Jannik/PaperClipAI
1
0 Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git synced 2026-10-18 15:39:47 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
4,133 Commits 1,198 Branches 1,963 Tags
9611da2b38c080e7608d760facba51ad3feed4e4
Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Dotta 5716fe907e test(runner): add full-stack acceptance and eval gates (#12700) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The runner subsystem executes agent work across local and managed
provider backends.
> - The lower pull requests restore the task runtime, provider backends,
and managed-provider control plane.
> - The restored system needs repeatable full-stack checks before it can
ship safely.
> - Paid live checks also need clear access, cost, and secret controls.
> - This pull request adds acceptance, live evaluation, chaos, and
release gates for the restored runner stack.
> - The benefit is measurable runner parity with safer release
decisions.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Cross-cutting. This change covers runner tests, release workflows,
server contracts, and evaluation tools.

**Problem or motivation**

The runner stack did not have one complete acceptance surface for native
Codex, ACPX, Claude Managed, and AWS AgentCore. Release checks could
miss provider drift, task-view regressions, cost-policy errors, and
destructive cleanup errors.

**Proposed solution**

Add a 57-cell full-stack catalog, a Daytona image, and opt-in paid
workflows. Add live evaluation, chaos, cost-limit, redaction, and
release contract checks. Add AWS AgentCore infrastructure and guarded
provisioning tools. Keep the native runner experimental flag off by
default.

**Alternatives considered**

We considered manual smoke tests only. They do not give repeatable
evidence and they do not protect release branches. We also considered
one large pull request. The stacked pull requests keep each review below
the Greptile file limit.

**Roadmap alignment**

This work supports the shipped Cloud / Sandbox agents milestone and the
shipped Agent evals & feedback milestone in `ROADMAP.md`.

Related stack:

- #12699 adds managed provider backends and lifecycle support.
- #12691 adds qualified OpenCode and ACPX provider backends.
- #12685 restores task runtime rendering and steering.

## What Changed

- Add the runner full-stack harness with 57 catalog cells and 60 unit
tests.
- Add a Daytona runner image with digest-pinned base images and
base-aware image-content checks.
- Add guarded live evaluation and chaos workflows with a fixed
40-execution matrix; live and full-stack paid schedules now run only on
Sundays or by manual dispatch.
- Add in-flight reported-usage cost stops, post-turn cost caps,
exact-threshold failure classification, secret redaction, retry
classification, and actor authorization.
- Reattach stream and hard-budget listeners before restart-recovery
continuations so restored paid sessions cannot bypass in-flight
interruption.
- Preserve OpenCode usage and cost across tool-loop messages and turns
while exposing an explicit current-run delta to durable accounting.
- Keep PNG/WebM evidence in access-controlled artifacts only, reject
SVG, and publish only pruned inert structured per-attempt evidence.
- Add AWS AgentCore infrastructure, provisioning checks, and smoke
tools; reject unsafe model identifiers, require exact stack ownership
markers, and make failed-stack replacement explicit.
- Add evaluation-session contracts and capability reports.
- Add release workflow checks for immutable action pins, frozen
dependency installs, exact weekly cron shape, paid-run guards,
provider-secret isolation, and chaos test paths.
- Reauthorize the original and triggering numeric actor IDs as the first
step of every provider-secret job, including partial reruns, before
checkout or provider access.
- Give each full-stack matrix cell only its matching provider
credential, expose Daytona only to Daytona cells, and disable shared
dependency caches anywhere paid credentials or OIDC write access are
present.
- Protect the legacy manual E2E workflow with the same default-branch,
allowlist, environment, and per-job authorization boundary.
- Rotate live-eval candidates by week and retain 120 days of compatible
history so the seven-week trend window remains viable.
- Restore the root runner-acceptance commands and reconcile reported
snapshots,
raw receipts, and terminal usage without double counting or losing late
usage.
- Mark ACPX token deltas exact only when every budget field is present,
keep
cumulative cost/request authority separate, reject non-USD cost
labeling,
  and include thought tokens in output-token budgets.
- Keep `enableNativeRunner` off by default. The acceptance harness
enables it only in its isolated test instance.

## Verification

Passed locally:

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner typecheck`
- `pnpm test:runner-acceptance:typecheck`
- `pnpm test:runner-acceptance` (19 tests)
- focused OpenCode proxy, driver, runnerd transport, live-session, and
turn-stream tests (106 tests)
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run
src/live/clean-room-server.test.ts` (22 tests)
- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck`
- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit` (62 tests)
- `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner
test:runner-workflow-evals` (22 tests)
- `pnpm -r typecheck`
- `pnpm build`
- `node --test
packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/aws-agentcore-provisioning.test.mjs`
(6 tests)
- `git diff --check`
- `cargo test --manifest-path
packages/paperclip-runner/runner/Cargo.toml -p paperclip-runner-core
--lib --locked` (161 tests)
- focused ACPX provider-event tests (10 tests)
- The rebased PR changes 92 files. `pnpm-lock.yaml` is unchanged.

I did not run paid live provider jobs or provision AWS resources. Those
checks need credentials and can create cost.

## Risks

The paid workflows can create provider cost. They require an allowlisted
original and triggering actor, the protected `runner-e2e-paid`
environment, explicit opt-in variables, and cost limits. The four
provider credentials exist only in that master-only environment, which
requires allowlisted reviewer approval and disables administrator
bypass; repository and organization Actions scopes contain no copies.

Provider usage arrives after a billable request, so the live guard
cannot prevent one request from crossing a threshold. It interrupts
immediately on the first reported threshold hit and permits no
continuation.

Visual evidence can contain secrets rendered as pixels. PNG/WebM remain
only in access-controlled workflow artifacts; SVG and per-attempt XML
are excluded, and S3/Pages receive a pruned structured dashboard.

The AWS scripts can create cloud resources. They use explicit commands,
least-privilege roles, KMS encryption, saved nonsecret metadata, and
explicit teardown.

This pull request does not enable the experimental native runner for
existing instances.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. The model used extended reasoning, tool use,
code execution, and parallel subagents.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
 2026-09-02 08:55:08 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip ffff1fe6e3 feat(runner): define package API and verification boundary (#12129) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The runner package now has protocol, transport, provider, catalog,
and authorization foundations.
> - Its first upstream package boundary should expose only the
implemented runtime and test-helper surfaces.
> - Rust correctness belongs in the repository existing build
verification, without introducing a parallel release process.
> - Direct package creation must build the files declared by the package
manifest.
> - This pull request defines the minimal package API and verifies the
optimized runner binaries in the existing PR and release Build jobs.
> - The benefit is a production-ready runner package boundary with
minimal build-process change.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #11962

This pull request replaces one bounded part of the archived large runner
change. It follows the package-local authorization change in #12126.

## What Changed

- Export only `@paperclipai/paperclip-runner` and
`@paperclipai/paperclip-runner/testing`.
- Keep Node-only fixture loading and semantic conformance helpers out of
the runtime root.
- Add a provider-neutral semantic conformance kit with stable JSON
comparison and fail-closed input checks.
- Keep deferred SDK, eval, browser, React, lab, and command surfaces
private.
- Pin the runner Rust toolchain to 1.97.1 with the minimal profile and
`rustfmt`.
- Run the Rust workspace tests in release mode.
- Launch the optimized `paperclip-runnerd` and fake-harness binaries in
process-level integration coverage.
- Add one `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:all` step
to each existing PR and release Build job.
- Make the existing server `prepack` lifecycle run its existing build
after it prepares UI assets.
- Document that no production adapter starts runnerd yet.

This revision adds no standalone GitHub Actions job. It adds no server
runner dependency or runner vendoring. It adds no Docker bootstrap or
clean-consumer harness. It does not change `pnpm-lock.yaml`.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:all`
  - 66 TypeScript tests
  - 8 protocol contract tests
  - 56 Rust unit and integration tests
- Release-mode integration coverage launches the optimized runnerd and
fake-harness binaries.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run
src/__tests__/server-package-build-script.test.ts` (2 tests)
- Clean `pnpm pack` from `server/` rebuilt the server and produced both
`package/dist/index.js` and `package/dist/index.d.ts`.
- `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs` (8
tests)
- `pnpm -r typecheck`
- `pnpm build`
- `pnpm check:token-gates`
- `git diff --check`
- No `pnpm-lock.yaml` diff.
- The diff changes 12 files.

## Risks

The runner adds Rust work to the existing Build jobs. These jobs can
take longer on a cold cache. The pinned toolchain makes contributor and
CI behavior reproducible. Cargo tests use `--release` to verify
optimized executables. The server prepack lifecycle now performs the
build that its published entry points require. This can make direct
server packing slower. This pull request does not wire runnerd into the
server. It does not select runnerd for any adapter. Existing application
execution and finalization paths remain unchanged.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. Agentic coding mode used repository tools, code
execution, and automated tests.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-08-25 09:31:48 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip d648becb90 refactor(ci): split workspaces-a into two Vitest native shards 
Split the slow workspaces-a CI lane into two Vitest native shards and keep release verification in parity.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-08-10 17:32:44 -07:00
Devin FoleyandDevin Foley b6e58019f2 ci: split serialized tests into five shards (#10923) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip uses CI to keep control-plane changes safe and mergeable.
> - The PR workflow splits serialized server tests across isolated
runners.
> - A recent successful run spent 305 seconds in serialized shard 2/4.
> - That job was the slowest check in the run.
> - The four shards reported about 739 seconds of Vitest suite time.
> - This pull request adds a fifth serialized shard and keeps release
verification aligned.
> - The benefit is a shorter PR critical path with no loss of test
coverage.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

The PR and release verification workflows run serialized server tests in
four shards.

**Current behavior**

Successful PR run 30876682788 spent 305 seconds in `Verify serialized
server suites (2/4)`. The test step used 256 seconds and made this job
the slowest check.

**Proposed behavior**

Run the same serialized suite set in five complete and non-overlapping
shards.

**Reason and benefit**

The measured suites reported about 739 seconds of total Vitest time.
Five runners reduce the expected average suite time from about 185
seconds to about 148 seconds before setup overhead.

**Breaking changes**

None. The change only alters CI partition size.

## What Changed

- Split serialized server tests into five shards in the PR workflow.
- Apply the same five-shard layout to release verification.
- Add a partition test that proves complete and non-overlapping
serialized coverage.
- Update release workflow coverage tests for five shards.

## Verification

- `node --test scripts/__tests__/run-vitest-stable-shard.test.mjs
scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs`
- `git diff --check`

## Risks

- Low risk. CI uses one additional runner for the serialized lane.
- Round-robin partition weights can still vary as suite timings change.

> This change does not overlap with planned core work in `ROADMAP.md`.
Related PR #10663 optimized the separate general-server lane.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, agentic coding with reasoning, tool use, and code
execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com>
 2026-08-05 16:29:49 -07:00
dependabot[bot] 18fe9486a0 build(deps): bump actions/setup-node from 6 to 7 (#9884) 
Bumps [actions/setup-node](https://github.com/actions/setup-node) from 6
to 7.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/releases">actions/setup-node's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v7.0.0</h2>
<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<h3>Enhancements:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Add cache-primary-key and cache-matched-key as outputs by <a
href="https://github.com/gowridurgad"><code>@​gowridurgad</code></a> in
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1577">actions/setup-node#1577</a></li>
<li>Migrate to ESM and upgrade dependencies by <a
href="https://github.com/gowridurgad"><code>@​gowridurgad</code></a> in
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1574">actions/setup-node#1574</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Bug fixes:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Remove dummy NODE_AUTH_TOKEN export by <a
href="https://github.com/gowridurgad"><code>@​gowridurgad</code></a> in
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1558">actions/setup-node#1558</a></li>
<li>Only use <code>mirrorToken</code> in <code>getManifest</code> if
it's provided by <a
href="https://github.com/deiga"><code>@​deiga</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1548">actions/setup-node#1548</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Documentation updates:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Add documentation for publishing to npm with Trusted Publisher
(OIDC) by <a
href="https://github.com/chiranjib-swain"><code>@​chiranjib-swain</code></a>
in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1536">actions/setup-node#1536</a></li>
<li>docs: Update restore-only cache documentation by <a
href="https://github.com/priya-kinthali"><code>@​priya-kinthali</code></a>
in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1550">actions/setup-node#1550</a></li>
<li>docs: Update caching recommendations to mitigate cache poisoning
risks by <a
href="https://github.com/chiranjib-swain"><code>@​chiranjib-swain</code></a>
in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1567">actions/setup-node#1567</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Dependency update:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Upgrade <code>@​actions/cache</code> to 5.1.0, log cache write
denied by <a
href="https://github.com/jasongin"><code>@​jasongin</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1569">actions/setup-node#1569</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>New Contributors</h2>
<ul>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/chiranjib-swain"><code>@​chiranjib-swain</code></a>
made their first contribution in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1536">actions/setup-node#1536</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/deiga"><code>@​deiga</code></a> made
their first contribution in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1548">actions/setup-node#1548</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/jasongin"><code>@​jasongin</code></a>
made their first contribution in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1569">actions/setup-node#1569</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/compare/v6...v7.0.0">https://github.com/actions/setup-node/compare/v6...v7.0.0</a></p>
<h2>v6.5.0</h2>
<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Update <code>@​actions/cache</code> to 5.1.0 and add security
overrides for undici and fast-xml-parser by <a
href="https://github.com/HarithaVattikuti"><code>@​HarithaVattikuti</code></a>
in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1579">actions/setup-node#1579</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/compare/v6.4.0...v6.5.0">https://github.com/actions/setup-node/compare/v6.4.0...v6.5.0</a></p>
<h2>v6.4.0</h2>
<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<h3>Dependency updates:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Upgrade <a
href="https://github.com/actions"><code>@​actions</code></a>
dependencies by <a
href="https://github.com/Copilot"><code>@​Copilot</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1525">actions/setup-node#1525</a></li>
<li>Update Node.js versions in versions.yml and bump package to v6.4.0
by <a
href="https://github.com/priya-kinthali"><code>@​priya-kinthali</code></a>
in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1533">actions/setup-node#1533</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>New Contributors</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/Copilot"><code>@​Copilot</code></a> made
their first contribution in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1525">actions/setup-node#1525</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/compare/v6...v6.4.0">https://github.com/actions/setup-node/compare/v6...v6.4.0</a></p>
<h2>v6.3.0</h2>
<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<h3>Enhancements:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Support parsing <code>devEngines</code> field by <a
href="https://github.com/susnux"><code>@​susnux</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/pull/1283">actions/setup-node#1283</a></li>
</ul>
<!-- raw HTML omitted -->
</blockquote>
<p>... (truncated)</p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/commit/820762786026740c76f36085b0efc47a31fe5020"><code>8207627</code></a>
Migrate to ESM and upgrade dependencies (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/issues/1574">#1574</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/commit/04be95cf3511ea51ebf9f224ddfb99cc7ab87cd4"><code>04be95c</code></a>
Add cache-primary-key and cache-matched-key as outputs (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/issues/1577">#1577</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/commit/7c2c68d20d402ed6a201ada70a81341941093140"><code>7c2c68d</code></a>
docs: Update caching recommendations to mitigate cache poisoning risks
(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/issues/1567">#1567</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/commit/6a61c0375d66246de94630495909f12cf8dac84d"><code>6a61c03</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/issues/1569">#1569</a>
from jasongin/update-actions-cache-5.1.0</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/commit/30eb73b41ded577900c1ebf968ef95cdf8f7434f"><code>30eb73b</code></a>
Resolve high-severity audit issues</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/commit/4e1a87a501d0302f99e30e2748568adcb388d09f"><code>4e1a87a</code></a>
Update dist</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/commit/360237f0c01778d0c17291f75c56d6feae4f7574"><code>360237f</code></a>
Strict equality</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/commit/4f8aac5beb2f0854bc79651567a18c67eb0b9de3"><code>4f8aac5</code></a>
Bump <code>@​actions/cache</code> to 5.1.0, log cache write denied</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/commit/f4a67bbeca970f103397d3d2b9462cf787cd2980"><code>f4a67bb</code></a>
Only use <code>mirrorToken</code> in <code>getManifest</code> if it's
provided (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/issues/1548">#1548</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/commit/0355742c943ddb13ca8a6b700f824231caa91e75"><code>0355742</code></a>
Remove dummy NODE_AUTH_TOKEN export (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/setup-node/issues/1558">#1558</a>)</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a
href="https://github.com/actions/setup-node/compare/v6...v7">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />


[![Dependabot compatibility
score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=actions/setup-node&package-manager=github_actions&previous-version=6&new-version=7)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.

[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)

---

<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)


</details>

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
 2026-07-21 12:04:06 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip cec0fc249a [codex] Parallelize release verify workflow (#9168) 
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Releases publish the same app and package set that operators
install, so release verification should keep full release-strength
coverage.
> - The release workflow currently verifies stable and canary releases
with one serial job that typechecks, runs all tests, and builds.
> - The PR workflow already proves the test surface can be split into
grouped general suites and serialized shards without changing coverage.
> - This pull request extracts the release verify work into a reusable
workflow and fans out the independent lanes.
> - The benefit is faster stable and canary release verification while
preserving the existing publish and preview gates.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

No public GitHub issue exists for this CI improvement.

**Subsystem affected**

Cross-cutting (multiple of the above)

**Problem or motivation**

Release verification spends most of its wall time in a single serial
test step even though the same stable test surface is already
partitioned for PR CI. Stable dispatches and master-push canaries
therefore wait on one long runner after setup, typecheck, tests, and
build run sequentially.

**Proposed solution**

Add a reusable release verification workflow with parallel typecheck,
grouped general tests, serialized test shards, and build lanes. Have
both stable and canary release verification call it with the ref they
need to verify.

**Alternatives considered**

Keeping the serial `pnpm test:run` job preserves the old shape but keeps
stable and canary releases waiting on one long runner. Skipping
verification when a source SHA already has green CI would be faster, but
adds stale-check and lookup risk beyond this change.

**Roadmap alignment**

No overlapping item found in `ROADMAP.md`; this is release CI
maintenance.

**Additional context**

The new workflow keeps the release-strength full `pnpm -r typecheck`,
uses the existing stable test grouping/sharding entry points, and leaves
publish/preview jobs unchanged.

## What Changed

- Added `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml` as a `workflow_call`
workflow accepting a `ref` input.
- Split release verification into parallel `typecheck`, `general_tests`,
`serialized_tests`, and `build` jobs with 20-minute lane timeouts.
- Mirrored the PR workflow's stable test partition: `general-server`
shards 1-3, `general-workspaces-a`, `general-workspaces-b`, and four
serialized shards.
- Replaced `release.yml` `verify_canary` and `verify_stable` job bodies
with calls to the reusable workflow while leaving publish and preview
jobs unchanged.
- Added a Node test that guards the release workflow delegation and
split verify surface.

## Verification

- `actionlint 1.7.12 .github/workflows/release.yml
.github/workflows/release-verify.yml`
- `node ./scripts/release-package-map.mjs check`
- `node --test ./scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs
./scripts/__tests__/run-vitest-stable-shard.test.mjs`
- `git diff --check`

## Risks

- Release verification now starts more jobs per release event,
increasing total runner setup/install minutes. This matches the existing
PR CI tradeoff and should reduce release wall time substantially.
- The called workflow checks out the requested ref shallowly. That is
intentional for verify lanes; publish and preview jobs still retain
their existing full-history checkouts.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent in local tool-use mode with shell
execution, repository editing, GitHub connector access, and medium
reasoning.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
 2026-07-09 19:28:00 -05:00