mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-15 03:51:22 +02:00
bf982c8c835b0435c0af465287c670e2dcf203c4
759
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
bf982c8c83 |
Normalize adapter display labels (#8913)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Adapter names are part of the board-facing agent setup and management experience. > - The product now treats adapters as harnesses, while execution environments are modeled separately. > - Several built-in adapter labels still carried legacy local wording from the older harness-by-environment model. > - That wording makes the UI noisier and implies a distinction users no longer need to reason about. > - This pull request normalizes adapter display labels while keeping persisted adapter type identifiers unchanged. > - The benefit is clearer adapter selection and management copy without a database migration. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue was found for this exact cleanup. Related public PRs: - Supersedes #8910, an earlier branch for the same cleanup that did not include the later docs/gateway/Cursor alignment. - Refs #8819, which is related display-registry work for external multi-segment adapter labels, but not a duplicate of this built-in label cleanup. Feature request details: - Subsystem affected: Cross-cutting (`ui/`, `packages/adapters`, and docs). - Problem or motivation: user-facing adapter names include legacy local qualifiers even though adapters map to harnesses and environments are first-class elsewhere. - Proposed solution: remove the legacy local wording from built-in display labels, keep machine-readable adapter type ids unchanged, and keep gateway disambiguation where it is useful. - Alternatives considered: changing persisted adapter type ids was ruled out because it would create migration and compatibility risk; one-off UI replacements were ruled out because the display registry is already the correct central label boundary. - Roadmap alignment: this is small adapter UX polish, not a new roadmap-level core feature. ## What Changed - Updated the adapter display registry so known adapter labels are final and no built-in local adapter renders a legacy local suffix. - Preserved clean derived labels for unknown plugin local types while keeping gateway disambiguation for unknown gateway types. - Updated `AdapterManager` to prefer registry labels when the server reports raw adapter type ids for built-ins. - Removed legacy local wording from built-in adapter metadata labels in UI and adapter packages. - Aligned Cursor adapter metadata with the central display registry label. - Updated adapter docs and Storybook fixtures to match the new display names. - Added focused registry coverage for built-in labels and unknown plugin suffix behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm check:tokens` - `git diff --check origin/master...fix/adapter-display-labels` - Patch-addition scan for added secrets, private paths, and internal links: no matches. - GitHub duplicate search for open adapter-label/local-suffix issues and PRs; #8910 was identified as the older superseded public PR. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/adapters/adapter-display-registry.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - Stale-label scan found no remaining user-facing display-label suffixes; remaining local wording is operational/test terminology such as adapter ids, docs about running locally, and test descriptions. ## Risks Low risk. The change is display-label and documentation focused, and adapter type ids remain unchanged. The main risk is ambiguous gateway naming, mitigated by keeping explicit gateway labels where variants need disambiguation. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex, tool-enabled coding agent in a local repository workspace. Context window size is not exposed by this environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
bac7307ec4 |
fix(adapter-utils): improve sandbox restore failure diagnostics (#8903)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent adapters share managed-runtime helpers from `@paperclipai/adapter-utils` so local and sandboxed runs can prepare, execute, and restore workspaces consistently. > - The sandbox managed runtime syncs workspaces in both directions by creating tar archives on the local host and inside the remote sandbox. > - A prior fix avoided archiving `.` during upload because tar self-entries can force chmod/utime on a directory the command user does not own. > - The restore/download path still archived the remote workspace as `.`, and failed managed commands only surfaced stderr. > - This pull request applies entry-based tar creation to the sandbox restore path and includes stdout in managed command failure diagnostics. > - The benefit is that restore failures become visible to operators and sandbox workspace restore avoids the same directory-metadata failure class already fixed for upload. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No existing public issue found; describing in-PR (bug). - **What happens:** sandbox workspace restore can fail while creating `workspace-download.tar` from the remote workspace when the tar command includes a `.` self-entry and the command user cannot update metadata on the workspace directory. If the failing command writes its diagnostic to stdout, the managed runtime error can collapse to a generic failed shell command without the useful tar message. - **Expected behavior:** restore should archive the workspace entries without a `.` self-entry, and failed managed runtime commands should include useful stdout/stderr diagnostics. - **Where:** `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.ts` restore/download path and `packages/adapter-utils/src/command-managed-runtime.ts` command error formatting. - **Related public context:** #7836 fixed the upload side of the same tar self-entry failure class. ## What Changed - Added stdout-aware failed-command formatting in the command managed runtime, keeping diagnostics bounded to the tail of stdout/stderr. - Added remote workspace tarball creation that names top-level entries explicitly instead of archiving `.` during sandbox restore. - Preserved empty-workspace restore support by creating a valid empty tarball when the remote workspace has no entries. - Added regression coverage for stdout diagnostics, restore tar members, and empty workspace restore tarballs. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/command-managed-runtime.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts` — 2 files, 17 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` — passed. - `git diff --check origin/master..HEAD` — passed. - Local public-hygiene/PII scan of the committed diff checked for internal ticket refs, local/private URLs, common token/key patterns, private-key blocks, and email-like values — passed. - GitHub duplicate/related search found no public issue or PR for `workspace-download.tar Permission denied` or `sandbox restore tar permission denied`; #7836 is linked as related prior work. - PR CI on commit `3ad4c8d` — all GitHub Actions lanes, security scans, and aggregate `verify` passed. - Greptile Review on commit `3ad4c8d` — Confidence Score 5/5; the prior P2 thread is resolved with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups. ## Risks Low. This is limited to shared adapter runtime error formatting and sandbox restore archive construction. Archive contents should remain equivalent apart from the removed `.` self-entry, and the new diagnostics are bounded to avoid dumping unbounded command output. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, tool-enabled coding agent with shell and GitHub CLI access. Context window size was not reported by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (n/a; internal adapter-runtime behavior only) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
246e1b38bf |
[codex] Include checkbox selections in continuation wakes (#8893)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Issue-thread interactions are the subsystem that lets board users answer structured prompts and resume agent work > - Checkbox confirmations capture a selected subset of known options, then wake the assignee through continuation context > - The wake context previously carried generic interaction metadata, but not the accepted checkbox option ids or option labels > - That meant the resumed agent could be woken after a checkbox confirmation without seeing the board's selected options in the turn context > - This pull request carries accepted checkbox selections through the interaction continuation wake snapshot and renders them into the adapter wake prompt > - The benefit is that agents can act on checkbox-confirmation selections without refetching or guessing the user's choices ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this bug. Searched public issues and PRs for checkbox confirmation / continuation selection duplicates and found no matching issue or PR. ### Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have searched existing open and closed issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] I am on the latest released version of Paperclip or can reproduce on `master`. - [x] I have confirmed the error originates in Paperclip itself, not in my agent adapter, API provider, or local configuration. ### What happened? When a board user accepted a `request_checkbox_confirmation` interaction, the assignee continuation wake included generic interaction metadata but did not include the accepted checkbox selections. The resumed agent turn therefore had no in-prompt access to the selected option ids or option labels/descriptions. ### Expected behavior When a `request_checkbox_confirmation` interaction is accepted, the resumed agent wake should include the checkbox prompt, selected option ids, and selected option labels/descriptions so the agent can act on the selected subset directly. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Create an issue-thread `request_checkbox_confirmation` interaction with multiple options and `continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee"`. 2. Accept the interaction with one or more selected options. 3. Inspect the continuation wake payload/prompt received by the assignee. 4. Observe that the selected checkbox options are missing from the wake context before this fix. ### Paperclip version or commit Reproduced against the pre-fix code path on `master`; this PR head is `9d17e70bce373e4850117f30c015c973c4b61789`. ### Deployment mode Local dev (pnpm dev) / built from source. ### Installation method Built from source (pnpm dev / pnpm build). ### Agent adapter(s) involved Not adapter-specific (core bug). The Codex/local adapter path exposed the missing wake context, but the missing field was in core interaction continuation payload construction. ### Database mode Embedded PGlite or external Postgres; the bug is not database-mode specific. ### Access context Both. Board users resolve the checkbox interaction, and agent bearer-key wakes consume the continuation context. ### Node.js version `v22.22.2` ### Operating system Linux workspace. ### Relevant logs or output No runtime exception is required to reproduce this. The failure mode is missing `checkboxSelection` data in the resolved interaction continuation wake payload. ### Relevant config Not config-related. ### Additional context Root cause: accepted checkbox interaction results were not extracted into the continuation wake context, and adapter wake payload normalization/rendering had no typed `checkboxSelection` field. ### Privacy checklist - [x] I have reviewed all pasted output for PII (usernames, file paths, API keys, tokens, company names) and redacted where necessary. ## What Changed - Added checkbox selection extraction for accepted `request_checkbox_confirmation` interactions and stored it in interaction continuation wake context. - Included checkbox selection context in heartbeat wake payload construction. - Added adapter-utils normalization and wake prompt rendering for checkbox prompt, selected ids, and selected option details. - Added regression coverage for route continuation context, heartbeat payload summaries, and adapter wake prompt rendering. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts` - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` - `rg -n "checkbox|confirmation|interaction|wake|continuation" ROADMAP.md` - `gh pr list --state all --search "checkbox continuation selection repo:paperclipai/paperclip" --json number,title,state,url,headRefName --limit 20` - `gh issue list --state all --search "checkbox confirmation options repo:paperclipai/paperclip" --json number,title,state,url --limit 20` ## Risks Low risk. The new payload field is additive, only populated for accepted checkbox confirmations, and existing continuation fields are preserved. The main compatibility risk is downstream code assuming an exact wake payload shape; adapter normalization treats the new field as optional. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell/tool execution in this workspace. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
69c55d465d |
Add telemetry data contract docs (#8886)
Adds the public telemetry data contract README, links it from contributor docs, and adds a focused README contract test for generated helper names. Verification: - git diff --check origin/master..HEAD - pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/telemetry/readme-contract.test.ts - PR CI green - Greptile 5/5 Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
60f7fb4223 |
PAP-12424 Work Timeline — Phase C: frontend Gantt page (Direction C) (#8880)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Operators need to *see* how work actually flowed across their agents over time — who was invoked, what they worked on, and how work was delegated between them > - The dashboard shows point-in-time state but nothing reconstructs the temporal, cross-actor picture of heartbeat runs and delegations > - A read-only company work-timeline endpoint was landed first (server aggregation over runs/issues/activity); it had no frontend > - This pull request adds the Gantt-style **Work Timeline** page that renders that endpoint, plus the small additive server contract change it needs (shared DTOs + a task title on each span) > - The benefit is a single dense view — actor rows, concurrency lanes, delegation connectors, zoom and a mini-map — that makes agent activity legible without an N+1 fetch storm from the client ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue. Problem, in-PR: - **Gap:** the company work-timeline aggregation endpoint has no UI. There is no way to visually inspect how heartbeat runs unfolded over time or how work was delegated between agents. - **Solution:** a dashboard-adjacent Gantt-style page at `/:companyPrefix/timeline`, linked from the sidebar's "Work" section, rendering runs as bars on per-actor rows with delegation connectors, kickoff chips, zoom, a lens filter, and a mini-map. - Built with React + custom inline SVG (no chart dependency; consistent with the existing Tailwind/Radix stack). ## What Changed - **Frontend Gantt page** (`ui/src/pages/Timeline.tsx`, `ui/src/components/timeline/WorkTimelineChart.tsx`): actor rows (agents/system only — humans never get a row), overlapping runs packed into concurrency sub-lanes, bars = heartbeat runs with a left colour tab for issue identity, truncated task title + timing/status on hover, click-through to the task. - **Human activity markers & human rows** for kickoff/delegation involving people, without giving humans their own run lane. - **Kickoff avatar chips** at each bar's leading edge; straight agent→agent delegation connectors (dashed for retries/changes-requested); in-progress runs extend to a dashed "now" line and fade out. - **Zoom** (hour/day/week, auto-fit), full-window **mini-map** with a draggable brush, **lens filter** (Everyone / per-user, server-side), and colour **by task / by status**. - **Pure layout/transform module** (`ui/src/lib/timeline/layout.ts`) — packing, kickoff derivation, connector resolution, scales — unit-tested in isolation. - **Server contract (additive):** moved the `WorkTimeline*` DTOs into `@paperclipai/shared` so the aggregation service and the UI consume one contract; added `issueTitle` to each span so the tooltip shows the task title with no N+1 client fetch. - Sidebar link, query keys, API client (`ui/src/api/workTimeline.ts`), and a Storybook story with fixtures. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared build` ✅ - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` ✅ · `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` ✅ - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/lib/timeline/layout.test.ts src/components/timeline/WorkTimelineChart.test.tsx` ✅ (15/15) - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/work-timeline-service.test.ts` ✅ (5/5) — the DTO move + `issueTitle` are additive; existing service tests use `objectContaining` and still pass. - Rendered `WorkTimelineChart` headless against a real slice of company activity via a Storybook story; manual browser QA of the live page passed on the feature branch. ## Risks - **Low risk.** The change is UI-only plus an additive server DTO refactor (types relocated to `@paperclipai/shared`, one new optional field). No schema/migration changes, no change to endpoint behaviour beyond the extra `issueTitle` field. The page is behind its own route and does not alter existing views. ## Model Used - Claude, Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`), via Claude Code with extended thinking and tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above (only the merged endpoint PR #8875 is related; no duplicates) - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Dotta
|
2f94a66ba1 |
Show live descendant status in inbox rows (#8876)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The inbox is where operators quickly scan which issues are active, blocked, or waiting for attention > - A blocked parent can still have active descendant work, but the inbox previously depended on only loaded rows to infer that state > - That made collapsed or partially loaded issue trees look more stuck than they really were > - This pull request carries live descendant summary data through the issue list API and inbox UI > - The benefit is a more accurate blocked-inbox signal, so operators can distinguish truly stalled work from blocked parents that still have live child activity ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue was found for this exact inbox descendant-status polish. Feature request fields: **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting: `server/`, `packages/shared`, plugin/MCP API surfaces, and `ui/` inbox rendering. **Problem or motivation** Inbox rows need to show when blocked or collapsed parents still have live descendant work, even when the live child row is not loaded in the current client tree. Without a server-provided descendant summary, a parent can look stalled even though active work continues below it. **Proposed solution** Expose an optional live descendant count on issue list results, request it from inbox views, and use it to render covered blocked status and live-below indicators. Keep the field opt-in so other issue list callers keep their existing payload shape and query cost. **Alternatives considered** Relying only on client-loaded subtree state was ruled out because it misses collapsed or unloaded descendants. Always returning the count was also avoided because most list callers do not need this extra summary. **Roadmap alignment** This is scoped operator-visibility polish for the existing inbox. It does not duplicate a named `ROADMAP.md` milestone. **Additional context** The recursive summary query is guarded against parent cycles, and the UI still falls back to loaded subtree live counts when server summary data is absent or stale. ## What Changed - Added optional `includeLiveDescendantSummary` support to issue list contracts, SDK surfaces, MCP tools, routes, services, and tests. - Added `liveDescendantCount` to issue list results when requested. - Updated inbox and blocked-inbox queries to request live descendant summaries. - Updated inbox row status rendering so blocked parents with live descendants show covered blocker treatment without duplicating the live-below chip. - Hardened live descendant summary traversal against parent cycles and preserved the loaded-subtree fallback path for blocked inbox rows. - Added focused tests for the API parameter, service behavior, helper logic, cycle handling, and inbox UI query/rendering behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-list-assignee-filter-routes.test.ts ui/src/lib/inbox-live-descendants.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueColumns.test.tsx ui/src/components/BlockedInboxView.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - Rebased cleanly onto current upstream `master` before pushing. - Confirmed the branch diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*` changes. ## Risks Low to moderate risk. The new descendant count is opt-in on list requests, but it adds query work when the inbox asks for it. The recursive traversal now tracks visited ancestors to avoid cycle failures. The UI uses the server count as a supplement to existing loaded-tree state, so stale or absent counts fall back to the prior behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled with local shell and git access. Reasoning mode and context window are managed by the Paperclip/Codex runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
b4815bf964 |
Scope environment custom images to instance environments (#8850)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Environments are now managed as instance-level runtime resources rather than per-company rows > - The custom environment image setup tables were introduced with their own `company_id` columns and route query parameters > - That split made one saved environment image state depend on an extra company context even though the environment itself is the durable owner > - It also made saved-environment probes harder because applying the active custom image template could require a company context when no secret-backed config needed one > - This pull request scopes custom image templates and setup sessions directly to the saved environment > - The benefit is that reusable environment images follow the same instance-scoped model as environments while secret resolution still uses company context only when secrets require it ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No matching public GitHub issue was found. Bug report: ### What happened? saved environment custom-image routes and persistence required a `companyId` even though environments are instance-scoped, and saved sandbox probes did not opt into active custom-image template application unless a company context was present. ### Expected behavior custom-image templates and setup sessions should be owned by the saved environment, and saved sandbox probes should apply the active template while still requiring a company context only for secret-backed runtime config. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Configure an instance-scoped sandbox environment with custom-image setup support. 2. Start or inspect a custom-image session or template for that saved environment. 3. Probe the saved environment without a custom-image-specific `companyId` query parameter. ### Paperclip version or commit current `master` after the environment custom-image template migration. ### Deployment mode Local dev (pnpm dev) or authenticated local Paperclip instance. ### Installation method Built from source (pnpm dev / pnpm build). ### Agent adapter(s) involved Not adapter-specific (core bug). ### Database mode Embedded PGlite/Postgres dev database. ### Access context Board human operator. ### Privacy checklist No logs, secrets, tokens, private URLs, or local machine paths are included. Duplicate search performed: - `gh search prs "environment custom image companyId repo:paperclipai/paperclip" --state open --limit 20` - `gh search prs "custom image environment scoped repo:paperclipai/paperclip" --state open --limit 20` - `gh search issues "environment custom image repo:paperclipai/paperclip" --state open --limit 20` The returned results were unrelated adapter, Docker, auth, or stale-workspace items. ## What Changed - Removed redundant `company_id` columns from environment custom-image templates and setup sessions. - Added migration `0127_environment_custom_images_instance_scoped` to collapse duplicate active rows per environment before dropping the old company-scoped indexes/columns. - Updated custom-image services, route handlers, shared validators, and UI API/query keys to use environment-scoped custom-image state. - Kept runtime secret resolution company-aware only when secret refs or bindings require a company context. - Made saved sandbox environment probes opt into active custom-image template application. - Updated DB, shared, server, and UI tests for the new environment-scoped contract. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db run check:migrations` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/db/src/environment-custom-images-schema.test.ts packages/shared/src/environment-custom-images.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-custom-image-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-custom-images-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-routes.test.ts ui/src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.test.tsx` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm test:run` before rebasing onto latest `master`; after the rebase only the migration number changed, and the migration check plus focused suite, typecheck, and build were rerun. - `pnpm build` ## Risks - Migration safety: the migration supersedes duplicate active templates per environment and fails duplicate active setup sessions before adding environment-only unique indexes. Operators with duplicate historical active rows should review which active template is kept. - Behavior shift: plugin custom-image setup calls now receive `companyId: "instance"` when no secret binding determines a concrete company context. - Secret-backed configs still require an explicit or uniquely inferable company context; environments with secret bindings spread across multiple companies continue to fail fast. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex via the `codex_local` adapter, GPT-5-based coding model with tool-enabled repository inspection, editing, testing, git, and GitHub CLI access. Exact context-window metadata was not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
2eba718bef |
Fix sandbox bridge credentials and stalled review recovery (#8844)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The local adapter and heartbeat recovery systems decide whether an agent has a real control-plane mutation path. > - Sandboxed local adapters split execution between the trusted host process and the sandbox shell/tool surface. > - A host-side adapter can still reach Paperclip while the sandbox shell surface cannot, which leaves agents thinking no endpoint or credentials are configured even though the host can still post comments. > - Execution-policy review stages can also remain pending after a reviewer run finishes without recording a decision. > - This pull request makes the sandbox bridge available to the actual shell mutation surface and adds bounded recovery for terminal-but-still-pending review participants. > - The benefit is that agents get a real reachable Paperclip API path where they need it, and stalled review stages become visible recovery work instead of silently drifting. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No exact public GitHub issue matched this combined failure. I searched for exact and related terms including `cannot reach the Paperclip control plane`, `execution_review_participant_recovery`, `sandbox callback bridge`, `review participant in_review`, and `control plane sandbox`. Related public issues: - Refs #8482 for `in_review` liveness invariant recovery. - Refs #863 for prior agent API-key reachability confusion. - Refs #248 for the broader sandboxed agent execution model. Bug summary: - What happened: a sandboxed local-adapter run could have host-side Paperclip access while the sandbox Bash/tool surface lacked a reachable API endpoint or usable run credentials. Separately, a reviewer run could finish while its execution-review stage remained pending, leaving the source issue in `in_review` with no decision and no live participant run. - Expected behavior: the mutation surface that agents actually use should receive a run-scoped Paperclip bridge, and pending review participants should get one bounded normal-model recovery wake before moving to explicit blocked/source-scoped recovery. - Steps to reproduce: run a sandbox-backed local adapter that needs Bash/curl/tooling to call Paperclip from inside the sandbox, or finish an execution-policy reviewer run without submitting the pending review decision. - Deployment mode: local/authenticated private development instance with sandbox-backed local adapters. ## What Changed - Changed sandbox callback bridge startup so bridge credentials are passed through the sandbox runner environment instead of embedded in the visible `nohup env ...` command string. - Added adapter-utils coverage proving the sandbox shell can call Paperclip through the bridge, forwards the host run JWT with `X-Paperclip-Run-Id`, and does not leak host or bridge tokens into stdout/stderr, runner command text, or runtime files. - Added one bounded execution-review participant recovery path for terminal reviewer runs whose `executionState` remains pending. - Escalated exhausted or non-invokable review participant recovery to blocked/source-scoped recovery with dedicated evidence, activity, and next-action text. - Documented the mutation-surface reachability contract in `doc/execution-semantics.md` and updated the Paperclip skill authentication guidance for sandbox bridge env vars. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/execution-target-sandbox.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts --no-file-parallelism --maxWorkers=1` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `git diff --check` - `curl -fsS $PAPERCLIP_API_URL/api/health` returned `status: ok` on the local instance. ## Risks - Medium behavioral risk: more `in_review` issues with terminal-but-pending reviewer runs will now be retried once and then blocked explicitly instead of remaining quiet. - Low sandbox bridge risk: credential delivery moved from command text to the runner environment, which is less leaky but depends on sandbox providers honoring the env payload for startup commands. - No database migration is included. - Full repo build and CI were not run locally before opening the PR; targeted server/adapter tests and typechecks passed. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 via the Codex local agent, with repository tool use and shell-based code execution. The runtime did not expose a precise context-window value to the agent. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
scotttongandClaude Opus 4.8
|
fb2b760915 |
fix(issues): attribute agent-authored comments instead of rendering them as "Board" (#8833)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Task/issue threads render each comment as a chat bubble; the author determines whether it shows as a left-aligned agent bubble (name + icon) or a right-aligned "Board" bubble > - Comments posted by an agent from a local execution environment are written with a non-human author id (`local-board`/system), so they were mis-rendered as blue "Board" bubbles instead of being attributed to the authoring agent > - This misattribution is confusing (it looks like the human board said something an agent actually said) and it can drive false wake/reconciliation behavior on the affected threads > - This pull request adds server-side attribution derivation (lossless run-id join first, then an explicit run-log post marker), persists the derived agent so the read path stops re-scanning run logs, and stops the client from labeling agent-derived comments "Board" > - The benefit is agent comments render as the correct agent, genuine human board comments are never reattributed, and reads get cheaper after a one-time persistence ## Linked Issues or Issue Description <!-- No public GitHub issue — describing the problem in-PR (bug report shape). --> **What happened?** In a task/issue comment thread, comments authored by an agent from a local execution environment are stored with a non-human author id (`local-board`/system). The UI renders these as right-aligned blue "Board" bubbles, implying a human board member authored them. The mislabeling is also a wake/reconciliation hazard: an agent comment that reads as "Board" can look like human board input. **Expected behavior** Such comments should render as the authoring agent (left-aligned bubble with agent name + icon). Genuine human/board comments must continue to render as "Board" and must never be reattributed to an agent. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Have an agent post a comment on an issue from a local execution environment (author id `local-board`). 2. Open the issue comment thread in the UI. 3. Observe the agent's comment rendered as a right-aligned blue "Board" bubble instead of the authoring agent. **Root cause** The read path did not resolve the authoring agent for these comments, and the client fell back to a "Board" label for the `local-board` author. ## What Changed - **Server derivation (`server/src/services/issues.ts`):** - Resolve the authoring agent from the comment's run id first (`createdByRunId`/`derivedCreatedByRunId` → `heartbeatRuns.agentId`) — lossless when present. - Second tier `run_log_comment_post`: read the run log lazily (only for still-unresolved comments) to match the explicit `comment id:` post marker. - **Guard:** never reattribute a comment whose author maps to a genuine user profile. Only the non-human sentinel (`local-board`, which is itself a `user` row) and authors absent from the `user` table are eligible. - Pure timing-overlap tiers are intentionally **not** used (Option A) — an agent comment and a human board comment posted during the same run are indistinguishable rows, so any timing guess risks mislabeling a real human comment. - **Persistence (`packages/db/src/migrations/0126_issue_comment_derived_attribution.sql`, `packages/db/src/schema/issue_comments.ts`):** add stored `derived_*` attribution columns and write the resolved agent back with a single bulk `UPDATE ... FROM (VALUES ...)`, so reads stop recomputing from run logs. Migration is additive (new nullable columns) with a batched, idempotent backfill of the lossless run-id tier over historical rows. - **Types (`packages/shared/src/types/issue.ts`):** expose the persisted attribution fields and the `IssueCommentDerivedAuthorSource` union. - **Client (`ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts`):** the message builder already prefers a resolved agent id (`authorAgentId ?? runAgentId ?? derivedAuthorAgentId`), so once the server persists the derived agent the bubble renders as the agent automatically — no client code change needed. Adds a regression guard confirming a genuine board comment with no derived agent is still rendered as "Board". - **Tests:** derivation + message-building tests, including assertions that genuine board/user comments are **not** reattributed. ## Verification - `cd server && npx vitest run issues-service` — 94 tests pass: run-id resolution, no-attribution on timing overlap alone (Option A), multi-run ambiguity, same-agent multi-run, and the genuine-user guard. Exercises the real persistence path (bulk UPDATE) against the test DB. - `cd ui && npx vitest run issue-chat-messages` — 27 tests pass; client no longer labels agent-derived comments "Board", and a genuine board comment with no derived agent is not re-labeled. - `cd server && npm run typecheck` — passes (exit 0). - Manual: on a thread containing old agent-authored comments, the blue "Board" bubbles render as the authoring agent; a genuine board comment on the same thread still renders as "Board". ## Risks - **Mis-reattributing a genuine board comment made during an agent run** → mitigated by the human-profile guard (only `local-board`/system authors are eligible) and by dropping pure timing tiers (Option A): only the lossless run-id join and the explicit run-log post marker attribute history. - **Backfill volume / run-log reads** → the migration backfill is batched (5000 rows/loop) and results are persisted so reads stop recomputing; the read-path persistence is a single bulk UPDATE rather than per-comment round-trips. Migration adds only nullable columns (no destructive change). - The persistence/backfill has **not** been run against any production database as part of opening this PR. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`), extended thinking, via Claude Code with tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs — related open PRs (#6006 narrow attribution run scan, #4729 attribution roll-up, #7014 reaped-run attribution) address different attribution paths; none fix the `local-board` "Board" bubble rendering this PR targets. Supersedes #8832 (same change; branch renamed to drop an internal ticket id per CONTRIBUTING → Branch Naming) - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
3522b1c9be |
Emit interaction resolved telemetry (#8824)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Issue-thread interactions are how agents ask users or the board for decisions and structured input > - Product telemetry needs to understand when those interactions resolve without exposing private interaction content > - Resolution currently happens through several service paths, so telemetry needs to be emitted consistently from the terminal transitions > - The interaction service should describe the resolved interaction, while the telemetry backend owns unknown-value normalization for dimensions > - This pull request emits `interaction.resolved` after successful database writes and removes redundant client-side normalization from the service > - The benefit is aggregate-safe telemetry for interaction completion behavior without leaking raw IDs, answer text, rejection reasons, or document content ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this internal telemetry follow-up. Feature context: - Problem/motivation: Paperclip needs aggregate product telemetry for issue-thread interaction resolution outcomes while preserving privacy boundaries around user answers and internal identifiers. - Proposed solution: Emit `interaction.resolved` once from terminal interaction resolution paths, passing runtime dimensions through the shared telemetry helper while preserving aggregate-safe counts and ID/free-text omission. - Alternatives considered: Normalizing interaction dimensions in the interaction service duplicated telemetry backend responsibility and made unknown-value handling inconsistent across telemetry clients. - Roadmap alignment: This is a focused telemetry instrumentation follow-up that builds on the generated telemetry event types from #8818. ## What Changed - Wires `interaction.resolved` telemetry into terminal issue-thread interaction resolution paths after successful database writes. - Passes raw interaction kind, status, continuation policy, resolution reason, target type, and creator agent role values to the shared telemetry helper instead of maintaining service-local allowlists. - Preserves resolver classification, target `none` derivation for non-confirmation interactions, non-negative aggregate counts, raw ID omission, and free-text omission. - Logs telemetry failures without blocking interaction resolution. - Adds service-level tests for accepted, rejected, answered, stale-target expiry, superseded-comment expiry, and raw creator-role pass-through payloads. ## Verification - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-telemetry.test.ts server/src/__tests__/shared-telemetry-events.test.ts` - `pnpm typecheck` - GitHub PR checks on the latest head commit are green, including `verify`, build, e2e, general tests, serialized server suites, security scans, and Greptile Review. - Security code review completed before this branch update. ## Risks - Low operational risk: telemetry is emitted after successful persistence and telemetry failures are logged without blocking the user-visible interaction flow. - Main behavioral risk is duplicate or missing telemetry from a resolution path; the focused tests cover the terminal resolution variants. - Telemetry dimension normalization now depends on the shared telemetry backend path instead of the interaction service, so backend normalization must remain the source of truth for unknown or empty dimension values. - The existing PR branch name contains an internal task id because this update continues an already-open PR branch instead of opening a replacement PR. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex coding agent, API-based coding environment with shell, repository, and GitHub CLI tool use. Context window size was not reported by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
8a93a0de4c |
Implement generated client telemetry types (#8818)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Telemetry is part of the control plane's operational visibility and needs stable event contracts. > - The shared telemetry client accepted first-party event names through a broad string surface, which weakened compile-time guarantees. > - Plugin telemetry still needs a dynamic path because plugin-defined events cannot be enumerated in the core generated type module. > - This pull request vendors generated Paperclip telemetry event and dimension types, closes the first-party event-name union, and keeps plugin telemetry on an explicit dynamic method. > - Review feedback clarified that backend normalization should remain the source of truth, so telemetry helpers now preserve raw categorical values while keeping generated per-event type hints. > - The benefit is stricter first-party telemetry typing without hiding backend normalization signals or changing batching, flushing, schema versioning, sinks, or endpoints. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this internal type-contract maintenance change. ### Problem or motivation The shared telemetry client should reject unregistered first-party event names at compile time, while the plugin telemetry bridge must continue to emit plugin-defined events through the existing batching and envelope path. Helper wrappers should also avoid client-side enum coercion so the backend can detect and record normalization when clients send unexpected categorical values. ### Proposed solution Generate and vendor the accepted Paperclip telemetry event and dimension types, use those types for the first-party `track()` API, keep plugin-defined telemetry on an explicit dynamic method, and let helper wrappers pass raw categorical dimensions through to backend validation. ### Alternatives considered Keeping `track()` open to arbitrary strings would preserve flexibility, but it would not give first-party callers the type safety this change is meant to provide. Enumerating plugin events in core was also ruled out because plugin-defined events are not known to the core package. Client-side enum normalization was removed after review because it duplicates backend validation and can hide misbehaving-client signals. ### Roadmap alignment This is a tightly scoped telemetry contract maintenance change and does not overlap with a roadmap-level core feature. ## What Changed - Vendored the generated Paperclip telemetry event and dimension type module under shared telemetry code. - Closed the first-party telemetry event-name union to generated backend-accepted names plus an explicit `RegisteredPluginEventName = never` extension point. - Added `TelemetryClient.trackDynamic()` for plugin telemetry bridge emission while keeping `track()` closed and typed. - Added JSDoc explaining when to use `track()` versus `trackDynamic()`. - Updated telemetry helper wrappers to type dimensions from each event's generated schema entry while passing raw categorical values through for backend normalization. - Added `trackInteractionResolved()` and updated focused shared/server tests for telemetry event typing, raw pass-through behavior, and plugin telemetry bridging. ## Verification Local verification passed before the latest push: - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/telemetry/client-types.test.ts server/src/__tests__/shared-telemetry-events.test.ts server/src/__tests__/plugin-telemetry-bridge.test.ts server/src/__tests__/project-goal-telemetry-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routine-run-telemetry.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-telemetry-routes.test.ts` - `git diff --check` Post-push verification completed on head `3d973ffbea6154b19ad208dcffd1374d1b25b654`: - GitHub PR checks passed, including `verify`, build, typecheck/release registry, general test shards, serialized server shards, canary dry run, e2e, and security checks. - Greptile Review passed with 5/5 confidence. - All PR review threads are resolved. ## Risks Low runtime risk. The change is intended to affect TypeScript contracts and helper typing while preserving the existing telemetry enqueue, batching, and backend ingest path. The main intentional behavior shift is that helper wrappers no longer coerce unexpected categorical values on the client; those values reach the backend so backend normalization can record the signal. Private company import source refs still use `hashPrivateRef` when `isPrivate` is true. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex, tool-enabled coding agent. Exact context window was not exposed by the runtime; the agent used repository file access, shell commands, and GitHub CLI operations. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Ege Chelebi
|
41059841f1 |
feat(gemini-local): add Gemini 3.1 Pro models to gemini-local adapter (#1602)
**Thinking path** The gemini_local adapter's model dropdown (packages/adapters/gemini-local/src/index.ts) still lists only Gemini 2.x. Google has since shipped the Gemini 3.1 Pro family, so users can't pick the current flagship from the dashboard and instead hit ModelNotFoundError when they type an ID by hand (#1506). The adapter passes the selected string straight to `gemini --model`, so the fix is to surface the valid 3.1 Pro IDs in the list. **What I did** Added two entries to the `models` array, above the existing 2.x entries: - `gemini-3.1-pro-preview` — Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) - `gemini-3.1-pro-preview-customtools` — custom-tools variant, tuned for agentic/tool use **Why it matters** Users can select the current flagship 3.1 Pro (and its custom-tools endpoint) directly, instead of guessing IDs and hitting ModelNotFoundError. **How to verify** Open the gemini_local model dropdown in the dashboard; both entries appear above the 2.5 entries and run against `gemini --model <id>` without error. **Risks** Minimal — additive, single-file change to a static list; nothing removed. Both IDs are confirmed-valid Google API identifiers. Fixes #1506. |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ac9a883f8b |
Expire ask-user questions superseded by comments (#8799)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Issue-thread interactions are how agents ask board users for typed decisions and structured answers inside an issue thread > - Confirmation interactions already become stale when a later board/user comment supersedes the pending decision > - Question interactions had the same workflow risk, because a board/user could answer in a comment while the old question card stayed pending > - This pull request extends the supersede-by-comment lifecycle to ask-user-question interactions and makes that status visible in the UI > - The benefit is agents get a clear continuation signal and users do not see stale question forms after the discussion has moved on ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No exact public GitHub issue was found. Bug report: **Pre-submission checklist** - [x] I have searched existing open and closed issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] I am on the latest released version of Paperclip, or can reproduce on `master`. - [x] I have confirmed the error originates in Paperclip itself, not in an agent adapter, API provider, or local configuration. **What happened?** Pending `ask_user_questions` interactions could remain open after a later board/user comment changed or answered the request in-thread. That left a stale form visible and kept the interaction in a pending state even though the discussion had moved on. **Expected behavior** Question interactions should follow the same default supersede-on-comment behavior as confirmation interactions, with an explicit expired result that points to the superseding comment. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create an `ask_user_questions` interaction on an issue. 2. Add a board/user comment created at or after that interaction. 3. Observe that before this change, the question interaction stayed pending instead of expiring as superseded by the comment. **Paperclip version or commit** Current `master` before this PR. **Deployment mode** Self-hosted server or local dev. The bug is in shared issue-thread interaction lifecycle handling. **Installation method** Built from source. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific. This is a core issue-thread interaction bug. **Database mode** Applies to the normal Paperclip database-backed interaction lifecycle. **Access context** Board user comments supersede agent-created questions. **Relevant logs or output** No crash output. The stale pending interaction was visible in the issue thread state. **Relevant config (if applicable)** None. **Additional context** Confirmation-style interactions already supported this stale-by-comment behavior. This PR brings question interactions into the same lifecycle model. **Privacy checklist** - [x] I have reviewed all pasted output for PII and included no private instance links, local ticket ids, secrets, logs, or screenshots. ## What Changed - Added `supersedeOnUserComment` support to `ask_user_questions` payloads, defaulting it to `true` during interaction creation. - Expire pending question interactions when a later board/user comment supersedes them, including a result with `expirationReason: "superseded_by_comment"` and the superseding `commentId`. - Updated interaction summaries and cards so expired question requests show a clear amber state with a jump link to the comment and correct singular/plural copy. - Updated agent onboarding guidance to describe the new default and how to opt out. - Added shared, server, and UI test coverage for the new lifecycle behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts --reporter=dot` passed: 5 files, 73 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts --reporter=dot && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passed after the final type-safety cleanup. - Confirmed the branch is rebased on current `origin/master`. - Confirmed the diff does not touch `pnpm-lock.yaml`, `.github/workflows`, or database migrations. ## Risks - Low-to-medium risk: `ask_user_questions` now defaults to expiring after later board/user comments. Existing callers that need questions to stay open through discussion can set `supersedeOnUserComment: false`. - Expired question interactions store an empty `answers` array, so downstream consumers should treat the explicit `expirationReason` as the meaningful outcome. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in Paperclip CodexCoder runtime, with terminal and repository tool use. Exact context window is not exposed in this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
a8f0ebaa80 |
Refresh run config before reusing workspaces (#8797)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent runs are assembled by the heartbeat service from agent config, project workspaces, environment config, secret bindings, skills, and runtime session state. > - The heartbeat service intentionally reuses adapter sessions, execution workspaces, and sandbox leases when that preserves useful state. > - Reuse becomes incorrect when the effective next-run config changes after a saved session, workspace, or lease was created. > - Stale reuse can make a later run appear pinned to old agent, environment, secret, instruction, or workspace settings. > - This pull request records non-sensitive fingerprints for the effective session, workspace, and lease config at run boundaries. > - When those fingerprints drift, Paperclip refreshes persisted runtime config or starts fresh execution instead of reusing stale state. > - The benefit is predictable next-run config freshness without storing raw secret values, full env maps, provider credentials, or private path details. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Refs #8058 - Related PRs checked during dedup search: #4968, #4155, #84, #8480. These cover nearby workspace/session routing or model-config freshness areas, but do not duplicate this effective run config fingerprinting path. ## What Changed - Added effective run config fingerprinting for session, workspace, and lease reuse decisions, with canonicalization that ignores generated runtime noise and redacts sensitive values. - Updated heartbeat reuse logic to compare stored and next-run fingerprints, reset stale saved sessions, refresh persisted workspace config snapshots, replace stale reused workspaces when required, and avoid stale sandbox lease reuse. - Included plain environment value drift via value hashes, without storing the raw env values. - Root-bound instruction content hashing so legacy direct absolute instruction paths are represented but not read for config fingerprints. - Batched secret/version metadata lookups for environment lease fingerprinting. - Added workspace operation/run result freshness metadata so operators can inspect non-sensitive decision categories. - Surfaced config freshness labels and next-run copy in the UI and docs. - Added focused coverage for fingerprint redaction, session reset decisions, workspace refresh/replace behavior, environment lease drift, and persisted workspace restoration. ## Verification - `git diff --check` - Sensitive-data scan before push: - `git diff --unified=0 origin/master...HEAD | rg -n --pcre2 "(AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID|AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY|ghp_[A-Za-z0-9_]{20,}|github_pat_[A-Za-z0-9_]{20,}|sk-[A-Za-z0-9]{20,}|-----BEGIN (RSA |OPENSSH |EC |DSA )?PRIVATE KEY-----|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16})"` - `git diff --unified=0 origin/master...HEAD | rg -n --pcre2 "[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\\.[A-Za-z]{2,}"` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/effective-run-config-fingerprints.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db clean` - `pnpm test:run` - `pnpm build` - UI screenshots from Cutter: - https://artifacts.cutter.sh/8797/run-2f4827c-2026-06-30T18-57-25/preview/change-01.png - https://artifacts.cutter.sh/8797/run-2f4827c-2026-06-30T18-57-25/preview/change-02.png - https://artifacts.cutter.sh/8797/run-2f4827c-2026-06-30T18-57-25/preview/change-03.png ## Risks - Medium: overly broad fingerprints could start fresh sessions, workspaces, or sandbox leases more often than necessary. - Medium: missing a config category would allow stale reuse to persist for that category. - Medium: legacy direct absolute instruction paths are no longer content-hashed unless they are paired with an absolute managed instructions root. - Low data risk: fingerprint metadata stores hashes and category names, not raw secrets, raw env values, provider credentials, or private path details. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex CLI / Codex coding agent, tool-enabled with shell, Git, GitHub CLI, local test execution, and code editing. The exact deployed model variant and context window are not exposed by this environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Cody <cody@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
5bd6c6ec3c |
build(deps): bump acpx from 0.6.1 to 0.11.2 (#8741)
Bumps [acpx](https://github.com/openclaw/acpx) from 0.6.1 to 0.11.2. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/releases">acpx's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>acpx 0.11.0</h2> <h2>v0.11.0</h2> <h3>Changes</h3> <ul> <li>Agents/built-ins: bump the default Claude ACP adapter range to <code>@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp@^0.37.0</code>. Thanks <a href="https://github.com/trumpyla"><code>@trumpyla</code></a>.</li> <li>Runtime/embedding: surface cost, token usage breakdowns, and advertised command metadata on runtime status/events. Thanks <a href="https://github.com/DaniAkash"><code>@DaniAkash</code></a>.</li> <li>Agents/built-ins: add <code>fast-agent</code> as a built-in fast-agent ACP adapter via <code>uvx fast-agent-mcp acp</code>.</li> <li>Agents/built-ins: add <code>mux</code> as a built-in coder/mux ACP adapter via <code>npx -y mux@^0.27.0 acp</code>. Thanks <a href="https://github.com/ThomasK33"><code>@ThomasK33</code></a>.</li> <li>CLI: add <code>acpx compare</code> to run one prompt across multiple agents and summarize timing, token usage, stop reason, permissions, and final output side by side. Thanks <a href="https://github.com/mvanhorn"><code>@mvanhorn</code></a>.</li> </ul> <h3>Fixes</h3> <ul> <li>CLI/Claude: isolate built-in Claude ACP sessions from user settings by default so globally enabled channel and daemon plugins cannot interfere with a spawned session. Set <code>ACPX_CLAUDE_INCLUDE_USER_SETTINGS=1</code> to restore user settings deliberately. Fixes <a href="https://redirect.github.com/openclaw/acpx/issues/361">#361</a>.</li> <li>ACP/models: support SDK 0.25 model config options while preserving <code>session/set_model</code> compatibility for adapters that explicitly advertise legacy model metadata.</li> <li>CLI/Claude: let Claude Code adjudicate model selectors missing from a stale advertised model list on later persistent turns, and preserve the adapter-reported current model after model switches. Thanks <a href="https://github.com/oakif"><code>@oakif</code></a>.</li> <li>Client/ACP: advertise scoped Devin/Windsurf-compatible client metadata and handle Devin extension requests/notifications without noisy method-not-found logs. Thanks <a href="https://github.com/LivioGama"><code>@LivioGama</code></a>.</li> <li>Runtime/sessions: treat corrupt public file-session records as missing while preserving genuine filesystem errors. Thanks <a href="https://github.com/KrasimirKralev"><code>@KrasimirKralev</code></a>.</li> </ul> <h3>Verification</h3> <ul> <li>npm: <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/acpx/v/0.11.0">https://www.npmjs.com/package/acpx/v/0.11.0</a></li> <li>Registry tarball: <a href="https://registry.npmjs.org/acpx/-/acpx-0.11.0.tgz">https://registry.npmjs.org/acpx/-/acpx-0.11.0.tgz</a></li> <li>Integrity: <code>sha512-l42LJFmd6kvbr1UytvwWmr5Mdy/v9l3FM6Necs01PWbjUIkxjCdxg97duqoRfRqxtDAfnNPb1IlgIf2ZgMZQqA==</code></li> <li>Candidate CI: <a href="https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/actions/runs/27676359224">https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/actions/runs/27676359224</a></li> <li>Trusted publish: <a href="https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/actions/runs/27676823793">https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/actions/runs/27676823793</a></li> <li>Packed CLI and real Codex ACP adapter E2E passed before tagging.</li> </ul> <h2>2026.5.23 (v0.10.0)</h2> <h3>Changes</h3> <ul> <li>CLI/sessions: add <code>sessions export</code> and <code>sessions import</code> for moving portable session archives between machines. Thanks <a href="https://github.com/mvanhorn"><code>@mvanhorn</code></a>.</li> </ul> <h3>Release Proof</h3> <ul> <li>npm: <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/acpx/v/0.10.0">https://www.npmjs.com/package/acpx/v/0.10.0</a></li> <li>registry tarball: <a href="https://registry.npmjs.org/acpx/-/acpx-0.10.0.tgz">https://registry.npmjs.org/acpx/-/acpx-0.10.0.tgz</a></li> <li>integrity: <code>sha512-hd48XV03gG3sd409T1lDrOKJTTz1ap4g0wrndXjxQ590tN85pBYlvfNLyerybvGRrtUGsZjNdt99r1jpIt6ukA==</code></li> <li>release workflow: <a href="https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/actions/runs/26323055145">https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/actions/runs/26323055145</a></li> <li>CI: <a href="https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/actions/runs/26323053524">https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/actions/runs/26323053524</a></li> </ul> <h2>2026.5.22 (v0.9.0)</h2> <h3>Changes</h3> <ul> <li>Tooling: add Slophammer TypeScript quality gates for coverage, complexity, unsafe types, mutation testing, DRY checks, and dependency boundaries.</li> <li>Agents/built-ins: switch the default Codex adapter to <code>@agentclientprotocol/codex-acp</code>, with Codex model selection handled through advertised ACP model ids, and bump the default Claude ACP adapter range.</li> <li>Tooling: add a repo-local autoreview skill and helper for Codex-first</li> </ul> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Changelog</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md">acpx's changelog</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>2026.6.23 (v0.11.2)</h2> <h3>Changes</h3> <h3>Breaking</h3> <h3>Fixes</h3> <ul> <li>Runtime/status: persist token usage reported on successful prompt responses, including adapters that only provide a sparse <code>usage_update</code>.</li> </ul> <h2>Unreleased</h2> <h3>Changes</h3> <h3>Breaking</h3> <h3>Fixes</h3> <h2>2026.6.23 (v0.11.1)</h2> <h3>Changes</h3> <ul> <li>Runtime/embedding: preserve per-agent environment variables across ACP session creation, queue handoff, persistence, and reconnects. Thanks <a href="https://github.com/zhangguiping-xydt"><code>@zhangguiping-xydt</code></a>.</li> </ul> <h3>Breaking</h3> <h3>Fixes</h3> <ul> <li>CLI/queue: harden command parsing, queue-owner startup, stale process cleanup, and release/CI checks found by <code>clawpatch</code>.</li> <li>Windows/Claude: only export a native <code>.exe</code> as <code>CLAUDE_CODE_EXECUTABLE</code>; unresolved <code>.cmd</code>, <code>.bat</code>, and <code>.ps1</code> shims now fall back to the Claude ACP adapter's bundled native binary. Fixes <a href="https://redirect.github.com/openclaw/openclaw/issues/93465">openclaw/openclaw#93465</a>.</li> <li>Client/ACP: ignore non-object JSON lines from adapter stdout before ACP dispatch, preventing primitive frames from crashing the SDK message path.</li> <li>ACP/models: call the current SDK <code>session/set_model</code> method for legacy model metadata instead of the generic extension fallback.</li> <li>CLI/config: add <code>--mcp-config</code> for session-scoped MCP servers without writing a project config file. Live persistent sessions reject MCP config changes until closed. Fixes <a href="https://redirect.github.com/openclaw/acpx/issues/387">#387</a>.</li> </ul> <h2>2026.6.17 (v0.11.0)</h2> <h3>Changes</h3> <ul> <li>Agents/built-ins: bump the default Claude ACP adapter range to <code>@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp@^0.37.0</code>. Thanks <a href="https://github.com/trumpyla"><code>@trumpyla</code></a>.</li> <li>Runtime/embedding: surface cost, token usage breakdowns, and advertised command metadata on runtime status/events. Thanks <a href="https://github.com/DaniAkash"><code>@DaniAkash</code></a>.</li> <li>Agents/built-ins: add <code>fast-agent</code> as a built-in fast-agent ACP adapter via <code>uvx fast-agent-mcp acp</code>.</li> </ul> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/openclaw/acpx/commits/v0.11.2">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
8f3fa07d59 |
build(deps): bump @pierre/diffs from 1.1.22 to 1.2.11 (#8744)
Bumps @pierre/diffs from 1.1.22 to 1.2.11. [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
29a26cbd65 |
build(deps): bump @codemirror/state from 6.5.4 to 6.7.0 (#8736)
Bumps [@codemirror/state](https://github.com/codemirror/state) from 6.5.4 to 6.7.0. <details> <summary>Changelog</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/codemirror/state/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md">@codemirror/state's changelog</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>6.6.0 (2026-03-12)</h2> <h3>New features</h3> <p><code>EditorSelection.range</code> now takes an optional <code>assoc</code> argument.</p> <p><code>SelectionRange.extend</code> can now be given a third argument to specify associativity.</p> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/codemirror/state/commits">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
1b180fae1f |
build(deps): bump @agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp from 0.48.0 to 0.52.0 (#8745)
Bumps [@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp](https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp) from 0.48.0 to 0.52.0. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/releases">@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v0.52.0</h2> <h2><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.51.0...v0.52.0">0.52.0</a> (2026-06-25)</h2> <h3>Features</h3> <ul> <li>Add version flag handling (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/813">#813</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/9616bdac47505e4a14c36d667fcffc9ae97e1f2a">9616bda</a>), closes <a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/809">#809</a></li> <li><strong>deps-dev:</strong> bump expect-type from 1.3.0 to 1.4.0 in the minor group (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/814">#814</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/61272acb30dcafaa2455d334b11ce2ad97339707">61272ac</a>)</li> <li><strong>deps:</strong> Update <code>@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk</code> to 0.3.191 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/810">#810</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/228f02ecfb23be16e59e121c6b42c0f2b2f40a4e">228f02e</a>)</li> <li>Push session title updates at turn end (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/812">#812</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/1fe7ec09a3a7bcb7501231dae4b0ffe6ef9b70a4">1fe7ec0</a>)</li> </ul> <h2>v0.51.0</h2> <h2><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.50.0...v0.51.0">0.51.0</a> (2026-06-24)</h2> <h3>Features</h3> <ul> <li><strong>deps:</strong> bump the minor group with 11 updates (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/807">#807</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/8f6ebd1d9198edf723f4c8c1aa2b49b906c46646">8f6ebd1</a>)</li> </ul> <h2>v0.50.0</h2> <h2><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.49.0...v0.50.0">0.50.0</a> (2026-06-23)</h2> <h3>Features</h3> <ul> <li><strong>acp:</strong> Handle ACP request cancellation signals (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/801">#801</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/9013d1d46883a7f3774a63a9dca16c4a0f634a97">9013d1d</a>)</li> <li><strong>deps:</strong> bump actions/checkout from 6.0.3 to 7.0.0 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/803">#803</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/044c43e0c894082b9e747c01e9dbde6e21036823">044c43e</a>)</li> <li><strong>deps:</strong> upgrade to <code>@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk</code><a href="https://github.com/0"><code>@0</code></a>.3.186 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/806">#806</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/a7e6137f6877b72b8daa39e74971c3559db8d28f">a7e6137</a>)</li> </ul> <h2>v0.49.0</h2> <h2><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.48.0...v0.49.0">0.49.0</a> (2026-06-22)</h2> <h3>Features</h3> <ul> <li>Update to claude-agent-sdk 0.3.185 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/798">#798</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/8dc8c864263fa50d03bec7ebff7aee776604cb3d">8dc8c86</a>)</li> </ul> <h3>Bug Fixes</h3> <ul> <li>Deduplicate streamed assistant blocks by content (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/800">#800</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/960f62d76582ae5c9c5575ab66974809049ce1d0">960f62d</a>)</li> <li>Infer 1M context from model descriptions (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/799">#799</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/508453c288b4a12701abd507199e7fa0ab172171">508453c</a>)</li> </ul> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Changelog</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md">@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp's changelog</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.51.0...v0.52.0">0.52.0</a> (2026-06-25)</h2> <h3>Features</h3> <ul> <li>Add version flag handling (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/813">#813</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/9616bdac47505e4a14c36d667fcffc9ae97e1f2a">9616bda</a>), closes <a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/809">#809</a></li> <li><strong>deps-dev:</strong> bump expect-type from 1.3.0 to 1.4.0 in the minor group (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/814">#814</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/61272acb30dcafaa2455d334b11ce2ad97339707">61272ac</a>)</li> <li><strong>deps:</strong> Update <code>@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk</code> to 0.3.191 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/810">#810</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/228f02ecfb23be16e59e121c6b42c0f2b2f40a4e">228f02e</a>)</li> <li>Push session title updates at turn end (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/812">#812</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/1fe7ec09a3a7bcb7501231dae4b0ffe6ef9b70a4">1fe7ec0</a>)</li> </ul> <h2><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.50.0...v0.51.0">0.51.0</a> (2026-06-24)</h2> <h3>Features</h3> <ul> <li><strong>deps:</strong> bump the minor group with 11 updates (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/807">#807</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/8f6ebd1d9198edf723f4c8c1aa2b49b906c46646">8f6ebd1</a>)</li> </ul> <h2><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.49.0...v0.50.0">0.50.0</a> (2026-06-23)</h2> <h3>Features</h3> <ul> <li><strong>acp:</strong> Handle ACP request cancellation signals (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/801">#801</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/9013d1d46883a7f3774a63a9dca16c4a0f634a97">9013d1d</a>)</li> <li><strong>deps:</strong> bump actions/checkout from 6.0.3 to 7.0.0 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/803">#803</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/044c43e0c894082b9e747c01e9dbde6e21036823">044c43e</a>)</li> <li><strong>deps:</strong> upgrade to <code>@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk</code><a href="https://github.com/0"><code>@0</code></a>.3.186 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/806">#806</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/a7e6137f6877b72b8daa39e74971c3559db8d28f">a7e6137</a>)</li> </ul> <h2><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.48.0...v0.49.0">0.49.0</a> (2026-06-22)</h2> <h3>Features</h3> <ul> <li>Update to claude-agent-sdk 0.3.185 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/798">#798</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/8dc8c864263fa50d03bec7ebff7aee776604cb3d">8dc8c86</a>)</li> </ul> <h3>Bug Fixes</h3> <ul> <li>Deduplicate streamed assistant blocks by content (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/800">#800</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/960f62d76582ae5c9c5575ab66974809049ce1d0">960f62d</a>)</li> <li>Infer 1M context from model descriptions (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/799">#799</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/508453c288b4a12701abd507199e7fa0ab172171">508453c</a>)</li> </ul> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/e9163f855398511c6eec0116216d8c06c52ec658"><code>e9163f8</code></a> chore(main): release 0.52.0 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/811">#811</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/61272acb30dcafaa2455d334b11ce2ad97339707"><code>61272ac</code></a> feat(deps-dev): bump expect-type from 1.3.0 to 1.4.0 in the minor group (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/814">#814</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/9616bdac47505e4a14c36d667fcffc9ae97e1f2a"><code>9616bda</code></a> feat: Add version flag handling (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/813">#813</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/1fe7ec09a3a7bcb7501231dae4b0ffe6ef9b70a4"><code>1fe7ec0</code></a> feat: Push session title updates at turn end (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/812">#812</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/228f02ecfb23be16e59e121c6b42c0f2b2f40a4e"><code>228f02e</code></a> feat(deps): Update <code>@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk</code> to 0.3.191 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/810">#810</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/23626c9a43b4fa2b4e98cf1abb25c55985711075"><code>23626c9</code></a> chore(main): release 0.51.0 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/808">#808</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/8f6ebd1d9198edf723f4c8c1aa2b49b906c46646"><code>8f6ebd1</code></a> feat(deps): bump the minor group with 11 updates (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/807">#807</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/07911601ccd2b8d8628aed545f7715c6aa0fa429"><code>0791160</code></a> chore(main): release 0.50.0 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/802">#802</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/a7e6137f6877b72b8daa39e74971c3559db8d28f"><code>a7e6137</code></a> feat(deps): upgrade to <code>@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk</code><a href="https://github.com/0"><code>@0</code></a>.3.186 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/806">#806</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/044c43e0c894082b9e747c01e9dbde6e21036823"><code>044c43e</code></a> feat(deps): bump actions/checkout from 6.0.3 to 7.0.0 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/803">#803</a>)</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.48.0...v0.52.0">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
8d9f9fd240 |
Add reusable sandbox custom images (#8794)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A growing part of that work runs in sandboxed environments rather than on the operator's local machine. > - Today sandbox providers can start fresh workspaces and run probes, but they do not have a shared contract for capturing and reusing prepared sandbox state. > - Operators need a way to set up tools, credentials, and project dependencies once, then reuse that prepared image for later agent runs. > - This pull request adds reusable sandbox custom images across the provider contract, server runtime, and board UI. > - It also keeps probes and sandbox copy flows aligned with pre-authenticated/custom-image environments. > - The benefit is faster, more reliable sandbox runs without repeatedly rebuilding the same environment setup. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue was found for this change. Inline feature request follows. ### Problem or motivation Sandboxed agents need reusable prepared runtime state so repeated runs do not require manual setup every time. Operators often need system packages, CLIs, SDKs, dependency caches, credentials, and project tooling available before an agent can work productively. ### Proposed solution Add a provider-level custom-image capability, server-side setup/capture lifecycle, Daytona/fake provider support, and board UI controls for creating, testing, selecting, and deleting custom images. ### Alternatives considered Leaving this as provider-specific setup outside Paperclip would keep the control plane blind to image state and would not give agents consistent environment metadata. Re-running setup commands for every lease is simpler, but slower and less reliable for interactive or credentialed setup. ### Roadmap alignment Checked `ROADMAP.md`; this aligns with the Cloud / Sandbox agents roadmap area and does not duplicate any related public issue or PR found by search. Additional context: - Subsystem affected: cross-cutting (`packages/db`, `packages/shared`, `packages/plugins`, `server`, `ui`). - Duplicate search: searched GitHub for `sandbox custom image` and `sandbox template environment`; no related public issues or PRs were found. ## What Changed - Added custom-image shared types, validators, constants, API paths, and database schema/migration. - Added server services/routes for custom-image templates and setup sessions, including runtime cleanup and provider metadata handling. - Extended plugin/sandbox provider capabilities for interactive setup, template capture, and template deletion. - Implemented custom-image support in the fake sandbox provider and Daytona provider. - Updated environment runtime/config handling so active custom images flow into leases, probes, and agent execution. - Added board UI controls and API client support for custom-image setup, capture, selection, status, and error states. - Hardened sandbox copy/probe behavior for insecure clipboard contexts and pre-authenticated sandbox images. - Added targeted coverage across shared validators, DB schema, server routes/services, provider plugins, adapter probes, and UI flows. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts` - `pnpm vitest run packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/test.probe.test.ts packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/test.ts packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/test.remote.test.ts packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local typecheck` - `pnpm vitest run packages/db/src/environment-custom-images-schema.test.ts packages/shared/src/environment-custom-images.test.ts packages/shared/src/validators/plugin.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-custom-images-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona/src/plugin.test.ts ui/src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.test.tsx ui/src/pages/CompanySettings.test.tsx` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - `rm -rf packages/db/dist && pnpm test:run` - Public-safety scan of the final diff found no internal Paperclip issue links, private instance URLs, or real secret patterns. ## Risks - Adds a database migration and new environment runtime tables, so migration ordering and rollback need care. - Provider implementations may differ in how reliably they can capture/delete images; unsupported providers surface capability-gated UI states. - Custom-image state can contain operator-prepared tooling and credentials inside the provider image, so providers must enforce their own access controls and cleanup semantics. - Broad surface area across shared contracts, server runtime, plugins, adapters, and UI means CI and Greptile review should be watched closely. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 (`gpt-5`) via Codex CLI with tool use and code execution. Assisted with branch cleanup, conflict resolution, local verification, and PR preparation. Earlier branch implementation work was assisted by Paperclip-managed Claude/Codex agents. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
0c2ec7deb4 |
Fix sandboxed Claude and Codex probe behavior (#8775)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Local adapters are the bridge between Paperclip's control plane and provider CLIs such as Claude Code and Codex. > - Those adapters can run either on the host machine or inside a remote/sandbox execution target. > - Sandbox probes need to validate the same auth/config path that real sandbox execution will use. > - The previous probe paths could surface misleading Claude errors, rely on host-only Codex state, or upload far more Codex home state than the probe needed. > - This pull request fixes the Claude and Codex sandbox probe/runtime behavior together while keeping provider-specific sandbox image work out of scope. > - The benefit is faster, clearer adapter health checks that better match real sandbox execution. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue was found for this exact bug during duplicate search. Bug report: **What happened?** Sandboxed Claude/Codex adapter tests could diverge from real runtime auth/config behavior. Claude sandbox probes could show the leading stream init line instead of the real final error, and Codex sandbox probes could upload full managed home state or mask a sandbox-local login with an empty uploaded `CODEX_HOME`. **Expected behavior** Sandbox probes should exercise the remote runtime contract, preserve useful sandbox credentials, avoid relying on unrelated host state, and report actionable probe failures. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Configure a remote/sandbox execution target for `claude_local` or `codex_local`. 2. Run the environment Test/probe path where host credentials differ from the sandbox's runtime credentials or the managed Codex home contains session history. 3. Observe that probe behavior can differ from the actual sandbox runtime path or surface an unhelpful Claude stream initialization line. **Paperclip version or commit** Current `master` before this PR, based on `4a2447da3`. **Deployment mode** Local development/control-plane deployment with remote sandbox execution targets. Related search performed: - Public issues: `Claude sandbox probe`, `Codex CODEX_HOME sandbox` returned no matches. - Public PRs: `Claude Codex sandbox probe`, `codex home sandbox`, `claude auth sandbox` returned no matches. ## What Changed - Made Claude sandbox Test probes materialize the same Paperclip-managed Claude config seed path used by sandbox execution. - Preserved sandbox-local Claude credentials when materializing remote Claude config and expanded auth-required detection for `/login` API-key failures. - Improved Claude hello-probe diagnostics so the final result/error is surfaced instead of the unhelpful stream init event, with transient upstream failures downgraded to warnings. - Changed Codex probe behavior to upload only minimal auth/config files instead of the full managed `CODEX_HOME`. - Let Codex sandbox probes leave `CODEX_HOME` unset when the host has no credentials, so pre-authenticated sandbox images can be tested directly. - Excluded bulky host-local Codex session/shell state from sandbox runtime home uploads. - Switched the Codex local default model away from the ChatGPT-unsupported `gpt-5.3-codex` option. - Added regression coverage for Claude parsing/probe paths, Codex adapter metadata/argument/probe behavior, and server-level Claude sandbox environment behavior. ## Verification Passed locally: - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm vitest run packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/parse.test.ts packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/test.probe.test.ts server/src/__tests__/claude-local-adapter-environment.test.ts` - `pnpm vitest run packages/adapters/codex-local/src/index.test.ts packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/codex-args.test.ts packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/test.remote.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `git diff --check` ## Risks - Adapter configuration behavior is sensitive to local vs sandboxed execution mode, so review should focus on environment detection, argument construction, and any state written during probe/test runs. - The Codex default-model change may affect newly created agents that rely on the adapter default instead of an explicit model. - Excluding Codex session/shell state from sandbox uploads should be safe for fresh sandbox runs, but reviewers should confirm no runtime resume path depends on that host-local state. - Provider-specific setup/capture behavior is intentionally left to separate work. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local`; tool-enabled local coding session with terminal access. Context window size was not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
3e31bf09bc |
[codex] Add pipeline automation title templates (#8787)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Pipeline automations let operators standardize repeated issue and workflow actions. > - Pipeline-created issues currently need a way to derive useful titles from routine variables. > - Without a configurable title template, automated pipeline output is harder to scan and distinguish. > - This pull request adds a title-template field through shared contracts, server persistence, API routes, and the pipeline settings UI. > - The benefit is clearer issue titles for pipeline-created work while preserving the existing pipeline behavior when no template is configured. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #8790 This PR adds configurable generated-issue title templates for pipeline automations. ## What Changed - Added `issueTitleTemplate` to the shared pipeline automation contract and field constants. - Persisted and returned the title template through pipeline service and route code. - Applied title-template rendering when pipeline automations create issue work. - Added pipeline settings UI controls for editing the title template and reusing routine variables. - Moved title-token cursor restoration out of the React state updater and into a layout effect. - Added server and UI coverage for storing, returning, and rendering pipeline title templates. ## Verification - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/pipelines-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/pipelines-routes.test.ts ui/src/pages/PipelineSettings.test.ts` - Result before review follow-up: 3 files passed, 58 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/PipelineSettings.test.ts` - Result after review follow-up: 1 file passed, 7 tests passed. - Branch was merged with current `paperclipai:master` at `f019f54bb3` before opening this PR. - Searched existing PRs for the same head branch and for pipeline title-template duplicates; no matching existing PR was found. - Note: GitHub could not open a PR directly from `cryppadotta/paperclip` because that repository is not a fork of `paperclipai/paperclip`. The same updated branch SHA was pushed to `paperclipai/paperclip` so this PR can compare normally against `master`. ## Risks Low to moderate risk. The change touches pipeline automation persistence and generated issue creation, so regressions would most likely appear as missing or incorrectly rendered generated issue titles. Existing behavior should remain unchanged when `issueTitleTemplate` is unset. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-enabled execution in a Paperclip heartbeat, with repository inspection, Git, GitHub CLI, and local test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
a7a73d5bc7 |
Fix stale server info debug metadata (#8753)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The experimental server info debug view helps local operators inspect what code a running dev instance is actually serving > - The view was moved into the account-menu drawer, which only mounts while that drawer is open > - That made stale health-query data easier to see after restarts, and the server was also caching the running commit at process boot > - A clean commit label alone is incomplete when the checkout has uncommitted local changes > - This pull request keeps the drawer health data fresh, refreshes git metadata on demand, and adds a path-free checkout-state summary > - The benefit is that the debug view reports restart time, running commit, and dirty-checkout state without exposing local paths, secrets, logs, or environment details ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes: #8752 ## What Changed - `SidebarServerInfo.tsx`: refetch the health query whenever the drawer opens and poll every 2s while the dev server is active. - `server-info.ts`: keep `processStartedAt` stable while refreshing git HEAD through a short TTL cache instead of freezing commit metadata at module boot. - Shared health contract/OpenAPI: add `serverInfo.git.localChanges` with only staged, unstaged, and untracked counts plus safe unavailable fallbacks. - `SidebarServerInfo.tsx`: add a `Checkout state` row that renders clean/dirty/unavailable copy without file paths. - Tests: cover stale drawer refresh, interval polling, TTL commit refresh, health response shape, checkout-state count parsing, and path-free UI rendering. ## Verification - `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/server-info.test.ts server/src/__tests__/health.test.ts ui/src/components/SidebarServerInfo.test.tsx` -> 3 files / 19 tests passing. - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts` -> refreshed stale workspace links without lockfile/source churn. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared --filter @paperclipai/server --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` -> passing. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` -> passing after the Greptile test-coverage fix. - `pnpm check:tokens` -> no forbidden tokens found. - Local diff scans for obvious secrets, credentials, private URLs, local paths, and PII patterns -> no matches. - GitHub PR checks on head `56defd446` -> all green, including `verify`, canary dry run, e2e, security scans, and Greptile Review. - Greptile latest summary -> Confidence Score 5/5, 0 new comments; the prior P2 polling-coverage thread is resolved. ## Risks Low risk. The UI remains behind the experimental `enableServerInfoDebugView` flag. The extra git status call is throttled by the existing server-info TTL and reports only counts, not paths or file names. If git status is unavailable, the commit row still works and the checkout-state row shows clear fallback copy. ## Model Used Claude Opus (claude-opus-4-8), extended thinking, with tool use / code execution assisted the original stale-metadata fix. OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex local, with tool use and code execution, added the checkout-state follow-up, Greptile fix-up, and PR verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
5e3d6e3627 |
[codex] Preserve plan review context in agent wakes (#8649)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Planning work relies on issue documents, request-confirmation interactions, and inline plan annotations > - Agents can be woken after a plan comment, annotation, or confirmation decision > - The wake payload needs enough plan-review context for the agent to act on the specific feedback instead of losing the thread and falling back to broad refetches > - This pull request adds bounded plan-review context to wake payloads and heartbeat context > - It also teaches the adapter wake prompt renderer to surface those open plan annotations and interaction results directly > - The benefit is that agents can continue plan review and plan acceptance flows with the relevant comments in hand while keeping wake payloads bounded and company-scoped ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No matching public GitHub issue was found. ### Subsystem affected Cross-cutting: `server/`, `packages/shared`, and `packages/adapter-utils`. ### Problem or motivation Plan-review continuations can wake an agent after a plan comment, inline annotation, or request-confirmation decision without enough inline context about the open plan annotations or accepted/rejected confirmation target. That makes scoped wakes less reliable because the agent may need to refetch broad issue history before it can tell what feedback should be incorporated. ### Proposed solution Include bounded, company-scoped plan review context in wake payloads and heartbeat context. The context includes open `plan` annotation threads, recent annotation comments, truncation metadata, and plan-confirmation interaction target/result details. Render that information in the adapter wake prompt so agents see the relevant plan-review feedback immediately. ### Alternatives considered Relying on agents to fetch the full issue thread after every plan-review wake was rejected because it is slower, harder to audit, and easier to mishandle when the wake is meant to be scoped to a specific comment, annotation, or interaction result. ### Roadmap alignment This supports the roadmap areas for Agent Reviews and Approvals, Deep Planning, and Enforced Outcomes by making plan approval continuations explicit and actionable. ### Additional context The implementation keeps payload size bounded with per-thread, per-comment, and total-body limits. Resolved annotation threads are intentionally omitted so the wake focuses on feedback still needing action. ## What Changed - Added shared `PlanReviewContext` types for plan annotation threads, comments, interaction targets, and continuation results. - Added server-side plan review context assembly for open `plan` annotation threads with bounded thread/comment/body limits. - Included plan review context in heartbeat context and scoped wake payloads for planning, annotation, comment, and plan-confirmation interaction wakes. - Rendered plan annotation deltas, open plan comments, interaction results, and accepted target revisions in adapter wake prompts. - Added focused regression coverage for scoped plan review context, wake prompt rendering, annotation filtering, and safe standard-mode annotation wakes. - Addressed Greptile feedback by bounding the plan-comment DB fetch and removing unused plan review context input fields. ## Verification - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server --no-file-parallelism --maxWorkers=1 server/src/__tests__/document-annotations-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-goal-context-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `git diff --check public-gh/master...HEAD` - GitHub PR checks are green on `36d0ac6a5dce27b9d62e201bf6d9829170c5974e`n- Rebased onto current `paperclipai/paperclip:master` and confirmed GitHub reports the PR as mergeable - Greptile Review completed successfully after 2 comments were addressed and resolved; 0 unresolved review threads remain ## Risks - Medium: wake payloads now include additional plan-review data, so limits and truncation behavior need to stay conservative as annotation volume grows. - Low migration risk: no database schema or migration changes. - Low repository hygiene risk: this PR does not touch `pnpm-lock.yaml`, `.github/workflows`, or media assets. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex using `gpt-5` as a coding agent with shell/tool execution. Reasoning mode and exact context window were not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
e6407b3225 |
refactor: revert X mention poller backend (#8709)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The core server and database packages should only carry features that are ready to remain in the product surface. > - The X mention poller backend added database tables, Drizzle schema exports, a server service, and a server test suite. > - That backend work needs to be removed from core for now so the main app does not carry unused X mention poller infrastructure. > - A clean revert is safer than leaving partially unused database and service code behind. > - This pull request removes the poller backend artifacts and keeps the migration journal aligned with the reverted migration history. > - The benefit is that fresh environments no longer create or expose the X mention poller backend tables or service code. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this revert. Duplicate PR search: searched open PRs in `paperclipai/paperclip` for "x mention poller"; only this PR matched. ### What happened? Core contained X mention poller backend infrastructure that should not remain in the main Paperclip product surface right now. ### Expected behavior Fresh core installs and migrations should not create the X mention poller tables, and the server/db packages should not expose the removed poller service or schema exports. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Inspect the prior migration journal after the original poller backend commit. 2. Inspect the Drizzle schema exports. 3. Inspect the server services and tests for X mention poller backend artifacts. ### Paperclip version or commit This PR reverts the backend artifacts from the current `master` history. ### Deployment mode Local development and CI. ## What Changed - Deleted the `0125_x_mention_poller` migration and removed its journal entry so fresh environments do not create the X mention poller tables. - Removed the X mention Drizzle schema file and schema exports from the db package. - Removed the X mention poller server service and its server test suite. - Left the functional diff unchanged from the original revert. ## Verification - `rg -n "x_mentions|x-mention-poller|mention poller|0125_x_mention_poller|xMention" packages server` returned no matches. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - Current functional CI checks are green; this metadata update is intended to re-run and clear the `commitperclip PR Review` gate. ## Risks - Developers who already applied migration `0125_x_mention_poller` locally will keep four stale tables that Drizzle no longer tracks: `x_mention_sources`, `x_mention_author_allowlist`, `x_mentions`, and `x_mention_budget_ledger`. - Manual local cleanup for those developers is to drop the stale `x_mention_*` tables from their local database after confirming they do not need that local data. - Fresh environments that have not applied the removed migration should be unaffected. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 family, via the ACPX-backed Codex local adapter. Tool use included local shell inspection and GitHub CLI metadata updates. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
44e2ab53fe |
feat: add X mention poller backend (#8707)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents and operators increasingly need external event sources to become durable Paperclip work inputs > - X mentions are one such source, but intake needs to be safe before any downstream automation consumes them > - The backend needs stable source state, idempotent mention storage, author gating, rate-limit handling, and budget accounting > - This pull request adds the database contract and service layer for X mention polling and hydration queueing > - The benefit is that future X-triggered workflows can build on a controlled, test-covered ingestion path instead of calling the X API directly ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - No public GitHub issue exists for this exact backend extraction. - Problem: Paperclip does not yet have a durable, budget-aware backend path for ingesting X mentions as external work inputs. - Proposed solution: add X mention source, mention, allowlist, and budget ledger tables plus a poller service that stores mentions idempotently, queues only allowlisted authors for hydration, tracks cursor state, records spend decisions, and fails closed when cost estimates are unavailable. - Related but not duplicate: #8609, #8199, and #7316 touch internal mention wake behavior rather than X API mention ingestion. ## What Changed - Added X mention poller database tables and schema exports for sources, stored mentions, author allowlists, and budget ledger entries. - Added a server-side X mention poller service with cursoring, idempotent upsert behavior, allowlist gating, hydration queue handling, rate-limit backoff, and budget pause behavior. - Added focused Vitest coverage for intake gating, duplicate retries, cursor safety, rate limits, budget failures, and hydration budget pauses. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/x-mention-poller.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` ## Risks - Migration ordering matters because this adds migration `0125_x_mention_poller.sql`; it should merge after the existing `0124` migrations on `master`. - The service is backend-only and adapter-driven in this PR, so product behavior should not change until callers wire it into a runtime path. - Budget accounting intentionally fails closed when estimates are missing, which may pause a source rather than risk unbounded API spend. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-enabled local repository and terminal workflow. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d77fab6aae |
fix(adapters/hermes-gateway): improve onboarding configuration (#8678)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip runs agents through adapters, including built-in local and gateway-style adapters. > - Hermes gateway users need to connect Paperclip to an already-running Hermes API server. > - The gateway setup flow was missing clear non-local adapter configuration fields and accepted fewer URL shapes than operators naturally paste from Hermes. > - It also surfaced sparse diagnostics when the gateway was unreachable or when Paperclip generated onboarding prompts for gateway agents. > - This pull request tightens Hermes gateway configuration, URL normalization, diagnostics, and onboarding defaults. > - The benefit is that Hermes gateway setup is easier to complete and easier to debug without affecting unrelated adapters. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue found for this exact follow-up. Related prior/in-flight Hermes work: - Refs #2363 - Refs #4359 - Refs #6473 Problem statement: - **Type:** Adapter follow-up / setup reliability - **Adapter:** `hermes_gateway` - **Motivation:** Operators configure `hermes_gateway` against a running Hermes API server, but the UI and onboarding flow did not expose enough gateway-specific configuration or diagnostics. - **Expected behavior:** Paperclip should render the gateway fields, normalize common Hermes dashboard/API URL inputs, preserve sensible gateway onboarding defaults, and report reachability failures with actionable detail. - **Deployment mode:** Built-in adapter package in the Paperclip monorepo. ## What Changed - Added UI config fields for non-local Hermes gateway settings, including tests for rendering and field behavior. - Accepted Hermes dashboard URLs by normalizing them to gateway API URLs for execution. - Improved gateway reachability and run URL diagnostics. - Updated Hermes gateway onboarding text/default behavior so join prompts preserve gateway configuration. - Added focused server, UI, and adapter tests for the gateway configuration and onboarding paths. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --prefer-offline` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/hermes-paperclip-adapter exec vitest run src/gateway/server/execute.test.ts` — 20 passed - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/invite-accept-gateway-defaults.test.ts server/src/__tests__/invite-onboarding-text.test.ts ui/src/adapters/hermes-gateway/config-fields.test.tsx ui/src/components/AgentConfigForm.render.test.tsx ui/src/lib/agent-onboarding-prompt.test.ts` — 23 passed across 5 files - Confirmed the PR diff excludes `pnpm-lock.yaml` and `.github/workflows`. ## Risks Low to moderate risk. The changes are scoped to Hermes gateway configuration/onboarding and generic non-local adapter field rendering. The main risk is rejecting an unusual Hermes URL shape that should be accepted; the normalization tests cover dashboard and API URL variants added here. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in a tool-enabled local CLI environment, with shell/GitHub/Paperclip API access. Exact runtime model identifier was not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
765a75207a |
Add experimental server info debug view (#8676)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The dev/server UI exposes a `/api/health` endpoint and a lower-left
account drawer, but nothing surfaces *which* build the running instance
is on or when it last restarted
> - When iterating on a local dev instance it is hard to tell whether
the server you're looking at has actually restarted onto your latest
commit, or how stale the running process is
> - Developers need a lightweight, opt-in way to confirm the running
instance's identity without digging through logs or shelling into the
host
> - This pull request adds an experimental "Server Info Debug View"
setting that surfaces the running instance's last-restart time and
current commit as read-only rows in the account drawer
> - The benefit is a quick, in-UI sanity check of what the live server
is actually running, behind an experimental flag so it ships zero cost
to users who don't opt in
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue exists. Describing the underlying request inline
following the feature request template:
**Problem or motivation:**
When working against a local Paperclip dev instance there is no in-UI
way to confirm what the running server is — its current commit or when
it last restarted. You have to check logs or the host shell to know
whether the process picked up your latest build.
**Proposed solution:**
An opt-in experimental setting ("Server Info Debug View") that, once
enabled, renders a small read-only "Server" section at the bottom of the
lower-left account drawer showing **Last restarted** (the server process
start time) and **Running commit** (the current git HEAD short SHA +
subject).
**Alternatives considered:**
A separate top-right pill/overlay (like the work-life-balance plugin).
The account drawer was chosen to reuse existing menu-row styling and
avoid adding new always-present chrome.
**Roadmap alignment:**
Small, self-contained developer-experience aid gated behind an
experimental flag; does not overlap planned core roadmap work.
## What Changed
- Added `server/src/server-info.ts`: captures a `serverInfo` snapshot
once at boot — process start time and current git commit (SHA +
subject). Git is read via `execFileSync` with SHA validation and a
timeout.
- `/api/health` exposes the `serverInfo` snapshot, but only on
full-details health responses (board/agent in authenticated mode, or
local-trusted dev).
- Gated the UI surface behind a new `enableServerInfoDebugView`
experimental setting, wired through the shared instance type, validator,
settings normalizer, and OpenAPI schema.
- UI: added `SidebarServerInfo` rendering the read-only rows in the
account drawer (`BreadcrumbBar` / `SidebarAccountMenu`), plus the
experimental settings toggle and a typed `health` API client.
- Moved `ServerGitInfo` / `ServerInfoSnapshot` into
`@paperclipai/shared` so the server and UI share one definition instead
of duplicating it.
- Added unit tests for the server-info snapshot, health route exposure,
validator/normalizer, settings routes, the experimental settings page,
and the sidebar component.
## Verification
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run
src/__tests__/health.test.ts src/__tests__/server-info.test.ts
src/__tests__/instance-settings-service.test.ts
src/__tests__/instance-settings-routes.test.ts` — 32 passed
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/components/SidebarServerInfo.test.tsx
src/pages/InstanceExperimentalSettings.test.tsx` — 9 passed
- `tsc --noEmit` on both `@paperclipai/server` and `@paperclipai/ui` —
clean
- Manual: enable **Settings → Experimental → Server Info Debug View**,
refresh the UI, open the lower-left account drawer — a "Server" section
shows Last restarted and Running commit.
## Risks
- Low risk. The UI surface is fully opt-in via an experimental flag and
defaults off.
- The `serverInfo` field on `/api/health` is access-controlled to
full-details responses only (board/agent in authenticated mode, or
local-trusted dev) — never anonymous authenticated callers — so the git
SHA is not broadly exposed.
- The only new server work is a one-time git read at boot, guarded with
SHA validation and a timeout; failures degrade gracefully (the git block
reports `available: false` rather than throwing).
## Model Used
Claude — `claude-opus-4` (Anthropic), extended thinking with tool use,
via Claude Code.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no
instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
fd2f82ac5b |
[codex] Add built-in Hermes adapters (#8543)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent adapters are the boundary between the control plane and the runtimes that actually do work. > - Hermes support needs to be available as first-class local and gateway adapters while still preserving the adapter-manager override path for external packages. > - The adapter work touches runtime execution, UI adapter metadata, onboarding prompts, scoped credentials, release packaging, and smoke coverage, so the handoff needs concrete verification rather than only unit tests. > - This pull request adds built-in Hermes local and Hermes gateway support, keeps external adapter overrides compatible, and documents/tests the gateway flow end to end. > - The benefit is that operators can hire Hermes-backed agents without a manual plugin install, while self-hosted installs can still override/shadow the built-ins through Adapter manager packages. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this exact Hermes built-in adapter, gateway onboarding, and release-source work. Problem description: - Hermes local and gateway adapters need a public, reviewable source path in the monorepo so package artifacts and built-in adapter behavior match the application source. - Operators need built-in `hermes_local` and `hermes_gateway` adapter choices without losing the ability to install external Hermes packages as overrides. - Gateway onboarding needs secure defaults for API server URLs, API keys, and generated agent setup text. - Hermes-originated task bridge credentials need narrower API-key scope configuration. - Related public PRs found during duplicate search include #3027, #2363, #7544, #7950, #8095, and #8543. ## What Changed - Added the unified Hermes adapter package with local and gateway server/UI/CLI exports, config schemas, transcript parsing, model detection, and package metadata. - Registered `hermes_local` and `hermes_gateway` as built-in adapters across shared constants, server registries, CLI packaging, and UI adapter registries. - Kept the external adapter override path compatible so installed Hermes packages can shadow built-ins and restore the built-in parser when disabled. - Added Hermes gateway onboarding docs, board-operator docs, Docker smoke assets, and shell smoke harnesses for join/e2e validation. - Added scoped task-bridge API-key support, authorization checks, issue-origin handling, and tests for Hermes-created Paperclip tasks. - Hardened gateway transport and redaction behavior for API keys, headers, session data, and smoke diagnostics. - Updated release packaging/bootstrap checks for the Hermes packages while leaving `pnpm-lock.yaml` out of the PR per repository policy. ## Verification Targeted local verification recorded before PR handoff: - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/hermes-paperclip-adapter exec vitest run src/gateway/server/execute.test.ts` — 14/14 passed. - `pnpm test:hermes-gateway-smoke` — 6/6 passed. - Hermes package typecheck/build checks passed. - Focused server/UI adapter tests passed — 31/31. - Release helper Node tests passed — 18/18. - `git diff --check origin/master..HEAD` passed. Fresh Docker E2E smoke evidence: - Ran `pnpm smoke:hermes-gateway-e2e` on 2026-06-26 with a fresh state directory and fresh Docker container against a live Paperclip dev server. - Hermes direct execution reached `completed`. - Hermes stop/cancel path reached `cancelled`. - Hermes gateway created a Paperclip task, Paperclip ran the Hermes agent, and the task reached `done` with the expected marker response. - Temporary board auth keys, token files, smoke state, and Docker containers were cleaned up after the run. PR checks on head `b5eae40ce`: - GitHub Actions passed: `policy`, `review`, `Typecheck + Release Registry`, all general test shards, all serialized server shards, `Build`, `Canary Dry Run`, `e2e`, and aggregate `verify`. - External checks passed: Snyk and Socket Project Report. - External Socket Pull Request Alerts remained pending after the first-party CI matrix completed. ## Risks - Medium risk: this spans adapter registration, package publishing, gateway execution, onboarding docs, API-key scoping, and UI adapter metadata. - Migration risk is low: the scope-config migration adds a nullable column and does not rewrite existing keys. - Gateway execution depends on operator-provided Hermes API configuration; the smoke covers the Docker gateway path but real deployments may differ by network/auth setup. - Direct Greptile review on the latest expanded diff is file-count limited, although the commitperclip review gate passed. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool use enabled in a local repository workspace. Context window size is not exposed in this environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Commitperclip review gate is green; direct Greptile review is file-count limited on the latest expanded diff - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
ef1422c23e |
fix(cursor): coalesce streamed assistant text into prose blocks (#8544)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agent runs stream their transcripts through per-adapter stdout
parsers into the chat/run transcript UI
(`ui/src/adapters/transcript.ts`)
> - The Cursor CLI (local) streams assistant text as many small `text`
events (often a token or word each), and the parser emitted one
assistant entry per event and trimmed each
> - As a result the chat rendered one bubble per token ("every line a
new token") and dropped inter-token whitespace, making Cursor runs hard
to read
> - The render layer already coalesces consecutive `delta` entries
(`appendTranscriptEntry`), but the Cursor parser never tagged streamed
text as a delta
> - This pull request tags streamed `text` as a delta (without trimming)
so the existing render-time coalescer merges them into one assistant
block, while a `tool_call`/`tool_result` between deltas still breaks the
run
> - The benefit is readable Cursor transcripts with correct spacing and
preserved tool boundaries, with no change to the canonical event stream
(raw view unaffected)
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No existing public issue — describing the bug inline (per
`.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml`):
**What happened**
In the chat/run transcript, Cursor (local) assistant messages render as
one bubble per token/word, and inter-token spaces are dropped, making
the transcript unreadable. Root cause:
`packages/adapters/cursor-local/src/ui/parse-stdout.ts` (`type: "text"`
branch) emitted `{ kind: "assistant" }` per streamed `text` event
without `delta: true` and trimmed each, so the render-time coalescer
(`ui/src/adapters/transcript.ts`) never merged them and whitespace was
lost.
**Expected behavior**
Streamed assistant text should render as a single contiguous prose
block, with tool calls preserved as boundaries between blocks.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run a Cursor (local) agent that streams a multi-word assistant
message.
2. Open the run transcript in the chat UI.
3. Observe each streamed token/word rendered as its own bubble, with
inter-token spaces missing.
**Paperclip version**
Reproduced on current `master` (cutover base `e68188c43`).
**Deployment mode**
Self-hosted, `cursor_local` adapter.
## What Changed
- `packages/adapters/cursor-local/src/ui/parse-stdout.ts`: tag streamed
`text` events as `{ kind: "assistant", delta: true }` and stop trimming,
so the existing `appendTranscriptEntry` coalescer merges consecutive
deltas into one block.
- `ui/src/adapters/cursor-coalescing.test.ts` (new): dual-shape golden
fixtures (Cursor local + cloud) exercising the full render-time
projection via `buildTranscript`.
## Verification
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/adapters/cursor-coalescing.test.ts src/adapters/transcript.test.ts`
→ **10/10 pass**.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui --filter
@paperclipai/adapter-cursor-local typecheck` → **green**.
- The golden fixtures assert the run `text → tool_call → tool_result →
text → consolidated final` renders as exactly **two prose blocks with
the tool between them**, **no duplication** of the consolidated final,
and **inter-token whitespace preserved** across coalesced deltas.
## Risks
- **Low risk.** Pure classification at parse time; the canonical event
stream and the raw view are unchanged — only the "nice" render-time
projection changes. The coalescing logic (`appendTranscriptEntry`) is
pre-existing and already covered by tests. No schema, migration, or
behavioral change outside transcript rendering.
## Model Used
- **Claude Opus 4.8** (Anthropic), extended/high reasoning mode, driven
via the Cursor agent with tool use + code execution. Diagnosis and
fixtures grounded in the repo's actual parser/render code.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above (none found)
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub references)
- [x] My branch name describes the change
(`fix/cursor-transcript-coalescing`) and contains no internal Paperclip
ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (N/A —
no documented behavior changes)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending CI run)
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
(pending review)
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Heyneman <sebastian@joinnova.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
|
||
|
Dotta
|
a329199e99 |
test(skills-catalog): cover packaged npm artifacts (#8661)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The skills catalog package publishes bundled and optional skills for installs and downstream runtime consumers. > - Published package consumers depend on both generated catalog manifests and the source skill files being present in the npm artifact. > - Prior fixes improved published package resolution, but the package contents themselves did not have a smoke test guarding against regressions. > - This pull request adds an npm-pack artifact test for the skills catalog package and hardens the test cleanup path. > - The benefit is that packaging regressions are caught before release instead of after users install a broken catalog package. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Bug description: The skills catalog npm artifact needs to include the generated catalog manifests plus bundled and optional skill files. Without a package-level smoke test, a future change to `files`, build output, or catalog paths could publish an artifact that installs successfully but cannot serve catalog consumers correctly. Expected behavior: The package artifact produced by `npm pack` includes `dist/generated/catalog.json`, `generated/catalog.json`, representative bundled and optional skill `SKILL.md` files, and `package.json`. Actual risk before this PR: Package content regressions could ship without a focused local test detecting the missing files. ## What Changed - Added a Vitest smoke test for `@paperclipai/skills-catalog` that runs `npm pack --json` and verifies required artifact paths. - Added a build fallback inside the test when `dist/generated/catalog.json` is absent before packing. - Packs into registered temporary directories and recursively removes them after each test run so generated `.tgz` files do not leak when parsing or assertions fail. - Allows enough time for the smoke test to exercise the build fallback path on fresh CI runners. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/skills-catalog test` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/skills-catalog clean && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/skills-catalog test` - Searched for duplicate/related PRs; existing PR #8327 is already merged and this PR adds regression coverage around the package artifact. - Checked `ROADMAP.md`; no overlapping roadmap entry for this packaging test. - Confirmed the branch diff does not touch `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows`. ## Risks Low risk. This is test-only coverage for package contents. The main practical risk is a slightly slower skills catalog test run because it invokes `npm pack` and may build the package manifest when `dist` is absent. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex coding agent with shell and GitHub CLI tool use. Context window not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
32ef854771 |
docs: expand capsule identicon prototyper guidance (#8665)
Reviewed by CTO for PAP-12039. Documentation/catalog-only change with regenerated manifest; focused catalog verification, CI, security scans, and Greptile are green. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
43b005b704 |
Add pipeline workflow primitives and operator UI (#7903)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The pipeline subsystem models repeatable work as items moving through stages, with agent automation, review gates, blockers, drift notices, and linked work. > - Operators need this to be usable as one coherent workflow surface, not just as backend primitives or disconnected route experiments. > - The branch now carries the pipeline data model, service/routes, CLI/tutorial path, aggregation feeds, operator UI, stage automation controls, liveness/retry handling, and follow-up polish that make the primitive reviewable end to end. > - This pull request is the single review target for that pipeline workflow primitive stack. > - The benefit is that reviewers can evaluate the full operator experience and server contract together against `master`. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this work. The underlying feature request is described inline. ### Problem or motivation Paperclip needs a first-class way to model multi-stage agent/company workflows where upstream items can spawn downstream work, request review, carry fields across pipelines, surface drift, retry automation, and show operators where work is blocked or active. Without a unified pipeline primitive, these workflows spread across ad hoc issues, routines, and comments, making the state hard to inspect or operate. ### Proposed solution Add the pipeline workflow primitive stack: database schema and migrations, shared validators/types, server services and REST routes, aggregation and liveness helpers, CLI/tutorial smoke support, and the React operator UI for pipeline lists, boards, item detail, review/learnings views, settings, stage automation, secrets, carry-over fields, and retry/recovery flows. ### Alternatives considered - Keep workflows as loosely linked issues and routines: rejected because operators need a single board/detail/settings surface for repeated workflow patterns. - Ship backend primitives first and defer UI: rejected for this branch because the operator experience is the main way to validate the primitive. - Add a narrower one-off content workflow: rejected because the same primitives are useful across future company processes. ## What Changed - Added and evolved pipeline schema, migrations, shared contracts, server services, REST routes, route tests, and CLI/tutorial smoke support. - Added pipeline aggregation, health/liveness, drift acknowledgment, blocker/carry-over, automation retry, stage automation environment, and permission recovery behavior. - Added the operator UI for pipeline index/board/item detail/settings/review/learnings flows, including stage secrets, automation controls, markdown/item descriptions, linked issue assets, liveness banners, and source automation metadata. - Refactored issue document frame rendering through the shared `DocumentFrameHeader` component to keep document controls consistent with the pipeline document surfaces. - Kept this PR as the single base-branch review target for the current pipeline branch. ## Verification Current branch refresh: - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/pipelines-service.test.ts` — 31 passed - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/pipelines-routes.test.ts` — 19 passed - `pnpm --filter ./server typecheck` — passed - `pnpm --filter ./ui typecheck` — passed - Verified Pipelines remains gated by `enablePipelines === true`: sidebar item is hidden unless the flag is enabled, direct pipeline routes redirect to `/dashboard` when disabled, and the Experimental settings UI still has no Pipelines toggle. - GitHub status checks on `df071c710646de625131064c3fb6588b5e97964a` — all complete with no failing conclusions, including Actions, Socket, Superagent/Security, and Greptile Review - Greptile summary on `df071c710646de625131064c3fb6588b5e97964a` — Confidence Score 5/5 - GitHub review-thread sweep — 0 unresolved Greptile threads Previously recorded during branch development: - Server pipeline service/route and aggregation tests - Shared validator tests - UI pipeline page/settings/item-detail/learnings/liveness tests - Pipeline tutorial smoke path ## Risks - High review surface: this is a large feature branch spanning database, shared contracts, server behavior, CLI/docs, and UI. - Migration ordering and schema compatibility need reviewer attention because this branch has been kept current across multiple `master` syncs. - GitHub still reports merge state `BLOCKED` because the PR is awaiting normal human review/branch-protection completion; all current status checks are green. - Branch-name checklist exception: this PR uses the pre-existing requested branch name, which predates the current public-branch naming rule. The PR title/body avoid internal issue references. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with repository tool use, shell execution, git/GitHub CLI operations, and local verification commands. Earlier commits in this branch were assisted by Paperclip agents and other AI coding agents as recorded in commit authorship. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b3c0fadd63 |
feat(routines): add date variable controls (#8655)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Scheduled routines can prompt agents with variables that are filled in at dispatch time. > - Existing routine variable handling supported plain text-like values, but date inputs need a structured contract so routines can pass consistent date values. > - Operators also need date variables to be easy to configure and override from the routine UI. > - This pull request adds a date variable type across shared validation, server dispatch, and UI editing/run dialogs. > - The benefit is that routine authors can define date inputs once and agents receive validated ISO-style date values when routines run. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #219 Feature request: - Problem/motivation: Scheduled routines need first-class, typed date variables so operators can configure dates without relying on free-form text conventions. - Proposed solution: Add an `x-date` routine variable type with shared parsing/validation, server dispatch support, and UI date-picker controls in routine variable editors and run dialogs. - Alternatives considered: Continue treating dates as plain text, but that leaves validation and formatting to individual operators and agents. - Roadmap alignment: This is a focused improvement to the completed Scheduled Routines milestone and does not duplicate an active roadmap item. Related PR search: - Searched existing PRs/issues for `routine date picker`, `date variables`, and `scheduled routine date variable`; no direct duplicate PR was found. ## What Changed - Added the shared `x-date` routine variable contract, parsing, defaults, and validation coverage. - Extended routine dispatch to validate and pass date variable values. - Added date input controls to the routine variable editor and routine run variables dialog. - Added focused tests for shared validation, server dispatch, and the UI date controls. ## Verification - `git diff --check public/master...HEAD` - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/routine-variables.test.ts packages/shared/src/validators/routine.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts ui/src/components/RoutineRunVariablesDialog.test.tsx ui/src/components/RoutineVariablesEditor.test.tsx` - 5 test files passed - 68 tests passed ## Risks Low to medium risk. This adds a new routine variable type across shared/server/UI paths, so the main risk is compatibility with existing routine variable payloads. The change keeps existing variable types intact and adds targeted validation tests for the new date behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with terminal, git, GitHub CLI, and local test execution capabilities. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
1a3e398107 |
Add bundled Paperclip capsules skill
Add the bundled paperclip-capsules skill, durable generator workflow references, catalog manifest updates, and shipped catalog coverage. |
||
|
Dotta
|
8f7282066e |
Add workspace file downloads
Add first-class workspace file downloads, broader attachment content-type support, and the stream-lifetime limiter fix from PR review. |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
569b7affc4 |
[codex] Add bounded workspace overview (#8627)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The execution workspace subsystem powers project and workspace views by listing runtime state, branch metadata, issue links, and status summaries. > - The existing workspace views relied on broad list data that can grow expensive as a company accumulates many workspaces and linked issues. > - That makes the Workspaces page and project workspace cards slower than necessary because the UI does not always need the full workspace detail payload up front. > - This pull request adds a bounded overview contract for workspace listings and moves the relevant UI surfaces to that cheaper path. > - The benefit is faster workspace loading while preserving detail fetches for pages that actually need full workspace data. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this change. Inline bug report follows the repository bug template. ### What happened? Workspace index-style screens can load too much execution workspace detail before the user asks for it. Several UI surfaces used fuller workspace data paths for summary displays, which can make workspace loading slower as workspace history grows. ### Expected behavior Overview screens should request a bounded summary payload, while detail screens should keep using the full workspace detail endpoint. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Run Paperclip from source with enough execution workspace history to make workspace lists non-trivial. 2. Open the Workspaces page or a project workspace summary card. 3. Observe that summary UI needs only bounded workspace metadata but can depend on broader workspace payloads. ### Paperclip version or commit `master` at the time this branch was prepared. ### Deployment mode Local dev (`pnpm dev`) ## What Changed - Added shared types, validators, and path constants for bounded execution workspace overviews. - Added server service and route support for overview queries with bounded linked issue/runtime metadata. - Updated workspace overview UI API calls, query keys, breadcrumbs, quicklooks, close dialogs, project summaries, and detail links to consume the cheaper overview shape where appropriate. - Added regression coverage for the new server route/service behavior and the UI overview consumers. - Registered the new workspace overview route in the generated OpenAPI spec. - Kept overview totals aligned with the project join and preserved project slug links in workspace headers. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-routes.test.ts ui/src/api/execution-workspaces.test.ts ui/src/components/ProjectWorkspaceSummaryCard.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Workspaces.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-service.test.ts` - `pnpm test:run:serialized -- --shard-index 1 --shard-count 4` ## Risks Low to medium risk. The change introduces a new overview contract across shared/server/ui layers, so the main risk is a mismatch between summary and detail payload expectations. The added route/service/UI tests cover the intended split, and full detail pages continue using the detail path. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent with repository tool use and local command execution. Exact served model identifier and context window were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
LeonSGP
|
3d7a4f12f9 |
fix(claude-local): use direct 4.5 model aliases (#3800)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - The `claude_local` adapter is the control-plane surface that turns Paperclip agent settings into concrete Claude CLI invocations. > - Issue #3777 reports that selecting Claude Haiku 4.5 from the Paperclip UI causes Claude Code to request `claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`, which some enterprise-scoped keys are not allowed to access. > - In the current adapter model list, the direct Anthropic 4.5 entries are version-pinned IDs, unlike the 4.6 entries which already use the stable short aliases. > - This pull request switches the direct 4.5 `claude_local` model options to the short aliases Claude Code account access expects, while leaving Bedrock-native IDs unchanged in the Bedrock-specific model list. > - The benefit is that selecting Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Haiku 4.5 from Paperclip no longer forces the CLI onto a more restrictive versioned direct model name. ## What Changed - Updated the direct `claude_local` adapter model list to use `claude-sonnet-4-5` instead of `claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929`. - Updated the direct `claude_local` adapter model list to use `claude-haiku-4-5` instead of `claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`. - Left the Bedrock-specific model IDs in `src/server/models.ts` unchanged so AWS Bedrock routing still uses region-qualified native IDs. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local typecheck` - Confirmed the only source change is `packages/adapters/claude-local/src/index.ts`. ## Risks - Low risk. This only changes the direct `claude_local` model IDs advertised by Paperclip for the two 4.5 options. - Bedrock behavior is unchanged because the Bedrock-native identifiers are defined separately and were not modified in this PR. - Existing 4.6 model options are untouched. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex on a GPT-5-class coding model with terminal tool use and local code execution in this workspace. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Fixes #3777 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ed65d08d57 |
[codex] Gate skill mutations with skills:create permission (#8616)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents and board users operate inside a company-scoped control plane where permissions decide which mutating actions they can perform > - Company skills are part of the reusable agent-company setup surface, but skill mutation had been coupled to broader agent-creation authority > - That coupling meant importing or managing skills required a permission that also implies hiring power, which is broader than the operation needs > - Paperclip already has a grant-based permission vocabulary, so skill mutation should be authorized through a dedicated `skills:create` capability while preserving existing default behavior for trusted agents > - This pull request adds the skill creation permission contract, enforces it on company skill mutations, exposes it in agent permission management, and documents the changed CLI/API expectations > - The benefit is a narrower, auditable permission path for skill import/create/update/delete flows without forcing agents to receive broader agent-creation authority ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue is linked. Problem: company skill mutation APIs were effectively tied to broader agent creation authority. This PR splits skill mutation authorization onto the public `skills:create` permission while keeping existing default skill creation behavior for agents unless explicitly disabled. Related public PR found during duplicate search: #5330. That PR uses an older `canManageSkills` shape; this PR implements the `skills:create` grant path instead. ## What Changed - Added `skills:create` to shared permission constants and agent permission types/validators as `canCreateSkills`. - Backfilled default human/member role grants for `skills:create`. - Updated company skill mutation routes to require board/user or agent access to `skills:create`, while preserving legacy/default agent behavior through `canCreateSkills` unless explicitly disabled. - Updated agent permission update handling, UI permission controls, duplicate-agent payloads, plugin SDK fixtures, and agent detail API surfaces for `canCreateSkills`. - Added regression coverage for skill route authorization, permission schema/default behavior, invite grants, omitted permission updates, and duplicate-agent payloads. - Updated CLI and Paperclip skill documentation for the new skill creation permission. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/agent-permissions-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-permissions-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-skills-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/invite-join-grants.test.ts ui/src/lib/duplicate-agent-payload.test.ts` — 5 files, 90 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm test:run ...changed files...` was attempted first, but the stable wrapper rejects explicit file arguments; direct Vitest was used for the same targeted files. ## Risks - Moderate authorization risk: this changes the gate for company skill mutations, so the tests cover board grant checks, agent explicit grant checks, legacy default allowance, and explicit denial. - Migration/backfill risk is low: the migration only grants `skills:create` to existing human roles that already need broad management capability. - UI/API compatibility risk is low: `canCreateSkills` remains default-on for full agent permissions, and the update validator preserves omitted values so unrelated permission edits do not re-enable disabled skill creation. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent with terminal/tool use enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
721541c41d |
Fix sandbox restore index drift (#8595)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Sandboxed agents can do useful work in a remote workspace, then export that result back to a host review checkout. > - A restore can leave the host checkout's index stale even when the sandbox content and committed state are correct. > - That drift makes reviewers see misleading missing-file or dirty-state results after sandbox execution. > - This pull request repairs the host index refresh path and surfaces a clean/dirty restore signal during finalization. > - The benefit is more reliable review checkouts and clearer sandbox finalization status. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #248 No exact public GitHub issue was found for this restore/index consistency fix. The underlying bug is that a sandbox restore can update host working-tree content without leaving the host git index aligned, so local review tooling may report stale deletions or misleading dirtiness. This PR keeps the restore/export path consistent and reports the resulting clean/dirty state. GitHub search performed for related or duplicate work: `sandbox runtime status`, `sandbox restore index`, and `runtime progress`. No direct duplicate PR was found. ## What Changed - Refreshed git workspace sync/index handling after sandbox restore/export operations. - Added finalization status that reports whether the restored host checkout is clean or dirty. - Preserved sandbox-managed runtime progress callbacks around restore and finalization. - Added adapter-utils tests covering the host index drift repair and clean/dirty finalization signal. ## Verification - Local PII scan before push: high-confidence secret patterns, internal issue links, local user paths, and private URL patterns checked across all three split diffs; no real secrets or internal links found. - `git diff --check feat/sandbox-runtime-status..fix/sandbox-restore-index-sync` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts` — 1 file, 10 tests passed. - `pnpm run typecheck` passed on `fix/sandbox-restore-index-sync`. - `pnpm run build` passed on `fix/sandbox-restore-index-sync`; Vite reported existing CSS `::highlight` and chunk-size warnings. - `pnpm run test:run` was attempted on `fix/sandbox-restore-index-sync`; it failed in two unrelated broad-suite tests. One depends on this host's Git default branch behavior, and one depends on local Claude model-discovery environment. The changed focused suite above passes. ## Risks - Git index refresh behavior needs to remain conservative so it does not hide real uncommitted user changes. - The clean/dirty finalization signal is diagnostic; it should not by itself mark a sandbox run successful or failed. - This PR is stacked on the runtime-status branch so finalization progress can reuse the same callback path. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex coding agent, with shell/tool execution in a local worktree. Exact context-window metadata is not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
a27e5ad002 |
Add ephemeral sandbox runtime status plumbing (#8593)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Sandboxed agent runs can spend meaningful time preparing a remote workspace before the agent transcript shows useful output. > - Operators need short, current progress text for those setup phases, but that text should not become durable run history. > - The existing live-run websocket path already carries run updates to the UI, so the backend can reuse that channel instead of adding polling. > - This pull request adds an ephemeral runtime-progress contract, a process-local status store, and heartbeat integration for sandbox-managed runs. > - The benefit is a clearer active-run experience without database migrations or persistent progress rows. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #248 No exact public GitHub issue was found for this status-message plumbing. The underlying problem is that active sandboxed runs currently have setup phases, such as workspace sync and restore, where the operator cannot see concise current progress through the live run state. This PR addresses that gap for the backend/runtime layer while keeping progress messages ephemeral. GitHub search performed for related or duplicate work: `sandbox runtime status`, `sandbox restore index`, and `runtime progress`. No direct duplicate PR was found. ## What Changed - Added shared runtime-progress types and the `heartbeat.run.progress` live event type. - Added a process-local heartbeat run runtime-status store with TTL, bounded/redacted messages, and terminal cleanup. - Threaded runtime progress callbacks through heartbeat execution and active/live run serialization. - Emitted sandbox-managed runtime phase updates for sync, adapter startup, restore/export, and finalization paths. - Added backend and adapter-utils tests for ephemeral status behavior, terminal cleanup, live serialization, and sandbox progress callbacks. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - Local PII scan before push: high-confidence secret patterns, internal issue links, local user paths, and private URL patterns checked across all three split diffs; no real secrets or internal links found. The only secret-like text is an intentional fake test fixture (`sk-test-secret`). - `git diff --check origin/master..feat/sandbox-runtime-status` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/heartbeat-run-runtime-status.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-runtime-state.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-live-run-routes.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts` — 4 files, 23 tests passed. - `pnpm run typecheck` passed on both top stacks that include this branch: `feat/sandbox-status-ui` and `fix/sandbox-restore-index-sync`. - `pnpm run build` passed on both top stacks that include this branch; Vite reported existing CSS `::highlight` and chunk-size warnings. - `pnpm run test:run` was attempted on `fix/sandbox-restore-index-sync`; it failed in two unrelated broad-suite tests. One depends on this host's Git default branch behavior, and one depends on local Claude model-discovery environment. The changed focused suites above pass. ## Risks - Runtime progress is process-local by design, so status disappears after TTL, terminal cleanup, or server restart. - Clients that do not consume `heartbeat.run.progress` simply keep existing behavior. - Message redaction is intentionally generic; overly specific phase details should stay out of runtime-progress payloads. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex coding agent, with shell/tool execution in a local worktree. Exact context-window metadata is not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip CTO <cto@paperclip.local> Co-authored-by: Paperclip CTO <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
51ffbb380f |
Exclude transient Codex home dirs from sandbox sync (#8581)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Local adapters can run agents against sandboxed execution targets by syncing the workspace and selected runtime assets into the sandbox. > - The Codex local adapter includes a managed Codex home asset so sandboxed Codex runs can use the expected auth, config, skills, and session state. > - That asset follows symlinks, which is useful for real Codex home content but unsafe for transient launcher directories. > - Transient `tmp` and `.tmp` directories can contain symlinks to large host binaries, so the sandbox archive can inline large executable targets instead of just the small home directory content. > - This pull request excludes transient Codex home directories from the sandbox home asset while preserving the required Codex home files. > - The benefit is a much smaller and more predictable sandbox setup upload without changing the runtime files Codex actually needs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue was found for this exact sandbox archive-size bug. Bug description: - What happened: sandboxed `codex_local` runs sync the managed Codex home as a `home` asset with `followSymlinks` enabled. If transient Codex home dirs such as `tmp` or `.tmp` contain symlinks to a large host binary, the archive can inline that binary and make `Syncing home to sandbox` much larger than the managed home directory itself. - Expected behavior: sandbox setup should include the Codex home files needed for auth, config, skills, and session continuity, but should not archive transient launcher scratch directories. - Reproduction shape: create a managed Codex home with normal auth/config/skills files and a `tmp/arg0` or `.tmp` symlink to a large host executable, then start a sandboxed `codex_local` run. The home asset archive grows by the symlink target size. - Version/commit: observed on local `master` before this change. - Related public context: #5028 covers a different managed Codex home reliability issue around stale auth files; this PR addresses sandbox archive bloat from transient symlink targets. ## What Changed - Excluded `tmp` and `.tmp` from the Codex `home` asset that is uploaded for sandboxed runs. - Added regression coverage proving transient symlinked home dirs are excluded from the tar while required auth/config/skills files remain included. - Kept `followSymlinks` behavior for the rest of the Codex home asset so existing non-transient symlink behavior is preserved. ## Verification - `git diff --check` - Local PII/secret pattern scan over the committed diff - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local typecheck` ## Risks Low risk. The exclusion is limited to transient Codex home scratch directories, and the regression test verifies the files needed in the sandbox are still archived. The main compatibility risk is if a user intentionally placed required persistent Codex state under `tmp` or `.tmp`; those paths are treated as volatile scratch space by this change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, and GitHub CLI tool use. Exact hosted model build and context-window size were not exposed in the local adapter runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
4b1332b61c |
fix(openclaw-gateway): drop root paperclip params (#4416)
Fixes #5997, fixes #4081, fixes #4723, fixes #6625, fixes #3923 Refs #6606 — this PR removes the rejected root `paperclip` field, but #6606 also requires the protocol v3→v4 bump, which is out of scope here; referencing rather than closing it. ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane that wakes and coordinates agent workers across company-scoped execution flows. > - The `openclaw_gateway` adapter is part of that wake path, so its outbound payload contract has to match the gateway's validated `agent` schema. > - `master` currently reintroduces a previously fixed regression by sending a top-level `paperclip` property in `agentParams` (see #3923, which reverts the original fix in #626). > - The gateway rejects unknown root params, which means OpenClaw wakes fail before the remote agent can start work. > - The actual wake context already rides in the generated `message`, so the extra root property is both redundant and harmful. > - This pull request removes that leaked root property, adds a focused regression test around param construction, and updates affected server expectations/docs to the supported contract. > - The benefit is that OpenClaw Gateway agents wake successfully again without losing inline wake context. ## What Changed - Removed the top-level `paperclip` field from OpenClaw Gateway `agentParams` and extracted `buildAgentParams()` so the contract is easy to test. - Added a package-level regression test that proves `payloadTemplate.paperclip` is stripped while explicit `agentId`/`timeout` behavior stays intact. - Updated server tests that inspect OpenClaw Gateway payloads to assert wake data is delivered in `message` instead of a rejected root field. - Updated the adapter configuration docs to state that wake context is embedded in the generated message text, not sent as a top-level param. ### Rebase onto current `master` (conflict resolution) This branch was opened against an older `master`; re-merging current `master` required: - Resolving conflicts in `execute.ts` — `master` hoisted `configuredAgentId` and moved the agentId/timeout precedence inline; this PR keeps the `buildAgentParams()` extraction that strips the gateway-rejected root `paperclip`. - Updating tests `master` added **after** this branch's base that assert the old root-`paperclip` contract. These suites use the OpenClaw gateway adapter purely as a delivery harness (`adapterType: "openclaw_gateway"` + a mock gateway) and observe wake content via the gateway payload, so dropping the root field requires them to read wake context from `message` instead: - `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts` - `server/src/__tests__/low-trust-red-team-routes.test.ts` (redaction guarantees preserved — sanitized body + `expectNoCanary` on the raw canary) - Replaced brittle JSON-substring assertions (flagged by Greptile) with a shared `parseWakePayloadFromMessage()` helper + `toMatchObject`, robust to serialization/key-order changes. The strict contract is confirmed upstream: OpenClaw's `AgentParamsSchema` is `Type.Object(..., { additionalProperties: false })` with no `paperclip` field, so a root `paperclip` is rejected (`invalid agent params: at root: unexpected property 'paperclip'`). ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-openclaw-gateway typecheck` — clean - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — clean - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/openclaw-gateway-adapter.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts server/src/__tests__/low-trust-red-team-routes.test.ts` — 26 passed (7 + 11 + 8) - `packages/adapters/openclaw-gateway/src/server/execute.test.ts` — 6 passed (run via a local temp vitest config because the root `vitest.config.ts` does not include this package) ## Risks - Low risk: this narrows the outbound payload to the gateway-supported contract and keeps wake context in the already-supported `message` channel. - Any downstream consumer that incorrectly depended on a top-level `paperclip` field from the gateway mock payloads would need to follow the supported `message` contract instead. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex CLI coding agent via API authored the original change; exact underlying model ID and context window were not exposed in that environment. - Rebase/conflict resolution and the test-assertion migration were done with Claude Code (Claude Opus 4.8, 1M context). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked the related issues above - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: serenakeyitan via breeze-runner <serenakeyitan@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Aymeloglu <aaymeloglu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
b3209486ca |
fix: default Daytona sandboxes to auto-archive so they leave the disk quota (#8561)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run their work inside sandboxes, provisioned through pluggable sandbox-provider plugins; the Daytona plugin is one of them > - Daytona bills storage against an org-wide disk quota, and a *stopped* sandbox still counts against that quota — only an *archived* sandbox is moved to cold storage and stops counting > - The Daytona plugin created sandboxes without supplying any auto-stop/auto-archive/auto-delete intervals, so Daytona fell back to its own defaults (archive after 7 days, never auto-delete) > - When in-product cleanup fails or never runs (crashed runs, failed lease destroys, orphaned probes), stopped sandboxes then sit for a week at a few GiB each until the org storage quota fills and blocks all workers > - This pull request makes the Daytona plugin apply quota-safe defaults on create (auto-stop 15m, auto-archive 60m, auto-delete 7d) so every sandbox eventually leaves the disk quota on its own, even when our own cleanup fails > - The benefit is that the storage quota no longer fills from leaked/idle sandboxes, while operators keep full control to override the intervals per environment ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue. Describing in-PR (bug report): ### What happened Running many agents in Daytona sandboxes eventually exhausted the org's storage quota, and Daytona returned an out-of-disk error that blocked all sandbox creation. Root cause: a *stopped* Daytona sandbox still consumes disk quota; only an *archived* sandbox is moved to cold storage and frees it. The plugin created sandboxes without specifying auto-stop/auto-archive/auto-delete intervals, so Daytona used its built-in defaults (auto-archive after 7 days, auto-delete disabled). Any sandbox that our own cleanup failed to remove — or that was orphaned by a crashed run — therefore lingered for up to a week, accumulating until the quota filled. ### Expected behavior Idle/leaked sandboxes should leave the storage quota automatically within a short window, without relying solely on in-product cleanup succeeding. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Configure the Daytona sandbox provider with no explicit auto-stop/auto-archive/auto-delete intervals. 2. Run many agent sandboxes over time (or leak some via crashed/failed runs that skip in-product cleanup). 3. Observe stopped-but-not-archived sandboxes accumulating against the org's 30 GiB storage quota until Daytona returns an out-of-disk error and blocks new sandbox creation. ### Deployment mode Self-hosted Paperclip using the Daytona sandbox-provider plugin. ## What Changed - `daytona/src/plugin.ts`: `parseDriverConfig` now defaults `autoStopInterval` → 15 min, `autoArchiveInterval` → 60 min, `autoDeleteInterval` → 7 days when the value is unset. Explicit per-environment values (including `0` and `-1`) are preserved and passed through unchanged. - `daytona/src/manifest.ts`: documents the new defaults and the quota rationale on each field, and sets the manifest `default` so the values surface in the environment configuration screen where operators can override them. - `daytona/src/plugin.test.ts`: adds tests covering the new defaults and that explicit values / disabling sentinels (`0`, `-1`) are respected. ## Verification ``` pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-daytona test ``` - 24 tests pass, including the new default-behavior tests. - Confirmed an explicit `autoArchiveInterval: 0` / `autoDeleteInterval: -1` in config is still forwarded unchanged (defaults only apply when the field is absent). ## Risks Low risk. Behavior change is limited to sandboxes created with no explicit interval config: they now auto-stop/archive/delete on Daytona-managed timers instead of Daytona's longer built-in defaults. Auto-archive is reversible (resuming an archived sandbox restores it). The only persistent action is auto-delete, which is a 7-day backstop for sandboxes nobody resumes, matching prior intent. Any environment that needs long-lived warm sandboxes can override the intervals (including disabling them with `0`/`-1`). ## Model Used Claude Opus (claude-opus-4-8), via the Paperclip agent harness with tool use. Extended reasoning enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude
|
ea1e321d86 |
Fix Daytona resource overrides for image-backed sandboxes (#8564)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Remote sandbox providers are part of the execution environment layer that lets agents run outside the local host. > - The Daytona sandbox-provider plugin exposes CPU, memory, disk, and GPU settings so operators can request larger execution sandboxes. > - The plugin was forwarding resource settings through snapshot/default creation, but Daytona rejects resource overrides on that path. > - Image-backed Daytona creation does support resource settings, so Paperclip should only send those values when an image is configured. > - This pull request makes the Daytona contract explicit in validation and runtime acquisition. > - The benefit is that operators get a clear Paperclip error for unsupported snapshot/default resource configs, while image-backed sandboxes still receive the requested allocation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists. ### What happened? Daytona sandbox environments can be configured with CPU/memory/disk/GPU resource settings, but snapshot/default Daytona sandbox creation rejects those resource overrides. Paperclip could pass unsupported resource fields through to Daytona and surface an opaque provider error. ### Expected behavior Paperclip should only send resource fields on Daytona creation paths that support them, and it should reject unsupported resource configurations before creating a sandbox. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Configure a Daytona sandbox environment with resource values such as `cpu: 4` and `memory: 4`. 2. Leave the environment on snapshot/default creation by not setting an image. 3. Acquire a Daytona sandbox lease. 4. Observe Daytona reject the resource override on the snapshot/default path. ### Paperclip version or commit Reproduced against the current Daytona sandbox-provider plugin behavior before this PR. This PR fixes the contract in the plugin code and tests. ### Deployment mode Local authenticated Paperclip instance using the Daytona sandbox provider. Additional scope: - Daytona provider only. - No schema changes. - No non-Daytona provider changes. Related search performed: - `gh search issues "Daytona resources snapshot repo:paperclipai/paperclip" --limit 10` - `gh search prs "Daytona resources snapshot repo:paperclipai/paperclip" --limit 10` ## What Changed - Restrict Daytona `resources` create params to image-backed sandbox creation. - Add validation/runtime guard for resource settings without an image. - Keep image-backed resource metadata and reusable-lease sentinel behavior covered by tests. - Update Daytona plugin tests for image-backed resources and snapshot/default rejection. ## Verification - `pnpm -C packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona test` - `pnpm -C packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona build` - Manual Daytona SDK probe in a local authenticated instance: image-backed creation with `daytonaio/sandbox:0.8.0` returned a 4 CPU / 4 GiB sandbox and deleted cleanly. - Greptile Review: 5/5, no inline comments. ## Risks - Existing Daytona environments that set resource values while relying on snapshot/default creation will now fail validation/acquisition with a clear error instead of calling Daytona and failing there. - Operators who need custom resource sizes should use image-backed creation or a provider-side resource-sized snapshot workflow. - Low migration risk: no database schema changes and no changes to non-Daytona providers. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent. Exact context window is not exposed in this environment. Tool-enabled workflow with shell, GitHub CLI, database inspection, and local test/build execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
71acf83070 |
build(deps): align react-dom with react@19.2.7 (replaces dependabot #8471) (#8557)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The board UI, plugin examples, and plugin SDK all share the same React dependency graph. > - Dependabot PR #8471 raised `react` and `@types/react`, but left `react-dom` and `@types/react-dom` on older 19.x ranges. > - That let dependency resolution install incompatible React runtime versions, which makes React refuse to run and breaks UI-oriented test suites. > - Current PR policy keeps `pnpm-lock.yaml` owned by CI for non-dependabot authors, so this PR updates manifests and lets CI regenerate the lockfile artifact. > - This pull request replaces #8471 with a complete React toolchain alignment across the package manifests it touched. > - The benefit is a single React 19.2.7 runtime graph that keeps dependency consumers from deduping onto a stale `react-dom` patch. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #8471 This PR replaces #8471, which updated `react` and `@types/react` but left `react-dom` and `@types/react-dom` behind. The resulting dependency graph can install mismatched `react` and `react-dom` versions, producing React's incompatible-version runtime error in UI tests. ## What Changed - Aligned `react-dom` package ranges to `^19.2.7` anywhere the React dependency set is present. - Aligned `@types/react-dom` package ranges to the 19.2 line. - Kept the `react@^19.2.7` and `@types/react@^19.2.17` bumps from #8471. - Added root pnpm overrides for `react` and `react-dom` so peer-only consumers resolve to the same 19.2.7 runtime instead of a stale patch. - Left `pnpm-lock.yaml` out of the PR, per the PR workflow policy; CI regenerates and shares the lockfile artifact when manifests change. ## Verification - `cd ui && NODE_ENV=test npx vitest run` passed locally before handoff: 243 files / 1739 tests. - `NODE_ENV=development pnpm install --lockfile-only --ignore-scripts --no-frozen-lockfile` passed locally on the rebased branch. - Confirmed regenerated `pnpm-lock.yaml` resolves `react` and `react-dom` to 19.2.7 and contains no `react@19.2.4` / `react-dom@19.2.4` entries. - GitHub Actions are green on this PR, including `policy`, `Typecheck + Release Registry`, all general test shards, `Build`, `e2e`, and `verify`. - Greptile completed at 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. ## Risks Low risk. This is a dependency-version alignment only, but React dependency changes can expose package-manager resolution issues. The root overrides intentionally constrain the React runtime pair to the same patch version to avoid that class of failure. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex based on GPT-5, using command-line tool execution and GitHub CLI operations in a Paperclip-managed workspace. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
65d45688fe |
build(deps-dev): bump esbuild from 0.28.0 to 0.28.1 (#8470)
[//]: # (dependabot-start) ⚠️ **Dependabot is rebasing this PR** ⚠️ Rebasing might not happen immediately, so don't worry if this takes some time. Note: if you make any changes to this PR yourself, they will take precedence over the rebase. --- [//]: # (dependabot-end) Bumps [esbuild](https://github.com/evanw/esbuild) from 0.28.0 to 0.28.1. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/releases">esbuild's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v0.28.1</h2> <ul> <li> <p>Disallow <code>\</code> in local development server HTTP requests (<a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/security/advisories/GHSA-g7r4-m6w7-qqqr">GHSA-g7r4-m6w7-qqqr</a>)</p> <p>This release fixes a security issue where HTTP requests to esbuild's local development server could traverse outside of the serve directory on Windows using a <code>\</code> backslash character. It happened due to the use of Go's <code>path.Clean()</code> function, which only handles Unix-style <code>/</code> characters. HTTP requests with paths containing <code>\</code> are no longer allowed.</p> <p>Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/dellalibera"><code>@dellalibera</code></a> for reporting this issue.</p> </li> <li> <p>Add integrity checks to the Deno API (<a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/security/advisories/GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr">GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr</a>)</p> <p>The previous release of esbuild added integrity checks to esbuild's npm install script. This release also adds integrity checks to esbuild's Deno install script. Now esbuild's Deno API will also fail with an error if the downloaded esbuild binary contains something other than the expected content.</p> <p>Note that esbuild's Deno API installs from <code>registry.npmjs.org</code> by default, but allows the <code>NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY</code> environment variable to override this with a custom package registry. This change means that the esbuild executable served by <code>NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY</code> must now match the expected content.</p> <p>Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/sondt99"><code>@sondt99</code></a> for reporting this issue.</p> </li> <li> <p>Avoid inlining <code>using</code> and <code>await using</code> declarations (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4482">#4482</a>)</p> <p>Previously esbuild's minifier sometimes incorrectly inlined <code>using</code> and <code>await using</code> declarations into subsequent uses of that declaration, which then fails to dispose of the resource correctly. This bug happened because inlining was done for <code>let</code> and <code>const</code> declarations by avoiding doing it for <code>var</code> declarations, which no longer worked when more declaration types were added. Here's an example:</p> <pre lang="js"><code>// Original code { using x = new Resource() x.activate() } <p>// Old output (with --minify)<br /> new Resource().activate();</p> <p>// New output (with --minify)<br /> {using e=new Resource;e.activate()}<br /> </code></pre></p> </li> <li> <p>Fix module evaluation when an error is thrown (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4461">#4461</a>, <a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/pull/4467">#4467</a>)</p> <p>If an error is thrown during module evaluation, esbuild previously didn't preserve the state of the module for subsequent module references. This was observable if <code>import()</code> or <code>require()</code> is used to import a module multiple times. The thrown error is supposed to be thrown by every call to <code>import()</code> or <code>require()</code>, not just the first. With this release, esbuild will now throw the same error every time you call <code>import()</code> or <code>require()</code> on a module that throws during its evaluation.</p> </li> <li> <p>Fix some edge cases around the <code>new</code> operator (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4477">#4477</a>)</p> <p>Previously esbuild incorrectly printed certain edge cases involving complex expressions inside the target of a <code>new</code> expression (specifically an optional chain and/or a tagged template literal). The generated code for the <code>new</code> target was not correctly wrapped with parentheses, and either contained a syntax error or had different semantics. These edge cases have been fixed so that they now correctly wrap the <code>new</code> target in parentheses. Here is an example of some affected code:</p> <pre lang="js"><code>// Original code new (foo()`bar`)() new (foo()?.bar)() <p>// Old output<br /> new foo()<code>bar</code>();<br /> new (foo())?.bar();</p> <p></code></pre></p> </li> </ul> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Changelog</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md">esbuild's changelog</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>0.28.1</h2> <ul> <li> <p>Disallow <code>\</code> in local development server HTTP requests (<a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/security/advisories/GHSA-g7r4-m6w7-qqqr">GHSA-g7r4-m6w7-qqqr</a>)</p> <p>This release fixes a security issue where HTTP requests to esbuild's local development server could traverse outside of the serve directory on Windows using a <code>\</code> backslash character. It happened due to the use of Go's <code>path.Clean()</code> function, which only handles Unix-style <code>/</code> characters. HTTP requests with paths containing <code>\</code> are no longer allowed.</p> <p>Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/dellalibera"><code>@dellalibera</code></a> for reporting this issue.</p> </li> <li> <p>Add integrity checks to the Deno API (<a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/security/advisories/GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr">GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr</a>)</p> <p>The previous release of esbuild added integrity checks to esbuild's npm install script. This release also adds integrity checks to esbuild's Deno install script. Now esbuild's Deno API will also fail with an error if the downloaded esbuild binary contains something other than the expected content.</p> <p>Note that esbuild's Deno API installs from <code>registry.npmjs.org</code> by default, but allows the <code>NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY</code> environment variable to override this with a custom package registry. This change means that the esbuild executable served by <code>NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY</code> must now match the expected content.</p> <p>Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/sondt99"><code>@sondt99</code></a> for reporting this issue.</p> </li> <li> <p>Avoid inlining <code>using</code> and <code>await using</code> declarations (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4482">#4482</a>)</p> <p>Previously esbuild's minifier sometimes incorrectly inlined <code>using</code> and <code>await using</code> declarations into subsequent uses of that declaration, which then fails to dispose of the resource correctly. This bug happened because inlining was done for <code>let</code> and <code>const</code> declarations by avoiding doing it for <code>var</code> declarations, which no longer worked when more declaration types were added. Here's an example:</p> <pre lang="js"><code>// Original code { using x = new Resource() x.activate() } <p>// Old output (with --minify)<br /> new Resource().activate();</p> <p>// New output (with --minify)<br /> {using e=new Resource;e.activate()}<br /> </code></pre></p> </li> <li> <p>Fix module evaluation when an error is thrown (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4461">#4461</a>, <a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/pull/4467">#4467</a>)</p> <p>If an error is thrown during module evaluation, esbuild previously didn't preserve the state of the module for subsequent module references. This was observable if <code>import()</code> or <code>require()</code> is used to import a module multiple times. The thrown error is supposed to be thrown by every call to <code>import()</code> or <code>require()</code>, not just the first. With this release, esbuild will now throw the same error every time you call <code>import()</code> or <code>require()</code> on a module that throws during its evaluation.</p> </li> <li> <p>Fix some edge cases around the <code>new</code> operator (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4477">#4477</a>)</p> <p>Previously esbuild incorrectly printed certain edge cases involving complex expressions inside the target of a <code>new</code> expression (specifically an optional chain and/or a tagged template literal). The generated code for the <code>new</code> target was not correctly wrapped with parentheses, and either contained a syntax error or had different semantics. These edge cases have been fixed so that they now correctly wrap the <code>new</code> target in parentheses. Here is an example of some affected code:</p> <pre lang="js"><code>// Original code new (foo()`bar`)() new (foo()?.bar)() <p>// Old output<br /> new foo()<code>bar</code>();<br /> new (foo())?.bar();<br /> </code></pre></p> </li> </ul> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/bb9db84c02433fbe37b3509f53f9f3e3cc48725e"><code>bb9db84</code></a> publish 0.28.1 to npm</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/9ff053e53b8eeb990f59355dbea365277ac45ee2"><code>9ff053e</code></a> security: add integrity checks to the Deno API</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/0a9bf2135b67c7e28989a5ba19f0f000805a5ab5"><code>0a9bf21</code></a> enforce non-negative size in gzip parser</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/e2a1a7132058ee067fe736eac15f695861b8654e"><code>e2a1a71</code></a> security: forbid <code>\\</code> in local dev server requests</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/83a2cbfc35809f4fd5152da59572d7bed7739d78"><code>83a2cbf</code></a> fix <a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4482">#4482</a>: don't inline <code>using</code> declarations</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/308ad745d824c77bc607603451b257d0f2fd9a38"><code>308ad74</code></a> fix <a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4471">#4471</a>: renaming of nested <code>var</code> declarations</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/f013f5f99a015bce92ec48d49181d4ad3177b29b"><code>f013f5f</code></a> fix some typos</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/aafd6e48b1088336a5f5a17e930be7e840d43d8c"><code>aafd6e4</code></a> chore: fix some minor issues in comments (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4462">#4462</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/15300c30b5e22f7cfcbed850c246d35095658386"><code>15300c3</code></a> follow up: cjs evaluation fixes</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/1bda0c31d7697c0af44b3ab39b81e599e559a395"><code>1bda0c3</code></a> fix <a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4461">#4461</a>, fix <a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4467">#4467</a>: esm evaluation fixes</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/compare/v0.28.0...v0.28.1">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
b86d60b802 |
build(deps): bump @cursor/sdk from 1.0.18 to 1.0.19 (#8462)
Bumps [@cursor/sdk](https://github.com/cursor/cursor) from 1.0.18 to 1.0.19. <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/cursor/cursor/commits">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
d5088c3987 |
build(deps): bump @codemirror/view from 6.39.15 to 6.43.1 (#8468)
Bumps [@codemirror/view](https://github.com/codemirror/view) from 6.39.15 to 6.43.1. <details> <summary>Changelog</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/codemirror/view/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md">@codemirror/view's changelog</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>6.41.0 (2026-04-01)</h2> <h3>Bug fixes</h3> <p>Fix an issue where <code>EditorView.posAtCoords</code> could incorrectly return a position near a higher element on the line, in mixed-font-size lines.</p> <p>Expand the workaround for the Webkit bug that causes nonexistent selections to stay visible to be active on non-Safari Webkit browsers.</p> <h3>New features</h3> <p>The new <code>EditorView.cursorScrollMargin</code> facet can now be used to configure the extra space used when scrolling the cursor into view.</p> <h2>6.40.0 (2026-03-12)</h2> <h3>Bug fixes</h3> <p>Fix a bug that caused Shift-Enter/Backspace/Delete on iOS to lose the shift modifier when delivered to key event handlers.</p> <p>Fix an issue where <code>EditorView.moveVertically</code> could move to the wrong place in wrapped lines with a large line height.</p> <p>Make sure the selection head associativity is properly set for mouse selections made with shift held down.</p> <h3>New features</h3> <p><code>WidgetType.updateDOM</code> is now called with the previous widget value as third argument.</p> <h2>6.39.17 (2026-03-10)</h2> <h3>Bug fixes</h3> <p>Improve touch tap-selection on line wrapping boundaries.</p> <p>Make <code>drawSelection</code> draw our own selection handles on iOS.</p> <p>Fix an issue where <code>posAtCoords</code>, when querying line wrapping points, got confused by extra empty client rectangles produced by Safari.</p> <h2>6.39.16 (2026-03-02)</h2> <h3>Bug fixes</h3> <p>Perform scroll stabilization on the document or wrapping scrollable elements, when the user scrolls the editor.</p> <p>Fix an issue where changing decorations right before a composition could end up corrupting the visible DOM.</p> <p>Fix an issue where some types of text input over a selection would be read as happening in wrong position.</p> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/codemirror/view/commits">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
957f30cd72 |
build(deps): bump @agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp from 0.47.0 to 0.48.0 (#8469)
Bumps [@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp](https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp) from 0.47.0 to 0.48.0. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/releases">@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v0.48.0</h2> <h2><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.47.0...v0.48.0">0.48.0</a> (2026-06-19)</h2> <h3>Features</h3> <ul> <li>Agent selection dropdown in config options (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/794">#794</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/5729c471f92e1d2a191eb2a6d18c2be47821e9ec">5729c47</a>)</li> <li><strong>deps:</strong> bump the minor group with 11 updates (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/787">#787</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/ad3b5fe74527f83964695a1e8056d010b981fc79">ad3b5fe</a>)</li> <li>Update to claude-agent-sdk 0.3.183 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/791">#791</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/744b2d41128f67091d4136283594c0db11ea4db5">744b2d4</a>)</li> <li>Update to new ACP SDK patterns (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/790">#790</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/2554c7bf980472760a6e7810b826f030d2c3af25">2554c7b</a>)</li> </ul> <h3>Bug Fixes</h3> <ul> <li>duplicate assistant text when turn activates mid-message (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/789">#789</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/1c80bf8e56a9279dc799e7bbdcae87241e99c18b">1c80bf8</a>)</li> <li>Skip empty thinking chunks (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/793">#793</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/15fdf26fc7d3a6c51e89d3e56fc91dd00cb3d7ae">15fdf26</a>)</li> <li>surface Bash tool image output instead of dropping it (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/617">#617</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/a759e64ef6d9b7c5bfe9a6e6b182db835f8ed3b6">a759e64</a>)</li> </ul> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Changelog</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md">@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp's changelog</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.47.0...v0.48.0">0.48.0</a> (2026-06-19)</h2> <h3>Features</h3> <ul> <li>Agent selection dropdown in config options (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/794">#794</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/5729c471f92e1d2a191eb2a6d18c2be47821e9ec">5729c47</a>)</li> <li><strong>deps:</strong> bump the minor group with 11 updates (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/787">#787</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/ad3b5fe74527f83964695a1e8056d010b981fc79">ad3b5fe</a>)</li> <li>Update to claude-agent-sdk 0.3.183 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/791">#791</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/744b2d41128f67091d4136283594c0db11ea4db5">744b2d4</a>)</li> <li>Update to new ACP SDK patterns (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/790">#790</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/2554c7bf980472760a6e7810b826f030d2c3af25">2554c7b</a>)</li> </ul> <h3>Bug Fixes</h3> <ul> <li>duplicate assistant text when turn activates mid-message (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/789">#789</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/1c80bf8e56a9279dc799e7bbdcae87241e99c18b">1c80bf8</a>)</li> <li>Skip empty thinking chunks (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/793">#793</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/15fdf26fc7d3a6c51e89d3e56fc91dd00cb3d7ae">15fdf26</a>)</li> <li>surface Bash tool image output instead of dropping it (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/617">#617</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/a759e64ef6d9b7c5bfe9a6e6b182db835f8ed3b6">a759e64</a>)</li> </ul> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/b4b7f561e2bc495132e624c9256b6e3cb9d9b477"><code>b4b7f56</code></a> chore(main): release 0.48.0 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/788">#788</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/41cde99fd7685e1b5b74f589bac9a68f3b79778f"><code>41cde99</code></a> test: isolate CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR in settings tests to stop user-tier leak (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/769">#769</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/5729c471f92e1d2a191eb2a6d18c2be47821e9ec"><code>5729c47</code></a> feat: Agent selection dropdown in config options (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/794">#794</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/a759e64ef6d9b7c5bfe9a6e6b182db835f8ed3b6"><code>a759e64</code></a> fix: surface Bash tool image output instead of dropping it (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/617">#617</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/15fdf26fc7d3a6c51e89d3e56fc91dd00cb3d7ae"><code>15fdf26</code></a> fix: Skip empty thinking chunks (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/793">#793</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/9f38cb67dfad31d8a1265c2d2449c16c1b03ff8b"><code>9f38cb6</code></a> test: Improve tmp dirs in tests (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/792">#792</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/744b2d41128f67091d4136283594c0db11ea4db5"><code>744b2d4</code></a> feat: Update to claude-agent-sdk 0.3.183 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/791">#791</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/2554c7bf980472760a6e7810b826f030d2c3af25"><code>2554c7b</code></a> feat: Update to new ACP SDK patterns (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/790">#790</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/1c80bf8e56a9279dc799e7bbdcae87241e99c18b"><code>1c80bf8</code></a> fix: duplicate assistant text when turn activates mid-message (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/789">#789</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/ad3b5fe74527f83964695a1e8056d010b981fc79"><code>ad3b5fe</code></a> feat(deps): bump the minor group with 11 updates (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/787">#787</a>)</li> <li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.47.0...v0.48.0">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
746e287e33 |
feat(control-plane): add annotation and workspace controls (#8229)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI-agent companies. > - The control plane coordinates issues, workspaces, documents, routines, and board review flows across company-scoped data. > - The local source branch contained related schema, service, and UI changes for workspace issue scoping and document/routine annotations. > - These changes need to move together because db schema, shared types, server services, and UI consumers form one contract. > - This pull request extracts the migration-bearing control-plane work from the source branch onto `origin/master`. > - The benefit is a standalone branch with deterministic migration order and focused review for the highest-risk part of the split. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No GitHub issue exists for this branch split. Internal source task: [PAP-11234](/PAP/issues/PAP-11234). Problem/motivation: - Workspace operations need explicit issue scoping so readiness and blocker handling can be derived correctly. - Document annotations need reliable live updates, save failure surfacing, normalized activity keys, and better comment panel behavior. - Routine descriptions need the same annotation contract as issue documents so operators can discuss and edit routine text without special-case infrastructure. Proposed solution: - Add the workspace-operation `issueId` migration and readiness scoping. - Add routine document/annotation schema, shared types, services, routes, and UI editing support. - Keep the related migrations in one PR so the renumbered `0106` and `0107` migrations land in a deterministic order after current `master`. Alternatives considered: - Split migrations into separate PRs, rejected because that would create migration-numbering conflicts and make each branch less standalone. - Merge this with UI polish, rejected because this branch needs deeper server/db review. Roadmap alignment: - Checked `ROADMAP.md`; the roadmap mentions future recurring routine capabilities generally, but no duplicate implementation PR for these annotation/workspace changes was found. ## What Changed - Added `0106_workspace_operations_issue_id.sql` and `0107_routine_description_annotations.sql`, plus schema exports. - Scoped workspace readiness to blocker issues and attached workspace operation issue ids. - Scoped issue-thread interaction accept finalization to the source run. - Added routine document annotation contracts across db/shared/server/UI. - Improved document annotation live updates, activity-key normalization, save failure surfacing, and comment panel behavior. - Added issue workspace property controls and compact blocked-by/quick-control UI updates. - Added focused server and UI regression tests for the new contracts. ## Verification - `CI=true NODE_ENV=development pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --prefer-offline` - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest server/src/__tests__/document-annotation-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routine-document-annotation-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueDocumentAnnotations.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx ui/src/components/WorkspaceRuntimeControls.test.tsx ui/src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider.test.ts --run` — 10 files, 273 tests passed. - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm -r --filter @paperclipai/db --filter @paperclipai/shared --filter @paperclipai/server --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed, including db migration numbering check. ## Risks - Migration-bearing PR; merge this branch before any later PR that adds migrations with higher numbers. - Cross-layer contract risk across db/shared/server/ui, mitigated with targeted tests and affected-package typecheck. - Review should pay special attention to company scoping in new routine/document annotation paths. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` / CodexCoder, GPT-5-class coding model with tool use and shell execution. Exact runtime snapshot and context-window setting were not exposed by the Paperclip run context. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details available from the run context) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots (N/A per source task: do not add screenshots/images unless specifically part of the work) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (N/A; no public docs changed) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
