3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
DottaandPaperclip	198218bf55	fix(config): require shared storage for managed cloud (#18350) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Managed Cloud instances must retain shared objects and secrets across server replacement. > - Implicit storage defaults can select local disk or an unintended bucket. > - Cloud runtime settings now come from a canonical database snapshot. > - This pull request validates bootstrap prerequisites before database setup and effective S3 settings after snapshot resolution. > - The benefit is an actionable refusal before local signing state or HTTP setup, while valid canonical Cloud settings work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A managed Cloud instance could start with local disk storage, an implicit bucket, or a local key file. After canonical Cloud configuration landed, checking only environment or file values would also reject a valid database bucket. Shared schema defaults could make an omitted raw bucket appear explicit. **Expected behavior** Managed Cloud requires external PostgreSQL, a stable environment master key, and effective S3 settings with a nonblank bucket. The canonical snapshot remains the configuration authority. Invalid configuration refuses startup before signing or HTTP effects. Self-hosted defaults remain compatible. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Select managed Cloud with its tenant token or managed configuration document. 2. Leave storage as local disk, or omit the S3 bucket from a raw canonical snapshot. 3. Start the server. Startup must refuse. An explicit valid bucket in the canonical snapshot must work without a file or environment bucket. **Paperclip version or commit** Current base: `4edd10804e2b42941aa2038e90c362c13a0b98dc`. **Deployment mode** Managed Cloud. Ordinary self-hosted defaults remain unchanged. Related PRs: #18335 owns canonical Cloud runtime configuration. #18327 owns S3 run logs. #18352 owns credential persistence. #18347 owns cutover checks. This PR adds configuration prerequisites to those existing boundaries. ## What Changed - Validate external PostgreSQL and a stable environment master key at the Cloud bootstrap boundary, before database setup. - Validate effective S3 settings after canonical snapshot publication and before Cloud signing, runtime consumers, or HTTP setup. - Require a nonblank bucket in the Cloud snapshot schema. Reject omitted or blank buckets in every legacy Cloud file before one-time import normalization, even when an environment bucket is supplied. Keep shared self-hosted schema defaults. - Preserve typed bucket provenance at the existing file-read boundary. Accept explicit canonical bucket names, including `paperclip`, and environment settings when the snapshot is null. - Validate effective legacy storage with the existing resolver before seeding. A rejected candidate leaves no canonical rows, so a corrected source file can be imported on retry. Environment overlays are checked but never persisted. - Add real PostgreSQL snapshot and migration-retry tests, startup refusal tests, and environment/file compatibility controls. Document that Cloud always requires its stable environment key, even with an external default secrets provider. ## Verification - Latest focused acceptance passed 199/199 in six files (54.29 seconds), using the command below plus `server/src/__tests__/cloud-configuration-migration-postgres.test.ts`. Real PostgreSQL proves rejected storage leaves all three migration authority rows absent, then a corrected legacy file imports on retry. An external-default-secrets control proves the deliberate unconditional Cloud master-key contract. - Before the peer correction, the frozen product diff passed 178 tests in five files: managed-cloud-prerequisites, cloud-runtime-config, server-startup-feedback-export, config-file, and cloud-configuration-readers. Command: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/{managed-cloud-prerequisites,cloud-runtime-config,server-startup-feedback-export,config-file,cloud-configuration-readers}.test.ts --maxWorkers=1 --no-file-parallelism`. Real PostgreSQL used a qualified POSIX test-only PG18.6 override because the host cannot supply the stock runtime's SysV semaphore allocation. - Coverage includes raw database and legacy omitted/blank bucket rejection, valid database and environment buckets, null snapshots, explicit default-named buckets, self-hosted compatibility, and refusal before local signing mutation. - The real AWS SDK configured-provider control uses a simulated loopback S3 service. It writes, reads from a fresh provider, and deletes an object. It also reads an encrypted credential with the stable environment key. This does not qualify production cloud permissions. - `git diff --check` passed. Final merges add unrelated master changes from #18241, #18363, and #18370; the focused storage product diff is unchanged. - Peer review reproduced a fresh legacy local-disk import that gained the default bucket before an S3 environment overlay. The importer now requires a raw explicit bucket for every legacy Cloud file. Six controls cover omission/blank values with and without an environment bucket; the full focused rerun passed 184/184 across all five files in 194.89 seconds. - Initial revised startup testing passed 167/168: one fixture omitted the database URL and failed before its intended key assertion. The corrected final run passed 178/178. An initial direct server typecheck failed because Runner declarations were not built; this is a setup failure, not a compile pass. Integration verification rebuilds dependencies before full checks. - Prior head `fae1e4aa` passed complete CI with 53 successes, two intended skips, and Greptile 5/5. `de71345f379cecb71dbfb219f35e14f942c10a3f` then passed complete CI (55 successes, three workflow skips, and a neutral external review), with Greptile 5/5 and zero unresolved threads. The external review identified the preseed rejection problem; its correction is committed at `75e04d0d77e19dcef0a8cb070b6b518f0f173b14`. The final merge head is `19b809ea2823a6a4e5ceb48ef2c2bac4721733d6`; [Fresh complete CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41127309762) passed on that head: 55 successful checks, three workflow skips, and one neutral external review. Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no actionable issues. Both earlier external review threads are resolved with the tested fixes. Earlier infrastructure retries remain documented in [the first diagnosis](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18350#issuecomment-6529964690) and [the runner shutdown evidence](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18350#issuecomment-6530364769). Earlier missing SDK build and fixture metadata failures were repaired before those passes. - Current frozen-head CI first attempt failed one unchanged Antigravity authentication success case in Runner Vitest 1/2 (`outcome=failure`, 1994 tests passed). The same file passed 11/11 locally in 2.33 seconds, and identical Runner source passed the prior complete CI run. Attempt 2 retried only failed jobs (the Runner shard and dependent aggregate). Both passed without a source change. No second retry was used. The exact timing cause is not established. [Failed job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41127309762/job/124309181778). - No production data, buckets, or live credentials were used. Complete local repository suites are not duplicated in this worktree; current-head required CI supplies the full suite gate. ## Risks - Managed deployments with local disk, omitted buckets, file-only keys, or missing external database URLs now refuse startup. Operators must supply valid prerequisites before rollout. - Required deployment environment overlays must remain stable across replacements. For example, a saved local-disk provider with an explicit bucket can use an environment S3 provider; removing that required overlay correctly refuses startup until the environment or canonical configuration is corrected. Environment settings are never silently copied into the canonical row. - Effective legacy storage must also pass before first seeding. A bad candidate does not create authority rows. Existing saved rows remain authoritative and can require environment overrides or a canonical configuration change if they are invalid. - A present legacy Cloud file needs an explicit raw bucket even if its saved provider is local disk or its environment supplies a bucket. Correct the file before one-time import, or use the existing absent-file/null-snapshot environment-only setup. Environment overlays are not persisted as operator choices. - A previously stored canonical nonblank `paperclip` bucket is authoritative. Prior normalization erased whether that value was originally explicit. This change cannot recover that provenance and does not reject existing nonblank canonical values. - Validation proves configuration shape, not cloud permissions, database reachability, or key compatibility with existing encrypted data. Keep the master key stable across replacements. - Cloud snapshot JSON parsing is stricter; omitted or blank raw S3 bucket values need correction. No database migration or provider operation changes are added. These prerequisites do not prove that every server persistence path is disposable. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-6.1-sol`. Context window: unknown. The model used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-30 16:21:46 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	35132af161	fix(config): preserve extensions and guard invalid repairs (#11005) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The CLI and server share a JSON configuration contract for local installations and worktrees. > - Existing config writes removed extension keys because Zod stripped unknown object properties. > - Invalid config files could also be replaced with defaults before an operator preserved the original bytes. > - Configuration updates must preserve operator edits and must not rewrite files when the effective value is unchanged. > - This pull request adds extension-preserving merges, guarded invalid-config repair, atomic writes, and focused regression tests. > - The benefit is safe setup and configuration reruns without data loss or unnecessary mtime changes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Known-field updates through the CLI or server removed unknown top-level and nested config keys. Non-interactive configure and onboard paths could replace a present but invalid config with defaults. **Expected behavior** Writers preserve extension keys, skip semantic no-op writes, and require explicit interactive confirmation before an invalid config is replaced. Repair preserves an exact collision-safe backup first. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Add an unknown top-level key and an unknown nested provider key to `config.json`. 2. Update a known field through the CLI or worktree config writer. 3. Observe that the extension keys are removed on the base branch. 4. Write invalid JSON and run configure or onboard without an interactive terminal. 5. Observe that the original file can be replaced without a durable invalid-file backup on the base branch. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at the pull request base commit. ## What Changed - Accept unknown properties at each extensible config object boundary while keeping every known field validated. - Merge known-field updates into the parsed source config and preserve only unknown extension data. - Warn about near-match key names without deleting or changing them. - Skip writes when the effective config is unchanged, which keeps file mtimes stable. - Write config changes through a temporary file, file sync, rename, and directory sync. - Distinguish a missing config from an invalid config in configure and onboard. - Back up invalid bytes as `config.json.invalid-N` and verify the source still matches that backup before repair. - Require interactive repair confirmation and reject non-interactive replacement with an actionable message. - Document the config preservation and repair behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/config-schema.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/config-store.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/configure-repair.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/configure.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/onboard.test.ts server/src/__tests__/config-file.test.ts server/src/__tests__/worktree-config.test.ts` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID= AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY= VITEST_MAX_WORKERS=1 pnpm test:run` - `pnpm build` - Confirm all pull request checks are green on the latest commit. - Confirm Greptile reports 5/5 with no unresolved comments. ## Risks - Passthrough keeps misspelled keys. Near-match warnings make this visible without destructive cleanup. - Merge behavior must distinguish unknown extension keys from optional known keys. Schema-aware regression tests cover preservation and known-key deletion. - Repair must not overwrite bytes that changed after backup. The writer compares the current source with the selected backup before atomic replacement. - The change does not alter database schema, company scoping, or activity logging. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 model family. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed. Agentic reasoning, tool use, and code execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-08-07 00:41:19 -05:00
Stefano Maffeis	68ba7ccae6	Fail loudly on invalid config files (#9041) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The server config loader reads `.paperclip/config.json` and feeds it into the shared Paperclip config schema. > - When a config file exists but cannot be parsed or fails schema validation, Paperclip should not silently ignore it. > - The current `readConfigFile()` catch block treats invalid files the same as missing files, so startup falls back to defaults while the banner can still point at the ignored config path. > - This pull request keeps the missing-file fallback, but makes present invalid config files fail with a path-specific error. > - The benefit is safer startup behavior and a clear diagnostic that points at the invalid config field. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #8908 ## What Changed - Changed `readConfigFile()` to return `null` only when the config file is absent. - Added explicit errors for unreadable/invalid JSON config files. - Added explicit Zod validation errors that include the config path and invalid field path without printing config contents. - Added server tests for missing config, invalid JSON, schema validation failure, and valid config parsing. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/config-file.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` ## Risks Low risk for valid configs and missing configs. This intentionally changes behavior for present invalid config files from silent fallback to startup failure, which is the issue being fixed. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex based on GPT-5, with repository file inspection, GitHub CLI, and local command execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-07-21 10:18:45 -07:00