Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DottaandPaperclip 5b50c6b32c fix(teams): return saved resource links after catalog installation (#18923)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Catalog installation creates agents, projects, and routines in one
company.
> - The install result includes saved IDs but no links to those
resources.
> - A chat agent can describe a partial installation without giving the
operator a way to inspect it.
> - This change returns canonical links for saved resources and
documents them for API discovery.
> - The operator can use the returned links to inspect the actual
installation.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A catalog install can create the intended resources and report skill
warnings, while its response leaves callers to construct board URLs from
IDs. A native chat attempt described the resources and warned about an
incomplete skill, but omitted resource links in both its initial and
repeat replies.

**Expected behavior**

The installation response should provide canonical company-scoped links
for its saved agents, projects, and routines. It must preserve warnings
and omit links for rows without saved IDs.

**Steps to reproduce**

Install a catalog team through the API. Inspect its saved resource rows
and response. Before this change, the response has IDs and names but no
resource links.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Parent `e7549ab613` from master. Related #16495 changes comment
authorization metadata in the same OpenAPI file; it does not address
team installation responses. No duplicate team-link PR was found.

## What Changed

- Add typed `resourceLinks` entries with resource kind, saved ID, name,
and canonical company-scoped href.
- Read the company prefix with one bounded primary-key query before
import. Encode URL segments and use saved IDs, including IDs returned
for reused resources.
- Preserve the portability import result, skill preparations, warnings,
permissions, and collision behavior.
- Document the response and add service, native API wire, OpenAPI, and
real database regression coverage.

## Verification

- Parent service regression: 1 failed, 28 passed. The new failure was
the missing resource-link response.
- Owning service/native wire, route authorization, and OpenAPI suites:
72 passed.
- Real PostgreSQL catalog-install suite: 4 passed. Returned links match
persisted agent IDs and the company prefix.
- Shared and server TypeScript checks passed. Fresh shared/SDK builds
and the owning Runner TypeScript prerequisite passed.
- UI typecheck, Storybook catalog check, 30 catalog/map controls, and
token gates passed.
- Actual CI found an omitted required `resourceLinks` field in the
existing Storybook install fixture; that fixture is now synchronized.
The earlier response-status review correction is also retained: install
schema and wire control use actual HTTP 201. Final head
`0bca72cf1f7641fd842a04c5a75cae4bcc274f05` passed all 48 normal CI jobs,
including `ci / verify`: [run
41773413940](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41773413940).
Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved review threads. The optional
Paperclip review remains queued and its comment says work is paused. The
Superagent security scan is neutral; neither supplies completed
assessment credit.
- `git diff --check` passed.
- Setup failures were retained: incorrect test working directory,
sandbox listener denial, missing built SDK/Runner declarations, and
native library aliases not hydrated from the package directory.
Corrected setup used the owning build and shipped hydration script. No
assertions or deadlines were relaxed.
- Repository-wide tests/build were not run locally; the full normal CI
suite passed. A new native chat attempt has not run for this change. The
earlier chat attempt remains failed for missing links. Local response
coverage does not prove that a model will include the links in its next
reply.

## Risks

- This is an additive JSON response field. Manually constructed
TypeScript install results must include the new typed field.
- The query adds one company-prefix lookup per installation. It selects
one scalar by company primary key and runs before mutation.
- Supplying links reduces URL construction work but does not guarantee
model use. Native qualification is still required.

## Model Used

OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with reasoning, repository inspection, code
editing, and tool execution. The host did not expose the model
context-window limit.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All required normal CI gates are green; optional
incomplete/neutral assessments are disclosed above
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-04 07:01:08 -06:00
fff3832a01 [codex] Add teams catalog extraction (#7550)
Fixes #7551

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for AI-agent companies, and reusable
company/team setup is part of making those companies faster to launch.
> - The teams catalog work introduces app-shipped team templates that
can be browsed, previewed, and installed into a company.
> - Catalog installation crosses several contracts: bundled package
contents, shared API types, server import/install behavior, CLI
workflows, and the board UI.
> - Agents also need a safe path through catalog installs: scoped
company selection, explicit source policy, approval fallback for agent
creation, and preserved catalog provenance.
> - This pull request extracts the completed teams catalog branch into
one reviewable PR on top of `public-gh/master`.
> - The benefit is a reusable teams catalog foundation with server, CLI,
package, docs, and hidden UI surfaces kept in sync.

## What Changed

- Added the `@paperclipai/teams-catalog` package with bundled/optional
team definitions, generated manifest, validators, catalog builder tests,
and migration notes.
- Added shared teams catalog types/validators plus server routes and
services for listing, previewing, and installing catalog teams.
- Integrated catalog install with company portability, skill/source
policy checks, provenance metadata, origin hashes, target-manager
reparenting, and installed/out-of-date detection.
- Added CLI `teams` commands and agent-safe company selection behavior,
including `company current` and approval fallback for forbidden
agent-run installs.
- Added hidden Team Catalog UI/API/query surfaces, Storybook fixtures,
and targeted UI tests while keeping the UI route out of primary
navigation.
- Added docs for CLI/company/teams catalog behavior and removed
generated screenshot artifacts from the PR diff.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/company.test.ts
cli/src/__tests__/teams.test.ts
packages/teams-catalog/src/catalog-builder.test.ts
packages/teams-catalog/src/shipped-catalog.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/agent-permissions-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-skills-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/teams-catalog-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/teams-catalog-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/teams-catalog-install-no-overrides.test.ts
ui/src/lib/company-routes.test.ts ui/src/pages/TeamCard.test.tsx
ui/src/pages/TeamCatalog.test.tsx
ui/src/pages/useInstallTeamCatalogEntry.test.tsx`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/teams-catalog typecheck && pnpm --filter paperclipai
typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm
--filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- Confirmed branch is rebased onto `public-gh/master` (`78dc3625a`) and
`public-gh/master` is an ancestor of `HEAD`.
- Confirmed PR diff excludes `pnpm-lock.yaml`, `.github/workflows/*`,
generated screenshot images, and screenshot helper scripts.

## Risks

- Medium review surface: this crosses package generation, shared
contracts, server install behavior, CLI, docs, and hidden UI code.
- Catalog install behavior creates agents/projects/tasks/skills and must
keep company scoping, permissions, source policy, and provenance checks
strict.
- `pnpm-lock.yaml` is intentionally excluded per repo policy;
CI/default-branch automation owns lockfile refresh.
- The Team Catalog UI is included but hidden from primary navigation, so
future enablement should re-check visual QA before exposure.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
>
> ROADMAP checked: this aligns with reusable companies/templates and
plugin-adjacent onboarding work. This PR packages work already developed
on the Paperclip task branch for review.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 series coding agent in this Paperclip session;
exact runtime context window was not exposed. Used shell, git, `gh`, and
local test/typecheck tooling.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots, or documented why screenshots are intentionally omitted
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-05 12:55:49 -05:00