PaperClipAI

Jannik/PaperClipAI

0 Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git synced 2026-10-28 20:21:50 +01:00

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
DottaandPaperclip	6987c2f20b	test(upgrades): qualify controller replacement with immutable artifacts and phase evidence (#17455 ) <!-- entire-trail-link-start --> https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/-/trails/105/changes/paperclip/105 <!-- entire-trail-link-end --> ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip needs evidence that an admitted execution survives a main-server replacement. > - Runner mechanics and server adoption belong to #17097 and #17439. > - A healthy HTTP endpoint does not prove recovery of the original execution. > - Qualification must identify the serving artifact, natural ownership, authenticated attachment and resumed processing separately. > - It must also retain failed runs and measure normal-operation costs. > - This PR extends the existing qualification machinery and acceptance record. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Operators can assess upgrade continuity from phase evidence tied to exact artifacts and profiles. Current behavior A same-artifact restart or synthetic executor pass cannot establish different-artifact upgrade and rollback support. Idle SQL gates also do not measure active-run capacity. Proposed behavior Use immutable A/B artifacts and strict phase receipts through the existing supervisor. Preserve failed evidence and add measured before/after workload costs. Builds on merged #17097 and #17439. The base is now `master`. #17456 follows for review convenience. This PR lands qualification machinery and the evidence record. The remaining hosted gates stay open for deployment qualification; merging this machinery does not claim those experiments passed. ## What Changed - Extend the main-server supervisor and installed-artifact verification for actual serving revisions, forward migrations and compatible rollback. - Distinguish HTTP readiness, natural ownership, authenticated attachment, resumed processing and backlog settlement. - Retain the original reconnect grace and execution identity checks. Never substitute a new task or edited lease for continuity. - Reuse real-harness and Daytona qualification paths, with exact profile and artifact provenance. - Bind current Copilot attestation inputs in the Daytona image fingerprint. - Keep one acceptance record, including both failed file-only stress phases and the final passing bounded-pool comparison. ## Verification After retargeting to master, all 158 focused qualification cases across 13 files pass, with E2E typecheck. The first 12-file batch has four report-lock test failures and 133 passes. Master #17811 had committed the exact already-approved output lock, while that fixture assumed HEAD must be the uncorrected input. The fixture now checks both pinned forms, executes the committed-lock path, and reconstructs the pinned input to retain all rejection tests. The production helper, policy hashes, patch and dependency resolution are unchanged. The corrected batch explicitly includes both process-preservation suites; the prior 146-case receipt has its own source and selection. Current candidate `8f1d6ec02f` integrates master `09ad9adce2`, including the merged server slice. Its diff contains only qualification code and documentation. The [qualification record](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/8f1d6ec02f5bf6c90e7b27da8156953cabd9a180/doc/plans/2026-10-22-hot-upgrade-qualification.md) is the acceptance ledger and retains source-attributed failures and hosted limits. On the eighth integration, all 146 cases across 12 focused qualification files pass, including report-lock preparation, workflow security and workflow targeting. E2E typecheck passes. The earlier 118-case result remains attributed to its prior source. The first sandbox invocation has 117 passes and one failure because process inspection was denied during inert fixture cleanup. The permitted repeat passes all 118 and a targeted process check finds no remaining fixture daemon. The earlier 96-case receipt remains source-attributed in the ledger. The latest two review regressions first fail: an intermediate replacement can cite another runner/session despite a valid final step, and malformed receipt JSON aborts evidence packaging. Each replacement now binds run/company/issue/runner/session, and corrupt receipts retain explicit invalid metadata plus sanitized diagnostics while other logs and receipts still package. These checks prove qualification machinery with injected supervisor operations, configuration subprocesses and real filesystem packaging. They do not qualify a hosted harness. Three request-reader cases, 14 artifact/configuration/cache/history cases, and three lost-partial-receipt cases fail before their respective corrections. The final collector preserves sanitized startup, readiness and recovery phase receipts through packaging and temporary-root deletion. Earlier embedded-Postgres initialization, report-catalog drift, CI scheduling/cleanup failures and fixture collisions remain recorded with their corrections or limits. The previous Greptile service error is retained as historical review evidence, not a current review pass. The record includes prior source `9bb9d3417e`'s actual Linux contention/fairness successes and the ordinary-warm regression proof from the server slice. The historical 300-session component campaign passes four after phases and retains earlier burst failures. Those component costs do not establish hosted capacity. The hosted API-only pair has zero agents/viewers, fails both absolute latency gates and the candidate memory gate, and does not complete the active-agent/viewer matrix. The strict ten-agent same-artifact restart remains attributed to its original artifact. It does not qualify this updated stack. Actual A→B/B→A, the normal drain-free Cloud rollout, and other hosted harnesses remain open. No new provider turn, deployment or hosted qualification was run during merge preparation. Prior source `57d3767eac` jobs 122590643944, 122590643983 and 122590644161 ended after runner shutdown/cancellation without final Vitest results. The shutdown cause is unproven. No retry was issued before this source was superseded by the required server recovery fix. These attempts remain failures/incomplete evidence. Fresh exact-head CI, legacy status, completed Greptile 5/5, resolved feedback and normal merge eligibility remain required. ## Risks Different-artifact A→B/B→A, the normal drain-free Cloud rollout path, other hosted harnesses and the complete concurrency/viewer matrix remain open. Frozen branch builds are development-build evidence. This PR owns qualification and evidence; production defects must be fixed in their earlier owning slice. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools and code execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-27 21:58:09 -05:00
Dotta	5716fe907e	test(runner): add full-stack acceptance and eval gates (#12700 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The runner subsystem executes agent work across local and managed provider backends. > - The lower pull requests restore the task runtime, provider backends, and managed-provider control plane. > - The restored system needs repeatable full-stack checks before it can ship safely. > - Paid live checks also need clear access, cost, and secret controls. > - This pull request adds acceptance, live evaluation, chaos, and release gates for the restored runner stack. > - The benefit is measurable runner parity with safer release decisions. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Subsystem affected Cross-cutting. This change covers runner tests, release workflows, server contracts, and evaluation tools. Problem or motivation The runner stack did not have one complete acceptance surface for native Codex, ACPX, Claude Managed, and AWS AgentCore. Release checks could miss provider drift, task-view regressions, cost-policy errors, and destructive cleanup errors. Proposed solution Add a 57-cell full-stack catalog, a Daytona image, and opt-in paid workflows. Add live evaluation, chaos, cost-limit, redaction, and release contract checks. Add AWS AgentCore infrastructure and guarded provisioning tools. Keep the native runner experimental flag off by default. Alternatives considered We considered manual smoke tests only. They do not give repeatable evidence and they do not protect release branches. We also considered one large pull request. The stacked pull requests keep each review below the Greptile file limit. Roadmap alignment This work supports the shipped Cloud / Sandbox agents milestone and the shipped Agent evals & feedback milestone in `ROADMAP.md`. Related stack: - #12699 adds managed provider backends and lifecycle support. - #12691 adds qualified OpenCode and ACPX provider backends. - #12685 restores task runtime rendering and steering. ## What Changed - Add the runner full-stack harness with 57 catalog cells and 60 unit tests. - Add a Daytona runner image with digest-pinned base images and base-aware image-content checks. - Add guarded live evaluation and chaos workflows with a fixed 40-execution matrix; live and full-stack paid schedules now run only on Sundays or by manual dispatch. - Add in-flight reported-usage cost stops, post-turn cost caps, exact-threshold failure classification, secret redaction, retry classification, and actor authorization. - Reattach stream and hard-budget listeners before restart-recovery continuations so restored paid sessions cannot bypass in-flight interruption. - Preserve OpenCode usage and cost across tool-loop messages and turns while exposing an explicit current-run delta to durable accounting. - Keep PNG/WebM evidence in access-controlled artifacts only, reject SVG, and publish only pruned inert structured per-attempt evidence. - Add AWS AgentCore infrastructure, provisioning checks, and smoke tools; reject unsafe model identifiers, require exact stack ownership markers, and make failed-stack replacement explicit. - Add evaluation-session contracts and capability reports. - Add release workflow checks for immutable action pins, frozen dependency installs, exact weekly cron shape, paid-run guards, provider-secret isolation, and chaos test paths. - Reauthorize the original and triggering numeric actor IDs as the first step of every provider-secret job, including partial reruns, before checkout or provider access. - Give each full-stack matrix cell only its matching provider credential, expose Daytona only to Daytona cells, and disable shared dependency caches anywhere paid credentials or OIDC write access are present. - Protect the legacy manual E2E workflow with the same default-branch, allowlist, environment, and per-job authorization boundary. - Rotate live-eval candidates by week and retain 120 days of compatible history so the seven-week trend window remains viable. - Restore the root runner-acceptance commands and reconcile reported snapshots, raw receipts, and terminal usage without double counting or losing late usage. - Mark ACPX token deltas exact only when every budget field is present, keep cumulative cost/request authority separate, reject non-USD cost labeling, and include thought tokens in output-token budgets. - Keep `enableNativeRunner` off by default. The acceptance harness enables it only in its isolated test instance. ## Verification Passed locally: - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner typecheck` - `pnpm test:runner-acceptance:typecheck` - `pnpm test:runner-acceptance` (19 tests) - focused OpenCode proxy, driver, runnerd transport, live-session, and turn-stream tests (106 tests) - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/live/clean-room-server.test.ts` (22 tests) - `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck` - `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit` (62 tests) - `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner test:runner-workflow-evals` (22 tests) - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - `node --test packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/aws-agentcore-provisioning.test.mjs` (6 tests) - `git diff --check` - `cargo test --manifest-path packages/paperclip-runner/runner/Cargo.toml -p paperclip-runner-core --lib --locked` (161 tests) - focused ACPX provider-event tests (10 tests) - The rebased PR changes 92 files. `pnpm-lock.yaml` is unchanged. I did not run paid live provider jobs or provision AWS resources. Those checks need credentials and can create cost. ## Risks The paid workflows can create provider cost. They require an allowlisted original and triggering actor, the protected `runner-e2e-paid` environment, explicit opt-in variables, and cost limits. The four provider credentials exist only in that master-only environment, which requires allowlisted reviewer approval and disables administrator bypass; repository and organization Actions scopes contain no copies. Provider usage arrives after a billable request, so the live guard cannot prevent one request from crossing a threshold. It interrupts immediately on the first reported threshold hit and permits no continuation. Visual evidence can contain secrets rendered as pixels. PNG/WebM remain only in access-controlled workflow artifacts; SVG and per-attempt XML are excluded, and S3/Pages receive a pruned structured dashboard. The AWS scripts can create cloud resources. They use explicit commands, least-privilege roles, KMS encryption, saved nonsecret metadata, and explicit teardown. This pull request does not enable the experimental native runner for existing instances. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. The model used extended reasoning, tool use, code execution, and parallel subagents. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-09-02 08:55:08 -05:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

DottaandPaperclip

6987c2f20b

test(upgrades): qualify controller replacement with immutable artifacts and phase evidence (#17455 )

https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/-/trails/105/changes/paperclip/105

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip needs evidence that an admitted execution survives a
main-server replacement.
> - Runner mechanics and server adoption belong to #17097 and #17439.
> - A healthy HTTP endpoint does not prove recovery of the original
execution.
> - Qualification must identify the serving artifact, natural ownership,
authenticated attachment and resumed processing separately.
> - It must also retain failed runs and measure normal-operation costs.
> - This PR extends the existing qualification machinery and acceptance
record.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

Operators can assess upgrade continuity from phase evidence tied to
exact artifacts and profiles.

**Current behavior**

A same-artifact restart or synthetic executor pass cannot establish
different-artifact upgrade and rollback support. Idle SQL gates also do
not measure active-run capacity.

**Proposed behavior**

Use immutable A/B artifacts and strict phase receipts through the
existing supervisor. Preserve failed evidence and add measured
before/after workload costs.

Builds on merged #17097 and #17439. The base is now `master`. #17456
follows for review convenience. This PR lands qualification machinery
and the evidence record. The remaining hosted gates stay open for
deployment qualification; merging this machinery does not claim those
experiments passed.

## What Changed

- Extend the main-server supervisor and installed-artifact verification
for actual serving revisions, forward migrations and compatible
rollback.
- Distinguish HTTP readiness, natural ownership, authenticated
attachment, resumed processing and backlog settlement.
- Retain the original reconnect grace and execution identity checks.
Never substitute a new task or edited lease for continuity.
- Reuse real-harness and Daytona qualification paths, with exact profile
and artifact provenance.
- Bind current Copilot attestation inputs in the Daytona image
fingerprint.
- Keep one acceptance record, including both failed file-only stress
phases and the final passing bounded-pool comparison.

## Verification

After retargeting to master, all 158 focused qualification cases across
13 files pass, with E2E typecheck. The first 12-file batch has four
report-lock test failures and 133 passes. Master #17811 had committed
the exact already-approved output lock, while that fixture assumed HEAD
must be the uncorrected input. The fixture now checks both pinned forms,
executes the committed-lock path, and reconstructs the pinned input to
retain all rejection tests. The production helper, policy hashes, patch
and dependency resolution are unchanged. The corrected batch explicitly
includes both process-preservation suites; the prior 146-case receipt
has its own source and selection.

Current candidate `8f1d6ec02f` integrates master `09ad9adce2`, including
the merged server slice. Its diff contains only qualification code and
documentation. The [qualification
record](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/8f1d6ec02f5bf6c90e7b27da8156953cabd9a180/doc/plans/2026-10-22-hot-upgrade-qualification.md)
is the acceptance ledger and retains source-attributed failures and
hosted limits.

On the eighth integration, all 146 cases across 12 focused qualification
files pass, including report-lock preparation, workflow security and
workflow targeting. E2E typecheck passes. The earlier 118-case result
remains attributed to its prior source. The first sandbox invocation has
117 passes and one failure because process inspection was denied during
inert fixture cleanup. The permitted repeat passes all 118 and a
targeted process check finds no remaining fixture daemon. The earlier
96-case receipt remains source-attributed in the ledger. The latest two
review regressions first fail: an intermediate replacement can cite
another runner/session despite a valid final step, and malformed receipt
JSON aborts evidence packaging. Each replacement now binds
run/company/issue/runner/session, and corrupt receipts retain explicit
invalid metadata plus sanitized diagnostics while other logs and
receipts still package. These checks prove qualification machinery with
injected supervisor operations, configuration subprocesses and real
filesystem packaging. They do not qualify a hosted harness.

Three request-reader cases, 14 artifact/configuration/cache/history
cases, and three lost-partial-receipt cases fail before their respective
corrections. The final collector preserves sanitized startup, readiness
and recovery phase receipts through packaging and temporary-root
deletion. Earlier embedded-Postgres initialization, report-catalog
drift, CI scheduling/cleanup failures and fixture collisions remain
recorded with their corrections or limits. The previous Greptile service
error is retained as historical review evidence, not a current review
pass.

The record includes prior source `9bb9d3417e`'s actual Linux
contention/fairness successes and the ordinary-warm regression proof
from the server slice. The historical 300-session component campaign
passes four after phases and retains earlier burst failures. Those
component costs do not establish hosted capacity. The hosted API-only
pair has zero agents/viewers, fails both absolute latency gates and the
candidate memory gate, and does not complete the active-agent/viewer
matrix.

The strict ten-agent same-artifact restart remains attributed to its
original artifact. It does not qualify this updated stack. Actual
A→B/B→A, the normal drain-free Cloud rollout, and other hosted harnesses
remain open. No new provider turn, deployment or hosted qualification
was run during merge preparation.

Prior source `57d3767eac` jobs 122590643944, 122590643983 and
122590644161 ended after runner shutdown/cancellation without final
Vitest results. The shutdown cause is unproven. No retry was issued
before this source was superseded by the required server recovery fix.
These attempts remain failures/incomplete evidence. Fresh exact-head CI,
legacy status, completed Greptile 5/5, resolved feedback and normal
merge eligibility remain required.

## Risks

Different-artifact A→B/B→A, the normal drain-free Cloud rollout path,
other hosted harnesses and the complete concurrency/viewer matrix remain
open. Frozen branch builds are development-build evidence. This PR owns
qualification and evidence; production defects must be fixed in their
earlier owning slice.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools and code
execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

2026-10-27 21:58:09 -05:00

Dotta

5716fe907e

test(runner): add full-stack acceptance and eval gates (#12700 )

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The runner subsystem executes agent work across local and managed
provider backends.
> - The lower pull requests restore the task runtime, provider backends,
and managed-provider control plane.
> - The restored system needs repeatable full-stack checks before it can
ship safely.
> - Paid live checks also need clear access, cost, and secret controls.
> - This pull request adds acceptance, live evaluation, chaos, and
release gates for the restored runner stack.
> - The benefit is measurable runner parity with safer release
decisions.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Cross-cutting. This change covers runner tests, release workflows,
server contracts, and evaluation tools.

**Problem or motivation**

The runner stack did not have one complete acceptance surface for native
Codex, ACPX, Claude Managed, and AWS AgentCore. Release checks could
miss provider drift, task-view regressions, cost-policy errors, and
destructive cleanup errors.

**Proposed solution**

Add a 57-cell full-stack catalog, a Daytona image, and opt-in paid
workflows. Add live evaluation, chaos, cost-limit, redaction, and
release contract checks. Add AWS AgentCore infrastructure and guarded
provisioning tools. Keep the native runner experimental flag off by
default.

**Alternatives considered**

We considered manual smoke tests only. They do not give repeatable
evidence and they do not protect release branches. We also considered
one large pull request. The stacked pull requests keep each review below
the Greptile file limit.

**Roadmap alignment**

This work supports the shipped Cloud / Sandbox agents milestone and the
shipped Agent evals & feedback milestone in `ROADMAP.md`.

Related stack:

- #12699 adds managed provider backends and lifecycle support.
- #12691 adds qualified OpenCode and ACPX provider backends.
- #12685 restores task runtime rendering and steering.

## What Changed

- Add the runner full-stack harness with 57 catalog cells and 60 unit
tests.
- Add a Daytona runner image with digest-pinned base images and
base-aware image-content checks.
- Add guarded live evaluation and chaos workflows with a fixed
40-execution matrix; live and full-stack paid schedules now run only on
Sundays or by manual dispatch.
- Add in-flight reported-usage cost stops, post-turn cost caps,
exact-threshold failure classification, secret redaction, retry
classification, and actor authorization.
- Reattach stream and hard-budget listeners before restart-recovery
continuations so restored paid sessions cannot bypass in-flight
interruption.
- Preserve OpenCode usage and cost across tool-loop messages and turns
while exposing an explicit current-run delta to durable accounting.
- Keep PNG/WebM evidence in access-controlled artifacts only, reject
SVG, and publish only pruned inert structured per-attempt evidence.
- Add AWS AgentCore infrastructure, provisioning checks, and smoke
tools; reject unsafe model identifiers, require exact stack ownership
markers, and make failed-stack replacement explicit.
- Add evaluation-session contracts and capability reports.
- Add release workflow checks for immutable action pins, frozen
dependency installs, exact weekly cron shape, paid-run guards,
provider-secret isolation, and chaos test paths.
- Reauthorize the original and triggering numeric actor IDs as the first
step of every provider-secret job, including partial reruns, before
checkout or provider access.
- Give each full-stack matrix cell only its matching provider
credential, expose Daytona only to Daytona cells, and disable shared
dependency caches anywhere paid credentials or OIDC write access are
present.
- Protect the legacy manual E2E workflow with the same default-branch,
allowlist, environment, and per-job authorization boundary.
- Rotate live-eval candidates by week and retain 120 days of compatible
history so the seven-week trend window remains viable.
- Restore the root runner-acceptance commands and reconcile reported
snapshots,
raw receipts, and terminal usage without double counting or losing late
usage.
- Mark ACPX token deltas exact only when every budget field is present,
keep
cumulative cost/request authority separate, reject non-USD cost
labeling,
  and include thought tokens in output-token budgets.
- Keep `enableNativeRunner` off by default. The acceptance harness
enables it only in its isolated test instance.

## Verification

Passed locally:

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner typecheck`
- `pnpm test:runner-acceptance:typecheck`
- `pnpm test:runner-acceptance` (19 tests)
- focused OpenCode proxy, driver, runnerd transport, live-session, and
turn-stream tests (106 tests)
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run
src/live/clean-room-server.test.ts` (22 tests)
- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck`
- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit` (62 tests)
- `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner
test:runner-workflow-evals` (22 tests)
- `pnpm -r typecheck`
- `pnpm build`
- `node --test
packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/aws-agentcore-provisioning.test.mjs`
(6 tests)
- `git diff --check`
- `cargo test --manifest-path
packages/paperclip-runner/runner/Cargo.toml -p paperclip-runner-core
--lib --locked` (161 tests)
- focused ACPX provider-event tests (10 tests)
- The rebased PR changes 92 files. `pnpm-lock.yaml` is unchanged.

I did not run paid live provider jobs or provision AWS resources. Those
checks need credentials and can create cost.

## Risks

The paid workflows can create provider cost. They require an allowlisted
original and triggering actor, the protected `runner-e2e-paid`
environment, explicit opt-in variables, and cost limits. The four
provider credentials exist only in that master-only environment, which
requires allowlisted reviewer approval and disables administrator
bypass; repository and organization Actions scopes contain no copies.

Provider usage arrives after a billable request, so the live guard
cannot prevent one request from crossing a threshold. It interrupts
immediately on the first reported threshold hit and permits no
continuation.

Visual evidence can contain secrets rendered as pixels. PNG/WebM remain
only in access-controlled workflow artifacts; SVG and per-attempt XML
are excluded, and S3/Pages receive a pruned structured dashboard.

The AWS scripts can create cloud resources. They use explicit commands,
least-privilege roles, KMS encryption, saved nonsecret metadata, and
explicit teardown.

This pull request does not enable the experimental native runner for
existing instances.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. The model used extended reasoning, tool use,
code execution, and parallel subagents.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

2026-09-02 08:55:08 -05:00