mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-06 10:48:12 +02:00
b721d24cacd33faab588b389118f5524502e8af7
4704
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
f55759942b |
fix(runner): accept compatible Codex releases from 0.149.0 (#13853)
Keep the minimum fixed at 0.149.0 until a deliberate maintainer change. Accept stable versions below 0.157.0 separately from the reproducible install pin. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.923.0-canary.9 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b41ccf097f |
fix(apps): configure MCP aggregators from inline task cards (#13879)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and their work. > - Agents request connections through cards in task threads. > - MCP aggregators need provider-specific URLs and authentication. > - The task dialog used the generic setup form and omitted these fields. > - This pull request uses the same provider setup controller in tasks and Apps. > - Users can configure a connection without leaving the task. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #13755, #13855. **What happened?** An inline Executor request opened a very wide dialog with an empty credential step. Connect failed because the MCP URL was missing. The other aggregator cards also bypassed their provider setup. **Expected behavior** Each card shows its provider instructions, URL field, and authentication options in a bounded dialog. Completing setup grants access only to the requesting agent. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Enable experimental MCP aggregators. 2. Have an agent request Zapier, Arcade, Composio, or Executor from a task. 3. Open the card and continue past Access. ## What Changed - Route page and task setup through the same provider controller. - Bound the task dialog width and preserve the requesting agent's access scope. - Support existing accounts, saved drafts, URL/token setup, and task-bound OAuth. - Keep a sign-in link available when the browser cannot open a popup. Verify completion through the existing durable callback path. - Add inline Access, configuration, and narrow Storybooks for all four providers. - Document the shared setup requirement and correct Executor's URL instructions. ## Verification - Focused Vitest selection: 24 passed. Covers all four inline forms, requester access, existing accounts, saved drafts, OAuth retry, callback validation, popup cleanup, and generic reconnect endpoint preservation. - UI typecheck, UI build, design-token gates, and Storybook build passed. - Live local browser: new Executor, Arcade, and Composio connections completed provider consent from task cards. Each appeared Connected with the requester selected. - Real Test calls returned Executor output `4`, an Arcade public GitHub star count, and Composio tool-discovery results. An ungranted agent was denied access. Real Paperclip process-agent runs discovered each provider catalog with only the requester’s connection installed. - Deployed implementation commit `5d722e89c` to the isolated staging tenant. The original failing Executor card now completes, discovers seven actions, limits access to its requesting agent, and resumes that agent. Its continuation completed real Executor calls and the provider resume flow, then returned an upstream Airtable authorization link. A real staging Test call returned `4` in 1.5 seconds. Later PR commits add regression coverage and popup-unmount cleanup. - Zapier fresh-token browser test remains pending a provider clipboard handoff. Its URL and token flow passes focused tests. - Latest-head CI (`d14f4c73c`): 53 checks passed; optional Storybook deployment and visual regression jobs skipped. Greptile 5/5, both review threads resolved. Canceled runners and unrelated chat timeouts passed the single retry on unchanged code. - The full local test suite was not run, as requested by the maintainer. CI runs the repository gates. ## Risks - OAuth popup behavior differs by browser. The explicit sign-in link and durable server completion checks provide recovery. - Saved task drafts store only a connection ID in browser storage. Credentials remain in the existing server vault. - No database or server protocol changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (`gpt-6-astra`) through Codex, with reasoning, code execution, and browser tools. The exact context-window size is not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.923.0-canary.8 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
60c7c9cd1a |
fix(runner-e2e): pass verified lock digest to Daytona image build (#13876)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Product E2E campaigns test the native runner in local and Daytona environments. > - Each campaign resolves one target lockfile and verifies its downloaded artifact. > - The Daytona image job did not pass that artifact digest to Docker. > - Docker used an older default digest and stopped before any selected task ran. > - This pull request passes and validates the campaign digest at the image build boundary. > - The image keeps its checksum check and frozen package installation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The merged-master [qualification campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35863582409) stopped in the Daytona image build. The resolved target lock digest was `e0c928a494f90ddad3c00791e83f09315ee8c82df2a0418a809dcf93649a8ab3`. Docker used its default digest, `57b298aceebc48bb94ea0593347348256475da7b2fddb77025d9e57cc8759420`. The checksum check rejected the mismatch. All 12 selected model cells were skipped. This follows the image provenance work in #13814. **Expected behavior** The image build must check the same lockfile artifact that the campaign restored and verified. A changed lockfile must still fail the checksum check. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a Product E2E campaign with a Daytona cell on master `7944ed3d976d1a7cc26a2d0cee51f227f3542084`. 2. Resolve a target lockfile whose digest differs from the Dockerfile default. 3. Observe the provider-pack image stage reject the lockfile before model execution. **Paperclip version or commit** `7944ed3d976d1a7cc26a2d0cee51f227f3542084`. **Deployment mode** GitHub Actions Product E2E campaign with a Daytona image build. **Install method** Built from source with the campaign lockfile artifact. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Native Codex and ACPX Claude cells were selected. No model cell ran in this failed campaign. **Database mode** Not involved. The failure occurs during image creation. **Access context** The authorized default-branch paid workflow. The build receives no provider credentials. ## What Changed - Read the image checksum from the existing target-lock job output. - Require a 64-character lowercase hexadecimal digest before image inspection or build. - Pass the digest as the existing Docker build argument. - Add regression checks and document the campaign checksum handoff. ## Verification - The Daytona image regression fails with the original workflow and passes with the fix. - All six Daytona image contract tests pass. - All 450 Product E2E unit tests pass. - Product E2E typecheck passes. - Actionlint passes for the changed workflow. - A context-shaped resolution probe preserves the downloaded lockfile bytes and digest. - All latest-head CI checks passed on `67d41fd9439b2a9a809ddb05765f8617585072c5` ([run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35865739359)). - Greptile gave 5/5 on this head; its test-scoping comment is addressed and resolved. - A hosted Daytona image rebuild and the three remote qualification cells remain pending after merge. ## Risks The campaign digest comes from the existing trusted target-lock job. The restored artifact checks, Docker checksum check, frozen install, content identity, image signing, and verification remain in place. The standalone Docker default remains available. This change does not alter task behavior, prompts, credentials, or dependency versions. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6-astra` through Codex performed diagnosis and review with code execution tools. OpenAI `gpt-5.6-luna` assisted with investigation, implementation, and verification. Context window limits are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.923.0-canary.7 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4721f55803 |
fix(apps): recover MCP OAuth setup after consent errors (#13855)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connections give agents governed access to external tools. > - MCP aggregator setup can return from provider consent to a saved draft. > - The branded setup did not explain failed or cancelled authorization. > - It also offered identity changes that the server does not apply when a saved connection resumes. > - This pull request explains OAuth return outcomes and keeps the displayed identity consistent with the saved policy. > - Users can understand the outcome and retry the same connection. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #13755 introduced the MCP aggregators. #13758 retired the legacy Composio broker. #13584 proposes changes to the provider handoff window; this fix retains the current handoff behavior. **What happened?** Cancelling Composio consent returned to the setup form with no explanation. The same controller ignored failed OAuth callback outcomes. Returning to Access on a saved draft also offered personal/shared choices, although the server retains the saved identity. This could make the OAuth request disagree with that identity. **Expected behavior** Explain cancellation or failure, preserve the draft, and offer Try again. Display the retained credential identity and start OAuth with the policy returned by the server. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Enable MCP aggregators and start a Composio connection. 2. Continue to provider consent and cancel it. 3. Observe the return screen. Before this change, it showed the form without cancellation feedback. 4. Go back to Access. Before this change, the form offered personal/shared choices even though resume retains the original identity. **Paperclip version or commit** Observed before the fix on `8c6cc7dccf91523e0720bd86f95487e66b4b0e63`. The original report of successful consent leaving setup unfinished did not reproduce. This PR addresses the recovery defects observed during that investigation. **Deployment mode** Isolated local development instance and authenticated staging deployment, with real Composio consent and provider calls. ## What Changed - Read the OAuth callback outcome in branded MCP setup and show cancellation or failure feedback. - Retry the same saved draft without displaying untrusted callback error text. - Keep saved personal/shared identity fixed in Access and select OAuth identity from the returned credential policy. - Add six focused regression cases and authorization-failure Storybook states for Arcade, Composio, and Executor. - Document return-screen recovery and retained identity in the connector playbook. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/apps/AppsConnect.test.tsx -t 'OAuth return' --maxWorkers=1`: 6 passed, 143 skipped, including after integration with current master. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec tsc --noEmit`: passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build`: passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build-storybook`: passed for the implementation commit. - Browser recovery: cancelled real Composio consent, observed the new feedback, returned to Access, retried the same personal draft, completed consent, and ran a real tool call. - Staging on implementation commit `84bb40aa70662e0c8955bf692c5714661b4bea93`: fresh shared and personal connections each completed on the first consent attempt and loaded 11 tools. Real discovery, execution, and schema calls succeeded. Both connections stayed Connected after reload. A real agent used the shared connection through the Paperclip gateway and returned the public repository documentation hierarchy with one success and zero errors. - All current-head CI gates passed on `662f84a67e867a52a2e5526026adbed00f6b59bf`. The Cursor execution and agent-chat browser shards each had an initial timeout; both passed on one targeted rerun without code changes. Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5, with no open review threads. - No full local suite was run, as requested. CI provides the broader checks. The PR adds a master merge and documentation after the live-tested implementation commit. ## Risks - This shared setup controller also serves Arcade and Executor. Their callback rendering and retry behavior have focused test coverage; this investigation used Composio for live provider testing. - Saved identity remains fixed during resume. A different identity requires a new connection, consistent with server behavior. - No database, protocol, credential storage, or gateway policy changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 via Codex, with code editing, shell tools, and browser testing. The exact runtime model ID and context window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.923.0-canary.6 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7944ed3d97 |
fix(runner): preserve hire runtime safety and first-activity timing (#13852)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane for companies of AI agents. > - Native runner agents need governed tools, durable runtime state, and useful execution evidence. > - A first activity trace waited 53.467 seconds even though tool activity took 6.274 seconds; provider input arrived before the server API call executed. > - Native agents also need a safe way to hire teammates without asking the model to rebuild runtime configuration. > - This pull request separates the observed ACP input-stream window from the actual server `tool.execute` span and adds a server-owned native hire contract. > - The benefit is clearer latency evidence and safer native teammates with existing approval, auth, and company boundaries preserved. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related Daytona provenance work is in [#13814](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13814). No duplicate public PR was found for this combined timing and native-hire change. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Native runner agents can use governed tools and request hires. The server did not expose a safe native hire operation that reused the caller's validated runtime settings. First-activity traces also mixed provider input timing with server tool execution timing. **Current behavior** A native hire must construct a separate runner configuration. Full configuration copying could expose paths, instructions, secrets, or sessions. Timing evidence could make a provider or MCP identity join appear proven when the trace did not contain that join. **Proposed behavior** The native `hire_agent` operation accepts identity and persona inputs. The server sends `adapterType: "paperclip_runner"` with `inheritRuntimeFrom: "caller"`, then copies only validated provider, model, permission, lifecycle, and bounded execution settings. It inherits and validates the default environment, derives the managed AI binding through existing normalization, preserves approval and permissions, and creates fresh child instructions. Caller secrets, paths, prompts, and sessions are excluded. Provider events now include the optional boolean `inputUpdated`, with Rust forwarding support. Timing evidence separately records the ACP input-stream window and the actual server `tool.execute` activity. It does not claim a provider or MCP join without matching evidence. **Reason and benefit** Native agents can hire teammates that start with the caller's approved execution policy. Operators retain company boundaries, auth rules, approval gates, and requalification. Reviewers can distinguish provider streaming time from server API execution time when diagnosing first-activity delays. **Breaking changes** None for existing hires or tool calls. `inheritRuntimeFrom` is optional and only applies to same-company native agent callers. Conflicting explicit runtime settings are rejected. The provider event field is optional for existing producers. ## What Changed - Added the native `hire_agent` protocol action, catalog entry, API contract, and runner authority checks. - Added `inheritRuntimeFrom: "caller"` validation and a closed native runtime inheritance allowlist. - Preserved managed AI binding normalization, default-environment validation, approval snapshots, permissions, requalification, and fresh child instructions. - Added provider `inputUpdated` schema support and Rust forwarding. - Added first-activity and server tool timing evidence with conservative identity-join handling. - Added route, authority, provider-event, sidecar, API, catalog, and Rust-focused tests. - Kept private Honeycomb links, raw traces, and local result paths out of this description. ## Verification Focused checks passed: - 458 timing/session checks. - 61 native hire inheritance checks. - 20 hire authority checks. - 1,741 API checks. - 106 catalog checks. - 54 provider sidecar checks. - 12 Rust provider checks. Live R2 and R3 each passed 45 checks across 6 runs (361,135 ms for R2). R1 stopped at missing Docker image setup. The final trace is available at https://ui.honeycomb.io/paperclip/environments/test/datasets/paperclip/result/BiMypLNvmiB?tab=traces. Latest-head CI passed all required build, typecheck, Rust, static, Vitest, serialized-server, workspace, chat, and E2E jobs. The focused local checks listed above passed; the broad local suite was not run before the live evaluation, while CI provides the full repository verification. ## Risks - Timing fields describe separate observed windows. They do not prove a provider or MCP owner without a valid trace join. - The inheritance allowlist must stay synchronized with native runner configuration fields. - Approval snapshots include resolved safe inherited settings and should be reviewed when native configuration fields change. - The focused local suite is narrower than the full repository suite; latest-head CI covers the broader repository checks. > Roadmap review: `ROADMAP.md` places this work within Paperclip's bring-your-own-agent direction. It extends existing native runner hiring and observability behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (exact serving model ID is not exposed), with extended reasoning and repository tool use; GPT-5.6 Luna assisted with focused implementation and verification work. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.923.0-canary.5 nightly/v2026.923.0-nightly.0 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
64faf0ae90 |
fix(ui): leave the archived company's settings after archiving it (#13846)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A person can archive a company from that company's settings page. > - After the archive, the page stays on the archived company. The only visible change is the button text "Already archived". > - It is unclear that anything happened, and the user has no next step on screen. > - This pull request navigates away after a successful archive: to another active company, to the Cloud portfolio when no active company remains on a managed instance, or to the companies list when self-hosted. > - The benefit is a clear outcome: the user sees where they are now and a toast that names what happened. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. Description follows the enhancement template: **What existing behavior does this improve?** The archive action on the company settings page. The mutation works, but the view stays on the archived company and gives no feedback beyond a disabled button. **Subsystem affected** UI: company settings page, company selection helpers, cloud links. **Current behavior** Archive succeeds. The button changes to "Already archived". The user stays on the archived company's settings. On a single-company instance nothing else changes. **Proposed behavior** After a successful archive, the app departs: another active company's dashboard with a toast; the Cloud portfolio's manage view when no active company remains on a managed instance; the companies list when self-hosted with nothing active, because that list shows the archived state and owns the unarchive action. **Reason and benefit** Staying on the archived company reads as "nothing happened". Leaving to a live surface makes the outcome clear and gives the user their next step. ## What Changed - `ui/src/lib/company-selection.ts`: new pure `resolveCompanyArchiveDeparture` helper. Another active company wins; the just-archived company is excluded by id, so a stale cached status cannot select it. Cloud portfolio is the fallback on managed instances; the companies list is the final fallback. - `ui/src/lib/cloudLinks.ts`: new `cloudPortfolioManageUrl` (`/orgs?manage=1`). The manage view matters: the plain launchpad auto-forwards a solo user back into their one openable stack — the page this navigation is escaping. - `ui/src/pages/CompanySettings.tsx`: the archive mutation now departs on success — toast + `navigate` for in-app destinations, a top-level navigation for the Cloud portfolio — instead of only setting the selected company id. - `ui/src/pages/CompanySettingsRenameHint.test.tsx`: render harness wraps the page in a `MemoryRouter` for the new router dependency. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run src/lib/company-selection.test.ts src/lib/cloudLinks.test.ts src/pages/CompanySettingsRenameHint.test.tsx src/pages/CompanySettings.test.tsx` — 22 tests pass. - New unit tests cover: active sibling wins (also on cloud), the just-archived company is never the destination even with a stale cached status, cloud portfolio fallback, self-hosted companies-list fallback, and the portfolio URL helper (null base included). - `pnpm exec tsc --noEmit` in `ui/` is clean after the plugin SDK build. ## Risks - Low risk. The archive API call is unchanged; only post-success navigation is new. The toast uses the optional actions hook, so surfaces without a ToastProvider stay safe. - On Cloud, the portfolio navigation is a full top-level navigation, so the query-cache invalidation for the departed document is skipped intentionally. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), via Claude Code CLI, extended thinking and tool use enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting mergecanary/v2026.923.0-canary.4 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
e4237c45f3 |
fix(ui): prevent organization title flicker during plugin loading (#13854)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The sidebar identifies the current organization. > - An optional plugin can replace this navigation surface. > - The built-in title appears before discovery and module loading finish. > - This pull request reserves the trigger until its owner is known. > - The organization name appears once, while failures retain built-in navigation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13832. Searched related pull requests and issues; no duplicate fix found. **What happened?** The organization switcher renders a provisional built-in title before an installed replacement loads. Unrelated plugin imports can also affect its loading state. **Expected behavior** Reserve the trigger with a neutral placeholder, then show the resolved navigation surface. Keep the built-in menu on failed or absent contributions. **Steps to reproduce** Install an organization-switcher contribution. Delay session, company, contribution, and module responses. Reload the page and watch the trigger through each stage. ## What Changed - Reserve the trigger through account, company selection, slot discovery, and module loading. - Distinguish failed session lookup from pending lookup so errors retain usable navigation. - Load and await only contributions matching the requested slots. Observe completion of imports started by another consumer. - Document loading behavior and add regression coverage for loading, failures, unrelated modules, and identity transitions. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed, including Rust checks. - `pnpm build` passed. - All 629 UI test files passed: 6,593 tests. The 42 focused UI/API/plugin tests also passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` and `git diff --check` passed. - `pnpm test:run` was also attempted. The broad local server run was stopped after recording skill-cache/channel fixture failures outside this diff (for example, runtime skill source status `missing` instead of `available`). The original cause is not established. All latest-head Linux CI gates pass; the complete UI suite and affected local checks pass. - Desktop (1440px) and mobile (390px) Chromium checks passed with real host components, dynamic module loading, and the built Account bundle. Delayed fixture responses produced exactly two title states: empty placeholder, then the resolved name. A slow refresh preserved the title and trigger dimensions; absent/failed plugin fallback and Escape dismissal passed, with zero uncaught browser errors. This is browser component integration, not a live signed-in tenant test. ## Risks A cold load displays a neutral placeholder until discovery completes. Absent, ambiguous, failed, and invalid contributions still use the built-in menu. No migrations or authorization changes. Scoped module loading changes when an unrelated contribution is imported; each surface loads its own matching modules. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, code execution, and browser verification. The exact deployment ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
106d89314f |
fix(evals): keep raw diagnostics out of public history (#13850)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Product E2E campaigns retain evidence from live provider runs. > - The public publisher copied per-attempt files based on their extension. > - Credential redaction does not remove hidden reasoning or provider session IDs. > - This pull request keeps those raw diagnostics out of public evidence bundles. > - Public reports retain normalized grades and declared fixture screenshots. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The Product history publisher accepted all JSON, log, Markdown, and text files under an attempt directory. API snapshots and process logs can contain provider reasoning even after credential redaction. **Expected behavior** Keep raw attempt diagnostics in retained Actions artifacts. Publish normalized results and declared fixture screenshots. Preserve the original grades and attempt evidence. **Steps to reproduce** Place a credential-redacted API snapshot with a reasoning event under an attempt's snapshots directory. The previous public path check admitted it because it ended in .json. ## What Changed - Remove extension-based admission for per-attempt text files in both S3 and Pages staging. - Require PNG paths to appear in the existing screenshot declaration allowlist. - Preserve root normalized results, grading, billing, provenance, and reviewed screenshot behavior. - Add seven denial cases for raw diagnostics, renamed files, malformed JSON, and false screenshot declarations. - Update report copy and the publication security contract. ## Verification - Focused history and report tests: 47 passed. - Replayed the filter against a copy of retained Grok evidence: six diagnostic files removed, one declared screenshot retained, zero provider calls. Original artifacts remain unchanged. - git diff --check passed. - Product typecheck in the reused local dependency tree reports an unrelated plugin type mismatch for organizationSwitcher in server/src/services/plugin-capability-validator.ts. CI will verify a fresh install. - No local browser or Docker execution. ## Risks Public reports no longer link raw per-attempt logs or API snapshots. Those files remain in the original Actions artifact. This change affects future publication only; it does not withdraw or rewrite existing immutable public campaigns. Normalized result content and marked screenshot review retain their existing boundaries. No workflow authorization, provider credentials, application behavior, or database changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, code editing, and tool execution. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.923.0-canary.3 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ac854a9b59 |
ci: build Daytona eval images on the authorized fleet (#13847)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Product E2E campaigns test the browser, server, and runner together. > - The trusted workflow selects an authorized execution fleet. > - Daytona image builds still use a fixed GitHub-hosted runner. > - This pull request applies the existing fleet selection to image builds. > - Campaign builds and tests then use the configured EC2 fleet. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13845 **What existing behavior does this improve?** The location of Daytona Product E2E image builds. **Current behavior** The image job uses ubuntu-latest even when RUNNER_E2E_AWS_ENABLED selects EC2 for the rest of the campaign. **Proposed behavior** Use the existing authorized runner output for the image job. Preserve the GitHub-hosted fallback when the EC2 switch is off. ## What Changed - Route Daytona image builds through the existing authorized runner selection. - Assert that the image job depends on authorization and receives no provider credentials. - Document the build routing and credential boundary. ## Verification - Product E2E workflow security: 11 tests passed. - git diff --check passed. - Reviewed actor checks, workflow triggers, target commit selection, signing, and package permissions. They are unchanged. - Required CI checks pass on the latest head. The first CI attempt had failures in unchanged chat tests; one diagnostic rerun passed. Both attempts remain in Actions. - Greptile reviewed the latest head at 5/5 with no inline findings. - Live EC2 image verification follows after this trusted workflow change is merged. No local Docker execution. ## Risks EC2 image builds depend on the fleet having working Docker and sufficient disk space. Existing authorization, image digest checks, signing, and the GitHub-hosted fallback remain in place. No provider secrets are added to the image job. No application or database changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, code editing, and tool execution. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
950ccb8eef |
ci: enable Grok qualification in the trusted paid workflow (#13845)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Product E2E tests verify tasks through the browser, server, and runner. > - These paid tests use a trusted workflow from master and an isolated target commit. > - The Grok target branch selects XAI_API_KEY, but the trusted workflow does not deliver that credential. > - Its artifact test also needs the pinned Python verifier before execution. > - This pull request adds both bindings inside the existing paid boundary. > - The tests can then run on the configured EC2 fleet without laptop Docker. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related evaluation infrastructure: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/11297. No duplicate Grok paid-workflow change was found. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Branch-targeted Grok Product E2E qualification in the existing paid workflow. **Current behavior** Grok cells cannot receive their selected API credential. The Grok build-revise case also misses the artifact-verifier setup step. **Proposed behavior** Deliver XAI_API_KEY only when the selected matrix credential is XAI_API_KEY. Prepare the existing pinned verifier for the Grok qualification suite. **Reason and benefit** Run the controller, browser, runner and artifact checks on the EC2 fleet. Preserve default-branch workflow authorization and protected environment secret access. ## What Changed - Bind the selected XAI credential only in the paid test step. - Install the checksum-verified Grok binary for local cells before provider access. - Include Grok qualification in the existing pinned artifact-verifier preparation. - Add an optional max_parallel input that can only lower the configured campaign concurrency. Use 1 for the Grok test key. - Extend security assertions and document setup. ## Verification - Ran the Product E2E workflow-security tests: 11 passed. - Checked the diff for whitespace errors. - Reviewed credential selection, setup ordering, numeric actor gates, target commit pinning, and trusted report checkout. - Live Grok execution follows after this workflow is available on master. This PR does not claim completed Grok qualification. ## Risks The paid test step can use the selected XAI credential and incur provider charges. The credential remains in runner-e2e-paid and is absent from setup, build, and reporting jobs. The default-branch gate and existing environment restrictions remain in place. No database migration or product behavior changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, code editing, and tool execution. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.923.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
8c6cc7dccf |
feat(cloud): sync primary-company archive state with the Cloud control plane (#13837)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Paperclip Cloud runs managed instances and controls their lifecycle
from a control plane.
> - Inside the app, a person can archive a company. On a managed
instance, the Cloud-pinned primary company is the whole organization.
> - Today that archive stays local. The control plane does not learn
about it, so it keeps the instance running and shows the organization as
live.
> - This pull request notifies the control plane when the primary
company crosses the archived boundary, and adds two control endpoints so
the control plane can verify the state and undo the archive during a
restore.
> - The benefit is that an archived organization stops running and shows
as archived, and a restore brings the company back without manual steps.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public issue exists. Description follows the enhancement template:
**What existing behavior does this improve?**
Company archive on Cloud-managed instances. Archiving the primary
company pauses agents and cancels runs, but the hosting control plane
never learns about it.
**Subsystem affected**
Server: company service, cloud-control middleware, instance routes.
**Current behavior**
A person archives the primary company. The instance keeps running. The
Cloud portfolio still shows the organization as live. Unarchive after a
Cloud restore requires manual steps inside the product.
**Proposed behavior**
The company service rings a Cloud lifecycle doorbell when the primary
company is archived or unarchived. The control plane verifies the state
through `GET /api/instance/lifecycle` before it acts. During a restore,
the control plane calls `POST /api/instance/lifecycle/unarchive-primary`
to bring the company back. Self-hosted instances are not affected.
**Reason and benefit**
An archived organization should not keep running, and its hosting
console should show it as archived. The verified read-back keeps the
doorbell a hint: a forged or duplicated ring cannot change state.
## What Changed
- New `services/cloud-lifecycle-sync.ts`: fire-and-forget doorbell `POST
{cloudOrigin}/v1/tenant/lifecycle-changed` with bounded retries. It runs
only on cloud-managed instances, and only for the derived primary
company id. It never blocks or fails the company mutation.
- `services/companies.ts`: ring the doorbell after a committed archive
or unarchive transition, in both the `update()` status-patch path and
`archive()`.
- New `GET /api/instance/lifecycle`: reports the primary company id, its
status, and how many other companies are not archived. Bound to a
`lifecycle:read` Cloud control assertion; board members can also read
it.
- New `POST /api/instance/lifecycle/unarchive-primary`: idempotent
unarchive of the primary company as a system actor. Bound to
`lifecycle:unarchive-primary`; requires instance admin otherwise.
- `middleware/cloud-control.ts`: a closed endpoint→method→action table
replaces the single hardcoded endpoint. Each assertion still authorizes
exactly one action on one endpoint.
- `services/cloud-instance.ts`: the primary-company id derivation moves
here as the single definition; `middleware/auth.ts` delegates to it. The
derivation itself is unchanged.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec tsc --noEmit` in `server/` is clean.
- `pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/cloud-lifecycle-sync.test.ts
src/__tests__/cloud-control-task-drain.test.ts
src/__tests__/instance-settings-routes.test.ts
src/__tests__/companies-service.test.ts
src/__tests__/cloud-tenant-company-provisioning.test.ts` — all pass.
- New tests cover: doorbell env-gating, retry bounds, no-throw contract;
the read-back status and sibling count; idempotent unarchive and the
admin gate; non-cloud 404s; control-assertion action binding for the new
endpoints, including cross-action and wrong-method rejection; and a
companies-service test that proves the doorbell rings exactly on
archived-boundary transitions.
## Risks
- Self-hosted instances see no behavior change: without a Cloud signal
the doorbell is a no-op and the endpoints answer 404.
- The doorbell is advisory by design. The control plane verifies through
the read-back before it acts, so a lost or duplicated ring cannot
corrupt state.
- The unarchive endpoint reuses the existing `companyService.update`
path, so agent reactivation and activity logging behave exactly like an
in-product unarchive.
## Model Used
- Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), via Claude Code CLI, extended
thinking and tool use enabled.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
canary/v2026.923.0-canary.1
|
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
be6f49a425 |
feat(runner): refresh shared coding harness runtimes (#13838)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip runs agents through local adapters and the native runner. > - Both paths must use the same installed provider CLI. > - New models require current harness releases. > - The runner still pins Codex 0.153.4, Claude SDK 0.3.263, and OpenCode 1.18.29. > - Changing the image alone would fail the runner's exact version and executable checks. > - This pull request updates those dependencies, integrity checks, controller checks, and image pins together. > - Shared installations can then run the current models without a task-time download. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13829, which updates model choices and reasoning controls. Searches found no open PR that updates these runtime pins. **Current behavior** The shared provider pack ships old CLIs. Claude Code 2.1.263 cannot run Opus 5.5, which requires 2.1.280. Remote controllers reject provider packs whose versions differ from their declared pins. **Proposed behavior** Use Codex 0.156.0, Claude Agent SDK 0.3.280 / Claude Code 2.1.280, and OpenCode 1.18.32 throughout the runner. Keep the reviewed ACP bridge patches and one shared CLI installation per provider. **Reason and benefit** Current harnesses support the new model IDs while preserving executable verification and remote provider-pack compatibility checks. ## What Changed - Update dependency overrides, the Codex ACP package patch, runtime profiles, and remote controller pins. - Verify the new Claude Linux x64 and macOS arm64/x64 executables and Codex Linux x64 executable against integrity-verified npm archives. - Refresh OpenCode version checks, fixtures, and the runner configuration label. - Refresh the eval image's Grok, Gemini, Kimi, Cursor, and GitHub CLI pins and archive hashes. Hermes remains current at 0.19.0. - Refresh the build-time lock digest from clean pnpm 9.15.4 resolution. Leave lockfile commits to repository automation. - Document model compatibility and the separation between CLI runtimes and patched ACP bridges. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. - Rust workspace release tests passed. - Package/patch and OpenCode binary-materialization contract tests: 11 passed. - Real Codex 0.156.0 startup-ownership and paginated session-resume probes passed with isolated synthetic homes and no model turn. - Codex app-server `thread/start` preserved `gpt-6-sol` and `gpt-6-luna`; no `turn/start` was sent. An unauthenticated built-in catalog does not include those account-served entries. - Installed Claude integrity probes passed for `claude-opus-5-5` and `claude-fable-5-1`. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner test:opencode:qualification` passed with the actual OpenCode 1.18.32 executable under Node 24 and Node 25. The loopback provider exercise covers health/version, session creation/read/delete, SSE, and a completed async prompt. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - The targeted runner suite passed 130 tests. Three macOS failures in snapshot module lookup and OpenCode final-message selection also reproduce on the unchanged base; Linux CI will provide the platform check. - [Final Linux CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35798076399): all gates passed. Four jobs needed one retry after their CI workers received shutdown signals. The PR has 55 successful checks, two skipped checks, Greptile 5/5, and no unresolved review threads. - Changed runner configuration UI tests: 5 passed. - Full macOS `pnpm test:run` reached 13,094 passing server tests, 84 skipped, and 18 failures before the wrapper stopped. Failures involved skill-cache publication permissions, missing bundled connector skills in the worktree, and a conversation-reset timing case. The 10 cache permission failures reproduce on the unchanged base; both conversation-reset cases passed on a targeted retry. The wrapper did not reach its later workspace/serialized groups locally; Linux CI covers those groups. - The local Docker daemon did not respond, so no local Docker build was run. No billable model requests were made. ## Risks - Deploy the matching controller and provider pack together. Older controllers enforce their previous exact pins. - Current upstream CLIs can change behavior. Existing protocol tests and isolated real Codex probes cover the integration boundaries; authenticated model inference is not part of these checks. - ACP bridge package versions and executable digests stay unchanged because their executable bytes are unchanged. Only the underlying CLI/SDK dependencies move. - No schema migration. Revert the runtime and image pins together to roll back. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 via Codex, with repository tools, code execution, and web research. The exact serving model ID and context window were not exposed by this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass for the changed surfaces and real-executable probes; full macOS-suite limitations are listed above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.923.0-canary.0 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
cdf04a33fa |
feat(adapters): refresh current coding models and reasoning controls (#13829)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Its adapters supply model catalogs and reasoning controls to agent setup. > - Several provider releases are missing from the fallback catalogs. > - Some newer models also have effort levels that the UI does not offer. > - Operators need the exact supported IDs and controls when discovery is unavailable. > - This pull request updates the existing adapters from current provider documentation. > - Operators can select current coding models without entering custom IDs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Model selection and reasoning controls across the existing coding-agent adapters. **Subsystem affected** Claude, Codex, Grok, Gemini, Cursor, Kimi, and OpenCode adapters; model discovery tests; agent creation and editing. **Current behavior** The catalogs omit Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Sol/Luna, Grok 4.7/4.6/4.5, current Gemini Flash models, and several Cursor/Kimi choices. Bedrock has obsolete IDs. The UI omits supported effort levels and saves Grok effort under a key the runtime does not read. **Proposed behavior** Offer verified current model IDs and model-specific efforts. Remove retired Gemini 2.0 choices. Keep configured defaults and saved model IDs. Keep runtime discovery for account-specific choices. **Reason and benefit** Catch up with provider releases through September 22, 2026. Correct the picker and runtime controls together. **Breaking changes** No database or API change. Gemini 2.0 options leave the picker after their June 1 shutdown. Existing saved IDs remain unchanged. Corrected Bedrock catalog IDs do not rewrite saved configuration. **Additional context** Supersedes the separate GPT-6 Sol PR #13830. Fable 5.1 was already merged in #12730, and GPT-6 Astra in #12851. The Grok 4.6/4.5 proposal #11324 was closed and parked by its author. This change retains the default-sentinel fix from #12062. Related discovery proposals #13127 and #13565 do not supply these catalog and effort updates. Searches found no open PR for the additional model IDs. See [the dated audit](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/feat/claude-opus-5-5/doc/adapter-model-audit-2026-09-22.md) for exact scope, primary sources, runtime observations, and account-specific limits. This updates existing adapters and does not duplicate planned core work. ## What Changed - Add Opus 5.5 for direct Claude and Bedrock, with a Claude Code 2.1.280 gate. Correct and extend Bedrock model IDs. - Add GPT-6 Sol/Luna and Fast mode. Offer Ultra for Astra/Sol and GPT-5.6 Sol/Terra, and Max for both Luna generations. - Add Grok 4.7/4.6/4.5, expose supported Extra High effort, and save Grok edits under `reasoningEffort`. - Add Gemini Flash 3.8/3.7/3.6/3.5, Flash Lite 3.5/3.1, and 3 Flash Preview. Remove retired 2.0 choices. - Add the current documented Cursor fallback models, including Fable 5.1, Composer 2.5, and Muse Spark 1.3. - Refresh OpenCode fallback IDs used in remote environments from its installed provider registry. - Add Kimi K3 256K. Update the existing coding alias to K2.8 Preview and enable its CLI effort settings. - Use model-specific Claude/Grok efforts in creation and editing. Clear unsupported effort when switching models. - Add catalog, CLI/ACP forwarding, compatibility, and UI persistence coverage. Record the audit and sources. ## Verification - Latest head `6e63c9ef53b54ba869cd4fb431a8570bebe289f4`: 53 CI checks passed, 2 skipped. This includes full workspace typecheck, build, and all test shards. Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. GitHub reports no merge conflicts. - 340 focused tests passed across adapter metadata, CLI/ACP arguments, Claude version checks, Kimi effort, Grok execution, server model discovery, and UI effort selection/persistence. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local --filter @paperclipai/adapter-grok-local --filter @paperclipai/adapter-gemini-local --filter @paperclipai/adapter-kimi-local --filter @paperclipai/adapter-cursor-local --filter @paperclipai/adapter-opencode-local typecheck` — passed. The same filters with `build` passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` and `git diff --check` — passed. - Full workspace and UI typechecks were attempted locally. They stop on existing missing `three` dependencies in `packages/shared/src/cliplab`. - Full `pnpm test:run` and `pnpm build` were not run locally. Worktree creation exhausted disk space, so a clean dependency install is not feasible on this host. Focused checks reuse existing dependencies. CI supplies full workspace verification. - No provider inference was run. Account-specific runtime model lists were inspected where available. - Manual check: select the new models in agent setup and editing. Confirm Luna has Max but no Ultra, Grok 4.7 has Extra High, and Fable 5.1 has Extra High/Max. Save Grok effort and confirm `adapterConfig.reasoningEffort` contains the selection. ## Risks - Catalog presence does not grant account access. Older CLIs and restricted accounts can reject a model. Opus 5.5 has an explicit upgrade check. - Higher effort can increase cost and latency. Existing agent defaults are unchanged. - Cursor fallback IDs come from public model documentation; the local account exposed no live catalog. Runtime discovery still adds account-specific variants. - Kimi effort remains supported only on its explicit CLI engine. This does not add effort support to its default ACP engine. - Saved obsolete Bedrock or retired Gemini IDs are not migrated automatically. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact deployment ID and context window are not exposed to this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
7badae6981 |
feat(plugins): add an optional organization switcher slot (#13832)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Plugins can add UI surfaces to the board. > - Organization navigation is still fixed in the host sidebar. > - A distribution needs a supported way to supply its own organization menu. > - This pull request adds one optional React slot with host-owned navigation controls. > - The built-in menu stays available when the optional contribution cannot render. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Plugin SDK, server capability validation, and sidebar UI. **Problem or motivation** An installed plugin cannot replace the organization switcher without editing the host menu. Existing sidebar and overlay slots do not provide this replacement surface. **Proposed solution** Add an `organizationSwitcher` slot that requires `ui.sidebar.register`. Pass display state, an icon renderer, and navigation/logout callbacks. Keep the built-in menu for absent, ambiguous, missing, failed, or unsupported contributions. **Roadmap alignment** This keeps distribution UI in plugins and adds a small host contract. It does not add an account system or change company authorization. The maintainer requested this extension. Related prior menu changes: #12788, #10917, and #10850. No duplicate replacement-slot PR was found. ## What Changed - Add the slot to shared validation, SDK types, and server capability checks. - Wrap both sidebar menu variants with the optional replacement. - Resolve selection against the current account query before mounting, and reset replacement state on account or company changes. - Add host-specific component props and a fallback to `PluginSlotMount`. - Document the React-only contract and its trust boundary. - Report runtime-supervisor fixture startup details when CI readiness fails. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/ui`: 6,580 tests passed. - Targeted manifest, replacement, and built-in menu tests: 26 passed, including the incoming-account selection regression. - Installed a local test contribution into an isolated server. CLI inspection reported `ready`. Browser checks covered the loaded production UI, keyboard dismissal, current-organization selection, and an expired remote session. Remote account responses were fixtures. - `pnpm test:run` was attempted. Its first server phase passed 8,323 tests but failed in 36 files due to embedded PostgreSQL startup and filesystem permission errors on this Mac. Later phases did not run. The current Linux CI run is green: 54 checks passed and two were skipped, including build, typecheck, and browser gates. See https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35796722770. - The earlier runtime-supervisor readiness failure did not reproduce locally. The complete affected shard passed locally: 58 files and 843 tests. The six supervisor tests also passed on Node 24.21.0 with CI flags. Added fixture startup diagnostics for the selected Node executable and listener port. The affected Linux shard then passed all 843 tests. The original root cause remains unconfirmed; no production runtime behavior or timeout was changed. ## Risks - Plugin UI remains trusted same-origin code. Display props do not authorize account requests. - A replacement can change navigation behavior. The host retains the built-in menu when discovery or rendering fails and keeps logout/session cleanup host-owned. - No database migration. Existing menus and portfolio behavior remain available. - Local full-suite verification is limited by the environment failures listed above. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and browser testing. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.922.0-canary.14 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f447990d77 |
fix(claude): recognize ACP quota fallback errors (#13831)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Claude adapter reports failures to the recovery system. > - Recovery must distinguish account quota from other provider limits. > - The Claude ACP bridge has a default message for an account with no quota. > - The current classifier misses that message and returns `acpx_turn_failed`. > - This pull request recognizes that exact typed message and uses the existing quota wait. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13651. This is a narrow follow-up to its typed quota classification. Related PRs #13549 and #10276 address broader quota classification and reset handling. This change covers the bridge's exact default quota message. **What happened?** A typed Claude ACP `limit` failure with the title `The Claude account has no available quota.` returns `acpx_turn_failed`. The recovery result has no quota label. **Expected behavior** Return `provider_quota`. Use the existing one-hour quota backoff when the provider gives no reset time. Keep context, turn, rate, and configured budget limits out of the quota path. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use the local ACP fixture to return the exact title above with category `limit` and severity `error`. 2. Run the Claude adapter in oneshot or persistent mode. 3. Before this change, the new regression cases receive `acpx_turn_failed` instead of `provider_quota` on ACPX 0.12.0 and 0.13.1. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `a959e4750`. Rebased onto current `master` before submission. **Deployment mode** Local source checkout with isolated ACP child-process fixtures. No live provider calls or customer-stack changes. ## What Changed - Recognize the exact Claude bridge quota fallback only for typed `limit` failures. - Add real-process regression cases for both pinned ACPX versions and both session modes. - Verify that unrelated categories, positive quota wording, and historical generic limit errors do not imply quota exhaustion. - Document the fallback and its existing recovery backoff. ## Verification - Red/green reproduction: all four new fallback cases failed before the classifier change and passed afterward. - 108 targeted tests passed across Claude ACP, quota, parser, and server recovery suites. - Claude adapter typecheck and build passed. - Real-process tests verify that provider text stays out of results and logs. - Full local `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. - The full local `pnpm test:run` attempt stopped after embedded PostgreSQL could not load a missing library symlink. The dependency setup was repaired in the worktree. The isolated database test then passed. The complete test suites passed in GitHub CI. - All 54 latest-head checks passed on `3d4d4e65386c5b6023ba34e6a2abcd94cff9a9bc`. Two optional Storybook jobs were skipped. - Greptile: 5/5, with no inline review threads or requested changes. ## Risks - Low risk. An exact match is required inside an existing typed `limit` failure. - If upstream changes this wording, this fallback can stop matching. Existing quota-message detection remains in place. - No schema, credential, or permission changes. Historical generic errors remain ambiguous and are not reclassified. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The session identifies the model family as GPT-6 but does not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. Used reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, and terminal test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.922.0-canary.13 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a10702a878 |
feat(slack): add governed tools for Slack-origin tasks (#13828)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Chat connectors let people start and continue agent tasks from other services. > - A Slack conversation needs access to its surrounding discussion and Slack collaboration tools. > - The agent must use the linked requester's access and keep private material within its permitted audience. > - This pull request adds Slack tools through the existing connector contribution and approval framework. > - People can ask an invited bot to read a discussion, create follow-up tasks, and collaborate in Slack. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Chat connectors, connector runtime, tool gateway, and connection Settings/Access. **Problem or motivation** Slack-origin tasks can receive messages but cannot inspect the rest of a channel or act through the originating bot. People must paste context or configure a separate integration. **Proposed solution** Supply typed Slack tools and a bundled skill only to the originating task and assigned agent. Resolve the linked requester on the server. Check bot and requester access before reads and writes. Use existing durable actions and approvals. Retrieved messages remain source material. **Alternatives considered** Slack's user-OAuth MCP server does not replace the customer-created chat bot. An unrestricted Web API proxy would not provide suitable permission or publication boundaries. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the existing MCP Tool Gateway & Apps work with a provider contribution. It does not add a task dispatcher or a separate Slack task lifecycle. Related: #11144 covers generic per-user MCP grant execution; this change binds Slack bot operations to chat-origin tasks. ## What Changed - Add 39 typed Slack tools, a method/scope matrix, a bundled skill, and shared native/HTTP execution. - Bind tools to company, endpoint, task, run, assigned agent, and admitted linked requester. Check membership and revocation on each call and before queued writes. - Add paginated reads, bounded history search, source links, messages, file uploads, reactions, pins, bookmarks, topics, canvases, lists, and approved channel operations. - Restrict private-source publication, including automatic replies and uploaded deliverables. Keep other people's bot DMs inaccessible. - Reuse action receipts, idempotency, approvals, and reconciliation. Suppress an identical explicit-send/final-reply duplicate. Return governed results through their verified originating conversation. - Add endpoint-bound personal search OAuth storage and lifecycle. Keep native real-time search disabled until a runtime meets Slack's transient-result requirements. Current runtimes use bounded history search. - Show capabilities, scope upgrades, and personal search authorization in Settings/Access and Storybook. Document provider and runtime limits. ## Verification - Current head `0eb21cba4`: CI checks pass and Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved findings. One unchanged rapid-callback timing test passed on a single CI retry. - Approval presentation regressions cover board-comment precedence and exact Slack publication; the expanded database assertion passed in CI. The local PostgreSQL startup probe later became unavailable, so that final assertion was verified in CI. Slack setup and failed-run retry browser tests also passed locally. - Full workspace typecheck and build passed. Server typecheck/build passed again after the approval routing fix. - Broad local suites passed in separate groups: server 12,958 tests, UI 6,555, shared 770, skills catalog 20, and other workspace packages 2,652. CLI and serialized server checks passed after environment/timeout retries. These are composite results, not one uninterrupted green full-suite invocation. - PostgreSQL authority regression covers admitted identity, cross-company/task/agent rejection, recovery, retained-session revocation, OAuth refresh/disconnect races, approval execution, exact publication lineage, retries, uncertain sends, and duplicate suppression. - Gateway/response regressions cover separate-origin approval batches and durable continuation. Focused provider, access, search, native runtime, route, and AgentMail regressions pass. - Storybook capability, missing-scope, OAuth configuration, authorization, and disconnect states were inspected in the browser. - Live staging: read a channel decision and full thread, create exactly two assigned backlog tasks, add a reaction, paginate discovery to exhaustion, and return bounded search matches with source links and coverage. - Live staging: create/edit/read a canvas and list, inspect the canvas in Slack, post/edit one message, and create a channel only after approval. New channels remain disabled for responses. - Live staging: read a response-disabled channel from the requester's DM; writes to that channel were denied. The test setting was restored. - Final live retest passed: explicit file upload and exact content read-back; approved deletion of only the disposable bot message; continuation confirmation returned to the original Slack thread without repeating the action. - Optional OAuth, private multi-user boundaries, native RTS, and CLI provider execution are not fully live-qualified. The staging agent initially supplied malformed tool arguments; valid arguments succeeded, and the tool/skill descriptions now emphasize UUID write keys. ## Risks - Existing Slack apps must add scopes and reinstall for new capabilities. Provider plans and document permissions can still restrict operations. - Instances need an independent `PAPERCLIP_TOOL_ACTION_SIGNING_SECRET` for governed tool actions. The staging instance was configured with explicit operator approval; fleet provisioning is a separate gap. - Native RTS is not exposed on current transcript-retaining runtimes. Bounded history scans are deliberately reported as incomplete. Inline file reads support text/canvas content up to 256 KiB; other types return metadata. - Private document edits fail closed when the full audience cannot be verified. Uncertain effects other than posts/uploads require inspection instead of blind retries. - Shared approval-delivery code now separates outcomes by source run to preserve origin boundaries. No database migration is required. - A separate completion-validator gap remains when the agent cites a prior run's registered artifact during finalization. It asked for registration again even though Slack delivery was confirmed. This change does not add a connector-specific task-completion policy. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository tools, code execution, and browser testing. The exact deployed model identifier and context-window size were not exposed in the session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.922.0-canary.12 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a959e47508 |
fix(apps): reduce Google Chat scopes and block unread filters (#13820)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Apps give agents controlled access to external services. > - Google Chat uses OAuth profiles and reviewed MCP tools. > - Those profiles request membership and read-state access that the supported feature set does not need. > - Removing read-state access also requires us to block unread search filters, including on existing connections. > - This pull request reduces both OAuth methods and enforces the reduced search contract before dispatch. > - Users retain conversation lookup, message history, ordinary search, and approved message sending. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Both Google Chat profiles request membership and read-state scopes. The supported tool set does not include membership listing or read-state updates. Message search still advertises an unread filter. Related work: Refs #12619. **Expected behavior** Managed and customer-owned OAuth request only the scopes needed for supported features. Unsupported unread filters fail clearly before any provider call. Existing cached catalogs and broader grants must not bypass that policy. **Steps to reproduce** Start Google Chat OAuth from either connection method and inspect the requested scopes. Inspect the message-search tool schema, then submit a search with `searchParameters.isUnread` set to true or false. **Paperclip version or commit** The scope change is based on master at `110d176fc`. **Deployment mode** Managed Cloud and self-hosted instances with Google Chat Apps enabled. ## What Changed - Remove `chat.memberships.readonly` and `chat.users.readstate.readonly` from shared profiles and all four Chat connection methods. - Hide unsupported read-state fields and instructions in agent and board Test tool schemas. - Reject explicit unread filters, including false, null, snake-case fields, and encoded filter objects, before provider dispatch. - Recheck previously approved calls and support existing profile-bound and URL-only Chat connections. - Add scope, signed broker request, OAuth URL, allowlist, schema, and dispatch regression tests. - Document coordinated app/broker rollout, existing-grant reconnects, and the remaining deployment checks. ## Verification - All seven focused OAuth and Chat gateway test files pass: 498 tests on the rebased branch. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass, using pinned pnpm 9.15.4. - The complete sharded CI test matrix passes, including general server, Chat, workspace, serialized server, Runner, and all eight browser e2e shards. The duplicate unsharded local `pnpm test:run` was stopped after CI passed; it did not complete locally. - `git diff --check` passes. - `node scripts/ingest-app-definitions.mjs` succeeds and leaves the branch unchanged. Google Workspace JSON is the durable reviewed input used by the generator. - All current-head CI checks pass at `7ee755371714dc036fff1c7da844776fee3f2ec1`, including typecheck, build, and canary dry run. Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. The generator concern was withdrawn after review of the source and regeneration evidence. - No production deployment or live Google consent test was performed. After coordinated deployment, verify reduced consent scopes, normal search/history, message sending, and rejection of unread filters. ## Risks - Coordinate deployment with the companion Cloud broker scope change. Mixed versions can reject exact-scope requests. - Existing tokens are not narrowed or revoked. Grants with old scopes need new consent. Do not revoke a shared Google client to migrate one profile. - Explicit unread filters now return an error instead of being sent to Google. Ordinary search and the approved send tool remain available. - No database, UI, lockfile, or workflow changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, a GPT-5-based coding agent, with tool use and code execution. The exact runtime model ID and context window were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9a76390cfa |
test(runner): improve blank-page diagnostics and infrastructure coverage (#13824)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Runner E2E tests verify real tasks and retain evidence for failures.
> - Some exposure tests assumed that port 42000 was free.
> - A blank task page could also fail without enough browser startup
evidence.
> - This pull request tests occupied ports and task reloads, and records
private startup diagnostics.
> - These changes make test failures easier to reproduce and explain.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #13815. Report publication already received its production fix in
#13750; this PR adds a regression check for that workflow.
**What happened?**
Three exposure tests assumed that the allocator would select port 42000.
The synthetic failure disappeared when another process occupied that
port. A prior Daytona run also retained an empty task page after
navigation, but its evidence did not record pending modules or
service-worker control.
**Expected behavior**
Exposure tests must exercise the intended failure on the actual assigned
port. Browser failure evidence must distinguish an empty root from
loaded content. A saved task must remain usable after navigation and
reload.
**Steps to reproduce**
Run the exposure regression with the base port pair marked unavailable.
Run the browser-support tests with an unresolved entry module. Open a
saved task under the service worker, navigate to the same URL, and
reload it.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Based on master at
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
1ccae464c5 |
feat(ui): add task artifact media gallery and full-row links (#13825)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Tasks collect the files and work products that agents create. > - The Artifacts tab shows these outputs in rows, which makes videos hard to compare. > - Small text links also make artifact rows harder to open. > - This pull request adds image and video tiles with previews and makes the full artifact row clickable. > - Users can compare outputs and open the existing media viewer with one click. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The task Artifacts tab and media previews in task chat. **Current behavior** Video outputs appear as file rows or icons. Users must click a small link to open a work product. A task with eight video outputs gives little visual context. **Proposed behavior** Show images and videos in a responsive gallery. Show a paused video frame as the thumbnail. Keep documents, links, and other files in rows whose entire area opens the item. **Reason and benefit** Users can compare generated media without opening each item. Larger click targets also make the sidebar easier to use. **Breaking changes** None. This uses the existing artifact URLs, media viewer, run grouping, and attachment filters. No API or database changes. Related work: #11226 added the task sidebar output surface, and #7361 added rich attachment previews. #3524 concerns a separate reviewed-assets panel. This PR improves the existing task artifact components. The duplicate search found no active PR for this change. This is polish for the shipped Artifacts & Work Products roadmap item. ## What Changed - Add a shared media tile for work products and agent attachments. - Reuse video and image previews in task artifacts and chat. Seek up to one second into videos and reset preview state when the source changes. - Use the existing task gallery for playback and downloads. Preserve grouping and attachment deduplication. - Extend native links and buttons across work-product rows, including keyboard focus indicators. - Add eight offline Storybook examples for video outputs, mixed media, clickable rows, narrow and wide panels, missing previews, empty state, and light mode. - Register the component in the design guide and document its use. ## Verification - 108 focused component tests pass, including thumbnail seeking, source changes, gallery activation, and attachment deduplication. - `pnpm build`, `pnpm -r typecheck`, Storybook build, token gates, and `git diff --check` pass locally. - Reviewed the production components in the embedded browser. Checked all eight video thumbnails, mixed media, narrow layout, light mode, blank-area row clicks, keyboard gallery activation for generic-MIME images, and playback from chat video thumbnails. - Storybook: open **Tasks / Artifact Gallery** and select **Eight Video Outputs**, **Mixed Media And Files**, or **Whole Row Clickable**. The small local clips are synthetic fixtures. - All build, typecheck, unit, runner, and end-to-end CI jobs pass for `b8ace289b5e07df5b9f2c319b159f3923ce427b4`. Greptile gives 5/5 with both review findings resolved. All 54 PR checks pass, including the external security scan. The full test suite passed in CI. The duplicate serial local test run was stopped after CI finished; the 108 focused tests, full build, and recursive typecheck passed locally. ## Risks - Video thumbnails require the browser to load metadata and a frame. A slow server or unsupported codec can leave the fallback visible; opening and downloading still use the existing viewer. - Full-row click targets change pointer interaction with work-product cards. Native link and button semantics remain in place. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with code execution and browser tools. The exact deployment ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
92d4868e79 |
fix(server): isolate run errors and redact runtime capability headers (#13826)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Operators use Sentry to investigate failed runs and server errors.
> - Run reports attach a task ID, run ID, error code, and adapter
fingerprint.
> - The server skips Sentry's OpenTelemetry setup to preserve its
separate tracing and privacy settings.
> - Without an async context manager, a scope mutation can attach old
run data to later errors.
> - The HTTP logger also retains a runtime credential capability header.
> - This change isolates run metadata and redacts that header so
diagnostics identify failures without leaking credentials.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #13446 and #13719.
**What happened?**
After a terminal run failure, an unrelated server exception can inherit
that run's tags, context, and fingerprint. Sentry then groups a database
error with an earlier adapter failure. The real SDK reproduces this with
the application's `skipOpenTelemetrySetup: true` setting. HTTP request
logs also retain the `x-paperclip-github-capability` header, which must
be treated as a credential.
**Expected behavior**
Run metadata belongs to the terminal run event. Later exceptions must
not inherit it. Every genuine error must still be captured. Runtime
capability headers must be redacted on success and failure logs.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Initialize the optional Sentry SDK with the application's options and
an in-memory transport.
2. Capture a terminal run failure.
3. Capture an unrelated exception.
4. Inspect the second event. Before this fix, it contains the first
run's identity and fingerprint.
5. Send a request with a fixture runtime GitHub capability header.
Before this fix, HTTP logs retain the fixture value.
## What Changed
- Pass tags, context, and fingerprint directly to `captureException`
instead of mutating the ambient scope.
- Preserve the existing run fields, grouping keys, ordinary exception
capture, and privacy settings.
- Test two run identities interleaved with unrelated exceptions against
the real optional SDK.
- Update the capture contract tests and document event-local run
metadata.
- Redact the runtime GitHub capability header through the existing HTTP
logger policy. Test successful, denied, and failed requests.
- Add a dedicated GitHub-hosted CI check that installs the exact
optional SDK version declared in `server/package.json`. It fails if the
real-SDK regression would be skipped. The SDK stays outside the
workspace and production dependency graph.
## Verification
- The real-SDK regression failed before the fix because the unrelated
event contained `contexts.run_failure`.
- Five focused suites passed: 123 tests, including all optional SDK
tests. Suites: `run-failure-sentry-real-sdk.test.ts`,
`run-failure-sentry.test.ts`, `sentry.test.ts`,
`run-failure-report.test.ts`, and `http-log-redaction.test.ts`. A custom
in-memory transport prevented outbound Sentry delivery.
- All three new header-redaction cases failed before the policy fix and
passed afterward.
- The dedicated CI command passed locally with
`PAPERCLIP_REQUIRE_SENTRY_TEST_SDK=1` and the audited SDK available
through `NODE_PATH`.
- Server TypeScript check passed with a scratch configuration that
resolves this checkout's workspace packages. The existing dependency
links point to another checkout.
- `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs` and `git diff --check`
passed.
- Gitleaks and a separate private-data scan passed before push.
- Full local workspace typecheck, test, and build were not run. The
machine has less than 2 GiB free and those commands include Rust builds.
Full PR CI must pass before merge.
- The dedicated real-SDK GitHub check passed with 1 test executed and no
skips: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35774449002
- Greptile reviewed
canary/v2026.922.0-canary.11
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a68f3d8e35 |
fix(runner-e2e): align Daytona image and provider pack provenance (#13814)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is an open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Daytona runner image provides the native runner and its provider package. > - The controller also sends a provider package to native Daytona cells when the image package does not match. > - A stale image and a package from another source revision caused a 1.8 GB upload before Claude could run. > - This pull request refreshes the reviewed lock checksum and documents how to reuse the exact package from an immutable image. > - The benefit is a reproducible setup path and clear evidence when image and package provenance do not match. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A Daytona native Claude run used image source revision `45c99a0d06cbd5b04982b06b79de321149930ac5` with a controller provider package from revision `294853dc...`. Runtime verification rejected the image package and staged a large package upload before model execution. A hosted campaign also failed during image setup because the Dockerfile expected lock checksum `d7d96cf0...` while the resolved lockfile checksum was `4b796c312833ebf2be4c38228babc0292c76774fb40d43bd18b54bd6b205753d`. Related public work reviewed: [#12795](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12795), [#12862](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12862), and [#12887](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12887). **Expected behavior** The Daytona image and controller provider package must come from the same verified build. A package extracted from the immutable image must pass the existing manifest, source revision, lockfile, binary, bridge, and artifact checks before a native Claude run starts. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Set `PAPERCLIP_E2E_DAYTONA_IMAGE` to the old immutable image digest. 2. Set `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_REMOTE_PROVIDER_PACK_PATH` to a package built from a different source revision. 3. Run a native Claude Daytona cell. 4. Observe provider package verification failure followed by the large staging upload. 5. Build the image with the stale Dockerfile lock checksum and observe the checksum failure. **Paperclip version or commit** `3b8df3dcd6f99e99277faa45f3351989edb5c239`. **Deployment mode** Daytona native runner E2E. **Install method** Built from source. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Claude Code through the native ACPX runner. **Database mode** Not database-related. **Access context** Not applicable to the setup failure. ## What Changed - Refreshed `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_LOCK_SHA256` in `docker/daytona-runner/Dockerfile` to the resolved lockfile checksum. - Added a local guide for extracting the provider package from an immutable verified image with Docker. - Documented the required provenance checks and the expected manifest-matched runtime log. - Documented that cold package upload coverage must remain separate from recovery coverage. - Pinned the preview-service test guest to the test runner’s Node executable and logged guest startup and bound ports for readiness diagnostics. ## Verification - 442 focused E2E tests passed. - Typecheck passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - Five provider-pack reuse tests passed. - Six Daytona image contract tests passed. - Fixed Daytona campaign [35740613581](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35740613581) passed. - The overall hiring campaign [35739993219](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35739993219) failed because of an unrelated Mini metadata failure; its Claude cell passed. - Full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted but did not complete. The isolated Postgres install was repaired and its 15-test probe passed. - After the fixture change, all seven preview reservation tests passed locally and CI server shard 6/12 passed on `20234f75f`. This removes login-shell Node resolution variance; the exact cause of the earlier CI-only timeout is not established. - CI run [35766034635](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35766034635) passed on `20234f75f`. All server, runner, browser, build, and typecheck gates passed. - The signoff browser case initially failed waiting for an approver run. All five signoff tests passed locally without changes; the one allowed CI retry passed all 19 shard tests. This is recorded as an intermittent failure, not a demonstrated product fix. - Greptile reviewed `20234f75f`: 5/5, no actionable findings. - [Follow-up report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-daytona-hiring-20260922/) includes timings, evidence links, and the remaining hiring configuration failure. - Review the immutable image source revision and extracted `provider-pack.json` before another paid recovery run. ## Risks - The Dockerfile checksum gate intentionally fails when the resolved lockfile changes. A future dependency change must refresh the reviewed checksum with the image change. - The local extraction guide requires Docker and a pullable immutable image. - An image built from an older source revision can still fail runtime manifest verification. The guide does not bypass that check. - The change does not alter runner prompts, approval policy, or recovery behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex using the primary GPT-6 backend; the exact backend deployment ID is not exposed. Repository analysis and code execution used tool access. Assistance also came from OpenAI gpt-5.6-luna. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.922.0-canary.10 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
2788f20fc0 |
fix(ui): show ancestors in the task detail Tasks panel (#13823)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Tasks form a hierarchy that explains why each piece of work exists. > - The streamlined Tasks panel shows child tasks and work created by the current task. > - It does not show ancestors, although the task response already includes them. > - This pull request adds linked ancestors above Subtasks in root-to-parent order. > - Users can now move up the task hierarchy from the same panel. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related implementation: #13241. A search found no duplicate ancestor-panel PR. **What happened?** The Tasks panel omitted the current task's ancestors. The streamlined header also hides hierarchy breadcrumbs. **Expected behavior** The Tasks panel should show the ancestor chain and let users open each ancestor. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a task with a parent and grandparent in the streamlined UI. 2. Open the Tasks tab in the side panel. 3. Observe that it shows child and created tasks but no ancestors. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master atcanary/v2026.922.0-canary.9 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
5f1100e3b3 |
refactor(server): remove retired operator UI snippet injection (#13789)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Operators can extend its interface through trusted plugin UI contributions. > - The server also accepts executable HTML through two legacy environment settings. > - This older path bypasses the plugin installation and lifecycle model. > - This pull request removes snippet injection from static and development pages. > - Operators must migrate existing integrations before upgrading. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Retire the operator HTML injection path from the server. Related public changes: #13168, #13245 and #13496 introduced the legacy settings; #13646 supplies the generic plugin host contract. **Current behavior** Managed instances append operator-supplied HTML or a decoded script body to every page. The same integration can use supported trusted plugin UI slots. **Proposed behavior** Ignore both retired settings. Serve normal branded static and development HTML, and keep plugin contributions unchanged. **Breaking changes** Installations that rely on `PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_UI_SNIPPET` or `PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_UI_SNIPPET_B64` must migrate before upgrading. The maintainer-owned staging and production deployments have completed the migration prerequisite. Other operators must migrate their integrations before adopting this change. ## What Changed - Remove the snippet injector and its static/dev rendering integration. - Remove injector-specific tests and retain a regression that old settings no longer change served HTML. - Replace setup instructions with a retirement and plugin-migration note. ## Verification - Rebased onto current master; `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/static-index-html.test.ts server/src/__tests__/vite-html-renderer.test.ts`: 5 tests passed. - With repository-pinned Rust/Cargo installed, full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass after rebase. - Previous full local `pnpm test:run` encountered unrelated macOS runtime-cache rename `EACCES` errors and a missing AgentMail skill path; a focused reproduction confirmed 5 failures / 95 passes. That is not a passing full-suite result. The unchanged focused suites, build and typecheck were repeated after rebase; the full local suite was not repeated. All 54 refreshed GitHub checks/contexts passed on `bd62bff63f9d7980bfd10e54cb0102693d27ecfb`; fresh Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved threads. - No UI component styling, database or API contract changed. - Maintainer approved the remaining rollout and cleanup. Staging snippet retirement and sleep/wake verification are complete. Production migration and removal of the legacy settings are complete for serving tenant instances. Remaining old warm inventory is excluded from new signups until configuration reconciliation completes. The maintainer authorized upgrading the remaining old deployments and clearing their pins. ## Risks - Removing the settings disables integrations that still depend on them; operators outside the completed maintainer rollout must migrate before upgrading. This is an intentional behavior change, documented at the existing setup-doc path. - Keep a previous image and its configuration for rollback. Existing browser tabs need a refresh to unload already-injected code. - Plugin UI remains trusted same-origin code. This does not add a security sandbox or change ordinary branding. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex; exact deployment variant and context-window size are not exposed in this session). Reasoning, repository inspection, local code execution and GitHub tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused rendering tests; unrelated local full-suite failures are disclosed above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All refreshed checks pass on `bd62bff63f9d7980bfd10e54cb0102693d27ecfb` - [x] Fresh Greptile is 5/5 on the current head, with no unresolved findings - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
3d78e3a4ec |
fix(runner): keep warm sessions alive with managed GitHub access (#13815)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - The native Runner keeps a live provider process between task turns. > - Managed GitHub access used a token tied to one run. > - A new run forced Paperclip to replace that process to replace its token. > - This PR gives the session a stable credential transport and binds each operation to the active run. > - The agent can keep its process while Paperclip checks current identity and grants. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Follow-up to #13738. Related credential-rotation work: #11770 and #8208 use process replacement for other adapter credentials; this change applies to managed GitHub access in the native Runner. **What happened?** A configured GitHub connection forced a warm native provider process to close at each new run. The saved conversation survived, but the live process did not. **Expected behavior** Keep the warm provider process. Resolve GitHub access for the current run when each command starts. Deny access while idle or after the run ends. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Configure managed GitHub access for a native Runner agent with a warm session. 2. Complete a turn, then send another message to the same task. 3. Observe the provider process close with the reason `warm native session configuration changed`. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master `8326e33ad`. Rebased onto `e3d8fb087` before submission. **Deployment mode** Local and remote native execution, including the sandbox callback bridge. ## What Changed - Move configured native GitHub transport and launcher ownership from the run to the provider session. - Bind the broker only after the executor acquires session ownership. Clear that binding when the run exits. - Keep the shared live-run, identity, grant, and trust-policy checks for each credential request. - Reject wrong scopes, idle requests, and credential responses that arrive after their run binding changes. - Retire transport and launcher files with the provider session. Keep anonymous commands available if bridge startup fails. - Add red/green executor tests, real subprocess and callback-bridge tests, and database checks. Update the runtime documentation. ## Verification - Before the fix, both new local and remote warm-session reuse tests failed. - After the fix, 435 targeted tests passed across the executor, broker, launcher, token, and database suites. - A real long-lived test process kept the same PID and original environment across two runs, including through the production callback bridge on local test processes. - Server typecheck and TypeScript compilation passed. - Full workspace typecheck and build passed. Server typecheck passed again after the review fix. - The fallback-logging regression failed before the fix; all 9 broker tests pass afterward. - The exact chat sidebar browser scenario passed locally. The initial CI timeout showed failed Vite module downloads; all eight browser shards pass on the latest commit. - All 53 latest-head checks passed, including the full CI test matrix and security checks (two unrelated conditional checks skipped). - The duplicate full local test run was stopped after CI passed; it is not claimed as a completed local pass. Targeted local tests, workspace typecheck/build, and the browser scenario passed. - Greptile reviewed the latest commit at 5/5 with no unresolved findings. - No fresh paid provider or Daytona campaign has run for this change. ## Risks - The broker now lives as long as the provider session. Tests cover idle denial, late cleanup, late responses, shutdown, and failed startup. - Its in-memory authority does not survive a controller restart. Existing checkpoint and process-recovery rules still apply. - Raw GitHub credentials remain confined to individual command processes. The session transport token cannot select a different task, agent, company, or run. - No database migration or public API change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, terminal tools, and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
74a9730acb |
fix: continue native agent chats after worker loss (#13813)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent Chat uses native workers to run Claude and Codex conversations. > - A worker crash leaves a cleanup hold because its provider did not acknowledge suspension. > - A new user message must not reuse that unverified session or repeat old tool calls. > - The existing continuation path can preserve history and start a fresh session, but local cleanup ownership remained held. > - This pull request verifies the stopped local owners and releases only their cleanup hold for a new user turn. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13775. **What happened?** After a native worker crashed, both providers retained cleanup quarantine. A saved plan survived, but the conversation could not produce another answer. **Expected behavior** Once the old worker and provider process groups have stopped, a new user message can continue in a fresh session with the saved work and prior action history. **Steps to reproduce** Run the opt-in `agent-chat-qualification` suite with case `worker-crash-retry` on native Codex and native Claude. The fixture saves a plan, kills the exact worker through a Linux pidfd, releases a local read-only brief, and sends a new message. ## What Changed - Verify the exact local worker stop receipt, provider identity receipts, released leases, and retained state before retiring a native cleanup hold. - Recheck process liveness and state before admission. Keep the old run and durable session files intact. - Use the existing explicit conversation continuation path. Generic Retry remains blocked for cleanup quarantine, including on the old failed-run marker after a successful continuation. - Extend the live oracle to require a successful fresh session, correct predecessor context, unchanged plan, one original message, and one answer containing a reference introduced after the crash. - Add physical-proof and database-backed admission tests. Document the precise qualification scope. ## Verification - Live Product E2E: **2/2 passed**, **2/2 cleanup passed**, with real native `gpt-5.6-sol` and `claude-sonnet-5`, Chromium, server, database, and public APIs. - Core recovery proof source: `3592b04c2bc76e23795fcdf964720e38a409dc4d`. Suite definition version 8: `9867367994d81a0c726956d91f2c7fddab6417a12f41b5cef3f7e62f3be417da`. - [Core recovery campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35741746990) · [Public evidence report](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-35741746990-1/). - Both cells verify the real crash boundary, blocked generic Retry, unchanged saved plan, one original prompt, one fresh successor with predecessor context, and one run-attributed answer containing the post-crash reference. Billing coverage is partial because the crashed runs did not report complete usage; missing cost is not zero cost. - [Master baseline](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35737364443): both providers stopped at quarantine, with cleanup passing. - [Follow-up baseline without the fix](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35738638866): Codex produced a complete red result. Claude reached the same error, but its artifact upload was canceled. - [Complete Claude baseline with the same version-8 definition](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35740555177): red at cleanup quarantine, cleanup passed, source `6479a90c5754044356b39a9278b9a3e92ce8e55e`. - Earlier candidate attempts remain retained: [first](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35738449214) passed Codex and found a Claude fixture wait race; [second](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35740408065) exposed the normalized session-open receipt mismatch. Both corrections are in the final source. - Targeted server suites: 570 passed before the final two additional receipt regression cases. The physical-proof suite, including those cases, passed 46/46. Eval oracle and catalog: 40 passed. Server and Product E2E typechecks passed. - **All 54 PR checks passed on final head `db6f775df`**, including repository typecheck, build, tests, browser shards, and canary dry run. The canary job required one retry after its runner received a shutdown signal. On the earlier core proof head, two timing-sensitive tests passed in isolation and on a single CI retry. - Final UI regression checks: 5 passed; UI typecheck and token gates passed. Updated eval oracle/catalog: 40 passed; eval typecheck passed. - Final version-9 two-provider campaign: **2/2 passed, 2/2 cleanup passed**, including the browser assertion that the quarantined historical run never regains Try again. [Final campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35747416013), source `db6f775dfff405e1514ec02fedb0450d42c7dad2`, definition hash `bf5abf1cc45cb6dad4e082fbf818b8fa0f4d8c282776a7e98762b22919eadab7`. [Final public evidence report](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-35747416013-1/). Final screenshots and retained state inspected for both providers; cost coverage remains partial. ## Risks - Missing or conflicting stop evidence keeps the conversation blocked. This change does not kill an unverified process. - This qualifies new user input after local worker loss. It does not enable automatic replay, exact-session recovery, remote crash recovery, or native onboarding defaults. - Old action outcomes remain part of the continuation. A process exit is not proof that an action did not happen. - No schema migration or production prompt change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The runtime does not expose a more specific model identifier or context-window size. Used reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, shell tools, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
110d176fc9 |
fix: preserve chat message bindings in review recovery (#13818)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - External chat messages can start work on tasks that remain in review. > - Paperclip queues one recovery run when a task loses its review path. > - That recovery keeps the chat source but loses the admitted message IDs. > - The authorization check then rejects the recovery before execution starts. > - This change retains the message IDs so the existing check can verify current access. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13809. **What happened?** A successful external-chat run can leave an active task in review without a maintained review path. Its automatic recovery then fails with `reviewed_chat_execution_binding_not_authorized`. The recovery context retains `chat:slack` but drops `wakeCommentIds`. **Expected behavior** An eligible recovery should retain its admitted message references and pass a new authorization check. Missing or revoked access must still prevent execution. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Finish a chat run whose task remains in review with no maintained review path. 2. Build the bounded review recovery from that run's context. 3. Dispatch the recovery through the reviewed-chat authorization check. The new regression tests fail before this patch. Related PR #13809 handles answered conversations that become idle. This patch handles recovery when the conversation remains active. ## What Changed - Retain the admitted message batch for external-chat review recovery. Derive the current comment reference from that batch. - Share the existing supported-provider selector between recovery and run-bound chat authorization. AgentMail remains on its separate email inbox path. - Keep the existing authorization check. Do not copy prior checkout, authorization, session, or prompt state. - Test Slack and Discord recovery, missing batches, revoked access, and changed task or company bindings. - Document the recovery authorization contract. ## Verification - The new tests reproduced the missing-message failure before the fix. - Six focused suites passed: 257 tests covering review recovery, reviewed-chat authorization, issue liveness, Slack lifecycle, comment-wake batching, and external-chat waits. PostgreSQL integration tests ran against a temporary local PostgreSQL database. - Focused test files: `review-path-recovery.test.ts`, `heartbeat-reviewed-chat-binding.integration.test.ts`, `heartbeat-issue-liveness-escalation.test.ts`, `slack-conversation-lifecycle.test.ts`, `heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts`, and `external-chat-wait.integration.test.ts`. - Server TypeScript check passed with scratch configuration that resolves this checkout's workspace packages. Existing dependency links point to another checkout; the default check reports stale shared-type errors. - `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs` and `git diff --check` passed. - `git diff | gitleaks stdin --redact --no-banner` passed. The diff was also checked for private identifiers and user data. - [Full PR CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35760757895) passed on the latest commit, including build, workspace typecheck, general and serialized tests, Rust checks, and all eight browser shards. The unchanged local-service readiness test and agent-chat page-load assertion passed when their failed shards were retried. The local-service suite also passed locally (6 tests). The first, superseded run lost a chat runner; its stuck browser job was cancelled to unblock the current run. - Full local workspace typecheck, tests, and build were not run. The machine has about 2 GiB free, and those commands include Rust builds. The full PR CI checks passed before merge. ## Risks Small context-construction change. Dispatch still checks current execution ownership and access for every admitted message. The recovery remains bounded to one attempt per consumed path. No schema changes. Existing failed runs are not retried by this patch. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
github-actions[bot]andlockfile-bot
|
213866fae0 |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#13780)
Auto-generated lockfile refresh after dependencies changed on master. This PR only updates pnpm-lock.yaml. Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com>canary/v2026.922.0-canary.8 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
83abfa46f6 |
feat(ui): enable Grok in Cloud agent setup (#13791)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their execution settings. > - The new-agent flow selects an adapter before configuring credentials and a model. > - Cloud uses one adapter policy for the picker and direct setup links. > - That policy excludes Grok despite its existing adapter and xAI connection support. > - This change adds Grok to the Cloud policy. > - Cloud users can configure Grok with the existing subscription or API-key flow. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Agent creation on Cloud. **Current behavior** The Cloud picker offers Claude, Codex, and OpenCode. Direct Grok setup links also fail the shared adapter check. **Proposed behavior** Offer Grok alongside the existing choices. Use the existing xAI connection and managed sandbox setup. **Reason and benefit** Users can select an already-supported adapter through the Cloud creation flow. **Breaking changes** None. Loaded and enabled checks still apply. Other excluded adapters remain excluded. ## What Changed - Add `grok_local` to the shared Cloud creation policy. - Display four adapter choices in a 2×2 grid on desktop and mobile, and reuse the theme-aware provider mark on the connection step so Grok is visible in dark mode. - Verify picker navigation and both Grok authentication methods through sandbox setup, model testing, and agent creation. - Verify that probe and hire payloads carry the xAI connection binding without the entered API key. - Update the agent configuration specification. ## Verification - `cd ui && pnpm exec vitest run src/components/NewAgentDialog.test.tsx src/pages/NewAgent.test.tsx src/components/new-agent/AgentProviderConnection.test.tsx` — 69 tests passed. - Chromium checks against the production components and built stylesheet — four cards occupy two rows and two columns at 1280px and 390px; the connection step loads and displays the white Grok logo in dark mode and the black logo in light mode. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` — passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` — passed. - `git diff origin/master...HEAD | gitleaks stdin --redact --no-banner` — no leaks found; manual diff review found no private identifiers or user data. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` — blocked at the existing runner package because `cargo` is not installed locally. - `pnpm test:run` — started locally, then stopped after the equivalent CI suites passed. - Initial [PR CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35681351752) passed, including full typecheck/build, general and serialized tests, Rust checks, and all eight browser-test shards. One unchanged Cursor test timed out on the first attempt; its five-test file passed locally and the failed CI shard passed on retry. - The [latest CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35683642812) passed build, typecheck, all general and serialized tests, Rust checks, and all eight browser-test shards. One unchanged local-service-supervisor test failed its HTTP readiness check on the first attempt; its six-test file passed locally, and the failed server shard passed on retry. - Live xAI login and model execution were not run; the setup tests mock provider calls. ## Risks Small UI policy change. The existing Grok adapter, authentication, and secret storage paths remain in use. No schema or control-plane change is required. Cloud must deploy a tenant-app release containing this change. Revert the policy entry to hide Grok from new-agent setup again. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with repository inspection, code editing, and shell-based verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.922.0-canary.7 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8725d6ce09 |
fix: make answered Slack conversations idle (#13809)
Settle published, successful Slack turns as Idle; resume the same conversation on an admitted message. Preserve unfinished work, delivery errors, and explicit dispositions. Verified through focused lifecycle/API/UI tests, full CI, and a real staging Slack conversation in the embedded browser. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.922.0-canary.6 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
e3d8fb0876 |
feat: attest standard production images at full source commits (#13797)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Operators deploy its standard production container on several CPU architectures. > - Downstream image builders need to identify the exact source of their base image. > - A short commit tag does not provide signed source evidence. > - This pull request adds a full commit tag and signed image digest for canonical master pushes. > - Consumers can verify the source and compose from the immutable digest. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Publication of the standard multi-platform production image. **Current behavior** The Docker workflow publishes short commit tags and channel tags. It does not provide a signed standard-image contract tied to the complete master commit. **Proposed behavior** Canonical master pushes also publish `sha-<full-commit>` and attest the exact index digest after platform validation and an immutable-image orphan-reaping check. The signer certificate binds the source repository, commit, workflow and ref. Existing tags and the separate cloud producer remain available. **Reason and benefit** Downstream builders can prove the source of a standard base without adding their dependencies or repository details to the public workflow. No matching open issue or duplicate PR was found. ## What Changed - Add the canonical full-SHA tag without changing existing tag mappings. - Validate amd64 and arm64 descriptors and hash the exact registry response bytes and require its digest header to match. - Verify the immutable image and sign it with GitHub artifact attestations. - Run the contract tests in trusted PR verification and document the consumer contract. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs scripts/cloud-source-verification.test.mjs scripts/standard-image-contract.test.mjs`: 37 passed. - A read-only check against an existing published index returned its exact expected digest. - `actionlint -shellcheck='' .github/workflows/docker.yml .github/workflows/pr-trusted.yml`: passed. Normal ShellCheck reports only existing `ls` and word-splitting warnings. - `pnpm build`: passed locally with Cargo available. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed locally. - Full local Vitest was attempted: 8,260 passed, 14 failed, with 34 failing suites. The failures were missing embedded-PostgreSQL library aliases in this fresh install and existing macOS runtime-skill-cache rename errors. Native aliases are now restored. Rerunning the 33 affected database suites produced 577 passes and two unrelated AgentMail skill-root lookup failures (32 suites passed). The four directly failing database tests also pass independently. This is not a claim that the full local suite passed. - All final-head CI checks pass. One unrelated routine-route mock assertion passed on the single-shard retry; its 15 tests also pass locally. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact head, with no unresolved threads. - Actual signing requires a canonical master push. This draft PR does not publish trusted provenance. ## Risks The new attestation step requires OIDC and attestation write permissions in the merge job. Signing failure leaves the image available but without the new admission proof. Consumers must fail closed when proof is missing. Existing release tags, the legacy producer, and image retention remain unchanged. No database or application behavior changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, shell execution and test tools. The session does not expose a more specific model variant or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.922.0-canary.5 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
8326e33ada |
Fix oversized sandbox process launch payloads (#13793)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and preserves context across retries. > - Sandbox ACP runs encode their command and environment into one launch value. > - A long continuation can make that encoded value exceed Linux's exec limit. > - The launch shell then exits before the agent can initialize. > - This PR transfers large command envelopes through a private temporary file. > - The agent receives the complete environment and can start normally. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13777. **Bug description** Sandbox tasks with long retry context fail during ACP initialization with exit 127. The streamed bridge also drops the shell error that explains the failure. **Steps to reproduce** Launch the streamed sandbox process bridge on Linux with one valid 110,000-byte environment value. Its base64 command envelope exceeds the limit on one exec argument or environment string. Daytona reports `argument list too long: env`, then exit 127. **Expected behavior** The command envelope must not make a valid child environment too large to launch. A shell startup failure must retain its diagnostic in the run log. ## What Changed - Keep envelopes up to 64 KiB on the existing launch path. Upload larger envelopes in bounded chunks inside a mode-0700 session directory. Set the final payload file to mode 0600. - Read the file without following symlinks and delete it before spawning the child. Remove incomplete uploads on failure. Both streamed and polled bridges use the same envelope. - Preserve stderr when the launch shell fails before the wrapper emits a terminal event. Emit a fixed terminal error and shutdown acknowledgement if a payload cannot be read or parsed, without exposing its contents. - Cover large environments, file permissions, payload deletion, interrupted uploads, missing or malformed payloads, and startup diagnostics. Document the transfer and cleanup behavior. ## Verification - Both large-envelope regressions fail before the fix and pass after it. - Targeted bridge, ACP engine, real-spawn, and stdin-race checks pass: 370 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` passes. - A gated live Daytona probe on the current sandbox image reproduced exit 127 with the old bridge. The fixed bridge launched the same command successfully. A second probe completed real Claude ACP initialization with a 110,000-byte context value. It did not run an agent task. All temporary sandboxes were deleted. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` reach the unchanged Rust runner step and stop because this machine has no `cargo` executable. - Full CI passes on `ea816cf58d`: [run 35683853754](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35683853754). All 53 checks pass; two optional checks are skipped. The local full-suite run was stopped after equivalent CI suites passed; it has no final local result. - Greptile is 5/5 on `ea816cf58d`, with no unresolved review threads. The branch is mergeable. ## Risks Large envelopes require extra upload calls during startup. The temporary data stays inside the private session directory and is removed before child startup or during failure cleanup. Individual child environment values still obey the operating system's native limits. No migration or configuration change is required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (targeted checks; full-workspace limits described above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.922.0-canary.4 nightly/v2026.922.0-nightly.0 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
c496acb570 |
Return client errors for known OAuth reconnect states (#13794)
Map missing OAuth refresh credentials and terminal reauthorization to HTTP 422. Preserve reconnect instructions and reporting of unexpected provider failures. All 363 focused tests and server typecheck pass. Required CI and review checks passed; Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved comments. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
1f3ff75d33 |
Recognize confirmed container loss when resuming Daytona leases
Daytona can retain a sandbox API record after its container disappears. Confirm the exact missing-container response with a bounded fresh read, then let the host apply its existing replacement and backup policy. Preserve unknown failures, recoverable errors, and identity mismatches. Verified 251 provider tests, 93 host lifecycle tests, plugin typecheck and build. Added 15 regressions. Read-only inspection confirmed the provider response and an existing verified backup without changing live state. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
a7d3b17a97 |
Explain disabled Slack MCP app access during discovery
Recognize Slack's exact disabled-app response and return actionable setup instructions from catalog and health routes. Bound response parsing and keep unknown upstream errors reportable without exposing provider settings links. Verified 361 focused tests, server typecheck, and authenticated discovery. The three route regressions fail before this change and pass afterward. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.922.0-canary.3 |
||
|
|
3c2bc4f546 |
ci: halve the isolated native Runner check by seeding it from the public master build cache (#13736)
## What Recurring CI health check (PAP-31): on the most recent fully-green PR run (`cb703ac`, run [35519542997](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35519542997)), the slowest check was **Compile isolated native Runner** at **452s** — ahead of the largest test shards (379s). Every run recompiled the full Rust dependency tree from zero, even though `docker.yml` already refreshes a **public** `mode=max` BuildKit cache (`ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip:buildcache-{amd64,arm64}`) on every master push, containing exactly these layers. This PR seeds **only the baseline build** with that registry cache, via anonymous pull. **Measured on this PR's own CI (which exercises the seeded path): the check completed in 123s, down from 452s — a 73% reduction, ~5.5 minutes saved per run.** ## Thinking Path Cost breakdown of the 452s from the job log: `cargo chef cook` dependency compile 214.7s, local cache export 43.1s, runner-core build 37.0s, metadata proof layer 36.8s, `cargo install cargo-chef` 36.4s, rebuild-verification build ~65s, setup/teardown ~20s. The dependency compile and toolchain layers are identical to what the production `docker.yml` build already caches publicly on every master push, so recompiling them here bought no signal — the check's real assertions live in the *verification* build, not the baseline. A first attempt used `actions/cache` plus a master `push` trigger, but the CI bot's GitHub App lacks `workflows` permission; the registry-cache approach is strictly better anyway (shared across PRs immediately, no 10GB Actions-cache quota pressure, no workflow change). ## What Changed - `scripts/check-docker-runner-cache.sh`: the baseline build now adds `--cache-from type=registry,ref=ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip:buildcache-{amd64|arm64}` (selected by host arch). `RUNNER_CHECK_SEED_CACHE` overrides the ref, or set it empty to force the old cold path. The script header documents the anonymous external read. - `.github/workflows/docker-runner-check.yml` (comment-only): the stale "no external cache" note now describes the anonymous GHCR seed and the verification build's local-cache-only isolation. This was pushed in a follow-up commit with workflow-edit permissions; the original CI-bot token could not touch workflow files. No Dockerfile stages or verification assertions changed. ## Verification - This PR's own `Compile isolated native Runner` check runs the seeded path (the script is in the workflow's trigger paths): **passed in 123s** vs the 452s baseline. - The rebuild-verification semantics are untouched: it still runs on a **fresh builder** importing **only the local cache exported by this run's baseline**, so it proves exactly what it proved before — that the runner image rebuilds reproducibly from this run's own exported layers. - Verified `ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip:buildcache-amd64` is anonymously readable (unauthenticated manifest pull succeeds), so the check gains no credential or secret dependency. ## Risks - **Stale or missing seed cache:** if the GHCR ref is unreachable, private, or garbage-collected, BuildKit logs a warning and falls back to the pre-PR cold compile — the check gets slower, never wrong. `RUNNER_CHECK_SEED_CACHE=""` restores the cold path explicitly. - **Cache trust:** the seed only accelerates the *baseline* build; the verification build still runs on a fresh builder against only this run's locally exported cache, so a stale or poisoned registry cache cannot make verification pass spuriously. The ref lives under `ghcr.io/paperclipai/*`, written only by repo CI on master pushes. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`) via Paperclip agent **Bender (Fable)**, issue PAP-31. --------- Co-authored-by: Bender (Fable) <bender-fable@paperclip.local> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
ded156a904 |
Keep interaction continuations scoped to the target task
Separate an interaction's producer from explicit resume history. Do not import another task's comments or results. Filter newly captured foreign origins and recover older inherited origins only when the saved producer context and comment row prove their source. Keep missing context and company boundaries fail-closed. Verified 46 continuation tests, 201 related recovery tests, and server typecheck. Added 20 database regressions for provenance and scope guards. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foleyandgithub-actions[bot]
|
3c70b3d008 |
docs(release): curate stable notes for the 2026.921.0-beta.1 promotion (#13785)
## Thinking Path > - The stable promotion reads `releases/beta/v<beta-version>.md` from `master` and publishes it as the GitHub Release body. > - Beta `2026.921.0-beta.1` (source `8f8a0ab7`, 77 commits since v2026.916.0) just published and starts its 3-day soak, headed for a stable around 2026-09-24. > - This PR rewrites the auto-generated draft into release voice during the soak, per the release checklist. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Notes for the stable to be promoted from [`2026.921.0-beta.1`](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/releases) — planned as `v2026.924.0`. **If the promotion date slips past 2026-09-24, bump the title and Released date before dispatching stable.** ## What Changed - Rewrote `releases/beta/v2026.921.0-beta.1.md` from the 77-entry scaffold into the standard release-notes structure: overview, Breaking Changes (legacy Composio broker retirement [#13758](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13758); full-auto execution defaults [#13686](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13686)/[#13693](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13693)), Highlights, grouped Fixes, Improvements, and an Upgrade Guide (migrations `0280`–`0283`, `enableMcpAggregators` flag). - Folded out release-infra noise: CI-only PRs, test-only PRs, release-notes bookkeeping commits, and the hide/restore Google-connector pair ([#13551](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13551)/[#13552](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13552), net zero). - Noted that the composer fix ([#13562](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13562)) already shipped early as stable 2026.916.1. ## Verification - Docs-only; every PR number cited was cross-checked against `git log dffc2b3ca..8f8a0ab7e`. - Migration range `0280`–`0283` verified against `packages/db/src/migrations` diff and attributed per commit. ## Risks None — documentation only. Content can be edited freely during the soak; the stable preflight only requires the file to exist on `master`. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`) via Claude Code, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (docs-only; no tests apply) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (none apply) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending on this fresh PR) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (pending) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Devin Foleyandgithub-actions[bot]
|
cf2742ac48 |
docs(release): canonicalize v2026.916.1 release notes (#13774)
## Thinking Path > - Stable `2026.916.1` just published from beta `2026.921.0-beta.0`; its curated notes live at `releases/beta/v2026.921.0-beta.0.md` on `master`. > - The release workflow's `canonicalize_stable_notes` job pushed this branch, which `git mv`s them to the canonical stable path. > - Merging restores the canonical `releases/` layout, matching every prior stable. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Follow-up to the [v2026.916.1](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/releases/tag/v2026.916.1) stable release; notes were curated in [#13766](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13766). ## What Changed - `git mv releases/beta/v2026.921.0-beta.0.md releases/v2026.916.1.md` (workflow-generated, content unchanged). ## Verification - Rename only; the GitHub Release body was already published from this content. ## Risks None — documentation layout only. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`) via Claude Code, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (rename-only; no tests apply) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (none apply) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending on this fresh PR) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (pending) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>canary/v2026.922.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
878734a061 |
fix(tools): treat OAuth sign-in challenges as client errors (#13786)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connected apps can require OAuth sign-in before they list their tools. > - Remote discovery recognizes this condition as `oauth_challenge`. > - Discovery and catalog refresh currently return it as HTTP 502. > - The server error handler reports that response as a crash. > - This pull request returns HTTP 422 for the explicit sign-in challenge. > - The operator keeps the sign-in instructions, while unexpected upstream failures remain reportable. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Connecting a remote MCP app that answers with a recognized OAuth challenge returns HTTP 502. Reading an empty catalog or explicitly refreshing it does the same. The server error handler then sends the expected sign-in condition to error monitoring. **Expected behavior** A known sign-in requirement returns HTTP 422 with the existing `oauth_challenge` code, message, and setup/reconnect links. An unexplained upstream HTTP 400 or an unavailable upstream service still returns 502 and reaches error monitoring. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Configure a remote MCP app that returns HTTP 401 with a Bearer challenge. 2. Connect the app, read its empty catalog, or request a catalog refresh. 3. Observe HTTP 502 and a server error report before this change. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `6de50ba594b15efaa3eae6ed869cd39b3a436456`. **Deployment mode** Server with remote MCP connections. The regression coverage uses local PostgreSQL and mocked upstream HTTP responses. Related: #9750 addresses MCP initialization and session recovery. It does not change the classification of this recognized sign-in condition. Targeted searches found no duplicate classification PR. ## What Changed - Return 422 for `oauth_challenge` from discovery and from catalog health-error normalization. - Preserve the existing structured error and remediation links. - Test automatic empty-catalog reads and explicit refreshes. Verify that OAuth challenges produce no Sentry capture and that upstream 400/503 failures still do. - Update the direct-connect and blocked-redirect expectations and document the monitoring behavior. ## Verification - Before the fix, three sign-in route regressions fail with 502 instead of 422; all four upstream-error controls pass. - After the fix, all 339 tool-access and error-handler tests pass, including authorization and redirect protections. - These suites ran against disposable Homebrew PostgreSQL 16.14 through the existing test-constructor seam. The temporary setup and config remain outside the repository. CI uses the ordinary embedded PostgreSQL setup. - Direct server `tsc --noEmit` passes. - Full build and recursive typecheck were attempted; the Runner Rust step cannot run because `cargo` is absent on this machine. - Full `pnpm test:run`: 8,211 passed, 14 failed, 4,759 skipped. The 36 failed files match the existing embedded PostgreSQL startup/cleanup and macOS runtime-cache `EACCES` limitations. The changed database-backed service suite passed separately with local PostgreSQL. - Greptile: 5/5 with no unresolved comments. Seven CI workers received a simultaneous shutdown signal; the failed jobs are being retried through the normal workflow. Other completed checks passed. ## Risks Low risk. Clients now receive 422 instead of 502 for the explicit `oauth_challenge` condition. The code, message, and remediation links remain available. No permissions, credential handling, OAuth discovery rules, retry policy, or schema change. Other upstream failures retain their existing behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 via Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, and test execution. The session does not expose an exact model snapshot or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (339 service and error-handler tests; full workspace limitations are documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.922.0-canary.1 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
6de50ba594 |
fix(sentry): carry the deployment environment to the browser (#13784)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Operators can enable Sentry for the server and the signed-in browser. > - The server SDK reads `SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT` from the process environment. > - The browser receives its DSN through the session response, but receives no environment. > - A browser in staging therefore reports errors under the SDK's production default. > - This pull request passes the configured environment through the existing session and monitoring gate. > - Browser errors then identify the deployment environment while preserving the existing privacy settings. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** With `SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT=staging`, browser exceptions are tagged `production`. This can send errors to the wrong environment's alerts and makes deployment follow-up unreliable. **Expected behavior** The browser uses the server's configured Sentry environment. A reused image works in either staging or production. A signed-out browser still sends no events. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Configure a frontend Sentry DSN and `SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT=staging`. 2. Sign in and capture a browser exception. 3. Inspect the event environment. Before this change, it is `production`. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `a3749aac4680a901fa0fe1cc898907887abc9908` with the real browser SDK and a local test transport. **Deployment mode** Authenticated server and browser with optional Sentry monitoring enabled. No duplicate environment-attribution issue or pull request was found in the targeted GitHub search. ## What Changed - Add `sentryEnvironment` to the authenticated session response and shared schema. The optional field supports a newer browser reading an older server response. - Pass the environment to the browser SDK. An environment change restarts the client through its existing serialized lifecycle. - Cover environment attribution with a real SDK event, session authorization, unchanged-session refetches, environment changes, and legacy responses. - Document configuration and compatibility. Keep the loaded bundle's release identity and existing privacy filters. ## Verification - The regression test emits `production` for a requested staging environment before the fix. - Focused route, schema, browser lifecycle and real-SDK tests: 69 pass. - UI and shared-package typechecks, direct server `tsc --noEmit`, and token gates pass. - Full `pnpm build` and `pnpm -r typecheck` were attempted. Both stop at the Runner Rust step because `cargo` is absent on this machine. - Complete UI suite: 6,540 tests pass in 626 files. - Full `pnpm test:run`: 8,210 passed, 14 failed, 4,753 skipped; 36 files fail due to embedded PostgreSQL startup/cleanup and macOS runtime-cache `EACCES`. These match the existing local baseline; none touch the changed behavior. - Greptile: 5/5, no unresolved review threads. Linux CI has passed Build, Typecheck + Release Registry, and the completed test jobs so far. Remaining jobs are running or queued: the AWS runner provisioner is retrying EC2 CreateFleet `InternalError` responses. Full results will be recorded before merge. ## Risks Low risk. This adds one optional session field and changes Sentry attribution only. No migration or new monitoring opt-in is introduced. Missing settings keep the browser SDK default. Agent and unauthenticated requests still receive 401 without monitoring settings. Existing loaded browser bundles keep their old behavior until refreshed. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 via Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, and test execution. The session does not expose an exact model snapshot or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused and full UI suites pass; full-root environment failures documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
5842185e4f |
fix: surface native cleanup quarantine and add chat qualification evals (#13775)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and their work. > - Agent Chat needs reliable native execution before native runners become the onboarding default. > - Existing stories covered idle reassignment and controller restart, but not an executing worker handoff or worker process loss. > - Status answer tests also need to reject stale claims and invented facts. > - This pull request adds six opt-in full-stack cells with independent state assertions and retained evidence. > - The probes exposed a misleading Retry across server projection and recovery-banner paths; the fix reports the blocked recovery honestly. > - The tests preserve failures without changing recovery policy, production prompts, or onboarding defaults. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #13762. Related: #13765 (Retry targets the latest failed attempt), #13753 (task context ownership), #13746 (native recovery work). ## What Changed - Add active reassignment with saved draft and plan preservation, old-worker cancellation, and successor completion checks. - Preserve recovery-needed projection when native cleanup fails before its coordinator exists, refuse a generic retry that would immediately fail again, and replace the recovery banner's misleading Retry with Inspect run. - Add verified local worker process loss with a required successful continuation; retain a failing qualification result when recovery is unavailable, while independently verifying the UI/API refuse doomed retries. - Add two-turn factual answer checks for current blockers, stale claims, inactive backlog work, and unknown facts. Retain prose for separate semantic review. - Add positive and negative oracle calibration and document fault isolation, cleanup, billing, and qualification limits. ## Verification - Eval TypeScript check passes. - All 442 eval support tests pass locally. The 89 focused server tests and server typecheck pass. Six recovery-banner UI tests and token gates pass. - Initial new-cell campaign: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35657128077. All six results are retained; four failed on fixture-contract issues and two exposed real worker cleanup quarantine. - All 26 existing native onboarding cells: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35656761484 (26/26 passed on mastercanary/v2026.921.0-canary.10 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
c221589b69 |
fix: close sandbox process proxies after remote exit (#13777)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their tasks. > - Sandbox agents use a local proxy to exchange ACP messages with a remote process. > - ACP keeps the proxy input stream open while it waits for a reply. > - The proxy received a remote exit but kept that input stream open. > - This left the proxy alive and could block later task retries. > - This pull request closes the input handle after a terminal remote event and lets final output drain. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A sandbox process could exit while its local proxy stayed alive. During startup, this could appear as a handshake timeout. A later task retry could then stop because the previous process was still alive. **Expected behavior** The proxy should exit with the remote process status, even when ACP has not closed its input stream. Final output and diagnostics should arrive before the proxy closes. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a sandbox process-session bridge with a child that writes output and exits. 2. Start the generated local proxy and keep its input stream open, as ACP does during startup. 3. Observe that the proxy stays alive after the remote process exits. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master at `846336e5a0`. Related: #13272 covers legacy sandbox startup recovery. #13765 covers the task retry UI. This change fixes the proxy process lifecycle. ## What Changed - Close the proxy input handle on remote exit or error, and preserve the exit status. - Stop forwarding input after the terminal event. - Wait for process close in the test helper so output is fully drained. - Test successful exit, failed exit, and spawn failure with input held open in both output modes. Check complete delivery of 208 KiB of final output. ## Verification - Before the fix, all four remote-exit regression cases timed out. - After the fix, all six terminal-event cases pass. - Targeted runtime suite: 362 tests pass across the sandbox bridge, stdin queue races, real ACP spawn, and ACP engine suites. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` passes. - Full workspace tests hit local platform failures: embedded PostgreSQL fails during initialization, and runtime skill-cache tests fail with `EACCES` while renaming read-only directories on macOS. The affected server code is unchanged in this PR. Those suites pass in CI. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` stop at the existing Rust runner step because this machine has no `cargo` executable. The CI typecheck and build gates pass. - [CI run 35658635907](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35658635907) passes all required gates. The first browser shard run passed all 12 tests but hit a GitHub 403 during report upload; the rerun passed, including upload. - Greptile scored commit `9c3c89148e` 5/5 with no review threads. The branch is mergeable. ## Risks The proxy now closes its input immediately after a terminal remote event. Tests cover final output delivery and preserve nonzero exit codes. Existing orphan processes still require cleanup or a server restart. Live sandbox startup needs validation after deployment; this change addresses the confirmed proxy hang and does not establish why an earlier remote process stopped. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (targeted checks; full-workspace limits described above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (existing behavior restored; no documentation change needed) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
a3749aac46 |
fix(deps): share Lezer node properties across editor languages
fix(deps): share Lezer node properties across editor languages The installed graph gave syntax highlighters @lezer/common 1.5.1 and language parsers 1.5.2. Their independent NodeProp counters collided, so highlighting ordinary code read unrelated metadata as tags and crashed with tags-is-not-iterable. Override @lezer/common to one compatible version in both manifests. Extend the installed-graph check and exercise Python, JavaScript, HTML and SQL highlighting through the editor dependencies. All four examples failed before the override and pass with it. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.921.0-canary.9 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
846336e5a0 |
test: harden agent chat setup, interruptions and restart evals (#13762)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage agents through ongoing conversations. > - Chat users can change instructions while a provider is already working. > - Existing chat evals wait for each turn to settle before the next message. > - They cannot prove delivery during active work or the saved effect of a correction. > - Existing fixtures also enable Agent Chat through the API rather than the settings UI. > - This PR adds bounded browser workflows and checks their persisted outcomes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13741, #13752, #13750. **What happened?** The chat suites cover planning, delegation, status, and recovery. They lack active-turn follow-ups and the experimental settings lifecycle. A sequential conversation can pass even if messages sent during work are lost. **Expected behavior** A follow-up submitted during a provider turn survives and affects the final reply. A changed launch day appears in the saved plan. Disabling Agent Chat rejects new messages while preserving history; re-enabling resumes the same conversation. **Steps to reproduce** Run the explicit `agent-chat-stories` suite. It selects three local cases for each native Claude and Codex profile. An ordinary provider command waits for a fixture brief file so the browser can send the follow-up at an observed active-run boundary. ## What Changed - Add six opt-in Product E2E cells for settings, active follow-ups, and plan corrections. - Drive experimental settings through the UI and verify disabled sends are rejected by the public API. - Use a bounded file wait in the actual isolated agent workspace, with provider-written readiness and an undisclosed brief reference. - Grade persisted user messages, final replies, native run outcomes, and exact saved plan fields. - Accept active-turn steering or one queued successor; reject lost input, duplicate input, and stale outputs. - Allow one steered run or two sequential runs throughout the shared harness, while preserving exact counts for other cases. - Require a single marker-bearing response attributed to the final provider run. - Unload the development browser client before restarting the server, avoiding reconnect/navigation races without weakening the post-restart memory check. - Add browser regressions for restart isolation and asynchronously saved settings switches. - Document prepared-agent setup, native onboarding limits, and the separate API-tool rollout gate. ## Verification - Eval TypeScript check passed. - Eval support suite: 436 tests passed in 39 files. - New oracle calibration: six tests passed, including plausible invalid outcomes. - Browser support regressions: seven tests passed; the restart regression was observed failing before the fix. - Catalog discovery selects exactly six local native cases and leaves default paid selection unchanged. - [Consolidated existing native chat report](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-35643286055-1/): master `b82661b56`, 33/34 passed, all cleanup passed. The failure was a browser navigation timeout across restart; the page request returned 200 and the chat rendered. - [Nine targeted restart/replay cells](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-35645850088-1/) passed on `1fe2fe275`, including the original failure, across native Claude/Codex and local/Daytona; all cleanup passed. - [Initial six-story campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35644832817) retained all six failures: asynchronous switch assertions, unavailable fixture paths, and rich-text escaping in raw command comparisons. The corrected fixtures preserve the same behavioral assertions. - [Six-story campaign v2](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-35646270035-1/) on `8232773a0`: 4/6 passed (both settings cases and both Claude interruptions). Codex could not see the host-temp fixture outside its workspace; this failed before follow-up delivery was exercised. - [Four affected interruption cases](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-35647760635-1/) all passed, including cleanup, on definition v3 / `ad6ac0545`. Files live inside the actual agent workspace and the observed run workspace is verified. Both providers saved Friday in the real plan with the undisclosed brief reference; follow-ups persisted while the original run was active. Together with both unchanged settings cases from v2, all six new scenario variants have passing live evidence. - Final head `ad6ac05456646c09d3452e320279457625353948`: 54 successful checks, two intentional skips, zero pending/failing checks; mergeable and clean. Fresh Greptile 5/5, zero unresolved findings. - Full typecheck, tests, build, and browser CI passed remotely. One earlier head encountered a signoff-policy browser timing failure; the final head passed that shard. - Local pnpm wrapper could not fetch its version/signature metadata in the restricted environment; local eval checks used the installed Node executables. Repo-wide validation was completed by GitHub Actions. ## Risks These are eval-only changes. The file wait is a timing fixture in the isolated agent workspace, not a production runner hook. Native Codex host-filesystem isolation stays unchanged. It has a two-minute limit and is released in `finally`. The prepared-agent settings case is not full native onboarding: the wizard currently offers legacy adapters. The disabled-entry assertion uses full document navigation, which clears the prior React Query cache; preserved history is checked through the public API and re-enabled chat. No production prompt, rollout default, adapter behavior, or credential policy changes. Active-task reassignment and worker-crash recovery remain outside these new cases. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with repository tools and code execution. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this task. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foleyandgithub-actions[bot]
|
8f8a0ab7ef |
docs(release): curate stable notes for v2026.916.1 (#13766)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip publishes stable releases from curated notes: the stable promotion reads `releases/beta/v<beta-version>.md` from `master` and publishes it as the GitHub Release body. > - Beta `2026.921.0-beta.0` was just published from a candidate branch carrying the 2026.916.0 source plus the cherry-picked composer fix #13562, headed for patch stable `2026.916.1`. > - Its `draft_stable_notes` job pushed the auto-generated scaffold; this PR rewrites it into release-notes voice so the stable promotion's preflight finds curated notes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Notes for the upcoming `2026.916.1` patch stable. The fix being shipped is [#13562](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13562) (fixes #13561, the desktop chat composer send button starting out disabled). ## What Changed - Rewrote `releases/beta/v2026.921.0-beta.0.md` from the auto-generated commit list into the patch-release format used by `releases/v2026.831.1.md`: what the patch is, the user-facing composer fix, the rode-along document-conflict classification repair, and an upgrade guide (no migrations, no configuration changes). ## Verification - Docs-only change; no code paths affected. - Format matches the prior patch release notes (`releases/v2026.831.1.md`). - The stable promotion will resolve this file from `master` for beta `2026.921.0-beta.0` and canonicalize it to `releases/v2026.916.1.md` after publishing. ## Risks None — documentation only. If the wording needs adjusting during review, the stable dispatch simply waits until this is merged. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`) via Claude Code, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (docs-only; no tests apply) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (none apply) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending on this fresh PR) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (pending) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>v2026.1001.0 canary/v2026.921.0-canary.8 beta/v2026.921.0-beta.1 nightly/v2026.921.0-nightly.1 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
df66219780 |
fix(ui): retry the latest failed task attempt (#13765)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work done by AI agents. > - The task thread lets an operator retry a failed run. > - Legacy runs with transcript output did not get a failure marker. > - The thread could therefore offer Try again for an older failure. > - The server correctly reused that failure's existing retry, even when it had already failed. > - This change keeps the latest failure actionable and reports stopped retry responses to the operator. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Try again could return success without starting work. An initial setup failure had an empty transcript. Its later retry produced output and failed. Only the initial failure had a retry marker, so the button kept requesting the initial failure's already-failed successor. **Expected behavior** Try again targets the latest failed attempt. An already-stopped retry response shows an error and refreshes the task's run state. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a legacy adapter task that fails before producing transcript output. 2. Retry it. Let this attempt produce output and a final failure comment before it fails. 3. Click Try again in the task thread. 4. Before this fix, the click targets the original failure and replays the stopped successor. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against `1483bb8bcf`; the regression is also present on the branch base `8813a50105`. **Deployment mode** Authenticated server with a legacy adapter. The bug is in the shared task UI and retry API client. Related: #11650 adds a different recovery-notice action. This change fixes failed-run markers and retry response handling. Searches found no duplicate of this failure case. ## What Changed - Render legacy failure markers even when the run has a transcript or final comment. - Keep later cancelled automatic retries from replacing the failed run's retry action. - Reject already-stopped retry responses in the API client so existing error feedback appears. - Refresh task run queries after both successful and failed retry requests. - Add regression coverage for failed and timed-out attempts, execution gates with output, and retry response states. ## Verification - Before the fix, the new regression tests failed: two selected the original failure, and four accepted a stopped successor as success. - Targeted task-thread, retry API, marker, and issue-page tests: 279 passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build`: passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: passed. - Full UI suite: 6,529 tests passed across 626 files. - [CI run 35650385023](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35650385023): all 53 checks passed, including full workspace build, typecheck, unit/integration suites, and browser tests. The redundant local full-workspace test run was stopped after CI passed; it is not counted as a completed local pass. - Greptile: 5/5 on `608ee58c99`, with no review threads or unresolved comments. The branch is mergeable. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` were attempted. Both stop at the Runner's Rust checks because this host has no `cargo`. The full workspace checks passed in CI. ## Risks Low risk. This changes UI presentation and response handling only. The server's exact-retry idempotency, authorization, execution ownership, and recovery gates remain in place. No schema changes or live task mutations. Existing documentation describes this retry action; the fix restores that behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (targeted checks; full-workspace limits described above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (existing behavior restored; no documentation change needed) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8813a50105 |
feat: run GitHub review bots through Paperclip agents (#13717)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work as tasks and runs. > - GitHub chat brings repository conversations into those tasks. > - A review bot needs the assigned agent, its authority, and governed provider tools. > - The existing channel connection did not supply that review workflow or a complete setup journey. > - This pull request adds GitHub App setup, account access, event prompts, task-bound review tools, and exact-commit checks. > - Operators can inspect each review through the same task, run, and activity systems. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** GitHub chat, governed connection tools, task execution, shared/database contracts, and connector setup UI. **Problem or motivation** Operators need a GitHub review bot that runs their assigned Paperclip agent. Mentions and PR events must preserve task ownership and requester authority. Provider publication must use the bot App identity and enforce the configured permissions. **Proposed solution** Extend the existing GitHub chat connector with resumable App onboarding, linked-member and sponsored-guest access, editable event prompts, and governed review operations. Validate structured assessments on the server and compute a stable Paperclip Review check for the exact head commit. **Alternatives considered** A separate review scheduler would duplicate Paperclip execution and permissions. Reusing personal GitHub credentials would change the bot identity and credential boundary. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the existing Connected Apps and governed-tool infrastructure. The project owner requested and approved this design. Related PR #8645 imports external Codex review feedback; this change runs an assigned Paperclip agent and publishes its results through the existing chat connector. ## What Changed - Include the current Paperclip instance origin in the copied setup prompt. Storybook uses its configured Paperclip origin; callback parameters and URL credentials are excluded. - Add a Claude/Codex copy button in the real setup and Storybook opening step. Its detailed prompt asks four setup questions and guides embedded-browser setup, verification, and optional required checks. Clipboard failure exposes selectable instructions. - Add a tutorial that explains why App installation, review scheduling, and required checks are separate choices. - Add manifest registration, an existing-App path, separate installation and repository selection, repository refresh, and explicit account confirmation. - Add low-trust agent guidance, effective capability verification, member selection, and explicit restricted guests with a sponsor. - Add configurable PR events, prompts, repository overrides, rating thresholds, and separate formal-review permissions. - Give the assigned agent governed App tools to read PRs, comment, begin an assessment, submit findings, and optionally submit a formal review. - Bind review history, root PR events, and inline replies to ordinary tasks. Deduplicate deliveries/findings and reject stale publication. - Link check Details to the underlying task on the current trusted hostname, or to Reviews before task creation. - Add schema migration 0283, API contracts, production UI, and 49 interactive Storybook states. - Repair local lease recovery. Keep the Cloud Dockerfile identical to master; no provider-pack layer or runtime-default environment variable is added. - Retry only rolled-back wake-admission transactions after transient endpoint-lock contention. A deterministic held-lock regression proves one accepted wake. ## Verification - Current head: `7ba761fe007bb798400d3e62346fa964f607f0f8`, rebased on master `d9b3a5653e41f2ee5a1345b97c86a238f7a5c8e9`. Dockerfile has zero diff against master. Final workspace typecheck and build passed. The new PostgreSQL migration regression passed and preserves existing relation and constraint identities after replay. - Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5. There are zero unresolved review threads and no merge conflicts. - All current-head checks are green: 54 passed and two conditional Storybook jobs skipped. This includes complete server/workspace test suites, build, typechecks, policy checks, Runner suites, browser suites, and security status. One timing-sensitive callback-ordering test passed in isolation and its CI shard passed one retry. The duplicate local full-suite run was stopped after CI completed; it is not counted as a local full-suite pass. - Before the final Slack rebase and migration renumbering, 186 focused GitHub tests, 14 native bootstrap cases, token gates, and Storybook build passed. The final rebase retained the new Slack communication guidance. - The embedded-browser setup test copied the full detailed prompt, including the configured Paperclip instance URL. Desktop and narrow layouts were checked. Component tests cover successful copying and clipboard failure with selectable text and retry. - Live local and hosted GitHub acceptance evidence refers to application revision `cb703ac959876a07ebf3d7a295847f9f351eb6fc`. Real agent tasks exercised issue mentions, automatic PR reviews, inline findings, repeated mentions, task continuation, and failing-to-passing checks after a push. The Storybook agent generated, built, and browser-rendered pages; missing acceptance text failed, matching text passed, and broken JSX produced an incomplete result. - Live cases also covered independently disabled push events, prompt injection, duplicate signed deliveries, rapid pushes, stale-result rejection, finding deduplication, and restart recovery. Formal reviews were denied while disabled and published only after explicit enablement. Check Details links pointed to the underlying task on the trusted hostname. - Those hosted native Claude runs used the provider-pack layer now removed from this PR. They do not prove native Claude works on the standard Cloud image. A replacement hosted native Codex run is not yet verified: the disposable QA tenant has only an Anthropic AI connection. No new staging or production deployment was made for the packaging removal. - Required-check merge enforcement could not be tested because the private disposable repository's GitHub plan rejected the rules configuration. Published success/failure/incomplete check states were verified directly. ## Risks - Latest master allocated migration 0282 to Slack. The GitHub migration is regenerated as 0283 with replay-safe table/index/constraint creation; a PostgreSQL regression verifies existing relations and constraints are preserved. Existing preview tenants remain subject to the fleet migration-history compatibility preflight; no bypass is introduced. - Migration 0283 adds company-scoped configuration, registration, review, and publication records. Existing connections retain their behavior until reviews/tools are enabled. - Signed webhooks and expiring registration state remain required. Hosted installations also need the companion narrow Cloud gateway exemptions. - Agent assessments can be incomplete or wrong. The server enforces coverage/result structure, current-head publication, rating policy, and separate formal-review permission; it does not replace code-review judgment. - No Cloud image packaging changes are included. Remote native ACPX/Claude and OpenCode retain their existing operator-supplied provider-pack prerequisite. Native Codex and Codex with managed MCP tools do not require that pack. Earlier staging deployment evidence refers to its stated revision, not this packaging-removal head. Production rollout and merging remain outside this change. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository, code execution, API, and embedded-browser tools. The exact serving model ID and context-window size were not exposed by the environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.921.0-canary.7 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d9b3a5653e |
feat(chat): add initial Slack communication guidance and connection menus (#13760)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Chat connectors let people use the same tasks and agent tools from external conversations. > - Agents need communication guidance that fits the conversation medium. > - That guidance belongs in the original task context, without repeated instructions on each turn. > - Connection owners also need clear settings and a consistent way to remove a connection. > - This pull request adds initial Slack guidance, optional connection instructions, and chat connection menus. > - The benefit is clearer Slack replies with the existing Paperclip workflow and permissions. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Agent replies in Slack and chat connection management in the Apps catalog. **Current behavior** Slack tasks do not carry a saved communication profile. The catalog shows a separate Manage button and does not offer removal on every chat connection row. **Proposed behavior** Save Slack guidance when a new conversation creates a task. Restore that original guidance when a model session is rebuilt. Do not append it to ordinary follow-ups. Expose optional additional instructions in Slack Settings. Put Manage and Remove connection in a three-dot menu for all chat providers. Keep Finish setup visible for drafts. **Reason and benefit** Small answers fit in Slack. Substantial deliverables use ordinary document or artifact tools with a useful Slack summary. Connection settings apply to new tasks and cannot change permissions. Users can remove both active and unfinished chat connections from the catalog. **Breaking changes** Two additive database columns store endpoint preferences and the initial conversation snapshot. Existing endpoints default to empty preferences. Existing conversations keep their original behavior. Non-Slack guidance is unchanged. Related public context: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13741 improves native chat recovery. This change adds communication context to those existing execution paths. A search found no duplicate communication-guidance PR. ## What Changed - Add a provider-guidance registry, enabled for Slack first. - Persist optional endpoint communication instructions and capture an immutable snapshot when a conversation creates a task. - Resolve guidance from the verified company-scoped connection. Restore it for fresh native and legacy sessions without per-turn reminders, extra model calls, or extra context queries. - Add the Slack Settings field, validation, audit coverage, and Storybook save/error states. - Add Manage and Remove connection menus for all seven chat providers. Keep the draft setup button. Require removal confirmation and allow retry after failure. - Add regression coverage, an active/draft menu story, and connector documentation. ## Verification All CI checks are green for |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b82661b561 |
refactor(connections): retire the legacy Composio broker (#13758)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and their access to external tools. > - Connectors expose these tools through a governed MCP gateway. > - PR #13755 added a direct Composio MCP connection behind the experimental MCP aggregators flag. > - The old project API-key broker still created toolkit child connections and showed a separate Services tab. > - Keeping both paths leaves obsolete setup and session code in the product. > - This change removes the broker and preserves direct MCP setup, credentials, permissions, and execution. > - Saved legacy records fail closed and remain available for explicit removal. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #13755. This retirement supersedes the legacy-path fixes proposed in #12630, #12632, #12634, and #12906. It does not close those PRs. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Composio connector setup, management, and runtime dispatch. **Current behavior** Composio offers both direct MCP and a project API-key broker. The broker mints sessions and creates one child connection per toolkit. **Proposed behavior** Offer only direct MCP. Remove the toolkit Services UI, REST routes, API client, and session broker. Block saved legacy parent and child records from discovery, execution, health checks, reconnect, and OAuth. Preserve their records and credentials until the operator removes each connection. **Reason and benefit** The direct MCP connector becomes the single supported Composio workflow. Provider accounts remain managed in Composio. ## What Changed - Remove the API-key catalog method and its generated-source definition. - Delete Composio broker clients, session creation, account synchronization, child lifecycle, and toolkit routes. - Remove the Services tab, service rows, child provenance, and cascade-removal controls. Keep Vercel provenance intact. - Retain a shared retirement guard for stored legacy records. Show Retired status and replacement/removal guidance in the connection list and details; hide obsolete runtime controls. - Preserve the experimental MCP aggregators flag and direct MCP infrastructure. - Replace broker fixtures with retirement tests and extend direct Composio catalog/reconnect coverage. ## Verification - Focused shared, server, and UI tests passed with one worker. Server retirement tests use a name filter; no full local test suite was run, as requested. - Server and UI TypeScript checks passed. - Token gates and UI build passed. - Real browser: opened the saved Composio connection, refreshed all 11 tools, and ran the provider's read-only GitHub account-list operation through the standard Test dialog as an agent. The provider returned success using the existing OAuth credentials. - See `doc/connections/COMPOSIO-BROKER-RETIREMENT.md` for scope and live evidence. - Storybook build passed. A fresh real agent used `COMPOSIO_SEARCH_TOOLS` and `COMPOSIO_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL` to return the actual Paperclip DeepWiki hierarchy: one success, zero errors. Gateway audit records confirm both calls succeeded. - Browser retirement check: a credential-free legacy fixture showed the guidance, opened the direct MCP replacement flow, and was removed through the standard confirmation. - Focused regressions for the experimental settings copy and exact OpenAPI route coverage passed. All latest-head CI checks passed (54 successful, two intentionally skipped); Greptile scored 5/5 with no unresolved review threads. The PR has no merge conflicts. ## Risks This intentionally breaks the old Composio project API-key and child-connection workflow. Existing legacy records cannot run, even if their stored status is active. Operators must create a new direct MCP connection and choose access rules; credentials and grants are not migrated. Remove each old record separately to delete its credentials. No schema migration or data deletion runs automatically. Direct MCP connections keep their existing grants and secrets. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 via Codex, with reasoning, code execution, and browser tools. The exact runtime variant and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.921.0-canary.6 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
1483bb8bcf |
fix: pass plugin workers to issue tree resume (#13757)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Issue tree controls can resume tasks and wake their assigned agents. > - A sandbox-backed run needs the shared plugin worker manager to acquire its lease. > - The issue tree route constructed a heartbeat service without that manager. > - A ready sandbox provider therefore appeared offline and the resumed run failed setup. > - This pull request passes the existing manager to the route and distinguishes missing wiring from a stopped worker. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related implementation: #10262 identified this wiring defect in several dispatch paths. This PR applies the issue-tree resume fix to current master and adds coverage in the current route and runtime suites. The other dispatch paths remain in the scope of that earlier PR. **What happened?** Resuming a paused issue subtree can fail to acquire a sandbox lease even while its provider plugin is ready and its worker is running. The error says the worker is not running because this route's heartbeat service never received the process's worker manager. **Expected behavior** Resumed work uses the same worker manager as normal issue dispatch. Missing wiring and an actually stopped worker produce distinct diagnostic errors. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Configure an agent with a plugin-backed sandbox environment and start the provider worker. 2. Pause a subtree assigned to that agent. 3. Release the hold with `metadata.wakeAgents: true`. 4. The old route constructs an unwired heartbeat service and the resumed run fails during setup. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced by source inspection and regression coverage against `9d19f98b50`. **Deployment mode** Server with a plugin-backed sandbox environment. ## What Changed - Pass the process's plugin worker manager from `createApp` through issue tree controls to heartbeat dispatch. - Check for a missing manager before reporting the sandbox worker as stopped. - Exercise the resume request with a shared manager and cover both runtime failure cases. Model a stopped worker explicitly in the existing infrastructure-retry fixture. Existing board and company access checks remain covered. ## Verification - Targeted Vitest route/runtime/recovery suites: 17 passed; 384 native database tests skipped because embedded Postgres cannot start on this host. - Direct server `tsc --noEmit` passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck`, server typecheck wrapper, and `pnpm build` were attempted. Their runner dependency requires `cargo`, which is absent on this host. CI must pass these checks before merge. - Full `pnpm test:run` was attempted. The general server stage reported 8,146 passed, 4,747 skipped, and 14 failed tests across 35 failed suites. Failures were embedded Postgres startup errors (with related teardown errors) and 10 cache-directory rename failures on this macOS host. The local run stopped there; Linux CI must pass the complete suite before merge. - All CI gates are green, including the native database recovery suite, workspace typecheck/build, runner checks, and browser tests. Greptile reviewed the current commit at 5/5 with no unresolved threads. - No live provider operations were performed by these tests. ## Risks Low risk: dependency forwarding and error classification only. The route retains board authorization, company boundaries, hold semantics, and existing cancellation/replay guards. The change does not replace a sandbox or discard a retained lease. No schema or API shape changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, repository tooling, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] This fixes existing behavior and does not add planned core features - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the bug issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no private ticket or instance data - [x] Targeted local tests pass; full-suite and toolchain limits are recorded above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] No documentation changes are needed for dependency forwarding - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.921.0-canary.5 |