runner): support preconfigured user homes for Codex and ACPX (#16486)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Runner launches the selected provider and keeps durable session
state.
> - Runner currently prepares private provider homes for each session.
> - Operators can already have working login, skills, and MCP
configuration on the execution machine.
> - This PR adds an explicit mode that uses that existing setup.
> - Runner keeps its task bridge and session ownership while leaving the
user's configuration in place.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Problem or motivation:** Rebuilding a provider home is unnecessary
when the execution account is already configured.

**Proposed solution:** Add `homeMode: "preconfigured"` to Runner adapter
config and runnerd transport options. Keep `"isolated"` as the default.
Initially support native Codex and ACPX Claude.

**Alternatives considered:** Continue copying user configuration into a
private home, or add an approval workflow. Both add work outside this
feature's scope.

**Roadmap alignment:** This extends the existing cross-provider Runner.
It does not add another runtime.

Related work: #14056 covers managed Codex credentials. #14474 covers
command environment delivery. This mode uses user-owned credentials and
retains the existing launch boundaries.

## What Changed

- Add a closed v7 launch contract for the selected home mode. Existing
contracts retain their behavior.
- Keep homeMode under operator control. Reject task overrides and
agent-authenticated changes, including removal through replacements,
adapter changes, or rollback. Ignore stored task values and exclude it
from automatic hire inheritance.
- Skip managed AI login, assigned-skill materialization, and external
MCP setup in preconfigured mode. Preserve the Runner task/completion
bridge.
- Keep protocol state and provider lifetime fences scoped to the Runner
session. Different sessions can share a home.
- Fail preconfigured ACPX planning/read-only launches before provider
admission until a read-only user-home launch is qualified. Use isolated
mode or native Codex for planning.
- Reject ACPX approval requests. Keep native Codex on `never`. Local
permission rules and hooks remain effective. Initially require the
default Runner ACPX `approve-all` setting; other Runner policies are
unqualified in this mode and fail before launch.
- Keep the internal ACPX bridge in a stable session namespace,
preserving an existing user MCP server named `paperclip`.
- Reject preconfigured ACPX Codex before launch until a session
permission profile can enforce Runner-state denial. Remove the
unprotected full-access mode switch; use native Codex or isolated mode
for that model family.
- Bump Pi to profile 23 because its attestation covers shared Runner
source changed here. Preserve profile 22 for historical recovery, and
update Docker/package verification inputs.
- Fence recovery on mode and home bindings. Fail missing
provider-history recovery without starting a replacement session.
Exclude the external Codex home from backups and credential cleanup.
- Discover remote HOME on the execution machine. Do not project
controller HOME or XDG paths onto it.
- Separate task instructions from Codex ACP isolation and update the
generated provider digest.
- Keep remote configured-environment manifests consistent when dropping
controller paths. Preserve exact Claude model IDs through per-launch
environment settings, without editing the user home or patching the
provider.

## Verification

- Targeted local checks cover native contracts and launch allowlists,
user-config preservation, provider admission, permissions, session
recovery, remote environment projection, heartbeat preparation, and
operator-only configuration. Runner, shared, and server TypeScript
checks and the Rust binary build pass; generated ACPX profiles are
current.
- Following the latest master integration, all 757 server
configuration/executor tests and 115 Runner admission/recovery tests
passed. Additional review-fix checks passed: 103 planning contract/host
tests, 78 provider-backend tests, 95 route/preparation/inheritance
tests, 43 task-validator tests, and 43 workspace-policy tests. Counts
describe separate runs and can overlap.
- The real pinned Claude ACP/SDK regression reproduces exact-model
aliasing without the fix (`claude-sonnet-5-5` becomes `sonnet`) and
passes with the fix. All 89 adapter tests pass. User settings remain
byte-for-byte unchanged.
- Localhost-only Claude SDK probes with synthetic credentials verify the
private bridge runs, local `ask` reaches the existing reject callback,
local `deny` blocks without a callback, and a user MCP server named
`paperclip` remains available. No user model allowlist is required.
- Review regressions cover fail-closed provider admission, saved-mode
recovery before routing, controller-home path removal without
configured-environment manifest drift, pre-launch rejection of
unqualified read-only ACPX launches, and denial of task/agent changes to
the operator-owned home mode.
- Before rebase, `d4d4ee2aebe4cb88c4f4d9ef8e22fed4b36b87be` received
standard Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved threads. Prior Apex findings
are fixed and covered by regressions. No manual Greptile retrigger is
requested for this rebase, per reviewer direction.
- The prior PR head and master hit the same GitHub runner encoding crash
in workspace-b on three PR attempts, including diagnostic logging
([prior PR
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38818474563/job/116714538405),
[prior master
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38819528748/job/116712423193)).
Rebased onto `origin/master` at `c3ffa3f0dd` to pull in its bridge-test
index correction. The rebased head
`edd153db410bea063b645e0000aa68649f287b00` passes all CI checks ([CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38824676914)),
including workspace-b. Greptile's automatic standard review is 5/5 on
this exact head, with no unresolved threads; no manual review was
requested.
- Local workspace-b investigation passed 911 shared tests and 3,868
tests across the remaining 15 workspace projects. The catalog run
separately hit an existing ignored
`.agents/skills/design-guide/SKILL.md` description-budget violation in
this checkout; that file is untracked, outside the PR, and left
untouched. Repeating shared tests with CI reporting enabled also passed.
- Rebase verification: the final Git tree exactly matches the previously
reviewed branch combined with current master. All 192 Runner
admission/contract tests, 61 server preparation/provider tests, and 68
bridge tests pass, as do Runner/server TypeScript and generated-profile
checks. The real Claude adapter fixture hit an `ENOTEMPTY` cleanup race
on its initial run; all 89 adapter tests passed on retry.
- Apex on rebased head `edd153db` returned 2/5: ACPX Codex selected full
access without enforcing Runner-state denial, and agent configuration
replacement could remove the operator mode. Both are fixed in
`26e14dbbf`. Preconfigured ACPX Codex is temporarily unqualified;
re-enabling it requires session permission enforcement on thread/turn
operations and a real filesystem-denial probe. The config guard covers
effective replacements, adapter changes, and rollback while allowing
ordinary agent merges and operator removal. All 190 focused Runner
tests, 103 server tests, both typechecks, and generated-profile checks
pass. Standard review and CI passed before the next Apex request.
- CI on `26e14dbbf` passed 1,967 Runner-shard tests but hit the
previously observed `ENOTEMPTY` fixture cleanup race after successful
Claude model admission. `eb83284fb` adds bounded filesystem retries to
that fixture's teardown; all 87 adapter tests pass. Assertions and
production cleanup behavior are unchanged. Head
`eb83284fb42ee19a15d9a93b106c1bbb07e1695e` passes all 59 CI checks ([CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38829500857))
and standard Greptile at 5/5 with no unresolved threads. Apex also
completed at **5/5** on that exact head ([Apex
result](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/16486#issuecomment-6201559527)).
All review threads are resolved, the branch has no merge conflicts, and
the PR remains unmerged.
- No live paid-provider or remote-machine smoke was performed. The
lockfile remains unchanged under the repository's refresh-bot policy;
local dependency installation resolved the changed patch hash.

## Risks

This explicit opt-in grants Codex tools access to the execution home
(read-only in planning), including credentials. Native Codex separately
denies Runner-owned protocol state. ACPX Claude retains its existing
provider trust boundary, and the isolated default is unchanged.
Providers may refresh credentials and update their own metadata.

User configuration can block tools or the completion reporter. Existing
blocked results and failure diagnostics remain the recovery path. Edit
the local settings and retry; no new approval workflow is added.

External provider history remains on the execution machine and is not
backed up by Runner. Remote HOME discovery requires `getent` and fails
explicitly when unavailable. Other harnesses need separate
qualification.

The Codex ACP bundle digest changes. Existing sessions tied to the old
bundle may need a fresh session. No database migration is required.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning and code execution. The exact
runtime model ID was not exposed.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the feature issue
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
ticket id
- [x] I have run targeted tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented risks above

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-15 17:57:58 -07:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip ec3eb1968b feat(runner): expose credential updates through PRP (#16463)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The Runner uses PRP to send harness events to the host.
> - A harness can replace its stored OAuth tokens during a run.
> - The host has no PRP signal that tells it to read the updated
credential.
> - This pull request adds a durable credential update event and
observers for supported stores.
> - The host can react before it acknowledges the event. Token values
stay outside PRP.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

`packages/paperclip-runner`: native provider execution, PRP schemas, and
host event delivery.

**Problem or motivation**

A Paperclip host that consumes PRP needs to react when a harness changes
its refresh-token credential. Existing credential copy-back paths do not
provide a common event during a warm session.

**Proposed solution**

Add `auth.credentials.updated` as a P0 runner event. Include only the
provider, binding ID, revision, and detection method. Observe native
Codex and Codex/Grok ACPX credential files. Retain each pending event
across runner restart until the durable outbox accepts it. Raw PRP
consumers opt in with `observeCredentials: true` before session open.
The bundled transport opts in for fresh sessions.

**Alternatives considered**

`harness.diagnostic` would mix a runner observation with harness
diagnostics. Sending token values through PRP would expose credentials
to event logs. Both approaches are unnecessary.

**Roadmap alignment**

I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This change extends the existing Runner protocol
and does not duplicate a planned core feature.

**Additional context**

Refs: #11094, #14056, #12696. These describe credential copy-back and
staging work. This PR adds the notification contract. It does not
replace those private credential channels or claim to fix their full
scope.

## What Changed

- Add strict credential update payload validation to PRP v1, v2, and v3.
Regenerate validators, the manifest, and the event catalog.
- Watch supported credential directories with `notify`. Add a periodic
read as a fallback and check at terminal and close boundaries.
- Persist a private baseline and pending event together. Notify on
account identity changes and retain the new baseline for later
refreshes. Ignore incomplete files, unsafe files, and metadata changes.
- Forward the event through the host transport. Test commit-before-ACK
delivery and replay.
- Commit pending runner observations before suspend and shutdown
commands complete. Preserve the provider event backlog.
- Create the private ACPX runtime directory before configuring
observation. Cover fresh session startup with observation enabled.
- Fence asynchronous PRP commits to the current authenticated connection
and run authority. Ignore replaced callbacks while preserving the
maintenance drain of admitted work.
- Deliver observations found during final provider cleanup before
clearing terminal recovery state. Retain the outbox and recovery state
when the host ACK is lost.
- Advance the pending Copilot candidate profile to v19 for the changed
shared PRP source hashes. Preserve its v18 history and pending
qualification status. Include the current fixture in the Docker build
context.
- Commit credential updates through an awaited host callback before PRP
ACK, including during idle and close. Persist them in a separate run-log
source namespace with company, agent, session, and runner checks.
- Preserve public event metadata through server redaction. Register the
event in task run details.
- Document opt-in behavior, supported stores, event semantics, and the
local run-log path.

## Verification

- All 45 durable runner control tests and 24 native executor integration
tests pass.
- Ten Rust credential observer tests pass. They cover atomic
replacement, polling, recovery, account-only changes and later refreshes
for Codex and Grok, unsafe files, fresh runtime creation, and the Grok
close handoff. Account identity stays private.
- The full Runner TypeScript suite passes: 3,565 tests in 221 files. An
additional 12 tests are skipped by the suite.
- All 214 focused tests pass for the contract, Codex event routing,
catalog, and durable host delivery.
- All 13 Node protocol contract tests pass.
- The exact Docker context integrity command passes: `docker buildx
build --file .github/docker-context-checks.Dockerfile .`.
- Rust formatting and generated protocol checks pass.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. The full local `pnpm
test:run` was attempted with CI-compatible `init.defaultBranch=master`,
then stopped after a reproducible failure outside this change:
`git-workspace-expiration.test.ts` expects one re-expired workspace but
gets zero. The same case fails in isolation on this macOS checkout. Full
repository validation is provided by CI; the focused Runner and host
tests pass locally.
- All 253 native transport and restart tests pass against the final
release binary.
- All 3 durable recovery tests and 139 candidate profile and native
admission tests pass.
- All 41 host redaction and task protocol surface tests pass. `pnpm
check:token-gates` passes.
- All 467 CI policy tests pass, including the 15 CI profiling tests. The
upstream secret-reference test fix is retained from master. No workflow
changes are included.

- The Apex host-delivery fix passes 381 targeted Runner tests, six host
database tests, repository typecheck, and the production build. The
Runner tests cover commit-before-ACK, retry after a rejected host
commit, warm attachment, and close after the turn queue ends.
- Prior head `2f125cfcb` passed CI, standard Greptile 5/5, and Apex 5/5.
One CI shard was interrupted by GitHub runner shutdown; its single rerun
passed. Both Apex findings are addressed: idle/cleanup host delivery and
late callback reconnect fencing. Current head `5db78f082` passes CI (56
successful statuses and four optional skips) and standard Greptile 5/5.
Apex review of the account-change update is 5/5 on this exact head, with
no actionable issues.
- All 121 durable control-plane and credential callback tests pass,
including account-only change delivery, subsequent refresh on the new
account during close, host commit retry, late success/failure races,
forward cursor delivery on a replacement connection, and the existing
maintenance retirement contract. All 27 native provider and durable
recovery integration tests pass after the account-change update.

## Risks

- File changes signal a stored credential update. They do not prove that
an OAuth refresh succeeded. Changes between reads can be combined.
- Unix Codex and Codex/Grok ACPX stores are supported. Other harnesses
and credentials held only in memory need their own integration.
- Hosts must update their event schemas before opting in. Older hosts
omit the flag and receive no new event. Older runners ignore the flag.
- The host must use its existing private credential channel and account
checks to read or copy the token. Account switches trigger notification
but do not authorize accepting the new account. The event grants no
credential access.
- Tests use synthetic credentials. No live OAuth refresh has been
forced.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-6.1-sol`, with high reasoning effort,
repository inspection, tool use, and code execution. The session does
not expose its context window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-15 14:49:00 -07:00
1b58ac6ec9 build(deps): bump smol-toml from 1.8.0 to 1.9.1 (#16020)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The Codex runner must set trust for the exact startup project.
> - smol-toml 1.9.1 returns tables with null prototypes.
> - Object spread replaces those prototypes and causes strict validation
to reject valid trust edits.
> - This PR keeps the parsed tables and adds tests for the dependency
update.
> - Codex can start while unrelated settings and trust boundaries stay
intact.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #16028. That merged PR contains the same table-preservation fix and
tests for both prototype styles.
This branch retains that work and adds more regression cases.
Related dependency updates: #15293 and #15364.

**What happened?**

Eight startup trust tests fail after the update to smol-toml 1.9.1.
The error is `codex_startup_trust_cannot_preserve_configuration`.

**Expected behavior**

Set trust for the exact startup project.
Keep unrelated configuration bytes and sibling project trust unchanged.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Check out the original PR head,
`90b133dfd963af4f19b4df11fdd6c11b4eeb2a2d`.
2. Install dependencies with `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`.
3. In `packages/paperclip-runner`, run `pnpm exec vitest run
src/drivers/codex/codex-startup-trust.test.ts`.

**Paperclip version or commit**

The verified head is `1a8e8ad8b2e1049ebb68595d85c92e3c0621559d`.

**Deployment mode**

Built from source on Linux. The affected code runs before Codex starts.

## What Changed

- Keep Dependabot's update from smol-toml 1.8.0 to 1.9.1 in the runner
and server.
- Keep parsed project tables. Use `parse("")` to create missing tables
with the parser's prototype.
- Keep strict candidate validation and the upstream tests for both
prototype styles.
- Add tests for nested values, dates, times, special numbers,
prototype-named keys, sibling trust, and repeated calls.
- Preserve the original Dependabot commit and lockfile. The two
follow-up commits change only the trust source and tests.

## Verification

- All 28 startup trust cases pass at the verified head. Run the command
above.
- The focused strict TypeScript check passes. Use `tsc --ignoreConfig
--noEmit --module nodenext --moduleResolution nodenext --target es2023
--types node --esModuleInterop --strict --skipLibCheck
src/drivers/codex/codex-startup-trust.ts
src/drivers/codex/codex-startup-trust.test.ts`.
- The runner TypeScript build passes. The full local build stops because
the test workspace has no Cargo executable.
- The broader Codex suite passed 271 of 272 cases before the source
conflict resolution. One unrelated fixture expects the runtime's
workspace path to be absent.
- The repository type check exited 137 in the DB package. The full local
test command was stopped after resource exhaustion.
- The final files merge cleanly with master
`976cdc77ed564dc3e014621505890b647e554a7f`. `git diff --check` passes.
- [CI for the verified
head](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38664681165)
passed. All 55 active checks passed; two Storybook checks were skipped.
Snyk also passed. [Greptile cycle
3](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/16020#issuecomment-6182103775)
scored this head 5/5 with no actionable findings and no open review
threads.

## Risks

- This update changes the parser used by the runner and server. CI must
check both packages.
- The trust edit must preserve unrelated TOML values and bytes.
Regression tests cover this behavior.
- Local resource and tool limits prevent a complete local validation
result. The full remote CI run passed at the verified head.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex helped with the compatibility fix, tests, and
review.
The runtime does not expose the exact model snapshot or context window
size.
The agent used repository tools, code execution, and GitHub tools.
Dependabot produced the original dependency and lockfile update.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — the focused 28-case suite
and strict type check pass; broader limits are listed above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — this
PR records the compatibility behavior and verification
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---

## Original Dependabot Update

Bumps [smol-toml](https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml) from 1.8.0
to 1.9.1.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/releases">smol-toml's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v1.9.1</h2>
<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>fix: reject invalid extra exponent sign by <a
href="https://github.com/cyyynthia"><code>@cyyynthia</code></a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/compare/v1.9.0...v1.9.1">https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/compare/v1.9.0...v1.9.1</a></p>
<h2>v1.9.0</h2>
<p><strong>Huge update</strong>!!! This is most likely the largest
update the library received since its release, with lots of new features
and improvements.</p>
<h3>Performance improvements</h3>
<p>Significant parts of the internal parse logic have been rewritten,
improving performance by <strong>1.5x-2x</strong>. The library was
already comfortably ahead of the others, but it is now faster than ever,
sitting at <strong>4x faster parse performance</strong> than the closest
maintained implementation.</p>
<p>Problematic code paths have also been replaced by safer
implementations, solving potential DoS vectors. See
GHSA-r4xh-jqrq-34v2.</p>
<p>Note: the objects returned by the library now have a <em>null
prototype</em>. This is a transparent change for 99.9% of users, and is
one of the most significant contributors to the major performance gains
in this version.</p>
<h3>Full Temporal support</h3>
<p>Version 1.8.0 brought support for Temporal in <code>stringify</code>;
now the library is also able to emit Temporal objects instead of its own
ad-hoc <code>TomlDate</code> object. It is not enabled by default, but
it will become the default in v2. Enable by setting <code>useLegacyDate:
false</code> in the parser's options.</p>
<h4>Better Temporal support in stringify</h4>
<p>Temporal support has been improved since it released: Temporal
objects that cannot be represented (such as
<code>Temporal.PlainMonthDay</code>) now throw an error (instead of
silently emitting a bogus object).</p>
<p>A new option has been added to <code>stringify</code> to disallow
Temporal objects that cannot be fully represented in TOML. This includes
<code>ZonedDateTime</code> objects with a IANA timezone attached instead
of a plain offset, and dates with a specific calendar value set. Enable
by setting <code>strictTemporal: true</code> in the options.</p>
<h3>Handling of unsafe keys</h3>
<p>Since its release the library has been protected against prototype
pollution attacks, setting properties like <code>__proto__</code> using
safe mechanisms that do not trigger prototype pollution. However, while
the returned objects are safe on their own, they may become problematic
if used carelessly.</p>
<p>Inspired by <code>secure-json-parse</code>, the library now offers a
way to either drop unsafe properties from the returned object, or to
throw an error and reject documents altogether. By default, these
potentially unsafe keys are preserved and returned.</p>
<h3>Miscellaneous updates</h3>
<ul>
<li>Unicode BOM is now gracefully accepted and ignored.</li>
<li>Table array headers are now properly checked again. Reported in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/issues/65">#65</a>.</li>
<li>Closed certain gaps where invalid whitespace would be accepted.
Reported in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/issues/61">#61</a>.</li>
<li>Bogus local date and local time values with a UTC offset are no
longer accepted.</li>
<li>Certain error messages are more accurate and handle errors at line
boundaries better.</li>
<li>The default export of the lib is now formally deprecated; use a
<code>import *</code> instead. Proposed in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/issues/50">#50</a>.</li>
<li>On Node 20+, strings that contain lone surrogates are now normalised
to well-formed strings.</li>
<li>On Node 20+, keys that contain lone surrogates are now
rejected.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/compare/v1.8.0...v1.9.0">https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/compare/v1.8.0...v1.9.0</a></p>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/commit/69aa050fef018b71799519bb2cbb54f158a0c5f9"><code>69aa050</code></a>
fix: actually properly fix exponent issues</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/commit/7be7084d24c85909cec84ecaafe39737ef4e4472"><code>7be7084</code></a>
chore: version bump</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/commit/be3290da3309502447e020ce106bb8a11d99e580"><code>be3290d</code></a>
chore: upgrade deps</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/commit/86c76134ad7a50e8e101ef7fd82cb0f155b278d8"><code>86c7613</code></a>
fix: reject invalid extra exponent sign</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/commit/6f9739a5ab481f57c3112024bc4947534b580b58"><code>6f9739a</code></a>
fix: gate <code>[is|to]WellFormed</code> (Node 18 compat)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/commit/a73ca32c7c9237f744c880d900ad15307a0cef56"><code>a73ca32</code></a>
fix: no Temporal with toml-test when Node &lt; 26</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/commit/7727890604580bd3fc2d7d2f79ad6e67b745ebe7"><code>7727890</code></a>
chore: version bump</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/commit/641903d60d47900080602b6a83e919d2a526547f"><code>641903d</code></a>
chore: rewrite README.md</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/commit/2df14c57945fec5a3737bc0cdce06a436bf9a77e"><code>2df14c5</code></a>
fix(types): make it work if Temporal doesn't exist</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/commit/3eaa44ef54b859990969935664b12023b26d0eae"><code>3eaa44e</code></a>
chore: update benchmark harness</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a
href="https://github.com/squirrelchat/smol-toml/compare/v1.8.0...v1.9.1">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />


[![Dependabot compatibility
score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=smol-toml&package-manager=npm_and_yarn&previous-version=1.8.0&new-version=1.9.1)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.

[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)

---

<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)


</details>

---------

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@devinfoley.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-14 18:46:09 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip fc3b15537b fix(runner): match call_api to existing agent REST permissions (#16040)
Route native call_api through existing agent REST permissions. Preserve admitted credentials across restarts, protect sensitive replies and private snapshots, and compare saved completion with provider history through the same redaction projection. Add permission, privacy and recovery regressions and update the access map and run-log guide.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-13 07:34:15 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip d67e3507b2 feat(runner): qualify Codex platform packages and cache hosted builds (#16028)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native execution needs a compatible installed daemon and provider
dependency.
> - The Codex-default work found missing platform packages and
clean-install startup failures.
> - Release builds also repeat dependency compilation and run
preparation serially.
> - This prerequisite packages four daemon targets and verifies
installed native startup.
> - It also caches hosted Cargo dependencies and overlaps JavaScript
preparation with compilation.
> - Agent creation defaults and experimental gates stay at the current
master behavior.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #15683. Refs #15555. Refs #15422. Refs #15926. Refs #15932.

Extract runtime and installation support from #15683. This prerequisite
has 65 changed files. Creation, onboarding, imports, UI runner selection
and graduation remain in the dependent PR. Feature/access maps and the
Storybook source catalog stay synchronized. Existing agents keep their
execution choices.

## What Changed

- Correct the existing runner test fixtures. Reserve owned credential
quorum listeners through the existing bounded fixture helper. Keep
foreign listeners intact, run actual credential staging once, and
preserve its rejection and unchanged-auth assertions. Reuse the
durable-resume outer-limit correction. Wait for actual warm-completion
and held-authorization callback entry under the existing recovery
deadline and surface early request errors. Preserve every semantic
assertion.
- Retain bounded installation failure diagnostics through the existing
qualification receipt upload. Keep the original error, 10-minute
deadline and all success checks.
- Keep startup ownership until credential preparation and registration
drain. Reject duplicate and post-close startup/resume work. Observe
shutdown during normal and adopted authentication readiness. Preserve
the primary failure and retain private state when cleanup is
unconfirmed.
- Package Linux x64/ARM64 and macOS Apple Silicon/Intel daemons. Verify
target headers, source identities, manifests, and hashes before assembly
and installation.
- Reuse the existing release producer/consumer workflows. Cache Cargo
dependencies by target, OS, compiler, lockfile, and contract inputs.
Rebuild workspace binaries. Permit trusted cache writes only for
canonical exact-source master pushes.
- Overlap JavaScript preparation with native compilation. Join both
commands and failure/cancellation cleanup before artifact verification.
- Preserve shell positional arguments in the shared SSH runner and apply
environment assignments correctly. Reject environment option keys. Six
before/after controls and two real SSH subprocess paths pass with zero
provider calls; this fix lands before both Codex and Claude defaults.
- Admit verified suspended SSH backups during cold controller
continuation, using the same full-scope, integrity and lifecycle checks
as sandbox targets. Two positive SSH cases fail before; all 14
positive/negative matrix cases pass afterward. Active ownership and
corrupt/malformed/nonempty state remain rejected.
- Record measured sandbox platform facts through the existing explicit
environment probe. Bind facts to the company, effective provider
configuration, immutable OCI image and actual captured image binding.
Check the returned cleanup receipt. Reject client-authored proof and
stale or named boot identities. Creation and discovery allocate nothing.
Preserve connection-only behavior.
- Resolve the actual remote Codex target and preserve same-host
development overrides. Preserve runtime artifact verification. Use
actual protocol/model compatibility rather than a numerical CLI version
fence.
- Resolve the installed Codex login dependency on 64-bit Linux and Mac
independently of the daemon libc baseline. Preserve account homes and
safe errors.
- Fix actual clean-install TOML table comparison. Preserve strict
semantic checks, comments, private writes, and malformed-input
rejection. Preserve primary startup failures and bounded cleanup.
- Document GNU libc 2.39+ and stock Ubuntu sandbox prerequisites.
Qualify ARM startup with a scoped distribution profile and unchanged
global restrictions. Preserve Windows and Alpine deferral.
- Preserve selected and saved native Codex reasoning effort in the
existing UI builder, while excluding it from other providers. This small
shared correction prevents import edits higher in the stack from
dropping effort.
- Reuse existing installed-package checks and assertions. Paperclip
tarballs contain no Codex native payloads. Official npm dependencies
supply the consumer's Codex binaries. All Docker and native builds stay
remote.

## Verification

Candidate: `271d434c170e74bdedde65d0b13059a55419c943`. It includes
current master `e168512f7bdbb6af6ea01954c6d7ed80b91e903e` and preserves
prior candidates through ordinary commits.

Current [full
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38346601686)
is successful on attempt 2. GitHub reports 54 successful checks and four
conditional skips, including required verify and browser aggregates,
workspace typecheck/tests/build, Linux DB controls, both runner shards
and [isolated native
compilation](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38346601609).
Fresh current-head Greptile is 5/5 with all four threads resolved. The
passing build's clean Grok/Codex report records CI merge source
`7a82a37438e6e448abc7cc5caa60dc2519a97be0`, 18 installed packages,
omitted Codex payloads, official host-only npm dependencies and zero
provider calls. Pi setup and its no-prompt lease verification also pass.
The first attempt's single 60-second Node archive download timeout
remains retained; its DNS/TLS/download cause remains unknown. One
unchanged-source retry was requested through the normal Build-job dialog
with debug logging disabled. GitHub's attempt 2 graph reports the other
CI jobs as well; no second retry or source/deadline relaxation was made.

The [final exact-source package
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38347027535)
is successful on literal `271d434c170e74bdedde65d0b13059a55419c943`. It
passes all four native producers, public Linux package assembly and
clean installed consumers on Apple Silicon, Intel Mac and Linux ARM64.
The nine qualification-mode skips are intentional; full CI above covers
their ordinary gates. Native builds and Docker assembly ran remotely.
The predecessor [`dae808` package
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38342104102)
remains literal historical evidence. Only tests and the dated record
differ from that source; runtime, package and workflow code is
unchanged. The reused credential fixture correction passes all 42
canonical Node 24 controls with synthetic data and independent
matching-source review, and the current hosted runner shard passes.
Production credential behavior is unchanged.

**Merge hold:** current-source CI, fresh 5/5 review and exact-source
package qualification pass. Actual code-owner approval and normal
protected merge remain pending. No slice has merged or deployed. GitHub
CLI authentication needs refresh; the normal signed-in embedded GitHub
UI provided this status without credential workarounds.

- The master merge preserves both Storybook source-review appendices and
the guarded test-home cleanup. All six existing cleanup controls pass
without skips. Master's isolated-home helper/test/setup are
byte-identical. The two existing whitespace lines in master's unrelated
privacy test remain outside this PR's diff.
- Canonical Node 24 passes all 24 existing public-install helper tests.
Three narrow added cases prove bounded/redacted failure metadata,
symlink exclusions, original exception identity, failed diagnostic
writes and no false failure on success. The Mac installer now uses
`--timing`; at most two 16 KiB tails and 32 structured entries per tail
enter the existing receipt upload. Raw argv, URLs, environment, error
text and stacks are omitted. A failed receipt explicitly remains
FAILED/unqualified/runtime-not-attempted. The 600,000 ms install
deadline and every real package/hash/payload/lock/lifecycle/runtime
oracle are unchanged.
- Canonical Node 24 reproduces the durable-resume outer timeout under
controlled fake latency. Only its outer test limit changes to 15
seconds; internal 500 ms/5 second deadlines and usage/effect assertions
remain. Controlled warm-recovery and before-bootstrap authorization
scheduling delays reproduce their callback polling failures, while the
explicit entry signals pass. Early recovery errors surface unchanged.
Independent review is clear. Historical mock binaries support the
fixture controls; fresh full hosted CI remains decisive. The original
hosted callback failure cause is inconclusive.
- The composed runner/surfaces/server/E2E TypeScript checks pass. Map
checks pass 35 areas/171 capability IDs. Token gates pass. The existing
Storybook catalog passes 223 files/2,210 stories; story IDs and
classifications remain intact. The current master had 25 inherited stale
fingerprints from three changed map recipes. Only those guarded
fingerprints and a source-only review note change; all 92 non-map
story/component/fixture inputs remain unchanged. Existing
classifications are retained. This proves source structure, not visual
or live acceptance.
- The 65-file contribution audit has no code file crossing from below
1,000 lines to above the limit. Earlier comment cleanup preserves
executable emissions, parsed workflows and action pins. Independent
cleanup/catalog and three-file reporting reviews are clear. No new
workflow, suite, grader or local native/Docker build was added.

**Prior `dae808` gate evidence:** fresh Greptile is 5/5 with four
resolved threads, isolated native compilation and the browser aggregate
pass. Its first runner shard passes the previous two corrections but
fails a different held-authorization cell at the implicit one-second
polling deadline. It records 1,672 passes/one failure/three skips. This
candidate applies the verified entry-signal correction without changing
production deadlines or any semantic assertions. Its original hosted
cause remains inconclusive until fresh CI.

**Previous-source evidence, kept literal:** the [exact `16a532` package
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38338806076)
passes all four native producers, public Linux package assembly, Apple
Silicon, Intel Mac and Linux ARM64 installed consumers. Its fresh review
is 5/5 with all four threads resolved. Full CI records 52 successful
checks, four conditional skips and the two fixture failures corrected
here. This is not a green full-CI candidate or proof for the new source.

`64c074fb8da1b31f8d6042c4fef48dc4164e759b` passed [full
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38332726938),
54 checks/four conditional skips, [isolated native
compilation](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38332726787/job/115085895328),
and fresh Greptile 5/5/all four resolved threads. The hosted transport
suite passed 246 tests and startup trust passed 22, closing that
source's local fake-binary limitation. These are historical after
reconciliation.

The [previous exact-source package
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38332921463)
built all four platform daemons and passed public Linux package assembly
plus Apple Silicon and Linux ARM64 installed consumers. **Intel Mac
failed:** its initial scripts-disabled npm install timed out before
lifecycle/runtime assertions. The underlying download/resolution/host
cause is unknown because the old helper deleted the npm logs. This is
the concrete baseline for the diagnostic change. The failed campaign
remains failed; no all-platform signoff or automatic retry is claimed.

The earlier `a200495` [four-target
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38283695248)
and [scoped ARM
qualification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38291535914)
remain component evidence. Cargo restores were cold misses; no
warm-cache speedup is claimed. Paperclip tarballs contain no Codex
payloads. Official npm dependencies supply Codex on the user's platform.

Current-source full workspace typecheck/tests/build, Linux DB controls,
static/Rust/native tests, all browser shards and exact-source package
consumers must pass. New-agent defaults and final managed onboarding
belong to #15683. Actual private Cloud composition, warm/cold signup,
task/follow-up and rollback compatibility remain later release gates.
Source audits found that ordinary managed onboarding does not run the
saved platform probe and Cloud distributes named snapshots without a
verified final boot-image binding. These dependent release blockers
remain open; prequalified E2E fixtures do not close them. Master adds
task-workspace migrations; the final image/migrator and previous-image
checks must include them. ARM paid task/follow-up and ordinary OS APT
installation are not proven.

## Risks

- Multi-target packages require source and header agreement. Missing or
mismatched artifacts fail explicitly. Existing execution choices remain
unchanged.
- Linux requires GNU libc 2.39+ and compatible sandbox prerequisites.
The scoped hosted ARM preparation does not qualify arbitrary containers
or kernels. Windows, 32-bit ARM, and Alpine remain deferred.
- Only dependency crates are cached. Preview jobs cannot write trusted
caches. Concurrent command cleanup must preserve the primary failure.
- Native-free Paperclip packaging retains official Codex npm
dependencies. No Codex payload bundling, schema migration, automatic
agent migration, or production deployment is included.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution, and parallel agents. The exact serving model snapshot and
context-window size are not exposed.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-13 06:24:07 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 1e0cfcb4fc test: retire redundant suites and consolidate owner coverage (#15978)
Retire duplicate ACPX and Codex proof after migrating unique assertions to their behavioral owners. Consolidate repeated fixtures and exact case matrices while preserving lifecycle, protocol, company, credential, approval, and ordering contracts. Remove the unused runtime-controls compatibility path and document test ownership and preservation evidence.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 10:44:02 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip d6e6d1c78a Stream OpenCode immediately, scope reasoning to turns, and deduplicate instructions (#15708)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and observe their work.
> - The native runner carries provider output into the task transcript.
> - OpenCode sends incremental text in `message.part.delta` events.
> - The driver ignored those events and waited for a full part snapshot.
Accepted chats also waited after lifecycle verification was complete.
> - This pull request forwards each valid chunk as it arrives and
removes unnecessary isolated startup work.
> - Valid chunks reach Paperclip sooner without changing completion or
permission rules. The matched browser experiment below does not
establish a reliable end-to-end latency improvement.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

The native OpenCode driver withheld text until OpenCode sent a full
snapshot. A local delayed-provider probe with the pinned OpenCode
1.18.34 runtime showed a 1,496 ms gap between the first native text
delta and the first Paperclip text delta (1,510 ms from provider text).

**Expected behavior**

Forward valid assistant text and reasoning deltas immediately. Preserve
repeated identical tokens, message roles, turn ownership, and final
response selection.

**Steps to reproduce**

Send an empty text part, then text deltas, and withhold the final full
snapshot. The new fixture requires the consumer to acknowledge its first
text delta before releasing the snapshot. The previous driver cannot
pass this handshake.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Baseline: `011e5669bad61c435a4745fb10812bef70376841`. The patch is
rebased onto current master.

**Deployment mode**

Local native OpenCode 1.18.34 on macOS arm64. Live diagnostics use
`openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731`. These are narrow
diagnostics, not full Product E2E qualification.

## What Changed

- Keep the macOS verified OpenCode launch pathname until child exit,
with guarded reuse and cleanup on failed launches. This fixes a
reproduced asynchronous executable-lifetime failure.
- Dispatch accepted queued chats immediately after lifecycle readiness
commits, through normal scheduler admission. Preserve ready state if
dispatch fails.
- Validate native OpenCode model access with the real hello probe
without a redundant catalog scan. Keep legacy adapter discovery
unchanged and isolate unspecified native probe directories.
- Map incremental text and reasoning to the existing canonical event
path, using observed part and message identities.
- Keep additive chunks without IDs distinct. Preserve ID-based event
deduplication.
- Clear current streaming part metadata when a new turn starts. Reject
mismatched session/message identities and unknown parts or fields.
- Disable automatic updates, remote model refreshes, and default plugins
in each isolated OpenCode process. Keep assigned MCP tools and default
model reasoning intact.
- Retain the latest cumulative text/reasoning part while its message
role is unknown, including completion metadata after more than 100
chunks.
- Expose `startTurn({ message, reasoningMode: "disabled" })` for one
OpenCode/OpenRouter turn. Carry the selection in the durable command
through Rust and the proxy. An omitted/default option restores provider
defaults on the next turn, including warm and recovered sessions. There
is no environment-level setting or automatic selection policy.
- Group optional Rust turn inputs in `CodexTurnOptions` and dispatch
through `start_turn_with_options`; retain `start_turn` for defaults.
Future turn settings can be added without another feature-specific
method.
- Expose a native-session capability for per-turn reasoning and reject
explicit unsupported selections before dispatch, including direct ACPX
and Codex backends. Runnerd checks the durable selected model as well as
the provider.
- Remove duplicate agent instructions from the shared OpenCode proxy
task envelope for all users. Send one system copy on every turn,
including prepared and resumed turns, because OpenCode reads the latest
user message’s system field. Preserve task constraints and completion
contracts.
- Document startup and streaming behavior. Add regression coverage for
role ordering, repeated chunks, final snapshot deduplication, and stale
turns.

## Verification

### Lower-load browser retry — 2026-10-10

**All 8/8 trials succeeded. In this batch, median Send → first visible
reply fell from 30.586 s to 12.476 s (59.2% lower).** Four fresh-agent
trials per variant, phase order before/after/after/before with two
trials per phase. Every adjacent-phase pair favored the candidate,
although one difference was only 0.301 s. This is evidence for the
readiness/probe changes on this host, not a production percentile or a
guarantee across providers.

| Phase/trial | Variant | Send → reply (s) | Observed ready → run (s) |
Session open → turn start (s) | Model requests |
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| 0/0 | before | 45.042 | 25.337 | 3.629 | 2 |
| 0/1 | before | 13.689 | 0.000 | 2.443 | 2 |
| 1/0 | after | 14.696 | 0.000 | 2.526 | 1 |
| 1/1 | after | 13.389 | 0.000 | 2.470 | 2 |
| 2/0 | after | 10.871 | 0.000 | 2.706 | 2 |
| 2/1 | after | 11.564 | 0.004 | 2.443 | 2 |
| 3/0 | before | 41.582 | 21.518 | 2.376 | 2 |
| 3/1 | before | 19.589 | 9.753 | 2.707 | 1 |

Observed ready-to-run median: **15.636 s → 0 s**; zero means execution
began by the first ready observation, not literally zero latency.
Polling interval is nominally 250 ms plus HTTP time.
Session-open-to-turn-start includes controller handling, not just child
startup. All eight ran within the existing startup timeouts; no timeout
or reasoning policy was changed. Host load at fixture creation stayed
**5.47–8.73 on 18 CPUs**, versus 68.9–100.8 in the prior campaign. No
builds/tests ran concurrently with measurement.

Same merged source **b0a0158729a7913882a0e756fe7e27228d72bf53**, release
runner, rebuilt static UI, OpenCode **1.18.34**, model
**openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731**, provider-default
reasoning, and empty isolated workspaces in both variants. Only the
readiness worker and explicit-model verification source were toggled;
the launch-lifetime fix and all proxy streaming changes were held
constant. Thus this does not separately measure the original streaming
changes. One browser per phase, two fresh companies/agents/chats per
phase. Measurement begins at capture-phase Send click and ends on
visible Hi text plus two animation frames. Status/thinking is excluded;
emoji can arrive just after the first text. Successful screenshots
inspected. Each variant had three two-request turns using
`paperclip_finish` and one one-request turn; no status lookup was
observed. Reported usage includes settlement after the first visible
reply.

Runner SHA-256
`57f658c220eecd2370ffd3333cd7e5d06d16bb2798af0cf43c84e01c8207c1c3`;
proxy
`bcc02fda2bf35b38a116cd880841aa6c534f6e0b497a96d97369a1e06dcc72ac`;
rebuilt UI tree
`eee238f2eda628c4e8c3660707986da4f8dd9100c814e26938fce3756df2eae4`
(sorted relative path, NUL, binary per-file SHA-256). Worker/probe
variant source hashes are unchanged from the preserved comparison below.
Measured turn cost **$0.00612574**, plus verification probes not
included in that figure. All eight attempts retained; all source/proxy
files restored and test supervisors exited.

Current commit validation: **53 successful CI checks, 4 skipped, zero
failing; Greptile 5/5 on b0a0158729 with no actionable findings.** The
previous 20 targeted post-merge tests passed. No source edit was made
for this rerun. Earlier failed and inconclusive cohorts below remain
historical evidence and are not pooled with this batch.


### Master update and failure diagnosis — 2026-10-09

Merged `origin/master` at `417db14e7d` into this branch without
conflicts; pushed merge commit
`b0a0158729a7913882a0e756fe7e27228d72bf53`. The incoming changes do not
alter OpenCode process startup or its timeout budgets. Historical
measurements below remain attributed to their original commits.

The four last-campaign failures never issued `turn.start`, so these were
**cold-session admission failures, not model replies failing**. Two
retained `session.open` commands eventually completed after controller
timeout/cleanup had begun. The other two ended with the inner
`thread/start` response timeout, and their diagnostics recorded OpenCode
startup retries. Startup event timestamps are buffered publication times
and must not be interpreted as exact process-spawn times.

On the merged source, two credential-free startup-only checks used the
real pinned OpenCode 1.18.34, empty temporary workspaces, a placeholder
key, and **no model turns**:

- Existing pinned executable: spawn at 1.083 s; failed health
attempt/retry at 11.311 s and 21.914 s; third process healthy at 32.210
s; session opened at **35.168 s**.
- Verified private executable path: snapshot preparation took **0.497
s**; process spawned at 1.588 s; healthy at 9.967 s; session opened at
**11.120 s**.

These are sequential diagnostic samples, not evidence that one
executable path is faster. Host load was **56.5–64.5 on 18 logical
CPUs**. The local health wait permits 10 s per attempt and the driver
retries up to three times; the outer controller's cold admission budget
is 30 s, and the Rust facade also waits 30 s for a response. Thus
retries plus setup/session creation can outlast the caller's budget. The
isolated 35.168 s success demonstrates that a session can eventually
open yet fail the app's admission deadline. Heavy load aggravates the
timing; its exact contribution is not isolated. No timeout was increased
and no new model-latency claim is made.

Merge validation: **20/20 targeted lifecycle-policy and heartbeat
run-completion tests passed**, including temporary PostgreSQL cases. The
first sandbox invocation skipped database cases; the authorized local-DB
rerun executed all 20. The package-manager launcher could not verify its
version via the unreachable registry, so validation used the
already-installed Vitest binary. Full CI/review subsequently passed on
this merge commit; see the October 10 retry above. Older results below
apply to their named commits.


### Follow-up: reproduced macOS launch failure — 2026-10-09

The retry exposed a startup bug rather than only host-load noise. The
macOS proxy deleted the private verified executable path immediately
after asynchronous spawn. A credential-free test of the actual pinned
OpenCode `--version` reproduced a fast SIGKILL and a 15-second timeout
in three immediate-cleanup attempts; three deferred-cleanup controls
succeeded. The timeout was killed by the diagnostic's own deadline. This
experiment does not establish the OS-internal reason for the fast
SIGKILL.

Commit `c30451e0ebf3f74e9ef70d37bbe4d9fe7fb56359` retains the private
launch path until child exit, cleans failed spawns, and waits for forced
shutdown before reuse. Source descriptor authentication, ownership,
mode, inode checks, and the prohibition on ambient executable fallback
remain. Overlapping reuse fails closed. The existing synchronous shell
test was changed to exercise the actual asynchronous boundary.

**Verification:** 59 focused proxy/driver tests passed; runner
TypeScript check passed. All six subsequent real OpenCode version
launches succeeded without timeout (4.11, 4.33, 5.73, 6.91, 4.95, 6.70
seconds). The native Rust binary is unchanged from the retry; no model
calls were made by these diagnostics.

Retained interrupted retry: before 42.56/18.69 seconds; after one
180-second timeout (`provider_process_exited` / health SIGKILL) and one
37.33-second success. The latter overlapped the credential-free
diagnostic and is not a clean matched timing. The next phase was stopped
before Send to diagnose the reproduced bug. Reported measured-turn cost:
$0.0016874, verification probes additional. These attempts are not
pooled with other campaigns.

<!-- launch-fixed-proof:start -->
**Completed retry, stopped by the declared failure rule after 6 of 8
planned trials. No reliable end-to-end speedup demonstrated.** At commit
`c30451e0ebf3f74e9ef70d37bbe4d9fe7fb56359`, the launch fix above was
held constant in both variants; only the readiness handoff and
explicit-model verification path changed. Planned phase order:
before/after/after/before, two fresh agents/chats per phase, one new
browser per phase. The second after phase had two consecutive failures,
so the final before phase was not run.

| Phase/trial | Variant | Send → first visible reply | Observed ready →
run | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0/0 | before | No reply within 180 s | 2.777 s | session.open timeout
|
| 0/1 | before | 47.654 s | 9.383 s | Succeeded |
| 1/0 | after | 50.051 s | 0.087 s | Succeeded |
| 1/1 | after | No reply within 180 s | 0.151 s | session.open timeout |
| 2/0 | after | No reply within 180 s | 3.337 s | session.open timeout |
| 2/1 | after | No reply within 180 s | 1.434 s | session.open timeout |

Both successful screenshots show “Hi 👋”. Timing starts at the browser's
capture-phase Send click and ends at the first visible answer text plus
two animation frames; the first fragment can be “Hi” before the emoji
arrives. Thinking/status text is not counted. All four failures were
`runner_local_connect_failed: PRP command session.open timed out`
(`native_session_interrupted`), before a reply; none reported the
earlier health-stage SIGKILL. They are retained, not discarded as
outliers. One success per variant does not support a speedup estimate or
median comparison. Observed ready-to-run median was **6.080 s before
(n=2) vs 0.793 s after (n=4)**; this is sampled every nominal 250 ms
plus HTTP latency and is a lower bound, not precise tracing. Host load
at fixture creation ranged **68.9–100.8 on 18 logical CPUs**, a
substantial confound that worsened over the campaign. No local
build/test was run concurrently with this campaign.

Provenance: pinned OpenCode **1.18.34**, model
**openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731**, default reasoning in
both variants, empty synthetic workspaces and isolated probe homes.
Release runner SHA-256
`57f658c220eecd2370ffd3333cd7e5d06d16bb2798af0cf43c84e01c8207c1c3`;
current proxy SHA-256
`bcc02fda2bf35b38a116cd880841aa6c534f6e0b497a96d97369a1e06dcc72ac`;
built UI tree SHA-256
`7f0c2b7f586cb753408351574b2239e22311944add99af4f6f3562cd6d47bbcb`. This
holds the rebuilt runner and static UI constant. Provider-reported
measured turn cost **$0.00120649**; verification probes are additional.
Including the earlier interrupted retry, this follow-up reports
**$0.00289389** in measured turn usage; missing usage is not assumed
free. Prior cohorts remain separate below.

Validation on `c30451e0e`: **59 focused tests passed**, runner
TypeScript check passed, **6/6 real credential-free pinned OpenCode
launches passed**, fresh Greptile **5/5 with zero unresolved threads**.
CI: **51 success, 4 skipped, 1 failed**. The failed native compilation
job never reached compilation: Docker's auth endpoint timed out during
Buildx setup, then failed the same way on one retry
([job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37994181674/job/114039737503)).
Full local checks were not rerun while measuring. The PR remains draft:
the launch defect is reproduced and fixed, but cold session startup
still exceeds the controller's admission budget on this host. Raising
that budget would not establish a faster first response.
<!-- launch-fixed-proof:end -->

### Readiness investigation and live rerun — 2026-10-09

**Measured queue fix; no reliable end-to-end speedup claim. Keep this PR
in draft.** Accepted chats could wait for the periodic queue sweep after
verification had already committed `ready`. The lifecycle worker now
dispatches through the existing scheduler immediately after that commit.
The normal company, pause, budget, concurrency, and task-ownership
checks still apply. Dispatch failure preserves readiness and leaves
recovery to the queue sweep.

Native OpenCode verification also avoids enumerating the full model
catalog before running its real hello request. Identifier validation
remains. Authentication failures, unavailable models, and timeouts still
prevent readiness. An unspecified local probe directory uses an empty
temporary directory.

**Queue-only experiment:** four before and four after attempts, in
before/after/after/before server phases, two fresh agents per phase.
Median observed ready-to-start delay fell from **19.429 s to 0.058 s**.
State polling was nominally 250 ms plus HTTP time, so the latter means
within observation resolution; it is not a precise 58 ms latency claim.
After timings were 100.20, 65.29, 63.78, and 76.97 seconds. Before had
one 59.65-second success and three 120-second response timeouts (one
provider health SIGKILL, one late success, one still running after
settlement and canceled). These censored results do not support a
success-only median speedup comparison. Focused tests overlapped the
last baseline phase, which further limits total-time interpretation.
Reported measured-turn cost: $0.0055383; verification probes and
incomplete/canceled usage are additional.

**Final matched experiment:** built static UI in both variants to avoid
pre-Send Vite compilation; current proxy, release runner, selected
model, default reasoning, and explicitly isolated empty probe
cwd/HOME/XDG held constant. Both worker handoff and model-probe changes
vary. Fresh browser/company/agent/chat per attempt. ABBA order, two
attempts per variant, 180-second response limit declared before the
batch, four-turn bound. Same Send-to-rendered-Hi metric as the earlier
experiment.

| Order | Variant | Send → visible Hi | Created → execution | Observed
ready → execution | Outcome |
| --- | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- |
| 1 | Before | 62.66 s | 23.467 s | 2.830 s | Succeeded |
| 2 | After | >180 s | 14.200 s | Within polling resolution | Provider
health SIGKILL |
| 3 | After | >180 s | 13.877 s | Within polling resolution | Provider
initialization timeout |
| 4 | Before | >180 s | 144.256 s | 14.067 s | Still running after
settlement; canceled |

Only one of four attempts produced a timed reply. **There is no valid
overall speedup estimate from this batch.** The dispatch delay is
removed, but provider startup failures and heavy shared-host load
remain. A recorded host sample was load 93.55 on 18 logical CPUs. This
is a confound, not proof that every failure was caused by host load.
Provider-reported measured-turn cost was $0.00032752, with no reported
usage for the other three attempts; verification probes are additional.

Retained earlier setup attempts: one shared-memory startup failure
before model calls, and a separate development-UI batch with a
60.06-second baseline followed by a navigation timeout before Send.
These attempts are retained separately, not counted as successful
response timings. No live attempts were silently dropped.

Provenance: source base `53580f8fbd40b963f3fb7ba5172ff3ede2e9ef1f`,
measured patch committed as `40b54eafb`, then rebased as
`c590770dcc2bb1debce14037935a7031e5c3c1ac`. **These live timings predate
the rebase.** Source and binary hashes are retained below. The inner
harness label `after` selects the identical current proxy in every
attempt; the outer campaign handoff label is the actual before/after
variant. Owned benchmark processes stopped and original proxy restored.

<!-- readiness-check-status:start -->
Post-rebase validation at `c590770dcc2bb1debce14037935a7031e5c3c1ac`:

- Full local `pnpm -r typecheck`: **passed**, including the native
release build (1,098.6 seconds on the loaded host).
- Focused lifecycle and adapter tests: **26 passed**. The 14 database
integration tests did not run locally because their hard-coded 20-second
database setup hook timed out. A retry with a CLI timeout override
encountered the same explicit hook limit. The earlier pre-rebase focused
batch passed 77 tests; these results are not substituted for post-rebase
execution.
- Local `pnpm test:run` was started, then stopped to avoid duplicating
CI on the saturated host. Local `pnpm build` was not run separately.
**Current-head CI passed Typecheck + Release Registry, Build, all
general and serialized test groups, Rust checks, both runner Vitest
groups, and all eight browser E2E shards.** The last general shard
passed 1,179 tests (72 files).
- Fresh [Greptile
review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15708#issuecomment-6085742217):
**5/5**, reviewed this exact head, no actionable defect.
- Final CI rollup: **49 success, 4 skipped, 4 failure**. The failures
are [Compile isolated native
Runner](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37990274515/job/114024329242),
[Docker context
integrity](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37990274623/job/114024196511),
[Canary Dry
Run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37990274623/job/114024196424),
and the dependent `ci / verify` aggregate. All three root failures are
Docker Hub HTTP 429 / unauthenticated pull-rate limits while fetching
Node base images. The native-image job was retried once and hit the same
limit. No source compiler/test failure was reported by those gates. CI
maintainers need authenticated pulls or to rerun after the registry
limit clears.
- Owned benchmark servers stopped. Local validation commands completed
or were stopped. The PR remains a draft: user-visible speed/reliability
is not qualified, and the Docker-dependent CI gates are not green.
<!-- readiness-check-status:end -->

<details><summary>Sanitized readiness evidence with all attempts and
source hashes</summary>

```json
{"campaign":{"order":["before","after","after","before"],"trialsPerPhase":1,"maxMeasuredTurns":4,"maxCampaignUsd":1,"sourceHead":"53580f8fbd40b963f3fb7ba5172ff3ede2e9ef1f","reasoning":"provider default, no override","proxySha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","purpose":"Final matched comparison of both optimizations; distinct from earlier queue-only campaign.","responseTimeoutMs":180000,"timeoutRationale":"Declared before this final campaign because earlier unchanged baselines sometimes exceeded 120 seconds; earlier timeouts remain retained.","ui":{"mode":"built static UI","treeSha256":"7f0c2b7f586cb753408351574b2239e22311944add99af4f6f3562cd6d47bbcb"},"priorCampaign":"combined-proof stopped after a development-UI navigation timeout before Send; no failed attempts erased."},"complete":true,"statistics":{"before":{"attempted":2,"successfulMeasurements":1,"medianTtfrMs":62657.2000002861,"rangeTtfrMs":[62657.2000002861,62657.2000002861],"medianObservedReadyToRunMs":8448.5,"medianRunStartToVisibleMs":37290.199951171875},"after":{"attempted":2,"successfulMeasurements":0,"medianTtfrMs":null,"rangeTtfrMs":null,"medianObservedReadyToRunMs":0.0,"medianRunStartToVisibleMs":null}},"measuredTurnCostUsd":0.00032752,"costCoverage":"Provider-reported measured chat turns only; harness verification probes are additional and not included.","readinessMetricLimit":"First observed ready state sampled every 250 ms plus HTTP duration; clamped to zero if execution started before the observation. This is a lower bound on ready-to-start delay, not a precise sub-millisecond metric.","results":[{"phase":0,"trial":0,"handoff":"before","ttfrMs":62657.2000002861,"answer":"Hi","statuses":["succeeded"],"error":null,"runErrorCode":null,"providerHealthKilled":false,"queueMs":23467.0,"queuedBeforeObservedReady":true,"observedVerificationMsAfterFixture":26390.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":2830.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":37290.199951171875,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00032752,"costUsdExact":"0.000327520","inputTokens":26864,"outputTokens":46,"cachedInputTokens":0,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326"},{"phase":1,"trial":0,"handoff":"after","ttfrMs":null,"answer":null,"statuses":["failed"],"error":"TimeoutError: page.waitForFunction: Timeout 180000ms exceeded.","runErrorCode":"provider_process_exited","providerHealthKilled":true,"queueMs":14200.0,"queuedBeforeObservedReady":true,"observedVerificationMsAfterFixture":24028.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":true,"runStartToVisibleMs":null,"usage":[{}],"workerSha256":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7"},{"phase":2,"trial":0,"handoff":"after","ttfrMs":null,"answer":null,"statuses":["failed"],"error":"TimeoutError: page.waitForFunction: Timeout 180000ms exceeded.","runErrorCode":"provider_initialize_timeout","providerHealthKilled":false,"queueMs":13877.0,"queuedBeforeObservedReady":true,"observedVerificationMsAfterFixture":18107.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":true,"runStartToVisibleMs":null,"usage":[{}],"workerSha256":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7"},{"phase":3,"trial":0,"handoff":"before","ttfrMs":null,"answer":null,"statuses":["running"],"error":"TimeoutError: page.waitForFunction: Timeout 180000ms exceeded.","runErrorCode":null,"providerHealthKilled":false,"queueMs":144256.0,"queuedBeforeObservedReady":true,"observedVerificationMsAfterFixture":136901.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":14067.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":null,"usage":[{}],"workerSha256":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326"}],"hostLoadSample":{"at":"2026-10-09T20:48:40.031Z","parallelism":18,"load":[93.546875,82.68017578125,75.9091796875]},"measuredChangesCommit":"40b54eafb","postRebaseCommit":"c590770dcc2bb1debce14037935a7031e5c3c1ac","postRebaseLimit":"Live benchmark predates the rebase. No post-rebase live result is claimed.","variantSourceHashes":{"before":{"server/src/modules/agent-lifecycle/application/worker.ts":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326","packages/adapters/opencode-local/src/server/test.ts":"4c10bacb55f2c7589e7b5c79d74781206ae075db8955f5b998065d6db3c0335a","server/src/adapters/registry.ts":"4a858763f69947d5745c7b8cb251a62fa404bc9683ade0ffb76282ed12761394"},"after":{"server/src/modules/agent-lifecycle/application/worker.ts":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7","packages/adapters/opencode-local/src/server/test.ts":"cd2ea3d51c3f1b4fb42261be701fb7f6b85704ad8e641e6db73d7c58e47364d3","server/src/adapters/registry.ts":"4a858763f69947d5745c7b8cb251a62fa404bc9683ade0ffb76282ed12761394"}},"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","prompt":"Reply with Hi and an emoji and nothing else.","runnerBinary":{"profile":"release","sha256":"6134c17debda14a76da69ac9631a2d10dad482ebd58dbc9a4e4480ed652211c4"},"probeIsolation":"Explicit empty cwd and HOME/XDG folders under the synthetic fixture workspace in BOTH variants. No server checkout or ambient provider home is used for the hello request.","comparisonLabelNote":"Inner run.mts variant after selects the identical current proxy in every trial; outer campaign readinessHandoff controls before/after source changes."}
```

Queue-only campaign:

```json
{"campaign":{"order":["before","after","after","before"],"trialsPerPhase":2,"maxMeasuredTurns":8,"maxCampaignUsd":1,"sourceHead":"53580f8fbd40b963f3fb7ba5172ff3ede2e9ef1f","reasoning":"provider default, no override","proxySha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04"},"complete":true,"statistics":{"before":{"attempted":4,"successfulMeasurements":1,"medianTtfrMs":59654.5,"rangeTtfrMs":[59654.5,59654.5],"medianObservedReadyToRunMs":19429.0,"medianRunStartToVisibleMs":8843.5},"after":{"attempted":4,"successfulMeasurements":4,"medianTtfrMs":71128.7000002861,"rangeTtfrMs":[63778.90000009537,100195.59999990463],"medianObservedReadyToRunMs":58.0,"medianRunStartToVisibleMs":26542.849975585938}},"measuredTurnCostUsd":0.0055383,"costCoverage":"Provider-reported measured chat turns only; harness verification probes are additional and not included.","readinessMetricLimit":"First observed ready state sampled every 250 ms plus HTTP duration; clamped to zero if execution started before the observation. This is a lower bound on ready-to-start delay, not a precise sub-millisecond metric.","results":[{"phase":0,"trial":0,"handoff":"before","ttfrMs":59654.5,"answer":"Hi 👋","statuses":["succeeded"],"error":null,"queueMs":50590.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":25709.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":8843.5,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00087852,"costUsdExact":"0.000878520","inputTokens":25644,"outputTokens":264,"cachedInputTokens":28416,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326"},{"phase":0,"trial":1,"handoff":"before","ttfrMs":null,"answer":null,"statuses":["failed"],"error":"TimeoutError: page.waitForFunction: Timeout 120000ms exceeded.","queueMs":41651.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":14656.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":null,"usage":[{}],"workerSha256":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326"},{"phase":1,"trial":0,"handoff":"after","ttfrMs":100195.59999990463,"answer":"Hi 🙂","statuses":["succeeded"],"error":null,"queueMs":65893.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":116.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":33243.60009765625,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00075782,"costUsdExact":"0.000757820","inputTokens":27014,"outputTokens":175,"cachedInputTokens":26368,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7"},{"phase":1,"trial":1,"handoff":"after","ttfrMs":65288.60000038147,"answer":"Hi 👋","statuses":["succeeded"],"error":null,"queueMs":43511.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":true,"runStartToVisibleMs":21227.60009765625,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00085326,"costUsdExact":"0.000853260","inputTokens":25166,"outputTokens":250,"cachedInputTokens":28160,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7"},{"phase":2,"trial":0,"handoff":"after","ttfrMs":63778.90000009537,"answer":"Hi 👋","statuses":["succeeded"],"error":null,"queueMs":39218.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":true,"runStartToVisibleMs":23479.89990234375,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.000839,"costUsdExact":"0.000839000","inputTokens":27068,"outputTokens":238,"cachedInputTokens":26368,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7"},{"phase":2,"trial":1,"handoff":"after","ttfrMs":76968.80000019073,"answer":"Hi 👋","statuses":["succeeded"],"error":null,"queueMs":46257.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":185.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":29605.800048828125,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00030582,"costUsdExact":"0.000305820","inputTokens":24694,"outputTokens":32,"cachedInputTokens":1792,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"ceffb90a6bc97ffaaf8ec7d0267c7bfa7738d321aaf2a618b5efb9b114bc88e7"},{"phase":3,"trial":0,"handoff":"before","ttfrMs":null,"answer":null,"statuses":["succeeded"],"error":"TimeoutError: page.waitForFunction: Timeout 120000ms exceeded.","queueMs":100979.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":3872.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":null,"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00190388,"costUsdExact":"0.001903880","inputTokens":25524,"outputTokens":852,"cachedInputTokens":55808,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"workerSha256":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326"},{"phase":3,"trial":1,"handoff":"before","ttfrMs":null,"answer":null,"statuses":["running"],"error":"TimeoutError: page.waitForFunction: Timeout 120000ms exceeded.","queueMs":129391.0,"observedReadyToRunMs":24202.0,"readyAndStartedInSameSample":false,"runStartToVisibleMs":null,"usage":[{}],"workerSha256":"02adc7e1162fb60439869cec62b75d8fb22fec71155f80535c8e00211cde8326"}]}
```
</details>

### Matched live browser latency evidence — 2026-10-09

**Conclusion: the overall first-response speedup is not established.**
Twelve successful real browser runs produced a lower after median, but
the updated path won only 3 of 6 adjacent pairs. Median paired
improvement was -0.17 seconds (effectively tied). Do not treat the
deterministic streaming-forwarding improvement as proof that this PR
fixes end-to-end first-response latency.

- **Actual path:** local Paperclip browser → real server/database →
current optimized Rust runner → pinned OpenCode 1.18.34 → OpenRouter
`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731`. Default reasoning in both variants;
no disabled-reasoning override.
- **Prompt:** `Reply with Hi and an emoji and nothing else.` Fresh
company, agent, chat, and per-turn native provider process for each
trial; same QA fixture instructions and selected model.
- **Comparison:** current product/runner at
`53580f8fbd40b963f3fb7ba5172ff3ede2e9ef1f` held constant. The baseline
substitutes the exact `opencode-app-server-proxy.ts`,
`opencode-proxy-task-envelope.ts`, and `opencode-server-driver.ts`
contents from pre-PR `41fec8c8921f9fb19c13fe11e2c9b71bf1017317`. This
isolates those changed modules; it is not an entire old-checkout
comparison.
- **Metric:** browser capture-phase Send click to a rendered `Hi`
markdown answer plus two animation frames, with a screenshot of the
answer. Thinking, tool labels, and status indicators do not count. This
is a DOM/render measurement, not instrumented compositor pixel timing.
- **Order/bound:** predeclared `before, after, after, before` repeated
three times; six trials per variant; 120-second response timeout; $1
campaign guard. All 12 measured trials returned `Hi` and an emoji and
finished successfully; none omitted.
- **Result:** before median **48.08 s** (37.42–66.40); after median
**42.50 s** (27.68–63.32). The 11.6% lower median alone is not
persuasive evidence of a reliable improvement given the mixed paired
results and broad overlap.
- **Remaining delay:** retained queue timestamps for 10/12 trials show
**9.76–41.65 seconds from run creation to execution start**. This is
before the OpenCode path changed here. Its cause is not established by
this benchmark. The final two queue reads were unavailable after
automatic server shutdown; all twelve primary browser timings were
retained.
- **Cost:** $0.010517369 provider-reported across the 12 measured turns;
$0.011371499 including the successful setup pilot. This is separate from
the older diagnostics listed below.
- **Retained setup attempts:** two failures before Send (composer
locator and transpiler helper); one baseline startup failure before any
observed model request (`SIGKILL` while probing OpenCode health); one
successful current-code pilot whose selector missed the visible reply.
These are retained separately, not silently included/excluded as valid
timings. The measured batch used the corrected selector and the same
release binary for both variants.
- **Limits:** local development server and headless Chromium on macOS
arm64, small sample, variable queue timing/provider routing/cache. This
does not qualify production/cloud performance or isolate the
contributions of each changed module. Server, browser, and owned runs
were stopped; original proxy build artifact restored; no product source
files changed for this experiment.

| Pair | Before: Send → visible Hi | After: Send → visible Hi | Faster
variant |
| --- | ---: | ---: | --- |
| 1 | 66.40 s | 27.68 s | After |
| 2 | 37.42 s | 28.00 s | After |
| 3 | 39.75 s | 55.22 s | Before |
| 4 | 47.32 s | 63.32 s | Before |
| 5 | 48.85 s | 29.79 s | After |
| 6 | 51.31 s | 61.07 s | Before |

<details>
<summary>Sanitized measurement records, source/binary hashes, usage, and
retained attempt classification</summary>

```json
{"manifest":{"candidate":"53580f8fbd40b963f3fb7ba5172ff3ede2e9ef1f","baseline":"41fec8c8921f9fb19c13fe11e2c9b71bf1017317","comparison":"Same current product and runner; replace the three OpenCode proxy/driver source modules with exact pre-PR contents for baseline. Reasoning uses defaults in both.","model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","prompt":"Reply with Hi and an emoji and nothing else.","samplesPerVariant":6,"order":["before","after","after","before","before","after","after","before","before","after","after","before"],"maxTurnMs":120000,"maxCostUsd":1,"variants":{"before":{"sources":{"src/cli/opencode-app-server-proxy.ts":"e9b46c937d7ce3b51dc44181a2a3ad82befda9ebe184adf80c0a6b30da140fd6","src/cli/opencode-proxy-task-envelope.ts":"fc23f8a515c2c4d1551f6b95e5b38e6254849dec23f7396e76b646e170a6e006","src/drivers/opencode/opencode-server-driver.ts":"99de415e8fc3bb5fb6f8d7512d751c4c37d2aa77a18b0546b9fb232f1a6fb6c5"},"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b"},"after":{"sources":{"src/cli/opencode-app-server-proxy.ts":"fa800e9bccce02f05f1af83e225d3b5a1300d0a7d4c35ac548f400d6c0a83f79","src/cli/opencode-proxy-task-envelope.ts":"5c387614fc9832322686326b8482eb00d88699d491b05cf59cadcd94a41194ea","src/drivers/opencode/opencode-server-driver.ts":"a944f3bf7f1bf897daec3a5dc2aa34ee9d1a2133efcb3cf150b002095a0ec586"},"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04"}},"runnerBinary":{"profile":"release","sha256":"6134c17debda14a76da69ac9631a2d10dad482ebd58dbc9a4e4480ed652211c4"},"metric":"Browser Send capture-phase click to visible Hi answer, sampled on animation frames, plus two paint opportunities. Excludes reasoning/tool/status text.","setupAttempts":["setup-failure-1","setup-failure-2","startup-failure-3","pilot-selector-failure"]},"summary":{"before":{"attempts":6,"measured":6,"medianMs":48083.050000190735,"minMs":37420.5,"maxMs":66397.69999980927,"totalCostUsd":0.004945229,"toolCalls":[4,1,0,0,0,1]},"after":{"attempts":6,"measured":6,"medianMs":42504.049999952316,"minMs":27680.099999904633,"maxMs":63320.90000009537,"totalCostUsd":0.00557214,"toolCalls":[0,1,0,4,0,1]},"medianReductionPercent":11.602841334350234,"medianPairedImprovementMs":-168.59999990463257,"reportedCampaignCostUsdIncludingPilot":0.011371498999999998},"pairs":[{"indices":[0,1],"beforeMs":66397.69999980927,"afterMs":27680.099999904633,"improvementMs":38717.59999990463},{"indices":[2,3],"beforeMs":37420.5,"afterMs":27997,"improvementMs":9423.5},{"indices":[4,5],"beforeMs":39751.60000038147,"afterMs":55217.199999809265,"improvementMs":-15465.599999427795},{"indices":[6,7],"beforeMs":47318.90000009537,"afterMs":63320.90000009537,"improvementMs":-16002.0},{"indices":[8,9],"beforeMs":48847.2000002861,"afterMs":29790.900000095367,"improvementMs":19056.300000190735},{"indices":[10,11],"beforeMs":51311.7000002861,"afterMs":61072.40000009537,"improvementMs":-9760.699999809265}],"trials":[{"index":0,"variant":"before","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:15:23.172Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":66397.69999980927,"domMs":66390.59999990463,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.002612595,"costUsdExact":"0.002612595","inputTokens":55962,"outputTokens":1344,"cachedInputTokens":83456,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b","toolCalls":["paperclip_get_task_context","paperclip_comment_on_task","paperclip_finish","paperclip_finish"],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"tool.execution.started":4,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:15:58.194Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:15:58.311Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:15:59.063Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:16:36.039Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:16:36.118Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[42915.0]},{"index":1,"variant":"after","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:16:36.598Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":27680.099999904633,"domMs":27636.599999904633,"answer":"Hi","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00030429,"costUsdExact":"0.000304290","inputTokens":26845,"outputTokens":28,"cachedInputTokens":0,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","toolCalls":[],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"item.delta":3,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:17:00.717Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:17:00.841Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:17:01.508Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:17:05.934Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:17:06.205Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[14435.0]},{"index":2,"variant":"after","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:17:08.762Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":27997,"domMs":27984.599999904633,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00101016,"costUsdExact":"0.001010160","inputTokens":27544,"outputTokens":366,"cachedInputTokens":26624,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","toolCalls":["paperclip_finish"],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"tool.execution.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:17:26.192Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:17:26.305Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:17:26.936Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:17:40.688Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:17:40.826Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[17763.0]},{"index":3,"variant":"before","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:17:41.376Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":37420.5,"domMs":37364.40000009537,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.000693018,"costUsdExact":"0.000693018","inputTokens":24236,"outputTokens":282,"cachedInputTokens":27648,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b","toolCalls":["paperclip_finish"],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"tool.execution.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:18:12.381Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:18:12.616Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:18:13.441Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:18:21.746Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:18:22.262Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[29216.0]},{"index":4,"variant":"before","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:18:23.000Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":39751.60000038147,"domMs":39705.7000002861,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.000265747,"costUsdExact":"0.000265747","inputTokens":26123,"outputTokens":77,"cachedInputTokens":0,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b","toolCalls":[],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:19:01.000Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:19:01.163Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:19:01.893Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:19:07.169Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:19:07.384Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[15843.0]},{"index":5,"variant":"after","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:19:10.050Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":55217.199999809265,"domMs":55204.89999961853,"answer":"Hi 🙂","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00030421,"costUsdExact":"0.000304210","inputTokens":4294,"outputTokens":28,"cachedInputTokens":22543,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","toolCalls":[],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:19:59.877Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:19:59.990Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:20:00.713Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:20:07.290Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:20:07.658Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[15104.0]},{"index":6,"variant":"after","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:20:09.550Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":63320.90000009537,"domMs":63313.09999990463,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00260723,"costUsdExact":"0.002607230","inputTokens":137971,"outputTokens":951,"cachedInputTokens":1024,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","toolCalls":["paperclip_comment_on_task","paperclip_get_task_context","paperclip_comment_on_task","paperclip_finish"],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"tool.execution.started":4,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:20:59.730Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:20:59.859Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:21:00.501Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:21:19.416Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:21:19.608Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[26519.0]},{"index":7,"variant":"before","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:21:20.519Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":47318.90000009537,"domMs":47246.800000190735,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.000257965,"costUsdExact":"0.000257965","inputTokens":4700,"outputTokens":71,"cachedInputTokens":21407,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b","toolCalls":[],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:22:03.924Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:22:04.439Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:22:04.772Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:22:09.915Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:22:10.343Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[16702.0]},{"index":8,"variant":"before","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:22:11.124Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":48847.2000002861,"domMs":48802.59999990463,"answer":"Hi 🎉","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.000327654,"costUsdExact":"0.000327654","inputTokens":44796,"outputTokens":32,"cachedInputTokens":0,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b","toolCalls":[],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:22:57.182Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:22:57.281Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:22:57.988Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:23:02.915Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:23:03.035Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[9541.0]},{"index":9,"variant":"after","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:23:03.579Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":29790.900000095367,"domMs":29748.800000190735,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00034054,"costUsdExact":"0.000340540","inputTokens":24710,"outputTokens":59,"cachedInputTokens":1792,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","toolCalls":[],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"item.delta":2,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:23:28.840Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:23:28.954Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:23:29.666Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:23:35.306Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:23:35.531Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[12732.0]},{"index":10,"variant":"after","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:23:37.247Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":61072.40000009537,"domMs":61061.300000190735,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00100571,"costUsdExact":"0.001005710","inputTokens":25307,"outputTokens":368,"cachedInputTokens":28160,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6691475ed55f10179ec6ee0023a1f6462982f763848da7cd5b1d0baf38633b04","toolCalls":["paperclip_finish"],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"tool.execution.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:24:33.721Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:24:33.832Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:24:34.601Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:24:43.135Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:24:43.278Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[17387.0]},{"index":11,"variant":"before","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:24:44.710Z","measurementError":null,"ttfrMs":51311.7000002861,"domMs":51300.5,"answer":"Hi 👋","runCount":1,"statuses":["succeeded"],"usage":[{"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","costUsd":0.00078825,"costUsdExact":"0.000788250","inputTokens":24316,"outputTokens":356,"cachedInputTokens":27648,"cacheWriteTokens":0,"usageSource":"per_run","costStatus":"reported"}],"bundleSha256":"6dd8726e72545341f6772e54ec5aeb6264dec74db67290df44930d87135efb6b","toolCalls":["paperclip_finish"],"eventCounts":{"turn.started":1,"tool.execution.started":1,"item.delta":1,"turn.completed":1},"eventTimes":{"session.started":"2026-10-09T19:25:31.347Z","turn.submitted":"2026-10-09T19:25:31.463Z","turn.started":"2026-10-09T19:25:32.208Z","firstTextDelta":"2026-10-09T19:25:39.405Z","turn.completed":"2026-10-09T19:25:39.563Z"},"completedRunDurationsMs":[15446.0]}],"additionalAttempts":[{"attempt":"setup-1","stage":"before_send","result":"non-editable composer locator","modelRequestObserved":false},{"attempt":"setup-2","stage":"before_send","result":"transpiler helper absent in browser","modelRequestObserved":false},{"attempt":"startup-pilot-before","runnerProfile":"debug","result":"no visible reply within 120s; OpenCode health startup SIGKILL; retained infrastructure failure","modelRequestObserved":false},{"attempt":"selector-pilot-after","runnerProfile":"debug","result":"Hi reply succeeded; browser selector missed it; no valid TTFR","providerReportedCostUsd":0.00085413}],"queueTimingCoverage":{"measuredTrials":10,"totalTrials":12,"records":[{"index":0,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:15:28.998Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:15:53.558Z","queuedMs":24560.0}]},{"index":1,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:16:38.520Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:16:54.157Z","queuedMs":15637.0}]},{"index":2,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:17:10.587Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:17:23.561Z","queuedMs":12974.0}]},{"index":3,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:17:43.807Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:17:53.564Z","queuedMs":9757.0}]},{"index":4,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:18:28.113Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:18:54.011Z","queuedMs":25898.0}]},{"index":5,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:19:12.343Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:19:53.993Z","queuedMs":41650.0}]},{"index":6,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:20:14.258Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:20:53.866Z","queuedMs":39608.0}]},{"index":7,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:21:23.019Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:21:54.298Z","queuedMs":31279.0}]},{"index":8,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:22:14.671Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:22:53.933Z","queuedMs":39262.0}]},{"index":9,"runs":[{"createdAt":"2026-10-09T19:23:06.155Z","startedAt":"2026-10-09T19:23:23.941Z","queuedMs":17786.0}]}],"limitation":"The server shut down before a final API read; queue timing is retained for the first ten trials only."},"conclusion":"No reliable end-to-end speedup established. The after median is lower, but only three of six adjacent matched pairs were faster; median paired improvement is approximately zero. The deterministic streaming-forwarding fix remains separately supported.","limitations":["Local dev server and headless Chromium on macOS arm64; six fresh chats per variant; not a production/cloud latency guarantee.","Current product and current release runner held constant; only three OpenCode modules replaced by their exact pre-PR contents for baseline.","Default model reasoning unchanged; no no-reasoning override or decision policy.","Upstream routing/cache and queue time vary; trials run serially in predeclared counterbalanced ABBA order.","Render proxy: capture-phase Send click to visible nonempty Hi markdown, then two animation frames; screenshot verifies the rendered answer. This is not instrumented compositor pixel timing.","Two setup-only failures, one startup failure, and one invalid-measurement successful pilot are retained separately, not silently treated as successful timings."],"reproducibility":{"harnessSha256":"f93996b306c7d31c19bfcb9cc197653f867944ffb900d81a23a34f831e17c0c5","variantBuilderSha256":"4e88a7bbdc0de5d72601194ebe3b96d9c6f6eda5a33d8e0f00cf2d5d14db34c2","analyzerSha256":"2d129177a1b8033f768aad3c82dc8fff70ba0ba76e7270b2d8612ee760d4aaf4"}}
```

</details>

- Latest options-struct refactor: 33 provider tests and 86 backend tests
passed. Four port-dependent fixtures initially failed inside the sandbox
and passed with loopback access. Latest check snapshot: 51 successes, 4
skips, and 2 failures (`ci / e2e` and `ci / e2e shard (5/8)`). This
latency experiment does not make the PR merge-ready.

- Focused TypeScript suites passed: OpenCode driver, per-turn reasoning,
prepared-context recovery, proxy envelope, live sessions, Codex context
control, and native instruction measurements. The real runnerd/proxy
integration test confirms disabled followed by default in the same
session. A stale staged binary initially hid the new parameter;
rebuilding the release runner resolved it.
- Capability-guard regression suites passed all 53 tests; the real
runner/proxy boundary still accepts the per-turn selection. Both
OpenRouter and non-OpenRouter real runner/proxy cases passed, along with
62 existing OpenCode fixture tests. Runner TypeScript build passed after
the final correction.
- Affected Rust modules passed: 33 provider tests and 86 durable backend
tests. Malformed or unsupported reasoning selections do not dispatch a
provider turn or poison admission state.
- Pinned OpenCode 1.18.34 with a local OpenRouter-compatible fixture
sent three successive provider requests with reasoning omitted,
`enabled: false`, then omitted. Each request contained one copy of the
agent instructions. No paid provider call was needed.
- The reconstructed first-turn task envelope shrank from 4,356 to 460
characters. This is a payload-size measurement, not a claimed token or
latency reduction. Existing stored conversation history is not
rewritten.
- Prior head `8c07fe2e70267a7c8a3118f1071eca73ecdc6c8a`: all 53 checks
passed, with four intentional skips. Greptile is 5/5 with no open
findings. One bounded retry cleared first-test timeouts, a legacy
signoff lease failure, and CI runner shutdowns. The timed-out suites
also passed locally (14 auth-signal tests, 40 device-login tests, and
the runner resume case).
- Known reported diagnostic usage totals about $0.0029. Two prematurely
closed baseline warm-turn attempts are excluded from latency comparisons
and their usage is not fully captured; background provider usage is also
not fully accounted. No further paid runs are active.
- `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. Runner TypeScript typechecks and build
also passed after the review correction.
- `pnpm test:run`: attempted and stopped after a reproducible failure in
the untouched Codex recovery test `archives a damaged prior epoch before
completing guarded same-task replacement with real runnerd`
(`server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-resume.test.ts:1072`).
It returns `needs_review` / failed instead of done / succeeded,
including when rerun alone. The broad local suite is not green. The two
initial collection failures disappeared after building; their isolated
rerun passed all 1,565 tests.
- `pnpm build`: passed.
- Pinned real OpenCode plus a delayed local provider: first native delta
to Paperclip delta fell from 1,496 ms to less than 1 ms at millisecond
measurement resolution. This isolates forwarding delay, not
network/model inference.
- Two live driver samples after the patch reached first text in
2.28–2.62 seconds including session startup. Baseline first responses
took 12.37–13.43 seconds. Small unmatched samples had different
reasoning/cache outcomes, so these are observations, not an attributed
speedup ratio.
- Full compiled runnerd protocol diagnostic: completed with `Hi 👋`;
first assistant delta at 9.19 seconds and cleanup complete at 9.44
seconds. The seeded mock-control-plane harness used 27,512 input tokens
across two provider requests, split into 13,521 and 13,991. The extra
`answer_status_question` call posted `Hi 👋` to the mock task in 12 ms,
then caused another model request. A reconstruction contains 25 tools
(35.3k JSON characters), 12.8k system characters, and a 4.4k task
envelope; 3.9k instruction characters appear in both system and task
context. Provider-reported cost was $0.00073976; the pricing-table
estimate was $0.00395332. This is one integration diagnostic, not a
production latency claim.
- A separate full-runner sample with existing lazy tool discovery also
completed, but took 14.64 seconds through cleanup and called
`paperclip_finish`. Its usage ledger recorded 12,888 input and 11,776
cached-input tokens, with $0.00096344 provider-reported cost. This did
not establish a latency improvement, so the default tool exposure was
not changed.
- Four direct OpenRouter requests separately measured default reasoning
at 2.45/3.90 seconds to first text and disabled reasoning at 0.66/0.53
seconds. Default reasoning remains unchanged; disabling it requires the
explicit per-turn option.

## Risks

- Immediate readiness dispatch changes scheduling timing. It uses
existing admission checks and preserves the periodic sweep as recovery.
- Native model verification relies on the real request rather than
catalog enumeration. The final live batch had provider startup failures;
overall speed and reliability are not qualified.
- Incremental chunks without IDs cannot safely be deduplicated by
content. Repeated identical chunks are valid. Known-ID duplicates remain
suppressed.
- OpenCode uses its bundled model catalog plus the explicit
selected-model entry. New remote catalog metadata will not refresh
during isolated startup.
- Default provider plugins are disabled. This runner supplies
credentials and assigned MCP tools through its own controlled
configuration.
- Disabled reasoning is supported only on the OpenCode/OpenRouter path
and requires a compatible model. It applies to one turn and is not an
automatic latency policy.
- The matched live browser sample is small and does not establish a
reliable end-to-end improvement. It includes local queueing/startup and
browser rendering, but does not qualify production or remote sandbox
latency.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex). Tool use, code editing, and command execution were
used. The session does not expose a more specific model ID or
context-window size. Live diagnostic target: DeepSeek
`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731` through OpenRouter and OpenCode
1.18.34.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-10 07:15:41 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 57e977be72 feat: integrate Pi 1.0 into the experimental Runner (#14921)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - The experimental Runner owns provider processes and durable
sessions.
> - Pi needs working task execution and human controls.
> - The five-PR stack must preserve changes already on master.
> - Each layer now carries the complete integrated source for a safe
sequential fallback.
> - This PR belongs to native GitHub stack #15602, ending at #14956.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #14436, #14631, #14743 and #14956.

Ship Pi 1.0 through the experimental Paperclip Runner. The five PRs are
#14921, #14922, #14923, #14924 and #14956. The user authorized the
complete merge after checks pass. Existing `pi_local` execution is
unchanged. Accounting and wider provider/platform qualification remain
deferred.

## What Changed

- Recover missing final replies after workspace finalization changes
owners, using accepted-turn evidence without rerunning work or granting
external-chat publication.
- Preserve the admitted Pi instruction root across warm runs, while
retaining changed-root rejection.
- Give Pi a bounded 15-second default shutdown grace so stop, drain
acknowledgement and durable suspension can complete. Explicit deadlines
and other providers retain their existing behavior.
- Integrate the Pi 1.0 runtime and master contracts.
- Use Pi profile 22. Preserve explicit caller-selected models and exact
native thinking levels. Keep Pi's wrapper, helper, extension and
question/control behavior unchanged from the qualified profile-19
runtime.
- Preserve master's Dot lifecycle and consent fields, configured task
environment, status guards and current Codex/Claude dependency versions.
Cursor stays qualified. Copilot stays pending; profile 17 binds the
changed shared protocol validation sources.
- Exclude general AWS IAM credentials from Pi static/custom provider
bindings and selected task projections; preserve the provider-scoped
Bedrock bearer key. Profile 21 is retained as historical provenance.
Rust and cloud install probes use the current declaration.
- Patch bundled brace-expansion 5.0.9 to the exact official 5.0.12
payload. Pin the patch and complete runtime closures. Include the patch
in normal installed setup tooling. Keep the upstream Pi shrinkwrap as
provenance and permit only this exact security correction.
- Include current attestation files in the Docker build context. Keep
the repository lockfile unchanged from master. CI and private image
builds resolve manifest changes before their frozen installation.

## Verification

- Full local `pnpm -r typecheck` passes, including Runner Rust, server
and UI. Focused integration checks pass: 194 Runner
admission/environment tests, 63 profile/credential tests with one
expected skip, 152 Dot/UI configuration tests, and Pi transcript/notice
tests.
- Full local `pnpm build` passes on the final source.
- Fresh final-source checks pass: all 698 Rust workspace tests (32
binaries), 156 credential/profile/controller tests with one expected
skip, Runner TypeScript typecheck, and 20 package/setup/sandbox tests.
- The profile-21 Pi materializer passes on the native host with the
official pinned Node 24.21.0 and its npm. It verifies all 150 locked
packages, the patched dependency and the exact closure. Setup/package
bundle tests and UI token gates pass.
- The old hashes were reproduced for all three supported targets before
calculating the patched graph. New closure hashes are darwin-arm64
`282022db10150c6632b3444df421342e7d534bdf5d5fb1097a2e79d0625a2bcf`,
darwin-x64
`64e251e19009f755c0b04f73ce2138246faab71a961b0f13d75ebfcc34bef12e`, and
linux-x64
`713b1fdff42fb56a1518bdc084f181d70bee8ebadc3e4b1d76321ed9108c8410`.
Independent native platform execution is separate from graph identity
reproduction.
- Historical cloud qualification remains unchanged: all seven core cases
pass on shipping source `10dc43c9ec65d88c2f782d62afb296d09494f215`,
harness `1a4408a48cfb5a1f094a311141c257c92cd7a893`, image
`sha256:5b3a775b383591bda1b0c1889e509acc70ce7f37c53f09733c81d59037f02280`,
and accepted Sonnet 4.6/low fixture. All 215 canonical files and all
seven cleanup checks pass independent verification. These are profile-19
results and are not relabeled as fresh profile-22 runs.
- Current Pi digest:
`sha256:e92078bee3c23bec4100aa589013a44613d054cd686826534025d8019e9f39a9`.
[The readiness
plan](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/pi-production-readiness/doc/plans/2026-10-02-pi-production-readiness.md)
preserves campaign and failed-attempt provenance.
- Merge only after every PR's current-head CI and fresh review pass.
Linux CI covers the full suites, build and browser tests. The local
embedded Postgres API-authority suite cannot start on this macOS/Node 26
host, so Linux CI must confirm that suite.

### Fresh profile-22 core qualification — 2026-10-08

All seven accepted core cases pass canonically on Pi profile 22, with
`openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6` and native-confirmed low
thinking. This model is a fixture; production accepts the caller's
explicit Pi provider/model.

Runtime/install source: `3241a992f2a7703e59e97ed0fd3e5d6405de4401`.
Frozen accepted harness: `1a4408a48cfb5a1f094a311141c257c92cd7a893`.
Immutable cloud image:
`ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip-daytona-runner@sha256:506f22db7edd78f37c0c40bec1cc084af1850455026dbf467194bfbb8fcef141`.
Pi digest:
`sha256:e92078bee3c23bec4100aa589013a44613d054cd686826534025d8019e9f39a9`.

[Hosted Linux image and clean-install
verification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37868328023)
passes, including all 20 source-bound archives, normal CLI/Pi setup,
companion import and the production pack reader. This exact installation
source includes the latest master integration and the corrected Pi warm
instruction-root fence. Full local typecheck/build and current-head
hosted CI verify the final stack. All 13 focused real-root regressions
pass. The full local executor suite passed 662 tests; 15 database tests
could not start the Mac embedded PostgreSQL service. Hosted Linux CI
passes the full required verification and E2E checks. These fresh
results keep their own source identity; profile-19 results remain
historical.

| Core path | Canonical campaign | Retained archive SHA-256 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| File edit, validation, download and Done |
`pi-core22-replyfix-0-1791511228` | 23 files;
`a473e8603a3dd4737863291f8d3d1e392391f0b16d433c3e0e0e9d8baf7a97b0` |
| Pending question and controller restart |
`pi-core22-replyfix-1-1791511376` | 33 files;
`6b829c4eb74e1f32a89c692a4ae7130dbfc1c6d3cf13915effe2103d9e242c8e` |
| Three-turn session/process/workspace continuity |
`pi-core22-replyfix-2-1791511587` | 23 files;
`7a87021f8f9a3fdd3c58bb4467f8d82c635e3ea4795d6e75f144d9aa14818df8` |
| Four typed questions and browser reconnects |
`pi-core22-replyfix-3-1791511881` | 42 files;
`9e31755252be1f4f9cb0626c984c142d4d1ae5f5bee3a7af08444db8d12c280a` |
| Plan approval and completion | `pi-core22-replyfix-4-1791512031` | 22
files;
`a0383ce1aab38e7b5a25ce0e9dd3bebea5c037ebd96ae6b29dae19015da2ae2c` |
| Same-turn steering and permission denial |
`pi-core22-replyfix-5-1791512261` | 39 files;
`c929b8c7070f0b66aedc17e65ca46e6beab1e363926ac9f7e2a75fb250f05949` |
| Stop during pending permission | `pi-core22-replyfix-6-1791512390` |
33 files;
`7f0a58ae0f4d5bfc76149435f4e322537089c5bd16e7ffe9b5ad71f10a621a07` |

All 215 canonical files (28714587 bytes) are independently
hash-verified. All seven cleanup grades pass, with no owned runtime
process or temporary root after each case. Automatic retries are zero.
The owned cloud host stopped normally after retention. The prior
profile-22 warm attempt remains failed and separately retained: archive
SHA-256
`1e54eba5ec72b50cee1534b23d1d1d4f21a090006b8a64501ba70db972abfde5`. Its
original canonical classification is preserved. Diagnosis reproduced a
product bug comparing an agent-files root against an unset
checkpoint-only field. The fix stores the admitted physical root
separately from the adopted per-run collection capability. The real-root
regression fails before the fix and passes afterward, including
rejection of a changed physical root. Fixture, grader, model and all
seven accepted case IDs are unchanged; this fresh campaign tests
final-reply publication after file registration first. The intermediate
restart attempt also remains failed and retained: archive SHA-256
`5dcaefdf1d17cf4cd54fd4cf810f45e736667392339b8ce7caf08bb4e225277f`. Its
original canonical classification is preserved. Pi resumed, wrote the
verified answer and completed its task; exact runner suspension was
proven, but idle stop consumed about 5.2s and left under 3s for the
drain acknowledgement. The Pi-only default shutdown grace is now 15s,
preserving a full 5s drain round trip and a finite suspension reserve.
Explicit caller deadlines, other provider defaults, literal drain
receipts and exact suspension identity checks remain unchanged. The
timing regression fails before this correction and passes afterward; all
18 focused settlement tests and Runner typecheck pass. The final-source
file attempt is also preserved as failed (`candidate_failure`), archive
SHA-256
`db6767b6773ea618997927ac77bdb005a5ac81492c7b9c0ffbc900449f829bc9`.
Native edit, validation, exact downloadable artifact and Done/succeeded
all passed, and the exact final reply was durably recorded. A workspace
recovery owner completed before the live heartbeat reached presentation,
leaving that reply absent from task chat. Recovery now materializes only
a completed final reply from the accepted turn of an ordinary internal
Done task, preserving issue/run/contract binding, suppression,
external-chat authorization and same-run deduplication. The database
regression covers the generated file-preparation receipt, suppression,
unapproved external continuation and replay. Server typecheck and all 49
response-selection tests pass; hosted Linux verifies the database
regression because embedded PostgreSQL cannot start on this Mac.

The delayed-final-answer database regression passes on [the final
root-source Linux server
shard](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37868262553/job/113628594152),
alongside 1,108 passing tests. The first root Runner shard had one
unchanged durable-resume test exceed its 5-second timeout; the identical
top-source shard and the isolated exact test passed. One rerun of that
failed job and its required aggregate passed without source or test
changes. The original failed job log and the single-rerun receipt remain
retained.

### October 9 merge verification

Current merge head: `5a8fe63512a7166aaef5cf50065a25008aa8b44b`. All
current-head checks pass, including `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`;
exact-head Greptile review is 5/5 with no unresolved threads. Current
master conflicts are resolved. The user authorized the maintainer
override of the code-owner review gate after these checks. The seven
retained live core cases remain bound to source
`3241a992f2a7703e59e97ed0fd3e5d6405de4401` and its recorded cloud image.

## Risks

- The security correction changes the dependency closure and profile
identity. Old sessions must reopen on the new profile. Exact identities
and credential bindings fail closed.
- The runner remains experimental and requires explicit selection.
Legacy Pi Local is unchanged. Caller model IDs pass through; the E2E
model is a fixture.
- Accounting and the broad platform/provider matrix remain deferred.
This merge does not publish a release or deploy a service.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex assisted with reasoning, repository
inspection, editing and tool use. The exact serving ID and context
window are not exposed in this session. Final live qualification uses Pi
1.0.0 with `openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6` and native-confirmed
low thinking.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-09 08:56:41 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 6f9d0a56ba fix: resolve installed Codex and preserve npm host dependencies (#15555)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Installed agents need their own runtime dependencies.
> - Native Codex startup and browser login could depend on a global CLI.
> - npm bundles do not inherit workspace dependency overrides or
patches.
> - Codex native packages must come from npm for the consumer host.
> - This PR fixes executable resolution and the required npm dependency
layout.
> - Usable installed CLI versions can run without a numeric version
gate.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #15422. This is a prerequisite for the later Codex-default change.

**What happened?**

Packaged native Codex startup and browser login could require a global
Codex CLI. The server's vendored runner lacked its own declared Codex
bridge. A bundled wrapper could retain producer-host binaries or select
the legacy adapter's separate platform version.

**Expected behavior**

Prefer the installed Codex executable. Accept usable older or newer
versions. Use the selected host's PATH when the dependency is absent.
Keep the patched JavaScript graph. Let npm install official native
packages for the consumer platform. Grant sandbox reads only to the
selected vendor resources.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Prepare a clean npm installation without a global Codex command.
2. Start native Codex or its browser login.
3. Inspect the selected executable, installed host package, and sandbox
resource paths.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Frozen master base: `1881894973a2b25838d8abed9bd8aeebc3af4441`.

**Deployment mode**

Source and packaged self-hosted installation.

## What Changed

- Share installed Codex command resolution across native startup, direct
evals, and browser login. Accept usable version differences. Preserve
explicit commands, recorded sessions, remote host boundaries, and the
Linux ARM64 legacy login path. Return safe errors for missing
executables and failed login terminals.
- Declare the server's Codex bridge. Retain the patched JavaScript
dependency graph in npm packages. Strip Codex native payloads. Declare
official optional host packages on the published server manifest so
native and legacy versions remain separate. Preserve consumer esbuild
platform dependencies.
- Adjust resource lookup for npm's separate platform packages. Retain
package identity, path containment, resolver ownership, and narrow
sandbox reads. Keep exact version and digest checks for explicit ACPX
artifact qualification.
- Extend existing packaging, installed-consumer, login, selection,
recovery, and integrity tests. Document the retained behavior.

The diff is now 23 files, 1,709 additions, and 53 deletions. The prior
diff had 35 files and about 3,700 changed lines. Removed work is
preserved on `codex/runner-packaging-full-snapshot` at
`6f3060beaa842ffcee21af058370d3cab5f571e9`.

Removed from this PR: release workflows and assembly, provider-pack
changes, Docker materialization, Git installer changes, extra login
HOME/working-directory isolation, and unrelated CI fixture repairs. This
PR does not change agent defaults, stored runner choices, UI, schema, or
provider qualification.

## Verification

- Final candidate: `dde37d7ed0121c10b60b8801eda80f8dc17909ad`. [All 47
ordinary CI jobs
passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37842288835)
on attempt 1, including typecheck, tests, build, E2E, runner checks, and
the installed-consumer canary. [Fresh Greptile
review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15555#issuecomment-6059581546)
is 5/5 on this head; no unresolved threads remain. Human approval is
still outstanding.
- Reused focused controls passed with Node 24: 71 initial narrowed
checks, then 56 affected Codex/selection/eval checks after the relative
PATH correction. Runner TypeScript no-emit, syntax, and diff checks
passed. The existing fixture reproduces the original relative PATH
failure and verifies working-directory selection, empty entries,
ordering, and absolute launch. One CLI entrypoint test was initially
blocked by sandbox IPC and passed with its existing local socket
allowed. Login HOME, config-directory assignments, and working directory
match master.
- [The actual clean Linux npm
consumer](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37842288835/job/113535523044)
passed on the final candidate's CI integration. All 17 Paperclip
tarballs omit native Codex payloads. Official npm host packages retain
their own integrity and `inBundle=false`. Native Codex selects 0.160.0;
the legacy closure retains 0.156.1. Package admission, command leases,
narrow native sandbox resources, consumer hooks, preserved lock, and
offline lifecycle controls passed. Provider calls were zero. No new
workflow is added.
- Actual official Codex 0.156.1 passed on the final committed source on
macOS ARM64: installed dependency preference, absolute and relative PATH
fallback, narrow resource lookup, and app-server initialize/initialized.
Executed module hashes match the candidate. One scripts-disabled
install, three version probes, and one handshake completed in 26
seconds; owned files and process group were removed. No login,
account/model request, or provider task ran.
- CI checked out `dfda8e708e87306d22ed735d78bdfcbe770e99b7` on base
`65b558180533039a891ee0cd1ccab9988aa79adc`. Its 13 upstream paths do not
overlap this PR's 23 paths or alter packaging/Codex inputs. The consumer
report records producer `7b8e94c08657b5ddc265946459762340f125726c`,
after the existing canary staged a generated-lock-only commit (one file,
three insertions). These identities are kept separate; raw
generated-lock bytes were not retained.
- No local Docker or Rust build, paid provider turn, merge, or
deployment. Later PRs must prove live onboarding and production cloud
packaging before changing defaults.

## Risks

- npm must install optional host dependencies. Missing dependencies
still return errors. Paperclip tarballs do not pre-bundle Codex
executables.
- The repository requires CI-owned lockfile updates. PR CI resolves the
changed manifest and stages its own producer lockfile. A raw source
Docker build with `--frozen-lockfile` must wait for the existing master
lockfile bot to merge its refresh, or use a disposable resolved
checkout. No Docker build or deployment is qualified by this PR.
- Ordinary Codex startup accepts version differences. Actual protocol or
login failures remain errors. Explicit ACPX artifact checks retain their
release pins.
- The published server delegates platform installation outside its
bundled JavaScript graph. Focused negative controls reject unsafe
package metadata and paths. The hosted consumer test passed on this
candidate’s CI integration.
- Existing agents retain their stored runner choices. There is no data
migration or automatic upgrade. Release pipeline and platform
qualification work remain separate prerequisites for later defaults.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and
parallel agents. The exact serving snapshot and context window are not
exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-09 08:19:51 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip f669194298 fix(runner): propagate configured environment to future turns (#15451)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native runners start provider processes and enforce a separate tool
environment policy.
> - The server resolves task environment bindings at each run boundary.
> - Fixed launch allowlists dropped custom variables after resolution.
> - Warm process reuse and a blanket fingerprint exclusion also hid
configuration changes.
> - This pull request carries a bounded, server-selected list of task
variable names through each process boundary.
> - The benefit is that later turns and tool commands receive configured
values while ambient host secrets stay excluded.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A native Codex agent could not use configured task credentials. Adding
the variables in Settings did not fix the next turn. The provider
sanitizer, runner launch, Rust provider launch, and shell policy each
used fixed allowlists. Effective config fingerprints also excluded all
variables with the `PAPERCLIP_` prefix.

**Expected behavior**

Explicitly bound task variables must reach provider processes and tool
commands. Added, changed, and removed values must take effect at the
next run boundary. A running turn keeps its original configuration.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Start a native Codex task without a custom environment binding.
2. Add a fake `PAPERCLIP_PAGE_BUCKET` value and a fake Pages credential
binding in Settings.
3. Continue the task and inspect the tool environment.
4. Before this fix, those values are absent even from a fresh runner
launch.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced at `b31558064`. The fix is rebased on current master.

**Deployment mode**

Self-hosted server with a native process runner.

Related changes: [the legacy Codex MCP environment
fix](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13321) and [ambient
server-secret
exclusion](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12870). These
affect different launch paths. This change preserves their credential
boundaries.

## What Changed

- Capture scoped task bindings after resolution, before managed provider
credential injection. Mint and validate the names-only projection at
native dispatch before host inheritance. Legacy adapters retain their
previous environment limits.
- Strip user-supplied projection markers from agent, environment,
project, and routine config.
- Carry selected values through the Codex, ACPX, OpenCode, runnerd, and
Rust subprocess launch boundaries.
- Add selected names to native and ACPX Codex shell include lists. Keep
selected values out of command arguments, including selected bootstrap
values.
- Reject malformed projections, reserved authority and loader names,
missing values, null bytes, and oversized input.
- Replace a retained native process when projected values change. Keep
unchanged processes reusable.
- Fingerprint custom namespaced variables while excluding known
generated runtime variables.
- Document next-run behavior and add regression coverage.

## Verification

- Red: the permanent reproduction failed at four launch/tool boundaries
and the namespaced fingerprint check. Two control checks passed.
- Green: the initial regression plus existing Codex environment and
shell tests passed (39 tests).
- Server config resolution, fingerprints, and native-session suites
passed (653 tests), including addition, rotation, removal, and unchanged
warm-session reuse.
- Rust regression tests passed. A real shell child received added and
rotated values, then lost them after removal. Unselected host variables
stayed absent.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed after rebase. The full
`pnpm test:run` was attempted but could not complete: fresh embedded
PostgreSQL databases fail during bootstrap on this macOS host. An
isolated suite and a disposable native `initdb` probe reproduced the
failure before test execution. `shmget` reports `No space left on
device` because the host has exhausted shared-memory IDs. This is not
disk exhaustion. The run was stopped after confirming the external setup
failure. CI results will be recorded separately.
- Runner boundary suites: 361 tests passed. Two process-launch errors
during concurrent binary staging passed on isolated rerun.
- Rust Codex provider and process supervisor integration suites: 97
passed, 2 intentionally ignored.
- ACPX shell and selected-bootstrap argv regressions: 3 failed before
the fix, then all 55 relevant tests passed.
- Review compatibility regression: 129-variable and large-value legacy
configurations failed before the correction and passed after moving
native-only validation to dispatch.
- Final review head `3f11e8d25`: repository typechecks and production
build passed. CI completed its implementation checks; one general-server
shard hit SQL `40P01` in `heartbeat-runtime-skills.test.ts` during its
`beforeEach` table truncate (1,199 tests passed in that shard). The
shard passed on its single rerun. All CI checks for this head are green.
Greptile reviewed this head at 5/5 with no new actionable findings; the
compatibility thread is resolved.
- No live provider credentials or model calls are required by these
tests.

## Risks

- Configured task credentials now reach the tools they were configured
for. The controller selects names only after existing scope and
secret-binding authorization.
- TypeScript and Rust validate the same bounded projection. Their
reserved-name rules must stay aligned.
- A changed projection replaces an idle provider process. Unchanged
values preserve reuse. Active turns retain their original environment.
- No database migration or API schema change.

> This fixes existing runner configuration behavior. It does not add a
new roadmap capability.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, local code execution, and
repository tools. The session does not expose a more specific API model
identifier or context window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-07 10:16:49 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 8cfedd7df8 fix(runner): restore task monitors and durable timed waits (#15446)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their task execution.
> - Agents need a durable way to return to work after a delayed check.
> - The issue monitor scheduler already provides a one-shot wake for an
assignee.
> - Native runners reject generic execution-policy writes and had no
bound monitor tool.
> - Scheduling alone is insufficient because native completion also
needs to accept a timed wait.
> - This pull request adds an authorized monitor tool and connects it to
completion and the existing scheduler.
> - An agent can now schedule its next check, end the run, and resume on
the same task.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A native runner could not set its own task monitor. `call_api` correctly
rejected execution-policy writes, while `schedule_wake` had no
production binding. `paperclip_finish` also rejected monitor waits.

**Expected behavior**

A standard native run can set a one-shot monitor on its current task or
another accessible task assigned to the same agent. After a confirmed
schedule on the current task, it can yield. The scheduler later delivers
`issue_monitor_due`.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Start a standard native task.
2. Ask the agent to check the task again later and end its current run.
3. Inspect available tools and try the generic issue execution-policy
update.
4. Observe the missing native tool and the lifecycle-write denial.

Related PRs: #14680 concerns monitor notes in the shared wake prompt.
#11919 changes attempt-limit scope. This PR adds native scheduling and
completion authority and retains the existing cumulative attempt bounds.
It does not depend on either PR.

## What Changed

- Add provider-neutral `set_task_monitor` with a default current-task
target, future timestamp, required notes, existing bounds, and explicit
clearing.
- Check company, task visibility, ownership, runtime permissions, work
mode, and active-run authority. Preserve review-only restrictions.
Reject the reserved server-owned quota-recovery name before saving or
accepting a native wait.
- Commit the monitor, audit event, and retry receipt together. Retry
receipts survive a successor run without re-arming cleared or consumed
timers.
- Permit `paperclip_finish` to yield to a persisted monitor. Recheck
ownership and the schedule when committing final disposition. Release
execution without an immediate continuation.
- Preserve due monitors during native execution. Fence wake admission
and consumption against replacement, clearing, reassignment, and
completion. Preserve unrelated review policy.
- Expose scheduled and consumed monitor instructions in task context.
Update provider schemas, Rust validation, generated contracts, and
execution documentation.
- Add an opt-in live Codex smoke script with isolated data and explicit
run/session/runner/process evidence.

## Verification

- Repository `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed after rebase.
Server typecheck passed again after review fixes. All CI test shards
pass on `3def77b1b`, including runner TypeScript/Rust, server,
serialized server, workspace, and browser tests. All CI gates are green,
including the canary dry run. Greptile is 5/5 on the same commit with
zero unresolved threads.
- The local monolithic `pnpm test:run`, started before the rebase, was
interrupted after current-head CI test coverage passed. It is not
counted as a standalone full-suite pass; the focused local regression
suites passed.
- Targeted server tests cover scheduling, replacement, clearing, policy
preservation, cumulative bounds, cross-run retries, permissions,
provider-neutral discovery, review restrictions, completion authority,
and scheduler/finalizer races.
- Runner contract/catalog/semantic tests and Rust terminal-tool tests
cover the new operation and monitor completion.
- Live Codex test passed twice (latest live run on `e0bcd63e6`) in a
temporary database and workspace, with a 300,000 ms warm window. First
run `67bd7709-c089-4d4a-9d2b-0d6b618a34b0` yielded at
`2026-10-07T13:15:03.274Z`. Second run
`97c323f9-595a-4cc5-a007-db5a2fbb937c` started at `13:15:30.952Z`,
received `issue_monitor_due`, and completed the same task. Exactly one
monitor wake was recorded.
- Both live runs used native session
`7b1dd753-1c9b-4e7a-b22f-a125dbc3748c`, runner
`e90d9a1b-3502-4ee3-b15e-edc024c555d4`, provider session
`01a11680-6d01-70c0-9a55-db7246ed66c3`, and PID `64218` with the same
process start time. This proves warm reuse for that local Codex test,
not only successful scheduling.
- Reproduce the paid live test with `node --import
./server/node_modules/tsx/dist/loader.mjs
server/scripts/smoke-native-task-monitor.ts --run`, with the installed
Codex binary on `PATH` and a valid local login.

## Risks

- The scheduler now defers monitor dispatch while the task has an active
native run. A stuck run still depends on the existing recovery
lifecycle.
- Idempotency uses the existing run ledger; no table or migration is
added.
- Other providers share the tested tool and completion contracts. Only
Codex received a live model test.
- Existing `call_api` lifecycle restrictions remain enforced. Monitor
waits do not bypass task blockers, reviews, or approvals.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with tool use, code execution, and
TypeScript/Rust editing. The session does not expose the exact deployed
model ID or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-07 08:41:24 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip a6306ba606 feat(runner): consolidate Cursor production integration (#15075)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The native Runner keeps provider sessions under company authority,
approvals, budgets and durable recovery.
> - Cursor work was spread across candidate branches. The published
branch lacked later plan, permission and cleanup fixes.
> - Production also needs public installation and matching runtime
assets for local and Daytona execution.
> - This pull request consolidates Cursor onto current mainline recovery
behavior and completes that installation path.
> - The installed v11 release passed focused local and Daytona
qualification after the generic mode and lifecycle cleanup. The later
model-selection correction and current mainline merge produce v14
artifacts that need matching release qualification.
> - Cursor admission is enabled in source; publish only an artifact
combination with matching qualification. Native AskQuestion and complete
per-run dollar accounting remain excluded.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #14435, #14631, #14669, #14699, #14724.

This completes the Cursor implementation by @cryppadotta from combined
source `22c78242a4e0c2369fecf0c2dc4e7600fbad6706`. It preserves newer
mainline recovery, completion and warm-directory behavior. Pi and
Copilot remain gated.

## What Changed

- Generate named Rust and TypeScript ACPX release profiles from one
manifest. Share runtime pins with packaging and server verification.
Preserve vendor runtime versions; bind the updated ACPX patch to Cursor
profile v14 and reject stale generated declarations at build/typecheck.
- Remove ACPX model allowlists, including the former Codex and Pi
restrictions and the duplicate developer test-drive gate. Send any
explicit model ID unchanged to its provider and verify the effective
selection before prompting. The bundled ACPX package forwards unlisted
IDs, rejects mismatched acknowledgements, and restores the exact
selection after session load. It does not expand Cursor model aliases.
Provider rejection, mismatch, or missing model controls fails without a
fallback. Model examples live in evaluation fixtures, outside runtime
declarations.

- Add pinned Cursor execution, contained instructions, exact model
verification and Agent/Plan/Ask modes.
- Carry an opaque generic `mode` identifier in shared native execution,
sidecar, Rust and recovery contracts. The provider adapter owns
supported modes, defaults, native translation and acknowledgement.
- Keep native RPC recognition, accepted-plan interpretation and
permission evidence behind provider adapters. Shared settlement and
recovery verify normalized facts and their committed evidence.
- Replace the Cursor-only warm-attachment branch with a runner-owned
capability. Only Cursor opts into it. Move profile compatibility and
optional usage parsing into provider metadata and adapters.
- Write generic plan-wait receipts. Read exact historical Cursor
receipts through a separate compatibility decoder. Reject mixed formats
and preserve existing authority checks.
- Carry native plans, semantic questions, todos, child activity,
permission identities and partial usage diagnostics through the Runner.
- Preserve durable response delivery, cancellation, warm ownership and
process retirement.
- Finish accepted planning runs successfully. Keep their tasks open for
explicit direction. Acceptance does not start implementation.
- Ship `paperclipai runtime setup cursor` and its provisioner through
the public package. npm installation does not download Cursor. Setup
uses the OS account's closure-keyed cache so system-wide npm packages
can remain read-only. Run it as the Paperclip service account.
- Include Cursor in normal provider packs and Daytona images for macOS
ARM64/x64 and Linux x64.
- Reject stale release packs by source revision and current ACPX/Cursor
pins before assembly writes files. Verify current Cursor
version/profile/closure again at runtime.
- Ship all three daemon targets and the expected Linux image-pack
identity. A macOS controller uses its packaged Linux daemon for Daytona.
Image mismatches fail before provider launch.
- Use the vendored Runner boundary for installed readiness probes.
Verify the actual installed Cursor probe.
- Verify compiled public Daytona plugins and their release versions in
installed smokes.
- Record exact artifacts, the acceptance matrix, retained failures,
supported capabilities and rollback behavior in the [readiness
report](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/cursor-production-readiness/doc/plans/2026-10-03-cursor-production-readiness.md).

## Verification

- Current head `f7ec5cc1f0e30c62a829c016ff2013a2a9d79037` merges
mainline `faa8e452c73bae5e044dd6379179a00106abb131`. It keeps Cursor
plan and cancellation guards alongside mainline historical-question
filtering. The evaluation catalog includes both Cursor and expanded
adapter accounting cases (683 total). Recursive typecheck, full build,
696 lifecycle/recovery tests, 45 fixture tests and fixture typecheck
passed. Current-head CI passed: 56 successful checks, one neutral and
four skipped. [Complete
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37557996535).
The fresh Base Greptile review is 5/5 on this exact head, with 304 files
reviewed, zero new comments and zero unresolved threads. The user
authorized overriding the CODEOWNER review gate after checks passed; no
failing checks are overridden. Prior results below retain their own head
identities.
- Corrective head `3d2b168366258036f6b6a6fccb382c49138cc601` fixes the
post-merge Apex finding. Automatic-review and new-evidence
reconciliation preserve pending child results and recheck delivery under
the status lock before completing. Account repair now excludes unrelated
secret consumers and requires the failed agent's identity. Regression
coverage includes the commit race, delivery statuses,
current-run/current-intent exclusions, repeated reconciliation, both
database reconciliation paths, and credential consumer boundaries. All
184 affected tests, server typecheck and server build passed.
Current-head Base Greptile review is 5/5, with 304 files reviewed, zero
new comments and zero unresolved threads. Current-head CI passed: 56
successful checks, one neutral and four skipped. [Complete
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37535994724).
This Base review is distinct from the earlier Apex review.
- Merge head `5957c257a` reconciles mainline `b508a05c4`. It preserves
both accepted-plan waits and pending-child-completion checks, current
provider selectors, task-creation response identities, and mainline ACPX
missing-file handling. The combined patch is bound to Cursor profile
v14; historical records keep their original identities.
- Merge head `5957c257a` passed recursive typecheck, full build, 43
installed ACPX/package contracts, 107 provider UI and plan/recovery
tests, 593 database-backed lifecycle tests, 49 profile/native contract
tests, 45 Product E2E fixture tests, fixture typecheck, token gates,
three provider-free browser task-creation cases, and Runner
conformance/replay checks. Its complete CI passed (55 successful checks,
one neutral and four skipped), while Apex returned 2/5 with a
child-delivery finding addressed below.
- The local full-suite attempt again failed the unchanged Git streaming
test (360-second timeout) and was stopped. The concurrent local Rust
attempt failed four unchanged Codex process/deadline tests; all four
passed serially without code changes in 7.29 seconds after removing the
competing test load. These failed commands are retained and are not
reported as full-suite passes; the fresh Linux CI runs are tracked
separately.
- The previous head `907bdb2a2778c7ffeb4a662a91460c9d1ddfc9c5` earned
Apex 5/5 with zero comments after fixing all three findings: per-user
install cache, stale release-pack rejection, and public Linux smoke
account/home handling. Its real built installer passed from read-only
public packages on macOS ARM64 and Linux x64. All 137 release-registry
checks and 64 ACPX package contracts passed. That review does not cover
this mainline reconciliation.
- Prior `beadd3654` passed the full CI matrix; its one unchanged chat
test failure and successful single retry remain in the [CI
history](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37521449327).
Historical results below remain attributed to their original builds.

- Fixture follow-up `dd59d7e82b103a88b7cbd7d2c38b612c0fbbff7a` removes
provider-specific model choices from generic offline ACPX tests. The
fake sidecar preserves the model and session identity selected at open
through suspension. Affected verification passed: 106 Rust tests and 73
TypeScript tests. This commit changes test code only; the
production-code checks below retain their recorded identities. Its CI
and Greptile review later passed; those results belong to that
historical head.
- Model-selection cleanup `9a070808b48960a41fdfd369ae0636b95af82459`:
252 focused Runner tests passed (six platform skips), covering all six
ACPX agents, native model acknowledgement, rejected selections,
installation integrity and recovery identity. The merged branch passed
recursive typecheck, full build, token gates, server admission (19
tests), and the Product E2E catalog (45 tests). The acceptance catalog
passed all four tests. The full Rust suite passed: 643 tests, 2 ignored.
It verifies sidecar acknowledgement of unlisted models and rejection of
model mismatches. The final commits only update Rust tests; production
sources match the verified build at
`65ec3279ac50185e3cda109b5cfd9b4f56105de0`. No new paid provider calls
were made.
- The merge preserves both Cursor and the new mainline public-MCP
fixture cases. Auto-merge remains disabled; the latest follow-up status
is recorded above. The local `pnpm test:run` attempt hit the unchanged
Git streaming test's 300-second timeout and was interrupted before
merging mainline. The broad Runner attempt found obsolete single-model
assertions plus three macOS fixture-path failures caused by a
`/private/tmp` override. The assertions are corrected; affected
TypeScript checks passed with the standard macOS temporary directory,
and the complete Rust suite passed. Neither interrupted command is a
full-suite pass.
- Earlier declaration-cleanup head `6f4a5e9e2` passed recursive
typecheck, build, Rust and focused tests. Its CI later exposed a test
expecting duplicated Grok digest literals. The current source fixes that
assertion to compare launcher bytes with the shared manifest. Historical
successes and failed attempts are retained; no new live provider
qualification is claimed.
- Previous head `e75fde6098b0ddd8cec765bfb6ecaeecb88a26a6` passed
complete CI (56 successful checks, one neutral, four skipped) and
Greptile 5/5. [Historical complete
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37489112305).
Those results are not claimed for the cleanup head.
- Frozen live application: `d7b696f9b8f79095233e9e3d56d23e6a6018dd48`.
Public package version: `0.0.0-cursor-verify.3d0c9b7761c6`. The
declaration cleanup preserves release pins and does not relabel that
tested artifact as a build of the new source. Mainline through
`e34abee670` was reconciled while preserving accepted-plan waits,
provider-capacity handling, and both Cursor and public-MCP fixtures.
- Clean normal installation, explicit Cursor setup and daemon resolution
passed on macOS ARM64, macOS x64 under Rosetta, and Linux x64. npm
lifecycle hooks ran without silently downloading Cursor.
- Historical v11 live matrix: **18/18 passed with cleanup** (nine local,
nine Daytona) after the generic mode and lifecycle cleanup. The campaign
has 23 attempts; all five failures and their diagnoses remain recorded.
Exact case identities, hashes and limits are in the readiness report.
All provider calls are real, use the explicit Luna model and
company-bound credentials, and run without qualification or
runtime-asset overrides.
- The immutable Daytona image is
`ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip-daytona-runner@sha256:d6259b6bba094702c13fc2283bd85550849c1c53145b656fb2746778f9fa1747`.
The public Daytona plugin is installed independently and its version is
checked.
- Recursive typecheck, full build, token gates and Runner
contract/conformance/replay checks passed on the frozen application. Its
complete Linux CI suite passed. The duplicate local full-suite command
was incomplete after timing failures; affected repeats passed, but that
command is not reported as a clean pass.
- Qualification fixtures passed typecheck, 1,675 Vitest tests (one
skip), 128 Node checks, three provider-free browser tests, and 150
focused lifecycle tests after the final diagnostic correction. The
affected legacy Cursor command file also passed all five tests after
removing its shorter 10-second override; it now inherits the suite’s
standard 15-second timeout. Greptile is 5/5 on `e75fde609` with no
unresolved review threads. CI results above are recorded separately from
historical build results.

## Risks

- Cursor v14 includes the updated ACPX dependency patch and release
identity. The v11 live matrix and image below remain historical
evidence. They do not certify new v14 package/image artifacts.

- ACPX accepts models beyond the qualification fixtures. Availability
and entitlement depend on the provider. Successful configuration is not
a claim of live qualification for every model.
- Shared mode is an opaque identifier. Provider adapters own its
meaning. Incompatible historical sessions remain fenced; exact committed
plan waits and task history remain inspectable.
- Native AskQuestion is excluded. Paperclip semantic questions are
supported. Authoritative per-run dollar accounting is unavailable;
partial counters remain diagnostics and unknown cost is not zero.
- Image input, detailed native diffs, deeper child transcripts and
native plan-file export remain follow-ups.
- macOS x64 has clean-install and daemon-startup proof under Rosetta,
not a separate live campaign on Intel hardware.
- Release only the tested package/image combination. Merging this PR
does not publish npm packages or deploy that image. Later builds need
their own release verification. Rollback disables new Cursor admission
while preserving records and recovery inspection.
- A model can fail an exact instruction: one cancelled-plan attempt
returned the wrong summary marker despite correct cancellation. The
unchanged repeat passed; both results remain in the report.

> ROADMAP.md was checked. This completes existing native Runner/Cursor
work; it does not add an independent core feature proposal.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact serving variant and context window are
not exposed in this session. The agent used reasoning, repository
inspection, code execution, protocol tests and browser-backed Product
E2E tools. Cursor acceptance uses the explicit
`gpt-5.6-luna[context=272k,reasoning=medium,fast=false]` model. That is
the evaluated provider model.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — affected suites passed;
full CI and the retained local failed attempts are recorded separately
above.
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — 56 successful checks, one
neutral and four skipped on `f7ec5cc1f0e30c62a829c016ff2013a2a9d79037`
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups —
fresh Base review passed on `f7ec5cc1f0e30c62a829c016ff2013a2a9d79037`;
zero new comments and no unresolved threads. The earlier Apex finding
remains fixed.
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-06 20:48:15 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip eab93fd4a0 fix: checkpoint adapter usage and preserve unknown prices (#14991)
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-06 18:16:18 -07:00
854af7df19 build(deps-dev): bump vitest from 4.1.11 to 5.0.3 (#12969)
Bumps
[vitest](https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest)
from 4.1.11 to 5.0.3.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/releases">vitest's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v5.0.3</h2>
<h3>   🐞 Bug Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Isolate <code>result.status</code> between <code>repeats</code> runs
 -  by <a
href="https://github.com/hi-ogawa"><code>@​hi-ogawa</code></a>,
<strong>Hiroshi Ogawa</strong> and <strong>Codex (GPT-6)</strong> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11218">vitest-dev/vitest#11218</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/5dbebe9e3"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(5dbeb)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
<li>Don't print an interceptor warning in browser mode  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/sheremet-va"><code>@​sheremet-va</code></a> in
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11377">vitest-dev/vitest#11377</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/15cc006aa"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(15cc0)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
<li>Don't retry when <code>test.fails</code> expectedly failed  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/hi-ogawa"><code>@​hi-ogawa</code></a>,
<strong>Hiroshi Ogawa</strong> and <strong>Codex (GPT-6)</strong> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11219">vitest-dev/vitest#11219</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/b24585f08"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(b2458)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
<li>Scope cache key generators to projects  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/ecoyoung"><code>@​ecoyoung</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11281">vitest-dev/vitest#11281</a>
and <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11301">vitest-dev/vitest#11301</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/92ba7fc1d"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(92ba7)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
<li><strong>browser</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Delay server <code>listen</code> until tests start running  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/sheremet-va"><code>@​sheremet-va</code></a> in
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11366">vitest-dev/vitest#11366</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/7d8ed3e9b"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(7d8ed)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
<li>Check mock path boundaries  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/saryn17"><code>@​saryn17</code></a>,
<strong>Ryosei Sato</strong> and <a
href="https://github.com/sheremet-va"><code>@​sheremet-va</code></a> in
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11361">vitest-dev/vitest#11361</a>
and <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11362">vitest-dev/vitest#11362</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/1c3888bce"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(1c388)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
<li>Keep config of browser-consumed environments  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/kasperpeulen"><code>@​kasperpeulen</code></a>
and <strong>Claude</strong> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11378">vitest-dev/vitest#11378</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/aafc0996f"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(aafc0)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
<li>Ignore page crash while cancelling  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/sheremet-va"><code>@​sheremet-va</code></a> in
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11386">vitest-dev/vitest#11386</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/7c36748fa"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(7c367)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
<li><code>toMatchScreenshot</code> uses wrong reference on retried tests
 -  by <a href="https://github.com/macarie"><code>@​macarie</code></a>
in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11393">vitest-dev/vitest#11393</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/c22aba992"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(c22ab)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>cache</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Revalidate imports of cached modules  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/sheremet-va"><code>@​sheremet-va</code></a> in
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11381">vitest-dev/vitest#11381</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/38f98855f"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(38f98)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>deps</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Pin <code>why-is-node-running</code> to <code>3.2.1</code> to avoid
users running into <code>ERR_PNPM_TRUST_DOWNGRADE</code>  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/AriPerkkio"><code>@​AriPerkkio</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11403">vitest-dev/vitest#11403</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/f6c9a4977"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(f6c9a)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>expect</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Pass current equality testers to <code>expect.extend</code>
asymmetric matchers  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/hi-ogawa"><code>@​hi-ogawa</code></a>,
<strong>Hiroshi Ogawa</strong> and <strong>Claude</strong> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11401">vitest-dev/vitest#11401</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/3e794a96b"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(3e794)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>jsdom</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Support Blob on jsdom 30.1  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/sheremet-va"><code>@​sheremet-va</code></a> in
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11379">vitest-dev/vitest#11379</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/6c49b7197"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(6c49b)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>pool</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Preserve unique pool ids when <code>groupOrder</code> is set  -  by
<a href="https://github.com/mtorp"><code>@​mtorp</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11392">vitest-dev/vitest#11392</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/50312ebb4"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(50312)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>ui</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Split-pane handle overlapping iframe  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/macarie"><code>@​macarie</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11221">vitest-dev/vitest#11221</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/f91db0dfd"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(f91db)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>vitest</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Remove root temp dir on close  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/abhinav-phi"><code>@​abhinav-phi</code></a> in
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11248">vitest-dev/vitest#11248</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/7c7119cf7"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(7c711)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>vm</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Do not optimize deps from index.html  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/ezefernandezyf"><code>@​ezefernandezyf</code></a>,
<strong>Hiroshi Ogawa</strong> and <strong>Codex (GPT-6)</strong> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11329">vitest-dev/vitest#11329</a>
and <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11360">vitest-dev/vitest#11360</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/caf2887de"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(caf28)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
<li>Don't reuse scripts across vite environments  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/MO2k4"><code>@​MO2k4</code></a>, <strong>Martin
Oehlert</strong> and <strong>Claude</strong> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11395">vitest-dev/vitest#11395</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/346d3896b"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(346d3)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5>    <a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/compare/v5.0.2...v5.0.3">View
changes on GitHub</a></h5>
<h2>v5.0.2</h2>
<h3>   🐞 Bug Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Bind <code>process</code> in case global is overwritten  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/AriPerkkio"><code>@​AriPerkkio</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11343">vitest-dev/vitest#11343</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/0b79231ad"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(0b792)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
<li><strong>detect-async-leaks</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Ignore <code>process.stdio</code> handles  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/AriPerkkio"><code>@​AriPerkkio</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11333">vitest-dev/vitest#11333</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/0fd6b9790"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(0fd6b)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>expect</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Fix <code>toMatchObject</code> with asymmetric matchers  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/ShreeBohara"><code>@​ShreeBohara</code></a>,
<strong>Claude Opus 5</strong>, <a
href="https://github.com/hi-ogawa"><code>@​hi-ogawa</code></a>,
<strong>Hiroshi Ogawa</strong> and <strong>Codex (GPT-5)</strong> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11100">vitest-dev/vitest#11100</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/42523289e"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(42523)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>jsdom</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Fix <code>Request</code> with <code>Blob</code> body on jsdom 28+
 -  by <a
href="https://github.com/harshit-d3v"><code>@​harshit-d3v</code></a> in
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11295">vitest-dev/vitest#11295</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/d1c3ecc93"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(d1c3e)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>reporter</strong>:
<ul>
<li><code>agent</code> to respect <code>--silent</code>  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/Raj4478"><code>@​Raj4478</code></a> and <a
href="https://github.com/AriPerkkio"><code>@​AriPerkkio</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11271">vitest-dev/vitest#11271</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/5b95efb6d"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(5b95e)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>reporters</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Handle concurrent <code>createReport</code> calls  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/7rulnik"><code>@​7rulnik</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11278">vitest-dev/vitest#11278</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/e8e556ff7"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(e8e55)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
<li><code>hanging-process</code> to use ESM entrypoint  -  by <a
href="https://github.com/AriPerkkio"><code>@​AriPerkkio</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11316">vitest-dev/vitest#11316</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/4e91e5668"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(4e91e)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>spy</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Fix stack overflow when spying <code>Set.prototype.add</code>  -  by
<a href="https://github.com/fengmk2"><code>@​fengmk2</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11299">vitest-dev/vitest#11299</a>
<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/a0a939653"><!-- raw
HTML omitted -->(a0a93)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!-- raw HTML omitted -->
</blockquote>
<p>... (truncated)</p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/33cadea62e8763c455c7fca38d9ab1dda87c5f75"><code>33cadea</code></a>
chore: release v5.0.3 (<a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11409">#11409</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/346d3896b65c3c907174447a035807342799f346"><code>346d389</code></a>
fix(vm): don't reuse scripts across vite environments (<a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11395">#11395</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/f6c9a4977ad3363f796a737834572e54c6ad5c18"><code>f6c9a49</code></a>
fix(deps): pin <code>why-is-node-running</code> to <code>3.2.1</code> to
avoid users running into `...</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/062c75d8b63519211d951d8293ea81b5a9e3c124"><code>062c75d</code></a>
chore: fix standalone docs build, update exports maps (<a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11394">#11394</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/caf2887dee8987a60118d53933f6e9cabd6b3e2a"><code>caf2887</code></a>
fix(vm): do not optimize deps from index.html (fix <a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11329">#11329</a>)
(<a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11360">#11360</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/50312ebb4eca6a98f6d0b2b61d5d9d38cbbabcef"><code>50312eb</code></a>
fix(pool): preserve unique pool ids when <code>groupOrder</code> is set
(<a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11392">#11392</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/7c36748fad1eae9687312f2f7ceadce6ec88b5df"><code>7c36748</code></a>
fix(browser): ignore page crash while cancelling (<a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11386">#11386</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/92ba7fc1df16a4fa5bbee3f198c582fbd56689d8"><code>92ba7fc</code></a>
fix: scope cache key generators to projects (fix <a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11281">#11281</a>)
(<a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11301">#11301</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/38f98855fa9cd7fd376afb84094eba0fda256a74"><code>38f9885</code></a>
fix(cache): revalidate imports of cached modules (<a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11381">#11381</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/b24585f08f2ea267746a2d6ca0e43edcbb29726f"><code>b24585f</code></a>
fix: don't retry when <code>test.fails</code> expectedly failed (<a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11219">#11219</a>)</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a
href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commits/v5.0.3/packages/vitest">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />

---------

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Priya Raman <priya.raman@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 12:13:46 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip a590ab769d Give managed agents persistent cryptographic identities (#15352)
Give agents persistent Ed25519 identities encrypted with the existing instance master key. Create keys transactionally for new agents and lazily before supported managed runs, expose public identities in the API and agent UI, and protect private material during runtime delivery and output persistence.

Preserve identities in recovery backups while giving imported and development-cloned agents fresh keys.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-06 13:57:03 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 9f7057e122 feat(connections): configure custom model providers across agent harnesses (#14970)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agents use a harness, a model, and a credential to run tasks.
> - Connections already store credentials and control who can use them.
> - Custom providers also need an endpoint and a supported API format.
> - A per-agent endpoint would duplicate credentials and access rules.
> - This pull request stores routing on the connection and projects it
into the harness.
> - Isolated credentials and protocol checks keep the selected
connection authoritative.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #37, #13083, #14104, #14565, #12692.

#14016 is a reference only. This PR has its own schema, vault
persistence, routing validation, runtime projection, and tests. None of
the five commits in #14016 is an ancestor of this branch. We do not
depend on or plan to merge it. #14967 addresses task-pinned account
pools. #14422 addresses another provider integration.

This is the first of two linked PRs. Merge this connection change before
#15341, which refines agent setup and adds the qualification harness.
The split keeps each review below 100 changed files. Provider catalog
entries have usable setup forms in this PR. Local browser subscription
sign-in is included.

## What Changed

- Store non-secret routing metadata on AI connections. Vault provider
API keys, including Bedrock bearer API keys. Reject general AWS access
keys.
- Enforce company, owner, human audience, agent access, connection
status, and protocol checks before resolving credentials. Keep reconnect
destinations immutable and retain connection identity during key
rotation.
- Project OpenRouter and compatible custom endpoints into Codex, Claude,
OpenCode, and local Hermes. Carry these settings through both legacy and
native runner transports. Clear conflicting host credentials and redact
keys from diagnostics.
- Preserve older OpenRouter accounts and native personal defaults. Add
Google API-key accounts and migration `0306` for the two
provider-default constraints.
- Run local Claude and Codex subscription sign-in behind the existing
browser sign-in card. Use private attempt homes and owner-bound
completion instead of a copied terminal command.
- Seed isolated Gemini authentication and preserve OpenCode workspace
permissions. Keep the selected connection authoritative. The independent
Gemini and Grok workflow fixes are in #15341.
- Keep native OpenCode custom gateway keys in a runner-owned
selected-model proxy; the harness config contains only a session-scoped
capability. Honor runtime outgoing proxy and certificate settings.
Preserve streamed responses and revoke the proxy on close or startup
failure.
- Allow ordinary members to connect native personal accounts before an
agent exists.
- Repair routed accounts from task cards using the saved provider
destination, protocol, model aliases, and connection identity.
- Add provider catalog definitions, model discovery, pinned logos, and
complete native and routed setup forms. Allow a personal routed
connection before a new agent exists. Keep endpoint authentication keys
out of Hermes terminal children.
- Recover cancelled or restarted browser sign-in with a clear restart
action. Support no-auth endpoints without a vault credential. Add
isolation and recovery regressions and runtime documentation.

## Verification

- Updated with `origin/master` at `22a3ea341`. Migration `0306` follows
the new master migration and passes migration and snapshot checks.
- The integrated connection regressions passed 152 tests and 50 native
OpenCode driver tests, including key-free child-shell configuration
reads, authenticated/no-auth forwarding, streaming, model/path
restrictions, cancellation, outgoing proxy routing, and NO_PROXY bypass.
Provider setup has 14 passing tests. The pinned real OpenCode 1.18.34
executable also completed a turn through the proxy against a local
synthetic provider; the reusable key was absent from its config. A
second real-executable smoke passed with an HTTPS CONNECT proxy and
runtime-specific synthetic certificate trust. Certificate-file and
certificate-directory regressions pass.
- Task-card repair passed 48 tests, including OpenRouter, Bedrock, and
custom gateway reconnect cases. UI typecheck and token gates passed.
- The prior core regression set passed 133 tests across new-agent setup,
provider forms, browser sign-in, routing projection, and connection
authorization. Token gates and UI typecheck passed.
- Full workspace typecheck and production build passed again after the
latest integration and credential-proxy fix. The merged deterministic
runner E2E suite passed 1,400 Vitest tests and 128 Node tests.
- Full workspace typecheck passed on the prior linked combined
implementation. Production build, Storybook build, 1,316 browser-harness
Vitest tests, and 128 Node tests passed. Head `9d964c8d9` includes the
latest master integration and regenerated migration. This exact head
passed 54 remote checks with four expected skips and Greptile 5/5; no
review threads remain open. An unchanged server fixture had a random
six-character issue-prefix collision on its first attempt. All 245 tests
passed locally and the single CI retry passed.
- A provider-free terminal check used the cited supported Hermes source
and dummy keys. Gateway and OpenRouter terminal children could not read
the selected key.
- The broad local Vitest attempt passed 15,442 tests but was not green.
It had an embedded-Postgres startup failure, an HTTP logger timeout, an
origin socket error, and a browser cancellation wait timeout. The
cancellation wait was corrected. The relevant connection tests and the
full origin test file passed separately. Latest-head CI must pass before
merge.
- Prior credential-backed acceptance exercised task creation, tool use,
artifact delivery, completion, and context-dependent follow-up. Claude
legacy and native runners passed Bedrock with `us-east-1` and
`us.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-6`.
- Historical local qualification retained 43 passing API/gateway cells
out of 46. Those attempts span earlier builds. They do not qualify this
exact commit or staging. All subscription combinations and staging
remain unqualified.
- Verify native subscription and API-key setup. Connect a regular
provider catalog row. Verify an incompatible harness and a changed
reconnect URL are rejected. Use #15341 for the complete browser
campaign.

## Risks

- Migration `0306` changes two check constraints. It preserves rows and
is safe to reapply. It takes normal constraint-change locks.
- Credential projection touches several harnesses. CLI upgrades can
change provider configuration and session behavior.
- The native OpenCode proxy adds a loopback hop, pins requests to the
selected model, limits request bodies to 16 MiB, rejects redirects, and
expires at session close. It prevents reusable keys in the child
configuration; it is not an OS isolation boundary against a process
debugger running as the same user.
- Custom endpoints must be reachable from the agent environment. Saving
a connection does not prove connectivity. Bedrock keys require rotation
before expiry.
- Gemini CLI 0.58.0 has an upstream ACP new-file error conversion
defect. Provider overloads and an unresolved follow-up timeout also
affect live Gemini qualification. We have not patched the installed CLI
or marked those cases as passing.
- OpenClaw Gateway, Hermes Gateway, Claude Managed, AWS AgentCore,
Process, HTTP, and legacy ACPX local are excluded. Vertex, ambient AWS
identity, arbitrary auth headers, and custom routing for other harnesses
are excluded.
- These PRs do not establish production or staging qualification for
every provider and login method.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution, and browser testing. The exact deployment model ID and
context window size were not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-06 13:29:03 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 63f3aa2dbf fix(runner): continue restart-interrupted Codex turns (#15297)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native runs retain their provider conversation across server
restarts.
> - A dead runner can restore a Codex conversation after its active turn
is lost.
> - The old recovery path synthesized a failed task result from that
interruption.
> - The task then required operator action even though its conversation
and workspace were available.
> - This pull request preserves the interruption cause and uses the
admitted restart attempt for one continuation in the same conversation.
> - The agent can reconcile unfinished actions and complete the current
request without resending the original task.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: #12845 added native restart recovery. #15042 covers admission
during shutdown. #14796 covers legacy shutdown recovery. This change
covers a lost native Codex turn after successful conversation
restoration.

**What happened?**

After a server restart killed the local runner, Paperclip restored the
saved Codex thread. Runnerd found that the old turn was no longer
active. It synthesized a failed terminal and a needs-review result from
the last progress message. The transport also discarded the terminal
error when it reconstructed thread history. The task failed instead of
continuing.

**Expected behavior**

After proving that the old process stopped and admitting a bounded
recovery attempt, resume the current request in the same conversation.
Preserve the workspace. Inspect unfinished actions before proceeding.
Keep real provider failures, accepted results, intentional stops,
unknown unreconciled effects, and exhausted attempts subject to their
existing rules.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Start a local native Codex run and leave its turn active.
2. Kill the isolated runner and provider processes, as can happen during
a server restart.
3. Restore the same provider thread with no active turn.
4. Observe the synthetic task failure. The new real-process regression
reproduces this boundary with a scripted provider.

## What Changed

- Record an explicit recoverable process-loss cause without inventing a
task result.
- Preserve terminal errors and prior turns in reconstructed provider
history. Recover the authoritative saved result when adopting an
accepted continuation.
- Send one continuation in the same conversation for an admitted
dead-runner recovery. Require reconciliation of unfinished commands and
external actions.
- Persist the interrupted terminal before submission and retain the
existing recovery marker across another controller loss.
- Keep provider attempt limits, terminal failures, and intentional
cancellation behavior.
- Add red/green regressions, real process-kill coverage, restart
checkpoint coverage, and retry-budget coverage. Document the behavior
and run-log evidence.

## Verification

- Red: the new native runtime regression rejected with
`NativeProviderTerminalFailure` on the original code; the Rust restore
regression found a missing recovery cause.
- Red/green: if restoring the conversation fails and replacement is
allowed, the replacement receives the full task and fresh-session
handoff. Both prepared and legacy execution inputs are covered.
- Red: a second controller crash after the provider accepted the
continuation caused an extra `turn/start`. The regression now proves
there are exactly two submissions total: the original and its
continuation.
- Green: focused runtime, backend, driver recovery, and real-process
restart suites (207 tests). After the final history/result changes,
driver recovery and real-process restart suites passed again (36 tests).
- Green: complete Codex transport suite (186 tests), server restart
classification/database integration suites (34 tests), and Rust Codex
provider suite (92 passed, 2 ignored).
- Full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on `60141e649`. The
subsequent replacement-prompt guard passed the Runner TypeScript check
and the complete runtime plus process-restart suites (148 tests).
- Local full-suite attempt: `pnpm test:run` reported two failures in the
untouched chat integration suite. Both passed individually, and the
complete chat suite passed on rerun (1,063 tests). After all remote test
shards passed, the duplicate serial local run was stopped with SIGINT;
it is not claimed as a full local-suite pass.
- Latest-head CI (`b1297dcd4`): 55 successful checks and 4 intentionally
skipped checks, including all test shards, typecheck, build, native
Runner verification, end-to-end tests, and canary dry run. [CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37405346303).
- Greptile: 5/5 on the latest head, with no unresolved review threads.
The PR is mergeable.
- The process tests use the real runner binary and a scripted Codex
provider. They do not call a live model service.

## Risks

- This changes local Codex recovery after process loss. A continuation
can execute more work in the retained conversation. Its prompt requires
state inspection before repeating an uncertain action; the system does
not replay tool calls.
- Recovery shares the existing three-attempt budget and one-shot
continuation marker. Real failures and older unmarked failed checkpoints
are not reopened.
- No database migration or API change is required.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6. The exact model ID and context-window
size are not exposed in this session.
- Capabilities: reasoning, source inspection, tool use, code editing,
code execution, and test analysis.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-06 07:49:47 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip dd868ed125 fix(runner): share native completion tool guidance (#14961)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Native Runner agents report completion through finish and block
tools.
> - The providers receive different descriptions for those tools.
> - Completion guidance belongs with the tools that enforce the result.
> - This pull request shares the descriptions and refreshes retained
catalogs.
> - A separate native suite checks completion and blocking on production
defaults.
> - Legacy agents retain their separate skill and API paths.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #14920, #14948, #14985.

**Current behavior**

Native Codex and MCP bridges describe finish and block differently.
Retained provider sessions can keep old descriptions.

**Proposed behavior**

Native providers receive the same finish and block descriptions. The
descriptions cover report selection, validation feedback, returned
outcomes, approval gates and final-answer timing. Retained native
sessions refresh from v13 to v14.

**Reason and benefit**

Put the completion procedure next to its native tool. Preserve stock
base instructions, schemas, permissions and terminal semantics. This PR
now stands alone on master. It contains no reduced manual, shared prompt
or operational-skill changes from #14948.

## What Changed

- Add canonical native finish and block descriptions. Use them in direct
Codex and both native MCP bridges.
- Advance the native tool contract to v14. Cover old-v13 refresh without
replacing task identity or prior history.
- Check authenticated tool catalogs, provider start/resume frames and
serialized daemon catalogs.
- Add an independent, explicit-only native completion suite. Preserve
the original assigned-skill durable-document journey. Pair it with a
concrete whole-task blocker across Codex, ACPX Claude and OpenCode.
- Verify the actual public production default bundle and budgets before
execution. Require independent durable disposition, native
result/terminal receipts and observable provider-final ordering.
- Correct the blocker browser oracle to accept the requested
explanation. Keep exact owner/action/scope checks. Calibrate positive,
missing and contradictory replies.
- Preserve only actual `tool_call` terminal names (`paperclip_finish` /
`paperclip_block`) in the native compatibility run-log projection.
Require the same named call ID through its finishing result; retain all
other redaction boundaries.
- Admit verified hosted shallow checkout/build hydration and bind the
selected runnerd to exact source/archive/binary provenance. Hosted cells
truthfully reuse the existing trusted build; local admission executes
Rust calibration. Forward only public source/run identifiers through
both launcher preflight subprocess paths.
- Enforce single attempts in the launcher for opted-in fixtures. Keep
ordinary retry policy unchanged. Run exact-source, credential-free
admission before credential loading.

## Verification

- Frozen candidate: `d6e59e4712a3158ab4cd7d58deff1389b4578c21`, based on
master `59c07ede72dc08b8aba149a01cc11e0b7a204621`; historical
descriptions: `e74ed61a69fbdd8b3a8f15dd6456bc3140246e33`. Exactly the
five original native production files and six unit tests differ. Both
carry identical corrected fixtures, strict named finishing-call grader,
closed compatibility carrier and admission. Defaults,
profiles/models/auth/permissions and manifest bytes match.
- Actual launcher `prepareNativeCompletionPreflight` →
`verifyNativeCompletionPreflight` admission passes on both exact refs
with zero providers: candidate 132 / historical 127 selected TypeScript
assertions, 128 Node calibrations and one Rust normalization calibration
each; E2E typecheck, manifest checks, selected binary provenance and
six-cell discovery pass. Each has 257 explicitly skipped unrelated
assertions, not coverage. The credential-free environment calibration
exercises both real prepare/verify subprocess options with public hosted
identifiers and rejects credential/ambient overrides. Complete actual
launcher prepare→verify also passes on both frozen refs with explicitly
synthetic hosted metadata/verified archives, separately labeled as
calibration rather than a trusted GitHub run. Exact framed provenance
parsing and mock source identity are calibrated without relaxing the
real verifier.
- [Complete matched qualification
report](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/532066620b88e8731a5211fbe1cbc48ce8c7dd1a/doc/plans/2026-10-02-native-completion-master-qualification.md),
[immutable
manifest](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/532066620b88e8731a5211fbe1cbc48ce8c7dd1a/doc/plans/2026-10-02-native-completion-calibrated-manifest.json)
and [closed retained
audit/hashes](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/532066620b88e8731a5211fbe1cbc48ce8c7dd1a/doc/plans/2026-10-02-native-completion-calibrated-results/comparison.json)
are inspectable. All six candidate cells pass; historical descriptions
pass five. Paired outcomes: **zero new failures, one new pass (Codex
blocker), five unchanged passes, zero pending pairs**. [Candidate
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37098728980)
and [historical
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37098815696)
each execute six original attempt-1 native runs, with no campaign retry
and successful cleanup. Their trusted workflow revision is
`215586d127e97c9301d86e769a39a15c13298ca2`, separate from measured
source. [Candidate public
HTML](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-37098728980-1/index.html)
and [historical public
HTML](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-37098815696-1/index.html)
retain declared screenshots.
- Independent candidate evidence agrees with all original grades: 51
strict native checks, 12 served-default/budget checks and 21 original
skill/document checks pass. The historical Codex blocker saves the
correct whole-task blocker but omits the required marker from its actual
provider final and identical saved reply. This is not semantic-summary
fallback. Its original browser/matcher failure stays retained; the
additional native snapshot/grade and workspace before/after digest were
never written and are not fabricated by the separate API/PRP audit.
Historical Codex completion has one failed finish followed by success
within the same native run; the public receipt records no failure
reason. All twelve runs and their usage remain counted. Reported
model-cost subtotals are $0.00421482 historical/$0.00437391 candidate;
Codex/Claude zero entries have unknown billing type, actual invoices are
unverified and hosted execution cost is unmetered. One matched trial
supports no extra failure within these six cases, not broad statistical
or coding-quality equivalence.
- Initial hosted `e18c2cf9` / `459455ac` and subsequent `0a9c5a7` /
`00a761b` cohorts each stopped before providers in all twelve cells. The
latter failed a mocked-receipt unit test under ambient hosted metadata;
all source/build proofs passed. [All twelve later setup
receipts](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/402ee94c52273ad58de355ae9a7d562dd22f8101/doc/plans/2026-10-02-native-completion-qualified-hosted-setup.json)
are retained. [Exact failed setup
receipts](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/27653eb1a8f8ce839776d760f4563f672e5a706c/doc/plans/2026-10-02-native-completion-master-hosted-setup.json)
and the original manifest remain intact. Local sandbox-denied loopback
and stale anchor-expectation attempts are retained separately; unchanged
appropriate assertions were corrected/admitted before paid dispatch. Old
anonymous OpenCode streams are not assigned inferred tool names or
retroactively passed.
- Full provider-free E2E support previously passed 927 tests in 67
files. Exact-head d6 normal CI run `37098409915`, attempt 1 passes full
repository typecheck/build/tests, Runner Rust/static checks, all browser
shards/aggregate and canary: 52 check-runs pass, four intentional skips,
Snyk passes. Fresh Greptile check `111132956342` is 5/5 with zero
unresolved threads. Source-specific deterministic tests do not
substitute for the bounded live comparison.
- Earlier native source `9138f570c341c251a5727c32d6615ce238bc8e03` is
archived. Its [complete reduced-manual-context
report](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/9138f570c341c251a5727c32d6615ce238bc8e03/doc/plans/2026-10-02-native-completion-live-comparison.md)
remains intact, including original failures, grader limits and
provider-free replay. It is not current-master-context qualification.

## Risks

Changed tool text can change model behavior. The completed six-pair
qualification shows no extra failing outcomes in this bounded trial;
other tasks and repeated-run variance remain unmeasured. Observable
final ordering does not prove provider feedback consumption. Public
evidence can fail closed if a provider does not expose the required
result sequence. This slice does not remove native fixed prompts or
measure general coding quality. No database, schema, permission or
legacy completion changes occur.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with code inspection, execution and tool
use. The exact deployment ID and context-window size are not exposed in
this session. They are unavailable rather than inferred from the model
menu.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-03 06:20:38 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 2ec82c5774 fix(runner): preserve task context when tool connections change (#14963)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agents use tools through company-scoped connections and provider
sessions.
> - Resolving a tool connection currently forces a fresh session even
when the provider can load new tools into the existing conversation.
> - A fresh provider conversation can receive too little history to
continue the task.
> - This pull request adds explicit tool-refresh capabilities and uses
them in both runner paths.
> - Fresh attempts receive bounded task history with source IDs and
retrieval instructions.
> - The benefit is that agents can continue the same task after a
connection changes.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A resolved tool connection forced a fresh provider conversation. The new
conversation could lose the original goal and prior answers. Claude also
rejected resume when only the MCP server set changed.

**Expected behavior**

Resume the provider conversation when its harness can refresh tools.
When a fresh session is required, supply enough bounded history to
continue the task. Preserve company, agent, task, workspace, model,
instruction, and skill checks.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Start a conversation and agree on a task and its constraints.
2. Request and connect a tool needed for the task.
3. Continue the conversation after the connection resolves.
4. Check that the agent remembers the task and can use the new tool.

**Paperclip version or commit**

The bug was reproduced on master at `c46e41e81`. This branch is rebased
on current master.

**Deployment mode**

Self-hosted server. Both legacy adapters and the native runner are
affected.

Related public work: Refs #13282 for task-backed conversations. Refs
#13057 for the broader session-compaction proposal. Refs #14659 for
another report about local CLI session continuity. This change fixes
tool-connection continuation. Provider authentication repairs keep their
existing recovery behavior.

## What Changed

- Expose tool-refresh support in native harness descriptors and legacy
adapter metadata.
- Request tool refresh after connection resolution. Keep provider
authentication repair as a fresh-session wake.
- Reload current tools and credentials while retaining supported Claude,
Codex, Grok, and other provider conversations.
- Allow MCP-only changes during qualified native recovery. Keep all
other compatibility checks.
- Refresh managed-provider and ACPX tool bindings when attaching a new
run.
- Add a fresh-session handoff for both runner paths. Bound database
reads, excerpts, and the final packet to 24,000 bytes.
- Include the original request, recent messages, decisions, plans, prior
answers, and source IDs. Mark omitted content. Apply reset boundaries,
wake cutoffs, quarantine, and secret redaction.
- Add regression tests and document the capabilities and handoff
behavior.

## Verification

- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. Rust formatting passed.
- Final review fixes passed 314 server tests, 333 adapter utility tests,
139 native-session runtime tests, and 12 managed-provider Rust tests.
They verify historical quarantine, raised budgets across attachment, no
history reads on successful resume, and handoff delivery on fresh retry.
- Broader branch verification also passed 1,401 adapter utility tests,
1,047 runner TypeScript tests, 43 Grok adapter tests, and 311 Rust core
tests.
- Live Claude CLI and Grok ACP probes preserved the provider session ID,
recalled a prior task constraint, and called a newly added read-only MCP
tool.
- GitHub CI passed on `b21486d18084a7aa4cafbe8e012f7cad6585d9cc`: 55
successful checks and 4 skipped checks. This includes all test shards,
all eight browser shards, runner checks, and the Grok clean public npm
install canary. [CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37057514976).
- A full local test attempt encountered a separate Git snapshot timeout.
All affected local suites passed after the final edits, and the full CI
test gates passed.
- Review the capability matrix in `packages/paperclip-runner/README.md`.
Repeat the four reproduction steps with a supported provider and with an
unsupported harness.

## Risks

- Provider tool refresh can fail. Existing recovery falls back to a
fresh conversation where policy permits it.
- A new transport can replace an old process while preserving the
provider conversation. Tests cover current credentials and unchanged
identity.
- Long history can omit older context. Explicit markers and source IDs
let the agent retrieve needed context within task scope.
- Unknown and unqualified harnesses use the fresh-session path. No
database migration is required.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and live
provider testing. The exact model ID and context-window size are not
exposed in this session. Claude and Grok also ran as test subjects.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-02 15:11:44 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip ec3bacc9bd fix(chat): hide ignored provider information (#14929)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Task and agent chats show agent progress and problems that need
attention.
> - Codex also sends account, skill, and unrelated thread notifications.
> - The runner correctly ignores that information but reports it as a
warning.
> - Chat then shows an internal diagnostic as an actionable provider
notice.
> - This pull request keeps the diagnostic in run logs and removes it
from chat.
> - Real provider warnings, errors, and agent replies remain visible.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

Chat showed “Received a provider update” and a warning with the text
“ignored
unrelated provider information”. Its details said “User Actionable: Yes”
even
though no user action was needed. Saved conversations retained the same
noise.

**Expected behavior**

Keep ignored provider information in the run log. Do not show it as chat
activity
or a user warning. Preserve real warnings and errors.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Start a conversation with the native Codex runner.
2. Have the provider send an account update, skill change, or unrelated
thread
   notification during the turn.
3. Inspect live chat and reload its saved history.

The regression tests also reproduce the old stored notice without a live
account.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Source implementation on master at `e00d10d5d`. The duplicate search
found no
open PR for this fix. Related prior work: #13109 improved
provider-notice
presentation. #12367 added Codex thread normalization. This change
addresses
the internal information that those paths still projected as chat
warnings.

**Deployment mode**

Native Paperclip Runner with the Codex app-server provider. The issue
was seen
in hosted chat and can be reproduced with local provider fixtures.

## What Changed

- Map ignored unrelated Codex information to `harness.diagnostic` in the
Rust
  and TypeScript normalizers.
- Retain a bounded allowlist of redacted provider method and thread/turn
identifiers.
- Use the same Unicode character limit and truncation marker in both
normalizers.
- Share the text redactor through a pure helper. Keep provider
connection code
  out of the standalone demo's source closure.
- Omit that diagnostic and the matching legacy notice from live chat.
- Omit the matching legacy notice from saved chat history.
- Test diagnostic retention, account-notification integration, live and
saved
  chat, and continued visibility of real warnings, errors, and replies.
- Document the local run-log event and historical display behavior.

## Verification

- Passed: 68 tests in the two affected UI transcript suites.
- Passed: 60 TypeScript tests across provider events, transport
behavior, and
  the standalone demo boundary.
- Passed: 13 Rust provider-event tests and the Codex
account-notification
  integration test.
- Passed: `pnpm check:token-gates` and Cargo formatting checks.
- Passed: full `pnpm build` and `pnpm -r typecheck`. After the review
fix,
the provider package build, typecheck, and both provider-event suites
passed again.
- Full local `pnpm test:run` failed: 608 files / 10,904 tests passed, 30
server
suites failed, and 104 files / 4,012 tests were skipped. Most failures
were
  embedded PostgreSQL startup errors. Two tests timed out in
`heartbeat-comment-wake-batching` and
`workspace-git-snapshot-streaming`.
  PostgreSQL startup also failed in `heartbeat-run-event-sequencing` and
`native-finalization-migration`. These server files are unchanged by
this PR.
Isolated heartbeat reruns were skipped locally. The stable test script
stopped
  after this general-server group, so later groups did not run locally.
- The original review thread is resolved. Greptile is 5/5 on current
head
  `683dab7cce57187c57e84c83f5e9da4ad75c9c04`.
- All current-head CI gates passed, including the full
server/chat/workspace
test matrix, Rust and TypeScript runner suites, browser E2E, build,
typecheck,
and release canary. [CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37021330663).
- Replay the exact old warning in either transcript adapter. It must
produce
no chat row. A genuine provider warning or error must still produce a
row.

## Risks

- Low risk. The display filter matches one diagnostic code or the
complete
  legacy warning shape. Other provider notices remain visible.
- New ignored-information events use the existing harness-diagnostic
event
type. They retain diagnostic evidence without original account payloads.
- No database migration, API permission, provider execution, or recovery
  behavior changes. This affects the local run log, not Telemetry or
  OpenTelemetry exports.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact backend model ID and context-window size
are
not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository inspection, code
editing, tool use, and test execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run the affected tests locally and they pass (the broad
local run has PostgreSQL startup errors and timeouts documented above;
the full CI matrix passed)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-02 09:59:34 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 408f70e69f fix(runner): preserve stock Codex base instructions (#14920)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The native Runner connects Paperclip tasks to Codex app-server.
> - Paperclip passed its runtime context as `baseInstructions`.
> - That field replaces the stock Codex base prompt.
> - This pull request sends the same Paperclip context as additive
developer instructions.
> - Codex keeps its stock prompt and still receives Paperclip task
instructions and tools.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

The native Codex driver and Rust provider sent Paperclip context through
`baseInstructions` on thread start and resume. Codex used this text in
place of its stock base instructions. Direct-chat resume also sent an
empty replacement base. The Runner Lab session path used the same
replacement field.

**Expected behavior**

Codex should retain its stock base prompt. Paperclip should add its
runtime context through `developerInstructions`. Other provider facades
should retain their current instruction handling.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Create a native Codex session through Paperclip Runner.
2. Inspect the `thread/start` request in the native provider trace.
3. Resume the session and inspect `thread/resume`.
4. Before this fix, these paths set `baseInstructions`. After this fix,
the Codex paths set `developerInstructions` and omit `baseInstructions`.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced against master at `cad26c6bfb736039c8ed5743da650a44792a083c`.

**Deployment mode**

Built from source. Native Codex app-server and runnerd paths. A local
protocol probe used codex-cli 0.153.4 and a localhost Responses stub.

No duplicate fix or matching public issue was found in the GitHub
search.

## What Changed

- Send additive developer instructions on Codex start and resume in the
TypeScript driver, Rust provider, and Runner Lab session path.
- Carry the additive fragment through runnerd, including runtime asset
path mapping.
- Preserve existing instruction fields for other provider facades,
including OpenCode.
- Add start/resume/direct-chat regression coverage and check the actual
Rust provider request.
- Document the historical option and trace field names. Record progress
and follow-ups in the working checklist.

## Verification

- `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed.
- `pnpm build` — passed.
- Targeted Codex driver lifecycle, driver, and live-session Vitest
suites — 139 tests passed.
- `cargo test --manifest-path
packages/paperclip-runner/runner/Cargo.toml --locked -p
paperclip-runner-core --test codex_provider` — 91 passed, 2 ignored
subprocess helpers.
- Real app-server probe: a localhost Responses stub captured identical
14,732-character stock base instructions on fresh start and cold resume.
Both requests retained the Paperclip marker in developer input. Both
stub turns completed. No paid inference was used.
- Runnerd transport Vitest suite — 182 tests passed.
- The initial `pnpm test:run` attempt reported local dependency-loading,
embedded PostgreSQL startup, and macOS `/var` versus `/private/var` path
failures. It was stopped after those failures. Loading-suite reruns
passed 1,428 tests after the build; native interaction/finalization
reruns passed 38 tests. A seven-suite diagnostic rerun passed 463 tests
and isolated the remaining path and PostgreSQL setup failures.
- With `TMPDIR=/private/tmp`, workspace, gateway, interaction, and
attachment suites passed all 356 tests. The remaining environment-image
and native-session-resumption suites passed all 44 tests with the same
canonical temp path. All affected suites passed on rerun. The original
full local command was stopped after failures and is not claimed as
passing.
- All 55 PR checks passed at `83281439456181396f3707eecda5d2ebc90bd14d`.
Greptile scored 5/5 with no open review threads.
- No paid live campaign or Product E2E browser suite was run. This
change has protocol and regression coverage; it does not claim improved
task quality.

## Risks

- Stock Codex behavior may differ from behavior under the previous
Paperclip replacement prompt. Restoring that behavior is the intended
change.
- Existing Codex threads retain their saved replacement base prompt.
They need a provider session reset to receive the stock base. This PR
does not reset active sessions or alter recovery rules.
- The legacy `baseInstructions` option and trace field names remain for
compatibility. They now describe the additive Paperclip fragment for
Codex.
- The separate Codex-through-ACP dependency patch remains a follow-up in
the harness coverage checklist. This PR covers native app-server
execution.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact runtime model variant and context window
are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository inspection,
code editing, shell execution, and test tools.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-02 08:53:47 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 94e8dec56b fix(runner): preserve tool outcomes through shutdown and restart (#14734)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The runner sends authorized tool calls to the server and saves their
results.
> - A provider turn can stop while a server write is still running.
> - The old shutdown path invented a failed result that could conflict
with the real result.
> - Truncated execution input and incomplete recovery records made the
failure harder to diagnose.
> - This pull request preserves exact inputs and actual outcomes through
shutdown and restart.
> - Tests force the race and crash boundaries so safe retries do not
repeat writes.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

Stopping a turn during a server tool call could record a false failure,
then reject the actual result as a conflict. The diagnostic input
formatter could truncate instruction content before execution. A crash
during saved-result delivery could leave that delivery permanently
indeterminate. Cleanup could hide the first failure, and a retry could
overwrite earlier run logs.

**Expected behavior**

Keep dispatched tools pending until their actual result is known.
Preserve accepted input bytes. Accept identical result delivery without
failing the task. Reject conflicting results with enough evidence to
diagnose them. Recover saved-result delivery without repeating the
business operation.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Hold an instruction update at the filesystem commit barrier.
2. Stop its provider turn before the server returns the result.
3. Release the write, deliver its result, and replay the same result.
4. Repeat with a restart before and after the delivery receipt is saved.
5. Check that there is one write and one audit row, and that the exact
result survives.

**Paperclip version or commit**

The change was developed from `44736c9c7` and rebased onto `0e5830887`.

**Deployment mode**

Self-hosted server with the native runner. Tests use local runner
processes, scripted providers, and PostgreSQL.

Related work: #12353 added durable semantic tool receipts; #12384 added
durable Codex tool recovery; #12404 bound semantic tools to ACPX
sessions. #14633 covers separate native-provider cancellation and
qualification work. This PR addresses server semantic-tool outcomes and
their durable delivery. No duplicate fix was found. AgentMail discovery
is outside this PR.

## What Changed

- Close turn admission without inventing results for dispatched tools.
Keep pending calls and accept late actual results.
- Accept identical result replay with a diagnostic warning. Include call
identity and both result hashes in real conflict errors.
- Preserve exact execution arguments. Reject prohibited or oversized
input before dispatch. Keep diagnostic previews redacted and bounded.
- Commit instruction-attempt evidence before the filesystem write. Save
completed mutation receipts so concurrent and restarted duplicates
return the first result. Recheck authorization before replay. An attempt
without a completed result stays unknown and cannot execute again.
Definite pre-write failures save and replay their original error without
another write.
- Recover an interrupted saved-result delivery only for backends with
durable result receipts. Never replay an ordinary business operation
with an unknown outcome.
- Preserve the initiating error when cleanup also fails. Record
incomplete settlement evidence. Propagate typed unknown-outcome errors
through the native tool wrapper without creating a false completed tool
result.
- Append run-log attempts and restore the durable log before appending
after local file loss. Reject incomplete restores. Publish a restored
prefix only if the destination is absent so concurrent attempts cannot
overwrite new lines.
- Add deterministic race, crash, replay, authorization, exact-content,
and log-restoration tests. Document their assertions in
`packages/paperclip-runner/docs/durable-recovery.md`.

## Verification

- Current head: `7e088f4c7fba8ebabf98ae95485a5753b013d489`. All 55
applicable checks pass; four conditional/manual checks are skipped. This
includes build, typecheck, Rust, both runner TypeScript shards, server
and workspace tests, all eight browser shards, isolated runner
compilation, and the clean-install release dry run. [CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36746101110).
- Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with zero new findings. All
three earlier review threads are resolved.
- Focused local verification includes 11 instruction integration tests,
23 surrounding authority/tool tests, 26 run-log tests, and 169
controller/driver tests. The post-rebase controller/transport/runtime
selection passed 415 tests. The full Rust release suite passed 617 tests
with two ignored. The real-process SIGKILL recovery test passed three
consecutive runs.
- The fault matrix in
`packages/paperclip-runner/docs/durable-recovery.md` uses explicit
barriers, real PostgreSQL rollback, durable journal reloads, and killed
runner processes. It covers late results, identical and conflicting
replay, exact long content, concurrent log restoration, lost commit
acknowledgements, and definite failure replay after the original CAS
base becomes valid again. No paid model calls are needed.
- Full local recursive typecheck and build passed during implementation.
Server typecheck and the runner TypeScript build passed after the review
fixes. The broad local repository test run was stopped after repeated
database startup timeouts. Four timing/launch failures in an earlier
broad runner run passed focused reruns without changed assertions or
timeouts. These are local verification limitations; the complete
current-head CI suite is green. An earlier CI workspace job received an
infrastructure shutdown signal; its current-head replacement passed.

## Risks

- A stopped turn can remain blocked when a dispatched operation has no
proven result. The system does not guess its outcome or rerun its
effect.
- Conflicting results still fail settlement. Existing failed or
conflicting journals are not repaired automatically.
- Accepted semantic input is limited to 480 KiB of encoded JSON to fit
the encrypted transport. Larger input fails before execution.
- Instruction filesystem writes and database receipts are not one atomic
storage operation. A separately committed attempt and audit record
survive rollback. An attempt without a completed success or definite
pre-write failure receipt remains blocked as an unknown outcome. It is
not replayed or reported as success.
- Run-log restoration now reads the durable object before appending when
the local log is missing. Failed or incomplete reads reject the append.
- No schema migration, dependency change, workflow change, or AgentMail
change is included.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and test
analysis. The exact served model ID and context-window size are not
exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites; the broad
local run limitation is recorded above)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-30 11:54:56 -05:00
da887ea3e9 fix(runner): honor Codex effort selected in composer (#14568)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents that work on assigned tasks.
> - The task composer lets a person choose an assignee, model, and
effort for the next run.
> - A Paperclip Runner agent can use Codex as its provider.
> - The composer hid Codex effort for that agent because it checked only
the older Codex adapter.
> - The native Runner input also did not carry an effort choice to
Codex.
> - This pull request carries the chosen effort from the composer to
each Codex turn.
> - People can now select a supported effort and get the effort they
selected.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #14322

**What happened?**

The composer showed a model but no effort slider when the assignee used
Paperclip Runner with the Codex provider. A task-level model override
also did not reach the native Runner input.

**Expected behavior**

The composer shows effort choices for a known Codex model. The next
native Codex turn uses the selected model and effort.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Open a task composer.
2. Select an agent that uses Paperclip Runner with the Codex provider.
3. Select a known Codex model such as `gpt-6-astra`.
4. Open the assignee and model picker. The effort slider is missing
before this change.

## What Changed

- Show known Codex effort levels for Paperclip Runner Codex assignees.
- Save the task effort override in the native run input and send it to
Codex on each turn.
- Apply the task's merged model and effort overrides when the native run
starts.
- Apply a task model override for OpenCode Runner without changing the
agent's provider.
- Add Runner effort tests and desktop and mobile Storybook cases.

## Verification

- `pnpm -r typecheck` passed.
- `pnpm build` passed.
- `pnpm build-storybook` passed.
- `pnpm check:token-gates` passed.
- Focused UI, server, Runner contract, and Codex driver tests passed.
- The full CI test matrix, build, typecheck, and canary dry run passed
on the latest head.

## Risks

- Native Runner inputs add an optional Codex effort field to the current
v5 input. Older inputs keep their previous behavior.
- A known model rejects an effort that its catalog does not support.
Unknown models do not show a slider.

> This fixes an existing composer bug. I checked `ROADMAP.md`; it does
not describe this bug as planned work.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact deployment ID and context window are not
exposed in this session. The model used reasoning, code execution, and
repository tools.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: OpenAI GPT-6 Astra <noreply@openai.com>
2026-09-29 09:41:05 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 24beb00575 feat(runner): add rich ACP transport and durable interaction foundation (#14430)
Add shared rich ACP transport, durable questions and permissions, verified provider packaging, and bounded activity and plan presentation. Keep Cursor, Copilot, and Pi pending their separate provider qualification.

Persist interaction settlement before publication, fence failed writes until fresh recovery, and preserve owned-process cleanup. Incorporate reviewed mainline integration with extended harness coverage.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-29 08:56:21 -05:00
DottaandFry 3ca196b0a6 feat(agents): persist agent files across tasks without revision history (#14420)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - An agent needs personal files across tasks and sessions.
> - AGENTS.md is one file in that directory. Supporting files need the
same persistence.
> - The Instructions Editor and agent runs must share one current
directory.
> - Concurrent runs should apply only the files they change. The last
sync of the same file wins.
> - This pull request uses existing file transport and removes temporary
copies after sync.
> - Old instruction-only sessions keep their restore contract. New saves
do not create revision history.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #14325. This replaces its revision-oriented design with persistent
agent files. Keep #14325 unmerged.

Transport prerequisite #14416 merged first at
`d172197117a14b80a1eb2d2835a0e7cce2679656`. This PR now targets master
and remains below 100 changed files.

Related work: #4513 and #8798 cover instruction tooling. This change
handles run synchronization, cross-task personal files, browser editing,
and old-session restoration.

## What Changed

- Keep one current directory per company and agent. Point AGENT_HOME at
a temporary working copy for each active run. Keep task files and
provider HOME separate.
- Restore text, binary files, and nested folders through workspace
transport. Exclude remote agent files from task Git snapshots with a
self-ignoring file inside the reserved runtime directory; never write
through repository-controlled Git metadata.
- Collect after the provider and child processes have stopped. Keep
resumable conversation state.
- Apply changed and deleted files under the agent lock. The last sync
wins for the same file. Unrelated concurrent changes survive.
- Remove temporary copies after successful sync, rejected sync, and
staging failure. Register ownership before copying so restart recovery
can remove interrupted preparation. Retry transient synchronization up
to three times. Preserve the original remote lease reference until
deletion succeeds; restart cleanup never acquires a replacement sandbox.
Do not create captured directories or a conflict-review queue for new
runs.
- Keep browser editing, stale-draft protection, and streaming binary
downloads. Keep the instruction entry and text editor limited to 1 MiB.
- Keep historical agent-folder sync failures on their affected runs
instead of repeating them above current saved instructions. Preserve
legacy candidate review and current browser-save errors. Avoid duplicate
quota warnings while retaining separate sync failures when they describe
a different problem.
- Require target-scoped caller grants for peer instruction access, while
preserving self edits, responsible-user checks, and protected-change
consent.
- Treat full storage as a nonblocking run warning, never an agent pause
or run-admission failure. Restore already-over-quota saved folders so
ordinary agent cleanup can recover; warn on each run until cleanup. The
run detail view shows the warning.
- Allow 256 MiB per file, 2 GiB per directory, and 100,000 entries. Hash
large files as streams. Check editor-save quotas with metadata instead
of hashing unrelated files.
- Preserve old native inputs, instruction-only copies, paths, digests,
and pending legacy candidates. Adopt old revision heads once. New writes
do not append history rows.
- Add idempotent migration 0287 and verify upgrades from the preview
tables and receipts.
- Add nine interactive stories under **Agents / Persistent files**,
including automatic incoming edits, stale browser drafts, and
storage-limit diagnostics.

## Verification

- Merge candidate: `4f5390107ec6ffd80a76d1d2e85530e66f21d079`, after
merging current master and the landed transport prerequisite.
Integration required no manual conflict resolution; the feature remains
99 changed files. Full workspace typecheck, production build, token
gates, and 715 focused tests passed on this merge candidate. Fresh
Greptile review is 5/5 with no unresolved findings. All 55 checks
passed, with four conditional skips, including the build, typecheck,
browser E2E, and canary dry run. A single retry recovered four jobs
interrupted by runner shutdowns; no source changes were required.
- Historical-warning UI fix: all 6,834 UI tests across 640 files passed,
including regression coverage for three old failures, legacy preserved
edits, and warnings scoped to the affected run. Full workspace
typecheck, production build, Storybook build, and token gates passed.
Browser-verified Storybook playtests passed for Historical Failures
After Successful Save, Storage Limit, and Full Storage Run Warning.
- Review follow-ups at `4e20c9fb2`: all 18 focused tests passed,
including external Git directories, linked worktrees, symlinks,
hardlinks, and distinct I/O failures alongside storage warnings. Server
and UI typechecks, token gates, and the production build passed.
- Storage warning regressions at `0724f3012`: all 33 directory tests and
all five heartbeat-list tests passed, with no skips in their successful
runs. They cover repeated runs while full, an already-over-quota saved
folder, cleanup, warnings retained after unrelated save failures, and
bounded warnings in large result JSON. Server typecheck passed after the
final warning fixes.
- Full workspace typecheck, production build, and token gates passed
during this follow-up. Product E2E harness: 631 tests passed across 52
files; harness typecheck passed. Earlier native session/context and
directory/legacy collection suites passed 537 tests; Runner
unit/transport suites passed 329 tests.
- **Real E2E at `0724f3012` (before this follow-up):** legacy local
Codex and native Daytona Codex each passed six tasks, one server
restart, seven independent assertions, and cleanup verification. Both
prove browser-to-agent edits, agent-to-browser edits, nested/binary
restoration, per-file last-sync-wins, a successful run after an
oversized save rejection, and cleanup clearing the warning.
- Native local Codex also passed the six-task quota flow before the
final warning-retention fixes. That pass began at `918d1ed02` while the
bounded-result warning fix was being edited, so it is not claimed as
exact-final-head evidence. Its final-head rerun failed during embedded
PostgreSQL bootstrap before any provider run: the macOS host had 87,365
of 87,381 SysV semaphores occupied. No unrelated services or kernel
limits were changed.
- The final-source report intentionally records **2/3 cells passed**,
preserving the blocked native-local attempt:
`tests/runner-e2e/results/agent-files-quota-final-20260928-report/`.
Earlier failed attempts and provenance notes remain under
`tests/runner-e2e/results/agent-files-quota-final-20260928-input/` and
the original campaign directories.
- Daytona used immutable image
`ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip-daytona-runner@sha256:5643f0d801417cae3581833a1a3bc6715b325e028602738d2652c44cac5dc6bf`
and its exact Linux runner binary. Controller source is `0724f3012`;
image source is recorded separately.
- Legacy-session compatibility and all three ACP Stop/resume browser
regressions passed on the prior validated feature head
`169fab46d5af21caa2269b4c1b29b69c933a6951`. They assert the same
provider session is retained and interrupted writes are not replayed.
Migration upgrade tests also passed earlier.
- Nine interactive stories are under **Agents / Persistent files**,
including **Full Storage Run Warning**. Its playtest and visual browser
inspection passed; the warning states that runs continue and the editor
remains available.
- Prior-head checks on `4e20c9fb2`: 55 passed, two conditional jobs
skipped, no failures or pending checks. All eight browser E2E shards and
their aggregate passed. Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 with no findings;
all review threads are resolved, the security scan passed, and GitHub
reports no merge conflicts.
- The broad local follow-up test run was interrupted after host
semaphore exhaustion affected isolated PostgreSQL instances. It also
encountered the existing macOS long-path fixture failure and two timeout
failures. This is not a claim that the full local suite passed. Logs are
retained; focused storage/warning tests passed.

## Risks

- A later sync can overwrite an earlier edit to the same file, including
a saved browser edit. There is no text merge or retained version. This
is the intended last-sync-wins policy.
- A save that exceeds a storage limit is rejected and its temporary copy
is discarded. The run itself continues normally, and later runs restore
the last saved files with a warning until cleanup. Transient sync
failures get bounded retries. An I/O failure partway through a sync can
leave some files updated; a failed receipt does not claim whole-folder
success.
- Larger folders increase copy time, network traffic, and temporary disk
usage. Active runs still need working copies. Terminal runs do not
accumulate archives. Operators must provision disk for agents and
configured concurrency; these limits are not company-wide quotas.
- A restored old native session remains instruction-only until a fresh
session starts. Its original conflict fence and existing pending
candidates remain compatible.
- Provider processes close at the collection boundary. Conversation
resume remains available, but warm process reuse is lost.
- Backups must include the instance filesystem and database. External
bundles keep their existing behavior until explicitly moved to managed
storage.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The session does not expose a more specific
model ID or context-window size. Reasoning, code execution, and browser
tools assisted this change. Real provider E2E uses `gpt-5.6-sol`.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Fry (Paperclip) <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-29 08:25:56 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 992f720262 fix: make runner task context ownership explicit (#13753)
<!-- Write all pull request text in Simplified Technical English
(ASD-STE100). -->

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Task descriptions, comments, continuation data, skills, and
execution rules enter several agent adapters.
> - The same source can be rendered by more than one automatic input
carrier.
> - Failed resumes can also rebuild input from stale or compact context.
> - This pull request gives each Paperclip-owned source one delivery
owner and preserves the required transport boundaries.
> - It adds deterministic adapter, interaction, runner, and browser
tests for these boundaries.
> - The benefit is more predictable context delivery with explicit
evidence for later live qualification.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: #13144 removes a duplicate environment payload and bounds wake
lists. Related: #11360 addresses Hermes resume behavior. This pull
request preserves compatible active-session formats while repairing
context ownership and stale question creation.

**What happened?**

Task descriptions and comments could enter more than one automatic
context block. Native transports could wrap a complete model input in a
second task envelope. Some legacy and gateway adapters could omit the
owned assignment on ordinary tasks or rebuild a failed resume with stale
compact context. A continuation could also request a question after
newer human comments had arrived.

**Expected behavior**

Each task or comment source has one automatic model-facing owner.
Distinct comment IDs and repeated wording remain distinct. Fresh
fallback attempts rebuild the required full context. A question request
is rejected when newer queued human direction makes it stale. Harness
access policy remains owned by execution configuration.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Build a task with a description and current comments.
2. Capture the actual adapter or runner input.
3. Compare source ownership and task-envelope nesting.
4. Queue a human comment before a continuation requests a question.
5. Trigger a failed resume and inspect the fresh retry input.
6. Run the focused adapter, interaction, runner, and browser checks.

## What Changed

- Add shared prompt-section selection at the provider-attempt boundary.
- Deliver owned assignment context through native, legacy CLI, ACP,
gateway, cloud, Pi, Kimi, Grok, Gemini, OpenCode, Cursor, OpenClaw, and
Hermes paths.
- Rebuild full or compact context after resume recovery changes the
attempt. Add native and Claude ACP tests of actual recovery requests.
- Preserve custom templates, loaded instruction files, execution
policies, and older active-session formats.
- Record continuation source metadata and reject stale question creation
under the issue-row lock.
- Add explicit Product E2E context-integrity profiles, prerequisite
gates, credential-isolation checks, and report fixtures.
- Bypass service-worker forwarding for same-origin Vite development
modules. A real Chromium test fails with resource exhaustion before the
repair and passes after it. Production asset caching keeps its existing
policy.
- Add browser diagnostics and service-worker module-loading regressions.
- Add an explicit zero-retry eval option. The default retry behavior
remains unchanged. Each campaign records its effective policy.
- Remove the model-facing working-directory sentence from four prompt
builders. Existing workspace, sandbox, permission, and custom-template
configuration remains unchanged.
- Align the everyday workflow assertion with the current 47-entry
catalog.

Compared with current upstream master, the branch carries the
context-ownership implementation and its tests, the explicit
context-integrity catalog and evidence harness, and the focused browser
regression checks.

## Verification

**Merge assessment:** focused regression evidence supports merge. This
is not full completion of the original broad qualification matrix. The
maintainer has authorized merge after fresh verification of the master
integration.

- Current head: `bbd52f82114eabf09bc7b1a7e97d54a5b43bbc00`. This
integrates current master `2f585ef26a1814fa209715242d1ca791b63e4c4e`.
All 14 conflicts are resolved. Cancellation checks, workspace
finalization, native Grok support, and both sets of tests are retained.
- Current-head Greptile: **5/5**, with no blocking findings. The review
names this exact commit. All **59 reported checks are terminal: 55
successful, 4 skipped, zero pending or failing**. This includes the full
root general and serialized suites, separate runner checks, typecheck,
build, canary, browser E2E, Docker, and security checks. The successful
legacy security status is included in that total.
- After integration: workspace typecheck and full build passed. Separate
runner checks passed: **2,160 TypeScript tests (10 skipped), 582 Rust
tests, and 39 preparation checks**. Other passing checks include 621
Product E2E harness units, 376 focused shared/adapter tests, 160
real-database/API tests, 86 Hermes tests, 18 browser-support checks, and
Product E2E typechecking. The complete root suite passed in CI. The
duplicate local monolithic root run was stopped after that CI result; it
is not counted as a completed local pass.
- New native recovery coverage retains full assignment, completion
contract, and explicit skill selection after safe replacement, for old
and prepared input formats. Full native session test file: **136/136
passed**.
- New Claude ACP coverage captures actual fresh, resumed, and
missing-session fallback requests. It verifies one assignment copy,
comment order, identical text under distinct comment IDs, and full
fallback context. Full file: **33/33 passed**. Both affected TypeScript
checks passed.
- Existing deterministic tests cover source revisions, approval and
trust boundaries, completion validation, custom templates, compatible
sessions, standalone driver wrapping, and maintained adapter transport
requests.
- Provider-free browser support: **17/17 passed** after the master
merge. Service-worker unit tests: **33/33 passed**. The module-overload
regression failed before the repair and passed after it in real
Chromium.

### Fresh live comparisons

The new batch ran exactly four Product E2E attempts. **All four passed
on the first attempt; no retries.** Each has six terminal matchers plus
the existing browser lifecycle and invariant checks.

| Exact case ID | Control | Candidate |
|---|---|---|
| `core-compatibility.runner-codex.local.plan-revise-accept` | Passed |
Passed |
|
`local-session-integrity.runner-acpx-claude.local.structured-question-restart-resume`
| Passed | Passed |

The plan case checks a revised canonical plan and revision-bound
approval before completion. The question case restarts the server before
submitting the answer, then verifies the continuation completes.

Control source is `dfa4e1bda8d50a1a01746603251a9128dbe9d0d6`. Candidate
source is `79fcdb5dece501d28064ea9da306603881b46f0c`. They use identical
frozen definitions and provider versions: Codex `0.156.0` with
`gpt-5.6-sol`; ACPX `0.13.1` / Claude ACP `0.73.0` with
`claude-sonnet-5`. The September 24 head added master browser recovery
and test-only changes. The September 28 head also integrates newer
master changes, including cancellation, workspace finalization, and
native Grok. These are frozen-source live results, not exact-head live
runs.

The candidate received one description copy where the control initially
received three. The submitted initial plan envelopes were 7,969 versus
19,097 characters. Question envelopes were 7,592 versus 18,919. These
are structural measurements, not whole-provider token or dollar savings.

### Earlier evidence and failed attempts

- The preceding fresh batch has four effective passing pairs: OpenCode
comment continuation and assigned skill, native Codex comment
continuation, and native Claude comment continuation. It retains **11
attempts: eight passed and three failed**.
- Original failures remain recorded: missing local PostgreSQL library
links before task creation; host-sleep cleanup after task/page checks
passed; and a Claude **control** session-open rejection before a model
turn. Setup was repaired identically on both worktrees. The permitted
unchanged infrastructure retries passed. The underlying Claude provider
startup error was not retained and remains unknown.
- Older R2 retains **17 passes and one failure** across 18 attempts,
including eight both-pass native/legacy Codex/Claude pairs. Its OpenCode
blank-page failure led to the service-worker repair. R2 is historical
evidence: master changed the native fixed prompt and removed duplicate
wake environment data afterward.
- The September 24 CI run initially failed one unrelated preview
readiness test (`ECONNREFUSED` on its local fixture). Its test and
production code match master. Isolated local verification passed **28
tests, 3 skipped**. One unchanged CI retry passed the full shard: **831
passed, 1 skipped**, including all **31 preview-exposure tests**. The
aggregate CI gate passed afterward. The precise startup cause remains
unknown; a port race is a hypothesis, not a proved cause.

### Limits

The original wider profile/workflow matrix, repeated trials, and remote
Daytona qualification are incomplete. These results support a focused
merge recommendation, not statistical equivalence or universal harness
qualification. Some usage receipts are missing in both variants, so no
token or dollar savings are claimed. The $500 ceiling was preserved
using conservative allowances; failed attempts and unknown charges
remain in the ledger.

Reproduce the focused additions with `pnpm exec vitest run
packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/acp.test.ts` and `pnpm
--filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run
src/native-session-runtime.test.ts`. Full checks use `pnpm -r
typecheck`, `pnpm test:run`, `pnpm build`, and the separate runner
checks. Paid evals require the frozen definitions, profiles, and
credentials; do not use `--all` as a substitute for the selected cases.

## Risks

- Context placement changes can affect model behavior. Deterministic
checks cover the selected paths, but live qualification remains
incomplete.
- The stale-question guard can reject a request when queued human
comments arrived during the run. This is intended.
- New stored inputs and model envelopes retain compatibility readers for
older active sessions.
- Custom templates may intentionally repeat content.
- Removing a model-facing working-directory sentence does not change
filesystem, command, sandbox, or permission configuration.
- The worker bypass applies only to same-origin development module
paths. Cache-policy tests preserve private-response handling and
production asset caching. Mounted HTTP fixture changes remain test-only.
- This PR does not claim measured token savings or statistical
equivalence across every harness.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, exact model gpt-6-astra, with repository tools and code
execution. Bounded supporting work used gpt-5.6-luna and gpt-6-luna. The
serving context-window size is not exposed in this task.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR using the required issue fields
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
ticket id
- [x] I have run the focused local checks and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect these changes
- [x] I have considered and documented risks above
- [x] All current-head Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
for the current head
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-28 14:49:14 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 7bc03e0acd feat(runner): default harnesses to full auto and support task reassignment (#13686)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and their work.
> - Agent Chat uses native runners to save plans and coordinate tasks.
> - Provider defaults differed across harnesses and could stop
unattended work at a second permission gate.
> - Agents also lacked a dedicated tool to move existing work to another
agent safely.
> - This change defaults native providers to full automatic permission
for provider tools and connected tools.
> - A guarded reassignment tool preserves task identity, stops the
previous run, and schedules the new owner once.
> - Codex and Claude chat acceptance tests now use production permission
defaults.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Native runner, ACPX Claude permission policy, task authority, and Agent
Chat acceptance tests.

**Problem or motivation**

A user can authorize an agent to save a plan or create a task, but
Claude's default provider gate can still stop that action. Reassignment
needs a dedicated operation that preserves context and avoids concurrent
owners or unintended recovery runs.

**Proposed solution**

Default Claude/ACPX to `approve-all`, OpenCode to `allow`, and Codex to
`never`. Apply the defaults at configuration, execution, fresh-session,
resume, driver, and proxy boundaries. Keep explicit permission settings
and server-side company, claim, task-mode, and approval checks. Add
`reassign_task` with version checks, durable idempotency, audited
cancellation, and guarded successor scheduling.

**Alternatives considered**

A Paperclip-only allowlist still blocks provider tools and other
connections during unattended work. Full automatic permission is the
requested product default. Recreating a task discards its identity and
history. Updating assignment without stopping the previous run can leave
two agents working on the same task.

**Roadmap alignment**

This extends the existing planning, delegated work, governed tool
access, and recovery features. It adds no new service or schema
migration. Recent related tasks and open PRs were checked for duplicate
work.

**Additional context**

Related: #13678 (Agent Chat tools and recovery), #13677 (remote runner
startup). The stacked legacy-adapter companion is #13693. This also
fixes the deployed-server artifact fallback needed to stage the current
runner binary.

## What Changed

- Default Claude/ACPX to `approve-all`, OpenCode to `allow`, and Codex
to `never`, including missing settings at direct driver and proxy entry
points. These defaults cover provider tools and connected tools.
Preserve explicitly configured restrictive modes.
- Include assigned approval reads using canonical side-effect
classifications, so verifying a recorded approval does not trigger
another provider gate. Paperclip approval decisions still enforce
controller authority.
- Carry the new permission mode through server configuration, execution
contracts, recovery identity, TypeScript, and Rust. Keep
`approve-paperclip` as an optional restricted mode, with exact SDK rules
and closed unknown requests. It is not a default.
- Add `reassign_task` to the semantic catalog, controller, mock
authority, and generated contracts.
- Guard reassignment with company authorization, expected owner and
version, protected-state checks, and durable retry receipts.
- Honor explicit backlog task creation atomically with the initial plan,
without scheduling a wake. Preserve backlog holds regardless of
dependency readiness.
- Stop active work before changing ownership. Restore the prior owner
through a guarded, idempotent wake if final handoff validation fails.
Keep intentional reassignment stops out of failure recovery. Preserve
backlog and blocked states without waking them early.
- Add authorization, concurrency, replay, stop, and permission boundary
regressions. Add Codex and Claude chat reassignment cases and run native
chat cases with production defaults.
- Clarify shared runner guidance: save plans and Paperclip documents
directly with `write_document`; create and register a local file only
when a downloadable file is requested.
- Document provider defaults and the operator choices for existing
agents.

## Verification

- Current head `d82fbb0f03546d27cecf072250e4172e0b1ee662`: **55 checks
passed**, with two intentional skips. [PR
checks](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13686/checks).
- Greptile reviewed that exact head at **5/5**. The security reviewer
acknowledged the intended full-auto default, and the acknowledged
discussions are resolved.
- Full workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed locally
after rebasing onto current master. Targeted adapter/server, runner,
API, default/resume, and heartbeat configuration tests passed.
- **All six real-provider acceptance cases passed on their first
attempt, with cleanup passing:** plan handoff, task reassignment, and
backlog creation/status, each on native Claude and Codex. Evidence
records Claude's effective `approve-all` mode. [Campaign and
downloadable
evidence](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35469926548).
- The live campaign tested combined revision
`a37881c824dcd7170380fc4b788732fc743e5da7`. The final PR heads add only
a heartbeat test expectation correction; application code is unchanged
from that live-tested revision.
- The campaign's result-enforcement job passed. Its separate report
publisher failed because the trusted workflow's `patchedDependencies`
configuration differs from its frozen lockfile. All six results and
screenshots remain available as GitHub artifacts. The overall manual
workflow is red for this publishing failure.
- Full-suite coverage is supplied by the passing CI partitions. The
separate unsharded local run was stopped after the corresponding CI
partitions passed; it is not counted as a completed local run.
- Reassignment tests cover stale state, cross-company access, denied
authority, cancellation failure, compensating wake, and idempotent
retries. Backlog tests verify the original creation audit, saved plan,
exact task count, and absence of task-bound runs.

## Risks

- Agents with no explicit permission mode now receive full provider tool
permission, including connected tools. This is a deliberate broad
default. Existing explicit restrictive modes still apply. Controller
authorization, company isolation, workspace boundaries, and Paperclip
governance remain in force.
- Reassignment crosses run cancellation and task ownership transactions.
Durable stop intent, revalidation, audit receipts, and guarded queue
dispatch cover interruptions and retries.
- The new permission enum requires a current runner artifact. The remote
artifact fallback uses the same resolved controller binary for upload
and execution.
- Live provider behavior remains subject to the selected model. Targeted
live results do not qualify the full catalog.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with code execution and repository tools.
The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in
this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-19 16:49:18 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 36dbb7ed1c fix: harden agent chat runner tools and recovery (#13678)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agent Chat turns discussion into plans, tasks, reviews, and hires.
> - These workflows need reliable tool results and task context on the
native runner.
> - Live Claude and Codex tests exposed lost retry requests, invalid
project inputs, and a child startup crash.
> - Recovery also exposed a misleading retry action and missing child
task context.
> - This pull request fixes those paths and adds regression coverage.
> - Agents can continue the original request and operators can inspect a
stopped run.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A failed Agent Chat retry could lose the user's question. Project
creation accepted unsupported icons in its tool schema. Codex could stop
when a helper's MCP startup event arrived before its thread lineage. A
stopped task offered Retry even when the server required execution
reconciliation. Resumed agents could miss existing delegated tasks.
Hiring and review instructions did not describe the native runner's
available tools and source requirements.

**Expected behavior**

Retries retain the selected request. Tool schemas match the API. Child
startup information does not gain authority over the parent or stop it.
Recovery actions match the server's requirements. Task context exposes
existing child work. Handoffs contain the material the assignee needs.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Enable experimental Agent Chat in an isolated development instance.
2. Configure native Codex and ACPX Claude agents on Paperclip Runner.
3. Ask for a plan, revise it, approve task creation, and request a hire
and status report.
4. Retry a failed chat turn and check that it answers the original
request.
5. Start a Codex helper before its thread lineage arrives.
6. Resume a delegated task and inspect its existing children and saved
output.

**Paperclip version or commit**

The live failures were found at `f2c5e54dc`. This branch is rebased onto
`86b7ee992`.

**Deployment mode**

Isolated local development instance with native Codex and ACPX Claude.
No database migration or default permission change.

Related work: Refs #13284 for Agent Chat. Refs #13438 for the
server-side API receipt fix, which this branch preserves. The transport
also accepts the earlier HTTP receipt format. Refs #13655 for the
current Codex continuation and helper lineage handling, which this
branch also preserves.

## What Changed

- Preserve failed Agent Chat wake-comment IDs and session generation
from the authorized source run. Reject pre-reset retries.
- Wrap API receipts with the correct semantic call identity. Test
current and earlier receipt formats through real HTTP and runnerd.
- Classify early child MCP startup notifications as information. Keep
foreign completion and result events rejected.
- Constrain project icons on both tool surfaces and regenerate the
protocol contracts.
- Include bounded, company-scoped visible direct child tasks in task
context. Filter hidden tasks before applying the limit.
- Replace the rejected Retry action with Inspect run for native
continuation reconciliation.
- Update hiring, review handoff, status reporting, and development
guidance.

## Verification

- Live tests covered Claude and Codex questions, plan revisions,
approval, task creation, hiring, status, chat reset, failures, and
recovery.
- The recovered task produced its saved checklist and example. A later
follow-up read the existing child tasks and document without creating
more work.
- Full build, repository type checks, token gates, 142 focused tests,
188 runner TypeScript tests, and the Rust notification/descendant
regressions passed after rebase. The separate local full-suite run was
stopped after the complete CI suite passed.
- Review fixes passed the updated route, tool-authority, and icon
regression tests plus server type checking.
- Required commands: `pnpm build`, `pnpm -r typecheck`,
`PAPERCLIP_IN_WORKTREE=false pnpm test:run`, and `pnpm
check:token-gates`.
- At `4ce8047b0`, all 55 applicable GitHub checks pass (two Storybook
checks are intentionally skipped), including the complete
general/serialized test matrix, runner tests, browser tests, build, type
checks, Docker checks, and canary dry run.
- Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 on `4ce8047b0`; all three findings were
fixed with regressions and there are no unresolved review threads.
- Two initial CI service-startup timeouts passed unchanged in local
reproductions and in the latest CI run.

## Risks

- The new event classification is limited to MCP startup information. It
does not authorize foreign task completion, results, or tool requests.
- Task context returns at most 100 direct child tasks and reports
truncation. It excludes hidden tasks and other companies. This improves
delegation context but does not enforce semantic duplicate detection.
- Native reconciliation still requires an operator to inspect and record
prior outcomes. The new link does not replace the recovery API.
- API tools remain opt-in. Claude permission choices remain explicit. No
default permission, schema, or workflow changes.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, code
execution, API tools, and browser testing. The exact deployment
identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. Live
acceptance agents used OpenAI `gpt-5.6-sol` and Anthropic
`claude-sonnet-4-6`.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-19 09:11:04 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 43acbcc398 fix(runner): preserve sessions and complete question and approval continuations (#13655)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The native runner connects task state to provider sessions.
> - Follow-up turns must retain provider memory and carry new user
direction.
> - Lost session IDs caused repeated context and extra input tokens.
> - Native question answers and approval races could leave valid work
blocked.
> - This pull request repairs those paths and adds regression coverage.
> - Agents can continue accepted work without repeating the conversation
or losing the user's answer.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #13574. That merged PR shortened continuation prompts and moved
question instructions into tool documentation. This change preserves
sessions and fixes failures exposed by broader testing. Related runtime
work: #13408 and #13410.

**What happened?**

Native follow-up turns could lose the provider session ID. Completion
guidance could replace the original task with its latest comment. Claude
native questions could remain pending after the user answered. Approval
during a running tool call could suspend the run before the tool
response arrived. Onboarding and chat handoff instructions also caused
repeated planning or missing plan documents.

**Expected behavior**

Reuse a valid provider session. Send only new events when that session
already has the history. Preserve the task requirements and apply later
user direction. Store the question answer and deliver it to the waiting
run. Finish governed tool responses before suspending. Execute the
accepted plan without asking for the same approval again.

**Steps to reproduce**

Run the continuation, local-session-integrity, first-task, and
agent-chat suites with native Codex and Claude. Include
provider-question-bridge, accept-while-running, and plan-handoff.

**Paperclip version or commit**

This branch is based on master d54b75011. The active full catalog run
tests 4e75881db. Later review fixes have separate regression coverage.

**Deployment mode**

Isolated local instances and Daytona sandboxes in the existing Runner
full-stack E2E harness.

## What Changed

- Retain provider session identity across turns and late usage
snapshots. Send new continuation events on session reuse, with full
context available for a fresh session.
- Preserve task requirements and later direction in completion guidance.
Return the current contract revision after a stale completion
submission.
- Bridge native Claude questions to saved Paperclip cards. Submit
answers through the saved card and resume the same run.
- Delay governed suspension until tool results settle. Add a
deterministic test barrier for approval during an active run.
- Clarify free-text question examples, explicit onboarding plans, and
execution of accepted chat plans.
- Fix continuation readiness, verified output evidence, and declared
screenshot collection.
- Qualify the legacy Claude test CLI at 2.1.277. The old 2.1.19 CLI did
not discover mounted skills. Update the existing workflow pin and
isolated launcher together.
- Refresh the Daytona image lockfile integrity pin after reviewing
master patch updates.
- Carry continuation mode as runtime metadata instead of inferring it
from user-visible text. Install the test Claude CLI without lifecycle
scripts.

## Verification

- Targeted paid verification: 20/20 cases passed across
local-environment campaigns before the rebase.
[Report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-seven-fixes-35397904249/).
- Harness checks: 379 unit tests passed; harness typecheck passed.
- Latest-head PR checks: 55 passed, two intentionally skipped. Greptile
is 5/5; the security scan passes.
- Review regressions: 350 executor tests and 204 session/driver tests
passed. A script-free Claude install was verified with the actual CLI.
- Full catalog, including the explicit-only everyday suite: [run
35417932353](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35417932353).
Completed: **164/205 passed; 41 failed**. [Full dashboard and failure
investigation](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-full-catalog-35417932353/).
Includes 204 case artifacts and one pre-case GitHub authorization
timeout; missing evidence is not scored as a pass. The full run tested
`4e75881db`; Final-head metadata/CLI smoke cases both passed. In the
separate [six infrastructure
retries](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35419769343),
the GitHub timeout case passed and all five Docker preflight failures
repeated. [Follow-up
dashboard](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-full-catalog-35417932353/follow-up/).
- Full local typecheck and build passed on the rebased branch. The full
local unit run completed with 657 passing files, two test timeouts and
one suite setup timeout. All three affected files passed when rerun in
isolation (84 tests). The first full local run was not clean.
- Focused regression coverage includes the live question bridge,
same-run response delivery, UI routing, stale revisions, approval
overlap, and session reuse.

## Full-catalog follow-ups

- Test infrastructure: 14 Claude everyday cells probe an absent host
CLI; six cells failed pre-task GitHub/Docker qualification (GitHub
passes on retry; all five Docker cases repeat; the workflow preflight
allowlist omits their case IDs); five ACPX Codex cells cannot create
sandbox namespaces.
- Runtime: four OpenCode completion-criteria mismatches masked by
shutdown errors, one service-approval suspension failure; three Daytona
recovery failures encounter existing skill files; one duplicate
completion wake.
- Confirmed test defects: question pagination and a noncanonical plan
document key.
- Product/behavior: mismatched visible/required question sets, an
attachment instead of the requested task document, one lone-option
onboarding question, early completion instead of review, and a Codex
Mini completion-schema failure.
- The report job itself fails on trusted master’s stale patch/lock
configuration. The linked report is rebuilt with the shared renderer
from original cell results and public fixture screenshots; it excludes
private snapshots, logs and traces.

These are investigated follow-ups, not silently regraded passes.
First-task passed 51/52. The PR checks are green independently of the
broader catalog’s behavioral/infrastructure failures.

## Risks

- Session reuse depends on a valid provider identity and context
coverage. Fresh-session fallback and reset tests cover this boundary.
- Native question delivery spans saved interaction state and a live
provider run. Tests cover duplicate events, closed runs, and same-run
answers.
- Provider behavior varies. The full paid catalog may expose failures
beyond these targeted fixes; those results will be reported without
relaxing valid approval or output checks.
- The legacy Claude version update is limited to test infrastructure. No
database migration is included.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with repository inspection, code execution,
and browser/E2E tools. The exact runtime model identifier and
context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (targeted checks and all
three timeout-file reruns pass; full-run timeout caveat above)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-19 07:42:57 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 11921075a4 Add first-task onboarding skill and Runner E2E coverage (#13517)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The first task helps a new user define and approve useful work.
> - That workflow needs reusable instructions and tests against the
production experience.
> - Native Codex and Claude must load the assigned skill, including
after resume.
> - Maintainers need recorded conversations and precise failed checks to
judge regressions.
> - This pull request adds the first-task skill and a suite in the
shared Runner E2E harness.
> - It keeps behavior results separate from informational quality scores
and incomplete recordings.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

The first onboarding task and the Runner E2E report used to review it.

**Current behavior**

Onboarding embeds its policy in a hidden brief. Native Codex drops the
skill-instructions setting at the Rust boundary. The shared E2E harness
has no onboarding suite or full conversation view.

**Proposed behavior**

Assign and invoke `/first-task` for the onboarding task. Send selected
Codex skills as structured protocol inputs. Run twelve scenarios across
legacy Codex, legacy Claude, native Codex, and native ACPX Claude.
Include all 48 cells in full campaigns. Show recorded chat, question and
approval cards, exact checks, instructions, and billing in the shared
dashboard.

**Reason and benefit**

Measure the real onboarding experience before changing prompts.
Distinguish infrastructure failures, behavior failures, and unexercised
journey steps.

**Breaking changes**

No database migration or production API change. First-task instructions
now live in an assigned skill. The user-edited persona is preserved; the
skill includes the maintainer-approved proposal-mode mapping and
saved-plan requirement.

Related: #11043 is earlier onboarding work. #13422 already fixes native
Claude model pinning, context delivery, and read permissions on master;
this branch includes those fixes through its base. The new Claude
recovery test supplements them.

## What Changed

- Extract and assign the first-task skill while retaining the production
greeting and opening question.
- Carry the Codex skill-instructions flag through thread start and
resume. Resolve explicit task skill references only against assigned
skills and send native skill inputs.
- Invoke an unambiguously selected assigned skill through Claude ACPX’s
native slash-command parser on initial and resumed turns, retaining the
entire task/wake envelope as its argument. Do not carry that invocation
into ordinary tasks.
- Restore the saved single-task proposal modes: confirmation card, or
saved plan with revision-targeted checkbox approval. Explicit plan
requests also require a saved plan.
- Add first-response and complete-journey cases with fixed user facts,
acceptance checkpoints, durable outcome checks, and accounting for child
runs.
- Fail the eval when choice questions have fewer than two real options.
Recognize planning documents without treating them as completed work.
- Add optional, bounded quality judging as explicit post-processing.
- Render full conversations and static interaction cards in the shared
report. Conversations start folded. Show original and regraded results
and incomplete journeys distinctly.
- Keep credential-persistence scanning outside the first-task behavioral
suite; retain public evidence redaction.
- Refresh generated capability references after the API-reference edits.
- Correct shared native question guidance and tool schemas: choices need
at least two meaningful options; open-ended questions use canonical text
fields with the required compatibility payload. Verify both formats
through real tool-authority persistence.
- Disable announcements automatically for every isolated Runner E2E
process and label the gallery environment/provider/target explicitly.
- Remove CI races in the GitHub connection browser test and native
session recovery test by waiting for the actual async work before
asserting its results.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/services/onboarding-first-task-assets.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-onboarding-first-task-routes.test.ts`: 19
passed.
- `pnpm --dir packages/paperclip-runner exec vitest run
src/drivers/acpx/runtime-host.test.ts
src/drivers/acpx/native-skill-prompt.test.ts
src/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.test.ts`: 70 passed. Native command
forwarding and the 1 MiB input boundary both failed before their fixes
and passed afterward. Coverage includes changed skills on reopen,
approval context, and an ordinary subsequent task.
- Runner E2E unit suite: 306 passed. Harness typecheck passed. The 64
first-task fixture and grader tests also pass.
- Full repository typecheck and build passed locally. Server typecheck
and Runner build passed again after the native-command change.
- Full GitHub Actions CI passed on `23e56447b`: all
server/workspace/browser shards, Runner verification, typecheck/release
registry, build, canary, policy, and Docker checks. Greptile reviewed
this exact head at 5/5 with no unresolved threads. The earlier broad
local run had database startup/timing failures that passed isolated
retries; the complete remote suite is green.
- Merge verification against current master: 312 harness tests and 13
native recovery tests passed. Regenerated semantic contracts and fixture
hashes pass their consistency check. Full local typecheck and build also
passed on the stacked queue branch. After merging the latest master and
preserving the GitHub setup timing regression in the split browser
suite, both focused GitHub browser tests passed. Three CI timing/startup
flakes passed local verification and one remote retry; all latest-head
checks are green.
- Real pinned Claude SDK and Claude ACP JSON-RPC probes against a local
mock API confirmed that `/skill-name` expands the assigned skill body
before the model request and retains the task arguments. A prose mention
does not. The probes made no paid model calls. The ACP probe used the
current first-task skill body and retained the wake arguments.
- [Full 48-case campaign and
report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-first-task-35053063880/):
44 passed after three interrupted Codex cases completed in targeted
reruns. Original results, regrades, and all 51 executions remain in the
report provenance.
- [Claude campaign after the shared-question
fix](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-first-task-claude-35099525201/):
10/12 passed with zero single-option failures. All 12 recorded the
current assigned skill and corrected guidance. The failures exposed
skipped skill invocation and a missing saved plan. This PR adds native
command invocation and explicit saved-plan instructions; the subsequent
report below still shows behavior failures.
- [Fresh 12-case Claude
report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-first-task-claude-35102737804/)
at `78452129e`: 10/12 pass after correcting two false proposal-matcher
failures. The recordings said “Here is the task I will create and
run/complete” in approval cards; the old matcher missed that word order.
Regression tests failed before the fix and pass after it. Original
results and offline regrade provenance remain linked. No agent rerun was
needed. Zero single-option-question failures; two behavior failures
remain: direct work before acceptance on a plain first message, and an
explicit plan request without a saved plan. Neither check was relaxed.
The follow-up `82087ac7e` fixes command-prefix size accounting;
`94aefb1f3` fixes only that proposal matcher.
- Report browser checks confirm folded conversations, rendered cards,
explicit Local/Daytona labels, and no page errors. The published-object
audit scanned 1,306 text files across 2,154 objects with no
credential-format findings or prohibited files. Image pixels and unknown
token formats are outside that scan.

## Risks

- Model behavior is nondeterministic. One campaign is evidence, not a
guarantee. The two remaining Claude behavior failures are visible in the
report and require further product work; this PR does not claim all
onboarding scenarios pass.
- The suite checks persisted Paperclip effects. It cannot prove the
absence of arbitrary external effects.
- Historical recordings can miss later journey steps. These remain
incomplete, never passes.
- Native profiles switch runtime after the production onboarding wizard
because it does not yet expose a native option.
- Quality scores are informational and cannot override behavioral
failures.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. The exact deployed model identifier and context-window size
are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-16 14:24:32 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip f2c5e54dca fix(runner): preserve handoff work and publish requested files (#13355)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and their tasks.
> - A task keeps its instructions, progress, and files when its assigned
agent changes.
> - The replacement runner lost the interrupted run's context and could
overwrite an existing draft.
> - A saved message also stayed attached to the former agent and could
reopen the task after the replacement finished.
> - File tasks could report Done with only a local path that the user
could not open.
> - This pull request transfers handoff context and saved messages, and
makes requested files accessible through the existing attachment
contract.
> - Users can change agents and collect completed work without repeating
instructions or confirming bookkeeping.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #13338. Builds on merged #13354 for queue admission and #13353 for
remote workspace retry. #10123 concerns restricted recovery-model
escalation; this change instead covers ordinary native handoff and file
completion.

**What happened?**

Codex wrote a draft before a user assigned the task to Claude. The
replacement lacked continuation context and replaced the draft. A queued
user message could later restart the former agent and reopen the
completed task. Separately, a runner could finish a requested file but
return only a machine-local path. Remote native runs had no bound file
publication tool.

**Expected behavior**

The replacement reads and preserves existing work, receives saved
messages once, and keeps each message's author. The former agent stays
stopped. A requested file has a working attachment or accessible work
product before Done. Text-only tasks do not require attachments.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Ask Codex to save three newsletter names and then wait.
2. Queue an instruction to keep those names and expand the draft.
3. Use Interrupt and assign to select Claude.
4. Verify the original names survive, the result has a working download,
and only the source and replacement runs exist.
5. Ask either provider for a Markdown checklist and open the file from
its completed response.

## What Changed

- Carry the exact same-task interrupted run's summary, semantic
receipts, and history into handoff context. Tell the replacement to
inspect existing files before editing.
- Adopt saved ordinary task comments into the successor's receipt under
the task lock. Preserve authors and separate mention, chat, and
interaction contracts.
- Prevent a former-assignee comment wake from reopening a completed task
or starting a stale execution.
- Reject workspace-only, fabricated, and cross-task file completion
references with actionable runner feedback. New file output also needs a
matching current-run publication receipt and asset filename/size/hash,
or an accessible work product registered by the current run. Prior
output can remain context alongside a current file, or be verified and
re-registered internally. Authorized chat attachment reuse retains its
verified current-run clone receipt; older receipt shapes require an
intact matching source.
- Bind remote file reads to the active environment runner and reuse the
existing attachment and work-product publication path.
- Enforce workspace confinement, regular single-link files, stable
identity, a 10 MiB limit, and exact size and SHA-256 checks. Rotate the
native session fingerprint for the updated tool contract.
- Contain rejected remote signals and protocol-failure cleanup,
including logging failures. Preserve the original cleanup rejection for
its owner; a rejected operation never supplies stop acknowledgement or
cleanup proof.
- Allow exactly one maximum-size base64 file through the native SSH
command adapter, preserving a finite output cap.
- Document handoff and accessible file completion rules.

## Verification

- Each observed bug has a failing regression before its fix. Final
post-rebase integration passed 732 tests across 13 files before the
final receipt and signal guards; final affected results are below.
- Publication provenance and compatibility: 8 provenance regressions and
2 compatibility regressions failed before their fixes; the final four
affected suites pass 53 tests, including mixed old/new references and
real authorized chat reuse. Controls cover old attachments and work
products, filename/size/hash/origin mismatch, missing/wrong receipts,
current-run publication, same-run durable proof, internally
re-registering preserved bytes, and no-new-file follow-ups.
- Remote signal rejection: the real Node subprocess previously exited 1
when the production launcher signalled a deleted sandbox. It now stays
alive for both a failed signal and failed logging; all 349 executor
tests pass. The failed signal still provides no termination proof.
- Remote file reader and SSH command boundary: 33 tests passed,
including real Linux descriptor reads and the actual SSH adapter
subprocess output cap (network executable replaced by a deterministic
fixture). Exact 10 MiB bytes pass, one byte beyond the encoded cap
fails.
- Live local Claude and Codex Stop journeys preserve the saved file,
deliver queued instructions once, and reach Done with two total runs.
The handoff journey preserves the original names and download with
exactly two runs. Both local providers deliver exact checklist files
without a completion confirmation.
- Live combined Daytona verification passed: the original failed task's
Retry reused its sandbox; a selected Git subfolder produced an exact
downloadable file; warm and deliberately resumed Claude runs took about
33 seconds. Codex produced a 240-byte download in 33.1 seconds after 134
seconds of contention/backoff. Both cloud downloads retained exact bytes
after the two owned sandboxes were deleted.
- The sandbox-deletion retest identified a separate ignored promise in
protocol-failure cleanup. Two real Node subprocess regressions failed
under fatal unhandled-rejection policy before the fix; all 36 protocol,
lifecycle, and integrity tests now pass. The original close promise
still rejects to its owning runtime. The final live retest passed: a
normal Claude Daytona task completed in 132.352 seconds, then its
sandbox was deleted. Thirteen samples over 361 seconds confirmed the
same controller stayed healthy, the task stayed Done with unchanged run
IDs, and its attachment retained exact bytes. The post-deletion browser
download passed with zero page errors; all five owned sandboxes are
confirmed absent.
- Full repository typecheck and build passed on final commit
`de64d16f1`. Final-head Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved threads.
[Final-head
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34736623758)
passed: 32 successful checks and two conditional skips. The earlier
mixed-source full local test invocation was deliberately stopped before
rebase, so no pristine green full local aggregate is claimed. Its known
failures passed in later affected suites.

## Risks

- Handoff may adopt only ordinary comments from its validated former
owner. Other delivery contracts must remain independent.
- File verification fails closed if a remote file changes during
reading. The runner must retry publication or explain a blocker.
- The updated session fingerprint starts a fresh provider process where
needed to install the new tool contract.
- No schema migration or historical status reconciliation is included.

## Model Used

OpenAI `gpt-6-astra` through Codex, with reasoning, code execution,
browser testing, and tool use. The context-window size is not exposed in
this task.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-13 08:41:20 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip c9021c6721 fix: require explicit native completion reviews (#13314)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native runs report their outcome through paperclip_finish.
> - The server previously turned incomplete reports into human approval
requests.
> - Those requests could block a later successful run, even when no
person had requested review.
> - This pull request creates review cards only for explicit attention
requests and withdraws proven old fallback cards.
> - Agents receive useful completion feedback, while explicit approval
gates and task state protections remain in force.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: #13266 removed reviews caused by policy upgrades. This change
removes the separate completion fallback.

**What happened?**

An agent reported needs_review while waiting for checks without
requesting a human decision. Paperclip created a generic Native
completion review. A later successful report could not complete the task
because that old card remained pending.

**Expected behavior**

Ordinary low-risk work completes after a valid done report, a successful
run, and workspace finalization. Incomplete work stays with the agent.
Explicit approval requests remain visible and must be resolved.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Complete a native run with needs_review and no attention requests.
2. Continue the task and submit a successful done report.
3. Observe that the old implementation leaves the task in review behind
a generic confirmation card.

## What Changed

- Require explicit attention requests to create native review cards.
Route each request independently and preserve pending or declined
decisions.
- Withdraw only pending system cards with matching old decision,
assessment, effect, contract, and prompt provenance. Preserve history
and explicit or answered requests.
- Reassess an affected current result without overwriting later task
edits, runs, contracts, or workspace failures.
- Return pending approval links and required actions through the
completion tool. Reject contradictory done reports and empty review
requests before accepting a result.
- Allow one corrective continuation for incomplete results, then expose
a recovery action.
- Update status fixtures, database regressions, runner tests, and the
completion contract documentation.

## Verification

- `pnpm -r typecheck` passed after merging current master.
- `pnpm build` passed after merging current master.
- The combined branch passed 89 completion and Agent Chat tests. Other
targeted tests passed: 170 external-chat and reconciliation tests; 50
runner-resume and control-plane tests; 13 arbiter tests; 7 chat delivery
tests; 21 runner completion and runtime-context tests.
- The full local test attempt exposed old review fixtures and a missing
fake-provider binary. The fixtures are fixed and the helper is built.
All affected suites pass in fresh reruns. The timing-sensitive Discord
test also passed on rerun.
- All latest-head CI checks passed, including build, typecheck, general
and serialized tests, runner verification, browser tests, and canary dry
run. Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved comments.

## Risks

- Cleanup changes existing pending cards. It requires exact system
provenance and only applies to low-risk agent-claim contracts. It does
not delete history or dismiss explicit requests.
- Status still commits after the turn and workspace finalization.
Completion feedback reports current constraints and does not claim an
early status commit.
- Incomplete reports now request a bounded corrective run instead of an
automatic approval. Repeated failures expose recovery.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with repository inspection, code execution, and
test tools. The exact deployment identifier and context window size are
not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-12 13:00:04 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 5cc7784986 test: remove cold executable reads from runner integrity deadlines (#13301)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native runner protocol tests verify that invalid authenticated input
fails closed.
> - Cloud readiness requires those tests to pass before a source commit
can deploy.
> - Two test fixtures hash the host Node executable twice even though
its process launcher is synthetic.
> - Cold reads of a large Linux executable consume time unrelated to
protocol failure handling.
> - This PR gives both synthetic runner fixtures tiny real artifacts and
keeps their existing deadlines.
> - Real authentication, encrypted frames, and request and notification
failures remain covered.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**
Cloud readiness repeatedly failed in `DurablePrpControlPlane > promptly
fails the real transport request and notification paths on authenticated
bad semantic input (throwing observer: false)` with `Test timed out in
5000ms`. The image built, but the failed source check prevented
deployment. See runs
[34656885170](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34656885170)
and
[34657111560](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34657111560).

The first case took 5.6–11.4 seconds; the following case took about 0.4
seconds. The original test reads and hashes `process.execPath` once
itself and once through the real transport. The Node executable is
122,678,944 bytes in the local Linux Node 24 container, versus 68,672
bytes on the development Mac. Instrumented Mac runs pass; cold
executable reads are a likely cause of the CI-only timeout.

**Expected behavior**
The deadline should measure real protocol rejection and consumer
failure, without reading a large unrelated executable as test fixture
data.

**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run the named test with the real transport and synthetic process
launcher.
2. For a deterministic probe, inject a six-second delay into the first
`readFileSync(process.execPath)` call.
3. The original test exceeds its existing five-second deadline. Both
cases pass after this change because neither reads the host executable.
The probe is temporary instrumentation, not part of this commit.

**Paperclip version or commit**
f12b647ae; the same failure also occurred on a38ccf997 and 9031516a7.

**Deployment mode**
Cloud readiness in GitHub Actions on Linux AWS runners. No duplicate
open PR found after searching runner timeout and durable PRP changes.

## What Changed

- Write a 26-byte synthetic runner artifact inside each existing
temporary test directory.
- Bind both the real authority and test client to that artifact's actual
SHA-256 digest.
- Retain synthetic process launchers, real wire exchange, all observer
and composed-runtime cases, integrity assertions, cleanup, and existing
five- and fifteen-second timeouts.

## Verification

- Passed all 107 tests across
`src/control-plane/durable-prp-control-plane.test.ts` and
`src/drivers/codex/codex-protocol-integrity.test.ts` using the package
Vitest configuration.
- With a temporary six-second host-executable read delay, the original
case times out. Both fixed cases pass in 235 ms combined under the same
fault injection.
- Passed `git diff --check`.
- Full workspace typecheck and build passed. The full local test command
stopped after the general server group: 10,694 tests passed and 15
failed. Thirteen failures involve macOS directory rename permissions in
the skill-cache suites. Two failures involve a missing local AgentMail
skill path. Later groups did not run in that local invocation. The
targeted runner tests passed; all Linux CI test groups passed.
- [Current-head CI run
34661107658](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34661107658)
passed. All 32 checks are green or intentionally skipped at
`e7053594e647fd8e9b71fc569cab6b7a3e9cd210`. Native runner verification
passed in 15m25s. Greptile is 5/5 on that head, with no unresolved
review findings.

## Risks

Low risk: this changes test fixture data only. The launcher never
executes the file. Artifact hashing and authentication still use real
bytes. Protocol behavior and existing test deadlines do not change. The
current Linux CI run passed both fixtures and the full native runner
verification. Further post-merge runs will test repeatability.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. The exact serving model ID and context window are not exposed
by this environment.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (targeted runner tests;
full local suite limitations are listed above)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-11 17:39:57 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 889947c238 feat: add experimental native chat connectors (#13038)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - People also ask agents for work in their existing chat tools.
> - Each external conversation needs one task and a current authorized
source.
> - Retries, Stop, and provider failures must not duplicate work or
expose private data.
> - The first chat PR establishes the opt-in provider and data
contracts.
> - This PR adds experimental channel integration and its durable
control plane.
> - Users can request work from connected channels and inspect delivery
in Paperclip.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #13100 and #13092. This is the second of exactly two chat PRs.
Foundation #13100 is merged and changed 143 files. Runner prerequisite
#13092 is also merged. This PR changes 400 files against master, below
the 500-file review limit. It contains no wireframe images or HTML
galleries.

## What Changed

- Add native Slack, GitHub, Microsoft Teams, Telegram, and Discord chat
connections. Keep chat disabled unless the operator enables experimental
chat connectors. Preserve the production GitHub tool connection and its
normal setup path.
- Bind each provider bot identity to one immutable Paperclip agent. Bind
each admitted external conversation to one task. Paperclip owns tasks,
runs, permissions, and audit records.
- Add durable admission, per-conversation queues, questions, task
controls, progress, final replies, images, files, and delivery receipts.
Board comments remain internal unless explicitly sent to the channel.
- Check current identity, provider reach, resource access, credentials,
runtime generation, and exact source before provider effects. Keep
private responses private. Never send raw reasoning, private logs,
credentials, or tool arguments.
- Hold uncertain sends for explicit audited resolution. Make Board
Send-to-channel atomic and idempotent. Keep reconnect and setup
credentials in Paperclip secret storage.
- Preserve current native-runner authority across retries, lost
acknowledgements, and recovery. Keep immutable input and completion
contracts separate from newer user input. Receipt reconciliation cannot
launch a provider.
- Reconcile chat close/new ordering and provider-effect lock order.
Audit resource access changes in the same transaction. Submit only the
selected resource from each UI toggle so stale pages cannot undo
unrelated access changes.
- Drain Codex stdout before certifying process exit. Bound the drain
with the existing shutdown grace. Preserve observed terminal authority
without treating an undrained process as successful or reusable.
- Incorporate master `018ca5da` with its ACP Stop, mobile task layout,
runner packaging, and official lock changes. Preserve dedicated
chat-answer continuations in both directions when ordinary queued
comments are adopted after Stop.
- Fence late adapter readiness behind an earlier Stop for the same run.
Preserve verified cleanup for registered adapters. Handle single Stop,
agent pause, duplicate Stops, and failure release without creating a
false cancellation receipt.
- Incorporate master's `6dd48cad4` wake-queue extraction. Preserve exact
failed-chat retry authorization and lineage, retired question-source
suppression, and the block on generic recovery that would discard the
admitted source. Fresh deferred input retains its separate promotion
path.
- Incorporate master `2a05b5ed3` and its queue-admission extraction,
simplified transaction ports, and separate runner CI job. Preserve exact
durable receipts, actor separation, and dedicated-answer isolation
through the new module. A failed receipt insert rolls back the
accompanying deferred-wake merge.

## Verification

Current head: `afe19299d06253cb628eb398e91d1200ea9f412a`, incorporating
master `2a05b5ed3457ea33efd6895520447d1d97fe98d8`. The conflicts are
resolved. This successor fixes two test-harness boundaries exposed by
CI: per-case route-module preparation and actual durable-save completion
before intentional runner termination. Production code and all existing
test/turn deadlines are unchanged. [Exact-head Greptile
review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13038#issuecomment-5587250594)
is **5/5**, completed September 10 at 13:20:55 UTC, with no actionable
findings or open review threads. [Fresh exact-head
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34481724341)
passes **all 24 jobs**, including Build and both required aggregates.
Normal exact-head guarded merge was attempted and rejected by the
remaining branch approval policy: CODEOWNER review is required and no
human approval is present. Normal **squash auto-merge is enabled** as of
September 10 at 13:36:26 UTC. Requested CODEOWNERS have been notified;
no approval bypass or self-approval was used. Earlier-head results below
remain historical evidence, not qualification of this successor.

- Final exact-head Linux evidence: 995/995 chat integration cases; 36/36
agent-skills routes; 35/35 runner live-session cases, including real
process kill/resume; 1948 runner Vitest cases with three existing
benchmark/platform guards; 870/870 API-authority cases; and 104 browser
cases with four existing optional skips. Rust, conformance/replay, full
repository build, typecheck, canary, all server/workspace shards, and
both required aggregates pass with normal CI concurrency. Earlier failed
attempts remain recorded below.

- Latest test-only qualification: 141/141
route/permissions/authentication cases pass in separate cold forks, with
plain server types and independent review clear. The real-runner suite
passes 35/35, with plain runner types and independent review clear. A
controlled premature-save acknowledgement fails as expected; matching
ownership/effect/process evidence, rejected saves, real turn outcome,
test abort, and pre-kill liveness are covered. No local reproduction of
the original CI scheduling failure is claimed. The preceding [CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34479680858)
passes 21/24 jobs, including all 995 Linux chat cases and browser
aggregate (104 passed, four existing optional skips); only Build, the
skills serialized shard, and the required verification aggregate fail.
Its exact-head Greptile review was 5/5. Both failed job logs are
retained.

- Final fixture qualification: all eight focused Discord cases and all
995 chat integration cases pass. The exact modal statement/PID is
observed before taking the real connection lock; the test then proves
its actual blocking relationship before mutation. Original SQL
execution, provider behavior, negative assertions, and 1s/15s timeouts
remain unchanged. Independent review is clear and test/production hashes
remain frozen. The preceding [CI
attempt](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34477184777)
passed 22 jobs, including Build/runner, typecheck, canary, all other
test shards, and browser aggregate (104 passed, four existing optional
skips); the two fixture failures and failed verification aggregate
remain recorded, not relabeled as a pass.

- Current queue-module composition: 308/308 recovery/batching/queue/Stop
tests; 995/995 full chat integration; 89/89 module tests, including real
PostgreSQL receipt-insert rollback; 24/24 workflow/module-boundary
tests; plain server and UI types. All four actual local process/ACP
browser paths pass in 1.4 minutes. Fresh databases, no skips or retries,
stable reviewed source hashes. The initial boundary failure is retained;
its no-op service wrapper was removed without changing recovery context
or weakening the check. An exploratory standalone test-directory
typecheck fails because its new upstream transformation config is not a
standalone typechecking project; standard CI/build does not invoke it,
and no configuration was weakened to suppress those diagnostics.

- The preceding head `e02a63d462ce5d47433b0aeb632bb6fd20aab1ba` passed
[all 24 CI
jobs](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34436462958)
and exact-head Greptile review at 5/5. Required CODEOWNER review
prevented its normal merge before master advanced again.

- Final extracted-module composition: 307/307 recovery, batching, queue
and Stop-control tests; 995/995 full chat integration; 49/49 module
tests including eight PostgreSQL adapter cases; and 19/19 issue-update
tests. Plain server types pass. All four actual local process/ACP
browser paths pass in 1.3 minutes. Fresh databases, no skips or retries
in these cohorts, frozen source hashes, and independent review clear.

- The preceding head `3e4e1c1c` passes [all PR CI
jobs](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34415826820),
including Build and required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`. Both the
original Rust failure and the previously load-sensitive lineage fixture
pass with unchanged Linux concurrency. Master advanced afterward and
required this reconciliation.
- Final master composition: 448/448 focused UI tests, 186/186 adapter
tests, 24/24 queue/control tests, and 11/11 packaging tests. Plain UI,
server, shared, and adapter types pass. Token gates and diff checks
pass. Independent server and UI reviews are clear.
- Stop-registration regression: both real-service cases fail against
exact `a95` source and pass with the fix. The full corrected
recovery/control suite passes 265/265. Duplicate-owner and failed-Stop
controls also pass. Plain server types pass. The readiness barrier
prevents provider startup without adding an acknowledgment to an already
terminal run.
- Final qualification strengthens terminal-field equality and repeats
both affected cases successfully on a fresh database. All four actual
local process/ACP browser paths pass again in 1.3 minutes, without skips
or retries. The final screenshot shows Cancelled, a paused subtree,
retained input, and no error toast.
- Two new actual-service regressions fail before the merge fix. They
prove that queued-comment adoption could consume a dedicated chat answer
or add unrelated input to that answer. The fixed four-case cohort
passes, including ordinary upstream continuation and adapter Stop
controls. Full recovery passes 257/257. All four actual local
process/ACP Stop browser flows pass in 1.4 minutes, without skips or
retries, on a fresh database.
- The unchanged runner artifact was qualified with 171/171 transport
tests, 870/870 API-authority tests, conformance 1/1, and replay 11/11.
Six controlled reader tests prove the exit/drain repair. Its local
serial Rust workspace passed 546 top-level cases plus two invoked
helpers; the later passing Linux CI supplies default-concurrency
evidence.
- Prior exact-source full chat integration passes 995/995. Settings
regressions cover concurrent stale pages, 501 destinations, pending
state, rejected updates, and explicit retry. These deterministic tests
do not prove live provider behavior.
- Retained failed attempts and their causes are in the [qualification
log](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/afe19299d06253cb628eb398e91d1200ea9f412a/doc/plans/chat-adapters/2026-09-08-chat-queue-and-webhook-repair.md).
The first merge adapter run timed out while macOS slept for 290 seconds.
Its unchanged repeat passed with a temporary sleep guard. No assertion,
deadline, or CI gate was weakened.

Review commands include `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest
run src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts
src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts` and `pnpm exec
playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts
tests/e2e/acp-stop-continuation.spec.ts`. Database suites require fresh
disposable databases. See the [browser
runbook](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/afe19299d06253cb628eb398e91d1200ea9f412a/doc/plans/chat-adapters/2026-09-04-chat-adapters-browser-e2e-runbook.md)
for provider setup and separate live acceptance steps.

## Risks

- This remains experimental. Deterministic tests and bounded live
evidence do not establish every provider feature, tenant, permission
layout, or media shape. Teams work-tenant qualification is still open.
- Failed and uncertain provider effects remain visible and can require
operator action. A transport receipt does not prove recipient
visibility.
- Native controller and runner artifacts must remain compatible.
Preserve lease ownership, terminal authority, source binding, and
quarantine during future changes.
- Access and audit rows commit together, but activity notifications
remain best-effort. This is not a new durable event outbox.
- The PR operation does not deploy a live server, replace its runner, or
change provider permissions. Remaining live qualification is documented
in the [temporary
handoff](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/afe19299d06253cb628eb398e91d1200ea9f412a/doc/plans/chat-adapters/2026-09-08-open-qualification-followups.md).

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex assisted with implementation, tool execution, testing, and
review. The work records `gpt-6-astra` assistance. The environment does
not report a context-window size. No private reasoning traces are
included.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-10 10:06:45 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 3b550c80fa fix(codex): correct startup trust, history reads, and resume usage (#13110)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip runs Codex locally and in remote sandboxes.
> - The runner must preserve startup configuration and session identity.
> - Missing project trust can disable repository configuration.
> - Full-history requests use deprecated provider fields.
> - Resume usage describes old work and must not become new run usage.
> - This change corrects startup trust, state reads, and usage
classification.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

Normal Codex runs could show repository-trust and history-deprecation
warnings.
Resume could report the preceding turn's token snapshot as a late-turn
warning.
The historical last-usage value could also be attributed to the new run.

**Expected behavior**

Trust the server-selected startup root in isolated configuration. Read
lightweight
provider state and paginated evidence. Use historical cumulative usage
as a
baseline without a new charge or user-facing warning.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Start a native Codex task in a selected repository.
2. Finish the turn and resume the provider thread.
3. Inspect provider notices, history requests, and per-run usage.
4. Repeat startup and cold resume inside a Daytona sandbox.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Codex CLI 0.153.4 is the pinned runtime and reproduced baseline.
Replayed onto master at 6abeb6733. Related authority work: Refs #13092.
This PR retains its startup cleanup and protocol-integrity checks.

**Deployment mode**

Local source checkout and disposable Daytona sandbox.

## What Changed

- Classify the exact historical resume usage event before the generic
stale-turn warning.
- Persist cumulative usage baselines across recovery of the same run.
- Use excludeTurns on resume and lightweight thread reads.
- Page turn metadata and selected turn items with cursor and identity
validation.
- Reject unsupported or incomplete history instead of guessing that
execution is idle.
- Trust the startup execution root on its host, including Git worktree
trust keys.
- Start Codex in that root and retain the selected sandbox profile on
later turns.
- Keep unrelated isolated configuration and Codex's separate hook trust
policy.
- Add Rust, TypeScript, accounting, native integration, and local
run-log documentation.

## Verification

- Codex and native-transport TypeScript: 333 passed before PR replay.
- Adjacent OpenCode/ACPX driver and accounting tests: 49 passed.
- Rust library, serialized: 226 passed. Native Codex integration: 72
passed, 1 ignored, plus two pagination regressions.
- Repository typecheck and build passed. All repository test groups have
passing coverage after fixture and resource retests; the initial
monolithic command was not clean.
- Fresh real Codex native browser tasks returned correct answers without
the three targeted notices. Answers persisted after refresh and restart.
- Real same-thread TypeScript driver tests passed locally and in
Daytona, including cold resume, configuration, skills, and an approved
harmless hook.
- Local usage summed to 64,607 tokens. Daytona usage summed to 42,737
tokens. Each sum matched its final session total exactly.
- See doc/plans/2026-09-09-codex-integration-acceptance.md for the scope
and limits of the live tests.
- After replay onto current master and review fixes: 334 Codex, backend,
and live-session tests passed, including checkpoint serialization and
real-runner process restart. TypeScript checks passed.
- The native Codex integration run passed 83 tests; the large lineage
test passed separately with the release runner (its debug build exceeded
the test deadline).
- All GitHub checks passed on the final PR head. Greptile is 5/5 with no
unresolved review threads. CI regenerates the lockfile for the added
TOML dependency, per repository policy.
- The first server shard hit a timing-dependent duplicate-key failure in
the unchanged artifact-document concurrency test. Its focused 11-test
suite passed locally. One CI retry on the same head passed all 103 files
and 1,405 tests (2 skipped): [retry
result](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34398832930/job/102631274667).

## Risks

- Trust applies only to the server-selected startup root and isolated
configuration. Sandbox and tool permissions remain authoritative.
- Codex still requires approval of individual hook hashes. This change
does not bypass that policy.
- Providers without the required history APIs fail explicitly.
- Daytona acceptance used the production TypeScript driver. Remote
Paperclip UI and remote Rust execution were not tested.
- No new public API, database state, recovery policy, or UI control is
included.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 (`gpt-6-astra`). Used for reasoning, code edits,
tool use,
and test execution. The exact context-window limit is not exposed in
this
session. Real-provider acceptance used Codex CLI 0.153.4 with
`gpt-5.6-sol`.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-09 15:35:18 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip fac07b42ad fix(runner): preserve durable native session authority across recovery (#13092)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The native runner carries tool results and task output to the
control plane.
> - A lost connection must not change which run owns a result.
> - A session must not become reusable while provider output is still
pending.
> - This pull request adds strict recovery evidence and bounded drain
barriers.
> - It preserves current PRP version negotiation and session-goal
support.
> - The benefit is safer reuse of native sessions after a transport
failure.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #13038. This is the first of two stacked pull requests. It contains
the native runtime prerequisites. The second pull request contains the
experimental chat-channel integration. It preserves the provider
identity and typed terminal-failure contracts in #13074 and the durable
recovery work in #13075.

**What happened?**

Native session failures could leave retained provider events, incomplete
tool results, or warm handoff state that was not safe to reuse. A later
run could observe output from an earlier authority.

**Expected behavior**

Recovery must preserve exact run, tool, process, artifact, and lease
evidence. Uncertain or corrupt state must fail closed. A successful
close must prove that retained provider output is settled.

**Steps to reproduce**

Run the transport and control-plane regressions. They hold and drop
authenticated frames, fail durable writes, and restart fresh controllers
and runner processes with retained state. Provider executables are local
test fixtures.

## What Changed

- Preserve pending provider cleanup and semantic-result evidence across
session close and restart.
- Add an authenticated warm handoff with exact old and new identities,
durable receipts, and completion acknowledgement.
- Drain retained provider events under the cumulative acknowledgement
fence.
- Reject corrupt tool-result contracts without unsafe provider replay or
reusable checkpoints.
- Keep ordinary PRP v1 sessions and current session-goal behavior.
Require negotiated PRP v2 and acknowledged native session evidence
before warm authority rotation.
- Preserve late semantic inputs and exact durable result receipts until
close can prove settlement.
- Add transport, crash-window, artifact, checkpoint, and final-output
regressions.
- Deduplicate resolved execution delivery under the current issue lock.
Reuse the exact existing successor after concurrent scans or a lost
acknowledgement. Preserve newer operator evidence.
- Persist idle provider integrity/capacity failures before process
retirement, retain permanent model-rejection classification, and keep
external question identifiers out of task instructions.
- Expose only the context source on native status events. Keep thin
dispatch projections compatible without exposing the complete context.

## Verification

- Review-fix revision: 128 runtime-context/native-session tests, five
idle-failure/adjacent Rust cases, 24 warm crash-window cases, three
startup-notification/close cases, and five attach/backlog cases passed.
The security and idle-failure cases were first reproduced failing.
- Prior merged revision: runner production build, TypeScript typecheck,
complete Rust workspace tests and formatting passed; 272 focused runner
tests and two real PostgreSQL regressions passed.
- Earlier full runner runs and CI Build failed on missing
semantic-result fixture receipts, stale local provider fixture bytes,
startup-notification ordering, and a confirmation-loss fixture that
could accidentally send its final ACK. Each cause was reproduced and
corrected without relaxing production authority or close assertions.
These earlier runs are retained as failures, not represented as passing
verification.
- The first local repository-wide run failed before later phases because
the isolated install omitted PostgreSQL's native-library aliases; it
also encountered an unrelated occupied-port fixture. Those results are
retained, not represented as a passing run.
- Exact `335b2ee52709afb3885d4d6ebb2a3ece4b5864d6`: the complete runner
suite passed 1,888 tests, with 10 existing skips. The full Rust release
workspace passed with serial test scheduling. The unchanged parallel
Rust run hit the five-second 300-descendant fixture deadline; that
failure is retained. No deadline or assertion was relaxed.
- The resolved-execution regression suite passed 57 tests, including
concurrent delivery, lost acknowledgement, superseded authority, and
newer operator evidence. Plain server typecheck passed. The
duplicate-delivery cases were first reproduced failing.
- Prior exact `335b2ee52709afb3885d4d6ebb2a3ece4b5864d6` CI passed all
required jobs and Greptile reported 5/5. Its local general-server run
passed 7,208 tests but failed one responsibility fixture; later phases
did not run. The fixture started the next wake while its bounded handoff
was active. It also used nonexistent comment IDs, which hid the current
stored-message-author identity rule. The updated tests use real message
authors, preserve task ownership, and await exact automatic handoffs. No
production identity policy changed.
- Current head `aa39275a1f300f7d1a0b16cd0885eea567cff6b0` includes
current master and the native context-source projection. The focused
identity/status cohort passed 27 tests and plain server typecheck
passed. Fresh full repository tests, types, build, required CI, and
Greptile review are pending. Final results will be updated before merge.
- This is deterministic local-provider evidence. It is not a claim of
complete live-provider qualification.

## Risks

- This changes authenticated recovery and close ordering. The TypeScript
transport and runner binary must be built from the same revision.
- Failed or incomplete evidence intentionally prevents reuse and can
require a fresh run.
- PRP v1 ordinary/cold sessions remain supported. A v1 connection lease
cannot upgrade in place. A current v2-capable runner held on a v1 lease
was qualified through owned-process retirement/join, fresh bootstrap on
the same old authority, v2 observation/ACK, then warm rotation. Legacy
binary replacement and adopted-owner migration are not qualified by that
test; rollout must not present them as automatic same-lease upgrades.
- This pull request has no database migration or chat-channel
activation. The second pull request keeps the channel feature
experimental.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex assisted with implementation, tool execution, tests, and
reconciliation. The existing implementation records OpenAI `gpt-6-astra`
assistance. The current environment does not report a context-window
size. No private reasoning traces are included.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-09 11:02:59 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 82f662656a fix(runner): restore legacy Git access and independent networking (#13094)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip runs agents for people with different GitHub accounts.
> - Managed operations must use the intended person's eligible
connection.
> - A failed duplicate connection must not hide a healthy grant for the
same account.
> - Legacy hosts also need their existing Git configuration when managed
access is not configured.
> - Runner networking and local Git operations must not depend on GitHub
broker availability.
> - This pull request separates those policies and improves failure
diagnostics.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?** New runs always cleared host Git credentials and
installed managed launchers. Network permission depended on GitHub
environment variables. A launcher failure could stop even local `git
status`. A newer unhealthy duplicate could take precedence over a
healthy connection, and generic health errors were shown as reconnect
requirements.

**Expected behavior:** Use a healthy eligible managed connection for the
intended account. Preserve host authentication only for unconfigured
standard-trust local or SSH execution. Permit local Git during broker
failures and keep network permission independent of GitHub credentials.

**Steps to reproduce:** Configure healthy and unhealthy grants for one
GitHub account, dispatch an agent, and execute Git commands. Separately
run an unconfigured legacy host with existing GitHub CLI authentication.
Stop the broker and run local `git status`.

**Paperclip version or commit:** Master at 668110469. **Deployment
mode:** Self-hosted. **Installation method:** Git checkout. **Agent
adapters involved:** Native Codex runner and shared adapter execution
setup. **Database mode:** Existing instance database; no migration.
**Access context:** Responsible person's managed grant, or explicitly
unconfigured legacy host. **Node.js version:** 26.4.0 locally.
**Operating system:** macOS development and Linux execution hosts.

**Relevant logs or output:** Previously `GitHub credential context
unavailable` hid configuration, transport, and capability errors. New
diagnostics identify these categories without credential values.

**Additional context:** Refs #13005 and #13022. Dependency provisioning
is addressed separately in #13093.

## What Changed

- Prefer healthy eligible grants and retry credential acquisition once
for the same principal and account before starting an operation.
- Preserve host Git configuration only when managed access is
unconfigured on a standard-trust local or SSH target.
- Project authentication mode and validated Git metadata into native
runner boundaries; refresh resumed provider settings when modes change.
- Enable network access through an explicit standard-trust controller
decision, independently of GitHub. Omitted or restricted decisions stay
disabled; replace warm providers when that decision changes.
- Run local Git with cleared credentials when the managed broker fails,
with specific redacted diagnostics.
- Retry access-refresh conflicts once without treating concurrency as
expired authorization.
- Show retry instead of reconnect for transient GitHub health failures.
Add optional authorization and run-diagnostic fields without a database
migration.

## Verification

- All latest-head CI gates are green, including typecheck, general and
serialized suites, browser tests, canary, native runner verification,
and build. Greptile is 5/5 with no remaining findings; the security scan
passed.
- Full recursive typecheck and build passed. UI token gates passed.
- Full general server run: 7,110 passed, one transient socket hangup;
that file passed on retry. All remaining workspace groups passed,
including 5,552 UI and 478 CLI tests. The complete serialized rerun
passed all 144 suites / 2,179 tests after the initial isolated timeout
passed on retry.
- 195 final launcher and native session tests passed, including
host/managed transitions, local/remote warm network-policy changes,
broker rotation, and attempts to override validated controller
filesystem roots.
- GitHub gateway fallback, duplicate connection selection, refresh
conflicts, per-user reauthorization, and native transport/security
suites passed.
- Additional live native fixtures passed SSH public-key authentication
and a Git credential helper in fresh and resumed host-mode sessions. An
unwritable managed configuration directory preserved local Git (exit 0)
while GitHub CLI failed with `configuration_directory_unavailable` (exit
4). The temporary SSH listener and keys were removed.
- Applicable Rust suites passed except two timing failures under load;
each failed case passed in isolation. The final environment contract
test passed.
- Linux native runner acceptance passed in both managed and legacy host
modes: DNS, HTTPS, npm package download, fresh-worktree Git status,
authenticated GitHub user lookup, repository read, and a new run
continuing the same provider conversation. Managed broker outage
preserved local Git and rejected authenticated access without host
fallback.
- Matching Linux server/runner artifacts and the separate provisioning
repair are deployed to the development instance. A fresh UI-dispatched
task and a new run after a server restart both passed all six shell
checks through the live controller and credential broker. Both runs
selected the expected healthy connection/grant and retained the same
provider conversation. Neither connection was repaired or reconnected.

The sandbox roots are assigned from the validated execution-target probe
**after** ordinary bindings are merged. Regression coverage supplies
forged roots and verifies they cannot override the controller paths.
Networking is enabled only for an explicit
`PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_NETWORK_ACCESS=enabled` controller decision; omitted
values remain disabled.

## Risks

Unconfigured standard-trust local and SSH runs regain access to host Git
authentication resources. Managed, sandbox, plugin, and low-trust runs
do not gain this fallback. Revoked managed access never falls back to
another account. Deploy server and runner artifacts together;
already-started operations retain their captured identity. An
unauthenticated command can still fail when it requires GitHub access.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with code editing, shell execution, tests,
and browser inspection. The exact model variant and context-window size
are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-09 10:15:10 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 6681104692 fix(runner): preserve provider identity and terminal failures (#13074)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The runner translates provider events into durable task execution.
> - Provider notifications can refer to another thread or a descendant.
> - Root validation treated these notifications as fatal, and later
layers could lose the original failure.
> - This pull request classifies event identity and preserves structured
terminal failures.
> - The server can then choose safe recovery without weakening tool
authority.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #13038. This change incorporates the shared protocol-integrity and
bounded-cleanup prerequisites from that PR. It does not include the chat
feature. Related failure classification work: #13028.

**What happened?**
An informational provider notification for another thread could
terminate the root session. A failed stream could then become a
missing-result error and lose its cause.

**Expected behavior**
Ignore unrelated informational notices with bounded diagnostics. Reject
invalid authoritative events. Preserve the original failure code and
recovery meaning through cleanup.

**Steps to reproduce**
Run a native Codex task. Deliver a notification for an unrelated thread,
or close the stream after a structured failure. Inspect the root outcome
and recorded failure.

**Paperclip version or commit**
Reproduced before e20010472. This branch includes the current
session-goal contract from that commit.

**Deployment mode**
Built from source. Native runner with Codex.

## What Changed

- Classify root, provider-confirmed descendant, stale, unrelated, and
invalid provider events.
- Keep tool requests bound to their original execution authority.
- Preserve typed failures through transport, session, and durable
control-plane cleanup.
- Keep bounded cleanup failures separate from the primary execution
failure.
- Add compatible shared contracts for continuation context, execution
status, and explicit reconciliation. The dependent PR adds their server
and UI consumers.

## Verification

- Runner TypeScript and ACPX suites: 1,733 passed, 7 skipped. Node
contracts: 38 passed.
- Real provider-process fixtures cover 300 descendant identities across
restart, the 4,096-identity capacity boundary, and rejection of
continuation after terminal acknowledgement and restart.
- Repository build, typecheck, and full `pnpm test:run` passed on the
rebased stack (18,448 tests passed, 49 skipped). The full Rust workspace
passed with `--test-threads=1`; parallel execution exposed an existing
fixture port-reservation race. All latest-head CI checks passed. One
unchanged artifact-document concurrency test failed on the first CI run
and passed on its single rerun.
- Added notification, streaming failure, protocol integrity, cleanup
quarantine, and durable failure tests.

## Risks

Provider event classification must retain the new session-goal behavior
on master. Descendant notifications must never gain root tool authority.
Shared contract fields are additive. This PR does not migrate data or
start replacement provider work.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The exact deployment ID and context window
were not exposed. Used reasoning, tool use, code execution, and browser
automation.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-09 08:53:07 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 7ed122911b Add end-to-end session goals to Paperclip Runner
Add capability-aware slash-goal controls, durable provider goal state, PRP v2 negotiation, autonomous goal execution, and safe local session recovery. Integrate with current master, preserve provider session identity, and verify the browser goal/chat/replacement/clear workflow and unsupported-agent rejection.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-08 16:18:47 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 1cc45086d3 feat: use the responsible person's GitHub for shared agent operations (#13005)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Several people can send instructions to the same agent and task.
> - A fixed GitHub token in the provider process can keep the first
person's access after another person's message is accepted.
> - Task ownership cannot select credentials for each accepted
instruction or preserve the identity of an operation already in
progress.
> - This pull request records ordered execution identity contexts and
resolves credentials when managed Git, gh, or GitHub tools start.
> - The benefit is automatic personal GitHub access for shared agents,
with durable continuation rules and no teammate credential fallback.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Cross-cutting: orchestration, connection grants, database, runtime
adapters, native runners, and run details.

**Problem or motivation**

A shared agent must use the person whose instructions it has accepted. A
queued message must retain its author. A retry or approval without new
instructions must retain the originating identity. GitHub must remain
optional for ordinary work.

**Proposed solution**

Persist execution identity separately from task ownership. Give new
processes a run-scoped broker capability and token-free managed
launchers. Capture identity at operation start. Keep an explicit
dedicated-agent grant as an override. Show redacted diagnostics in run
details.

**Alternatives considered**

Per-task ownership, fixed provider tokens, and mutable repository author
configuration do not handle accepted steering or concurrent operations.
A manual account-selection action would add unnecessary setup to each
turn.

**Roadmap alignment**

This completes the existing Multiple Human Users, MCP Tool Gateway &
Apps, Secrets Manager, and Self-healing Runs capabilities. The
implementation follows the maintainer-approved plan.

Related work: Refs #12843, Refs #12907. Existing proposals #4618 and
#8945 cover per-agent or per-worktree author configuration. This change
instead follows the accepted human instruction across runtime types.
Refs #11831 for governed personal connection delegation; this change
preserves connection audience checks and does not use standing
delegation as a personal credential fallback.

## What Changed

- Add durable, ordered identity contexts and active run references.
Preserve message authors through consolidation, steering, retries,
delegation, approvals, routines, and restart.
- Add an authenticated operation-time GitHub credential broker and
local/remote managed git and gh launchers. Keep personal tokens out of
the long-lived provider process.
- Resolve GitHub gateway and server-side Git operations through the same
responsible-person or dedicated-grant selection rules.
- Make absent and unavailable GitHub credentials non-blocking at generic
startup. Clear host and prior-person credentials. Keep anonymous Git
access where supported.
- Add run-detail identity history and the dedicated-account warning.
Keep task ownership and queue-versus-steer decisions unchanged.
- Preserve personal OAuth declarations through connection edits. Retain
exact selected grants in the gateway.
- Fix continuation races found during real acceptance: verify a warm
owner before credential rotation, and wait for bounded durable runner
suspension before the next run starts.
- Make migrations replay-safe. Retain identity through agent/run
deletion, remove it with its company, and clean terminal launcher
directories before releasing execution environments. Document
coordinated release and rollback.

## Verification

- Full workspace typecheck, build, and token gates passed. The complete
local suite passed in its normal test groups: 17,120 passing tests,
including all 143 serialized server suites. After integrating the newly
merged runner API work, full local typecheck and build passed again,
along with 890 focused integration tests. All 31 checks on the
integrated revision passed, including build, browser E2E, release
registry, canary dry run, typecheck, security and all test suites.
Greptile is 5/5 with all review threads resolved.
- Current focused checks passed: 142 native executor tests, 67 runtime
lifecycle tests, 9 durable identity tests, 75 credential/routine tests,
19 low-trust/resumption tests, and the executable migration replay test.
- Authenticated browser acceptance with two Paperclip users and two
GitHub accounts on one shared native agent passed. Real commits and
pushes followed A → B accepted steering → queued A continuation in the
same saved conversation. GitHub commit author and committer identities
matched all three operations. Both runs succeeded and task ownership
stayed unchanged.
- Real GitHub MCP calls switched from A to B after accepted steering. A
delegated subtask retained its originating identity across a server
restart.
- Disabling B's GitHub connection left ordinary work successful. Managed
gh was unauthenticated and the provider had no inherited GH_TOKEN or
GITHUB_TOKEN.
- The browser displayed run-detail diagnostics and the exact
dedicated-account warning. A final controller-restart check followed by
another-person continuation retained the conversation, selected the
correct GitHub login and Git author, and removed each terminal launcher
directory.
- Company-lifetime migration and all five previously failing CI suites
passed locally (167 tests). Same-token gateway A → B → A and six
broker/launcher boundary tests passed.
- Remote callback, launcher, sandbox, and runtime contract tests passed.
Both native and legacy Codex completed actual Daytona executions on the
integrated revision ([campaign
results](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34155056509)).
The remote package-manager shim staging regression also passed locally.

## Risks

- Deploy the migrations, server broker, launchers, and runner artifacts
together. Existing processes finish with their original contract. New
managed processes need the broker endpoint for GitHub operations.
- Finish or stop new managed executions before rolling application code
back. Keep the additive schema and identity history during rollback.
- Scripts that require a persistent raw GH_TOKEN must use managed git,
gh, or GitHub gateway tools. Run capabilities authorize code executing
within that run to acquire its current identity; this is not
hostile-code isolation within one execution principal. Managed commands
prevent automatic credential carryover; arbitrary code deliberately
copying a credential is outside that boundary.
- Uncertain steering acknowledgement deliberately holds new credential
acquisition until reconciliation. Already-started operations retain
their captured identity.
- GitHub private access and provider outages can still fail the specific
operation that needs them. Dedicated grant failure does not fall back to
personal access.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex assisted implementation, review, shell
execution, and browser acceptance. The exact model variant and
context-window size are not exposed in this session. Tool use included
TypeScript and Rust tests, database integration tests, GitHub CLI, and
authenticated browser control.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-07 14:32:20 -05:00
Dotta 0c1e7504c0 fix(runner): persist warm Daytona workspaces across turns (#12904)
## Thinking Path

> - Daytona preserves a stopped sandbox filesystem, but deleting or
replacing a sandbox removes its only remote copy.
> - Warm reuse therefore improves latency but cannot be Paperclip's
durability boundary.
> - The host execution workspace must remain authoritative after every
successful turn, while same-run recovery must avoid overwriting
unexported remote work.
> - Result proposal, workspace export/merge, and terminal completion
need a durable, replayable ordering so a crash never starts a duplicate
provider turn.
> - A paid browser acceptance suite must exercise both legacy Codex and
Runner Codex for three real turns on one continuously warm Daytona
sandbox.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #12901.

Runner Codex did not previously export successful Daytona workspace
changes back to the authoritative host workspace. That made warm reuse
depend on Daytona's remote filesystem and left deleted/replacement
sandboxes without a reliable reconstruction path. The existing paid
fixture also lacked a focused three-turn continuity case for both Codex
adapters.

## What Changed

- Persist versioned, atomic native workspace-sync descriptors and
durable seeds in `PAPERCLIP_HOME`, without credentials or a database
migration.
- Classify fresh, warm, replacement, and same-run-recovery workspace
preparation explicitly; ambiguous lease/root/digest evidence fails
closed.
- Finalize native workspace export/merge after semantic result proposal
and before run completion, with idempotent replay that never submits a
second provider turn.
- Surface legacy Codex workspace restoration failures instead of masking
them, while preserving an earlier provider error when both fail.
- Keep healthy reusable Daytona leases warm for legacy and native
adapters, stamp finalized workspace generations, and retain existing
cleanup behavior for per-turn or unhealthy leases.
- Preserve Runner Codex's provider process/session across warm turns,
including bounded post-terminal tail draining and exact authority
rotation.
- Add the exact paid `daytona-warm-continuity` matrix:
  - `legacy-codex × daytona × warm-three-turn`
  - `runner-codex × daytona × warm-three-turn`
- Drive all three turns through the browser, verify ordered file
continuity and stable lease/workspace/runtime identities, capture
per-turn timings, and delete the sandbox immediately after assertions.
- Document `pnpm test:e2e:runner -- --suite daytona-warm-continuity`; no
package script was added.

## Verification

- `pnpm typecheck` — passed, including migration safety (no migration
added)
- Focused server/runner Vitest coverage — 144 passed
- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit` — 114 passed
- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck` — passed
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner test:codex` — 66 passed,
1 helper ignored
- `native-session-executor.test.ts` — 139 passed, including safe
fail-closed cleanup after remote runner identity capture failure
- Paid local browser acceptance, exact post-rebase Linux/amd64 runner
binary:
- Runner Codex — passed in 1.7m; 3 runs; lease outcomes `created,
resumed, resumed`; 10/10 matchers; cleanup passed
- Legacy Codex — passed in 2.7m; 3 runs; lease outcomes `created,
resumed, resumed`; 10/10 matchers; cleanup passed
- [Protected paid GitHub Actions
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34026735033)
against `7da42a91b95fa7fb2df126668ef7e37afb3b2b9d` — passed 2/2:
- Runner Codex — 3 runs; lease outcomes `created, resumed, resumed`;
evidence and cleanup passed
- Legacy Codex — 3 runs; lease outcomes `created, resumed, resumed`;
evidence and cleanup passed
  - Merge/enforcement, S3 history, and Pages publication jobs passed
- Paid result artifacts were scanned for both provider credentials;
neither secret was present.
- Current PR checks — 31 passed, 1 expected Storybook skip; Greptile
5/5; Superagent security scan passed
- `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` — passed
- Confirmed no `package.json`, lockfile, migration, or SQL changes.

## Risks

- Workspace synchronization now sits on the terminal-success path, so a
remote export failure deliberately prevents false success. Retryable
state retains its lease/seed; loss of the only unexported remote copy
fails closed.
- Warm provider reuse has strict identity and quiescence checks.
Mismatched or ambiguous evidence blocks reuse rather than risking
concurrent provider work.
- The paid suite incurs Daytona and Codex cost only in the existing
protected scheduled/manual workflow and explicitly destroys its sandbox
after each cell.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex with GPT-5 agentic reasoning, repository inspection, real
browser E2E execution, Rust/TypeScript test execution, and GitHub
Actions diagnostics.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either linked an existing issue or described the issue
in-PR
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name contains no internal ticket id
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have documented the dedicated suite invocation without adding a
package script
- [x] I have considered and documented risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green on the current revision
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
on the current revision
- [x] I will address all reviewer comments before requesting merge
2026-09-06 08:16:12 -05:00