2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Dotta	12b0cc6304	fix(chat): recover committed native Agent Chat replies (#18465) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and keeps its results available to users. > - Agent Chat needs a visible reply before the conversation can wait for more input. > - Native result commitment and reply presentation are separate obligations. > - A completed conversation can retain a valid final message without a saved reply. > - Existing reply recovery excludes these completed conversation turns. > - This pull request repairs that persistence gap through the existing recovery worker. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native Agent Chat turn completed successfully and saved its workspace. Its accepted result and final assistant message were durable, but no reply appeared in the conversation. The chat stayed active. The deployment hiring journey in #18351 then reached its deadline while waiting for the first reply. **Expected behavior** Recover the exact accepted turn's final reply once, then use normal conversation settlement. Keep later user input active. Do not run the agent again or replace a selected or deleted reply. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create an active conversation with one admitted native turn. 2. Commit an accepted DONE result and a final-channel assistant message for that exact run, session and turn. 3. Finish workspace finalization before live heartbeat reply presentation. Leave no saved reply. 4. Run normal response recovery. Before this fix it finds no conversation candidate and leaves the chat active. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced with actual services at frozen master `8bcc5a01edd5d87540401521e6f30d3df43e1848`. The production predicate also exists in the deployed revision that exposed the failure. Related work: #18351. The broader receipt and recovery work in #18118 and #18409 does not touch these source files. ## What Changed - Discover unanswered committed Agent Chat turns through the existing native response presentation worker. - Recheck company, agent, responsible user, current execution and conversation generation under the normal transaction locks. - Require the accepted result digest and an exact final message from the same native run, session and accepted turn. Keep external publication authority separate. - Commit the reply and presentation receipt before normal conversation settlement. Later input stays active. Recovery does not repeat agent work. - Preserve skip decisions and selected or deleted replies. Add database controls for foreign identity, stale sessions, partial commitment, duplicates and ordinary internal task behavior. - Document the recovery boundary in the developer guide. ## Verification - Real-service RED/GREEN uses all 418 canonical migrations in isolated PGlite and the exact new regression fixture. Before the fix: zero candidates, no reply, recovery returns false and the chat stays active. After the fix: one candidate, one exact reply, recovery returns true and the chat waits. A repeat returns false and creates no second reply. - All 20 canonical regression cases pass locally through a fixture-only PGlite bridge. Only local database provisioning and `createDb` selection differ from the normal embedded PostgreSQL fixture. Production services, SQL queries, transactions, protocol validation and assertions remain real. Linux embedded PostgreSQL CI is required before merge. - Focused current-source no-emit typing passes for both production modules and the new regression file, with normal Express augmentation and source aliases. The broader local presentation/ownership and conversation-settlement PGlite bridge run was interrupted before it reported results; it is not counted as a pass. No repository-wide local build is claimed from borrowed workspace dependencies. Clean-build CI and canonical PostgreSQL consumer tests remain required. - `git diff --check` and the scoped source/test secret scan pass. No captured run data, credentials or private target identities are committed. - No live journey retry, deployment, configuration change or test-plan admission was performed. The original failed journey remains failed; this production fix still needs deployed qualification through the unchanged journey. - Current-head [canonical Linux CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41207018345) passed all 57 terminal checks with no failure or pending check. The new 20-case database regression actually passed in [server shard 8](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41207018345/job/124555006090), at 13:59:25 UTC (2,643 ms). Typecheck, build and the existing consumer lanes passed. Fresh [Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18465#issuecomment-6544208002) on exact `f32a432e10b377ae6277d6f728995d5fedcf9d7b` is 5/5; the review-thread inventory is empty with no pagination. No live deployment or journey pass is claimed by these checks. ## Risks Eligible active conversations can gain a previously missing reply. Recovery accepts only the exact saved final message under its accepted result and current conversation identity. It does not run a model, repeat hiring or change a prior test grade. Reply persistence precedes waiting-state settlement; existing conversation recovery retains ownership of a later interrupted settlement. No schema or public API changes are included. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The session does not expose a more specific backend model ID or fixed context window. Used reasoning, repository tools, TypeScript and real database test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-10-31 09:08:20 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	5d79d88d68	fix(server): let settled native finalizations permit idle sleep (#18184) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Native runs retain finalization records for recovery and audit history. > - Idle sleep checks durable work before it stops an instance. > - The current check treats every retained finalization as pending work. > - A committed record can remain after its run and status effects have finished. > - This pull request recognizes complete records without deleting them. > - Instances can sleep while unfinished execution and recovery work remain protected. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A retained `native_run_finalizations` row prevents idle sleep even after the run has finished and its status decision has been applied. The current gate checks whether any row exists. **Expected behavior** Complete finalization history should remain available without counting as pending work. Active leases, retries, accounting, recovery, and incomplete status effects must still prevent sleep. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Finish a native run and retain its committed finalization. 2. Confirm that its accepted result, assessment, applied decision, and delivered effects agree. 3. Request an idle report under a valid quiet admission hold. 4. Observe that the retained row reports background work before this change. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master at `cd0c86e5e1d427c8fa8aa8c3a9499391ee9b425b` with a local PostgreSQL fixture. **Deployment mode** Server with PostgreSQL. No provider calls are needed to reproduce the gate failure. Related PR and issue searches found no duplicate for this check. ## What Changed - Replace the blanket finalization-row check with a completion proof bound to the same company, issue, run, accepted result, assessment, and applied decision. - Require the owning run's successful workspace-finalization receipt; retain unresolved leases, retries, accounting, recovery, and status effects. - Share final-reply candidate discovery with the presentation recovery worker, so a completed run cannot hide a required reply. The pure query stays with native presentation; idle inspection uses it in the existing read-only transaction and five-second statement limit. - Register open warm sessions and in-flight close/checkpoint promises with local idle inspection. Historical controller/provider process metadata remains preserved. - Add PostgreSQL and local-warm regressions and document the retained-history rule. ## Verification - PostgreSQL sleep/finalization and chat-monitor continuation suites: 300 tests passed, including 56 finalization cases. - Local-warm regression: passed; an open session and its pending close/checkpoint both block sleep until retirement completes. - Server typecheck and server build: passed after review fixes. - Full workspace typecheck and build: passed before the review additions; hosted checks cover the updated revision. - An earlier local full invocation encountered two chat recovery failures that passed in isolation, and two existing Git workspace fixture failures caused by Xcode system Git initializing `main`. Those two pass with `init.defaultBranch=master` scoped to the test subprocess. That superseded full invocation was stopped for review revisions; no full local pass is claimed. No machine configuration or unrelated source was changed. - Fresh Apex review: 5/5 on `6846203fe2383bae1ede888fbaaedf83e9946e73`, with all findings addressed. - Hosted CI: fully green on `6846203fe2383bae1ede888fbaaedf83e9946e73`, including the final verify gate. Twelve jobs were interrupted by a simultaneous runner shutdown; rerunning the failed jobs completed successfully. - No hosted deployment of this change is claimed. ## Risks This changes an automatic-stop gate. An incomplete proof could stop an instance with pending work. The SQL fails closed and retains the existing admission, local work, plugin, schedule, backup, and provider-allocation gates. PostgreSQL cases cover unresolved leases, retry/recovery intent, accounting, projections, rejected results, unapplied decisions, and pending effects. No migration or history deletion is required. Reverting the predicate restores the conservative gate. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository tools and local PostgreSQL verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-29 11:11:22 -07:00