2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
3 people	3790ca2f13	fix(runner): repair approval and Stop races and eval infrastructure (#13750) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Runner tasks must continue after approval and stop when the user presses Stop. > - Live evals found races at approval delivery and provider startup. > - Browser readiness and CI setup errors also hid the actual task results. > - This pull request fixes those races and the related test infrastructure. > - Regression tests and saved live reports show which cases now pass. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Companion eval definitions PR: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-evals/pull/25 (AgentCore paused and provider/environment infrastructure). Related: #13741 now supplies the late-startup Stop fence and warm-attachment recovery; this PR retains that fence and extends startup tracking and regression coverage to both native backend paths. #13539 introduced queued approvals during active runs. #13738 fixes child assignment, task replies, and warm process continuity and is already in the base. #13291 concerns automatic continuation of interrupted legacy sandbox runs; this PR fixes native startup cancellation and does not change that recovery policy. **What happened?** An accepted service approval could wait after its source run stopped. Stop could return success before the provider handle existed. Work could then start after Stop, or a cancelled run could be recorded as failed. Some E2E tests also failed on unloaded browser content or irrelevant reply wording. Runner CI could fail before model work because of dependency or sandbox setup. **Expected behavior** Deliver each settled approval once after its source run stops. Do not start work after an acknowledged Stop. Preserve the audited cancellation. Test the intended product behavior with a ready browser and verified runtime dependencies. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Approve a service request while its source run is active. Let the run finish. Check that its result starts one continuation. 2. Delay provider startup. Press Stop before its handle is available. Check cancellation, then submit `/new`. 3. Run the browser, warm-workspace, and Stop-and-redirect cases from the linked report. **Paperclip version or commit** The branch includes master at `9d19f98b5`. The report records the original source for each focused attempt. **Deployment mode** Isolated local development instances and disposable Daytona sandboxes. ## What Changed - Deliver settled tool-action results for the exact company and source run during final cleanup. Keep the existing idempotent receipt and periodic recovery sweep. - Wait for startup to hand off its provider handle before acknowledging Stop. Reject first-turn admission after cancellation. Preserve a matching audited pending or acknowledged cancellation. - Wait for mounted task history and connector controls in browser tests. Record failure evidence. Grade workspace contents and process continuity separately from exact reply wording. Require each warm-turn marker once and in order, allowing surrounding prose. - Stop-and-redirect now checks that the source file exists and work is active before Stop. - Resolve target dependency locks in an uncredentialed CI job. Verify the lock artifact hash. Keep orchestration and publication on the trusted workflow revision. - Materialize the pinned OpenCode executable and configure the exact Codex executable's user-namespace profile before provider credentials are available. - Compress Daytona directory uploads with gzip. Preserve files, executable modes, symlinks, empty directories, and confinement checks. - Classify file-transfer RPC deadlines as infrastructure. Keep unrelated runner RPC failures visible. ## Verification - [Focused live report with screenshots and original attempts](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-reliability-20260921/): 14 of 15 selected Product E2E cases pass across the recorded revisions. Claude and Codex Stop → `/new`, Claude service approval, delegation, both hiring/reuse cases, and native Daytona warm continuity pass. - Two credentialed Runner smoke cases pass. These are not full protocol coverage. - E2E harness after the master merge: 429 tests pass. E2E and server TypeScript checks pass. - Daytona plugin: 239 tests pass, 6 skipped. Plugin TypeScript build passes. The compression test fails against the old code and passes with the change. - Runner backend/runtime regression group: 161 tests pass. Cancellation/startup selection: 26 tests pass. Approval delivery: 34 real-database tests pass. - Workflow security: 7 tests pass. Both edited workflows pass actionlint. Runner TypeScript and Rust builds pass. - After merging master, all 389 native executor tests pass, including both native backend paths and late startup after the Stop deadline. - Post-merge `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. The monolithic local `pnpm test:run` was interrupted to integrate master and is inconclusive. The [hosted CI test partitions](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35620461738) pass on `50a3e43822bcba1e0d07b1b45b0be91cbf9312da`. An unchanged sandbox callback schema test initially received HTTP 503. It passed five isolated local runs, its full local test file, and one failed-job CI retry. No assertion was weakened. ## Risks - Stop can wait for the bounded startup handoff. If it cannot settle, the existing pending-recovery state remains instead of a false acknowledgement. - Immediate approval delivery must remain idempotent across cleanup and recovery sweeps. Tests cover duplicate delivery and company/run boundaries. - The workflow changes still need hosted Linux verification. They retain the trusted workflow and credential boundaries. - Gzip reduces the observed provider upload from about 1.8 GB to 663 MB. It does not yet fix the remaining Claude Daytona transfer timeout. That recovery test never reached Claude, so recovery remains unverified. Use a matching image with the verified provider package preinstalled for the next recovery test; retain cold-upload coverage separately. - The report preserves diagnostic runs with missing source metadata and marks them as such. It does not claim a new full-suite pass. - This PR adds no new prompt policy or historical status reconciliation. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex performed the primary implementation and review. The exact primary backend model ID is not exposed in this session. OpenAI `gpt-5.6-luna` assisted with bounded infrastructure work and verification. The agents used repository tools, code execution, and browser tests. The exact backend revision and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: OpenAI GPT-6 <noreply@openai.com>	2026-09-21 12:50:50 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	e26d787928	Shorten continuation prompts and verify question tool guidance (#13574) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents must continue tasks using user answers without losing earlier requirements or approval gates. > - The wake prompt mixed human decisions with prior tool evidence and repeated detailed question instructions. > - Those instructions belong with the question tool, with a short routing hint in the wake. > - The Runner evals need to prove that answers, approvals, and completed work survive later turns. > - This PR shortens the prompts, separates authenticated answers, and adds continuation tests with useful screenshots. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13517. This is a follow-up to the merged onboarding skill and Runner E2E work. Related #13539 covers responses received while a run is active; this PR preserves its cases and adds continuation coverage. Existing continuation/recovery and question PRs were searched; none covers this prompt/documentation and eval change. **What existing behavior does this improve?** The instructions sent when an agent continues a task, the native human-input tool documentation, and the evidence captured by Runner full-stack E2E. **Current behavior** The wake repeats a long question-tool guide. Human answers appear alongside untrusted prior results. Screenshot capture can finish at DOM load while the task still shows a spinner, even when backend behavior checks pass. **Proposed behavior** Keep earlier requirements unless the user changes them. Treat clarification as distinct from approval. Give authenticated human responses a scoped field. Keep tool and agent results as evidence. Put detailed question behavior in the tool descriptor and retain one routing sentence in the native wake. Wait for the correct task and loaded conversation before taking screenshots. **Reason and benefit** Reduce repeated prompt text and make authority boundaries clear. Test that real question cards, later answers, approval gates, and completed child tasks still work. Make screenshots useful for human review. ## What Changed - Shorten shared continuation instructions for legacy and native runners. Separate authenticated user responses from tool results and agent summaries. - Remove the detailed question guide from native wake prompts. Keep its behavior in the canonical `request_human_input` descriptor and existing payload schema. Regenerate semantic contracts and fixture hashes. - Add five continuation cases across four local profiles. Add a dedicated choice-then-text case for native Codex and native Claude. All 22 cells join the shared full E2E campaign. - Cover revised scope, clarification without approval, hostile instructions in a handoff file, and reuse of a completed child after restart. Keep production instructions and fixed user facts. - Capture continuation screenshots only when the intended task and conversation have rendered. Add provider-free browser regressions for loaders and wrong-task capture. - Preserve current master’s extra tool and onboarding cases. The default campaign now contains 166 cells; 35 manual everyday cells remain separate. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed after replay on current master. - `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit`: 340 passed. Harness typecheck passed. - `PAPERCLIP_PLAYWRIGHT_CHANNEL=chrome pnpm test:e2e:runner:browser-support`: 4 passed. These tests failed against immediate screenshot capture and passed after the fix. - Focused continuation and native-input tests: 36 passed locally. The tool-authority suite could not initialize embedded PostgreSQL locally, including one isolated retry; its 17 assertions did not run locally. The full remote server shards passed on this PR commit. - `pnpm build`: passed after replay on current master. `pnpm test:run` was attempted locally but hit the same embedded PostgreSQL initialization failure; the remaining local run was stopped after complete remote CI passed. This is not claimed as a full local test pass. - [Full PR CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35232755685): passed on `6a22128c14f4552d0613a6d9a25955db4a1ed02f`. All server/chat/workspace/serialized shards, browser shards, Runner checks, typecheck, build, canary and policy checks passed. The isolated native Runner build and security checks also passed: 57 successful checks, with two expected Storybook skips. - Greptile reviewed the exact PR head at 5/5, with no findings or unresolved review threads. The PR has no merge conflicts. - [Live question-docs report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-question-docs-35227647794/): 3/3 passed at source `83dd132f2` before replay on master. Native Codex and Claude each asked a choice, waited, asked a text question, and saved both answers. Claude also passed a completed-child restart case. All three native turns are checked for absence of the old question block. - [Earlier continuation report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-continuation-35154943615/): all five continuation cases passed on native Claude. The report retains campaign and revision provenance and separately shows two unresolved onboarding behavior failures. - [Before/after prompt report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-prompt-comparison-20260917/): full text, current recorded Claude inputs, and reproducible reference-token counts. The controlled wake comparison removes 401 reference tokens; the net counted input reduction is 339 after charging the larger tool description. These are text-size estimates, not measured billing savings. ## Risks - Prompt wording affects model behavior. Live results cover the stated cases, not every provider or conversation. Legacy profiles are registered but were not rerun for this change. - The optional continuation field changes prompt data only; there is no database migration or new production API. - Authenticated answer projection excludes generated summaries and agent-resolved interactions. It preserves the answer’s question or approval scope. - The screenshot guard can expose UI loading failures that earlier runs hid. Backend grading alone no longer makes those captures valid. - The two prior onboarding failures remain separate product issues: work before acceptance and a missing saved plan. This PR does not claim the entire onboarding suite passes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser verification. The exact deployed model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — targeted tests above; the full local database-startup limit is documented - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-09-17 09:32:54 -05:00