Batch retained-reader project checks through the existing multi-actor read API. Share raw database reads within one call, retain actor-specific privacy and supplied membership data, and avoid loading large saved-run payloads for identity checks.
Keep current-reader writes, distinct saved-run policies, company root fences and later-call revocation checks. Add query-count and access-control regressions. All 255 affected cases and full repository typecheck/build pass. Hosted response-time acceptance remains separate.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and their work.
> - Grok Bot can request governed work from its own conversation.
> - Managed Runner admission can take longer than the initial MCP
response.
> - The dispatcher treated a delayed offer as a reason to start another
routine.
> - The original conversation was already waiting for that same work.
> - This pull request keeps admission in its original request and
cancels old prepared echoes.
> - Users get one task interaction while normal assigned-task wakes
remain available.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #16219 and #16394. The duplicate search found no other proactive
Grok correction.
**What happened?**
A real idle Grok conversation created one Paperclip task and reached
accepted completion. During admission, the dispatcher also sent a
routine webhook after the offer was ten seconds old. Two acceptance
requests and two title writes were recorded. The extra routine can
compete with the original conversation.
**Expected behavior**
Immediate and delayed Bot-initiated admission stay with the original
request. The Bot checks the same request ID and arguments until
admission succeeds or fails. A new routine must not echo that work back
to the Bot.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Ask an idle Grok Bot to create and complete a Paperclip task.
2. Let managed admission return pending.
3. Leave its offered assignment unaccepted for more than ten seconds.
4. Run the dispatcher. It sends another routine webhook for that
proactive offer.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Observed through the actual Grok client on Core
11d69d04c7. Both new wake regressions also
fail on current master before this correction.
## What Changed
- Remove the delayed proactive-admission wake scan.
- Fence prepared proactive wakes using the current binding and
generation. A dispatcher restart cancels those old intents without
sending them.
- Tell Grok to keep checking its original queued request. Preserve Dot
event instructions and normal assigned-task dispatch.
- Add delayed-offer and recovered-intent regressions. Update the agent
guide and release evidence plan.
## Verification
- Two new network regressions fail before the fix. The corrected Grok
and Dot suites pass all 80 checks.
- The full focused Grok, Dot, MCP authorization/shutdown and
question-delivery selection passes 214 checks across six files.
- Repository typecheck and build pass. Token gates, the 2,731-story
structural catalog and Storybook build pass. All these checks also pass
after the branch was rebased onto master
250429942e.
- The real-client investigation created one task and one managed run,
saved a 100-word report, reached canonical Done and recorded successful
lease cleanup. Its exact public source marker was absent from the
operator prompt, and no Paperclip proxy operation fetched it. The
no-echo condition failed on that source; this PR still requires a
deployed real-client repeat.
- Public synthetic marker for the deployed repeat:
`grok-native-read-8731cd8120b140829fbe476f6974fde8`.
- Current-head CI passes with 55 successful checks and two optional
Storybook skips. Greptile reviewed
e6b828af28 at 5/5 with no findings.
- The first workspace CI attempt hit a 5,000ms timeout in the unchanged
snapshot-worker command-preparation test. All four variants passed
locally; one targeted remote retry passed. The initial failure is
retained and its root cause is not established.
## Risks
Grok must keep checking the original request while admission is pending.
If that conversation ends, the durable request remains available for
reconciliation; Paperclip cannot infer provider idleness from a delay.
Prepared intents from older dispatchers are cancelled by the authority
guard. The real client must verify the polling path after deployment. No
schema migration is needed.
## Model Used
OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, shell tools
and computer use. The exact serving model ID, snapshot and context
window are not exposed by this session.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Its PR workflow runs dozens of parallel build and test jobs.
> - Individual job durations do not show the elapsed cost of the whole
suite.
> - Maintainers need one shared timeline to find slow work and repeated
setup.
> - This pull request adds full-suite profiles for selected CI CODEOWNER
PRs.
> - Honeycomb shows each job, step, test file, and supported test on
that timeline.
> - The benefit is evidence for changes that reduce total CI time.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The main PR workflow has about 48 jobs. Maintainers need to compare
their overlapping work and find which jobs delay completion.
**Current behavior**
GitHub shows job and step durations separately. Test files and tests are
not joined to a full workflow trace.
**Proposed behavior**
A CI CODEOWNER adds `profile-ci` to a PR. The tested code stays on that
PR branch. All main PR lanes run, including lanes normally skipped for
stack position or release notes. A trusted post-run exporter sends one
wall-clock trace to Honeycomb.
**Reason and benefit**
The trace supports decisions about which CI work to speed up or remove.
Ordinary PRs do not export traces. The roadmap and related-PR search
found no duplicate CI profiling work.
## What Changed
- Add label selection and a full-suite override. Verify the PR author,
original actor, and rerun actors against the trusted `.github/**`
CODEOWNERS rule.
- Record Vitest, Playwright, and Node test file/test timings in local
artifacts. Keep ordinary reporter behavior and failing exit codes.
- Add a trusted `workflow_run` exporter. Use actual GitHub timestamps
for all jobs, setup, steps, waiting, and teardown. Mark missing test
data and partial reruns.
- Keep the ingest key out of PR jobs. Store it only in the
`ci-profiling` environment, restricted to `master`. The exporter reads
bounded JSON and never executes artifact code.
- Record expected test invocations outside reporters so a missing
invocation cannot appear complete. Preserve `node --test` on older PR
checkouts. Flush large shard inventories before exit.
- Add security, timing, routing, and real-reporter checks. Document
operation and activation. Protect the exporter with CODEOWNERS.
## Verification
- 509 focused workflow/reporter/shard checks passed. They include
outside authors, outside rerun actors, bots, stale revisions, malicious
ZIP paths, incomplete reports, and partial ingestion failures.
- Final revision `3bf5d9017d` adds multi-file qualification and fixes
short-file step parenting and duplicate Node file-wrapper events.
Greptile reviewed this exact revision at 5/5 with no unresolved threads.
[Main PR CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38728040302):
the initial attempt had 54 successful checks, 3 intentional skips, and
one serialized-shard failure from an unchanged workspace-authorization
test exceeding its 15-second timeout. The single failed-shard retry
passed: the final result is 55 successful checks and 3 intentional
skips. The same timeout reproduces locally with profiling disabled; both
assertions pass with a diagnostic 60-second timeout override (about 23
seconds total). No source or CI timeout was changed.
- A dry run against real GitHub attempt 2 of run `38677445871` produced
exactly 3 executed jobs, 40 spans, and 510 seconds, excluding 45
carried-over jobs. The partial trace remains explicitly incomplete; this
validation did not upload data.
- `actionlint` passed for all four changed workflows. `git diff --check`
passed.
- Full Node 24 `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. The local
full `pnpm test:run` was stopped after it reported a setup-token timeout
and a distribution-plugin-catalog fixture failure. The 30 setup-token
tests passed on focused rerun. The plugin fixture fails at `rmSync` of a
directory symlink on this macOS/Node 24.11.0 host; the same failure
reproduces with the unchanged base Vitest configuration and unchanged
test/service files (10 other tests pass). The local full test suite is
therefore not claimed green.
- A real root-config Vitest probe passed 13 tests with profiling both
off and on. Multi-file Vitest, Playwright, and Node probes each verify
two distinct filename rows and four correctly parented tests, including
repeated test names across files. Separate passing probes exercise the
full exporter hierarchy `workflow → job → step → filename → tests`.
Intentional failing probes preserve failing exit status.
- Verified all 48 measured jobs in latest-head run `38728040302` used
AWS: one `paperclip-ci-routing-x64` gate and 47
`paperclip-public-pr-x64` jobs. Profiling preserves AWS authorization
and its GitHub-hosted fallback. The separate privileged exporter runs on
`ubuntu-latest` outside the measured suite.
- [Live Honeycomb
baseline](https://ui.honeycomb.io/paperclip/environments/test/datasets/paperclip-ci/trace/oaPMzw8zGwG):
48 jobs, 731 spans, 479 seconds. It matches [GitHub run
38671274294](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38671274294).
This historical trace has job/step data only; it is not proof of the
future label-triggered test-reporting journey.
- Verified the dedicated Honeycomb key is ingest-only with dataset
creation disabled. Verified the GitHub environment allows only the
`master` branch. No repository-level secret of that name exists. Both
credential values were scanned absent from source and branch history.
After merge, add `profile-ci` to a CI CODEOWNER PR, wait for the entire
PR run and exporter, then follow the run-summary link. Collapse job
children to compare parallel lanes; expand a job to inspect its steps
and tests.
## Risks
- Activation requires merging the trusted workflow definitions to
`master`. This PR continues using the current trusted reusable workflows
until then.
- Selected runs produce many spans and artifacts. Oversized artifacts
fail export instead of truncating data. Missing or cancelled reporters
are marked incomplete.
- GitHub timings have second precision. Node test times use reporter
receipt time. Rust retains job/step timing but lacks per-test wall
timestamps.
- CI CODEOWNERS are individual users in the explicit `.github/**` rule.
Unsupported team rules and identity lookup failures disable profiling.
- An interrupted upload can leave partial data. Retrying uses the same
span IDs, but the Events API does not promise deduplication.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, code execution, repository
tools, and browser verification. The runtime does not expose the exact
serving model ID or context-window size.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Move native sandbox snapshot captures off the controller callback queue while preserving the existing capture and restore contract. Keep legacy adapters inline, bound captures to two workers, and verify cleanup and reordered worker completion.
Validation: 461 affected cases, full typecheck/build, exact-head CI/E2E/Superagent and Apex 5/5. The full local canonical suite remains running; no full local pass or under-30-second staging response is claimed.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Replay this preparation’s verified private workspace seed after failed warm validation, including when the generation cache refuses publication. Preserve host-current semantics and rebuild if the private seed is missing or changed.
Verified 89 focused cases, full typecheck/build, exact-head CI/E2E/security and Apex 5/5. Live PAP latency acceptance remains separate.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Preserve the verified company/workspace seed-cache scope when a warm sandbox requires host-current staging. Keep remote identity checks, archive digests and rebuilding for missing or corrupt cache generations.
85 focused cases and full repository typecheck/build pass. Exact-head full CI/E2E, Superagent, legacy Snyk and Apex 5/5 pass with no unresolved findings. No staging response-time claim is made.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and their work.
> - Grok Bot receives assignments through routine webhooks and uses
agent MCP tools.
> - Each accepted assignment belongs to the current external
interaction.
> - A pending tool result or comment could start another routine while
that work was still active.
> - Quiet MCP traffic cannot prove that Grok has stopped working.
> - This pull request keeps receipts and feedback durable for the
current interaction to read.
> - New task routines start only for offers that the Bot has not
accepted.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #16219 and #16305. The duplicate search also found #12991, which
covers instruction files for local Grok runs.
**What happened?**
The dispatcher could start another routine for an unread result after a
period without a routine reply. It could also wake accepted work for a
task comment. A queued delivery could still start after the Bot had
claimed the offer.
**Expected behavior**
Accepted work stays in its current interaction. The Bot polls the
original operation receipt and reads queued feedback at a safe boundary.
Acknowledgements of a sent wake remain valid after acceptance.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Accept a Grok assignment and leave it active.
2. Add an unread comment, or complete a tool operation whose call
returned pending.
3. Run the dispatcher after its quiet period.
4. Observe another webhook call. Also queue an offer wake, accept the
offer before sending, and observe that delivery still starts.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Observed during real-client qualification on Core
ff0f976de1. The three new regression cases
also failed on current master before the correction.
## What Changed
- Stop automatic result and feedback wakes for accepted work. Keep both
available through their existing read paths.
- Require an unaccepted offer before dispatch or an explicit delivery
retry. Serialize the final HTTP handoff with acceptance receipts. Cancel
obsolete unsent wakes. Preserve late acknowledgements and immediate Stop
authority.
- Return current Grok polling instructions on assignment reads. Clarify
pending and unknown outcomes in setup guidance.
- Add protocol, receipt-polling, queued-delivery and
late-acknowledgement regressions. Update the operation guide and
readiness plan.
## Verification
- Three new regression cases fail before the fix because a webhook
starts.
- The latest 31 Grok protocol checks and 47 existing Dot Runner checks
pass. New tests force acceptance during secret lookup and the final send
check. They also prove that acknowledgements and Stop remain free during
pending delivery.
- The final-head Grok, Dot, MCP and question-delivery suite passes all
212 checks across six files. Dedicated onboarding UI checks passed six.
- Dedicated Runner driver checks use the real local Rust daemon. Built
the debug daemon required by that package; all 17 checks then passed.
- Repository typecheck and build pass. Token gates, the 2,731-story
structural catalog and the Storybook build pass.
- Public synthetic marker for the post-deployment native source-read
check: `grok-native-read-b45be4eff22cb15a31d0af512f437b8d`.
- Final-head CI passes all 55 checks, with two optional Storybook skips.
Greptile is 5/5 with no open threads. The first chat-shard attempt
failed one Telegram SQL-quiet timing assertion; all five related cases
pass locally and the single targeted CI rerun passes.
- After deployment, repeat actual Grok work through an answered
question, receipt polling, a saved report and file, canonical completion
and cleanup. This correction is not production qualification by itself.
## Risks
A Bot that does not poll a pending receipt can wait without another
routine wake. Current assignment reads now supply polling instructions
to existing connections. Task comments stay queued until the Bot reads
them or Runner admits the next continuation. The real client must verify
that behavior before production enablement. The observed second file
version does not prove which provider interaction created it. Acceptance
can wait for the bounded webhook response. Stop and authenticated
acknowledgements use independent row locks and remain available.
## Model Used
OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, shell tools
and browser tools. The exact serving model ID, snapshot and context
window are not exposed by this session.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Batch dependency Markdown reads through the bounded Git snapshot reader and queue newly discovered dependencies once. Preserve package contents, limits, authorization, audits, and reference order.
Validation: 63 affected cases; full typecheck/build; exact-head full CI, E2E, Superagent and Apex 5/5. Local Git comparison: 502 individual reads reduced to three batches with identical entries.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Tests protect sandbox execution, run recovery, credentials and the
board UI.
> - Several owner suites repeat the same setup and prove the same result
more than once.
> - These copies add maintenance work and can hide weak assertions.
> - Each cut needs a retained test that proves every distinct contract.
> - This pull request consolidates repeated setup and removes twelve
redundant executions.
> - It also replaces two weak assertions with checks of real outputs.
> - The benefit is 2,831 fewer test lines with clearer regression proof.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The maintenance and regression strength of the existing Vitest owner
suites.
**Subsystem affected**
Sandbox adapter utilities, server heartbeat recovery and environment
capabilities, and the board UI.
**Current behavior**
Tests copy database rows, query builders, render calls and runtime
inputs. Some cases repeat an existing contract. One token test omits a
real bridge credential. A PostHog host comparison can compare absent
controls.
**Proposed behavior**
Use small local helpers with fresh values and the same action order.
Keep each distinct contract in an owner test. Check real bridge
credentials and fixed PostHog method states. Carry the exact persisted
first-run success assertion into the stronger cancellation keeper.
**Reason and benefit**
The ten test files shrink by 2,831 net lines. Twelve redundant
executions retire. All other case tables, inputs, security boundaries,
timeouts and cleanup rules remain.
**Breaking changes**
None. This round changes tests and audit evidence only.
**Additional context**
Refs: #15978, the merged first cleanup. Refs: #16022, the merged prior
cleanup. Its squash merge is `dabb8c5daf430a1987af611e2e7ca4c7b23ef7d4`.
Related open work: #14634 repairs feedback fixture completion; #14477
supplies explicit sandbox fixture tools; #14198 changes cleanup retry
behavior in another heartbeat file. This audit preserves those separate
action and cleanup contracts. It does not apply their changes.
This PR was first stacked on `codex/test-audit-followup`. After #16022
was squash merged, only the two Round 6 commits were replayed onto
merged master `dabb8c5daf430a1987af611e2e7ca4c7b23ef7d4`. The original
stack head is preserved in a local snapshot branch. The current diff
contains only ten test files and two evidence files. No merge is
requested.
## What Changed
- Consolidate repeated setup in three sandbox adapter suites. Remove
seven redundant executions and retain the real protocol, cleanup and
scratch-file checks. Save 875 lines.
- Consolidate heartbeat database fixtures and read queries. Retain exact
wake cancellation, total run count and the actual first-run success
receipt. Remove one duplicate execution. Save 1,372 lines.
- Remove two repeated rejected-capability cases. Carry the absent
snapshot assertion into the retained runner case. Save 22 lines.
- Consolidate UI fixtures and render calls. Remove two repeated
connection cases. Replace the weak PostHog comparison with fixed method
and required-key checks in both real hosts. Save 562 lines.
- Record audit scope, decision and expansion counts, all twelve keeper
mappings and deliberate mutation results in the [audit
report](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/test-audit-round-six-delivery/doc/plans/2026-10-12-test-audit-round6.md)
and [controls
evidence](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/test-audit-round-six-delivery/doc/plans/2026-10-12-test-audit-round6-controls.json).
## Verification
Source baseline: `a090035cafb29c06f6fca2dbe43561ad866b7c1b`. All ten
original test programs are byte-identical at the stacked base
`58c5c4aa241c85f4665a3159c192888bbb2a5cfa`.
- Baseline: 1,841/1,841 cases passed in the main thirty-file
owner/sibling run. Another 219/219 cases passed in nine extra files.
- Preservation: all four proposal packages passed independent review.
Whole-program helper expansion retains ordered inputs, callbacks,
awaits, queries, fresh allocations and hooks outside the declared
assertion migrations and repairs.
- Candidate: all 2,048 cases passed across 39 complete owner/sibling
files. The main run passed 1,831 cases. The extra run passed 217 cases.
Both runs had zero failures and zero skips.
- PostHog control: the repaired positive case passed. The original weak
case passed with authentication choices removed. The repaired case
failed at its fixed OAuth aria-checked assertion under the same
mutation.
- Eight accepted mutations failed at their intended assertions. They
cover bridge-token exclusion, fallback cleanup, READY bytes, real
scratch-file preservation, exact wake cancellation, the persisted
first-run success receipt, rejected capability snapshots and reachable
PostHog method controls. Two original weak cases passed with the same
defects. All production source bytes were restored.
- Rejected control: changing run status before legacy release timed out
before wake cancellation. This result is not counted as assertion proof.
Its replacement changed only the persisted receipt after real drain in
the existing transaction. It failed at the direct fixed succeeded-row
assertion.
- No new code comments or 1,000-line threshold crossings were
introduced. No production, schema, lockfile or workflow changes are
included.
On the exact final test sources, later committed as
`d8de9422f0703d4508a9dc880b67a07f13e0f110`, `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm
check:token-gates` and `pnpm build` passed. The required full `pnpm
test:run` completed with **exit 1** after **52.14 minutes** on clean,
immutable `d8de9422f0703d4508a9dc880b67a07f13e0f110`. HEAD and tracked
sources remained unchanged.
The first general-server group ran 889 files: **882 passed, one failed
and six skipped**. Its 18,032 cases were **17,925 passed, two failed and
105 skipped**. The only failing file was
`server/src/__tests__/remove-test-home.test.ts`. On macOS, the read-only
runtime bundle and symlink cleanup cases returned `ENOTEMPTY`. The
permission-error case expects `EACCES` or `EPERM`. Four reported failure
entries cover these two cases, including their cleanup errors. The test
and helper are byte-identical to previous master
`4b766b872993045a2e787404f0475503683e5ded` and audit master
`e364b92c82`.
The default wrapper stopped after that group failed. **Later local
groups did not run.** The earlier public-MCP, HTTP log redaction and
workspace snapshot failures did not recur. The 39 focused owner/sibling
files and all 48 remote CI jobs completed independently. This result is
an unresolved macOS cleanup limitation, not full local success. No test,
skip, retry, timeout or cleanup rule was changed to hide it.
The three adapter files received a whitespace tidy after focused
execution. Full runtime AST and string/template/regex byte equality link
those tested sources to the final sources. All 134 adapter helper calls
were checked again. Replayed code commit
`3d3defd2a60595a623045d9e2c6c586f4acb3452` has the exact final test
bytes. Evidence commit `e868e6645ce0d598d756d3458f0b3d71afd6db4a` adds
the report and controls JSON, with one historical ancestry
clarification. All ten accepted test hashes and all seven
production-owner source guards match. No package, lockfile, workspace,
TypeScript, Rust or Vitest dependency manifest changed since the audit
snapshot.
The [original stack CI
workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38312876910)
passed all 48 jobs on head `c171d6c0d603d22bb997c1f9a9bdcd5bcc5d22aa`.
Those results are historical stack proof.
The [fresh master-context CI
workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38318223856)
completed successfully with **all 48 jobs passed** on current head
`e868e6645ce0d598d756d3458f0b3d71afd6db4a`. Its tested merge commit was
`41292af60c6eb60d477637d23822bb17b08dc07e`, combining workflow base
`88bf4c6c1d222f818faa56257efe79207c892a6c` with that head. The delivery
commits remain based on pinned master
`dabb8c5daf430a1987af611e2e7ca4c7b23ef7d4`. Both required master checks,
`ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`, passed. Two separate optional Storybook
checks were skipped by their scope gate.
[Fresh Greptile
review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/16047#issuecomment-6133323165)
gives the current head **5/5**, with no findings, inline comments or
unresolved review threads. The [current-head commitperclip
review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38318223666)
also completed successfully. This PR remains open and draft; no merge is
requested. The local macOS failure above remains unresolved.
## Risks
- A helper could share a value or capture the wrong binding. Independent
expansion and lexical binding checks guard the actual helper calls.
- A retired case could contain a distinct assertion. Each cut has an
exact keeper map and carried observations.
- A mutation could fail before the intended assertion. Controls reject
timeouts and earlier failures. The rejected receipt mutation remains in
the evidence.
- The delivery ancestry changed after the parent squash merge. Exact
source hashes preserve the audited tests and producer receipts. Fresh CI
and review passed in the current master context; the broad local run
remains evidence from its immutable audit snapshot.
- The complete local default failed in two unchanged macOS cleanup
cases. Later local groups were not run. This limitation remains visible
even though focused checks and remote CI passed.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with this work. The exact served
model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. It used
repository tools, code execution, AST analysis and parallel audit
agents.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
