Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Nicky LeachandPaperclip 35ab90ad0f Map runtime activity to authorized task plugin panels (#18131)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and tasks.
> - Plugins contribute views to the task sidebar.
> - A ready view can belong to an earlier task.
> - Runner records activity under its authenticated run.
> - This PR maps that activity to installed task-panel declarations.
> - The sidebar checks readiness after current-run use and restores use
after reconnect.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Builds on merged contract #18129 and Runner publisher #18050. This PR
targets
master and is ready for review. Earlier combined verification is
retained in
[the verification
archive](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18050#issuecomment-6489369676).

**Subsystem affected**

Run-event reads, plugin task contributions and the task sidebar.

**Problem or motivation**

Readiness polling can show a view left ready by another task. Reload and
reconnect must recover current-run use without losing concurrent live
activity.

**Proposed solution**

Map recorded activity to installed task-panel declarations. Merge
authorized
history and live activity, then perform bounded readiness checks for the
running agent. Preserve the existing read-only view.

## What Changed

- Add optional `{ namespace, activityKey }` activation mappings to
task-panel
declarations. Legacy declarations remain valid but contribute no task
panel.
- Add `view=plugin-panels` to the existing run-events route. Preserve
run-read and
telemetry-read authorization, secret redaction and private-run denial.
Map
activity to installed contributions and return at most 128 panel
identities.
- Scope activation caches to current panel versions and activity
declarations.
Preserve unchanged panels during unrelated plugin updates and history
reads.
- Merge history and live hints without losing concurrent activations.
Filter by
  company, task, run and agent. Restore history on mount and reconnect.
- Replace periodic availability checks with up to three readiness
attempts after
activity. Fresh activity restarts settled transient failures. Pending
checks,
  successful readiness and HTTP 4xx failures are left alone.
- Reuse live run updates with the panel cache key. Recover only panel
history
after a pending subscription read. Mark expected not-ready query results
so
  the global error reporter skips them; real failures remain reportable.
- Preserve current-run dismissal and the read-only plugin view. Update
manifest
  comments and producer/consumer documentation.

## Verification

- Current head: `5e04d757c`, based on master `09c05c550`. Range
comparison
confirmed all six feature commits were unchanged by the rebase. The
final
follow-up keys readiness by the plugin installation ID and availability
path.
- `cd ui && node ../node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run
src/hooks/useTaskPluginPanels.test.tsx`
— all 45 cases passed. `cd ui && node ../node_modules/typescript/bin/tsc
-b` passed.
- The shared query-client and live-update recovery selection passed 96
cases on
  `49c544cd2`. Token gates passed before the final hook-only changes.
- Earlier focused verification passed 57 manifest cases, 69
database/history cases,
event-registry cases and route authorization cases, including
private-run denial.
- Regression coverage includes subscription/history races, task changes
during
recovery, unfocused run completion, bounded readiness retries, denied
reads,
expected not-ready responses, changed activity mappings, unchanged panel
preservation, old cache scopes, and same-version route or installation
changes.
- [Current-head
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40942001707)
passed: 54 successful checks, two skips, no failures or pending checks.
- [Standard and final
review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18131#issuecomment-6489842168)
both scored 5/5 on `5e04d757c`. The final review used the Apex tier,
added no
comments, and left no unresolved findings. The PR is conflict-free and
ready for review.
- Local checks stay targeted. GitHub CI provides the broad build, test,
typecheck,
browser and Runner coverage. No deployment or live-provider acceptance
is claimed.

<details>
<summary>Retained failures and recovery evidence</summary>

- `ac9329548` twice failed a browser reload assertion while conversation
history
was concealed. Master fixed its readiness wait in #17923. The approve
journey
then passed locally on `fea63a418` with installed Chrome (1 passed, 39
seconds).
All eight browser shards passed in later CI. The browser test is outside
this diff.
- A canary checkout failed with Git HTTP 408; its unchanged-head retry
passed.
- `de07d09fa` failed the mobile Cases card click after a ten-second
stability wait.
The same read-only journey passed locally on that exact head (1 passed,
26 seconds).
Its unchanged-head CI retry passed 22 cases, with one skip. The original
artifact
  is retained; the cause of that click timeout is not established.
- [CI on
`49c544cd2`](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40903679075)
passed 54 checks with two skips. CI also passed on `de07d09fa` after the
recorded retry.
- The `1e59ab441` merge checkout passed all browser and server suites.
Runner
shard 2 passed 2,252 cases and timed out waiting for a
controller-recovery command.
The test had landed on master in #18161 after the former branch base.
Rebasing
aligned the local checkout with that code; Runner shard 2 then passed on
`fcf7380d3`.
The original timeout cause remains unproven; no unrelated timeout was
changed.
- [CI on
`fcf7380d3`](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40940235193)
recorded runner shutdown signals in typecheck and a workspace shard. A
chat
recovery test observed a null wake deadline, and one Runner transport
fixture
failed during close. Those separate assertion failures remain
unexplained.
All of those jobs passed on the final readiness-key head. Those later
passes
establish recovery; they do not prove the cause of the earlier assertion
failures.
- Local browser setup first stopped at pnpm version-download
verification, then a
sandbox IPC restriction, then a missing bundled browser. Installed pnpm
9.15.4
  and Chrome completed the journeys. No dependency files were changed.
- Earlier optional-property TypeScript errors were corrected. Embedded
PostgreSQL
needed its install hook run from its package directory. Older CI also
recorded
fixture-cleanup lock timeouts, attention-fixture timeouts, and canceled
server
shards after runner shutdown. The parent fixed its FIFO snapshot-copy
failure
before merge. The linked verification archive retains earlier combined
evidence.

</details>

## Risks

Activity is a hint and grants no access. Missing plugins, denied reads
and
unavailable views contribute no panel. Older runs without activity
records show
no task plugin tab. A used view stays available for the running task;
reconnect
reconciles readiness. Matching producer and consumer builds are
required. No
migration, dependency, image publication or deployment is included.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools and code
execution.
The exact serving snapshot is not exposed.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 13:56:48 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 6cc765bd81 feat(live): deliver recoverable transcripts to interested views (#17456)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip should show live agent output without repeating
presentation work for every view.
> - Execution, acknowledgements and durable checkpoints must remain
independent of browser interest.
> - The server already owns authorization and redaction at delivery.
> - A shared browser connection can declare which visible runs need full
transcripts.
> - Catch-up must handle subscription races, disconnects, terminal
output and slow consumers.
> - This PR delivers the backend and UI contract together without a
database migration.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

Visible transcript consumers receive recoverable output through one
shared browser connection.

**Current behavior**

Independent views can create duplicate connections, presentation work
and recurring history reads. A subscription race or filtered native
history can lose the saved tail.

**Proposed behavior**

Negotiate run interests, subscribe before catch-up and retain
independent canonical recovery cursors. Keep lightweight lifecycle and
attention events available without full transcript delivery.

PR 4 of #17097 → #17439 → #17455 → #17456. The runtime feature is
independent of hot-upgrade recovery; the stack order is for review
convenience.

## What Changed

- Add additive WebSocket capability negotiation, replacement interests,
revision acknowledgement and resynchronization notices.
- Reference-count visible consumer interests on one company-scoped
browser connection. Preserve older-client/server behavior.
- Reuse canonical structural/current-user/registered-secret redaction
for plugin run notifications through the same bounded delivery queue.
Keep producer and uninterested streams free of recipient lookups.
- Refresh application queries after the matching recovery
acknowledgement, including one follow-up after an older in-flight read.
Ordinary interest acknowledgements add no refresh.
- Keep authorization and redaction at delivery. Browser interest cannot
change harness execution, PRP ACKs, checkpoints, accounting or canonical
logs.
- Deduplicate by sequence and log identity. Catch up terminal output and
saved tails without recurring reads during healthy negotiated streaming.
- Bound delivery to 1,000 items and 1 MiB. Overflow requires
resynchronization; persistent congestion closes the connection.
- Preserve compact-history expansion from current master across
paginated catch-up. Snapshot the original read window before React can
defer its update.

## Verification

On current source `f6710f0b3c`, Linux [job
122604880503](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40624101891/job/122604880503)
executes all five run-read permission cases successfully (2.574
seconds), including grant and revocation on the same connection. Its
shard passes all 2,430 cases.

Current [server-shard job
122604880416](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40624101891/job/122604880416)
has 1,513 passes, one failure and three skips: an unchanged nested-clone
expiration/restore test exceeds its 15-second deadline. The preceding
`5efc6c48bf` source has identical non-document bytes; [its corresponding
job
122601359272](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40623017917/job/122601359272)
passes all 21 nested-clone cases, including that case in 9.505 seconds.
The exact timing cause is unproven. The single diagnostic [retry job
122609332597](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40624101891/job/122609332597)
passes all 21 nested-clone cases (61.316 seconds), including the
formerly timed-out case in 7.003 seconds, and all 1,514 shard cases
(three skips). The failure remains recorded; no timeout or assertion was
changed.

After the server squash merge and qualification retarget, all 50 focused
server cases and all 91 focused UI cases pass again, with both
typechecks and token gates. Runner vendor preparation rebuilds current
master inputs before those tests. This source needs fresh CI and
reviews; prior CI and browser receipts do not qualify it by inference.

Current candidate `f6710f0b3c` now targets master `6987c2f20b`, after
merged #17097, #17439 and #17455. Its diff contains only transcript
delivery and its documentation. It adds no database migration.
Retargeting changes only the evidence document; all production and test
code is byte-identical to `5efc6c48bf`.

On the eighth integration, all 50 focused server delivery cases and all
91 focused UI cases pass, with both typechecks and token gates. The
following 35-case receipt belongs to the earlier delivery correction.
Four low-queue authorization/decoration stall variants and the
late-rejection case fail before correction. They now verify the
five-second read deadline, old and negotiated clients, revisions that
cannot reset the deadline, unaffected sibling connections, rejected late
results, and timer cleanup. The first combined toast run has four
loopback EPERM failures and 31 passes; its permitted repeat passes all
35. Earlier 28-case evidence excluded the toast file.

The permission correction requires the current HTTP company-scope
transcript permission, plus task access, for both native events and
legacy logs. Prior Linux source `49a8783e9b`, job 122549913643, executes
all five run-read cases, including grant/revocation on the same
connection, successfully. That source placed this file in server shard
11; later shard assignments can differ and must be checked against their
actual inventories. The older `405bedd189` receipt retains a separate
scheduled-retry teardown race and inherited fixture collision; neither
is waived. The new head must pass again in Linux CI.

The seven extracted stream-recovery tests preserve their assertions. All
39 related legacy/native cases, UI typecheck and token gates pass after
restoring the initially missed fixture helper. Earlier full workspace
build/typecheck and Chrome journeys at `445a76563c` cover two views,
company switches, reconnect, terminal catch-up, reload and zero
recurring healthy transcript reads. Those browser receipts are
historical source evidence and do not qualify this new head by
inference. The [qualification
record](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/f6710f0b3c84c6fdb2021df67206261b446dfc97/doc/plans/2026-10-22-hot-upgrade-qualification.md)
retains exact earlier UI/history, source-boundary and cleanup failures
with their fixes and limits.

The workload-cost test preserves bounds and authorization callback
counts for zero interests, one viewer, multiple browsers and a slow
viewer. Its socket congestion is simulated. It measures neither SQL nor
network costs. Current permission checks and the final hosted
active-agent/viewer matrix remain unmeasured; no production savings are
claimed.

Fresh exact-head CI, legacy status, completed Greptile 5/5, resolved
feedback and ordinary merge eligibility remain required.

The earlier recipient corrections pass all 47
registry/plugin/delivery/WebSocket/toast cases and all 174 UI
provider/recovery/interest cases, both typechecks and token gates on
source `b202e59a25`. A real bus/host-service test registers a synthetic
run secret through the production registry and reproduces its raw
notification before the fix; native/legacy/final notifications now
redact it, disposal prevents late worker notification. A later P1 review
reproduces lost final notifications on settings-read and
secret-resolution failure. Both cases fail before correction. Any
delivery failure or subscription timeout now sends one content-free
stream error and removes the plugin subscription. It never changes the
agent execution or run status. Later events start no new redaction
reads. The final integrated six-file server lane passes all 50 cases,
with server typecheck and token gates. Existing browser delivery
behavior is unchanged. Storage and secret-provider seams are scripted.
Two real React Query/provider regressions first miss a run during
resync; both now refresh after the valid replacement ACK, including
pending-read and stale-scope cases. The prerequisite qualification batch
passes all 118 cases and E2E typecheck after master integration. Fresh
CI, security scan and reviews remain pending on this head.

The contribution-rule review correction removes 104 explanatory comments
introduced by this slice and keeps the ordering, deadline and
plugin-delivery explanations in the delivery document. Existing comments
and functional test/lint directives remain. All edited source files have
identical parsed non-comment tokens before and after the change. All 50
server delivery cases and all 91 cases in six affected UI suites pass,
along with token gates. The new head requires fresh CI, security and
review.

## Risks

A slow or disconnected viewer must resynchronize from authorized
canonical history. It may see a display gap until catch-up completes.
Company changes and revoked access must remove delivery interests. This
slice adds no database migration and cannot change execution or recovery
authority. Full transcript delivery evaluates current company-scope
permission per delivery. Active plugin recipients also perform canonical
redaction reads; viewer-load database costs on this final source remain
unmeasured.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools and code
execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-27 22:23:30 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip e335265568 fix(ui): stop idle task run polling with live updates (#17608)
Stop successful empty assigned-task run queries from polling only while the matching company and session connection is open. Preserve active, pending, failed, and disconnected cadence. Share one lifecycle refresh owner between the task and chat views, discover reviewer events without task identity, and refresh after older in-flight reads settle.

All 175 focused tests, 9,079 UI tests, build, typecheck, exact-head Greptile 5/5, and required CI pass. Regression mutations catch reviewer discovery, duplicate reads, readiness, failure state, missing refreshes, and scope cleanup. Earlier E2E cleanup deadlock and server cleanup timeout remain documented; failed-only reruns passed on their same commits.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-25 07:54:47 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 3e5a9f5afe perf(ui): load recent tasks with bounded summaries (#16851)
Replace passive recent-task detail reads with bounded, authorized summaries. Keep account isolation, stored history, task actions, and live recovery behavior.

Overlap access checks with shell settings and avoid duplicate session and health reads on the first healthy socket opening. Retain domain reconciliation.

Add focused coverage and local performance evidence. Isolate the existing cache capacity test from entry expiry on slow CI runners.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-19 12:13:28 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 6681c71b40 fix(ci): stabilize chat startup and close the initial live-update gap (#13895)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Browser tests check chat state across navigation, reload, and agent
runs.
> - Runtime tests check that a service is ready before Paperclip
publishes its address.
> - CI for #13891 failed in these paths, then passed attempt 3 with the
same code.
> - The browser traces stopped during development asset startup. A
separate sidebar assertion used an unstable focus path through the rich
editor.
> - This PR gives browser tests fresh built assets and a direct keyboard
path to the star button. It adds service-worker reload coverage under
CPU throttling.
> - A later browser failure exposed a real reload race: comments can
change between the first query and the first live subscription. The UI
now refreshes active queries when that subscription opens.
> - Runtime fixtures now have separate registry state and better failure
evidence. The readiness deadline remains unchanged.
> - A later CI run exposed a wall-clock backoff assertion and three
authorization cases sharing one test lifecycle. The PR anchors the
assertion to transport time and separates the cases.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #13891. Related runtime ownership and cleanup work: #11791, #11389,
#11278.

Evidence: [original CI run, attempt
3](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35910335089/attempts/3).
Attempt 3 passed both affected shards without code changes. This PR is
separate from the wake-payload change, which has since merged.

| Failure | Diagnosis and classification |
| --- | --- |
| Sidebar blank page and retry text missing after reload in CI | Both
traces show a blank document before React startup. Vite connects, but
the failing page makes no application API requests. The service worker
forwards the unbundled development module graph. The retry response is
already stored and its process-adapter run succeeded before reload. This
places the failure in browser bootstrap, not wake payload or reply
persistence. The exact reason the development module graph stopped is
not established by the retained trace. The harness now serves built
assets, and the new test covers startup and controlled reload at 4x CPU
throttling. |
| Star opacity remains zero on macOS | Reproduced on unchanged master
`f55759942b`. The old test clicked the rich editor, focused the star,
then used Tab and Shift+Tab. An instrumented baseline run captured the
sequence: Tab moved from the star to the next sidebar link, then the
editor bundle called `focus()` on its contenteditable before Shift+Tab.
That key reached the composer, where it is a work-mode shortcut. This
confirms a pending editor selection update stole focus; it was not the
browser skipping sidebar buttons. The assertion did not prove the star
retained focus. The test now moves the pointer away, focuses the
preceding sidebar link, presses Tab once, and asserts both actual focus
and opacity. This is test synchronization and keyboard traversal, not a
demonstrated CSS defect. |
| Runtime readiness exceeds 10 seconds | The old error only says `fetch
failed`. There is no child startup output in that failure, so it cannot
distinguish slow process startup from a refused or stalled probe. It
passed unchanged locally and took 3.416 seconds in attempt 3. Resource
contention is plausible but unproved. This PR does not claim a proven
historical runtime root cause: it isolates fixture registry/log files,
checks ports before spawn and after stop, checks live backends at
publication, and preserves transport errors, probe count, elapsed time,
and fixture startup timestamps for the next occurrence. |
| Later CI: recovery reply disappears after reload | Product
synchronization bug, distinct from the blank-page bootstrap failure.
Reproduced locally with a trace: the comments request started at
`21:56:07.443`, the server saved the reply at `.520`, and the first live
subscription started at `.541`. The reload fetched a successful run and
its complete log, but missed the comment event. The provider refreshed
after reconnects only. It now refreshes active queries on the first
connection too. A deterministic regression test fails before the fix. No
browser assertion was changed. |
| Later CI: Slack backoff and authorization tests | The 30-second
backoff assertion required more than 25 seconds to remain when it read
the saved action. CI spent 10.311 seconds in the test, exceeding that
five-second allowance. A local six-second read delay reproduces the
failure; the new transport-anchored lower and upper bounds pass the same
fault injection. The neighbouring authorization test ran three
independent fixtures in one test and timed out at 15 seconds. Each case
now has its own fixture cleanup and the normal per-test deadline, so
earlier cases do not remain active during later global worker sweeps. No
specific production slow call was established. |
| Self-hosted runner loses communication or shuts down | The original
lost-communication failure has no assertion. On final-head [attempt
1](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35925901613/attempts/1),
Build, Runner Vitest 1/2, and chat 2/3 ran on three separate fleet
instances. All received a runner shutdown signal at `22:04:55 UTC`,
within 35 milliseconds, then cancellation. Server shard 6/12 received
the same shutdown signal one minute later. All four were Spot
`m7i-flex.xlarge` instances in `us-east-1a`. No test assertion or build
error preceded those stops. This is infrastructure interruption; the
reason the fleet stopped the runners is not available in job logs. |

## What Changed

- Build the browser fixture UI into the static server's preferred
directory, `server/ui-dist`, and disable Vite middleware. Ignore these
generated assets. Start the source CLI directly from the repository
root, as required by the CLI invocation safety contract.
- Keep all existing chat assertions. Add first takeover and three
service-worker-controlled reloads under CPU throttling. Assert that the
page uses built module assets and that opening it creates no chat task.
- Use forward keyboard traversal from the Zeta link to its star. Check
focus before checking the reveal style.
- Give each runtime exposure test a temporary Paperclip home and restore
environment state after process cleanup.
- Check that reserved ports are free before spawn, serve the fixture
response before exposure, and become free after stop.
- Include the nested fetch error, probe count, and elapsed time in
readiness failures. Add a unit test for this diagnostic contract.
- Refresh active queries when the first live connection opens, covering
events missed during initial page loading. Keep reconnect toast
suppression unchanged.
- Measure Slack retry timing from the transport attempt and recovery
completion. This checks the full provider-requested delay without
spending a small wall-clock allowance on unrelated processing.
- Run each Slack authorization-revocation scenario as a separate test,
with cleanup between cases. All assertions remain.
- Document the browser fixture's build and serving mode. No configured
assertion deadline, readiness deadline, retry count, or skip was added.

## Verification

- Final-head [Linux CI, attempt
2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35925901613/attempts/2):
**green**. All 52 check runs passed; two conditional checks were
skipped. The legacy Snyk status also passed. No pending or failed checks
remain.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` passed.
- `pnpm build` passed again after the final UI fix.
- Focused runtime suites: 38 passed, 3 existing platform skips.
- CLI invocation safety suite: 39 passed.
- Slack timing negative control: inserting a six-second delay before
reading the saved action fails the old assertion. All four revised
authorization/backoff cases pass with that same delay. The diagnostic
delay is not committed.
- Live update suites: 92 passed, including the new regression. UI
typecheck and token gates passed.
- Recovery browser negative control: the unchanged tests reproduced the
missing reply (1 failed, 9 passed). After the first-connection fix, all
six recovery paths passed twice (12 passed). Browser assertions and
deadlines are unchanged.
- Server typecheck passed after the Slack test adjustment.
- `GITHUB_WORKFLOW=PR pnpm test:run:general -- --group general-chat
--shard-index 0 --shard-count 3`: 342 passed. The other 682 tests belong
to the remaining shards; collection verified exact coverage.
- Final direct-source CLI launch: all five chat session tests passed.
- `PAPERCLIP_E2E_PORT=32993 PAPERCLIP_PLAYWRIGHT_CHANNEL=chrome pnpm
exec playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts
tests/e2e/agent-chat-sessions.spec.ts --repeat-each=3`: 15 passed,
including nine controlled reloads at 4x CPU throttling.
- `GITHUB_WORKFLOW=PR pnpm test:run:general -- --group
general-server-without-chat --shard-index 10 --shard-count 12`: 55 files
passed, 867 tests passed, 21 existing skips. An earlier run could not
initialize PostgreSQL because this Mac exhausted its System V
shared-memory slots. After reclaiming the orphaned segment from this
task's stopped browser server, the full shard passed.
- On final commit `1f1fafc08d`, [browser
4/8](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35925901613/job/107400837947)
passed all 16 tests; [browser
8/8](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35925901613/job/107400838155)
passed all 23 tests; [server
11/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35925901613/job/107400838328)
passed 887 tests with one existing skip. The readiness lifecycle case
took 1.842 seconds. Chat 1/3 also passed. All four jobs interrupted by
runner shutdowns passed unchanged on their single rerun.
- Greptile reviewed `1f1fafc08d`: **5/5**, with no unresolved comments.
- Full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped after confirming
failures outside this patch: a sibling `skills` directory shadows
bundled Slack/AgentMail skills; macOS rejects rename of read-only
skill-cache directories (`EACCES`, also reproduced in an isolated
filesystem probe); and the host exhausts PostgreSQL System V
shared-memory slots. Focused reruns confirmed these limits. The complete
Linux CI run is the repository-wide verification; the full local run is
not green.
- Baseline evidence: the original sidebar test failed on unchanged
master; a development-mode run at 4x CPU throttling passed six selected
cases, so CPU pressure alone did not reproduce the CI bootstrap stall.

## Risks

- Default browser tests now exercise the shipped static UI. They no
longer implicitly cover Vite middleware or HMR; use the development
server for those checks.
- The new browser startup test uses Chromium CDP, matching the only
configured browser project.
- Opening a live subscription now causes one active-query refresh to
close the initial event gap. This adds startup API reads but no
recurring poll.
- Runtime behavior and deadlines are unchanged except for error details.
The historical readiness stall remains unconfirmed; a green rerun alone
cannot establish its cause.
- Local verification runs on macOS. The runtime lifecycle checks also
passed on Linux CI.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The session identifies the model family as
GPT-6; an exact served model ID and context window size are not exposed.
Used reasoning, repository inspection, shell tools, code editing, and
test execution. No subagents were used.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#123` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — targeted suites passed;
full local host limits are listed above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-23 15:22:21 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip c65fc9e3c8 fix: recover authentication and browser connection failures (#13724)
fix: recover authentication and browser connection failures

Include connect timeouts in the bounded retry policy for idempotent actor
synchronization. Handle WebSocket constructor failures through existing
reconnect paths and preserve HTTP polling while realtime is unavailable.
Refresh visible company queries until the socket recovers and clear all
fallback timers on hiding or unmount.

Verify 172 focused tests, server/UI typechecks, UI build, and design token
gates. Full workspace build/typecheck require the unavailable Rust toolchain;
the full test run is tracked separately.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-20 12:43:25 -07:00