2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Nicky LeachandPaperclip	80a2b9284b	Define durable runtime activity events (#18129) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and tasks. > - Runner reports durable run events through PRP. > - Runtime clients need a typed record of reported activity. > - The event must keep the normal run authority and read boundaries. > - This pull request adds the generic runtime activity event contract. > - Later PRs can publish and consume this contract without private plugin coupling. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description First feature prerequisite extracted from #18050. Runner publishing is #18050; the dependent consumer is #18131. Related independent test stability work: #18128. The parent search and review history is preserved in [the verification archive](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18050#issuecomment-6489369676). **Subsystem affected** Runner event protocol, server run-event persistence and redaction, and UI event taxonomy. **Problem or motivation** Core needs a durable, typed activity record tied to the authenticated run. A text marker is not an event contract. **Proposed solution** Add `runtime.activity.recorded` as a P1 event with a closed `{ namespace, activityKey }` payload. Runner knows no plugin or panel identity. Run/session identity, sequence and emission time stay in the outer envelope; Core resolves company, task and agent through the authorized run binding. Use the existing authenticated persistence, acknowledgement, replay and redaction paths. ## What Changed - Define and validate the event in PRP v1, v2 and v3. Update the generated protocol artifacts and event catalog. - Preserve saved and live event redaction. Test persistence, replay deduplication and the existing run-read boundary. - Register the event in the UI taxonomy without changing panel display behavior. - Advance the source-bound Copilot identity to 78. Retain all published historical identity fixtures without changing their bytes. ## Verification - Root `pnpm typecheck` and `pnpm build`: passed for the revised activity contract. - Node protocol checks: 14 passed. Provider identity and registry tests: 185 passed. Server tests: 103 passed. UI event registry: five passed. - Maintained Grok and Copilot identity generator checks and `git diff --check`: passed. - The first activity-contract review scored 4/5 because the dependent producer and readers still used the earlier contract. Both dependent PRs are now updated and restacked; the finding is resolved and review is running again. - Initial extraction retained a consumer-only import in one server suite. That suite failed to load. The consumer case and import were moved out; the final three server files passed all 103 cases. - Earlier panel-specific head `6137c50bc` had green CI and standard/Apex 5/5. Those scores do not qualify this revised activity contract. Fresh CI and reviews are pending. Earlier combined results in the archive apply only to their recorded source revisions. ## Risks This change is additive. It adds no route, publisher, filesystem transport, provider sandbox grant, or panel display behavior. Activation hints grant no permission to read a plugin view. Provider identities bind the changed protocol source; historical identities remain decode-only. No schema migration or dependency change is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools and code execution. The exact serving snapshot is not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-29 00:32:12 -07:00
Dotta	39206c0096	feat(ui): complete the task workspace (#12640) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The task page is the main place where people guide and review agent work. > - Native runner events already project into the existing task chat on the lower stack. > - The larger task workspace must support those events without breaking direct adapters. > - Legacy questions, final replies, empty transcripts, and classic controls must keep their behavior. > - This pull request completes the provider-neutral task workspace experience. > - The benefit is one coherent task surface for native and direct execution paths. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12639. Refs #12617. Refs #12352. **Subsystem affected** Task chat, task detail, side panels, interaction forms, and transcript presentation. **Problem or motivation** The task page does not provide one complete workspace for live activity, plans, questions, queued guidance, files, and documents. Earlier native UI work also exposed compatibility risks in legacy question and reply paths. **Proposed solution** Add the task workspace components and provider-neutral protocol presentation. Keep runner-only controls behind runtime facts. Preserve all direct-adapter composer, transcript, interaction, and finalization behavior. **Alternatives considered** A separate runner page would duplicate task behavior. Replacing legacy transcript logic would create unnecessary adapter regressions. **Roadmap alignment** This work supports the unified task experience and the Cloud and Sandbox agents milestone. ## Stack - Base PR: #12639. - Lower PR: #12638. - This PR contains only its 119-file UI delta against `runner/remote-wss-transport`. - The next stack PR adds administrator and observability controls. ## What Changed - Added a reusable task workspace side panel for files and documents. - Added provider-neutral cards for tools, plans, questions, protocol activity, and progress. - Added queued guidance and richer composer state. - Added compact and expanded interaction presentation. - Added live activity, thinking, usage, recovery, and final reply presentation. - Added document annotations and task deep links. - Added bounded question validation and response handling. - Preserved native runner event projection from master. - Preserved legacy channel-less replies and explicit final reply precedence. - Preserved direct-adapter and classic-interface controls. - Did not change server execution selection, Rust code, migrations, workflows, or `pnpm-lock.yaml`. ## Verification - GitHub Actions will run UI tests, repository tests, typecheck, build, browser tests, security, and policy gates. - Tests cover active, settled, empty-transcript, interaction, queued-message, plan, question, file, document, and classic-interface states. - Compatibility tests cover direct adapters and native runner projection together. - Local tests were not run. The requested verification policy uses GitHub Actions for this series. - `git diff --check runner/remote-wss-transport...HEAD` passes. - The delta contains 119 UI-only files. ## Risks - This is a large task-page change. - Most files are new focused components and tests. - Shared transcript code keeps the lower native projection and legacy direct-adapter fallbacks. - Runner-only controls use adapter and runtime facts. - No execution path or rollout flag changes in this PR. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5.6. The work used high-reasoning agent mode, repository tools, GitHub tools, and parallel code-audit agents. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with Fixes: / Closes / Refs OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-09-01 02:44:19 -05:00