mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-13 15:55:46 +01:00
a3d43b7bfdceada2ff487a9957577486aa9ab413
2503
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
aaf1337c7b |
fix(slack): require mentions only for channel roots (#20821)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents for work. > - Slack connects people to those agents through channels and threads. > - A mention can start a conversation without making the bot answer all channel traffic. > - The current setting also requires mentions on every thread reply. > - This interrupts an existing conversation and can cancel a queued reply. > - This change requires mentions on channel roots and allows replies without a mention. > - People can continue a thread without adding the bot name to each message. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The Slack connection setting that requires an at-mention. **Current behavior** When the setting is on, a channel thread reply must mention the bot. The delivery and execution checks reject a reply that has no mention. **Proposed behavior** Require a mention on a top-level channel message. Allow replies in existing threads without a mention. Keep the current DM access controls. **Reason and benefit** A person can continue an existing conversation without repeating the bot name. **Breaking changes** Existing connections with the setting on will accept thread replies without a mention. The saved setting, default value, and API field stay the same. ## What Changed - Rename the control to **Require at-mention in channels**. Explain the thread and DM rules in the help text and operator documentation. - Keep the mention policy in the Slack module. Use the thread root and message IDs to identify a reply. - Call that policy from durable admission, wake authorization, and queued run start. These shared paths must enforce the same setting when a delivery resumes. Other providers keep their current behavior. - Update PostgreSQL integration tests for thread replies, DMs, queued deliveries, and combined wake inputs. Add tests that reject incomplete reply identity. ## Verification - Reproduced rejected thread replies and cancelled queued reply runs before the fix. - Passed 16 focused PostgreSQL integration cases after the fix. - Passed 71 tests on revision `31b1adede2b92bad24b8fa21b8f6fffa9bd26d04` after the rebase. This includes the full durable wakeup suite, Slack policy tests, and eight selected Slack delivery cases. - Command: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/chat-channels/slack/wake-authority.test.ts server/src/__tests__/durable-chat-wakeup.test.ts server/src/__tests__/chat-channels.integration.test.ts -t "at-mentions by default|thread replies without mentions|rechecks queued Slack|preserves running Slack tool authority|Slack channel mention policy|durable inbound chat scheduler receipts"`. - Strengthened the queued-root test to check the mention-rejection reason and content redaction. A temporary change that disabled mention enforcement caused this test to fail with the unrelated-message reason. The real policy is restored. - Removed the added source comments to follow the contribution rules. - `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs` and `git diff --check` pass. - `pnpm verify` returns exit 2 because the operator documentation is a global CI input. Required CI must supply the wider coverage. - Local preflight installed dependencies and built the plugin SDK. It could not build Runner Rust binaries because this environment has no `cargo` executable. The focused server tests run without those binaries. - Live Slack and browser tests were not run. This change uses the existing provider message and thread identities. - Required CI passed on `31b1adede2b92bad24b8fa21b8f6fffa9bd26d04`: [PR workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/43035551294), including typecheck, build, server/chat tests, Runner checks, and browser E2E. Current-head Greptile and Paperclip reviews are both 5/5 with no open findings. ## Risks - Existing connections with mention gating on will now accept unmentioned thread replies. This is the intended behavior change. - A missing or invalid thread or message ID does not grant the reply exception. - No schema migration is required. Destination, sender, and company access checks stay in place. - The existing chat integration test file is large. This change updates its current Slack cases to reuse the full delivery and authorization fixture. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning and code execution tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
123ee31552 |
fix(ui): omit task IDs from parent breadcrumbs (#20804)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Task headers show a path from the parent task to the current task. > - The parent link adds a task number before its title on desktop. > - That extra number makes the parent title change when users open the task. > - This pull request shows the parent title without its number at every width. > - Users can follow the parent link with a consistent task title. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #20366 added parent task navigation. #10933 added the current task number. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Parent links in task header breadcrumbs. **Current behavior** A desktop parent link includes its task number. A private parent chip also shows its number on desktop. **Proposed behavior** Show only the parent title at all widths. Show Private for a private parent. Keep the current task number, title limits, and responsive truncation. **Reason and benefit** The parent title stays the same when the user follows the link. ## What Changed - Remove the parent identifier from the task page breadcrumb data. - Remove the unused viewport dependency from the breadcrumb effect after review. - Show the Private label at all widths for a private parent. - Update component tests, page navigation tests, and Storybook assertions. - Document title-only parent links in DESIGN.md. ## Verification - Six updated page regressions fail before the fix and pass after it. - All 285 focused BreadcrumbBar and IssueDetail tests pass. - UI typecheck and token gates pass. - Catalog validation and all 30 map/catalog tests pass. - Storybook build passes. All ten Chromium stories finish render/play with no page errors. - Browser checks cover 1440, 768, 390 and 320 pixel widths, light and dark themes, private parents, and keyboard parent navigation. - Parent numbers are absent at every width. Both long titles truncate on phones. The current task number stays visible, and the page has no horizontal overflow. - Private labels stay the same during desktop to phone to desktop resizing. Seven screenshots are saved as task evidence. - These checks mount the production header with fixture data. Page tests use mocked APIs. No live backend authorization or pixel baseline comparison is claimed. - [CI run 43020142521](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/43020142521) passed on |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
f77b8a288e |
fix(ui): keep the GitHub star prompt off tasks that need a Retry (#20713)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - A task that fails shows a banner with a Retry button. The user
clicks Retry to run the task again.
> - Self-hosted boards also show a "You completed 5 tasks! Star on
GitHub" modal (#20453).
> - The modal can open on the task page while the task shows its Retry
banner.
> - The modal is a Radix dialog. It sets `aria-hidden="true"` on the
rest of the page and sets `pointer-events: none` on the body. The Retry
button is visible, but a click does not reach it and assistive
technology cannot find it.
> - This pull request makes the star prompt wait for a calm moment. It
does not open on a task or agent chat page, and it does not open while a
task Retry or status banner is on screen.
> - The benefit is that a visible Retry is always reachable.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #20453
**What happened?**
A restart chaos run left a task in the failed state with the Retry
banner. The "You completed 5 tasks!" star modal opened over the same
page. The Retry button was in the DOM and visible. Playwright
`getByRole('button', { name: 'Retry' })` did not find it, because the
modal had set `aria-hidden="true"` on the banner. The body also had
`pointer-events: none`, so a user click on Retry did not reach the
button.
**Expected behavior**
A promotional prompt never covers a task that needs the user. A visible
Retry is always reachable.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. On a self-hosted instance, finish five tasks in one company. Do not
open the star prompt before.
2. Let a sixth task fail so that it shows "Couldn't finish this attempt"
with Retry.
3. Open that task. The star modal opens over the Retry banner.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7f72ea7534 |
fix(links): retain PR status across page reloads (#20654)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task messages contain GitHub pull request links. > - A hover loads PR status into a shared memory cache. > - A page reload clears that memory and returns each link to an unknown state. > - The browser already saves selected reads for each user and company. > - This pull request adds learned link previews to that cache. > - Reloads show the saved status. Only user interest can refresh stale previews. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** After a user loaded PR status, a page reload removed the learned state. The browser persistence rules excluded link-preview queries. Related implementation: #20593. Searches of open and closed PRs found no duplicate reload-cache fix. **Expected behavior** Keep learned PR status across reloads for the same account and company. Do not load every PR on page render. Reuse fresh results and refresh stale results on hover or keyboard focus. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a task with repeated GitHub PR links. 2. Hover one link and wait for its status. 3. Reload the page. 4. Before this fix, both links return to unknown until another hover. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against master source at `30403781b9418355c78dc0ed978366af77036e76`. ## What Changed - Add link-preview queries to the existing user and company persistence rules. - Keep at most 100 previews across accessible companies. Use the existing 24-hour retention, build boundary, and sign-out cleanup. - Keep the original read time and freshness when restoring previews. Other query types keep their existing restore behavior. - Add regressions for saved status, negative results, bounds, age, account changes, membership loss, and sign-out. - Add a production-component Storybook example and browser reload checks. Update the cache documentation. - Use one query-key definition for the component, persistence rules, and cache tests. The browser read-cache module owns persistence and account cleanup. This change extends that owner. The link service and provider API contracts stay the same. ## Verification - Red: the new reload and retention tests failed because a fresh client had no saved PR data. - Green: 102 focused UI tests passed across the cache, sign-out, account-query, and query-client suites. - UI typecheck passed. - Storybook catalog generation and the static Storybook build passed. - All 21 browser checks passed with retries disabled. They prove status and negative-cache restoration after real reloads, no eager requests, no fresh-hover refetch, and one stale-interest refresh shared by duplicate links. Existing light/dark and narrow PR states, keyboard access, exact URLs, and card positioning also pass. - The first browser attempt could not launch because this session lacked Chromium. Chromium was installed before the complete passing run; that first attempt supplies no test verdict. - `pnpm verify --explain` returned exit 2. The browser test path requires broad CI coverage. No full local suite is claimed. - The supplied staging page was not accessible through the web tool. No deployed acceptance is claimed. - CI on the first head failed in a Slack long-publication timeout and a font-loading-frame browser check. Both files are outside this change. The two publication cases passed when run locally in isolation. The font case also passed locally against the built UI. [Final-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42909433167) passes on `e19d5b8bb1a910b1cbb9bb9a62ab87cdf684737f`. Typecheck, build, tests, E2E, and Rust checks pass. There are 58 successful check runs, three expected skips, and one neutral Paperclip Review check. The legacy Snyk status passes. Both Greptile and the supplemental Paperclip review report 5/5 on the final head. No actionable findings or unresolved review threads remain. The Paperclip Review check itself has a neutral conclusion. ## Risks - PR display data now remains in browser local storage until expiry, build change, or sign-out. Each query requires the matching user and an accessible company. - A stale saved status can remain visible for up to 24 hours. Hover or keyboard focus refreshes it after the provider freshness window. - Storage restrictions retain the existing memory-only fallback. No schema migration is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser automation. The runtime does not expose the exact serving model ID or context-window size. No subagents were used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
bbf5cfeb62 |
fix(agents): return to the index after termination is accepted (#20667)
Return to the Agents index when termination is accepted, including while asynchronous cleanup continues, so the profile does not remain on an Agent not found error. Cover both action menus, roster refresh, failed requests, and unsaved changes during pending termination. Verified with 53 focused tests, the full UI suite (11,949 passed; one skipped), UI typecheck and build, all applicable CI checks, and Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved comments. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
0d4b1d8c89 | Gate agent plugin tabs by execution environment (#20657) | ||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a3b34a9d88 |
fix(ui): allow queued message deletion before queue acknowledgement (#20553)
## Thinking Path Paperclip lets a user queue a message while an agent works. The user must be able to remove that message before delivery starts. A new local message can clear the displayed queue ID until the server accepts it. This also disables trash for older saved messages. The page rejects the action before it sends a request. This change keeps trash available when the server says the user can discard the message. When the queue ID is absent, the page uses the existing comment cancellation route. The server finds the queue and checks the author and dispatch state in the same transaction. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Trash stays disabled for a saved queued message while another message waits for queue acknowledgement. The page handler also throws before it sends a cancellation request. **Expected behavior** Trash removes the selected queued message before dispatch. A message that has started dispatch stays visible with an error. Other queued messages stay queued. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Send a follow-up while an agent works. 2. Send another follow-up before the queue read includes it. 3. Try to discard the first saved message. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced from source at `0e3fdebea825`. **Deployment mode** Source checkout on Linux. UI tests use jsdom. Route tests use isolated embedded PostgreSQL. Related work: #15865 changes mixed-queue interrupt handling. #15939 changes recovery after a queued message is discarded. #15465 changes discard permissions for agent-authored entries. This change fixes trash for a user's own saved messages while queue acknowledgement is pending. ## What Changed - Keep trash enabled for a saved message with discard permission when the displayed queue ID is absent. - Use the existing author-only cancellation route when queue identity is pending. Keep the revision-checked route when queue identity is present. - Keep failed cancellations visible. Refresh the queue after cancellation and remove successful deletions from comment caches. - Cover deletion, dispatch conflicts, permission failures, network failures, history reloads, final-message cleanup, and concurrent dispatch. ## Verification - Red: three regression cases failed on the original production code. The trash button was disabled. Both page cases made no cancellation request. - Green: five complete UI suites pass, with 767 tests and one existing skipped test. These cover the page, queue component, thread, queue merge, and optimistic comments. - Green: 11 focused PostgreSQL route cases pass. They cover both routes, queue promotion, final-message cleanup, authorship, dispatch conflicts, and a concurrent dispatch claim. - `pnpm check:token-gates` and `git diff --check` pass. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passes. - The GitHub tree is `d4f0d61cbef2620c1fd62e6988ad80ccb1ba6173`. It is identical to the tested local tree after merging master `902f3767960d`. - `pnpm verify` selected more than 1,500 server test files. That broad local run was stopped without a pass claim. CI will supply broad build and test coverage. The preflight helper could not build Rust because Cargo is absent. - [CI Build](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42835584447/job/129897150252) and [browser E2E](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42835584447/job/129901676175) pass for head `44dea22faea51a6664a6f45852a42f62f5c72bbd`. - [Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/20553#issuecomment-6770202777) gives the current head 5/5 with zero comments and no unresolved review threads. - [Final CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42835584447) passes for head `44dea22faea51a6664a6f45852a42f62f5c72bbd`: 55 check runs passed and 4 were skipped. No failures or pending checks remain. Typecheck, Build, all general test shards, serialized suites, Runner checks, and browser E2E passed. Snyk also passed. ## Risks The fallback has no client queue revision. The existing server transaction finds the queue for the selected comment and checks ownership and dispatch state. Tests cover rejection after dispatch and when another user owns the message. No API contract or schema changes are required. No visual tokens change. Existing user documentation remains accurate. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex. The runtime does not expose a more specific provider revision or context window size. Used reasoning, repository tools, code edits, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
f30ac226d6 |
Keep project environment mappings independent of shared defaults (#20651)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A project supplies work context and repository storage to task runs. > - Creation selected a storage owner but did not retain the selected environment on the project. > - Configuration stored an environment inside checkout policy, but policy reads and run selection dropped it. > - Projects therefore continued to follow shared agent and instance defaults. > - This pull request saves placement on each project and uses it for new runs. > - The benefit is an independent Project to Environment association with the existing storage, trust, and recovery safeguards. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20459 and #11644. Follow-up to #20587. The reported journey is Project > Configuration: changing one project's environment must not change another project's mapping or shared defaults. Related open PR #18176 repairs placement through the legacy workspace-policy field. This follow-up introduces a separate project association, saves creation defaults, and migrates saved legacy references. It overlaps that PR's placement, permission, and recovery safeguards. The changes should be reviewed together. #9588 concerns environment-variable response privacy and does not address placement. ROADMAP.md has no separate project-association work planned. ## What Changed - Add nullable `projects.environment_id` and expose `Project.environmentId`. Save the effective creation default once on the project. Keep environment placement separate from checkout/isolation policy. - Read and write Environment directly in Project Configuration. Keep the control available with isolated workspaces disabled. Each form reads its project's value, even when environment choices share a query cache. - Offer environments compatible with the current storage owner. Change the target and storage together when the existing storage selector attaches a core project to a plugin. Preserve retained-data restrictions and validate the observed storage owner again on save. - Resolve new task runs from their organizational project's target before agent and instance defaults. File sources from another project do not change placement. Explicit low-trust sandbox choices and enforced sandbox policies retain precedence. External provider placement remains separate. - Restore admitted native runs from their owned environment lease. Later project edits apply to new admissions. Require workspace-write permission for environment changes and clears. Check company bindings before runtime admission and during lease creation. - Migrate valid saved policy references into the project column. Normalize legacy API writes. Count and clear matching project references when an environment is deleted. Update API and behavior documentation. - Refresh the maintained SDK source registry for the two changed shared files. Runtime pins are unchanged. ## Verification - [Hosted CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42908045146) is green on `8b3b7d5b5aed51fc4c8e9c2e3506508bbaf9e00c`: **60 successful checks**, three skipped gates, no failures, and `ci / verify` passed. GitHub reports no merge conflicts. Standard Greptile scored the same commit **5/5** with both review threads resolved. - Source checkout on macOS arm64, Node 26.12.0, with fresh isolated PostgreSQL. No production data or live provider calls. - The two-project component test changes the first form with isolation disabled and a shared query cache. The second form keeps its target. Storage changes update only the selected project. A saved target remains selected while the list loads, and an explicit clear remains possible. - API integration creates two projects from the same default, patches one, reads both, and checks that agent and instance defaults remain unchanged. A later instance-default change does not rewrite either saved project target. Tests cover unavailable/incompatible choices, anonymous and cross-company denials, and storage preconditions. - The migration test runs the actual SQL against an existing project row and verifies its environment and disabled checkout policy survive. Deletion accounting and clearing affect only matching project references. - The final guard set passes **53 tests across four files**: `project-environments.test.ts`, `environment-selection-route-guards.test.ts`, `heartbeat/environment-selection.test.ts`, and `ProjectProperties.environment.test.tsx`. All **64 environment-run-orchestrator tests** pass, including direct lease acquisition without an extra caller argument. The broader affected set passed **109 tests across eight files** before the additional admission guards. These sets overlap. - UI typecheck, migration numbering/safety, token gates, module boundaries, query-error rendering, and diff checks pass. `pnpm verify --explain` returns exit 2 and requires broad CI because shared schema/runtime paths and behavior documentation changed. Broad coverage is delegated to current-head CI. - Early iterations failed due to a legacy parser that drops the environment field, a fixture without real company membership, and incorrect expectations for privacy-preserving 404 denials. The service now reads legacy references before normalization, the API fixture has real membership, and denial assertions match the existing privacy contract. The orchestrator mock also needed the reused company-binding guard in its service contract. The focused suites above pass after those corrections. - Local server typecheck remains blocked by installed ACPX, Slack, AI SDK, and Runner type mismatches in unchanged dependency-facing code. It reports no errors in the changed production paths. This is not a full local typecheck or suite pass. Hosted CI supplies full current-head coverage. - SDK source-proof and privacy qualification passes **56 tests across three files**, including the real built SDK. The maintained source registry matches the committed revision; runtime pins are unchanged. - Review reproduced two failures: an incoming policy without a storage owner could be validated before the existing owner was restored, and uppercase legacy UUIDs missed migration matching. Preserve the owner before validation and compare normalized UUID text. Both regressions now pass. The post-fix project/storage/orchestrator batch passes **107 tests**: `node node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run server/src/__tests__/project-environments.test.ts server/src/__tests__/project-workspace-provider.integration.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-run-orchestrator.test.ts --silent`. - The first hosted run failed build, typecheck, and canary at the same `run-completion.test.ts` call because lease acquisition required a new argument. The lease method now enforces binding internally. Its existing caller compiles without a new field, and the orchestrator tests prove the binding flag reaches the runtime. The full server check no longer reports that error; the local dependency errors above remain. ## Risks - Apply the normal database migration before serving the new revision. The migration adds a nullable foreign key and copies valid legacy project selections. It does not move repository data or resize provider storage. The five newest schema snapshots are retained. - New projects retain their creation target when shared defaults change. Existing projects without a saved selection continue to inherit defaults. A null target explicitly opts into inheritance. - Existing saved project selections now affect placement. Missing, archived, incompatible, and foreign-company targets fail validation; they do not silently choose another storage owner. A running admitted process keeps its original owned lease. - Local dependency limitations are listed above. No live-provider, deployed-browser, or production rollout qualification is claimed. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact serving snapshot and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
353945c86d |
fix(tool-gateway): let agents create gateway tokens without receiving the value (#20613)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Tool gateways let external MCP clients use a company's tools with a
gateway client token
> - Since delegated connection management (#17737), an agent can create
and revoke gateway client tokens for its responsible person
> - #20581 stopped agents from getting the one-time token value, but it
did this by making token creation person-only
> - The product decision is that agents keep their delegated authority
to create and revoke tokens
> - This pull request restores agent token creation, but the agent never
receives the token value: the person reveals the value once on the
gateway's Tokens page
> - The benefit is that an agent can do the rotation work for the
person, and the secret still never enters chat, run events, logs or tool
output
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #17737
Refs #20581
**What happened**
After #20581, `POST /api/tool-gateway/gateways/{gatewayId}/tokens`
returns 403 `gateway_token_requires_person` to every agent caller.
Agents lost the delegated authority to create gateway client tokens that
#17737 gave them. Before #20581, an agent that created a token received
the plaintext value in its tool result and could repeat it in chat.
**Expected behavior**
An agent with delegated connection management can create and revoke
gateway client tokens. The agent never receives a token value. The
responsible person gets the value once, on the gateway's Tokens page.
Person callers keep today's behavior.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Give an agent delegated connection management for a responsible
person with `tools:admin`.
2. As the agent, call `POST
/api/tool-gateway/gateways/{gatewayId}/tokens` (for example through
`call_api`).
3. See 403 `gateway_token_requires_person`.
## What Changed
- Agent create: `POST /api/tool-gateway/gateways/:gatewayId/tokens` from
an agent with delegated authority returns 201 with token metadata only
(`id`, `tokenPrefix`, `expiresAt`, `pendingReveal: true`), plus
`tokensPath`, a `reveal_credential` `requiredUserAction` for the
responsible person, and a `nextStep` instruction. The saved row has no
usable value: its stored hash is of a value that is generated and then
discarded. Gateway authentication also rejects `pendingReveal` rows.
- Person reveal: new person-only `POST
/api/tool-gateway/gateway-tokens/:tokenId/reveal`. It generates the
value, stores its hash, clears `pendingReveal` and returns the value
once. A conditional update makes a second or concurrent reveal return
409. Only the token's responsible person can reveal it (403
`gateway_token_reveal_requires_responsible_person`). Agent callers get
403 `gateway_token_requires_person`. A token revoked before reveal
cannot be revealed.
- Why a reveal that generates the value: no stored plaintext existed to
reveal, and storing one (even encrypted) for later display adds a secret
at rest. Generating the value at reveal time keeps the existing one-time
display and stores only a hash.
- Schema: `tool_mcp_gateway_tokens.pending_reveal boolean not null
default false` (migration `0460_gateway_token_pending_reveal`). Shared
`ToolMcpGatewayToken.pendingReveal`, and `ConnectionRequiredUserAction`
gets `reveal_credential` / `gateway_token`.
- UI: the Tokens page shows a "Waiting for you to reveal" section for
pending tokens with a "Reveal token" button. The value appears in the
existing "New token — copy now" one-time block. Pending tokens show the
status "Not revealed".
- Agent gateway create: the 201 for agent callers also includes
`gatewayPath`, `tokensPath` and a `nextStep` that tells the agent to
link the saved gateway.
- The agent create-token `nextStep` and the catalog say not to revoke
the old token in the same turn: its client keeps working on it until the
person installs the new value.
- The reveal update and its `tool_gateway.token_revealed` activity entry
commit in one transaction. The Tokens page offers Reveal only for tokens
that act for the signed-in person.
- API reference: new `docs/api/tool-gateway-tokens.md` (create, reveal,
revoke) in the docs nav.
- Revoke stays allowed for agents with delegated authority (unchanged
route).
- API catalog: create-gateway, create-token, reveal and revoke
descriptions now say who acts, that agents never receive values, the
page paths, and that the old token is revoked only after the client
works with the new one.
- Agent access map: create-token policy note and a new reveal entry.
- Evals `gateways-profiles.create-gateway` and
`gateways-profiles.rotate-token`:
- Remove the keyword grader (`human|operator|admin|manage`) and the
handoff text checks. Grade saved state, rendered links and secret
absence. A plain reply or a question card is accepted.
- Remove the setup probes that called the create routes as the agent.
Under delegated authority, those probes created a real gateway
("Forbidden agent gateway"), which failed create-gateway before the
agent ran.
- create-gateway: exactly one gateway for the intended profile and
company, created by the agent (or by the person after a handoff); the
person opens it from a rendered link; attribution matches the creator;
any agent-created token is still pending reveal; no token value in chat,
cards or run events.
- rotate-token: after the agent's turn, both setup tokens still work and
any replacement the agent created is pending the person's reveal; the
person follows the rendered Tokens page link and reveals (or issues) the
value in a private browser; the new value works before the old token is
revoked; the unrelated client keeps access; no token value appears
anywhere, including a regex scan for any full `pcgw_<id>.<secret>`
value.
- The changed scenario context and outcomes are recorded in
`chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.json` `changedFields` and pinned in
the manifest test. The inventory digest, descriptors (`oracleVersion`
v2, `sourceFiles`) and SDK public input pins are updated. The unused
`external-gateway-handoff.ts` module is removed.
- Fixture realism: the create-gateway profile now allows a real read
tool (an empty profile made the agent ask which apps to add instead of
finishing), and the rotation tokens get a neutral owner note instead of
"Disposable rotation fixture" (the agent read that note as an eval
hint).
- Shared private-browser helpers (`external-private-browser.ts`,
`external-private-browser-worker.ts`) get one optional `pendingTokenId`
input and one `revealedPending` receipt field.
## Verification
- Red: on `master` route code, the new integration tests `lets agents
create and revoke gateway client tokens without ever receiving a token
value` and `reveals an agent-created gateway token value only to its
responsible person` fail (403 `gateway_token_requires_person`).
- Green: `cd server && npx vitest run
src/__tests__/connection-management.integration.test.ts -t gateway` (25
passed). The test checks that the agent `call_api` result has no `token`
field and no token-shaped value, that the agent cannot reveal, that the
person reveals once (second reveal 409) and the value authenticates,
that agent revoke works and stops the value, that a token revoked before
reveal never gets a value, and that person create still returns the
value.
- `npx vitest run src/__tests__/tool-gateway.test.ts
src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts
src/services/native-runtime/runner-api.test.ts` (2247 passed).
- `cd ui && npx vitest run
src/pages/apps/gateways/panels/TokensPanel.test.tsx
src/pages/apps/gateways/gateway-helpers.test.ts` (16 passed); `pnpm
check:token-gates` clean.
- Eval graders and catalog: `pnpm exec vitest run --config
tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts` on the gateway oracle tests,
`external.test.ts`, catalog consistency/contract, TestOps
export/retained, phase/clock callers and SDK input/type tests (all
pass); `node --test` on the TestOps manifest, adapter, contract,
streaming and reconcile tests (all pass); `node
tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`
(unchanged).
- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passes. `tsc --noEmit` for `server`,
`ui` and `tests/runner-e2e`: no errors in changed files.
- Paid end-to-end run of both eval cases, run
[42872921890](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42872921890)
on
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
2e6850e745 |
perf(task-chat): open tasks from a preloaded cache and cold tasks in one request (#20592)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - People open tasks from task lists, the Inbox and the sidebar many times each hour > - A task's chat shows its first frame only after about seven separate reads finish > - #20355 added one batched `chat-bootstrap` read that returns all of these reads. #20450 used it only for the sidebar's Recents > - The hosted database is CPU-bound, so the UI must open tasks faster and must also send fewer requests > - This pull request uses the bootstrap for task lists, for open intent on any task link, for cold opens and for a hard load of a task URL. It shares one coordination module between all of these paths > - The benefit is that a task opens from cache more often, a cold open sends one chat request instead of about seven, and the first content paint comes sooner ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20355 (server read that this pull request consumes). Refs #20450 (Recents preload, now on the shared path). **Is your feature request related to a problem?** A click on a task in a task list waited for about seven separate chat reads. The default task list (Coordinator) had no preload at all. A press or a resting hover on a task link sent the same seven reads, and the page then sent a second set. A hard load of a task URL started its chat reads only after the JavaScript bundle and the company list loaded. Sidebar project task links had no open-intent prefetch. **Describe the solution you'd like** Use the single `chat-bootstrap` read everywhere a task is about to open. Let the page's gating reads share a bootstrap that is in flight instead of sending their own requests. Keep the core issue read separate so the header does not wait for the larger read. **Describe alternatives you've considered** Preload 30 rows per list in three requests (the first prototype). Each task costs the server about fifty queries, and a resting hover warms any other row before the click, so this change preloads 10 rows in one request. ## What Changed - `ui/src/lib/issue-chat-bootstrap.ts`: one module decides when to send a bootstrap and lets page reads share it (`readFromIssueChatBootstrap`). Seeding uses the existing `issueChatBootstrapCache` (replace-style reads are refreshed when newer, merge-style reads are filled only when empty, other companies are ignored). It skips tasks that are loading, loaded in the last 30 seconds, or already fresh in cache, under the id or the identifier. It never aborts a request in flight, so a click that unmounts the list still uses the answer. Each request is bound to the account that sent it; a request sent before the first session read is bound to the first account the session reports, and a sign-out revokes it. A page read shares a bootstrap only while its key holds no data (a refresh after a write always reads the server), and waits at most 5 seconds for it. Every ref of a task (id and identifier) is tracked at request start. Entries expire after 30 seconds. - Task lists preload the chat of their top 10 rows in one request, after the list's own reads settle and the browser is idle (`usePreloadTaskChats`, `when-page-settles.ts`): the Coordinator task list (`TaskList` with `preloadCompanyId`), the streamlined and legacy issues lists and the streamlined Inbox. Recents now uses the same path, so a task in both places loads once. A list that stays open preloads each task at most once in five minutes: live events (#20563's lanes) keep a preloaded task's cache current or mark it stale, and a stale key is read from the server, never from an older bootstrap. All seeded keys are per-task keys on the fast live lane, not the ambient lane. - Open intent (press, click, resting hover or focus) on a task with no chat history in cache warms it with one bootstrap request instead of six separate reads (`prefetchIssueDetailForNavigation`). A task seen before still refreshes its cached reads one by one. - A cold open starts one bootstrap. The gating reads (recent comments, activity, runs, input facts, interactions, attachments, live runs, active run) wait for it instead of sending their own requests. The core issue read stays independent. - A hard load of a task URL starts `GET /api/issues/:ref/chat-bootstrap` from the inline preload script, in parallel with the JavaScript bundle. The page adopts that answer. - Sidebar project task links (Coordinator sidebar) get the same hover, press and focus warming as Recents and `IssueLinkQuicklook`. - Tests: unit tests for the coordination module, Recents, `TaskList` preload, sidebar warming and the cold-intent path. A new layout journey checks that a task the Inbox preloaded reveals once at its latest message without reading its chat again. Journeys that hold one separate read now also hold or fail the bootstrap. The Inbox reveal journey held a read that the chat no longer sends on open (it was flaky on master too), so it now holds the recent comment window. - The perf harness gains `PAPERCLIP_ISSUE_PERF_LIST_DWELL_MS` and the README documents it. ## Verification Measurement setup: production UI builds of master (`e01fe7f84a` and the earlier base `8d2bf78323`) and of this branch, served by one local server with `PAPERCLIP_UI_DEV_MIDDLEWARE=false` and embedded PostgreSQL. Only `index.html` changed between variants (both asset sets were present), so the server, database and seeded task were the same. Four rounds of the issue-detail harness, with master and branch alternated in each round: 20 pairs per S1 cell, 40 per S2 cell. The host was shared with other agents (load average 16 to 43), so the spread is large. Content paint (the task is readable), median paired delta, branch minus master: | Scenario | Profile | Pairs | Content paint | Branch faster in | API requests before content (master / branch) | |---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:| | S1 preloaded click (dwell 1500 ms) | unthrottled | 20 | -45 ms | 15/20 | 25 / 18 | | S1 preloaded click (dwell 1500 ms) | Fast 4G, 4x CPU | 20 | -23 ms | 13/20 | 26 / 18 | | S1 click, no dwell | unthrottled | 20 | -51 ms | 15/20 | 25 / 18 | | S1 click, no dwell | Fast 4G, 4x CPU | 20 | -21 ms | 12/20 | 26 / 18 | | S2 cold deep link | unthrottled | 40 | -61 ms | 28/40 | 54 / 40 | | S2 cold deep link | Fast 4G, 4x CPU | 40 | -129 ms | 29/40 | 47 / 39 | Medians (p25 to p75), content paint in ms: S1 dwell unthrottled 295 (283-315) → 248 (217-276). S1 dwell Fast 4G 1133 (1114-1226) → 1093 (853-1176). S1 no dwell unthrottled 295 (277-328) → 260 (233-332). S1 no dwell Fast 4G 984 (842-1196) → 923 (816-1110). S2 unthrottled 1002 (677-1235) → 896 (619-1280). S2 Fast 4G 4643 (4155-5061) → 4516 (4298-4894). Header paint is neutral to slightly later in two cells: S1 dwell unthrottled +39 ms (3/20 faster) and S2 Fast 4G +56 ms (17/40). In those cells the header now paints in the same frame as the content. In the first two rounds, the median gap from header to content fell from 105-157 ms to 29-74 ms unthrottled and from 557 ms to 298 ms for S2 on Fast 4G. Other header cells are -27 to +1 ms. The local server answers each read in a few milliseconds, so the network wait that the preload removes is small here. The request count is the stable result: a cold open sends one chat request instead of about seven. List page: the preload request starts after the first task row is in the DOM (64 ms after it unthrottled, 200-280 ms after it on Fast 4G, page clock). Time to the first visible row, 30-task list: unthrottled master 1863 ms vs branch 1563 ms (6 pairs, branch faster in 5). Fast 4G master 3626 ms vs branch 3727 ms (14 pairs, branch faster in 6, mixed signs). The preload starts after the row paints, so it cannot delay it; the Fast 4G difference is noise. One 10-task bootstrap took 78-162 ms on the server. Checks run: - `pnpm exec vitest run` for the bootstrap, cache, prefetch, Recents, sidebar, quicklook, `TaskList`, issues list, Inbox, issue detail and Coordinator tests: 18 files, 646 tests pass. - `pnpm exec tsc -p ui/tsconfig.json --noEmit`: clean, except missing generated Storybook catalog files that this change does not touch. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: clean. - `tests/e2e/task-loading-frame.spec.ts`, `disconnect-resilience.spec.ts` and `connection-reviews.spec.ts` (production build): 21 passed, 1 skipped. - `tests/perf/issue-detail/layout-stability.spec.ts` and `plan-startup.spec.ts` against the production build: all pass. The Inbox reveal journey and the new preloaded journey passed 4 of 4 repeats each. - `pnpm verify` asks for broader CI coverage because an e2e spec changed. ## Risks - More server work for list views: one bootstrap of up to 10 tasks per list visit (about fifty queries per task), skipped for tasks already loaded in the last 30 seconds. It runs only after the page's own reads settle and the browser is idle, and only while the tab is visible. - A resting hover on a never-opened task now sends one bootstrap instead of about six reads. The server work per task is about the same; the request count is lower. - If a bootstrap fails, each page read falls back to its own request. The fallback is slower than before for that one open (the reads start when the page mounts, not at the press). - The header can paint a few tens of milliseconds later in the same frame as the content when everything is cached. - An answer that arrives after a sign-out or account change is dropped. An answer for another company is ignored. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, Playwright runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
28063474d2 |
fix(ui): show why a queued message edit was not saved (#20583)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - In task chat, a person can edit a queued message before the agent receives it > - The server rejects an edit with 409 when the queue changed in another session > - The composer kept the text, but it showed no reason, so the edit looked stuck > - This pull request shows the reason under the editor > - The benefit is that the person knows the edit was not saved and what to do next ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened** Two sessions edited the same queued message. The older save got `409 queued_comment_revision_conflict`. The composer still said "Editing queued message" and showed no error. **Expected behavior** The composer tells the person that the queue changed in another session, keeps the text, and lets them save again. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Queue a message on a task with a running agent. 2. Open the task in two tabs and start editing the queued message in both. 3. Save in the second tab, then save in the first tab. 4. See no error in the first tab. ## What Changed - `TaskChatComposer` shows a save failure for a queued message edit in its existing `role="alert"` line (`data-testid="task-chat-queued-edit-error"`). The error clears when the edit ends or a new save starts. - `api/errors.ts` has copy for `queued_comment_revision_conflict`, `queued_comment_stale_queue`, `queued_comment_stale_target` and `queued_comment_not_pending`. - The existing queue refresh after a 409 updates the revision, so a second save works. ## Verification - Red then green: `cd ui && npx vitest run src/components/task-chat/TaskChatComposer.test.tsx` (new test `shows why a concurrent queue change rejected the save and keeps the edit` fails on `master`; all 146 pass with the change). - `npx vitest run src/components/TaskChatThread.test.tsx src/api/errors.test.ts` (479 passed). - `pnpm check:token-gates`: all gates clean. - `tsc --noEmit -p ui`: no errors outside unrelated Storybook files. ## Risks - Low risk. UI copy only, no new API. A stale edit now shows a short error line in addition to the "Queued message changed" label. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), tool use and code execution in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
89ec4e7614 |
feat(links): add cached GitHub pull request previews (#20593)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task conversations contain links to pull requests and other work. > - A URL alone cannot tell the operator whether a PR is open, merged, or blocked by conflicts. > - Fetching every link at render time wastes API calls and can expose private data through a shared cache. > - This pull request adds a demand-driven links service and a GitHub PR adapter. > - Each viewer and company has a separate cache. Repeated links share one request and result. > - Operators get context when they hover or focus a link. Normal links stay useful when a provider is unavailable. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Task Markdown links, shared link metadata, and the server GitHub API boundary. **Problem or motivation** PR links have compact labels and neutral icons. They do not provide a rich hover card or a common status source across repeated mentions. A background resolver cannot borrow a person's GitHub connection because it has no viewer identity. **Proposed solution** Recognize supported links locally. Request metadata after a delayed hover or keyboard focus. Show a card at the first line of the link, aligned with its icon. Share the result across all mentions in the current viewer and company. Keep the exact original navigation URL. The first adapter supports GitHub pull requests. Open is green, merged is purple, and merge conflicts are orange. Draft, closed, unknown, loading and unavailable states remain quiet. **Alternatives considered** Eager page scans would spend API quota on links the operator does not inspect. Company-wide caching of personal GitHub results would cross the credential boundary. This change uses neither approach. **Roadmap alignment** ROADMAP.md was checked. This extends existing task links and the GitHub resolver. It adds no deployment adapter or new background worker. Searches of open and closed PRs for link previews and PR hover cards found no matching implementation. ## What Changed - Add host-owned link recognition and a normalized preview contract. The service selects an adapter by provider. - Add a board-only company read endpoint. It checks company access before cache reads and sends a private, no-store response. - Use the current viewer's eligible GitHub connection. A configured connection that cannot supply credentials fails closed. With no managed connection, reuse existing company credentials or public access. Instance credentials retain the public-repository check. - Reuse the GitHub external-object resolver for API transport and response parsing. Add title and mergeability to its normalized snapshot without changing its existing state contract. - Coalesce requests by company, viewer and canonical PR URL. Bound cached entries and concurrent work. Cache success for one minute and failures for a short period or the provider retry window. - Add an abortable request deadline. Timed-out work stays in the concurrency budget until it settles. No periodic worker or idle polling is added. - Add a shared browser query and anchored preview card. Repeated Markdown links observe the same result. There are no automatic retries, window-focus refreshes, toasts or connection prompts. - Add ten production-component Storybook examples and real pointer/keyboard browser checks. Document the API and verification route. ## Verification - Linux source checkout: 233 focused tests passed in nine suites. They cover recognition, fixed API destinations, provider states, access failures, credential selection, viewer/company isolation, request coalescing, expiry, cache bounds, concurrency bounds and mounted OpenAPI coverage. - A live public GitHub smoke returned this PR's correct title and open state. Two equivalent URLs shared one real network request. Personal connection access was not part of that smoke. - A controlled HTTP server stalls a real response body. The test proves cancellation while another lookup completes. - UI typecheck and the server layered typecheck passed. The UI production build passed. - Token gates and query policy gates passed. All 30 map/catalog support checks passed. The three new server test files also passed a focused TypeScript check. - All 27 focused browser checks passed on the reviewed source tree. They cover light/dark themes, narrow layouts, open/merged/conflict/draft/closed/loading/unavailable/failed states, fixed positioning during pointer movement, exact navigation and keyboard access. A real browser HTTP interception counts one deferred lookup for two equivalent PR links. - The first browser attempt lacked Chromium. A later combined build/test attempt exhausted the sandbox's 8 GiB memory limit and killed Storybook. Those attempts supply no pass evidence. Chromium is installed, and the final browser checks run with the build stopped. One initial Storybook dependency reload interrupted a streaming check. All eight existing inline-link cases passed on the warmed server, followed by a complete 27-case pass. - Synthetic Storybook pointer events did not exercise the native hover boundary. The assertions now run through real Playwright pointer and keyboard actions. The fixture stories retain the production components. - Review fixes preserve the Draft label when GitHub reports both draft and conflicts. They also preserve neutral link colors in dark mode. The 25 affected service checks pass, including the added combined-state regression. Browser checks compare unknown, draft and closed links with the muted theme color. - The first CI policy run rejected a literal retry opt-out. The code now uses the existing explicit zero-retry helper. A new test-spy type error was also corrected. These failures are fixed; their earlier runs remain failed. - `pnpm verify --explain` returned exit 2 because the browser test path selects broad CI. No full local suite is claimed. The final CI run supplies that coverage. - The previous head `437913c797963aa113bb82e2ae8b836969317ef9` passed CI and received a 5/5 Greptile score. All four review threads are resolved. Master then advanced. The current head `ae2a1c2adbd61a621cca9bdd160561952613df6e` resolves the source-manifest conflict against master `9b21dcbdda01296349f3cfe0a3a6891e79df6130`. Fresh CI and review are running. - The previous CI run found a lost class on decorated PR links and a stale SDK source manifest. Both are fixed. The existing CommentThread integration test and 26 focused link service tests pass. All 45 SDK source/privacy tests pass. All eight source-manifest helper tests pass. The manifest helper changed only source identities and added the two new shared files. Runtime, compiler, parser and library pins stay unchanged. - A later review found that expired timeouts could reuse a settled promise. The service now removes settled requests from its shared-request map and counts unfinished provider work separately. The new regression failed before the fix and passes after it. The concurrency-bound and real stalled-HTTP tests also pass. - UI typecheck and token gates pass after these fixes. The browser rerun needed Chromium in the new session. That first attempt did not exercise the UI. The complete 27-case browser rerun passed before the master merge with retries disabled. All 27 browser cases also passed on the merge revision with retries disabled. - After the master merge, all 84 focused link, OpenAPI and integration tests pass. All 55 SDK source/privacy/manifest tests pass. UI typecheck and token gates pass again. The source manifest retains master's reviewed runtime pins and includes both sets of source changes. GitHub confirms the PR can merge cleanly. The preflight helper rebuilt the shared package and plugin SDK; Cargo is unavailable locally. Final CI supplies Rust coverage. - The latest master update changed the reviewed report-lock policy but left the SDK lock hash at its previous value. The SDK source/evidence checks reproduced the mismatch. This change sets only the SDK lock hash to the authenticated output of the existing master policy and patch. Compiler, parser and Zod pins stay unchanged. All 56 SDK source/evidence/manifest tests now pass. All 84 focused link/API/integration tests, UI typecheck and token gates also pass on the updated source. ## Risks - This cache is process-local. Separate server replicas can make separate GitHub requests. - A cached result can remain visible for its short lifetime after GitHub changes. A later hover refreshes expired data. - GitHub can report unknown mergeability. The UI shows conflicts only when GitHub explicitly reports them. - Personal preview data stays in viewer/company caches. It is not written to company external-object records or persisted browser query storage. - Stories simulate the API. They do not prove a live GitHub login or private-repository access. - No schema migration is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6. The runtime does not expose the exact serving model ID or context-window limit. Used reasoning, repository inspection, source editing, shell execution and browser tools. No subagents were used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
9b21dcbdda |
refactor: remove SPEC docs and repoint spec citations (#20565)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Contributors and agents read the docs under `doc/` before they change code > - `doc/SPEC.md` and `doc/SPEC-implementation.md` were out of date. `doc/SPEC-implementation.md` became an append-only log: in 60 days it got about 1,645 new lines and lost 181, across 140 commits > - #20557 changed `AGENTS.md` so the code and its tests are the source of truth, and the specs are only background > - This pull request removes the two spec docs. It moves only the sections that live code comments cite into focused docs, and it repoints all other references > - The benefit is one less stale document that agents read and append to ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20557 (merged). This PR is the follow-up that removes the docs. It is based on `master`, which already contains #20557. **Issue type** Outdated content. The docs are out of date and conflict with the code. **Where is the issue?** `doc/SPEC.md`, `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, and the code comments and docs that cite them. **What's wrong?** `doc/SPEC.md` and `doc/SPEC-implementation.md` are out of date, but agents still read them and append a paragraph with each fix. **Suggested fix** Delete both files. Move the sections that code cites into focused docs. Repoint the references. ## What Changed - Deleted `doc/SPEC.md` and `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`. - Moved these spec sections, because live code comments cite them: - §9.3.1 "Shared default-open issue writes" → new section in `doc/agent-permission-defaults.md`. - §9.8.1 "Issue-thread interaction resolver contract" → `doc/execution-semantics.md`, "Issue-thread interaction resolution". That section already had most of the contract. I added only the missing parts: the `supersedeOnUserComment` default, the canonical policy list, the addressee and cap rules, the rule that surfaces show the server's effective audience, and the cross-issue budget charge. The short policy summary at the top of the section now points to the list, so the definitions occur one time only. - §9.9 "Task Watchdog Authority Contract" → new "Authority contract" section in `doc/TASK-WATCHDOG.md`. It holds the allowed and disallowed mutation lists and the deferred capabilities. The atomic recovery batch, restoration verification, and interaction rules were already in `doc/execution-semantics.md` §11, so the new section links there and does not repeat them. I did not move the "Downstream acceptance criteria" checklist or the sentence about the CTO and Security sign-off. These were implementation-time notes; the tests now hold that coverage. - §9.10 "Company Skill Policy Contract" → new `doc/company-skill-policy.md`. No focused doc had this contract. I did not move the "Required regression tests" phase checklist. - Did not move any other part of the specs. - Repointed code comments that cited spec sections: - `packages/shared/src/issue-write-denial.ts` (§9.3) → `doc/agent-permission-defaults.md` - `server/src/routes/issues.ts` (§9.9) → `doc/TASK-WATCHDOG.md`, "Authority contract" - `server/src/routes/issues.ts` (§9.3, §9.8.1 cross-issue budget) → `doc/agent-permission-defaults.md` - `ui/src/lib/interaction-audience.ts` and `ui/src/components/InteractionGovernancePanel.tsx` (§9.8.1) → `doc/execution-semantics.md` - `ui/src/lib/skill-policy-denial.ts`, `ui/src/pages/CompanySkills.tsx`, `ui/src/pages/CompanySkills.production.tsx`, `ui/src/pages/SkillStudio.tsx` (§9.10) → `doc/company-skill-policy.md` - `server/src/services/recovery/ownership-invariant-report.ts` (monitor deadline wait path) → `doc/execution-semantics.md` §8. That section already lists the one-shot monitor as a valid wait path. - Resynced the git blob pin for `packages/shared/src/issue-write-denial.ts` in `tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.json`. The comment edit changed the file's hash, and the Runner support suite checks that pin. I used `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --write`; only that one pin changed. - Updated `AGENTS.md` §1 so it does not name the deleted files. - Removed the links to the deleted files from `doc/plugins/PLUGIN_SPEC.md`. - Updated the `doc-maintenance` agent skill (`.agents/skills/doc-maintenance/`) so it no longer audits or stages `doc/SPEC.md`. - Removed or replaced references in `maps/README.md`, `maps/feature-map/README.md`, `maps/storybook-map/README.md`, `doc/PRODUCT.md`, `doc/CLIPHUB.md`, `doc/DEPLOYMENT-MODES.md`, `doc/DEVELOPING.md`, `doc/evals.md`, `doc/spec/agent-runs.md`, `doc/AGENTCOMPANIES_SPEC_INVENTORY.md`, `doc/connections/CONNECTOR-PLAYBOOK.md`, `doc/plugins/ideas-from-opencode.md`, `doc/execution-semantics.md`, `doc/TASK-WATCHDOG.md`, and `.devin/wiki.json`. - In `doc/execution-semantics.md`, the "admission is independent of cleanup and accounting" reference now states the rule inline: only a hard stop, an explicit pause, or an inactive company refuses admission. - Kept these references as they are: dated plans in `doc/plans/` and `docs/plans/`, the dated log `doc/logs/2026-05-24-cli-api-parity-e2e-log.md`, `releases/`, the transcript fixture `ui/src/fixtures/runTranscriptFixtures.ts` (it uses the filename only as sample text), and `docs/specs/external-task-protocol.md` (it refers to the Symphony project's own `SPEC.md`). ## Verification - `git grep -n "SPEC-implementation\|SPEC\.md"` (without `releases/`, and ignoring `PLUGIN_SPEC.md` citations) finds only the kept references listed above. - `grep -rn "§9\.\(3\|8\|9\|10\)" ui/src server/src packages/shared/src` finds no results. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`: "Maps aligned: 35 areas, 192 capability IDs". - `pnpm check:token-gates`: "All gates clean". - `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-type.test.ts tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-evidence.test.ts`: 45 passed. These failed in CI before the pin resync. - `pnpm verify`: exit 2 ("Broader verification required") because `AGENTS.md` is a global CI input. Required CI supplies the broad coverage for this revision. - All code changes are comments only. No runtime behavior changes. The title uses `refactor:` because comments in source files changed. ## Risks - Low risk. The change removes docs and edits comments only. - A reader can lose context from spec sections that I did not move. The text stays in git history. The code and its tests are the source of truth. - External links to the two deleted files will return 404. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits). Standard context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks above; CI supplies broad coverage) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (not applicable: docs and comments only) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
ed3ffc3bc7 |
fix(ui): let chat review requests open the document they ask about (#20590)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - In chat, an agent can end its turn on a confirmation card that asks
the person to review a saved document
> - The full task view links the card's document, but the compact chat
card showed the document key as plain text unless it was the plan
> - A person who is asked to review a draft in chat could not open the
draft from the card
> - This pull request links a document on the same chat to its
`#document-<key>` panel, the same link a reply uses
> - The benefit is that a review request in chat lets the person read
what they are asked to approve
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
In a chat eval run on master `f4337bb5fb`
(`questions-and-approvals.reject-and-revise`), the agent saved a `draft`
document and ended its turn on a confirmation card "Review research
notes introduction draft" with `target: { type: "issue_document", key:
"draft", revisionId }`. In the chat composer takeover, the card showed
`draft` as a plain chip with no link.
**Expected behavior**
A confirmation card in chat opens the document it asks the person to
review, like the full card in the task view does.
**Steps to reproduce**
Create a pending `request_confirmation` on a chat task with
`payload.target = { type: "issue_document", key: "draft", revisionId }`.
Open the chat. The takeover shows the `draft` chip without a link.
## What Changed
- `CompactTarget` in `TaskChatCompactInteractionCard.tsx` gives an
`issue_document` target on the same chat the href `#document-<key>`.
Plan targets, targets with an explicit `href`, attachments and documents
on other tasks keep their current behavior.
- Added a `TaskChatThread` test: a pending draft review request in the
takeover links `#document-draft`.
## Verification
- `npx vitest run src/components/TaskChatThread.test.tsx -t "links a
review request"` in `ui`: red before the fix, green after.
- `npx vitest run src/components/TaskChatThread.test.tsx
src/components/coordinator/CoordinatorTaskCommitment.test.tsx
src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts`: 457 passed.
- `node scripts/check-token-gates.mjs`: all gates clean.
- Paid chat eval on a temporary branch with this change: see the comment
on this PR.
## Risks
- Low risk. Plan review cards are unchanged; their plan preview already
opens the plan.
- No API, schema or stored state changes.
## Model Used
- Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), agentic coding with
tool use in Claude Code.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
98ce93dd4e |
Choose project storage from compatible environments (#20587)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Projects supply repository files to agent runs through core staging or a storage plugin. > - A storage plugin's default claim silently attached new projects even when their agents used a different environment. > - An environment name or driver type does not establish shared storage access. The existing binding and task-driver contracts do. > - This pull request groups creation choices by that contract and selects storage from the creator's effective environment. > - The benefit is a visible, validated choice and a clear error before an incompatible managed workspace operation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #20459. Related: #20156 covers a separate provider-failure diagnostic. The PR search found no other fix for #20459. ROADMAP.md has no duplicate project-creation change. ## What Changed - Show **Available in** when configured environments require different project storage. Each option names the environments that can use the same storage owner. Hide the selector when all choices are compatible. - Derive compatibility from repository staging and managed binding ownership. Local, SSH, and sandbox environments use core staging. Managed storage requires a registered task driver from the same installed storage plugin. Separate storage plugins remain incompatible. Unknown plugin contracts and the fake sandbox are excluded. - Follow the creating agent's environment, or the person's primary agent, then the instance default and local fallback. Apply managed-only and forced Kubernetes policy. The product has no separate user or company environment-default field today. - Add a company-authorized discovery endpoint and an optional creation `environmentId`. Validate the choice again on save. Store the storage owner without overriding agent run environments. Preserve explicit API storage choices and existing project ownership. - Keep the hidden repository-free private-task project independent of environment availability. Submit the observed storage owner as `expectedStorageProviderPluginId` so a changed contract fails at save without setting a workspace policy. Instance task-isolation defaults stay inherited. - Reject an incompatible managed workspace before a provider operation. Name the storage and selected environment in the error. Add regression tests, API documentation, creation-story fixtures, and minimal corrections to obsolete map text. ## Verification - **102 tests passed across 7 files:** project environment integration, installed storage policy, repository persistence, project environment routes, project creation telemetry routes, OpenAPI, and NewProjectDialog. Run with `node node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run server/src/__tests__/project-environments.test.ts server/src/__tests__/project-workspace-provider.integration.test.ts server/src/__tests__/project-repositories-persistence.test.ts server/src/__tests__/project-routes-env.test.ts server/src/__tests__/project-goal-telemetry-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts ui/src/components/NewProjectDialog.test.tsx --silent`. - The review fixes cover both archived-default private-task cases and changed-storage rejection. With both instance isolation flags enabled, a new core repository project keeps a null policy and resolves to an isolated Git worktree. The complete affected set passes all 102 tests. - The CI query-error policy failure was fixed by using the shared query view. The form and shared query-view suites pass **24 tests**, including cached choices during a transient refetch failure. `node scripts/check-query-error-rendering.mjs --enforce --summary` reports zero findings. - CI exposed stale SDK source hashes and heartbeat fixtures that paired plugin storage with Local. Refreshed exactly four shared-source hashes with the maintained generator (runtime pins unchanged). All **53 SDK privacy/source-proof tests**, including real built SDK output, pass. All **7 corrected managed-storage heartbeat scenarios** pass; the fixtures declare the owning plugin's task environment and substitute transport at the existing execution seam. - Shared and UI TypeScript checks pass. The UI production build passes. `pnpm check:token-gates`, `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs`, and diff checks pass. - Tested UI states: compatible choices, incompatible groups, default within a group, manual override, create failure, loading, discovery failure and retry, and an unavailable default. Tests use the production form and existing design tokens. - The integration tests use real isolated PostgreSQL on macOS arm64 with Node 26.12.0. They cover user/agent defaults, storage persistence, policy restrictions, company and authentication denials, and rejection before a provider call. Discovery uses saved configuration and makes no worker or provider requests. - Local verification limits: `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` stop in unchanged adapter-utils code because the installed ACPX types lack `inheritProcessEnv`. A direct server check also finds an unchanged AI SDK type-version mismatch. The existing heartbeat test `inherits the instance default environment across companies while preserving explicit agent overrides` times out at line 518 on both this change and unmodified master with the same dependencies. The full `pnpm test:run` attempt passed all six chat shards (1,948 tests), then the Git workspace expiration suite reported 14 failures. I stopped that broad run. Two sampled failures reproduce on unchanged master with the same `unknown_worktree_git_files` refusal; the other expiration failures were not independently compared. A later broad workspace-preparation run also hit workspace validation failures and was stopped; the seven corrected fixture scenarios pass independently. These limits do not establish a full local suite pass. Hosted CI remains required. - Initial missing-package and loopback-denial failures were resolved by repairing isolated dependency links, building the SDK, and running database tests with loopback access. No deployed or live-provider execution is claimed. ## Risks - Creation defaults now follow the effective environment. A plugin's `defaultForProjects` claim alone no longer selects storage. This is the intended behavior change. - Compatibility covers repository project storage. It does not guarantee arbitrary host paths, retained-workspace moves, adapter/image support, credentials, or worker readiness. Matching provider configs cannot prove a cross-plugin storage contract. - A person's primary agent supplies the personal default because there is no separate personal environment setting. An unavailable configured default requires a valid explicit choice or a configuration repair. - No migration runs. Existing projects keep their storage owner. This change does not detach existing managed data or provide a storage migration. - Full local verification has the limits listed above. CI and standard Greptile review are pending. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact serving snapshot and context-window size were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d82e5efeb9 |
perf(ui): cut repeated reads while a task is open (#20563)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The board UI keeps an open task current with a shared company
websocket and with polling fallbacks
> - In a busy company, one open task sent 35 to 60 API requests in 17
seconds, and each request waits on the database
> - Most of these requests were repeated reads: task summaries 22 times,
the task run list 11 times, task browsers 6 times, and the 60 KB agent
list 6 times
> - The cause is not the open task. Other agents' run and task events
invalidate company-wide lists on every 300 ms batch, and the task view
polls runs and browsers on fixed intervals even while the websocket is
open
> - This pull request spaces company-wide refreshes, and it lets the
websocket replace run and browser polling while it is connected
> - The benefit is about 79% fewer reads from an open task in a busy
company, with the same polling fallback when the connection is down
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #17608
Refs #9627
**What happened?**
An open task in a busy company sent the same reads again and again. In
one 17-second visit, the UI requested `issues/summaries` 22 times, the
task live runs 11 times, the task browsers 6 times, and the company
agent list 6 times. The company live runs and the task's child lists
(`parentId`, `createdFromIssueId`, `descendantOf`) were requested 2 to 3
times each.
**Expected behavior**
A busy company must not make an open task refetch company-wide lists on
every event batch. While the live connection is open, the UI must use
events, not fixed fast intervals, for task runs and browsers. The UI
must keep its polling fallback when the connection is closed.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Open a task in a company where other agents run work.
2. Keep the task open for 17 seconds.
3. Count the API requests in the browser network panel.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Based on master at
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
dff8bed007 |
fix(ui): show chat activity immediately during admission (#20559)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Chat uses a shared runner turn to show activity after Send. > - The turn currently shows Queued while the server admits the request. > - People need immediate activity feedback during this short wait. > - This change uses the existing Working header and Thinking activity during ordinary admission. > - Specific server holds stay visible so people can see setup or maintenance delays. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The activity indicator in task chat and agent chat after Send. **Current behavior** Ordinary admission shows Queued in the header and activity row. It changes to Working and Thinking when execution starts. **Proposed behavior** Show Working and Thinking from message submission through ordinary queued admission. Keep the same avatar, name, and activity row in place. Preserve specific server waits and the existing queue controls. **Subsystem affected** ui/ — React board UI. ## What Changed - Use the default activity presentation when a queued turn has no specific server hold. - Retain maintenance, agent setup, server restart, previous-run, provider, and preparation labels. - Omit the elapsed-time suffix until a start time is known. This prevents a frozen Working for 0s header before a run exists. - Update component tests for submission, acknowledgement, reassignment, and runtime discovery on desktop and mobile. - Update the activity guidance in DESIGN.md. - Keep this behavior in the shared runner turn. No API, queue, or execution contract changes are needed. ## Verification - Chat component suites: 582 passed, 1 existing skip. - Command: `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatRunnerTurn.test.tsx ui/src/components/TaskChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx`. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: passed. - `pnpm verify`: exit 2. DESIGN.md is a global CI input, so the selector requires broader CI coverage. The three focused chat suites passed again on final commit `e85b8e43b007288f3ef41e0a42e801d5d2c41e54`. Required CI passed on this revision. See the CI result below. - The earlier CI attempt on `796fac80a06769d67af5b899fb186a875bfb228d` failed the unchanged Rust test `process_lineage::journal::tests::reaping_stops_a_dead_runners_provider_and_its_escaped_tool_job` with `unattributed_orphan`. This UI change does not alter its compiled inputs. The cause is not yet established. The current revision passed the Rust check. The earlier failure cause remains unknown. [Failed job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42843806417/job/129926132490). - The workspace preflight installed dependencies and built shared and plugin SDK outputs. Its unrelated Runner build could not start because cargo is unavailable. The current revision passed CI typecheck and build. - Both current-head reviews are 5/5 with no remaining findings. There are no unresolved review threads. - Current-head typecheck, build, general tests, serialized server tests, all eight E2E shards, and Rust checks passed. [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42845383745). - The Runner support suite reported one 30-second timeout in `private-reporter-artifacts.test.ts`; 11,291 other tests passed. Both tests in that file passed locally in isolation (1.64 seconds for the full command). The one rerun passed in CI attempt 2. The timeout cause remains unknown. [Failed job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42845383745/job/129932351496). - Final CI result: attempt 2 passed on `e85b8e43b007288f3ef41e0a42e801d5d2c41e54`. Typecheck, build, tests, Rust checks, and all eight E2E shards passed. [CI attempt 2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42845383745/attempts/2). ## Risks - Low risk. This changes presentation only. A queued turn can show Thinking before provider execution starts. - Specific server holds remain visible. Scheduling, permissions, and saved message controls do not change. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific deployment model ID or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ce1ee9e89f |
fix: stop prompts from encouraging subtasks (#20362)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents read runtime prompts, tool help, skills, and role instructions. > - Several of these texts tell agents to create child tasks as a normal next step. > - One accepted-plan prompt even forbids work on the current task. > - Task parentage is useful, but it does not need a prompt that encourages task creation. > - This pull request removes those prompts and keeps the task APIs available. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #10642. This change adjusts prompt wording; it does not add delegation-cycle guards. **Current behavior** Prompts tell agents to create children after plan approval, use children for long work, and create a task just to pass context. Onboarding requires a child even for a single request. **Proposed behavior** Continue work on the current task. Keep explicit assignments, optional task creation, parentage, dependencies, and approval gates. Use the separate-task recipes when the user requests that structure or when continuing existing work. **Reason and benefit** Reduce needless task trees without removing subtask support. Keep the patch limited to wording, existing test expectations, and generated catalog data. ## What Changed - Align accepted-plan prompts and remove direct child-creation advice from runtime and error text. - Make task tool descriptions neutral. Keep their fields, defaults, and handlers. - Update the main skill, onboarding, CEO instructions, company templates, specialist workflows, and matching guides. - Keep historical release snapshots intact. Refresh the explicitly seeded schema fixture's catalog digest; the server still verifies historical release snapshot hashes. - Refresh the affected generated catalogs, capability inventory, semantic contracts, and fixture manifest. ## Verification - Final tested head: `c6e304d0c105cdbfbe0b2ab0a233307fcd91a04b`. - All 66 check runs are complete: 60 pass, one is neutral, and five are skipped by CI conditions. Snyk also passes. No checks fail or remain pending. - [PR CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42846226554) passes typecheck, build, server/general tests, all eight E2E shards, Runner support, Runner Rust, and the aggregate verify gate. [Windows](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42846226546) and [Docker Runner](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42846226108) also pass. - [Greptile](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/20362#issuecomment-6751419835) and [Paperclip review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/20362#issuecomment-6751454010) give this exact head 5/5. All six inline threads are resolved. Neither current summary has findings. - Merged master `bf0220d34a156c81853755c3d1365ddc527037de`. Resolved three generated-file conflicts with the canonical generators. - Local verification passes: 473 focused prompt, continuation, UI, catalog, runtime and native-execution tests; Runner TypeScript build; generated metadata; UI token gates; and diff checks. - The prior head `c22018cb0f` failed three SDK evidence tests because two source hashes were stale. Reproduced all three failures locally. The existing generator refreshed only the hashes for the denial-copy file and its test. All 53 affected evidence/source-pin tests then passed, including private-value rejection. No scanner logic, assertions, or runtime dependency pins changed. Current CI confirms the support suite passes. - A prior commit failed the Rust process reaping test. Its cause remains unproven. No Rust code or assertions changed. Later Rust runs pass; this does not establish the cause of the earlier failure. - Local preflight built shared/plugin SDK packages, then stopped because `cargo` is absent. Current-head CI supplies Rust and full build coverage. `pnpm verify --explain` selects broad required CI; full local suites were not repeated. ## Risks - Wording changes guide the model; they do not enforce a ban on subtasks. - Existing installed skill versions and saved custom instructions need their normal refresh process. This PR does not migrate company configuration. - Existing approved task assignments and approval gates remain in effect. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6, through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact routed model ID and context-window size were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
38cc6b2a74 |
fix(ui): restore pinned sidebar links above More (#20369)
Restore the mixed pinned navigation list after Inbox and before More, retaining saved order, agent pins, drag controls, and unpin actions. Verified with focused tests, UI checks, browser interaction checks, and passing PR CI. Greptile: 5/5. |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
cac82ed4d9 |
fix(ui): show parent tasks in responsive breadcrumbs (#20366)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Tasks can have a parent task. > - The task header does not show that parent in its navigation path. > - On a phone, the header removes the task path and shows only the current title. > - Long parent and current titles must share the available space. > - This pull request adds a parent link and limits each displayed task title to 48 characters. > - People can move to the parent and keep the current task number in view. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The navigation path in a task header. **Current behavior** The global path omits the parent. The phone header shows only the current task. Long parent titles cannot share the row safely. **Proposed behavior** Show the immediate parent before the current task. Limit each displayed title to 48 Unicode code points, with an ellipsis. Limit the parent to 40% of the row. On phones, remove the collection link and parent number so both titles and the current task number fit. **Reason and benefit** People can see the task context and open its parent. Full titles stay in hover text and accessible names. Private parents have no link. Related: #9302 adds project navigation. This change adds task parent navigation. ## What Changed - Add the immediate parent from the existing authorized ancestor response to the global task path. - Make parent and current titles shrink. Apply a 48-character display limit without changing stored titles. - Keep the current task number visible on phones. Keep private parent labels noninteractive. - Add ten Storybook scenarios with the production header. Cover linked parents, long titles, phone widths, tablet width, dark theme, standalone tasks, Mine source, and private parents on desktop and phones. - Add regression tests and document the layout rules in DESIGN.md. - Keep the source collection and filters when people follow the parent link. Cover route state, stored state and legacy query links. - Use the existing noninteractive lock chip for private parents. Hide its parent number on phones. Refresh its control key when an open task changes screen size. Both regressions failed before their fixes and pass after them. - Refresh the SDK public source registry after the master update. The existing helper keeps all runtime and dependency pins unchanged. This repairs three support tests that failed on stale master source identities. ## Verification - Focused UI tests: `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/BreadcrumbBar.test.tsx ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx` — 280 passed. - UI typecheck: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm build-storybook` — passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` — passed. - Catalog checks and 30 map/catalog tests — passed. - Chromium: all ten scenarios rendered with no page errors. Story play functions finished. Checked 1440, 768, 390 and 320 pixel widths, keyboard parent navigation, private parent links, title limits and horizontal overflow. - Private-parent browser check: resize an open task from 1440 to 320 pixels and back. The chip changes from the parent number to Private and back. It remains noninteractive. - Screenshots were captured in light and dark themes. They are task evidence and are not committed. - This verifies the header with fixture data and the page wiring with mocked APIs. It does not claim live backend authorization or a pixel baseline comparison. The static server returns 404 for optional shell context reads. After keyboard navigation, destination task reads also return 404 because the preview has no task backend. The header renders and all play checks pass. - Case discovery and OpenAPI tests: 47 passed. - Current head: `e7a1ada02e75e9b2cbd5f6076ad6c113954f3a4b`. [CI run 42834603680](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42834603680) passed. All 61 head check runs are complete: 58 passed and three conditional jobs were skipped. The legacy Snyk status passed. [Greptile](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/20366#issuecomment-6751938924) reviewed this head at 5/5 with no actionable findings. All four inline review threads are resolved. - After the master update: all 280 UI tests, UI typecheck, token gates, Storybook build, 30 catalog tests and ten Chromium stories pass. All six screenshots match the saved images byte for byte. - SDK and process support checks: 105 tests pass. The source pin helper has eight passing tests. The three SDK failures reproduced before the registry refresh and passed after it. The helper check reports no remaining source drift and no runtime pin changes. - The earlier case discovery failure reproduced before the summary correction and passed after it. All server shards passed on the next head. That CI run failed one unchanged Rust process-reaping test: its owned tool stopped, but two unattributed orphan processes blocked verification. The earlier CI run passed the same Rust inputs. Cross-test process interference is possible; the historical log does not prove the cause. The next CI run passed Rust. That run failed three SDK checks on stale master source pins and one process inspection check. The source pin repair is in this head. The process check passes locally, but the earlier process inspection failure remains unexplained. - The same prior run failed the cohort migration resume test. Its upload barrier releases after five seconds; maximum uploads were seven and three in the two attempts, below eight. Three server files also exceeded the 180-second file budget. These test inputs come from master. A local attempt could not reproduce that CI assertion because its child Git command failed in this execution environment. Fresh CI 42834603680 passed these paths, including every server shard and Runner support. No test or process safety check was weakened. ## Risks - Breadcrumb titles display less text. Hover text and accessible names retain the full title. - The global path shows the immediate parent. People can follow parent links through a deeper task tree. - The shared breadcrumb component also serves other pages. Existing header and agent-switcher tests pass. - No schema, API behavior or stored title change. - SDK source identities must match the integrated source. The registry change uses the existing helper and preserves all runtime and dependency pins. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6. The exact runtime model ID and context window size are not exposed. Used reasoning, repository tools and Chromium verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
f4337bb5fb |
test(evals): land the chat catalog eval harness on master (#19614)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The chat-feature evals measure whether agents complete real chat requests through the product > - The chat catalog eval harness and its repairs live on the `chat-eval/master-candidate` branch, not on master > - Today's work made 139 of 242 chat evals pass in verified single-case live runs. Each product fix landed on master as its own pull request > - The eval-side changes (setups, graders, fault seams, evidence capture) still exist only on the candidate > - This pull request lands the harness on master. Master stays the source of truth for product behavior > - The benefit is one tree: evals run against master commits, and product fixes reach the evals as soon as they merge ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19441, Refs #19599, Refs #20270, Refs #20334, Refs #20342, Refs #20344, Refs #20354, Refs #20360, Refs #20373, Refs #20382, Refs #20409 **What existing behavior does this improve?** The chat catalog eval harness and the product it evaluates live on a long-running branch outside master. Eval fixes do not reach master, so master-based eval runs use old setups and graders. **Subsystem affected** `tests/runner-e2e` chat catalog harness, plus a small set of product changes that exist only on the candidate. **Proposed change** Land the harness on master. Every product fix from this eval work already merged to master as its own pull request. Conflicts keep master's product behavior. ## What Changed - Most of the diff (808 of 851 files) is under `tests/runner-e2e/`: chat-catalog domains, scenarios, descriptors, the TestOps manifest, private evidence tooling, and their tests. - Graders now check saved state, setup literals and rendered or clicked links. Many keyword and regex checks on free-form replies are removed. Each changed grader has a bumped `oracleVersion` and calibration tests (a valid reply, a reworded valid reply, and broken variants that must fail). - The shared link helper `hasLink` no longer treats a list link (for example `/COM/issues?view=mine`) as a link to every task without a URL key. - Setup fixes build real state through supported product routes: routine history, agent grants through the board grant route, budget holds with a real cap, and a storage-layer archive fault for `inbox-search.archive-partial-failure`. - Browser boundary journeys (sign-in, chat-disabled, onboarding) now write the standard pass evidence files. - Retargeted cases, approved by the maintainer: `agent-chat.chat-disabled` (Conference Room gate), `agents.restore-instructions` (no saved instruction history), `access.manage-membership` (member permission edits stay board-only). - The private evidence trusted files (`manual-private-handoff.ts`, `manual-private-retention.ts`, `manual-private-report-assets.ts`) are byte-identical to master. - Product files outside `tests/` (43 files, +1,328 −49) carry candidate-only changes that master does not yet have. Most are tests. The main code changes are in `request-human-input.ts`, `heartbeat-run-summary.ts`, `native-completion-feedback.ts`, `native-run-finalizer.ts`, `openapi.ts`, `secrets.ts` and `IssueChatLongThreadPerf.tsx`. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run chat-catalog-domains chat-catalog-contract.test.ts chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts unit-launcher.test.mjs --testTimeout=180000` in `tests/runner-e2e`: 269 files pass, 3,550 tests pass. - `node --test chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs`: 10 pass. - `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`: no change. - `tsc` for `server` and `tests/runner-e2e`: clean. - Live single-case verification: 139 of 242 cases passed on paid runs, and a person read the saved evidence for each. These are single-case runs, not one full-cohort run. ## Risks - Large diff. Most of it is test-only, but the 43 non-test files change product code paths. Review those files first. - Some graders are now less strict on reply wording. A person must read replies for meaning on those cases. - 42 cases need disposable outside accounts (Notion, Slack, GitHub, Daytona and others) and stay blocked. `access.invite-teammate` stays failing until local agent isolation lands, because the runner's durable state keeps a live invite token. - The paid workflow compares the trusted private-evidence files with master. They are unchanged, so this risk is low. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with tool use and code execution, in Claude Code. Subagents used the same model. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
7329eaf353 |
perf(ui): open sidebar Recents tasks from cache (#20450)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The board UI sidebar has a Recents list of the tasks a person opened
last
> - The Recents list renders from a local snapshot, but its links had no
warm-up. A click waited for the task-detail code and about nine
first-frame reads
> - Task lists (Inbox, Tasks) already warm a task on hover, press and
click, and #20355 added a batched `chat-bootstrap` read that had no UI
consumer
> - The hosted database is CPU-bound, so a fix must add at most one read
per page load and must not compete with the page's own reads
> - This pull request gives Recents the same open-intent prefetch as
task lists, warms the task-detail code, and preloads the top ten recent
tasks with one `chat-bootstrap` request after the page is idle
> - The benefit is that a click on a recent task shows its chat from
cache, without a wait for the API
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #20355 (server read this PR consumes). Builds on #20389, #20398 and
#20419.
**Is your feature request related to a problem?**
Opening a task from the sidebar's Recents was slower than opening it
from a task list. The Recents links had no prefetch. The task page
waited for its first-frame reads after the click.
**Describe the solution you'd like**
Recents links use the task lists' open-intent prefetch. When the page is
idle, one batched request loads the first frame of the most recent tasks
into the task page's caches.
**Describe alternatives you've considered**
Per-task prefetch of every recent task. That makes up to ten times nine
requests per page load, which the hosted database cannot afford.
**Additional context**
I searched open PRs and remote branches for "chat-bootstrap" and
"instant task opens". The only related work is the server-side branches
that merged as #20355. There is no other in-flight UI consumer of
`chat-bootstrap`.
## What Changed
- `ui/src/hooks/useIssueNavigationPrefetch.ts`: the open-intent handlers
from `IssueLinkQuicklook` move into one hook (light warm on pass-over;
`history: true` on a resting hover or focus, a mouse or pen press, and a
click). `IssueLinkQuicklook` now uses the hook. Its behavior does not
change.
- `ui/src/components/RecentTaskNavItem.tsx`: one Recents link wrapper
that applies the hook. The classic list (`SidebarRecentTasks`), the
Coordinator task rows and `DesignSidebar` use it. `SidebarNavItem`
accepts the handlers through a new optional `linkHandlers` prop.
- Classic Recents links now open `/issues/<identifier>` (Coordinator
already did). The old UUID link remounted the task page after a redirect
to the identifier route.
- `ui/src/hooks/useRecentTaskOpenWarmup.ts`: when Recents shows a task,
it fires the task-detail code warm-up (`useWarmTaskDetailCode`). After
two frames, a visible tab, no fetching queries and an idle callback, it
sends one `issues/chat-bootstrap?ids=` request for the ten most recent
tasks. It skips tasks whose first frame is cached and fresh. It sends no
request for an empty list or a hidden tab. It sends at most one request
per account per page load. Unmount or an account change aborts the
request.
- `ui/src/lib/issueChatBootstrapCache.ts`: `seedIssueChatBootstrap`
writes each field under the keys the task page reads, for the requested
ref, the id and the identifier: core issue, recent comments, comment
input facts (one batch, through the new `seedIssueIdBatch`), recent
activity, the recent run window (through the new shared
`buildRecentIssueRunWindow`), interactions, attachments, live runs and
active run. An explicit `null` active run is stored. A missing field is
not stored. It does not replace data that is as new or newer, data with
a read in flight, or data with a pending invalidation. Keys whose page
merges observed history (comments, activity, runs, input facts) are
filled only when empty. Items for another company are ignored.
- The seed fills the `?view=core` key, not the full detail key.
`seedIssueDetailCache` is not used: the core payload cannot stand in for
the detail read's related data, and seeding it there would suppress that
read.
- `issuesApi.chatBootstrap` client method.
- `tests/perf/collections/recent-task-open.spec.ts` and its README
section.
## Verification
Local disposable instance (`local_trusted`, production UI build,
embedded PostgreSQL, collection fixture plus 12 comments on each of 8
recent tasks, streamlined UI with the Coordinator sidebar). Journey:
open Projects with 8 Recents, wait for network idle plus 3 s, click a
recent task, measure until its latest comment is on screen. Each run
uses a fresh browser context (empty HTTP cache and storage apart from
Recents). Median of 5 runs, same server and fixture for both arms:
| Arm | Click to first chat frame | Idle page API requests |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `master` (
|
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
82abb3ea04 |
fix(native): classify a Codex API-key unknown model as a model rejection (#20488)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Native runner agents run on a provider (here Codex) with a model the
user saves on the agent
> - When the provider rejects that model, Paperclip should classify the
run as `native_provider_model_rejected`, ask the user to choose a model,
and let Retry finish the task
> - Paperclip recognized only the ChatGPT-account rejection (a 400 JSON
envelope). With API-key auth, Codex returns a different terminal error
for an unknown model
> - So the run failed as a generic `adapter_failed` ("Native session
failed"), and recovery opened a reconciliation incident ("Recovery
needed") for a turn that never did any work
> - This pull request recognizes the real API-key shape, bound to the
configured model, and names the rejected model on the task
> - The benefit is that the task asks for a model choice instead of a
reconciliation, and Retry completes the task after the user picks a
valid model
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
The restart-chaos config fault CF3 `model_id` saves a Codex agent with
the model `chaos-missing-model-<nonce>`. The run stays "running" for
about 60 seconds, then fails with `errorCode: adapter_failed`, "Native
session failed". The task shows "Recovery needed", cause
`native_continuation_requires_reconciliation`. The grader fails as
`CF3/model_id:actionable_message` (waves `w-20261110T061914-s206-cf` t01
and `w-20261110T053831-s205-cf` t02).
Root cause: the wave runs Codex with an OpenAI API key. I drove the
bundled `codex app-server` (0.160.0) directly with an unknown model:
- With API-key auth, Codex retries the Responses API 404 ten times
(about 59 s), then fails the turn with `{"message":"unexpected status
404 Not Found: The model \`<id>\` does not exist or you do not have
access to it., url: https://api.openai.com/v1/responses, cf-ray: …,
request id:
req_…","codexErrorInfo":{"httpConnectionFailed":{"httpStatusCode":404}}}`.
- With ChatGPT auth, the turn fails in about 3 s with `message` =
`{"type":"error","status":400,"error":{"type":"invalid_request_error","message":"The
'<id>' model is not supported when using Codex with a ChatGPT
account.","code":"model_not_found"}}`. Paperclip already classified this
one.
`createNativeProviderFailureObservation` parsed only the JSON envelope,
and the runner's provider-failure category for an HTTP 404 is `unknown`.
The terminal therefore stayed unclassified.
**Expected behavior**
The run is `native_provider_model_rejected`, the task shows `userAction:
"choose_model"` and names the model, no reconciliation incident opens,
and Retry completes the task after the user picks a valid model.
**Steps to reproduce**
`node cli/node_modules/tsx/dist/cli.mjs
tests/restart-chaos/config-wave.ts --faults CF3 --adapters codex
--references model_id --tasks 1 --concurrency 1 --restarts K2 --seed
206` on `master` (with `OPENAI_API_KEY` set).
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
a14ae9b5c9 |
fix(workspaces): name a failed workspace setup command on the task page (#20478)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Before an agent starts, Paperclip prepares the task workspace and runs the project's configured setup commands (for example the workspace provision command) > - When that command fails, the run fails as `setup_failed`, and the task stops with a Retry > - The task page shows only "Failed" and a generic recovery notice. The real error (the command, its exit status and output) is visible only on the run page > - The user cannot see from the task which setting is broken or what to change > - This pull request records a bounded, named cause for a failed setup command and shows it on the task page > - The benefit is that the task names the broken setting and what to change, and classification, retry and recovery stay the same ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The restart-chaos config fault wave CF1 sets a project `workspaceStrategy.provisionCommand` to `bash ./scripts/provision-worktree.sh`, a script that does not exist. The run fails as `setup_failed` with `Execution workspace provision command "bash ./scripts/provision-worktree.sh" failed: bash: ./scripts/provision-worktree.sh: No such file or directory`. The task page shows "Failed" and "Paperclip automatically retried continuation … still has no live execution path". The grader fails the task as `CF1/provision_command:message_only_in_run_detail`. **Expected behavior** The task page names the failed setup step, the configured command, its exit status and a short tail of its output, and says what to change. Retry behavior stays the same. **Steps to reproduce** `node cli/node_modules/tsx/dist/cli.mjs tests/restart-chaos/config-wave.ts --faults CF1 --adapters codex --tasks 2 --concurrency 2 --restarts K1,K2 --seed 204` on `master`. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at |
||
|
DottaandClaude
|
1e13c58a4e |
fix(heartbeat): name the cause of generic adapter failures and keep SQL text off the board (#20483)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Heartbeat run settlement records why a run failed, and the board shows that record. > - Runs that fail without a named code settle as `adapter_failed` (or `setup_failed`) with no cause. > - A user, an operator, and the restart chaos harness cannot tell what went wrong from such a run. > - Some run errors also show raw SQL statement text to users. > - This pull request records a bounded `failureCause` code for generic failures, shows it on the board, and keeps SQL text out of run errors. > - The benefit is that a generic failure now names its cause, for example "adapter failed (40001)", without leaking messages, SQL, or secrets. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20385 (the nested-cause extraction this change reuses). Related: #20421 (restart chaos universal checks U1-U4). **What happened?** The restart chaos audit of 79 saved waves found 30 failed runs with `errorCode: "adapter_failed"` and a null or generic error. Every U3 ("diagnosable") warning was `adapter_failed`. Nobody could tell what failed. Some board run errors also showed raw SQL statement text from wrapped database errors (Drizzle `Failed query: ... params: ...`). **Expected behavior** A run that fails with a generic code names a short, safe cause. The board shows the cause next to the stop reason. Run error text never shows SQL statements or their parameters. **Steps to reproduce** Make an adapter throw a wrapped database error (an `Error` whose nested `cause` has `code: "40001"` and whose message has a Drizzle `Failed query:` statement). Before this change, the run settles as `adapter_failed` with no cause, and `heartbeat_runs.error` contains the SQL statement and parameters. The new tests in `server/src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts` reproduce this. ## What Changed - Runner: move the #20385 event-commit cause extraction into `safeErrorCauseCode` (`packages/paperclip-runner/src/control-plane/safe-error-cause.ts`) and export it. The Runner's own diagnostics use the same function, unchanged in behavior. - Shared: add the `failureCause` contract (`packages/shared/src/run-failure-cause.ts`): one `[A-Za-z0-9_.:-]` token of at most 80 characters, `normalizeRunFailureCause`, `readRunFailureCause`, and `withoutSqlStatementText`. - Server: add `server/src/services/heartbeat/run-failure-cause.ts`. Settlement records `resultJson.failureCause` only when the code is generic (`adapter_failed`, `setup_failed`). `errorCode` stays the same. - Thrown errors (`failRun`, `failRunSetup`): `provider_http_<status>`, else `provider_<category>`, else the first safe code in the error and up to three nested causes (`40001`, `ECONNRESET`), else the error class name, else `unknown_error`. - Adapter results without a code (`completeRun`): the error family, `signal_<name>`, `process_cancellation_failed`, `exit_code_<n>`, `adapter_reported_error`, or `unknown_error`. - The failure log lines (`heartbeat execution failed`, `heartbeat execution setup failed`, and a new `heartbeat run failed` warning for generic adapter results) include `failureCause` and `errorCode`. - Server: replace SQL statement text in run error text with "Database query failed (<cause>)" at all three settlement paths, including the cancelled branch. The execution blocker's `runError`, the attention inbox (failed-run excerpt and metadata), and continuation summaries apply the same replacement on read, so older rows also stop showing SQL there. - Server: Retry admission and failed-preparation replay accept only a closed set of `resultJson` keys. `failureCause` is added to each of those lists (`task-retry.ts`, `chat-channels/failed-run-retry.ts`, `cancelled-native-startup.ts`, `fresh-workspace-continuation.ts`). It is a diagnostic code with no execution or replay authority, so a failed-preparation run stays retryable. - Server: `runsForIssue` returns a validated top-level `failureCause`. It is null for older rows, non-string JSON values, and malformed values. - UI: `RunForIssue.failureCause`; `IssueRunLedger` shows "adapter failed (40001)". Older runs keep "adapter failed". The Storybook run-ledger fixture has a failed run with a cause. - Restart chaos harness: run samples keep `failureCause`. U3 treats a generic code with a specific `failureCause` as diagnosable. A bare `Error`, `unknown_error`, or the no-code fallback `adapter_reported_error` still counts as vague. U3 stays a warning. - Docs: `doc/run-log-events.md` and the harness README describe the field and the SQL replacement. ## Verification - Red before the fix: the four new `run-completion.test.ts` cases failed against `origin/master`'s `run-completion.ts` (no `failureCause`, SQL text in `error`). - Green: - `server/src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts`: all tests passed (real embedded PostgreSQL). New cases cover a nested `40001` three levels deep for execution and setup failures, SQL and a secret parameter absent from `error` and `resultJson`, the bound (an 81-character code and a SQL "code" fall back to the class name), `exit_code_137` for a code-less adapter result, a cancelled result with SQL text, no cause for a named code, and the log line. On this loaded host the suite's `afterAll` database teardown hit its 30 s hook limit after every test passed (the known local teardown limit, also seen in #20385). CI runs the suite. - `server/src/services/heartbeat/run-failure-cause.test.ts` (4), `server/src/__tests__/activity-service.test.ts` (recorded, legacy, malformed, overlong, boolean, and number cause projections), `server/src/__tests__/issue-continuation-summary.test.ts` (legacy SQL row). - `packages/shared/src/run-failure-cause.test.ts` (6), `ui/src/components/IssueRunLedger.test.tsx` (21), restart chaos `universal.test.ts` and `observer.test.ts`. - `packages/paperclip-runner/src/control-plane/durable-prp-control-plane.test.ts`: 207 passed (the stall-diagnostic cases still read `40001` and `ECONNRESET`). - Typecheck: shared, runner, server (all layers), UI, restart chaos harness. `pnpm check:token-gates`: all gates clean. - `pnpm verify` returned exit 2 (global doc input changed); required CI supplies broad coverage. - CI on `6295f8d` found that the new key made failed-preparation runs ineligible for Retry (`chat-channels.integration.test.ts` saved board-message Retry got 409; `workspace-recovery-preparation-dispatch.test.ts` dispatched 0 Retries). Both reproduced locally and pass after the allowlist fix, with the other 459 Retry cases in `chat-channels.integration.test.ts` and all 25 in `workspace-recovery-preparation-dispatch.test.ts`. - No chaos waves were run. Storybook was not opened in a browser; the fixture typechecks and the label is covered by the UI test. ## Risks - Low risk. `errorCode` values do not change, so retry, recovery, and comparison logic is unaffected. - No schema change and no migration. `failureCause` is a new optional `resultJson` key. Rows saved by the previous release have no key and render as before; a new row read by an old server is ignored. - The SQL replacement only acts on a Drizzle `Failed query:` marker, or on `$n` placeholder text with a statement shape. Ordinary error text does not change. When it acts, it also drops the text after the statement. - Code that checks `resultJson` against a closed key list must allow `failureCause`. I found and updated the four lists on the Retry path; a list I missed would refuse a Retry for a run with a generic failure. - This is the run log / instance database path. It adds no Telemetry event. - The server failure log line still logs the raw error message (unchanged behavior); only the board-facing text is changed. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file editing) and code execution for tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
8809f44b5e | Connect Codex and Claude login to agent computers (#20417) | ||
|
|
a5e01634f6 |
feat(ui): ask self-hosted users to star Paperclip on GitHub after 5 done tasks (#20453)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Many teams run Paperclip self-hosted, so the project grows when those users tell others about it > - A GitHub star is the cheapest way for a user to do that, but the app never asks > - Asking too early is noise. A user who has finished a few tasks knows whether Paperclip helps them > - This pull request adds a one-time, dismissable modal that asks self-hosted users for a star after their company has 5 done tasks > - The benefit is more visibility for the project, and no repeated prompt for the user ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Board UI (dialogs shown in the main app shell). **Problem or motivation** Self-hosted users have no prompt to star the repository. Users who like Paperclip often do not think of it. A prompt at the right moment helps other teams find the project. **Proposed solution** Show a small modal once the selected company has 5 tasks with status "done". The modal shows the Paperclip mark, the headline "You completed 5 tasks!", a short body, a "Star on GitHub" button and a "Not now" button. It shows only once per browser. Closing it in any way counts as seen. **Alternatives considered** A permanent banner or sidebar link. Both stay on screen after the user decides, so they cost attention every day. A one-time modal costs attention once. **Roadmap alignment** This is a small UI addition. It does not overlap with planned core work in ROADMAP.md. No related public issues or PRs found (searched for "star", "github star"). ## What Changed - Added `GitHubStarPrompt` (`ui/src/components/GitHubStarPrompt.tsx`). It reads the health endpoint and shows only on self-hosted instances (never on Cloud), never during onboarding, and only after 5 done tasks in the selected company. It waits for any other open dialog to close. It stores a "seen" flag in `localStorage` when it opens, so a reload does not show it again. - Mounted the prompt in `BoardDialogs`. - Exported the modal-detection helpers (`MODAL_SELECTOR`, `useModalOpen`) from `AnnouncementWell` so both components use the same rule. - Added `PaperclipMark`, the mark alone from the existing lockup geometry. The lockup and the mark now share one path constant. - Added the `issues.starPromptDone` query key. - Added tests for when the prompt opens and when it stays hidden. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/GitHubStarPrompt.test.tsx src/components/AnnouncementWell.test.tsx` - `pnpm check:token-gates` (all gates clean) - `pnpm typecheck` - Manual: on a self-hosted dev instance, mark 5 tasks in one company as done. The modal opens. "Star on GitHub" opens github.com/paperclipai/paperclip in a new tab. Reload: the modal does not open again. To see it again, delete the `paperclip.github-star-prompt.seen` key from `localStorage`. ## Risks - Low risk. The change is UI only and additive. - The prompt runs one small issues query (limit 5) while it is still eligible. After it is seen, the query is disabled. - If `localStorage` is not available, the prompt treats itself as already seen and does not show. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model id `claude-opus-5-5`, run through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits). Standard context window; extended thinking at low effort. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: squadbot <squadbot@squadbots-Mac-mini.local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
9a4a5066fa |
perf(inbox): stop optional reads from holding Mine rows hidden (#20407)
> Follows #20388, which merged to `master` as `50df9a19b9`. This branch now includes `origin/master`, so its diff carries only this PR's change: `ui/src/pages/Inbox.tsx`, `ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx`, `ui/src/api/approvals.ts` and `ui/src/api/access.ts`. ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Mine inbox is the first page a board user opens to see the tasks that need them > - The page hides task rows until every inbox read finishes, including reads that do not change the rows > - A slow user directory, approvals or join-request read therefore delays every task row, and a stalled read keeps the skeleton up > - Loading is also a layout contract: content that arrives late must not push visible rows down or reset keyboard selection > - This pull request removes the user-directory gate where names only fill row text, and bounds the approvals and join-request gates so a failure or stall cannot hold rows hidden > - The benefit is that a slow optional read no longer hides task rows, and the rows still do not move when late data arrives ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20388 **What existing behavior does this improve?** The Mine inbox reveal gate waits for every source, including the user directory, approvals and join requests. **Subsystem affected** Board UI inbox (`ui/src/pages/Inbox.tsx`). **Current behavior** If the user directory is slow, every task row waits for it, although user names only fill text in the rows. If approvals or join requests stall, the skeleton stays up until the request ends. **Proposed behavior** Rows reveal on session, experimental settings, `inbox/mine`, dismissals, agents and projects. The user directory fills names in place. Approvals and join requests can delay rows for one attempt of at most 10 s. **Reason and benefit** A slow optional read no longer hides the task list. A failed read shows the existing "Some inbox items couldn’t load" banner with a retry instead of a skeleton. **Breaking changes** None. ## What Changed - User directory: it no longer gates task rows. It still gates rows when they are grouped by assignee, because user names name and order those groups. - Approvals and join requests: they still gate rows (see "Kept gates" below). The gate now covers only the first attempt (`isLoading && failureCount === 0`). That attempt uses a 10 s request timeout (`INBOX_OPTIONAL_READ_TIMEOUT_MS`). After a failure or timeout, rows reveal and the query retries in the background. - Timeout notice: a timed-out approvals or join-request read is a transient error, which the inbox hides. Once the app's retries end, the inbox now shows the "Some inbox items couldn’t load" notice and "Retry missing items" button for a `TIMEOUT` on those reads. Other transient errors stay hidden as before. - `approvalsApi.list`, `accessApi.listJoinRequests` and `accessApi.listUserDirectory` accept optional `RequestOptions` (signal and timeout). Other callers do not change. - Tests in `ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx` ("optional reads and the reveal gate"): - rows reveal while the user directory is pending, and keep their order, their DOM nodes and the keyboard selection when it arrives; - assignee grouping still waits for the user directory; - a delayed approvals read holds rows (the kept layout guarantee); - a failed approvals or join-request read reveals rows with the retry banner and no skeleton; - after one failed attempt, rows reveal while the approvals read retries; - a stalled approvals read times out and reveals rows; - approvals or join requests that keep timing out under the app retry policy (`shouldRetryRequest`) show the missing-items notice and retry button. ### Kept gates Approvals and join requests stay in the gate. On Mine they sort in among the task rows by time (`getInboxWorkItems`). A pending approval is usually recent, so it sorts near the top. If it arrived after the rows were visible, it would push every task row down by one row. I could not reserve space for it, because the count is unknown until the read returns, and an empty reserved slot would collapse and shift the rows the other way. So I kept these two gates, and I bounded them so they cannot hold rows hidden on failure or stall. Keyboard selection already follows the selected row by key, so late data does not reset it. The user-directory test checks this. ## Verification Focused checks on this revision: - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx src/api/access.test.ts`: all passed (91 Inbox tests). - Red/green: with the #20388 versions of `Inbox.tsx`, `approvals.ts` and `access.ts`, three new tests fail (user directory pending, retry after first failure, stalled approvals). They pass with this change. The other four pin guarantees that already held. - Review fixes: the timeout-notice tests fail without `eb5d55da86` and pass with it. `cd ui && npx vitest run src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx`: 94 passed. - After merging `origin/master` (`54d73aef19`): `cd ui && npx vitest run src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx src/api/execution-workspaces.test.ts`: 101 passed. `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`: passed. - CI note: on head `e438e16c80`, `ci / e2e shard (3/8)` failed in `planning-mode-visual-verification.spec.ts` (the first task's `task-chat-composer-mode` did not appear within 30 s). That journey runs onboarding into the first task chat. It does not open the inbox or use the changed reads, so I treat it as unrelated. The other 33 tests in the shard passed. The new head reruns it. `pnpm check:token-gates`: clean. - `pnpm verify --base perf/inbox-referenced-workspaces` selected 2,219 Vitest files because `ui/src/api/access.ts` is imported widely. I did not run that broad set locally (the shared host was under heavy load). Required CI supplies that coverage. Performance (same local fixture as #20388: authenticated mode, non-admin member, 8,750 execution workspaces, 38,750 tasks, production UI bundle, headless Chromium, new context per run). The host load average was about 30–48 from other work, so I used alternating pairs. | Scenario | #20388 | This PR | Median paired saving | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | No injected delay, 6 pairs | median 870 ms (747–1,922) | median 1,046 ms (795–2,002) | mixed signs, no measurable change | | User directory delayed 3 s, 5 pairs | median 3,980 ms (3,852–6,048) | median 1,096 ms (698–1,263) | 2,814 ms | | Approvals stalled 20 s, 1 run each | 20,829 ms | 10,737 ms | — | On this fixture the optional reads finish before `inbox/mine`, so this PR does not change the normal cold load. It helps when an optional read is slower than `inbox/mine`, for example under server load. ## Risks - Low risk. The change only removes or bounds waits for reads that do not decide row order. - Assignee names can appear a moment after the rows on a slow user directory. The rows keep their height and position. - If approvals or join requests time out on every retry, the notice and retry button appear. If they time out and later succeed, they insert into the list after the rows are visible. This happens only in that failure path. - The 10 s timeout applies to these inbox reads only. Other pages that read the same data do not change. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edit, headless browser). Extended reasoning on. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5
|
a9d0946e64 |
fix(ui): keep the persisted cache's final state when it cancels reads (#20431)
The persisted read cache cancels in-flight reads with revert: false when it clears account data or evicts a denied task, then writes their final state itself. A non-silent cancel settled later as a query error, which overwrote that state with CancelledError and reached QueryCache.onError. Cancel these reads silently so the written state stays. Refs #20430 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5570debc5b |
fix(ui): stop reporting cancelled queries to Sentry (#20430)
React Query's CancelledError keeps the default Error name, so the name-based abort check never matched it. A query cancelled with revert: false (for example by the persisted cache when an issue read is denied or the account changes) reached the query cache onError as an "unknown" error and was sent to Sentry. Recognize it by class. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
915edcff49 |
fix(workspaces): preserve archived native recovery during migration (#20424)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Durable workspace migration must retain saved files and pending recovery work. > - An archived Git workspace can have an authenticated restore recipe and a terminal native run with pending remote files. > - Its task can select a different workspace. Reopening the archived workspace would change that task. > - The current migration owner refuses this source because it has no live local directory. > - This pull request uses the existing online recovery preservation owner for this exact archived recipe case. > - Migration retains the old task, provider allocation, recovery action, and native sync reference. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20298, #20394, and #20418. Related cleanup work in #19812 does not cover this migration case. **What happened?** A historical archived Git workspace with a saved restore recipe and a terminal prepared native sync reference cannot migrate online. Admission reports `remote_copyback_unresolved` and `workspace_recovery_unresolved`. The old task can already select another workspace, so reopening it is not a safe migration path. **Expected behavior** Authenticate the archived files into private scratch. Preserve all typed native and provider recovery obligations in the existing migration journal and markers. Keep the original task selection, history, archive state, and restore flags unchanged. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Archive a Git worktree with staged, unstaged, and untracked files in a saved recipe. 2. Retain a terminal failed native run, its prepared sync reference, and its matching remote allocation and recovery action. 3. Remove the old local worktree and select a different workspace on the task. 4. Call `migrateRemoteWorkspace` without `writersStopped`. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `b2a7d322ed0bafda04a0b78ce14e4f25c8d5d170`. **Deployment mode** Self-hosted server with PostgreSQL and configured object storage. ## What Changed - Permit the existing online recovery owner to inspect recipe-backed archived Git sources. - Acquire the existing native finalization locks for those sources. Reinspect their exact proofs after lock acquisition and before publication. - Lock related source-task ancestry before publication. - Reuse the existing private Git restore, authenticated archive, journal, marker, and recovery-source contracts. Add no schema or provider calls. - Leave active sources and archived sources without a valid recipe on their existing refusal paths. - Include the shared UI correction from #20418. A nullable draft override follows fresh task data when the user has no local choice. Explicit choices increment a generation. Normal and recovered successful sends clear only their own choice; failed sends and newer choices remain intact. ## Verification - Unchanged master RED: the new historical-source fixture fails with `remote_workspace_migration_blocked:remote_copyback_unresolved,workspace_recovery_unresolved`. - Five focused real PostgreSQL, filesystem, Git, and encrypted-storage tests pass on Node 24.22.2. The success case loses an upload reply, resumes the same operation and snapshot, restores the staged/unstaged/untracked bytes, and verifies unchanged task history, lease, recovery action, finalizer, and recipe flags. - Recipe, prepared reference, and provider allocation changes during the actual upload each refuse publication. A competing native finalization owner refuses before capture. - Migration command: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/remote-workspace-migration.test.ts -t 'unselected archived recipe|archived prepared source|competing native F owner'`. - All server typecheck layers, module boundary checks, and whitespace checks pass for the migration revision. The migration source bytes remain unchanged through the shared UI follow-ups. - Initial CI run 42727051535 exposed an existing planning-mode browser failure: shard 3/8 passed 33 cases but the refreshed task mode did not appear. The same issue occurred twice on #20418. A real local regression proved that initial cached data could leave the composer in its old mode. This path does not invoke migration. - Review then exposed genuine defects in the initial shared UI repair: an optimistic save rollback could reset a failed draft, and an earlier send could replace a newer draft choice. Recovered delivery also left a consumed choice pinned. All three have real RED→GREEN controls. The final shared fix uses an explicit nullable override, a choice generation, and one attempt-bound settlement owner for normal and recovered success, with no value-equality inference or durable payload changes. - Exact shared UI source now passes all 145 composer tests (2.88s), the original desktop/mobile planning browser case (15.5s; assertions and timeouts unchanged), token gates, and the canonical UI typecheck. The test harness uses the full persisted `IssueWorkMode` type, including `skill_test`, to fix the observed CI typing failure. - These UI results are reused from the identical shared source in #20418 through `ba1f85f18085dd0e84c594ed0cb68d5bf817c93c`. The unchanged planning browser pass is on the explicit-state model before the later settlement-helper extraction. The final receipt/resend controls, full composer suite, typecheck, and token gates include that extraction. They do not claim a local browser run on this entire combined branch. Fresh required CI and review qualify this PR head. - Previous-release state: existing recipe, v3 prepared reference, and journal shapes carry forward unchanged. A saved partial operation resumes with the same IDs. Migration does not certify remote file recovery or provider termination. Live provider recovery and hosted migration remain separate acceptance steps. ## Risks The change admits one more source class into an existing preservation path. An incorrect proof could publish incomplete file authority. The canonical recipe validation, full authenticated restore, native finalization locks, source reinspection, and publication checks remain mandatory. Pending remote data stays pending and retains its original allocation and reference. The shared UI repair updates only an unchanged draft mode; its regression checks preserve a local user choice. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. The runtime does not expose a deployment suffix or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
50df9a19b9 |
perf(inbox): read only the execution workspaces Mine rows reference (#20388)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Mine inbox is the first page a board user opens to see the tasks that need them > - The page loaded the company's full execution-workspace summary list and kept task rows hidden until that list arrived > - On a company with thousands of workspaces, that read checks each workspace row against the privacy predicate. It was the slowest request on the page > - The inbox needs workspace names only for the workspaces its rows reference, and only when the view shows workspace data > - This pull request adds an `ids` filter to the summary read, makes the inbox request only referenced workspaces, and stops rows from waiting for workspace data when the view does not show it > - The benefit is that Mine rows appear when the task data arrives, and the workspace read becomes a small bounded query ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The Mine inbox (`/:companyPrefix/issues?view=mine`) shows its task rows late on companies with many execution workspaces. **Subsystem affected** Board UI inbox and the execution-workspace summary API. **Current behavior** The page calls `GET /api/companies/:id/execution-workspaces?summary=true` with no filter. On a large company this returned 8,758 rows (2.5 MB) and took 12.3 s on the server. The reveal gate included this read, so rows appeared at 13.4 s although `inbox/mine` arrived at 1.6 s. **Proposed behavior** The inbox requests summaries only for the workspaces its rows reference. Rows appear when the Mine task data arrives, unless the view shows workspace data. **Reason and benefit** The workspace read becomes a small bounded query, and it leaves the critical path for the default Mine view. **Breaking changes** None. The `ids` parameter is optional and additive. ## What Changed - `packages/shared`: add `executionWorkspaceSummaryIdsQuerySchema` (comma-separated UUIDs, 1–100 distinct values) and `EXECUTION_WORKSPACE_SUMMARY_IDS_MAX`. - `server`: `GET /companies/:companyId/execution-workspaces` accepts `ids`. Bad input returns 422. The service adds `inArray(execution_workspaces.id, ids)`. The company scope and the actor read condition still apply, so privacy does not change. - `ui/src/api/execution-workspaces.ts`: `listSummaries` accepts `ids`. New `listSummariesByIds` reads ids in chunks of 100 and concatenates the results. - `ui/src/pages/Inbox.tsx`: the workspace query is keyed on the sorted distinct `executionWorkspaceId`s of the rows the inbox holds (Mine, touched, context and remote search issues). It uses `keepPreviousData` and runs only when isolated workspaces are on and at least one id exists. - Reveal gate: rows wait for the workspace read only when workspace data changes what the rows show. This is workspace grouping, a visible Workspace column, or an active search (workspace names are searchable). Otherwise rows reveal without it. - Tests: route ids pass-through and 422 cases (non-uuid, empty, separators only, more than 100); service test for the id filter with company scope and the read condition; UI api chunking test; Inbox tests for "rows reveal while the workspace read is pending when no workspace column or grouping is active", rows waiting when the Workspace column is visible, and "shows the resolved isolated workspace name" with the id-filtered call. Follow-ups (not changed here, they still read the unfiltered list): - `ui/src/pages/LegacyInbox.tsx:772` - `ui/src/components/IssuesList.tsx:985` - `ui/src/components/LegacyIssuesList.tsx:888` - `ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.tsx:570` (filtered by project and reuse, but not by ids) ## Verification Focused checks on this revision: - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-routes.test.ts src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-service.test.ts -t "summar|ids"`: 14 passed (embedded Postgres ran the service test). - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/api/execution-workspaces.test.ts src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx`: all passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server --filter @paperclipai/ui --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: clean. - `pnpm verify` selected 2,481 Vitest files (the shared validator change reaches most suites). I stopped it at a 25-minute limit on a heavily loaded shared host. Before the limit, three server tests outside this change failed: `agent-commentary-skills` (skill mount), `agent-config-read-access` (24.8 s timeout) and `agent-directory-working-copies`. Required CI supplies the full coverage. - Review fix `fc3f82dae0`: when workspace data is visible, the reveal gate also waits while `keepPreviousData` supplies the previous id set's summaries. A new test switches Mine → Recent to a new workspace and checks the Recent row stays hidden until its workspace loads. It fails without the change. - Follow-up commits `bf34f84823` and `8fc743b5ca` add a 100-row Mine test with a counted workspace id scan. It fails with the old `= []` defaults and passes with the stable `NO_ISSUES` default. Performance (local, synthetic fixture): - Instance: isolated worktree instance, `authenticated` mode, signed in as a non-admin company member so the real workspace privacy predicate runs. Production UI bundle (`PAPERCLIP_UI_DEV_MIDDLEWARE=false`). Headless Chromium 1440×900, a new browser context per run (cold HTTP cache and cold query cache). macOS, Apple Silicon, with other local sessions running. - Fixture: 8,750 execution workspaces (each with a source task and a privacy-source key), 38,750 tasks, 150 Mine tasks; the Mine snapshot returns 100 rows that reference 100 workspaces. - Finish event: the first `[data-slot="task-row"]` is in the DOM. | Measurement | Before (`02bfe71a6b`) | After | | --- | --- | --- | | Cold time to rows, median of 7 | 1,209 ms (1,046–1,312) | 702 ms (567–1,209) | | Workspace summary read, server wait (time to first byte), median of 7 | 496 ms unfiltered, 2.0 MB | 18 ms with 100 ids, 22 KB | The difference of medians is 507 ms. This is close to the unfiltered read's wait on this fixture (about 550–590 ms in the browser runs). The runs were sequential batches, not alternating pairs. Limits: this fixture does not reproduce the 12.3 s server time seen on the development instance. Here the unfiltered read cost 0.5–1.7 s and grew with the company's task count. The browser gain on the original instance should be close to that instance's unfiltered read time, but I did not measure it there. ## Risks - Low risk. The `ids` filter only narrows the existing query. It does not change the read condition or the company scope. - A row whose workspace is not readable by the actor shows no workspace name, as before. - When the Workspace column or grouping is visible, rows still wait for the workspace read. That read is now small. - When the id set changes, the query refetches all chunks. Before a view first reveals, rows wait for the new summaries if workspace data is visible. After that, the previous names stay visible while a refresh loads. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edit, headless browser). Extended reasoning on. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b09f17fbfd |
fix(agents): repair queued setup through task connection cards (#20361)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents doing work for people. > - Agent verification must finish before an accepted task can start. > - A missing AI account default can prevent verification before a provider starts. > - Lifecycle policy treated that owned configuration refusal as a temporary failure and retried each minute. > - The accepted turn remained Queued without explaining the prerequisite. > - Park account configuration failures and reuse the task's existing inline connection card. > - Successful repair rechecks verification and releases the original queued turn under its original authority. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An OpenCode agent selected the responsible user's OpenRouter default, but that default did not exist. Verification retried unchanged configuration indefinitely and its accepted task stayed Queued. **Expected behavior:** Preserve accepted work, explain the setup prerequisite, and let the appropriate person repair it using the existing task connection UI. Completion must verify the agent before starting the same queued turn. Genuine pause, approval and access gates remain effective. **Reproduction:** Create an OpenCode Runner agent with a responsible-user OpenRouter binding and no personal default; assign a task while verification is pending. The base retries verification and shows an unexplained queue. Related: #18702 handles pending task connection recovery after account repair. This PR handles the earlier agent-verification boundary. #20330 addresses a separate Codex governed-wait timeout and is already merged. ## What Changed - Share owned account-selection failure evidence through a pure library contract. Lifecycle policy parks those configuration failures with fixed, redacted guidance; temporary infrastructure errors retain their retries. - Batch setup-state reads for unstarted queued turns. Distinguish manual repair from automatic setup retries and preserve Stop, started/history state and lifecycle holds. - Reuse the existing `connection_intent` card, account selection and completion APIs. Its controller-only `agentSetup` marker accepts only never-started legacy turns; runtime tokens still require a running run. - Address the card to the lifecycle verifier's account owner, preserving the task's execution principal and private-task visibility. Attach missing cards on admission, verification, startup and full recovery, including retained retries and continuations. Repeated delivery and publication remain bounded. A new queued turn supersedes the setup card of a stopped turn; generic connection cards retain cross-run reuse. - Recheck lifecycle verification after usable-account completion, then release the existing turn through the normal readiness path. Preserve decline, Stop, reassignment and changed setup-owner gates. Fence an in-flight verification failure from overwriting a repair; add no provider wake or recurring worker. - Park owned account refusals during resume as well as initial verification. Bind setup cards to the lifecycle operation, settle obsolete deliveries, and keep explicit Retry guidance accurate. - Reuse the router’s existing lifecycle pin for setup repair without rerouting the task, advancing the pool cursor, or replacing its saved binding. Legacy direct-account cards remain readable. - Hide the incorrect Resume banner during setup, retaining genuine manual/budget pause controls. Document the execution and retry contract. ## Verification - Red: eight original behavior assertions failed on the base, including the real selector's retry decision and the real batched queue projection. Six owned selection cases failed classification. Temporary-error presentation, different task/verifier users, retained retry/continuation recovery and the setup Resume banner also have failing-before/passing-after regressions. - Green: 430 affected backend, lifecycle, shared-contract and UI tests passed before the final review corrections. Subsequent focused runs cover one inline card, real account selection/completion, duplicate delivery/publication, verification before readiness, unchanged run authority, private tasks, no extra provider wake, decline/Stop/reassignment, company isolation, invalid runtime tokens, transient retries and redacted diagnostics. - Final setup/card and generic connection-service suites: 49 tests passed. The stopped-turn case failed before the correction, then passed with real account completion, the stopped source remaining cancelled, and the replacement source remaining queued. - After rebase, all 129 focused assertions passed. The local queue suite’s 88 execution assertions passed repeatedly, but its database-fixture teardown exceeded both 30-second and 120-second hooks. An isolated queue case completed, and the setup/connection suites fully passed. The original queue test and cleanup remain unchanged; broad CI supplies the full-suite result. - Server/UI typechecks, module boundaries, token gates and diff checks passed. `pnpm verify --explain` requested broad CI because the execution-contract document changed; no redundant full local suite was substituted. - Real source acceptance: macOS arm64, Node 26.4.0, isolated embedded PostgreSQL and local board identity. Created an OpenCode/OpenRouter agent and task through the API with no default. Admission retained one unstarted turn and produced the existing inline Connect OpenRouter card. The browser opened its credential form and closed it without entering credentials. The same card/run persisted after server restart and reload, with the setup label and no incorrect Resume. The browser also reproduced Stop followed by a new queued turn retaining the stale card on the prior head. On `12f609c98372fd1e50644028db75cfcc8deb210d`, startup superseded the stale card and retained the same replacement turn, with the original turn still cancelled and no provider execution. - The earlier CI case-search failure also reproduces on exact base `0e3fdebea8257bdff11573081c76b306f12db230` without this PR. Its repair is now in master via #20371; this branch is rebased onto it and contains no API-search changes. - Staging's actual Runtime test returned “Connect an account and choose your personal default” before provider startup. The original turn later started independently on deployed code, then hit a separate workspace-export failure. Automatic file recovery subsequently marked that run successful; its task remains Blocked and the trial’s useful output is unverified. This PR is not deployed; provider authentication through its card and downstream publication remain unverified. No account, credential, default, permission or binding was changed during diagnosis. - Previous revision review: Greptile 5/5 on `12f609c98372fd1e50644028db75cfcc8deb210d`, with all four inline findings addressed and resolved. [Full CI passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42713494508) on that revision: 59 successful checks, one neutral check and three intentional skips, with no pending or failed checks. - Latest revision `976bcae993805a8a2222395bbff9394f6791b424`: resume, router and Retry-copy regressions failed before repair. Green: 92 lifecycle/setup/shared tests, 83 setup/generic-connection/router tests, and 137 UI/shared tests. Server/UI typechecks, module boundaries and token gates passed. [Full CI passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42720731137) on this exact revision: 59 successful checks and three intentional skips, with no pending or failed checks. Greptile reviewed this head at 5/5; all six review findings are addressed and resolved. Real Stop/retry acceptance retained the same replacement turn and current-operation card through two actual server restarts, with no provider execution. ## Risks - Known account configuration failures now require repair or explicit Retry. Temporary failures keep automatic retries; accepted work and authority remain intact. - The projection adds one company-scoped batch read only for unstarted queued turns. Card attachment examines at most 100 active candidates and adds no timer, worker, schema or migration. - The optional stored setup-card marker requires an aware reader during rollback. No run/session/checkpoint identity format changes. Setup presentation grants no access and cannot bypass verification or other gates. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, tool use, code editing and test execution. The exact serving model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8004ad069e |
perf(ui): skip socket reconcile for reads that have no live events (#20398)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The board UI keeps company data fresh through `LiveUpdatesProvider`, which listens on a WebSocket and invalidates queries for each event > - The provider closes the socket while the tab is hidden, and events are not replayed, so it invalidates every active query when the socket opens and when the tab returns > - Some of those queries have no live events at all: instance settings, plugin UI contributions, and the person's workspace and sidebar preferences > - Reconciling them adds requests to every tab return and to the first socket open, on a server that is already saturated > - This pull request excludes those reads from the reconcile and gives them a 5-minute stale time > - The benefit is four fewer requests on each tab return and on the first socket open, with no change to company data freshness ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The burst of requests when a board UI tab regains focus, and the second wave right after page load. **Subsystem affected** Board UI live updates (`ui/src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider.tsx`) and query defaults (`ui/src/main.tsx`, new `ui/src/lib/live-reconcile.ts`). **Current behavior** On a local instance, returning to a hidden Mine tab sends 27 API requests. Those include `instance/settings/experimental`, `workspace-preferences/me`, `plugins/ui-contributions` and `sidebar-preferences/me`. Live events never touch these. The same four re-fire when the socket first opens after load. **Proposed behavior** The socket reconcile skips those four reads. Their stale time is 5 minutes, so a window-focus refetch runs at most every 5 minutes. Their own mutations still invalidate them at once. **Reason and benefit** Each tab return costs four fewer requests. On staging, about 25 requests re-fire together on focus, and every one delays the visible rows. ## What Changed - New `ui/src/lib/live-reconcile.ts`: `LIVE_EVENT_FREE_QUERY_KEYS` (instance settings, general and experimental settings, plugin UI contributions, workspace preferences, sidebar preferences), `isLiveReconciledQuery`, and `applyLiveEventFreeQueryDefaults`. - `LiveUpdatesProvider` passes `isLiveReconciledQuery` as the predicate on its invalidate-all paths: tab return, disconnected polling, socket open, `live.resync`, and the transcript recovery that runs after a resync. The first healthy open still also skips session and health. - `main.tsx` applies the 5-minute stale time to those keys with `setQueryDefaults`. No observer sets its own stale time for them. - Not changed, and why: - `auth/get-session` and `health` keep focus refetch and reconnect handling for sign-out and reconnect detection. - `cli-auth/me` (board access) keeps the reconcile because it detects revoked access. - The company list keeps the reconcile because live events invalidate it. - Company data (agents, chats, projects, approvals, labels, join requests, live runs and others) keeps the reconcile. The socket is closed while hidden, so the reconcile is how missed events arrive. Keeping the socket open while hidden is a larger change and is not in this pull request. - Tests: new `live-reconcile.test.ts` covers the scope and the stale-time defaults. The hidden-tab test in `LiveUpdatesProvider.hook.test.tsx` expects the predicate. ## Verification - `ui`: `npx vitest run src/lib/live-reconcile.test.ts src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider src/lib/query-client.test.ts src/lib/persisted-query-cache.test.ts` passes (283 tests). - `pnpm verify` asks for broader CI coverage because `main.tsx` is outside the resolved test graphs. Required CI provides it. - Manual, on a local instance with the Mine page: hide the tab for 45 s, then show it, and count `/api/` resource entries. `master` sends 27 requests and this branch sends 23. The four reads above are absent; every company read is still present. ## Risks - The reconcile was also how other tabs picked up changes to these reads. A change made in another tab or browser now reaches this tab on its next focus after 5 minutes, or on reload; before, it was the next focus after 30 s. This covers an administrator changing an instance or experimental setting or installing a plugin, and the same person changing their workspace or sidebar preferences in another tab (for example the coordinator or classic shell, or sidebar order). Changes made in the same tab still apply at once. - Low risk otherwise. Only the reconcile predicate and the stale time change. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser). 1M-token context window. Extended thinking was off. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
b184e40108 |
perf(ui): serve every project list from one includeArchived read (#20395)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The board UI reads the company project list in many places: the
sidebar, starred projects, the command palette, the new-task dialog, and
archive-aware pages such as the Mine inbox
> - Active-only consumers read `GET /projects`, and archive-aware ones
read `GET /projects?includeArchived=true`, under two React Query keys
> - A Mine load therefore fetched the same large payload twice (580–590
KB each on our dev instance)
> - The two responses differ only by archived rows; the server's active
list is exactly the rows where `archivedAt` is null
> - This pull request makes every consumer share the
`includeArchived=true` query, and active-only consumers filter it with
`select`
> - The benefit is one project read per page instead of two
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What existing behavior does this improve?**
Duplicate project list reads on page load.
**Subsystem affected**
Board UI project queries (`ui/src/lib/company-projects-query.ts` and its
consumers).
**Current behavior**
A cold Mine load sends both `/companies/:id/projects` (sidebar) and
`/companies/:id/projects?includeArchived=true` (inbox).
**Proposed behavior**
One `includeArchived=true` read serves both. Active-only consumers apply
`selectActiveProjects`.
**Reason and benefit**
The project list is one of the largest shell payloads. Reading it once
saves a large response on every page that has both kinds of consumer.
## What Changed
- New `companyProjectsQuery(companyId, { includeArchived? })` in
`ui/src/lib/company-projects-query.ts`. It always uses the
`includeArchived: true` key and fetch. For active-only use it adds a
stable, module-level `select` that keeps rows without `archivedAt`.
- 22 files that read the active list now spread
`companyProjectsQuery(...)`, and so do the plugin SDK project picker and
16 archive-aware pages that wrote the shared key and fetcher inline.
Their `enabled` and other options are unchanged. `OnboardingWizard`'s
one imperative read is unchanged. `pages/Inbox.tsx` already reads the
same key and fetcher, so it shares the entry without an edit.
- Invalidation: project mutations and live events invalidate
`queryKeys.projects.all(companyId)`, which matches the shared key. The
onboarding wizard invalidated the old active-only key; it now
invalidates `projects.all`.
- Tests: new `company-projects-query.test.tsx` (one request for both
consumers, correct filtering, and one refetch after `projects.all`
invalidation). Three existing tests (`CommandPalette`, `CompanyExport`,
`GitHubBotManagement`) now seed or expect the shared key.
- New browser check
`tests/perf/collections/shared-project-list.spec.ts`: after the Mine
inbox read completes, the page has sent no active-only project request.
## Verification
- `pnpm verify` passes.
- `ui`: the consumer suites (`CoordinatorSidebar`, `SidebarProjects`,
`SidebarStarredProjects`, `CommandPalette`, `NewIssueDialog`,
`AgentWorkPanels`, `CoordinatorNeedsYou`, `IssueDetail`,
`ProjectDetail`, `Projects`, `CompanyExport`, `ChatExecutionDefaults`,
`GatewaysList`, `Search`, `IssueProperties`, `persisted-query-cache`)
pass.
- Browser check:
`PAPERCLIP_COLLECTION_PERF_BASE_URL=http://127.0.0.1:<port> pnpm exec
playwright test --config tests/perf/collections/playwright.config.ts
shared-project-list.spec.ts`. It passes on this branch and fails on
`master`.
## Risks
- A page that needs only active projects now downloads archived rows
too. For most companies that is a small difference; the duplicate read
it removes is a full copy.
- The server does not order either list, and consumers sort for display,
so filtering on the client keeps behavior.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with
tool use (shell, file edits, browser). 1M-token context window. Extended
thinking was off.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
c7eb35809e |
perf(ui): read skills and routines only when an editor mounts (#20392)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The board UI wraps every page in an `EditorAutocompleteProvider` that supplies slash commands to Markdown editors > - The provider read the full company skills and routines lists as soon as a company was selected, on every page > - The Mine inbox has no editor, but it still paid for both reads: 259–284 KB for skills and 225–333 KB for routines on our dev and staging instances, with skills taking 8.5–13.7 s on a saturated staging server > - Those reads compete with the inbox rows for the same server > - This pull request starts the two reads only when the first Markdown editor mounts > - The benefit is two fewer large reads on every page without an editor, and no change for pages that have one ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The requests that every board UI page sends on load. **Subsystem affected** Board UI context (`ui/src/context/EditorAutocompleteContext.tsx`). **Current behavior** A cold load of `/:prefix/issues?view=mine` sends `GET /companies/:id/skills` and `GET /companies/:id/routines` although nothing on the page renders them. **Proposed behavior** The provider keeps both queries disabled until a component calls `useEditorAutocomplete()`. `MarkdownEditor` is the only caller, so the reads start when an editor mounts: a task composer, the new-task dialog when it opens, a comment box. **Reason and benefit** Each page without an editor saves two large reads. Pages with an editor read the same data at mount, before a user can type `/`. ## What Changed - `EditorAutocompleteProvider` holds a `requested` flag. Both queries are `enabled` only after it is set. - `useEditorAutocomplete()` sets the flag in an effect on first use. The flag stays set, so the lists stay current through the existing live-update invalidations for skills and routines. - New unit test `EditorAutocompleteContext.test.tsx`: no reads without an editor; one read of each list when two editors mount. - New browser check `tests/perf/collections/shell-editor-reads.spec.ts`: a Mine load sends no `skills` or `routines` request. ## Verification - `pnpm verify` passes. - `ui`: `npx vitest run src/context/EditorAutocompleteContext.test.tsx src/components/task-chat/TaskChatComposer.test.tsx` passes. - Browser check against a disposable local instance: `PAPERCLIP_COLLECTION_PERF_BASE_URL=http://127.0.0.1:<port> pnpm exec playwright test --config tests/perf/collections/playwright.config.ts shell-editor-reads.spec.ts`. It passes on this branch and fails on `master`. - Manual: on a local instance the Mine load dropped from 34 to 32 API requests. Opening a task shows the composer; `/` lists skills and routines as before. ## Risks - Low risk. On the first editor mount the slash menu is empty until the two reads return. On `master` the same reads ran at app start, so a user who typed `/` within the first moments of a page with an editor saw the same gap. - `attention/summary` is not changed. The navigation's "Needs you" count renders it on the Mine page. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser). 1M-token context window. Extended thinking was off. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
7e93ccb4b3 |
perf: fetch recent task summaries in one request (#20389)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The board UI sidebar shows the person's recent tasks on every page, including the Mine inbox > - The sidebar refreshes those rows through `GET /companies/:id/issues/summaries`, which accepted at most five IDs > - `useRecentTasks` sent the chunks one after another, so a 25-task history cost five sequential requests > - On staging each request took 3–6 s, so the recent-task rows settled about 20 s after load and every request competed with the inbox rows > - This pull request raises the per-request cap to 50 and fetches any remaining chunks in parallel > - The benefit is one summaries request for a typical history instead of a serial chain ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The refresh of the sidebar's recent tasks on page load. **Subsystem affected** Board UI (`ui/src/hooks/useRecentTasks.ts`) and the `/issues/summaries` route bound (`packages/shared`, `server/src/routes/issues.ts`). **Current behavior** A history of N recent tasks sends ceil(N/5) summaries requests in series. Measured on staging on 2026-11-09 for a cold Mine load: five requests of five IDs, started at 1.0 s, 4.3 s, 8.1 s, 12.3 s and 18.4 s, each taking 3.3–6.1 s. **Proposed behavior** Up to 50 recent tasks are one request. Longer histories send their chunks at the same time. **Reason and benefit** The staging server is saturated, so each extra serial round trip delays the sidebar and the inbox rows. One request removes four round trips from a typical load. ## What Changed - `ISSUE_SUMMARIES_MAX_IDS` is now 50 (was 5). The shared validator, the route's 400 message, the service guard and the OpenAPI description use the new bound. - `useRecentTasks` builds all chunks first and fetches them at most three at a time (`RECENT_TASK_SUMMARY_CONCURRENCY`). The recent list has no size cap, so this keeps a long history from becoming a burst. The cache key, omission handling and pruning are unchanged. A failed chunk still fails the batch, so nothing is pruned on a partial failure. - Tests: the route test accepts exactly `MAX` IDs and rejects `MAX + 1`; a hook test checks that at most three chunks are in flight; the API test uses the constant; `useRecentTasks` tests cover a 25-task history in one request and a 103-task history with three chunks in flight together, with and without a failed chunk. - New browser check `tests/perf/collections/recent-task-summaries.spec.ts`: a Mine load with a 12-task history sends summaries requests that each carry all 12 IDs, and the server answers 200 with all 12 tasks. ## Verification - `pnpm verify` (selected Vitest files) passes. - `server`: `npx vitest run src/__tests__/issue-summaries-routes.test.ts src/__tests__/issue-display-status.test.ts` passes (embedded PostgreSQL). - `ui`: `npx vitest run src/hooks/useRecentTasks.test.tsx src/api/issue-summaries.test.ts src/components/task-chat/TaskChatBlockerLinks.test.tsx src/components/CoordinatorSidebar.test.tsx src/components/SidebarRecentTasks.test.tsx` passes. - Browser check against a disposable local instance: `PAPERCLIP_COLLECTION_PERF_BASE_URL=http://127.0.0.1:<port> pnpm exec playwright test --config tests/perf/collections/playwright.config.ts recent-task-summaries.spec.ts`. It passes on this branch. With `master`'s hook and constant it fails: three requests of 5, 5 and 2 IDs. ## Risks - Low risk. The route still validates UUIDs, deduplicates, and applies the same read authorization per row. Blocker attention is computed with set-based queries, so 50 IDs is the same number of queries as 5. - During a rolling deploy, a new UI against an old server would get a 400 for a history above five tasks. The server serves the UI bundle, so both change together on a normal deploy. The sidebar keeps its stored snapshot when the refresh fails. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser). 1M-token context window. Extended thinking was off. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
eebdfe71b1 |
fix(ui): show submitted screenshots and Markdown in steering messages (#20367)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - People send follow-up messages while an agent works. > - The queue above the composer holds those messages until delivery. > - The queue showed raw Markdown and had no screenshot previews. > - Submitted screenshots stayed in the composer until the save response arrived. > - This pull request shows formatted text and previews in the queue at submission. > - It keeps upload receipts so failed saves can restore the draft and its files. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Send a message with Markdown and screenshots while an agent works. The queue shows Markdown source. It has no screenshot previews. The composer keeps the submitted screenshots until the save response arrives. **Expected behavior** Show formatted text and screenshot previews in the queue. Clear the submitted previews with the text. Restore them if the save fails. Keep files added for the next message. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open the Screenshot Submission Storybook case under Steering and queued messages. 2. Add a screenshot and formatted text. Select Send. 3. Leave the simulated save pending. Inspect the queue and composer. 4. Reject the save. Confirm the draft and screenshots return. Retry and complete the save. Related work: #19321 bounds the queued-message list. This fix keeps that scrolling behavior. ## What Changed - Hide submitted attachment previews as soon as Send clears the text. Keep their upload receipts until the request settles. - Use the shared Markdown renderer in queued rows. Show up to three compact screenshots with a count for more images. Strip standalone image syntax from the text preview. - Keep paragraph boundaries. Wrap thumbnails and controls within narrow rows. - Load queue previews only from local attachment and asset content paths. Add an opt-in image omission mode to the shared Markdown renderer for compact queue text. - Correct the case lookup API summary so the existing search test passes with the full catalog. - Add regressions for successful, rejected, and uncertain saves. Check files added to the next draft. - Add a production-component Storybook case with controlled save responses and a desktop/mobile browser test. - Document the queue display and draft recovery behavior in DESIGN.md. ## Verification - Red: the original components fail five new unit cases. The desktop and mobile browser cases also fail on raw Markdown. Screenshots show the previews still in the composer. - Green: 256 composer, queue, and shared Markdown unit tests pass. - Related coverage: 466 thread, draft, and attachment tests pass. One existing test is skipped. - Three browser cases pass. Desktop and mobile cases check pending save, rejection, retry, successful save, and steering. A 320px case checks separate paragraphs with no margins, three loaded thumbnails, the additional-image count, and auto-send controls. It checks that all controls and images fit within the queue. - UI typecheck and design token gates pass after the review fixes. The initial implementation also passed the UI production build, Storybook catalog checks, and 30 map/catalog tests. The final PR workflow passed typecheck, build, all required test suites, and browser E2E checks. - Browser command: `pnpm exec playwright test queued-message-screenshots.spec.ts --config=tests/storybook-visual/playwright.config.ts --project=stories`. Use `STORYBOOK_TEST_BASE_URL` to target an owned Storybook server. - Review regressions first failed with two unit failures and an inline-paragraph browser failure. They pass after the fixes. - Initial CI failed the case lookup search test. It reproduced locally and now passes all three cases after the API summary correction. - Initial CI also failed process identity inspection during a server shutdown test. All 22 focused shutdown tests pass locally without source changes. The cause remains unconfirmed; the final CI Runner support suite also passed without changes to process cleanup. - The browser cases mount production components with simulated upload/save and steer responses. They do not prove backend persistence or live provider delivery. - `pnpm verify` returns exit 2 because DESIGN.md is a global CI input. The required PR workflow supplies the broad CI coverage. - Native preflight cannot finish because Cargo is absent in this environment. UI dependencies were installed. The missing plugin SDK build was prepared before the successful UI checks. - Final head: `2219de45721360d36341ea1ae46641b6bcb20360`. [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42708839687) passed. No checks are pending or failing. Greptile and Paperclip Review each gave 5/5. All five prior review threads are resolved. ## Risks - Narrow rows can grow to show two text lines and thumbnails. The existing queue height limit still applies. - Screenshot previews use the existing image-reference parser and a local attachment path filter. Image omission is opt-in; thread and decision media keep their existing modes. - Pending uploads remain in draft state while their previews are hidden. Rejection and uncertain-response tests check that the same receipts return without losing later attachments. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6. The runtime does not expose a more specific serving model ID or context limit. Used reasoning, tools, code execution, and browser checks. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
02bfe71a6b |
fix(ui): keep new-task composer stable during submission (#20365)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - People use the New task dialog to send work to an agent. > - The dialog uses the shared task composer. > - A send request added an empty header with a bottom margin. > - That margin increased the composer height by 12 pixels. > - This pull request shows the header only when it has content. > - The composer keeps its size and position while the request runs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The New task composer grew by 12 pixels when a person sent a task with a description and no separate title. On desktop, the centered dialog moved up by 6 pixels and the editor moved down by 6 pixels. On mobile, the editor moved down by 12 pixels. **Expected behavior** The composer, editor, and dialog must keep their size and position while the task request runs. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open New task. 2. Enter a task description without a separate title. 3. Send the task while the create request is still pending. 4. Compare the composer and editor bounds before and after the send. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `0e3fdebea8` in the production NewIssueDialog component through its existing Storybook story. **Deployment mode** Local source checkout. The browser check uses fixture requests and starts no agent runs. No duplicate fix was found in the open PR and issue search. Related open PR #19725 changes keyboard and pinch-zoom sizing; it does not change the empty header during a task send. ## What Changed - Keep the header absent during a normal send when it has no title, subtask context, or notice. - Keep the existing title, subtask context, connection retry notice, and error message. - Extend the submit test to check stable composer sections for description-only tasks, titled tasks, and subtasks. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatComposer.test.tsx`: 253 tests passed. - The new description-only regression failed on the original code because an empty header appeared. It passed after the fix. The title and subtask cases passed in both versions. - Chromium browser check at viewport widths 1280 and 390: the original composer grew by 12 pixels. After the fix, all measured bounds for the composer, editor, and dialog stayed equal before and during the send. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: passed. - `git diff --check`: passed. - No documentation change is needed. The task creation contract stays the same. - The worktree preflight installed dependencies but could not build Runner because Cargo is absent. UI verification completed. [CI passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42702272345) for `53aa01c169559da1b31fd224c60ebeabd4ccf9c5`. It covers typecheck, build, general tests, and all eight end-to-end test shards. ## Risks - Low risk. The change only controls an empty header during a normal send. Existing tests cover connection retry and error notices. - No API, database, dependency, or design token changes. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The session does not expose a more specific backend model ID or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
98f49af70a |
feat: filter agents by model, status, harness, and connection (#20317)
Add shared filters to both All Agents layouts and views. Keep chart ancestors and bulk selections when filters hide agents. Use the same metadata for filter choices and table cells. Add tests and update the filter journey and design guidance. |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
93f7c3b5d3 |
fix(tasks): keep a budget-held Retry's failure visible and refresh the open task (#20338)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - When a task's automatic recovery stops, the person's Retry rechecks
the task's gates. If a gate refuses, for example a budget hard stop, the
Retry is saved and starts by itself once the gate allows it
> - After a person pressed Retry under a budget hold, the task page went
blank: no failure, no notice and no Retry. A person had no way to see
why nothing started
> - Two gaps caused it. The task notice drew only system-owned states,
and a budget hold presents as a person-owned state with no card of its
own. Also, admission saved the wait reason without publishing anything
that an open page listens to
> - This pull request keeps the failure visible and names the budget
wait, and it refreshes an open task when admission records why a Retry
waits
> - The benefit is that "failure remains visible if the new attempt
cannot start" holds without the person reloading the page
> - These two commits were pushed to #20306 after it was squash-merged,
so they are not on master
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #20306 (merged without these two commits) and #20270.
**What happened?**
In the chat eval
`chat-features.runner-opencode.local.recovery.retry-exhausted`, a person
pressed Retry on a task whose native recovery was exhausted while the
agent's budget was held. The Retry was accepted (`POST
/api/issues/{id}/retry` returned 202). The task page then stayed blank
for more than 60 seconds on the open page.
**Expected behavior**
The task keeps the failure visible and says that it is waiting for the
budget. Once the budget allows new work, the saved Retry starts once by
itself.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Let a task's run fail, and put the assignee over a budget hard stop.
2. Open the task and press Retry.
3. The page shows nothing about the failure or the wait.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c67909cb0f |
fix: keep tool approvals valid through OAuth refresh and delayed review (#20340)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage agent work and approve app actions. > - An approval must bind the action that the person reviewed. > - OAuth access tokens can expire while that person is away. > - The old target snapshot treated each token refresh as a new authorization. It also imposed a one-hour review deadline. > - This pull request separates token renewal from authorization identity and keeps the human decision durable. > - Current access, the reviewed arguments, meaningful target changes, task closure, and execution receipts still control dispatch. > - People can approve later without repeating a decision after routine connection maintenance. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A pending app action returned `approved_tool_target_changed` after its OAuth tokens refreshed. The tool and connection settings were unchanged. The same card also expired after one hour. A sign-in problem could discard an accepted decision before provider dispatch. **Expected behavior** The original card remains reviewable after routine OAuth refresh and a server restart. A later approval runs the exact reviewed action once. A connection repair preserves the decision while Paperclip verifies the same authorization. Meaningful changes require a new review. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Connect an OAuth MCP app and configure an action to require approval. 2. Request the action, then refresh its access and refresh tokens before approving. 3. Approve the original card. Before this change, it returns HTTP 409 even when the authorization is unchanged. 4. Wait more than one hour. Before this change, the card expires without a task-specific deadline. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced from master at `76254ead2229`. The final branch is rebased onto current master. ## What Changed - Add versioned approval target comparison. New snapshots bind credential identity epochs, consent, permissions, ownership, connection configuration, tool contracts, and credential references. Authenticated OAuth refresh preserves identity. Manual credential replacement does not. - Remove the implicit one-hour deadline from ordinary app action reviews. Keep explicit deadlines and terminal-task expiry. Synchronize the nullable interaction deadline in shared contracts and UI. - Keep accepted, undispatched actions when sign-in is required. Show a saved-approval repair state. Resume on committed connection changes after target and access revalidation, without an idle retry loop. - Preserve the existing execution claim, result receipt, and uncertain-outcome no-replay rules. - Explain meaningful target changes without inviting the person to retry the stale card. - Add a production task-thread Storybook example and document compatibility and recovery behavior. ## Verification - Red: production-refresher invalid-grant handling and formal-approval withdrawal during a sign-in wait also reproduced as failing regressions before their fixes. - Red: before implementation, the local OAuth HTTP fixture failed for both public and confidential clients with `approved_tool_target_changed` after token refresh. - Green: the extended fixture passes for public and confidential clients with personal and shared grants. It covers actual local HTTP token exchanges, multiple refreshes, a rebuilt gateway, an ended originating run, approval after 25 hours, duplicate approval, preserved sharing arguments, sign-in waiting, and event-driven repair. The gateways use the production OAuth refresher; an invalid refresh preserves the accepted decision before provider dispatch. Omitted-scope responses cover equivalent scope-reporting changes. The provider is an isolated local fixture, not a deployed Notebook service. - Negative controls refuse changed consent, scopes, tool definition, destination, and manual credential replacement before provider execution. - Existing gateway service, connected-tool acceptance, secret owner, secret service, unsigned-review queue, and connection-health suites passed. Explicit-deadline fixtures still prove expiry behavior, including deadlines on accepted sign-in waits. A withdrawn formal approval cancels a waiting action before connection recovery. - Approval card, task-chat, error-copy and target-comparison tests passed. Server and UI typechecks passed. Token gates and Storybook catalog checks passed. - Inspected the new saved-approval repair card in local Storybook using the production task thread. It shows a reconnect link and no second approval button or false running state. - `pnpm verify --explain` returned exit 2 and requested broad CI coverage. [Full CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42677855507) passed on `eb4f1c7caa9ee6e802c314ffc5eadec475a5de0c`, including build, typecheck/release registry, general and serialized tests, and all eight browser shards. - Greptile reviewed the same final head at 5/5. Both findings from the first review are fixed and their threads resolved; no open follow-ups remain. ## Risks - No database migration is needed. The new comparison reuses the vault identity epoch. Only authenticated OAuth refresh code can preserve that epoch; HTTP credential-write schemas cannot select that behavior. - Earlier signed requests keep their original exact-version checks and saved deadlines. Already-expired cards are not revived. A historical card whose credentials already changed needs a fresh review. - A new consent, account, permission set, destination, or manually replaced credential must not inherit the old authorization. Reconnection continues automatically only when revalidation proves the same saved authorization. - The interaction enrichment now permits a null deadline. Existing string deadlines remain valid. The web client and shared validator change together. - This PR does not deploy to staging or perform a live Notebook publication. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with repository tools, code execution, and browser inspection. The runtime does not expose the exact model ID, context-window limit, or reasoning-mode label; those values are not asserted. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
0e325e8d52 |
fix(runner): settle saved handoffs after verified shutdown (#20336)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - An agent can save a question or approval handoff before its provider stops. > - A missing provider terminal notification does not prove that the saved work failed. > - Runner already verifies provider exit, event drain, tool settlement and suspension. > - This change uses that proof to settle the same saved handoff. > - Unproven shutdown holds continuation and explains that the work is saved. > - Recovery must never repeat the completed work or allow overlapping execution. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20330. That PR extends the Codex terminal drain window. This change handles the separate case where no terminal arrives but the owned shutdown can prove stopped execution. **What happened?** A native run saved a human handoff, accepted cancellation, and later stopped its provider. The missing terminal notification still made the attempt fail and show “Couldn’t finish this attempt.” **Expected behavior** Keep the saved handoff. Accept its yielded result after either an authoritative provider terminal or verified shutdown of the exact execution. If shutdown remains uncertain, retain the handoff and explain the hold without offering a duplicate Retry. **Steps to reproduce** Save a governed wait, acknowledge interruption, and omit the provider terminal. The new regression uses the real Runner binary and a controlled Codex process. The old runtime rejects the handoff instead of asking the existing shutdown owner to settle it. **Deployment mode** Native Runner with Codex. Local verification used macOS arm64 and Node 26.4.0. Hosted sandbox recovery has not been qualified. ## What Changed - Add an optional driver shutdown-settlement operation. Runner returns proof only after its existing stop, drain, tool settlement and suspension barrier passes. - Bind the receipt to the run, normalized session and turn. Persist it with the saved wait and validate it during recovery. - Complete the same yielded handoff after verified shutdown. Retire the stopped session from warm reuse. Do not invent a provider terminal or complete usage. - Retain a named shutdown-pending condition under the existing bounded same-run recovery policy. Preserve actual provider failures and integrity failures. - Show saved-work shutdown guidance in task and inbox presentation. Keep genuine approvals authoritative and disable duplicate Retry. - Document the completion and restart contract. The checkpoint field is additive; older checkpoints retain the terminal-or-shutdown path. ## Verification - Red: the new runtime regression failed against the original implementation because verified shutdown was never requested. Server presentation and error-classification regressions also failed before the fix. - Red: both inbox shutdown states showed generic text before the inbox change. - Green: Runner runtime, shutdown and harness-backend suites pass 301 tests. Tests cover missing terminals, failed stop proof, wrong identity, cancellation, late proof, genuine provider failure, and restart after receipt persistence. Recovery completes once without another model turn. - Green: the native executor and task-presentation suites pass 1,371 tests. Execution projection, inbox and blocker presentation pass 125 tests. Two test-authoring mistakes were corrected: an integrity-error text expectation and an assertion for a nonexistent projection field. Their initial failures remain in local logs. - Runner TypeScript and full server layered type checks pass. Token gates and diff whitespace checks pass. - Live provider acceptance: real Runner and Codex with gpt-6.1-sol, one disposable local workspace, one tool call, and one deliberately dropped terminal notification. The saved file, bound settlement receipt, one accepted yielded result, one provider turn, confirmed provider exit and suspended Runner all passed. The tool handler and persistence port were controlled. This does not claim a full server or hosted journey. - The full browser question-and-answer cell stopped before execution because OPENAI_API_KEY was absent. No model work ran in that attempt. Hosted sandbox recovery and the full browser continuation journey remain unverified. - `pnpm verify` returned exit 2 because the execution-spec change requires broad CI. Required CI will supply that coverage; a full local repository suite was not repeated. - Review correction in `8553da244e`: a failed trailing-event write could hide a provider failure. A new regression reproduced red, then passed after all ordinary drain errors retained the named pending condition. No settlement receipt or result can be accepted after that error. The live missing-terminal check passed again on the corrected runtime. - The real PostgreSQL control-plane regression and three existing governed-wait controls pass. The new case persists one accepted yielded result, a bound shutdown receipt, and the original pending human question without a provider terminal. - First CI revision `7c2cb9b1`: test-program typecheck found a missing `PrpEvent` annotation in the new fixture. The annotation is fixed and the Runner test-program typecheck passes. Runner support also timed out in the unchanged `registered roots remain protected even when equal to genuine public static bytes` case after 30 seconds. One unchanged local diagnostic passed in 3.69 seconds overall. The hosted timeout cause remains unknown; no timeout, fixture, or assertion was weakened. [Original failed support job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42670851821/job/129346900133). - Rebased onto the merged #20330 and current recovery changes. The combined branch passes 1,402 executor/presentation tests. Both prompt and 18-second provider terminals still pass. A warm session with no terminal passes after the full 30-second drain and verified stop/suspension. Its initial overly broad assertion rejected a nonterminal turn event; the corrected assertion rejects every terminal type. The rebased CI gate was cancelled before any runner or step started; its cause is unconfirmed and it supplies no validation credit. Final revision `b49ec5a144` starts fresh CI and review. - Final-head CI attempt 1 failed before creating jobs. GitHub reports an internal server error (correlation `2c576b07-b67f-4179-a69f-74f7d99cd926`), followed by empty runner-selection outputs for the aggregate jobs. One unchanged-commit retry was requested; the initial admission failure remains recorded. [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42673159868). - **Current blocker:** final head `b49ec5a144e94e41e96e2508a79bd9aec91fe45a` has a fresh 5/5 Greptile review and zero unresolved threads, but required CI is not complete. GitHub reports an active [Actions and Checks API incident](https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/tp8cghg7tlc4). Attempt 2 ran only part of the full selected graph. Build, canary, Rust, sandbox providers, admitted browser shards and other completed test jobs passed. The E2E aggregate correctly failed because `policy` and `e2e_shards` had `abandoned` results. Server shard 5/12 received a runner shutdown signal at 18:36:55 UTC and its test step was cancelled; its job still reports in progress. The shutdown cause is not established. The separate review workflow had the same pre-execution internal-error class and passed one bounded retry. No further retry was submitted during the incident. Resume with the missing/cancelled coverage after GitHub recovers; do not count the absent typecheck, Runner or support jobs as passes. [Failed coverage gate](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42673159868/job/129354318236), [interrupted server shard](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42673159868/job/129350854174). ## Risks - A missing terminal can use one additional bounded shutdown interval. Unknown shutdown still blocks continuation. - Provider terminal and usage accounting keep their separate meaning. The receipt proves stopped execution and settled tool outcomes, not model success. - Recovery rejects a foreign receipt, a later turn, an active turn with a settled receipt, and an actual failed provider terminal. - There is no database migration. Older checkpoint shapes remain readable. Drivers without this optional proof retain a named pending state. - This PR does not deploy the fix or repair an existing hosted task. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools and local code execution. The exact serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. Live test inference used gpt-6.1-sol. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
a3e7e63330 |
Guard Native recovery with process-space proof and explicit containment (#19813)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and their work. > - Recovery must preserve execution ownership and accepted results. > - A saved PID proves nothing outside its recorded process namespace. > - Uncertain unfinished work must stay held until its original owners stop. > - Operators need a source-bound containment action and a separate ordinary Retry. > - Accepted results must use the existing finalizer without another provider turn. > - This PR keeps those paths safe, recoverable, and quiet between real obligations. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #19713 Refs: #19591 Recovery could use a local PID to release or replace a controller from another process namespace. Connected-chat Retry also rejected successful containment on a task in `todo`. The new containment action used a broader permission than the existing owner-stop action. A later review found that result-less guards also rejected the existing accepted-result confirmation action. ## What Changed - Record and verify the controller's kernel/PID namespace. Keep unknown and foreign unfinished ownership held. Preserve independent durable stop evidence and the existing remote lease fences. - Use the shared accepted-result ownership reconciler. Bind settlement to the observed lease token, generation, boot, PID, namespace and process birth. Retain finalizer, cleanup, current-controller, live-owner and remote exclusions. - Share the remote-owner reader across recovery consumers. Scope runner leases to the same company, task and run. Do not make local PID probes for remote accepted-result ownership. - Gate original-host containment on `runtime:confirm_owner_stop`. Bind it to the current task, source, assignee, original expiry, lease and Stop state. Audit separate controller/provider containment and reviewed action outcomes. - Keep containment separate from ordinary Retry. Use one canonical committed receipt and the normal admission, budget, workspace and lineage checks. Preserve the recorded external-action outcomes. - Keep the controller-only confirmation actionable for both result-less work and accepted results. Result-less work gets its next source-bound attention in the same transaction. Accepted results keep their original result and use normal shared settlement/finalization. - Keep identity inspection quiet. Preserve the original foreign-owner expiry and use the existing scoped finalizer in accepted-result recovery controls. - Update the recovery card, validators, execution projection, docs and access maps. Reuse existing canonical columns; add no migration or ownership backfill. ## Verification Current publication head: `71ea76b568de09d6313d8992e803131d9d5c54f3`. **The current fix has a causal red/green check.** On the test-only revision, both foreign-local stopped/fenced controller cases failed because recovery probed saved runner, process-group and provider PIDs in this host's namespace. This measured the wrong probes; it did not run duplicate providers. After the fix, the same two cases passed every no-probe, no-claim, no-controller-stamp, no-stop-receipt and unchanged-authority assertion. Three existing remote preparation, grace and fenced-controller progress cases also passed. Total: **5 passed, 0 failed;170 filtered rows excluded**. All three normal affected App TypeScript programs passed on this head (660,681 and428 roots). The fix separates a controller wait from execution stop proof. Independent live/grace evidence still schedules recovery. A stopped/fenced foreign controller can pass this namespace guard only for remote execution, which keeps its later checkpoint and never-launched checks. Foreign local execution stays held before runner or provider PID inspection. Earlier source-scoped results remain evidence, not fresh executions on the current head: - On `c86dd741`, the complete failed-owner file passed **25/25**, with no skips or filters. Empty scans wrote no controller stamps. Foreign ownership kept its original expiry. Normal returned-claim settlement and attention at the exact deadline passed. - On `c86dd741`, **15 selected accepted-result/restart controls passed**. The81 filtered rows are excluded. Both completion cases used the existing scoped finalizer and kept their accepted result without another provider turn. - Trusted CI at synthetic merge `50d072a5` (actual master `1b7fe334` plus `c86dd741`) passed the complete **17-case maintenance-server file**. This includes the original90-real-second quiet observation and two qualified hourly windows. The quiet case took118,918ms. The four jobs that failed on the earlier publication all passed on that synthetic merge. - On `6243b32c`, the complete ownership-report file passed **29/29**. Native NULL namespace stayed unprovable and generic compatibility remained. Three selected recovery controls passed;170 filtered rows are excluded. - On `f81f2c3c`,356 business cases passed: whole ownership-route221, recoveryUI70, owner-proof38 and controller-confirmation8; selected accepted-result authority18; and one real connected-chat containment, separate authorized Retry, useful Native result and downstream reply case. The2,024 filtered rows are excluded. A separate earlier accepted-result causal case kept the original result and completed after restart without replay. Normal Shared exports, App programs, UI typecheck, token gates and map checks passed on their recorded revisions. Unchanged DB, adapter, Eval and Runner inputs/outputs have explicit carry proofs. The clean normal merge with fetched master `8fe524f7` preserves all31 exclusive owned paths and14,827 unrelated master entries. The nine overlapping paths were reviewed, including the upstream unidentified-run stop action. Fresh CI must validate that actual merge composition. PG cases used existing external PG17, fresh owned databases, pools at most4, one worker and no SQL observer during cases. Registered clients and recorded process groups closed. Independent final SQL audits found zero campaign sessions before normal database cleanup. Original failing fixtures remain retained. Original failures are preserved. One new test first failed compilation due to a missing getter import; an import-only correction passed its full owning programs before the causal red/green check. A local quiet attempt stopped in the normal prerequisite hook before any business case and its collector rejected two normal build markers. The later17-case CI pass establishes quiet recovery; it does not turn that failed local collector into a pass. An earlier useful case passed before its private cleanup collector failed on an owned read-only directory; normal cleanup completed after all owners closed. Earlier runner-shutdown cancellation and a separate private whole-suite failure remain unexplained. Current-head checks are complete:57 success,1 neutral and3 skipped, including the successful aggregate CI gate. The legacy status passed. Greptile is5/5 and Ponytail gives an explicit5/5 Ship verdict for this head. All seven review threads are resolved. Full recursive typecheck, the full test suite and release build were not repeated locally. No result here proves deployed suspension, a live provider or termination on another host. ## Risks - Unknown physical ownership can require an owner/admin action. A false containment statement can be unsafe. - New work, reassignment, Stop, renewed authority, accepted results or pending cleanup can invalidate an action. The operator must refresh. - Controller confirmation does not prove provider/tool containment. Completed external actions must not be replayed. - Generic legacy and child-process compatibility remains separate from the strict Native controller policy. - Existing saved state and canonical schema are preserved. Permanent safety refusals remain held with their normal named recovery path. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` agents implemented and tested the changes with reasoning, repository tools and code execution. A GPT-6-based Codex managing agent reviewed and integrated them. The host does not expose the manager's exact build or the context-window sizes. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8fe524f796 |
fix(issues): let the board confirm an unidentified run stopped instead of an endless Retry wait (#20310)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Before a new attempt can start on a task, Paperclip must prove the previous run's agent stopped, so two agents never work the same task at once > - A local native run can be interrupted after it asked to start the runner but before it recorded the runner's process. The runner may have saved state and started a provider, and provider processes can outlive it, so the existing check (#19694) rightly refuses to assume the run stopped > - Today that case has no way out: every Retry is accepted and then waits forever as `process_identity_missing` (storage chaos ST1, t02/t03) > - This pull request makes the wait explicit and actionable. The task explains why it waits, and a board operator who has checked can confirm the run stopped; the parked Retry then starts at the click > - A second shape from the Daytona storage baseline (t06) parked a Retry with no reason at all: a follow-up was interrupted by a graceful shutdown while it was still restoring its workspace. No provider ran, but the restore hold kept the same agent held, so the Retry never started > - The benefit is that no Retry stays accepted-and-waiting with nothing anyone can do ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19831. Storage chaos wave `w-20261109T145628-s9902` (ST1), tasks t02 and t03. **What happened (CHA-3, run `3c3f6241`):** - The run requested a runner launch (`native.process_start_requested`), and a K2 restart hit before its process identity was recorded. - After the restart, the resumed attempt failed on the storage outage. The task was blocked. - The board's Retry (202) was parked as `executionWait.reason = process_identity_missing`: "The previous run has no verified stop record." - `recordUnidentifiedLocalRunnerStop` cannot prove the stop because this run's runner saved control-plane state. Once that exists, a provider may have started (#19694), and a provider is not guaranteed to carry `--run-id` or `PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID` (the Codex provider env omits it on purpose). The shared owner prover needs a PID, which the run never recorded. - Nothing could ever clear the wait. **Daytona storage baseline `w-20261109T154810-s9911`, task t06:** - The run succeeded. The follow-up was cancelled (`continuation_task_ownership_changed`), and the next run was interrupted by a graceful shutdown (`server_shutdown_interrupted`) 3 s into `preparing`. It was restoring the saved remote workspace and had launched no provider. - Restore recovery saved the files (`workspaceRecovery.status: recovered`, system recovery `complete`). But the `legacy_execution_requires_reconciliation` restore hold releases only for a different owner, or for a native Stop fenced before any provider turn, so it kept the same agent held. - The UI Retry returned 202 and parked with `executionWait.reason: execution_recovery`, the generic wait, so the task showed a Retry that never started. Automatic proof needs the runner to record its identity before saving state and to group provider processes under it. That is follow-up runner work; this PR removes the endless wait now. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/native-local-process-stop.ts`: new `confirmUnidentifiedLocalRunnerStopped`. It accepts only a finished native run of the task with no recorded process and whose latest launch evidence is an unconfirmed launch on this host in a local environment. It still refuses while a runner with `--run-id <run>` is running. It records `native.local_process_stopped` with `basis: "operator_attested"` and the attesting user. That is the receipt the existing continuation gate already accepts. - `server/src/routes/issues.ts`: `POST /issues/:id/recovery-actions/confirm-run-stopped` (`runId`, `stopEvidence` of 20 to 12,000 characters). It is board-only and requires issue read plus `runtime:confirm_owner_stop`, like the other stop attestations. It logs `issue.run_stop_confirmed` with the evidence, promotes deferred intents for the issue, and resumes each parked task Retry, so work starts at the click. Refusals return 409 with a code. - `packages/shared`: `confirmRunStoppedSchema`, and the presentation user action `confirm_run_stopped`. - `server/src/services/task-interruption-presentation.ts`: a Retry parked as `process_identity_missing` for a native run that recorded no process now presents as waiting for the user (`canRetry: false`, `userAction: "confirm_run_stopped"`), with a message explaining why and who can act. A run with a recorded process keeps the existing verification wait. - UI: - `ExecutionBlockerNotice` shows the explanation and, for users who can confirm a stop, "Confirm it stopped" with a short evidence form. - It reuses `PreviousServerStopConfirmation`, now with optional `action`, explicit `runId` and `formId`, and a custom button label. - The Inbox names the action. - `server/src/services/execution-blocker.ts`: `interruptedPreparationBeforeProviderWorkCondition`. The restore hold also releases for the same agent when the stopped run was a system-interrupted preparation (legacy runtime never resolved, still `preparing`) with no process identity, no runner or provider events, no finalization or result, and every lease released with a confirmed stop. It mirrors the existing interrupted-preparation proof and still requires the completed workspace-recovery receipt. Auto-replay is unchanged; this only lets the user's Retry or message start. - Review fixes: - `unidentifiedLocalLaunchRefusal` holds the endpoint's launch, host and lease checks, and the presentation offers `confirm_run_stopped` only when it passes. - The attested stop wakes cost accounting in the same transaction. - The confirmation form is keyed by task and run. - The route is registered in OpenAPI. ## Verification Red/green (each new test fails against master and passes with this PR): - `server/src/__tests__/issue-confirm-run-stopped-routes.test.ts`: - The parked Retry presents `confirm_run_stopped` with the explanation. - Confirming records the operator-attested stop and the activity entry, satisfies the stop check, and resumes the parked Retry: its receipt is coalesced into a newly started run. - It refuses with 409 while a runner for the run is running. - Agents and viewers get 403. - `ui/src/components/ExecutionBlockerNotice.confirm-run-stopped.test.tsx`: the notice offers "Confirm it stopped" (and no dead Retry) and posts the run and evidence. A viewer sees the explanation without the action. - `server/src/__tests__/interrupted-preparation-restore-retry.test.ts` (t06 shape): - The restore hold no longer blocks. - A Retry is accepted and resumed into a started run, and the audit hold keeps `replay: blocked`. - The hold stays when a provider turn started, when a runner event was recorded, when an operator stopped the run, or when the sandbox has no stop receipt. - `issue-confirm-run-stopped-routes.test.ts`: - A case per refusal code checks the presentation keeps the generic wait and the endpoint returns 409. - An `alreadyStopped` case. - An accounting-wake assertion. - The UI test switches targets with stale evidence. Regression and static checks: - `ExecutionBlockerNotice`, `WorkspaceExportRecovery` and its control tests: 74 passed. - `tsc --noEmit` passes for `packages/shared`, `server` and `ui/src`. `pnpm check:token-gates` is clean. ## Risks - A board operator can now attest that an unidentified run stopped. The attestation is permission-gated, requires written evidence, is activity-logged, and is refused while a runner for the run is visibly running. A wrong attestation could start a second agent beside an orphaned provider, the same trust model as the existing previous-server attestations. - The confirmation component now accepts a run without a recovery action. Existing callers pass the action as before. - No schema migration. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
12523fb677 |
fix(chat): send a task whose automatic recovery stopped to the person's Retry (#20306)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A person asks the chat agent (the controller) to act on tasks that other agents own > - When a task's automatic recovery stops, for example after three runner losses, the task is blocked and the person gets a Retry control on it. Retry rechecks the task's gates and keeps the failed attempt's evidence > - The blocker told every reader "Try again or send a new message to continue". A controller read that as its own instruction. It found that Retry is board-only, then resumed the task with a comment and reassigned the task to itself > - That skips the assignee's budget and hold gates and hides the failed-run Retry from the person > - This pull request names Retry as the person's control in the blocker text, and tells the controller to point the person to it > - The benefit is that "try that task again" leads to the supported, gated Retry instead of an agent takeover ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20270 (automatic recovery after a lost local runner) **What happened?** In the chat eval `chat-features.runner-opencode.local.recovery.retry-exhausted`, a person asked the CEO agent to "Try the website task again" after the website task's native recovery was exhausted. The agent read the task's `executionBlocker` (`canRetry: true`, nextAction "... Try again or send a new message to continue once the previous execution has stopped."). It found that `POST /api/issues/{id}/retry` is board-only. It then posted a `resume: true` comment, which moved the task from blocked to todo, and reassigned the task to itself to re-run it. The task lost its failed-run Retry control, and the original assignee's gates were not checked. **Expected behavior** The agent links the original task, says why it stopped, and tells the person to use Retry there. It takes the work over only when the person explicitly asks for that. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Let a native run exhaust its automatic recovery (for example, three runner losses). 2. In the controller chat, ask it to try that task again. 3. The agent comments to resume the task, or reassigns it, instead of pointing to Retry. ## What Changed - `execution-blocker.ts`: the text that is added when a person can retry is now `EXECUTION_BLOCKER_PERSON_RETRY_ACTION`: "A person can use Retry on this task, or send it a new message, to continue once the previous execution has stopped. Agents cannot retry it for them." - `agent-conversations.ts`: a new chat guidance paragraph. When another task's automatic recovery has stopped, the supported next step is the person's Retry on that task. The controller links the task and explains why it stopped. It does not reassign the task, change its status, comment on it to resume it, or create a replacement task, unless the person explicitly asks it to take the work over. ## Verification - `board-access-denial.test.ts`: the directive contains the new rule. - `execution-blocker-read.test.ts`: a retryable blocker's nextAction ends with the person-Retry text. - 54 tests pass locally for these two files. - Paid live run of `recovery.retry-exhausted` with this change and #20270 on the eval branch: the run ID will be added below. ## Risks - Low. Only text changes. Any UI that shows the blocker's nextAction shows the new sentence instead of "Try again or send a new message ...". - No schema or saved-state change. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
189fefb991 |
perf(task-chat): warm the whole first frame before a task opens (#20286)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - People open tasks from the issues list and the inbox to continue a conversation with an agent > - The compact task chat shows its first frame only after about ten reads settle. These include recent comments, activity, recent runs, interactions, attachments and live runs > - Navigation prefetch warmed only the issue and its recent comments. The other reads started on the click, and the slowest one decided when the chat appeared. On staging that took 1.1–2.0 s > - This pull request warms the whole first-frame set when an open is likely, under the exact keys the page reads > - The benefit is that a task the person is about to open can render from cache. A pointer that only passes over rows does not add load ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** On a busy instance, the composer and the latest messages appear 1.1–2.0 s after a click on a task row. The page waits for about ten reads. Before the click, only two of them are warmed. **Proposed solution** Warm the rest of the first-frame reads when an open is likely: a mouse or pen press, a click, keyboard Enter, or a hover or focus that rests on the link for 120 ms. The page and the prefetch use the same fetchers and query keys. **Alternatives considered** - Warm everything on every hover. This sends about 7 requests for each row that a pointer crosses, so it was rejected. - Warm only on press. The time from press to click is short, so most of the wait would remain. - A single bootstrap endpoint. This is planned separately, because it changes the API contract. **Roadmap alignment** This is part of the task-loading performance plan in #20276. It follows #20277 and #20284. ## What Changed - New `ui/src/lib/issue-chat-history-queries.ts`: - The recent activity and recent run window fetchers moved here from `IssueDetail.tsx`, together with their query keys. The logic is unchanged. - `prefetchIssueChatHistory` warms activity, the run window, interactions, attachments and live runs. It warms the active run only for running work, as the page does. - Live state uses a 5 s stale time. The other reads use the existing 30 s navigation stale time. - The run-window prefetch uses the same conversation mode as the page. Thus a reconnect in an agent conversation reads only the watched runs by id. - `prefetchIssueCommentInputFacts` warms the input facts of the recent comments after those comments arrive. - `ui/src/hooks/useIssueIdBatches.ts`: new `prefetchIssueIdBatches` fills the same batch keys that the hook reads. The hook and the prefetch share one batching function. - `prefetchIssueDetailForNavigation` accepts `history: true` and then also warms that set, plus the comment input facts. - `IssueLinkQuicklook`: - A hover still warms the light set at once. The quicklook trigger does not start a history prefetch. - A hover that rests on the link for 120 ms warms the full set. Leaving the link before 120 ms cancels it. - Keyboard focus uses the same 120 ms dwell as a hover. Blur cancels it. - A primary mouse or pen press and a click warm the full set at once. - A touch can start a scroll, so it warms only the light set. The full set waits for the click. - The keyboard Enter handlers in `IssuesList`, `LegacyIssuesList`, `Inbox` and `LegacyInbox` pass `history: true`. - `IssueDetail.tsx` uses the shared fetchers and keys. ## Verification - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/lib/issueDetailCache.test.ts src/components/IssueLinkQuicklook.test.tsx src/hooks/useIssueIdBatches.test.tsx` passes 29 tests. These are the new ones: - A `history` prefetch fills every key that the compact chat waits on, with the same run-window shape that the page builds. - A `history` prefetch fills the comment input-fact batch keys that the chat reads. - In an agent conversation, a reconnect reads the watched runs by id, not every run. - Prefetched id batches render with no loading state on the first render. - The active run is read only for work that is running. - A light prefetch makes no history requests. - A pointer that passes over a link in less than 120 ms warms only the light set, with the quicklook on and off. - A hover that rests on a link warms the full set. - A mouse press warms the full set at once. - A touch warms only the light set until the click. - Keyboard focus warms the full set only after it rests on the link. - The tests for the review fixes (quicklook hover, input facts, conversation mode, touch and focus) fail without the fix. - The `IssueDetail`, `Inbox`, `IssuesList` and `LegacyInbox` suites pass: 4 files, 412 tests. - `pnpm typecheck` in `ui` shows no new errors. The only errors are existing ones from an unbuilt `plugin-sdk` package in this worktree. - The staging harness from #20276 will measure the gain after deploy, for a hover, a click, and a revisit. ## Risks - More requests when an open is likely: up to 7 extra reads for each task that is pressed with a mouse or pen, or hovered or focused for 120 ms. These are the same reads that the page would send on open, so a completed open costs nothing extra. A hover that does not lead to an open costs those reads. - Freshness: a prefetched result can stay fresh for up to 30 s (5 s for live state). Websocket invalidation still refreshes these keys, as on a revisit today. - No API or schema change. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used in Claude Code with tool use (shell, browser automation, file editing). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
ef2b8d5324 |
fix(issues): make every Retry start work or say why (#20283)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - When a task's run fails, the board recovers it with a Retry button, so that button must either start work or say why it did not > - An audit of every Retry-type button found three gaps. The task Retry shown during a scheduled retry's countdown returned "accepted" but changed nothing. A stale Retry looked like success in the Inbox. "Retry now" skipped the task's read and change checks, so a member who cannot see a private task could start its retry > - This pull request makes the task Retry start a scheduled retry immediately, makes every Retry that did not start work say why, and gives "Retry now" the same authorization as the task Retry > - The benefit is that no Retry click silently does nothing ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19831. The board reported a dead Retry button. A read-only audit of every Retry button confirmed: - **Task Retry during a scheduled retry was a no-op.** `TaskInterruptionPresentation.canRetry` is true in `retry_scheduled`, so `ExecutionBlockerNotice` shows Retry. `requestTaskRetry` treats `scheduled_retry` as busy and inserts a `coalesced` wake pointing at that run. `resumeTaskRetry` reads only `deferred_issue_execution`, and dispatch uses coalesced user wakes only to carry comments. Nothing promoted the run: the API answered 202 `accepted: true` and the countdown did not change. - **A stale Retry looked like success.** `accepted: false, stale: true` comes back as HTTP 200. The Inbox ignored `accepted` and opened the task as if work had started. The task page showed no reason. - **"Retry now" checked less than the task Retry.** It ran only `assertBoard` and `getAccessibleResource`, skipping `assertIssueReadAllowed` and `issue:mutate`. A company member who cannot read a private task could promote that task's scheduled retry. - **"Retry now" said nothing for some outcomes.** It toasted only `promoted` and `gate_suppressed`. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/task-retry.ts`: when the Retry coalesces into the task's latest run and that run is `scheduled_retry` (with no other Retry already active), the receipt returns `scheduledRetryRunId`. - `server/src/routes/issues.ts`: - `POST /issues/:id/retry` then promotes that run through the existing `retryScheduledRetryNow`, the same path "Retry now" uses. It logs `issue.scheduled_retry_retry_now` with `source: "task_retry"` and returns `scheduledRetry: { outcome, message }`. - `POST /issues/:id/scheduled-retry/retry-now` now runs `assertIssueReadAllowed` and `decideIssueAccess("issue:mutate")`, matching `/retry`. A private task the member cannot read now answers 404. - `ui/src/hooks/useTaskRetry.ts`: new `taskRetryNotStartedReason`. When a Retry did not start work (stale, or a scheduled retry that is gate-suppressed, waiting, or gone), the hook returns that reason as its error. `ExecutionBlockerNotice` and `StalledDependencyNotice` already display it. - `ui/src/pages/Inbox.tsx`: a task Retry that did not start work shows the reason in the error toast and does not navigate. - `ui/src/hooks/useRetryNowMutation.ts` and `IssueScheduledRetryCard.tsx`: every "Retry now" outcome now shows its headline and message, including `no_scheduled_retry` on the card. - `ui/src/api/issues.ts`: `retryTask`'s response type includes `scheduledRetry`. ## Verification Red/green (each new test fails against master and passes with this PR): - `server/src/__tests__/issue-scheduled-retry-routes.test.ts`: - "starts a scheduled retry now when the task Retry is clicked during its countdown": 202 with `scheduledRetry.outcome: "promoted"`, the same run becomes `queued`, and no second retry run is created. - "refuses Retry now on a private task the member cannot see, like the task Retry": on master "Retry now" answers 200 `promoted`; now both routes answer 404 and the run stays `scheduled_retry`. - The seed now adds the board user's membership, which the stricter route needs. All 33 tests pass. - `ui/src/hooks/useTaskRetry.test.tsx`: a replaced attempt, a gate-held scheduled retry and a waiting scheduled retry each show their reason; a promoted one shows nothing extra. - `ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx`: an Inbox Retry that did not start work (stale, or gate-held) toasts the reason and does not navigate. - `ui/src/components/IssueScheduledRetryCard.test.tsx`: "explains when there was no scheduled retry left to start". Other Retry buttons: the chat failed-run Retry already reports stopped and failed retries (`agents.test.ts`). Agent lifecycle "Retry now" and cost "Retry accounting" start no task work and already surface their API errors. Regression and static checks: - UI: 7 files, 168 passed. Server: task-retry and scheduled-retry suites, 149 passed. `issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts` passed. - `maintenance-server-routes.test.ts` "assembled maintenance server production wiring" fails identically on master on this Mac (`ensure-build-deps`). - `tsc --noEmit` passes for `server` and `ui/src`. `pnpm check:token-gates` is clean. ## Risks - A task Retry during a scheduled retry now starts the run immediately, through the existing "Retry now" promotion gates (pause, budget, cleanup waits). A gate that holds it is reported, not bypassed. - "Retry now" is stricter: a member without read or change access to the task gets 404 or 403, as on `/retry`. - No schema change. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d10c6e0e8b |
fix(chat): hold a chat message at the agent's daily limit instead of dropping it (#20292)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent Chat sends each person's message to the conversation agent through a durable outbox (`deliverConversationComments`). The outbox keys each wake receipt as `conversation-comment:<commentId>`. > - The outbox treats any receipt with that key as delivered. Queue admission writes a `skipped` receipt when the agent reached its daily run or cost limit. > - So a chat message sent after the agent used its daily allowance was consumed silently. No run started, the chat showed nothing, and nothing resumed it. > - A person's message must never be silently dropped. The daily limit is an operator control, so the message must wait honestly, not bypass the limit. > - This pull request makes the outbox hold the message at the daily limit, like it already does for a paused agent, and resume it when the limit resets. > - The benefit is that a chat message at the daily limit is saved, shown with its reason, and sent automatically at 00:00 UTC. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. Inline bug report: **What happened** In a chat eval, the conversation agent (CEO) had `maxDailyRuns: 3`. After three chat turns and a separate failed-model phase on another agent, the person sent a fourth message. The comment was saved (POST 201), but no CEO run started. The conversation stayed `active` with no `executionRunId`. The ownership reconciler later reported `I7_visible_next_action`. The server log shows no wake error. Queue admission had written a `skipped` receipt (`heartbeat.daily_run_limit`) under the outbox key, so the outbox counted the message as delivered. **Expected behavior** A chat message that reaches the agent's daily limit is not consumed. It stays saved, the chat shows why it waits, and it is sent automatically when the limit resets. The daily limit still applies: the message does not start a run early. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Set a conversation agent's `runtimeConfig.heartbeat.maxDailyRuns` to N. 2. Send N chat messages and let each turn finish. 3. Send one more chat message. 4. See that no run starts, the chat shows no waiting state, and the message is never answered (a `skipped` wake receipt with reason `heartbeat.daily_run_limit` exists for `conversation-comment:<id>`). ## What Changed - `server/src/services/agent-conversations.ts`: add `conversationDeliveryHold`, which applies the same daily run/cost limit check as queue admission. The outbox returns `deferred` at the limit and writes no receipt, so the message stays owed. It reports the next UTC day start through a new optional `onDeferredDeadline` option. - `server/src/services/recovery/service.ts`: stranded-work recovery passes its `onDeferredDeadline` to the outbox, so the held message is retried when the limit resets. - `server/src/services/heartbeat/queue.ts`: if the limit is reached while an outbox wake is in admission (a race), admission throws a 409 with `reason: heartbeat.daily_*` for `conversation-comment:` keys instead of writing a `skipped` receipt. The outbox already maps a matching 409 to `deferred`. Other wakes keep the current skip behavior. - `server/src/routes/issues.ts` (`GET /issues/:id/queued-comments`): when a chat has no queue receipt but has messages held by the daily limit, return them as a `deferred` queue with `executionWait` (reason and message). Edit, send and discard stay off because the outbox owns delivery. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatQueuedMessages.tsx`: show the `executionWait` message for such an outbox-held queue (no queue id and no target run). Receipt-backed queues keep the current behavior and do not duplicate the task status. - Tests: three real-database tests in `agent-conversation-delivery.test.ts` (hold and resume after the limit resets, recovery deadline, and a limit reached during real `heartbeatService.wakeup` admission) and one UI test. ## Verification - `cd server && pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/agent-conversation-delivery.test.ts`: 10 passed. Without the source change, the three new tests fail (`expected 'delivered' to be 'deferred'`; the real queue path writes the skipped receipt). - `cd server && pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/issue-recovery-conversations.test.ts src/__tests__/agent-conversations.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-undispatched-execution-wait.test.ts src/services/heartbeat/queue.test.ts src/__tests__/agent-chat-messages.test.ts`: 215 passed. - `cd ui && pnpm exec vitest run src/components/task-chat/TaskChatQueuedMessages.test.tsx`: 36 passed. - `pnpm exec tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json`: clean. `node scripts/check-token-gates.mjs`: clean. - Manual: give a chat agent `maxDailyRuns: 1`, send two messages. The second message shows in the queued messages bar with "<agent> reached its daily run limit. Your message is saved and sends automatically when the limit resets at 00:00 UTC." ## Risks - Behavior change for chat only: a chat message at the daily limit now waits in the outbox instead of being consumed. It is sent after 00:00 UTC. If an operator raises the limit, the message is sent on the next recovery pass for that chat; the UI message does not promise an earlier send. - Saved state from the previous release: no persisted shape changes. Messages that an earlier release already consumed with a `skipped` receipt stay consumed. They are not replayed later, which avoids sending old messages without notice. - The queued-comments read adds one agent read and one daily-limit count for a chat with no queue receipt. This is the same query that admission runs. - The recovery deadline is in-process; instance-sleep scheduling does not get a new deadline from this change. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), agentic coding with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
6958cb112c |
fix(ui): keep responder avatars visible across stale execution outcomes (#20293)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage agents and send follow-up messages in task chat. > - The responder identity should stay visible while a message starts a run. > - Comment storage, task reads, and run discovery finish separately. > - An older intent can resolve during admission of the new message. > - A reopened task can also retain its previous terminal status until the next read. > - This change keeps those older outcomes from clearing the new startup feedback. > - The avatar stays visible until the new run or its own admission outcome arrives. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related fixes: #17885 and #18312. A search found no other PR for these races. **What happened?** After Send, the agent avatar can disappear before the new run appears. A prior intent changing from working to resolved clears the new submission. Sending a follow-up that reopens a done or cancelled task also clears startup feedback against the old task status. **Expected behavior** Keep the responder visible through comment acknowledgement and run discovery. Stop startup feedback on a current failure, blocker, or completion. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Send a follow-up while a previous intent is still reported as working. 2. Let that same intent resolve before the new run read completes. 3. Observe the responder disappear. Alternatively, send a follow-up to a done or cancelled task and delay the reopened task read. **Paperclip version** Reproduced on source master at `33a23e0246`. Rebased onto `3ef45fdd92` before submission. **Deployment mode** Local component tests reproduce the read ordering. An isolated local trusted instance verifies the real Send-to-process-run path in Chromium. It does not invoke a live model provider. No staging message was sent. ## What Changed - Record the previous intent identity. Its later resolution cannot acknowledge the new message unless the observed run belongs to that message. - Pass the existing reopen request into shared submission state on both chat surfaces. - Keep startup feedback through the previous terminal status. Restore ordinary completion handling once the reopened status arrives. - Add six Send regression cases, a live-run handoff assertion, and coverage for later completion and ordinary terminal notes. - Clarify identity continuity in DESIGN.md. ## Verification - Red: all six new Send cases fail on unchanged master. - Green after rebase: 531 tests pass, one existing test is skipped, across TaskChatThread, IssueChatThread, and useRunnerSubmission. - Chromium: the existing compact-startup responder test passes on a disposable local instance. Frame sampling checks that the same identity stays mounted through acknowledgement and process startup. - UI typecheck and token gates pass. Initial typecheck lacked generated plugin SDK declarations; it passed after local server setup built that dependency. - Affected checks passed after rebase on `de9ed52c0b`. Final CI on `de9ed52c0bd6a6f7738614af31aec1eae2b871d0`: 59 checks passed, four skipped, no failures. [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42646038090). Greptile and Paperclip review both gave 5/5 with no actionable findings or unresolved review threads. ## Risks Low scope: client startup feedback only. An old intent must not hide a new admission, but a new failure must still end it. Existing backoff and failure tests remain covered. The reopen exception applies only to an explicit reopen and ends when the reopened status arrives. No API, database, permission, or provider behavior changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. Capabilities used: reasoning, source editing, shell execution, and browser verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |