Commit Graph
32 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DottaandPaperclip 8f822bfcf7 fix(cloud): persist configuration and load release-image packages (#18335)
Land the approved Cloud configuration and release-image package stack.

Includes the separately reviewed adapter settings (#18335), external adapters (#18333), bundled plugins (#18336), startup configuration (#18339), and migration/package checks (#18341).

Includes the final image-owned loader and linked-dependency inventory corrections.

Verified stack head: 462716170d.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 19:21:33 +00:00
DottaandPaperclip ed8fae8dbb fix(workspaces): preserve completed shallow sandbox exports (#18221)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip coordinates agent work and preserves its results.
> - Remote execution copies completed workspace changes back to the
host.
> - An agent can fetch a published branch with shallow Git history.
> - A full Git bundle omits the shallow boundary metadata and can fail
host connectivity checks.
> - This pull request carries the boundaries through the full-bundle
fallback and imports through normal Git fetch.
> - Recovery must also recognize completed native work on a reusable
lease without treating it as ordinary executor reuse.
> - Completed work can be saved without another provider turn, while
existing host history remains connected.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**
Sandbox finalization can fail with a missing parent commit after an
agent checks out a separately fetched shallow branch. Re-exporting a
full bundle repeats the failure because Git bundles do not encode
shallow boundaries.

**Expected behavior**
Import the completed branch and saved files. Preserve existing host
ancestry and concurrent host edits. Keep normal Git connectivity and
workspace merge checks.

**Steps to reproduce**
1. Prepare a sandbox from one host commit.
2. Fetch a different published branch with depth one and check it out.
3. Save a result file and restore the sandbox workspace.

**Paperclip version or commit**
Reproduced against master before this repair. The regression fails with
the missing-parent error before the production change.

Related public context: #15268 covers rewritten history integration.
This repair handles shallow bundle transport before integration.
Searches found no equivalent open repair.

## What Changed

- Export shallow boundaries beside the full bundle when the delta import
lacks history.
- Unpack into a temporary shared bare repository. Keep parent
connections already available on the host and import with Git's shallow
fetch protocol.
- Reject malformed boundary values and retain existing connectivity,
branch, and concurrent-work merge guards. Keep boundary probes within 15
seconds without consuming the separate 60-second Git import budget.
- Let source-bound preservation recover reusable leases only for the
finalizer-selected, accepted successful native result and matching
completion contract. Retain provider-stop, physical ownership and
host-writer checks; ordinary reusable sources remain blocked.
- Classify invalid Git metadata separately from omittable unsafe
archives. Keep native finalization failed and preserve service-owned
file recovery; carry the sender's dedicated rejection across the command
boundary without transient retries.
- Share the failure allowlist across bounded run/activity projections
and cancelled-preservation selection. Migration `0416` rebuilds the
matching partial index; task chat retains the non-retryable recovery
notice.
- Add real Git, filesystem sandbox and database recovery regressions.
Update execution semantics and affected verification maps.

## Verification

- Red: real filesystem sandbox restore failed with the same
missing-parent/revision-walk error before the export repair.
- Green: 240 focused Git, workspace restore, sandbox transport and
native-finalization tests pass. Coverage includes both transfer paths,
malformed/oversized metadata, a genuinely shallow host with its original
boundary intact, and concurrent host work with both merge parents
verified.
- Red/green: a 14-second simulated probe left the final real Git fetch
only 45,893 ms before the budget split. It now retains over 55 seconds
after the probes; a 16-second probe exhausts its own budget before host
import.
- Red/green: an oversized read progress report was retried three times
before its distinct metadata classification. It now aborts the first
read before payload consumption, leaves the host tip unchanged and does
not retry.
- Red/green: the real metadata error was swallowed by best-effort export
and native finalization incorrectly returned success. Both regressions
now pass; all 240 focused Git/restore/native-finalization tests pass. A
PostgreSQL/filesystem fault-injection test also verifies retained files,
failed run, service-owned recovery barrier, no preservation receipt and
no new wake.
- Red/green: duplicate metadata produced 47 Git process starts before
deduplication; the bounded-work regression now passes. Oversized byte
and boundary inputs fail before Git probes.
- Recovery red: both reusable lease policies exhausted recovery despite
a selected accepted successful result. The assembled
PostgreSQL/filesystem path now passes for retained and both reusable
policies, including idempotent re-admission after exhausted automatic
recovery, saved files, no agent wake, and once-only existing-result
finalization.
- Source verification controls reject ordinary reusable leases,
rejected/failed/unselected results, another physical allocation owner,
and an active host writer without changing recorded state.
- The 78-test PostgreSQL/filesystem recovery/source suite passed before
the metadata classification correction. Its new persisted
metadata-failure regression also passes. Full workspace typecheck and
build pass at final head `69f10daab2`.
- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check` pass.
- Full local `pnpm test:run` attempts did not finish. They are not
counted as passes. Early focused runs exceeded 5-second and 30-second
fixture deadlines; the final serial suite passed all 176 tests with a
30-second per-test budget in 56.8 seconds.
- Red/green: both bounded PostgreSQL projections dropped the new code in
oversized results. All 19 source/projection cases now pass, plus an
actual index-predicate test that excludes a metadata repair hold and
still selects ordinary cancelled work.
- Red/green: an oversized sender `.git/shallow` lost its error type
before host validation. The real transport test now verifies one typed
rejection, no shallow-payload read, and an unchanged host tip. All 465
command/sandbox/task-chat tests pass, and token/migration gates pass.
- Full typecheck/build pass after these final contract corrections at
`69f10daab2`; all 20 PostgreSQL source/projection/index contracts pass.
All current-head CI checks passed; Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved
review threads. Merged #18230 supplies the CI-cache and Linux
shell-fixture baseline repairs; their duplicate changes have been
removed from this PR. The final Runner lane passed after one justified
rerun of an unchanged authentication fixture timeout (all 11 fixture
tests also pass locally). Previous CI failures and incomplete local runs
remain recorded; live deployment and retained-run recovery remain
separate verification.

## Risks

- The fallback creates a temporary shared bare clone. Metadata is
limited to 64 KiB and 256 unique boundaries, duplicate/parent probes are
cached, and Git import has a 60-second command budget plus a separate
15-second boundary-probe budget. It runs only after a missing-history
import failure.
- Incorrect boundaries could hide real host ancestry. The importer
retains available parent connections, and regressions cover that case.
- The full-bundle fallback can transfer a bundle twice. This preserves
the existing fast delta path; removing that extra transfer is outside
this correctness repair.
- Preservation eligibility expands only for completed native exports on
reusable leases. It creates no provider turn and leaves ordinary
reusable leases ineligible. Database/filesystem regressions cover result
selection and competing physical/host ownership.
- The migration rebuilds one partial index; no tables, columns or user
records change. There are no agent execution admission, model, trust,
recovery permission, workflow or lockfile changes.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, code execution, and browser tools.
The exact serving variant and context-window size are not exposed in
this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 20:02:53 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip ebed7f5237 test(evals): protect Antigravity setup and two-turn delivery (#18190)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and their work.
> - A provider integration must work through ordinary agent setup and
task controls.
> - The recorded Antigravity walkthrough exposed setup, delivery, and
continuation failures.
> - A repeatable check must verify real work and retain failed attempts.
> - This pull request converts all 47 recorded steps into one fixed
Product E2E journey.
> - Maintainers can rerun the case and inspect independent delivery,
cleanup, and accounting evidence.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Builds on merged #18187, #18188, and #18189, and consumes the shared
repairs from merged #18230 and the equivalent manual-policy declaration
from #18222. Refs #18214 for the CI task wrapper. Refs #12503 and #14938
for related legacy adapter work.

**Agent or provider**

Google Antigravity native Runner with a saved managed Google
subscription and the exact Low model.

**Why this adapter is useful**

A user must be able to add an agent, connect its account, and receive
real task results across a follow-up. Picker visibility alone is
insufficient.

**How the agent is invoked**

A fixed Playwright driver uses ordinary product controls. The agent runs
through native ACP. Independent checks use public APIs, actual
downloads, owned process observations, and native lifetime fences.

## What Changed

- Register one explicit-only case:
`antigravity-agent-journey.runner-antigravity.local.saved-subscription-two-turn`.
- Map all 47 source steps and declare saved-account prerequisites,
finite limits, and same-host macOS ARM64 scope.
- Create an agent through the ordinary picker, connect the saved
account, select Low, run Test, and wait for readiness. Save an
instruction marker, deliver a file, and update it through an ordinary
follow-up.
- Require each run's visible completed file activity, exact downloaded
bytes, committed Done result, same tagged conversation, distinct
physical owner birth, released lease, and free native fences. Verify
reload persistence.
- Stop failed native runs that still own a retry. Replay an existing
Stop with its durable request identity and wait for the matching audited
acknowledgement. A terminal reservation without a native intent remains
unconfirmed.
- Keep private evidence in the existing result, report, dashboard, and
accounting pipeline. Retain the paused QA agent and financial history
while preserving the shared account and budget policies.
- Journal only the ordinary wizard's future ID, target, name, intended
harness and expected creator before forwarding its POST unchanged. Bind
the response and interrupted recovery to exact identity reads; a pending
404 stays unconfirmed.
- Serialize private resource snapshots through temporary-file fsync,
atomic rename and directory fsync. Abort forwarding on storage failure
and preserve legacy receipts. If later journal or diagnostic writes
fail, retain the primary error, always close the browser, and attempt
the ordinary failed report.
- Add production-component browser controls and harden task-menu
readiness, alias selection, scroll restoration, failure packaging, and
one hermetic auth-test budget.
- Wait for the existing GitHub recovery fixture to register its next
deadline before asserting the original range; preserve its
nested-transaction and zero-request checks. In the decision-expiry
fixture, verify the exact saved expiry separately from the earlier
global wake of another queue.

## Verification

- Fresh registered acceptance passed on eval source
`9060f3cd01b7c3445ecdf703d72e9cf30fe42b59` and merged serving product
`61bd4ac6919c2309f766a25e62273b074cee3261`. It completed ordinary setup
and two turns with native `.5` and `gemini-3.8-flash-low`. All 16
matchers, 14 checkpoints, and cleanup passed in **165,613 ms**. Actual
downloads were **61 bytes** and **119 bytes**. Both turns passed their
own run-bound browser activity checks and reload persistence.
- Independent read-back confirms Done, a paused retained agent, the same
connected saved default account, and no active owned run. Both accepted
results have the same full tagged conversation and distinct primary
process births. All 21 observed processes retired; both leases released
and all three native fences were free after each turn. The selected `.5`
checkpoints also showed equal agent/backend session IDs; this is an
observed case requirement, not a generic ACP invariant.
- Receipts report 339,273 input tokens, 7,224 output tokens, and 202,846
cached input tokens. Subscription prices are unavailable. Billing
coverage remains incomplete, not free.
- The normal report CLI passed. All 310 files from nine original
attempts and two separate recoveries retained their hashes. The twelve
current screenshots are byte-identical, and 194 local report links are
contained and valid. The eight earlier reports were copied without
regeneration.
- Delivery source `1bf4fb04df04710b82844b3c9355767f46b5f68f` branches
from `d3f2a60e795fc60d64c8b19d1eed4d48657d5492` and merges cleanly with
current master `1d571de5f9f886d66e520800baec8fc2f67d0948`. All 41 prior
`c8b332` authored file blobs remain identical; the 42nd path is the
decision-expiry fixture contract correction. Creation ownership, the
strict durable writer, and the ordinary successful workflow remain
unchanged. Of 43 measured file blobs, 30 remain identical. The
Antigravity oracle, artifact, billing and report gates and its
suite-specific validation block remain unchanged. The actual retained
agent matches its original creator; its original request `setupId` was
not captured and is not reconstructed.
- Later master changes include model-visible workspace guidance and
rejected-terminal-report handling. Their bounded source assessment is
separate: the first actual finish failed, then a same-turn replacement
was accepted and committed. Later read-only results match both original
native-result hashes, and the complete event catalogs have no
`session.failed` event. Master #18228 also expands detection of explicit
JSON file requests. The measured create/update-and-attach `.txt` task
already required publication under both parsers; the publication
validation gate itself is unchanged. Master #18240 changes remote
workspace cache staging and adds an OpenCode index refresh. The selected
local lane returns before those paths. Master #18213 adds optional
numeric turn timing and trace boundaries. Its selected Antigravity
model, text, IDs, result and retirement semantics remain unchanged in
the bounded source review. Local diagnostic rows and awaits can change
event ordinals and latency; the oracle checks relative semantic order.
Collector coverage and latency improvement remain outside this proof.
This does not claim that the whole current runtime is byte-identical to
serving `61bd`, or relabel the measured result as a new run.
- The adopted upstream cache controls passed 3/3 with pinned real Turbo.
Forced work disables local and remote reads and writes; ordinary work
reuses local results. The original genuine-pnpm/Turbo controls remain
historical to `9060`'s earlier write-only policy. The duplicate cache
patch is superseded by #18230. Its qualification-only pnpm addition is
removed because the adopted upstream controls do not require it.
- The E2E typecheck, map checks and 277-control replay are carried from
the unchanged eval source paths. That replay passed, including the 183
Antigravity controls, catalog/connection checks and the separate
product-journey validator. The carried creation controls include 91
config/recovery cases. The final launcher suite passed 19/19, including
five real campaign finalization fault cases; the report suite passed
7/7. These final checks did not rerun the earlier 277-control group. The
canonical production-component browser spec passed in 27.4 s under its
unchanged 60 s limit before the replay. Four paused-composer cases and
the product base's build/typecheck plus 376 focused regressions were
verified earlier.
- The shipped wizard and actual API client cover persistence before
forwarding, lost response JSON, foreign/malformed requests, wrong
response identity/creator and cleanup-error preservation. Real
filesystem controls failed 5/5 before the writer repair and passed 5/5
afterward, preserving the old journal on partial-write, temporary-file
sync and rename faults. Three persistent-sync campaign controls failed
before the finalization repair and passed afterward. All five final
campaign fault cases preserve the primary failure, cleanup failure,
usage and failed report while attempting browser closure. The strict
journal still blocks the next mutation. These are provider-free
ownership controls; the Google task proof remains the original `9060` →
`61bd` acceptance.
- The decision restart check passed in the local 20-case fixture run. A
current-source real-PostgreSQL rollback control reproduced the exact
90,000 ms earlier global wake: the old equality rejected it, while the
exact durable expiry and new future-wake bound passed. The original 60 s
open-state, exact-timestamp, continuation and quiet checks remain. The
broader local run was **FAILED: 19 passed / 1 failed**, with a 15 s
timeout and a 30 s cleanup timeout in an unchanged timestamp-pagination
case. That case passed in canonical `c8b332` CI; the local timeout cause
remains inconclusive. An extra local server typecheck failed against
stale cached Runner declarations; it did not check this excluded test
file. Both limits remain recorded for fresh canonical CI.
- A broader local GitHub recovery group passed 21/22. Its unchanged
pagination case observed an unexpected config request; the log does not
establish the cause. That result remains retained, and fresh
current-head CI is the final broader gate.

- Exact delivery-head CI completed with 55 successes, two skips, and one
optional neutral review. Required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`, build,
typecheck, and Runner checks passed. Fresh Greptile is 5/5 with zero
unresolved threads. Optional Paperclip is neutral 4/5; its carried
recommendations are dispositioned against the public Stop contract and
selected live identity evidence.

Seven earlier converted attempts retain their failed grades and partial
evidence. Historical Paid8 and its later read-only per-run UI
observation remain separate from the fresh acceptance above. Unknown
prices and the older partial startup accounting remain explicit. Full
lineage and raw evidence remain private in the normal report bundle.

## Risks

- This case requires an authorized saved personal default Google
subscription and finite operator candidate admission. It does not test
fresh OAuth or establish global qualification.
- The physical observer supports a same-host loopback macOS ARM64
target. Cloud, Linux, and other models remain outside this case.
- A known-cost stop cannot cap missing prices or in-flight subscription
charges. Existing operator policies remain unchanged.
- Raw account/native identities stay private. Missing retirement proof
keeps resources retained. The selected cleanup mode does not test agent
purge.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex (GPT-6). The host did not expose the exact model revision
or context limit. The model used tools for code edits, tests, browser
automation, and review.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 19:51:32 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 61bd4ac691 feat(agents): set up Antigravity with saved Google subscriptions (#18189)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and their work.
> - Users choose providers and managed accounts while adding agents.
> - Antigravity was missing from the ordinary additional-agent picker
and its saved Google path did not complete native readiness.
> - A user needs a successful Test, an enabled task action, and a stable
account binding.
> - This pull request connects the ordinary setup flow to the native
candidate.
> - It also preserves retired credential refreshes across database
failures and server restarts.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Built on merged #18188 and #18187. Refs: #12503, #14938 for related
legacy CLI proposals.

**Agent or provider**

Google Antigravity ACP 1.4.3.

**Why this adapter is useful**

Users need to set up an Antigravity agent and run real work through
their managed Google subscription.

**How the agent is invoked**

Native Paperclip Runner uses the pinned Antigravity ACP runtime. Exact
operator admission remains required; the local candidate result does not
enable general release.

## What Changed

- Show Google Antigravity in the ordinary adapter grid and preserve the
draft choice when setup resumes.
- Reuse the same user’s saved personal default Google subscription and
discover the exact low model through the native account.
- Run a prompt-free native Test and wait for authoritative readiness
before enabling task assignment.
- Carry the managed account through native runs and recover retired
refreshes through the existing encrypted, fsynced journal with exact
generation checks.
- Retain the latest rotated credential through verification, storage,
and partial home-removal failures. Retry the exact account’s retained
cleanup before another provider use.
- Reconcile cleanup before taking the credential mutation lock, fence
owners arriving during lock acquisition, and support nested lock holders
without a join cycle.
- Bound sign-in retirement outside database transactions and preserve
claims for the existing cleanup owner; one pending sign-in does not
block unrelated accounts.
- Cover Gemini and Pi API-key recovery, keep API-key bulk manual-model
editing usable, and keep adapter discovery available after candidate
expiry.
- Skip taskless native timer work before run or credential admission.
Preserve current master monitor and deadline scheduling.

## Verification

- The registered local saved-Google-subscription journey passed all 16
matchers in 196,520 ms using eval source `12aba` against actual serving
source `4a37ee7c`. Both turns stayed in one conversation, produced exact
downloaded files of 61 and 119 bytes after reload, and used distinct
native primary processes. All observed owners retired, leases released,
and credential fences settled. Independent readback confirmed Done work,
no active owned runs, a connected saved account, and the retained agent
paused for inspection.
- The measured runtime is production-equivalent to pre-restack
`65ef31dc` except its test-only transport fixture correction.
Current-master head `ff7c9249` preserves all 99 product paths: 98 exact
blobs and only eight inherited plugin-panel lines in `agents.ts`. Its
native binary was rebuilt for inherited Codex-only diagnostic changes;
the changed Rust behavior is outside Antigravity's ACPX execution path.
Shared native/UI changes have focused regression coverage. The recorded
live result is not represented as a measured replay of `ff7c9249`.
- Full workspace build and typecheck passed on `ff7c9249`. All 376
focused tests in 14 files passed, covering Google credential/retirement
controls and the inherited native-tool, redaction, route, and UI
recovery changes. Token gates, maps, and diff checks passed. The
required-close fixture was separately demonstrated red, then passed all
317 selected provider-wiring cases.
- [Current-head
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40959387972)
is green: 55 successful checks, two skipped workflow checks, and an
optional neutral review check. Required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`
passed. Greptile and Paperclip Review both report 5/5 on exact
`ff7c9249`, with zero unresolved review threads.
- This qualifies the selected operator-authorized local
saved-subscription candidate. The original exploratory journey remains
historical evidence; the repeatable fixed-driver eval is in the next PR.

## Risks

- Google refresh recovery must preserve the exact grant, account, and
credential generation. An uncertain native owner or failed encrypted
handoff retains the private home and blocks cleanup.
- A successful local saved-subscription candidate does not qualify fresh
OAuth, API keys, Cloud, Linux, other models, or general release.
- Timer filtering changes only taskless native Runner admissions.
Existing task-bound monitors and legacy adapters retain their owners.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex (GPT-6). The host did not expose the exact model revision
or context limit. The model used tools for code edits, tests, and
review.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 16:51:50 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 6f278dd6d7 fix(runtime): settle recovery lease and connection lifecycles (#18167)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - A remote runner can survive a controller restart.
> - Recovery renews its execution lease during slow preparation.
> - The native executor then shares that renewal timer.
> - Preparation kept its reference until all finalization finished. A
tick after lease release treated completion as ownership loss and
detached the retained runner.
> - A Linux continuity test also found that buffered wire events could
arrive before their connection was registered. Cleanup then kept a
completed promise under an undefined key and never finished.
> - This pull request transfers renewal ownership after execution
acquires its reference. It also registers each connection before wire
callbacks can run.
> - Recovered turns can complete, retain the warm runner, and settle
connection cleanup.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A recovered remote run could complete, release its coordinator lease,
then detach during instruction collection. The next turn could find the
old runner still using the ingress port. Recovery then stopped because
it could not prove process ownership.

**Expected behavior**

Preparation keeps the lease alive until execution owns renewal.
Execution stops renewal before releasing the lease. Actual ownership
loss still detaches the runner. Buffered wire callbacks must use the
registered connection, and cleanup must finish.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Recover an in-flight remote runner after a controller restart.
2. Let the recovered turn complete.
3. Hold instruction collection open through the next lease renewal tick.
4. Send a follow-up that needs the retained runner.

Related: #17439 introduced remote controller recovery. #18011 preserves
checkpoint authority through warm preparation. This change fixes the
lifetime of preparation's renewal reference.

## What Changed

- Pass an internal lease-acquired callback from recovery through
heartbeat dispatch.
- Release preparation's renewal reference after the executor registers
its own. Keep final cleanup for exits before dispatch.
- Add a PostgreSQL regression for completion while finalization is still
pending. Cover callback forwarding, acquire-before-release ordering, and
failure before dispatch.
- Register the authority connection before subscribing to wire events.
Handle an immediate close before accepting buffered data.
- Add regressions for a message or close delivered during subscription.
- Extend Linux continuity coverage with preparation renewal and delayed
instruction collection after recovery.
- Update the continuity guide and session verification recipes.

## Verification

- The new recovery regression failed before the fix because renewal
detached the runner after lease release. The 76 recovery, renewal, and
dispatch tests then passed. The final ordering and early-exit checks
passed again after replacing fixed sleeps with controlled interval
ticks.
- Both buffered-wire regressions failed before the connection fix. All
170 control-plane tests passed afterward. Existing tests cover stale
authority, ownership loss, pending operations, and closed ingress.
- Linux ARM64 acceptance passed at
`a7daefacceb8bd994d0b79d284cdf54f3e3829d1`, with Node 24.19.0,
PostgreSQL, the real Rust runner, TLS ingress, and a deterministic Codex
protocol fixture. The test interrupted the first turn, recovered it,
held finalization open for a renewal interval, and completed two
follow-ups. It retained one provider process, three turns in one
history, and the same runner identity. Final suspension and connection
cleanup completed. The ordinary warm-reuse case also passed three turns
with one provider process.
- Earlier Linux attempts completed the turns but hung during cleanup. A
debugger found a fulfilled promise keyed by an undefined connection. The
regression reproduces that defect. One later setup attempt timed out
while staging an unstripped 373 MB debug binary. The passing run used
the same binary with debug symbols removed.
- Reproduce Linux acceptance with the `same-server` case in
`doc/testing-native-remote-continuity.md`.
- `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, map validation, and `git diff
--check` passed at the final revision. The full local `pnpm test:run`
command was attempted, but the serial run had not finished after 13
minutes. It was stopped after the equivalent CI lanes passed. It is not
counted as a full local pass.
- Greptile and the Paperclip review both scored the final revision 5/5
with no findings. All Runner verification lanes passed. The first CI
attempt hit timing failures in voice recovery, agent YAML configuration,
and the task-title outage browser test. The full YAML and voice-recovery
files passed locally (88 and 19 tests). These paths were unchanged and
passed on the prior revision. All three passed on the single retry.
Final current-head status: 55 successful checks, one neutral check, and
two skipped Storybook checks. No pending or failed checks remain.
- Live Daytona/model acceptance and recovery of the hosted task remain
unverified. This PR does not deploy the change.

## Risks

- Releasing preparation before execution starts renewal could leave a
gap in authority. The callback runs after the executor registers its
reference.
- Preparation errors must not leak renewal. The recovery promise retains
idempotent final cleanup.
- Wire callbacks can run during subscription. Message and close
regressions check that registration is complete before either callback
runs.
- No schema, API, model, permission, lease duration, or retry policy
changes.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution, and browser diagnostics. The exact serving model identifier
and context window are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 11:18:53 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 7d8d1fbc1d fix(adapter-utils): provide a default author for local commits (#18094)
<!-- entire-trail-link-start -->
https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/-/trails/209/changes/paperclip/209
<!-- entire-trail-link-end -->

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agents use managed launchers for Git and GitHub commands.
> - These launchers exclude host credentials and host Git identity.
> - A checkout without an author cannot save a local commit when managed
GitHub identity is absent.
> - A local author default belongs in the launcher that owns this
isolation.
> - This pull request supplies a private Paperclip default and preserves
explicit and managed identity selection.
> - Agents can save local work without manual author setup or extra
GitHub access.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

An ordinary `git commit` fails with `Author identity unknown` in a fresh
checkout without author settings or a usable managed GitHub identity. An
agent must set its own author to continue.

**Expected behavior**

The managed launcher supplies a default local author. Repository and
command settings override that default. A current managed identity
retains its existing precedence.

**Steps to reproduce**

Run the managed launcher in a fresh Git repository without author
settings or broker credentials. Add a file, then run `git commit -m
work`.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced at `063cfd43813cabf18417605fb9eefb9aacf95c8d` on Linux with
Node 25.9.0 and pnpm 9.15.4.

**Deployment mode**

Managed sandbox execution. The shared launcher also serves local and SSH
execution that selects managed access.

Related: #16662 changes precedence for a connected GitHub account. #8945
assigns identity to managed worktrees. This repair supplies the missing
anonymous launcher default and keeps the current managed precedence. It
does not require either change.

### Hypothesis and thesis for a fix

**Hypothesis:** The launcher removes inherited author variables and host
Git config. Without a broker identity or explicit repository settings,
it has no author. Four real-Git cases reproduce the reported error on
the base revision.

**Thesis for a fix:** Put `Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>` in a
private Git config for each operation. Git treats it as global config,
so repository and command settings can override it. The existing broker
environment still takes precedence. Do not store a person's identity in
shared checkout config, where it could remain after steering or
revocation. The default grants no GitHub access.

## What Changed

- Write the default author to the existing private operation directory
with mode `0600`. Remove it when the operation exits.
- Point managed Git at this file while keeping host global/system
config, credentials and SSH identity excluded.
- Add real-Git regressions for missing, absent, unavailable and rejected
access. Preserve explicit overrides, identity changes and revocation
controls.
- Verify two shell commits through normal launcher staging and a commit
after anonymous heartbeat cleanup. Check saved files, commit metadata
and temporary config cleanup.
- Update identity documentation and the two run map recipes.

## Verification

- Red: the four new local-commit cases fail on the base launcher with
`Author identity unknown`.
- Green: all 80 focused tests pass in one run across
`github-launcher.test.ts`, `github-launcher-environment.test.ts`,
`heartbeat-github-launchers.test.ts` and `native-github-access.test.ts`
(23.31 seconds).
- A controlled filesystem failure first made the candidate discard valid
managed credentials. After the correction, the same real launcher
process retains them. Default-author file failure does not change
operation-directory readiness.
- Review found a second failure: a partial write can leave invalid Git
config. The real-process test failed before the repair with `fatal: bad
config line` from `git status`. The launcher now selects the default
file only after the write succeeds. Both write-failure cases retain
managed credentials, allow status, require identity when no default is
available, and save a commit with explicit identity. The test reads the
stored commit metadata with real Git.
- Real shells, generated launchers and Git create and inspect saved
commits. Sandbox transport and broker replies use controlled fixtures.
No live cloud rollout or GitHub write acceptance is claimed.
- The isolated test process excludes inherited task launcher paths, Git
config and broker authentication variables. An initial run exposed those
test-environment inputs; the isolated replay passed. The heartbeat
assertion now checks the private default file and its cleanup instead of
expecting `/dev/null`.
- Adapter-utils typecheck and build pass. Map validation and `git diff
--check` pass.
- Conflict repair on 2026-10-29: merged master
`fa5e70faf47ef2ca20bf2daf95b7503c94469b89` into the PR branch. Resolved
19 conflict paths by retaining master for unrelated files. All seven Git
identity files remain byte-for-byte equal to the reviewed fix. The final
diff is seven files, 145 additions and 15 deletions.
- At head `c501e3f28369d404c91082b89188dc150c9362a9`, all 80 focused
tests pass again (37.53 seconds). Adapter-utils typecheck and build
pass. Map validation and migration checks pass. The PR diff passes `git
diff --check`.
- Full workspace typecheck and build were attempted again. Both stop
because this sandbox has no Rust `cargo`. The duplicate full local
Vitest run was stopped after about five minutes without a final result
while full CI was running. The earlier full local attempt was stopped
without a final result. No local full-suite pass is claimed.
- GitHub now reports the PR as mergeable. All current-head checks have
completed. [Full CI run
40878973679](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40878973679)
passes, including typecheck, build, Rust, test shards and all eight E2E
shards. The exact-head check inventory has 54 successes, one neutral
Paperclip Review and two Storybook skips. Snyk passes. Greptile and
Paperclip each reviewed `c501e3f28369d404c91082b89188dc150c9362a9` at
5/5 with no actionable findings. All review threads are resolved. GitHub
reports the PR as clean and mergeable.
- The prior CI run had one failed E2E test: `a lost creation response
requires reload and cannot blindly replay commands`. Its YAML parser
received page text that starts with `Skip to Main Content`. The new run
passes E2E shard 7/8 and the full E2E gate. The prior failure remains
part of this record. A passing run does not establish the earlier
failure's cause. This change does not alter that test or the agent
configuration UI.

## Risks

- Commits without explicit or managed identity now use the generic
Paperclip author. Operators can still set repository or command
identity.
- `git config --global` writes to temporary operation config and does
not persist. The documentation states this behavior.
- If the private config directory cannot be prepared, commits still need
explicit identity. Existing redacted diagnostics and credential
isolation remain.
- One small synchronous file write is added to a directory the launcher
already creates. No new subprocess, network request, persistent identity
or authority cache is added.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, shell execution and tool
use. The runtime does not expose the exact model ID or context window
size to this agent.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 08:56:12 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 60b8089a44 fix(runner): trust managed Cloud sandbox images (#18066)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Cloud selects and updates the sandbox image used by its agents.
> - Runner admission also required saved qualification for the exact
snapshot and configuration.
> - An image update left the old record stale and stopped work before
runtime startup.
> - This pull request trusts the image selected by Cloud and uses the
real runtime startup check.
> - Agents can continue after an image update without an operator
running a separate qualification test.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A managed Cloud image update could cause
`sandbox_snapshot_qualification_required` before provider work began.
Runner discovery also fell back to Legacy when saved platform
qualification was absent. The agent Test action could require a separate
qualification request even when discovery already offered Paperclip
Runner.

**Expected behavior**

A managed Cloud image can start without a saved qualification record.
Runtime startup and the handshake report actual compatibility failures.
Custom images keep their existing qualification rules.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Use Paperclip Runner on a Paperclip-managed Cloud sandbox.
2. Save qualification for its current snapshot.
3. Update the platform-selected snapshot and leave the old record in
place.
4. Start a task. Before this fix, admission rejects the stale record
before starting the provider.

Related work: Refs #17445, Refs #17724, Refs #17448. These changes cover
saved-computer qualification and setup tests. This fix removes the
qualification prerequisite only for managed Cloud images.

## What Changed

- Use one managed-image policy in runner selection and lease admission.
Require the active Cloud configuration to provision the provider. Active
captured custom images are excluded.
- Use the current Cloud image and ignore missing, stale, revoked or
valid saved qualification records for that image.
- Reuse the existing provisioned-runner selection path. Keep adapter
availability checks and the Legacy choice for managed sandboxes.
- Read custom-image metadata directly during discovery without resolving
provider credentials.
- Use the existing template-matching rule for captured images. Ignore
outdated captures, preserve qualification for matching custom captures,
and fall back to Legacy discovery for malformed saved capture config.
- Skip the separate qualification request when discovery already offers
Paperclip Runner as the default. Test checks the actual runtime.
- Add regressions for image updates, provider failures, custom images,
self-hosted environments and company access. Update the development and
verification guides.

## Verification

- Before the fix, managed-image discovery regressions returned Legacy,
and the rendered Test action called the separate qualification endpoint.
- The original runtime source fails four of the five managed-image
regression cases. The fixed runtime passes all five, including provider
startup error propagation. The baseline check uses the original module
source through a temporary Vitest transform and the same database-backed
tests.
- All 603 focused tests pass: 231 runner selection, 185 environment
runtime, 10 snapshot qualification, 168 rendered agent form and nine
form source controls. Discovery controls cover unavailable credentials,
stale managed markers without an active provisioner, outdated captures,
matching custom captures and malformed saved config. The
outdated-capture regression fails before the fix and passes afterward.
- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `pnpm check:token-gates` pass.
- Full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. All five focused files
passed together on `8275bbe72bb4d91fb3a02fb0658f0846b2abc966`
(`codex/simplify-managed-runner-readiness`, Node 24.19.0, macOS ARM64).
- The full local `pnpm test:run` suite is still in progress. Hosted CI
is waiting at `ci / gate / Select trusted runner`; the separate `review`
workflow is queued. Greptile is 5/5 on the current head, and both review
threads are resolved. This PR is not yet verified by full CI.
- Live fixed-source Daytona acceptance is not verified. This workspace
has no Daytona API key or image configuration. The earlier deployed
recovery is not evidence for this source change.

## Risks

- Managed Cloud now trusts its selected image. A bad image can fail at
real runtime startup instead of a saved qualification gate.
- Company access, credentials, runtime integrity and handshake checks
still apply. Self-hosted sandboxes, custom environments and active
captured custom images keep their qualification and immutable snapshot
binding.
- No schema change or data migration is required. Existing qualification
records can remain in place.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, tool use and code
execution. The exact model ID and context window are not exposed in this
session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-28 14:39:26 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip c4b6168e08 fix(server): disclose assigned tool search page bounds (#18056)
<!-- entire-trail-link-start -->
https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/-/trails/187/changes/paperclip/187
<!-- entire-trail-link-end -->

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for AI agents at work.
> - Native agents find connected app tools through the assigned-tool
search tool.
> - Large catalogs require small pages and an offset for the next page.
> - The input schema enforces a maximum of 20 results, but its
descriptions omit that number.
> - Providers can render the integer field as a plain number and hide
its numeric bounds.
> - This pull request puts the existing range and default in both
descriptions.
> - Agents can choose a valid page size before they make a search call.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

An agent can request `limit: 50` for `paperclip_search_assigned_tools`.
The tool rejects the call with `invalid_tool_call` at
`/properties/limit/maximum`. Its model-visible description does not
state the accepted range.

**Expected behavior**

The tool description and the `limit` description must state the range of
1 to 20 and the default of 5. Agents can use `nextOffset` to read more
results.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Inspect the assigned-tool search description in a provider tool list.
2. Render the integer schema as a TypeScript number field.
3. Request `limit: 50` without a visible page-size bound.
4. Observe the validation error. Retry with a valid size and offset.

### Hypothesis and thesis for a fix

The numeric schema is correct, but the descriptions omit the page limit.
Put the existing range and default in text that all providers can see.
Keep the strict validation in the assigned-tool discovery owner. This
should reduce avoidable retries. It does not guarantee that every model
call will be valid.

## What Changed

- State the accepted range and default in the search description and the
`limit` property. Add the existing default as schema metadata.
- Test the tool listing and calls through the real HTTP MCP bridge for
both compact delivery paths.
- Document the page size and offset procedure in the Runner README and
verification maps.

## Verification

- Red: the two new bridge tests fail against the unchanged
implementation because the listing omits the numeric guidance.
- Green: all 37 tests in
`server/src/services/native-runtime/assigned-mcp-tools.test.ts` pass
after the change. The tests cover default pages, a 20-result page,
offset continuation without duplicates, and rejection of 21 and 50.
Existing tests cover grants, revocation, modes, approvals, aliases, and
schema chunks.
- Current head `7d658d0c4e4d9db3feb53a5c508214440ff058c4`: 37/37 focused
tests pass locally. Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved threads.
Current-head CI is green, including typecheck, build, unit tests, Runner
checks, and all browser shards ([CI run, attempt
2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40733284523/attempts/2)).
Browser shard 7 initially failed in a newly merged agent YAML editor
test when its clipboard read included the whole page. The single retry
passed without a code change; the exact cause is unconfirmed. The
original failure remains in [the CI
log](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40733284523/job/122975224906).
- Run the focused suite from `server/`: `pnpm exec vitest run
src/services/native-runtime/assigned-mcp-tools.test.ts`.
- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check` pass.
- The bridge uses real local HTTP. The app gateway uses synthetic
descriptors. No deployed build or live model improvement is claimed.
- Full local verification is incomplete. Recursive typecheck and server
typecheck require `cargo`, which this workspace lacks. A direct server
TypeScript check was killed by the workspace. The full test suite had no
final verdict before the resource stop. CI must supply the remaining
verification.

## Risks

Low risk. This change describes existing limits and adds default
metadata. It does not change search execution, page caps, gateway
access, revocation, approvals, or audit. Models can still send invalid
calls. This change has not measured their future retry rate.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with tool use and code execution. The exact
provider model ID and context window are not exposed to this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used, its capabilities, and unavailable
model metadata
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the bug report fields
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues
or links
- [x] The public branch name describes the change and has no internal
task ID
- [x] I have run the focused tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added tests for the reported failure
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented risks
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open recommendations or follow-ups
- [x] I will address reviewer comments before requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-28 13:55:48 -05:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip a2fbce9305 Fix plugin session and directory reuse on follow-up turns (#18045)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip preserves task state when agents receive follow-up work.
> - Plugin computers keep their process state outside the controller.
> - A local receipt proves that a previous plugin run suspended.
> - A cold resume left that receipt in place after the session became
live.
> - The next warm follow-up rejected the stale receipt as an identity
mismatch.
> - A separate follow-up path also treated a fresh task directory as a
Git worktree.
> - This PR consumes the obsolete receipt after admission and preserves
the bound directory on follow-up.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: #17820. This change retains the controller restoration added by
#18018.

**What happened?**

A plugin session resumed from a suspended checkpoint and completed a
turn. Its next warm follow-up failed with
`runner_state_identity_mismatch:
prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate`. The journal had the completed
run's identity. The local suspension receipt still had the preceding
run's identity. Two separate task histories showed this sequence.

After a fresh retry completed in a repository-free plugin directory, an
ordinary follow-up could instead fail with `The selected plugin
environment does not support Core Git worktree preparation.` The saved
task settings contained only `mode: isolated_workspace`, which
introduced the default Git strategy on the next admission.

**Expected behavior**

Keep the same admitted provider session during warm follow-ups. Reuse
the saved plugin task directory without Core Git preparation. Retain
ownership checks and explicit strategy settings.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Complete a warm plugin task and let its session suspend.
2. Resume the checkpoint and complete another turn.
3. Send a follow-up while that session remains warm.
4. Separately, complete a fresh retry in a repository-free plugin
directory and send an ordinary follow-up.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Both regressions reproduce against base `820c45846` with the added
tests.

**Deployment mode**

Hosted plugin execution. Local reproduction uses the real filesystem and
a disposable PostgreSQL 18 database, with synthetic provider execution.

## What Changed

- Remove the local plugin suspension receipt after provider recovery and
durable run admission publish a live session. Admission still checks the
receipt first. Normal suspension writes a new receipt.
- Recognize a saved fresh plugin directory through its company, task,
workspace, owner, attempt and path. Use the existing directory-selection
path. Explicit strategy settings still apply.
- Add cold-to-warm, database-backed workspace-selection and ownership
regressions. Update execution semantics and session verification
recipes.

## Verification

- Red: the cold-to-warm regression failed on unchanged executor code
with `prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate` on the follow-up.
- Red: the PostgreSQL regression selected a Git strategy on unchanged
environment-selection code. The explicit-strategy denial case already
passed.
- Green: all 95 tests in `workspace-preparation.test.ts` and
`provider-fresh-workspace.test.ts` pass against a disposable local
PostgreSQL 18 database, selected with the existing
`PAPERCLIP_WORKSPACE_PREPARATION_TEST_DATABASE_URL` test seam.
- Green: 92 focused executor cases pass, including plugin checkpoint
recovery, warm rotation and denial cases. The full
`plugin-runner-task.test.ts` suite also passed (38 tests).
- Green: direct server check, `node node_modules/typescript/bin/tsc -p
server/tsconfig.json --noEmit`.
- Green: `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, `git diff --check`, and a local
diff scan for secrets, personal data and live identifiers.
- Full local native suites: 988 of 1,004 cases passed. Sixteen
integration cases could not start their bundled PostgreSQL cluster. The
failure persisted outside the sandbox. These cases are not claimed as
passing. An earlier sandboxed attempt also denied process and loopback
operations; those denials disappeared when run outside the sandbox.
- The first broad local commands could not locate Cargo on `PATH`. Rust
is installed under `~/.rustup`; its Cargo executable was verified. Per
the requested scope, subsequent local verification stays targeted to
changed TypeScript paths; no Rust source changed. CI Typecheck + Release
Registry and Rust verification passed on the initial commit. The
complete repository test suite was not run locally.
- Review regression: an explicit agent-level Git strategy reproduced the
incorrect directory fallback before correction. After including the raw
agent strategy in the existing check, all three targeted cases
(implicit, task-level explicit, agent-level explicit) pass. The server
TypeScript check passes after this correction.
- CI on `a81668c4b`: the first workspace-a 2/2 attempt failed in
unchanged UI `AgentActionButtons.test.tsx` (`calls clearError and
refreshes agent-related queries`, zero mock calls). [Original failed
job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40717870938/job/122921463517).
That shard passed on `294c5dfc3`. The failure is retained here. The UI
shard passed on final commit `687000287`; no unrelated UI edits or local
UI suite runs were added.
- CI also exposed three existing local-directory recovery failures on
`a81668c4b`: the review correction applied the raw agent strategy guard
to local directories. [Original failed server
job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40717870938/job/122921463229).
Narrowed that guard to adapter-managed directories, preserving local
recovery behavior. All 20 targeted cases (three plugin selection cases
and 17 local recovery scenarios) pass afterward, and server TypeScript
verification passes.
- Final commit `687000287d3339b7e15e35d95515b3c75c273d7a`: [hosted CI is
green](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40720169342),
including the corrected server shard, all other server/workspace shards,
Runner checks, typechecking and build. All 55 non-skipped PR checks
pass. Greptile scores this exact commit 5/5, with no unresolved review
threads. GitHub reports no merge conflicts.
- Pre-merge hosted acceptance was requested. The maintained deployment
CLI stopped during artifact discovery: no published private Cloud
composition exists for `687000287`. The current private build requires
canonical Core master readiness and standard-image provenance. The
Core-only branch preview omits the private computer plugin needed for
the journey. No campaign or tenant update was started; private-preview
deployment support is a separate prerequisite. No live deployment or
provider acceptance run is claimed.

## Risks

The receipt is removed only after the existing runtime publishes an
admitted session. Earlier admission failures keep their proof. A later
normal suspension creates a new receipt. The change preserves existing
identity, lifecycle and controller checks.

Directory selection remains limited to the exact bound, active,
repository-free plugin recovery directory. Foreign owners, changed
paths, wrong attempts and explicit Git strategies do not gain this
fallback. No schema, API, credential, permission or fleet-default change
is required.

Existing failed runs and recovery holds remain history. This PR does not
edit quarantined state or replay an interrupted task. Rollback restores
the previous code and can reintroduce the two admission failures.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use and code execution.
A more specific model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this
session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-28 10:26:12 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 820c458465 fix(runner): restore per-turn controller checkpoints before resume (#18018)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip coordinates agents and preserves their work between turns.
> - Remote native sessions save controller checkpoints in the database.
> - External persistence leaves a small identity marker on local disk.
> - A later `per_turn` continuation must restore that checkpoint before
it reads the controller identity.
> - The restore path handled warm sessions only, so valid per-turn
continuations failed before provider execution.
> - This PR restores the referenced checkpoint and retains the existing
ownership and lifecycle checks.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: #17439 added external controller persistence and the warm
restore path. #18011 repairs warm preparation and fresh bootstrap
checks; it does not cover ordinary per-turn continuation.

**What happened?**

A remote OpenCode run completed with `per_turn` lifecycle and saved its
controller checkpoint in the database. Its next turn reused the
normalized session. Admission read the remaining external-persistence
marker as a full controller file and failed with
`runner_state_identity_mismatch: durable_identity_unreadable`. The prior
run's complete checkpoint and harness backup still existed. The failure
occurred before provider work started.

**Expected behavior**

Restore the exact prior controller checkpoint before identity
inspection. Then apply the existing company, task, session, prior-owner
and suspended-state checks before a provider can start.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Complete a remote native OpenCode task with `per_turn` lifecycle and
external controller persistence.
2. Send a follow-up that resumes the same saved session without a
session reset.
3. Observe admission reject the valid external controller marker before
provider execution.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Observed at `40c1ab36cdac70c85dc8fe5e912431834fdb691b`. The same
warm-only restore remains on current master.

**Deployment mode**

Hosted Linux with Daytona and native OpenCode. The original model was
`openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017`.

## What Changed

- Restore external controller state for ordinary remote per-turn
continuations through the existing checkpoint loader.
- Bind that read to the current company and task, the marker's run, and
the expected normalized session.
- Keep local, warm and restart-recovery paths, prior-owner checks and
harness backup checks intact.
- Refresh a prior-run projection from the latest checkpoint after a
rejected active-owner attempt. Keep current-run full state and the
existing legacy file-backed fallback intact.
- Add restoration and denial regressions, execution documentation and
session verification recipes.

## Verification

- Red: the real controller generated an external marker; a valid
per-turn OpenCode continuation failed with the exact
`durable_identity_unreadable` error before tool-authority construction.
The repair passed the same case and its ownership guards.
- Review regression red/green: a real controller advanced its checkpoint
after an active-owner rejection. Before the follow-up fix, a later valid
continuation retained a null attach seed. After the fix, it restored the
newer attach template and prepare command. Legacy full-file roots with
no database checkpoint retain their existing behavior.
- At current head `1f6589233e6121d082a0c0c4444ea895b6e8cd7c`, 86 focused
executor cases and all 14 execution-driver cases pass. Coverage includes
checkpoint restoration, direct/backup suspension, Codex, legacy files,
warm admission and canonical bootstrap, missing or malformed evidence,
wrong bindings, active/foreign owners and unsuspended runners. Tests
stop before provider launch.
- The real PostgreSQL encrypted-checkpoint integration passes, including
normalized-session refusal before write and stale-writer fencing.
Independent source review found no actionable safety defect.
- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, `git diff --check`, full `pnpm -r
typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass on current head.
- The local full suite did not complete: native PostgreSQL startup
failed under the host sandbox, an initial Docker rerun lacked
migrations, and the migrated retry crossed the review-fix revision
change. Logs are retained; that mixed-revision run was stopped and its
owned database removed. Full test evidence comes from current-head CI.
- Current-head CI passes: 53 successful checks, two intended Storybook
skips, none pending or failing. Greptile is 5/5 on that exact head with
no open review threads. The only manual merge conflict with #18011 was
in the verification recipes; both recipes and the unchanged per-turn
restore helper are preserved.

**Live continuation acceptance remains unverified, so this PR stays
draft.** Two disposable OpenCode/Daytona attempts never reached turns
two and three:

- At `72b49208b1`, the first turn executed tools and produced the exact
33-byte workspace note, but exceeded its four-minute settlement
deadline. The first completion lacked a registered attachment; the
second decorated a typed attachment reference with filename/size/hash
text. The strict UUID parser rejected that reference before checking a
valid criterion reference. The scoped attachment, asset and publication
receipt exist. Replaying the actual guard rejects the original input
before a database lookup; correcting only that reference passes against
the recovered row and receipt. This did not show a
publication-persistence or controller defect. The task remained
unsettled.
- At `1f6589233e`, a separately approved replacement used a temporary
prompt-only fixture change requiring exact `deliverable:<attachmentId>`
references, with metadata in `verification.detail`. Production code,
grading and deadlines were unchanged; the fixture patch was removed
afterward. This attempt had no recorded provider authentication,
harness-ready, model, tool or result event. Ingress acquisition took
84.072 seconds; transport connection took 205.835 seconds within the
239.832-second failed native execution. A local settlement GET also
timed out after 30 seconds. The underlying startup stall is unresolved;
these observations do not establish a remote provider outage. Final
recovery was blocked with `ambiguous_remote_recovery_evidence`; no
successful settlement or continuation is claimed.

Both attempts used a Darwin arm64 source host with Node 26.4.0, isolated
PostgreSQL 18, a Linux x64 runner and OpenCode 1.18.34. The
representative qualified model was
`openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731`; the original incident used
`openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017`. The controller defect
occurs before provider work. Runtime artifacts came from immutable build
`e7ea2e2961`, whose Runner package source is identical to the candidate.
The current-source manifest, artifact, distribution, asset and all 110
archive-hash checks passed. Each attempt had $10 company/agent model
budgets and zero automatic workflow/task retries. Accounting was
incomplete; zero recorded spend is not proof of zero cost.

Earlier setup failures are also retained: host PostgreSQL bootstrap
denial, cached-pack compatibility admission before provider work, and an
[official artifact
build](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40696838122)
that stopped during an unrelated Pi npm install at its 300-second bound.
No manifest or integrity guard was weakened. Owned local processes and
databases are stopped, and the temporary fixture patch is removed.
Standard fixture cleanup had left one replacement sandbox started; it
was stopped and deleted through the SDK. Every owned sandbox was then
verified absent with a final 404 readback. Resource cleanup does not
establish successful task finalization.

An earlier head retained one [voice-recovery timing
failure](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40695892339/job/122843005098):
a deadline test observed two failed-provider inspections instead of one.
A single isolated shard rerun passed all 1,579 tests without a source
change. Its timing explanation remains an inference. The current
reconciled head passed without a retry.

## Risks

Restoration writes a local projection before the existing admission
checks. The encrypted checkpoint loader validates company/task/run and
normalized session before writing. A later ordinary continuation
refreshes a prior-run projection so rejected admission cannot freeze an
active owner's older checkpoint. Active, foreign or unsuspended prior
owners still cannot start a successor. Missing or malformed evidence
remains blocked. The change adds no retry, credential, provider binary
or lifecycle-policy change; it preserves the existing legacy fallback.

This PR does not deploy the repair or recover the original hosted tasks.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, code execution and
collaborating agents. The session exposes GPT-6 as its model version; a
more specific model ID and context-window size are unavailable.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-28 09:49:32 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 25f1070fbd fix(runner): preserve checkpoint proof across warm preparation (#18011)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip coordinates agent work and preserves its execution state.
> - Native Runner checkpoints preserve authority across controller
changes.
> - Warm sessions also need checkpoint writes while their successor
prepares.
> - External persistence replaces the local state file with a marker.
> - Two existing checks treated those valid states as lost ownership or
prior activity.
> - This PR uses the existing preparation lease and canonical controller
state to keep those checks accurate.
> - The result is safe warm-session retirement and fresh-session startup
on reused sandboxes.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: #17439 and #17320. The open #17401 changes the recovery welcome
window and does not cover these paths.

**What happened?**

A configuration change could fail before the next provider turn with
`runner did not durably suspend before checkpoint`. The task already
pointed to its preparing successor, but that successor did not yet have
a native coordinator. The old completed runner's maintenance checkpoint
was rejected.

A separate fresh session on a reused sandbox could fail with
`resumed_unavailable`. Checkpoint registration had replaced the full
local state file with an external-persistence marker. The bootstrap
check still required the old full-file format. Process supervision then
reported unconfirmed termination before launch.

**Expected behavior**

Retire the completed warm runner under the same process's live
preparation lease. Admit a fresh remote session only when the registered
controller proves exact identity, no prior activity and pending
bootstrap commands, and the remote session directory can be claimed
atomically.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Complete a native warm turn with external checkpoint persistence.
2. Change configuration so instruction preparation must retire that
session, then submit a follow-up.
3. Separately, admit a fresh native session on a reused sandbox lease
after external checkpoint registration.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced in the checkpoint implementation introduced by #17439. Fixed
against current master.

**Deployment mode**

Source checkout tests and a hosted Docker/Daytona incident. No
deployment or original-task retry is part of this PR.

## What Changed

- Accept completed-run maintenance under the exact successor's live,
same-process preparation lease only before a native coordinator exists.
- Preserve original controller generation, accepted-result, no-new-work,
company and task checks.
- Pass the registered controller through the existing connection
callback and read its current canonical state for untouched-session
proof.
- Keep marker-only, identity, activity, backup and atomic
remote-directory guards.
- Add regressions and update execution semantics and session
verification recipes.

## Verification

- Warm retirement red: the real Postgres writer rejected the preparing
successor's `runner.suspend` checkpoint with
`native_runner_checkpoint_owner_lost`.
- Warm retirement green: 14 Postgres ownership cases pass, including
stale/foreign/expired owners, conflicting native authority and new
provider work.
- Bootstrap red: real controller registration and external persistence
caused the resumed and replacement positives to fail. Six external
negative cases passed.
- Bootstrap green: all 34 bootstrap cases, the bootstrap-state predicate
and 13 connection-driver cases pass (48 total).
- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check` pass.
- Full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass.
- Full local `pnpm test:run` remains partial/interrupted. The default
attempt could not initialize embedded Postgres on this Mac. A dedicated
Postgres 18 attempt ran for 17 minutes without a completed file result
before interruption; the generic helper separately confirmed unsupported
embedded Postgres (`initdb` failed after five attempts) and ignores the
external database URL. The generic probe skipped one test. Setup and
interrupted-run logs are retained; neither is claimed as a behavioral
red or a full local pass.
- Real source-hosted Codex/Daytona acceptance was attempted at
`6ce7fcacc4` with `gpt-6.1-sol`, `xhigh`. The actual task stopped before
provider work at `runner_ingress_auth_failed`, with zero authenticated
connections and zero source events. A separate environment-qualification
handshake reached challenge/response; that does not prove task
authentication. The three-turn warm reuse, configuration retirement,
useful output and reload workflow remains unverified, so this PR stays
draft.
- The live attempt used the cached Linux amd64 Runner binary
`7437a4e32a099180889be534fcfb2a086046514490c1448aba46c55848983ed8` from
the immutable Daytona image. The current staging binary could not be
copied because SSH timed out, and the configured current EXE image
returned registry 403. No compatible current local or CI-downloadable
artifact was available. Earlier setup failures and cleanup receipts are
retained; no provider success is claimed. Disposable test resources were
cleaned up.
- Exact-head Greptile completed at 5/5 with no open feedback:
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18011#issuecomment-6469515952.
All current-head CI checks pass: 53 successful checks and two intended
Storybook skips.

## Risks

The preparation fallback affects maintenance checkpoints only after an
accepted result. An existing native coordinator prevents that fallback.
Stale controller generations, expired or foreign preparation leases,
wrong tasks and new provider work remain denied.

The bootstrap check retains the live controller object and reads current
state each time. It does not trust a marker or restore local state
beneath a live controller. Pending turns, prior events/connections,
backups and existing remote directories retain recovery gates. No
schema, provider binary, credential, permission or lifecycle-policy
change is required.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, code execution and
collaborating agents. This session does not expose a more specific model
ID or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-28 09:09:09 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip b8f6d9b23f docs: clarify delegated connection feature and access maps (#17882)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The feature and agent access maps describe user journeys and their
permission boundaries.
> - PRs #17737 and #17739 added delegated connection setup across
several existing areas.
> - The maps include those operations, but some recipes and board-only
statements are stale.
> - This PR adds usable setup recipes and corrects the access
descriptions.
> - The benefit is a clearer verification path that preserves human and
agent authority boundaries.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #17737, #17739.

Related: #17862 changes connection setup advice and catalog choices.
This PR only clarifies the existing maps.

**Issue type**

Outdated and missing documentation.

**Where is the issue?**

The paired connection setup, app permissions, chat channels, model
accounts, and gateway maps under `maps/`.

**What's wrong?**

Delegated setup guidance sits under Gotchas without a matching driving
recipe. Some model-account text still groups supported account sign-in
with board-only host controls. A few callback, privacy, and native
admission descriptions omit important limits.

**Suggested fix**

Add the missing recipes. State the current route and service boundaries.
Keep existing capability IDs and distinguish source review, fixture
tests, and live provider proof.

## What Changed

- Add paired entry points and driving recipes for delegated setup,
permission changes, and managed AI sign-in.
- Describe Google consent restoration, GitHub requested credential
fields and saved rotation, and Vercel personal credential attribution.
- Correct the Vercel callback state checks and chat
conversation/test-status privacy scope. Name the separate GitHub
registration handoff endpoint.
- Replace blanket board-only AI login wording with the specific
managed-account and host/session boundaries.
- Link the five access maps to shared native admission and work-mode
limits. State the permitted self-targeted policy administration
boundary.

## Verification

- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passed: 35 paired areas and 192 stable
capability IDs. This checks structure and references.
- `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs` passed. Generated output remains
ignored.
- `git diff --check` passed.
- Eleven selected cases in
`server/src/__tests__/connection-management.integration.test.ts` passed
on source `db70c5acd9`, the unchanged base of this documentation commit.
They use a fresh PostgreSQL database, actual agent keys/run JWTs, human
sessions, and deterministic provider fixtures. The other 61 cases were
not selected.
- The selected cases cover connection/profile creation, Google saved
choices, native API entry points, Slack caller/target policy, GitHub
import and identity confirmation, durable gateway authority, AI
accounts/pools, saved human handoffs, revocation, scope, trust, and
Ask/Plan denial.
- Read-only source reviews checked all five areas. The disposable
database was removed after the run.
- Full workspace typecheck, build, and test sweep were not rerun for
this Markdown-only change. Live provider login and browser journeys were
not run. Per-operation source-only/not-run labels remain unchanged.

## Risks

Low risk. Incorrect documentation could misstate a permission boundary
or imply broader verification. The changes cite the owning routes and
services and retain fixture and live-provider limits. No runtime,
schema, lockfile, or workflow files change.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution, and read-only source-review agents. The session does not
expose a more specific deployment ID or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — existing fixtures
verify this documentation-only change
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green — CI is running and Paperclip
Review is queued on the current head
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups —
exact head `4d16f101968d6908f90f72b6ff6ecbb79037f168`
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 09:40:41 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 0c9d10d695 feat(connections): complete saved setup guidance and coverage maps (#17739)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Product and agent access maps describe the same capability IDs.
> - Agent connection management changes the callable operations and
permission boundaries.
> - Reviewers need an operation inventory that distinguishes API access,
human handoffs, and fixture evidence.
> - This pull request adds saved setup screens and updates the maps for
#17737.
> - The benefit is that users and contributors can inspect the coverage
and remaining boundaries.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Product and permission documentation, saved authentication setup UI and
consent metadata, and product/agent access maps.

**Problem or motivation**

The current maps describe board-only management paths. They need to
match delegated connection management and distinguish administration
from ordinary tool execution.

**Proposed solution**

Record route operations, required grants, responsible-user limits,
transport, saved authentication handoffs, provider-fixture evidence, and
explicit local-operator boundaries for every connection family.

**Roadmap alignment**

This is the documentation companion to #17737. It covers existing
Connected Apps, governed MCP gateways, chat channels, and
personal/shared AI accounts. It uses existing server setup operations
and adds their saved handoffs to the existing UI.

## What Changed

- Show saved AI sign-in and connection setup handoffs in the existing
UI.
- Open GitHub import and rotation links at the required human step.
Resume a committed rotation after reload without asking for another
secret.
- Restore saved Google service choices for the addressed user while
preserving newer consent. Successful direct/cloud consent records its
own timestamp, independently of refresh or lease writes; existing
refresh paths preserve it.
- Update product, implementation, and permission-default documentation.
- Reconcile app permissions, connection setup, chat channels,
profiles/gateways, and model account coverage.
- Use matching capability IDs in the product and agent access maps.
- Label source-reviewed operations separately from fixture-tested
operations and live provider setup.

- Preserve catalog creator attribution under the responsible user, with
the actual agent still recorded. This follow-up moved from the
implementation to keep both reviews below 100 files. This companion now
changes 38 files, including the preserved Vercel personal-credential and
OAuth callback attribution follow-ups alongside consent and catalog
ownership.

- Name the addressed-human browser-session and consent step for Slack
managed authorization and installation. Preserve source-only evidence
for those individual operations.

## Verification

- Current companion head: `04d40cdd605452d91cf4931476eb292a210825af`,
including implementation `2ecd6451d0` and master `ea727dc3c2`, 38 files.
All intended companion files survive: 35 are byte-identical to the
previous companion; two chat maps and qualification add current
evidence. Exact-head Superagent passed and Paperclip Review supplied an
actual neutral5/5 assessment with no findings and explicit
no-independent-runtime/live/current-CI verification limits. Exact-head
Greptile also completed at5/5 with no findings; both formerly failed
shards and their verification aggregate passed on attempt2; full
exact-head Linux CI workflow40446969603 completed SUCCESS. All current
checks and statuses are terminal clean, with no unresolved findings.
This PR remains dependent on #17737 and needs fresh checks after its
required post-squash replay. The preceding 605 head’s reviews are
historical after this update. Older b0ea Linux workflow success after
its single rerun also remains historical.
- Earlier preserved-stack verification passed **2,165 tests**: 70
assembled-server actual-auth scenarios, 27 OpenAPI contracts, 2,022
native API tests and 46 saved GitHub wizard cases in fresh PostgreSQL.
The parent also passed **141 existing gateway/policy tests**. Workspace
typecheck/build, maps and token gates passed. The initial typecheck IPC
denial and all material intermediate regressions remain in the
qualification record; no full local sweep or live provider setup is
claimed.
- Operation maps now cover issuer/target gateway policy intersection and
post-approval revocation, bounded activity pagination through
private-only windows, and native local-login encrypted receipts. The
companion preserves the Vercel OAuth callback ownership change with its
existing credential ownership follow-up.

- Parent CI has one retained connection-intent e2e failure from a
periodic-recovery timing race. GitHub refused the first job-rerun
attempt while its workflow was nonterminal. Once completed, the single
failed-job rerun was accepted as attempt 2 and passed, including the
full parent Linux workflow.

- Companion Linux server shard 4/12 retained a cleanup-idleness timeout
in `login-cleanup-work.test.ts` (active work was still 1 after its
five-second wait). The same unchanged cleanup suite passed all 16 cases
in the parent Linux job 121950185096 and all 16 cases locally against a
fresh disposable PostgreSQL database. Relevant cleanup/reaper/scheduling
runtime code is unchanged. The single unchanged-code failed-job rerun
was accepted as **attempt 2** on the previous `b0ea3c940f` head
(workflow 40431671705). The failed shard and complete Linux workflow
passed on attempt 2; no additional unchanged-code rerun was used for
this failure. The first local attempt failed the existing dedicated
`_test` database-name guard before running tests; the correctly named
fixture passed without weakening the guard.

- **Earlier 82 GitHub UI tests passed**. All three new replacement cases
were red before the fix. A confirmed unchanged generation preserves the
earlier copy; a changed or unreadable generation blocks copying and
reconnecting. An explicit status check can restore the copy when it is
still current. All earlier import, rotation, verification, and retry
states remain covered.
- The complete stack passed **82 API/OpenAPI tests** in fresh
PostgreSQL, including 55 scenarios with real agent keys, run JWTs, human
sessions, production defaults, persistence, and deterministic providers.
The parent also passed **60 Copilot installation tests**, preserving
published v62 and binding combined guidance as v63.
- **Earlier 10 focused Google/OAuth tests passed**: eight picker cases
and two local-HTTP protocol cases proving consent metadata survives
concurrent token refresh. The refresh and legacy UI cases were red
before the fix. These protocol fixtures use the existing injected board
actor and do not count as agent-authenticated proof.
- Workspace typecheck/build passed after the consent change; normal
migration generation reported no SQL changes for the additive JSON
metadata. The parent's latest caller-authorization correction passed
server typecheck/build. Map validation and token gates passed. Maps
cover 35 areas and 192 capability IDs. The specification names migration
`0380_broken_aqueduct.sql`.
- The test-call operation maps now record the full caller/target tool
access decision (profiles, policies, and explicit grants), credential
identity for every auth label, approval, and rate checks. The
profile-only precondition was removed after the new permitted-access
cases failed; those cases and the no-auth identity regression now pass.
Saved test status requires its originating principal and current
linked-task access; actual key/JWT privacy-denial evidence is recorded.
- Tool-connection activity is now operation-verified: 100 events over
two tasks require two capability decisions and at most two run captures
(previously 100/102), preserve private-event filtering, and deny the
next request after audit revocation. The regression was red before the
fix.
- Cloud enrollment creation and callback entries now name
instance-administrator and company/principal checks. The callback is a
browser return with HTML or a 303 redirect. Status reads retain their
separate board-actor rule.
- Operation maps identify the API, transport, authorization, evidence,
and human/operator boundaries. Structural checks do not establish live
provider behavior. Earlier failures and fixture corrections remain in
`doc/plans/2026-10-13-connection-api-parity.md`.
- An earlier companion head (`26edbe17`) received an actual Paperclip
Review assessment of 5/5 with no actionable findings, published with
neutral status. That review did not run tests or confirm CI, and it is
historical for this new head. The prior incomplete execution result is
not counted as a passed assessment. Fresh review remains pending. The
duplicate enrollment findings have explanatory replies and are resolved.
- The latest implementation correction passed all 55 actual-auth
scenarios and 27 OpenAPI contracts (separate commands). It repairs
unavailable old credential material, preserves fresh import versus
configured reconnect links, and distinguishes credential field
sets/completion modes in handoff keys. The new fresh-link and collision
cases were red before the fix. All 41 GitHub wizard tests now pass,
including filling the fresh saved handoff and asserting App import
rather than reconnect; UI typecheck, maps and token gates also pass.
Qualification retains the earlier failures and an incorrect OpenAPI
filename that selected only the integration module before the correct
separate contract run.
- Configured GitHub credential-entry links carry canonical requested
fields and all/any mode. The form displays and submits those values
through human reconnect while retaining other saved credentials. Two
webhook/client-secret cases were red before the fix; combined all/any
and legacy-link cases also pass. The current UI fixes the old bf760912
baseline referenced by the duplicate main review finding.
- After merging master baec3abd67 and regenerating migration0380, the
complete stack passed **128 tests** (55 actual-auth, 27 OpenAPI and 46
GitHub wizard cases), workspace typecheck/build, maps and token gates.
Eight current Google UI cases also passed. The two local-HTTP OAuth
cases could not initialize embedded PostgreSQL in this fresh attempt, so
that attempt is not a protocol pass; the earlier ten-case evidence is
historical and fresh Linux CI remains required.
- The reproduced Linux automatic-Slack challenge failure is fixed by
retaining verification only for the same signing fingerprint and
callback URL; all eight neighboring provider compatibility cases pass.
Qualification also retains the uncommitted GitHub field variant that
failed initial-secret compatibility before the extension was narrowed to
reconnect, and the first unmigrated external-database diagnostic.
Upstream 0379 remains intact; normal generation/pruning produced
additive/idempotent 0380, with repeated application verified.
- Both PRs must ship together. The user authorized merging when checks
pass. Merge #17737 first, replay only this companion's changes onto
master, retarget this PR, and require fresh current-head CI and review
before its squash merge.

- The updated maps distinguish authorized bot-token/API-key setup from
human verification-key entry and forbid generic channel secret-reference
replacement. Actual key/JWT security baselines were red before both
guards; all 82 API/OpenAPI cases, eight native receipt protections, and
49 policy-service tests now pass. The qualification record preserves the
initial lifecycle/fixture/union-assertion diagnostics and the preceding
Linux CI assertion failures. Maps pass on this updated stack. Fresh
exact-head CI and reviews remain required.

- The parent now preserves a per-field credential-change boundary before
retiring saved credential-entry cards. Old health, unchanged entry,
unrelated repair and retries cannot bypass it. Current authority is
checked before and inside credential persistence; a real provider-time
revocation regression was red before the fix. Final 82 API/OpenAPI
tests, four neighboring lifecycle cases, and server typecheck/build
pass. Maps pass, and qualification retains the hidden-metadata fixture
failure and the measured minute-boundary rate-test failure. Production
rate behavior is unchanged; only the relevant test Date clock is fixed.

- After the current master/parent refresh, all **341 affected UI
cases**, combined workspace typecheck/build, maps and token gates pass.
The updated parent also passed **97 actual-auth/OpenAPI cases**, **141
gateway/policy cases** and **61 profile installation cases**. Published
upstream Copilotv62/v63 remain unchanged; combined guidance is now v64
(`sha256:22e31f95ef972bcead98a4a707c9f33433558fd111e390e027a2bbb4346e112a`).
Qualification retains the initial source-identity failure and fixture
port/migration setup failures. No full local sweep, fresh local OAuth
protocol run or live acceptance is claimed; fresh Linux CI must qualify
this successor.

- Latest review follow-up: the parent fixes caller-policy bypass in
Slack tests/invitations and premature identity-handoff completion. The
maps now name caller/target Block/Ask/rate intersection, one charge for
a shared bucket, and the addressed human’s exact current identity link.
Parent verification passes all **99 actual-auth/OpenAPI tests**,
typecheck and build. The preserved combined companion passes the four
focused tests (including twelve Slack policy/recipient combinations and
the actual human OAuth confirmation path), workspace typecheck/build and
maps. The 50 embedded-PG continuation cases were skipped locally because
their database could not start; fresh Linux CI remains required. All
material red/intermediate results and corrected-fixture evidence are
retained in the qualification record.

- Current `04d40cdd60` CI workflow40446969603 retained two new failures:
server1/12 `workspace-runtime.test.ts` could not reach a fixture
subprocess’s health endpoint within its ten-second readiness window
(job122001926052), and chat2/3 `wakes Slack session sync from
publication commit and leaves settled action queues quiet` observed one
select after its idle predicate (job122001925936). Both same cases
passed in parent `2ecd6451d0` Linux jobs122001920494/122001920581. The
runtime and queue implementations are unchanged by this companion. Both
failing cases also pass unchanged locally: two real-subprocess runtime
readiness/reuse tests and the exact Slack quietness assertion against a
fresh migrated PostgreSQL database. Logs:
`/tmp/parity-04d-server1-failure.log`,
`/tmp/parity-04d-chat2-failure.log`,
`/tmp/parity-2ecd-server1-green.log`,
`/tmp/parity-2ecd-chat2-green.log`,
`/tmp/parity-04d-runtime-qualified.log`,
`/tmp/parity-04d-chat-quiet-qualified.log`. The single standard
unchanged-code failed-job rerun was **accepted as attempt2** on the
unchanged exact head at `2026-10-27T04:24:30.513973+00:00` after the
workflow completed. Both new failure retry allowances are now
**consumed**; both failed shards and the complete Linux workflow have
now passed on attempt2, including the verification aggregate. No
additional unchanged-code rerun will be requested for either failure. No
timing, assertion, idle-work guard or policy was weakened. If either
case fails again, investigate/fix rather than rerun again. The older
5b/b0ea rerun allowances remain consumed and separate.

## Risks

- Saved handoff links depend on the API changes in #17737, including the
nonsecret credential-generation metadata. Both PRs must ship together.
- A map can overstate operation coverage. Entries identify their
evidence and retain human authentication and trusted-host limits.
- Structural map checks do not prove live provider behavior.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific deployment ID or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — focused UI/guidance and
map checks
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — saved setup UI
tests and map validation apply
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — exact `04d40cdd60` full Linux
CI completed SUCCESS on attempt2; all current checks/statuses are
terminal clean, with an actual neutral5/5 Paperclip assessment
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups —
exact `04d40cdd60` review completed with no findings
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 08:21:02 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 063a498b54 Bound native OpenCode assigned-tool catalog projection (#17740)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native agents use assigned connection tools through a governed
gateway.
> - OpenCode received the gateway catalog directly, outside the bounded
server tool projection.
> - A large catalog can exceed a provider grammar compiler's capacity
even when it fits the transport limits.
> - Synthetic requests reproduced the Fireworks grammar timeout on the
configured DeepSeek model.
> - This pull request gives OpenCode two assigned-tool discovery and
call schemas through the existing server relay.
> - The gateway keeps the same grants, validation, approvals,
revocation, and audit rules.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A native OpenCode run could fail during provider grammar compilation
before its first assigned-tool call. OpenCode advertised the full
assigned gateway catalog. A synthetic catalog of 741 tool schemas
reproduced `Grammar processing took too much time` on Fireworks through
OpenRouter with `deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017`. The same model and
backend accepted a compact two-tool discovery/call catalog. This
reproduces the mechanism; it does not replay a historical private
request.

**Expected behavior**

Assigned-tool discovery must keep provider grammar size bounded. Every
call must retain the run's original gateway binding and permissions.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Give a native OpenCode run a large assigned connection catalog.
2. Use a provider that compiles tool schemas into a constrained output
grammar.
3. Observe the full catalog in the provider tool surface before this
change.
4. After this change, observe only `paperclip_search_assigned_tools` and
`paperclip_call_assigned_tool` for assigned tools. Discover and call a
permitted tool through its pinned alias.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Source checkout based on current `master`.

**Deployment mode**

Native local or sandbox execution with OpenCode 1.18.34.

Related work: Refs #14258 (discovery paging), #16678 (local adapter MCP
launch), and #17688 (gateway capability advertisement). This change
covers native OpenCode catalog projection.

## What Changed

- Route native OpenCode assigned tools through the existing server-owned
authenticated relay.
- Use bounded discovery/call schemas for OpenCode, including small
catalogs. Preserve transport capacity checks.
- Keep assigned gateway credentials on the controller. Ignore gateway
and credential values in tool arguments.
- Preserve exact declared MCP operation names through admission and
driver dispatch. Resolve transport prefixes only against the closed
catalog. Reject unknown or shortened names.
- Refresh former OpenCode direct-catalog and shortened-name checkpoints.
Keep the existing fingerprints for other providers.
- Add local and remote wiring, catalog capacity, alias, scope,
work-mode, approval, and revocation tests.
- Allow the native test files to use a validated dedicated external test
database when embedded PostgreSQL is unavailable.
- Document the assigned-tool execution contract.

- Bound OpenCode discovery pages to 32 KiB and large-schema chunks to
16K characters. Keep other harness budgets unchanged.
- Test medium pages and escaped large schemas through the actual HTTP
MCP bridge on the explicit Runner testing surface.

## Verification

- Red before the catalog fix: OpenCode did not create the server relay,
and forced compact delivery advertised 1 or 741 direct schemas.
- Red before the alias repair: HTTP MCP changed declared operation
names, and the driver sent `search_assigned_tools` instead of the
authorized `paperclip_search_assigned_tools`.
- Current repair tests: 112 OpenCode/proxy tests pass, plus one actual
Rust/proxy/HTTP MCP regression. Two checkpoint regressions fail with the
former scoped revision and pass with the new revision. Other providers
keep their prior fingerprints.
- The combined QA candidate with this exact PR head passes all 916
native tests and all 113 transport tests on supported Node 24.22. An
earlier Node 26.4/macOS run passed the 113 assertions but had an
uncaught networking error. That non-clean run remains recorded; its
stack matches [the upstream Undici
defect](https://github.com/nodejs/undici/issues/5544). No production
workaround or error suppression was added.
- `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and `git diff --check` pass on
`bc41ba72be2195eabeb0d7727227ee0cd02e8532`. The maps structural check
passes.
- The local `pnpm test:run` attempt stopped after host embedded
PostgreSQL initialization failures. The relevant database suites pass
with isolated PostgreSQL 18. All repository CI gates, including
aggregate `ci / verify`, pass on the current head.
- Synthetic live provider comparison: 741 invented schemas produced the
exact Fireworks grammar timeout in 20.9 seconds. Two compact invented
schemas produced a discovery call in 585 ms on the same model and
backend.
- The first hosted QA attempt exposed the alias failure described above.
On the patched source, a real local Rust runner → proxy → OpenCode
1.18.34 → exact DeepSeek smoke completed discovery, one synthetic
gateway read, and `paperclip_finish`, then emitted `turn/completed`. It
used the production compact projection and unchanged Rust allowlist.
- Two earlier local smoke attempts exposed missing terminal authority
and completion-contract fields in the smoke harness. Those failures
remain recorded. The corrected ordinary bindings produced the clean
result.
- Fresh Greptile: 5/5 on `bc41ba72be2195eabeb0d7727227ee0cd02e8532`,
with no new actionable findings or unresolved threads.
- Hosted QA publication and lifecycle acceptance remain pending. The
separate deployed-agent `Paperclip Review` check is also pending; it
follows a task that failed on the earlier deployed runtime.

- Local OpenCode/OpenRouter acceptance at `bc41ba72`: 530 synthetic
tools were authorized and installed. A simple model-ID reply completed
in 17.3 seconds with no app calls. A discovery task completed in 37.6
seconds, used the search/call relay, made one upstream call, and
returned the exact synthetic value. This is local source acceptance, not
a staging sandbox timing comparison.
- The large-result review finding has a failing-before/passing-after
HTTP MCP regression. Five medium schemas now page without invalid JSON.
A large schema with escaped text reconstructs exactly through bounded
chunks. All 35 assigned-tool tests and the server typecheck pass after
this follow-up.
- Final head `d84ce4856a6e65a35ad5fb8b561492598b525f4e`: all CI gates
pass. Greptile and Paperclip Review both rate the change 5/5. No review
threads remain open. The final full build, server typecheck, and 35
assigned-tool tests pass locally.

## Risks

- OpenCode uses discovery before it calls an assigned tool, including
for small catalogs. This can add a model turn.
- An existing OpenCode provider checkpoint rotates once because it
retains the former tool declarations. Paperclip task history remains
available.
- The historical filtered catalog was not captured. The synthetic
comparison proves the failure mechanism, not the exact cardinality of an
earlier private request.
- No model, provider route, permission, or automatic retry policy
changes.

## Model Used

The bounded-result follow-up also used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6 family). The
exact backend model ID and context-window size were not exposed for that
session. It used reasoning, code execution, and tool use.

OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` in Codex, with reasoning, tool use, code execution,
and source inspection. The runtime does not expose the context-window
size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-26 10:49:23 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip a1f77821b9 perf(tasks): show recent conversation before historical activity (#17593)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - A task page must show the instruction and current conversation
quickly.
> - The current page waits for related task data and historical run
transcripts.
> - These reads grow with task history, even when the reader only needs
the latest answer.
> - This pull request gives cold opens a small initial view and loads
older history on demand.
> - Messages and runs observed while the page stays open remain visible.
> - The benefit is a readable task before historical diagnostics finish
loading.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: #14667 and #16229. The first changes the reveal gate and scroll
anchors. The second adds general history pagination. This PR adds a core
task read and a folded recent-conversation view. It preserves the
default full-read API contracts. The shared files will need coordination
if either related PR lands first.

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

Cold opening an ordinary task with a long conversation or large run
logs.

**Current behavior**

Task enrichment and historical transcripts delay the readable
conversation. A cold open can fetch several megabytes of tool activity
before revealing saved messages.

**Proposed behavior**

Show the task instruction, recent saved replies, latest human input, and
the latest run's conversation data first. Fetch older messages and full
run activity when the reader chooses **More messages**. Retain new
messages while the page stays open.

## What Changed

- Add an authorized core issue view that skips related enrichment. Keep
enrichment on the existing detail read. Share task mutation, rollback
and invalidation updates with the core cache.
- Add a bounded recent-comment read. Preserve the first human
instruction when no description exists, including legacy rows with a
NULL author type. Keep company and task access checks and comment
redaction.
- Add optional recent activity and run-summary views. Fetch original
input receipts for visible comments separately so delivered messages
stay out of the queue. Reconcile watched unfinished runs after a
reconnect beyond the preview window, removing deleted runs after
reconciliation.
- Filter the latest native run's initial events to assistant messages,
request lifecycles and terminal results. Full event reads remain
available on expansion. Legacy fallback reads use a small tail extended
to the first complete record. HTTP cancellation aborts the storage read.
- Retain observed messages across cursor catch-up and new runs. Apply
local cancellation and deletion to both caches and their task aliases.
Refetch locally seeded history pages on expansion. Preserve expansion
across identifier and UUID links. Keep deep links, classic tasks and
Agent Chat on their existing full-history path.
- Update API documentation, design guidance, capability maps and
regression coverage.

## Verification

- Final acceptance on `9ea0b15ae44d9f6d2c9a9f824b4835f299f92979`: all CI
gates passed, including server/UI tests, all eight browser shards,
runner checks, full typecheck and build. [Final CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40326990328).
GitHub reports 55 successful checks, two intentionally skipped checks,
and one neutral Paperclip Review check described below. No checks are
pending or failed; Greptile is 5/5 and no review threads remain open.
- October 26 merge update: merged current `master`. The only conflict
was in task-page imports; both the compact-history hook and the new
live-update hooks remain. All CI tests and build jobs passed on
`044fd6733d`. Fresh review found canceled-comment cache drift, legacy
human-comment filtering, send-then-expand truncation, and partial legacy
log records. These defects were fixed in `af3d66a5bd`.
- Review-fix verification: 470 tests pass across ten affected suites,
including all six PostgreSQL cold-open tests without a helper override.
Cancellation/delete and send-then-expand regression tests failed before
the fixes and pass afterward. Coverage includes task identifier/UUID
reopen, stale in-flight reads, legacy NULL author types, local-file and
object-storage tails cut inside UTF-8 text, route forwarding, and
request cancellation. Full workspace typecheck and production build,
token gates, map validation and diff checks pass.
- Follow-up review found that a failed expanded legacy read lost its
record-alignment state on retry. `9ea0b15ae4` commits the expanded
window only after a successful read. The new regression fails before the
fix and passes afterward; all 19 transcript tests, UI typecheck, UI
build and token gates pass. Greptile reviewed this commit at 5/5 with no
actionable findings, and all review threads are resolved.
- The final Paperclip Review check ended neutral because its execution
did not complete; no passing Paperclip assessment is claimed. Its
earlier four concrete findings were fixed and regression-tested.
Greptile and the security scans completed successfully on the final
commit.
- The preceding `af3d66a5bd` CI run was canceled when superseded by the
retry fix. Its server shard 11 check briefly reported failure, but the
job API records cancellation and its test step passed all 1,750 tests.
This superseded run is not used as final CI acceptance.
- 549 focused tests pass on the final implementation across nine task
UI, activity-route, OpenAPI and PostgreSQL suites. These cover pending
history, desktop/mobile visibility, expansion, retained runs, message
bursts, cancellation recovery and queued-comment removal in both views.
- Legacy expansion keeps the latest answer visible while fetching and
deduplicating older output.
- Five PostgreSQL tests pass for core access denial, recent comments,
missing-description instructions, event paging and bounded activity/run
reads. macOS could not start another PostgreSQL cluster because it
exhausted its semaphore limit. These tests used a separate disposable
database on an existing local server through a temporary test setup
override. The helper was restored afterward.
- Full workspace typecheck and build pass with the final state fixes, as
do token gates and capability-map validation.
- Token gates, capability-map validation and `git diff --check` pass.
- Browser proof used a disposable task with 80 comments and six large
run histories. The cold view showed the instruction and recent exchange.
**More messages** revealed older comments. Navigation away and back
preserved expansion.
- Local HTTP sample: core 50 ms, recent comments 24 ms, recent run
summaries 17 ms. The latest native conversation response was 839 JSON
characters / 8 ms; its full event response was 1,099,005 / 86 ms.
Browser content paint was 1.34 seconds with development assets cached.
These are local observations, not staging latency claims.
- The first CI run passed every job except four board-send browser cases
and the review threshold. Those browser fixtures only mocked the old
comments endpoint; they now serve both recent and full reads, retaining
all message and attachment assertions. Both initial review findings were
fixed with regression tests. The next CI run passed every job. The
deeper review identified core-cache mutation, older delivery receipt and
retained run-status gaps; those are now fixed with regression coverage.
Final review is 5/5 with zero unresolved findings. Final-head CI
initially failed one unchanged runner shutdown test
(`runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts`, timeout-attachment case) with
`NativeSessionCloseUnrecoverableError`; all other CI jobs passed. The
same runner code passed on 971a762f80. A targeted local reproduction
also failed during provider drain. The failure is outside the changed
task loading paths; its underlying cause remains unresolved. The single
failed-job retry passed on the same head; this demonstrates recovery,
not a root-cause fix. All CI gates passed on the previous implementation
head `9004f94f28`: [CI run and
retry](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40192334629).
- `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped after repeated embedded
PostgreSQL startup failures. The native session suite recorded 15
database-related failures; other database suites could not start. No
complete local suite pass is claimed.

## Risks

- The compact view intentionally omits older diagnostics until
expansion. Existing open questions and approvals still use the current
interaction and run paths.
- Previously observed comment and activity rows remain cached while
open. The newest preview and incoming cursor pages refresh; this does
not add a general historical-edit synchronization protocol.
- Recent views are optional. Existing full API callers retain their
response shape and behavior. No migration is required.
- A legacy tail can exceed the requested byte limit by the prefix of its
first log record. Backward reads stop at the preceding record boundary
and honor cancellation.
- Staging has not been deployed or qualified with this change. Instance
startup latency is separate from task history loading.
- The related open PRs touch the same task-history files.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository editing, shell
tools and browser testing. The exact serving model identifier and
context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — 549 affected task tests;
the full local suite and unrelated runner failure are documented above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-26 08:11:39 -05:00
Nicky Leach 62f60bf158 Measure first deliverable text in native run traces (#17434) 2026-10-24 09:40:08 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip bf223596ab fix(runner): bootstrap fresh sessions in replacement sandboxes (#17320)
Reuse the untouched-session proof and atomic directory claim when a sandbox
replacement carries a provider session that has never run. Retain verified
restore for saved backups and all prior or ambiguous session activity.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-23 15:35:24 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip c5ca29dbef fix(claude): prepare compatible sandbox runtimes during onboarding (#17259)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip connects agent accounts and prepares their execution
environments.
> - A managed sandbox image can outlive the model defaults shipped by
the app.
> - Claude setup skipped installation whenever a CLI was already on
PATH.
> - The selected model then failed its minimum-version check after
sign-in succeeded.
> - This pull request prepares a compatible private CLI before testing
or running it.
> - Cloud onboarding also stops asking customers to run inaccessible
shell commands.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A new managed Cloud stack completed Claude subscription sign-in. Its
environment test then failed because the snapshot contained Claude Code
2.1.263, while the selected `claude-opus-5-5` model requires 2.1.280.
The screen displayed Manual debug commands that a hosted customer cannot
run.

**Expected behavior**

Paperclip prepares its managed runtime before testing the selected
account. A stale image CLI does not require the customer to upgrade a
server package. Failed preparation still blocks hiring. Cloud does not
display manual shell debugging.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Start a managed sandbox with Claude Code 2.1.263 on PATH.
2. Connect a Claude subscription and select `claude-opus-5-5` on the CLI
lane.
3. Connect the agent. Installation is skipped because the command
exists, then the version gate blocks the hello test.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Source baseline: `6204239cfc8c3be79fc185cf3f468ebaa0ab1e3e`.

**Deployment mode**

Authenticated managed Cloud with a Daytona named snapshot. The
correction also applies to the default CLI in other managed sandbox
transports.

Related work: Refs #14993 sets model/runtime requirements; Refs #15993
changes native defaults on qualified targets. Neither prepares an
outdated default sandbox CLI on this path. Searches found no open
duplicate.

## What Changed

- Check the actual default CLI against the selected model's existing
minimum version.
- When a sandbox's default command is outdated, install the exact
required npm package into a private versioned workspace prefix. Reuse a
compatible private installation. Keep the image's global CLI intact.
- Verify the private executable and use that same command for the
account hello test and normal CLI runs, with matching command metadata.
Probe effort support after preparing that executable so the chosen
effort is retained. Keep the model, account, engine and permissions
unchanged.
- Return safe preparation checks to environment tests and normal run
logs, distinguishing installation failure causes without returning raw
installer output or credential-bearing URLs.
- Exclude provider and Paperclip credentials from the installer
environment. Preserve the existing failing version gate if installation
or verification cannot succeed. Local, SSH and explicit custom commands
remain operator-managed.
- Hide Manual debug and legacy operator check hints on Cloud and while
deployment metadata is unknown; preserve check messages and details.
Retain self-hosted help and the detailed failed checks. Cloud copy asks
for a retry instead of asking the customer to repair the environment.
- Add subprocess-backed runtime controls, an account-probe regression
and mounted Cloud/self-hosted wizard controls. Update development
guidance and the affected capability maps.

## Verification

- Passed all Claude source suites and the server Claude execution suite
on head `c941ae44c22d8dafec0df033a129e39ce4ebd966`: **412 passed**, one
existing opt-in test skipped. These include the new command/effort
ordering, safe installer diagnostics, environment forwarding and run-log
regressions.
- On final head `0ecae0e9304f495a57524158b3700b8e9bc21cb8`, passed **208
tests** across all 174 mounted onboarding wizard tests and 34 Claude
execution tests. The failure fixture includes the real command-bearing
hint, and execution asserts both metadata command fields agree.
- Passed `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, `pnpm check:token-gates`,
`node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check`. Full typecheck and
build were repeated successfully on final head
`0ecae0e9304f495a57524158b3700b8e9bc21cb8`. [Latest-head
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39879208694)
is green: 54 checks passed and two skipped, including browser E2E and
serialized database suites.
- The new runtime controls execute real subprocesses with a controlled
installer. They cover an old CLI, an already compatible CLI, failed or
ineffective installation, local/custom commands, and an unknown version.
The probe regression asserts that the hello call uses the private
executable.
- A separate non-root local subprocess check installed the real npm
`@anthropic-ai/claude-code@2.1.280` package. Its private command
reported 2.1.280, the simulated image CLI remained 2.1.263, and a second
preparation reused the private copy. This ran on macOS ARM64. It did not
use a provider account, send a model prompt, or prove live Daytona
behavior.
- Attempted `pnpm test:run`. Embedded PostgreSQL initialization failed
after five attempts on this Mac with `Postgres init script exited with
code null`. The unchanged native-session database cases then failed.
Stopped only that full-suite process tree after recording the repeated
startup failure. No full local-suite pass is claimed; Linux CI must
cover those tests.
- The first new subprocess fixture had a quoting syntax error. It was
corrected before the passing focused runs. The one-off real-package
script first required an ESM extension correction, then passed. Logs
retain both attempts. A new execution assertion initially inspected the
final sandbox cleanup shell instead of the launched command; it now
checks execution metadata. A broader directory selection also picked up
generated `dist` tests whose Markdown fixtures are not copied by the
build (two ENOENT failures). The explicit source-suite run above passes;
no generated-test pass is claimed.
- Apex review: **5/5**, reviewed final head
`0ecae0e9304f495a57524158b3700b8e9bc21cb8`, all five earlier findings
addressed and resolved, no new findings.
- Merge, deployment and a fresh live Cloud subscription test are still
required. No customer account or production runtime was changed by this
branch.

## Risks

- An outdated sandbox needs npm registry access and up to 120 seconds
for one bounded installation attempt. A failed or unverified install
continues to block execution.
- The versioned package uses sandbox workspace storage. Compatible
cached copies avoid repeat installation within that workspace. Existing
runtime cleanup and sandbox lifecycle still apply.
- The compatible version comes from the adapter's existing model-version
contract. This does not add a model fallback or change the selected
execution engine.
- No schema, credential, permission, workflow or lockfile change.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with implementation and
verification. The exact serving model ID and context-window limit are
not exposed in this session. Capabilities used: code editing, shell
execution, API inspection and test execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-22 18:44:53 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 042051904d fix(codex): deliver configured service secrets to shell tools (#17216)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets operators assign tools and credentials to agents.
> - Legacy Codex starts provider processes and builds a separate shell
environment policy.
> - Both ACP and CLI removed every variable whose name contained KEY,
SECRET, or TOKEN.
> - This also removed service credentials that the operator explicitly
assigned, such as SLACK_BOT_TOKEN.
> - This pull request uses the resolved configuration to admit assigned
service secrets by name.
> - Every Codex launch keeps a bounded shell allowlist, including
launches without an agent identity.
> - Assigned scripts can use their credentials without adding unassigned
host secrets to shell tools.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: #16255. That PR fixes project-level exclude patterns. This PR
fixes the removal of explicitly assigned service secrets and the
fallback to an inherited policy when no agent identity is present.

**What happened?**

A Codex task could not run a Slack posting script. SLACK_BOT_TOKEN was
present in its resolved launch environment, but Paperclip removed its
name from shell_environment_policy.include_only. A live removal check
also showed that an identity-free launch without an explicit policy
could inherit an unassigned host token.

**Expected behavior**

An explicitly assigned service credential reaches shell commands.
Removing that binding removes its shell access on the next launch.
Unassigned host credentials stay outside the allowlist. Codex login
credentials and observability headers keep their separate provider
paths.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Configure a Legacy Codex agent with a synthetic SLACK_BOT_TOKEN
value.
2. Run a shell command that checks whether the variable exists without
printing its value.
3. Before this fix, the variable is absent. Repeat through ACP and CLI.
4. Remove the binding and run a second turn. Check that neither the
removed token nor an unassigned host token reaches the command.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced in the executor regressions before the fix on master at
4dfcb4c9b8. The final change is rebased on 25f2d05282.

**Deployment mode**

Source checkout. Local macOS arm64 provider acceptance with Codex CLI
0.160.0 and Codex ACP 1.6.2, gpt-5.6-sol, and an existing ChatGPT login.

## What Changed

- Added one shared Codex shell-name policy for Legacy ACP and CLI
execution.
- Admit explicitly resolved service-secret bindings. Keep Codex login
keys, observability credentials, and private runtime transport tokens
outside that opt-in.
- Reject glob-shaped environment names so one configured name cannot
match other credentials.
- Always emit the bounded policy. Do not fall back to host inheritance
after a binding is removed.
- Updated executor regressions, the identity contract, and the paired
verification maps.

## Verification

- Red before the fix: executor regressions failed because
SLACK_BOT_TOKEN was absent in ACP and CLI, with and without agent
identities.
- Green: 267 tests passed across the two executor suites and the shared
shell-policy suite. Coverage includes host/provider isolation,
unresolved and removed bindings, glob names, identity delivery, and
names-only metadata.
- The complete Codex adapter source suite passed after the CI follow-up:
571 tests passed, 1 skipped across 31 files. Its typecheck also passed.
- The first CI run caught four stale expectations in ACP config and SSH
launch tests. Those now assert the bounded policy and the existing
command/resume behavior. No production code changed in that follow-up.
- Live CLI and ACP acceptance: run a Python presence check through each
real adapter, remove the synthetic Slack binding, and run again. The
assigned token was present only on the first turn. The unassigned host
token and OpenAI API key were absent on both turns. CLI retained its
session; ACP correctly invalidated its session after the configuration
changed. Workspace proof files persisted.
- An earlier live CLI check failed after binding removal because the
no-policy fallback exposed the synthetic host token. The final change
removes that fallback. Both live checks then passed.
- Full pnpm -r typecheck and pnpm build passed. The changed packages
were compiled again after the safety correction.
- node scripts/check-maps.mjs and git diff --check passed.
- The local pnpm test:run attempt reported failures in native
warm-session tests and was interrupted. That full-suite result is not a
pass; PR CI must establish the final repository-wide gate. One named
native failure passed alone, and the complete native executor file then
passed separately (774 tests). The original broad-run failure cause
remains unconfirmed.
- After rebase, one Gemini skill-root case timed out at five seconds
while the broad run was active. The case passed alone, and the full
focused set then passed again at the PR head (267 tests). The earlier
timeout remains part of the verification record.
- An initial broad adapter run failed because sandbox restrictions
denied loopback listeners. Running the same suites with loopback access
passed.

## Risks

- Explicitly assigned service secrets now reach shell commands. This is
the intended behavior change: assigning a credential authorizes the run
to use it, and a model-directed command can read it. This is not a
broker that hides assigned credentials from the model. Operators must
assign only credentials and service permissions authorized for the run.
Configuration and secret-access authorization remain with their existing
owners.
- Superagent initially flagged this intended assigned-credential
exposure as a P2. The inline reply records the trust-model rationale and
the documentation states it explicitly. The security scan on the final
documented revision passed without any check override.
- The launch policy contains names, not values. Log redaction remains in
place. Provider login credentials and observability headers remain
excluded from the service-secret opt-in.
- Identity-free Codex runs now also receive a bounded policy. This
removes reliance on the operator's inherited shell policy.
- Existing explicit project exclude patterns retain their behavior;
#16255 addresses that separate case.
- The change has not been deployed to a shared instance.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. The exact served model ID and context-window size are not
exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with Fixes / Closes /
Refs OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run the focused tests locally and they pass; the full-suite
limitation is recorded above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-22 18:17:34 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 734c265339 Default new Pi agents to Paperclip Runner (#17142)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Users choose a harness during agent setup.
> - Claude, Codex, and OpenCode already receive their qualified Runner
default.
> - Pi has a qualified native integration but new Pi agents still use
the direct adapter.
> - This change gives new Pi agents the native default on supported
targets.
> - Saved agents keep their runner and compatible settings. Legacy
remains available in Advanced.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #17120, #14921, #14922, #14923, #14924, and #14956. Related generic
default work: #15422. This PR is the separate Pi follow-up to the merged
OpenCode change.

**Current behavior**

Choosing Pi for a new agent saves the direct Pi adapter. The native Pi
integration remains behind the generic experimental flag.

**Proposed behavior**

Default new Pi agents to ACPX Pi on macOS ARM64/x64 and GNU/Linux x64
with supported glibc. Keep unsupported targets and explicit Legacy
selections on the direct adapter. Require an explicit provider/model
before test or hire. Permit model-free inactive setup drafts.

**Reason and benefit**

Users choose Pi once and receive its qualified runner. Saved agents
retain their identity and settings. Conversions reject unsupported
legacy thinking and launch settings instead of dropping them.

## What Changed

- Add Pi to the shared platform/default contract and server creation
selection.
- Admit native Pi without the generic experimental flag.
- Preserve provider models, credentials, workspace settings, exact
thinking, and saved native policies.
- Add Pi runner controls, branding, setup resume, onboarding, built-in
configuration, and import handling.
- Add managed Pi OpenRouter routing and matching native provider API-key
accounts. Keep subscription and custom gateway exclusions. Clear
alternate credentials and reject custom Pi provider overrides.
- Keep Pi draft models empty instead of applying Claude's default model.
- Verify setup against the pinned Pi runtime. For native Pi on the
official OpenRouter route, reverify the API key live without requiring a
global Legacy Pi CLI.
- Match Pi’s bounded controller close window to its native snapshot
cleanup and lifetime verification, preserving explicit caller deadlines
and the mandatory drain/suspension proof.
- Bind Pi sidecars to the package that owns the pinned native assets,
including source and vendored server layouts. Other providers retain
their existing package authority.
- Keep protocol-owned finish/block tools out of the ACPX forwarded
catalog. The trusted bridge installs these tools itself; the complete
Rust authorization catalog and terminal receipt ledger remain intact.
This fixes actual Pi session startup and applies to other ACPX
consumers.
- Advance Copilot’s shared-source attestation to v58 because it pins the
shared files touched by Pi. Preserve immutable v57 bytes and historical
decoding; Pi’s own release identity is unchanged.
- Add regression coverage and update the paired maps and developer
documentation.

## Verification

- Passed: full repository typecheck and full production build on final
head 656d304783, including the generated attestation repair.
- Passed: focused shared/server/UI suites covering default selection,
platform fallback, conversion preservation, inactive drafts, managed
account compatibility, credential isolation, OpenRouter routing/model
IDs, exact thinking controls, and saved-account selection. Relevant
batches include 375 server/conversion tests, 267 account/routing tests,
and 110 UI setup/account tests.
- Passed: 179 attestation, historical-profile, qualified-profile, and
native-execution contract tests after CI identified stale Copilot source
hashes. The identity generator check passes; the only delta after the
passing Pi browser run is this Copilot attestation/history repair.
- Passed: 145 managed-account tests, including actual service
preparation and API-key adoption/rejection for native Pi without the
Legacy CLI; 6 pinned-installation probe tests.
- Red then green: an actual task failed session.open because its
54-operation catalog included the bridge-owned terminal tools. The
regression with those tools failed before the filter; all 399 Rust
library tests pass after it. The full product retry exposed an
additional package-authority mismatch. Four authority tests failed
before that repair; 11 authority checks and 14 installation/asset checks
pass afterward. Direct real Pi session initialization with the corrected
package root and catalog succeeds. No model prompt was sent by that
diagnostic.
- Red then green: real Pi posted Hello from Pi but its controller closed
before native cleanup could finish. The cleanup-budget test failed with
the old default and passes with the bounded Pi window. All 46 selected
suspension, drain, and package-authority tests pass after building their
native fixture.
- Passed: token gates, paired map checks, Rust formatting, and git diff
--check.
- Passed real browser acceptance on macOS ARM64, generic native runner
flag disabled, source a433748a12 (Pi code unchanged afterward): the UI
selects Paperclip Runner by default, retains Pi and the selected
model/account, and verifies the pinned runtime plus live OpenRouter key.
A fresh UI-created task, assigned to the UI-created native Pi agent,
posted exactly `Hello from Pi` and reached Done without retry or
restart. The native run and workspace finalization succeeded; the
response and Done persisted after Reload.
- Evidence: 8 preserved browser attempts, including the final passing
18-step journey with all screenshots. Prior failures remain recorded.
The earlier failed checkpoint run recovered on server restart; that
recovery is separate from the fresh final task’s clean success.
- Preserved browser failures: missing account control/inherited Claude
draft model; incompatible managed-account/model-prefix handling; generic
npm probe for Pi; Legacy CLI hello check; duplicate terminal tools and
wrong provider-package authority at actual native session.open; a real
Hello from Pi comment followed by premature checkpoint cleanup timeout.
Each failure has retained screenshots/logs and a corresponding focused
repair. The fresh final task proves these repairs end to end.
- The exact Runner Vitest shard was also run locally after the
attestation fix: the stale-hash failure is gone; 1,833 tests passed, 10
skipped, and two Codex retained-control settlement scenarios failed with
`native_cleanup_maintenance_unproven` during terminal ACK/suspension
replay. Both scenarios passed in an isolated rerun (2/2), and the same
19-test file passed in the preceding Linux CI run. The precise
full-shard timing cause is not established. These Codex scenarios are
outside the changed Pi paths; the original local failures are retained;
no complete local Runner-shard pass is claimed. The corresponding Runner
shard now passes on the final head in hosted Linux CI. All 60 final-head
check runs are now terminal and clean (55 successful, 1 neutral, 4
skipped), and the legacy Snyk status is successful.
- Local full repository tests were attempted but not completed:
provisioning briefly confused a workspace symlink, then a later run was
stopped before browser-driven repairs. No full local-suite pass is
claimed. Final-head hosted CI is green and fresh Greptile review is 5/5
with all review threads resolved; earlier jobs canceled by runner
shutdown are not counted as a pass.

## Risks

- Pi cleanup has a finite 45-second default window, accounting for the
native 30-second snapshot cleanup and 5-second lifetime fence. Other
providers and explicit caller deadlines retain their prior behavior.
- Pi requires explicit operator setup with `paperclipai runtime setup
pi` on the execution host. This PR does not add automatic downloads.
- Linux ARM64, Windows, musl, and unqualified targets retain Legacy.
- Legacy thinking levels minimal, medium, and xhigh cannot be translated
exactly. Native max thinking, warm lifecycle, or restricted permissions
cannot be dropped during a return to Legacy.
- Copilot’s bound profile advances to v58 with exact current launch
admission; v57 remains decodable for recovery. No historical identity is
rewritten.
- Existing agents and immutable run descriptors are not migrated. Cloud
Pi availability is unchanged.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex with reasoning, code editing, command
execution, and browser use. The exact serving model ID and
context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-21 17:10:00 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 39e44a9d9b Default new OpenCode agents to Paperclip Runner (#17120)
Default new OpenCode agents to Paperclip Runner on qualified macOS and Linux x64 targets. Preserve saved runner choices, explicit Legacy selection, and unsupported-target fallback. Pi remains a separate change.

Verified the complete browser path with a real OpenRouter connection: create the new agent, assign a task, observe its response and Done status, and reload to confirm persistence. CI passes and Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved findings.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-21 15:09:15 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 9ef434fe79 docs: expose feature map IDs and add a recipe index (#16987)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Its feature map describes user journeys and their verification
paths.
> - The map already defines feature IDs and full capability IDs.
> - The README and child pages did not show those IDs consistently.
> - Readers need those IDs to connect issues, tests, stories, and
evidence.
> - This pull request adds a recipe index and displays the existing IDs.
> - The benefit is clear references across the product and agent access
maps.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Issue type**

Missing documentation.

**Where is the issue?**

`maps/feature-map/README.md`, the child recipes, and their agent access
companions.

**What's wrong?**

The README sends readers to Storybook to browse features. Child pages
show local keys, such as `installation`, without the full
`plugins/installation` ID. Readers must inspect the generator to find
the full reference.

**Suggested fix**

List recipe links and existing IDs in the README. Show each feature ID
and full capability ID in its child pages. Explain capability IDs and
entry-point references. Keep the current keys and anchors.

Related work: Refs #15288. Refs #16052. Refs #15983. No duplicate open
PR or issue was found by title search.

## What Changed

- Add an index grouped by feature area. It lists every recipe, feature
ID, and full capability ID.
- Explain how IDs are formed and used in issues, tests, Storybook, and
evidence.
- Add feature IDs to all product recipes and agent access companions.
- Show full capability IDs beside recipe keys and below access and
Storybook guidance headings.
- Preserve existing keys, heading anchors, and generated ID values. Keep
the latest upstream company capability in the index.

## Verification

- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passes for 34 feature families and 175
capability IDs.
- `node --test scripts/check-maps.test.mjs
scripts/storybook-feature-index.test.mjs` passes all 17 tests.
- `node scripts/storybook-feature-index.mjs` passes on this checkout and
generates the feature indexes and overview inputs.
- `git diff --check` passes.
- A source comparison confirms that the README matches the recipe index.
After removal of the added ID labels, all 68 child pages match the
upstream prose and headings.
- Full workspace checks were attempted: `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm
test:run`, and `pnpm build`. They could not start because the local pnpm
wrapper could not fetch and verify the pinned pnpm 9.15.4 release. This
checkout also has no workspace dependencies installed.
- `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs` could not run because
`storybook/internal/csf-tools` is not installed. The direct map and
index checks above pass without that dependency.
- Remote typecheck, release-registry, and full build checks passed. The
first attempts of [server shard
3/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39460473910/job/118758430448)
and [server shard
12/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39460473910/job/118758429932)
stopped after their runners received a shutdown signal. The test steps
were canceled. GitHub rejects the rerun request with HTTP 403: "The
workflow run containing this job is already running". Five other CI jobs
remain active. The next action is to rerun the two interrupted shards
after workflow 39460473910 ends. No application changes were made to
address these runner interruptions.
- To inspect the result, open the feature-map README, follow a recipe
link, and compare its full capability IDs with its access companion.

## Risks

- Low risk. The change updates map documentation only. It changes no
application code or ID schema.
- The readable README index and child labels repeat source IDs. Keep
them aligned when a capability changes.
- Generated capability descriptions now include the visible ID prefix.
Generated IDs, labels, navigation order, and verification fields remain
the same.
- Full local workspace checks and catalog generation remain unverified
for the environment reasons above.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, model `gpt-6.1-sol`, with a 475,000-token context window
and `xhigh` reasoning effort. The model used local file tools, shell
commands, and GitHub CLI access.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-20 12:00:36 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 45b67f1d93 feat: default new Apple Silicon Claude agents to Paperclip Runner (#15993)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets users choose an agent harness and account.
> - The server resolves the runner for new agents.
> - Claude still needs the same ordinary native-default journey as
Codex.
> - Existing agents must retain their runner, model and account.
> - This PR defaults new Apple Silicon Claude agents to Paperclip Runner
with Opus 5.5.
> - Users can connect and work without a runner override.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #15683. This PR depends on #15994 and precedes #15997. Related
scope: #15422, #13978 and #15224.

## What Changed

- Resolve new Apple Silicon Claude agents to `paperclip_runner`,
`provider: acpx`, `acpxAgent: claude`. Keep explicit Legacy, models,
provider routing and saved execution.
- Use `claude-opus-5-5` for ordinary Claude defaults and retain explicit
overrides.
- Reuse existing API-key/subscription connections, credential storage
and checks. Generalize the shared Advanced runner control with Claude
branding.
- Carry configured effort into the shared v9 contract. Preserve
compatible permissions, instructions, skills, timeouts and session
behavior. Require Legacy for unsupported settings.
- Qualify a new immutable managed Claude target at explicit Connect
through the existing permission-gated probe. Use fresh scoped discovery
for test and hire. Discard stale results and require an explicit Connect
after settings change.
- Retain merged Codex onboarding recovery, auth preparation,
import/effort corrections and Grok Bot gates.
- Check the Claude first-task wizard's saved default directly. Update
configuration/runtime documentation and exact Opus 5.5 accounting.

- Align hire fixtures with the merged host-environment restriction.
Native agent-authenticated hires cannot inject host env settings; both
creation endpoints verify that no extra agent is saved.

## Verification

- Updated onto master `9179d8dcc3e908c217fde4f63c9d08ccf8132eeb` through
#15994. Native input v9 carries effort while preserving v7 home modes
and v8 Muse. Codex defaults remain unchanged.
- Focused local verification passed 285 server tests, 323 UI tests, 124
setup/registry tests, and two v9 permission-pin transport cases. Direct
server/UI TypeScript checks passed. An initial 30-second hook timeout
was resolved by serial verification with a longer hook budget: all 122
credential/permission cases and 232 snapshot/environment cases pass.
Direct server TypeScript checking also passes.
- Ordinary web creation with the experiment disabled saved native
Claude, Opus 5.5 and High effort without runner/model overrides. The
actual product task and follow-up both succeeded on integrated source
`b2c9fe43f9cd3bc5dd9d22552da0148845ba71a4` with the cloud-built daemon
from `04e0202ca81387b17cbe7fd094a8338648356fe9`. The final master
reconciliation also changes shared runtime source. Historical proof
retains its source identity; a final-source cloud qualification is
running before refreshing the preview daemon.
- Both actual browser downloads were checked: v1 has three sections/six
checkboxes (451 bytes); v2 preserves the original body and adds two
Rollback checks (612 bytes). The original attachment stayed
byte-identical. The follow-up records session resume and the same
provider session. Total estimated API usage: $0.518432800, with no
pending/unpriced usage in the successful fixture.
- Fixed the live-discovered setup incompatibility: native API-key
validation no longer depends on the global Legacy Claude CLI. The
existing provider endpoint verifies the key without a paid prompt;
subscription/custom routing probes remain intact.
- Fixed security review's native-hire credential redirection:
agent-supplied URLs, proxy/launch settings and other host environment
controls are rejected before inheritance. Native credential references
remain supported and partial edits use the saved harness. Added
create/hire/update regression coverage.
- Current-head cloud CI is green. All three stack PRs have fresh
Greptile 5/5 reviews and zero unresolved review threads. Required
typecheck, test and build gates ran in cloud CI; Docker work stayed
remote. Earlier failed checks remain in their original runs.
- Docker and native release builds ran in cloud infrastructure. An
inadvertent local Rust prerequisite was stopped; no local Docker build
was run.

- The final master merge preserves task-loading, permission,
skill-retention and OpenRouter changes. Pi uses a fresh combined profile
27, preserving both historical profile-24 declarations; Copilot remains
profile 22. Focused protocol checks passed 155 cases (one skipped), the
updated Pi attestation check passed 18 (one skipped), and 91
evaluation/catalog checks passed.

- Latest-application manual continuation passed in 37.942 seconds on
`695e5c005a85bddc8711d3fcddcaf6b7e1fb64d0`, with High effort, native
Opus 5.5, Anthropic API attribution, the same resumed Claude session, an
independently checked 635-byte file and persisted Done status. It uses
the earlier verified Mac daemon; the preceding-source package
qualification passed at `dca62c7aeb4b45f0dd91a8e18d386a16a2658ef8`. That
package run predates the small TypeScript startup fix and is not
relabeled as qualification for it.
- Upgrade limitation: changed compiled sidecar identity rejected old
durable launch state and recovery hit session-open bounds before
eventually resuming. That attempt was operator-cancelled and retained;
the successful manual continuation does not qualify seamless upgrades.

- Local latency profile, Opus 5.5/High unchanged: three alternating
real-ACP loopback samples per variant reduce median provider-ready time
from 5.081s to 4.034s. The matched real API task startup improves from
5.533s to 4.348s, but total reply time changes from 17.933s to 20.221s
because agent work varies. This establishes a startup saving of about
one second, not a consistent total-reply speedup. A real candidate
follow-up passed in 20.146s and resumed the same saved session. The
loopback fixture makes no external model requests; failed initial probes
remain retained.
- The startup change passes 107 focused runtime/effort/lease tests, 53
profile checks (one skipped), TypeScript checking and the
TypeScript-only runtime build. Native hire fixture checks pass 70 tests;
their first local run retained a socket-hangup failure and stale
OpenCode expectation, both accounted for before the passing rerun.
Broader required checks run in cloud CI.

## Risks

- Missing packages, authentication rejection, unsupported settings and
unavailable models must fail explicitly. Existing agents retain saved
execution; explicit runner changes use existing revision/session
invalidation.
- Subscription follow-up remains unverified; remaining live acceptance
uses API keys per human steering. Historical accounting holds and the
separate $50 ceiling remain intact.
- The subscription acceptance limit remains explicit for review. No
Claude database migration is introduced.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution and browser testing. The exact serving model ID and
context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] Focused local tests and final cloud verification pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-19 13:58:52 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 95672307f4 feat(runner): carry acknowledged Claude effort through native resume (#15994)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - The native runner must carry each supported agent setting.
> - Claude effort must reach its ACP session before a prompt and after
resume.
> - Installed Claude setup must find the owning server package without a
qualification override.
> - This PR adds those shared contracts and preserves historical
readers.
> - The Claude default change can then use the same runner path.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #15683. This prerequisite follows the actual Codex squash
`adb69e8f09852c772d9901ae270e5b2d66e39c77`. Consumers: #15993 and
#15997. Related scope: #15422, #13978 and #15224.

## What Changed

- Add native-input v9 for Claude effort. Preserve v1–v8 readers,
including v7 explicit home modes, v8 Muse, Dot and Grok Bot.
- Preserve prepared task input and constraints through the newer
contracts, including completion-only continuation without wrapping
compact model input again.
- Carry effort through daemon/sidecar admission; require provider
acknowledgment before prompting and after resume.
- Find installed server package authority through the verified canonical
layout. Retain package-integrity, digest, architecture and no-follow
checks.
- Return Claude startup cancellation promptly while retaining unfinished
settings writes and the lifetime lease through cleanup. Preserve merged
Codex close/cleanup behavior.
- Retain both independently authored historical Pi profile-24
declarations. Combined master/Claude source attestations use Pi profile
27; pending Copilot remains profile 22. This does not expand either
provider's qualification boundary.

- Avoid a spare verified executable snapshot when Claude effort control
reuses its initialized provider. Preserve cold-control snapshot renewal
and acknowledged effort.

## Verification

- Reconciled with master `9179d8dcc3e908c217fde4f63c9d08ccf8132eeb`,
retaining its task-loading, progress, skill-retention, permission and
OpenRouter changes.
- Final focused protocol/provider checks passed 155 tests (one skipped),
the updated Pi attestation check passed 18 (one skipped), and 91
evaluation/catalog checks passed. Generated TypeScript/Rust profile
checks and Rust formatting pass. The integrated consumer's
TypeScript-only runtime build also passes.
- Earlier branch checks passed 369 protocol tests (one skipped), 72
catalog checks and TypeScript checks/build; their source identities
remain historical. No Rust compilation or Docker build is needed locally
for this proof.
- Current-head cloud CI is green. All three stack PRs have fresh
Greptile 5/5 reviews and zero unresolved review threads. Required
typecheck, test and build gates ran in cloud CI; Docker work stayed
remote. Earlier failed checks remain in their original runs.
- [Earlier four-target package
qualification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39267321383)
passed on source `04e0202ca81387b17cbe7fd094a8338648356fe9`; it is not
relabeled as proof for the final merge. Existing failures and
unknown-cost holds remain preserved.
- Current-head cloud CI is green. All three stack PRs have fresh
Greptile 5/5 reviews and zero unresolved review threads. Required
typecheck, test and build gates ran in cloud CI; Docker work stayed
remote. Earlier failed checks remain in their original runs.

- Latest-application manual continuation passed in 37.942 seconds on
`695e5c005a85bddc8711d3fcddcaf6b7e1fb64d0`, with High effort, native
Opus 5.5, Anthropic API attribution, the same resumed Claude session, an
independently checked 635-byte file and persisted Done status. It uses
the earlier verified Mac daemon; the preceding-source package
qualification passed at `dca62c7aeb4b45f0dd91a8e18d386a16a2658ef8`. That
package run predates the small TypeScript startup fix and is not
relabeled as qualification for it.
- Upgrade limitation: changed compiled sidecar identity rejected old
durable launch state and recovery hit session-open bounds before
eventually resuming. That attempt was operator-cancelled and retained;
the successful manual continuation does not qualify seamless upgrades.

- Local latency profile, Opus 5.5/High unchanged: three alternating
real-ACP loopback samples per variant reduce median provider-ready time
from 5.081s to 4.034s. The matched real API task startup improves from
5.533s to 4.348s, but total reply time changes from 17.933s to 20.221s
because agent work varies. This establishes a startup saving of about
one second, not a consistent total-reply speedup. A real candidate
follow-up passed in 20.146s and resumed the same saved session. The
loopback fixture makes no external model requests; failed initial probes
remain retained.
- The startup change passes 107 focused runtime/effort/lease tests, 53
profile checks (one skipped), TypeScript checking and the
TypeScript-only runtime build. Native hire fixture checks pass 70 tests;
their first local run retained a socket-hangup failure and stale
OpenCode expectation, both accounted for before the passing rerun.
Broader required checks run in cloud CI.

## Risks

- Explicit Claude effort needs a daemon and sidecar that support input
v9. Historical readers stay available; downstream builders and
permission-pin transport checks must also use v9.
- Source-bound profile changes may require reopening older Pi/Copilot
sessions. Copilot remains pending and executable package closures remain
unchanged.
- This prerequisite changes shared runtime behavior; Claude default
selection remains in #15993/#15997. No database migration or Codex
default change is introduced.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution and browser testing. The exact serving model ID and
context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-19 13:31:09 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 0528cc7ee0 perf: overlap native GitHub and assigned-tool setup (#16620)
Prepare managed GitHub access and fresh assigned-MCP discovery concurrently for remote native Codex. Wait for both before provider construction and drain both on failure through the existing run cleanup.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 20:19:28 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 9a3290fe10 perf(runner): overlap default remote artifact preparation (#16608)
Prepare the native runner and default image Codex harness together on providers that declare concurrent sync support. Preserve all executable checks, wait for both operations on failure, and retain serial explicit harness installs.

Verified with 881 affected cases, full typecheck/build, exact-head full CI and Greptile Base 5/5. The real Daytona component median fell from 839ms to 432ms; full deployed reply latency remains unproven.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 17:29:27 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 647116dd4b fix(adapter-utils): allow sandbox agents to read run diagnostics (#16575)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agent work and its execution history.
> - Sandbox agents use a callback bridge to reach the control plane.
> - The API already provides authorized run diagnostics.
> - The bridge denied those read routes before the API could check
access.
> - Health scans could see task activity but could not inspect failed
runs.
> - This pull request admits exact GET routes on both bridge transports.
> - Linked task results also apply the caller's task-read filter.
> - Agents can inspect failures through their existing run identity.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A sandbox health scan received `403 Route not allowed` for run history,
run details, events, and task recovery records. The same agent could
read task activity and connected provider state. The bridge stopped
these diagnostic requests before they reached the API.

**Expected behavior**

The bridge should admit the existing diagnostic GET routes. The API must
still enforce company and task access and redact run content. Execution
and recovery writes must stay denied by these rules.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Start an agent in a sandbox with the normal callback bridge.
2. Use its injected API credential to request company run history.
3. Request a run's details or events.
4. Observe the bridge's route denial before the API handles the request.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced with the callback route list on master at `9f4a956b906`.

**Deployment mode**

Authenticated server with a managed sandbox. Both queue and HTTP/2
transports use this route list.

Related work: Refs #15854 adds separate cost-read routes to this list.
It does not add run diagnostics. Searches found no duplicate
run-diagnostic change.

## What Changed

- Admit nine existing diagnostic GET paths: company history and live
runs; run details, events, logs, workspace operations and task links;
task runs and recovery records.
- Reject other methods, extra path segments, execution control, recovery
resolution, and provider-trace administration.
- Filter linked tasks by the caller's task-read predicate in both
activity and original-task queries. Keep those results in the run's
company. A readable run must not expose private task titles.
- Test both route lists and the HTTP/2 request path. Preserve query
parameters and controller denial responses. Add a database regression
with public and private tasks linked to a readable company run.
- Document bounded diagnostic reads, private-run stubs, access checks,
and credential handling in the agent API reference. Update both affected
run access maps with the sandbox entry points and verification limits.

## Verification

- Passed both bridge suites: 139 tests.
- Passed the server run-route, activity-route, and secret-redaction
suites: 117 tests, including the new task-link filter test. The cold
route-import test needed a 30-second timeout on this host.
- Passed `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, the adapter-utils typecheck,
both generated capability checks, and `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`.
- Attempted `pnpm test:run`. The bundled PostgreSQL binary cannot start
on this host. The native session suite reported 15 database startup
failures; the privacy suite skipped its 15 cases. Stopped that full
local attempt after those failures. No full local-suite pass is claimed.
The final 16-case privacy suite also skipped locally for the same host
limitation; Linux CI ran all 16 cases successfully.
- One unchanged queue-response test hit a file-read race during the
combined local run. A separate rerun of both complete bridge suites
passed all 139 cases. The transient race was not independently isolated;
the original failure is retained in this record.
- All CI gates pass on head `97c65cec459d3fc2787083d05ae6ec51e3fd7b70`.
Linux CI passed all 16 database-backed run privacy cases, including the
new public/private task-link regression. These also cover private-run
denial, authorized owner/reviewer reads, redacted list stubs, credential
diagnostics, and deleted-task handling: [serialized shard
1](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38925932547/job/117057907621).
- Apex reviewed the final head at 5/5. Both findings are addressed and
their review threads are resolved.
- After deployment, run a new sandbox audit. Confirm it can list and
inspect authorized failed runs without a board credential. This has not
been deployed or live-tested by this PR.

## Risks

- Sandbox agents can reach more diagnostic GET routes. The existing
server access checks and redaction still apply.
- Linked task results now omit tasks that the caller cannot read.
Authorized task links remain visible.
- This change does not grant execution control or recover a failed
workspace.
- Existing bridge sessions may need a new run to load the updated route
list.
- No schema, credential, UI, workflow, or lockfile change.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with implementation and
verification. The exact serving model ID and context-window limit are
not exposed in this session. Capabilities used: code editing, shell
execution, and test execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 09:04:07 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip ebceb2a744 trace(server): time workspace, native setup and startup recovery (#16330)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and their work.
> - The controller prepares workspaces before it starts a Runner.
> - A slow run can spend 30–80 seconds inside the combined workspace phase.
> - Startup recovery can also delay queued work for minutes.
> - Native runs also have gaps before Runner startup and after the provider result.
> - Existing traces do not identify the awaited steps inside those intervals.
> - This change adds closed timing boundaries around the existing operations.
> - Operators can locate the wait without changing execution or exposing content.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

Operator-configured OpenTelemetry diagnosis of controller preparation and startup recovery. Related: #16178, #16236 and #16285 introduced the existing preparation timing and sampling contract. #16306 and #16312 reduce separate configuration and copyback work.

**Current behavior**

The workspace interval combines source resolution, trust checks, provisioning, database persistence, binding and repository admission. Startup awaits accounting and native recovery before queued work resumes, but neither has a separate duration. Native backend setup and post-turn cleanup also contain unmeasured awaits. CPU profiles and a fast database probe cannot identify which await is slow.

**Proposed behavior**

Record workspace steps and native controller setup and cleanup with the existing hashed run ID. Record startup phases as independent, operator-sampled root spans without custom attributes. Keep the same operation order, results, failures and authorization.

**Reason and benefit**

These boundaries distinguish source work, database writes, repository admission and restart recovery. This is a diagnosis change. It does not claim a response-time improvement or a solved latency budget.

## What Changed

- Add 14 closed workspace step names around 16 existing awaits. Repeated updates and bindings produce separate spans.
- Time startup tool reviews, gateway sessions, delivery-worker readiness, accounting, plugin readiness, native recovery, hot restart, orphan reaping, retries, queued work and goal recovery.
- Time native GitHub setup, wake binding, backend construction, connector assignments, MCP discovery, tool authority, companion selection and binary resolution. Time selected post-turn GitHub, coordinator and instruction cleanup awaits.
- Move preparation timing to a pure shared module. Keep the existing heartbeat import as an alias. Both heartbeat and native timing skip tracer lookup when the endpoint is unset or blank, including when another library registered a provider.
- Tracing lookup, callback, status and end faults cannot repeat work or replace its value or error.
- Add real PostgreSQL workspace timing coverage and silent no-op/fault controls. Update the tracing contract and paired run maps.
- Keep span attributes closed. Startup spans add none; workspace steps use only the existing run hash. No commands, paths, returned records or exception messages are recorded.

## Verification

- Diagnostic-gap baseline: the new real workspace test fails against the unchanged workspace implementation because the expected step spans are absent. It passes with the wrappers.
- Final affected coverage: **804 distinct cases pass** across seven complete suites: 698 native-executor cases, 39 real PostgreSQL workspace cases, 61 timing/context/startup cases, and six execution-configuration integration cases. The final native and unit invocations pass with no selected skips. The workspace suite passed in the initial six-file invocation on the same final workspace source.
- Preserve the initial six-file attempt as failed: **7 failed and 789 passed**. All seven errors occurred during embedded PostgreSQL startup. The log reports local macOS shared-memory exhaustion. A fresh 15-case database group passes, followed by the complete 698-case native suite. These runs overlap; do not add their counts.
- The new native timing assertion fails against unchanged native code because the expected spans are absent. It passes with the wrappers and retains the credential-isolation assertions.
- Full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`: passed on the final production source. Earlier nullable-closure errors are fixed with erased assertions inside existing guards. The failed attempts remain recorded.
- Normalized AST comparison: removing only timing wrappers, timing imports/local handles and erased assertions restores the original workspace, startup and native executor programs. This checks call order and policy expressions; it is not live acceptance.
- The expanded head first failed two configuration integration assertions because their test providers had no endpoint. Configure the endpoint explicitly in those two tracing tests, and restore it after each test. All six cases then pass with the original credential cleanup, redaction and exact span assertions. Production is unchanged by this repair.
- The first PR head failed one unchanged attachment test at its 15-second deadline in CI. The complete 32-case attachment suite passes locally with that deadline. Do not label the failed CI attempt green. The expanded head needs fresh full CI.
- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`: passed, 35 areas and 176 capability IDs. `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs`: 283 files and 2,728 stories. Structural checks only; no browser, play or Storybook build claim.
- `git diff --check`: passed. No added prose comments, lockfile changes or new 1,000-line crossings.
- A duplicate full local test run was not started. Fresh exact-head full CI and E2E pass on `15a683bb2419960f611584f8c07cdcfc9ce3af0b`. All 56 check runs are successful or optional skipped. Superagent and legacy Snyk pass. Completed Apex review is 5/5 on this same head, with zero unresolved review threads.

Commands:

```sh
pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server --maxWorkers=1 --fileParallelism=false server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts server/src/services/execution-preparation-timing.test.ts server/src/startup-recovery-timing.test.ts server/src/services/heartbeat/preparation-timing.test.ts server/src/services/heartbeat/preparation-timing-context.test.ts server/src/services/heartbeat/workspace-preparation.test.ts
pnpm -r typecheck
pnpm build
node scripts/check-maps.mjs
node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs
```

## Risks

- Configured operators receive more spans. They still follow the configured sampler and exporter.
- Startup spans measure the awaited phase, including remaining readiness waits. They do not measure earlier worker construction or a provider turn.
- Workspace and native setup intervals overlap their containing phases. Do not add them to the parent duration. Native timing covers named awaits, not every statement or every error path.
- These spans are not yet deployed or tested against a live latency run. No first-party Telemetry event, run-log write, schema or API changes are included.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with tool use and code execution. The exact served variant and context-window size are not exposed to this task.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-14 17:16:07 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip adb69e8f09 feat: default new Codex agents to Paperclip Runner on Linux and macOS (#15683)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source control plane for agent companies.
> - People choose a harness when creating an agent.
> - The server should resolve that harness to a qualified runner.
> - Codex is the first harness in the staged default rollout.
> - Saved agents must retain their execution choices.
> - New Codex agents therefore use Paperclip Runner on qualified
macOS/Linux targets, with an explicit Legacy override.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #16028, #15555, #15673, #15422, #15631, #15926, #15932, #16149.

The runtime/install prerequisite and release repair are merged. This
slice owns Codex creation, setup, configuration and preservation. Other
harness defaults remain unchanged. It adds no database migration;
incoming master migrations, required maps and regression coverage are
retained.

## What Changed

- Resolve `runner: auto | paperclip | legacy` at the common creation
boundary across onboarding, API/CLI, hires, built-ins, plugins and
imports. Freeze pending hires and export resolved execution choices.
- Preserve existing runners on upgrades, unrelated edits and import
updates, including compatible accounts, workspace settings, Codex effort
and intentional clears.
- Use the underlying harness picker and branding; put the runner
override in Advanced. Use the shared dropdown and update
production-component stories and creation contracts.
- Support qualified Apple Silicon, Intel Mac, Linux x64 and Linux ARM64.
Linux requires GNU libc 2.39+. Disabled, external, unsupported and
unqualified combinations retain their applicable Legacy execution.
- Test the selected runtime/account/model/environment. Ordinary Connect
probes eligible immutable managed targets and refreshes scoped
discovery. Creation/discovery do not provision. Auth, dependency,
incompatible-setting and cleanup failures remain actionable without
changing runners.
- Keep setup probes read-only, preserve local/SSH isolation and resolve
packaged assets before staging credentials. Bound cleanup reads by the
remaining absolute deadline; physically close every owned ingress socket
before endpoint release. Unconfirmed cleanup retains recovery state.
- Preserve validated completed-onboarding callbacks through startup
recovery. First file-producing work belongs to the child task and uses
the existing dependency/block handoff and task-scoped registration.
- Reuse existing E2E fixtures, artifact checks, reporting and controls.
Keep Docker/Cargo/native compilation remote. Paperclip tarballs contain
no Codex payloads; official optional npm platform dependencies remain.

## Verification

Current tested head: `1c03a8815672d82c264a9b08d4ea1984e8fae107`.
**Merge-ready: required CI, fresh review, package qualification, Mac
core acceptance and Test task/follow-up acceptance pass.** The existing
attachment and native-continuity oracles independently verify both Test
downloads, run attribution and unchanged native/provider/workspace
identities. The maintainer authorized a code-owner-review exception for
this PR only. The first Test setup failure and normal Board
completion-review friction are retained below. Actual post-merge
packages and private Cloud distribution remain separate qualification
gates.

- [Current
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38564241625):
all 48 ordinary jobs and required verify/E2E pass. Attempt 1 retained
six simultaneous host-shutdown cancellations. One failed-only retry
passes those six lanes and two aggregates, preserving 40 successes.
Actual integration checkout `53104c1` combines this head with master
`c80`; it is not relabeled as the branch tree. Fresh exact-head Greptile
5/5, 30 resolved threads, no actionable findings.
- [Exact-source package
qualification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38565287239):
nine applicable jobs pass, nine conditional jobs skip. Four remote
native producers; Linux x64 clean install; Intel Mac, Apple Silicon and
Linux ARM64 native startup/physical cleanup controls. All 18
tarballs/four daemon source/hash/manifest bindings and 343 migrations
through 0344 verify. No Codex payload is packed. These hosted tarballs
are not a published npm canary.
- Normal Apple Silicon installation and credential-free native
startup/cleanup pass using the packaged daemon, with no source build or
provider turn. Fresh installed DB initialization passes. Upgrade
651a→1c03 preserves all three complete execution configs, accounts, ten
recorded run profiles, paused budgets, active incidents, cost summaries
and two historical unpriced events. Historical recovery state is
retained.
- Cleanup regressions: four delayed-read baseline failures become 15
passing deadline/authority controls. No-acknowledgement and prior-error
socket ownership regressions become 12 passing controls. Direct
runtime/server types, maps: 35 areas / 176 IDs, diff checks and
independent reviews pass. Permission/auth/reconnect policy and the
10-second setup budget remain intact.
- Existing source coverage includes creation/selection/imports, pending
approvals, recovery, account/lifecycle handling, mounted forms,
dropdowns and E2E support. Full typechecks/tests/build/token and
applicable Storybook checks pass in the recorded current CI; no
duplicate suite or weakened grader.
- Literal 9546 live Mac proof: ordinary Auto Codex onboarding, useful
document, real completed-child callback/reply, seven successful native
runs, manual follow-up and independently downloaded1,101-byte child
file. Existing Legacy title edit/reload preserves execution; two real
Legacy runs produce independently checked15/34-byte files. These remain
historical source records.
- Current literal 1c03 Mac core acceptance passes independent checks:
ordinary Auto native Codex onboarding without runner override; only
timeout 180 seconds/concurrency 1 saved; six successful native runs and
six serialized turns (maximum overlap 1); both same-task continuity
checks and five mechanical callback checks; actual rendered parent reply
and exact child downloads. The useful handoff advances from revision 1
to 2. Both files are 48 bytes, SHA-256
`8b742bd4e8123a7c078f0a8d9f3449fbfa8a320d7d90be641a2818db3c53d92c` and
`f42db9774fa06e804ab7d596fc8b922a2b638921c418b87d0111151d290a6afe`;
exactly one byte changes and old history remains. The agent is paused
with zero active runs/errors. Both artifact work products have
`isPrimary=false`, and descriptive titles fail a stricter title-helper
assumption; these retained results are scoped editorial follow-up, not
new merge gates. Six source-bound screenshots are uploaded and verified
in the private primary QA report.
- [Literal 9546 managed
proof](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-38485488621-1/index.html):
original 19 assertions and completed judge pass, four native turns,
child-bound240-byte file and session/workspace continuity. Checkout
reports a verified generated target-lock mutation; full final porcelain
was not retained. Signed execution-image identity remains separate from
Core source.
- Actual 651a Test deployment succeeds on one owned/pinned target. One
ordinary Auto API-key Connect then fails native cleanup before hire.
Controller turn/drain/suspend completion and service-recorded
environment cleanup are observed; they do not certify physical deletion
or native authority retirement. Failure/recovery/unknown holds are
retained. No Legacy switch or unchanged paid retry. The two source
repairs above require actual treatment.
- [Current immutable Core
preview](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38570365725)
and matching DB/shared artifacts pass. One owned, pinned Test target
serves exact `1c03`; identical migration history correctly skips the
migrator. Ordinary Auto Codex Connect succeeds and hires native; saved
native selection and QA bounds survive reload. The initial child
preparation attempt fails before provider work, with actual stdout
identifying `renewal_deadline`; its trigger remains unknown and the
failure is retained. Normal Board **Try again** and **Resume** recover
the child to Done, producing a browser-verified 44-byte file, SHA-256
`0a8458b1efcc2d7a0d815689458c4caab039a46c7c7a3e5805de6bc8b1a96ecc`. The
actual parent callback reports the completed child document/file. The
existing validator requires a parent-owned attachment, so recovery
enters normal Review; after byte checking, normal **Approve completion**
reaches parent Done. No forced status or duplicate parent file is used.
The validator is unchanged from integrated and current master.
Autonomous initial callback-to-Done is not proven. The same-child
follow-up completes document revision 2 and publishes a second
independently downloaded 44-byte file, SHA-256
`22022257300fae762784632d08d3bbe0bab61e2ce81f91864a14dcd7aa464591`; only
the revision digit changes. The unchanged existing native-continuity and
attachment oracles pass. All ten recorded runs are terminal: nine native
successes and the retained pre-provider setup failure. The QA agent is
paused with zero active runs. The pre-existing parent evidence scope
mismatch is a separate follow-up, with ordinary completion review
exercised rather than a forced status or relaxed validation. This
unsigned Core preview remains distinct from post-merge private Cloud
composition.

## Risks

- Saved agents are not migrated. Explicit runner changes use normal
configuration/session rules; historical runs retain their recorded
execution.
- Native readiness depends on verified assets and server-owned target
qualification. A Legacy probe, HTTP200 or successful account save cannot
prove native readiness.
- Recovery exceptions remain restricted to validated
completed-onboarding reports; process-loss, ownership and terminal-state
safeguards remain active. Unexecuted live journeys stay open.
- Linux ARM paid tasks, Windows, Alpine and 32-bit ARM remain deferred.
Cold Cargo cache misses are recorded; no warm-cache speedup is claimed.
- Historical invoices/physical cleanup remain unconfirmed and held.
After merge, exact published npm canary, signed standard image/migrator,
private composition and serving/live acceptance still require
qualification. Production deployment/default promotion is not
authorized.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, tools, code execution and
parallel agents. Exact serving snapshot and context-window size are not
exposed.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used with available version and
capability details
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have linked public issues or PRs above
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
ticket id
- [x] I have run the stated focused tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented risks
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green on the current candidate
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open findings on the current candidate
- [x] I will address all reviewer comments before requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-14 11:33:02 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip fc3b15537b fix(runner): match call_api to existing agent REST permissions (#16040)
Route native call_api through existing agent REST permissions. Preserve admitted credentials across restarts, protect sensitive replies and private snapshots, and compare saved completion with provider history through the same redaction projection. Add permission, privacy and recovery regressions and update the access map and run-log guide.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-13 07:34:15 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip d67e3507b2 feat(runner): qualify Codex platform packages and cache hosted builds (#16028)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native execution needs a compatible installed daemon and provider
dependency.
> - The Codex-default work found missing platform packages and
clean-install startup failures.
> - Release builds also repeat dependency compilation and run
preparation serially.
> - This prerequisite packages four daemon targets and verifies
installed native startup.
> - It also caches hosted Cargo dependencies and overlaps JavaScript
preparation with compilation.
> - Agent creation defaults and experimental gates stay at the current
master behavior.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #15683. Refs #15555. Refs #15422. Refs #15926. Refs #15932.

Extract runtime and installation support from #15683. This prerequisite
has 65 changed files. Creation, onboarding, imports, UI runner selection
and graduation remain in the dependent PR. Feature/access maps and the
Storybook source catalog stay synchronized. Existing agents keep their
execution choices.

## What Changed

- Correct the existing runner test fixtures. Reserve owned credential
quorum listeners through the existing bounded fixture helper. Keep
foreign listeners intact, run actual credential staging once, and
preserve its rejection and unchanged-auth assertions. Reuse the
durable-resume outer-limit correction. Wait for actual warm-completion
and held-authorization callback entry under the existing recovery
deadline and surface early request errors. Preserve every semantic
assertion.
- Retain bounded installation failure diagnostics through the existing
qualification receipt upload. Keep the original error, 10-minute
deadline and all success checks.
- Keep startup ownership until credential preparation and registration
drain. Reject duplicate and post-close startup/resume work. Observe
shutdown during normal and adopted authentication readiness. Preserve
the primary failure and retain private state when cleanup is
unconfirmed.
- Package Linux x64/ARM64 and macOS Apple Silicon/Intel daemons. Verify
target headers, source identities, manifests, and hashes before assembly
and installation.
- Reuse the existing release producer/consumer workflows. Cache Cargo
dependencies by target, OS, compiler, lockfile, and contract inputs.
Rebuild workspace binaries. Permit trusted cache writes only for
canonical exact-source master pushes.
- Overlap JavaScript preparation with native compilation. Join both
commands and failure/cancellation cleanup before artifact verification.
- Preserve shell positional arguments in the shared SSH runner and apply
environment assignments correctly. Reject environment option keys. Six
before/after controls and two real SSH subprocess paths pass with zero
provider calls; this fix lands before both Codex and Claude defaults.
- Admit verified suspended SSH backups during cold controller
continuation, using the same full-scope, integrity and lifecycle checks
as sandbox targets. Two positive SSH cases fail before; all 14
positive/negative matrix cases pass afterward. Active ownership and
corrupt/malformed/nonempty state remain rejected.
- Record measured sandbox platform facts through the existing explicit
environment probe. Bind facts to the company, effective provider
configuration, immutable OCI image and actual captured image binding.
Check the returned cleanup receipt. Reject client-authored proof and
stale or named boot identities. Creation and discovery allocate nothing.
Preserve connection-only behavior.
- Resolve the actual remote Codex target and preserve same-host
development overrides. Preserve runtime artifact verification. Use
actual protocol/model compatibility rather than a numerical CLI version
fence.
- Resolve the installed Codex login dependency on 64-bit Linux and Mac
independently of the daemon libc baseline. Preserve account homes and
safe errors.
- Fix actual clean-install TOML table comparison. Preserve strict
semantic checks, comments, private writes, and malformed-input
rejection. Preserve primary startup failures and bounded cleanup.
- Document GNU libc 2.39+ and stock Ubuntu sandbox prerequisites.
Qualify ARM startup with a scoped distribution profile and unchanged
global restrictions. Preserve Windows and Alpine deferral.
- Preserve selected and saved native Codex reasoning effort in the
existing UI builder, while excluding it from other providers. This small
shared correction prevents import edits higher in the stack from
dropping effort.
- Reuse existing installed-package checks and assertions. Paperclip
tarballs contain no Codex native payloads. Official npm dependencies
supply the consumer's Codex binaries. All Docker and native builds stay
remote.

## Verification

Candidate: `271d434c170e74bdedde65d0b13059a55419c943`. It includes
current master `e168512f7bdbb6af6ea01954c6d7ed80b91e903e` and preserves
prior candidates through ordinary commits.

Current [full
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38346601686)
is successful on attempt 2. GitHub reports 54 successful checks and four
conditional skips, including required verify and browser aggregates,
workspace typecheck/tests/build, Linux DB controls, both runner shards
and [isolated native
compilation](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38346601609).
Fresh current-head Greptile is 5/5 with all four threads resolved. The
passing build's clean Grok/Codex report records CI merge source
`7a82a37438e6e448abc7cc5caa60dc2519a97be0`, 18 installed packages,
omitted Codex payloads, official host-only npm dependencies and zero
provider calls. Pi setup and its no-prompt lease verification also pass.
The first attempt's single 60-second Node archive download timeout
remains retained; its DNS/TLS/download cause remains unknown. One
unchanged-source retry was requested through the normal Build-job dialog
with debug logging disabled. GitHub's attempt 2 graph reports the other
CI jobs as well; no second retry or source/deadline relaxation was made.

The [final exact-source package
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38347027535)
is successful on literal `271d434c170e74bdedde65d0b13059a55419c943`. It
passes all four native producers, public Linux package assembly and
clean installed consumers on Apple Silicon, Intel Mac and Linux ARM64.
The nine qualification-mode skips are intentional; full CI above covers
their ordinary gates. Native builds and Docker assembly ran remotely.
The predecessor [`dae808` package
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38342104102)
remains literal historical evidence. Only tests and the dated record
differ from that source; runtime, package and workflow code is
unchanged. The reused credential fixture correction passes all 42
canonical Node 24 controls with synthetic data and independent
matching-source review, and the current hosted runner shard passes.
Production credential behavior is unchanged.

**Merge hold:** current-source CI, fresh 5/5 review and exact-source
package qualification pass. Actual code-owner approval and normal
protected merge remain pending. No slice has merged or deployed. GitHub
CLI authentication needs refresh; the normal signed-in embedded GitHub
UI provided this status without credential workarounds.

- The master merge preserves both Storybook source-review appendices and
the guarded test-home cleanup. All six existing cleanup controls pass
without skips. Master's isolated-home helper/test/setup are
byte-identical. The two existing whitespace lines in master's unrelated
privacy test remain outside this PR's diff.
- Canonical Node 24 passes all 24 existing public-install helper tests.
Three narrow added cases prove bounded/redacted failure metadata,
symlink exclusions, original exception identity, failed diagnostic
writes and no false failure on success. The Mac installer now uses
`--timing`; at most two 16 KiB tails and 32 structured entries per tail
enter the existing receipt upload. Raw argv, URLs, environment, error
text and stacks are omitted. A failed receipt explicitly remains
FAILED/unqualified/runtime-not-attempted. The 600,000 ms install
deadline and every real package/hash/payload/lock/lifecycle/runtime
oracle are unchanged.
- Canonical Node 24 reproduces the durable-resume outer timeout under
controlled fake latency. Only its outer test limit changes to 15
seconds; internal 500 ms/5 second deadlines and usage/effect assertions
remain. Controlled warm-recovery and before-bootstrap authorization
scheduling delays reproduce their callback polling failures, while the
explicit entry signals pass. Early recovery errors surface unchanged.
Independent review is clear. Historical mock binaries support the
fixture controls; fresh full hosted CI remains decisive. The original
hosted callback failure cause is inconclusive.
- The composed runner/surfaces/server/E2E TypeScript checks pass. Map
checks pass 35 areas/171 capability IDs. Token gates pass. The existing
Storybook catalog passes 223 files/2,210 stories; story IDs and
classifications remain intact. The current master had 25 inherited stale
fingerprints from three changed map recipes. Only those guarded
fingerprints and a source-only review note change; all 92 non-map
story/component/fixture inputs remain unchanged. Existing
classifications are retained. This proves source structure, not visual
or live acceptance.
- The 65-file contribution audit has no code file crossing from below
1,000 lines to above the limit. Earlier comment cleanup preserves
executable emissions, parsed workflows and action pins. Independent
cleanup/catalog and three-file reporting reviews are clear. No new
workflow, suite, grader or local native/Docker build was added.

**Prior `dae808` gate evidence:** fresh Greptile is 5/5 with four
resolved threads, isolated native compilation and the browser aggregate
pass. Its first runner shard passes the previous two corrections but
fails a different held-authorization cell at the implicit one-second
polling deadline. It records 1,672 passes/one failure/three skips. This
candidate applies the verified entry-signal correction without changing
production deadlines or any semantic assertions. Its original hosted
cause remains inconclusive until fresh CI.

**Previous-source evidence, kept literal:** the [exact `16a532` package
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38338806076)
passes all four native producers, public Linux package assembly, Apple
Silicon, Intel Mac and Linux ARM64 installed consumers. Its fresh review
is 5/5 with all four threads resolved. Full CI records 52 successful
checks, four conditional skips and the two fixture failures corrected
here. This is not a green full-CI candidate or proof for the new source.

`64c074fb8da1b31f8d6042c4fef48dc4164e759b` passed [full
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38332726938),
54 checks/four conditional skips, [isolated native
compilation](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38332726787/job/115085895328),
and fresh Greptile 5/5/all four resolved threads. The hosted transport
suite passed 246 tests and startup trust passed 22, closing that
source's local fake-binary limitation. These are historical after
reconciliation.

The [previous exact-source package
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38332921463)
built all four platform daemons and passed public Linux package assembly
plus Apple Silicon and Linux ARM64 installed consumers. **Intel Mac
failed:** its initial scripts-disabled npm install timed out before
lifecycle/runtime assertions. The underlying download/resolution/host
cause is unknown because the old helper deleted the npm logs. This is
the concrete baseline for the diagnostic change. The failed campaign
remains failed; no all-platform signoff or automatic retry is claimed.

The earlier `a200495` [four-target
campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38283695248)
and [scoped ARM
qualification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38291535914)
remain component evidence. Cargo restores were cold misses; no
warm-cache speedup is claimed. Paperclip tarballs contain no Codex
payloads. Official npm dependencies supply Codex on the user's platform.

Current-source full workspace typecheck/tests/build, Linux DB controls,
static/Rust/native tests, all browser shards and exact-source package
consumers must pass. New-agent defaults and final managed onboarding
belong to #15683. Actual private Cloud composition, warm/cold signup,
task/follow-up and rollback compatibility remain later release gates.
Source audits found that ordinary managed onboarding does not run the
saved platform probe and Cloud distributes named snapshots without a
verified final boot-image binding. These dependent release blockers
remain open; prequalified E2E fixtures do not close them. Master adds
task-workspace migrations; the final image/migrator and previous-image
checks must include them. ARM paid task/follow-up and ordinary OS APT
installation are not proven.

## Risks

- Multi-target packages require source and header agreement. Missing or
mismatched artifacts fail explicitly. Existing execution choices remain
unchanged.
- Linux requires GNU libc 2.39+ and compatible sandbox prerequisites.
The scoped hosted ARM preparation does not qualify arbitrary containers
or kernels. Windows, 32-bit ARM, and Alpine remain deferred.
- Only dependency crates are cached. Preview jobs cannot write trusted
caches. Concurrent command cleanup must preserve the primary failure.
- Native-free Paperclip packaging retains official Codex npm
dependencies. No Codex payload bundling, schema migration, automatic
agent migration, or production deployment is included.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution, and parallel agents. The exact serving model snapshot and
context-window size are not exposed.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-13 06:24:07 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 7d9b93aee2 docs: establish paired feature and agent access maps (#16025)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Contributors use the feature map to understand and verify product
capabilities.
> - Agents need APIs and usable entry points within their permission
boundaries.
> - Product recipes and agent access need separate records with shared
capability IDs.
> - This pull request establishes that contract and gives maintenance
ownership of both maps.
> - The benefit is repeatable access review without changing product
behavior or permissions.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #15983, which added the portable verification skills and updated
the feature map. This is its contract-only follow-up. Related: #15288
added the original feature map.

**Issue type**

Missing documentation and maintenance contract.

**Where is the issue?**

The product map, its missing agent access companions, and the
verification skills.

**What's wrong?**

There is no shared convention for API presence, agent entry points,
permission boundaries, access gaps, or evidence. An API declaration does
not prove that a permitted native or remote agent can use it.

**Suggested fix**

Keep the product and agent access maps as siblings under `maps/`. Reuse
capability IDs. Record representative source inventory separately from
operation review and live proof. Keep both maps aligned through the
maintenance skill.

## What Changed

- Move the existing product map to `maps/feature-map/`. Preserve its
recipes and Poteto format. Update relative links and add companion
links.
- Add `maps/agent-access-map/` with 35 area files and 171 matching
capability IDs. Seed representative API operations, agent paths,
policies and known gaps from the reviewed source inventory. Mark entries
as `baseline`, `source-only`, and live verification `not-run`.
- Define the shared contract in `maps/README.md`. Track API presence,
agent availability, policy, evidence and review depth separately.
Require operation enumeration before marking a broad capability
operation-reviewed.
- Extend `maintain-verification-skill` to reconcile both maps and
inspect actual route policy and production tool admission. Update
creation, verification, notices and contributor references to use the
shared contract.
- Add `scripts/check-maps.mjs` and ten regression tests. Check matching
areas/IDs, indexes, references, contract fields, API method/path
examples, justified exceptions and evidence-state consistency.
- Keep the coverage inventory unchanged. Preserve skill invocation
policies and both MIT license blocks. No product API, permission, UI,
runtime helper, migration, dependency or workflow changes.

## Verification

- Passed: `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` reports 35 paired areas and 171
matching capability IDs. All local map references resolve.
- Passed: `node --test scripts/check-maps.test.mjs` runs ten tests.
Fixtures cover missing companions, renamed/orphan/duplicate IDs, broken
references, missing operation fields, empty exceptions, missing API
examples, empty policy fields, and verified evidence without passed
verification.
- Passed: metadata validation for all three verification skills. Skill
and contributor links resolve. Invocation policies and both license
blocks are unchanged.
- Compared relocated recipes with current master. Contents differ only
in relative links and companion links. `coverage.json` is byte-for-byte
unchanged. Master's updated read-only interaction test reference is
retained.
- Passed: `git diff --check`. The branch starts from current master and
contains only this contract change.
- Repository-wide typecheck, tests and build were not run locally for
this documentation and Node structural-check scope. Live agent access
was not exercised. Those gaps are explicit in the baseline entries; the
structural check does not certify behavior. CI and automated review are
pending.

## Risks

- The companions are representative source baselines. They are not
complete operation inventories or passed agent journeys.
- The checker cannot establish actual permissions, native tool
admission, operation completeness or truthful live evidence. Maintenance
must inspect source and verify with the actual permitted agent context.
- External links to the old product-map directory may need updates.
Repository references have been updated.
- Existing access gaps and board/user restrictions remain recorded. This
contract does not change authority or implement missing paths.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex assisted with this change. The session does
not expose the exact serving model ID, configured context-window size,
or reasoning setting. Capabilities used: source analysis, file edits,
shell commands, and structural regression tests.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 14:52:28 -05:00