Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5 83c6832ccb fix(build): typecheck package, Playwright, and e2e test files in CI (#18839)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Runner, plugin, and Playwright tests verify how those agents run,
connect, and appear in the board
> - Most package tsconfigs exclude tests, and Vitest strips types, so a
type error in those tests fails nothing
> - The tests drifted to 803 real type errors, and some of those errors
hid assertions that checked nothing
> - paperclipai/paperclip#18739 and paperclipai/paperclip#18738 check
the server test tree and four test projects, but not these files
> - This pull request adds a required check for these test files, fixes
every error, and fails CI if a test file is in no program
> - The benefit is that a type error in any test file outside
`server/src` now fails CI

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18739
Refs #18738

**What happened?**

517 test files were in no program that required CI checks. A type error
in those files did not fail CI.

**Expected behavior**

CI fails on a type error in any test file.

**Steps to reproduce**

Add `export const value: number = "text";` to a test file under
`packages/paperclip-runner/src` on master. CI stays green, because
`tsconfig.json` excludes test files and Vitest strips types.

**Measured gap**

Each row is a program with its tests included, on one thread. File and
error counts are for head `7d4b5e907a`. Memory peaks were measured
before the two latest merges of master.

| Group | Test files | Real errors | Peak |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| `paperclip-runner` Node source | 290 | 644 | 1.09 GiB |
| `paperclip-runner` surfaces | 9 | 12 | 0.42 GiB |
| `paperclip-runner` devtools and examples | 14 | 0 | 0.68 GiB |
| `sandbox-providers/kubernetes` | 21 | 65 | 0.44 GiB |
| 8 other sandbox providers and `bridge-template` | 32 | 4 | 0.34 GiB |
| `plugins/sdk` | 22 | 15 | 0.41 GiB |
| `plugin-workspace-diff` | 5 | 0 | 0.37 GiB |
| `plugin-orchestration-smoke-example` | 1 | 1 | 0.15 GiB |
| `kv-demo-mcp-server` | 3 | 0 | 0.13 GiB |
| `packages/db` scripts | 1 | 0 | 1.01 GiB |
| 8 Playwright suites under `tests/` | 52 | 25 | 1.72 GiB |
| `tests/runner-acceptance` | 3 | 0 | 0.58 GiB |
| `tests/e2e`, through layer declarations | 63 | 37 | at most 1.59 GiB |
| `ui` `AttentionInteractionResolver.test.tsx` | 1 | 0 | n/a |
| **Total** | **517** | **803** | |

27 of the 803 errors came from master while this pull request was open.
Each merge of master brought new test code that no check had read.

Errors that were config errors, not real errors:

- One TS2688 for each provider, because the root install does not
install provider dependencies.
- 9 in the Runner Node program (TS7016 and TS6059).
- 2 in `tsconfig.browser.json`. TypeScript 7 removed `baseUrl`, so that
config was invalid.
- 213 in the Playwright suites (`@/*` aliases and Vite types).
- About 60 in `tests/e2e` (import extensions and aliases).

`packages/plugins/create-paperclip-plugin` has no gap. Its tsconfig
excludes its test, but `cli/tsconfig.json` reaches that test through an
import. `server/test-baselines` also has no gap, because
`tests/lifecycle-baseline` reads it.

## What Changed

- Added `scripts/typecheck-test-programs.mjs` and its tests. The
`Typecheck + Release Registry` job runs it. It checks each program in
`PROGRAMS` on one thread.
- The script fails if a tracked `*.test.ts(x)` or `*.spec.ts(x)` file
outside `server/src` is in no program. The compiler file list decides
this, because `include` drops `foo.test.tsx` when `foo.test.ts` exists.
- Added a `tsconfig.test.json` to each uncovered package, and
`tests/tsconfig.playwright.json`.
- Added `tests/e2e` to `PROJECTS` in
`scripts/typecheck-test-projects.mjs`, with a `tsconfig.json` and a
`tsconfig.layers.json`.
- Added `scripts/typecheck-sandbox-providers`. It is a small workspace
that installs provider SDKs from one lockfile. I did not add a lockfile
inside each provider, because
`scripts/build-standalone-public-packages.mjs` uses a frozen install
when one exists, and that changes what a release resolves.
- Corrected `packages/paperclip-runner/tsconfig.browser.json` for
TypeScript 7.
- Set `rootDir` to `..` in
`packages/paperclip-runner/tsconfig.test.json`, because one Runner test
imports from `packages/adapter-utils/src`. The program does not emit
files, so this changes no build output.
- Moved the Kubernetes provider from `vitest ^3.2.4` to `^4.1.8`, the
version the other providers use. Vitest 3 requires `tinypool ^1.1.1`,
which has two critical advisories (GHSA-85c8-ppgw-ccpr and
GHSA-5gmw-xhrv-c9v3). The first patched version is 2.1.2. Its tests have
the same result on both versions: 189 passed, and the same 12
`file-sync` tests failed.
- Moved the Kubernetes provider from `zod ^3.24.2` to `^4.6.6`, and gave
its two `z.record` calls a key schema. This is the only production
change, and it stays in this pull request. See "Production change for
review".
- Renamed `AttentionInteractionResolver.test.ts` to
`AttentionInteractionResolver.replace.test.ts`, so TypeScript reads the
`.test.tsx` beside it.
- Fixed all 803 errors, with changes to test files and test support
only. The fix for `contracts/native-execution.test.ts` is the same as
the fix in paperclipai/paperclip#18739, so those two changes merge
cleanly.
- Updated `doc/DEVELOPING.md`.

This pull request does not edit `server/scripts/typecheck-layers.mjs`.
paperclipai/paperclip#18739 and paperclipai/paperclip#18738 have both
merged, and this branch includes them.

### Production change for review

The new lockfile made dependency review flag `zod@3.25.76` as a
high-severity advisory (GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5). The first patched version
is 4.6.6, so 3.x has no fix. The published Kubernetes plugin uses zod to
validate operator config. The zod 3 source does not compile against zod
4, so a typecheck-only override cannot fix this.

The existing tests do not prove this change, because they also passed
with the invalid one-argument `z.record`. So I parsed 45 inputs with the
same schema on zod 3.25.76 and zod 4.6.7:

| Result | Inputs | Detail |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| Identical | 23 | Includes defaults, valid config, and a `__proto__`
key |
| Same outcome, new error wording | 21 | For example, `Invalid url` is
now `Invalid URL`. `validateConfig` shows this text to operators. |
| Different outcome | 1 | `jobTtlSecondsAfterFinished: 2 ** 60` was
valid and is now rejected. The new limit is `Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER`. |

I did not test this against a real cluster.

The decision is to keep this change in this pull request. Since then,
paperclipai/paperclip#17364 has moved the rest of the repository to zod
4.6.x, so the Kubernetes plugin now matches it.

### Behavior change for review

`reducedMotion` under `use` is not a Playwright option. It had no effect
in 11 configs and 2 `test.use` calls, so those suites ran with
`no-preference`. The options are now under `contextOptions`, so reduced
motion now takes effect. `app-shell-design.spec.ts` asserts a real
transition, so it now asks for `no-preference` itself.

The baseline manifest has `snapshotCount: 0`, so this invalidates no
published baseline. A frozen trial reference PNG can differ.

### Findings

These are product questions. I did not change them, and I did not hide
them with casts:

1. **`PrpEvent` and its schema disagree.** The TypeScript type in
`src/protocol/replay-contract.ts` requires `normalizedSessionId`. The
`required` list in `protocol/schemas/event.schema.json` does not include
it. `validatePrpEvent` accepts events that the type forbids.
2. **`requestCheckboxConfirmation` is stricter than its runtime.** It
uses the output type, so plugin authors must pass `continuationPolicy`
and `allowDeclineReason`, although the schema gives them defaults.
`z.input` would fix this.
3. **`RetainedRunnerdMaintenanceInput.backend.kind` is a free string.**
The quarantine domain comes from `descriptor.kind`, but the release uses
`proof.backend.kind`. If they differ,
`completeRetainedNativeSessionCleanup` returns 0 and the quarantine
stays. The production caller passes `"runner"` today, so this is not a
live bug.
4. **`CodexHarnessSession.close(input?)` is optional, but the contract
requires `{ reason }`.**

These are tests that verified nothing. I corrected them, and they pass:

- `backends/native-instruction-measurement.test.ts` filtered on
`placement === "core"`, which is not a valid placement. It measured an
empty tool list. It now measures 14 tools.
- `drivers/acpx/codex-acpx-driver.test.ts` checked for `usage.updated`,
which is not an event type.
- The `hostFixture()` helper in `drivers/acpx/runtime-host.test.ts`
ignored two overrides, so
`expect(prepareSandbox).not.toHaveBeenCalled()` could not fail.
- `live/live-session.test.ts` set `agent: "pi"` before a spread that
overwrote it.
- `native-distribution-integrity.test.ts` passed an AbortSignal where
`openCommand` expects `{ signal }`.

These are gaps that this pull request does not close:

- **The root lockfile still has some old zod versions.**
paperclipai/paperclip#17364 moved the direct zod dependencies to 4.6.x.
`pnpm-lock.yaml` still resolves `zod@3.25.76`, `4.1.11`, and `4.4.3`,
which are below the patched 4.6.6.
`packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/pi-distribution/package.json` pins
`zod` to `3.25.76`, and some agent SDKs resolve `4.4.3`. Dependency
review does not flag them, because this pull request does not add them.
- **Dead GitHub coverage.** `chat-adapters-ui-providers.spec.ts`
returned early for GitHub, so four later `provider === "github"`
branches never ran. I removed them. They included the private key file
and paste match, and the reconnect flow. Nothing asserts those behaviors
in that spec now.
- **Provider tests do not run in CI.** The root `vitest.config.ts` lists
only Daytona. The other 8 providers, `bridge-template` included, are
typechecked now, but CI does not run their tests.
- **One `packages/db` test never runs.**
`scripts/clean-poisoned-claude-sessions.test.ts` is outside the
`include` of `packages/db/vitest.config.ts`.
- **`plugin-orchestration-smoke-example` does not collect.**
`@paperclipai/shared` is not linked in its `node_modules`. It passes 3
of 3 with an alias.

## Verification

Run these commands:

```sh
node scripts/typecheck-test-programs.mjs --low-memory
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck
node scripts/typecheck-test-projects.mjs --low-memory --reuse-declarations
node --test scripts/typecheck-test-programs.test.mjs
```

Results on macOS (arm64), Node 26.12. CI uses Node 24, and its
`Typecheck + Release Registry` job also passes. At head `7d4b5e907a`,
the test programs, `tests/e2e`, and the script tests pass again with 0
errors. The times and peaks below come from the run before the two
latest merges of master:

| Check | Result |
| --- | --- |
| Test programs, `--low-memory` | Exit 0, 0 errors, 42 seconds, peak
1.78 GiB |
| Server layers, low memory | Exit 0, 0 errors, 38 seconds, peak 3.41
GiB |
| Test projects, including `tests/e2e` | Exit 0, 0 errors, 13 seconds,
peak 1.59 GiB |
| Script tests | 12 passed |
| Injected type error in each of 23 places | Each one failed its program
with TS2322 |
| Coverage check | 0 unchecked files, 10 seconds |

I did not run this in a 4 GiB container. The peaks above are `maximum
resident set size` for the largest single process.

**Runtime check of the fixes.** Types do not prove that a test still
works, so I ran the suites before the two latest merges of master:

| Suite | Result |
| --- | --- |
| Runner, full suite | 4,885 passed, 3 failed, 13 skipped |
| Sandbox providers, 10 packages | 939 passed, 12 failed, 36 skipped |
| Plugin SDK | 200 passed |
| `kv-demo-mcp-server` | 12 passed |
| Renamed UI test and its sibling | 4 passed |

All 15 failures exist without these fixes or come from the local
machine:

- **3 Cursor Cloud timeouts.** `artifact-delivery.test.ts` has 1 and
`cursor-cloud-driver.test.ts` has 2. They time out in a full local run,
and all 133 tests in those files with `codex-security-config.test.ts`
pass when run alone. They fail in the same way with those two files at
their unedited versions.
- **12 Kubernetes `file-sync.test.ts` failures.** They fail in the same
way before and after the fixes. The first failure is that
`/proc/self/fd` does not exist on macOS.

After each of the two latest merges of master, I ran only the Runner
test files that I changed:

| Merge | Result |
| --- | --- |
| `885c249cb9`, 8 files | 534 passed |
| `7d4b5e907a`, 7 files | 672 passed, 16 failed |

The 16 failures are in the two `source-reconciliation` test files. They
fail in the same way with master's unedited versions of those files. 15
of them fail with `ACPX sidecar exited at initialize`, so I think my
local build of the Rust and sidecar binaries is out of date. I did not
rebuild them to check. CI builds them from scratch, and all Runner jobs
pass in CI at `7d4b5e907a`.

**Not run:**

- `tests/e2e` and the 8 Playwright suites need a server, so most of them
have only compile checks. `playwright test --list` loads 308 tests from
the main e2e config.
- `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/kubernetes/test/integration` needs
a cluster, so it has only compile checks.
- I did not run the full `pnpm test:run` or root `pnpm build`. Required
CI runs them.

**Reduced motion.** I ran 6 motion-sensitive Storybook specs in system
Chrome with a temporary config, once with `reduce` and once with
`no-preference`. Both runs had 45 passed and the same 5 failed. So
reduced motion did not change those results. The 5 failures do not
depend on motion. At least one comes from the browser, because system
Chrome prints `oklch(55.6% 0 0)` where the test expects `oklch(0.556 0
0)`. I did not run the other Storybook specs. The `storybook-visual`
label runs that workflow.

## Risks

- **A new lockfile to maintain.** A change to a provider `package.json`
now fails the typecheck job until someone refreshes
`scripts/typecheck-sandbox-providers/pnpm-lock.yaml`. The failure
message gives the command.
- **The job has a new install.** The step downloads provider SDKs, so it
depends on the npm registry. It uses `--frozen-lockfile` and
`--ignore-scripts`.
- **The local install replaces provider `node_modules`.** A contributor
with a standalone provider install must reinstall that provider after
running the script.
- **Reduced motion can change Storybook results.** See "Behavior change
for review". That workflow is not part of required CI.
- **Kubernetes plugin validation changed.** A release of this plugin
ships zod 4. Error wording changes, and very large integers are now
rejected. See "Production change for review".
- **Master moves fast.** Each merge of master brought new test code with
type errors, 27 so far. After this merges, the check reports those
errors in the pull request that adds them.

## Model Used

- Provider: Anthropic Claude, through Claude Code
- Model: Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`)
- Capabilities: tool use, code execution, and subagents for the type
fixes in separate files

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived
details. The app generated the branch name.
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass. See the failures explained
in Verification.
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-06 07:33:59 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip 6aabcff7d1 fix(ui): add space above failed attempt notices (#18636)
Add token-based top padding outside failed-attempt notices and assert the full 16px gap in the browser check.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-02 12:10:43 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 27db8354e4 fix(ui): make failed attempt notices stand out (#18174)
<!-- entire-trail-link-start -->
https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/-/trails/257/changes/paperclip/257
<!-- entire-trail-link-end -->

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Task conversations show when an agent could not finish a saved
request.
> - The exhausted-attempt notice currently looks like ordinary muted
status text.
> - People can overlook both the failure and its available Retry action.
> - This pull request gives failed attempts a padded, tinted surface and
a recognizable error icon using existing tokens.
> - The benefit is a clearer failure state while automatic recovery
keeps its quiet presentation.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: #17386 and #14156 cover recovery behavior. This PR only
improves the exhausted-attempt notice's presentation. Searches found no
duplicate styling PR.

**What happened?**

“Couldn’t finish this attempt. Your message is saved.” appears as muted
text without a background or padding above the task conversation, making
the failure easy to miss.

**Expected behavior**

An exhausted attempt should have a distinct, readable surface with
internal spacing and an obvious Retry action when permitted.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Open a task whose system-owned interruption is `failed`.
2. Find the notice above the conversation.
3. Compare it with an automatic retry countdown. Previously, both had
the same muted inline treatment.

## What Changed

- Style failed attempts with a rounded destructive-tinted background,
token-based padding, foreground text, and a decorative error icon.
- Center the icon with the message and Retry button, including when the
message wraps.
- Keep the Retry button from shrinking on narrow screens.
- Check the center positions in the existing browser layout test.
- Add a production-component Storybook example beside a saved message.
- Document the exhausted-attempt treatment in the design guidance.

## Verification

- `pnpm check:token-gates` and `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`: pass.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
ui/src/components/ExecutionBlockerNotice.test.tsx`: 8 tests pass. These
cover Retry, countdowns, read-only access, active and resolved states,
admission waits, and admission errors.
- Chromium layout: 4 cases pass at 320px and 1280px in light and dark
themes. The icon, text, and Retry button have the same vertical center.
The previous code failed this check by 8–10px.
- Updated desktop and mobile screenshots are saved with the task.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` and `pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/ui build`: pass after the workspace SDK is built.
- Full local typecheck and build need Cargo. Cargo is not installed in
this sandbox. The full local Vitest run did not complete in the prior
session. CI must verify these checks.
- The updated head `4ba8de9da3e5c0c084cb5f752f371eccff31376a` passes all
test jobs, typecheck, build, and all eight E2E shards. The final CI
summary is queued.
- Greptile completed its review of this head with a score of 5/5. It
found no actionable issues. There are no review threads.
- The separate Paperclip Review check is queued. Its review task stopped
before it could publish the result. This check must complete before
merge.

## Risks

Low risk: this is a presentation-only change. The failed state takes
more vertical space. Recovery, authorization, retry timing, and API
contracts retain their existing behavior. Colors, spacing, radius, and
icon sizing use existing design tokens.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution, and browser inspection. The exact runtime model ID and
context-window size were not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-02 09:25:24 -06:00
467125fafb feat(connections): one-screen connector setup with stated defaults (#14811)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agents use Connections (the Apps catalog) to act in services like
Notion, GitHub, Google Workspace and Railway
> - Each connector asked the user to answer setup questions before it
went to the provider. Most of the questions already had the correct
answer selected
> - ROADMAP.md lists "simpler setup" for Apps and Connections as ongoing
work. This change continues that work
> - This pull request removes the questions that Paperclip can answer
itself. It states the defaults in one line and moves the choices behind
"Change" and onto the Permissions tab
> - The benefit is that most connectors take one click in Paperclip and
then the provider's own consent screen

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

No public issue exists. This is the description, from the enhancement
template.

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The setup flow for tool connectors in the Apps catalog.

**Subsystem affected**
Apps and Connections: `ui/src/features/connections`,
`ui/src/pages/apps`, the `packages/shared` app definitions, and the
OAuth routes in `server/src/routes/tool-access.ts`.

**Current behavior**
Every connector opened with an Access step. The step asked who can use
the connection and which agents get it, and both answers were already
selected. 18 connectors also asked "How do you want to connect?" when
Paperclip could rank the methods. The Google apps and Postman also asked
"What should Paperclip be able to do?" before sign-in. The four gateway
connectors (Zapier, Arcade, Composio, Executor) used a separate two-step
wizard. Asana was pinned to a customer-owned OAuth app, so the user had
to register an app in Asana's developer console. The "Set all" control
on the Permissions tab changed only one action. After the user approved
access, Railway's consent page showed "you can close this window" and
did not return to Paperclip.

**Proposed behavior**
One screen per connector, with one primary button. The screen states the
defaults in one sentence, for example "Connects for everyone in your
organization, available to all agents". A "Change" link opens one
Advanced panel. When the provider's metadata allows dynamic client
registration, Paperclip registers a client itself. Connecting lands on
the Permissions tab. On that tab, "Set all" changes every action in the
group.

**Reason and benefit**
The user makes fewer decisions before the connection exists. Most
choices are easier to make after the connection, on the Permissions tab,
where a change has an immediate effect.

**Breaking changes**
None. No schema or API change. Existing connections keep their settings.

## What Changed

- **No Access step.** `ConnectionSetupFlow` no longer has the Access
step. The flow shows the resolved default above the primary button and
on the completion screen. The access controls moved into one Advanced
panel. The panel opens automatically only when a setting in it is
required.
- **A default method for every app.** The flow always picks the ranked
default method. Alternate methods are in the Advanced panel. The Google
and Postman capability choice is not asked before sign-in. The
write-capable method is the default.
- **Gateway connectors.** `RemoteMcpProductionSetup` (Zapier, Arcade,
Composio, Executor) no longer has its own Access step. Its commit path
and the main commit path use one helper, `askFirstCatalogEntryIdsFor`,
for server-suggested defaults.
- **Dynamic registration from live metadata.**
`canRegisterOAuthClientDynamically` now allows registration when the
provider advertises a registration endpoint, even if the catalog entry
lists only customer-owned clients. The Asana and Linear definitions and
catalog text match live probes. Asana issues clients for loopback
callbacks only, so a hosted deployment still needs an Asana app.
- **Connection setup states.** New
`packages/shared/src/connection-setup-state.ts` sorts each method into
`instant`, `authorize`, `paste` or `register`. The gallery card verb
("Connect" or "Add key") comes from this resolver and the instance's
ownership availability.
- **Generic MCP.** The generic path no longer asks "Does it need a key?"
first. A credential challenge from the server shows the key field.
- **Permissions tab.** Each action row shows its risk level. Each group
has a "Set all" control. The control sends one change for the whole
group. Before, each row's save started from the same render, so the
saves overwrote each other. The Zapier/Arcade/Composio/Executor setup
screen had the same defect.
- **OAuth callback interstitial.** A cross-site browser navigation to
`/api/tools/oauth/callback` gets a small same-origin "Finishing your
connection…" page. That page repeats the request, and the repeat does
the code exchange. Railway's consent page replaces itself after about
two seconds, and the code exchange plus tool discovery takes longer than
that. The interstitial uses only a meta refresh, because the OAuth code
is single-use. Requests without `Sec-Fetch-Site: cross-site` take the
old path.
- **Linear registers through its MCP server.** Linear pins the console
endpoints at `linear.app`. Pinned endpoints now replace discovery only
when the method cannot register, or when the connection has an
operator-entered client. So a Linear connection now finds the
registration endpoint at `mcp.linear.app`.
- **Own-OAuth-app recovery stays on the one-click screen.** When the
method also accepts a customer-owned client, the client fields are in
the Advanced panel. The panel opens after a failed sign-in. "Try again"
resumes the draft with the operator's client.
- **E2E specs** follow the one-screen flow. The Access-step clicks are
removed, the specs open **Change** before they pick agents, and they
expect GitHub's **Add key** verb.
- **Default permissions do not change.** New connections still allow
every action. The user can set actions to Ask first or Off on the
Permissions tab.

## Verification

- `cd ui && npx vitest run src/pages/apps src/features/connections
--no-file-parallelism`
- `cd packages/shared && npx vitest run src/app-definitions.test.ts
src/connection-setup-state.test.ts`
- `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts
src/__tests__/remote-mcp-connectors.test.ts`
- `pnpm check:token-gates`
- New tests:
- `PermissionsPanel.group.test.tsx` checks that "Set all" sends one
change for the whole group. It fails on the old code.
  - `action-permissions.test.ts` checks the group update.
  - `connection-setup-state.test.ts` checks the four setup states.
- A server test checks that a cross-site callback gets the interstitial
and does not use the OAuth state, and that the same-origin repeat
completes the connection.
- Manual check on a hosted staging deployment. GitHub, Google Drive,
Composio, Notion, PostHog and Railway each connected from one screen and
returned to the Permissions tab. On Railway, "Set all" changed all 65
write actions, and the change remained after a reload.
- Visual changes: snapshot baselines are intentionally not updated. See
the `doc/design/DECISION-SHEET.md` entry "Per-change snapshot
verification demoted to dormant (Jul 13 2026)".

## Risks

- **Fewer confirmation clicks.** Organization-wide access is the
default, and the user does not confirm it on a separate step. This was
already the preselected answer. The flow shows the default before the
user clicks and again after the connection.
- **Google write scope.** Google apps now request the write-capable
scope by default. A narrower scope needs a new sign-in.
- **Dynamic registration from live metadata.** A provider can advertise
registration and then reject a redirect URI. Asana rejects hosted
callbacks, for example. In that case registration fails, and the
customer-owned client path remains available for recovery.
- **Callback interstitial.** The OAuth callback adds one same-origin
step for cross-site browser navigations. Browsers without `Sec-Fetch-*`
headers use the old direct path.
- Chat and bot connectors (Discord, Telegram, Microsoft Teams, iMessage)
do not change.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used through
Claude Code with tool use (shell, file editing, browser automation) and
extended thinking. It wrote the code, the tests and this description. A
human product owner directed the work and tested it by hand.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: scotttong <squadbot000@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-30 23:13:47 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 35fdc0c66b fix: make task recovery durable and preserve current requests (#13075)
Make task recovery durable and preserve the latest user request across native and legacy continuations. Keep routine recovery quiet and prevent replay when action outcomes are uncertain.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-09 09:14:25 -05:00