Commit Graph
13 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DottaandPaperclip bf0220d34a perf(workspaces): migrate with one archive and no readback (#20554)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip coordinates agents and keeps their workspace files.
> - A legacy workspace must move from a local volume to object storage.
> - The importer creates an archive, downloads and restores it, and
captures the source again.
> - Parent imports also download and recapture children that already
have committed snapshots.
> - This repeated work makes the one-time migration slow.
> - This change copies each source file once and trusts the upload
acknowledgement.
> - Existing source locks and atomic publication still own the
migration.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

The one-time migration of legacy local and Git workspaces to durable
snapshots.

**Current behavior**

Each workspace is captured twice and restored as a test during
migration. Parent imports also read back already imported child
snapshots. Capture hashes source files before writing them and scans
them again afterward.

**Proposed behavior**

Build one archive from one source-file read, encrypt it, upload it, and
publish its reference. Trust the upload acknowledgement. Reuse journaled
uploads after an interrupted process. Retain committed child snapshots
by database reference.

**Reason and benefit**

Remove repeated source reads, temporary copies, complete downloads, and
recursive child verification. The tests assert one capture, one upload,
and zero migration downloads.

**Breaking changes**

The archive format stays compatible. File hashes required by current
readers are computed inline during the copy. There is no preliminary
file-hashing pass. Existing readers can cold-restore the result.

Related work: #19817 and #20447.

## What Changed

- Add single-pass capture that fills fixed-length checksum fields in the
existing archive header after copying.
- Remove migration readback, test extraction, fresh-source recapture,
and Git integrity scans.
- Compute the encrypted archive checksum while writing it.
- Reuse acknowledged and journaled uploads without rebuilding or
downloading them.
- Retain already imported children through their database bindings.
Remove the recursive payload verification cache.
- Keep company checks, source and writer locks, recovery bindings,
journal identities, cancellation, and atomic publication.
- Bind archived repository intent paths to the operation without
reconstructing an archive to check them.
- Update the migration contract and the affected tests.

## Verification

- Node 24.22.2 and pnpm 9.15.4 on macOS arm64.
- At e876dbdc: focused capture, migration, lost-acknowledgement, and
frozen old-reader compatibility checks: 11 passed.
- Real source-file open counts prove one read per file. The single-pass
archive matches the existing archive bytes and manifest.
- Cold restore preserves staged and unstaged Git work, untracked files,
executable modes, and confined symlinks.
- At e876dbdc: full archive and cohort suites: 147 passed.
- At e876dbdc: server layered typecheck passed.
- At 58e5c229: four review fixes add Git source-root confinement,
archived lost-acknowledgement reuse, old-journal intent binding, and
wrapped-key readability. New focused regressions are included;
current-revision CI is pending.
- Post-review local runs were inconclusive: Git cases timed out in both
existing strict and single-pass modes, and DB tests stalled before
assertions. The unchanged earlier passes are not presented as
final-revision passes. Required CI will verify the final revision.
- Earlier full migration, snapshot storage, and nested-reference suites
passed before the compatibility refinement. Required CI supplies fresh
broad coverage for the final revision.
- Initial compatibility checks exposed the need to retain the existing
file-hash header. Inline checksums fixed that failure without another
source-file pass.
- Initial tests that required repeated verification were updated to the
requested copy-once contract. Upload-time database mutations still test
the retained business-state guards.

## Risks

- Migration now trusts the storage acknowledgement and cooperating
writer fences. It does not prove the uploaded bytes with a download or
detect later local edits with a second capture.
- Already imported child objects are trusted without another object
read. Their database bindings remain checked.
- Original source files remain available for recovery.
- This adds no automatic migration, server pin, or serving deployment.
Ordinary run capture and authenticated restore retain their existing
behavior.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with code editing and terminal tools. The
exact runtime model revision and context window are not exposed in this
session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used, including the runtime details
available to this session
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
related work above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the enhancement issue
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues
or links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
ticket ID
- [x] I have run relevant tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented risks
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open follow-ups
- [x] I will address reviewer comments before requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-10 09:13:33 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 9f00f2b83e fix(workspaces): recognize committed imports in linked source scope (#20444)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Online workspace migration fences every local Git source that a
capture can reach.
> - A linked worktree can remain on disk after its workspace is migrated
to cloud storage.
> - The source inspector lists local workspace rows, so it then treats
that linked worktree as unregistered.
> - This pull request uses the existing canonical import journal and
snapshot proof to recognize its exact original physical root.
> - The benefit is that a later linked workspace can migrate without
weakening source ownership or stopping agents.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**
After one linked Git workspace commits its canonical migration, its
local files and Git registration can remain. The workspace row now uses
`cloud_sandbox`. A later migration of a related local workspace fails
with `online_workspace_source_scope_unproven` because the original
linked root is no longer in the local-row list.

**Expected behavior**
The inspector can recognize the exact original physical root from the
same-company successful migration journal and its committed or
superseded snapshot. Unknown or changed provenance must still fail.

**Steps to reproduce**
1. Create two local Git workspaces with a shared worktree registration.
2. Complete canonical migration for one workspace while retaining its
original local files.
3. Inspect or migrate the other workspace. Before this fix, the
inspector returns no source scope.

**Paperclip version or commit**
Reproduced on `f73ff4ace9` with real PostgreSQL, Git, filesystem, and
canonical snapshot storage.

**Deployment mode**
Self-hosted server. This is a core workspace migration bug.

**Relevant logs or output**

`remote_workspace_migration_blocked:online_workspace_source_scope_unproven`

Refs #20418, #20436, #20441. This fix changes source registration only.

## What Changed

- Let the existing imported-source owner match optional exact linked
physical roots in addition to its existing nested-child paths.
- Require each added linked root to have a finished successful
same-company journal, an exact committed or superseded snapshot binding,
and the same manifest digest.
- Include those proven physical roots in the online scope and its source
fingerprint checks.
- Retain Git root, backlink, pointer, ownership, company, foreign
writer, source lock, and publication reinspection guards.
- Keep existing nested-child behavior and all persisted schemas
unchanged. Previous-release canonical imports remain readable. No
runtime authority comes from an arbitrary provider path or remote
authority.

## Verification

- Genuine baseline RED: both committed and superseded imported sibling
cases return a null source scope after a real successful import.
- GREEN: 17 focused real-PostgreSQL/FS/Git tests pass. They cover both
imported states, the original issue source fence, changed
journal/snapshot/manifest/unfinished provenance, a foreign local alias,
unregistered links, backlink/pointer corruption, and a listing change
during upload.
- Command: `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/services/remote-workspace-migration.test.ts -t 'imported
linked Git source|foreign local writer|unproven linked|revalidates the
linked Git listing|nested Git wrapper.*shared|nested Git wrapper
blocked'`.
- Server layered typecheck, module boundaries, and `git diff --check`
pass.
- Actual controlled staging canary: the canonical API committed both
targeted workspace snapshots in 310.249 seconds. The owned job closed
with exit 0 and all owned processes joined. A separate read-only
inventory confirmed that both workspaces left the legacy provider set.
This used a reviewed private administrative artifact; the serving app
image and normal release path stayed unchanged.
- Final head `1759ac6f40a1b35f79587b246de8b36e7a371537`: 56 successful
checks, 4 intentional skips, and 1 neutral status. Greptile and Ponytail
both report 5/5 with no findings or unresolved threads.
- Initial CI had unchanged Runner-support and workspace-recovery
timeouts, plus an unrelated heartbeat plugin-environment timing/fixture
failure. The same owning inputs passed on the sibling PR. Each failed
job then passed one targeted retry on unchanged product bytes. The
original failures remain recorded in the CI history.

## Risks

- This recognizes a retained original root only from the existing
committed import ledger. It does not treat arbitrary cloud workspace
paths as local ownership.
- Each physical root still passes the existing Git identity and
foreign-scope checks. Publication re-inspects the source scope under the
existing source locks.
- This adds no object reads, provider calls, recurring work, capture
algorithm changes, or data exclusion. The existing import query keeps
its current 10,240-row limit and runs during explicit migration
inspection only.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6.1 Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. The host does not expose an exact context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-09 21:11:54 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 18697b8d21 perf(workspaces): share cohort child-source verification (#20418)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip must preserve agent workspace bytes during online
migration.
> - A cohort can contain several aliases of the same physical source.
> - The importer verifies imported children before capture and again
before publication.
> - The immutable-object cache avoids repeated downloads but still
recaptures local child bytes for every alias.
> - This pull request shares the initial proof within the held cohort
fence and checks fresh bytes once more after every capture joins.
> - The benefit is less repeated local archive work while child
mutations still block the whole cohort.
> - Required browser CI twice reproduced an independent stale
composer-mode bug. A focused regression proves that refreshed persisted
task mode was ignored after mount. The state repair follows task data
when there is no local override. Explicit local mode choices retain
their own generation so a completed send cannot clear the next draft’s
choice.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #20311, #20387, #20401, #20404.

**Current behavior**

Two aliases recapture the same imported child's local bytes four times,
even with one immutable object read. A larger alias cohort repeats this
multi-GB work for each member.

**Proposed behavior**

Share the successful initial verification for the same physical root,
Git roots and exact recorded child set or discovery mode. After all
captures join, run a separate fresh final verification for each root and
recorded child set. Keep every member's database and publication checks.

**Reason and benefit**

The local PostgreSQL fixture proves that two aliases now perform two
child recaptures instead of four. Hosted timing improvement has not been
measured.

## What Changed

- Add invocation-local initial and final proof maps to the existing
cohort child verifier.
- Retain the existing canonical source-owner check before and after
shared results.
- Defer cohort final nested checks until all captures finish, and join
every final reader before publication or fence release.
- Keep singleton verification, saved journal schemas, snapshot IDs,
archive bytes and per-member publication checks unchanged.
- Extend the existing real PostgreSQL alias fixture with a child
mutation during the last parent upload.
- Repair the required CI planning-mode race with a nullable local
override: absent override follows task data; a user selection belongs to
the draft. A successful send or confirmed resend/receipt clears it only
if no newer choice exists. Failed saves preserve the mode and restored
message. Queued-edit backup retains whether the mode was explicit. Leave
the browser assertion and timeouts unchanged.

## Verification

- Canonical Node24 worktree preflight and plugin SDK prerequisites
passed. Server TypeScript passed.
- Genuine unchanged-source PostgreSQL RED: two aliases performed four
local child recaptures instead of two (one failed, 22 intentionally not
selected). GREEN: five source-sharing, last-upload child mutation,
capture/cancellation join and actual outer-commit rollback controls
passed (18 intentionally not selected; 66.53s). The actual fence-loss
control also passed (one passed, 22 intentionally not selected; 38.13s).
Both wrappers completed cleanup.
- Migration source and tree bytes remain identical to locally qualified
`466837cfe997924c3794fd5d0e96134cab1cd04c`; later commits only repair
the composer and its tests.
- Required planning browser CI originally failed, then failed its one
unchanged-head retry, because the planning chip remained absent after
opening-question dismissal. Those failures remain recorded
([original](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42723622165/job/129523785985),
[retry](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42723622165/job/129534415590)).
The final-head identical case passes in 30.5s, with all 34 shard cases
passing ([final
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42731309796/job/129550549775)).
Assertions and timeouts were not relaxed.
- Composer regressions reproduced stale loaded mode, optimistic-save
rollback, overwritten next-draft choices, and stale mode after confirmed
resend/receipt. All 145 composer tests now pass (2.88s). Canonical UI
TypeScript and token gates pass. The original planning browser case also
passed locally (15.5s; 26.9s including setup).
- The first final-head serialized-suite attempt was automatically
cancelled at its unchanged 20-minute job limit. Grouped Turbo output did
not expose an individual failing assertion; cause remains unknown
([retained
attempt](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42731309796/job/129550550373)).
One same-head diagnostic retry was a cache miss and executed all 419
heartbeat recovery tests successfully in 376.94s on the identical CI
checkout
([retry](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42731309796/job/129561196792)).
It is not classified as infrastructure or a known flake.
- Final exact head `ba1f85f18085dd0e84c594ed0cb68d5bf817c93c`: all 61
checks terminal (56 success, four skipped, one neutral); required CI is
green
([workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42731309796)).
Fresh Greptile is 5/5 with every review thread resolved
([review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/20418#issuecomment-6754705323)).

Focused commands:

```sh
node --import ./cli/node_modules/tsx/dist/loader.mjs packages/db/src/test-postgres-command.ts pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/remote-workspace-cohort-migration.test.ts -t "shares the merged child verifier|joins active capture peers|keeps every authority and activity unpublished"
pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatComposer.test.tsx
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck
pnpm check:token-gates
```

## Risks

- Reuse is limited to one invocation under the same complete source and
finalizer fences. Different physical roots, Git roots, recorded child
sets and discovery mode have different keys. No local-byte proof is
stored durably or reused after restart.
- Initial and final maps are separate. A child change during any parent
upload must fail the fresh final verification before the atomic
publication transaction starts.
- Final readers all finish before an error can release the source fence.
Per-member database child rows, source fingerprints, journals, keys and
publication locks retain their existing checks.
- This reduces repeated verification for aliases. It does not change
capture concurrency, upload policy or immutable checkpoint validation.
Hosted speedup remains unverified.
- The CI repair must distinguish task data from explicit draft intent.
Only a successful send with the same choice generation clears its
override; a later draft selection and failed-save rollback retain it.
Regression tests cover these transitions. It adds no styling, request,
or persistence changes.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with tool use and code execution. The runtime does
not expose a more specific model identifier or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-09 19:28:31 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 88186fe578 fix(workspaces): preserve unmaterialized repository intent during migration (#20416)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Workspace migration preserves saved files when a web server becomes
replaceable.
> - A repository request records intent before any checkout exists.
> - Online migration currently requires that request to finish, even
when preparation needs credentials and has saved no repository files.
> - This pull request preserves that database intent while migrating the
existing workspace files.
> - Normal admission still owns repository acquisition and authorization
after restore.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**
Online workspace migration refuses a pending repository request, or a
request marked `needs_repair` with `repository_preparation_failed`, even
when its contained checkout path does not exist. This can force an
unrelated agent turn and credential acquisition before existing files
can be preserved.

**Expected behavior**
Preserve an absent, unpinned repository request unchanged. Migrate the
existing files under the normal source locks. Prepare the repository
only on a later authorized admission.

**Steps to reproduce**
1. Create a task-scoped local workspace with saved files and an absent
repository checkout.
2. Keep its repository request pending, or let canonical preparation
fail before checkout publication.
3. Attempt online workspace migration. Before this fix, it refuses with
`repository_preparation_unresolved`.

**Paperclip version or commit**
Reproduced against master `8004ad069e`.

**Deployment mode**
Self-hosted control plane with PostgreSQL and local legacy workspace
files. The regression uses real local PostgreSQL and independent
filesystem restore.

Related migration work: #20371. No duplicate open unmaterialized-request
fix was found in the GitHub search.

## What Changed

- Accept unchanged pending requests and canonical preparation failures
only when no pin or branch exists and the contained checkout path is
absent.
- Require a proven online source or the existing offline writer-stop
contract.
- Leave companion workspace requests under their existing strict
blocker. Classify the current workspace request with its filesystem
check.
- Extend existing migration and cold-admission fixtures. Repository rows
retain their catalog, requested ref, failure state, timestamps, and
identity.

## Verification

- RED: the real PostgreSQL/filesystem regression produced two
`repository_preparation_unresolved` failures for online pending and
failed requests. Offline pending passed. Duration: 24.95 seconds.
- Local server TypeScript check passed with Node 24 and pnpm 9.15.4.
- GREEN on final head `eeaea6134a56397ca8c12ed8f7009a19c41d79b1`: 18
focused cases passed across the existing migration and cold-admission
suites in 77.48 seconds. This covers offline pending intent, online
pending/failed intent, active preparation and partial checkout refusals,
strict companion requests, publication races, real archive restore, and
later normal repository preparation.
- The first GREEN attempt reached successful cold preparation, then
failed one inherited assertion that expected the old failure code after
success. The assertion now expects the canonical owner to clear it. The
migration row-equality checks had already passed; no production change
was needed for this assertion failure.
- Final-head [PR workflow
42723571639](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42723571639)
completed SUCCESS. The [final `ci / verify`
gate](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42723571639/job/129531238991)
passed at 2026-11-10 00:08:04 UTC. The full rollup contains 55
successful checks and 4 intentional skips, with no pending or failed
checks. Greptile reviewed exact head
`eeaea6134a56397ca8c12ed8f7009a19c41d79b1` at 23:52:42 UTC with 5/5, a
successful check, and no inline threads. The optional `pnpm verify
--explain` selection was invalidated when the assertion commit landed
during selection; no verification pass is claimed from it. Focused local
tests and required CI supply the verification scope.
- The first local test invocation could not resolve the plugin SDK
before its local build. It ran no tests. The SDK was then built and the
RED regression ran successfully as a failure proof.

## Risks

- The failed-request exception is limited to
`repository_preparation_failed`. Unknown failures remain blocked.
- Active preparation, a pin, a branch, a partial checkout, unsafe paths,
and unresolved companion requests still block migration.
- Migration does not edit repository intent or grant repository/task
access. A restored request can still fail normal preparation if its
current authorization or source is unavailable.
- Offline migration retains its existing writer-stop and maintenance
checks. Online migration retains its source, task, lifecycle, and
publication fences.
- This patch changes internal migration admission. No schema, public
API, user command, or documentation contract changes.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and tool use. The exact
serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-09 18:10:09 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 6583ffa3b4 fix(workspaces): migrate task directories with legacy shared mode (#20371)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - A control-plane replacement must restore saved work without its old
disk.
> - Online workspace migration saves a guarded physical source to object
storage.
> - Some older task directories have shared workspace mode in their
saved metadata.
> - Their physical paths still identify one company and one source
issue.
> - The selected-source check rejects that mode even though the alias
check accepts it.
> - This pull request admits the old mode under the same physical-source
and writer guards.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18835 and #19873 for workspace preservation and source-fence
ownership. Related #11914 addresses mode selection during workspace
reuse. This branch also carries the one-line API discovery correction
shared with #20370. The search found no duplicate fix for this migration
admission path.

**What happened?**

Online migration rejects an ordinary local task directory when its row
has legacy `shared_workspace` mode. The directory can have the exact
managed company and source-issue path, with no repository or branch. The
selected-source check requires `isolated_workspace`, while its existing
alias check permits both modes.

**Expected behavior**

Admit either saved mode only when the same physical path, company,
source issue, aliases, lifecycle state and writer checks prove a safe
source. Preserve the saved mode. Do not require global maintenance.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Create a `local_fs`, `project_primary` workspace with
`shared_workspace` mode, a source issue, and a null provider reference.
2. Put its files at the managed
`isolated-workspaces/<company>/<sourceIssue>` path.
3. Inventory online migration. The previous code reports that the source
is unproven.
4. With this fix, migrate through the existing owner and restore the
saved archive.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Base: `0e3fdebea8257bdff11573081c76b306f12db230` from freshly fetched
master.

**Deployment mode**

Online local-filesystem workspace migration with durable snapshots.

## What Changed

- Permit `shared_workspace` beside `isolated_workspace` in the existing
physical task-source admission check. All other checks remain in their
existing owners.
- Extend the existing migration and archive-restore fixture with the
legacy shared-mode task path and null provider reference.
- Use the truthful task-case lookup summary “Find the cases for a task”.
This restores its existing first-page discovery contract without
changing search scores, pagination or tests.

## Verification

- Canonical worktree preflight passed in 26.2 seconds with cached Node
24 and pnpm 9.15.4. The existing SDK dependency preparation completed
before the server tests. An initial direct test attempt could not
resolve the unbuilt SDK and executed no test cases.
- **RED:** Against the previous admission rule, the original
project-path fixture passed and the new task-path variant failed with
`eligible: false`: 1 passed, 1 failed, 86 skipped, 13.58 seconds.
- **GREEN:** All **88 tests** in
`server/src/services/remote-workspace-online-source.test.ts` passed in
**35.47 seconds** after the one-line fix. This includes migration,
archive restore, foreign and mismatched source aliases, source-issue
fencing, active execution, lifecycle, and publication-race controls.
- Command: `node node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run
server/src/services/remote-workspace-online-source.test.ts
--maxWorkers=1 --fsModuleCache` under Node 24.
- `git diff --check` passed. Tests used disposable PostgreSQL and a
local object-storage provider. Hosted migration acceptance remains
separate.
- Required CI [attempt
1](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42704874763/attempts/1)
failed on previous head `c69ea90bc0f2f18707336004598e2429f590790d`.
[Server shard
12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42704874763/job/129459250886)
failed `case-history-api-discovery.test.ts:14`: the first five results
for `case for task` did not include `GET /api/issues/{issueId}/cases`.
This test source is unchanged in this PR. The dependent final verify
gate failed. The attempt remains a nonpass; no retry has been requested.
- The shared API discovery diagnosis reproduced the existing lookup
route at rank six. The summary omitted a query term. The correction from
#20370 changes only that truthful summary. On final head
`0d645370545130a8a835da8c1a77030562b29049`, the unchanged three-case API
discovery regression passed in **10.64 seconds**. The 88-case workspace
proof above remains valid for its unchanged source and fixture inputs;
it was not rerun.
- Final head `0d645370545130a8a835da8c1a77030562b29049`: [fresh required
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42707521663)
**passed** at 22:13:53 UTC on November 9. All 51 workflow jobs are
accounted for: 49 successful and 2 skipped. The [final verify
aggregate](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42707521663/job/129476327386)
passed. The exact-head rollup and classic Snyk status are successful,
with no failed or pending checks.
- Fresh Greptile review is **5/5** for this final head, with no open
inline threads. Ponytail's **5/5** review covers previous head
`c69ea90bc0f2f18707336004598e2429f590790d`; it is historical evidence
for the unchanged workspace patch, not a final-head review. The old
failed CI attempt remains recorded above.

## Risks

- This admits a previously refused saved metadata shape. The physical
directory must still match the company and original source issue. The
alias check still rejects a different issue on that task path.
- Source, lifecycle, task and active-run fences are unchanged. No live
metadata is rewritten to gain admission. Saved workspace modes and
snapshot formats carry forward; no schema or command changes are needed.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`), with reasoning, repository
tools and code execution. Context-window size is not exposed by the
runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-09 16:15:47 -06:00
Dotta 1b7fe33432 fix(workspaces): preserve import verification across process restarts (#20311)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Online import preserves old local files before the web server can
use a disposable filesystem.
> - A parent import must authenticate saved child archives before it can
omit their directories.
> - The operation journal preserves import identity, but completed child
checks existed only in process memory.
> - A container restart therefore repeated downloads, decryption and
restoration that had already succeeded.
> - This pull request saves a versioned verification receipt on each
immutable child snapshot.
> - A replacement process can reuse those checks while it reacquires
locks and verifies current local files.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19854 for verification reuse within a live source fence. Refs
#19873 for cohort import. Refs #20298 for the separate remote-hold
admission fix. Searched related workspace verification and restart PRs;
none provides durable child verification.

**What happened?**

Replacing a server container interrupts a long online import. The
original operation and snapshot survive, but a later invocation
downloads, decrypts and restores completed child archives again. The
current cache ends with the source-lock owner.

**Expected behavior**

Completed immutable checks survive process and scratch loss. Resume
keeps the same operation and snapshot, reuses only correctly bound
verification, and publishes once. Current local files and Git state must
still be checked under fresh source locks.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Import two nested child workspaces, then start the parent import.
2. Kill the importer after a child verification finishes. Remove its
scratch directory.
3. Resume in a new process. Before this fix, the completed child is
downloaded and restored again.

**Paperclip version or commit**

The regression fails on the previous migration verifier. The final
branch includes master at `189fefb99183953be37f0d1084275fbb0f35d6e2`.

**Deployment mode**

Managed Linux server with PostgreSQL and explicit S3 storage
configuration.

## What Changed

- Add optional opaque storage namespace identity. S3 binds it to the
explicit endpoint, region, bucket, normalized prefix and addressing
style. Implicit endpoints retain full verification.
- Save a versioned child-snapshot receipt only after canonical crypto,
manifest and file restoration succeed and a second HEAD confirms the
same strong ETag and size.
- Bind reuse to the complete snapshot reference, key material, child
lineage, source operation and storage namespace. Require a fresh strong
HEAD and canonical validation that the current secret provider can
unwrap the saved snapshot key.
- Keep current directory/Git capture and source-owner checks on every
invocation. Read-only verifier callers do not write checkpoints.
- Merge checkpoint metadata under a short row lock without changing
parent journal hashes, snapshot retention or update timestamps. Bound
reads and writes. Lock timeouts, statement timeouts, deadlocks and
serialization conflicts are safe cache misses. Other errors remain
fatal.
- Extend real PostgreSQL/Git/archive tests with process death, scratch
removal, resume, changed bindings and single publication.

## Verification

- Baseline RED: two import invocations read each child twice. With
durable receipts, each child is read once across both invocations.
- Real process regression passed on the final rebased head: SIGKILL the
owned importer after one checkpoint, delete all scratch, and resume in a
new Node process. It retains the same operation and snapshot, reads each
child once across both processes, and records one publication.
- 53 focused cases passed in 104.86 seconds on the final production
bytes before rebase. They cover existing nested/cohort behavior,
namespace identity, changed source/reference/key/lineage/ETag, unknown
proof versions, weak validators and bounded row contention.
- After clean rebase and stronger scratch/snapshot assertions, the real
process case passed again in 18.54 seconds. Server TypeScript, module
boundaries and diff checks passed on final head
`9da68ee7ce4a778201ef85e21a11c49eeea7bc16`. Required CI supplies
final-head broad coverage.
- The initial restricted-network dependency setup failed; unchanged
preflight passed with normal network access. Initial TypeScript failures
in test pipe assertions were corrected. No failed attempt is counted as
a pass.
- Review found a missing current-master-key check. A real restart
regression with all child checkpoints complete reproduced unsafe
publication after switching to a different valid master key. Follow-up
`7ea92c2abd9ffdb2e7dd81cecf62c8fc7a6e74a5` delegates to the canonical
snapshot-key owner before both durable and in-memory cache hits.
- The fixed process regressions passed 2/2. Ten key-authority and
existing identity/source guard cases passed. The wrong-key process now
refuses with zero additional child payload GETs, no publication, and
unchanged original journal/snapshot rows. Server typecheck, module
boundaries and diff checks passed on the follow-up.
- Review also found that transient database failures could make the
optional checkpoint cache stop a valid import. Read and save now fall
back only for SQLSTATE `55P03`, `57014`, `40P01`, and `40001`.
Connection loss, identity changes, crypto failures, programming errors
and cancellation remain fatal. Reads use a read-only transaction with
one-second lock and eight-second statement limits.
- The checkpoint database-fault regression failed two cases before the
fix. All four recoverable import cases then passed. The final selected
run passed 21 cases, including fatal-error and cancellation controls,
real row contention, both process-restart cases and key/identity guards.
Server typecheck and boundaries passed. Fault injection is limited to
the checkpoint database boundary; the importer, PostgreSQL, Git,
archives, storage and publication remain real.
- Latest master was merged without rewriting published history. Six real
import/process-restart cases passed again on final head
`8c8e4213a680ebb5c8d6864416bc3a4f271e1e76` in 38.03 seconds. [Required
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42658248222)
finished with 54 successful checks and four intentional skips; Snyk
passed. [Fresh
review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/20311#issuecomment-6745354381)
is 5/5 with all four threads addressed and resolved. Hosted verification
after normal release delivery remains pending.

## Risks

- A stale receipt could skip authentication of a different object.
Complete reference/lineage/namespace binding, fresh strong HEAD and
row-locked save validation prevent that reuse. Missing or unsupported
hints trigger full verification.
- Mutable local files can change between attempts. Their source locks
and fresh captures remain required; a checkpoint never certifies current
local bytes.
- Checkpoint persistence can contend with other snapshot owners. It has
one-second lock and eight-second statement limits; the four classified
transient SQL errors retain the normal fully verified path. Other
database errors stop the import so lost source ownership cannot be
hidden.
- No schema, archive format, public API or saved-run identity change.
Older snapshots without receipts remain readable and get full
verification. Existing data and recovery obligations stay intact.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`), with reasoning, repository
tools and code execution. Context-window size is not exposed by the
runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-11-09 11:03:48 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 965ca91dd0 Capture legacy workspace cohorts under one source fence (#19873)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Workspace migration preserves local files as authenticated portable
snapshots.
> - Workspaces that share Git storage require one complete source fence.
> - Independent imports contend on that fence and cannot safely run as a
batch.
> - This change adds an opt-in cohort owner that captures members
concurrently and publishes them atomically.
> - Existing source, recovery, snapshot and publication checks remain
authoritative.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

The administrative remote-workspace migration owner for workspaces in
one shared physical source component. Related changes: #19688, #19854
and #19855.

**Current behavior**

Each independent import acquires the complete source fence. Parallel
independent calls therefore contend instead of overlapping archive work.
A caller cannot use a surrounding transaction and assume that a
successful savepoint confirms the outer commit.

**Proposed behavior**

An explicit `migrateRemoteWorkspaceCohort` call selects one to eight
leaves from one proven component. It owns the full
source/lifecycle/copyback fence, uses the original pool for bounded
archive work, validates every member, publishes serially, and returns
success only after the outer commit.

**Reason and benefit**

This supplies a correctness-gated path for a controlled two-member
hosted qualification. It makes no wall-clock speedup claim. No running
app call site or scheduler selects cohorts automatically.

**Breaking changes**

The existing single-import API retains its guards and rejects a journal
owned by a cohort. New cohort journals require the same complete member
set on resume.

## What Changed

- Extract the existing reservation, capture, validation and publication
stages for reuse by both owners.
- Add an opt-in cohort API with default concurrency two and a maximum of
eight. Every member must share the same complete physical/Git/alias
component; selected roots must be leaves relative to each other.
- Persist exact cohort and operation membership in the existing journal.
Compare all selected fingerprints with the aggregate proof before the
first reservation under the complete fence, and recheck each member when
reserving its journal. Refuse foreign journals, incomplete or mixed
replay sets, lost fences and changed sources. Keep all authorities and
activity events unpublished if the outer commit fails.
- Share the merged nested-child verifier inside one complete fence.
Queue its prepare calls, retain its two-child bound and authenticated
immutable proof, and recheck local bytes and database bindings on every
pass.
- Document the API, exact-membership resume protocol, resource bounds
and required hosted qualification.

## Verification

- Integration head `fce1896010`: 32/32 PostgreSQL/filesystem cases
across the cohort owner, the complete merged nested-verifier suite, and
five existing parent-import cases.
- Final source-proof repair: 19/19 cohort-owner cases pass, including
real first- and last-member metadata changes before reservation,
changed-source partial-resume refusal, mixed local/imported refusal with
storage forbidden, cancelled/failed/finished admission, a late finished
timestamp, complete fences, queued child-proof reuse, cold restore,
cancellation, commit failure and exact replay. All local database checks
use the canonical owned wrapper, one Vitest worker and Node 24.22.2 on
macOS arm64/PostgreSQL 18.1.
- Final rebased head is based on
`fbe689938c3bf8c5849d2cd56b9da90029db9389`, including current
source-owner, database-schema and Runner contract changes. The 19-case
owner suite, full server layered source/tests/test-tree typechecks,
module boundaries and diff checks are rerun on that base; required CI
supplies the native Runner qualification.
- Selection-only `node scripts/local-verify.mjs --base
68db7ed9e3 --explain` exceeded its
60-second observation bound before producing a plan. It supplies no test
pass; required CI must supply broad coverage.
- Genuine replay RED: a committed two-member cohort accepted a
one-member replay. The repaired owner requires its full
succeeded-journal/snapshot membership.
- Genuine terminal-journal RED: read-only preflight accepted a
cancelled, finished saved member, and apply created two pending
snapshots and the missing peer journal before refusing later. The repair
rejects that state before preflight eligibility or snapshot work and
rechecks unfinished state before publication.
- Genuine source-proof race REDs: early workspace metadata drift could
strand a partial journal. A first repair checked each member only when
reserving it; an additional last-member regression showed that an
earlier journal could still be written before noticing the changed
member. The final owner compares the complete preimage in the existing
fenced preflight before the first reservation and retains
per-reservation checks. Both first- and last-member cases now leave zero
journals/snapshots and permit a fresh attempt. Changed sources after a
genuine partial reservation still refuse.
- Coverage includes parallel uploads, cold restore with originals
removed, complete source/copyback fences, exact partial-reservation
resume, actual read-only preflight with storage forbidden,
foreign/changed journals, peer failure and cancellation, fence
connection loss, and a real deferred outer-commit failure.
- Prior head `70bc2740d0` passed all CI after one explicitly bounded
same-head retry of server shard 4. Its first attempt observed an
unrelated heartbeat/plugin test still running at a five-second wait;
automatic test retry then hit the fixed-name environment uniqueness
constraint. The test and 1,100 relevant owner files matched the nearest
successful base gate. The one job retry passed the target test in
3,491ms and all 3,045 shard tests. Original failures remain recorded;
their initial cause is unknown. This does not supply CI acceptance for
the later repair head.
- Earlier prototype evidence remains historical: 286 PostgreSQL controls
and twelve cold restores passed on its prior base. Six macOS timing runs
were inconclusive under contention, including slower cohort runs. They
are not speedup or hosted acceptance evidence.
- Hosted acceptance remains a two-member same-component leaf canary with
no imported children, followed by same-host timing, peak-memory and
scratch-headroom observations before considering a larger batch.

Run the focused owner file from `server/` with the canonical temporary
PostgreSQL owner:

```sh
node ../cli/node_modules/tsx/dist/cli.mjs ../packages/db/src/test-postgres-command.ts -- node ../node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run src/services/remote-workspace-cohort-migration.test.ts --fsModuleCache --maxWorkers 1 --hookTimeout 90000
```

Final head `112ffeb20c272c6ef5e1e0956be889c85511f0d0` passed [required
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42402942287)
with 56 successful checks and four skips; the aggregate is green.
[Greptile reviewed this exact head at
5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19873#issuecomment-6710780943),
and a fresh paginated review-thread read has zero unresolved findings.

## Risks

- Concurrent archive work increases CPU, memory, scratch space, database
and storage load. Admission must count logical member workers and up to
two nested-child workers, not Node processes. Eight-member use remains
unqualified.
- The complete cohort fence lasts until all started work joins. Slow
callbacks can delay cancellation and associated source writers.
- The exact journal exception is internal and binds company, cohort,
workspace and operation IDs. Wrong or changed membership fails closed;
operators must inspect unknown outcomes before resuming the same full
set.
- Existing remote recovery holds, provider obligations, source files and
history remain preserved. A successful import does not settle those
independent obligations.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, code execution and repository
tools. This runtime does not expose a more specific backend model ID or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-07 13:02:54 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 54b83b15a3 Reuse authenticated nested workspace verification (#19854)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip preserves the work that its agents produce.
> - Portable workspace migration can save nested workspaces before their
parent.
> - The parent must prove that a committed child snapshot covers any
files it omits.
> - The existing owner downloads and restores the same immutable child
archive before and after parent capture.
> - The fresh local-file checks are required, but the repeated immutable
archive check is avoidable within one live source fence.
> - This pull request reuses only an authenticated archive proof with an
unchanged reference and provider identity.
> - It also bounds independent child branches at two workers while
retaining every fresh local and Git check.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19805 and #19688. A duplicate search found no separate fix for
repeated child archive verification.

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

Online Git parent migration after nested workspaces have committed
portable snapshots.

**Subsystem affected**

server/ — workspace migration and nested snapshot coverage.

**Current behavior**

Each parent verification pass downloads, authenticates and restores
every child archive, then captures the child's current local tree. The
second pass repeats the immutable download and restore. Independent
child branches also run in sequence. A large parent can exhaust its
existing budget before parent capture begins.

**Proposed behavior**

One private verifier belongs to the existing live source-owner
transaction. It can reuse a completed archive proof only when the full
snapshot reference, operation, child closure, ETag and byte length still
match. Missing or weak ETags and non-cancellation HEAD errors keep full
verification. Caller cancellation still stops work. A changed identity
forces fresh authenticated readback. The owner still captures current
local bytes and Git state in both passes.

**Reason and benefit**

Remove duplicate immutable work without treating an old local-file check
as current authority. Two independent topmost branches can overlap.
Recursive descendants stay serial within those branches, so the bound
does not grow with depth.

## What Changed

- Add a private per-fence verifier to the existing tree owner. It clears
its proof map at the end of the import and refuses a different owner
transaction.
- Reuse only completed ciphertext, GCM, plaintext, and canonical restore
verification with a matching fresh provider identity.
- Retain all current database, operation, recursive coverage,
local-file, Git and manifest checks on each pass.
- Bound independent branches at two. Abort queued work on failure and
await active peers before scratch cleanup or fence release.
- Use the verifier only in the existing online Git importer. Keep the
offline full-verification path and all capture deadlines unchanged.
- Document resource admission, fallback behavior and the hosted
acceptance limit.

## Verification

- Genuine baseline RED through the real parent importer: child GET
counts 2 + 2, canonical restores 4, maximum overlapping readbacks 1. The
four fresh local child captures already pass.
- Exact positive GREEN: child GET counts 1 + 1, canonical restores 2,
maximum overlapping readbacks 2. All four fresh local child captures
remain.
- The fixture uses real encrypted archives and the canonical S3
provider's local HTTP HEAD parsing with actual payload-derived ETags. It
uses fake fixture credentials only.
- Final focused suite: **13/13 PASS**, 148.36 seconds, at `eaf17d3340`.
This includes recursive max-two completion, failure/cancellation
joining, identity/ref/content changes, same-fence alias reuse and
stale-owner refusal.
- Both affected existing migration suites: **256/256 PASS**, 201.84
seconds, at initial head `eaf17d3340`.
- The HEAD-failure review repair has genuine two-case RED evidence and
three passing failure/cancellation controls. Full layered
source/test-tree typecheck and module boundaries pass at repaired head
`763648adad`. Final exact-head controls: **21/21 PASS**, 86.63 seconds
(all 16 new controls plus five existing parent cases).
- The first extended recursive fixture correctly failed because it
created a Git branch after taking an earlier snapshot. The fixture now
creates all branches before any import; the source-change guard remains
intact.
- Exact-head CI: 56 success, four expected skips, and one neutral
Paperclip Review. Required gates pass; Greptile is fresh 5/5. Its
optional aggregate-handler cleanup recommendation is resolved with the
intentional fail-closed rationale.
- Local verification is macOS arm64 / Node26.4.0. The observed hosted
parent still needs to complete within its unchanged budget after normal
delivery. No hosted timing improvement is claimed here.

## Risks

- Two simultaneous child verifications can use more I/O, memory and
scratch space. Operators must count logical verifications, even in one
process.
- HEAD availability and provider identity are required for proof reuse.
Providers without a usable ETag perform the full check.
- Reuse lasts only for one live transaction. A retry, changed reference,
changed provider identity, process exit or owner change requires fresh
verification.
- Faster verification does not waive changed child bytes or guarantee a
specific hosted completion time. No provider turn, authority marker,
source deletion or larger timeout is introduced.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository and code-execution tools.
The exact serving model revision and context-window size are not exposed
to this agent.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-07 10:45:17 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip d5c4f7dd02 fix: preserve shared Git sources during online workspace migration (#19688)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip preserves the work produced by its agents.
> - Remote workspace migration must preserve legacy Git history and
local edits.
> - Linked checkouts can share administration and objects with other
tasks.
> - A task lock alone cannot exclude writers of a shared or borrowed
store.
> - The online source owner must derive and retain the full physical
ownership closure.
> - This change reuses task, project, lifecycle and finalizer locks for
that closure.
> - Idle legacy Git work can then migrate while unrelated remote turns
continue.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #19642.

**What happened?**

Online migration keeps legacy Git sources blocked because several task
checkouts can share a project base or a private Git cache. A read-only
source observation found 160 pending Git records, 120 distinct paths and
nine common stores. Its largest project cohort contained 126 records and
110 task owners. An ordinary-directory fence cannot preserve these
sources by itself.

**Expected behavior**

Derive the physical source owners from stable Git metadata. Hold their
existing source and lifecycle keys through publication. Retain all
history and recovery obligations. Reject foreign aliases, unknown stores
and changed sources. Let unrelated object-backed work continue.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Create a managed project checkout and linked task worktrees.
2. Keep a settled prepared recovery source on a sibling task.
3. Keep unrelated remote work running.
4. Request an online import of an idle leaf checkout.
5. The existing owner keeps the shared source blocked.

**Paperclip version or commit**

This branch builds on merged #19642 (`7ac99718a4`) and fresh master
`fb3cf1a072`. It adds the Git closure. It does not add a writers-stopped
shortcut.

**Deployment mode**

Hosted native Runner with remote workspace storage. Local qualification
uses owned synthetic Git repositories, disposable PostgreSQL databases
and the actual archive and storage owners.

## What Changed

- Read bounded stable Git pointers, common-directory metadata and local
alternates. Derive the complete physical source ownership cohort.
Preserve all object stores.
- Retain common and borrowed store owners in preparation, lifecycle,
runtime, expiration and actual reopen paths. Keep company boundaries and
the existing 128-key bound.
- Hold exact sibling native recovery proofs under their existing
physical finalizer keys. Recheck descriptors, allocations, recovery
actions and source identities before capture and publication. Preserve
original states and warnings.
- Require leaf-first nested imports. Reuse the existing immutable child
download, restore and source comparison before parent exclusion.
- Bind the self-contained archive owner to the held Git namespaces. Keep
its three walks, history normalization, fsck, bytes and digest format.
Reject bare, detached, network, unknown or changed Git storage.
- Check both foreign path fields. Keep foreign metadata private.
Document the proof, bounds, source observation and remaining eligibility
limits.

## Verification

- Final revision `2934e41c923b93e16508b978c849b747c86be645`: all checks
are terminal, with 56 successful and four skipped, zero failures and
zero pending. The [required CI
aggregate](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42326464408/job/128266279210)
passed. Build, types, all server/Runner/serialized suites, end-to-end
aggregate and Snyk passed. [Fresh exact-head Greptile
review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19688#issuecomment-6699760104)
is 5/5 with no open threads. GitHub reports MERGEABLE and CLEAN.

- Review then found two correctness gaps: an ordinary managed directory
inside an unrelated host repository was blocked, and a Git parent could
miss a completed nested operation after its child snapshot became
missing or deleted. Three actual-owner regressions reproduced both gaps
in 9.70 seconds. The corrected owner passes 12 focused cases in 17.08
seconds. It imports and restores only the ordinary root bytes, preserves
the outer repository, rejects both missing/deleted child receipts before
a parent journal, and retains valid/changed child coverage and
private-cache contention. Its wrapper exited 0 and cleanup completed.
The first bootstrap attempt failed before tests ran because the host
exhausted its 32 shared-memory segment limit; no shared services were
stopped and no pass is claimed for that attempt. The final qualified
source/test type graph, module boundaries and diff checks pass.
- Receipt scans keep canonical path resolution. A lexical SQL prefix can
omit children reached through symlinked ancestors. The observed full
metadata closure completed in 1.17 seconds; no measured bottleneck
justifies weakening that alias proof. Writer admission still rejects
uncertain Git ownership before mutation. Expiration returns its typed
skip, and reopen returns its structured failure. Runtime and lifecycle
do not bypass an unknown source. No broad error-contract change was
added.

- Full CI at `720104ea975e` exposed five existing boundary cases across
three server shards. Four exact cases reproduced locally as failures in
25.98 seconds. Reopen now preserves its structured failure when source
inspection rejects the path, without reconstructing it. Runtime
recognizes only the exact regular ignore-only `.git/info/exclude`
fragment; migration still rejects that fragment. The original
arbitrary-path and file-URL import/delete-host/resume fixtures keep both
supported input forms and use the genuine offline setup path after their
sole writer finishes. The production mode gate is unchanged. A new
real-owner control proves the offline flag still rejects a running
legacy database writer.
- The final focused run passed all ten cases across four suites in 22.75
seconds, including all five CI failures, invalid-pointer admission,
fragment rejection, offline writer exclusion and actual nested reopen
lock ordering. Its wrapper exited 0 and cleanup completed. The known
invalid-pointer case remains fail-closed; the separate unexpected-I/O
diagnostic retains safe error metadata without command text or
credentials. Existing Git stderr redaction coverage remains intact. The
final metadata reader suite passed 20 cases in 2.68 seconds. The
qualified server/test source type graph, module boundaries and diff
checks pass. No production assertions or timeout defaults were weakened.
Fresh CI and review are required for the repair revision.

- A later review found that the ordinary early return still used only
one foreign path field. The actual ordinary providerRef-only regression
failed as incorrectly eligible. One source-path owner now enumerates
both local locators for company/foreign ordinary and Git scans, layout
checks, early admission, lifecycle/reopen/runtime and
expiration/move/preparation retention. Capture and display keep their
original preferred path. The actual owner canary passed 49 cases across
two suites in 109.15 seconds. It covers
cwd-only/ref-only/different/symlink locators, same-company mismatches,
foreign owners, lifecycle ordering, Git/recovery imports and
expiration/reopen. Three selected-locator fallback cases also failed
before their guard; the final eight-case control passed in 31.05
seconds, including the configured alias and valid import/private-child
controls. All wrappers exited 0 and completed cleanup. The
metadata/locator suite passed 19 cases. The final source/test type
graph, module boundaries and diff checks pass.

- Review found two P1 gaps. Both configured-directory symlink cases
failed before canonicalization. The actual parent import lost an
already-imported child's unique private cache and failed its archive
fence instead of retaining that owner. The corrected real-owner canary
passed four cases in 20.78 seconds: configured symlink runtime
provisioning, private-cache contention before the parent journal,
successful parent publication after release, and unchanged/changed child
coverage. The metadata suite passed 15 cases in 4.14 seconds. Both
wrappers exited 0 and cleanup completed.
- A fresh source read-only observation found 160 pending Git records and
nine common stores. An additional exact receipt query found 1,243
completed migration receipts and 557 nested source paths under pending
Git roots. All 126 records in the largest project were present in the
captured Git metadata set. For all 110 present candidate workspace
records, the derived closure fits the unchanged 128-key cap. The worst
case needs 110 issue keys and one project key, with 17 keys of headroom.
Its 173 imported children introduce no physical issue owner outside
those 110 logical task owners. This checks the observed key bound only.
It does not claim migration eligibility or a coherent snapshot.
- The initial stacked CI did not run four Runner test lanes: trusted
master passed new --package-lane/--native-server options to the old base
lane script. The branch is now rebased onto actual merged master and
retargeted before synchronization. It includes the canonical current
lane parser without an unrelated Runner patch. Fresh new-head CI is
required.

- The actual importer/source owner run passed 36 cases across three
suites in 187.75 seconds. It covers sibling prepared recovery, unrelated
running remote work, common-cache contention, changed
coordinator/allocation/path state during upload, exact nested coverage,
dirty unpushed work, and existing expiration/reopen owners. Wrapper exit
0 and cleanup completed.
- A separate previously hanging lifecycle-worker restore passed in 17.33
seconds with the unchanged 15-second test-body limit. An earlier run
timed out in three expiration/reopen cases and blocked cleanup; its
wrapper later exited 1. These failures remain recorded. They are not
counted as passes.
- Two boundary controls first failed: a foreign providerRef-only alias
was incorrectly eligible, and actual reopen did not admit its distinct
cache owner at the initial source boundary. The narrow guards now
inspect both foreign locators and derive physical Git keys before the
raw lifecycle transaction. The foreign alias and existing real nested
reopen contention passed. The private-cache control first retained
contradictory recorded source provenance and stayed fail-closed after
release. The corrected present legacy-worktree fixture passed in 12.61
seconds. These failed attempts remain recorded; they are not passes.
- The metadata reader and serialized/local archive controls use actual
Git repositories. They compare archive bytes and digests, remove every
original source, restore staged and unstaged work, and run fsck. The
metadata reader passed 13 cases in 2.85 seconds. The local/serialized
archive controls passed nine cases in 9.27 seconds. All processes exited
0. An additional actual importer control changed a relative commondir
pointer to the absolute name of the same store during upload.
Publication was rejected, the uploaded journal remained available, and
original files stayed intact (one case, 5.86 seconds; wrapper exit 0 and
cleanup complete).
- The final rebased full local server/test type graph passes with
db/shared/Runner source aliases because reused dependency declarations
predate new master exports. The first rebased attempt reported those
stale declaration fields/tables, and is not counted as a pass. Module
boundaries and diff checks pass. Standard package builds, types and
broad regression checks remain required in CI.
- No hosted import, admission hold, cancellation, provider mutation,
source filesystem write or shared-cache Git command was performed for
this change. The source observation is read-only and is not a locked
eligibility proof.

## Risks

- A missing writer owner could make physical source exclusion
incomplete. Existing mutation owners retain the same
company/task/project keys, and uncertain metadata fails closed.
- A project can contain a large cohort. Limits remain finite. A bound
failure keeps the source blocked.
- Bare, detached, unowned or network Git stores remain blocked online.
Missing archived sources retain their existing authenticated
reconstruction path.
- Exact recovery proofs preserve authority and obligations. They do not
infer provider termination or mark a prepared descriptor finalized.
- This change does not claim all observed Git records are immediately
eligible. Existing preparation, provider, recovery, runtime and
source-change blockers remain.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use and code execution.
The host does not expose a more specific backend model ID or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-06 20:08:19 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 7ac99718a4 fix(workspaces): fence legacy sources for online migration (#19642)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip coordinates AI agents and preserves their saved work.
> - Remote workspace storage replaces legacy host directories with
durable snapshots.
> - Several legacy workspace records can name one physical project
directory.
> - A task lock alone cannot exclude a new task that selects that
directory.
> - Terminal recovery records can retain valid sources after physical
writers settle.
> - This change fences the source through its real preparation and
lifecycle owners.
> - Idle ordinary sources can then migrate while unrelated remote work
continues.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

Online migration rejects ordinary legacy directories when several
workspace records name the same path. A source inspection found 45
aliases across three project roots with no root Git marker or previously
imported nested child. The instance also had unrelated running remote
work. Requiring the whole instance to drain prevented useful migration
of these idle sources.

Terminal native sources and superseded finalization attempts also remain
blocked after their exact physical and durable owners settle. Their
files, provider allocations and recovery records must remain available
through the change of file authority.

**Expected behavior**

Migrate an idle ordinary source under a derived physical source fence.
Let unrelated object-backed turns continue. Preserve provider and
recovery obligations. Keep unknown writers, shared Git stores and
uncertain source state blocked.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Create several local workspace records for one managed project
directory.
2. Give the aliases different source tasks. Leave their local writers
idle.
3. Keep a valid remote workspace turn running on another source.
4. Inspect or apply migration to an alias. The old owner returns
`overlapping_workspace_requires_maintenance`.
5. Retain a terminal native prepared source with a null coordinator
owner, or an old finalize attempt with an exact later committed receipt.
The old online path keeps these sources blocked.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Current tested head: `7478c817f09f7eed396922c0f7831af07ae6ff14`, based
on master `8621bcf53ee2e4bbefb7d193add42dd544ca06e8`. Related recovery
work: #19131.

**Deployment mode**

Hosted native Runner with remote workspace storage. Qualification uses
disposable local PostgreSQL databases, actual archive/storage owners and
synthetic source trees. The source observations were read-only.

## What Changed

- Retain the existing company/task source keys and add one physical
managed-project key. Heartbeat source selection, materialization, reopen
and lifecycle owners share it. Configured aliases of canonical task
directories retain their original task key.
- Fence runtime provision and each configured service CWD through both
startup owners. Check all unsettled service CWDs for physical source
overlap, even when workspace IDs differ. Runs with no services keep
their filesystem-free path.
- Derive a bounded ordinary alias closure. Lock every alias task and
lifecycle key. Reject foreign companies, changed membership, unproven
descendants, included Git metadata and other unresolved writer
obligations.
- Commit remote authority on the connection that holds source exclusion.
Refresh a stale selected local workspace after admission if migration
published remote authority. Publish activity after commit.
- Admit exact terminal native recovery sources under the existing
physical finalizer keys. Bind descriptors, allocations and owner
checkpoints to journaled fingerprints. Recheck them before capture and
publication.
- Add a separate company-scoped online entry for exact superseded
finalization receipts. Keep the offline entry's deployment prerequisites
and keep inventory read-only.
- Document the proof and the remaining Git/common-store extension. The
original files stay in place. No new scheduler, deployment action or
database migration is added.

## Verification

- Review found that the real reopen path could hold lifecycle exclusion
while waiting for a project source. The new actual nested-reopen
regression failed before the repair: lifecycle lock count was 1 while
another connection held the project fence. The repair acquires declared
and physical project sources before reconstruction and lifecycle. The
contention case, ordinary-fetch restore and runtime nested restore
passed. The lifecycle-worker restore first completed in 16.64 seconds
but exceeded its unchanged 15-second body limit; a bounded warm rerun
passed at that same limit. Both wrappers exited and completed cleanup.
The source type graph, module-boundary check and diff check pass. Final
7478 CI passed: 58 successful jobs, three skipped, one neutral and a
successful Snyk context. Fresh Greptile is 5/5 for exact7478, with no
unresolved threads. [Final
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42318150314/job/128240631573).

- Full CI on `e4283b3452` passed the other server, build and type
checks. One exposure owner case failed: two execution workspaces
received one preview pair after source admission serialized their
starts. The first local seven-case run reproduced that failure; adding
the owner argument alone did not change the hash payload. The completed
repair binds run-scoped reuse to its execution-workspace owner. All
seven existing real-process/fake-broker cases then passed in 13.81
seconds, with wrapper exit 0 and cleanup complete. Public scope IDs and
explicit project/agent sharing are unchanged. The final7478 head passed
all required CI and fresh review gates.

- The service/source/restore owner canary passed 25 cases across four
suites before the final no-service fast-path guard (41.33 seconds). This
includes actual project service processes with a different project ID
and no execution-workspace ID. Their startup waits for source ownership,
migration stays blocked while they run, and the source becomes eligible
after their verified stop. The final three-case runtime canary passed at
the final source inputs (18.70 seconds). It covers that fast path and
both service-CWD variants. Both wrappers exited 0 and completed cleanup.
- The boundary-repair canary passed 9 cases across four suites at
`7c18f1c170`. It covers the real rehome/conversion gateway, project
command provisioning, future task selection, stale imported authority,
foreign-company binding, and existing standalone filesystem callers. The
shared PostgreSQL wrapper exited 0 and completed cleanup. Duration:
94.15 seconds.
- The P1 diagnostic passed 46 cases across five suites at the pre-rebase
P1 revision. It covers the actual importer with an export warning
created by `recordNativeFinalizationFailure`, strict
prepared-source/action bindings, finalizer locks, source/lifecycle
races, unrelated remote execution, and bare Git with external
alternates. It uses the repository shared PostgreSQL wrapper,
`--fsModuleCache`, and a local-only 90-second hook allowance. Duration:
245.44 seconds. No product timeout changed.
- The canonical retained-directory compatibility check passed 22 cases
across two suites. Missing archived task directories still import from
authenticated restore points; they do not need a present-directory
source proof.
- Both initial P1 regressions were observed before the fix. The real
finalizer warning made the importer ineligible. The old archive owner
accepted a nested bare repository borrowing external objects. The new
cases pass and preserve the original warning, prepared descriptor,
allocations and files.
- Prior attempts remain non-passes: the first 23-case canary passed on
an earlier head; its exact-head rerun hit 30-second database
setup/cleanup limits. A read of the owned PostgreSQL server found a
template clone waiting on `DataFileExtend` for 58 seconds. A broader
owner run was intentionally interrupted during slow existing heartbeat
setup. One diagnostic invocation used an invalid CLI option and executed
no tests. A later review canary passed 21 cases and failed the new real
restore contention case: cwd-only admission missed the declared project
of an external worktree. Its fixture also omitted the required
file-repository authorization callback and produced an unhandled
rejection after the failed assertion. The repaired run passed 22 cases,
exited 0 and completed cleanup. These earlier failures are not reported
as passes.
- The recovery owner passed 37 PostgreSQL cases, including 14 new and 23
existing finalized-recovery cases. The operation reconciliation owner
passed 40 cases. The initial archive run passed 103 cases and found a
missing closed diagnostic entry; the corrected diagnostic and expanded
Git rejection cases pass in the P1 run.
- The full server type graph passes with the Runner source exports
mapped locally because this checkout has no built Runner declarations.
The latest module-boundary check and `git diff --check` pass. Standard
package build/typecheck and broad final-head regression coverage remain
required in CI.
- The initial CI exposed missing admission scopes for standalone
filesystem APIs and a changed foreign-company error. The latest repair
keeps those APIs independent of a database and holds physical fences at
their actual database-backed mutation owners. The branch also includes
the existing master fix for unchanged Runner default-model assertions.
New review findings and new-head CI are being checked.
- The local canary command and bounded source selection are documented
in `doc/plans/2026-11-06-online-ordinary-source-fence.md`. Source
observations only read data. A fresh bounded metadata probe found 254
pending legacy records and zero unsettled local-process services. No
live import, hold, cancellation, provider action or source filesystem
write was performed for this change.

## Risks

- Run-scoped reuse now includes execution-workspace ownership in its
private key. Explicit project/agent sharing keeps its previous identity.
- A missing writer owner could make a source proof unsafe. Admission
derives physical aliases, includes future project selection and retains
all existing source/lifecycle/finalizer locks. Unknown and changed state
fail closed.
- Cross-company physical alias checks use bounded minimal-path pages.
Lexical-prefix filtering cannot safely replace them because a symlink
can hide a foreign alias. Unknown paths or more than 10,240 foreign
records leave the source explicitly unproven. More than 1,000
same-company local records also fail closed.
- The project key can serialize local preparation within one project. A
first project waits; additional project acquisition fails on contention
to avoid a lock cycle. Remote authority keeps its remote preparation
path.
- Recovery preservation does not prove provider termination or
successful file recovery. Existing provider allocations, checkpoints,
task intent and recovery actions remain authoritative.
- This slice does not finish shared Git migration. Git
administrative/common-object/alternates closure and exact nested
imported-child coverage remain the next owned extension. No global
writers-stopped shortcut is used online.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use and code execution.
The host does not expose a more specific backend model ID or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-06 18:42:45 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip f5f5184f23 fix(workspaces): preserve retained branches and private commit sources (#19147)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Ephemeral web servers must preserve existing task files before
volume removal.
> - An old private checkout can be absent while its recorded branch
still exists.
> - A deleted branch can also retain its exact commit in the original
private object source.
> - The importer currently rejects these surviving sources.
> - This pull request saves the verified committed tree and records its
exact source proof.
> - It keeps task state, branch ownership and recovery obligations
unchanged.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19138, #19144, #18826.

**What happened?**

Existing Git workspace records can have missing checkout folders and
retained branch objects. The importer returns
`local_source_unsafe_or_missing`. A successful deletion receipt can also
have a valid private object source that the importer overlooks in favor
of a missing or changed project cache.

**Expected behavior**

Save the surviving committed tree from the exact recorded branch or
deletion receipt. Reject competing owners, live worktree registrations,
changed branches and invalid source identities. Do not use the current
default branch as a substitute.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Retain an isolated workspace branch in its managed project cache.
2. Remove its clean checkout but keep the branch and original workspace
record.
3. Attempt workspace migration.
4. Alternatively, retain a deleted commit in its recorded private source
while its shared source is unavailable.

## What Changed

- Pin a retained branch in its verified company and project Git cache.
- Require the recorded private path, no competing workspace owner and no
surviving Git worktree registration or index authority.
- For a user-owned branch, require its exact successful unforced removal
receipt after archival. Preserve the branch ownership metadata.
- Prefer a verified recorded private object source for successful
deletion receipts when that source still exists.
- Recheck branch and receipt proof before publication. Preserve
compatibility with existing migration journals.
- Allow missing active records only through the existing offline writer
fence. Keep their status unchanged.
- Add byte-restoration and rejected-authority tests. Document the source
limits.

- Revalidate and honor interrupted journals' original Git source path.
Reject detached registrations and retained orphan index data. Reuse the
cleanup producer command formatter for paths containing spaces.

## Verification

- 172 focused migration, concurrency and isolated-source tests pass with
real PostgreSQL and Git repositories.
- The previous importer fails the retained-branch and offline-active
restoration cases. The previous source selection also fails the
private-cache and clean user-owned receipt cases.
- Tests remove the old home and restore the pinned commit and task file
bytes. New shared default-branch work is excluded.
- Tests reject competing owners, registered worktrees, missing branch
ownership, deleted branches, changed branch tips, forced removal and
revoked receipts.
- Read-only re-inventory of 79 actual failed source records makes 78
eligible with committed owner overlays. One older local test repository
remains blocked. This is source-overlay qualification, not full
released-image acceptance.
- A separate bounded archive replay completed six imports before its
25-minute deadline. That timing failure remains open; it does not
establish complete migration.
- Local server typecheck has no changed-file diagnostics. Stale linked
declarations prevent a clean local whole-server result. Full clean CI
remains required.
- Serving enrollment and empty-home recovery remain separate acceptance
gates.

- Latest rebased head 9f42901683 passes 172 focused
migration/archive/concurrency tests. Four review regressions fail on the
previous source; the revoked journal source already rejected correctly.
The real cleanup fixture uses an unforced removal under a home path
containing spaces. The orphan-index fixture is locked to keep Git
maintenance from deleting its synthetic retained state before
inspection.
- The prerebase layered server typecheck passed. Current-head full CI
remains required after integrating master. The local environment reset
removed earlier temporary logs; the current red/green logs and source
now live in persistent worktree folders.

- Current-head full CI passes on run 41965901512 after one bounded
failed-shard retry. The first run failed an unrelated status-card
fake-clock deadline assertion by 150 ms; the same source passed the
retry. Its cause remains unestablished, and the first failure log
remains in Actions and persistent local evidence. No migration-related
test failed.

## Risks

- A retained branch saves committed data that still exists. It cannot
certify recovery of files that were already absent.
- User-owned branches remain user-owned. A clean removal receipt grants
preservation authority, not deletion authority.
- Any retained registration, conflicting record or changed proof keeps
migration blocked.
- This PR does not resolve the remaining source, recovery or migration
timing gates.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6.1 Codex, exact model ID `gpt-6.1-sol`. Used for reasoning,
code editing, shell tools and test execution. The runtime does not
expose its context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-04 22:35:55 -06:00
Dotta 82dd3bb702 Preserve unstarted queued turns during offline enrollment (#18887)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Existing-volume enrollment moves server files to durable object
storage.
> - Enrollment stops application deployments before it changes file
authority.
> - A task drain keeps unstarted turns queued in the database.
> - The migration rejected every queued row, so a busy instance could
never finish enrollment without discarding requests.
> - This change preserves unstarted queue intent and continues to reject
running or previously started executions.
> - Users keep their pending turns and saved files through the
conversion.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A preserving enrollment found queued turns after task admission stopped.
The workspace, instruction-file, and historical-log guards treated these
rows as live writers. The drain also prevented the rows from starting,
so waiting could not satisfy the migration guard.

**Expected behavior**

After every old deployment has stopped, maintenance can move files while
unstarted queued turns remain unchanged. The replacement claims those
turns through normal admission. Actual executions and retained execution
ownership continue to block migration.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Queue a turn behind another task.
2. Start a task drain and let the current task finish.
3. Stop the application deployments and run offline enrollment.
4. Observe `active_execution_requires_drain` for the unstarted queued
turn.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced on the migration contract through #18864. This branch starts
at `ab2d2098a2764c511978d1c3e7a3fc5dfcef07f4`.

Related: #18826, #18835, #18841, #18864. Searches for queued enrollment
and queued migration found no duplicate fix.

## What Changed

- Share one offline execution predicate across workspace, agent-file,
and historical-log migration.
- Reuse the existing pre-dispatch evidence predicate; queued turns with
execution markers, saved checkpoints, source events, coordinators, or
environment leases remain blockers.
- Keep task bindings and normal live-migration restrictions unchanged.
- Exercise normal replacement admission after deleting the old
filesystem: the same queued run reads restored workspace bytes and
instructions, completes its original wake, and cannot execute twice.
- Document the offline boundary and queued-turn behavior.

## Verification

- **111 tests passed** across the final 110-case migration suite and
assembled queued-turn heartbeat proof, with real PostgreSQL and local
S3. This includes workspace/log migration, queued ownership blockers,
ordinary agent-file controls, and the actual bundled maintenance
process.
- The maintenance process preserves the queued row while archiving
historical output. The new assembled heartbeat test creates a normal
wake under drain, migrates without changing either row, deletes the
original filesystem, and resumes through normal admission. It reads
saved workspace bytes and the restored instruction bundle, persists one
successful native result, completes the same wake, and verifies a second
sweep does not duplicate execution. Only sandbox transport/provider
execution are scripted; no live model or Daytona calls.
- An earlier optional run-evidence worker integration invocation was
skipped without its dedicated environment; it is outside the changed
offline path.
- Server typecheck, server build, and runtime bundle passed.
- The first maintenance test exposed the separate agent-file guard; that
guard now uses the same offline predicate and the test passes.
- Initial local typecheck attempts lacked CLI dependency links in this
isolated checkout. Restoring dependencies fixed setup without source
changes.
- Full repository checks run in CI. The first head lost spot runners in
Build and serialized tests; one unchanged idle-deadline fixture crossed
UTC midnight and failed its timestamp assertion. Final-head CI passed on
run 41744678994 after retrying a spot-runner shutdown. Greptile reviewed
the exact final head at 5/5; all inline findings are resolved. The
separate Paperclip Review app remains queued. Hosted enrollment remains
pending release qualification and compatibility verification for the
existing provider configuration.

## Risks

The offline predicate relies on Cloud stopping every old application
deployment. It does not make online migration safe. Running executions
always block. Requeued executions with retained ownership also block. No
queued request, task binding, or recovery state is removed or rewritten.
No database schema changes.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 based, with reasoning and tool-assisted code
execution. The exact deployed model identifier and context-window size
are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-11-03 18:33:41 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip 2a16dcf629 fix(workspaces): preserve shared directory trees during enrollment (#18835)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - A volume-free web server needs existing task files in durable object
storage.
> - Historical workspace records can share a physical folder or contain
other task folders.
> - A task-level migration hold cannot fence every alias, and capturing
a parent recursively duplicates nested task data.
> - Offline enrollment imports children first and verifies their durable
coverage before omitting them from a parent archive.
> - Snapshot retention preserves those child versions for as long as a
covering parent depends on them.
> - Existing files, task bindings, and archived states remain intact
through the storage migration.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Builds on merged #18826.

**What happened?**

The per-workspace importer could capture a shared project folder while
another workspace record still owned the same path. It also recursively
included runtime-created nested task workspaces in each parent import.
Packaged enrollment rejected existing workspace data instead of invoking
its migration owner.

**Expected behavior**

Require offline maintenance for overlapping paths. Import nested tasks
before their parents, verify every excluded directory against its saved
snapshot, preserve dependencies through retention, and resume
interrupted imports without replacing existing remote authority.

**Steps to reproduce**

Create a project workspace and another task workspace below its
`.paperclip/worktrees/` directory. Try importing either while ordinary
writers are running, then run offline enrollment. Interrupt a parent
import after upload and resume it.

## What Changed

- Add physical-overlap admission checks and an offline entry-point
guard, including global running and queued executions.
- Import pending records in leaf-first pages through the existing
migration owner.
- Verify nested snapshots by downloading, restoring, and comparing the
original source before and after parent upload; check transitive
dependencies.
- Publish parent dependency receipts under child snapshot row locks.
Retention pins those children and revisits them when the parent is
deleted.
- Index imported-child dependency lookups with a partial GIN index; a
PostgreSQL query-plan regression covers 2,500 unrelated snapshots.
- Propagate cancellation through capture and object storage operations
and preserve existing retry journals.
- Wire workspace migration into packaged maintenance and document its
preservation contract.

## Verification

- The original overlap and duplicate-parent regressions failed before
implementation.
- 73 migration and retention tests pass against real PostgreSQL and
files, including interrupted uploads, resumed batches, equal-path
aliases, changed or missing child data, nested descendants, and active
or queued executions.
- Six S3-compatible storage integration tests pass, including migration
through the maintenance owner and restoration of both parent and child
after deleting the original filesystem.
- The standalone process case was initially skipped because the worktree
had no bundle. After rebuilding the server and runtime bundle, that test
passed against PostgreSQL and S3: authenticated ready/export receipts,
preserved decision secret, blocked application routes, and clean SIGTERM
shutdown.
- Server typecheck, server build, runtime bundle build, and
module-boundary checks passed. Full repository CI passed on
97136a20b9 after targeted retries of
infrastructure-interrupted jobs.
- Review fixes resolve physical paths through symlinked ancestors and
persist each parent journal’s original capture scope, including
pre-change journals. All three new regressions failed before their
fixes. An initial abort/retry test exposed JSON object-key ordering in
the saved scope; deep equality fixes that case, and the full migration
suite passed.
- Three new fixtures initially omitted required workspace fields; one
also omitted its task binding. The fixtures now satisfy the existing
contract; production validation was not relaxed.
- The parent PR's full local suite stopped on a chat retry-notice
timeout and a following fake-timer failure. All four relevant cases
passed separately without source changes; this is not a claim that the
full local suite passed.
- No staging enrollment or live rolling-deploy result is claimed by this
PR.

## Risks

The offline flag is an internal maintenance contract: Cloud must
actually stop every predecessor deployment before starting the process.
Deep or large trees require additional object downloads and source
comparisons and may exceed one maintenance window; import journals
support retry. Dependency lookups are company-scoped and event-driven,
with no added idle polling. Unavailable archived sources and unresolved
recovery/copyback still block migration and require separate owner work.
Unsupported local providers and cleanup_failed workspaces deliberately
remain enrollment blockers: filtering them from both the batch and
eligibility would abandon local files when the volume is detached. Two
regression tests prove that rejected records keep their files and do not
acquire remote authority. Original folders and the original volume
remain retained. The additional review request to ignore parallel-write
policy, stale task ownership, or a missing task binding in offline mode
is intentionally not applied: stopping deployments does not establish
those semantics. #18841 documents the separate owner actions and adds
three offline regressions preserving their files and blocking detach.
The batch reports the first failed workspace and supports journaled
retry; it does not promise aggregate diagnostics.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. This session does not expose a more specific serving model ID
or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used with available version and
capability details
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR using the bug template
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local issues or links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task
ID
- [x] I have run the focused tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added tests for the changed behavior
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented risks
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address reviewer findings before merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-03 14:50:14 -06:00