mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-11 23:36:51 +02:00
b4fccaa8c46f4e3eede7db5bfca09d3fae8b09b7
739
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
3e31bf09bc |
[codex] Add pipeline automation title templates (#8787)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Pipeline automations let operators standardize repeated issue and workflow actions. > - Pipeline-created issues currently need a way to derive useful titles from routine variables. > - Without a configurable title template, automated pipeline output is harder to scan and distinguish. > - This pull request adds a title-template field through shared contracts, server persistence, API routes, and the pipeline settings UI. > - The benefit is clearer issue titles for pipeline-created work while preserving the existing pipeline behavior when no template is configured. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #8790 This PR adds configurable generated-issue title templates for pipeline automations. ## What Changed - Added `issueTitleTemplate` to the shared pipeline automation contract and field constants. - Persisted and returned the title template through pipeline service and route code. - Applied title-template rendering when pipeline automations create issue work. - Added pipeline settings UI controls for editing the title template and reusing routine variables. - Moved title-token cursor restoration out of the React state updater and into a layout effect. - Added server and UI coverage for storing, returning, and rendering pipeline title templates. ## Verification - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/pipelines-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/pipelines-routes.test.ts ui/src/pages/PipelineSettings.test.ts` - Result before review follow-up: 3 files passed, 58 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/PipelineSettings.test.ts` - Result after review follow-up: 1 file passed, 7 tests passed. - Branch was merged with current `paperclipai:master` at `f019f54bb3` before opening this PR. - Searched existing PRs for the same head branch and for pipeline title-template duplicates; no matching existing PR was found. - Note: GitHub could not open a PR directly from `cryppadotta/paperclip` because that repository is not a fork of `paperclipai/paperclip`. The same updated branch SHA was pushed to `paperclipai/paperclip` so this PR can compare normally against `master`. ## Risks Low to moderate risk. The change touches pipeline automation persistence and generated issue creation, so regressions would most likely appear as missing or incorrectly rendered generated issue titles. Existing behavior should remain unchanged when `issueTitleTemplate` is unset. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-enabled execution in a Paperclip heartbeat, with repository inspection, Git, GitHub CLI, and local test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
a7a73d5bc7 |
Fix stale server info debug metadata (#8753)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The experimental server info debug view helps local operators inspect what code a running dev instance is actually serving > - The view was moved into the account-menu drawer, which only mounts while that drawer is open > - That made stale health-query data easier to see after restarts, and the server was also caching the running commit at process boot > - A clean commit label alone is incomplete when the checkout has uncommitted local changes > - This pull request keeps the drawer health data fresh, refreshes git metadata on demand, and adds a path-free checkout-state summary > - The benefit is that the debug view reports restart time, running commit, and dirty-checkout state without exposing local paths, secrets, logs, or environment details ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes: #8752 ## What Changed - `SidebarServerInfo.tsx`: refetch the health query whenever the drawer opens and poll every 2s while the dev server is active. - `server-info.ts`: keep `processStartedAt` stable while refreshing git HEAD through a short TTL cache instead of freezing commit metadata at module boot. - Shared health contract/OpenAPI: add `serverInfo.git.localChanges` with only staged, unstaged, and untracked counts plus safe unavailable fallbacks. - `SidebarServerInfo.tsx`: add a `Checkout state` row that renders clean/dirty/unavailable copy without file paths. - Tests: cover stale drawer refresh, interval polling, TTL commit refresh, health response shape, checkout-state count parsing, and path-free UI rendering. ## Verification - `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/server-info.test.ts server/src/__tests__/health.test.ts ui/src/components/SidebarServerInfo.test.tsx` -> 3 files / 19 tests passing. - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts` -> refreshed stale workspace links without lockfile/source churn. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared --filter @paperclipai/server --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` -> passing. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` -> passing after the Greptile test-coverage fix. - `pnpm check:tokens` -> no forbidden tokens found. - Local diff scans for obvious secrets, credentials, private URLs, local paths, and PII patterns -> no matches. - GitHub PR checks on head `56defd446` -> all green, including `verify`, canary dry run, e2e, security scans, and Greptile Review. - Greptile latest summary -> Confidence Score 5/5, 0 new comments; the prior P2 polling-coverage thread is resolved. ## Risks Low risk. The UI remains behind the experimental `enableServerInfoDebugView` flag. The extra git status call is throttled by the existing server-info TTL and reports only counts, not paths or file names. If git status is unavailable, the commit row still works and the checkout-state row shows clear fallback copy. ## Model Used Claude Opus (claude-opus-4-8), extended thinking, with tool use / code execution assisted the original stale-metadata fix. OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex local, with tool use and code execution, added the checkout-state follow-up, Greptile fix-up, and PR verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
5e3d6e3627 |
[codex] Preserve plan review context in agent wakes (#8649)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Planning work relies on issue documents, request-confirmation interactions, and inline plan annotations > - Agents can be woken after a plan comment, annotation, or confirmation decision > - The wake payload needs enough plan-review context for the agent to act on the specific feedback instead of losing the thread and falling back to broad refetches > - This pull request adds bounded plan-review context to wake payloads and heartbeat context > - It also teaches the adapter wake prompt renderer to surface those open plan annotations and interaction results directly > - The benefit is that agents can continue plan review and plan acceptance flows with the relevant comments in hand while keeping wake payloads bounded and company-scoped ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No matching public GitHub issue was found. ### Subsystem affected Cross-cutting: `server/`, `packages/shared`, and `packages/adapter-utils`. ### Problem or motivation Plan-review continuations can wake an agent after a plan comment, inline annotation, or request-confirmation decision without enough inline context about the open plan annotations or accepted/rejected confirmation target. That makes scoped wakes less reliable because the agent may need to refetch broad issue history before it can tell what feedback should be incorporated. ### Proposed solution Include bounded, company-scoped plan review context in wake payloads and heartbeat context. The context includes open `plan` annotation threads, recent annotation comments, truncation metadata, and plan-confirmation interaction target/result details. Render that information in the adapter wake prompt so agents see the relevant plan-review feedback immediately. ### Alternatives considered Relying on agents to fetch the full issue thread after every plan-review wake was rejected because it is slower, harder to audit, and easier to mishandle when the wake is meant to be scoped to a specific comment, annotation, or interaction result. ### Roadmap alignment This supports the roadmap areas for Agent Reviews and Approvals, Deep Planning, and Enforced Outcomes by making plan approval continuations explicit and actionable. ### Additional context The implementation keeps payload size bounded with per-thread, per-comment, and total-body limits. Resolved annotation threads are intentionally omitted so the wake focuses on feedback still needing action. ## What Changed - Added shared `PlanReviewContext` types for plan annotation threads, comments, interaction targets, and continuation results. - Added server-side plan review context assembly for open `plan` annotation threads with bounded thread/comment/body limits. - Included plan review context in heartbeat context and scoped wake payloads for planning, annotation, comment, and plan-confirmation interaction wakes. - Rendered plan annotation deltas, open plan comments, interaction results, and accepted target revisions in adapter wake prompts. - Added focused regression coverage for scoped plan review context, wake prompt rendering, annotation filtering, and safe standard-mode annotation wakes. - Addressed Greptile feedback by bounding the plan-comment DB fetch and removing unused plan review context input fields. ## Verification - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server --no-file-parallelism --maxWorkers=1 server/src/__tests__/document-annotations-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-goal-context-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `git diff --check public-gh/master...HEAD` - GitHub PR checks are green on `36d0ac6a5dce27b9d62e201bf6d9829170c5974e`n- Rebased onto current `paperclipai/paperclip:master` and confirmed GitHub reports the PR as mergeable - Greptile Review completed successfully after 2 comments were addressed and resolved; 0 unresolved review threads remain ## Risks - Medium: wake payloads now include additional plan-review data, so limits and truncation behavior need to stay conservative as annotation volume grows. - Low migration risk: no database schema or migration changes. - Low repository hygiene risk: this PR does not touch `pnpm-lock.yaml`, `.github/workflows`, or media assets. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex using `gpt-5` as a coding agent with shell/tool execution. Reasoning mode and exact context window were not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
e6407b3225 |
refactor: revert X mention poller backend (#8709)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The core server and database packages should only carry features that are ready to remain in the product surface. > - The X mention poller backend added database tables, Drizzle schema exports, a server service, and a server test suite. > - That backend work needs to be removed from core for now so the main app does not carry unused X mention poller infrastructure. > - A clean revert is safer than leaving partially unused database and service code behind. > - This pull request removes the poller backend artifacts and keeps the migration journal aligned with the reverted migration history. > - The benefit is that fresh environments no longer create or expose the X mention poller backend tables or service code. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this revert. Duplicate PR search: searched open PRs in `paperclipai/paperclip` for "x mention poller"; only this PR matched. ### What happened? Core contained X mention poller backend infrastructure that should not remain in the main Paperclip product surface right now. ### Expected behavior Fresh core installs and migrations should not create the X mention poller tables, and the server/db packages should not expose the removed poller service or schema exports. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Inspect the prior migration journal after the original poller backend commit. 2. Inspect the Drizzle schema exports. 3. Inspect the server services and tests for X mention poller backend artifacts. ### Paperclip version or commit This PR reverts the backend artifacts from the current `master` history. ### Deployment mode Local development and CI. ## What Changed - Deleted the `0125_x_mention_poller` migration and removed its journal entry so fresh environments do not create the X mention poller tables. - Removed the X mention Drizzle schema file and schema exports from the db package. - Removed the X mention poller server service and its server test suite. - Left the functional diff unchanged from the original revert. ## Verification - `rg -n "x_mentions|x-mention-poller|mention poller|0125_x_mention_poller|xMention" packages server` returned no matches. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - Current functional CI checks are green; this metadata update is intended to re-run and clear the `commitperclip PR Review` gate. ## Risks - Developers who already applied migration `0125_x_mention_poller` locally will keep four stale tables that Drizzle no longer tracks: `x_mention_sources`, `x_mention_author_allowlist`, `x_mentions`, and `x_mention_budget_ledger`. - Manual local cleanup for those developers is to drop the stale `x_mention_*` tables from their local database after confirming they do not need that local data. - Fresh environments that have not applied the removed migration should be unaffected. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 family, via the ACPX-backed Codex local adapter. Tool use included local shell inspection and GitHub CLI metadata updates. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
44e2ab53fe |
feat: add X mention poller backend (#8707)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents and operators increasingly need external event sources to become durable Paperclip work inputs > - X mentions are one such source, but intake needs to be safe before any downstream automation consumes them > - The backend needs stable source state, idempotent mention storage, author gating, rate-limit handling, and budget accounting > - This pull request adds the database contract and service layer for X mention polling and hydration queueing > - The benefit is that future X-triggered workflows can build on a controlled, test-covered ingestion path instead of calling the X API directly ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - No public GitHub issue exists for this exact backend extraction. - Problem: Paperclip does not yet have a durable, budget-aware backend path for ingesting X mentions as external work inputs. - Proposed solution: add X mention source, mention, allowlist, and budget ledger tables plus a poller service that stores mentions idempotently, queues only allowlisted authors for hydration, tracks cursor state, records spend decisions, and fails closed when cost estimates are unavailable. - Related but not duplicate: #8609, #8199, and #7316 touch internal mention wake behavior rather than X API mention ingestion. ## What Changed - Added X mention poller database tables and schema exports for sources, stored mentions, author allowlists, and budget ledger entries. - Added a server-side X mention poller service with cursoring, idempotent upsert behavior, allowlist gating, hydration queue handling, rate-limit backoff, and budget pause behavior. - Added focused Vitest coverage for intake gating, duplicate retries, cursor safety, rate limits, budget failures, and hydration budget pauses. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/x-mention-poller.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` ## Risks - Migration ordering matters because this adds migration `0125_x_mention_poller.sql`; it should merge after the existing `0124` migrations on `master`. - The service is backend-only and adapter-driven in this PR, so product behavior should not change until callers wire it into a runtime path. - Budget accounting intentionally fails closed when estimates are missing, which may pause a source rather than risk unbounded API spend. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-enabled local repository and terminal workflow. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d77fab6aae |
fix(adapters/hermes-gateway): improve onboarding configuration (#8678)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip runs agents through adapters, including built-in local and gateway-style adapters. > - Hermes gateway users need to connect Paperclip to an already-running Hermes API server. > - The gateway setup flow was missing clear non-local adapter configuration fields and accepted fewer URL shapes than operators naturally paste from Hermes. > - It also surfaced sparse diagnostics when the gateway was unreachable or when Paperclip generated onboarding prompts for gateway agents. > - This pull request tightens Hermes gateway configuration, URL normalization, diagnostics, and onboarding defaults. > - The benefit is that Hermes gateway setup is easier to complete and easier to debug without affecting unrelated adapters. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue found for this exact follow-up. Related prior/in-flight Hermes work: - Refs #2363 - Refs #4359 - Refs #6473 Problem statement: - **Type:** Adapter follow-up / setup reliability - **Adapter:** `hermes_gateway` - **Motivation:** Operators configure `hermes_gateway` against a running Hermes API server, but the UI and onboarding flow did not expose enough gateway-specific configuration or diagnostics. - **Expected behavior:** Paperclip should render the gateway fields, normalize common Hermes dashboard/API URL inputs, preserve sensible gateway onboarding defaults, and report reachability failures with actionable detail. - **Deployment mode:** Built-in adapter package in the Paperclip monorepo. ## What Changed - Added UI config fields for non-local Hermes gateway settings, including tests for rendering and field behavior. - Accepted Hermes dashboard URLs by normalizing them to gateway API URLs for execution. - Improved gateway reachability and run URL diagnostics. - Updated Hermes gateway onboarding text/default behavior so join prompts preserve gateway configuration. - Added focused server, UI, and adapter tests for the gateway configuration and onboarding paths. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --prefer-offline` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/hermes-paperclip-adapter exec vitest run src/gateway/server/execute.test.ts` — 20 passed - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/invite-accept-gateway-defaults.test.ts server/src/__tests__/invite-onboarding-text.test.ts ui/src/adapters/hermes-gateway/config-fields.test.tsx ui/src/components/AgentConfigForm.render.test.tsx ui/src/lib/agent-onboarding-prompt.test.ts` — 23 passed across 5 files - Confirmed the PR diff excludes `pnpm-lock.yaml` and `.github/workflows`. ## Risks Low to moderate risk. The changes are scoped to Hermes gateway configuration/onboarding and generic non-local adapter field rendering. The main risk is rejecting an unusual Hermes URL shape that should be accepted; the normalization tests cover dashboard and API URL variants added here. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in a tool-enabled local CLI environment, with shell/GitHub/Paperclip API access. Exact runtime model identifier was not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
765a75207a |
Add experimental server info debug view (#8676)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The dev/server UI exposes a `/api/health` endpoint and a lower-left
account drawer, but nothing surfaces *which* build the running instance
is on or when it last restarted
> - When iterating on a local dev instance it is hard to tell whether
the server you're looking at has actually restarted onto your latest
commit, or how stale the running process is
> - Developers need a lightweight, opt-in way to confirm the running
instance's identity without digging through logs or shelling into the
host
> - This pull request adds an experimental "Server Info Debug View"
setting that surfaces the running instance's last-restart time and
current commit as read-only rows in the account drawer
> - The benefit is a quick, in-UI sanity check of what the live server
is actually running, behind an experimental flag so it ships zero cost
to users who don't opt in
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue exists. Describing the underlying request inline
following the feature request template:
**Problem or motivation:**
When working against a local Paperclip dev instance there is no in-UI
way to confirm what the running server is — its current commit or when
it last restarted. You have to check logs or the host shell to know
whether the process picked up your latest build.
**Proposed solution:**
An opt-in experimental setting ("Server Info Debug View") that, once
enabled, renders a small read-only "Server" section at the bottom of the
lower-left account drawer showing **Last restarted** (the server process
start time) and **Running commit** (the current git HEAD short SHA +
subject).
**Alternatives considered:**
A separate top-right pill/overlay (like the work-life-balance plugin).
The account drawer was chosen to reuse existing menu-row styling and
avoid adding new always-present chrome.
**Roadmap alignment:**
Small, self-contained developer-experience aid gated behind an
experimental flag; does not overlap planned core roadmap work.
## What Changed
- Added `server/src/server-info.ts`: captures a `serverInfo` snapshot
once at boot — process start time and current git commit (SHA +
subject). Git is read via `execFileSync` with SHA validation and a
timeout.
- `/api/health` exposes the `serverInfo` snapshot, but only on
full-details health responses (board/agent in authenticated mode, or
local-trusted dev).
- Gated the UI surface behind a new `enableServerInfoDebugView`
experimental setting, wired through the shared instance type, validator,
settings normalizer, and OpenAPI schema.
- UI: added `SidebarServerInfo` rendering the read-only rows in the
account drawer (`BreadcrumbBar` / `SidebarAccountMenu`), plus the
experimental settings toggle and a typed `health` API client.
- Moved `ServerGitInfo` / `ServerInfoSnapshot` into
`@paperclipai/shared` so the server and UI share one definition instead
of duplicating it.
- Added unit tests for the server-info snapshot, health route exposure,
validator/normalizer, settings routes, the experimental settings page,
and the sidebar component.
## Verification
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run
src/__tests__/health.test.ts src/__tests__/server-info.test.ts
src/__tests__/instance-settings-service.test.ts
src/__tests__/instance-settings-routes.test.ts` — 32 passed
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/components/SidebarServerInfo.test.tsx
src/pages/InstanceExperimentalSettings.test.tsx` — 9 passed
- `tsc --noEmit` on both `@paperclipai/server` and `@paperclipai/ui` —
clean
- Manual: enable **Settings → Experimental → Server Info Debug View**,
refresh the UI, open the lower-left account drawer — a "Server" section
shows Last restarted and Running commit.
## Risks
- Low risk. The UI surface is fully opt-in via an experimental flag and
defaults off.
- The `serverInfo` field on `/api/health` is access-controlled to
full-details responses only (board/agent in authenticated mode, or
local-trusted dev) — never anonymous authenticated callers — so the git
SHA is not broadly exposed.
- The only new server work is a one-time git read at boot, guarded with
SHA validation and a timeout; failures degrade gracefully (the git block
reports `available: false` rather than throwing).
## Model Used
Claude — `claude-opus-4` (Anthropic), extended thinking with tool use,
via Claude Code.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no
instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
fd2f82ac5b |
[codex] Add built-in Hermes adapters (#8543)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent adapters are the boundary between the control plane and the runtimes that actually do work. > - Hermes support needs to be available as first-class local and gateway adapters while still preserving the adapter-manager override path for external packages. > - The adapter work touches runtime execution, UI adapter metadata, onboarding prompts, scoped credentials, release packaging, and smoke coverage, so the handoff needs concrete verification rather than only unit tests. > - This pull request adds built-in Hermes local and Hermes gateway support, keeps external adapter overrides compatible, and documents/tests the gateway flow end to end. > - The benefit is that operators can hire Hermes-backed agents without a manual plugin install, while self-hosted installs can still override/shadow the built-ins through Adapter manager packages. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this exact Hermes built-in adapter, gateway onboarding, and release-source work. Problem description: - Hermes local and gateway adapters need a public, reviewable source path in the monorepo so package artifacts and built-in adapter behavior match the application source. - Operators need built-in `hermes_local` and `hermes_gateway` adapter choices without losing the ability to install external Hermes packages as overrides. - Gateway onboarding needs secure defaults for API server URLs, API keys, and generated agent setup text. - Hermes-originated task bridge credentials need narrower API-key scope configuration. - Related public PRs found during duplicate search include #3027, #2363, #7544, #7950, #8095, and #8543. ## What Changed - Added the unified Hermes adapter package with local and gateway server/UI/CLI exports, config schemas, transcript parsing, model detection, and package metadata. - Registered `hermes_local` and `hermes_gateway` as built-in adapters across shared constants, server registries, CLI packaging, and UI adapter registries. - Kept the external adapter override path compatible so installed Hermes packages can shadow built-ins and restore the built-in parser when disabled. - Added Hermes gateway onboarding docs, board-operator docs, Docker smoke assets, and shell smoke harnesses for join/e2e validation. - Added scoped task-bridge API-key support, authorization checks, issue-origin handling, and tests for Hermes-created Paperclip tasks. - Hardened gateway transport and redaction behavior for API keys, headers, session data, and smoke diagnostics. - Updated release packaging/bootstrap checks for the Hermes packages while leaving `pnpm-lock.yaml` out of the PR per repository policy. ## Verification Targeted local verification recorded before PR handoff: - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/hermes-paperclip-adapter exec vitest run src/gateway/server/execute.test.ts` — 14/14 passed. - `pnpm test:hermes-gateway-smoke` — 6/6 passed. - Hermes package typecheck/build checks passed. - Focused server/UI adapter tests passed — 31/31. - Release helper Node tests passed — 18/18. - `git diff --check origin/master..HEAD` passed. Fresh Docker E2E smoke evidence: - Ran `pnpm smoke:hermes-gateway-e2e` on 2026-06-26 with a fresh state directory and fresh Docker container against a live Paperclip dev server. - Hermes direct execution reached `completed`. - Hermes stop/cancel path reached `cancelled`. - Hermes gateway created a Paperclip task, Paperclip ran the Hermes agent, and the task reached `done` with the expected marker response. - Temporary board auth keys, token files, smoke state, and Docker containers were cleaned up after the run. PR checks on head `b5eae40ce`: - GitHub Actions passed: `policy`, `review`, `Typecheck + Release Registry`, all general test shards, all serialized server shards, `Build`, `Canary Dry Run`, `e2e`, and aggregate `verify`. - External checks passed: Snyk and Socket Project Report. - External Socket Pull Request Alerts remained pending after the first-party CI matrix completed. ## Risks - Medium risk: this spans adapter registration, package publishing, gateway execution, onboarding docs, API-key scoping, and UI adapter metadata. - Migration risk is low: the scope-config migration adds a nullable column and does not rewrite existing keys. - Gateway execution depends on operator-provided Hermes API configuration; the smoke covers the Docker gateway path but real deployments may differ by network/auth setup. - Direct Greptile review on the latest expanded diff is file-count limited, although the commitperclip review gate passed. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool use enabled in a local repository workspace. Context window size is not exposed in this environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Commitperclip review gate is green; direct Greptile review is file-count limited on the latest expanded diff - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
ef1422c23e |
fix(cursor): coalesce streamed assistant text into prose blocks (#8544)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agent runs stream their transcripts through per-adapter stdout
parsers into the chat/run transcript UI
(`ui/src/adapters/transcript.ts`)
> - The Cursor CLI (local) streams assistant text as many small `text`
events (often a token or word each), and the parser emitted one
assistant entry per event and trimmed each
> - As a result the chat rendered one bubble per token ("every line a
new token") and dropped inter-token whitespace, making Cursor runs hard
to read
> - The render layer already coalesces consecutive `delta` entries
(`appendTranscriptEntry`), but the Cursor parser never tagged streamed
text as a delta
> - This pull request tags streamed `text` as a delta (without trimming)
so the existing render-time coalescer merges them into one assistant
block, while a `tool_call`/`tool_result` between deltas still breaks the
run
> - The benefit is readable Cursor transcripts with correct spacing and
preserved tool boundaries, with no change to the canonical event stream
(raw view unaffected)
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No existing public issue — describing the bug inline (per
`.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml`):
**What happened**
In the chat/run transcript, Cursor (local) assistant messages render as
one bubble per token/word, and inter-token spaces are dropped, making
the transcript unreadable. Root cause:
`packages/adapters/cursor-local/src/ui/parse-stdout.ts` (`type: "text"`
branch) emitted `{ kind: "assistant" }` per streamed `text` event
without `delta: true` and trimmed each, so the render-time coalescer
(`ui/src/adapters/transcript.ts`) never merged them and whitespace was
lost.
**Expected behavior**
Streamed assistant text should render as a single contiguous prose
block, with tool calls preserved as boundaries between blocks.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run a Cursor (local) agent that streams a multi-word assistant
message.
2. Open the run transcript in the chat UI.
3. Observe each streamed token/word rendered as its own bubble, with
inter-token spaces missing.
**Paperclip version**
Reproduced on current `master` (cutover base `e68188c43`).
**Deployment mode**
Self-hosted, `cursor_local` adapter.
## What Changed
- `packages/adapters/cursor-local/src/ui/parse-stdout.ts`: tag streamed
`text` events as `{ kind: "assistant", delta: true }` and stop trimming,
so the existing `appendTranscriptEntry` coalescer merges consecutive
deltas into one block.
- `ui/src/adapters/cursor-coalescing.test.ts` (new): dual-shape golden
fixtures (Cursor local + cloud) exercising the full render-time
projection via `buildTranscript`.
## Verification
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/adapters/cursor-coalescing.test.ts src/adapters/transcript.test.ts`
→ **10/10 pass**.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui --filter
@paperclipai/adapter-cursor-local typecheck` → **green**.
- The golden fixtures assert the run `text → tool_call → tool_result →
text → consolidated final` renders as exactly **two prose blocks with
the tool between them**, **no duplication** of the consolidated final,
and **inter-token whitespace preserved** across coalesced deltas.
## Risks
- **Low risk.** Pure classification at parse time; the canonical event
stream and the raw view are unchanged — only the "nice" render-time
projection changes. The coalescing logic (`appendTranscriptEntry`) is
pre-existing and already covered by tests. No schema, migration, or
behavioral change outside transcript rendering.
## Model Used
- **Claude Opus 4.8** (Anthropic), extended/high reasoning mode, driven
via the Cursor agent with tool use + code execution. Diagnosis and
fixtures grounded in the repo's actual parser/render code.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above (none found)
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub references)
- [x] My branch name describes the change
(`fix/cursor-transcript-coalescing`) and contains no internal Paperclip
ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (N/A —
no documented behavior changes)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending CI run)
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
(pending review)
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Heyneman <sebastian@joinnova.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
|
||
|
Dotta
|
a329199e99 |
test(skills-catalog): cover packaged npm artifacts (#8661)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The skills catalog package publishes bundled and optional skills for installs and downstream runtime consumers. > - Published package consumers depend on both generated catalog manifests and the source skill files being present in the npm artifact. > - Prior fixes improved published package resolution, but the package contents themselves did not have a smoke test guarding against regressions. > - This pull request adds an npm-pack artifact test for the skills catalog package and hardens the test cleanup path. > - The benefit is that packaging regressions are caught before release instead of after users install a broken catalog package. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Bug description: The skills catalog npm artifact needs to include the generated catalog manifests plus bundled and optional skill files. Without a package-level smoke test, a future change to `files`, build output, or catalog paths could publish an artifact that installs successfully but cannot serve catalog consumers correctly. Expected behavior: The package artifact produced by `npm pack` includes `dist/generated/catalog.json`, `generated/catalog.json`, representative bundled and optional skill `SKILL.md` files, and `package.json`. Actual risk before this PR: Package content regressions could ship without a focused local test detecting the missing files. ## What Changed - Added a Vitest smoke test for `@paperclipai/skills-catalog` that runs `npm pack --json` and verifies required artifact paths. - Added a build fallback inside the test when `dist/generated/catalog.json` is absent before packing. - Packs into registered temporary directories and recursively removes them after each test run so generated `.tgz` files do not leak when parsing or assertions fail. - Allows enough time for the smoke test to exercise the build fallback path on fresh CI runners. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/skills-catalog test` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/skills-catalog clean && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/skills-catalog test` - Searched for duplicate/related PRs; existing PR #8327 is already merged and this PR adds regression coverage around the package artifact. - Checked `ROADMAP.md`; no overlapping roadmap entry for this packaging test. - Confirmed the branch diff does not touch `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows`. ## Risks Low risk. This is test-only coverage for package contents. The main practical risk is a slightly slower skills catalog test run because it invokes `npm pack` and may build the package manifest when `dist` is absent. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex coding agent with shell and GitHub CLI tool use. Context window not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
32ef854771 |
docs: expand capsule identicon prototyper guidance (#8665)
Reviewed by CTO for PAP-12039. Documentation/catalog-only change with regenerated manifest; focused catalog verification, CI, security scans, and Greptile are green. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
43b005b704 |
Add pipeline workflow primitives and operator UI (#7903)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The pipeline subsystem models repeatable work as items moving through stages, with agent automation, review gates, blockers, drift notices, and linked work. > - Operators need this to be usable as one coherent workflow surface, not just as backend primitives or disconnected route experiments. > - The branch now carries the pipeline data model, service/routes, CLI/tutorial path, aggregation feeds, operator UI, stage automation controls, liveness/retry handling, and follow-up polish that make the primitive reviewable end to end. > - This pull request is the single review target for that pipeline workflow primitive stack. > - The benefit is that reviewers can evaluate the full operator experience and server contract together against `master`. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this work. The underlying feature request is described inline. ### Problem or motivation Paperclip needs a first-class way to model multi-stage agent/company workflows where upstream items can spawn downstream work, request review, carry fields across pipelines, surface drift, retry automation, and show operators where work is blocked or active. Without a unified pipeline primitive, these workflows spread across ad hoc issues, routines, and comments, making the state hard to inspect or operate. ### Proposed solution Add the pipeline workflow primitive stack: database schema and migrations, shared validators/types, server services and REST routes, aggregation and liveness helpers, CLI/tutorial smoke support, and the React operator UI for pipeline lists, boards, item detail, review/learnings views, settings, stage automation, secrets, carry-over fields, and retry/recovery flows. ### Alternatives considered - Keep workflows as loosely linked issues and routines: rejected because operators need a single board/detail/settings surface for repeated workflow patterns. - Ship backend primitives first and defer UI: rejected for this branch because the operator experience is the main way to validate the primitive. - Add a narrower one-off content workflow: rejected because the same primitives are useful across future company processes. ## What Changed - Added and evolved pipeline schema, migrations, shared contracts, server services, REST routes, route tests, and CLI/tutorial smoke support. - Added pipeline aggregation, health/liveness, drift acknowledgment, blocker/carry-over, automation retry, stage automation environment, and permission recovery behavior. - Added the operator UI for pipeline index/board/item detail/settings/review/learnings flows, including stage secrets, automation controls, markdown/item descriptions, linked issue assets, liveness banners, and source automation metadata. - Refactored issue document frame rendering through the shared `DocumentFrameHeader` component to keep document controls consistent with the pipeline document surfaces. - Kept this PR as the single base-branch review target for the current pipeline branch. ## Verification Current branch refresh: - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/pipelines-service.test.ts` — 31 passed - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/pipelines-routes.test.ts` — 19 passed - `pnpm --filter ./server typecheck` — passed - `pnpm --filter ./ui typecheck` — passed - Verified Pipelines remains gated by `enablePipelines === true`: sidebar item is hidden unless the flag is enabled, direct pipeline routes redirect to `/dashboard` when disabled, and the Experimental settings UI still has no Pipelines toggle. - GitHub status checks on `df071c710646de625131064c3fb6588b5e97964a` — all complete with no failing conclusions, including Actions, Socket, Superagent/Security, and Greptile Review - Greptile summary on `df071c710646de625131064c3fb6588b5e97964a` — Confidence Score 5/5 - GitHub review-thread sweep — 0 unresolved Greptile threads Previously recorded during branch development: - Server pipeline service/route and aggregation tests - Shared validator tests - UI pipeline page/settings/item-detail/learnings/liveness tests - Pipeline tutorial smoke path ## Risks - High review surface: this is a large feature branch spanning database, shared contracts, server behavior, CLI/docs, and UI. - Migration ordering and schema compatibility need reviewer attention because this branch has been kept current across multiple `master` syncs. - GitHub still reports merge state `BLOCKED` because the PR is awaiting normal human review/branch-protection completion; all current status checks are green. - Branch-name checklist exception: this PR uses the pre-existing requested branch name, which predates the current public-branch naming rule. The PR title/body avoid internal issue references. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with repository tool use, shell execution, git/GitHub CLI operations, and local verification commands. Earlier commits in this branch were assisted by Paperclip agents and other AI coding agents as recorded in commit authorship. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b3c0fadd63 |
feat(routines): add date variable controls (#8655)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Scheduled routines can prompt agents with variables that are filled in at dispatch time. > - Existing routine variable handling supported plain text-like values, but date inputs need a structured contract so routines can pass consistent date values. > - Operators also need date variables to be easy to configure and override from the routine UI. > - This pull request adds a date variable type across shared validation, server dispatch, and UI editing/run dialogs. > - The benefit is that routine authors can define date inputs once and agents receive validated ISO-style date values when routines run. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #219 Feature request: - Problem/motivation: Scheduled routines need first-class, typed date variables so operators can configure dates without relying on free-form text conventions. - Proposed solution: Add an `x-date` routine variable type with shared parsing/validation, server dispatch support, and UI date-picker controls in routine variable editors and run dialogs. - Alternatives considered: Continue treating dates as plain text, but that leaves validation and formatting to individual operators and agents. - Roadmap alignment: This is a focused improvement to the completed Scheduled Routines milestone and does not duplicate an active roadmap item. Related PR search: - Searched existing PRs/issues for `routine date picker`, `date variables`, and `scheduled routine date variable`; no direct duplicate PR was found. ## What Changed - Added the shared `x-date` routine variable contract, parsing, defaults, and validation coverage. - Extended routine dispatch to validate and pass date variable values. - Added date input controls to the routine variable editor and routine run variables dialog. - Added focused tests for shared validation, server dispatch, and the UI date controls. ## Verification - `git diff --check public/master...HEAD` - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/routine-variables.test.ts packages/shared/src/validators/routine.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts ui/src/components/RoutineRunVariablesDialog.test.tsx ui/src/components/RoutineVariablesEditor.test.tsx` - 5 test files passed - 68 tests passed ## Risks Low to medium risk. This adds a new routine variable type across shared/server/UI paths, so the main risk is compatibility with existing routine variable payloads. The change keeps existing variable types intact and adds targeted validation tests for the new date behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with terminal, git, GitHub CLI, and local test execution capabilities. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
1a3e398107 |
Add bundled Paperclip capsules skill
Add the bundled paperclip-capsules skill, durable generator workflow references, catalog manifest updates, and shipped catalog coverage. |
||
|
Dotta
|
8f7282066e |
Add workspace file downloads
Add first-class workspace file downloads, broader attachment content-type support, and the stream-lifetime limiter fix from PR review. |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
569b7affc4 |
[codex] Add bounded workspace overview (#8627)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The execution workspace subsystem powers project and workspace views by listing runtime state, branch metadata, issue links, and status summaries. > - The existing workspace views relied on broad list data that can grow expensive as a company accumulates many workspaces and linked issues. > - That makes the Workspaces page and project workspace cards slower than necessary because the UI does not always need the full workspace detail payload up front. > - This pull request adds a bounded overview contract for workspace listings and moves the relevant UI surfaces to that cheaper path. > - The benefit is faster workspace loading while preserving detail fetches for pages that actually need full workspace data. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this change. Inline bug report follows the repository bug template. ### What happened? Workspace index-style screens can load too much execution workspace detail before the user asks for it. Several UI surfaces used fuller workspace data paths for summary displays, which can make workspace loading slower as workspace history grows. ### Expected behavior Overview screens should request a bounded summary payload, while detail screens should keep using the full workspace detail endpoint. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Run Paperclip from source with enough execution workspace history to make workspace lists non-trivial. 2. Open the Workspaces page or a project workspace summary card. 3. Observe that summary UI needs only bounded workspace metadata but can depend on broader workspace payloads. ### Paperclip version or commit `master` at the time this branch was prepared. ### Deployment mode Local dev (`pnpm dev`) ## What Changed - Added shared types, validators, and path constants for bounded execution workspace overviews. - Added server service and route support for overview queries with bounded linked issue/runtime metadata. - Updated workspace overview UI API calls, query keys, breadcrumbs, quicklooks, close dialogs, project summaries, and detail links to consume the cheaper overview shape where appropriate. - Added regression coverage for the new server route/service behavior and the UI overview consumers. - Registered the new workspace overview route in the generated OpenAPI spec. - Kept overview totals aligned with the project join and preserved project slug links in workspace headers. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-routes.test.ts ui/src/api/execution-workspaces.test.ts ui/src/components/ProjectWorkspaceSummaryCard.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Workspaces.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-service.test.ts` - `pnpm test:run:serialized -- --shard-index 1 --shard-count 4` ## Risks Low to medium risk. The change introduces a new overview contract across shared/server/ui layers, so the main risk is a mismatch between summary and detail payload expectations. The added route/service/UI tests cover the intended split, and full detail pages continue using the detail path. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent with repository tool use and local command execution. Exact served model identifier and context window were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
LeonSGP
|
3d7a4f12f9 |
fix(claude-local): use direct 4.5 model aliases (#3800)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - The `claude_local` adapter is the control-plane surface that turns Paperclip agent settings into concrete Claude CLI invocations. > - Issue #3777 reports that selecting Claude Haiku 4.5 from the Paperclip UI causes Claude Code to request `claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`, which some enterprise-scoped keys are not allowed to access. > - In the current adapter model list, the direct Anthropic 4.5 entries are version-pinned IDs, unlike the 4.6 entries which already use the stable short aliases. > - This pull request switches the direct 4.5 `claude_local` model options to the short aliases Claude Code account access expects, while leaving Bedrock-native IDs unchanged in the Bedrock-specific model list. > - The benefit is that selecting Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Haiku 4.5 from Paperclip no longer forces the CLI onto a more restrictive versioned direct model name. ## What Changed - Updated the direct `claude_local` adapter model list to use `claude-sonnet-4-5` instead of `claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929`. - Updated the direct `claude_local` adapter model list to use `claude-haiku-4-5` instead of `claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`. - Left the Bedrock-specific model IDs in `src/server/models.ts` unchanged so AWS Bedrock routing still uses region-qualified native IDs. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local typecheck` - Confirmed the only source change is `packages/adapters/claude-local/src/index.ts`. ## Risks - Low risk. This only changes the direct `claude_local` model IDs advertised by Paperclip for the two 4.5 options. - Bedrock behavior is unchanged because the Bedrock-native identifiers are defined separately and were not modified in this PR. - Existing 4.6 model options are untouched. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex on a GPT-5-class coding model with terminal tool use and local code execution in this workspace. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Fixes #3777 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ed65d08d57 |
[codex] Gate skill mutations with skills:create permission (#8616)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents and board users operate inside a company-scoped control plane where permissions decide which mutating actions they can perform > - Company skills are part of the reusable agent-company setup surface, but skill mutation had been coupled to broader agent-creation authority > - That coupling meant importing or managing skills required a permission that also implies hiring power, which is broader than the operation needs > - Paperclip already has a grant-based permission vocabulary, so skill mutation should be authorized through a dedicated `skills:create` capability while preserving existing default behavior for trusted agents > - This pull request adds the skill creation permission contract, enforces it on company skill mutations, exposes it in agent permission management, and documents the changed CLI/API expectations > - The benefit is a narrower, auditable permission path for skill import/create/update/delete flows without forcing agents to receive broader agent-creation authority ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue is linked. Problem: company skill mutation APIs were effectively tied to broader agent creation authority. This PR splits skill mutation authorization onto the public `skills:create` permission while keeping existing default skill creation behavior for agents unless explicitly disabled. Related public PR found during duplicate search: #5330. That PR uses an older `canManageSkills` shape; this PR implements the `skills:create` grant path instead. ## What Changed - Added `skills:create` to shared permission constants and agent permission types/validators as `canCreateSkills`. - Backfilled default human/member role grants for `skills:create`. - Updated company skill mutation routes to require board/user or agent access to `skills:create`, while preserving legacy/default agent behavior through `canCreateSkills` unless explicitly disabled. - Updated agent permission update handling, UI permission controls, duplicate-agent payloads, plugin SDK fixtures, and agent detail API surfaces for `canCreateSkills`. - Added regression coverage for skill route authorization, permission schema/default behavior, invite grants, omitted permission updates, and duplicate-agent payloads. - Updated CLI and Paperclip skill documentation for the new skill creation permission. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/agent-permissions-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-permissions-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-skills-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/invite-join-grants.test.ts ui/src/lib/duplicate-agent-payload.test.ts` — 5 files, 90 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm test:run ...changed files...` was attempted first, but the stable wrapper rejects explicit file arguments; direct Vitest was used for the same targeted files. ## Risks - Moderate authorization risk: this changes the gate for company skill mutations, so the tests cover board grant checks, agent explicit grant checks, legacy default allowance, and explicit denial. - Migration/backfill risk is low: the migration only grants `skills:create` to existing human roles that already need broad management capability. - UI/API compatibility risk is low: `canCreateSkills` remains default-on for full agent permissions, and the update validator preserves omitted values so unrelated permission edits do not re-enable disabled skill creation. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent with terminal/tool use enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
721541c41d |
Fix sandbox restore index drift (#8595)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Sandboxed agents can do useful work in a remote workspace, then export that result back to a host review checkout. > - A restore can leave the host checkout's index stale even when the sandbox content and committed state are correct. > - That drift makes reviewers see misleading missing-file or dirty-state results after sandbox execution. > - This pull request repairs the host index refresh path and surfaces a clean/dirty restore signal during finalization. > - The benefit is more reliable review checkouts and clearer sandbox finalization status. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #248 No exact public GitHub issue was found for this restore/index consistency fix. The underlying bug is that a sandbox restore can update host working-tree content without leaving the host git index aligned, so local review tooling may report stale deletions or misleading dirtiness. This PR keeps the restore/export path consistent and reports the resulting clean/dirty state. GitHub search performed for related or duplicate work: `sandbox runtime status`, `sandbox restore index`, and `runtime progress`. No direct duplicate PR was found. ## What Changed - Refreshed git workspace sync/index handling after sandbox restore/export operations. - Added finalization status that reports whether the restored host checkout is clean or dirty. - Preserved sandbox-managed runtime progress callbacks around restore and finalization. - Added adapter-utils tests covering the host index drift repair and clean/dirty finalization signal. ## Verification - Local PII scan before push: high-confidence secret patterns, internal issue links, local user paths, and private URL patterns checked across all three split diffs; no real secrets or internal links found. - `git diff --check feat/sandbox-runtime-status..fix/sandbox-restore-index-sync` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts` — 1 file, 10 tests passed. - `pnpm run typecheck` passed on `fix/sandbox-restore-index-sync`. - `pnpm run build` passed on `fix/sandbox-restore-index-sync`; Vite reported existing CSS `::highlight` and chunk-size warnings. - `pnpm run test:run` was attempted on `fix/sandbox-restore-index-sync`; it failed in two unrelated broad-suite tests. One depends on this host's Git default branch behavior, and one depends on local Claude model-discovery environment. The changed focused suite above passes. ## Risks - Git index refresh behavior needs to remain conservative so it does not hide real uncommitted user changes. - The clean/dirty finalization signal is diagnostic; it should not by itself mark a sandbox run successful or failed. - This PR is stacked on the runtime-status branch so finalization progress can reuse the same callback path. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex coding agent, with shell/tool execution in a local worktree. Exact context-window metadata is not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
a27e5ad002 |
Add ephemeral sandbox runtime status plumbing (#8593)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Sandboxed agent runs can spend meaningful time preparing a remote workspace before the agent transcript shows useful output. > - Operators need short, current progress text for those setup phases, but that text should not become durable run history. > - The existing live-run websocket path already carries run updates to the UI, so the backend can reuse that channel instead of adding polling. > - This pull request adds an ephemeral runtime-progress contract, a process-local status store, and heartbeat integration for sandbox-managed runs. > - The benefit is a clearer active-run experience without database migrations or persistent progress rows. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #248 No exact public GitHub issue was found for this status-message plumbing. The underlying problem is that active sandboxed runs currently have setup phases, such as workspace sync and restore, where the operator cannot see concise current progress through the live run state. This PR addresses that gap for the backend/runtime layer while keeping progress messages ephemeral. GitHub search performed for related or duplicate work: `sandbox runtime status`, `sandbox restore index`, and `runtime progress`. No direct duplicate PR was found. ## What Changed - Added shared runtime-progress types and the `heartbeat.run.progress` live event type. - Added a process-local heartbeat run runtime-status store with TTL, bounded/redacted messages, and terminal cleanup. - Threaded runtime progress callbacks through heartbeat execution and active/live run serialization. - Emitted sandbox-managed runtime phase updates for sync, adapter startup, restore/export, and finalization paths. - Added backend and adapter-utils tests for ephemeral status behavior, terminal cleanup, live serialization, and sandbox progress callbacks. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - Local PII scan before push: high-confidence secret patterns, internal issue links, local user paths, and private URL patterns checked across all three split diffs; no real secrets or internal links found. The only secret-like text is an intentional fake test fixture (`sk-test-secret`). - `git diff --check origin/master..feat/sandbox-runtime-status` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/heartbeat-run-runtime-status.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-runtime-state.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-live-run-routes.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts` — 4 files, 23 tests passed. - `pnpm run typecheck` passed on both top stacks that include this branch: `feat/sandbox-status-ui` and `fix/sandbox-restore-index-sync`. - `pnpm run build` passed on both top stacks that include this branch; Vite reported existing CSS `::highlight` and chunk-size warnings. - `pnpm run test:run` was attempted on `fix/sandbox-restore-index-sync`; it failed in two unrelated broad-suite tests. One depends on this host's Git default branch behavior, and one depends on local Claude model-discovery environment. The changed focused suites above pass. ## Risks - Runtime progress is process-local by design, so status disappears after TTL, terminal cleanup, or server restart. - Clients that do not consume `heartbeat.run.progress` simply keep existing behavior. - Message redaction is intentionally generic; overly specific phase details should stay out of runtime-progress payloads. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex coding agent, with shell/tool execution in a local worktree. Exact context-window metadata is not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip CTO <cto@paperclip.local> Co-authored-by: Paperclip CTO <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
51ffbb380f |
Exclude transient Codex home dirs from sandbox sync (#8581)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Local adapters can run agents against sandboxed execution targets by syncing the workspace and selected runtime assets into the sandbox. > - The Codex local adapter includes a managed Codex home asset so sandboxed Codex runs can use the expected auth, config, skills, and session state. > - That asset follows symlinks, which is useful for real Codex home content but unsafe for transient launcher directories. > - Transient `tmp` and `.tmp` directories can contain symlinks to large host binaries, so the sandbox archive can inline large executable targets instead of just the small home directory content. > - This pull request excludes transient Codex home directories from the sandbox home asset while preserving the required Codex home files. > - The benefit is a much smaller and more predictable sandbox setup upload without changing the runtime files Codex actually needs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue was found for this exact sandbox archive-size bug. Bug description: - What happened: sandboxed `codex_local` runs sync the managed Codex home as a `home` asset with `followSymlinks` enabled. If transient Codex home dirs such as `tmp` or `.tmp` contain symlinks to a large host binary, the archive can inline that binary and make `Syncing home to sandbox` much larger than the managed home directory itself. - Expected behavior: sandbox setup should include the Codex home files needed for auth, config, skills, and session continuity, but should not archive transient launcher scratch directories. - Reproduction shape: create a managed Codex home with normal auth/config/skills files and a `tmp/arg0` or `.tmp` symlink to a large host executable, then start a sandboxed `codex_local` run. The home asset archive grows by the symlink target size. - Version/commit: observed on local `master` before this change. - Related public context: #5028 covers a different managed Codex home reliability issue around stale auth files; this PR addresses sandbox archive bloat from transient symlink targets. ## What Changed - Excluded `tmp` and `.tmp` from the Codex `home` asset that is uploaded for sandboxed runs. - Added regression coverage proving transient symlinked home dirs are excluded from the tar while required auth/config/skills files remain included. - Kept `followSymlinks` behavior for the rest of the Codex home asset so existing non-transient symlink behavior is preserved. ## Verification - `git diff --check` - Local PII/secret pattern scan over the committed diff - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local typecheck` ## Risks Low risk. The exclusion is limited to transient Codex home scratch directories, and the regression test verifies the files needed in the sandbox are still archived. The main compatibility risk is if a user intentionally placed required persistent Codex state under `tmp` or `.tmp`; those paths are treated as volatile scratch space by this change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, and GitHub CLI tool use. Exact hosted model build and context-window size were not exposed in the local adapter runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
4b1332b61c |
fix(openclaw-gateway): drop root paperclip params (#4416)
Fixes #5997, fixes #4081, fixes #4723, fixes #6625, fixes #3923 Refs #6606 — this PR removes the rejected root `paperclip` field, but #6606 also requires the protocol v3→v4 bump, which is out of scope here; referencing rather than closing it. ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane that wakes and coordinates agent workers across company-scoped execution flows. > - The `openclaw_gateway` adapter is part of that wake path, so its outbound payload contract has to match the gateway's validated `agent` schema. > - `master` currently reintroduces a previously fixed regression by sending a top-level `paperclip` property in `agentParams` (see #3923, which reverts the original fix in #626). > - The gateway rejects unknown root params, which means OpenClaw wakes fail before the remote agent can start work. > - The actual wake context already rides in the generated `message`, so the extra root property is both redundant and harmful. > - This pull request removes that leaked root property, adds a focused regression test around param construction, and updates affected server expectations/docs to the supported contract. > - The benefit is that OpenClaw Gateway agents wake successfully again without losing inline wake context. ## What Changed - Removed the top-level `paperclip` field from OpenClaw Gateway `agentParams` and extracted `buildAgentParams()` so the contract is easy to test. - Added a package-level regression test that proves `payloadTemplate.paperclip` is stripped while explicit `agentId`/`timeout` behavior stays intact. - Updated server tests that inspect OpenClaw Gateway payloads to assert wake data is delivered in `message` instead of a rejected root field. - Updated the adapter configuration docs to state that wake context is embedded in the generated message text, not sent as a top-level param. ### Rebase onto current `master` (conflict resolution) This branch was opened against an older `master`; re-merging current `master` required: - Resolving conflicts in `execute.ts` — `master` hoisted `configuredAgentId` and moved the agentId/timeout precedence inline; this PR keeps the `buildAgentParams()` extraction that strips the gateway-rejected root `paperclip`. - Updating tests `master` added **after** this branch's base that assert the old root-`paperclip` contract. These suites use the OpenClaw gateway adapter purely as a delivery harness (`adapterType: "openclaw_gateway"` + a mock gateway) and observe wake content via the gateway payload, so dropping the root field requires them to read wake context from `message` instead: - `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts` - `server/src/__tests__/low-trust-red-team-routes.test.ts` (redaction guarantees preserved — sanitized body + `expectNoCanary` on the raw canary) - Replaced brittle JSON-substring assertions (flagged by Greptile) with a shared `parseWakePayloadFromMessage()` helper + `toMatchObject`, robust to serialization/key-order changes. The strict contract is confirmed upstream: OpenClaw's `AgentParamsSchema` is `Type.Object(..., { additionalProperties: false })` with no `paperclip` field, so a root `paperclip` is rejected (`invalid agent params: at root: unexpected property 'paperclip'`). ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-openclaw-gateway typecheck` — clean - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — clean - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/openclaw-gateway-adapter.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts server/src/__tests__/low-trust-red-team-routes.test.ts` — 26 passed (7 + 11 + 8) - `packages/adapters/openclaw-gateway/src/server/execute.test.ts` — 6 passed (run via a local temp vitest config because the root `vitest.config.ts` does not include this package) ## Risks - Low risk: this narrows the outbound payload to the gateway-supported contract and keeps wake context in the already-supported `message` channel. - Any downstream consumer that incorrectly depended on a top-level `paperclip` field from the gateway mock payloads would need to follow the supported `message` contract instead. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex CLI coding agent via API authored the original change; exact underlying model ID and context window were not exposed in that environment. - Rebase/conflict resolution and the test-assertion migration were done with Claude Code (Claude Opus 4.8, 1M context). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked the related issues above - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: serenakeyitan via breeze-runner <serenakeyitan@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Aymeloglu <aaymeloglu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
b3209486ca |
fix: default Daytona sandboxes to auto-archive so they leave the disk quota (#8561)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run their work inside sandboxes, provisioned through pluggable sandbox-provider plugins; the Daytona plugin is one of them > - Daytona bills storage against an org-wide disk quota, and a *stopped* sandbox still counts against that quota — only an *archived* sandbox is moved to cold storage and stops counting > - The Daytona plugin created sandboxes without supplying any auto-stop/auto-archive/auto-delete intervals, so Daytona fell back to its own defaults (archive after 7 days, never auto-delete) > - When in-product cleanup fails or never runs (crashed runs, failed lease destroys, orphaned probes), stopped sandboxes then sit for a week at a few GiB each until the org storage quota fills and blocks all workers > - This pull request makes the Daytona plugin apply quota-safe defaults on create (auto-stop 15m, auto-archive 60m, auto-delete 7d) so every sandbox eventually leaves the disk quota on its own, even when our own cleanup fails > - The benefit is that the storage quota no longer fills from leaked/idle sandboxes, while operators keep full control to override the intervals per environment ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue. Describing in-PR (bug report): ### What happened Running many agents in Daytona sandboxes eventually exhausted the org's storage quota, and Daytona returned an out-of-disk error that blocked all sandbox creation. Root cause: a *stopped* Daytona sandbox still consumes disk quota; only an *archived* sandbox is moved to cold storage and frees it. The plugin created sandboxes without specifying auto-stop/auto-archive/auto-delete intervals, so Daytona used its built-in defaults (auto-archive after 7 days, auto-delete disabled). Any sandbox that our own cleanup failed to remove — or that was orphaned by a crashed run — therefore lingered for up to a week, accumulating until the quota filled. ### Expected behavior Idle/leaked sandboxes should leave the storage quota automatically within a short window, without relying solely on in-product cleanup succeeding. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Configure the Daytona sandbox provider with no explicit auto-stop/auto-archive/auto-delete intervals. 2. Run many agent sandboxes over time (or leak some via crashed/failed runs that skip in-product cleanup). 3. Observe stopped-but-not-archived sandboxes accumulating against the org's 30 GiB storage quota until Daytona returns an out-of-disk error and blocks new sandbox creation. ### Deployment mode Self-hosted Paperclip using the Daytona sandbox-provider plugin. ## What Changed - `daytona/src/plugin.ts`: `parseDriverConfig` now defaults `autoStopInterval` → 15 min, `autoArchiveInterval` → 60 min, `autoDeleteInterval` → 7 days when the value is unset. Explicit per-environment values (including `0` and `-1`) are preserved and passed through unchanged. - `daytona/src/manifest.ts`: documents the new defaults and the quota rationale on each field, and sets the manifest `default` so the values surface in the environment configuration screen where operators can override them. - `daytona/src/plugin.test.ts`: adds tests covering the new defaults and that explicit values / disabling sentinels (`0`, `-1`) are respected. ## Verification ``` pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-daytona test ``` - 24 tests pass, including the new default-behavior tests. - Confirmed an explicit `autoArchiveInterval: 0` / `autoDeleteInterval: -1` in config is still forwarded unchanged (defaults only apply when the field is absent). ## Risks Low risk. Behavior change is limited to sandboxes created with no explicit interval config: they now auto-stop/archive/delete on Daytona-managed timers instead of Daytona's longer built-in defaults. Auto-archive is reversible (resuming an archived sandbox restores it). The only persistent action is auto-delete, which is a 7-day backstop for sandboxes nobody resumes, matching prior intent. Any environment that needs long-lived warm sandboxes can override the intervals (including disabling them with `0`/`-1`). ## Model Used Claude Opus (claude-opus-4-8), via the Paperclip agent harness with tool use. Extended reasoning enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude
|
ea1e321d86 |
Fix Daytona resource overrides for image-backed sandboxes (#8564)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Remote sandbox providers are part of the execution environment layer that lets agents run outside the local host. > - The Daytona sandbox-provider plugin exposes CPU, memory, disk, and GPU settings so operators can request larger execution sandboxes. > - The plugin was forwarding resource settings through snapshot/default creation, but Daytona rejects resource overrides on that path. > - Image-backed Daytona creation does support resource settings, so Paperclip should only send those values when an image is configured. > - This pull request makes the Daytona contract explicit in validation and runtime acquisition. > - The benefit is that operators get a clear Paperclip error for unsupported snapshot/default resource configs, while image-backed sandboxes still receive the requested allocation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists. ### What happened? Daytona sandbox environments can be configured with CPU/memory/disk/GPU resource settings, but snapshot/default Daytona sandbox creation rejects those resource overrides. Paperclip could pass unsupported resource fields through to Daytona and surface an opaque provider error. ### Expected behavior Paperclip should only send resource fields on Daytona creation paths that support them, and it should reject unsupported resource configurations before creating a sandbox. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Configure a Daytona sandbox environment with resource values such as `cpu: 4` and `memory: 4`. 2. Leave the environment on snapshot/default creation by not setting an image. 3. Acquire a Daytona sandbox lease. 4. Observe Daytona reject the resource override on the snapshot/default path. ### Paperclip version or commit Reproduced against the current Daytona sandbox-provider plugin behavior before this PR. This PR fixes the contract in the plugin code and tests. ### Deployment mode Local authenticated Paperclip instance using the Daytona sandbox provider. Additional scope: - Daytona provider only. - No schema changes. - No non-Daytona provider changes. Related search performed: - `gh search issues "Daytona resources snapshot repo:paperclipai/paperclip" --limit 10` - `gh search prs "Daytona resources snapshot repo:paperclipai/paperclip" --limit 10` ## What Changed - Restrict Daytona `resources` create params to image-backed sandbox creation. - Add validation/runtime guard for resource settings without an image. - Keep image-backed resource metadata and reusable-lease sentinel behavior covered by tests. - Update Daytona plugin tests for image-backed resources and snapshot/default rejection. ## Verification - `pnpm -C packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona test` - `pnpm -C packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona build` - Manual Daytona SDK probe in a local authenticated instance: image-backed creation with `daytonaio/sandbox:0.8.0` returned a 4 CPU / 4 GiB sandbox and deleted cleanly. - Greptile Review: 5/5, no inline comments. ## Risks - Existing Daytona environments that set resource values while relying on snapshot/default creation will now fail validation/acquisition with a clear error instead of calling Daytona and failing there. - Operators who need custom resource sizes should use image-backed creation or a provider-side resource-sized snapshot workflow. - Low migration risk: no database schema changes and no changes to non-Daytona providers. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent. Exact context window is not exposed in this environment. Tool-enabled workflow with shell, GitHub CLI, database inspection, and local test/build execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
71acf83070 |
build(deps): align react-dom with react@19.2.7 (replaces dependabot #8471) (#8557)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The board UI, plugin examples, and plugin SDK all share the same React dependency graph. > - Dependabot PR #8471 raised `react` and `@types/react`, but left `react-dom` and `@types/react-dom` on older 19.x ranges. > - That let dependency resolution install incompatible React runtime versions, which makes React refuse to run and breaks UI-oriented test suites. > - Current PR policy keeps `pnpm-lock.yaml` owned by CI for non-dependabot authors, so this PR updates manifests and lets CI regenerate the lockfile artifact. > - This pull request replaces #8471 with a complete React toolchain alignment across the package manifests it touched. > - The benefit is a single React 19.2.7 runtime graph that keeps dependency consumers from deduping onto a stale `react-dom` patch. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #8471 This PR replaces #8471, which updated `react` and `@types/react` but left `react-dom` and `@types/react-dom` behind. The resulting dependency graph can install mismatched `react` and `react-dom` versions, producing React's incompatible-version runtime error in UI tests. ## What Changed - Aligned `react-dom` package ranges to `^19.2.7` anywhere the React dependency set is present. - Aligned `@types/react-dom` package ranges to the 19.2 line. - Kept the `react@^19.2.7` and `@types/react@^19.2.17` bumps from #8471. - Added root pnpm overrides for `react` and `react-dom` so peer-only consumers resolve to the same 19.2.7 runtime instead of a stale patch. - Left `pnpm-lock.yaml` out of the PR, per the PR workflow policy; CI regenerates and shares the lockfile artifact when manifests change. ## Verification - `cd ui && NODE_ENV=test npx vitest run` passed locally before handoff: 243 files / 1739 tests. - `NODE_ENV=development pnpm install --lockfile-only --ignore-scripts --no-frozen-lockfile` passed locally on the rebased branch. - Confirmed regenerated `pnpm-lock.yaml` resolves `react` and `react-dom` to 19.2.7 and contains no `react@19.2.4` / `react-dom@19.2.4` entries. - GitHub Actions are green on this PR, including `policy`, `Typecheck + Release Registry`, all general test shards, `Build`, `e2e`, and `verify`. - Greptile completed at 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. ## Risks Low risk. This is a dependency-version alignment only, but React dependency changes can expose package-manager resolution issues. The root overrides intentionally constrain the React runtime pair to the same patch version to avoid that class of failure. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex based on GPT-5, using command-line tool execution and GitHub CLI operations in a Paperclip-managed workspace. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
65d45688fe |
build(deps-dev): bump esbuild from 0.28.0 to 0.28.1 (#8470)
[//]: # (dependabot-start) ⚠️ **Dependabot is rebasing this PR** ⚠️ Rebasing might not happen immediately, so don't worry if this takes some time. Note: if you make any changes to this PR yourself, they will take precedence over the rebase. --- [//]: # (dependabot-end) Bumps [esbuild](https://github.com/evanw/esbuild) from 0.28.0 to 0.28.1. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/releases">esbuild's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v0.28.1</h2> <ul> <li> <p>Disallow <code>\</code> in local development server HTTP requests (<a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/security/advisories/GHSA-g7r4-m6w7-qqqr">GHSA-g7r4-m6w7-qqqr</a>)</p> <p>This release fixes a security issue where HTTP requests to esbuild's local development server could traverse outside of the serve directory on Windows using a <code>\</code> backslash character. It happened due to the use of Go's <code>path.Clean()</code> function, which only handles Unix-style <code>/</code> characters. HTTP requests with paths containing <code>\</code> are no longer allowed.</p> <p>Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/dellalibera"><code>@dellalibera</code></a> for reporting this issue.</p> </li> <li> <p>Add integrity checks to the Deno API (<a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/security/advisories/GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr">GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr</a>)</p> <p>The previous release of esbuild added integrity checks to esbuild's npm install script. This release also adds integrity checks to esbuild's Deno install script. Now esbuild's Deno API will also fail with an error if the downloaded esbuild binary contains something other than the expected content.</p> <p>Note that esbuild's Deno API installs from <code>registry.npmjs.org</code> by default, but allows the <code>NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY</code> environment variable to override this with a custom package registry. This change means that the esbuild executable served by <code>NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY</code> must now match the expected content.</p> <p>Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/sondt99"><code>@sondt99</code></a> for reporting this issue.</p> </li> <li> <p>Avoid inlining <code>using</code> and <code>await using</code> declarations (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4482">#4482</a>)</p> <p>Previously esbuild's minifier sometimes incorrectly inlined <code>using</code> and <code>await using</code> declarations into subsequent uses of that declaration, which then fails to dispose of the resource correctly. This bug happened because inlining was done for <code>let</code> and <code>const</code> declarations by avoiding doing it for <code>var</code> declarations, which no longer worked when more declaration types were added. Here's an example:</p> <pre lang="js"><code>// Original code { using x = new Resource() x.activate() } <p>// Old output (with --minify)<br /> new Resource().activate();</p> <p>// New output (with --minify)<br /> {using e=new Resource;e.activate()}<br /> </code></pre></p> </li> <li> <p>Fix module evaluation when an error is thrown (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4461">#4461</a>, <a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/pull/4467">#4467</a>)</p> <p>If an error is thrown during module evaluation, esbuild previously didn't preserve the state of the module for subsequent module references. This was observable if <code>import()</code> or <code>require()</code> is used to import a module multiple times. The thrown error is supposed to be thrown by every call to <code>import()</code> or <code>require()</code>, not just the first. With this release, esbuild will now throw the same error every time you call <code>import()</code> or <code>require()</code> on a module that throws during its evaluation.</p> </li> <li> <p>Fix some edge cases around the <code>new</code> operator (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4477">#4477</a>)</p> <p>Previously esbuild incorrectly printed certain edge cases involving complex expressions inside the target of a <code>new</code> expression (specifically an optional chain and/or a tagged template literal). The generated code for the <code>new</code> target was not correctly wrapped with parentheses, and either contained a syntax error or had different semantics. These edge cases have been fixed so that they now correctly wrap the <code>new</code> target in parentheses. Here is an example of some affected code:</p> <pre lang="js"><code>// Original code new (foo()`bar`)() new (foo()?.bar)() <p>// Old output<br /> new foo()<code>bar</code>();<br /> new (foo())?.bar();</p> <p></code></pre></p> </li> </ul> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Changelog</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md">esbuild's changelog</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>0.28.1</h2> <ul> <li> <p>Disallow <code>\</code> in local development server HTTP requests (<a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/security/advisories/GHSA-g7r4-m6w7-qqqr">GHSA-g7r4-m6w7-qqqr</a>)</p> <p>This release fixes a security issue where HTTP requests to esbuild's local development server could traverse outside of the serve directory on Windows using a <code>\</code> backslash character. It happened due to the use of Go's <code>path.Clean()</code> function, which only handles Unix-style <code>/</code> characters. HTTP requests with paths containing <code>\</code> are no longer allowed.</p> <p>Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/dellalibera"><code>@dellalibera</code></a> for reporting this issue.</p> </li> <li> <p>Add integrity checks to the Deno API (<a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/security/advisories/GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr">GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr</a>)</p> <p>The previous release of esbuild added integrity checks to esbuild's npm install script. This release also adds integrity checks to esbuild's Deno install script. Now esbuild's Deno API will also fail with an error if the downloaded esbuild binary contains something other than the expected content.</p> <p>Note that esbuild's Deno API installs from <code>registry.npmjs.org</code> by default, but allows the <code>NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY</code> environment variable to override this with a custom package registry. This change means that the esbuild executable served by <code>NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY</code> must now match the expected content.</p> <p>Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/sondt99"><code>@sondt99</code></a> for reporting this issue.</p> </li> <li> <p>Avoid inlining <code>using</code> and <code>await using</code> declarations (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4482">#4482</a>)</p> <p>Previously esbuild's minifier sometimes incorrectly inlined <code>using</code> and <code>await using</code> declarations into subsequent uses of that declaration, which then fails to dispose of the resource correctly. This bug happened because inlining was done for <code>let</code> and <code>const</code> declarations by avoiding doing it for <code>var</code> declarations, which no longer worked when more declaration types were added. Here's an example:</p> <pre lang="js"><code>// Original code { using x = new Resource() x.activate() } <p>// Old output (with --minify)<br /> new Resource().activate();</p> <p>// New output (with --minify)<br /> {using e=new Resource;e.activate()}<br /> </code></pre></p> </li> <li> <p>Fix module evaluation when an error is thrown (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4461">#4461</a>, <a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/pull/4467">#4467</a>)</p> <p>If an error is thrown during module evaluation, esbuild previously didn't preserve the state of the module for subsequent module references. This was observable if <code>import()</code> or <code>require()</code> is used to import a module multiple times. The thrown error is supposed to be thrown by every call to <code>import()</code> or <code>require()</code>, not just the first. With this release, esbuild will now throw the same error every time you call <code>import()</code> or <code>require()</code> on a module that throws during its evaluation.</p> </li> <li> <p>Fix some edge cases around the <code>new</code> operator (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4477">#4477</a>)</p> <p>Previously esbuild incorrectly printed certain edge cases involving complex expressions inside the target of a <code>new</code> expression (specifically an optional chain and/or a tagged template literal). The generated code for the <code>new</code> target was not correctly wrapped with parentheses, and either contained a syntax error or had different semantics. These edge cases have been fixed so that they now correctly wrap the <code>new</code> target in parentheses. Here is an example of some affected code:</p> <pre lang="js"><code>// Original code new (foo()`bar`)() new (foo()?.bar)() <p>// Old output<br /> new foo()<code>bar</code>();<br /> new (foo())?.bar();<br /> </code></pre></p> </li> </ul> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/bb9db84c02433fbe37b3509f53f9f3e3cc48725e"><code>bb9db84</code></a> publish 0.28.1 to npm</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/9ff053e53b8eeb990f59355dbea365277ac45ee2"><code>9ff053e</code></a> security: add integrity checks to the Deno API</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/0a9bf2135b67c7e28989a5ba19f0f000805a5ab5"><code>0a9bf21</code></a> enforce non-negative size in gzip parser</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/e2a1a7132058ee067fe736eac15f695861b8654e"><code>e2a1a71</code></a> security: forbid <code>\\</code> in local dev server requests</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/83a2cbfc35809f4fd5152da59572d7bed7739d78"><code>83a2cbf</code></a> fix <a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4482">#4482</a>: don't inline <code>using</code> declarations</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/308ad745d824c77bc607603451b257d0f2fd9a38"><code>308ad74</code></a> fix <a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4471">#4471</a>: renaming of nested <code>var</code> declarations</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/f013f5f99a015bce92ec48d49181d4ad3177b29b"><code>f013f5f</code></a> fix some typos</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/aafd6e48b1088336a5f5a17e930be7e840d43d8c"><code>aafd6e4</code></a> chore: fix some minor issues in comments (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4462">#4462</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/15300c30b5e22f7cfcbed850c246d35095658386"><code>15300c3</code></a> follow up: cjs evaluation fixes</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/commit/1bda0c31d7697c0af44b3ab39b81e599e559a395"><code>1bda0c3</code></a> fix <a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4461">#4461</a>, fix <a href="https://redirect.github.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/4467">#4467</a>: esm evaluation fixes</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/compare/v0.28.0...v0.28.1">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
b86d60b802 |
build(deps): bump @cursor/sdk from 1.0.18 to 1.0.19 (#8462)
Bumps [@cursor/sdk](https://github.com/cursor/cursor) from 1.0.18 to 1.0.19. <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/cursor/cursor/commits">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
d5088c3987 |
build(deps): bump @codemirror/view from 6.39.15 to 6.43.1 (#8468)
Bumps [@codemirror/view](https://github.com/codemirror/view) from 6.39.15 to 6.43.1. <details> <summary>Changelog</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/codemirror/view/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md">@codemirror/view's changelog</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>6.41.0 (2026-04-01)</h2> <h3>Bug fixes</h3> <p>Fix an issue where <code>EditorView.posAtCoords</code> could incorrectly return a position near a higher element on the line, in mixed-font-size lines.</p> <p>Expand the workaround for the Webkit bug that causes nonexistent selections to stay visible to be active on non-Safari Webkit browsers.</p> <h3>New features</h3> <p>The new <code>EditorView.cursorScrollMargin</code> facet can now be used to configure the extra space used when scrolling the cursor into view.</p> <h2>6.40.0 (2026-03-12)</h2> <h3>Bug fixes</h3> <p>Fix a bug that caused Shift-Enter/Backspace/Delete on iOS to lose the shift modifier when delivered to key event handlers.</p> <p>Fix an issue where <code>EditorView.moveVertically</code> could move to the wrong place in wrapped lines with a large line height.</p> <p>Make sure the selection head associativity is properly set for mouse selections made with shift held down.</p> <h3>New features</h3> <p><code>WidgetType.updateDOM</code> is now called with the previous widget value as third argument.</p> <h2>6.39.17 (2026-03-10)</h2> <h3>Bug fixes</h3> <p>Improve touch tap-selection on line wrapping boundaries.</p> <p>Make <code>drawSelection</code> draw our own selection handles on iOS.</p> <p>Fix an issue where <code>posAtCoords</code>, when querying line wrapping points, got confused by extra empty client rectangles produced by Safari.</p> <h2>6.39.16 (2026-03-02)</h2> <h3>Bug fixes</h3> <p>Perform scroll stabilization on the document or wrapping scrollable elements, when the user scrolls the editor.</p> <p>Fix an issue where changing decorations right before a composition could end up corrupting the visible DOM.</p> <p>Fix an issue where some types of text input over a selection would be read as happening in wrong position.</p> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/codemirror/view/commits">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
957f30cd72 |
build(deps): bump @agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp from 0.47.0 to 0.48.0 (#8469)
Bumps [@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp](https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp) from 0.47.0 to 0.48.0. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/releases">@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v0.48.0</h2> <h2><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.47.0...v0.48.0">0.48.0</a> (2026-06-19)</h2> <h3>Features</h3> <ul> <li>Agent selection dropdown in config options (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/794">#794</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/5729c471f92e1d2a191eb2a6d18c2be47821e9ec">5729c47</a>)</li> <li><strong>deps:</strong> bump the minor group with 11 updates (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/787">#787</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/ad3b5fe74527f83964695a1e8056d010b981fc79">ad3b5fe</a>)</li> <li>Update to claude-agent-sdk 0.3.183 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/791">#791</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/744b2d41128f67091d4136283594c0db11ea4db5">744b2d4</a>)</li> <li>Update to new ACP SDK patterns (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/790">#790</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/2554c7bf980472760a6e7810b826f030d2c3af25">2554c7b</a>)</li> </ul> <h3>Bug Fixes</h3> <ul> <li>duplicate assistant text when turn activates mid-message (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/789">#789</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/1c80bf8e56a9279dc799e7bbdcae87241e99c18b">1c80bf8</a>)</li> <li>Skip empty thinking chunks (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/793">#793</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/15fdf26fc7d3a6c51e89d3e56fc91dd00cb3d7ae">15fdf26</a>)</li> <li>surface Bash tool image output instead of dropping it (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/617">#617</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/a759e64ef6d9b7c5bfe9a6e6b182db835f8ed3b6">a759e64</a>)</li> </ul> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Changelog</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md">@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp's changelog</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.47.0...v0.48.0">0.48.0</a> (2026-06-19)</h2> <h3>Features</h3> <ul> <li>Agent selection dropdown in config options (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/794">#794</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/5729c471f92e1d2a191eb2a6d18c2be47821e9ec">5729c47</a>)</li> <li><strong>deps:</strong> bump the minor group with 11 updates (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/787">#787</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/ad3b5fe74527f83964695a1e8056d010b981fc79">ad3b5fe</a>)</li> <li>Update to claude-agent-sdk 0.3.183 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/791">#791</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/744b2d41128f67091d4136283594c0db11ea4db5">744b2d4</a>)</li> <li>Update to new ACP SDK patterns (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/790">#790</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/2554c7bf980472760a6e7810b826f030d2c3af25">2554c7b</a>)</li> </ul> <h3>Bug Fixes</h3> <ul> <li>duplicate assistant text when turn activates mid-message (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/789">#789</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/1c80bf8e56a9279dc799e7bbdcae87241e99c18b">1c80bf8</a>)</li> <li>Skip empty thinking chunks (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/793">#793</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/15fdf26fc7d3a6c51e89d3e56fc91dd00cb3d7ae">15fdf26</a>)</li> <li>surface Bash tool image output instead of dropping it (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/617">#617</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/a759e64ef6d9b7c5bfe9a6e6b182db835f8ed3b6">a759e64</a>)</li> </ul> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/b4b7f561e2bc495132e624c9256b6e3cb9d9b477"><code>b4b7f56</code></a> chore(main): release 0.48.0 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/788">#788</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/41cde99fd7685e1b5b74f589bac9a68f3b79778f"><code>41cde99</code></a> test: isolate CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR in settings tests to stop user-tier leak (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/769">#769</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/5729c471f92e1d2a191eb2a6d18c2be47821e9ec"><code>5729c47</code></a> feat: Agent selection dropdown in config options (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/794">#794</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/a759e64ef6d9b7c5bfe9a6e6b182db835f8ed3b6"><code>a759e64</code></a> fix: surface Bash tool image output instead of dropping it (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/617">#617</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/15fdf26fc7d3a6c51e89d3e56fc91dd00cb3d7ae"><code>15fdf26</code></a> fix: Skip empty thinking chunks (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/793">#793</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/9f38cb67dfad31d8a1265c2d2449c16c1b03ff8b"><code>9f38cb6</code></a> test: Improve tmp dirs in tests (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/792">#792</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/744b2d41128f67091d4136283594c0db11ea4db5"><code>744b2d4</code></a> feat: Update to claude-agent-sdk 0.3.183 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/791">#791</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/2554c7bf980472760a6e7810b826f030d2c3af25"><code>2554c7b</code></a> feat: Update to new ACP SDK patterns (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/790">#790</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/1c80bf8e56a9279dc799e7bbdcae87241e99c18b"><code>1c80bf8</code></a> fix: duplicate assistant text when turn activates mid-message (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/789">#789</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/commit/ad3b5fe74527f83964695a1e8056d010b981fc79"><code>ad3b5fe</code></a> feat(deps): bump the minor group with 11 updates (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/issues/787">#787</a>)</li> <li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp/compare/v0.47.0...v0.48.0">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
746e287e33 |
feat(control-plane): add annotation and workspace controls (#8229)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI-agent companies. > - The control plane coordinates issues, workspaces, documents, routines, and board review flows across company-scoped data. > - The local source branch contained related schema, service, and UI changes for workspace issue scoping and document/routine annotations. > - These changes need to move together because db schema, shared types, server services, and UI consumers form one contract. > - This pull request extracts the migration-bearing control-plane work from the source branch onto `origin/master`. > - The benefit is a standalone branch with deterministic migration order and focused review for the highest-risk part of the split. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No GitHub issue exists for this branch split. Internal source task: [PAP-11234](/PAP/issues/PAP-11234). Problem/motivation: - Workspace operations need explicit issue scoping so readiness and blocker handling can be derived correctly. - Document annotations need reliable live updates, save failure surfacing, normalized activity keys, and better comment panel behavior. - Routine descriptions need the same annotation contract as issue documents so operators can discuss and edit routine text without special-case infrastructure. Proposed solution: - Add the workspace-operation `issueId` migration and readiness scoping. - Add routine document/annotation schema, shared types, services, routes, and UI editing support. - Keep the related migrations in one PR so the renumbered `0106` and `0107` migrations land in a deterministic order after current `master`. Alternatives considered: - Split migrations into separate PRs, rejected because that would create migration-numbering conflicts and make each branch less standalone. - Merge this with UI polish, rejected because this branch needs deeper server/db review. Roadmap alignment: - Checked `ROADMAP.md`; the roadmap mentions future recurring routine capabilities generally, but no duplicate implementation PR for these annotation/workspace changes was found. ## What Changed - Added `0106_workspace_operations_issue_id.sql` and `0107_routine_description_annotations.sql`, plus schema exports. - Scoped workspace readiness to blocker issues and attached workspace operation issue ids. - Scoped issue-thread interaction accept finalization to the source run. - Added routine document annotation contracts across db/shared/server/UI. - Improved document annotation live updates, activity-key normalization, save failure surfacing, and comment panel behavior. - Added issue workspace property controls and compact blocked-by/quick-control UI updates. - Added focused server and UI regression tests for the new contracts. ## Verification - `CI=true NODE_ENV=development pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --prefer-offline` - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest server/src/__tests__/document-annotation-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routine-document-annotation-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueDocumentAnnotations.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx ui/src/components/WorkspaceRuntimeControls.test.tsx ui/src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider.test.ts --run` — 10 files, 273 tests passed. - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm -r --filter @paperclipai/db --filter @paperclipai/shared --filter @paperclipai/server --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed, including db migration numbering check. ## Risks - Migration-bearing PR; merge this branch before any later PR that adds migrations with higher numbers. - Cross-layer contract risk across db/shared/server/ui, mitigated with targeted tests and affected-package typecheck. - Review should pay special attention to company scoping in new routine/document annotation paths. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` / CodexCoder, GPT-5-class coding model with tool use and shell execution. Exact runtime snapshot and context-window setting were not exposed by the Paperclip run context. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details available from the run context) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots (N/A per source task: do not add screenshots/images unless specifically part of the work) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (N/A; no public docs changed) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e68188c438 |
fix: upstream deployed document-comment, routine-annotation, workspace & board-polling fixes (#8536)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - This change touches several already-shipped subsystems — document-comment annotations, the selected-agent Conference Room chat surface, routine description annotations, workspace-operation tracking, and the board polling/inbox UI > - A batch of incremental fixes and two small backend additions had accumulated on a local mainline and were deployed to a live instance, but never landed upstream — so each `origin/master` sync kept re-diverging > - Leaving them un-upstreamed means the same delta has to be re-merged on every sync and risks being lost or silently reverted > - This pull request rebases that delta cleanly on top of current `origin/master` (preserving recent upstream work such as reusable sandbox leases and the relation-list collapse controls) and brings it up for review > - The benefit is that mainline and the deployed instance converge, and these fixes/additions get normal review + CI + Greptile coverage ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No single GitHub issue tracks this; it is a bundle of bug fixes and two small feature additions. Following the issue-template fields: **Bug fixes (what was wrong → what this does):** - Document comments rendered out of document order, didn't live-update across clients, swallowed save failures, and lost the markdown text selection on re-render. Now: doc-order sort, live updates, surfaced save-failure state, stable selection across re-renders. - The board polling hot path returned oversized payloads on every poll. Now: an opt-in `summary` projection trims the heartbeat-run list payload. - Assorted UI fixes: sidebar nav peek/streamlining edge cases, markdown file-viewer re-mount/line-height issues on iOS Safari, inbox badge/skill deep-link tab selection, and `⌘.` work-mode cycling on iOS. **Feature additions:** - `workspace_operations.issue_id` — associate a workspace operation with the issue that triggered it (new migration `0106`, schema, service, shared type). - Routine **description annotations** — comment threads on a routine's description document, mirroring issue document annotations (new migration `0107`, `routine_documents` schema, routes/service, editable-sections UI). - Selected-agent **Conference Room chat** surface wiring and live issue-thread updates. **Related PR:** #8229 (`feat(control-plane): add annotation and workspace controls`, draft) covers overlapping annotation/workspace-control territory — flagging it so a reviewer can reconcile the two rather than double-merging. ## What Changed - `feat(workspace)`: `workspace_operations.issue_id` migration + schema/service/type; issue workspace property controls reconciled with upstream's evolved "Service" row. - `feat(routines)`: routine description annotations — `routine_documents` schema, migration `0107`, routes/service, `editable-sections` UI. - `fix(document-comments)`: doc-order sort, live updates, save-failure surfacing, stable markdown selection (+ storybook story, rerender test). - `feat(chat)`: selected-agent Conference Room chat surface and live issue-thread updates (`LiveUpdatesProvider`, `issue-chat-messages`, interactions service). - `perf(board)`: opt-in `summary` projection for the board polling/heartbeat-run list payload, plus assorted sidebar / file-viewer / inbox / IssueProperties UI fixes. Organized into 5 logical commits. Migrations are numbered incrementally after upstream's latest (`0105`) — `0106` then `0107`, no journal collision. ## Verification - Built by 3-way merging the deployed delta onto current `origin/master`; the only merge conflict (`IssueProperties.test.tsx`, two adjacent test blocks) was resolved in favor of upstream's evolved "green service link above the workspace row" layout, which matches the merged component's rendered output. - Confirmed recent upstream work is preserved post-merge: reusable sandbox lease teardown (`#8513`), the IssueProperties relation-list collapse controls, and the sidebar streamlined-nav default. - Confirmed the net diff vs `origin/master` is exactly the intended feature delta (65 files) and that overlapping server files (`issues.ts`, `agents.ts`, `heartbeat.ts`) only add feature code without disturbing upstream logic. - This delta is already running on a live deployed instance. - Full typecheck/test suite + Greptile to run in CI (see checklist). ## Risks - Two new migrations (`0106`, `0107`). Both are additive (new table / new nullable column) and ordered after upstream's `0105`; no data backfill, low risk. If another migration-bearing PR merges first, renumber before merge. - Largest blast radius is in the merged overlapping UI/service files; covered by the existing test suites for those files plus CI. - Overlaps thematically with draft PR #8229 — reviewers should reconcile rather than merge both blindly. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`), extended thinking, with tool use (git, shell). Agentic coding workflow. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
2dbaf4a7fa |
External object references across issue surfaces (#8512)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to coordinate AI agents, issues, approvals, comments, and work products. > - The involved subsystem is issue context: markdown links, issue properties, related work, lists, filters, inbox/sidebar status, and plugin-provided external context. > - The gap is that URLs to external systems currently remain mostly plain links, so humans and agents must manually open them to understand status, identity, and liveness. > - This matters because external work objects such as GitHub issues and pull requests are part of the operational state of a Paperclip company. > - The implementation keeps core provider-neutral: shared contracts, storage, sync, routes, and UI surfaces live in core while providers can contribute detection and status resolution. > - This pull request adds the external object reference foundation, GitHub provider support, issue-surface rendering, filters, sidebar/list/inbox signals, and test/story coverage. > - The benefit is that linked external work becomes inspectable Paperclip context without hardcoding every provider directly into the UI. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this work. Feature request: - Problem: URLs in Paperclip issues, comments, documents, and related surfaces do not expose provider status or object identity inline. - Proposed behavior: detect supported external object URLs, persist normalized references, refresh provider status, and render concise status-aware links across issue surfaces. - Users affected: board users, agents, and maintainers who triage issues containing external work links. - Acceptance: external object references are company-scoped, provider-extensible, visible in key issue surfaces, filterable where relevant, and covered by focused shared/server/UI tests. Related PR search: - No open duplicate PRs found for `external object references`. - Closed related prior attempt: #4556. ## What Changed - Added shared external-object contracts, validators, status/liveness helpers, and plugin protocol declarations. - Added database schema and additive migrations for external objects, source mentions, and display metadata. - Added server services/routes for detecting, syncing, summarizing, refreshing, and resolving external objects across issues, documents, comments, projects, and plugins. - Added a GitHub external-object provider plus plugin SDK authoring docs. - Wired UI presentation across markdown links, comments, issue chat, documents, properties, related work, issue rows, filters, inbox/sidebar badges, and Storybook stories. - Rebasing cleanup: moved the branch onto current `master`, repaired stale worktree provision config, hardened environment-sensitive tests/mocks, and removed committed screenshot artifacts from the PR branch to keep the reviewable file set below tool limits. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/external-objects.test.ts server/src/__tests__/external-object-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/external-objects-service.test.ts ui/src/components/ExternalObjectPill.test.tsx ui/src/lib/external-objects.test.ts` passed after rebasing: 5 files, 56 tests. - Historical branch verification before this PR creation included `pnpm test:run`, `pnpm -r typecheck`, and `pnpm build`; this PR body does not claim those were rerun after the final rebase. ## Risks - Medium: this adds a new cross-surface sync path on issue/document/comment writes. The implementation uses safe sync wrappers so external-object failures warn instead of blocking core mutations. - Medium: the migrations introduce new tables and indexes. They are additive and company-scoped. - Medium: provider-specific URL parsing can miss or misclassify edge cases. Shared canonicalization tests and provider tests cover current GitHub shapes. - Low: UI badge/filter behavior could add visual noise for object-heavy issues; component tests and Storybook stories cover the intended surfaces. > Roadmap checked: `ROADMAP.md` references the plugin system as the current extension path and does not list a duplicate core feature. Related long-range docs discuss external references, work products, preview URLs, and plugin extension points; this PR implements the scoped external-object reference foundation. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding-agent runtime, with shell and GitHub CLI tool use. Reasoning mode: medium. Exact deployed runtime model ID and context window were not exposed in the environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
cd38c150b0 |
feat: reuse Daytona sandbox leases (#8513)
Add opt-in reusable Daytona sandbox lease support, including retryable pending cleanup handling.\n\nPR: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/8513 |
||
|
Lennie Sliwinski
|
2e2da3bc2f |
fix: isolate remote Claude config from local credentials (#7676)
Fix remote Claude sandbox config isolation and permissions handling.\n\nPR: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/7676 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
0b945f449b |
Make streamlined sidebar default to on (#8496)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The board UI has an experimental streamlined left navigation mode that changes how projects and agents appear in the sidebar. > - Today that mode is opt-in, so users keep seeing the classic navigation unless they find and enable the experiment. > - The requested product behavior is to make streamlined navigation the default experience while keeping an explicit experiments opt-out. > - This pull request flips the shared/server default, updates UI consumers to treat only explicit `false` as classic mode, and covers both the default-on path and opt-out behavior in tests. > - The benefit is that new and legacy settings get the streamlined sidebar by default without removing the classic-sidebar escape hatch. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #7645 Related: #8430 takes the broader route of removing the classic sidebar. This PR intentionally keeps the opt-out path. ## What Changed - Default `enableStreamlinedLeftNavigation` to `true` in shared validation and server-side normalization. - Preserve explicit stored `false` as the experiments opt-out for the classic sidebar. - Render the sidebar and experimental settings toggle as streamlined-on unless the setting is explicitly `false`. - Add regression coverage for loading/default streamlined sidebar behavior and the opt-out patch from the experiments page. - Remove internal issue identifiers from newly touched source comments before publishing. ## Verification - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` — passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/instance-settings-service.test.ts ui/src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx ui/src/pages/InstanceExperimentalSettings.test.tsx` — passed, 3 files / 27 tests. - `pnpm build` — passed, with existing Vite/CSS/chunk-size warnings. - `pnpm test:run` — failed in unrelated `server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts`: the test `auto-detects the default branch via symbolic-ref when origin/HEAD is set` creates a temp repo on `main` then runs `git push -u origin main master`; `master` does not exist in that temp repo. Summary: 1 failed, 214 passed, 1780 tests passed, 1 skipped. ## Risks Low-to-medium behavioral risk: the default sidebar changes for users who never explicitly set the experiment. Explicit `false` remains respected, so users can still opt out via experimental settings. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex local adapter, with tool use and code execution. Exact context window was not surfaced in the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ddc193c2b9 |
docs: clarify plan task dependency handling (#8485)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip planning skills turn approved plans into executable issue graphs for agents > - The executor starts assigned tasks that have no open blockers > - Parent/child nesting gives structure, but it does not create execution dependencies > - Planning guidance that does not make this distinction can let dependent tasks run too early > - This pull request clarifies that hard dependencies must be encoded as `blockedByIssueIds` > - The benefit is that agents converting plans into tasks have a clearer checklist for creating and verifying runnable task graphs ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue was found for this documentation update. Problem: - The planning guidance could be read as if hierarchy, phase order, or prose blocker notes were enough to sequence execution. - In Paperclip, only explicit blockers prevent an otherwise-ready assigned task from starting. Expected behavior: - Skill guidance should tell planners to encode each hard dependency as `blockedByIssueIds` on the dependent issue. - It should also tell planners to verify the created issue graph before closing the source planning issue. ## What Changed - Clarified that parent/child issue nesting is structural and not an execution blocker. - Added guidance to build a compact task matrix with task, owner, initial status, and blockers when converting accepted plans into tasks. - Added verification guidance to re-fetch or otherwise inspect created issues before marking the source planning issue done. - Updated the bundled task-planning skill handoff text to point at the same dependency expectations without duplicating the full companion skill text. ## Verification - Ran `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` locally. - Rebased cleanly onto the latest `master` from `paperclipai/paperclip` before pushing. - Greptile completed at 5/5 on the latest head; the previous P2 wording thread was fixed and resolved. - GitHub PR checks are green on latest head `2b07db9aef22ca32c65fa66fcca2db86c5b01220`, including policy, commitperclip review, typecheck/release registry, general test shards, build, serialized server suites, e2e, canary dry run, verify, Socket, security-review, Snyk, and Greptile. - No additional local unit test command was run because this is a documentation/skill-text-only change and the remote PR suite covered the repository gates. ## Risks Low risk. This changes skill guidance only; it does not alter runtime behavior, database schema, migrations, workflows, or UI code. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in the Paperclip local adapter runtime. Exact backend model ID and context window were not exposed by the runtime. Used shell, git, GitHub CLI, and the GitHub connector for repository inspection and PR creation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
2c98c8e1e5 |
Fix sandbox git publishing and large workspace uploads (#8422)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Sandbox and SSH runtimes need to preserve agent work across isolated execution environments > - Git-backed workspaces were being copied mostly as filesystem archives, which breaks when `.git` points outside the mounted workspace and makes sandbox agents unable to publish their own branches > - Large ignored dependency trees could also be swept into the sandbox overlay, causing multi-GB transfers and max-string failures in some sandbox clients > - This pull request makes sandbox runtime setup use a git-backed HEAD sync plus a small dirty/untracked overlay, and bounds sandbox file transfers so large archives do not need one huge string > - The benefit is that sandbox agents can commit and push from a usable git checkout without uploading dependency trees such as `node_modules` ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #8395 No public duplicate issue or PR was found after searches for `sandbox git workspace`, `git push sandbox`, and `node_modules sandbox upload`. Bug report: - What happened: sandbox-backed agent workspaces could receive a `.git` file that pointed at host-only git state, leaving the sandbox unable to run normal git workflows. The sandbox overlay upload could also include ignored dependency directories, creating very large transfers. - Expected behavior: sandbox and remote runtimes should prepare a usable git-backed workspace, copy only the necessary workspace overlay, and restore git history plus file changes without depending on a host-only `.git` path. - Steps to reproduce: 1. Run an agent in a sandbox-backed workspace whose local git checkout is a worktree. 2. Ask the agent to complete a GitHub workflow that requires commit/push access. 3. Observe that git operations can fail inside the sandbox, and ignored dependency trees can be uploaded as part of the workspace overlay. - Paperclip version or commit: reproduced against `master` before this PR, base `7aa212296eb1`. - Deployment mode: local dev / sandbox-backed runtime. - Installation method: built from source. - Agent adapters involved: local adapters using shared adapter-utils runtime preparation. - Database mode: not database-related. - Access context: agent runtime. - Local verification environment: Node.js v25.6.1, pnpm 9.15.4, macOS arm64. - Privacy checklist: all pasted output was reviewed for secrets, private hostnames, local usernames, and internal instance links. ## What Changed - Added a GitHub workflow push preflight so agent runs can detect missing push credentials when a workflow explicitly needs GitHub publishing. - Added shared git workspace sync helpers for shallow HEAD import/export and dirty/untracked overlay tracking. - Updated sandbox managed runtime setup to use git history plus a selected overlay instead of uploading the full local workspace for git-backed workspaces. - Bounded sandbox archive upload/download paths so large payloads stream or chunk instead of materializing one oversized string. - Excluded `.git` and ignored dependency trees from sandbox upload, download, and restore baselines while preserving local ignored directories during sync-back. - Added focused tests for git workspace sync, sandbox overlay selection, transfer chunking, and heartbeat push-preflight behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/git-workspace-sync.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/command-managed-runtime.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-project-env.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm build` - Public-hygiene scan of the PR diff and commit messages for internal issue ids, local paths, private hostnames, and obvious token patterns. ## Risks - Medium risk: this changes sandbox runtime synchronization semantics for git-backed workspaces, especially around dirty tracked files, untracked files, deleted paths, and ignored files. - The main mitigation is focused test coverage for upload contents, restore exclusions, and git round-trip behavior. - The SSH runtime keeps the current bundle-based implementation from `master`; this PR only aligns shared excludes and sandbox behavior with that model. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-enabled shell/git/GitHub workflow, with code execution and repository inspection. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
33353ce62b |
feat(skills): remove bundled paperclip-dev skill and retire required skill attribute (#7029)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Local adapters (Claude, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, Grok, OpenCode, Pi, ACPX) ship bundled "skills" — opinionated Markdown prompt bundles materialized into the agent's runtime > - One of those bundled skills, `paperclip-dev`, existed to let agents develop Paperclip itself; it has now moved to its own external repo and no longer belongs in the core tree > - The adapter skill model also carried a `required` / `requiredReason` attribute plus a `paperclip_required` `AdapterSkillOrigin` variant, all of which only existed to mark bundled skills as non-optional in the UI and adapter sync logic > - With `paperclip-dev` gone, no bundled skill is "required" anymore, and the type / runtime surface for `required` is dead weight — but it is computed at request time and never persisted, so a clean removal is safe (no compatibility shim needed) > - This pull request deletes `skills/paperclip-dev/` and removes every trace of the `required` / `requiredReason` field and the `paperclip_required` origin across shared types, validators, adapter-utils, all eight local adapters, server routes, the company-skills service, the UI, the storybook fixtures, and the test suite > - The benefit is a smaller, simpler adapter-skill surface: one origin (`company_managed`) for managed bundled skills, `resolvePaperclipDesiredSkillNames` collapses to "just the configured desired set", and the AgentDetail skills tab no longer renders a "Required by Paperclip" section that no longer applies ## Linked Issues or Issue Description <!-- No existing public GitHub issue; describing the underlying work inline (feature_request template fields). --> **Summary** Remove the bundled `paperclip-dev` skill (now maintained in its own external repo) and retire the `required` / `requiredReason` skill attribute and the `paperclip_required` skill origin, which only existed to support it. **Problem or motivation** `paperclip-dev` is the only bundled skill that was ever marked "required". Now that it lives in a separate repository, shipping it inside the core tree is wrong, and the entire `required` surface (a type field, a validator field, a synthesized `paperclip_required` origin, UI "Required by Paperclip" section, and required-skill merging in the desired-skills calculation) becomes dead weight. The `required` value is computed at request time and never persisted, so it can be removed cleanly without a migration or compatibility shim. **Proposed solution** Delete `skills/paperclip-dev/`, drop the `required` / `requiredReason` fields and `paperclip_required` origin everywhere they are produced or consumed, collapse managed-skill origin to a single `company_managed` value, and simplify `resolvePaperclipDesiredSkillNames` to return only the configured desired set. **Alternatives considered** Keeping the `required` attribute as a no-op for forward compatibility — rejected because it is request-time only (nothing persists it), so leaving it in place is pure dead surface area with no callers. **Roadmap alignment** Internal cleanup / dead-code removal that simplifies the adapter-skill surface; it does not introduce or duplicate any planned core feature in ROADMAP.md. ## What Changed - Deleted bundled `skills/paperclip-dev/` (moved to a separate repo). - Dropped `required`, `requiredReason`, and the `paperclip_required` origin from `packages/shared/src/types/adapter-skills.ts`, `packages/shared/src/validators/adapter-skills.ts`, and `packages/adapter-utils/src/types.ts`. - In `packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.ts`: removed `readSkillRequired()`; dropped `required`/`requiredReason` from `listPaperclipSkillEntries()`, `normalizeConfiguredPaperclipRuntimeSkills()`, `buildPersistentSkillSnapshot()`, and `PaperclipSkillEntry`; collapsed `buildManagedSkillOrigin()` to always return `company_managed`; simplified `resolvePaperclipDesiredSkillNames()` to return only the configured desired set (signature preserved so adapter call sites are untouched). - Walked all eight local adapters (`acpx-local`, `claude-local`, `codex-local`, `cursor-local`, `gemini-local`, `grok-local`, `opencode-local`, `pi-local`) and removed every remaining `requiredReason` / `paperclip_required` reference. - `server/src/services/company-skills.ts`: dropped the `required = sourceKind === "paperclip_bundled"` synthesis when listing runtime skill entries. - `server/src/routes/agents.ts`: removed required-skill merging from the desired-skills calculation in the persist-config path and the unsupported-snapshot path (keeping the current version-aware `desiredSkillEntries` structure). - `ui/src/pages/AgentDetail.tsx`: dropped required-based filters, the required tooltip, and the entire "Required by Paperclip" section from the agent skills tab; storybook fixtures in `ui/storybook/stories/acpx-local.stories.tsx` cleaned up to match. - Tests: deleted the `required: false` case in `paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts` and the "keeps required bundled skills installed" case in every `*-local-skill-sync.test.ts`; `acpx-local-execute.test.ts`, `cursor-local-execute.test.ts`, `cursor-local-skill-sync.test.ts`, `agent-skills-routes.test.ts`, and `packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` were updated to drop removed fields and map `origin: "paperclip_required"` → `"company_managed"`. - `server/src/adapters/registry.ts`: two `as unknown as ServerAdapterModule["..."]` casts on `hermesListSkills` / `hermesSyncSkills` (matching the existing `executeHermesLocal` pattern). `hermes-paperclip-adapter@0.2.0` still depends on the published `@paperclipai/adapter-utils` which keeps the retired `paperclip_required` variant; the cast bridges the workspace-vs-published type mismatch at the registry seam and can drop once hermes upgrades. ## Verification Run from the workspace root: ```sh grep -rn "skills/paperclip-dev" . grep -rn "paperclip_required" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" . grep -rn "requiredReason" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" . pnpm -w typecheck pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run paperclip-skill-utils pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run skill-sync ``` The first three greps return only the explanatory comment in `server/src/adapters/registry.ts` (no live `paperclip_required` / `requiredReason` usage) and zero `skills/paperclip-dev` source hits. Locally: - `pnpm -w typecheck` → all packages this PR touches pass (adapter-utils, shared, server, ui, cli, and the cursor/gemini/opencode/pi adapters). - Affected vitest suites pass: `paperclip-skill-utils`, `server-utils`, all eight `*-local-skill-sync`, `agent-skills-routes`, and the `acpx`/`cursor`/`pi` execute suites. ## Risks - Behavioral shift in the agent skills UI: the "Required by Paperclip" section disappears. No bundled skill is required anymore, so this only affects environments that previously surfaced `paperclip-dev` as a forced-on row; those installs will see the skill move into the regular "company-managed" list (and be uninstalled on next sync unless explicitly listed as desired). - Existing agents may still have the string `"paperclip-dev"` in their persisted `desiredSkills`. That entry is inert (no source for it to install from); a one-time DB cleanup is out of scope. Low risk. - Hermes adapter type bridge: two casts in `registry.ts` paper over a type-only divergence between the workspace `@paperclipai/adapter-utils` and the published version still pinned by `hermes-paperclip-adapter@0.2.0`. Runtime behavior is unaffected because the retired `paperclip_required` value is no longer produced by anything in this tree. The casts can be removed once hermes upgrades its dependency. ## Model Used - Provider: Anthropic - Model: Claude Opus 4.7 (`claude-opus-4-7`) - Capability: agent tool use via Paperclip's `claude_local` adapter ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
7aa212296e |
codex_local adapter output inactivity monitor (#5017)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The `codex_local` adapter runs `codex exec` as a child process and streams JSONL events from its stdout > - NEE-79 caught a real-world `codex_local` orphan: codex sat in `read()` on stdin for 1h+, no JSON events emitted past startup, no LLM call in flight. The adapter had no inactivity timer; the only safety net was the platform-level 1h silent-run detector > - This is precisely the failure shape NEE-80 scoped: an adapter-detected fault that should be killed *by the adapter* and surfaced as `failed`, not waited out for an hour > - This pull request adds an output-inactivity watchdog inside the codex-local adapter that resets on every parsed JSONL event from stdout, kills the child via SIGTERM → 5s grace → SIGKILL when it fires, and resolves the run with a structured watchdog failure > - The benefit is that NEE-79-class hangs shorter than 1h stop reaching the platform-level safety net — they fail fast and visibly at the adapter layer, with diagnostic logs that don't require host shell access ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No existing GitHub issue covers this; describing the underlying bug in-PR per the bug report template (`.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml`): - **What happened?** A `codex_local` run sat in `read()` on stdin for over an hour: codex emitted its startup JSONL events, then nothing — no further events, no LLM call in flight, no exit. The adapter kept the child alive indefinitely; the run was only reaped by the platform-level 1h silent-run safety net, an hour after it had effectively died. - **Expected behavior:** The adapter should detect that its child has stopped producing output long before the platform-level safety net, kill it, and surface the run as `failed` with a diagnostic that explains what happened. - **Steps to reproduce:** Run any `codex_local` issue where `codex exec` hangs after startup (e.g. codex blocks reading stdin and never emits another JSONL event). Observe the run stays alive until the 1h platform safety net fires. - **Paperclip version or commit:** reproduced on master prior to this branch. - **Agent adapter(s) involved:** codex_local. Related PRs found while searching for duplicates (none implement an event-aware inactivity watchdog inside `codex_local`): - #4004 — generic idle + wall watchdogs for `runChildProcess` in adapter-utils; complementary, operates below the JSONL parse layer and is not codex-event-aware - #4742 — fail-fast on codex-local *startup* hang; this PR covers the post-startup hang class - #6861 — zombie-run termination for codex-local; reaping after exit, not inactivity detection - #7811 — the analogous output-idle timeout for grok-local ## What Changed - `packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/watchdog.ts` *(new)* — pure watchdog primitive with injectable timers/clock: `resolveCodexInactivityTimeout`, `createCodexInactivityWatchdog`, `formatWatchdogErrorMessage`. Default `7 * 60_000` ms; honors `null` as the disabled escape hatch - `packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/execute.ts` — `runAttempt` now wraps `onSpawn` to capture `pid`/`processGroupId`, feeds stdout chunks through `noteStdoutChunk`, and on watchdog fire sends SIGTERM to the process group, schedules SIGKILL after 5s, and returns an `AdapterExecutionResult` with `exitCode: null`, `signal: SIGTERM|SIGKILL`, `errorMessage: "watchdog: no codex output for {N}m {S}s"`, `errorCode: "codex_output_inactivity_watchdog"`. With `errorMessage` set and `timedOut: false`, `heartbeat.ts:5860` maps the run to `outcome === "failed"` (not `cancelled`) - `packages/adapters/codex-local/src/index.ts` — `agentConfigurationDoc` documents `outputInactivityTimeoutMs` (number ms; `null` disables; non-positive falls back to default with a warning log at spawn) - `packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/watchdog.test.ts` *(new)* — 13 tests covering acceptance criteria 2 and 3 plus supporting cases: fires after silence, no-fire across 12× (threshold − 1s) cycles, multi-event chunks, non-JSON ignoring, single-fire idempotency, formatter shape, full resolution table, `null` → disabled - `packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/watchdog.integration.test.ts` *(new)* — real Node subprocess that prints one JSONL event then sleeps; `runChildProcess` reaps it within `threshold + 6s`; signal is SIGTERM or SIGKILL; `parsedEventCount === 1` (acceptance criteria 1 and 4) ## Verification ``` $ pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local typecheck > tsc --noEmit # clean $ pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local exec vitest run ✓ src/server/quota-spawn-error.test.ts (1 test) ✓ src/server/codex-home.test.ts (3 tests) ✓ src/server/codex-args.test.ts (3 tests) ✓ src/server/watchdog.test.ts (13 tests) ✓ src/server/parse.test.ts (9 tests) ✓ src/server/execute.remote.test.ts (4 tests) ✓ src/ui/parse-stdout.test.ts (3 tests) ✓ src/ui/build-config.test.ts (1 test) ✓ src/server/watchdog.integration.test.ts (1 test) Test Files 9 passed (9) Tests 38 passed (38) ``` Acceptance criteria check: 1. ✅ Simulated child emits one event then sleeps → killed at threshold; result `errorMessage` matches `watchdog: no codex output for {N}m {S}s` (`watchdog.integration.test.ts`) 2. ✅ Child emits events every (threshold − 1s) → not killed (`watchdog.test.ts: "does not fire when events arrive every (threshold - 1s)"`) 3. ✅ `outputInactivityTimeoutMs: null` disables the watchdog (`resolveCodexInactivityTimeout` returns `disabled`; `execute.ts` skips watchdog construction and logs a startup warning) 4. ✅ Real subprocess reaped well within `threshold + 6s` — 250 ms threshold, 290 ms wall clock in CI 5. ✅ Adapter-level fault → `outcome === "failed"` per `heartbeat.ts:5860`. NEE-79-class hangs <1h get caught at the adapter, not the platform-level safety net Post-rebase verification (head `2a8703fab`, rebased onto master `69a368ed5`): ``` $ pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local typecheck # clean $ pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local exec vitest run Test Files 11 passed (11) Tests 64 passed (64) ``` ## Risks - Low risk. Behind a default-on watchdog that only fires after 7m of zero parsed JSON events. Operators can disable it with `outputInactivityTimeoutMs: null` for known-slow tasks - The kill path reuses the same `process.kill(-pgid, signal)` pattern that `runChildProcess` already uses for its terminal-result cleanup, so signal semantics match the existing code path - `timedOut: false` is preserved on watchdog fire — the platform-level timeout outcome is unchanged, only the `failed`-vs-success classification flips. No behavioral shift for already-failing runs - Sandbox/SSH execution targets: the watchdog fires and emits the structured log, but the kill is best-effort because remote pids aren't owned by this process. The platform-level 1h safety net still applies. Out of scope for NEE-81 by design ## Model Used - Provider: Anthropic Claude - Model: claude-opus-4-7 - Mode: Claude Code (extended thinking, tool use) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots (N/A — no UI changes) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (`agentConfigurationDoc` for `outputInactivityTimeoutMs`) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (re-running on the rebased head) - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (P2 addressed; review threads resolved) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Neeraj Kumar Singh <b.nirajkumarsingh@hotmail.com> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
a937b89a47 |
fix(daytona): valid memory input in env config form + size presets (#8389)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Environments are configured through a JSON-schema-driven form (`JsonSchemaForm`), and each sandbox provider (here, Daytona) supplies a manifest describing its fields > - In the Daytona environment config form, the "memory" field rendered as a free-text input; on save the value round-tripped to `0`, producing a server-side "number must be greater than zero" error even when the user typed a valid number like `2` > - Rather than patch the free-text input, memory is now a true dropdown of the sandbox sizes Daytona actually supports, so an invalid value can no longer be typed or coerced > - The dropdown leads with a blank "None" row that is selected by default (meaning "not configured — use Daytona's defaults"); `0` is never offered because it is not a valid configuration > - The benefit is that operators pick a valid memory size from a constrained list, it saves correctly as an integer, and leaving it unset cleanly omits the field instead of submitting `0` ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists; describing the bug inline per the bug report template. ### What happened? In the Daytona environment configuration form, the memory field is a free-text input labelled "gigabytes of RAM". Entering a value such as `2` and saving coerced the value to `0`, and the server rejected the save with "the number must be greater than zero". There was no way to enter a valid memory size through the form. ### Expected behavior Selecting a valid memory size (e.g. `2`) keeps that value and saves cleanly as an integer. Leaving memory unset is valid and submits no value (Daytona defaults apply). `0` is never selectable. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Open the environment configuration form for a Daytona sandbox provider. 2. In the memory field, type `2`. 3. Click Save. 4. Observe the value becomes `0` and the form errors with "the number must be greater than zero". ## What Changed - Daytona manifest: `memory` is now an `enum` of the supported sandbox sizes `[1, 2, 4, 8]` (GiB). It stays optional, so "not configured" remains valid. `0` is not in the list. - `JsonSchemaForm` `EnumField`: optional enums now render a leading blank **None** row that is selected by default when no value is set, letting the user express "not configured" and clear a previous selection (Radix `Select` forbids an empty-string item value, so the unset state maps to a sentinel that translates back to `undefined`). - `JsonSchemaForm` `EnumField`: when every enum option is numeric, the selected value is coerced back to a number on change so the payload keeps the schema's integer type (a stringified `"2"` would otherwise fail server-side integer validation — this is what fixes the original bug for the dropdown path). - Tests: added `EnumField` coverage in `JsonSchemaForm.test.tsx` (blank row present, no `0`, blank selected by default, numeric coercion, blank → unset) and Daytona manifest coverage in the plugin test (memory enum is `[1,2,4,8]`, excludes `0`, stays optional). ## Verification - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/components/JsonSchemaForm.test.tsx src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.test.tsx` → 16/16 passing (14 + 2). - `vitest run` in `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona` → 19/19 passing (incl. 3 new manifest tests). - `cd ui && npx tsc --noEmit` → clean. - Behavior: the memory field now renders as a dropdown showing **None / 1 / 2 / 4 / 8**, with **None** selected by default. Picking `2` stores the integer `2`; picking **None** clears the field so it is omitted from the payload (no `0`, no "must be greater than zero" error). ## Risks - Low risk. The blank-row + numeric-coercion changes live in `EnumField`. The blank row is only added for **optional** enums (required enums are unaffected); numeric coercion only triggers when every option is numeric, so existing string enums (`egressMode`, `backend`, `sessionStrategy`) are unchanged. The manifest change is scoped to the Daytona provider. ## Model Used Claude (Anthropic), Opus-class model, used via the Paperclip agent workflow (author + reviewer agents) with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above (none found) - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
67ca8287e8 |
fix(codex-local): seed managed auth into isolated homes (#8403)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The `codex_local` adapter isolates local Codex runs by assigning managed `CODEX_HOME` state per company and per agent > - PR #8272 tightened that isolation, but it left a gap: once `CODEX_HOME` became explicit, the adapter treated it like a user-managed override and skipped auth seeding > - That meant newly isolated agents could launch with no usable `auth.json`, hit OpenAI unauthenticated, and fail with `401 Missing bearer` > - Users who had already persisted one of those broken managed homes could remain stranded even after config changes unless Paperclip repaired the home itself > - This pull request teaches Paperclip to seed managed homes correctly, backfill already-stranded managed homes on startup, and reject credential-less managed homes before they reach the provider > - The benefit is that affected managed `codex_local` agents recover automatically after upgrade and restart, without manual `CODEX_HOME` surgery ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Fixes #497 - Refs #5028 - Related PR: #8272 - Related PR: #8399 ## What Changed - Distinguished Paperclip-managed `CODEX_HOME` paths from genuine external overrides and always seeded auth into managed homes, even when `CODEX_HOME` is explicit in config. - Wrote API-key-backed `auth.json` files for managed homes when `OPENAI_API_KEY` is configured, otherwise symlinked the shared Codex auth for subscription/OAuth flows. - Added a startup reconciliation pass that backfills already-isolated managed homes created by the broken release so upgrade plus restart repairs stranded agents automatically. - Preserved previously resolved API-key auth when the stored `OPENAI_API_KEY` binding is secret-backed and startup cannot resolve the secret value directly. - Hardened the managed-home preflight to require a credential-bearing `auth.json`, not just file presence, and documented the recovery behavior. - Added regression tests covering managed-home seeding, fail-fast behavior, and server-side startup reconciliation. ## Verification ```bash pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/codex-home.test.ts packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/execute.auth.test.ts server/src/__tests__/codex-auth-reconciliation.test.ts server/src/__tests__/codex-local-execute.test.ts server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local typecheck pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck pnpm check:tokens pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts ``` GitHub Actions `PR` workflow is green on latest head `e5b1e08d4`, including policy, typecheck, test shards, build, e2e, serialized server suites, and canary dry run. Greptile Review is green on latest head with 0 comments added. No UI changes. ## Risks - Startup reconciliation now mutates persisted managed Codex homes at boot. Risk is low because it only touches Paperclip-managed company/agent home paths and no-ops when a home already has usable auth. - Genuine external `CODEX_HOME` overrides remain intentionally self-managed, so those users still own repair steps inside their custom home. - Hosts with neither shared Codex auth nor an explicit per-agent API key now fail earlier with a clearer adapter error instead of surfacing a downstream `401`, which changes timing but not capability. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in a local Codex session; exact served model ID/context window were not exposed to the session. Tool use and code execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
c0743482bc |
fix(claude-local): tolerate sandboxes whose Claude CLI lacks --effort (#8393)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The claude-local adapter launches the Claude CLI inside execution environments (local, SSH, and ephemeral sandboxes such as Daytona) > - Newer adapter code passes `--effort` to the CLI, but the Claude binary baked into some sandbox images is older and rejects it with `error: unknown option '--effort'`, so every run in those environments fails > - This needs addressing because the failure is environment-dependent and silent from the operator's perspective — the run just dies with a CLI usage error > - This pull request probes the in-sandbox CLI for `--effort` support once, caches the result per environment, and strips the flag (with a warning) when the CLI does not support it > - The benefit is that sandboxes with older Claude CLIs keep working instead of failing, with negligible probe overhead because the capability check is cached and reused across ephemeral leases ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists. Describing the bug inline following the bug report template: ### What happened? Runs using the `claude-local` adapter inside certain sandbox/execution environments fail with `error: unknown option '--effort'`. The adapter unconditionally appends `--effort` to the Claude CLI invocation, but the Claude CLI version present in some sandbox base images predates that flag, so the process exits with a usage error and the run dies. ### Expected behavior The adapter should detect that the target environment's Claude CLI does not support `--effort` and degrade gracefully — drop the flag and emit a warning — rather than failing the run. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Configure an execution environment (e.g. a sandbox image) whose bundled Claude CLI is old enough to predate the `--effort` option. 2. Run any claude-local task that resolves to an effort level (so `--effort` is appended). 3. Observe the run fail immediately with `error: unknown option '--effort'`. ### Paperclip version or commit `master` at the time of this PR (branch forked from current `master`). ### Deployment mode Self-hosted / local instance using execution environments (reproducible with ephemeral sandbox providers such as Daytona where `reuseLease: false`). ### Agent adapter(s) involved Claude Code (`claude-local`). ## What Changed - Add a CLI capability probe (`cli-capabilities.ts`) that runs the target Claude binary's `--help` inside the execution environment to detect `--effort` support. - Strip `--effort` from the CLI args (emitting a warning) when the probe reports the flag is unsupported; keep it otherwise. - Cache probe results keyed by `sandbox:providerKey:environmentId:command` (no lease id) so the probe is reused across ephemeral leases — important for `reuseLease: false` sandbox configs like Daytona, which would otherwise re-probe on every run. - Conservative fallback: if the probe itself can't run/parse, assume the flag is supported (preserves prior behavior). ## Verification - `node_modules/.bin/vitest run src/__tests__/claude-local-execute.test.ts src/__tests__/claude-local-adapter-environment.test.ts` → **2 files, 30 tests passed**. - Regression test issues two `execute()` calls with distinct lease ids and asserts the in-sandbox `--help` probe runs exactly once (cache reuse across leases). - Added tests covering: flag stripped when unsupported, flag retained when supported, warning emitted, and conservative fallback when the probe fails. ## Risks Low risk. The change is additive and gated behind a probe with a conservative default (assume supported on probe failure), so existing environments that support `--effort` are unaffected. Worst case for an environment where the probe is unreliable is the prior behavior (flag passed through). ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.8 (claude-opus-4-8), extended thinking, with tool use / code execution via Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots (N/A — no UI change) - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (N/A — no doc-facing behavior change) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending CI) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (pending review) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
07e98d2b2c |
feat(adapter-utils): add observable sandbox sync progress (#8395)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for running AI-agent companies, so long-running remote work needs to stay observable to human operators. > - Cloud / sandbox agents are an active roadmap area, and their workspace sync path is part of the runtime substrate every remote coding run depends on. > - In the sandbox and SSH execution-target flows, Paperclip logged that sync had started, then often went silent for the full transfer window. > - That made large remote syncs feel stalled and also hid a real performance problem in the command-managed sandbox upload path. > - The first part of this pull request threads a throttled progress-reporting surface through the adapter execution-target stack so sync and restore work can emit meaningful updates. > - The second part fixes the command-managed sandbox transport itself: it removes the old serial 32KB append bottleneck, but also falls back away from the single-stream path when a provider-backed sandbox runner cannot surface mid-flight stdin progress. > - The result is that sandbox and SSH transfers are both faster and more observable, including the live Daytona-style sandbox case that previously only emitted `0%` and `100%`. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this bug, so it is described inline below following the bug report template. ### What happened - Remote sandbox and SSH workspace syncs could spend a long time transferring data while only logging a start line (`Syncing workspace and runtime assets to sandbox environment`) and, at best, a terminal line. - In the command-managed sandbox path, the original upload implementation also paid a large performance cost by appending base64 data in many small sequential remote writes (thousands of serial 32KB round-trips on a large workspace). - After the initial transport rewrite, live provider-backed sandbox runs still only emitted `0%` and `100%` because the single-stream stdin RPC buffered progress until completion. ### Expected behavior - Long-running sandbox and SSH syncs should periodically report how much of the transfer is complete (a percentage and/or MB transferred) so an operator can tell the run is healthy and making progress rather than stuck. - The main sandbox upload path should not be artificially slow. - A transfer that fails partway should leave an explicit failure marker in the log rather than a dangling intermediate percentage. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Run an agent against a sandbox (command-managed) or SSH (remote-managed) execution target with a non-trivial workspace. 2. Watch the run log during the workspace/runtime asset sync phase. 3. Observe that the log shows the sync start line and then stays silent for the full transfer (live provider-backed sandbox runs only show `0%` then `100%`). ### Paperclip version or commit - Branch `PAPA-825-provide-status-updates-when-syncing-sandboxes` off `master`. ### Deployment mode - Self-hosted / local instance using sandbox (command-managed) and SSH (remote-managed) execution targets, including provider-backed sandbox runners. ## What Changed - Added shared throttled runtime progress reporting and threaded `onProgress` through the adapter execution-target surface and adapter `execute.ts` entrypoints. - Added sync and restore progress reporting for the command-managed sandbox path and the SSH/remote-managed path, including git import/export progress where totals are known. - Reworked command-managed sandbox transfer behavior so uploads use the faster single-stream path when appropriate, but fall back to chunked progress-emitting writes when the runner cannot expose mid-stream stdin progress. - Marked provider-backed environment sandbox runners as not supporting single-stream stdin progress so live sandbox runs emit meaningful intermediate updates instead of only `0%` and `100%`. - Emit an explicit terminal failure marker (`failed at NN% (x/y MB)`) when an SSH/tar transfer rejects, so a failed sync no longer leaves a dangling intermediate percentage in the log. - Run the SSH sync/restore size estimate (local directory walk / remote `du` probe) concurrently with the transfer instead of awaiting it before opening the pipe, so progress instrumentation no longer adds startup latency proportional to workspace file count. - Added and extended focused regression coverage for runtime progress throttling and the new failure marker, command-managed sandbox transfers, sandbox orchestration, SSH transfer progress, and environment execution-target wiring. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/runtime-progress.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/ssh-fixture.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/command-managed-runtime.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/command-managed-runtime.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-execution-target.test.ts` - `npx tsc --noEmit` for `packages/adapter-utils` ## Risks - The provider-backed sandbox fallback now prefers chunked command-managed writes when progress hooks are active, so small-to-medium uploads may trade some raw throughput for observable intermediate progress on runtimes that cannot surface true mid-stream stdin progress. - Progress percentages on tar-based transfers still depend on estimates in some cases, so operators may briefly see MB-only lines before the estimate resolves, then near-final clamping before the terminal `100%` line. - This PR changes shared execution-target behavior used by multiple adapters, so regressions would most likely appear in remote runtime setup/teardown flows rather than in a single adapter. ## Model Used - Initial implementation: OpenAI GPT-5.4 via Codex local agent (`codex_local`), high reasoning mode. - Observability follow-ups (failure marker, concurrent size estimate, added tests): Claude Opus 4.8 via Claude Code (`claude_local`). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
547463d3a2 |
refactor(environments): make execution environments instance-scoped (#8375)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for AI-agent companies, so execution environment selection has to stay inspectable and predictable across companies, agents, and runs. > - The environment subsystem decides where an agent heartbeat actually runs and how remote sandbox state is realized and restored. > - That subsystem previously mixed company-scoped environment catalogs with issue-level environment stamping, so a reassigned issue could keep executing in the previous assignee's sandbox. > - That behavior breaks the control-plane contract: changing the assignee should change the executing agent/environment path unless there is an explicit current override. > - Fixing it cleanly required more than a narrow patch; the environment model had to move to instance scope with a single inherited default and per-agent override semantics. > - This pull request rewires the schema, server/API surface, runtime resolution, and UI around that model, then adds regression coverage for cross-company inheritance and per-agent isolation. > - The benefit is that environment choice now follows the approved instance/agent configuration path instead of stale issue state, while shared environments only need to be configured once per instance. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - No directly matching public GitHub issue or PR was found while searching for this refactor. ### What happened? Reassigning work between agents with different execution environments could keep running in the previous sandbox because environment choice was stamped onto the issue and outranked the current assignee. The same subsystem also forced environment catalogs to be duplicated per company even though the underlying execution environments were instance-wide resources. ### Expected behavior Execution should resolve through the current instance and agent configuration path, with one instance-scoped environment catalog, one instance default, optional per-agent override, and no stale issue-level environment authority surviving reassignment. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Configure two agents to use different execution environments. 2. Assign an issue to the first agent so the issue records execution state in that environment. 3. Reassign the same issue to the second agent and run another heartbeat. 4. Observe that the pre-fix runtime can still sync or execute in the original sandbox instead of the second agent's environment. ### Paperclip version or commit Current `master` before this PR. ### Deployment mode Self-hosted server. ### Installation method Built from source (`pnpm dev` / `pnpm build`). ### Agent adapter(s) involved - Claude Code - Not adapter-specific (core bug in environment authority / resolution) ### Database mode External Postgres. ### Access context Both board reassignment and agent heartbeats were involved. ## What Changed - Moved environments and their default selection contract to instance scope in DB/shared types, including the migration that dedupes legacy per-company environments and seeds the instance local default. - Reworked environment CRUD/auth flows to use instance-scoped APIs and added route/service coverage for instance-level environment management. - Changed runtime resolution to prefer `agent default -> instance default -> built-in local`, removed issue-level environment stamping from the active execution path, and isolated sandbox/plugin leases by `(executionWorkspaceId, agentId)`. - Added environment env-var runtime precedence so environment-provided values act as the baseline for agent execution. - Moved the environment UI into instance settings and updated agent configuration surfaces to reflect inherit/override behavior. - Added regression coverage for instance-default inheritance across companies and for the new runtime resolution behavior. - Fixed a rebase-only duplicate `enableTaskWatchdogs` flag regression in instance settings types/validators/services so the branch typechecks cleanly on current `master`. - Updated stale server tests so CI matches the shipped instance-scoped environment contract. ## Verification - `git diff --check` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/environment-runtime-driver-contract.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-permissions-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-instance-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/execution-workspace-policy.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-plugin-environment.test.ts server/src/__tests__/instance-settings-routes.test.ts` ## Risks - The migration changes environment scope and dedupes existing rows, so installs with unusual legacy environment combinations should be reviewed carefully during upgrade. - Remote execution behavior now depends on instance-default inheritance semantics instead of issue-level stamping, so any remaining code paths that still assume issue-scoped environment authority would surface as follow-up bugs. - This PR includes both server/runtime behavior and UI relocation, so reviewers should watch for authorization edge cases around instance settings and environment management. > I checked [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md). This work fits the existing Cloud / Sandbox agents direction as a bug-fix/refactor to current behavior, not a new parallel product surface. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent in this Paperclip/Codex session; GPT-5-class tool-using model with code execution and shell access. The exact backend model ID is not exposed to the session runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
uky333andFull-Stack Engineer
|
eb68198c42 |
feat(adapter-claude-local): emit errorCode claude_refusal on stop_reason refusal (#8314)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run through adapters; `@paperclipai/adapter-claude-local` shells out to the Claude CLI and maps its result JSON into Paperclip's run outcome (`errorCode` / `errorFamily`) > - A Fable 5 policy refusal exits the CLI cleanly (`exitCode=0`, `is_error=false`) with `stop_reason: "refusal"`, which the adapter mapped to `errorCode: null` > - Paperclip therefore recorded the run as a silent success, so the agent's heartbeat stalled with no signal for operators and no hook to retry or alert > - This pull request adds a refusal detector to the adapter so a refusal resolves to a distinct `errorCode: "claude_refusal"` (`errorFamily: "model_refusal"`) > - The benefit is that policy refusals become observable: the server persists the code, operators can see it on the run, and downstream retry/alert policy can key off it ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists. Describing the underlying bug in-PR, following `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml`: **What happened?** When the Claude CLI returns `stop_reason: "refusal"` (a model policy refusal), it still exits cleanly (`exitCode=0`, `is_error=false`). `@paperclipai/adapter-claude-local` keyed refusal detection off the failure flag during error-code resolution, so it returned `errorCode: null` — a refused run was indistinguishable from a successful one, recorded by Paperclip as a silent success with no signal to retry or alert. **Expected behavior** A refusal should resolve to a distinct, non-null error code (`errorCode: "claude_refusal"`, `errorFamily: "model_refusal"`) so the server can surface it to operators and downstream policy can react. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run any agent on the `claude-local` adapter with a prompt the model refuses on policy grounds. 2. The Claude CLI exits `0` with `is_error=false` and `stop_reason: "refusal"`. 3. Observe the run resolves `errorCode: null` (pre-fix) instead of a refusal-specific code. **Paperclip version or commit** `adapter-claude-local` v2026.609.0 (`dist/server/execute.js` error-code resolution block); reproduced on `master`. **Deployment mode** Local / self-hosted. **Agent adapter(s) involved** `@paperclipai/adapter-claude-local` (Claude Code, local). ## What Changed - **`packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/parse.ts`** — new `isClaudeRefusalResult()` helper, parallel to `isClaudeMaxTurnsResult()`. Detects `stop_reason` / `stopReason` / `error_code` / `errorCode` == `refusal` and `subtype` == `model_refusal`, case/whitespace tolerant. - **`packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/execute.ts`** — compute the refusal flag independent of the `failed` flag (a refusal exits cleanly, so keying off `failed` would miss it); resolve `errorCode: "claude_refusal"` and `errorFamily: "model_refusal"`; surface `stopReason: "refusal"` in `resultJson`. - **`packages/adapter-utils/src/types.ts`** — widen `AdapterExecutionErrorFamily` with `"model_refusal"`. - **`packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/index.ts`** — export the new helper. - **`packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/parse.test.ts`** — 7 new unit tests. ## Verification ``` npx vitest run packages/adapters/claude-local # 35 passed (7 new) npx tsc --noEmit -p packages/adapter-utils # clean npx tsc --noEmit -p packages/adapters/claude-local # clean ``` Manual: a result JSON with `stop_reason: "refusal"` on a clean exit now resolves `errorCode: "claude_refusal"` and `errorFamily: "model_refusal"`; non-refusal results are unaffected. ## Risks Low risk. Additive only — it introduces a new error code on a path that previously returned `null`; no existing error code or success path changes. `claude_refusal` is deliberately **not** added to the transient-upstream retry set: a refusal is deterministic, so retrying the same prompt yields the same refusal. It surfaces as a distinct non-transient code for operators; downstream retry/alert policy can key off `claude_refusal` / `errorFamily: model_refusal` later. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`), extended-thinking mode, run via Claude Code with tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above (no related PRs found) - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots (N/A — no UI changes) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (N/A — internal adapter error-code addition; no user-facing docs) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (this push re-runs the gates; will confirm once green) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (prior run was 4/5 on a PR-description note now addressed; will confirm on re-run) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Full-Stack Engineer <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Sergio Sánchez Zavala
|
323b6220cc |
Fix Gemini headless invocation stalls (#8368)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Local adapters turn Paperclip runs into unattended CLI invocations. > - The `gemini_local` adapter depends on Gemini CLI behaving non-interactively in headless worker sessions. > - When Gemini CLI falls back to browser-based auth, the process can stall at startup instead of producing stream-json output. > - The adapter should make headless intent explicit and turn missing auth into a classified, fast failure. > - This pull request hardens the Gemini child-process environment and parser classification around that failure mode. > - The benefit is that operators get actionable `gemini_auth_required` failures instead of silent hung runs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No exact public issue exists for this runtime stall. Related: #2344 covers a Gemini CLI adapter environment/auth probe failure. This PR addresses a different runtime path: unattended `gemini_local` executions that can stall when Gemini CLI attempts interactive browser auth in a headless session. Bug summary: - Adapter: `gemini_local` - Symptom: child Gemini CLI process starts but produces no stream-json output when auth requires interactive browser flow - Expected: unattended runs either produce stream-json output or fail quickly with a classified auth error - Actual: the run can hang at invocation until an external watchdog kills it - Scope: Gemini adapter process env, auth-required parsing, and adapter docs/tests Duplicate search performed: - `gh pr list --state all --search "gemini headless invocation stall"` found only this PR. - `gh pr list --state all --search "gemini NO_BROWSER NO_COLOR"` found only this PR. - `gh issue list --state all --search "gemini headless authentication"` found related issue #2344 but no exact duplicate. ## What Changed - Set a headless-safe Gemini invocation env at the final child-process boundary: `TERM=xterm-256color`, `COLORTERM=truecolor`, and `NO_BROWSER=1`. - Delete inherited `NO_COLOR` from the child env so Gemini CLI keeps color-capable terminal behavior when deciding whether it can run non-interactively. - Classify Gemini `FatalAuthenticationError: Manual authorization is required...` failures as `gemini_auth_required`. - Update Gemini adapter docs to describe the non-interactive `--prompt` path and headless env behavior. - Add/extend focused parser and remote execution tests for the auth-required and env invariants. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapters/gemini-local/src/server/parse.test.ts packages/adapters/gemini-local/src/server/execute.remote.test.ts` — 23 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-gemini-local typecheck` — passed. - Local Gemini CLI probe confirmed `NO_BROWSER=1` turns the browser-auth stall into a fast auth error instead of an interactive wait. ## Risks Low risk. The change is limited to `gemini_local` invocation env, parsing, docs, and tests. It does not touch schemas, API routes, persisted data, or other adapters. Operational risk: environments that intentionally rely on `NO_COLOR` being inherited by Gemini child processes will no longer pass that variable through. That is intentional here because Gemini CLI auth/headless behavior should not depend on inherited color suppression. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Codex CLI, with shell/file-editing tool use for repository inspection, code edits, tests, and GitHub PR maintenance. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge /cc @codex — please review. |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
364f0f5a8d |
fix(server): enforce issue read for issue thread lists (#8331)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents coordinate through issue threads, so issue comments and interactions are part of the task authorization surface. > - Low-trust and boundary-limited agents can receive narrow mention-scoped access, but that must not turn into broad same-company issue-thread reads. > - The comment creation path was narrowed to allow explicit mention replies without granting mutation access. > - The surrounding list/read routes still needed to enforce the same `issue:read` boundary before returning thread data. > - This pull request applies the issue read check to issue comment and interaction listing routes, and locks that behavior with server regressions. > - The benefit is that narrow cross-agent collaboration remains possible without exposing unrelated issue-thread history. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Bug fix: - What happened: same-company agents outside an issue read boundary could still hit issue-thread listing routes and receive thread data. - Expected behavior: issue comments and issue-thread interactions should only be listed after the actor is allowed to read the issue. - Steps to reproduce: configure a peer agent denied by the issue read boundary, then request `GET /api/issues/:id/comments` or the issue interaction listing route. - Paperclip version/commit: current `master` before this branch. - Deployment mode: applies to server authorization in all modes. Related public context: #7389, #7863, #8024. ## What Changed - Added issue read enforcement before listing issue comments. - Added issue read enforcement before listing issue-thread interactions. - Added server regressions for denied peer-agent issue-thread access while preserving mention-scoped collaboration behavior. - Removed an avoidable per-mentioned-comment issue reload in mention-grant authorization by passing the already-loaded issue assignee through the helper. - Documented cross-agent issue read/comment authorization behavior in the Paperclip API reference. - Added a resilient fallback for pinned external skills when GitHub tree fetches are temporarily unavailable during catalog builds. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/authorization-service.test.ts` - 2 test files passed - 84 tests passed - Existing mocked recovery revalidation warnings were emitted by the route suite and the command exited 0 - Greptile: 5/5 on commit `b73fc323f192dc44f88374c16865008d4348923b`; no unresolved review threads. - `pnpm vitest run packages/skills-catalog/src/catalog-builder.test.ts` - 1 test file passed - 6 tests passed - CI: all visible PR checks are terminal green on commit `b73fc323f192dc44f88374c16865008d4348923b`. ## Risks Low risk. This tightens read authorization on issue-thread listing routes; any caller that depended on same-company access without `issue:read` will now receive 403 and must use an explicit grant or valid issue read path. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex, Codex coding agent environment, tool use and local command execution enabled, reasoning mode active. Context window not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
a71c4b6782 |
[codex] feat(watchdog): add task watchdog control plane (#8339)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The task lifecycle and recovery subsystems decide when agent work is still productive, stalled, or ready for review. > - Existing recovery paths can observe stopped or incomplete work, but there was no first-class per-task watchdog model with scoped review permissions. > - Watchdog follow-ups also need strict boundaries so recovery/status-only runs cannot mutate approvals or perform deliverable work. > - This pull request adds the task watchdog data model, API/service layer, scheduler/review flow, adapter wake context, UI configuration surfaces, and docs. > - The branch has been rebased onto current `paperclipai/paperclip` `master`; the watchdog migration is now ordered after master's latest migrations as `0104_issue_watchdogs`. > - The benefit is a more explicit task-review loop that preserves Paperclip's single-assignee and governance invariants while making stalled work easier to route. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No linked GitHub issue. Paperclip task: [PAP-11275](/PAP/issues/PAP-11275). ## Problem or motivation Task recovery needs a first-class watchdog path that can inspect stopped work and create scoped follow-ups without bypassing normal task ownership. Board/UI users need a way to configure watchdogs on tasks and see watchdog-related live work. Recovery/status-only runs must remain limited to status reporting and must not create approvals, link approvals, or submit approval comments. ## Proposed solution Add a task-watchdog data model, scheduler/classifier, scoped mutation guard, adapter wake context, API/UI configuration surfaces, and documentation so watchdog agents can review stopped task subtrees under explicit boundaries. ## Alternatives considered Reuse the existing recovery-action flow only. That would keep stopped-work detection implicit, make per-task watchdog assignment harder to expose in the UI, and would not provide a durable scoped-review issue for stalled task trees. ## Roadmap alignment This is Paperclip control-plane lifecycle infrastructure for task execution and recovery. I checked `ROADMAP.md`; this PR does not duplicate an existing planned core item. ## What Changed - Added issue watchdog schema, migration, shared contracts, validators, CRUD API, and service support. - Added task watchdog scheduler/classifier behavior, scoped mutation enforcement, adapter wake context, and default watchdog mandate guidance. - Added UI surfaces for configuring watchdogs on new/existing tasks, viewing watchdog activity, and exposing the experimental setting. - Added docs for the user-facing task watchdog workflow and implementation semantics. - Gated new-task watchdog setup behind `enableTaskWatchdogs` and blocked cheap status-only recovery runs from approval mutations. - Rebased onto current `master` and renumbered the idempotent watchdog migration from the branch-local `0102_issue_watchdogs` slot to `0104_issue_watchdogs`. - Addressed Greptile feedback by loading watchdog classifier input with a recursive subtree query and centralizing the watchdog origin-kind constant. - Added and updated focused server/UI tests for watchdog routes, scheduler/classifier behavior, scope boundaries, live task visibility, settings, and new issue dialog behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/task-watchdogs-scheduler.test.ts server/src/__tests__/task-watchdogs-classifier.test.ts` - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/approval-routes-idempotency.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm vitest run ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `git diff --check` - Verified the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows`. ## Risks - Medium risk: this introduces a new task lifecycle surface touching DB schema, server routes/services, adapter wake context, and UI task configuration. - Watchdog scheduling behavior depends on the new experimental setting and runtime context checks behaving consistently across local and production agents. - The watchdog migration is idempotent (`IF NOT EXISTS` / duplicate-object guards) so users who tried the previous branch-local migration number should not get duplicate-object failures. - CI and the second Greptile pass are pending after the latest review-fix push. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent in the Paperclip workspace. Exact runtime model id and context window were not exposed to the agent; tool use and local command execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A per Paperclip task instruction: do not add screenshots/images to this PR unless they are specifically part of the work. - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7069053a1f |
[codex] Add ask issue work mode (#8334)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Issue work mode controls how a task starts and how the conversation composer frames the operator's intent. > - Paperclip already supports standard agent execution and planning mode, but there is no lightweight mode for asking a question without immediately implying execution or plan drafting. > - That gap makes low-commitment clarification workflows look like normal task execution. > - This pull request adds an explicit Ask mode and threads it through shared contracts, server heartbeat context, and the issue composer UI. > - The benefit is that operators can create or switch a task into a question-oriented mode while preserving existing agent and planning flows. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this change. Inline feature request follows the repository feature request template. ### Subsystem affected Cross-cutting: `packages/shared`, `server/`, and `ui/`. ### Problem or motivation Issue conversations currently distinguish standard agent work from planning work, but question-first conversations do not have a clear public mode in the shared contract or UI. Operators who want to ask an agent a focused question have to use standard mode, which can imply normal task execution, or planning mode, which asks for a plan rather than an answer. ### Proposed solution Add Ask as a first-class issue work mode. It should be selectable from issue creation and issue chat, cycle alongside Standard and Planning from the keyboard shortcut/menu, appear distinctly in composer styling, and be included in heartbeat context so agents know to answer directly instead of executing or drafting a plan. ### Alternatives considered - Keep using standard mode for questions: rejected because it does not communicate answer-only intent to the agent or the UI. - Reuse planning mode for questions: rejected because planning mode asks for a plan and is semantically different from asking a question. - Add only local UI copy: rejected because the mode needs to be represented in the shared contract and server heartbeat context to be reliable. ### Roadmap alignment This is a focused issue-workflow improvement. `ROADMAP.md` was checked and no duplicate planned core work was found. ### Additional context Related public searches performed before opening this PR: - GitHub PR search for `"ask mode" repo:paperclipai/paperclip` - GitHub issue search for `"ask mode" repo:paperclipai/paperclip` - GitHub PR search for `"work mode" "ask" repo:paperclipai/paperclip` No duplicate PR was found. ## What Changed - Added `ask` to the shared issue work-mode contract and validation coverage. - Included issue work mode in heartbeat context summaries so agents can see standard, planning, and ask state. - Added Ask mode metadata, styling, composer tone handling, and selection/cycling behavior in the issue chat/new issue UI. - Updated focused tests for shared validators, heartbeat context, and affected UI work-mode flows. ## Verification - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/ChatComposer.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx ui/src/lib/work-mode-meta.test.ts` - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts ui/src/components/ChatComposer.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx ui/src/lib/work-mode-meta.test.ts ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx` The broader targeted command passed 8 test files / 245 tests. Visual reference for Standard/Planning/Ask composer states: https://gist.github.com/cryppadotta/714d8590bac55500a65e7e16de5bb4b8 It emitted an expected warning from an existing server test fixture about a missing run-log fixture while verifying derived issue comment metadata. ## Risks Low to moderate risk. This adds a new enum value that crosses shared, server, and UI contracts. Existing standard and planning modes are preserved, but any downstream code assuming only two non-terminal work modes may need to handle `ask`. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex coding agent in Paperclip CodexCoder mode, with shell, git, GitHub connector, and local test execution tools. Context window and exact hosted model snapshot are not exposed in this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`, `feat/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
5e086cb828 |
fix(server): resolve published skills catalog package root and fallback (#8327)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to run and supervise AI-agent companies. > - The skills system is part of that core operator experience because agents and humans both depend on the catalog-backed Skills Manager surfaces. > - In source checkouts, the server can find the catalog manifest and bundled skill files through monorepo-relative paths, but published installs do not preserve that layout. > - That mismatch makes `GET /api/skills/catalog` fail in npm/pnpm installs even though the catalog package itself is present. > - The server therefore needs to resolve the catalog from the published `@paperclipai/skills-catalog` package first, while still keeping a monorepo fallback for local development. > - This pull request makes the published package the primary resolution path, uses the same resolved package root for bundled skill file reads, and degrades the list route safely when the manifest is unavailable. > - The benefit is that Skills Manager catalog reads behave correctly in packaged installs instead of only in repo-local development layouts. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #8316 Refs #7281 Refs #7313 Refs #7350 Refs #7860 Refs #8223 Refs #8227 ## What Changed - Added `@paperclipai/skills-catalog` as a runtime dependency of `@paperclipai/server`. - Exported `./package.json` from `@paperclipai/skills-catalog` so the server can resolve the published package root directly. - Updated `server/src/services/skills-catalog.ts` to resolve the manifest and package root from the published package first, with the monorepo path retained only as a development fallback. - Applied that resolved package root to bundled catalog file reads so manifest lookup and skill-file reads use the same published layout. - Added `listCatalogSkillsOrEmpty()` so `GET /api/skills/catalog` returns `[]` and logs a warning when the manifest is unavailable instead of surfacing a 500. - Added targeted server tests for published-package resolution and missing-manifest fallback handling. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/skills-catalog-service.test.ts src/__tests__/company-skills-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server build` - Packaging smoke: - pack `@paperclipai/shared` and `@paperclipai/skills-catalog` from this checkout - mount those packed artifacts under `server/dist/node_modules` - import `server/dist/services/skills-catalog.js` - verify a bundled catalog `SKILL.md` resolves and reads successfully from the packed package layout ## Risks - Low risk: the change is narrowly scoped to catalog package resolution and fallback behavior. - The new `./package.json` export slightly broadens the catalog package's public surface, so reviewers should confirm that is an acceptable runtime contract. - The empty-array fallback intentionally changes failure mode for a missing manifest from `500` to a warning + empty payload, which is safer for packaged installs but could hide packaging regressions if logs are not monitored. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` (GPT-5-based coding agent; exact backend model ID/context window not exposed in this harness), with tool use, shell execution, git, and local test/build verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |