mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-12 22:56:58 +01:00
a4dbde6181bcc2bd4c3ad0443dc00eb4e040356d
9
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
124b2cd0ad |
fix(server): certify background deadlines for idle tenants (#19001)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Background services own future checks, retries, and recovery work. > - An idle tenant can stop only when a durable wake covers its remaining duties. > - The current alarm catalog covers several domains but leaves these owners blocked. > - A saved future timestamp alone cannot prove that reconstruction or admitted work has settled. > - This pull request binds durable domain snapshots to the actual registered worker revisions. > - The tenant can hand off supported future duties and retain all checks for uncertain or active work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No matching public issue was found. Related work: [domain deadline handoff #18656](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18656), [owned blocker diagnostics #18632](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18632), and [completed history proof #18646](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18646). The separate [native idle-session change #18988](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18988) covers runtime retirement. [Far-future retry re-probes #13534](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13534) changes recovery responsiveness after an upstream success; this change preserves existing retry decisions. **What happened?** Future status-card, external-object, skill-sync, watchdog, retry, and quota duties lacked complete owner-bound coverage in the idle deadline proof. A completed quota task could also retain its monitor policy and timestamp and remain blocked after the scheduler had disarmed it. **Expected behavior** A settled registered owner can hand off its exact supported future deadline. Active work, dirty reconstruction, transaction uncertainty, changed revisions, claims, unknown state, and unsupported duties keep the tenant awake. Completed history retains its data and stops recurring work when the owner has no remaining duty. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Produce a supported future duty through its normal service. 2. Let the registered worker finish reconstruction and admitted work. 3. Request an owned idle report with the negotiated domain deadline catalog. 4. Check the saved earliest deadline and generation before durable alarm registration. 5. Stop and reconstruct the worker. Check that ordinary admission and claims resume useful work once due. 6. Complete a quota task. Keep its saved policy and timestamp. Check that linked unfinished work still blocks sleep and that settled history does not. **Paperclip version or commit** The owned patch was qualified at `699c8569fa34338dd75cdc5731381ec1e2efdb45`. Publication head `491fac368ee72eaac8ae105d53e6bf6b305d8a6a` normally merges actual master `039e0dad2c51c80251e1302a19c5566e039c357a`. All 43 owned files are byte-identical. All 29 new upstream paths are preserved. The later normal current-master integration is `8c912e1ba4fc66397a7341ade59373af8075068f`, described separately below. **Deployment mode** Source checkout with real PostgreSQL 17 and a controlled local Node process. No deployed alarm, tenant suspension, database suspension, or fleet result is claimed. ## What Changed - Add registered-worker reconciliation revisions and invalidate them on stop. - Keep status-card, external-object, and skill deadline interpretation with their owners. - Reuse the watchdog classifier against the supplied database snapshot. - Validate the exact saved retry run and paired queued wake. - Validate legacy quota source bindings and the current assignee or reviewer policy. - Preserve common issue scope, dependency, sibling, and state checks for covered waits. - Compose normalized owner snapshots within the existing bounded deadline proof and recheck revisions after inspection. - Bind actual service and worker instances from server startup. Missing bindings preserve existing blockers. - Retain completed quota policy and timestamps while independently rejecting linked unfinished runs or wakes. - Block unconsumed budget evaluation inputs through the owning queue predicate. Accounting policy and settlement stay unchanged. - Bind completed quota history through fixed-size UUID-array parameters, preserve exact company/task/source associations, and guard external references before the run-ID join. - Batch watchdog subtrees and shared classifier facts without changing the 64-query or two-second proof budget; preserve exact company pairing for first-run evidence. - Extend production-path regression controls and document supported coverage and limits. ## Verification Current integration head: `688abc6cac6016b9fb50e5832f81e2975ed5d49f`. Fresh exact-head checks completed with **58 successes, three intentional skips and one neutral review**, including aggregate `ci / verify`. The complete current Greptile review is **5/5**. The complete current Ponytail verdict is **Ship (4/5)**, with only optional cleanup of an unused MCP proof input; both prior correctness findings are resolved. All review threads and nested pages were inspected. The normal master merges preserve the registered retry deadline owner and current startup completion log after the same readiness await. The earlier focused evidence below remains tied to its tested source revisions. Current-master integration `8c912e1ba4fc66397a7341ade59373af8075068f`: - Normally merge actual master `46fb933b0155d183ce64a8bdc4950d1b58c926f6`. Every nonoverlapping tree blob retains its owning parent across 14,044 paths. All 42 owner-only files and 15 critical binding/proof/readiness files remain byte-identical. Three automatic overlaps preserve the existing watchdog binding, conservative unavailable-reader fallback and optional actual owner arguments. The two scoped-deadline conflicts retain the entire upstream resource-reservation/mid-pass admission/abort algorithm inside the existing reconciliation revision/running/failure fence, with both parent test sets. - Actual TypeScript 7.0.2 server noEmit passed in 9.434 seconds, normal source declaration layers in 12.102 seconds, and four selected test/helper/config layers extending the actual CI configuration in 3.167 seconds. No compiler option weakening, heap override, donor declarations or SDK replacement stub. - Focused PG0 controls passed: 102 scheduler/proof/owner controls in 16.451 seconds, including all 21 scoped-deadline cases; 121 startup controls; and all 107 unchanged instance-settings route cases in 6.456 seconds. The latter first hit a local prewire-guard listener-registration race. Only the ignored guard was corrected to register the same actual OS-bound server port immediately after native listen returns. Closed, unknown, foreign, offhost and PG destinations remain blocked. Original failure evidence is retained; product code and assertions were unchanged. - The exact current UI policy command now reports zero findings (0.362 seconds); its seven scanner controls pass. The earlier dependent PR used an old scanner/source baseline under a newly enforcing trusted workflow and reported 397 findings. Carrying the genuine current master resolves that mismatch without editing unrelated UI sites or relaxing the gate. - Every meaningful worker checked its executing PID/thread/preload hash and matching receipt. PG0 controls opened no PostgreSQL sockets; all owned processes exited. Original dependency-cache/DNS, ignored-harness syntax/type and guard failures remain separate from product results. - This is fresh semantic and focused runtime qualification, not a local whole-repository or current-head PostgreSQL acceptance rerun. The upstream workspace-busy parked-retry/terminal-holder notification path remains unchanged by this merge and needs its separate current-graph producer check. Historical six-case/scale results below stay tied to their measured sources. A matching controlled default-cadence follow-up is in #19191; no fresh current-head two-cycle or deployed suspension claim follows from this merge. - All 59 exact-head check contexts now pass (55 success, one neutral, three intentional skips), plus the legacy security status. The complete edited Greptile review is 5/5 for this exact commit, with all root/nested pages inspected and no unresolved threads. Ponytail stopped without completing its new turn; it supplied no new verdict or finding. Prior actual findings remain addressed. Earlier scores/checks below belong to their explicit earlier commits. On frozen clean merged source `699c8569fa`: - Real PostgreSQL acceptance: **6/6 passed**,83.483 seconds wall. Actual retry producer creates the exact saved run/wake; stopped and reconstructed owner resumes through current admission, one durable start, real local process output and normal task completion. Includes cancellation, drain arrival, retained quota history with queued-run/wake negatives, watchdog review settlement and budget-input empty/pending/consumed control using the actual owner. - Affected coordinator, deadline, scoped-deadline, recovery and composed-proof controls: **78/78 in five files passed**,32.114 seconds wall, worker 1/no file parallelism. - `pnpm exec tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json`: **passed**,17.467 seconds. Native TypeScript 7.0.2 and Node 24.22.2. - PostgreSQL tests use one dedicated test database, matching fixture/admin URLs, pool limit four, one worker, and no embedded fallback. Every run recorded unchanged source hashes and a clean checkout. - The eight-second real-clock retry is a domain execution check. It is below the Cloud minimum wake lead and is not a positive accepted hosted sleep cycle. - The completed quota-history product failure and original fixture/protocol failures were preserved; the owning-reader fix passed a real PostgreSQL red/green regression before the fresh merged six-case pass. - After runtime completion, the dedicated database had zero other clients and no owned runtime processes. All three qualification process PIDs exited. The coordinator independently audits and drops the database. - Comment-only cleanup has equal strict TypeScript parser ASTs across 15 files. The final lexical audit finds no added comments relative to actual master. `git diff --check` passed. - Earlier retry fixtures omitted responsible-user membership, advanced JavaScript time past the real PostgreSQL lease clock, or produced stdout without normal task completion. Corrected fixtures use real membership, an eight-second real deadline, and ordinary task comment/completion. The last case exposed legitimate disposition repair rather than duplicate retry promotion. - The quota and watchdog controls first ran before admitted work or the existing 30-second reconstruction duty settled. The stronger tests require an interim blocked report and then exact settled-owner proof. Production deadlines were not changed. The separate completed-quota-history defect was fixed in its reader and verified with linked unfinished-run and wake controls. - The status/object and skill owners reviewed the actual final startup, route and post-backup bindings. Their domain source evidence carries where token-equivalent. The master coordinator coalescing change was reviewed separately. Historical domain PostgreSQL results are not presented as fresh full-suite results on this head. The later master merge adds retry predecessor cleanup checks under the existing issue claim lock. The source audit confirms unchanged saved deadlines and run/wake identities. The three actual retry lifecycle/cancellation/drain cases passed on the batched candidate with this parent (31.817 seconds). Those local dependency controls preceded the current exact-head remote run. Native backup preservation and TestOps changes from master are retained. No pass is inferred for changed dependency behavior solely from unchanged owned files. Review repair published as `643f1e7400`: - The original reader returned `unknown` after seven actual watchdog reviews settled across seven companies. The unchanged composed-report regression passed after batching; the final reader passed in 61.841 seconds, including active queued-work and stopped-owner rejection. - A separate two-company red/green control rejects terminal-run context from another company as first-run grace evidence. Shared facts are serialized once, with per-root IDs and review summaries. - The affected recovery, proof and diagnostic unit controls passed 47/47 (14.575 seconds). Startup owner-contract fixtures passed 121/121 (10.589 seconds). - Diagnostic PostgreSQL controls passed7/7 (12.406 seconds), including the normal budget-input producer and its exact blocker reason. Initial empty-state setup uses the same cleanup as per-case teardown when a dedicated test database is reused. - Actual repository `pnpm exec tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` passed 12.710 seconds with no heap override. Final source has no added code comments; whitespace checks pass. - The original query-budget failure, two-company discriminator, initial cross-suite fixture failure and an interrupted incorrect local-driver selector are retained separately. The interrupted run is not a pass. Independent cleanup found zero owned clients or runtime processes. Quota-scale repair published as `6696a37f8a`: - The exact 10,000-row completed-history case reproduced `MAX_PARAMETERS_EXCEEDED`:90,002 bound parameters exceeded the driver's 65,534 limit, and the composed report returned `unknown` despite settled owners. Original failure and actual driver diagnostics are retained. - Fixed pending-work queries use three typed UUID-array parameters plus the result limit, keeping exact company/issue/source tuple bindings. The primary run-ID column stays uncast; a guarded CASE validates the raw external reference before conversion. The 10,000-row cap and 64-query/two-second proof budget are unchanged. - The same 10,000-row composed-report case passed 18.860 seconds, with unfinished run/wake rejection, malformed-reference safety and conservative 10,001-row overflow. Its fixture derives retained history from the actual quota producer and normal task completion, expands valid persisted issue/source pairs, then starts the actual registered owners. - The existing actual quota producer case passed 14.187 seconds, including exact future deadline, retained completion history, unfinished work, real foreign-company source references and noncanonical/malformed references. - Affected owner/proof controls passed 22/22 (26.444 seconds). Production server noEmit passed 16.039 seconds. - CI on 643 identified TS7034/TS7005 in the settled-watchdog fixture's initially untyped collection. It is now explicitly typed. A separate affected-entry semantic check extending the repository's actual `server/src/__tests__/tsconfig.json` passed 15.093 seconds: six affected tests, two owner files, ambient declarations and current imported source, with unchanged strict/module/lib/path settings. The production server config excludes that test directory and is not presented as test-layer proof. No custom suppression or replacement SDK stub was added. - All runs were sequential with pool max 4, worker 1, source/config/command hashes and cleared inherited provider/LIVE/other-database variables. Cleanup found zero owned database clients or local runtime processes. At prior head `6696a37f8a5718cd0f79054969a0084462d41d47`, all required CI gates pass. The exact-head inventory has 55 successes, one neutral review and three intentional skips. Greptile is 5/5. The complete latest Ponytail verdict confirms the quota finding is fixed; its only remaining note is optional unused MCP proof state, not a behavior defect. All three review threads are resolved. The earlier 643 result remains historical. The repository-wide typecheck, tests, build and browser gates passed in the prior `6696a37f8a5718cd0f79054969a0084462d41d47` CI run. The new `8c912e1ba4fc66397a7341ade59373af8075068f` full CI also passes. They were not run as a full local workspace command in the focused PostgreSQL lease. Local evidence above uses bounded external databases and does not claim embedded-cluster, live-provider or deployed-alarm qualification. ## Risks - An unsupported or uncertain owner state must remain blocked. An optimistic exemption could lose work while compute is stopped. - Changes during reconstruction or inspection must invalidate the proof. A memory-only timer is not durable alarm coverage. - Current authorization, budgets, cancellation, accounting, and resource ownership still apply on dispatch. The proof does not grant execution authority. - The supported writer model uses in-process transaction signals and startup/resume reconstruction. Independent SQL writers and other replicas need an explicit wake contract. - Native, review, coalesced, and taskless retry variants remain conservative until their owner cases qualify. Reviewer quota and hosted alarm qualification remain open. - The shared catalog remains opt-in. Legacy callers and missing owner bindings retain their old blockers. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` was the configured model for the delegated service implementations and reviews. OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, performed managing review and integration. Both used repository tools and code execution. The exact served backend snapshots and context-window limits were not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass on the final merged head - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — exact current-head run passes - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups — complete current-head review and all paginated threads inspected - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
482ec0aea9 |
fix(native): run saved copy-back retries on schedule behind a slow export (#19145)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native runs copy their sandbox workspace back after the provider finishes. A failed copy-back saves a retry 30 seconds later, with a bound of 3 attempts. > - One shared delivery queue runs these retries. A pass of that queue ends only when its slowest check ends. > - A legitimate sandbox export can take 10+ minutes. While it runs, all other due retries wait. > - On staging, a run active across a deploy showed "Reconnecting" with an overdue retry for about 24 minutes. Its retries ran at +24 min and +3.5 min instead of +30 s. It settled only after about 32 minutes. > - This pull request lets idle check slots admit entries that come due during a pass. It does not overlap a running check's resource and does not start work after abort or drain. > - The benefit is that the existing 3-attempt bound settles a failing copy-back in about 1 minute, not after the slowest unrelated export. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native run whose result is durable but whose workspace copy-back failed stays in `running` with the label "Reconnecting" for a long time. Its saved retry time is in the past. The retry does not run until an unrelated slow copy-back in the same queue pass finishes. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start two native runs on different tasks with accepted results. 2. Let the copy-back of run A take many minutes. 3. Let the copy-back of run B fail. It saves a retry 30 seconds later. 4. Watch run B. Its retry does not run until run A's copy-back ends. **Expected behavior** Run B retries on its saved schedule. After 3 failed attempts it settles with `native_workspace_sync_out_retry_exhausted` and a recovery action, while run A continues. **Paperclip version or commit** master at |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e0c6992426 |
fix(heartbeat): prevent saved input starvation during queue reloads (#18819)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Accepted messages and task Retry requests use durable wake receipts. > - The recovery worker loads receipts in pages of 100 and checks batches of 25. > - Company activity can reload those pages before the pending batch drains. > - Reloads reset ready receipts' dispatch times and can repeatedly favor receipts already checked. > - This pull request preserves the priority of unchecked ready receipts so saved input can reach normal admission. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Saved input can remain deferred after the preceding run finishes. Repeated company eligibility changes reset the dispatch times of pending receipts during paginated reconstruction. A PostgreSQL regression checks only 75 of 178 receipts on the original code despite twelve eligibility changes. **Expected behavior** Each ready receipt must reach its admission check. Existing wait deadlines, retry backoffs, authorization, and execution gates must still apply. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Seed more than one page of deferred receipts. 2. Keep those receipts pending after their checks. 3. Send company eligibility notifications between scheduler passes. 4. Check that every receipt is reconsidered, including receipts later in the backlog. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `367f29478d`. **Deployment mode** Built from source with PostgreSQL. The defect occurs before provider execution. Related: #10195 reports a similar starvation symptom in a different promotion loop. #18621 added saved-input Retry after a successful run. This change fixes fairness in the deferred-receipt worker. ## What Changed - Add an optional entry merge callback to scoped deadline reconstruction. - Use it in the deferred-receipt worker to retain unread ready receipts' priority while refreshing their state. - Place receipts whose wait has expired into the ready queue during reconstruction. - Keep real wait, claim, and dispatch deadlines authoritative. - Add a paginated starvation regression, real process dispatch coverage, and GitHub lock-collision recovery coverage. - Document the recovery fairness rule. ## Verification - The PostgreSQL starvation regression checks only 75 of 178 receipts before the fix. It checks all 178 afterward, both with ordinary receipts and with expired execution waits. - Seven focused scheduler cases pass, including moved interrupt grace, moved native error deadline, fresh claim/wait deadlines, and unchanged-gate grace. - GitHub endpoint lock-collision recovery, retained board authority, HTTP Retry, and five current admission-gate cases pass. - Real process acceptance passes on the final code: task Retry crosses the repeatedly invalidated backlog, reconstructs its persisted queued run after a worker restart, saves `receipt-proof` in run output, and has one successor for the Retry receipt. The test holds executor capacity while advancing queue time, then starts fresh workers at PostgreSQL time before releasing a real process lease. The defect is in admission scheduling before provider execution; this acceptance uses PostgreSQL and a local process adapter. - The full workspace build and typecheck (`node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`) pass locally. The affected worker suites pass 52 of 53 cases together; the existing native multi-company batch case times out in that combined run and passes in isolation without code changes. All new regression and acceptance cases pass. - Local `pnpm test:run` stops in its first chat shard on three 15-second timeouts (Teams long native HTTP picture delivery, direct final-response materialization, and contended inbound notices). All three pass in isolation without code changes. Later full-suite groups did not run locally after that shard failure. - [The full GitHub Actions matrix passes](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41697489374) on `ac91df2cc6db6c77529d923177b375b8c92efd45`, including all general-test, serialized-server, browser, build, and typecheck jobs. Server shard 8 initially failed an upstream process-adoption test and passed its one rerun without code changes. - [Greptile is 5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18819#issuecomment-6612091535) on the same current head, with no actionable findings or unresolved review threads. The separate Paperclip Review check is neutral; its previous request was bound to an older commit. Focused command: ```sh pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/deferred-execution-receipt-work.test.ts server/src/__tests__/scoped-deadline-work.test.ts ``` ## Risks - Ready receipt order changes during repeated reconstruction. Admission still reads current durable state. - A ready receipt must not inherit an obsolete priority after it acquires a future deadline. The merge applies only when both pending and loaded entries are immediate. Deadline safety tests cover that boundary. - The merge callback is optional. Other scoped workers retain their current reconstruction behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` in Codex, max reasoning effort, with tool use and local code execution. The runtime does not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused regressions and acceptance; full-run timing limitations documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
bf7f77d8cd |
fix: avoid response recovery self-contention (#18715)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The server must present accepted agent responses as comments under current chat authority. > - The recovery worker can check four tasks at the same time. > - Different tasks can share a chat endpoint or external principal. Their authorization transactions then compete for endpoint or identity locks. > - A failed transaction leaves the accepted response pending and repeats its source queries on a later retry. > - This pull request groups checks that share a task, endpoint or principal before dispatch. It keeps every transactional authority check and lock. > - The benefit is less failed recovery work and prompt, exactly-once presentation of valid accepted responses. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17714 for a separate publication-commit lock-order fix. Refs #18686 for separate run-list JSON work. Neither changes this recovery admission path. **What happened?** A response-presentation worker reported `could not obtain lock on row in relation "chat_endpoints"`. Four real PostgreSQL recovery fixtures reproduced three such failures in one pass with no external ingress. The worker grouped by task, while authorization locks shared endpoints and principals. Review also exposed two valid Slack endpoints in one workspace that share one principal and compete for its try-advisory lock. **Expected behavior** Recovery checks that share an endpoint or principal should retain task order without competing with one another. Unrelated endpoints should make progress. The server must still reject stale authority and retry legitimate external contention. **Steps to reproduce** Run the shared-endpoint regression or the portable comparison helper linked below. The fixture creates four accepted historical responses for distinct tasks and principals on one actual endpoint. ## What Changed - Read optional endpoint and principal scheduling hints through a company-scoped join to the canonical wake action. The join does not change eligibility or grant authority. - Extend existing bounded check groups to merge intersecting resource keys. Preserve task order, transitive conflicts, independent-group progress, shutdown, drain and pending scopes. - Add real PostgreSQL controls for shared endpoints, a principal shared across two endpoints, an observed blocked transaction with independent endpoint progress, external locks, exact selected output, and endpoint revocation despite a forged hint. - Add a portable helper that materializes the pinned baseline with `git show`, runs the existing real fixture, retains results, and restores temporary files. ## Verification - Final principal-extension head `57047441b28765ed1cf49b8924efc69f5c03dcb4`: 34 focused scheduler/chat controls passed on Node 24.22.2 / pnpm 9.15.4. Independent exact-head source review is green. Full local `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass on this head. Fresh Greptile and Paperclip reviews are both 5/5 with no findings. All 59 final-head contexts are complete: 55 success, 3 skipped, and the neutral Paperclip review at 5/5. There are no failures or pending checks. - Earlier endpoint-only head `eea437e7edbe7eb41eb880d4d8fd6d99a9c247da`: full local typecheck/build and all remote CI passed. The redundant local full suite was interrupted for this review fix after 956 passing chat cases; it is not a full local pass. - Final shared-principal counts-only comparison completed the same two exact responses: product calls 165 → 147, rows 114 → 100, outer contention failures 1 → 0. SQL query errors stayed zero; advisory-lock refusal is not a failed SQL query. - The earlier endpoint-only study completed five alternating pairs / ten measured runs: median calls 443 → 293, rows 314 → 200, query errors 6 → 0 for four exact responses. Its instrumented shared-host CPU data predates the principal extension and is not a final-head or hosted CPU claim. Retry clocks were accelerated; wall time is not hosted latency. - [Raw samples, final principal work counts, portable commands and failure accounting](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/57047441b28765ed1cf49b8924efc69f5c03dcb4/doc/performance/2026-11-03-response-presentation-contention.md). - Initial server4 CI reported three provider calls instead of two in the unchanged Anthropic identity fixture. The exact local case passed; the full 88-case file passed with observations showing the two expected identity-route calls. The third CI call's origin remains unknown. One bounded rerun of the failed job and its dependent CI aggregate passed. No assertion or source change was made for that failure. - The causal benchmark baseline worker/query is `82c033ed127d07862e6765aa4b69a3cf339bde81`. The PR base is `36df8933f0`. They are not claims about the currently serving revision. ## Risks - Connected resource groups can reduce parallelism when tasks link several endpoints. This preserves the existing task ordering contract. - Missing or stale endpoint/principal hints retain current transactional checks. Other workers and ingress can still cause legitimate NOWAIT retries. - There is no schema, API, permission or provider-transport change. Endpoint revocation and company isolation remain enforced by their existing owners. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`), with tool use and code execution, produced and reviewed this change. The runtime does not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
453f5fbb78 |
perf(external-objects): schedule scoped refresh obligations (#18384)
Reviewed and verified at
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
42fd568cf8 |
Drive issue recovery from committed changes and exact deadlines (#18402)
Reviewed and verified at
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c2971badde |
perf(server): recover independent native replies concurrently (#18421)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work for AI agents. > - A native run can commit its result before its reply is saved. > - The response recovery worker saves replies from those committed results. > - It checks each candidate in series, so one task can delay unrelated tasks. > - This pull request checks up to four independent tasks at once. > - Each task keeps serial checks, and the existing coordinator owns retries and shutdown. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Recovery of committed native task replies. **Current behavior** The worker checks one candidate at a time in a batch of up to 25. A database lock or a slow read for one task delays replies for other tasks. **Proposed behavior** Check up to four company-and-task groups at once. Check candidates within each group in their existing order. Keep the current batch limit and company selection. **Reason and benefit** A ready task reply can be saved while another task waits for a database lock. The change reduces waiting under a reply backlog. **Breaking changes** Replies for different tasks can be saved in a different order. There are no API or schema changes. Other deadline workers keep serial dispatch. Related work: #17696 adds the recovery worker. #17501 reduces its read payloads. #18367 adds its timing spans. These changes are already merged. The PR search found no open change that adds this concurrency. ## What Changed - Add optional keyed concurrency to the shared scoped deadline worker. - Enable a limit of four for native response recovery, keyed by company and task. - Await all active checks before the pass ends. Retain per-candidate failure backoff, drain behavior and pending work. - Test concurrency limits, task order, company separation, drain/resume, shutdown, retries and idle wake behavior. - Add a PostgreSQL regression that holds one task's finalization row lock while a second task saves its exact accepted reply. - Document the worker's concurrency and sleep contract. ## Verification - The PostgreSQL lock regression fails with serial dispatch. It passes with this change. Both accepted replies are saved once after the lock is released. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/scoped-deadline-work.test.ts server/src/__tests__/delivery-work-coordinator.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-work-batch.test.ts server/src/__tests__/deadline-work.test.ts server/src/services/execution-preparation-timing.test.ts` — 55 tests pass. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/presentation-ownership-read.test.ts` with its documented dedicated PostgreSQL URL — 21 tests pass. The disposable database was dropped. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passes. - `pnpm build` — passes. - One matched local replay with 25 older pending replies and one fresh reply used the real worker, a 10-connection PostgreSQL pool and 8 ms delay in each network direction. The saved fresh reply was first observed after 29.193 s with serial dispatch and 9.798 s with this change. All 26 replies were saved exactly once in both runs, with no worker errors. Both disposable databases were dropped. This is one synthetic workload pair, not a staging measurement. - `pnpm test:run` was attempted. Embedded PostgreSQL could not initialize its template after five attempts, so the broad run was stopped. The changed PostgreSQL tests pass on the separate local server. Remote CI is green. This PR does not claim a measured staging speedup. - The [first CI browser shard](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41162257463/job/124422204506) failed during company cleanup after its task assertions and empty-run check passed. Company deletion hit the `activity_log_company_id_companies_id_fk` constraint. The fixture uses paused process agents and reported no runs. The one failed-jobs rerun passed all 45 browser tests. All CI checks are now green. ## Risks - Four checks can use more database connections than serial recovery. The limit applies to this queue only; the batch limit stays at 25. - The shared helper has more dispatch logic. Its default remains serial. Tests cover task order, retry deadlines, drain and waiting for active checks during shutdown. - This improves reply recovery under backlog or lock contention. It does not establish a target for total agent-turn latency. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with code editing, tool use and local test execution. This session does not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e93732c3d4 |
fix(server): deliver voice replies from commits and saved deadlines (#17578)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Phone calls receive approved answers from the existing chat publication queue. > - The chat maintenance timer checks for voice replies every second, including when no reply is ready. > - A reply can be saved before its publication commits. An early wake alone can miss that final transition. > - Existing session, reply, publication, and action rows already record delivery and recovery work. > - This pull request uses committed changes and saved deadlines to drive phone reply delivery. > - Empty reply queues become quiet while authorization, ordering, and uncertain-send protection remain in place. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Stacked on #17576. Related delivery infrastructure: #15625. Related voice connection work: #11418. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Background phone reply delivery and recovery of abandoned dispatch intents. **Current behavior** Chat maintenance calls voice reply delivery every second. It also scans old dispatch intents. Publication transport starts a direct push before the final publication commit. The timer masks that timing gap. **Proposed behavior** Committed publication, reply, session, and configuration changes wake the shared coordinator. Ready replies drain in bounded passes. Saved rate-limit and dispatch-expiry deadlines retain recovery. An empty queue or a permanent delivery barrier has no recurring reply scan. **Reason and benefit** Remove recurring SQL from idle phone reply delivery without dropping replies, replaying uncertain sends, or adding a queue table. **Breaking changes** No API or schema change. Explicit manual recovery remains available. Inbound admission cleanup, history retention, and reports remain on their current paths for separate migrations. ## What Changed - Extract ordered reply state and multipart policy within the voice owner. Retain current authorization and atomic dispatch claims. - Register a scoped reply worker with startup reconstruction, fair work batches, failure backoff, drain/resume handling and shutdown ownership. - Extend the existing shared dispatcher with normalized partial-page results to preserve the bounded parent recovery contract. Existing complete-array consumers retain their calls. - Signal before relevant writes in their existing transactions. Both normal publication completion and operator resolution wake the actual conversation after commit. - Bound reply inventory to 100 total headers per refresh. Preserve partial scans, concurrent changes and newer denied-call restoration obligations across reconstruction. - Track abandoned dispatch actions independently of live calls. Quarantine expired intents without resending them. - Use existing active-call authorization checks to reactivate replies that were previously denied. Healthy call inspections do not rescan empty reply queues. - Remove the periodic reply scan and the early direct publication push. Keep provider requests outside database transactions. ## Verification Published head: `1435cab10be3f95c38ab6672d2a890ae49e9d300`. Voice recovery #17576 has landed at master `e1ba77f06771a27114b3999004b0ca5e3c172dd4`. A normal merge reconciles squash ancestry while preserving the complete reviewed 31-file reply patch byte for byte and all unrelated master changes. The PR now targets master; fresh exact-head CI and Greptile are required. The prior 449-case/typecheck/build results below cover the identical owned source, not a new full-suite run. - **449 distinct targeted cases pass**: 111 complete voice-store/reply; 19 complete parent recovery; and 319 complete tool-gateway, secret-proposal, shared dispatcher/coordinator/batching/startup/hostname cases. Production server typecheck and build pass. The policy checker and its Node tests pass. Later edits record evidence only. - Two real normal-publication/operator-resolution tests seed 105 unrelated calls and 105 future dispatches. Five publications selected **1,065/1,060 inventory rows before repair**; both paths now pass the same **125-row total budget** and deliver every answer once. This counts selected SQL results, not physical tuple visits or host savings. - Publication commits now signal their actual conversation. The voice reader returns at most 100 total session/action headers per refresh, preserves phase/cursor state and retries, and resets on worker registration. Current-state checks and dispatch claims still own provider effects. The 105-action case measures the page cap, restarts the same owner during reconstruction, waits at saved future deadlines and quarantines every abandoned action without resending. - A real 403 fixture proves that an older broad scan cannot erase a denied call first observed behind its cursor. Its owner callback still emits the committed restoration wake after scan completion. The existing actual-service authority-restoration and final-publication timing tests remain in the full suite. They are not replaced by direct helper calls. - Guarded removal of conversation scoping, cursor reset or the denial revision fence fails the intended budget, 100-versus-5 restart or missing committed-wake assertion; source is restored. An initial shadowed fixture name and an inadequate due-action reset probe are retained as failed attempts in the [current audit](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/d2c0a7de8c3e9cac8382b1268f3f5d883a2067b3/doc/plans/2026-10-25-voice-reply-delivery-sleep-audit.md#publication-inventory-and-paging-acceptance-october-28). - Parent recovery still passes paging, restart, behind-cursor insertion, feature changes, actual disablement, quiet health observations, current authority, exact-scope failure fences and wildcard-failure isolation through the shared worker. Four existing array-based worker consumers retain their API and pass their full suites. - The two voice fixtures self-migrate separate empty databases. Legacy tool-review/secrets suites use separate migrated clones. Earlier full-local attempts remain limited by embedded PostgreSQL setup and are not passing full-matrix claims. Older counts apply only to their stated revisions. Fresh exact-head Greptile, Ponytail if present, security and all CI remain merge gates. No live-provider, multi-writer, external-wake, deployed-sleep or savings claim is made. ## Risks - Missing a supported producer can strand work. Tests cover real enqueue, retrieval, normal publication, and operator publication paths. Startup reconstructs existing records. - Signals cover the process-local database owner. Independent SQL writers or other replicas need their own wake contract. - Authority restoration relies on the existing live-call recovery check. This dependency must be preserved if that owner changes later. - A provider acceptance receipt does not prove speech. Unknown outcomes remain blocked from automatic resend. - This change does not extend Cloud alarms, allow sleep during live calls, or prove deployed suspension or cost savings. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 via Codex, with repository inspection, reasoning, code execution and test tools. The runtime does not expose a more specific deployment identifier or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used with the available version and capability details - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket identifier - [x] I have run the selected tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
623f1dc289 |
fix(server): schedule secret-proposal expiry from committed changes (#17446)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents can propose secrets and bindings for approval. > - Pending proposals already contain their expiry and encrypted value. > - The server scans for expired proposals on every maintenance tick, even when none exist. > - Committed proposal changes and saved expiry times provide the required triggers. > - This PR uses those triggers and preserves scrubbing, approval checks, and recovery. > - Empty and completed proposal history no longer causes recurring expiry queries. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17443. This is the second PR in the sleep migration stack and targets its branch. **What problem does this solve?** The periodic proposal scan contacts PostgreSQL when no proposal needs maintenance. That obstructs idle database behavior across tenant instances. **What is the proposed solution?** Use transaction-aware notifications for creation and resolution. Reconstruct the earliest pending expiry at startup. Run cleanup at that deadline, or retry while reconciliation remains unfinished. **Why is this useful?** It removes an idle scan while retaining security checks and physical ciphertext cleanup. No queue table or migration is required. ## What Changed - Added intent notifications before secret/binding creation, approval, terminal transitions, and linked interaction resolution. The existing outer transaction owns settlement. - Kept expiry selection, ciphertext scrubbing, dependent rejection, and authorization in the secret-proposal service. - Registered a startup and deadline worker in place of the aggregate maintenance sweep. Empty/terminal states disarm; overdue batches and failures retain retries. - Reused shared scoped deadline dispatch for secret expiry. The service owns company-filtered SQL and expiry policy. Custom-image expiry continues to use `registerDeadlineWork`. - Added real PostgreSQL producer, outer-transaction, concurrent-write, expiry, restart, interaction resolution, and drain/resume tests. Updated startup wiring fixtures and documented the supported writer/lifecycle contract. ## Verification - Landing reconciliation at `c10eb1bcf752b058713e05d3345e5cf38dd3fa72`: 160 tests pass across the complete secret-proposal, scoped deadline, company batch, coordinator, startup, custom-image service and custom-image worker suites; no cases skipped in the accepted runs. Server typecheck passes. This integrates master after #17443 landed; fresh remote CI and Ponytail review are required before merge. Current head: `5bbe17ad9ebc4573b08ed1a9323644ef9608ca09`. This remains a single-duty PR stacked on #17443. - Integrated pinned master `8548173fc9efdc0fa07644fb92dcc0b6851a95e5` with normal merges. Every branch passed generated-schema checks and its target-branch migration-order gate. Existing SQL is unchanged; the 25 stack migrations follow master’s new migration. - Duty-specific producer coverage, lifecycle tests, and earlier failure records: [2026-10-08-instance-sleep-and-scheduler-inventory.md](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/5bbe17ad9ebc4573b08ed1a9323644ef9608ca09/doc/plans/2026-10-08-instance-sleep-and-scheduler-inventory.md), [2026-10-24-recurring-server-sleep-stack.md](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/5bbe17ad9ebc4573b08ed1a9323644ef9608ca09/doc/plans/2026-10-24-recurring-server-sleep-stack.md). - Combined tip `51e6cbe67979b55b340ea9f0f434c5b5c682ccd6`: **355 startup/cancellation/recovery/dispatch/preservation tests**, **75 connection-management tests**, and production server typechecking pass. These combined checks do not mean every intermediate PR independently ran the full repository suite. - Real master-to-stack database upgrade passes: **379 unchanged prior migration receipts plus 25 new migrations**, with the gateway responsibility fixture preserved. - Owning-branch checks: 84 runner installation/settlement cases plus runner typechecking and generated TypeScript/Rust profile agreement; 253 GitHub review workflow cases. Stop-attribution and held-worker readiness regressions failed before their fixes. - Failure accounting: the initial combined run passed 349 cases and failed six idle assertions in a reused preservation database containing old cancelled runs. Repeating the combined command with a fresh preservation database passed. Earlier invalid project selection, merge import/type errors, and the interrupted full local suite are not counted as passing checks. - **Latest-head CI and review remain required.** Prior CI findings include GitHub idle observation, route teardown, attention cleanup, touch-picker E2E, workspace health, and voice-cleanup timing; local passes do not erase those failures. No full local repository-suite, deployed sleep, fleet cost, or live Copilot qualification claim is made. ## Risks - Notifications cover supported writers sharing the database signal owner. Independent SQL writers and other process roots require a separate ingress contract; startup recovery alone is not live replica support. - The shared coordinator and scoped worker also serve later stack duties. Their defaults remain intact; existing voice, chat, native, and startup consumers are included in integrated verification. - Startup now checks overdue proposals immediately. During drain, physical cleanup waits; approval still rejects expired proposals synchronously. - Each due company pass remains bounded to 100 rows. Failed scopes back off from 30 seconds to five minutes; healthy overdue work keeps draining. Self-generated write hints coalesce and do not erase a failed sweep's backoff. - Heartbeat-disabled behavior and Cloud sleep-safety gates remain unchanged. This does not establish deployed suspension or external wake coverage. Tool review and gateway token cleanup remain separate slices. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and code execution. The exact serving model identifier and context window were not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |