Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DottaandPaperclip 27d35314be feat: connect experimental Cursor Cloud to native Runner (#18069)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents at work.
> - Native Runner owns execution and task authority.
> - Operators need an explicit native Cursor Cloud choice.
> - Tools/files need company, task, session and run scope.
> - This connects setup and lifecycle to Runner Core.
> - Legacy agents retain their selected runtime/history.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Depends on #18068. Managed-only API placement and API-owned Stop
containment are in #18310. Refs #5664, #11803, #17299, and #17471. No
duplicate native integration was found.

## What Changed

- Add explicit native setup, Test, saved settings and dispatch with
no-prompt account/catalog/callback checks.
- Scope MCP to company, agent, task, session and run through
authenticated HTTPS. Register verified artifacts/work products; preserve
unpriced accounting, completion and budgets.
- Connect Question/Plan continuation, cold handoff and admitted fresh
sessions; recheck waiting admission under the task lock.
- Present audited Stop intent while preserving physical containment
proof; bound typed Stop metadata. Preserve title edits through
preference/navigation readiness.
- Select one live/history representation per run to prevent duplicate
settled cards. Integrate upstream task/read-state/retry/schema contracts
and repair two test fixtures.

## Verification

Core #18068 merged normally as `3910352c923a`. Product head
`5a60f541c982` has passing repository CI/build/browser checks, including
required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`, plus a fresh exact-head Greptile
5/5 review with zero unresolved threads. Two non-required external app
checks remain pending: Paperclip Review is queued waiting for its
assigned agent; Superagent Security Scan is reviewing the diff. These
are not claimed completed. The normal merge endpoint enforces the
repository rules; no policy or status override is used. The dependent
Top PR is addressing its fresh deferred-Stop review finding.

Product `5a60f541c982` passed 270 UI and 20 selected
Cloud/native/disk-full tests, UI/server typechecks, tokens and maps.
Top’s clean normal merge passed tokens/maps/diff checks; its matrix is
pending. Earlier receipts retain Core’s 47 Rust, 4 compiled-native
retirement and 19 settlement controls, normal Runner build, and runtime
9af build/recursive typecheck. Reproduced loading/shutdown CI fixture
failures passed 7/7 browser and 121/121 unit tests, including a
broken-unsubscribe negative control. No timeout/oracle was relaxed.

The actual-parent restack adopts 75 mainline paths, including
schema/permission and generic runtime changes, beyond the prior two
fixture repairs and client projection fix. The full difference from
hosted `9af1a5de42a2` is therefore larger than four files; backend
source also differs. The merged config-read checks match Core391, and
the Cursor placement/runtime/relay/selection modules match frozen9af;
selected affected regressions pass. Paid proof keeps its actual 9af
source/image identity. The separately tested live/history card fix is
not claimed deployed on that host.

On 9af, original saved settings survived reopening and fresh no-prompt
Test authenticated catalog/model/binding; no new Save is claimed. Fresh
Linux admission passed. With `claude-sonnet-4-5`, Artifact downloaded
exact 27 bytes and matched 121 canonical identities in complete
S3-served history. First Stop’s strict quiet FAILED on a 10.373-second
gap despite independent cancellation/no late artifact. One targeted
unchanged-sampler retry retained all 24 samples: 35.076 seconds quiet /
maximum gap 4.584 seconds, 67 ordered canonical identities, and separate
CANCELLED/artifact-absent status after the original 180-second deadline.
The pre-reload duplicate settled card is disclosed. Exact-ID cleanup for
the three new provider agents is awaiting authorization, so full grades
and the fresh Artifact’s post-cleanup download remain blocked. A
historical deleted-provider artifact was newly downloaded on 9af;
original F226 Question/Plan/reconnect and cleanup proof keep their
identities.

Retained failures: stale fixture 132/133; E8 48/135 with 87 reset-hook
failures; Mac 17 SQL failures/skips; earlier
title/startup/custody/Stop/deletion failures with unknown causes/bounded
recoveries; `dea023` Stop’s warning/50 duplicate identities; pre-repair
ACK and original Core CI failures. WSP’s 251-assertion, 7/8-suite
attempt failed physical PostgreSQL teardown; the unchanged wrapper rerun
passed 128. Retry alone establishes no cause or full local-suite pass.
All paid attempts remain recorded; vendor dollar cost is UNKNOWN.

## Risks

Experimental: Cursor independently acknowledges neither the effective
model nor instruction digest before the first prompt. Explicit values
are submitted and checked through behavior; unpriced provider dollar
cost stays UNKNOWN.

Callbacks need authenticated reachable HTTPS. Scope, revocation,
budgets, completion and cleanup remain authoritative. Operator Stop
intent is separate from physical containment. Saved legacy agents retain
their selected runtime. Prior shared title-save/deletion failures remain
disclosed.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, assisted with reasoning, repository tools,
code execution, browser verification, and delegated code review. The
serving model’s exact API ID and context window are not exposed. No
value is inferred from the model catalog.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used and the limits of available model
metadata
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have linked public issues or described the issue in this PR
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues
or links
- [x] My branch describes the change and contains no internal ticket ID
- [x] I have run the scoped local tests reported above; pending gates
are stated separately
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented the risks
- [x] All required CI gates pass on the current head
- [x] Fresh Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved findings on the current
head
- [x] I will address all reviewer comments before requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 09:01:39 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip f6fc336a35 fix(ui): reveal task conversations without loading layout shifts (#18545)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Tasks combine saved messages, documents, run output, monitors, and
decisions.
> - Compact history makes long tasks load quickly.
> - The loading view still showed the real task header before the thread
scrolled to recent messages.
> - Different loading frames also changed the viewport, composer bounds,
and header typography.
> - This pull request uses one loading frame and reveals the prepared
conversation once.
> - The benefit is a stable first view without a material loading-speed
penalty.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A cold task open could show a generic skeleton, then the real title and
monitor above placeholder messages, then jump to recent content. The
loading view changed width on desktop and height on mobile. Its title
line height differed from the real title.

**Expected behavior**

Keep the loading viewport and composer in place. Prepare the initial
reading position out of view. Reveal the recent conversation once its
data, fonts, scroll position, and composer bounds settle. Cap the font
wait at three seconds if the font host does not answer.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Open a task with a long title, long saved replies, document cards, a
monitor, and a pending decision.
2. Reload it with CPU and network throttling.
3. Watch the header appear above placeholders, then move offscreen when
the recent conversation appears.

**Paperclip version or commit**

e122478368. The synthetic baseline recorded 10 animation frames with a
real header visible before the conversation was ready.

**Deployment mode**

Built from source. Local production previews used the same disposable
PostgreSQL fixture and API.

Related work: #17593, #16878, #18092, and #18461 preserve compact
startup and saved-card behavior. Older open PR #14667 addressed
transcript reveal and reading anchors; this change targets the remaining
loading-frame transition on current master.

## What Changed

- Prepare task data while the personal layout preference loads. Keep the
temporary page hidden until the correct layout is known. This removes a
12 px mobile header change.
- Share one matching loading frame across task metadata and history
preparation. Use the real composer surface and dock geometry for its
placeholder.
- Keep the real title and monitor concealed until the viewport, scroll
position, composer, and fonts settle. Bound a stalled font request to
three seconds.
- Reserve the final chat viewport and breadcrumb identifier position.
Mount task properties after the personal preference resolves.
- Match the loading title typography to the selected task interface,
including Classic.
- Add normal-CI browser coverage for rich tasks, Classic startup and
typography, mobile layout selection, and stalled fonts. Preserve the
outage recovery assertions.
- Add Design Guide examples and an optional retained fixture with 200
long messages, documents, a PR card, a monitor, and a pending
confirmation. Disable both interval and on-demand agent wakes in this
fixture.

## Verification

- Final UI source: `8398af3493`. The later commits change tests or merge
master. The recorded production build is `99867e2dc3`; its UI source is
identical to the final PR head.
- All 10,263 UI tests pass: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest
run`. Workspace typecheck and the full production build pass. Token
gates, module boundaries, map validation, and diff checks pass.
- Task browser checks pass 40 cases. Shared chat passes 22 cases. The
normal-CI loading and outage recovery suite passes all 13 cases on the
final head.
- The eight rich loading cases cover direct and list entry, delayed
fonts, and delayed personal preferences on desktop and mobile. At 4× CPU
slowdown and 80 ms latency, each records zero real-header frames before
reveal. Loading-frame, composer, and initial reading-position movement
are 0 px. Title typography matches.
- The normal browser suite also verifies that unresolved mobile layouts
stay hidden, the selected mobile viewport stays fixed, and a seeded
Classic loading title matches the resolved title after an uncached
reload.
- Cold speed: five fresh contexts per variant and viewport, alternating
before/after order. Same local API and synthetic fixture; 4× CPU
slowdown, 80 ms latency, 1.18 MB/s download. No interception,
recordings, builds, or test suites during measurement. Desktop median:
3578 ms before, 3572 ms after. Mobile median: 3500 ms before, 3476 ms
after. Sample ranges overlap.
- The unmodified baseline records 10 real-header frames before
readiness. The final eight-case matrix records zero. Local recordings
and failed prototype evidence are retained outside the repository. No
private staging content is published in this PR.
- CI initially counted hidden zero-size elements as visible frames. Its
saved data confirms the `(0, 0, 0, 0)` entries. Both browser samplers
now ignore those entries and retain all visible geometry checks. The
corrected local suite passes.
- The default `pnpm test:run` command stopped in the unchanged server
chat integration shard with `No test found ... in lines ...` and 1817
skipped tests. This is not a local full-suite pass. One unchanged
AgentActionButtons test also failed during a concurrent run; all 37
cases pass in isolation, and the full 10,263-test UI rerun passes
without source changes to that component.
- Final-head [CI
passes](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41320240728)
at `d1ef4a955f`. No checks are failed or pending. Greptile and Ponytail
Paperclip Review both report 5/5 for that exact head. All review threads
are resolved.
- The fix is not deployed to staging.

## Risks

- First reveal waits for stable geometry and fonts, with a three-second
font cap. A font that arrives after this degraded-mode cap can still
change text metrics. The existing history deadline still exposes usable
content if another dependency stalls.
- The loading frame cannot predict arbitrary conversation content. The
real content remains concealed until its initial position is ready.
- The shared thread also serves agent chat. Its browser startup and
scroll journeys are included in final verification.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and
browser inspection. The host did not expose a more specific model ID or
the context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-02 08:13:34 -06:00