5 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
DottaandPaperclip	0e0b63e5a5	feat(connections): add experimental task-pinned AI routing (#14967) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - AI Connections separate account access from models and harnesses. > - A pool must act as one connection while retaining each task’s account. > - Core must enforce member access and preserve session and recovery rules. > - A plugin supplies rotation policy without receiving credentials. > - This change adds durable routing and native connector setup and management. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** AI Connections, Connectors, plugins, run dispatch, and session compatibility. **Problem or motivation** Operators need to rotate new tasks across saved accounts while each task keeps its account and session. Pool setup must fit the existing connector catalog and account workflow. **Proposed solution** Add an experimental router binding, a capability-gated plugin hook, and transactional task pins. Plugins declare native pooled connectors through `aiConnectionRouter`. Core hosts the existing-account picker, ordering step, and account settings. Related usage contract: #14936. Companion private plugin: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/pull/643. **Roadmap alignment** This extends Apps and AI Connections. Core supplies generic enforcement and native connector UI; the private plugin owns rotation and quota policy. The prior duplicate search found no matching router implementation. ## What Changed - Add a router binding without changing existing concrete bindings. Keep the instance flag and new pools disabled by default. Require manual operator configuration. Show no routing toggle in Experimental settings on either open-source or Cloud installs, even after routing is enabled. - Persist company-scoped pools, one shared cursor per pool, and pins keyed by company, pool, agent, and task. Commit pins and cursor advances together with revision checks and bounded retries. Persist run-ID affinity before allocation. - Pass only authorized metadata and normalized usage to plugins. Core retains credential handling, member access checks, runtime qualification, and recovery evidence. Probe outside locks with a shared 15-second budget and freshness cache. - Resolve routing before credential preparation and backend selection. Preserve pins through turns, session resets, removed members, and quota waits. Retain admitted recovery after disable or uninstall. - Separate credential session epochs from token generations. Verified refresh preserves the epoch; reconnect and manual replacement change it. Include the credential slot ID in session and usage-cache identity, so reconnecting an indexed legacy account invalidates its old session even when both epochs are zero. - Validate pool member installations before accepting saved-agent bindings and recheck compatibility when the harness changes. Install only authorized members in the new-agent transaction and record their IDs in local activity. Pool membership cannot install a restricted shared connection. - Preserve pool bindings when agents hire teammates through either creation API or native caller runtime inheritance. Block stale manager credential references; retain explicit child authentication precedence and reject incompatible inherited pools. - Add native connector registration through plugin metadata. Reuse the Connectors catalog, setup header, account header, sidebar, dialogs, and usage display. Setup selects and orders saved connections. Advanced settings hold usage rules and member runtime defaults. New-account setup opens in another tab. - Use revision-checked pool archival from the Connectors catalog and account page. Keep task pins, cursors, recovery evidence, and underlying connections. Reject ordinary connection updates or removals that bypass pool revisions. - Add pool selectors, composer models, override notes, quota status, run details, activity records, and local run-log records. Keep session-adoption copy minimal. - Show **Used by** below the pool connections. List current company agents with shared avatars and profile links. Include paused agents; exclude terminated agents and agents using another pool. - Add Core stories for the generic connector workflow and runtime surfaces. Cloud stories reuse these production routes and tokens through a preview-only alias. ## Verification - Final head `73cb953bca30ed83e4505dd820edd9b5edffd28b`: full workspace `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and `pnpm check:token-gates` pass locally. - All 422 focused connector/settings/shared-contract/migration tests and all 156 database-backed AI connection, hiring, reconnect, and durable-routing cases pass (69 hiring cases rerun after the final auth-precedence fix). The merged shared contract retains connection instructions and pool metadata. The pool migration is generated at sequence 0299 after the latest upstream migrations; this PR makes no lockfile changes. - All four full-app Playwright tests pass on the final head after a cold restart and migration, against the installed private plugin and isolated database, with no route or pool-API mocks. They cover hidden routing controls after manual opt-in, native pool creation, ordering, membership edits, rename, paused defaults, enabling/save/refresh persistence, stale edits, cancellation/removal, preserved underlying accounts, unavailable routers, and Used by avatars and profile links. Exact command: `PAPERCLIP_CONNECTION_POOL_E2E=1 AI_CONNECTIONS_TEST_COMPANY_ID=a37b9625-5ecf-4e29-8081-04df3d6e7d6f AI_CONNECTIONS_TEST_URL=http://127.0.0.1:3108 pnpm exec playwright test --config tests/ai-connections-app/playwright.config.ts connection-pools.spec.ts`. - [Native setup, ordering, and management screenshots](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14967#issuecomment-6006976278) address the review follow-up. [Earlier selector, quota, and run-detail screenshots](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14967#issuecomment-5971537316) show the runtime surfaces. Core previews: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui storybook`, then **Connectors / Pool host** or **AI Connections / Connection pools**. Cloud owns its host-backed plugin stories; both repositories’ Operator Setup Required story assertions pass. - Live acceptance used OpenAI/Codex and Anthropic/Claude ACPX, resumed both exact sessions after restart, preserved pinned accounts through explicit reset and controlled quota deferral/recovery, and committed only two allocations across fourteen runs. A later UI-created task test again rotated OpenAI then Anthropic and resumed OpenAI through follow-up/restart/quota recovery. That later Anthropic execution was blocked by its saved OAuth token expiring (provider 401). No live usage probes ran. - The full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted earlier and did not complete because of macOS embedded PostgreSQL bootstrap/shared-memory failures and the 40,000-file Git fixture timeout. The focused database suites above now pass; full-suite verification is provided by the split CI lanes. The preceding CI run had one runtime readiness timeout; it passes locally both alone and inside the larger runtime suite. That larger local suite also encountered an embedded PostgreSQL setup failure and two macOS temporary-path alias assertions; those two assertions pass with canonical TMPDIR=/private/tmp. All final-head CI checks are terminal green, including full general/serialized server suites, Runner checks, browser E2E shards, canary verification, build, and typecheck. Greptile is 5/5 on that exact head with no unresolved threads. ## Risks - The migration adds routing tables and a credential epoch column. Install the private plugin only with the compatible Core contract. - Routing and each pool require opt-in. Production distribution and fleet defaults remain unchanged. - Unknown usage stays eligible. Known pinned exhaustion waits; revoked access requires operator repair. - Legacy adapters require compatible members. Runner model and effort overrides remain limited by qualified backend support. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, code execution, and browser testing. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes:` / `Closes:` / `Refs:` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (targeted suites; full-suite limitations are reported above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-05 20:44:37 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	96bf004a79	fix: use persisted state for lifecycle continuation and retry budgets (#13888) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Its control plane decides when a task can continue, wait, stop, or complete. > - Legacy continuation could change when an agent changed its wording without changing task state. > - Shared attempt counts also let repair and infrastructure retries affect each other's limits. > - This pull request uses persisted state and separate, bounded allowances for these decisions. > - If automatic repair stops, the task explains what happened and offers a guarded retry. > - Paired tests and real-provider evaluations verify that Stop, approvals, ownership, and spending limits remain authoritative. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related work: Refs #13761, Refs #11126, Refs #13610. These cover obsolete continuation dispatch and retry storms. Open and closed issues and PRs were searched for related lifecycle, continuation, and retry work. **What happened?** Legacy continuation depended on English wording and progress heuristics. Repair, failure retry, and productive continuation could consume shared counts. When bounded repair stopped, the task showed a technical recovery message without a clear next action. **Expected behavior** Persisted disposition and owned execution paths determine the next action. Missing disposition prompts bounded agent repair. Explicit work mode determines planning mode. Narrative changes and raw activity counts cannot replenish allowances. An exhausted repair shows a readable notice. An explicit retry checks current controls and preserves the assigned agent. **Steps to reproduce** Run `pnpm test:lifecycle-baseline`. The paired probes keep structured state constant while varying completion, planning, blocker, and progress prose. Run the explicit `lifecycle-baseline` and `continuation-accounting` Product E2E suites for real-provider coverage. In Storybook, open **Design previews / Recovery notice** to inspect the production component's normal, pending, acknowledged, unavailable, failure, and mobile states. ## What Changed - Hide the image attachment button, icon, and drop/paste hint in answer composers. Image paste and drop support remains available. - Merge current master and retain both browser regression sets. Use a production-stamped service worker in the offline recovery browser fixture. - Share one state-based legacy continuation decision across immediate, delayed, and recovered dispatch. Bind bounded repairs to their source run and episode. - Remove title and description wording from work-mode authority. Agents can still write requested plans in execution mode. - Persist separate failure-retry and productive-continuation counters. Disposition repair and resource waits cannot consume or reset those allowances. - Validate delayed repair identity, then recheck current gates before provider dispatch. Fence native startup cancellation. - Show **Agent needs attention**, a plain-language explanation, **Retry agent**, and expandable details in both task interfaces. Report request progress, acknowledgement, and errors inline. - Store typed recovery notice metadata. Recognize older active notices only through exact stored action and run IDs. Notice text never grants retry authority. - Use the existing recovery-action endpoint for retry. Recheck current action, status, owner, agent availability, dependencies, active runs, pending questions and confirmations, approvals, pause controls, and budget. Duplicate requests do not wake twice. - Add component, page, route, database, contract, and Storybook coverage. Keep the scenario inventory and executable evals here. Historical reports and snapshots live in the [commit-pinned paperclip-evals archive](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-evals/blob/ce3e5afcd4a1184650f586a2b5b8be5874c66c8b/experiments/2026-09-lifecycle-authority/README.md). - Preserve unsaved project fields while the same project URL changes to its canonical alias. Do not reuse data across projects or companies. This separate fix addresses the repeated repository-editor browser failure without changing the browser test. - Keep the development service worker from intercepting Vite module reloads. Update the connection-intent browser fixture to record progress and completion through the agent API. ## Verification Merge preparation on September 25, commit `c1e8e4b7ddd9fbc4913ed55ce21b8e12906c2f97`: - Merged master `bd2030932` and resolved the browser test-list conflict by keeping both sets of regressions. - Deterministic lifecycle baseline: 1,090/1,090 assertions passed; no failures, skips, or missing selected evidence. Unit 423, runner 184, database integration 397, grading 86. - Browser support: 17/17 passed. The offline recovery test first failed with an unstamped development worker, then passed with the production stamp. Its assertions are unchanged. - Focused interaction UI and offline fallback tests: 19/19 passed. Verified the custom-answer composer in Storybook: no attachment controls or hint; entering an answer enables Next. - Recursive typecheck, production build, token gates, and diff checks passed. The worktree is clean. No new real-provider campaign was run. - Current CI and review: [Current PR CI passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36166011243): 55 successful checks and two optional Storybook skips. Greptile scored this exact commit 5/5. Hiding the question attachment controls is an intentional UI change; paste/drop remains available. Earlier recovery UI verification, commit `21be0fec0e90e86b6d662b8ee4831847cd041cdb`: - Recursive typecheck, production build, token gates, and diff checks passed. - Focused UI coverage: 338 tests passed across six suites (336 before the interaction guard, with the two affected suites rerun at 149 passed after it). Covers both task interfaces, the real page mutation, pending/error acknowledgement, stale state, and unavailable controls. - Recovery database integration: 352 tests passed before the interaction guard. The complete recovery-action and mutation-route suites passed 181 tests after it. The two new pending question/confirmation regressions failed before the fix and passed afterward, including resolved-interaction controls. Shared validator suite: 31 passed. E2E catalog suites: 34 passed. - Browser inspection passed for light/dark themes, mobile layout, expandable details, pending retry, acknowledgement, failure, and disabled retry. Storybook renders the production component; its request is simulated. - The broad local run hit two chat callback-order wait failures and was stopped after all CI unit/database/runner shards passed. Both local failures passed when rerun without the competing full-suite process. - CI exposed a repeated project-repository draft-loss race during canonical redirects. A new unit regression failed before the fix; all nine project-page tests now pass, including controls for other projects and companies. Both unchanged repository browser tests passed against a fresh local server. UI typecheck, production UI build, and token gates passed after this fix. - [Earlier PR CI passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36072486798) on `21be0fec0e90e86b6d662b8ee4831847cd041cdb`: 55 successful checks, two optional Storybook skips, and no failed or pending checks. The repository browser shard passed with the production fix. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact commit with no unresolved review threads. The PR is mergeable. Historical, source-qualified lifecycle evidence: - Lifecycle baseline: 1,074 assertions. Native session coverage: 447 tests. Product E2E support: 515 tests. Browser support: 11 tests. Full earlier verification is retained in the archive. - [Real-provider campaign: 8/8 passed, zero retries](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-35881382080-1/index.html), source `e88d210417280140b44a36449027290adcb1aeaa`. Evidence and cleanup checks passed. This includes deliberately exhausted repair cases that correctly remain blocked; it does not mean every task finished Done. This campaign predates the recovery UI change. - Archive migration verified all 16 original JSON files byte-for-byte and all 24 checksum entries. App tests do not need private archive access. [Archive PR #27](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-evals/pull/27) is merged. ## Risks - Agents that omit durable disposition receive at most two repair attempts by default. Prose-only completion exposes missing state rather than silently changing scheduling. - A retry is an explicit board action. The server rechecks current controls. A successful response confirms the task returned to To do; it does not claim that the provider has already started. - Existing notice metadata remains valid. Only older active notices with matching structured evidence receive the new UI. Historical notices without that evidence keep their existing rendering. No schema migration is required. - Old run records require conservative retry accounting. Tests cover old counters, alternating retry lanes, restarts, and exhausted repairs. - Historical snapshots require private `paperclip-evals` access. The app index retains public campaign links. Live campaigns qualify specific sources and scenarios; no new real-provider campaign has run for the recovery UI commit. > This fixes existing lifecycle and recovery behavior and does not duplicate planned core work. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex assisted implementation, reasoning, code execution, and review. The exact serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this task. Historical real-provider evaluations used Codex model `gpt-5.6-sol`, separately from the implementation assistant. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-09-25 15:28:11 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip	0e9b24c821	fix: resume subscription comment wakes and preserve retry status (#13433) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Concurrent task runs can share a managed AI subscription with one credential lease. > - #13438 added durable retries for busy subscriptions and task-lock checks. > - A comment wake can run for an agent who is not the task assignee. Such a run never owns the task lock, so the new checks suppress its retry. > - This pull request preserves those comment wakes while keeping the lock checks for assignee runs. > - It also shows the subscription wait in task status and preserves the failure count through the database projection. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13438. **What happened?** When a subscription is busy, a non-assignee comment wake is cancelled without a successor. Repeated subscription waits also display an inflated attempt count because the execution query omits the preserved failure count. **Expected behavior** An eligible comment wake waits and resumes without claiming the assignee's task lock. The task shows “Waiting for AI subscription”. Waiting does not consume provider-failure retries. Assignee retries still stop when the task lock is cleared or transferred. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Configure an agent with a managed subscription and concurrent runs. 2. Hold its credential lease in one run. 3. Mention the agent on a task assigned to another actor. 4. Release the lease and inspect whether the comment wake has a scheduled retry. The test uses a real embedded Postgres database and a real credential lease. Provider execution uses a fixture. The reassignment test applies a database mutation after the real checkout. No live provider account is needed. **Paperclip version or commit** Based on `f912ecaac` from #13438. Before the reconciliation fix, the rebased regression at `2063cfd13` failed because the comment wake had no scheduled retry. The original configuration failure was reproduced on `5282cabde` before #13438 merged. **Deployment mode** Built from source with embedded Postgres for local verification. ## What Changed - Record non-assignee comment-wake authority at admission while holding the task and run locks. A later reassignment cannot grant this exception. Preserve it through repeated subscription waits. - Keep master’s lock checks for assignee retries, including the check inside the scheduling transaction. - Show the subscription wait and preserve its failure count in the execution projection query. - Limit pre-provider wait receipts to fresh executions. A persisted native execution input must retain its recovery path. - Add lease, retry, projection, cancellation, reassignment, pause, revocation, service-recreation, and ownership regression coverage. - Use master’s 60–120 second retry interval and document the resulting behavior. ## Verification - Red: after rebase, the comment-wake test failed with no scheduled retry; the other 50 contention and retry-scheduling tests passed. - Red/green: reassigning the task immediately after real checkout reproduced an unwanted successor for both assignment and comment wakes. Both tests pass after recording authority at admission. - Green: all 285 targeted tests pass across 12 suites, including #13438’s four cancellation-race phases, its hiring/connection suite, run-dispatch integration tests, and both reassignment regressions. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passes after rebase. - `pnpm build` passes on the final revision. - The full general and serialized test suites pass in [CI run 34899514681](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34899514681) on `99f1e4c1d`. Full-suite verification ran in CI; local verification used the 285 targeted tests. - All 32 active PR checks pass, including build, typecheck, native runner verification, canary dry run, and all browser shards. Two Storybook checks are skipped by path filters. - Greptile reviewed `99f1e4c1d` at 5/5 with no outstanding findings. All review threads are resolved. - `git diff --check` and `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs` pass. ## Risks - The non-assignee exception requires authority recorded under admission locks or its server-created subscription retry. Tests cover caller-supplied flags, assignment and comment reassignment races, repeated comment waits, and assignee lock protections. - A wait uses master’s 60–120 second interval. A long-held lease can produce multiple wait records. - Existing native sessions can have provider effects. They must not receive a fresh-execution receipt that permits replay. - No schema migration or credential permission change is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, model `gpt-6-astra`, with repository search, code editing, shell execution, and test tools. The session does not expose its context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-09-14 16:58:37 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	f912ecaacf	fix: carry AI connections through hiring and unblock task execution (#13438) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents hire other agents and assign tasks to them. > - Managed AI connections must follow those hires across legacy and native runners. > - Missing accounts should pause task execution and let the user connect from the task. > - Subscription contention must wait without asking for new credentials. > - This pull request fixes these paths and the native tool and Daytona staging failures found during live tests. > - The result is a working hire, subtask, and connection setup flow on local and remote runners. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A managed Claude or Codex agent could hire a teammate without a usable AI binding. Cross-provider hiring could fail before the user had a chance to connect the new provider. First-time task setup did not show the existing AI credential form inline. A busy subscription could request a new connection. Native API replies could stop the parent after a hire had already committed. Fresh Daytona sandboxes could fail to extract read-only skill directories created on macOS. **Expected behavior** Compatible hires inherit the managed connection choice. A hire for another provider uses the responsible user's default. If that account is missing, the hire succeeds and the task asks for a connection. Completing setup in the task resumes work automatically. Explicit child auth settings and existing unmanaged login paths keep precedence. Shared-account access checks remain in force. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Connect a Claude or Codex parent with a managed AI account. 2. Ask it to hire one agent of each provider and create a self-assigned subtask. 3. Assign work to both hires without connecting the second provider first. 4. Connect the missing provider from its task card. 5. Check that all tasks finish and same-provider work uses the original account. 6. Repeat with native runners and fresh Daytona sandboxes. The opt-in browser suite in `tests/hiring-ai-connections/README.md` performs these steps. **Paperclip version or commit** The live failures were reproduced from `f2c5e54dc`. The branch is rebased onto `5282cabde`. **Deployment mode** Isolated local development instance. Legacy CLI and native runners. Local execution and ephemeral Daytona sandboxes. Related work: Refs #13247 for managed AI connections. Refs #13268 for legacy credential-reference inheritance, which this branch preserves. Refs #13432 for a concurrent managed-inheritance fix. This PR also covers cross-provider task setup, subscription waits, native API replies, and Daytona extraction. It permits missing responsible-user defaults at hire time; restricted shared selections still fail. ## What Changed - Apply managed connection defaults to both agent creation routes. Preserve explicit auth choices and legacy credential-reference inheritance. - Allow hires before their responsible user connects the provider. Keep approval gates, company boundaries, and shared-account access checks. - Reuse the production AI credential form inside the pending task card. Resume the task after setup. - Retry subscription lease contention without consuming the provider-failure allowance or creating a connection request. - Require task execution-lock ownership when scheduling, promoting, and dispatching subscription retries. Recheck ownership under the issue row lock. - Rename the HTTP operation identity at the native tool boundary so it cannot override the runner's operation identity. - Delay directory permission restoration during Daytona extraction. Preserve the final read-only modes. - Add database-backed regressions, real browser acceptance tests, and Storybook states. Document setup and run-log behavior. ## Verification - Six real browser scenarios passed: both parent providers on legacy local and legacy Daytona; native Codex locally; native Claude on Daytona. Each scenario hires both providers, completes a self-subtask and assigned work, and connects the missing provider inline with automatic continuation. - Successful runs verify the account, responsible user, runner mode, and Daytona lease. All 18 test sandboxes were deleted. - Live authentication used API keys. Subscription inheritance, lease contention, and retry have integration coverage. Fresh subscription OAuth sign-in was not automated. - Red/green tests reproduced missing bindings, missing inline forms, subscription contention, native API reply failure, and GNU tar permission failure. - Seven Storybook browser checks passed. They cover both providers, method selection, narrow layout, completion, cancellation, and invalid credentials. - Full local suite coverage completed before rebase. Initial timing and fixture startup failures passed unchanged on isolated reruns. The first full command did not exit cleanly; the remaining workspace and serialized groups were completed separately. - After rebase, 107 hiring/auth/retry tests and 59 native API, task-card, and Daytona tests passed. The full workspace typecheck, production build, and token gates passed again. Storybook build passed before rebase. - Review fixes: 169 hiring/retry/dispatch tests, 37 adjacent tests, and four explicit cancellation-race cases passed. Eight cross-provider cases cover stale auth keys on both creation routes and both runner types. Server typecheck and build passed. - Final CI on `ee4890837a8a4913e07453392b9a75969580dae1`: 32 checks passed. Two optional Storybook jobs were skipped. The full server, workspace, browser, native runner, build, typecheck, and release checks passed. - Three unchanged tests initially failed on a busy port, a chat row-lock race, and preview-server readiness. Each affected job passed after one CI rerun. Isolated local checks also passed: 41 credential tests, the chat-concurrency case, and 25 preview-runtime tests. - Greptile reviewed the final commit at 5/5. Both review threads are resolved. GitHub reports no merge conflicts. ## Risks - A missing personal account now defers authentication to the first task. Explicit incompatible bindings and restricted shared accounts still fail at hire time. - An inherited personal default uses the responsible user's existing authorization to install access for the new agent. It never copies credentials or another user's identity. - Subscription contention retries after a delay and rechecks task eligibility. It does not consume the provider-failure budget. - Native hiring uses the existing managed API-tools opt-in. Remote native runners require a matching Linux binary and provider pack, as documented in the acceptance README. - No schema changes. Live tests make paid provider calls and remain opt-in. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (`gpt-6-astra`) in Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, browser automation, and API tools. The context-window size is not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-09-14 16:15:48 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	35fdc0c66b	fix: make task recovery durable and preserve current requests (#13075) ... Make task recovery durable and preserve the latest user request across native and legacy continuations. Keep routine recovery quiet and prevent replay when action outcomes are uncertain. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-09-09 09:14:25 -05:00