mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-07 16:11:46 +02:00
76ea79fd05857c5225a49f6ed5dcdfd1ffbd412c
739
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1c07b5903b |
feat: Chat leads the left nav, agent work beside chats, and a Combined Inbox + Task List flag (#15100)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The left nav is the main way people move between tasks, the inbox, and Agent Chat > - The nav has separate Inbox and Tasks rows that show overlapping work, and Chat is one row among many > - The side panel beside a chat shows the conversation's own artifacts, not the work the agent did > - People want Chat to be easy to find, and they want one place for their task views > - This pull request moves Chat to the top of Work, shows the agent's tasks and artifacts beside each chat, and adds an experimental flag that folds Inbox into Tasks > - The benefit is a shorter nav and a chat view that shows what the agent is working on. Both changes stay off until an operator enables them ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #14706 (the secondary Agent Chat navigation this change builds on) Refs #14848 (reopen the last visited agent chat) **Subsystem affected** UI navigation (left nav, mobile tab bar), Agent Chat side panel, task list and inbox, and the company artifacts API. **Problem or motivation** Inbox and Tasks are two nav rows for overlapping work. Chat sits in the top group with no clear home. The chat rail lists only agents you already talked to, so you cannot see your other teammates there. The side panel beside a chat shows only the conversation's own artifacts. It does not show the tasks and files the agent made. **Proposed solution** With Agent Chat on, Chat leads the Work section and the rail lists every eligible agent. The chat side panel opens on the agent's tasks as cards, and the agent's artifacts are available from +. A new experimental flag, Combined Inbox + Task List, makes Inbox a set of views inside Tasks. **Alternatives considered** Rebuilding the inbox inside the task list. Instead, `/issues` hosts the existing Inbox component for inbox views and the existing task list for status views, so all inbox behaviour stays the same. **Roadmap alignment** Agent Chat (ROADMAP.md, "Agent Chat (including CEO Chat)"). All changes are behind experimental flags that are off by default. ## What Changed - **Agent Chat nav (streamlined shell):** Chat is the first row of Work, not a top-group row. Workspaces leaves the nav while Agent Chat is on. The mobile tab bar is Home · Chat · + · Tasks · Agents. The legacy shell keeps master's top-group Chat row. - **Chat rail:** `AgentConversationsSidebar` lists every eligible agent. The open chat is first, then conversations by recent activity, then the rest of the roster alphabetically. Terminated agents and agents you left are omitted unless you have history with them. The picker still marks only real conversations as "Open chat". - **Chat side panel:** a new default Tasks tab shows one card per task the agent created, was assigned, commented on, or acted on, newest first. It has the task list's filter popover and a sort control. **+ → Artifacts** shows the agent's artifacts as cards. Cards open in a new tab. Agent Chat off keeps the old Artifacts tab. - **Artifacts API:** `GET /api/companies/:companyId/artifacts` accepts `agentId`. The filter applies to documents, work products, and attachments by the agent each result is attributed to. The shared validator and the UI client carry the new parameter, and the OpenAPI entry picks it up from the shared schema. - **Combined Inbox + Task List flag (`enableCombinedInboxTasks`, off by default):** new card in Settings > Experimental. The Inbox row goes away and its badge moves to Tasks. A Views menu on `/issues` covers Mine, Unread, Blocked, Recent, Everything, All, Active, Backlog, and Done. Bare `/issues` opens the last-used view (default Mine). Links that carry `assignee`, `workspace`, `participantAgentId`, or `q` open All so the filter is kept. `/inbox/*` and `/issues/{all,active,backlog,done,recent}` redirect to the matching view. `/inbox/requests` stays its own page. - **Task detail breadcrumb:** the view key now decides the source, so quick-archive still works after a reload from an inbox view. - **Docs:** `doc/PRODUCT.md` and `doc/SPEC.md` describe the chat rail, the chat side panel, and the new flag. ## Verification - `cd ui && npx vitest run --no-file-parallelism src/components/chat src/components/task-side-panel/TaskSidePanel.test.tsx src/components/AgentConversationsSidebar.test.tsx src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx src/components/SidebarCompanyMenu.test.tsx src/components/Layout.test.tsx src/pages/AgentChats.test.tsx src/pages/InstanceExperimentalSettings.test.tsx src/lib/task-views.test.ts src/lib/issueDetailBreadcrumb.test.ts src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx src/pages/Issues.test.tsx src/App.test.tsx src/App.activity-routing.test.tsx src/components/MobileBottomNav.test.tsx src/components/CommandPalette.test.tsx`: 20 files, 356 tests pass. - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/company-artifacts-service.test.ts`: 13/13 pass, including the new agent-filter test across all three artifact sources. - The new rail test fails against the unmodified rail. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: all gates clean. - Manual: enable Agent Chat in Settings > Experimental. Open Chat. The rail lists all agents. Open a chat. The side panel shows the agent's tasks. Use **+ → Artifacts** to see the agent's artifacts. Then enable Combined Inbox + Task List. The Inbox row goes away, and Tasks shows a Views menu. - Snapshot baselines are intentionally not updated. See `doc/design/DECISION-SHEET.md`, "Per-change snapshot verification demoted to dormant (Jul 13 2026)". ## Risks - With both flags off, the app behaves like master. The only exception is the API: it accepts a new optional query parameter. - With Agent Chat on, the rail can list many agents in a large company. It uses the agent list the app already loads, and search filters it. - The Tasks panel reads at most 200 recently updated tasks per agent and says so when it reaches the limit. The Artifacts panel reads at most 500 of the agent's artifacts. - Combined Inbox + Task List changes what bare `/issues` opens for people who enable it. Deep links with a task filter still open All. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edit, test runs). Extended thinking was enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: scotttong <squadbot000@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
eb049aebf2 |
feat(skills): let agents update company skills safely (#15049)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is an open source control plane for AI-agent companies. > - Company skills give agents reusable work instructions. > - Skill Studio can edit skill files and save version history. > - Agents can create a skill, but they do not have a first-class update tool. > - An agent update needs a version check and safe retry behavior to prevent lost edits. > - This pull request adds `update_skill` through the existing company skill file API. > - The change keeps company policy, version history, and audit records in one path. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting: the server API, shared validation, and runner tool catalog. **Problem or motivation** An agent can create a company skill but cannot update its `SKILL.md` through a first-class tool. An unguarded retry can also create duplicate versions or overwrite a newer edit. **Proposed solution** Add `update_skill` with a required current version ID and a retry key. Route it through the existing skill file API. Reject stale versions and changed-input retries. Save the version and audit event together. **Alternatives considered** A separate write endpoint would duplicate the Skill Studio mutation path and policy checks. This PR reuses that path instead. **Roadmap alignment** This work extends Skills Manager and Skill Studio, which are listed in `ROADMAP.md`. **Additional context** The tool accepts a complete `SKILL.md`, not a partial patch. Callers must read the current version before they edit it. ## What Changed - Add optional version and retry fields to the existing skill file update contract. - Add a guarded API update with a stable retry receipt and attributed audit event. - Add `update_skill` to native and semantic runner tool catalogs, with mode and policy gates. - Add unit, integration, protocol, and semantic-tool regression coverage. - Document agent use and extend the OpenAPI request contract. ## Verification - Focused tests and direct server and runner TypeScript checks passed before this PR. - `git diff --check` passed after the rebase onto `master`. - CI passed on the latest PR head, including the full test matrix, typecheck, and build. Local full typecheck and build stopped because `cargo` is not installed. The local full test run ended without a verdict. - No dedicated end-to-end eval scenario was added or run. The protocol coverage and semantic-tool test cover the new action deterministically. - Reviewers can read a skill version, call `update_skill`, repeat the same key, then try a stale version and a changed-input key. Only the first edit must create a new version. ## Risks - File writes and database transactions must stay in sync when a write fails. The integration tests cover failed writes and retry behavior, but CI must verify them on the PR head. - Existing Skill Studio callers do not send the new optional coordination fields. Their request shape remains valid. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex CLI assisted with this change. The runner did not expose the exact model ID or context window. The agent used code execution and repository tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details; exact model ID and context window were not exposed) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused tests; full suite is pending CI) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green (53 pass, 4 skip on the latest head) - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b17019e14d |
fix(agents): reduce default instructions and qualify stock harnesses (#14948)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Its adapters supply task context and access to Paperclip skills and tools. > - The default hire manual and shared prompts also repeat general work procedures. > - Those procedures overlap with stock provider instructions and the Paperclip skill. > - Existing E2E fixtures supply a QA manual, so they do not qualify the production default. > - This pull request reduces the generic instructions and adds real default-hire coverage. > - The benefit is less competing guidance, with inspectable evidence for preserved skills and task context. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #14920. That merged change preserves native Codex base instructions. This PR covers the default manual, shared legacy prompts, operational skill guidance, and the narrowly approved ACP skill-discovery/session-environment repair for measured delivery and credential-persistence failures. **What existing behavior does this improve?** New non-CEO hires without a custom bundle and legacy task/chat startup and continuation prompts. **Current behavior** The shipped default manual contains 602 words. Generic task/chat prompts and ordinary resume deltas repeat work procedures already available through the harness and Paperclip skill. **Proposed behavior** The default manual contains only the eight-word company identity. Shared startup prompts retain identity and connection guidance. Ordinary resume deltas retain current work context without the generic execution contract. **Reason and benefit** Let the stock harness guide general work. Keep Paperclip-specific capabilities and independently test default hires, skills, ordered comments, and chat restart. **Breaking changes** New default hires receive less guidance. Existing saved manuals, explicit custom bundles, CEO templates, and specialized wake contracts retain their behavior. The obsolete includeExecutionContract option remains accepted for source compatibility. ## What Changed - Reduce the default hire manual to one sentence. - Reduce shared task/chat defaults and remove the generic ordinary-resume contract. - Keep connection guidance, auth, skills, custom prompts, and specialized wake context. - Add credential-free instruction-boundary gates and 26 explicit Product E2E cells across eight legacy/native profiles, including two focused Paperclip-storage cases. - Capture public hire receipts before providers run, then grade delivered prompts and independent task/chat outcomes. - Add an early legacy skill API recipe for saving a task document, checking the saved revision receipt and linking the document. Improve stock task/heartbeat skill-selection metadata and show a clickable Markdown UI-link example. Keep native tool completion separate. - Advertise bounded routing descriptions and exact successfully staged SKILL.md paths in legacy ACP Claude; keep full bodies on demand and preserve remote path rebasing. - Remove only the provider environment from copied persisted ACP session records, while loading current run credentials and preserving all other options/conversation state. - Regenerate both capability metadata inventories and reject stale manifests/inventories before provider admission. - Publish the original reduction and focused skill-repair comparisons, preserving all failures, automatic recovery, cost coverage and limitations. ## Verification **Behavioral qualification remains pending.** Original legacy ACP Claude loses the issue document only in the reduced cohort beneath an unchanged credential failure. A source-backed diagnosis finds that neither ordinary assignment reads the staged operational skill, while the runtime persists provider environment in session state. The new common repairs expose skill metadata/path and omit persisted env; strict document and credential guards stay intact. [Inspectable diagnosis and retained hashes](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/9f654db4541d3d002769c988f6e51fc0b08dadbd/doc/plans/2026-10-03-legacy-acp-claude-readiness.md). Current repair head `de0965984ff3edf611ae6d0e7ca5c7d5ae3947bb` incorporates master `569c7203aa24b95440682983ce7940ba1d4247bd` (merged #14961/#15007). All 222 affected adapter tests, adapter-utils/E2E typechecks, and final 96 variant/grader/retry calibrations pass. The frozen historical comparator is `c25697f4260b6f3adfea143c3ae9932e2f42986d`: 8,280 of 8,291 paths identical, exactly two production instruction paths plus nine declared unit expectations differ. The operational skill/discovery/environment repairs, selected model/profile/task/core grader/auth/permissions/retry policy are identical. Both actual launcher prepare→verify admissions pass with zero providers. [Immutable manifest and exact receipts](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/9f654db4541d3d002769c988f6e51fc0b08dadbd/doc/plans/2026-10-03-legacy-acp-claude-evidence/manifest.json). One original legacy ACP Claude cell per variant is authorized, with enforced single campaign attempts, 12-minute deadlines and company/agent 1,000-cent hard stops; every product recovery run/cost is counted. Actual live outcomes are pending. Current normal CI has one failed server shard and failed aggregate verify under diagnosis; other normal gates including typecheck/build/Rust/all eight browser shards pass. Fresh review completed successfully; the valid historical startup/resume masking finding was fixed with per-invocation task/chat checks and strict complete-snapshot capture, calibrated and resolved. Prior heads, failures and campaigns below remain historical evidence, not checks on this repair head. - Prior head `36aa4d81c49a1a8f6f04b1a068fae19aa901955f` is replayed on merged hiring master `862a5758ba0e88a33232c1f1fa645e85c38a3113`. All 52 current-head checks pass with two intentional Storybook skips, including repository typecheck/test/build and the browser shard. Fresh Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved review threads. Exact-head stock prerequisites pass 599 assertions (598 TypeScript + 1 Rust), all six gates and retained receipt verification, zero providers/source errors. Fingerprint `a7f5a22d860a88fe20cce213c6d5e0004788f32c8363930729aea4fd740ad16d`. Combined catalog/hiring calibrations pass 67 assertions, E2E typecheck and 26-cell stock discovery pass. Canonical contract/inventory checks and the later issue-derived reference calibration are retained; that reference-only follow-up is not live-qualified by earlier frozen runs. - Prior full repository typecheck/build passed. The complete local Vitest run executed 14,956 tests: 14,870 passed, 83 skipped, three timing failures. All three affected files passed unchanged narrow reruns; original failures remain retained. Current-head CI now passes the full general checks; the original local failures remain retained. - The original 24-pair default-manual/shared-prompt comparison has two new overall classic Claude/OpenCode document-delivery failures plus an additional legacy ACP Claude document loss beneath an unchanged credential-guard failure (not closed by later runs), two newly passing OpenCode ordered cases, seven unchanged failures and 13 unchanged passes. Equal 15/24 totals do not establish behavioral equivalence. [Complete original report](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/875f4c397d9e8c3f12f39dedd59abaf1eaf5236e/doc/plans/2026-10-02-stock-harness-live-comparison.md). - The skill-only repair holds the eight-word manual/shared prompts and merged #14920 fixed. All four matched profile configurations and 203 fixture/behavior files match. Candidate `abd0b628ca642c09a54a4edc56a5227402f6686e` varies only the two skill sources against baseline `bc83fe030234439ac51279502a28803958963e2e`. [Candidate workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37060885547) and [baseline workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37060888047) each pass 571 exact-source prerequisites before providers; all eight cells clean up successfully. Failed campaigns publish successfully and remain failed. - Repair pairs: Claude original Fail → Pass; Claude explicit Pass → Pass; both OpenCode cases Fail → Fail. Explicit OpenCode's handoff worsens beneath the unchanged failing UI-link grade: baseline gives a clickable API URL, candidate gives a code-formatted path without an anchor. The request's usable-link wording is narrower in the UI-only oracle. [Complete repair report and safe projection](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/875f4c397d9e8c3f12f39dedd59abaf1eaf5236e/doc/plans/2026-10-02-legacy-document-skill-repair.md). - The subsequent narrow stock metadata/link correction has two matched Pass → Pass cases, zero new machine failures/passes and no pending pairs. Both original-case handoff links remain deficient: candidate uses a wrong PAP prefix, baseline supplies a bare prefix-less slug path; the preserved original oracle only requires a durable document. Both explicit clickable UI-link cases pass revision/content/link grading. All four exact-source 587-check gates, single assignment runs and cleanup pass. This does not establish fix causality because baseline also succeeds. [Candidate workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37069547401) freezes `fe9dc1e3c518825242ed889ab9c8352986f8c2ed`; [matched baseline](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37069552374) freezes `0d7ecfa96d72fba79b7f0a25052b42c0686c0488`. This is a skill-only comparison with reduced manuals/shared prompts held constant, not a repeat of the historical-manual comparison. Only original and clarified explicit classic OpenCode cases are selected, two per variant/four expected turns. 8,242 other tracked files and both profile hashes match; protected workflows admit each exact source before credentials. [Complete qualification report](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/74d0d3d945f4c52d0814b5a845ab5bd09f33cd6b/doc/plans/2026-10-02-opencode-skill-routing-link-qualification.md). Candidate original loads Paperclip/reference before saving publicly; baseline original loads it after writing locally, then saves publicly within the same assignment. Reported cost totals are $0.0107824490 candidate / $0.0107909015 baseline, with unmetered runtime. The later reference-only issue-derived link correction is provider-free calibrated and **not live-qualified** by these frozen runs; no further paid runs. - Retained tool calls show the repaired original OpenCode assignment loads only its assigned output skill before writing locally. Operational Paperclip is first loaded during automatic disposition recovery; its early recipe is visible then, but it never saves the missing document. Explicit candidate loads Paperclip and reads the new reference before saving successfully. All nine actual runs are counted. Reported LLM totals are $0.3802537209 baseline and $0.4918990161 candidate; local runtime is unmetered. - Initial setup, packaging, cancelled/missing-cell recovery, callback test and relative-output attempts remain retained. No completed provider failure was rerun. Frozen measurement branches are unchanged by later canonical metadata maintenance. - Run `pnpm test:e2e:runner:stock-harness`, `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit`, and `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck`. Select `stock-harness` explicitly for paid execution; it is excluded from `--all`. Prior-head integration: `36aa4d81c49a1a8f6f04b1a068fae19aa901955f` replays this PR on merged hiring #14985 (`862a5758ba0e88a33232c1f1fa645e85c38a3113`), preserving the four explicit custom-CEO-bundle checks, minimal generic manual boundary, and both suites. The combined fixture catalog and hiring calibrations pass 67 assertions; exact-head stock prerequisites pass 599 assertions (598 TypeScript + 1 Rust), all six gates and retained-receipt verification, zero providers/source errors, fingerprint `a7f5a22d860a88fe20cce213c6d5e0004788f32c8363930729aea4fd740ad16d`. E2E typecheck and 26-cell stock discovery pass. Fresh current-head CI passes all 52 checks with two intentional skips, and fresh Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved review threads. The prior source-plan browser failure is retained: a deterministic process fixture replayed its last `fixture:plan` command on `chat_task_completed`, writing revision 2 with identical body after the approval handoff. This was not paid provider execution. Rebased current-head CI passes the same assertion without an old-head retry or a change to that browser fixture. The merged hiring change was measured separately on immutable matched unions, with this reduced/shared/operational context and native completion guidance held constant. [Complete original two-profile report](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/f0512647656be78e48abd8c22a3078db8bf6bcd2/doc/plans/2026-10-02-hiring-template-live-comparison.md): [candidate](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37075466208) / [historical baseline](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37075469463), 705 provider-free prerequisites each. Both pairs are unchanged Fail → Fail on the exact-five count, with six core delivery checks passing all four cells; 28 actual successful runs include eight automatic completion wakes, zero retries, four successful cleanups. Source-read coverage is uncomparable, actual model charges unknown. Separately versioned provider-free accounting remains analytical work; original verdicts are preserved. This does not rerun or qualify the completed default-manual or native campaigns. ## Risks - Legacy ACP Claude's additional delivery loss is not closed by any later matched run and blocks the no-extra-failing-behavior merge criterion. Legacy document delivery may have relied on the prior manual/shared prompts. The early skill repair improves Claude in one trial; the later OpenCode pairs pass in both variants and cannot establish causality or robust recovery. Both original-case links remain deficient beneath the storage-only grade. The later issue-derived reference correction has only provider-free validation. Native finish/block descriptions must not be supplied to legacy agents. - The comparison holds merged native Codex fix #14920 constant; it cannot measure that fix's before/after task performance. - These bounded skill/context/chat workflows do not measure general coding quality. Unrepresented providers remain unqualified. - Saved manuals and old Codex sessions are not automatically migrated. Codex through ACP still has a separate base-instruction follow-up. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family as identified by this session. The exact deployment ID and context-window size are not exposed. The assistant used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and delegated PR/eval work. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (relevant suites and all three unchanged narrow reruns pass; complete-run timing failures retained in Verification) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green on the new repair head (prior-head checks retained above) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups on the new repair head - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
78e0034498 |
fix(evals): account for hiring completion notifications (#15007)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Product E2E evals check real hiring and delegated task completion. > - The hiring fixture requires three requested CEO turns and two coder executions. > - The server can also wake the CEO when each delegated task completes. > - Two exact-five-run guards rejected these valid completion turns in all four retained cells. > - This pull request validates bounded completion turns in both guards. > - The benefit is accurate workflow grading while all actual runs and coverage failures remain visible. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #14985, #14948, #14961. **What happened?** The original hiring comparison reports Codex Fail → Fail and Claude Fail → Fail. Each cell has seven successful runs. The five requested work turns are accompanied by two server task-completion notifications. All six other delivery checks pass. **Expected behavior** Require exactly three distinct user-requested CEO turns and one coder execution for each of two known tasks. Admit at most two strictly attributed server completion turns, including one turn that batches both tasks. Reject unknown, duplicate, failed, retried or extra-work runs. **Steps to reproduce** Inspect the retained four-cell report linked below. Each original result fails `five-successful-turns`. The same exact count was also enforced by the final chat-flow guard. ## What Changed - Add one typed lifecycle helper shared by the hiring scorer and the hiring-only final chat guard. - Validate public run ledgers, company/user/account identity, request attribution, task origins, completion deliveries, timing and replies. - Keep exactly five required work turns; declare seven maximum total turns for cost and timeout planning. - Count all actual runs, including notification runs and unexpected resets. Keep other chat count guards unchanged. - Version the hiring grader as v3 (turn accounting v2) and include the helper and chat guard in its definition digest. - Keep source-read, exact coder-body and all six other delivery checks unchanged. - Add 144 focused helper/scorer/settlement calibrations and separately versioned exact retained-input replay reports. - Retry complete bracketed observations, await both owed callbacks and attributed replies, and refresh the final guard consistently. - Reject unrelated completion writes and failed mutation attempts using exact canonical/native action IDs. Missing identity mapping is uncomparable action coverage. ## Verification - All 977 credential-free E2E support tests pass across 64 files, including 144 focused lifecycle/action/scorer/settlement calibrations. - E2E typecheck, ordinary plugin SDK and Runner TypeScript dependency builds, capability contract/inventory checks and the existing two-cell hiring discovery pass. - [Executable replay report](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/fed1729018cc100f5f4bbfb692777e49009c423b/doc/plans/2026-10-02-hiring-executable-accounting-replay.md) pins current code revision `e4077ade1818d98b9862ae79ee1d49a007dcf9c1`, v3 definition digest, exact source/input hashes and each original/new check. - The stricter replay verifies both Codex variants through both executable guards. ACPX Claude action attribution remains unresolved/uncomparable because provider execution IDs cannot be exactly joined to native request IDs; guards fail closed. No notification writes are observed. All six other outcomes and every original source/template coverage check stay unchanged. Original files and Fail → Fail machine verdicts remain preserved; zero providers are called. - Full attempts remain uncomparable in both profiles. Historical Claude also keeps its six-backtick exact-template mismatch. This grading repair does not prove model-performance equivalence. - The limited sidecar-v1 and initial executable-v2 passes checked notification-created tasks but could miss unrelated document writes. Those assessments remain preserved and do not prove harmless notifications. The stricter v3 replay is separate. - [Original measurement and separate sidecar](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/8eb517ca1497687237163bdef4dfc4d3332ea916/doc/plans/2026-10-02-hiring-template-live-comparison.md) retain 28 actual runs, eight automatic notifications, four successful cleanups and unknown actual model charges. No models are rerun. - The branch is replayed on master `59c07ede7`. Intervening master changes are UI-only; eval source bytes and replay verdicts match. The four-cell provider-free replay was repeated against the reachable code revision. - Initial-head normal CI retained browser failures in agent-run denial feedback and touch-picker scroll position. Those browser paths and imports were unchanged, but their cause was not established. The necessary review-fix head passes both browser checks; no blind rerun was requested. - Local full repository typecheck/test/build were not repeated. Exact-head normal CI passes the required repository gates, including typecheck, tests, build and browser shards. Fresh Greptile review completed on `fed1729018cc100f5f4bbfb692777e49009c423b` with 5/5 and zero unresolved threads. An independent rerun of the 144 focused helper/scorer/settlement tests passes on the unchanged head. **Merge readiness:** This PR repairs the evaluator. Its positive and negative calibrations pass, both guards reject missing action attribution, current-head CI and review pass, and there are no merge conflicts. The retained ACPX cells remain uncomparable because their action IDs cannot be joined. That coverage limit remains a separate follow-up; it does not require relaxing this grader or changing the old results. No model calls, production instructions, carrier changes, or historical regrades are part of this readiness update. ## Risks - Missing or inconsistent public lifecycle evidence fails the bounded helper. The focused calibrations reject plausible false positives and malformed observations. Unmatched action IDs fail closed and are reported as uncomparable rather than a model task regression. - Source-read evidence remains incomplete. This PR does not change provider event carriers or relax the coverage oracle. - The versioned count check differs from original v1 results. Reports retain both versions and exact input hashes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family as identified by this session. The exact deployment ID and context-window size are not exposed. The assistant used reasoning, repository tools, code execution and delegated calibration work. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip normal CI gates are green (exact head `fed1729018cc100f5f4bbfb692777e49009c423b`; fresh review tracked separately below) - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (completed exact-head review; zero unresolved threads) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ffe5e9e2a8 |
fix: retain execution evidence for Retry and saved input (#15033)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people steer and recover AI-agent conversations. > - Recovery eligibility depends on retained cancellation receipts. > - Run presentation intentionally omits result JSON on SQL_ASCII databases and reduces oversized output. > - Retry and the saved-input sweep mistakenly used that presentation read for admission. > - The banner could offer Retry while the endpoint rejected the same stopped run. > - Read the narrow execution-evidence fields for internal admission and keep normal presentation unchanged. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15024 and #15015. Searched existing recovery and redaction PRs; no duplicate fix found. **What happened?** On a SQL_ASCII instance, a verified pre-dispatch review-wait cancellation offers Retry in the recovery notice. Clicking it returns an eligibility conflict, and a saved user message remains deferred. The notice reads the retained database receipt, but the endpoint and sweep read a presentation projection where `resultJson` is null. **Expected behavior** Retry and saved user input use the recorded execution evidence and ordinary admission gates, independent of presentation redaction. Public run reads retain their existing encoding and output-size protections. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Record a cancelled, unclaimed review-wait continuation and its recovery hold. 2. Use the SQL_ASCII presentation projection, where run result JSON is omitted. 3. Click Retry or save a new user message and let the recovery sweep inspect it. 4. Verify a fresh turn starts once, with no replay of consumed input. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `9ae3d8db3`. **Deployment mode** Authenticated private self-hosted server with a SQL_ASCII database. ## What Changed - Add an explicit internal read of cancellation, startup, review-wait, tool-inventory, and Stop evidence; omit provider diagnostics. - Use that read in the Retry route, wakeup validation, and saved-input continuation checks. - Preserve the distinction between absent result JSON and an unrecognized stored result. - Cover the reproduced SQL_ASCII Retry and saved-input failures, retained public redaction, native Stop behavior, and excluded provider output. - Document the presentation and admission distinction. ## Verification - Red: four selected assertions fail before the fix, including the SQL_ASCII eligibility conflict and saved input remaining deferred. - Targeted green regressions and existing native Stop cases pass. - Workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. - All 626 affected recovery, continuation, and route tests pass, including 22 focused admission and native Stop cases. Current-head CI has 54 passing gates and 2 skipped optional Storybook checks. Greptile reviewed `9b94af91e295a4e8007dfc6bff6a8d532d945e36` at 5/5 with no findings or open review threads. No complete local monolithic pass is claimed; the complete suite runs in sharded CI. ## Risks Admission still checks recorded process and controller ownership, provider events, cleanup, company scope, user authority, pending decisions, and task holds. The evidence projection must retain every field used by these eligibility predicates; existing native Stop cases guard against dropping its acknowledgement receipt. No schema, dependency, UI, or public response change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, an agent based on GPT-6. The exact runtime model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser inspection. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9ae3d8db3d |
fix: keep pre-dispatch review waits out of execution recovery (#15024)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The queued-run gate can cancel a continuation that must wait for review. > - This cancellation happens before execution authority or a provider starts. > - Recovery currently treats the gate receipt as unknown provider execution. > - That mistake blocks a conversation after a successful reply and hides Retry. > - This pull request recognizes only the recorded, unclaimed review-wait state. > - Review waits keep their normal disposition path, and new user input can recover older false holds. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15015, #15020, and #15022. Related #11614 narrows the review posture that causes cancellation; this change corrects recovery after a valid cancellation. **What happened?** After a successful agent reply, the queued-run gate cancelled an automatic continuation with `issue_continuation_waiting_on_review`. The gate retained `timeoutSource: stale_queued_run_gate` and a matching stop reason. No execution authority or provider started. Recovery still created an unknown-action hold, moved the task to Blocked, and hid Retry. **Expected behavior** Use normal review-wait disposition repair for this recorded state. Allow Retry, a new user message, or saved undelivered input to recover an older false hold after ordinary admission checks pass. Preserve the cancelled run and do not replay its input. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Finish an agent turn on an open task that has a real review target. 2. Let the automatic continuation reach the queued-run review gate. 3. Refresh after the cancelled run is checked by recovery. 4. Confirm a review wait is handled as a wait rather than unknown provider work. 5. Reproduce an older false hold for the same receipt, then request Retry or send a new message. 6. Confirm only one fresh turn starts, and contradictory execution or cleanup evidence retains the hold. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `215586d127`. **Deployment mode** Authenticated private self-hosted server, built from source. ## What Changed - Recognize the exact review-wait dispatch receipt only while all execution claims remain unset. - Exempt recovery only after checking retained launch and provider events, coordinators, and environment cleanup. Keep the synchronous classifier conservative without that database proof. - Apply the verified classification to automatic recovery, heartbeat retries, and stranded-queue release, so saved user input starts once. - Reuse guarded startup admission for Retry, new input, and saved input on older false holds. - Show a precise review-wait notice and keep continuation guidance consistent with Retry availability. - Verify provider events, launch events, coordinators, and cleanup before admission. - Add five initial red regressions, three additional red recovery evidence regressions, concurrent saved-input coverage, and negative evidence checks. - Document the review-wait contract. ## Verification - Red: five regressions fail on unchanged master. Existing review-wait and contradictory-evidence cases still pass. - Workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` passes. - All 752 affected recovery, continuation, queue, classification, and retry-scheduling tests pass. - Three additional review regressions failed before the database proof was added; all 12 focused review-wait cases then pass. - Workspace `pnpm build` passes. - Saved-input promotion and recovery notice regressions fail before their fixes and pass afterward. - Current-head CI has 54 passing checks and 2 skipped optional Storybook checks. Greptile reviewed `0bf1437110e1617ae4544afa41f4319eac763dba` at 5/5 with zero open findings. The complete suite runs in sharded CI. No complete local monolithic pass is claimed; an earlier long run was stopped, and its unrelated failing case passed in isolation. ## Risks The error code alone cannot establish that no provider started. This exception also requires the server gate receipt, matching stop reason, and null execution authority fields. User admission separately checks coordinator, launch and provider events, environment cleanup, pending decisions, ownership, task holds, budget, and active execution. No migration or dependency change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, an agent based on GPT-6. The exact runtime model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser inspection. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
215586d127 |
fix: settle interrupted preparation with a retained cancellation fence (#15022)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A cancelled preparation must preserve history while allowing a new user turn. > - Older preparation can retain its cancellation fence but omit the unwind marker. > - The controller from that older boot is gone, its lease expired, and no provider started. > - Use the same narrow preparation proof for this retained-fence state. > - The benefit is working Retry and saved-message recovery after interrupted startup. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15020 and #15015. Related #13293 addresses post-launch recovery. **What happened?** A preparation interrupted before native selection retained `startupCancellation.beforeNativeSelection: true` but no preparation-settled marker. Its owner expired across restart and it had no environment leases. The missing-receipt compatibility rule did not recognize the retained fence, leaving Retry absent and saved messages deferred. **Expected behavior** Admit one new user turn when the preparation evidence agrees, the old controller expired, and cleanup is complete. Preserve previous results and do not replay the cancelled input. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Cancel Paperclip Runner preparation before runtime selection. 2. Retain the cancellation fence without an unwind marker or environment leases. 3. Restart after its old controller lease expires. 4. Send a new message, select Retry, or allow the saved-message worker to reconsider new input. 5. Confirm one successor receives only undelivered input. Repeat with live ownership, invocation evidence, or pending cleanup and confirm execution stays held. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `94f6f3eb4`. **Deployment mode** Authenticated private self-hosted server, built from source. ## What Changed - Accept a retained before-selection cancellation fence in the expired historical preparation proof. - Retain runtime, stage, adapter, ownership expiry, process, event, and cleanup requirements. - Extend Retry, fresh-message, partial-queue, concurrent-worker, and contradictory-evidence tests to both receipt states. - Document recovery when the preparation-settled marker was not retained. ## Verification - Red: five exact-state regressions fail on the parent commit. - Green: all 203 continuation tests pass, including the five new regressions and 13 additional negative evidence cases. Process recovery and queued-comment routes add 413 passing tests. - A read-only candidate service check against the retained live run returns Retry eligibility without changing any task state. - An unrelated containment assertion failed once in CI. All 85 tests in that route suite pass locally and the CI shard passes on rerun. - Workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. - Final head `48240de3d`: all 54 CI checks pass, two optional Storybook checks skip, and Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. The complete local monolithic suite is covered by sharded CI; the earlier local run was stopped after a workspace case failed, and that case passed in isolation. - After merge, deploy the exact merged commit and verify an actual agent reply through the task composer. ## Risks A cancellation receipt alone must not certify that provider execution stopped. This path still requires unresolved preparation, no native identity or coordinator, an expired controller from another boot, no launch or provider evidence, and completed environment cleanup. Current-boot preparation remains held until it settles. No schema or dependency change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, an agent based on GPT-6. The exact runtime model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser inspection. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
94f6f3eb47 |
fix: recover historical interrupted native preparation (#15020)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A task conversation must accept new user input after an interrupted startup. > - Native startup begins with a legacy preparation row before runtime selection. > - Older builds did not retain the startup cancellation receipt on that row. > - The immutable adapter claim and expired controller can still prove that no provider started. > - This pull request uses that narrow proof for explicit Retry and saved user input. > - The benefit is a conversation that recovers after an upgrade without repeating old work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15015. Related #13293 covers retained process evidence after provider startup. This change covers interrupted preparation before native runtime selection. **What happened?** After an upgrade, a task stopped during native preparation can still show automatic recovery stopped. A new user message saves but does not start. Retry is absent because the historical run has no cancellation receipt. **Expected behavior** Offer Retry and admit new user input when immutable run evidence proves that no provider started and cleanup is complete. Preserve incomplete or contradictory evidence as a recovery hold. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Retain a cancelled run with the Paperclip Runner adapter claim, an unresolved runtime, and the preparing stage. 2. Keep its old controller boot ID and expired lease. Retain no native identity, coordinator, result, process identity, or provider events. 3. Upgrade from a build that did not save the startup cancellation receipt. 4. Send a new user message or select Retry. Confirm that one fresh turn starts. 5. Repeat with an active controller, a provider launch, or unfinished cleanup. Confirm that execution stays held. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `cc67d4e1d` with a historical interrupted preparation row. **Deployment mode** Authenticated private self-hosted server, built from source. ## What Changed - Recognize historical interrupted native preparation from immutable run evidence and an expired controller from another server boot. - Reject adapter invocation evidence in the startup proof. Keep process and environment cleanup checks. - Apply the same proof to saved user messages in the bounded recovery worker. - Recheck saved-message eligibility under the existing task and run locks. Keep normal ownership, decision, pause, and budget gates. - Add regression tests for Retry, a new message, concurrent saved-message recovery, and contradictory evidence. Document the compatibility rule. ## Verification - Red: Retry, new-message recovery, and saved-message recovery fail on the parent commit. - Green: 185 continuation tests, 335 process-recovery tests, and 78 queued-comment route tests pass. Two additional red regressions cover partially delivered saved queues and pass after the admission fix. - Workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. - Final head `48db53f4f`: all 54 CI checks pass; two optional Storybook checks skip. Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. - The local monolithic `pnpm test:run` was stopped after CI passed. One unrelated workspace case failed in that long run; all three workspace reconciliation cases pass in isolation. No complete local monolithic pass is claimed. - After merge, deploy the exact merged commit and verify recovery through the normal task composer. ## Risks Historical compatibility could grant a new turn without enough startup evidence. The proof requires an immutable native adapter claim, an unresolved preparing stage, no result or native identity, an expired controller from another server boot, and no invocation or provider evidence. Environment cleanup remains mandatory. The fix does not replay old input or change historical run results. No schema or dependency change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, an agent based on GPT-6. The exact runtime model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser inspection. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
cc67d4e1d8 |
fix: preserve steering and recover stopped task conversations (#15015)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A task conversation must let a user guide a running agent and resume stopped work. > - The active run owns its input protocol, even when the user changes the next model or effort. > - Queue delivery waits for a provider receipt, which must be able to persist during the request. > - A stopped startup also needs a clear user action that passes normal task admission. > - This pull request fixes steering delivery, makes queue actions immediate, and restores explicit continuation. > - The benefit is a responsive conversation that can recover without losing saved input. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A queued message could change from Steer to Interrupt while a native run prepared. A steer request could wait on its own database lock and fail to deliver. A stopped startup could then leave the conversation without a working Retry or message continuation. Interrupt also waited for the server and showed a toast. **Expected behavior** The active run keeps its input protocol. Steer delivers input to that run. Steer and Interrupt clear the submitted queue rows and show the input in the conversation immediately. Failed delivery restores the latest queue with an inline error. An eligible stopped run offers Retry, and authenticated user input can start a fresh turn through normal task admission. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a task with a native Paperclip Runner. 2. Change the selected model or effort while that run prepares. 3. Queue a message and press Steer. 4. Observe the provider receipt and queue state during the request. 5. Stop a startup before its provider process begins, then try Retry or send a new message. 6. Repeat queued delivery with a legacy runner and press Interrupt. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on the parent of this branch, `59c07ede7`. **Deployment mode** Authenticated private deployment. The fixes also cover local task conversations. Related work: Refs #12834, Refs #13354, Refs #13275. The open refactor in #13160 moves the same queue route; it does not fix the receipt lock or stopped-run continuation addressed here. ## What Changed - Select queue behavior from the active run's immutable dispatch and runtime resolution. - Leave the run row unlocked during provider acknowledgement, then lock and read it before merging the receipt. - Retain queued input if the target run stops during that wait. Keep inline delivery errors visible after empty queue updates. - Permit exact Retry and authenticated continuation after verified native startup cancellation. Preserve pause, approval, budget, ownership, and process-stop gates. - Carry undelivered native queue input into a fresh turn once the old execution is confirmed stopped. - Show Steer and Interrupt input in the conversation and clear submitted composer rows immediately. Restore the latest queue inline on failure. Remove delivery toasts. - Keep optimistic delivery stable across stale polls, empty queues, and paginated history. Preserve classic Interrupt error handling. - Document recovery and optimistic delivery behavior. Add regression tests across server, shared queue projection, and UI boundaries. ## Verification - Red-green regression tests reproduced the queue protocol, receipt lock, stopped-startup continuation, and optimistic delivery failures. - The focused server route, continuation, queue, and runner boundary suites passed during implementation. - The queue-route suite passes with 78 tests. The three complete conversation UI suites pass with 347 tests. - UI typecheck, production build, and `pnpm check:token-gates` pass. - Workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. The local monolithic `pnpm test:run` is still running; remote CI verifies the complete suite on the latest commit. - All CI gates pass on `bd9031ad56abfcde13d13a13488c1b9217c2fd3a`, including the full test shards, runner verification, browser E2E, typecheck, release registry, and canary dry run. - Greptile reports 5/5 for that commit. Both review threads are resolved. ## Risks This changes queue display and explicit continuation admission. The UI must restore rejected delivery without losing other-session edits. The server must preserve concurrent provider result updates and must not resume a process whose stop is uncertain. Focused tests cover these boundaries. This change has no database migration. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, an agent based on GPT-6. The exact runtime model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser inspection. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
1815474597 |
fix: report pending execution phase at Stop timeout (#14990)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The server owns each adapter execution and waits for it to settle after Stop. > - A Stop timeout reports that termination remains unverified. > - Existing phase timings arrive only after their work completes, so a stalled await has no timing. > - This pull request samples the pending phase when the Stop timer expires. > - Operators can identify the pending operation without treating diagnostics as stop proof. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The opt-in Sentry context for an unconfirmed adapter Stop timeout. **Current behavior** The timeout includes execution identity but no pending phase. A session close, instruction collection, workspace restore, or diagnostic write can remain pending without producing its completion timing. **Proposed behavior** Add a closed-list phase and elapsed milliseconds from the exact live execution control. Sample them when the timeout fires. Report `unknown` and a null age when the control or attribution is unavailable. **Reason and benefit** The next timeout can identify which operation is still pending. It does not require task text, paths, provider output, or additional database writes. **Breaking changes** No API or execution behavior change. The existing opt-in error context gains two fields. Related public work: #14639 added Stop identity diagnostics; #14866 and #14945 cover instruction cleanup and teardown outcomes. This change adds pending attribution to those paths. The native Stop work in #14802 remains separate. ## What Changed - Add a bounded tracker per execution control. Token scopes support nested and overlapping awaits. A late release cannot clear a newer scope. - Track adapter execution, ACP cancellation and settlement, diagnostic writes, and host cleanup. Keep a coarse host scope until the executor finishes. - Sample only the matching current control and settlement promise at timeout. Freeze the sanitized result. Use a monotonic clock and cap elapsed time at one day. - Test stalled operations, repeated Stop calls, stale and wrong-run controls, callback failures, scope bounds, and the real Sentry SDK context. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - Six focused suites passed: 79 tests. They cover pending scopes, Stop control ownership, real ACP settlement stalls, and Sentry context isolation. - The real Sentry SDK contract ran with the audited optional peer `@sentry/node@10.71.0` installed outside the workspace. Valid phase and elapsed values were exported; arbitrary labels and nonfinite elapsed values were rejected. - An independent agent reviewed the production diff and ran the focused tests without blockers. - `git diff --check` and a redacted Gitleaks scan passed. The local full `pnpm test:run` was stopped during its large serial server batch to avoid duplicating the sharded CI suite. No complete local broad-suite pass is claimed. - All CI gates passed on `c223237b58aa8d479d1c66d7d399de30270bac4f`: 54 successful checks and two expected Storybook skips. This includes the full sharded test suite, typecheck, build, real Sentry SDK isolation, browser tests, canary dry run, and the security scan after the PR became ready for review. - Greptile scored the same commit 5/5 with no actionable findings or unresolved review threads. ## Risks This is diagnostic instrumentation. Cancellation, deadlines, teardown order, termination proof, and file recovery proof remain unchanged. Unsupported or uninstrumented work uses a coarse phase. Tracker overflow fails closed to `unknown`. The tracker emits no new run-log or Telemetry event. The existing Sentry opt-in gate remains in place. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The agent used code inspection, local command execution, automated tests, and an independent agent review. The runtime did not expose a more specific model identifier or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
4abff286c2 |
fix: retain resolved ACP execution timeout metadata (#14986)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work through adapters and heartbeat runs. > - ACP adapters resolve a timeout for the selected execution target. > - An untouched sandbox timeout uses a four-hour default. > - Heartbeat finalization rebuilt the metadata from the stored zero. > - This made a timed-out sandbox run report an effective timeout of zero. > - This change retains the adapter's resolved policy for accurate run diagnostics. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** ACP sandbox runs with `timeoutSec: 0` use the four-hour default. Their terminal metadata reports `effectiveTimeoutSec: 0` and `timeoutSource: config` because heartbeat finalization only reads the stored agent configuration. **Expected behavior** The result must report the policy the adapter used: `14400` and `sandbox_default`. Explicit limits, fractional limits, explicit unlimited overrides, and local defaults must keep their resolved values. **Steps to reproduce** Run an ACP adapter on a sandbox target with `timeoutSec: 0`. Compare the start log's four-hour policy with the terminal result's effective timeout. The new tests exercise the adapter result and the heartbeat metadata merge without waiting four hours. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced from `6eaf218924f0a89faf1c02eb0d6877a6c5c8a2cb`. **Deployment mode** Self-hosted server with an ACP sandbox execution target. Searched open timeout and metadata issues and PRs. Related #14804 exposes timeout configuration in forms; #14496 proposes a default policy; #14833 addresses CLI session retention. This PR changes only ACP result metadata. ## What Changed - Retain the resolved timeout in the ACP result after settlement. - Use validated adapter resolution when merging terminal timeout metadata. Preserve config fallbacks for older adapters and the HTTP millisecond policy. - Test sandbox defaults, explicit and fractional limits, explicit unlimited overrides, local defaults, malformed metadata, and unchanged cancellation fields. - Document the result fields and their meaning. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - Stop metadata tests: 23 passed. - Reporter and diagnostic suites: 84 passed; two real-Sentry-SDK tests skipped because the optional SDK is not installed. - ACP engine suite: all 206 tests passed with a deterministic local `gemini --version` shim. Ambient host CLI probes made the existing Gemini session-resume fixture intermittent (one assertion failure in each of two broad runs); an isolated 15-case rerun and the clean-base 206-test suite also passed. No assertion or timeout was changed. - `pnpm test:run` is in progress. This PR does not claim a complete local suite pass. - Independent review found no blocking issues. The tests cover real adapter emission and the real metadata merge separately. ## Risks Low runtime risk: this changes result diagnostics. It does not change timeout values, cancellation acknowledgement, cleanup, checkpoint safety, retries, or provider operations. It does not fix the cause of a quiet or long-running tool. Older stored results are not rewritten. The new source values apply only when an adapter returns a valid resolution. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 with reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, and test execution. The deployment-specific model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
862a5758ba |
fix(agents): reduce hiring templates to role descriptions (#14985)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - New agents receive role instructions from onboarding, the hiring skill, or a team package. > - These sources repeat harness procedures and impose generic work policies. > - They can crowd out the task and the harness instructions. > - This pull request reduces those sources to short role descriptions. > - It preserves configuration, skills, authentication, reporting lines, and approval controls. > - The benefit is less repeated instruction text with explicit coverage for the default hiring path. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #3307. The CEO template can impose a fixed delegation route instead of letting the agent choose how to fulfill the request. This change removes that route. It does not implement autonomous goal selection. Related work: #14920 preserves stock Codex base instructions. #14948 reduces the generic manual and shared runtime prompts. #14961 improves native completion-tool descriptions. This PR is separate from those changes. ## What Changed - Select only the short CEO `AGENTS.md` for new default CEO bundles. Keep the three former companion files as compatibility assets. - Reduce the first-agent chief-of-staff prompt and coder, QA, UX, and security role examples. - Reduce seven bundled team role bodies. Preserve their role, reporting, and skill metadata. Regenerate the catalog. - Make hiring examples optional. Replace the long generic role manual with short role drafting guidance. Preserve explicit requester instructions. - Add configuration and import coverage for native and legacy managed bundles, custom instructions, first-agent rendering, and catalog contents. - Add an explicit-only hiring eval that starts from the production CEO default and checks one coder hire, independently computed JSON output, saved instructions, and worker reuse. - Include the full prompt comparison and a separate three-request drafting simulation. Neither is a live provider comparison. Prompt differences: [before and after](doc/plans/2026-10-02-hiring-template-prompt-diff.md). The CEO default falls from 1,897 to 20 words. The coder example falls from 652 to 18 words. Word counts describe instruction size, not outcome quality or billing. ## Verification - PASS: 99 focused server tests and eight shipped-catalog tests. - PASS: catalog generation and validation for four shipped teams. - PASS: hiring skill validation. - PASS: `pnpm -r typecheck`. - PASS: `pnpm build`. - INCOMPLETE: the full local `pnpm test:run` was stopped before rebase. Its original log is retained. This is not a completed full-suite pass. The full current-head GitHub CI workflow passed: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37073372419. - PASS: `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck` and `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit` (63 files / 843 tests). - PASS: discovery for the two new hiring cells, 50 existing everyday cells, and the full 438-cell catalog. - PASS after rebase: 99 server tests, 11 catalog tests, 62 selected E2E support tests, and the E2E typecheck. - PASS: all current-head PR checks at `57dcee147ed0b2d2e3cc657cd9e50fb16bf9ec25`: 51 successful check runs, two intentional Storybook skips, and successful Snyk status. Fresh Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. - PENDING follow-up: matched live hiring runs on frozen integration refs. No live outcome-quality or non-regression result is claimed from the configuration checks or this merge. The new suite has two local native cells: Codex and ACPX Claude. It expects five provider turns per cell. It compares source-derived bundles, so the historical long templates remain admissible. Missing successful source-read receipts make a pair uncomparable. They do not establish a behavior regression or equivalence. ## Risks - New default roles have fewer prescribed procedures. Live checks must determine whether a removed instruction was needed for an outcome. - Existing custom and saved bundles keep their contents. The retained companion assets avoid a source-file compatibility break. - Specialized Summarizer, Reflection Coach, and Wiki Maintainer prompts remain unchanged. Their product contracts need separate review. - The generic non-CEO fallback reduction is in #14948. This PR alone does not provide its eight-word fallback. - Configuration tests and drafting simulations do not establish live outcome quality. QA, UX, security, and chief-of-staff hiring behavior remain outside the new two-cell comparison. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, code editing, shell tools, and delegated verification. The runtime does not expose the exact deployment model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
6eaf218924 |
chore: grant Storybook publishing access through CODEOWNERS (#14984)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Storybook previews help contributors review the board UI. > - The publishing workflow uses the default branch CODEOWNERS file to authorize users. > - Tonio and Scott need access to this workflow. > - This pull request adds both accounts as release documentation owners. > - The existing workflow can then authorize both accounts without a separate user list in code. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Access to the Storybook build and publishing workflow. **Subsystem affected** Repository ownership and GitHub Actions authorization. **Current behavior** The workflow reads individual accounts from every CODEOWNERS rule on the default branch. Neither `tonio-alucema` nor `scotttong` is in that file. Both accounts already have repository admin access, but the workflow authorization check denies them. **Proposed behavior** Add both accounts to the `doc/RELEASING.md` ownership rule. After merge, both can start and rerun Storybook publishing workflows. A configured `storybook-deploy` environment reviewer must still approve deployment. CODEOWNERS membership does not add an account to the environment reviewer settings. **Reason and benefit** Contributors can publish UI previews through the same CODEOWNERS policy as other maintainers. The authorization code has no account-specific exceptions. **Breaking changes** None. The existing authorization and deployment approval checks remain in place. **Additional context** Related changes: #13226 added the publishing workflow. #13231 added stable branch bookmarks. A search found no open PR for these permission changes. ## What Changed - Add `@tonio-alucema` and `@scotttong` only to the release documentation ownership rule. - Test that accounts listed for release documentation can start and rerun publishing workflows. - Test that removing an account from CODEOWNERS removes its publishing access. - Explain how CODEOWNERS entries and environment reviewers affect publishing access. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/__tests__/storybook-deploy.test.mjs`: all 25 tests pass. - `actionlint .github/workflows/storybook-deploy.yml .github/workflows/storybook-visual.yml`: passes. - `git diff --check`: passes. - GitHub API checks confirm that both accounts have repository admin access. The deployment environment requires an existing reviewer and disables administrator bypass. - Repository-wide typecheck, tests, and build were attempted. They cannot complete in this worktree because workspace dependencies are not installed. Typecheck cannot find Node type definitions. Tests and build cannot load the workspace `tsx` package. - After merge, run `Storybook Deploy` from `master`, select a source branch, obtain environment approval, and check the published URLs in the run summary. ## Risks Both accounts gain permission to start and rerun Storybook publishing. Deployment still needs approval from a configured environment reviewer. No AWS permissions or live GitHub settings change in this PR. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The exact backend model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. The agent used reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, shell execution, and GitHub API tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
22cea6b2e6 |
fix: bound sandbox bridge waits and flag silent runs sooner (#14979)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Sandbox agents exchange input and output through bridge control commands. > - A provider can stop responding to a command even when it receives a timeout. > - These small commands can inherit a four-hour agent lifetime and block input or teardown. > - The board also calls a silent run healthy for the first hour. > - This pull request bounds bridge control waits and surfaces silence sooner. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A sandbox run can remain active when a bridge control command never returns. The shared helper passes a timeout to the provider but does not enforce it on the host. It also accepts the agent's hours-long timeout. Output silence remains `ok` for an hour and becomes `critical` only after four hours. **Expected behavior** Bound short bridge operations even if the provider never settles. Report failed input delivery through the existing shutdown path. Warn after five silent minutes and escalate after fifteen. Keep normal agent command limits and require verified termination before releasing execution ownership. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use a sandbox runner whose bridge read or input-upload promise never settles. 2. Set its configured timeout to four hours. 3. Observe that the old queue client never returns or rejects. 4. Inspect a running task with 35 minutes of output silence. The old summary still reports `ok`. **Paperclip version or commit** Base commit `d6d88b9de2`. **Deployment mode** Self-hosted server with sandbox execution. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Shared command-managed sandbox bridge, including Codex ACP sessions. The informational silence thresholds apply to active runs across adapters. Related: #14889 recovers stalled Daytona output streams; #14485 retries explicit gateway failures during input delivery. This change bounds short control operations whose provider promises never settle. It does not add tool replay or automatic cancellation for output silence. #6297 proposes configurable per-agent silence thresholds; this patch only changes the existing defaults. ## What Changed - Enforce at most 30 seconds per bridge control shell command on the host and provider, including callback startup and shutdown, process-session launch, and payload setup. Preserve shorter configured deadlines and launch environments. - Keep the long-lived agent command outside this deadline. Use a fixed timeout diagnostic without command payloads. - Surface suspicious output silence after five minutes and critical silence after fifteen minutes. - Decouple the shared-workspace holder cutoff from warning thresholds and preserve its existing one-hour value. - Add regressions for hung reads, a late upload response, failed input delivery, exact warning boundaries, and fresh output clearing warnings. - Update the adapter guide and execution contract. ## Verification - The three new queue-client regressions fail on the unchanged base and pass with this patch. - Final callback bridge and sandbox session suites: 214 passed. These cover hung reads, writes, startup, shutdown, process-session launch, payload setup, and the separate long-running agent limit. - Stdin ordering and shutdown suite: 56 passed after the lifecycle change. - Daytona and watchdog coverage passed in the earlier focused runs. Across the focused suites, 602 distinct tests pass. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`: passed. Server and adapter typecheck/build also passed after their respective follow-up changes. - `pnpm test:run`: attempted and stopped after known local failures. Four chat/email cases used an external ancestor skill path, three skill-cache cases failed on macOS, and one wakeup case timed out. The wakeup case passes alone (1 passed, 27 skipped). This run spanned the workspace-cutoff follow-up and also failed its new holder case; a fresh final-head workspace suite passes all 19 tests. The interrupted run is not a full local-suite pass or final-head verification. - A filesystem queue-drain test failed once during the lifecycle rerun and passed on the complete two-suite rerun. It uses the filesystem client, outside the changed command-runner path. - Complete CI on `ff2212c235`: 53 successful checks and two expected skips, including the full test suite and canary packaging dry run. No failed or pending checks. - Greptile reviewed `ff2212c235` at 5/5. All review findings are addressed, no threads remain unresolved, and the branch has no merge conflicts with `master`. - `git diff --check` and a scan of added text for secrets and private identifiers passed. ## Risks - A bridge control operation that needs more than 30 seconds now fails, even if the caller selected a longer run lifetime. Agent commands retain their own limits. - Timing out a provider promise does not cancel the remote operation or prove it stopped. Existing execution settlement still owns termination verification. No uncertain tool action is replayed. - Quiet healthy runs display warnings sooner. Existing snooze, continue, and false-positive dismissal controls still apply. Silence alone does not cancel a run, create review work, or change assignments. - No schema or API shape change. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with tool use and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run change-specific tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
5b8b2b38ca |
feat(apps): add Neon connection (#14980)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents reach external services through the Apps catalog. Each catalog entry is a reviewed `AppDefinition` that wires a provider's hosted MCP server into Paperclip's shared vault, grants, policies, gateway, and audit trail. > - Neon is a widely used serverless Postgres provider with an official hosted MCP server, but it is not in the catalog. Teams that run their databases on Neon must use the generic "connect your own MCP server" path, which has no branding, no guidance, and no project or read-only controls. > - The connector playbook requires a catalog entry for a provider like this: the hosted server supports dynamic client registration and bearer API keys, and the common definition fields can express every option Paperclip can serialize. > - This pull request adds the Neon definition, its official artwork, the research and permission-review ledger rows, documentation, and deterministic tests, without any provider-specific runtime code. > - The benefit is a one-click, governed Neon connection with optional project pinning and read-only mode, and a documented path to live qualification. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** Neon is a common Postgres host for the applications agents work on, but Paperclip's Apps catalog has no Neon entry. Operators who want agents to inspect schemas, run SQL, or manage branches must paste the MCP URL into the generic remote-MCP flow, which gives no branding, no provider guidance, no project boundary, and no read-only switch. **Proposed solution** Add a catalog-only Neon connection built from the connector playbook: browser sign-in through Neon's dynamic client registration with the reviewed `read` and `write` scopes, or a customer API key sent as an Authorization bearer header. Both methods expose Neon's documented `projectId` pin and `readonly` switch as optional Advanced fields. Every discovered tool stays governed by the normal per-action policies. **Alternatives considered** A plugin was not needed because no custom UI, tables, workers, or webhooks are involved. A separate read-only method was not added because the playbook treats read-only switches as advanced fields rather than methods. Neon's repeatable `category` query filter was left out because tenant fields serialize lists as one comma-joined value, so it cannot be sent correctly without new runtime code; per-action policies cover catalog narrowing instead. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the existing self-serve remote-MCP connection catalog and does not overlap planned core work. ## What Changed - Added the `neon` provider to `scripts/ingest-app-definitions.mjs` (category, API-key placement, methods, tenant fields, guidance, warnings) and regenerated `packages/shared/src/app-definitions/neon.json` plus the generated registry. - Added the Neon row to the self-serve MCP research ledger with `dcr_or_api_key` auth and risk tier S4. - Added permission reviews for `neon/mcp-oauth` (explicit scopes `read`, `write`, taken from Neon's live authorization-server metadata) and `neon/mcp-api-key` (provider key), with evidence links. - Added Neon's official tile icon (`ui/public/brands/apps/neon.png`, copied byte-for-byte from the icon linked by neon.com) and the brand manifest entry. - Added prosumer gallery copy for the Neon card. - Added `doc/connections/NEON.md` (service involvement, endpoints, administrator setup, capabilities and policy, manifest, brand provenance, validation hook) and linked it from the connections README and the permission audit. - Tests: Neon definition shape, store visibility and artwork, URL recognition, reviewed scopes with scope-widening rejection, URL projection of the project pin and read-only flag, invalid project ID rejection, the connect form's API-key gating, and the pinned catalog counts. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/app-definitions.test.ts packages/shared/src/app-definitions-url.test.ts` — 34 passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts` — 367 passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/apps/AppsConnect.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/Browse.test.tsx ui/src/lib/app-brand-assets.test.ts ui/src/pages/apps/AppLogo.brand-assets.test.tsx` — all passed. - `node scripts/check-app-brand-assets.mjs` and `node --test scripts/app-brand-validation.test.mjs` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck`, `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`, `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`, `pnpm check:token-gates` — clean. - Manual: in a local instance, open Apps → Browse, confirm the Neon card and icon, open `/apps/connect?source=neon`, confirm both methods, the Advanced project pin and read-only toggle, and that Connect enables after an API key is entered. The operator completed a live connection against a Neon account on this build. - Live metadata probed on 2026-10-02: both `.well-known` documents at `mcp.neon.tech` return the recorded endpoints and scopes; an unauthenticated `initialize` returns 401 with `resource_metadata`. ## Risks - Low risk to existing providers: the change is additive catalog data plus tests. The generated registry only gains one import. - Neon's hosted server grants broad project and database management. The definition carries two warnings, recommends a development project, and keeps every write under the normal action policies; the read-only switch is enforced by Neon's server, not locally. - The permission-review ledger records live proof for both methods as not run; the full lifecycle checklist in `doc/connections/NEON.md` still needs a documented pass before the entry is considered fully qualified. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5.1 (`claude-fable-5-1`) in Claude Code, with extended thinking and tool use (shell, file editing, browser verification). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
d6d88b9de2 |
fix: preserve run outcomes when agent file cleanup is deferred (#14945)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The heartbeat service records each agent turn and releases its working files. > - A turn can save its work and finish before instruction-copy cleanup runs. > - A cleanup exception can replace that completed result with an adapter failure. > - This also loses result accounting and can prevent environment lease release. > - This pull request records a cleanup warning and keeps the original run outcome. > - The existing recovery sweep retries cleanup from the durable working-copy record. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related cleanup and lock work: #14866 and #14869. Related, distinct work: #14695 retains warm-process files; #12021 handles provider-process SIGTERM after a terminal result. **What happened?** An agent saved its plan, posted a comment, and requested approval. The provider completed its turn. Instruction-copy cleanup then timed out on a directory lock. Its exception escaped a `finally` block and replaced the provider result, so the completed turn showed `Run failed`. **Expected behavior** Keep the provider outcome, usage, cost, saved work, and pending approval. Record a cleanup warning and let the existing recovery sweep retry. A real provider failure must keep its original error. A failed file save must keep its failed-save receipt. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Complete a legacy adapter turn that saves work and requests approval. 2. Make instruction-copy release throw a directory-lock timeout. 3. Read the run result. Before this change, the cleanup error replaces the provider outcome. The new heartbeat tests reproduce the failure without a live provider or external service. **Paperclip version or commit** The regression reproduces on `c83df091b1a5207375eaf23466bb5c62e4e1518e`. This branch is rebased onto `cf8ad63c80`. **Deployment mode** Server-managed agent execution with persistent instruction working copies. ## What Changed - Catch instruction-copy release failures in both heartbeat teardown paths. Stop repeating a failed cleanup attempt within the same run. - Write a sanitized `instruction_cleanup` warning. A warning-write failure also preserves the run result. - Test successful, failed, and throwing providers; both teardown paths; warning-write failure; accounting; approval state; and execution-control release. - Extend the held-lock test to prove a fresh recovery worker removes the deferred copy and preserves its failed-save receipt. - Document deferred cleanup and the run-log event. ## Verification - Red proof: all five new heartbeat regression cases fail with the original release calls. - At head `20bea4f431c916d2f5db1970213aab85f5daa34c`, all 417 tests passed across heartbeat process recovery, agent directory working copies, and directory merge locks. - Full local `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and `git diff --check` passed. - [GitHub CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37031119795) passed at this head. All 53 reported checks passed; the two Storybook checks were correctly skipped. This includes general and serialized tests, browser shards, runner verification, build, typecheck, and the canary dry run. - Greptile reviewed this head with 5/5, no code comments, and no unresolved review threads. The branch has no merge conflicts. - The local `pnpm test:run` attempt was stopped after it reported eight failures in unchanged suites. Four Slack/AgentMail cases selected an unrelated ancestor skills directory and failed with `ENOENT`; the two Slack cases passed with a temporary local skill-root link, which was then removed. Three company-skill cases reproduced macOS `EACCES` errors when renaming read-only cache directories. One gateway case passed when rerun alone. No full local-suite pass is claimed; the complete CI test jobs passed. ## Risks - Cleanup errors now leave recovery work pending. The durable working-copy record remains available for the existing retry sweep. - This change preserves provider failures and failed-save receipts. It does not claim that unsaved file edits were saved. - Native instruction reservation errors retain their existing behavior because they guard process ownership. - No schema, lockfile, workflow, API, or UI changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. The exact backend model ID and context-window size are not exposed by this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9786f6df56 |
fix(runner): preserve credential content in document saves (#14937)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Runner sends authorized tool calls to the control plane. > - Agents use these calls to save plans and instruction files. > - The Runner used diagnostic secret detection to reject execution arguments. > - Ordinary credential-related prose could reject a document save before persistence. > - This pull request forwards the original arguments and leaves credential policy to the provider harness. > - The benefit is reliable saves with useful diagnostic records. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related foundation: Refs #12415 and #14430. No duplicate save-policy fix was found. **What happened?** A `write_document` call failed before the server saved its plan. The Runner reported `semantic tool input contains credential material; refusing to execute altered arguments`. The detector also masked ordinary phrases such as `secret manager` and `credential handling` in diagnostics. Both TypeScript dispatchers had equivalent execution gates. One dispatcher also rewrote structured approval and question payloads before execution. **Expected behavior** Paperclip forwards authorized arguments unchanged. The provider harness decides credential-content policy. Log and audit redaction does not reject or rewrite save input. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Send an authorized `write_document` call with a plan that discusses credential handling. 2. Include an intentional credential value in the body to exercise harness-owned policy. 3. The old Runner rejects the call. With this change, the document service stores the exact body. 4. Diagnostic records still mask explicit credential values. Qualified credential fields, short bearer values, opaque diagnostic pairs, and valid encoded JSON token headers have regression coverage. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced at `c46e41e81c03cd3c8b64cf993615b604d7fe8c62`. The branch is based on current `master`. **Deployment mode** Server deployment with the native Paperclip Runner. Local regression tests use the real document service and an embedded test database. ## What Changed - Remove credential-content vetoes from Rust admission and both TypeScript semantic dispatchers. - Preserve original structured approval and question arguments during execution. - Keep transport bounds, schema checks, authorization, idempotency, and audit masking. - Require explicit credential syntax or recognized formats for diagnostic masking. Preserve ordinary prose, metadata, and dotted identifiers. - Test exact document persistence, replay, nested argument identities, and masked audit copies. - Remove obsolete retry guidance and document harness-owned credential policy. ## Verification - `cargo test --manifest-path packages/paperclip-runner/runner/Cargo.toml --locked -p paperclip-runner-core --lib --test acpx_event_payload --test acpx_provider_state --test acpx_provider_turns`: 355 tests passed. - Focused server and adapter tests: 189 tests passed after rebase. These include the real document save and the complete tool-gateway suite. - Semantic dispatcher and conformance tests: 34 tests passed. - Diagnostic redaction and MCP tests: 46 tests passed, including all six review examples. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on the repaired branch. - The broad local root suite was interrupted after database fixture setup failures. The focused database suites passed. CI runs the complete configured test lanes. ## Risks - Authorized tool arguments can intentionally contain credentials. The harness must enforce its content policy. - Diagnostic detection is narrower. Explicit assignments, credential fields, and recognized credential formats remain masked. - The change does not add a database migration or change company authorization. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The session exposes the GPT-6 model family; its exact runtime model identifier and context window size are not exposed. Used reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
839cac1343 |
fix: request supported offline access for generic MCP OAuth (#14950)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents use external MCP tools through the governed gateway. > - Remote MCP connections can use OAuth access tokens that expire. > - Some providers issue refresh tokens only after an offline-access request and consent. > - Resource scopes hid that identity-provider capability in the generic connection flow. > - This pull request requests supported offline access and tests expiry through a local MCP server. > - The benefit is continued tool access without another sign-in when the provider permits refresh. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related PR: #13447 addresses the same OAuth symptom together with managed Codex configuration. This PR focuses on generic MCP OAuth. It also covers consent, explicit scope overrides, legacy reconnects, exact scope persistence, and real HTTP expiry tests. **What happened?** A generic MCP resource can advertise only its tool scopes. Its OAuth server can separately advertise `offline_access`. Paperclip selected the resource scopes and omitted the offline-access request. A provider could then issue an access token without a refresh token. Tool access stopped after the access token expired. **Expected behavior** Paperclip adds advertised offline access to the selected tool scopes when the OAuth server does not exclude refresh tokens. It requests consent and stores the scopes sent in the authorization request. Existing connections can discover this capability when the user reconnects. Providers without this capability keep their existing scope behavior. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run `node scripts/mcp-fixtures/servers/oauth-refresh-fixture.mjs` from the repository root. 2. Add its MCP URL as a generic connection on a local Paperclip instance. 3. Approve the test consent page and call `read_status`. 4. Let the two-minute access token expire and call the tool again. 5. Before this fix, the connection needs another sign-in. With this fix, the call refreshes the token and succeeds. **Paperclip version or commit** The integration regression reproduced the missing-refresh-token failure on the parent of this PR's fix. The same test passes with the fix. **Deployment mode** Local development. Automated tests use a loopback HTTP MCP/OAuth server and a disposable PostgreSQL database. ## What Changed - Track offline-access capability separately from MCP tool scopes. - Add supported offline access and consent for generic connections. - Preserve the actual requested scopes through callback completion and reconnect. - Discover the capability for older connections with cached OAuth endpoints. - Add a reusable MCP/OAuth fixture with PKCE, token expiry, resource binding, and refresh-token rotation. - Test shared and personal gateway calls through two refresh rotations. Cover scope selection, unsupported refresh, and legacy reconnects. - Document the behavior and local test commands. ## Verification - The two real HTTP expiry tests failed before the fix with `oauth_refresh_missing` after the first token expired. - Tests passed on the current head: 76 generic MCP regressions, all 365 tool-access service tests, and 4 fixture controls. - Full workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. Server TypeScript checks also passed after the review fixes. - All remote checks passed on `d22909bb34e9d54478c0002077c498ffe105932d`. Greptile gave 5/5 with both previous findings resolved. The complete local `pnpm test:run` is still running. - Run `node --test scripts/mcp-fixtures/servers/oauth-refresh-fixture.test.mjs` for the standalone provider controls. - Run `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/generic-mcp-connection.test.ts` for the Paperclip integration tests. ## Risks - Users can see a consent prompt when a generic provider supports offline access. - The provider can still decline to issue a refresh token. Access works until expiry, then the user must reconnect. - A provider that advertises offline access but rejects the scope produces an OAuth error. This PR does not add an automatic retry without that scope. - Existing grants without refresh tokens need another sign-in. The fix does not change them in place. - Curated Apps keep their reviewed scope and authorization-parameter allowlists. No database migration is required. - This simulation verifies the suspected failure. The reported internal MCP server has not been tested. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The runtime did not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7a52dcdc74 |
fix: repair MCP validation and cancelled execution recovery (#14951)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The tool gateway gives agents access to connected services. Recovery controls what happens when a run stops. > - Generated tool names can exceed the provider limit after the MCP client adds its prefix. > - The same invalid definition can fail each automatic retry. A cancelled run can also hold saved messages without showing its cause. > - This pull request bounds tool names, stops configuration retries, and retains cancellation evidence. > - It shows the stopped run and admits saved input only after the existing safety checks pass. > - The benefit is a clear recovery path that preserves operator Stop and prevents duplicate message delivery. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A long connected MCP tool name makes the provider reject the entire request. Automatic recovery repeats the invalid request. Separately, unexpected legacy cancellations can leave saved input behind a recovery hold. The notice does not identify the stopped run or its cause. **Expected behavior** Complete MCP names fit the provider limit. Tool-definition errors require configuration repair. Cancelled runs retain their source and reason. The recovery notice shows the cause and saved-message count. Verified unexpected cancellations can start a fresh turn through the existing admission checks. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Assign an App gallery connection with a long application key and tool name to a Claude agent. 2. Start a run. The provider rejects a name over 128 characters, including its MCP prefix. 3. For cancellation recovery, stop a legacy provider turn without an operator Stop request and send a user message while the recovery hold is active. 4. Inspect the recovery notice and the deferred message queue. **Paperclip version or commit** Rebased onto master at `cf8ad63c806685bfd7c48e3ed4a919d61a7c55f1`. **Deployment mode** Hosted or self-hosted server with legacy Claude or Codex execution. Related public work: - Refs #14017. That PR caps name segments. This PR preserves existing short names and uses stable hash aliases for long complete names. It also covers classification and recovery. - Refs #4510. That PR adds a cancellation-source column. This PR records bounded evidence in the existing run result, without a migration. - Refs #12552 and #4506. Those PRs suppress recovery after operator cancellation. This PR preserves operator intent and uses the existing continuation gates. ## What Changed - Bound gateway names with the full provider prefix in the 128-character budget. Retain the original upstream tool name for dispatch and permissions. - Classify invalid tool definitions as configuration failures before diagnostic redaction. Stop automatic retries and continuation attempts for that error code. - Persist cancellation source, expectedness, initiator, reason, and time. Preserve recorded Stop intent when adapter results arrive. Report unexpected started cancellations with closed diagnostic labels. - Show the run cause, saved-message count, and Inspect run link. Offer Continue for eligible unexpected cancellations. Require verified provider stop, empty tool inventory, ownership, and the existing pause, budget, approval, and dependency gates. Use the existing queue for single delivery. - Add regression coverage and update the execution, MCP gateway, and run-log documentation. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - Ran `pnpm test:run` and completed its workspace and serialized groups. Initial resource and timing failures passed on isolated reruns. All 149 serialized route suites passed. - Reran the changed server, adapter, and UI suites after the rebase. Coverage includes long-name upstream dispatch, configuration retry suppression, cancellation evidence retention, privacy labels, oversized run projection, and concurrent saved-message delivery. - `pnpm test:e2e tests/e2e/legacy-failure-continuation.spec.ts` passed all six browser scenarios. The recovery notice shows the run cause and inspection link, and each recovery entry point reaches one new response. - Added database-backed checks for active, removed, paused, unavailable, and disabled chat connections. The final continuation and recovery-notice suites passed 167 tests. Externally bound chats hide board Continue and show a usable next action. - All 55 GitHub checks passed on `42afbf1371dcaeb72646e3d8f65c19ff7cddf8de`. Two unrelated Storybook jobs were skipped by their normal conditions. Greptile reviewed that commit at 5/5 with no findings and no open review threads. ## Risks - Long tool names change to aliases. Existing short names stay compatible. The original connection and upstream name remain the dispatch authority. - Invalid tool definitions no longer get automatic retries. An operator must repair the configuration before a new attempt. - Continuation changes apply only to positively identified unexpected legacy cancellations with complete empty tool inventory. Operator Stop, unknown historical cancellations, outstanding tools, and unverified provider termination keep their holds. - No database migration. The added projection fields are optional. Cancellation reason and initiator IDs remain local run evidence; Sentry receives only closed source and initiator-type labels and expectedness. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, shell execution, and GitHub tool use. The runtime does not expose the exact model variant or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7d59de6113 |
feat(connections): probe provider usage limits on demand (#14936)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connections store the AI accounts used by legacy and native runners. > - Subscription accounts can reach session, weekly, model, or paid usage limits. > - Operators need to read these limits for a specific stored account before making a routing decision. > - This pull request adds an on-demand usage probe to the connection service and account detail. > - The result preserves provider limits, reset times, paid usage, and unknown values for later consumers. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Shared contracts, the connection service and API, and the account detail UI. **Problem or motivation** Managed AI accounts lack a common operation to read their current usage limits. A local harness probe can read a different login from the account selected for an agent. **Proposed solution** Add `aiConnectionService.probeUsage()` and a board-only connection usage endpoint. Probe the selected credential grant on request. Support Codex, Claude, and Grok subscriptions, plus OpenRouter API key limits. **Alternatives considered** Harness-specific automatic polling would couple the read to execution and can read ambient credentials. This change uses the managed connection credential and leaves scheduling and admission decisions to later work. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the existing Personal & Shared AI Accounts capability. It adds no routing or quota enforcement. Related: Refs #14459 for managed OpenAI quota reads; Refs #14781 and Refs #13379 for downstream pacing and budget work. This operation reads one requested account across all three subscription providers. ## What Changed - Add typed usage snapshots and a probe capability flag to managed AI connections. - Normalize Codex, Claude, Grok, and OpenRouter responses. Keep model scopes, provider admission, reset periods, and paid allowances separate. Preserve unknown values. - Enforce company membership, credential audience, grant identity, and connection lifecycle before reading the stored secret. - Add a board-only `GET /api/companies/:companyId/ai-connections/:connectionId/usage` endpoint with `no-store` responses. - Add manual **Check usage** and **Refresh** actions to account details. Show compact usage bars, resets, admission and overage status; remove repeated descriptions and account-default copy. Clear previous results during a new request or error. - Add Storybook previews using the production account components for all four providers, initial checks, loading, and permission errors. - Add provider, authorization, runner selection, API, and UI coverage. Document provider sources and live qualification. ## Verification - Initial provider, authorization, selection, API, and UI validation passed (96 focused tests): `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/ai-connection-usage.test.ts server/src/__tests__/ai-connections.test.ts ui/src/components/ai-connections/AiConnectionUsagePanel.test.tsx server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts`. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passes for the initial implementation. After simplifying the UI, 9 usage-panel and date-helper tests, UI typecheck, token gates, and Storybook build pass. The initial feature module boundary check also passed. - Real Codex, Claude, and Grok credentials were saved to encrypted disposable connections. The actual usage HTTP route returned 200 with `status: ok`. Legacy and native runner selection checks passed. The tests started no model turn and exchanged no refresh token. The disposable databases and vaults were removed. - Live Claude responses added structured scoped limits. Live Grok responses omitted included-plan usage. Tests now cover both shapes and preserve the Grok omission as unknown. - The full workspace build passes. A full local test run hit a heartbeat feedback timeout. That case passes in isolation. The duplicate local run was stopped after all remote checks passed. The Slack ordering and OpenCode transport CI flakes also pass in isolation and on the CI rerun. - Current head: `ff3d479029a1c4248190323e221b2803cfb0d79d`. All 54 active checks pass. Two Storybook checks are intentionally skipped by the workflow. Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved review findings; the branch is mergeable. ## Risks - Subscription usage endpoints can change. Credentials can lack usage-read permission. The probe returns explicit errors without fresh limits in these cases. - A successful probe can contain partial data. Missing utilization or admission remains unknown. An enabled paid-usage switch does not prove a funded balance. - This change adds no migration. It does not change runner admission or automatic provider selection. Provider requests use fixed endpoints, disabled redirects, bounded response sizes, and a 15-second deadline. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, file editing, shell execution, and HTTP tools. The session does not expose the exact runtime model variant or context window size. Real provider credentials were used only for the authorized live checks. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
6c1a75da49 |
feat(connections): make AgentMail a default connection with inline setup (#14772)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connections give agents access to external services. > - AgentMail needs both a saved key and an inbox assigned to the agent. > - Chat requests offered a setup link instead of an inline card and could treat a saved key as complete. > - Inbox setup also hid address conflicts behind a generic server error and a separate review step. > - This pull request makes AgentMail a default connection, adds the inline card, reduces setup to two steps, and shows conflicts beside the address. > - Shared native dropdown styles also give every caret a consistent inset. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** AgentMail requests in chat did not show a usable inline connection card. Manual setup required extra screens, ignored saved account keys, and could trap new-address setup in a locked inbox dropdown. Agent selectors omitted the avatar from the selected value. A taken address could produce an HTTP 403 from AgentMail and appear as an internal server error. Native dropdown arrows also touched the right edge of their fields. **Expected behavior** Make AgentMail available as a default connection. Ask for the API key inline, with a direct link to its provider page. Default human access to the company and agent access to the requesting agent. Resume the agent only after an assigned inbox is active. Manual setup should ask for an agent and email address, then finish. Address checks should run as the user types. Taken addresses should show clickable alternatives. A domain dropdown beside the name should prefer a verified custom domain. Setup should suggest authorized saved AgentMail keys and show agent avatars in the picker and selected value. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Ask an agent to connect AgentMail when it has no assigned inbox. 2. Check that an inline API-key card appears and links to the provider's API-key page. 3. Open AgentMail setup, choose an agent, and request an address that is already taken. 4. Correct the inline error, refresh, and finish setup with the same request ID. 5. Inspect native dropdown carets in light, dark, disabled, and right-to-left states. Uses the bounded provider-error parser merged in #14768. Related work: #13256 introduced AgentMail; #14725 expanded connection search. ## What Changed - Stop recurring email queries for tasks that have no email thread. Share the query between the thread provider and activity view. Keep email-task updates and invalidation-based discovery. - Make AgentMail available without the experimental chat setting. Keep the catalog, setup and management routes, agent Channels tab, task email feed, receiving worker, and agent tools available by default. Other experimental chat providers stay gated. - Make the email address and copy icon a single clickable action with the shared Copied! confirmation. Add View inbox linking directly to the matching AgentMail console inbox, with the address encoded as one URL path segment. - Reorganize inbox Settings around the copyable email address, usage instructions, and receiving status. Move reconnect credentials into a disclosure and separate the Disconnect action. Add production Settings stories for active, paused, unassigned-address, revoked, webhook, long-address, mobile, and reconnect states. Show repair controls when the inbox has an error. Keep usage instructions tied to an active inbox with an address. - Add AgentMail channel intents and an inline key field with the direct API-key URL. - Keep setup and retry state tied to the interaction. Require an active inbox for completion. Preserve company and agent access checks. - Reduce manual setup to agent selection and email selection. Put the domain dropdown beside the address and default to a verified custom domain. Preserve explicit choices across reloads. Keep receiving settings under Advanced options. - Check the initial address and edits after a 350 ms pause. Abort superseded requests and ignore stale responses. Show clickable suggestions and retain known creation conflicts across reloads. - Add a company-scoped, manager-only address check using the saved credential. Search the visible inbox list instead of fetching an uncreated inbox: live AgentMail retains negative lookups that can break subsequent access-key creation. Unlisted addresses remain unknown; creation is authoritative. - Suggest labeled saved AgentMail keys in both manual setup and the inline card. Filter by company, provider, active credential, and current-user grants on the server. Prefer an account key and preserve the selected key or an explicit new-key choice across refresh. Use verified scope metadata and bounded concurrent checks for legacy keys. Never return secret values. - Catch an inbox-only key before the email step. Allow its existing inbox only after an explicit choice. Recover old locked drafts at the key picker. Save the replacement key before retiring an empty draft, then use a new setup URL so refresh preserves the switched account; stop if cleanup fails. Preserve already allocated addresses and their original accounts. - Use the shared AgentSelect in email setup. Show the canonical agent avatar in each option and the selected value, including other consumers of the shared component. Add regression coverage for legacy and current Lucide agent-mention icon formats. - Start each catalog Add connection with a fresh setup identity. Honor Finish setup's exact draft/account/address instead of resuming an unrelated browser draft. Return Cancel and Done to Connectors and Email settings to the inbox. Group the task/thread explanation in a How it Works card. - Route AgentMail catalog removal through the email inbox control API, including unfinished drafts. Refresh both the catalog and inbox views. - Render each inbox management tab separately. Access uses the saved account grants and agent controls; Conversations and Activity use the shared persisted email feed. Activity lifecycle actions use the email API. Reconnect returns to inbox Settings. Conversation failures show a retry instead of a false empty state. Email delivery recovery stays in the task. - Map documented provider address conflicts to a field error. Preserve actionable messages for other failures. - Preserve non-secret draft fields across refresh, scoped to the requested agent. Never save API keys in browser storage. Resume partial inbox creation with the original agent, address, and request ID. - Show an already-created address with explicit retry and new-address recovery instead of locked inputs. Preserve the original inbox and resumable draft when choosing another address. Distinguish runtime-key 404 errors and log safe provider status/operation/code. - Apply final agent access once within email setup authorization for a new account whose original installs are unchanged. Preserve later permission edits and reused account installs. Support in-place retry of progress loading. - Let a failed inline setup change keys after retiring an empty draft. Persist its replacement setup identity without storing secrets. Recover a server-saved account when refresh interrupts the save response, while preserving intentional account changes. - Render the production setup in Storybook and add error, recovery, and mobile states. - Inset native select carets in shared CSS. Preserve custom icons, listboxes, keyboard behavior, and forced-color controls. - Add browser regression coverage and an AgentMail Product E2E case with persisted-state and rendered-card evidence. ## Verification - Full `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, `pnpm check:token-gates`, and `git diff --check` passed after the default-availability change. - All 485 focused tests passed. These cover setup, management, catalog and route gates, connection intents, email authorization, Cursor execution, and the OpenAPI contract. All 39 email integration tests run with the experimental chat setting off. - The shared polling change passed four behavioral tests, UI typecheck and build, and token gates. - `tests/e2e/agentmail.spec.ts` passed with the actual server setting off. This full-stack browser test uses simulated provider responses. It covers catalog entry, saved keys, editable address and domain controls, creation, conflicts, retry, all management tabs, clipboard feedback, the provider link, and task email rendering. - In the live local browser, Add connection reached the editable email step with the saved account key. The verified custom domain was selected by default. Both domain choices worked. The existing inbox Settings page remained available. Both active inboxes completed new mail checks with the setting off. No new provider inbox or email message was created for this pass. - Earlier live provider acceptance covered creation on a verified custom domain, Finish connecting on the reported draft, successful mail checks after refresh, and catalog removal of disposable draft and active connections. Clicking the email address copied the exact address and showed Copied!. View inbox opened the same inbox in AgentMail’s console. No email messages were sent. - Production setup and Settings Storybook builds and interactions passed. Settings states include active, paused, unassigned, revoked, webhook, long-address, mobile, and reconnect. Receiving and revoked-access stories had zero accessibility violations. - Full local `pnpm test:run` on an earlier revision completed with 14,709 passing, 87 skipped, and four transient failures. All four failed cases passed in focused reruns without product changes. That serial full local command was not repeated after each follow-up. The latest-head full CI suite is the final test gate. - CI found an obsolete browser assertion that hid every channel when the flag was off. Updated it to keep AgentMail and the Channels surface visible while preserving the GitHub chat route gates. All 11 provider browser tests passed locally after scoping the Channels selector to the agent sidebar. Two initial local attempts stopped at temporary Postgres initialization. The passing run used a separate disposable database on the existing local Postgres server; it was removed after the test. - Updated the remaining sidebar and aggregator discovery assertions for default AgentMail availability. Ordinary task fixtures now return no email thread. All 128 sidebar/task-page tests and all 42 aggregator tests passed locally. - Latest head `b42bb4cd5cc9f2d01a99ab8026832d5a956ea85f`: full CI passed, with 54 successful checks including Snyk and two intentional Storybook skips. The CI run is https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37020833647. A fresh Greptile review scored 5/5 with no unresolved threads. Live model evaluations and inbound/outbound email delivery were not run. ## Risks - AgentMail no longer needs experimental opt-in. Setup still requires a human to connect an account and assign an inbox. Inline setup creates an inbox after a human submits a new or saved key. Company access, agent access, inbox assignment, and completion checks remain enforced. - AgentMail read APIs cannot prove global address availability. The visible-list check is bounded to 100 entries and cannot see inboxes outside the key’s scope. The UI reports this limitation, suggests alternatives without claiming they are free, and keeps final creation conflicts inline. Lookup outages show an error without preventing the authoritative creation attempt. - Native select CSS affects the whole app. Custom-icon selects and multi-row lists are excluded. Forced-color mode keeps the browser caret. - Saved-key discovery uses stored verified scope metadata and checks authorized legacy credentials concurrently within a shared three-second deadline. Provider outages mark legacy choices unavailable; users can still enter another key. Final use rechecks authorization and provider access. - No database migration or transport default change. Live connection remains the default. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact served model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites; full-suite limitation documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green (latest head `b42bb4cd5cc9f2d01a99ab8026832d5a956ea85f`) - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (latest head `b42bb4cd5cc9f2d01a99ab8026832d5a956ea85f`) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ec3bacc9bd |
fix(chat): hide ignored provider information (#14929)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task and agent chats show agent progress and problems that need attention. > - Codex also sends account, skill, and unrelated thread notifications. > - The runner correctly ignores that information but reports it as a warning. > - Chat then shows an internal diagnostic as an actionable provider notice. > - This pull request keeps the diagnostic in run logs and removes it from chat. > - Real provider warnings, errors, and agent replies remain visible. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Chat showed “Received a provider update” and a warning with the text “ignored unrelated provider information”. Its details said “User Actionable: Yes” even though no user action was needed. Saved conversations retained the same noise. **Expected behavior** Keep ignored provider information in the run log. Do not show it as chat activity or a user warning. Preserve real warnings and errors. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a conversation with the native Codex runner. 2. Have the provider send an account update, skill change, or unrelated thread notification during the turn. 3. Inspect live chat and reload its saved history. The regression tests also reproduce the old stored notice without a live account. **Paperclip version or commit** Source implementation on master at `e00d10d5d`. The duplicate search found no open PR for this fix. Related prior work: #13109 improved provider-notice presentation. #12367 added Codex thread normalization. This change addresses the internal information that those paths still projected as chat warnings. **Deployment mode** Native Paperclip Runner with the Codex app-server provider. The issue was seen in hosted chat and can be reproduced with local provider fixtures. ## What Changed - Map ignored unrelated Codex information to `harness.diagnostic` in the Rust and TypeScript normalizers. - Retain a bounded allowlist of redacted provider method and thread/turn identifiers. - Use the same Unicode character limit and truncation marker in both normalizers. - Share the text redactor through a pure helper. Keep provider connection code out of the standalone demo's source closure. - Omit that diagnostic and the matching legacy notice from live chat. - Omit the matching legacy notice from saved chat history. - Test diagnostic retention, account-notification integration, live and saved chat, and continued visibility of real warnings, errors, and replies. - Document the local run-log event and historical display behavior. ## Verification - Passed: 68 tests in the two affected UI transcript suites. - Passed: 60 TypeScript tests across provider events, transport behavior, and the standalone demo boundary. - Passed: 13 Rust provider-event tests and the Codex account-notification integration test. - Passed: `pnpm check:token-gates` and Cargo formatting checks. - Passed: full `pnpm build` and `pnpm -r typecheck`. After the review fix, the provider package build, typecheck, and both provider-event suites passed again. - Full local `pnpm test:run` failed: 608 files / 10,904 tests passed, 30 server suites failed, and 104 files / 4,012 tests were skipped. Most failures were embedded PostgreSQL startup errors. Two tests timed out in `heartbeat-comment-wake-batching` and `workspace-git-snapshot-streaming`. PostgreSQL startup also failed in `heartbeat-run-event-sequencing` and `native-finalization-migration`. These server files are unchanged by this PR. Isolated heartbeat reruns were skipped locally. The stable test script stopped after this general-server group, so later groups did not run locally. - The original review thread is resolved. Greptile is 5/5 on current head `683dab7cce57187c57e84c83f5e9da4ad75c9c04`. - All current-head CI gates passed, including the full server/chat/workspace test matrix, Rust and TypeScript runner suites, browser E2E, build, typecheck, and release canary. [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37021330663). - Replay the exact old warning in either transcript adapter. It must produce no chat row. A genuine provider warning or error must still produce a row. ## Risks - Low risk. The display filter matches one diagnostic code or the complete legacy warning shape. Other provider notices remain visible. - New ignored-information events use the existing harness-diagnostic event type. They retain diagnostic evidence without original account payloads. - No database migration, API permission, provider execution, or recovery behavior changes. This affects the local run log, not Telemetry or OpenTelemetry exports. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact backend model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, tool use, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run the affected tests locally and they pass (the broad local run has PostgreSQL startup errors and timeouts documented above; the full CI matrix passed) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e00d10d5d5 |
fix(connections): repair stale AI defaults from agent settings (#14916)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and controls the credentials used for their work. > - Managed AI connections resolve each responsible user's provider default. > - Agent settings created another account but kept the old default selected. > - A rejected provider test left the old account marked as connected. > - Claude ACP reported a typed login failure as a generic terminal-access error. > - This pull request repairs the selected account or selects the new login explicitly. > - Agents can save and run with the repaired credential, and failed logins request sign-in. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Fixes #14831. - Refs #13867. Environment failures remain separate from credential-health failures. ## What Changed - Add an agent-settings action to reconnect an unavailable personal default in place. Keep its connection, grant, default, and agent access. - State that a new account becomes the user's provider default. Select its returned grant before changing the agent binding. Keep the actual sign-in method. - Show default-update errors and allow retry without another provider login. - Show the agent-access choice. Connection managers start with company-wide access for their own tasks. Other members start with access for the current agent. - Use the server's connection-manager permission in the shared list response. This includes members with a custom management grant. - Mark credentials as needing attention after an explicit login rejection in Test or Save. This includes API-key 401 and 403 responses. Network, quota, and server failures keep the credential health unchanged. - Reuse the credential-generation check so an old failure cannot invalidate a newer reconnect. - Route Claude's typed provider `access` failure to the existing login-recovery flow. Replace its generic terminal-access fallback with a sign-in message. - Add regression tests and update the AI Connections documentation. ## Verification - Red: the UI tests failed on the missing reconnect action, unused returned grant, missing access choice, and lost default-update error. The server tests failed because rejected credentials stayed connected. The real ACP fixture returned `acpx_turn_failed` for typed login failures. - Green: 156 tests passed across the AI connection, hiring, agent field, and New Agent suites. All 37 environment-route tests passed. The Claude ACP authentication fixtures also passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - The full local `pnpm test:run` passed 707 files and 14,503 tests, then exited with an agent-conversation timeout and embedded PostgreSQL startup failures in unchanged suites. The isolated conversation and migration tests passed on rerun. Later local test groups did not run after this failure. - [All CI gates passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37012669356) on commit `38513dfe2`. This includes the full test matrix, browser tests, typecheck, build, Runner checks, and canary dry run. - Greptile reviewed commit `38513dfe2` and returned 5/5 with no open findings. - The regression tests use a real embedded database and a real ACP fixture process. Live provider sign-in requires a valid account and was not run. ## Risks - Connecting a new account from agent settings changes the user's provider default. The dialog states this before sign-in. - The displayed access choice can allow all company agents to use the account for its owner's tasks. Reconnect keeps the existing access. Server permissions still control installs. - Claude's typed `access` category maps to the provider's `auth_required` signal. Tool and workspace request failures retain their existing classification. - No database migration or provider credential format changes are required. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The exact served model identifier and context window are not exposed in this session. Capabilities used: reasoning, repository tools, code editing, and command execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
408f70e69f |
fix(runner): preserve stock Codex base instructions (#14920)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The native Runner connects Paperclip tasks to Codex app-server. > - Paperclip passed its runtime context as `baseInstructions`. > - That field replaces the stock Codex base prompt. > - This pull request sends the same Paperclip context as additive developer instructions. > - Codex keeps its stock prompt and still receives Paperclip task instructions and tools. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The native Codex driver and Rust provider sent Paperclip context through `baseInstructions` on thread start and resume. Codex used this text in place of its stock base instructions. Direct-chat resume also sent an empty replacement base. The Runner Lab session path used the same replacement field. **Expected behavior** Codex should retain its stock base prompt. Paperclip should add its runtime context through `developerInstructions`. Other provider facades should retain their current instruction handling. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a native Codex session through Paperclip Runner. 2. Inspect the `thread/start` request in the native provider trace. 3. Resume the session and inspect `thread/resume`. 4. Before this fix, these paths set `baseInstructions`. After this fix, the Codex paths set `developerInstructions` and omit `baseInstructions`. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against master at `cad26c6bfb736039c8ed5743da650a44792a083c`. **Deployment mode** Built from source. Native Codex app-server and runnerd paths. A local protocol probe used codex-cli 0.153.4 and a localhost Responses stub. No duplicate fix or matching public issue was found in the GitHub search. ## What Changed - Send additive developer instructions on Codex start and resume in the TypeScript driver, Rust provider, and Runner Lab session path. - Carry the additive fragment through runnerd, including runtime asset path mapping. - Preserve existing instruction fields for other provider facades, including OpenCode. - Add start/resume/direct-chat regression coverage and check the actual Rust provider request. - Document the historical option and trace field names. Record progress and follow-ups in the working checklist. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm build` — passed. - Targeted Codex driver lifecycle, driver, and live-session Vitest suites — 139 tests passed. - `cargo test --manifest-path packages/paperclip-runner/runner/Cargo.toml --locked -p paperclip-runner-core --test codex_provider` — 91 passed, 2 ignored subprocess helpers. - Real app-server probe: a localhost Responses stub captured identical 14,732-character stock base instructions on fresh start and cold resume. Both requests retained the Paperclip marker in developer input. Both stub turns completed. No paid inference was used. - Runnerd transport Vitest suite — 182 tests passed. - The initial `pnpm test:run` attempt reported local dependency-loading, embedded PostgreSQL startup, and macOS `/var` versus `/private/var` path failures. It was stopped after those failures. Loading-suite reruns passed 1,428 tests after the build; native interaction/finalization reruns passed 38 tests. A seven-suite diagnostic rerun passed 463 tests and isolated the remaining path and PostgreSQL setup failures. - With `TMPDIR=/private/tmp`, workspace, gateway, interaction, and attachment suites passed all 356 tests. The remaining environment-image and native-session-resumption suites passed all 44 tests with the same canonical temp path. All affected suites passed on rerun. The original full local command was stopped after failures and is not claimed as passing. - All 55 PR checks passed at `83281439456181396f3707eecda5d2ebc90bd14d`. Greptile scored 5/5 with no open review threads. - No paid live campaign or Product E2E browser suite was run. This change has protocol and regression coverage; it does not claim improved task quality. ## Risks - Stock Codex behavior may differ from behavior under the previous Paperclip replacement prompt. Restoring that behavior is the intended change. - Existing Codex threads retain their saved replacement base prompt. They need a provider session reset to receive the stock base. This PR does not reset active sessions or alter recovery rules. - The legacy `baseInstructions` option and trace field names remain for compatibility. They now describe the additive Paperclip fragment for Codex. - The separate Codex-through-ACP dependency patch remains a follow-up in the harness coverage checklist. This PR covers native app-server execution. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact runtime model variant and context window are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, shell execution, and test tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c46e41e81c |
fix(heartbeat): validate native MCP gateway ownership (#14914)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage agents and govern their tool access. > - Native runs receive an immutable MCP tool assignment for one agent. > - The gateway must enforce that owner when it authenticates a run token. > - Older gateway rows stored the owner only in metadata. > - This change validates the gateway and profile, binds new rows, and repairs valid older rows on reuse. > - It also delivers each native assignment once. > - Other agents cannot use the assignment, and explicit shared gateways keep their configured scope. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Builds on #14012 by @busla (Jón Levy). That PR adds agent binding and seven regressions. This PR carries that fix onto current master and adds legacy authentication, profile validation, and duplicate-delivery coverage. Related: #14864 improves discovery memory use. **What happened?** Native gateway creation stored an owner in metadata but left `agentId` null. Authentication could therefore accept another agent's run token. Managed discovery could also deliver historical native assignments again. **Expected behavior** A native assignment accepts only its owner's run token. The gateway and profile must refer to the same immutable assignment. The current assignment enters the run configuration once. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run the database fixtures in `heartbeat-runtime-mcp-servers.test.ts` on the baseline. 2. Create a native assignment and inspect its stored gateway owner. 3. Authenticate with another agent's run token, then inspect legacy reuse and managed delivery. 4. The baseline fails six ownership and delivery cases. The fix passes all twelve cases. **Paperclip version or commit** The red baseline is `f2e0f1963`. This PR is based on `cad26c6bf`, which includes the merged discovery fix. **Deployment mode** Native Paperclip Runner execution and managed Codex MCP delivery. Reproduction uses isolated database and HTTP fixtures. ## What Changed - Store the agent owner and agent context on new native gateways. - Validate profile and gateway assignment metadata before reuse or token creation. - Bind valid legacy rows with a company-scoped, null-owner update and validate the result. - Reject mismatched run tokens before legacy repair. - Identify native assignments by gateway metadata, the reserved profile key, or profile source. Reject missing or malformed provenance, including JSON null. - Exclude historical native assignments from managed gateway delivery. Keep their rows for existing runs. - Add twelve database and HTTP regressions and document the runtime contract. ## Verification - Red baseline: six regressions fail and four controls pass before the initial fix. Two additional regressions reproduce metadata-loss admission and a JSON-null TypeError before the review fix. - All twelve ownership regressions pass on the final code, including owner admission, cross-agent rejection, metadata loss, JSON-null HTTP 401, and explicit shared-gateway admission. Policy, listing-memory, and discovery HTTP coverage also passes. - Full workspace typecheck and build pass locally. Server typecheck and compilation pass again after the review fix. The final ownership and grant patches pass 42 combined database and HTTP regressions. - [Full CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37011383657) passes for `626a08ae66361cf586105877e24d806b1a7a9c20`: all 54 checks succeed; two optional Storybook checks skip. This includes full typecheck, build, all test shards, all eight E2E shards, runner verification, and the canary dry run. - Greptile scores that exact head 5/5. No review threads remain unresolved. ## Risks Invalid historical native gateway or profile metadata now rejects authentication. Valid unbound rows are repaired only when their owner reuses the assignment. Conflicting owners are never overwritten. Historical rows are retained for existing runs. Explicit shared gateways use ordinary profiles and keep their configured scopes. The reserved native profile namespace remains agent-owned even when gateway metadata is cleared. No schema or dependency changes are included. ## Model Used Original fix and seven regressions in #14012: Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5, `claude-opus-5-5`, 1M context, as reported by @busla. Extensions and verification: OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and tests. This session does not expose the exact serving model identifier or context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
483dbc8890 |
fix(tool-access): enforce stored grant restrictions (#14915)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip governs the tools that agents can discover and call. > - Stored grants can limit access to a tool, connection, or application. > - The grant matcher must enforce every restriction in that scope. > - A nonmatching allow list fell through to a policy selector matcher that ignores allow. > - This change requires an explicit allow match and validates additional selectors. > - Malformed and unknown restrictions deny access. > - Discovery and execution now enforce the same stored grant limits. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #14864 adds the shared database and HTTP discovery fixture used here. Searched existing public PRs for tool grant scope fixes. No duplicate scope-validation fix was found. **What happened?** A stored grant with a nonmatching `scope.allow` could authorize a tool. Empty or malformed allow lists, unknown selectors, and combined mismatching selectors could also authorize access. The fallback policy matcher does not validate stored grant JSON. **Expected behavior** An explicit allow list must match the requested tool, connection, or application. Every additional selector must also match. Unknown or malformed restrictions must deny access. Existing null and empty-object scopes keep their broad grant behavior. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run `tool-grant-scope.test.ts` on the baseline. 2. Create a deny profile and a grant that names another tool. 3. Attempt discovery or a call for the tool outside the grant. 4. The baseline authorizes access. The fix denies it. **Paperclip version or commit** The red baseline is `f2e0f1963`. This PR is based on `cad26c6bf`, which includes the merged discovery fix. **Deployment mode** The company-scoped MCP gateway. Reproduction uses isolated database fixtures and a deterministic HTTP provider. ## What Changed - Require an explicit allow entry to match the gateway or upstream tool name, connection, or application. - Apply all additional selectors after the allow match. - Reject unknown selectors, invalid value types, empty restrictions, and non-object scopes. - Preserve null and empty-object scope compatibility. - Add sixteen regressions, including discovery, successful execution, and revocation through the HTTP gateway. - Document stored grant scope behavior. ## Verification - Red baseline: seven restricted-scope cases and three malformed-root cases fail. HTTP discovery also exposes tools outside the grant. - All 16 grant regressions and 35 adjacent policy tests pass locally. The HTTP test excludes an ungranted tool from discovery, returns 403 for its call, and verifies that no provider call occurs. It also checks successful execution and later revocation. - Server typecheck passes. The final ownership and grant patches also pass 42 combined database and HTTP regressions. - [Full CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37011177989) passes for `803fa9440111742672c94c4471e5b98f15dd3b97`: all 54 checks succeed; two optional Storybook checks skip. This includes full typecheck, build, all test shards, all eight E2E shards, runner verification, and the canary dry run. - Greptile scores that exact head 5/5. No review threads remain unresolved. ## Risks Stored scopes with unknown keys or malformed restrictions now deny access. Operators must correct those grants before they can authorize tools. Null and empty-object scopes keep their previous broad behavior. There are no schema, dependency, or API changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, database regressions, and HTTP tests. This session does not expose the exact serving model identifier or context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
cad26c6bfb |
fix(tool-gateway): bound MCP discovery memory and concurrency (#14864)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents discover governed tools through the MCP gateway. > - A listing repeated policy and full run-row reads for each catalog tool. > - Parallel listings multiplied those allocations during run startup. > - One 900-tool baseline listing used 11,489 queries and about 1.7 GiB of extra heap in a fixture. > - This pull request shares reads within a listing and bounds whole listings across the process. > - The benefit is lower discovery memory use while execution still checks current policy. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13115. Its on-demand target change affects the same listing loop. **What happened?** MCP discovery repeated roughly 13 reads per tool. Full run snapshots and repeated connection configurations caused large allocations. Per-listing bounds alone did not limit concurrent listings across gateways. **Expected behavior** Discovery reads shared inputs once per listing. The process bounds active and queued listings. Catalog payload size and policy evaluation still grow with the catalog. Tool execution checks current access rules. **Steps to reproduce** Create a company with a remote MCP connection, 900 catalog tools, large schemas, and a large run snapshot. Send concurrent tools/list requests using a run-bound gateway token. Run the committed benchmark for a deterministic reproduction. **Paperclip version or commit** Baseline: |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
4a999089ef |
Retry transient failures in dashboard reads (#14873)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip shows company activity in the dashboard. > - The dashboard reads company, task, approval, and cost data. > - A pooled database connection can close during one of these reads. > - The driver must reject ambiguous statements because writes may have committed. > - These four dashboard queries are known to be read-only. > - This change retries only the failed read and preserves completed work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #14773, which correctly removed automatic replay of ambiguous database statements. Searched existing database and dashboard PRs. Related #8780 changes pool recycling and logging; #13925 adds dashboard consistency coverage. Neither provides these per-query retries. **What happened?** A dashboard request returns a server error when its company lookup, task count, approval count, or monthly spend query loses its database connection. Drizzle wraps the driver's connection error in `cause`. **Expected behavior** A transient connection failure gets a bounded retry of the specific read. Completed reads and budget processing are not replayed. Persistent outages and non-connection errors still fail the request. **Steps to reproduce** Inject a typed `CONNECTION_CLOSED` error into one of these reads. Then allow the next query to succeed. Before this change, the dashboard request fails immediately. ## What Changed - Apply independent retries to the company lookup, task counts, pending approval count, and monthly spend query. Each callback rebuilds its own query with the same company scope. - Extract the existing authentication retry helper as `retryIdempotentDatabaseOperation`. Preserve authentication behavior and its existing exports. - Retain the existing limit of three total attempts with 50 ms and 100 ms pauses. Match typed connection codes through the error cause chain. - Test later-read failures, unchanged query parameters, retry exhaustion, missing companies, and errors that must not retry. Document the boundary. ## Verification - Final focused dashboard, authentication, and real database wire suites: 38 tests passed. Six initial recovery regressions failed before the implementation. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed on the final source. - Independent review: no actionable findings. The reviewer separately passed all 38 focused tests and checked the code allowlist, attempt bounds, pauses, and final error identity. - `pnpm test:run`: the general-server group completed with 14,738 tests passed, 13 failed, and 87 skipped. All 13 failures match the previously reproduced clean-base macOS skill-cache failures. The two test files and their implementations are unchanged from that baseline. The runner exited after this group, so the remaining local workspace and serialized groups did not run. All corresponding Linux CI groups passed on this commit. - `pnpm build`: passed on the final source. - Full CI: 53 successful checks and 2 skips on `6a113529c0`. Greptile: 5/5 on that commit, with no review threads or remaining findings. - Merge compatibility with master `f2e0f19630`, including #14866: no conflicts. The five reviewed files are unchanged in the resulting merge tree. ## Risks A persistent outage adds at most two retries per covered query. Each connection attempt retains the configured driver timeout. The change does not repair the underlying network or database failure. Agent counts, run-activity queries, and the budget workflow stay outside these retry boundaries. General database statements and disconnected transactions are not replayed. There is no schema or authorization change. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, and test execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific serving model identifier or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (38 focused tests; the full local run has the baseline limitation documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
f2e0f19630 |
Defer agent directory cleanup until stop proof is available (#14866)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and their persistent files. > - Each run owns a temporary agent directory and a save receipt. > - Cleanup needs independent proof that the owning process stopped. > - A cleanup call without that proof currently waits for the directory lock anyway. > - A second lock failure can prevent environment release after the run already reported a failed save. > - This change skips cleanup that has no authority and retries unavailable remote copies after exact destruction proof. > - The save failure stays visible. Existing lock owners remain protected. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related work: Refs #14787 (lock diagnostics), #14695 (warm instruction ownership), #9667 (stale lock proposal), and #9872 (control-plane ownership proposal). I checked open PRs and issues. This change leaves the shared filesystem lock protocol in place and does not duplicate the warm-retention work in #14695. **What happened?** Heartbeat cleanup records an explicit unavailable instruction-save warning, then calls directory release before releasing the environment lease. Release can wait for a lock even though the copy has no process-stop proof and cannot be removed. That secondary timeout prevents the following lease-release step. If destruction proof arrives later, the unavailable copy is excluded from both recovery queries. **Expected behavior** Skip a release that cannot remove anything. Preserve the failed-save receipt and candidate fields. Once exact remote destruction is recorded, recover remote cleanup without running a provider command. Unavailable local copies retain their potentially uncollected edits even if local stop proof arrives later. A blocked cleanup must not prevent cleanup for other agents. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Prepare an agent directory, report its save unavailable, and leave process-stop proof absent. 2. Hold the shared directory lock and call release. Before this change, release waits and fails although removal is not authorized. 3. Record destruction of the copy's exact remote lease. Before this change, neither recovery sweep selects the unavailable copy. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against `efc2e6810e9bc0dc8cb412b0e7647c0db9821caa`. **Deployment mode** Local and remote execution with persistent agent directories. Tests use an isolated embedded PostgreSQL database and fixture transports. ## What Changed - Re-read receipts and skip release before lock acquisition when stop proof is absent, the copy is superseded, or cleanup is complete. Keep the same checks inside the lock. - Recover unavailable remote copies only after exact destruction proof. Preserve their unavailable state, errors, candidate hash, and candidate bytes. Keep unavailable local copies and their uncollected edits unchanged. - Store destruction-only cleanup authority with the stop proof. Later cleanup honors it after a lost database response or restart, including when a transport remains cached. - Defer failed or unproven cleanup with bounded batches and a retry delay. Keep failed cleanup visible in logs and its receipt. - Serialize preparation of an existing run with cleanup. Fresh run preparation keeps its existing admission path. - Cover held locks, receipt scope, delayed proof, batch fairness, lost update responses, cached transports, and concurrent same-run preparation with database regressions. ## Verification - Focused directory, legacy instruction-copy, shared lock, and bounded diagnostic suites: 169 tests passed across four files. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed on the final source. - `pnpm build`: passed on the final source. - Completed all selected local `pnpm test:run` groups: 733 general server suites, 149 serialized suites, and 14 workspace projects. There are 13 known macOS `EACCES` failures in the unchanged runtime skill cache tests. Their exact signatures match earlier clean-base results, and the cache source and test blobs match both that base and this PR base (existing fix: #14290). One CLI import test timed out under concurrent load; its full file passed separately (17 tests). Broad coverage began before the review corrections; the final source has the focused 169-test run, typecheck, and build. This is a local verification limit, not a passing full local suite. - `git diff --check` and local Gitleaks plus private-identifier/PII diff scans passed. - Independent review of the final source found no remaining actionable issue. Its 17 targeted tests cover crash recovery, cached transports, same-run preparation, real local edit preservation, proof scope, and batch fairness. The main focused run also covers contained scheduling failures. - Final commit `35a24085f7`: Greptile 5/5 with no recommendations and zero unresolved review threads. - Final commit `35a24085f7`: all 53 checks passed, including Canary Dry Run and the security scan; two visual checks were intentionally skipped. The workspace shard passed on retry after GitHub reported that its first runner lost communication. An earlier Canary runner shut down after the release dry run passed. Neither interruption recorded an application assertion failure; the exact final-head checks are now green. ## Risks - This repairs cleanup ordering and recovery eligibility. It does not repair an ambiguous legacy lock owner or restore unsaved files. Actual collection still fails visibly when its lock cannot be acquired. - An unavailable remote copy is recovered only after exact destruction proof. A stopped but retained environment stays protected; recovery does not execute a command that could restart it. - Unavailable local copies with later stop proof still retain potentially uncollected edits. A general local recollection or reclamation policy remains outside this change. - Existing-run preparation now waits for the same lock as cleanup. The fresh-run path is unchanged. - The cleanup mode is stored in the existing private receipt JSON. No schema migration or public API change is required. - No deployment, task replay, or runtime lock deletion was performed. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, repository tools, and test execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific model suffix or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4039d4f06b |
fix(auth): allow scoped low-trust work and owner-chat instruction edits (#14870)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Low-trust agents must work within their assigned scope. > - Task creation currently rejects these agents before checking assignment permission or scope. > - Persistent instruction saves also reject direct requests from authorized chat owners. > - This PR checks the requested action and its recorded authority instead of denying all such work. > - Agents can organize permitted work and follow their owner's instruction-edit requests while outside work stays restricted. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Low-trust agents cannot create self-assigned tasks or subtasks, even within their allowed scope. An authorized user also cannot ask an agent in their own Agent Chat to update its managed `AGENTS.md`. Agent-folder collection can hide the permission rejection behind a generic save failure. **Expected behavior** Allow task creation when assignment permissions and project or root-task scope permit it. Allow instruction self-edits during authenticated owner-chat execution, subject to the user's current edit permission. Outside tasks, subtasks, connector messages, and peer agents do not inherit that instruction authority. Explain the actual denial when a save fails. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Configure an active agent with `low_trust_review` and a project or root-task boundary. 2. Ask it to create an in-scope task assigned to itself, or a subtask of its own task. 3. As a user with permission to configure that agent, ask it in your Agent Chat to update its managed `AGENTS.md`. 4. Observe blanket permission denials rather than action-specific checks. **Paperclip version or commit** Rebased onto master at `8ec4b84e1`. This is a core authorization change, independent of adapter choice. **Deployment mode** Authenticated server. Regression coverage uses the server services, HTTP routes, native tool authority, and embedded PostgreSQL. Related work: #14775 adds human-directed task execution. #13599 concerns instruction-path configuration; this PR leaves that configuration restricted. #11988 proposes separate active-review instruction protection. #10693 reports unclear authorization denials on a different API surface. ## What Changed - Apply task-assignment checks to both HTTP creation routes and native task creation, including unassigned work. Preserve low-trust policy and source attribution on the created task and its initial plan. - Allow self-assigned decomposition within the permitted project or root-task tree. Resolve workspace-derived project scope before authorization, and reauthorize existing tasks before duplicate detection returns them. Keep cross-project and peer-assignment checks. - Derive instruction self-edit authority from the accepted run identity and authenticated owner-message wake. Recheck current permissions at save time. Bind retries to the same request and chat session. - Reject inherited instruction authority from outside tasks, subtasks, plugins, connectors, stale sessions, cancelled runs, and peer edits. - Surface permission errors in instruction and agent-folder save receipts. Tell chat agents to explain the rejected action and the specific restriction. - Update the low-trust policy and implementation documentation. ## Verification - All 297 tests in 11 focused server suites pass after the rebase. These cover owner-chat saves, private copies, warm agent directories, reset and retry boundaries, permission revocation, task creation routes, and native tool authority. - After review fixes, all 126 tests in the four affected authorization/chat suites pass. Workspace scope regressions and 146 existing creation/ownership/workspace-route tests also pass. - The final duplicate-task and CI fixes pass all 39 tests across chat-project tools, duplicate creation, environment-selection guards, and assignee-invokability routes. The duplicate-task test reproduced an unauthorized response before the fix and verifies denial plus permitted reuse afterward. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passes after rebasing; `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit` also passes after the review fixes. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` passes. - Final head `7e73270b86748792649e4ae6fbc6879f73b42b73`: all 54 checks passed, with two expected skips and no pending or failed checks. This includes builds, typechecking, the full test matrix, end-to-end tests, runner verification, the canary dry run, and security scans. - Greptile is 5/5 on that exact head, with no unresolved review threads. This change has not been deployed to staging. ## Risks This changes authorization behavior. The instruction exception must not become an inherited task permission. The check uses server-owned execution records, requires the agent's own chat and instructions, and keeps normal protected-change and responsible-user checks. Saves fail closed when current provenance or permission is missing. Owner chat grants a turn-scoped capability; the server does not classify the message intent or require approval of the exact new file bytes. Prompt injection within an authorized owner-chat turn remains a model-level risk. This is the requested owner-chat trust boundary, without a new per-edit confirmation flow. No database migration or broad trust-preset change is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, code editing, shell tools, and test execution. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8ec4b84e1c |
fix(chat): resume messages after failed runs without duplicate delivery (#14857)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A user can send a new message after a native run fails. > - The server checks that the old execution has stopped before it starts a fresh turn. > - A failed run can retain a result accepted before checkpoint or cleanup failed. > - The continuation gate treated that saved result as active recovery and held the new message forever. > - This pull request removes that false liveness signal while retaining controller, process, environment, and authorization checks. > - Live staging then exposed a second defect: chat admission created a successor without consuming the original deferred receipt, so completion delivered the message again. > - Consume that exact receipt atomically with admission, while preserving separate turns for later chat messages. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A new user message stayed in the queue with `controller_settling` after the previous run had reached `terminal_failure`. The old coordinator had no lease owner but still had a `resultId`. Its remote environment had a verified stop receipt. **Expected behavior** Start one fresh turn after execution has stopped and normal admission checks pass. Preserve the failed run and its accepted result as history. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Accept a native result, then fail checkpoint or cleanup and exhaust recovery. 2. Retain the result ID on the terminal failure record and stop the execution environment. 3. Send a new user message. Before this fix, it waits forever for the finished controller. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced in a database-backed regression test on `26900655b`. **Deployment mode** Server with a native runner and remote sandbox. Local process stop checks also apply. Related: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14775. Searched existing PRs for retained-result continuation fixes; no duplicate found. ## What Changed - Remove the retained-result veto for terminal failures. - Keep controller ownership, successor, process, environment cleanup, pending decision, and ordinary admission checks. - Add regressions for retained results, active execution, missing stop evidence, and delayed remote cleanup. - Atomically consume the resumed receipt in agent chat, even though chat does not coalesce other queued messages. - Reproduce completion-time duplicate promotion, race cleanup against periodic recovery, and prove a subsequent chat message keeps its own turn. - Document that a saved result does not make a terminal failure active. - Keep exhausted workspace export on its separate repair path, tested through the production finalizer. ## Verification - Red: retained-result admission failed with `controller_settling` before the original fix. The new chat-specific regression then reproduced duplicate promotion when the first reply finished. - Green: 406 tests across native continuation, workspace-export recovery, and the wake-queue module passed on `cbc531cc0`. - The chat regressions exercise real Postgres transactions, simultaneous recovery callbacks, successful completion, the production queue-drain use case, and repeated drain attempts. A distinct follow-up remains a separate turn. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on `cbc531cc0`. - The earlier full local test run encountered a timeout and follow-on failure in unchanged AI connection-adoption tests; all 50 tests passed on isolated rerun. That local run was stopped after the full CI test matrix passed on the earlier head. - All 54 CI checks passed on `cbc531cc0` (2 skipped), including the full test matrix and browser shards. One unchanged interaction-route test returned HTTP 500 on its first CI attempt; its full 84-test file passed locally, and the failed shard passed on one targeted rerun. - Greptile reviewed `cbc531cc0`: 5/5, no unresolved findings. - Live staging first verified that the original saved message resumes and receives a successful response; that test exposed the duplicate now covered above. - Deployed exact commit `cbc531cc0410e1ef6e8811c6c5c014c3528351ed` to the affected staging workspace; deployment verification, health, authentication, and startup recovery passed. - Submitted a fresh message through the browser. The agent replied in 39 seconds; server records show exactly one successful run, native phase `committed`, no error, and an empty queue. A later check more than a minute after completion found no duplicate run. ## Risks The change affects admission after native execution failure and consumption of a resumed deferred receipt. A fresh turn must never overlap the prior execution, and consuming one chat receipt must not absorb later messages. Tests retain the controller, process, and remote-stop guards. This change does not migrate data, apply an old result, or reset the old retry budget. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6). The exact runtime model identifier and context window are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, database-backed tests, and browser inspection. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
dd9983b894 |
fix(adapter-utils): release restore locks when a process crashes (#14869)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent runs restore workspace files and collect instruction-file changes. > - Writers to the same target directory must wait for each other. > - The current lock records a PID, which a new process can reuse after a crash. > - A reused PID can keep an orphaned lock alive and make each later run fail. > - This pull request makes a SQLite file lock decide ownership. The OS releases it when the process exits. > - Later runs can proceed after a crash, and concurrent live writers remain protected. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #10914. This addresses crash recovery. It does not cancel a stalled operation in a process that is still alive. Related work: #9667, #14787, and #12187. The earlier attempt in #9667 assumes one live server per lock root. This implementation uses an OS-backed lock to support concurrent writers without treating a different process token or an old timestamp as proof of a dead owner. It retains the private lock root and bounded timeout diagnostics from the merged changes. After a process dies while holding a restore lock, a replacement process can reuse its PID. The existing `process.kill(pid, 0)` check then reports a live owner forever. Later runs can complete their model turn but fail during file collection or restore. ## What Changed - Hold a SQLite `BEGIN IMMEDIATE` transaction for each directory write. Use the existing built-in `node:sqlite` dependency. - Keep each lock database on a stable inode. Keep PID and time metadata only for diagnostics. - Retain the 30-second asynchronous wait and existing timeout error code and diagnostic fields. - Fail closed when an old directory lock exists. Document a stopped-writer upgrade and rollback procedure. - Add real child-process tests for crashes, PID reuse, live owners, and connection cleanup. Cover callback failures, independent targets, stable inodes, invalid lock files, and ambiguous legacy records. ## Verification - Before the fix, the crash/PID-reuse test and the live-owner test both failed. Both pass with this change. - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/directory-merge-lock.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/workspace-restore-merge.test.ts`: 56 tests passed. - Restore and agent-file working-copy integration tests: 118 tests passed before the additional connection-cleanup test. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - Full GitHub CI: all checks passed, including Linux workspace tests, server test shards, build, typecheck, and browser tests. - Greptile: 5/5, with no review threads or unresolved comments. - `pnpm test:run`: started locally, then stopped with SIGINT (exit 130) after full CI passed. The local serial run did not complete and is not counted as a full local pass. The completed CI shards provide the full-suite result. ## Risks - **Upgrade and rollback require a drain.** Stop every old writer that shares an instance root before switching protocols. Old and new versions must not write concurrently. - Existing legacy `.lock/` directories remain blocking. After all writers stop, preserve run evidence and move those directories to an operator scratch directory. The new code does not infer that they are abandoned from PID or age. - Never delete or replace a `.lock.sqlite` file while writers can run. These small files remain after release. - The shared filesystem must support reliable SQLite locking. Broken network-filesystem locking is unsupported. - This change prevents new orphaned ownership. It does not recover file changes lost during earlier failed collections, or interrupt a live operation that stalls. - No application database migration or new native dependency is required. See `doc/workspace-restore-locks.md` for the procedure. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex based on GPT-6, with code execution and repository tools. The exact model variant and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused regression and integration suites; see the full-suite note above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
efc2e6810e |
fix: show each task once in dashboard agent cards (#14847)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their tasks. > - The dashboard shows recent agent activity in compact cards. > - Those cards use run records, so two runs for one task can create duplicate task cards. > - An operator needs to see each task once when scanning the dashboard. > - This pull request selects one run per linked task before it applies the card limit. > - The live runs page still shows each run for run inspection. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The dashboard showed the same task in two agent cards when that task had both an active run and a completed run. **Expected behavior** The dashboard should show a linked task at most once. It should keep the active run card when one is present. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start an agent run for a task that already has a completed run. 2. Open the company dashboard. 3. Observe two cards linked to the same task. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on the pre-change master at `8b4aa0692`. **Deployment mode** Local dev, built from source. The bug is in the core dashboard UI and does not depend on an agent adapter or database mode. ## What Changed - Select distinct linked tasks from capped active and recent run samples before applying the dashboard card limit. - Keep separate cards for runs without a linked task. - Preserve the dashboard's count of additional distinct cards behind the live-runs link. - Add UI and embedded Postgres regression tests for duplicate runs and document the dashboard rule. - Give the existing multi-request cross-tenant authorization test enough time on loaded CI runners. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/ActiveAgentsPanel.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/api/heartbeats.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/dashboard-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-live-run-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - Review the dashboard with an active and a completed run on the same task. Confirm that it shows one card. Open Live agent runs to inspect both run records. ## Risks - A very high volume of recent runs for one task can fill the capped sample and leave older tasks off the dashboard. The Live runs page remains available for full run inspection. - The dashboard may fetch up to 50 distinct run representatives to preserve its overflow count. The default run API response and persisted data are unchanged. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The runtime does not expose the exact model ID or context window size to this task. The model used reasoning, tool calls, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
6f2ce27ca7 |
fix(workspaces): prepare checkouts without a local seed config (#14810)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task preparation can create an isolated Git worktree and run its setup script. > - The Paperclip repository setup script also prepares a seeded development instance. > - A server configured through environment variables can have no local seed config. > - This stops ordinary task preparation before the agent starts. > - This pull request prepares checkout dependencies when no seed source exists, while preserving errors for invalid sources and existing development instances. > - Tasks can start without creating or claiming a seeded development runtime. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A task with the Paperclip repository fails during setup when the host has no repository-local or default instance config. The automatic worktree provisioner requires a seed source even when the task only needs the checkout. **Expected behavior** A plain checkout should prepare its dependencies without a local development database. A missing custom source, invalid source path, or existing development instance with a missing source should still fail. Starting a seeded runtime must still require a valid source. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run an environment-configured Paperclip server without a local instance config. 2. Add the Paperclip repository to a project. 3. Start a task that uses an isolated Git worktree without a custom provision command. 4. Observe the setup error before agent execution. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against `0d3e7bf6ac` with a real script subprocess and workspace realization regression. **Deployment mode** Environment-configured server with external PostgreSQL. **Additional context** Searched open and closed GitHub PRs and issues. Related work: Refs #14795 (seed-source diagnostics) and Refs #11733 (source validation). This change keeps source validation and seed-readiness checks in place. ## What Changed - Permit dependency setup when the default seed config is absent (including the Docker image config path) and the worktree has no development-instance state. - Keep missing custom configs, invalid paths, and lost sources for existing instances as errors. - Create no config, environment file, or seed manifest for a plain checkout. - Keep dependency install failures visible and allow normal instance setup once a source becomes available. - Cover the setup script, seed-runtime refusal, and automatic server worktree realization. - Document the difference between checkout preparation and seeded-runtime readiness. ## Verification - Regression tests failed before the fix for absent-source checkout preparation and dependency setup. - `bash -n scripts/provision-worktree.sh` - `node --test scripts/__tests__/provision-worktree-self-heal.test.mjs` — 34 passed; 1 existing flock-dependent test skipped on macOS. - Server regression — 2 passed, covering an unset config and the Docker image default path. - `pnpm build` — passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed. - All CI checks passed, including the full test shards, build, typecheck, browser tests, and canary dry run. - The first local `pnpm test:run` encountered two chat-test failures because skill discovery selected an unrelated parent directory. Both tests pass at the PR commit in a clean temporary checkout. The full local run was not completed; the redundant clean run was stopped after the complete CI suite passed. - `git diff --check` and added-line secrets/PII scan passed. - Greptile: 5/5, no comments. The branch has no merge conflicts. - No live tenant deployment or task retry was performed. ## Risks - A new checkout with no implicit seed config now completes dependency setup. It has no seeded development instance. A runtime request still fails until a valid source exists. - Existing instances and custom source paths retain their failure behavior. The script does not synthesize a source from environment credentials or copy a live database. - No schema, API, or task-setting changes. Revert the commit to restore the previous setup behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), with tool-assisted analysis, code edits, and local tests. The runtime did not expose a verified model variant or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
6d654f63d1 |
feat(apps): make MCP action test results readable (#14859)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connected Apps let an operator control which MCP actions an agent can use. > - The Permissions page lets the operator run a real action as an agent. > - The Test dialog displayed the nested MCP response as escaped JSON. > - A useful result was hard to read, even when the action worked. > - This pull request renders known MCP content as a readable preview and keeps the raw response available. > - The benefit is faster validation without losing the data needed to diagnose a failure. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The per-action Test dialog on a connection's Permissions page. **Subsystem affected** ui/ — React board UI. **Current behavior** The dialog shows the gateway response as an escaped JSON blob. Text content that contains JSON stays inside a string. The obsolete connection Test page also keeps a separate set of stories. **Proposed behavior** The dialog uses structured MCP content when present. It parses JSON text blocks when possible. It shows compact tables, cards, fields, or plain text. It keeps the full raw response behind a control and opens that view for errors or unknown block shapes. Stories exercise the Permissions page dialog, and the obsolete Test page and stories are removed. **Reason and benefit** An operator can inspect a successful action result at a glance and still inspect the exact gateway response when a call fails or looks wrong. **Breaking changes** No API or stored data changes. The Test dialog presentation changes. The raw response stays available. **Additional context** I tested a read-only Notion search through the real Permissions page. The dialog showed three result cards and the raw response control worked. Storybook uses invented example data. No directly matching public issue or open PR was found in the GitHub search. ## What Changed - Render structured MCP output and JSON text content in the action Test dialog. - Show wide rows as cards, keep short rows as tables, and retain the raw response for diagnosis. - Remove the obsolete connection Test page and its stories. - Add focused dialog tests and Permissions page Storybook cases for success, errors, mixed blocks, and malformed blocks. - Document the Test dialog result behavior in the connection playbook. - Keep agent mention icons visible when the Lucide icon node is unavailable in server rendering, which repaired a repeatable CI failure. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/ui` — passed (7,111 tests). - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/apps/app-detail/ActionTestDialog.test.tsx` — passed (11 tests). - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/ui ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx` — passed (53 tests). - `pnpm test:run` — started, then stopped after the review fixes changed the head; the full sharded suite passed in CI. - `pnpm build` — passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` — passed. - Use a connected MCP app. Open Permissions, select a read action, and run Test. Inspect the preview and the raw response control. ## Risks - MCP tools can return provider-specific block shapes. Unknown blocks open the raw response so the operator can inspect the exact result. - Row and field previews limit visible data. The raw response preserves the complete result. > This is a targeted improvement to the existing Connected Apps item in `ROADMAP.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The session used tool access, code execution, and browser validation. The exact deployment ID and context window were not exposed to the session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
527e146980 |
feat(ui): share animated agent setup prompts (#14862)
Use the shared animated prompt-copy control across setup, invitations, webhooks, and task handoffs. Preserve first-click copying, clipboard recovery, and logo continuity. Add Storybook coverage and restore mention icon masks for the current Lucide data shape. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
6395cae072 |
fix(runner): ship provider pack in the standard Docker image (#14854)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Remote OpenCode and ACPX runs need a provider pack from the application build. > - Cloud now builds its application image from the standard production image. > - The provider pack was added only to the legacy cloud image target. > - The standard image therefore cannot supply the pack to downstream Cloud images. > - This pull request adds the pack to the production image and lets the cloud target inherit it. > - Remote runs can then use the pack that matches the application source commit. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13827. Refs #14024. The standard production image does not include the remote provider pack. Downstream Cloud images inherit that omission. Remote OpenCode and ACPX runs fail with `runner_remote_provider_artifact_incompatible` and ask for `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_REMOTE_PROVIDER_PACK_PATH`. ## What Changed - Build and copy the provider pack into the standard production image. - Set the pack path and check that an unprivileged user can read its artifacts and execute Node. - Let the legacy cloud target inherit the pack from production. - Add regression checks for production packaging and cloud inheritance. - Document stamped image behavior and the default pack path. ## Verification - The 12 focused Docker stamp and provider-pack reuse tests pass on commit `4a11f8d52aead55f85527c8e82c6d7f2644ce0da`. - The new packaging regression failed against the old Dockerfile and passed with the fix. - On the current commit, `pnpm build` and `pnpm -r typecheck` pass. All seven standard-image contract tests also pass. - The current-head CI build, typecheck, test, browser, and native Runner checks passed. The local full suite hit one chat-channel assertion failure; that exact test passed in isolation. The remaining local run was stopped after CI completed to avoid duplicating its full suite. An earlier run on the pre-rebase base had a heartbeat comment batching timeout; the external chat wait integration suite passed all 142 tests in isolation. - [The stamped preview image build passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36885002850/job/110446106393), including the production-stage provider pack build, copy, and unprivileged artifact readability/executable check. Publication, compatibility validation, and deployment of this exact commit to a staging QA instance passed. - Reproduced the exact missing-pack error on an existing staging image with Paperclip Runner, ACPX, and Claude in a remote Daytona computer. The legacy Claude adapter succeeds with the same account and computer. After deploying this commit, the same native task succeeded: it computed `5050` with a real remote shell command, wrote a proof file, read it back in a separate call, uploaded the file as a deliverable, and completed the task. The uploaded file contents and Done state persisted after a page reload. The run trace confirms Paperclip Runner, ACPX, and Claude. The first run took 2m 59s, including approximately 97s of remote artifact preparation. A second native run read the unchanged file from the prior run and completed successfully. Its startup took about 120s; this verifies repeated execution and file persistence, not fast provider-pack reuse. ## Risks - Stamped standard images now include the provider pack and its build cost. A pack build failure now fails the production image build. - Unstamped local builds still skip pack generation. Setting the path alone does not create a pack. - No database, provider authentication, or runner verification rules change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact serving model identifier and context window are not exposed in this session. Capabilities used: repository inspection, code editing, shell verification, and browser testing. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
33a00d2f1e |
fix(ui): reopen last visited agent chat (#14848)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Agent Chat keeps one conversation for each agent and board user. > - The Chat sidebar entry opens the agent chooser each time. > - A user must then find and reopen the chat they just used. > - The browser already records recent agent chat visits by company and user. > - This pull request uses that record to reopen the last available chat. > - The chooser still serves users who have no available saved chat. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #14706 added the secondary Agent Chat navigation. **What happened?** The Chat sidebar entry opened the agent chooser, even after a user opened an agent chat. **Expected behavior** The Chat entry should reopen the last agent chat visited by the current user in the current company. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Enable Agent Chat and open a chat with an agent. 2. Open another page. 3. Select Chat in the sidebar. 4. Observe the agent chooser instead of the chat. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master at `0829d94af`. **Deployment mode** Local development, browser UI. The change also uses the same browser storage path in authenticated mode. ## What Changed - Use the existing recent chat record when the Chat landing route opens. - Check saved agents against the current roster and chat history before redirecting. - Keep the chooser when no saved chat is available, and show a retry state for load errors. - Add route tests and update the Agent Chat implementation spec. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/AgentChats.test.tsx ui/src/lib/recent-agent-chats.test.ts` — 16 tests passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` — passed. - `pnpm exec playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts tests/e2e/agent-chat-sessions.spec.ts --grep 'secondary chat navigation preserves layout'` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed on the final commit. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` — passed earlier in this branch; latest-head CI completed all 47 jobs successfully. - `pnpm test:run` reported an unrelated native runtime test failure before it was stopped. That test and an unrelated external object refresh test passed in isolation. CI runs the same suites on the PR. - To check in the UI: open an agent chat, leave it, and select Chat. The same chat should open. Clear the recent chat record or use another company to see the chooser. ## Risks - The recent order is stored in the browser. Clearing browser storage returns the user to the chooser. - An existing chat ID is stored with its visit. If the chat is removed, the landing route skips that visit when history loads. Cross-tab storage removal clears the identity; failed writes retain an in-tab fallback. - The landing route waits for the agent roster and validates saved issue IDs against chat history when available. If history fails, an active agent chat can still open; roster or session failures show a retry action. - No database or API contract changes are required. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The runtime did not expose an exact API model ID or context window. It used reasoning, repository tools, shell commands, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4ac374103f |
fix(connections): repair Asana MCP and add shared-app sign-in (#14756)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Connections let agents use provider tools through the permission
gateway.
> - Asana provides an official remote MCP server, but its v2 server
requires a registered MCP OAuth app.
> - Setup can discover retired v1 endpoints and send a callback that
differs from the displayed URL.
> - This pull request repairs custom app setup and adds sign-in through
Paperclip's shared app.
> - Users can choose their own app without enrolling with Paperclip
Cloud.
> - Agents can use Asana tools after the user connects their account and
sets action permissions.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Related: #14739 supplies the personal credential repair used by resumed
Asana setup. No duplicate Asana authentication PR was found.
**What happened?**
Asana setup failed even with a user-created app. Root discovery metadata
still points at v1. MCP v2 uses the Asana OAuth issuer and requires an
MCP app with a client secret. Local setup also displayed a localhost
callback while an Origin header could make authorization use a numeric
loopback callback.
**Expected behavior**
Sign in with Paperclip's app when its broker profile is available. Keep
custom MCP app setup available without Cloud enrollment. Use the correct
issuer, callback, client credentials, and resource throughout setup.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Open Asana in the connection catalog.
2. Supply an Asana MCP app's client ID and secret.
3. Start OAuth on a local instance opened with a numeric loopback
address, or resume a draft that cached v1 metadata.
4. Observe the wrong discovery endpoint or callback mismatch.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Reproduced from
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
0829d94af2 |
fix(auth): derive low-trust human direction from existing execution records (#14775)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Low-trust review contains work that may include hostile input. > - Its default intake boundary currently blocks direct human chat and tasks outside that boundary. > - Human direction should authorize the assigned work while preserving containment. > - Existing conversations and execution requests already identify direct human instructions. > - This pull request derives exact-task authority from those records and the current assignee. > - The agent can perform that work without gaining access to unrelated tasks or privileged tools. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A low-trust agent with a project boundary rejects its owner's direct Agent Chat before provider execution. Human-assigned tasks outside that project fail the same check. **Expected behavior** An authorized human can talk to the agent or assign it a task. The exact task runs with its existing sandbox, credential, and tool restrictions. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Enable Agent Chat and isolated workspaces. Configure a sandbox agent with low-trust review scoped to an intake project. 2. Send the agent a direct board chat message, or assign it a projectless task. 3. Observe `low_trust_boundary_mismatch` before execution. Related: #14766 adds private task directories for repo-free low-trust execution. It is now merged into master and included in the branch base, so CI and staging verify the combined behavior. ## What Changed - Derive owner-chat access from existing conversation identity. - Derive exact-task access from the existing human requester and server-owned request origin, including coalesced requests. Plugin and external sender attribution do not authorize work. - Follow existing `retryOfRunId` database links for automatic continuations, checking company, agent, and task throughout; cancelled ancestors cannot grant authority. - Require a live run and current assignment. Preserve sandbox, credential, privileged-tool, responsible-user, and quarantined-output checks. - Retain board backlog assignments in existing request records without starting execution. Reassignment cancels old human requests in the common service transaction, including plugin writes; late settlement cannot revive them. - Add real database and HTTP coverage for request provenance, retry ancestry, cancelled runs, concurrent reassignment, spoofing, and containment. Document the rule. - Preserve legacy board assignment requests through their existing source, reason, and human requester. - Use the existing wrapped-error helper for concurrent chat-question idempotency; a deterministic race test reproduces the CI failure before the fix and passes after it. - No new schema, migrations, or user-identity fields. Existing requester columns hold attribution. ## Verification - Passed the focused database, policy-retention, HTTP, and reassignment tests locally. The HTTP test creates a task through the real board route and checks the resulting persisted wakeup before exercising agent reads, comments, mutations, and review handoff. - Database tests hold a reassignment transaction open to verify coherent authorization before and after commit, with a two-connection pool. They cover retries, coalesced requests, cancelled ancestry, invalid cross-company/agent/task links, cycles, and forged attribution. - Full local `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on the final commit (`d107c26df`). [Latest-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36815589542) passed: 54 successful checks, two expected skips, including all eight browser-test shards. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact commit with no unresolved threads. Local tests were targeted; the full test suite ran through CI’s test matrix. - The revised HTTP suite passed all 13 tests; database authorization tests passed all 11, including legacy compatibility and late watchdog settlement; the backlog route contract passed all 3 tests. Another 102 tests covering durable chat admission, wake queues, and Cursor execution passed. - All 90 interaction-service tests passed with both create calls deliberately held until their optimistic reads complete, forcing duplicate-key recovery. That forced race failed before switching to the shared wrapped-error helper. - Previous staging proof covered owner chat and projectless task persistence. The simplified revision has not been redeployed; that earlier proof is not claimed for the new implementation. ## Risks - This is an authorization change: only the live run's exact task qualifies, and normal responsible-user restrictions still apply. - Existing request and retry records are authoritative. Merely naming a responsible/originating user or an external connector sender does not qualify. - Reassignment invalidates existing human request records transactionally. A cancelled run or request cannot regain authority when the task is assigned back. - Ordinary task exceptions require server-owned origin or the legacy board assignment source/reason/actor combination. Existing owner chats use conversation identity. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser testing. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
467125fafb |
feat(connections): one-screen connector setup with stated defaults (#14811)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agents use Connections (the Apps catalog) to act in services like
Notion, GitHub, Google Workspace and Railway
> - Each connector asked the user to answer setup questions before it
went to the provider. Most of the questions already had the correct
answer selected
> - ROADMAP.md lists "simpler setup" for Apps and Connections as ongoing
work. This change continues that work
> - This pull request removes the questions that Paperclip can answer
itself. It states the defaults in one line and moves the choices behind
"Change" and onto the Permissions tab
> - The benefit is that most connectors take one click in Paperclip and
then the provider's own consent screen
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public issue exists. This is the description, from the enhancement
template.
**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The setup flow for tool connectors in the Apps catalog.
**Subsystem affected**
Apps and Connections: `ui/src/features/connections`,
`ui/src/pages/apps`, the `packages/shared` app definitions, and the
OAuth routes in `server/src/routes/tool-access.ts`.
**Current behavior**
Every connector opened with an Access step. The step asked who can use
the connection and which agents get it, and both answers were already
selected. 18 connectors also asked "How do you want to connect?" when
Paperclip could rank the methods. The Google apps and Postman also asked
"What should Paperclip be able to do?" before sign-in. The four gateway
connectors (Zapier, Arcade, Composio, Executor) used a separate two-step
wizard. Asana was pinned to a customer-owned OAuth app, so the user had
to register an app in Asana's developer console. The "Set all" control
on the Permissions tab changed only one action. After the user approved
access, Railway's consent page showed "you can close this window" and
did not return to Paperclip.
**Proposed behavior**
One screen per connector, with one primary button. The screen states the
defaults in one sentence, for example "Connects for everyone in your
organization, available to all agents". A "Change" link opens one
Advanced panel. When the provider's metadata allows dynamic client
registration, Paperclip registers a client itself. Connecting lands on
the Permissions tab. On that tab, "Set all" changes every action in the
group.
**Reason and benefit**
The user makes fewer decisions before the connection exists. Most
choices are easier to make after the connection, on the Permissions tab,
where a change has an immediate effect.
**Breaking changes**
None. No schema or API change. Existing connections keep their settings.
## What Changed
- **No Access step.** `ConnectionSetupFlow` no longer has the Access
step. The flow shows the resolved default above the primary button and
on the completion screen. The access controls moved into one Advanced
panel. The panel opens automatically only when a setting in it is
required.
- **A default method for every app.** The flow always picks the ranked
default method. Alternate methods are in the Advanced panel. The Google
and Postman capability choice is not asked before sign-in. The
write-capable method is the default.
- **Gateway connectors.** `RemoteMcpProductionSetup` (Zapier, Arcade,
Composio, Executor) no longer has its own Access step. Its commit path
and the main commit path use one helper, `askFirstCatalogEntryIdsFor`,
for server-suggested defaults.
- **Dynamic registration from live metadata.**
`canRegisterOAuthClientDynamically` now allows registration when the
provider advertises a registration endpoint, even if the catalog entry
lists only customer-owned clients. The Asana and Linear definitions and
catalog text match live probes. Asana issues clients for loopback
callbacks only, so a hosted deployment still needs an Asana app.
- **Connection setup states.** New
`packages/shared/src/connection-setup-state.ts` sorts each method into
`instant`, `authorize`, `paste` or `register`. The gallery card verb
("Connect" or "Add key") comes from this resolver and the instance's
ownership availability.
- **Generic MCP.** The generic path no longer asks "Does it need a key?"
first. A credential challenge from the server shows the key field.
- **Permissions tab.** Each action row shows its risk level. Each group
has a "Set all" control. The control sends one change for the whole
group. Before, each row's save started from the same render, so the
saves overwrote each other. The Zapier/Arcade/Composio/Executor setup
screen had the same defect.
- **OAuth callback interstitial.** A cross-site browser navigation to
`/api/tools/oauth/callback` gets a small same-origin "Finishing your
connection…" page. That page repeats the request, and the repeat does
the code exchange. Railway's consent page replaces itself after about
two seconds, and the code exchange plus tool discovery takes longer than
that. The interstitial uses only a meta refresh, because the OAuth code
is single-use. Requests without `Sec-Fetch-Site: cross-site` take the
old path.
- **Linear registers through its MCP server.** Linear pins the console
endpoints at `linear.app`. Pinned endpoints now replace discovery only
when the method cannot register, or when the connection has an
operator-entered client. So a Linear connection now finds the
registration endpoint at `mcp.linear.app`.
- **Own-OAuth-app recovery stays on the one-click screen.** When the
method also accepts a customer-owned client, the client fields are in
the Advanced panel. The panel opens after a failed sign-in. "Try again"
resumes the draft with the operator's client.
- **E2E specs** follow the one-screen flow. The Access-step clicks are
removed, the specs open **Change** before they pick agents, and they
expect GitHub's **Add key** verb.
- **Default permissions do not change.** New connections still allow
every action. The user can set actions to Ask first or Off on the
Permissions tab.
## Verification
- `cd ui && npx vitest run src/pages/apps src/features/connections
--no-file-parallelism`
- `cd packages/shared && npx vitest run src/app-definitions.test.ts
src/connection-setup-state.test.ts`
- `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts
src/__tests__/remote-mcp-connectors.test.ts`
- `pnpm check:token-gates`
- New tests:
- `PermissionsPanel.group.test.tsx` checks that "Set all" sends one
change for the whole group. It fails on the old code.
- `action-permissions.test.ts` checks the group update.
- `connection-setup-state.test.ts` checks the four setup states.
- A server test checks that a cross-site callback gets the interstitial
and does not use the OAuth state, and that the same-origin repeat
completes the connection.
- Manual check on a hosted staging deployment. GitHub, Google Drive,
Composio, Notion, PostHog and Railway each connected from one screen and
returned to the Permissions tab. On Railway, "Set all" changed all 65
write actions, and the change remained after a reload.
- Visual changes: snapshot baselines are intentionally not updated. See
the `doc/design/DECISION-SHEET.md` entry "Per-change snapshot
verification demoted to dormant (Jul 13 2026)".
## Risks
- **Fewer confirmation clicks.** Organization-wide access is the
default, and the user does not confirm it on a separate step. This was
already the preselected answer. The flow shows the default before the
user clicks and again after the connection.
- **Google write scope.** Google apps now request the write-capable
scope by default. A narrower scope needs a new sign-in.
- **Dynamic registration from live metadata.** A provider can advertise
registration and then reject a redirect URI. Asana rejects hosted
callbacks, for example. In that case registration fails, and the
customer-owned client path remains available for recovery.
- **Callback interstitial.** The OAuth callback adds one same-origin
step for cross-site browser navigations. Browsers without `Sec-Fetch-*`
headers use the old direct path.
- Chat and bot connectors (Discord, Telegram, Microsoft Teams, iMessage)
do not change.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used through
Claude Code with tool use (shell, file editing, browser automation) and
extended thinking. It wrote the code, the tests and this description. A
human product owner directed the work and tested it by hand.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: scotttong <squadbot000@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
0dc8d80eea |
Clarify worktree seed source setup failures (#14795)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Managed worktrees can prepare an isolated Paperclip development instance. > - The built-in provisioner requires a canonical registered seed source config. > - A missing source currently has the same message as a rejected symlink or non-regular file. > - This pull request separates those messages and names the supported setup choices. > - Operators can choose the intended setup without changing the source-validation guards. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A plain repository checkout can select the control-plane instance as its seed source. If that instance runs with environment-only configuration, the source config file can be unavailable. The provisioner stops with a message that also covers noncanonical files and gives no repair guidance. **Expected behavior** The error should identify the selected source and distinguish an unavailable prerequisite from a rejected file. It should explain that a seeded development instance needs a canonical registered source. It should describe the explicit no-op only for a checkout-only worktree. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use a plain base checkout with no repository-local config. 2. Leave the control-plane instance config file absent. 3. Run the built-in worktree provisioner against an isolated checkout. **Paperclip version or commit** Base commit `c8f874311c`. **Deployment mode** Managed local worktrees, including servers configured only through environment variables. Related: #11733 adds deeper source-readiness checks. #11735 changes runtime and seed lifecycle handling. This change only improves the existing shell guard's diagnostics. ## What Changed - Distinguish unavailable source configs from symlinks and non-regular files. - Identify whether the selected source belongs to the base workspace or control-plane instance. - Explain seeded-instance prerequisites and the explicit checkout-only setup choice. - Verify failure still precedes target-state creation and CLI invocation. - Document the setup choice and its runtime-readiness limit. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/__tests__/provision-worktree-self-heal.test.mjs`: 21 passed; one platform-gated test skipped because macOS lacks `flock`. - `bash -n scripts/provision-worktree.sh` and `git diff --check`: passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/ai-connections.test.ts`: 50 passed after running the installed PostgreSQL package's own symlink hydration script in this worktree. - `pnpm test:run`: attempted, then stopped after unrelated database suites failed at startup. The offline install had omitted PostgreSQL native library symlinks. The focused database rerun above verifies the local repair; the complete suite is delegated to CI. - `pnpm build`: passed. - [Required PR CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36797650741) passed on `0a3ba63e12`: 50 successful checks and two intentional Storybook skips. Greptile scored that exact commit 5/5; there are zero unresolved review threads and no merge conflicts. ## Risks - Diagnostics only. This does not supply a source config or repair an existing blocked task. - The failure predicates and exit status stay unchanged. Symlink and non-regular-file errors do not recommend skipping setup. - The checkout-only no-op requires an explicit policy choice. It does not grant runtime or seed readiness. - No schema, migration, tenant policy, deployment, or Sentry reporting change. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6-based Codex, with reasoning, shell tools, and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed by this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
4b9a6000f7 |
Add bounded evidence for directory lock timeouts (#14787)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent files use directory locks during collection and cleanup. > - A lock timeout can fail finalization after the model turn completes. > - The timeout currently identifies no owner state or waiting operation. > - This pull request adds bounded evidence to the existing run failure report. > - Operators can distinguish a known local holder from a possible old lock without changing lock safety. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A directory lock timeout does not distinguish active local work from an owner record left by an earlier process. The stored execution stage can also precede the cleanup operation that failed. **Expected behavior** The failure report should identify the waiting operation and expose bounded ownership clues. It must preserve the timeout and keep unknown ownership protected. **Steps to reproduce** Hold a directory merge lock while a second caller reaches its acquisition deadline. The regression tests exercise a live holder and an older owner record with a live PID. Related: #9667 proposes stale-lock recovery under a single-server assumption. This change only adds evidence and does not adopt that assumption. #14575 and #14665 add other run failure diagnostics. ## What Changed - Record lock owner state, capped age and wait duration, same-process and process-age comparisons, and whether this module holds the lock. - Label agent-directory release, collection, checkpoint, and warm handoff timeouts with a fixed operation code. - Validate each field before the existing event-local Sentry report accepts it. Exclude owner records, PIDs, paths, and absolute timestamps. - Limit the extra diagnostic owner read to 100 ms with best-effort abort; malformed JSON is `invalid` and unreadable owner records remain `unknown`. - Document the diagnostic limits and verify that contenders never reclaim protected locks. ## Verification - Focused lock, diagnostic, real Sentry SDK, and database-backed agent-directory tests: 126 passed, including stalled-read and malformed/missing/unreadable-owner regression coverage. - Final revision `0691613dcc`: all 54 reported checks successful, with two intentionally skipped Storybook checks. Greptile: 5/5, zero unresolved review threads; no merge conflicts. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - `pnpm test:run`: complete suite coverage ran with the existing repository shard flags: four general-server shards, four serialized shards, two general-workspaces-a shards, and general-workspaces-b. The full run is not green because of the base failures below. - The broad run found 13 failures in the unchanged macOS skill-cache tests. All 13 reproduce on the clean base revision. Open PR #14290 covers that existing failure. - Two unchanged CLI archive tests hit their five-second limits during the broad run; all 17 tests in that file pass on recheck. A CLI auth socket error also cleared on recheck (19 tests), and its full serialized shard passed on rerun. ## Risks This is a diagnostic change, not a stale-lock fix. Owner observations can race with release. Wall-clock shifts can affect the age comparison. A local-holder flag covers only this module instance. None of these fields authorizes reclamation or proves a file save. Lock acquisition, release, retries, task status, and recovery guards retain their current behavior. No schema change or deployment action is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with code execution and repository tools. The exact model build and context window were not exposed to this agent. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks pass; existing base failures are documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
98d8a6ccac |
Stop replaying ambiguous database disconnects (#14773)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip stores agent work and control state in PostgreSQL. > - Its database client must not repeat a mutation after an uncertain result. > - The global retry wrapper treated `write CONNECTION_CLOSED` as proof that PostgreSQL never received a statement. > - postgres.js also uses that message when the connection closes after statement delivery. > - This pull request removes that global replay and tests the actual driver over a local wire connection. > - Callers retain control of retries when they can prove the complete operation is idempotent. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Follow-up to #13417. Preserve the transaction disconnect handling from #13643 and the explicit actor synchronization retries introduced in #12773. Searched open and closed issues and PRs for database retries, disconnects, and `CONNECTION_CLOSED`. The open circuit-breaker proposal #11142 addresses outage queue growth; it does not establish whether an already-sent statement can be replayed. **What happened?** The database wrapper replayed an arbitrary statement up to three times after `write CONNECTION_CLOSED`. The driver adds `write ` to connection-close errors even after the peer receives the statement. A local protocol peer receives the same submitted INSERT three times when it drops each response. A committed write could therefore execute more than once. **Expected behavior** An ambiguous statement result must fail without automatic replay. A subsequent operation must be able to reconnect. **Steps to reproduce** Run the new wire regression against the parent commit. The six Simple Query cases and the parameterized Drizzle case receive three executions instead of one. The named prepared-client case was already safe and stays covered. The peer reads the entire statement and then closes the connection. This demonstrates repeated delivery with the real driver; it does not claim that a historical incident duplicated a committed write. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on source commit `018993140f` with the patched postgres.js 3.4.9 dependency. **Deployment mode** Built from source with a local PostgreSQL protocol peer. No live provider or customer database is used. ## What Changed - Pass the original postgres.js client to Drizzle and remove the global statement replay wrapper. - Add eight wire regressions: six Simple Query cases for INSERT, side-effect-capable SELECT, and a data-changing CTE, plus parameterized Drizzle and named prepared-client cases. The extended peer processes Parse, Describe, Bind, and Execute, verifies bound parameters, and drops the response only after Execute. Each case checks one delivery and recovery on a fresh query. - Document ambiguous outcomes and the retry compatibility tradeoff. Keep explicit idempotent actor-sync retries and disconnected-transaction handling unchanged. ## Verification - Before the fix: the six Simple Query cases and the parameterized Drizzle case failed with three executions instead of one. The named prepared-client case was already safe. All eight wire cases pass on this branch. - Final focused client, pool teardown, configuration, and actor-sync retry checks: 28 tests passed. `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` also passed after the test-only follow-up. - First implementation head, `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/db`: all 158 tests passed across 45 files, including real PostgreSQL transaction/reserved-connection recovery. The local embedded dependency's symlinks were hydrated before this run. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - The complete local `pnpm test:run` did not finish; no complete local suite pass is claimed. All CI test, typecheck, and build gates passed on the first implementation head `11f8b22d90`. Final-head CI is pending after the test-only follow-up. - `git diff --check`: passed. Reviewed the diff for secrets, personal data, generated output, and run artifacts. ## Risks Some transient statement failures that the global wrapper previously replayed now reach the caller. Operation owners must retry only when they have an idempotency guarantee or a durable receipt that prevents duplicate effects. A connection error is not proof that a write failed to commit. There is no SQL-text retry heuristic, new suppression, schema change, or migration. This change prevents unsafe replay; it does not prevent network disconnects. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex / GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and local protocol tests. The exact backend model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Final verification (September30): every final-head CI check passed at `3004c5bda39c985c3557547ec45e33870ce5d010`. Greptile scored5/5 on this head, all review threads are resolved, and the branch is mergeable. Eight real-wire regressions cover simple, parameterized Drizzle, and named prepared queries. Full local suite did not produce a completed result; the complete CI matrix passed. This public PR remains open for maintainer merge. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c8f874311c |
fix(ui): hide Google connectors only on the Connections page (#14774)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents for work. > - The Connections page lists the apps and saved accounts that agents can use. > - Google Workspace verification is still pending. > - Google entries must be temporarily hidden from this page without removing their implementations. > - This PR filters the final page rows, including saved Google accounts, after the page resolves their provider. > - Definitions, direct setup routes, OAuth profiles, credentials, and runtime access stay intact. > - Review instances can keep the prior UI by staying on their pinned app release. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Temporary provider visibility on the Connections landing page. **Current behavior** The page can show Google Workspace catalog entries and saved accounts while verification is pending. **Proposed behavior** Hide all nine Google Workspace rows on this page. Keep every other connector and all Google integration code unchanged. Use an existing release pin for review instances instead of a hostname exception in the app. **Reason and benefit** Pause public discovery without disabling existing runtime tools or removing the implementation needed for verification and later re-enablement. **Breaking changes** Google accounts are no longer visible on this landing page. Direct setup and management routes remain available. This is not an access-control restriction. Related completed work: #13551 used catalog-level visibility. This change is deliberately limited to the landing page and also covers saved account rows. #14740 reduced Google scopes; this change leaves those scopes unchanged. No duplicate open PR or matching open issue was found. ## What Changed - Derive the Google app slugs from the existing Workspace profile registry. - Filter the combined catalog and saved-account rows only inside `Browse`. - Cover all nine Google entries, active/draft/disabled accounts, legacy connection metadata, mixed-provider rows, and independently identified non-Google connectors in regression tests. - Document the display-only hold, pinned review builds, and how to restore visibility after approval. ## Verification - Passed: `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/apps/Browse.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/AppsConnect.test.tsx` (199 tests, including the latest master changes). - Passed: `pnpm check:token-gates`. - Passed: `pnpm build`. - Passed: `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` after merging the latest master. An earlier overlapping run hit a local runner codesign race; sequential checks passed. - Passed again after the final custom-provider fix: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` and `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build`. - The full local `pnpm test:run` was started, then stopped after the full remote CI suite passed to avoid continuing duplicate long-running work on the developer machine. It is not claimed as a completed local pass. - All 54 latest-head CI checks passed. Two non-applicable Storybook jobs were skipped. One serialized server job lost its self-hosted runner connection; its single retry passed. - Greptile: 5/5 on `aeda167bf4494feed6ee0de2585960511fb02918`, with no unresolved review threads. - Confirmed in the existing review instance that all nine Google entries still appear after its current release was pinned. No new app release was deployed to that instance. - Reviewer steps: open Connections on this branch with Google catalog entries and saved Google accounts. None should appear. Non-Google connectors must remain. Direct Google setup routes must still load. ## Risks - Existing Google accounts cannot be found on this page during the hold. Their data and runtime access remain unchanged. - This is a UI-only filter, not an authorization gate. Direct routes and API access still work by design. - Review instances must not receive this UI build until the hold is removed. Their existing release pin excludes fleet app upgrades; an explicit targeted upgrade must still be avoided. - No migrations, backend changes, broker changes, or credential changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-5-based coding agent), with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and browser inspection. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f7e36ba3e2 |
fix: isolate repository-free low-trust tasks in private directories (#14766)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work by agents within company boundaries. > - Email tasks can run under the low-trust review preset. > - These tasks must use an isolated workspace and a sandbox. > - The default workspace strategy assumed that the project had a Git repository. > - A project without a configured workspace failed before the agent could start. > - This change gives each such task a private directory and keeps the sandbox requirement. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An inbound email assigned to a low-trust agent failed with `git_worktree_base_not_git_checkout` when its boundary project had no configured workspace. Setup had accepted the project and sandbox. **Expected behavior** The agent can process email without a repository. Its workspace stays isolated from other tasks and the shared agent home. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Select a low-trust agent with an active sandbox and a project boundary. 2. Leave the project without a configured workspace. 3. Receive an email through AgentMail. 4. Observe that startup fails before provider work starts. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against `5edf55d73`. **Deployment mode** Hosted staging with sandbox execution. Related: #13256 added email tasks. #13636 fixed default isolation for projects without workspaces; the explicit isolation used by low-trust tasks still needed this path. ## What Changed - Select private task directories for low-trust sandbox tasks with no configured workspace or explicit workspace strategy. - Keep each directory scoped to its company and task. Retain files across turns and reassignment and reject symlink paths and mismatched workspace reuse. - Preserve Git validation for configured workspaces and explicit strategies, plus the existing authorization and remote gates for referenced projects. - Add a startup regression and directory isolation tests. Document the supported repository-free path. ## Verification - The startup regression failed before the fix with the same Git validation error. - 260 targeted email, workspace policy, heartbeat, referenced-project and directory tests pass. - Full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass on the latest commit. - All CI checks, including the complete sharded test suite and canary dry run, pass on `b4ccd9802b09b2e95499df72d48b4a3906b8c328`. - The final commit also passes the same server shard locally: 60 files, 1,024 passed / 6 skipped tests. The earlier all-groups local run was interrupted during follow-up edits; complete-suite verification comes from CI on the final commit. - Deployed the reviewed commit to staging and independently verified the full serving SHA. Two real Codex runs in Daytona succeeded and finalized the same private company/task workspace. The first wrote a 35-byte marker; the second read the existing file without modifying it and returned the independently verified SHA-256 `ce3bbeb44d07ca6822826d3a5945752a38d30b356d10829f3159a191e5aa92a6`. - Live runtime caveat: Codex reported a nested `bwrap` loopback permission error and used its configured escalated execution inside Daytona. The outer Daytona sandbox remained active for both runs. - The startup regression uses a real database, production trust checks, workspace persistence, sandbox lease acquisition and realization, and a fake provider. It checks reassignment and allows only an authorized referenced project. - The transfer regression runs production archive/sync-back/merge code against distinct filesystem roots: create output in one sandbox, restore it, then read and update it in a fresh sandbox. The provider I/O is emulated; live staging verification is separate. ## Risks - The new default applies only to low-trust sandbox tasks without workspace configuration. Standard agents and explicit Git strategies keep their existing behavior. - Task directories retain work across turns and consume instance storage. The change does not migrate or copy existing shared files. - No database migration or credential changes are required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and browser tools. The exact runtime model revision and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
1d23cb6962 |
ci: pin a checkout-independent Rust cache path so PR lanes hit master's cache (#14394)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip ships a native Runner binary, written in Rust, and seven CI lanes build it on every pull request > - `Canary Dry Run` is the slowest check on every green PR run, and most of its time is `cargo build --release` on third-party crates > - Master saves a Rust dependency cache for these lanes, but every PR lane logs `No cache found` and compiles every crate from zero > - The cache key matches, but GitHub also compares a hash of the absolute cache paths, and the master writer (RunsOn fleet, `/home/runner/_work/...`) and the PR readers (GitHub-hosted, `/home/runner/work/...`) hash different paths > - This pull request gives both sides a checkout-independent workspace path, so the hashes match and the PR lanes restore master's cache > - The benefit is about 2.5 minutes less wall clock per PR run and about 18 fewer runner-minutes per run ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists for this problem. The description below follows the enhancement template. Related prior PRs on the same cache: Refs #13194, Refs #13259, Refs #13457, Refs #13459, Refs #13500, Refs #13586. None of them pins the workspace path, so none of them fixes this miss. **What existing behavior does this improve?** The `Swatinem/rust-cache` restore step in the PR workflow lanes that build the Runner: `Canary Dry Run`, `Build`, `Typecheck + Release Registry`, and the four `Verify Paperclip Runner` lanes. **Subsystem affected** CI workflows under `.github/workflows/`, their guard tests under `.github/scripts/tests/`, and `doc/RELEASE-AUTOMATION-SETUP.md`. **Current behavior** Every PR lane logs `No cache found` although master holds an entry with the exact key. Run 36424309181 computed `v0-rust-release-runner-v1-Linux-x64-c3a3ca66-a95b0328`, and master holds a 678 MB entry with that key. GitHub matches a cache entry on the key and on a version hash of the absolute paths in the cache. The master writer runs on the RunsOn fleet, where the checkout is `/home/runner/_work/paperclip/paperclip`. The PR readers run on GitHub-hosted `ubuntu-latest`, where the checkout is `/home/runner/work/paperclip/paperclip`. The stored version `5c40870d…` is the sha256 of the `_work` paths plus `zstd-without-long|1.0`. The `work` paths hash to `1656e9ee…`. The key can never match, so each lane compiles every third-party crate again. **Proposed behavior** The writer and the readers pass the same checkout-independent path to `rust-cache`. Both runner layouts then produce the same version hash, and the PR lanes restore master's cache. **Reason and benefit** `Canary Dry Run` takes 533s on a green run. 251s of that is dependency compilation that a warm cache removes. Seven lanes pay this cost in every PR run. **Breaking changes** None. This change affects CI only. ## What Changed - Add a `Pin the Runner Rust workspace path` step before `rust-cache` in the master writer (`release-verify.yml`, typecheck and runner lanes) and in all four PR readers (`pr-trusted.yml`). The step creates the symlink `$HOME/paperclip-runner-rust` → `$GITHUB_WORKSPACE/packages/paperclip-runner/runner` and passes that path to `rust-cache` as `workspaces: <path> -> target`. `rust-cache` resolves the input with `path.resolve`, which does not follow symlinks, so both runner layouts now produce the same cache paths and the same version hash. `$HOME` is `/home/runner` on both images, which is why the `~/.cargo` paths already agreed. - Bump the shared keys `release-runner-v1` → `release-runner-v2` and `release-typecheck-v1` → `release-typecheck-v2`. The old, unreachable entries are then visibly orphaned instead of sharing a key with the new ones. - Extend the guard tests `pr-runner-rust-cache`, `release-runner-cache`, and `typecheck-rust-cache`. They now require the pin step in both workflows with identical text, placed before the cache step, and they reject a `workspaces:` value that resolves under the checkout. The `pr-runner-rust-cache` test checks all four PR reader jobs and fails if a `rust-cache` step appears in a PR job that is not in its reader list. - Update `doc/RELEASE-AUTOMATION-SETUP.md` to name the `release-runner-v2` key and to explain the pinned workspace path. ### Expected savings once merged Measured from run 36424309181. "Removed" is the dependency-compile time that a warm restore removes, minus about 18s to restore the 680 MB entry. The fleet writer's own restore shows this cost. | Lane | Today | Removed | Expected | |---|---|---|---| | Canary Dry Run | 533s | ~150s | ~380s | | Typecheck + Release Registry | 462s | ~155s | ~305s | | Verify Paperclip Runner (vitest 2/2) | 453s | ~245s | ~210s | | Verify Paperclip Runner (rust) | 400s | ~175s | ~225s | | Build | 348s | ~130s | ~220s | | Verify Paperclip Runner (static checks) | 321s | ~170s | ~150s | | Verify Paperclip Runner (vitest 1/2) | 346s | ~70s | ~275s | - Wall clock per PR run: about 533s → about 385s. That is about 2.5 minutes faster to a green check set. `Canary Dry Run` stays the longest check. The rest is the non-cargo work in `release.sh` (standalone package builds ~30s, publish-payload preview ~73s). - Runner time: about 18 runner-minutes saved per PR run across the seven lanes. - The first master push after merge compiles from zero once in the fleet writer (about 4 extra minutes on that one run) and saves the v2 entry. Later PRs hit it. When a PR changes `Cargo.lock`, the prefix restore key still gives a partial hit, as before. ## Verification - Run the guard tests for the three cache lanes: `node --test .github/scripts/tests/pr-runner-rust-cache.test.mjs .github/scripts/tests/release-runner-cache.test.mjs .github/scripts/tests/typecheck-rust-cache.test.mjs` Result: 21 pass, 0 fail. - Run the full guard suite: `node --test '.github/scripts/tests/*.test.mjs'`. Result: 376 pass, 3 fail. The 3 failures are in `docker-canary-promotion.test.mjs`. They hit a sandbox temp-file ENOENT and fail the same way on the unmodified branch. - Run `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs`. Result: 14 pass. - Local archive test: create a tar from the `_work` layout through the symlink (relative `../../../paperclip-runner-rust/target` entries, `tar -P -C $GITHUB_WORKSPACE`, the same way `@actions/cache` does). Extract it on the `work` layout. The files land in the real target directory and the symlink stays intact. - After merge, open any GitHub-hosted PR run and confirm that the seven Rust lanes log `Restored from cache key ...release-runner-v2...` in place of `No cache found`. ## Risks - Low risk. The change touches CI workflows, their tests, and one doc page. No product code changes. - If the pin step fails, `rust-cache` reports a miss and the lane compiles from zero, as it does today. The build does not break. - Both runner layouts sit four levels under `/home/runner`, so the relative `../../../` archive entries line up. The existing `~/.cargo/registry` and `~/.cargo/git` cache paths already rely on this property. A future runner image with a different `$HOME` depth would miss the cache but would not fail the job. - `rm -rf "$pinned"` acts on the symlink itself (no trailing slash), never on the checkout behind it. It only matters on a reused runner. - Squash-merge note: the branch carries commits by `Bender (Fable)`. Add `Co-Authored-By: Bender (Fable) <bender-fable@paperclip.local>` to the squash body to keep that authorship. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 (`claude-fable-5-1`), run through Claude Code inside a Paperclip agent heartbeat. Extended thinking was on. Tool use: shell, GitHub CLI, and the GitHub REST API for workflow logs, cache listings, and PR operations. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id. The agent execution workspace fixed this branch name, so I cannot rename it. Squash-merge drops the branch name. - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Bender (Fable) <bender-fable@paperclip.local> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
3bbb8d0f69 |
Add bounded AgentMail failure diagnostics (#14768)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - AgentMail connections create inboxes and handle email tasks. > - A failed provider request currently records only its HTTP status. > - The same 403 can mean a permission denial, a resource limit, or another provider restriction. > - This pull request records a fixed operation name and a documented, allowlisted error code. > - Operators can distinguish these failures without exposing provider payloads or changing retry behavior. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An AgentMail inbox creation failure reports only `AgentMail request failed (403)`. The response body is deliberately excluded because it can contain private mail or credentials. That also discards the provider code needed to identify the cause. **Expected behavior** Keep the HTTP failure visible with a fixed operation name and a safe provider code. Never copy arbitrary error text, resource identifiers, suggested fixes, or URLs into diagnostics. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Make an inbox creation request through `agentmailApi` with a fake provider returning HTTP 403 and `code: "missing_permission"`. 2. Observe that the old error lacks the operation and provider code. 3. With this change, verify the error includes `operation=create_inbox, code=missing_permission`, preserves status 403, and excludes all other response fields. Related work: #13256 introduced the AgentMail connection. The provider documents stable codes in its [error reference](https://docs.agentmail.to/errors). ## What Changed - Add a fixed method/route-to-operation map and an allowlist of documented provider codes. - Read at most 8 KiB for diagnostics, with a one-second deadline. Cancel unread bodies and preserve the HTTP error if reading or parsing fails. - Keep the existing error prefix, status, retry delay, and failure handling. - Add regression coverage and document the diagnostic limits. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/agentmail-api.test.ts` — 44 tests passed. - `pnpm build` — passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed before the review correction. Final `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit` also passed. - Full local `pnpm test:run` did not finish successfully; three company-skills-service failures were observed outside the changed module. The final-head CI server suites passed. The remaining workspaces-b CI retry covers an unrelated HTTP/2 port collision. - The diff passed a scan for configured secrets, private deployment references, and non-fixture email addresses. ## Risks - A failed request can now wait up to one extra second while reading its diagnostic code. - New, missing, malformed, or oversized provider codes report `unknown`. A future provider code needs an explicit allowlist update. - This is a diagnostics change. It does not establish or repair the cause of an existing provider denial. - No schema, credential policy, or retry behavior changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact served model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 at 20853e31abacf53a32f1a63467ee208a719bbf00; the locked-body finding is fixed and its thread resolved - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Final verification (September 30): all final-head GitHub checks pass at `20853e31abacf53a32f1a63467ee208a719bbf00`, including the targeted workspaces-b rerun after the unrelated EADDRINUSE failure. Greptile scored 5/5 on this head and no review threads remain unresolved. The branch is mergeable. The local full-suite run did not yield a passing completion; CI completed successfully across all suites. This public PR remains open for maintainer merge. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e2908fff5c |
fix: enforce terminal outcomes during recovered sandbox cleanup (#14767)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native runners can keep a reusable sandbox warm after successful turns. > - Failed turns must stop their sandbox before a later retry resumes it. > - Workspace recovery can release a lease outside the executor's normal teardown. > - Successful file copy-back can then retain a sandbox even when its run failed. > - This pull request checks the durable run outcome at the shared release boundary. > - Ordinary teardown and recovery now apply the same retention rule. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A real Daytona verification on `5edf55d73` produced a failed native turn. The runner process exited, but workspace recovery retained the sandbox without stopping it. The recovery callback used successful workspace copy-back to select warm retention. It bypassed the terminal-state check in normal heartbeat teardown. **Expected behavior** Keep a sandbox running only after a successful run. Failed, cancelled, timed-out, and interrupted runs must convert requested warm retention to stop-and-retain. Preserve the existing ownership hold before release. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Persist a terminal failed native run whose workspace copy-back succeeds. 2. Release its environment lease from the recovery path with a stored `keep_running` disposition. 3. Observe that the provider receives `keep_running` on the base commit. 4. With this fix, the provider receives `stop_and_retain` and the lease status follows the durable run outcome. **Paperclip version or commit** Base: `5edf55d7350c7f08c9dd132c7e0f1421fa0bf2fb`. **Deployment mode** Native runner with a reusable Daytona sandbox. Related: #14747 retires unsuccessful warm runner sessions. This change closes the separate recovery lease-release path. Related search found no duplicate fix. ## What Changed - Read the durable run status at the shared lease-release boundary. - Apply the existing terminal-outcome retention rule before calling the environment runtime. - Use that same durable status for the lease-state mapping. - Add five database-backed regressions for four unsuccessful outcomes and successful warm retention. - Document the recovery rule. ## Verification - Before the fix: the four unsuccessful-outcome regressions fail; the successful case passes. - After the fix: 163 tests pass across the lease-release, native lifecycle, and explicit continuation suites. - Repository typecheck and build pass. - `pnpm test:run` encountered the existing local `native-session-resume.test.ts:1125` assertion failure; a focused rerun reproduced the same failure. This was also recorded before this follow-up with the unmodified base executor. The full command was stopped after that confirmation, so later local groups were not completed. - All 56 latest-head checks are successful or intentionally skipped (54 passed, 2 skipped), including the complete CI test groups and browser E2E suite. Greptile is 5/5 on `e7da3b3ad`, with no unresolved review comments. - Deployed exact PR head `e7da3b3adbf7a13642c0e56f5b0f0c4666adf358` to the staging workspace and independently verified the serving commit. A real failed native turn persisted `keep_running` and completed workspace finalization, reproducing the recovery-path conditions; Paperclip automatically issued stop-and-retain, and an independent Daytona read confirmed `stopped`. No manual stop was used. - Retried that failed run through the public API after correcting its temporary API-key credential. The same stopped sandbox resumed successfully. Three successful turns retained one live runner PID/start time and the same native, runner, and provider sessions. - Verified exact canonical note contents, deletion persistence, and an unchanged 8 MiB binary after every turn. Subsequent checkpoints copied/hashed only 58 and 87 bytes. After sandbox deletion, canonical files still matched. Temporary secrets were removed and agent/configuration policy restored. - Live acceptance used temporary API-key authentication. The separate managed-subscription authentication issue and browser Retry control were not tested by this campaign. ## Risks - Recovery callers can no longer use stale success status to retain a failed run's sandbox. - The existing native ownership hold still blocks release while ownership is unresolved. - Successful warm turns and explicit destroy dispositions keep their existing behavior. - No database migration, API contract, dependency, or UI change is included. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and test analysis. The exact served model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
33f2b3a159 |
fix: separate GitHub tools and code review bot connections (#14750)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Connectors catalog lets people give agents tools or connect agents to conversations. > - GitHub put these two uses behind one card and an extra choice. > - People should choose the connection they need from the catalog. > - This pull request keeps GitHub for tools and adds GitHub Code Review Bot as a separate card. > - Each card opens its setup directly. Both use the existing connection code. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** GitHub connector discovery and setup. **Current behavior** With chat connectors enabled, GitHub opens a menu that asks whether to use tools or create a bot. Saved tools and bots share the same catalog entry. **Proposed behavior** GitHub opens tool account access. GitHub Code Review Bot opens agent selection. Saved bots and drafts appear under the bot card. Chat-disabled instances show only GitHub tools. **Reason and benefit** The catalog names the two uses and removes an extra setup choice. The bot keeps the existing GitHub provider, credentials, endpoint IDs, setup steps, and runtime. **Additional context** Related work: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12843 and https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14594 established GitHub account identity. This change preserves that tool flow. No duplicate catalog split was found. ## What Changed - Split the generated app definitions into GitHub tools and GitHub Code Review Bot. Reuse the existing GitHub logo and channel method. - Open bot setup directly, including old resume and reconnect links. - Put existing bot endpoints and drafts under the bot card. Hide duplicate internal chat applications. - Keep pasted GitHub URLs mapped to the tool connection. - Add seven Storybook states for the catalog, saved connections, disabled chat, both setup paths, mobile, and light mode. - Fix narrow-screen bot rows so the label cannot overlap status and setup actions. - Update catalog, route, browser, and API tests, plus the GitHub connector guide. ## Verification - [Hosted Storybook](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/storybook/branches/codex~2Fgithub-review-connection/?path=/story/connections-github-and-code-review-bot--catalog): seven states built from this branch. The deployment passed its public-file verification. - All GitHub checks pass on `d13a2cd53561645bb2a15c6f8e75a61a936d6459`. Two optional Storybook jobs skip under their normal trigger rules; the manual Storybook deployment passes. The branch has no merge conflicts. - Greptile: 5/5 on the current head, with no review comments or unresolved threads. - `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, `pnpm check:token-gates`, and `pnpm build-storybook` passed. The final Storybook fixture also passed UI typecheck and the hosted build. - Targeted catalog, URL matching, routing, grouping, brand, and chat UI contract tests passed. - GitHub provider browser tests: 2 passed. These cover direct tool setup and the bot setup and management lifecycle with provider responses mocked. - Embedded-browser test on an isolated local instance: opened both cards, selected an agent, saved a bot draft, and resumed the same endpoint under the bot card after a reload. - Storybook Tool Setup and Bot Setup assertions pass in the published preview. Chat Disabled assertions pass locally. Inspected mobile and light mode, including the draft-row layout and official GitHub marks. - Local full-suite limitation: `pnpm test:run` was not clean. A cross-company route assertion failed in the aggregate run and passed in isolation; a workspace-runtime test reached its 30-second hook timeout. Some isolated database reruns skipped when the embedded-PostgreSQL availability probe failed. The local aggregate was stopped after CI completed. The corresponding full CI suites pass all 360 tool-access tests and all 162 workspace-runtime tests. - No live GitHub authorization or installation was performed. The isolated instance correctly stopped at the cloud enrollment or public HTTPS prerequisites. ## Risks - Low scope: catalog presentation and routing change. There is no database migration or provider credential change. - Existing GitHub bot URLs now open bot setup directly. The tool route remains `/apps/connect?source=github`. - The bot remains behind the existing chat-connectors feature flag. Existing endpoints retain `provider: github`. - Channel applications are represented by endpoint rows. Regression tests cover legacy bot applications, tools, active bots, and drafts together. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code execution, and embedded-browser tools. The exact deployed model ID, context window size, and reasoning setting are not exposed to this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |