mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-09 16:02:36 +01:00
5e62d8ee821cec11448474524fa674612698dfd5
302
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51a65af9b8 |
fix(recovery): continue preserved preparation after process loss (#19464)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their execution state. > - A server restart can stop workspace preparation before provider execution. > - Workspace recovery must preserve files before the task can continue. > - Recovery handled interrupted preparations but skipped failed process-loss records with the same no-provider certificate. > - A withheld first retry could also hide the remaining retry budget. > - This change resumes certified preparations through normal admission after file recovery. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A process-loss attempt remained failed after workspace recovery completed. Its first retry had been cancelled before dispatch by the workspace hold. The task had no running attempt or automatic continuation. **Expected behavior** Continue once after the server proves that provider work did not start, file preservation completed, and the exact leases stopped. Retain the existing failure budget and all task admission gates. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Stop a Runner preparation before native runtime selection. Record the restart recovery bootstrap certificate. 2. Retain the workspace and withhold the first automatic retry before dispatch. 3. Complete file preservation and restart the recovery worker. 4. Observe that the old code schedules no successor. The regression test reproduces this with PostgreSQL and real filesystem operations. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against master at `2f35eb1080`. Related prior work: #19422 continues saved user input after verified copy-back. This change handles automatic continuation of certified process-loss preparation. ## What Changed - Accept failed process-loss preparation only with the durable no-provider bootstrap certificate and existing execution, lease and file checks. - Discover and settle the recovered source through the existing preparation recovery path. - Continue from a verified withheld retry without rewriting its history or resetting its failure count. Adopt it only as the sole retry child; multiple-child history reuses the newest existing child deterministically. - Exercise automatic dispatch, preserved-file readback, one provider turn, accepted result and task completion in the local native-session fixture. - Keep a durable continuation receipt after file-hold settlement until a successor is recorded. Known gates wait for existing eligibility events. Unresolved delivery keeps its shared recovery deadline. - Document the recovery and retry-budget rules. ## Verification - Red: both new PostgreSQL/filesystem regressions failed with zero scheduled successors where one was required. - Green: 54 focused recovery, automatic-dispatch, interruption, multiple-child history and admission safety cases pass on `13c27c2c2f`. The full PostgreSQL admission adapter suite passes all 83 tests; server source declaration typecheck also passes. Local environment: Darwin arm64, Node 26.4.0, PostgreSQL 18.1, Vitest 5.0.3. - Additional red/green: interruption after committed settlement, pause/resume, failed enqueue after cursor advancement, and absence of an earlier retry all failed before their repairs. Restart before enqueue, restart after the successor claim, and pause/resume now preserve one continuation. A rolled-back eligibility change cannot start execution. Deferred and delivered records have no retry deadline. - Local acceptance uses the real heartbeat dispatcher, isolated files and PostgreSQL, with a simulated native provider. It reads the preserved file, writes continued work, accepts the structured result and completes the task once. - Negative cases retain no-certificate, provider-evidence, live-owner, Stop, missing-stop-receipt, wrong-snapshot, human-block, pause, reassignment, approval and exhaustion fences. - CI fixture regression: 4 error-propagation/concurrent-resolution cases pass after adding the new obligation read to their transaction stubs; existing assertions remain unchanged. - Existing idle-drain and notification contract regressions: 4 tests pass after restricting recovery wakes to actual durable obligations. Late approvals block scheduled, queued and final dispatch. - Additional existing retry-scheduling suite: 62 cases pass locally. The pre-provider quota case exceeds its existing 5-second terminal wait on this loaded Darwin host, including when tested alone and with the preceding retry implementation. It remains a local timing limitation; the assertion and timeout were not changed. All Linux CI server shards pass on the combined head, including this unchanged suite. - Existing run-control, legacy-recovery and shared execution-control lifecycle suites: 128 tests pass with the review repair. Required CI supplies final-revision broad coverage. - Real-Codex acceptance was not run: automatic approval review rejected authenticated provider execution because it could incur cost/external effects and required explicit approval. No provider call ran; the controlled-provider acceptance covers the causal restart and durable scheduling behavior. - Hosted acceptance and recovery of existing tasks require rollout. They have not been claimed from the local provider fixture. - Final-head review: Greptile 5/5 on `13c27c2c2f`, no outstanding findings. Another contributor added the multiple-child history safety repair in `13c27c2c2f` while CI was running. The delta was inspected and the 54 focused recovery cases rerun successfully. Required CI passes on that exact combined head: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42241794918. All 55 successful checks include aggregate `ci / verify`, typecheck, build, canary, all server and E2E shards, and Runner package/Rust/static checks. The separate Paperclip Review service check remains queued waiting for its assigned agent; no validated assessment has been returned. ## Risks A malformed preparation certificate or a false no-execution receipt could permit duplicate work. The existing checks still reject provider execution records, native coordinators, live controllers, unsettled leases and unverified files. The pending continuation must survive a restart without polling known admission blockers. A withheld retry retains its original row and consumes its remaining failure budget. Normal admission checks current ownership, approvals, pause and budgets. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 family via Codex. The exact model ID and context window are unavailable in session metadata. Used reasoning, code editing and tool execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal task id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
06c0566a08 |
fix: make task Retry work after a refused automatic attempt (#19466)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task Retry stores a durable request before it starts a new run. > - An automatic attempt can stop at the execution gate before a provider starts. > - That cancelled attempt becomes the source of the next Retry click. > - Admission rejected that source, or chose an older run that did not match the stored Retry authority. > - This pull request verifies the refused attempt and keeps it as the exact authority source. > - The user can start one new turn after the older execution holds pass their existing checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Retry can remain deferred when the latest run was cancelled with `execution_reconciliation_required` before dispatch. An older failed preparation has an execution recovery hold. The Retry receipt names the cancelled child, but admission only accepts a failed preparation as an extra source. It can also choose the older run as `previousRunId`, which fails the exact source check at dispatch. **Expected behavior** Retry starts one new turn when the latest attempt has a verified pre-dispatch refusal and every older execution hold is ready. Provider activity, retained execution resources, missing receipts, or a live earlier process keep the hold. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Seed a failed native preparation and its recovery hold. 2. Let a later automatic attempt be cancelled by the stale queued execution gate before dispatch. 3. Click Retry against that latest cancelled attempt. 4. Before this change, continuation admission returns no receipt. After this change, one successor starts with authority bound to the clicked attempt. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `2f35eb1080`. Rebased onto `6cafcaf89b` for submission. **Deployment mode** Local source checkout with embedded PostgreSQL and the native Runner on macOS arm64. Refs #15383 and #16939. Those changes cover legacy conversation cancellation and queue promotion. This change covers the exact source of a task Retry receipt after a gate refused its automatic child. ## What Changed - Reuse the existing database-backed pre-dispatch refusal proof when admitting the exact Retry source. - Keep the clicked source as `previousRunId`. Continue to check every older execution hold. - Add database regressions for safe refusal, unsafe evidence, concurrent dispatch, and duplicate clicks. - Add an opt-in acceptance test that drives the authenticated Retry route through a real Codex turn and task finalization. - Document the admission contract. ## Verification - TDD: the new database regression returned `null` on the original code. It passes with the repair. - Final head `c43a84b1bf`: 487 tests pass across task Retry, explicit native continuation, and execution continuation. Server TypeScript and module boundary checks pass. - Live acceptance: `PAPERCLIP_LIVE_REFUSED_RETRY=true PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_BINARY=<current-source-runnerd> pnpm --dir server exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts src/services/native-runtime/refused-task-retry.live.test.ts`. - The real HTTP request returned 202 on the final rebased head `c43a84b1bf`. Codex `gpt-6.1-sol` with high effort produced the requested file. The task became done, both task locks cleared, and finalization committed. A repeated click reused the same receipt and did not create another run. The source file stayed unchanged. - Server TypeScript check and module boundary check. - `pnpm verify --explain` returned 2 because the execution contract doc requires broad CI coverage. The required CI checks supply that coverage. ## Risks This changes execution admission. The existing proof requires the stored refusal receipt and no provider work or retained execution resources. Earlier recovery holds, process stop checks, decisions, actor authority, and task ownership still apply. No schema change or migration. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The host does not expose an exact author model ID or context window. The live acceptance provider was `gpt-6.1-sol` with high reasoning effort. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — all GitHub Actions checks pass on `c43a84b1bf`; Paperclip Review completed at 5/5 with no findings (neutral check conclusion). - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups — reviewed `c43a84b1bf` with no actionable findings - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4696ff4990 |
fix: reserve agent In Progress display for active runs (#19453)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task status must tell operators whether an agent is working or waiting. > - A task can retain its in-progress lifecycle status after its run stops. > - The shared read projection only handled scheduled monitoring waits. > - The UI also ignored other projected statuses for in-progress tasks. > - This pull request requires an active task run for the In Progress display. > - Operators can see waits without changing execution or recovery authority. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An agent task still showed In Progress after its run ended with an access failure and left a pending connection request. Stale execution locks and saved lifecycle state could show the same false activity. **Expected behavior** An agent task shows In Progress only with a task-linked queued or running run. Otherwise, it shows Blocked for recovery, In Review for a pending response or review, Monitoring for a scheduled check, or Todo for remaining work. Human ownership keeps its selected status. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create an agent-owned task with an in-progress lifecycle status. 2. End its run and retain a pending human request. 3. Read the task, its summary, and search results. Before this change, they still show In Progress. ## What Changed - Derive visible activity from company-scoped, task-linked runs in the existing shared SQL projection. - Project inactive tasks to existing waiting or todo states. Preserve lifecycle status, locks, admission, and recovery. - Make the shared UI resolver use the projection while preserving explicit and optimistic status changes. - Cover stopped runs, stale locks, human waits, company isolation, monitoring, filters, counts, search, and UI labels. - Document the presentation rule in the product and execution contracts. ## Verification - Red before the server fix: 7 new regression cases failed because they returned in_progress. The 10 existing cases passed. - Green after the server fix: 20 cases passed in issue-display-status.test.ts, using embedded Postgres and real task APIs/search. Seven nearby active-question cases also passed. - Review regression: dismissed requests, historical questions, and returned review work each failed before the follow-up fix. All three now pass using the existing active-interaction rule and pending review state. - Red before the UI fix: 4 label cases failed. Five additional safety cases caught stale projections hiding explicit transitions. - Green after the UI fix: 43 tests passed across task-status-presentation, issue-filters, and issue-detail-subissues. - pnpm -r typecheck passed. All UI token gates and synchronization checks passed. - pnpm build passed. Server typecheck and build passed again after the review fixes. - Full CI passed on |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8c578668b8 |
fix(heartbeat): start new queued runs promptly after restart and name the wait (#19431)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The heartbeat queue starts queued agent turns. Restarts and deploys
happen often.
> - After a restart, new queued turns waited minutes before they
started. The task showed only "Queued", with no reason.
> - The cause is startup order. The queued-run dispatch worker registers
only after many unrelated first passes finish one after another: tool
reviews, delivery workers, the terminal workspace sweep, native restart
recovery, and residual and issue recovery.
> - The server binds its listener before this recovery, and
`/api/health` answers during it. A deployment can route traffic to the
new server for minutes before queued work starts.
> - This pull request starts queued turns that never executed as soon as
plugin workers and adapters are loaded. It also names the wait while the
server starts, recovers, or shuts down.
> - The benefit is that tasks resume quickly after a restart and show a
visible reason while they wait.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
On a hosted instance, the server restarted twice for deploys. Both
times, queued runs on idle agents started about 3.5 to 4 minutes after
the restart. Before the restart, the runs also waited about 5 minutes
while the deploy drained the old server. During the wait after the
restart, the execution presentation showed `phase: queued`, `label:
"Queued"`, `cause: null`.
**Expected behavior**
Queued work resumes automatically and quickly after a restart. While it
waits, the task shows a reason.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Start a task drain (`POST /api/instance/task-drain`). Assign issues
to idle agents. The runs stay queued.
2. Stop the server (SIGTERM) and start it again.
3. Make any startup first pass slow (a large instance does this
naturally). Queued runs start only after every earlier startup pass
finishes.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
140fcf98ed |
fix(retry): name a declined task Retry and let a new click replace it (#19426)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A task interrupted by a restart or deploy must resume automatically, or offer a Retry that works on first use > - A board Retry saves an intent first. Dispatch then rechecks the requester's authority and saved source before it starts a run > - When that recheck refused the intent, dispatch returned a bare "deferred". The intent stayed saved with no reason, and the task still showed Retry > - Each later click with a new key joined that same intent, so Retry returned 202 and never started a run > - This pull request names the refusal on the intent and lets a new click replace an intent that can never start > - The benefit is that a Retry button that is shown starts one run, or explains why it cannot ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native task in a managed sandbox lost its runner twice. Saved-work recovery recovered the files. The task showed "Saved work recovered. Retry or send a message to continue." and `canRetry: true`. A Retry click returned 202 and logged `issue.retry_requested`, but no run started. A second click with a new idempotency key returned the same request ID and `state: failed`. No run started. **Expected behavior** If Retry is offered, a click starts exactly one run. If the Retry cannot start, the task names the reason, and a later click is a fresh attempt. A Retry accepted during the pre-deploy drain starts after the restart. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Recover the files of a failed native run so the hold offers Retry. 2. Save a Retry intent whose dispatch-time authority recheck fails (for example, the requester lost access). 3. Dispatch it: no run starts, and the intent has no wait reason. 4. Click Retry again with a new key: the response returns the first request ID, and no run starts. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `b400914345` (staging served `4d49a31286`; the affected code is the same). Related: #19399 (automatic Retry after a lost runner), #19422. ## What Changed - `heartbeat/queue.ts`: when dispatch declines a task Retry because the requester can no longer change the task, or its saved board message changed, record a named wait (`retry_authority_denied`, `retry_source_changed`) and log it. Before, it returned "deferred" with no record. - `task-retry.ts`: a new click with a new key replaces an unadmitted intent that dispatch declined for its requester's access (`retry_authority_denied`). The old intent becomes `skipped` / `task_retry_replaced`, and activity records `replacedRequestId`. Waits on shared state (cleanup, recovery, an active run, preservation) still coalesce. The restart hook never replaces a user's click. Chat-owned intents keep their own owner. - `task-interruption-presentation.ts`: fixed public messages for the two new wait reasons. `retry_authority_denied` keeps Retry, because a new click is a fresh attempt. `retry_source_changed` is terminal: an edited saved message cannot be replayed, so Retry is hidden and the user sends a new message. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the rule. ## Verification - New regressions in `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts` use the real recovery, Retry and dispatch services on embedded Postgres. The fixture runs the automatic Retry from a lost runner, then that Retry's own run loses its runner, and recovery saves its files: - `starts exactly one run when Retry is pressed after the automatic Retry's own run lost its runner` (also checks that a replayed dispatch and a second click start no second run). - `does not let a Retry that could not start swallow a later Retry`: red before the fix in two steps. With no fix, the declined intent has no wait reason. With only the wait fix, the second click returned the first request ID. Green after the fix: one run, bound to the second click. - `dispatches a Retry accepted during the pre-deploy drain once the restarted server resumes`: green before and after. The drain does not lose a saved Retry. - `npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts src/services/task-retry.test.ts src/services/task-interruption-presentation.test.ts src/services/quarantined-task-retry.test.ts src/services/explicit-native-continuation.test.ts`: 892 passed. - Not verified on staging. After deploy, an intent that dispatch refuses shows a named `retryWait` reason. ## Risks - Low risk. Only intents that dispatch declined for their requester's access are replaced. All other coalescing stays. - A replaced intent's late dispatch finds it `skipped` and starts nothing, so a double click still starts at most one run. - The exact gate that held the staging intent is not confirmed from records. If it was a shared-state wait, the new code names it only if it is one of the two reasons above. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, local test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
7e3caa7bac |
fix(tree-control): resume work a pause gate refused after release (#19421)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The board can pause an issue tree. A pause stops work. Resume or
release must continue that work once.
> - PR #19394 made release re-dispatch a run that a pause Stop
cancelled.
> - That rule covers only a run that an operator Stop ended and that the
hold snapshot named.
> - A scheduled retry that comes due during a pause is not stopped. The
dispatch gate cancels it with `issue_paused`. The release did not see it
as owed work, so the task stalled with no run.
> - This pull request makes every gate that refuses work for a pause
record the covering hold. Release then re-dispatches that work exactly
once.
> - The benefit is that a paused task with a parked retry or a queued
run continues after release, with no manual wake.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #19394
**What happened?**
A child task had a `workspace_busy` scheduled retry. The board paused
the parent tree. The retry came due during the pause. The
scheduled-retry gate cancelled it with `issue_paused` ("Scheduled retry
suppressed because the issue is held by an active subtree pause hold").
The board released the hold. Four minutes later the child was still
`in_progress` with no run, no execution blocker, and no new activity.
**Expected behavior**
Release (or `mode: "resume"`) re-dispatches the refused work exactly
once. No reconciliation and no user message are necessary.
Stranded-issue recovery does not add a second run.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Give an assigned child task a parked `workspace_busy` scheduled
retry.
2. Pause the parent tree.
3. Let the retry come due while the pause is active. The gate cancels it
with `issue_paused`.
4. Release the pause. No run starts for the child.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
bf53060904 |
fix(recovery): continue saved input after verified workspace copy-back (#19422)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native execution preserves accepted results and task files after a failure. > - A later user message can request a new turn after the old execution stops. > - File recovery can finish by copying files back or by retaining a verified archive. > - The retained-result gate accepted the archive proof but missed a verified copy-back receipt. > - This change accepts that existing receipt for terminal failures and preserves execution authority and prior results. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A task keeps a user message queued with `finalizing_saved_result` after its old native coordinator reached `terminal_failure`. The accepted result and a successful, exact `workspace_recovery` copy-back receipt are saved. The gate only checks the alternate `workspace_recovery_snapshot` receipt. An older failed result can also keep a newer failed turn's saved input blocked. **Expected behavior** A new user message or deliberate task Retry can continue from verified recovered files after the old execution stops. Preserve the old result and unknown action outcomes. Keep an active finalizer or missing stop evidence blocked. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Retain an accepted result when a native run reaches terminal failure. 2. Complete host copy-back with the exact run, allocation, descriptor and final file digest. 3. Save a new user message or request task Retry. 4. Observe that admission still reports `finalizing_saved_result`. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against `4d49a3128613b282fb344272ed7ca15f98dea2ac`. **Deployment mode** Authenticated native execution with retained workspace recovery. Local regressions use disposable PostgreSQL and the real heartbeat queue. They start no model provider or sandbox. Related work: #19355 covers saved input after Stop. #18267 concerns manual reconciliation of duplicate legacy holds; it excludes workspace and system recovery and does not fix this receipt gate. I searched open PRs and issues before starting this change. ## What Changed - Reuse the existing host-verified repair receipt when an accepted result belongs to a coordinator in `terminal_failure`. - Retain the separate checks for active controllers, environment termination, live executions, questions, approvals and current user authority. - Add message, saved-message and task Retry regressions, plus concurrent queue delivery and invalid-receipt cases. - Document this continuation path. Add no schema, API or background worker. ## Verification - All 483 tests pass across explicit continuation, task Retry, quarantined Retry and finalized recovery migration suites. - The final focused fixture has 17 cases. All pass with the change. With the original production gate restored, all four positive cases fail and all 13 safety cases pass. - Negative cases cover missing, unfinished and mismatched receipts, another task or source, unrecovered files, a live finalizer, an active controller, missing remote stop and active execution. - The real heartbeat path delivers one saved message under concurrent recovery calls. Later recovery calls create no second turn. The old accepted result and recovery budget stay unchanged; unknown outcomes stay unknown. - The first delivery fixture omitted the newer failed source needed by the recovery scanner. I corrected the fixture to preserve that history and repeated the unchanged-code comparison. Earlier failure logs remain in the verification record. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs` and `git diff --check`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - Full local `pnpm test:run`: running with a 20-minute bound; no full-suite pass is claimed. All hosted CI checks passed. Greptile scored the exact head `d04fb98892fd77853ad03e6b44cd612e805abc13` 5/5 with no findings or review threads. - Hosted delivery of the already saved input still requires a qualified staging build containing this change. ## Risks The new path requires the existing exact repair receipt and a terminal failure. A coordinator still accepting or committing a result keeps the previous hold. Stop, owner and live-run checks still run before admission. The old result is neither applied nor replayed. Receipt verification adds bounded indexed reads only on this retained-result failure path. No migration or provider configuration changes are required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`) through Codex in T3 Code, with xhigh reasoning. The context-window size is not exposed. Used code editing, tool calls and local test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used, including the available runtime details - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this is a scoped bug fix - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in this PR using the bug-report fields - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task id - [x] I have run the affected tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added regression tests and updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented the risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open findings - [x] I will address all review findings before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
11bc490cda |
fix(recovery): keep a stopped copy-back's files instead of holding the workspace (#19385)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A native run can have its result accepted before the copy-back of its sandbox files finishes. If the copy-back fails, it retries. > - A board Stop during those retries ends the run. It sets the run's finalization to `terminal_failure` / `native_retry_cancelled`, and the result stays accepted. > - After that, nothing exports the files. The finalization worker skips terminal rows, and cancelled-workspace preservation skipped any run with an accepted result. > - The task workspace stays dirty and bound to the stopped run. Every later run on the task waits for the workspace, then fails setup with the unfinished-writer error. > - This pull request lets cancelled-workspace preservation also admit an accepted result whose copy-back a Stop ended. > - The benefit is that stopping a stuck copy-back saves its files and frees the task, like stopping any other run. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #16700, #17677, #18820, #19304 and #19305 (cancelled-workspace preservation). This pull request adds the accepted-result case to that path and keeps its other checks unchanged. **What happened?** On a hosted instance, a native run's result was accepted, but its copy-back kept failing and retrying. A board operator pressed Stop to unblock the task. The run became `cancelled`, its sandbox was stopped and kept, and its finalization moved to `terminal_failure` / `native_retry_cancelled` with the result still accepted. The next run on the task was cancelled with "Shared execution workspace is busy: run … ended, but its workspace save has not settled". About 24 automatic retries followed over an hour. The last one failed with "The workspace still has an unfinished writer or save operation." After that nothing ran: the task stayed `in_progress` with no run and no recovery action. A Retry or a new comment would hit the same block. The workspace stayed `dirty: true` with the stopped run as its writer, and no `workspaceRestoreRecovery` was ever recorded. The reason: `preserveCancelledNativeWorkspaces` requires `resultId IS NULL`, and `registerCancelledWorkspacePreservationWork` and `preserveNativeFailedWorkspace` both return early when `resultId` is set. **Expected behavior** Stopping a run during its copy-back retries keeps its files, as stopping any other run does. Paperclip's workspace recovery saves them and releases the workspace. Nothing commits or replays the stopped result. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Accept a native result for a run whose copy-back is in `retryable_failure`. 2. Stop the run with the board Stop. The finalization becomes `terminal_failure` / `native_retry_cancelled`. 3. Start another run on the task. It waits for the workspace and then fails setup. No save of the stopped run's files is ever recorded. The new database tests run steps 1 and 2 against PostgreSQL and check that the save is recorded. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `9ceaec6f97e`. **Deployment mode** Any deployment that uses remote (sandbox) task workspaces. Seen on a cloud-managed instance. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-failed-workspace-recovery.ts`: cancelled-workspace preservation now also admits an accepted result when the finalization is `terminal_failure` with `native_retry_cancelled`. That is the state a Stop leaves after ending copy-back retries. All three entry points use the same rule: - the startup scan `preserveCancelledNativeWorkspaces`; - the worker `registerCancelledWorkspacePreservationWork`; - `preserveNativeFailedWorkspace`, only when it is called with `requireCancelledStop`. Preservation still requires everything it required before: a cancelled run, an acknowledged Stop, no live finalization owner or controller lease, a prepared workspace reference, and the exact retained source. - An accepted result with any other failure code is still skipped; those runs keep their own export repair path. Failed (not cancelled) runs are unchanged. - The accepted result stays recorded and uncommitted. Preservation does not change the task's status or queue a run. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describe the stopped copy-back case in the paragraph on writers stopped mid-run. - `native-cancelled-workspace-preservation.test.ts`: move the accepted-result fixture into an `acceptResult` helper, and add a test with three cases. ## Verification - Failing first. The new test "preserves files of an accepted result whose copy-back was stopped" has three cases: worker, startup scan, and a sandbox that the Stop already stopped and kept, through the real `prepareSandboxStopAndRetain` and `settleStopOnlyCleanup`. All three fail on `master`, with no `workspaceRestoreFailure` recorded, and pass with this change. - Each case checks that: - the save obligation and recovery action are recorded for the exact lease; - `inspectWorkspaceRecoverySource` finds one source; - the finalization keeps its `resultId`, `terminal_failure` and `native_retry_cancelled`; - the workspace stays held by the stopped writer until the save publishes; - no run or wake is created, and the task status is unchanged. - The existing "does not admit preservation for accepted-result" case still passes. It uses an accepted result with a different failure code. - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-cancelled-workspace-preservation.test.ts`: 44 passed. - Related suites, 10 files and 854 passed: - `native-failed-workspace-recovery`, `workspace-recovery`, `heartbeat/run-control` - `native-cancellation-request` (unit and integration) - `heartbeat-remote-workspace-busy`, `native-workspace-export-retry`, `native-workspace-reconstruction` - `native-stop-accounting`, `task-workspace-binding` - `cd server && npx tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.json`: pass. - Not run end to end on a live instance. Diagnosed from that instance's run, finalization, lease, workspace and recovery-action rows. ## Risks - On deploy, the startup scan and the worker will pick up existing cancelled runs in this state and record their saves. That is the intended repair, and it uses the same retention checks as other stopped writers. - A copy-back interrupted by a server restart can leave a `remote_workspace_snapshot` operation marked `running` after its process is gone. This change does not settle such rows. If one blocks the later save, the save follows its existing retry and board hand-off. - No schema migration. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs, read-only database queries). The runtime does not expose the context window or reasoning configuration. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
90b8190c33 |
fix(native-runtime): detect half-open runner ingress and project Stop for live runs (#19407)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native runs in a managed sandbox talk to the server through a provider-ingress WebSocket. The server opens this socket to the runner (`paperclip-runnerd`) through the sandbox preview proxy. > - A staging run ran a 20-minute foreground shell command that printed nothing. After the first second, no run events arrived. The run stayed "Working" for over 35 minutes. No watchdog acted, and the run projection said `canStop: false`. > - The server only detected a lost runner connection from a `close` or `error` event. It never sent pings. A half-open route, for example a proxy that drops the connection without a FIN, never emits `close`. The run then waits forever and the 7-minute reconnect grace never starts. > - A long silent tool call is legitimate. The fix must tell "quiet but alive" apart from "nothing alive". A protocol ping does that: runnerd answers every ping with a pong while its provider waits on the tool. > - This pull request pings authenticated runner connections and terminates the socket after 90 seconds of total silence. The existing reconnect grace and transport-failure path then recover the run. It also makes the execution projection report `canStop: true` for every queued or running run. > - The benefit is that a run with a dead runner connection now ends in a bounded time instead of hanging. API readers also see the Stop that the board already offers. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native-runner run (managed sandbox, OpenCode with an OpenRouter model) ran a foreground shell command for about 20 minutes with no output. The last run event came at about T+1s. The command finished on disk, but the run never got another event and stayed `running` / "Working" for over 35 minutes. Its projection had `canStop: false` and `permittedActions: ["inspect_run"]`. A board cancel through the API worked. **Expected behavior** The server detects a dead runner connection and recovers or fails the run in a bounded time. A runner that is alive but quiet stays attached. The projection reports that a live run can be stopped. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a native run in a managed sandbox. 2. Make the agent run a long foreground command that prints nothing. 3. Let the preview route drop the WebSocket without a close frame. 4. Before this fix, the run stays "Working" forever. ## What Changed - `server/src/realtime/runner-prp-outbound.ts`: after PRP authentication, `WsJsonWireConnection.monitorLiveness` sends a WebSocket ping every 20 s. Any inbound frame or pong counts as liveness. After 90 s with nothing inbound, it terminates the socket. That emits an ordinary `close`, so the PRP authority and the reconnect loop use the existing 7-minute grace and then fail the transport. If the server's own event loop stalls, the window restarts instead of blaming the runner. The 90 s bound is longer than runnerd's own 60 s connection lease, which already requires runnerd to read the socket. - `server/src/services/execution-projection.ts`: `canStop` is now `true` for every `queued` or `running` run. The old failed-native-retry rule is unchanged. - `server/src/services/execution-projection.ts`: a queued run now shows "Waiting for previous run to stop" (cause `previous_run_settling`) when a predecessor that admission checks (the task execution owner, the retried run, or the agent's latest settled run on the task) still has pending cleanup by `hasPendingRunCleanup`. Before, a turn queued after a Stop showed only "Queued" with no reason while the stopped run's controller still waited on the dead runner. That in-process wait (`claimQueuedRun` settling-owner gate) also made Retry a no-op. The liveness bound above makes that controller settle. Its existing cleanup then calls `startNextQueuedRunForAgent`, which starts the queued turn. - `server/src/services/run-cancellation.ts` and `server/src/modules/run-dispatch/adapters/postgres.ts`: a user-stopped native run whose runner was unreachable can later settle as `failed` (`native_provider_terminal_failed`) when its transport fails closed. The dispatch gate's message deferral required a `cancelled` source and compared the message with `finishedAt`. The user's follow-up message was therefore marked `skipped`, and the task asked for a second message. The new `recordedUserStop` helper honors the recorded user Stop on such a failed source, so the gate saves the message for the deferred-receipt worker. - `packages/shared/src/types/execution-projection.ts`: documents the `canStop` meaning. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: documents the ingress liveness bound and the new `canStop` meaning. ## Verification - Red then green: `runner-prp-outbound.test.ts` "detects a half-open authenticated ingress and fails the run within a bounded window". On the old code it failed because no ping was sent and the socket was never terminated. It now passes and the active-run `failure` rejects with `runner_ingress_unavailable`. - Safety: "keeps a quiet but live runner attached through a long silent tool call" checks that a runner answering pings stays attached for 20 simulated minutes with no termination and no failure. - Red then green: `execution-projection.test.ts` "offers Stop for every live run, including a long-silent native turn". On the old code it failed with `canStop: false`. - Red then green: `execution-projection-recovery.test.ts` "names the wait when a stopped predecessor still holds the task's runner" (real Postgres). On the old code the successor projected a plain "Queued". It also checks that the wait clears on lease release and ignores another agent's run. - Red then green: `workspace-recovery.test.ts` "continues a message sent after Stop when the stopped run later failed closed". On the old code it failed 3 of 3 runs with the receipt `skipped`. It now passes, and the full file passes twice (392 tests). The test now pins the message after the recorded Stop. Before, the fixture could write both in the same millisecond, which made the sibling variants flaky. - Passed: run-cancellation, explicit-native-continuation, run-dispatch and run-control suites (622 tests). - Passed: `npx vitest run src/realtime/ src/services/execution-projection*.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-privacy-routes.test.ts`, the native-runner-execution-driver tests, and the plugin-runner-task tests. - Passed: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`. - I read runnerd (`runner-core/src/durable/transport.rs`) and confirmed it answers `Ping` with `Pong` in its non-blocking read loop. - Not run: a live managed-sandbox reproduction. Staging and Daytona were not reachable from this environment. `plugin-runner-probe.test.ts` needs a local cargo build of runnerd, and it did not start in this worktree. ## Risks - A false termination is possible if a runner fails to answer pings for 90 s while it is still alive. runnerd already loses its own connection lease after 60 s without reading, so this bound does not add a stricter requirement. A terminated live runner reconnects within the existing grace. - If the preview proxy drops WebSocket control frames, ping alone does not prove liveness. Inbound PRP frames (runnerd's lease renewals, about every 30 s) still count, so a live runner stays attached. - `canStop` now means "the board can Stop now" for live runs. The UI already shows Stop for running and queued runs without reading this hint, so the UI does not change. - Out of scope: the inbound runner WebSocket server (`runner-prp-ws.ts`), and a lost OpenCode SSE event while the runner is alive. A stopped run whose controller hangs for a reason other than a dead transport still holds the queued successor. The projection now names that wait, but this PR does not force-release it, because the controller has no termination evidence. A queued reason for the agent concurrency cap is also not covered. The wait label calls the admission predicate (`hasPendingRunCleanup`) for up to three predecessor runs per queued run. This adds a few reads to projections of queued runs only. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use (shell, file edits) in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
a4bb059f59 |
fix(heartbeat): retry transient sandbox provider lease refusals and explain the block (#19412)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - A task runs in an execution environment. A managed sandbox
environment gets a lease from a sandbox provider (for example Daytona)
before the agent starts.
> - When the provider answered sandbox create with a temporary error
(HTTP 502), the run failed as the generic `setup_failed`.
> - `setup_failed` is the fail-closed code for unknown setup errors. It
gets no automatic retry, so the task went to `blocked` at once. The task
showed only "Couldn't finish this attempt".
> - A user had to find and press Retry. The Retry then worked, which
shows that the failure was temporary.
> - This pull request classifies temporary provider refusals during
lease acquisition from structured fields. It retries them within the
existing bounded bootstrap budget, and it explains the block when the
retries are used up.
> - The benefit is that a short provider outage no longer stops a task.
When the outage continues, the task shows the cause and a Retry that
works.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A task was assigned to an agent that uses a managed Daytona sandbox
environment. Sandbox creation returned `HTTP 502`, and the cleanup of
the provisional sandbox could not be confirmed. The run failed with
`setup_failed` and the error `Failed to acquire lease for environment
"Paperclip Sandbox" (sandbox): Daytona sandbox creation failed (HTTP
502); cleanup could not be confirmed for paperclip-create-…`. Three
seconds later the task was `blocked`. No automatic retry was scheduled.
The task showed no specific reason. A manual Retry started a new run
that completed normally.
**Expected behavior**
A temporary provider error (HTTP 5xx, 429, timeout) before the agent
starts must retry automatically with bounded backoff. The task must show
why it waits. If the retries are used up, the task must show the cause,
a next action, and a Retry that works on the first click.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Configure an agent with a sandbox environment.
2. Make the provider return HTTP 502 on sandbox create.
3. Assign a task to the agent.
4. See that the run fails with `setup_failed` and the task goes to
`blocked` with no retry.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at `612da1e8e0`.
## What Changed
- Plugin SDK: an `environmentAcquireLease` error now carries a closed
diagnostic envelope (HTTP status or a closed errno code) across the
worker RPC. It takes the status of the create call only, not of the
compensating cleanup lookup. The existing creation-cleanup ownership
envelope is unchanged. New module: `environment-acquire-error.ts`. The
resume diagnostic helpers are shared.
- Server: new `EnvironmentProviderUnavailableError` and code
`environment_provider_unavailable`. The environment run orchestrator
sets it as the cause of `lease_acquire_failed` only when structured
evidence shows a transient status (408, 425, 429, 500, 502, 503, 504, or
a closed connection errno). It never parses message text. Saved-sandbox
resume and stopped-worker refusals keep their own codes.
- Setup failure (`failRunSetup`): a fresh, pre-dispatch run records
`environment_provider_unavailable` with a `providerFailure` (phase
`startup`, retryability `transient`). The run uses the bounded bootstrap
retry (30 s, then 60 s). An accepted interaction continuation keeps its
own continuation retry, as for `plugin_worker_unavailable`.
- Recovery: the new code is registered with the other bootstrap codes.
It is not sent to the generic continuation retry. It does not create an
execution-reconciliation hold, because no provider work started. On
exhaustion the stranded notice has the title "Sandbox provider was
temporarily unavailable" and a specific next action.
- UI: `ProviderFailureNotice` labels the `sandbox` provider as "Sandbox
provider". The task notice shows the provider failure, "Paperclip will
retry automatically" while a retry is scheduled, and Retry after
exhaustion.
- Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the policy and the
sandbox ownership rule.
## Verification
Red before the fix, green after the fix:
- `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` › "transient
sandbox provider refusal during lease acquisition":
- "retries automatically and runs exactly one successful successor
without user action": the real heartbeat. The lease runtime returns a
Daytona 502 once, then delegates. Before the fix: one `failed` run and
no successor. After the fix: one `scheduled_retry` successor with no
hold and a `retry_scheduled` presentation. After promotion, exactly one
successor succeeds.
- "explains the block with a working Retry once automatic retries are
used up": three refusals. The task is `blocked` with a "Sandbox provider
was temporarily unavailable" notice. The presentation is `{ state:
"failed", canRetry: true, providerFailure: { httpStatus: 502 } }`, and
no execution-reconciliation hold exists. One `requestTaskRetry` is
accepted, and its run succeeds.
- `server/src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts` › "routes a …
sandbox provider lease refusal through bounded bootstrap recovery": the
real orchestrator wrapping. Only the fresh, structured 502 is retried. A
message-only 502, a 400, a run after provider dispatch, and a retained
native run stay `setup_failed`.
- `packages/plugins/sdk/tests/environment-acquire-error.test.ts`: the
real worker RPC. The test checks the create status (not the 404 cleanup
lookup), the errno, no provider text, the unchanged cleanup envelope,
and that forged envelopes are rejected.
Commands:
```sh
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk exec vitest run tests/environment-acquire-error.test.ts tests/environment-creation-cleanup.test.ts tests/environment-resume-error.test.ts
cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts src/services/recovery/ src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts src/services/heartbeat/retries.test.ts src/services/legacy-execution-recovery.test.ts src/services/task-interruption-presentation.test.ts src/services/task-retry.test.ts src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts
cd packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona && npx vitest run
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck
```
I did not run a live Daytona 502 on staging. Re-check on staging after
deploy (see Risks).
## Risks
- Sandbox leaks or double creation: each retry is a new run with a new
durable creation record and a new provider name
(`paperclip-create-<operationId>`). The failed attempt stays owned by
its own record, and the existing creation reconciler settles it. A retry
never reuses or abandons it. While a provisional sandbox waits for
reconciliation, up to two more sandboxes can be created for the same
task. This is the same as a manual Retry today.
- Plugins built with an older SDK do not send the envelope. Their
refusals stay `setup_failed`, which is the current behavior.
- An in-process error with `status`/`statusCode` 500–504 or a connection
errno during lease acquisition is now retried twice. The budget is
bounded and shared with the other bootstrap codes.
- An RPC timeout on the host side is not classified by this change.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used through
Claude Code as an agent with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs).
Extended reasoning was on.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
9668e73b4b |
fix(native): continue a turn automatically when reattachment loses its runner (#19399)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native runs in managed sandboxes recover through reattachment: after a server restart, and for a same-run retry when a turn ends without a semantic result > - Reattachment fails closed when the original runner or sandbox is gone (`native_remote_recovery_lease_mismatch`, `runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable`) > - Saved-work recovery then saves the files, but the task stays blocked with "Saved work recovered. Send a message to continue." The recovered hold offers no Retry > - A restart, deploy or maintenance window must not need a user message to continue work > - This pull request requests the task Retry automatically, once, when it is safe, and offers Retry on the recovered hold when it is not > - The benefit is that interrupted work continues after infrastructure events, and a user who must act gets a Retry that works on first use ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native task in a managed sandbox was interrupted. In one case a server restart claimed a queued user-comment turn for reattachment. In another case a turn completed without a semantic result, and the same-run retry claimed the run for reattachment with no restart. In both cases the original runner or sandbox lease was gone. The run failed with `native_remote_recovery_lease_mismatch` or `runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable`. Recovery saved the work. The task stayed `blocked` with "Saved work recovered. Send a message to continue." The execution blocker had `canRetry: false`. A manual `POST /api/issues/:id/retry` started a run that succeeded. **Expected behavior** After an infrastructure interruption, the task continues automatically when the interrupted turn's outcome is known. Otherwise the task offers a Retry that works on first use. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a native task in a managed sandbox from a user comment. 2. Lose the sandbox lease or the remote runner process (for example, restart the server during a maintenance window). 3. Let reattachment fail and saved-work recovery complete. 4. See that the task waits for a new message and offers no Retry on the execution blocker. **Root cause** Reattachment (`reattach_remote_runner`) correctly refuses to replace a missing runner or allocation. Nothing then continued the user's request. The automatic continuation rule only allows a new user turn after reconciliation. `getExecutionBlocker` hid Retry whenever a workspace restore hold existed, also after the files were verifiably recovered. The same-run retry path also re-enters the restart-recovery owner, so its event said "after server restart" with no restart. ## What Changed - New `server/src/services/heartbeat/restart-interrupted-turn.ts`: after a reattachment claim executes, if the run failed because its runner or allocation was lost, request the same task Retry that `POST /issues/:id/retry` creates. It runs once per run (idempotency key `restart-interrupted-turn:<runId>`), under the authority of the user who sent the message, assigned the task, or clicked Retry. It requires that the run recorded no provider turn or that its last provider turn is settled. System wakes, in-flight turns, and a Retry that this hook already requested do not continue automatically. - `heartbeat/recovery.ts`: call the hook after each reattachment claim. Label same-run retry reattachment as "Reattaching to the existing remote runner to resume this run", and add `trigger: "same_run_retry"` to the event payload. - `execution-blocker.ts`: a failed run whose saved work is verifiably recovered now offers Retry (`canRetry: true`) with "Saved work recovered. Retry or send a message to continue." An intentional Stop keeps "send a message" only. - `task-retry.ts`: optional `initiatedBy: "restart_recovery"` records the activity as actor `system`/`restart-recovery` with `onBehalfOfUserId`. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the rule. ## Verification - New regressions in `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts` use the real recovery, Retry and dispatch services on embedded Postgres: - `continues a user turn once ... after $title and recovery saved the work` (3 cases: restart lease loss before the turn, same-run retry with the runner gone after a settled turn, same-run retry with the lease gone after a settled turn). Each asserts one queued successor bound to the Retry and the user's authority after recovery, idempotent hook calls, system activity attribution, and no second automatic attempt for the automatic Retry's own failure. - `does not continue automatically when $title, and offers a Retry that works on first use` (in-flight turn, system wake, unrelated error). Each asserts no successor, `canRetry: true` on the blocker and the interruption presentation, and one successor after one Retry click. - Red before the fix: all 6 tests fail (no successor, blocker `canRetry: false`). Green after the fix. - `npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts src/services/task-retry.test.ts src/services/task-interruption-presentation.test.ts src/services/execution-blocker-read.test.ts src/services/heartbeat/recovery.test.ts src/services/explicit-native-continuation.test.ts src/services/quarantined-task-retry.test.ts src/__tests__/workspace-restore-repair-route.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-failed-workspace-recovery.test.ts`: 1098 passed. - Not verified on staging. After the next deploy, check a task interrupted by a restart: it should continue without a message, or show Retry. ## Risks - The automatic Retry uses the original user's authority. Admission rechecks that user's current permission, stop proof, saved-work recovery, approvals, pauses, budget and ownership. A refused request leaves the visible Retry. - A settled turn that ended without a result is continued with a fresh Retry turn from saved work. A turn whose outcome is unknown (in flight) is not. - The hook runs after the claim's execution returns. If the server stops between the failure and the request, the task shows Retry instead. - Not in scope: same-run disposition recovery still cannot start a new runner in the existing sandbox after the original remote runner exits. This change continues the task with one fresh Retry turn instead. If that Retry turn also ends without a result and loses its runner, the task shows Retry. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, local test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Related: #19355 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5c185db77c |
fix(tree-control): resume work a subtree pause interrupted (#19394)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Task tree control lets the board pause a task tree and then resume
it.
> - A pause stops the runs that are active in the tree. The release must
then continue the work that was pending.
> - A child task whose run was active at pause time did not start again
after release. The child became blocked and asked for a user message.
> - A pause is an operator hold, not a failure. It must not strand work,
and it must not require reconciliation for a run that never started.
> - This pull request re-dispatches interrupted work one time on
release, and it settles a legacy Stop that never entered the adapter.
> - The benefit is that pause and resume keep a task tree moving without
manual recovery, and real safety gates stay in force.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A parent task delegated two children. One child's run was active (in
host workspace preparation, before the adapter started) when the board
paused the parent's tree. The pause cancelled that run. After the board
released the hold, no new run started for that child. The child became
`blocked` with the execution blocker cause
`legacy_execution_requires_reconciliation`. Later the next action became
"Send a message to continue." A sibling child that had no active run at
pause time resumed normally.
**Expected behavior**
A run that a subtree pause cancels is an operator hold. On release, the
pending work starts again one time, automatically. It does not go
through execution reconciliation when the run never entered its adapter.
It does not wait for a user message.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Create a parent task and a child task that is assigned to an agent.
2. Wake the child. While its run is in host preparation (or queued),
call `POST /api/issues/:parentId/tree-holds` with `{ "mode": "pause" }`.
3. Call `POST /api/issues/:parentId/tree-holds/:holdId/release` without
`wakeAgents`.
4. Before this change, no new run starts, and `getExecutionBlocker`
reports `legacy_execution_requires_reconciliation` for the child.
**Root cause**
- (a) The pause records each interrupted run in the hold member snapshot
(`activeRunId`). Nothing used that record on release.
- (b) Release woke tasks only when `metadata.wakeAgents === true`.
Without it, release relied on stranded-issue recovery. That recovery
stands down when the latest run was cancelled by an operator
(`isOperatorCancelledRun`). So the interrupted child had no owner.
- (c) The pause Stop of a legacy run in preparation is written directly
as `cancelled`. Legacy terminalization classifies a cancelled run with
no bootstrap evidence as an unknown outcome. It records
`legacy_execution_requires_reconciliation`, although the gated dispatch
never entered the adapter.
- Native runs: the verified native Stop does not create the
reconciliation hold, but gap (b) applies to native runs too. The release
change is runtime-independent.
## What Changed
- `issueTreeControlService.findOwedPauseResume` decides if a task is
owed one resume. The task's latest run must be an operator Stop that a
pause hold member snapshot names, recorded while that hold was active.
The task must still be executable by the same agent, and no pause may
still cover it. The obligation belongs to the run, so overlapping pauses
keep it until the last covering release.
- New `services/issue-tree-resume.ts` re-dispatches owed work with wake
reason `issue_tree_resumed` (`holdId` and `interruptedRunId` in the
context). A compare-and-set claim (`treeHoldResume`) on the interrupted
run makes the resume happen at most once. A failed wake returns the
claim.
- Pause release and `mode: "resume"` call it for every member of the
released hold, also without `wakeAgents`. When `wakeAgents` is true, the
existing loop wakes every executable member.
- A task that still has an execution blocker is not replayed. The
release writes `issue.tree_resume_wake_skipped`, the blocker stays
visible, and the obligation stays unclaimed.
- `releaseHold` updates only an `active` hold. A repeated release gets
`409`.
- `settleCancelledLegacyPreparation`: when the executor that owned a
cancelled legacy run proves that dispatch never entered the adapter, it
records bootstrap evidence and resolves that run's
`legacy-execution:<runId>` hold as `false_positive`. It also corrects an
automatic no-replay disposition and restores a `blocked` status only
when that disposition made the change. Then it re-dispatches owed work,
for a release that happened while the Stop was unwinding. It requires a
requested Stop with no existing recovery receipt, and no process,
session, native finalization, unreleased lease, or execution-start
event.
- `settleUnrecoverableExecutions` waits while a legacy executor still
holds its controller lease, and records a `legacyCancellationBlock`
receipt when it blocks a task for a cancelled legacy run.
- Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md` and `doc/composer-stop.md` describe
the resume rule.
## Verification
- New regression
`server/src/__tests__/issue-tree-pause-resume-run.test.ts` uses embedded
Postgres, the real heartbeat, and the real tree-control routes:
- A run paused during preparation: nothing runs during the hold, there
is no blocker, and release creates exactly one `issue_tree_resumed` run
that succeeds. A second release returns `409` and creates no run.
- Release before the stopped preparation finishes unwinding (with the
periodic disposition run in between): exactly one resumed run after the
executor settles.
- An automatic no-replay disposition that ran first: the blocker clears,
the status returns to `in_progress`, and release resumes once.
- Overlapping child and parent pauses: no resume while the parent pause
remains, then exactly one resume after it is released.
- A queued run cancelled by the pause: release creates exactly one
resumed run.
- A task reassigned to a user during the hold: no resume.
- A mid-turn legacy Stop with unknown outcome: no replay, the
reconciliation blocker remains, and `issue.tree_resume_wake_skipped` is
logged.
- Red before each fix: the first 4 cases failed on master; the 3 review
cases failed on the first PR commit. All 7 pass now.
- Also passed locally: `issue-tree-control-routes`,
`issue-tree-control-service`, `heartbeat-workspace-busy`,
`heartbeat-undispatched-execution-wait`, `execution-control-work`,
`legacy-workspace-restore-recovery`, `legacy-continuation-authority`,
`task-retry`, `legacy-execution-recovery`, `agent-conversations`,
`heartbeat-retry-scheduling`, `satisfied-connection-intents`.
- Not verified here: a live staging pause/resume. Re-check on staging
after deploy.
## Risks
- Behavior change: release now starts the work that the pause
interrupted, also without `wakeAgents`. Before, that work stayed idle.
Other idle tasks still wake only with `wakeAgents`.
- The settlement trusts the executor's adapter-entry flag. The flag is
set only inside the atomic dispatch gate, which refuses a cancelled run.
The settlement also requires no process, session, lease, or execution
event.
- A native run whose Stop has not finalized at release time is not a
target. Stranded recovery and explicit wake still apply.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude
Code with tool use (shell, file edit, test execution).
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7c0922a7b6 |
fix(native): preserve provider backups during slow workspace saves (#19359)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Remote native sessions save provider state so another web server can continue the same conversation. > - A provider can suspend while its accepted result is still saving a large workspace. > - The run has released its live lease at that point. A new backup-owner lookup rejects this uncommitted state. > - This pull request captures the real owner during backend creation and retains it with the current session authority. > - The existing database checks still reject a changed boot, generation, result, or successor before inspection and during publication. > - The benefit is that a slow workspace save no longer prevents the provider backup. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A remote session can fail to save its provider backup with `native_harness_storage_owner_missing`. The provider has suspended, but its accepted result is still in `workspace_finalizing`. The close callback tries to acquire a new owner after the run released its lease. A later allocation cannot use a backup that was never published. **Expected behavior** Save the suspended provider with the authority acquired during execution. Recheck that authority before provider inspection and before and after upload. Keep result finalization and provider-work permissions unchanged. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a remote native session with durable provider storage. 2. Accept its result and release the live lease while its workspace save remains pending. 3. Close the provider transport. The old owner lookup rejects the save before provider inspection. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master `bf10bc695abaef6b20e85b287f456b5ce2edb266`. **Deployment mode** A web server with object storage and remote managed Runner sessions. Related: #19225 retains failed-turn ownership through close. #18436 restores an external controller checkpoint before a changed warm process is replaced. This change fixes late backup-owner acquisition while an accepted result saves its workspace. ## What Changed - Capture the provider backup owner when the remote backend still owns its execution lease. - Bind that owner to the current session authority. An older close callback selects the current warm attachment's owner. Revalidate the captured fence before inspecting or skipping provider state. - Add a regression for the close callback during workspace finalization. - Restore encrypted provider files with a captured owner while workspace finalization remains pending. Reject boot, generation, result, and successor changes during upload. - Document the ownership contract. ## Verification - Observed the callback regression fail on the old code with `native_harness_storage_owner_missing`. The same test passes with this fix. - `cd server && node ../node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --config vitest.config.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-harness-backup-storage.integration.test.ts`: 59 passed, using real PostgreSQL and encrypted object write/readback. - `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs`: passed. - Full workspace typecheck: passed with the complete production fix. - Native execution: 1,151 passed. Managed warm lifecycle: 9 passed. These tests require a lost-owner error during shutdown, including before an incomplete provider checkpoint is skipped. The final change to the lifecycle test also requires rejection after lease renewal is lost. - Full local `pnpm build`: passed on the final head. - The full local `pnpm test:run` stopped in chat shard 6 on five existing deadline assertions. Earlier chat shards passed; the PR CI chat shards passed. This is not a full local-suite pass. - The first CI server shard 4 attempt failed the unchanged legacy environment-inheritance fixture at its five-second completion wait. The same failure reproduced locally on the repair head and on an earlier checkout without this repair. One unchanged CI retry passed. No fixture assertion or timeout change is shipped. - Latest-head CI has passed. Greptile reviewed the final head at 5/5 with no open threads. The separate Paperclip Review is paused. This PR does not claim staging acceptance. ## Risks The backup owner now lives with its session authority. A wrong authority selection must fail rather than publish provider state. Database publication still checks the original company, task, run, boot, generation, and accepted result before and after upload. Tests change the owner during upload and verify that the selected backup stays intact. No schema, data migration, or new provider-work permission changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 model family, with reasoning and code execution tools. The host does not expose the exact runtime model ID or context-window limit. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
002455ea06 |
fix(issues): finish a reassignment whose native stop settles after the request (#19354)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A user can stop or interrupt a running native task and then send a message to give new direction > - When the stopped run left a workspace hold, the dispatch gate withholds the follow-up run until recovery saves the work > - The gate must save the user's message on its receipt so that the deferred-receipt worker continues it after recovery > - Two conditions made the gate skip the message instead of saving it, so the task stayed in progress with "Saved work recovered. Send a message to continue." although the user already sent one > - This pull request saves the message in both conditions > - The benefit is that the message the user already sent continues once, automatically, after recovery ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** After a user stopped or interrupted a native task with an isolated sandbox workspace and sent a message, the follow-up run was cancelled with `execution_reconciliation_required`. Its error said "Saved work recovered. Send a message to continue." Nothing re-woke the task. In the interrupt case, a periodic sweep started a run about four minutes later. In the case where the follow-up first waited for the stopped run's workspace save (`workspace_busy`), each later retry parked on the same resolved recovery action, and the task did not continue. **Expected behavior** When the recovery that the follow-up waited on resolves, the message that the user already sent continues once, automatically. The product does not ask for a second message. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a native task in a managed sandbox with an isolated workspace. 2. Stop the run (or send a comment with interrupt), then send a message while the stop and workspace save are still settling. 3. Wait for the workspace recovery to resolve. 4. See that the follow-up run is cancelled with `execution_reconciliation_required` and that no run continues the message. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` before this change. **Root cause** `deferUnstartedUserComment` (run dispatch) refused to save the withheld message in two cases: 1. It compared the message time with the source run's `finishedAt`. A native run finishes only after its provider stop and workspace save settle, which takes seconds. A message written after the Stop request but before that settlement was treated as input written before the Stop. The receipt was marked `skipped`. 2. It required the run's own receipt to be user-owned. A workspace-busy retry or an admission retry carries the user's message under a system-owned receipt, so the message was dropped with the retry. ## What Changed - Add `userStopBoundaryAt(run)` in `run-cancellation.ts`. For a run cancelled by a user Stop or interrupt, it returns the recorded Stop request time (`cancellation.recordedAt`) when that is earlier than `finishedAt`. For all other runs it returns `finishedAt`. - Use this boundary in the dispatch gate's message deferral, in native explicit-continuation admission, and in the remote-Stop continuation check, so the three places agree on "message written after the Stop". - When the withheld run is a system-owned retry, walk a bounded chain (max 8) of retries that did not reach the provider (`workspace_busy` with `providerWorkStarted: false`, or a verified pre-dispatch `execution_reconciliation_required`) to the originating user receipt. Save the message on that receipt with the user's original wake context. Mark the retry's system receipt `skipped`. - Update the "input written before the Stop" test so that the Stop request, and not only the settlement, comes after the message. ## Verification - New regressions in `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts` (`continues a message ... without a second message, after recovery already resolved`): a direct follow-up and a workspace-busy retry. Each runs recovery to completion first, then lets the gate withhold the follow-up, then runs only the deferred-receipt worker. Each asserts that exactly one successor run is queued with the user's message and the user's authority, and that no provider work starts. - Red before the fix: both tests fail because the receipt is `skipped` instead of `deferred_issue_execution`. Green after the fix. - `npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts` (384 passed). - `npx vitest run src/services/explicit-native-continuation.test.ts src/modules/run-dispatch src/services/execution-continuation.test.ts src/services/run-cancellation.test.ts` (581 passed). - 19 more heartbeat, retry, queued-comment, and native recovery suites (1272 passed). One failure, `heartbeat-process-recovery > redacts opaque environment-bound credentials from Sentry diagnostics: result`, also fails on unchanged `master` and is not related. ## Risks - A message written after the Stop request but before the stopped run settled now continues. The stopping run cannot consume new input after its Stop request, and admission still removes comments that a run already delivered (`undeliveredLegacyUserCommentIds`). All admission gates (holds, stop proofs, approvals, budget) still apply. - Only user Stops and interrupts move the boundary. Other cancellations keep `finishedAt`. - The retry walk is bounded, stays in one company, agent, and issue, and accepts only retries without provider work. It revives a user receipt only from `cancelled` or `skipped`, so a second retry cannot save the same receipt twice. - Not in scope: a run that fails during native preparation with no user message (for example `runner_state_identity_mismatch: prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate; retirement_refused=unexpected_root_entry` on a system wake). After its recovery resolves, the task still waits for a user message. That is a separate root cause in the native session executor's prior-owner retirement proof. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, local test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
789a71bc17 |
fix(runner): retry quarantined tasks in their saved workspace (#19340)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native sessions retain execution ownership and action history across turns. > - Task Retry must prove that old execution has stopped before it starts another turn. > - An attempt can inherit its predecessor's identity and fail before it launches a provider. > - The cleanup proof searched under that failed attempt and compared unrelated event sequences. > - This pull request verifies the retained owner and starts one fresh authorized turn. > - Saved results and uncertain action outcomes remain intact. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Task Retry accepted repeated clicks but kept the canonical request deferred with `executionWait.reason: local_cleanup`. It created no successor, although the retained local worker and provider had stopped. **Expected behavior:** After exact cleanup proof, admit one fresh turn. Preserve the old journal and result. Keep unresolved action outcomes unknown. **Steps to reproduce:** 1. Finish a local native turn with retained cleanup state and a saved result. 2. Let the next attempt inherit its identity and fail with `native_session_cleanup_quarantined` before any launch. 3. Upgrade across a tool-contract change, then click task Retry. 4. The old code requires the failed attempt's stop receipt and journal identity. It also requires the current tool fingerprint and equal sequence numbers across raw and normalized events. Those requirements cannot match the retained owner. **Paperclip version or commit:** Reproduced on `31bf6e4482`. **Deployment mode / installation method:** Authenticated, self-hosted source checkout. **Agent adapter(s) involved:** Native `paperclip_runner`, local Codex app-server. The shared physical-stop proof also covers ACPX. **Database mode:** Embedded PostgreSQL 18.1. **Access context:** Board task Retry. **Node.js version / operating system:** Incident: Node 24.20.0, Linux ARM64. Local verification: macOS ARM64. **Relevant logs or output:** Accepted Retry stays in `deferred_issue_execution`; no new run or provider launch occurs. **Relevant config:** Per-turn local native execution. The old tool contract differs from the current contract. **Additional context:** Related: #19311 prevents the oversized tool result that can lead to retained cleanup. #18217 covers broader cleanup isolation and retained-result maintenance. #19134 admits stopped Runner sources under the current run lease. This patch fixes explicit continuation admission on current master. ## What Changed - Resolve the retained journal's owner under the same company, task, agent, workspace, native session, and runner instance. - Require terminal ownership, settled controllers, released local leases, and exact inherited process birth. Refuse any launch evidence on the failed attempt. - Accept a current host's verified process absence from its exact launch receipt when an older server lacks a stop receipt. A later launch invalidates that observation. - Validate normalized receipts against their own IDs, sequences, and digests. Match ordered provider identities to the independent raw journal. - Keep tool compatibility at the session reuse boundary. Explicit continuation always uses a fresh session. - Bind the stop proof to its exact successor and canonical Retry receipt. Reuse the proven local workspace through normal preparation. Refuse changed bindings, closed or remote workspaces, pending operations, and other live leases. Projectless run-ID placeholders keep the existing fresh-workspace fallback. - Retain journals, results, files, and uncertain action outcomes. Add regression and opt-in live acceptance coverage. - Make the split-handoff browser test wait for both child-completion notices and all run settlement before teardown. Assert the final task set stays unchanged. ## Verification - Red: canonical Retry on the original code accepts one saved intent but creates zero successors and records `local_cleanup`. - Red: distinct raw and normalized event sequences reproduce that wait after owner resolution alone. After admission was repaired, live acceptance then exposed the empty-attempt workspace problem. A PostgreSQL regression also reproduced that wrong workspace selection. - Green at `6684df5e82`: **479 targeted cases**, including 26 new PostgreSQL cases for duplicate clicks, exact process and workspace ownership, controller/lease fences, changed state, and independent receipt integrity. The complete 1,150-test native executor suite passed earlier. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass again at final head `432a52bea8`, including its build stamp. Token gates pass. Master now contains the unrelated directory-fixture type correction found during the first typecheck. - Real authenticated HTTP Retry with Codex `gpt-6.1-sol`, high effort, and per-turn execution passes again at final head `432a52bea8` (93.3 seconds). It preserves the first file line, appends the second once, starts a fresh session in the existing workspace, keeps the retained journal unchanged, commits finalization, and clears task locks. - The strengthened split-handoff browser scenario passes **three consecutive local runs**. Its original CI teardown and one same-head rerun failed when cleanup cancelled an active legacy completion-notification run and hit a PostgreSQL row-lock timeout. The scenario now waits for the complete handoff before cleanup. [Initial failure](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42106466518/job/127523693634), [same-head rerun](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42106466518/job/127531698321). These failures remain part of the verification record. - The local full `pnpm test:run` passed all six chat integration shards. Its obsolete pre-rebase attempt was stopped during the general server phase; no complete local-suite pass is claimed. Full CI, including both required gates, passed at `6684df5e82`. At final head `432a52bea8`, all initial CI groups passed except the unchanged status-card deadline test, whose post-wakeup clock assertion missed its bound by 10 ms. That exact case passed three unchanged local repetitions (16.8/27.0/18.3 seconds); the single isolated shard rerun passed all **2,218 tests** (123 files), with no source changes. [Initial timing failure](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42114473652/job/127550722187). - Greptile reviewed `6684df5e82` at **5/5**, with no actionable findings. A second reviewer identified the supported projectless placeholder case. A new real PostgreSQL regression reproduced its workspace-binding failure before the one-line fallback correction; all **45 focused cases** now pass, including default environment selection and changed binding/cwd refusal. Greptile reviewed final head `432a52bea8` at **5/5**, with no blocking findings. The second reviewer’s thread is resolved. - The patched Linux build verified the actual retained worker/provider ownership and process absence in a transaction that was rolled back. No retained state was retired or provider started during that pre-deployment check. ## Risks - This changes an execution admission proof. Incorrect ownership could permit a second executor. The proof retains process, controller, lease, scope, journal, and receipt fences, and duplicate admission is tested through the real queue. - Missing or conflicting evidence remains deferred. Windows, remote execution, automatic replacement, and session reuse retain their existing policies. - No database migration or UI change. The original affected task still needs deployment of the fix before recovery can be claimed. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, SSH diagnostics, and live provider testing. This session does not expose the exact backend model build or context-window size. The live test agent uses OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` at high effort. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
15249a689d |
fix(server): preserve sessions across cosmetic sandbox updates (#19349)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and saves provider sessions between turns. > - Session and workspace compatibility include the selected environment revision. > - The managed sandbox reconciler also updates names, descriptions, and stock metadata. > - Those cosmetic updates advanced the revision even when the execution configuration stayed the same. > - A later turn therefore discarded an otherwise compatible saved session. > - This pull request keeps that revision stable for cosmetic reconciliation and retains resets for real configuration changes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #18943 and #18552. **What happened?** A managed sandbox rename or description update made a later task turn start a fresh provider session. The driver, provider, snapshot, and agent configuration could all remain unchanged. Both session and workspace freshness use the environment's `updatedAt` as its configuration revision. **Expected behavior** Cosmetic managed reconciliation preserves compatible task sessions. Actual sandbox configuration or availability changes retain the normal replacement checks. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a managed sandbox and save a task-session fingerprint for it. 2. Reconcile the same sandbox configuration with a new name, description, or managed metadata. 3. Evaluate the saved session against that environment. Before this fix, the decision resets the session and reports the environment category. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master `d3713d827f70ddba63a323e57c562384dbd648ba`. **Deployment mode** Managed sandbox server. The regression uses an isolated PostgreSQL database and the actual reconciler and session-freshness resolver. ## What Changed - Keep the existing revision for an active managed sandbox when its execution configuration stays equal. - Continue advancing the revision when configuration or availability changes. - Retain activity records and managed-stock binding updates for cosmetic reconciliation. - Add a regression that checks session reuse, audit history, and rejection after a real snapshot change. - Document the freshness contract. ## Verification - The new PostgreSQL regression failed before the production change: it reported `reset: true` and changed category `environment`. - All 53 environment-service cases pass after the fix. - All 190 session-freshness and assembled heartbeat session-preparation cases pass. - Full local typecheck passes. The full local Vitest run remains active, with its local build queued afterward. Initial typecheck setup failures were retained and resolved by repairing generated SDK links; no source workaround was added. - [Full current-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42114984839) passes, including the sharded test suites and build: 55 successful checks, 3 skipped, and 1 neutral. - Greptile and Ponytail both reviewed this commit at 5/5 with no findings. No review threads remain unresolved. - Deployed verification remains pending normal delivery. No pinned release or manual rollout is required. ## Risks - Cosmetic managed reconciliation keeps `environments.updatedAt` unchanged, so it does not reorder that environment by this timestamp. Activity records and managed-resource bindings still record the update. - The comparison uses canonical configuration hashes, so JSON property order cannot hide a real change or create false drift. - Existing fingerprint formats and saved session records remain compatible. Real configuration and availability changes still advance the revision. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex desktop, with reasoning and terminal/browser tools. The host does not expose a more specific deployment suffix or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
b929ad43de |
fix: keep dependency waits neutral and explain GitHub access failures (#19315)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and shows users what can move it forward. > - Task status and tool approval cards describe different parts of that work. > - A queued dependency wait has no provider attempt to retry. > - GitHub can reject an approved action while other connection tools still work. > - These cases showed a false Retry banner and an unhelpful provider error. > - This pull request keeps dependency waits neutral and gives GitHub access failures a direct repair path. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #19268 preserves pending Retry preparation and current failure causes. **What happened?** A queued wake cancelled by the dependency gate appeared as a failed attempt with Retry. A GitHub MCP permission denial appeared as raw HTTP error text after an approved repository action. **Expected behavior** Keep the task's dependency state. Show GitHub access failures with a clear explanation and a link to the selected connection's Permissions page. Preserve actual failures, provider details, and approval gates. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Queue a wake, then leave its task dependent on unfinished work before dispatch. 2. Open the task after the dependency gate cancels that wake. 3. Separately approve a GitHub action whose MCP result contains `403 Resource not accessible by integration`. 4. Reopen the saved tool approval. ## What Changed - Recognize both queues' unstarted dependency-wait receipts in cancellation provenance and task projections. No dispatch or recovery gate changes. - Classify GitHub's specific permission error after MCP result normalization. Keep result validation, the raw diagnostic, and working tools available. - Apply the same display code to both historical GitHub error codes. Identify the provider from company-scoped connection metadata, including renamed apps, without rewriting stored decisions. - Show a token-based inline access card with **Manage GitHub access** and collapsed **Error details**. - Give agents trusted recovery steps after an approved GitHub action fails. Keep provider text in the untrusted result and prevent automatic replay. - Add regressions, a production-component Storybook case, and execution/connector documentation. ## Verification - Red before the fix: cancellation provenance, dependency-wait projection, the real queue cancellation, approved MCP failure classification, saved interaction projection, and the error card assertions failed at the expected behavior. - Green focused tests: queue cancellation, one ready-task executor, approval-before-dispatch, one failed GitHub request, connection reuse, retained provider diagnostics, saved interaction reads, task list/detail projection and redaction. - UI: 106 component tests passed. Token gates and Storybook catalog checks passed. - `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`: passed. - Local source instance: verified a saved dependency wait stays neutral after reload; a saved GitHub error shows repair guidance, expands its original error, and opens the correct connection Permissions page. PostgreSQL and HTTP APIs were real. The GitHub denial was a controlled MCP fixture; no account or provider permission changed. - `pnpm build`: passed for all workspace packages, the Runner binary, server, CLI and UI. The server build and all server typecheck layers also passed after the review repair. - Additional safety checks passed for realistic repository arguments, active recovery, failed Retry preparation, and bounded provider diagnostics. - Review repair: 45 pure tests and 7 PostgreSQL cases passed. These cover both historical error codes, renamed apps, and company/provider/application identity boundaries. A second local browser check verified the renamed app, retained error detail, and correct Permissions destination. - Final review regressions: the dispatcher and metadata cases failed before the repair. Afterward, 25 focused cases and 59 projection/identity cases passed, including connection-key precedence. The native wait and app-only GitHub source also passed a local browser check. - The historical read adds at most one connection query per interaction read batch. It selects IDs and the provider key only and runs only for candidate permission failures. It adds no provider requests. - Full local `pnpm test:run` stopped at the chat suite's `afterAll` cleanup timeout. All 268 assertions in that group and the three prior chat groups passed. The failure is retained here; it is not counted as a full-suite pass. CI passed on `e8a692e1e2` after one workspace-startup rerun. Fresh CI is pending for the combined head. Its first workspace-a attempt timed out in the CLI company import/export test's child-server startup wait; 4,968 UI tests and 287 CLI tests passed in that job. The same shard passed on the preceding commit. The workspace shard passed on its one rerun. All other test, build and browser jobs passed. The [first failure](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42093823928/job/127478869941) is retained in the Actions history. Greptile reviewed the preceding head at 5/5. Fresh review is pending for the combined head. ## Risks The GitHub classifier matches the documented permission-denial phrase, not every 403. Rate limits, missing resources and other providers retain their existing error behavior. Historical normalization affects display only. A dependency cancellation needs an unstarted run and a supported queue receipt; current user gates, Retry preparation and recovery remain authoritative. No schema migration or credential changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6, through the Codex agent. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository tools, TypeScript, PostgreSQL, MCP fixtures and browser verification. The parallel agent-recovery commit records Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 as co-author. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used with version and capability details - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR using the bug template - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change - [x] I have run the focused tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented risks - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open findings - [x] I will address reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
ffd9591ab4 |
fix(recovery): preserve cancelled files after a reusable sandbox stops (#19305)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - A native run writes its task files in a remote sandbox. The task
workspace records that run as its writer until the files are saved.
> - When a user stops or reassigns a run, the cancelled-workspace
preservation worker records the unsaved files as file recovery work.
> - A warm run (`keep_running`) that is not successful releases its
reusable sandbox through stop-and-retain. That release can finish before
the worker sees a terminal coordinator.
> - The worker accepted only an active lease or a released ephemeral
lease. It ignored the released reusable lease, so it never recorded the
file recovery.
> - The workspace kept the ended writer's hold. Each successor run
waited, then failed with "The workspace still has an unfinished writer
or save operation" after the one-hour cutoff.
> - This pull request accepts a released reusable lease that has a
confirmed stop-and-retain receipt as a preservation source.
> - The benefit is that the stopped run's files become recovery work,
and the task is not stranded behind a hold that nothing settles.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #18820 (preserves files when Stop finds no live controller). Refs
#17677 (schedules cancelled workspace preservation). Refs #19285 (parks
a workspace wait behind an ended writer).
**What happened?**
A board user reassigned a task during a warm native run. Stop cancelled
the run with `issue_reassigned`, and the Stop acknowledgement was
recorded. The executor settled the coordinator to `terminal_failure`
with no owner. About eight seconds later, terminal release stopped and
retained the reusable Daytona sandbox. The lease became `released` with
`leasePolicy: reuse_by_environment`, a `stopped` termination receipt and
a stop-and-retain receipt. The task workspace stayed `dirty` with
`writerRunId` set to the cancelled run. No file recovery was recorded.
The new assignee's runs waited as `workspace_busy` for one hour. Then
each run failed `setup_failed`, and the task became blocked.
The heartbeat run row showed `nativePhase: "observed"`. That value is
stale: the checkpoint persist wrote it during teardown. The coordinator
itself was `terminal_failure`: the run's execution projection was
`recovery_needed` with no matching recovery action.
**Expected behavior**
The preservation worker records the stopped run's prepared files as file
recovery work. The lease keeps its release status and receipts. No
second stop and no new provider turn start.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Cancel a native run with an acknowledged run-only Stop. Its remote
workspace reference is `prepared`, and the coordinator is
`terminal_failure` with no owner.
2. Release its reusable lease through stop-and-retain (`released`,
`reuse_by_environment`, confirmed stop receipt).
3. Run the cancelled-workspace preservation worker or the startup scan.
4. On master, the run has no `workspaceRestoreRecovery`, and no recovery
action exists.
## What Changed
-
`server/src/services/native-runtime/native-failed-workspace-recovery.ts`:
add one source check, `cancelledWorkspaceSource`, for cancelled
preservation. The worker check and the startup scan both use it. It
keeps the active and ephemeral cases. It adds a released reusable lease
only when the stop-and-retain receipt is confirmed
(`hasConfirmedSandboxStopAndRetain`) and `preparedRemoteWorkspaceSource`
proves the exact remote-workspace binding. This is the same proof the
restore recorder uses. Native-sync runs have no such proof and stay
ineligible. An ineligible source causes no run write or notification.
- The restore recorder (`preserveLegacyWorkspaceRestoreSources`) already
accepts this source. It checks the confirmed receipt and the exact
prepared workspace binding, and it keeps the lease status, policy and
receipts. This pull request does not change it.
- `native-cancelled-workspace-preservation.test.ts`: add the incident
shape as a regression for the worker and the startup scan, and add
safety cases.
- `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the stopped reusable source and
the writer hold until recovery.
## Verification
From `server`:
```sh
npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-cancelled-workspace-preservation.test.ts
```
- Red before the fix: the two new regression cases failed (`expected {
nativeCancellation: … } to match object { …, workspaceRestoreRecovery: …
}`). 30 other cases passed.
- Green after the fix: 36 passed.
- Review follow-up: the cases `invalid-receipt`, `expired-lease` and
`native-sync` failed on the previous head
|
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
8464a8c9ae |
fix(native): settle a bootstrap retry that lost its task lock (#19307)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A native run that fails before any provider work gets a bounded same-run bootstrap retry. Restart recovery decides whether that retry can run. > - The retry needs the task's issue lock. A user comment or another wake can move that lock to a new run before the retry is due. > - Restart recovery then returned `issue_execution_lock_changed` without a write. The same check ran on every recovery pass and never ended. The coordinator stayed `retryable_failure`. > - The orphaned-lease sweep waits for a terminal coordinator before it preserves the workspace. So the sandbox lease stayed active, and every later run for the task was cancelled as `workspace_busy`. > - This pull request gives a lock-lost bootstrap retry the same bounded admission that a superseded remote retry already has. > - The benefit is that the retry settles, the board gets a reconciliation action, and the sandbox lease is released instead of blocking the task. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. Bug description: **What happened?** On a hosted instance, a native agent run failed at startup because the provider rejected `session.open` with a rate limit. Paperclip scheduled a same-run bootstrap retry. Seconds later, a new run for the task took its issue lock, most likely woken by a user comment. From then on, every restart recovery pass for the old run returned `blocked` / `issue_execution_lock_changed` and wrote nothing. The run recorded about 1,000 recovery events over 12 hours. Its coordinator stayed `retryable_failure` with `recoveryMode: bootstrap_retry`. The scoped orphaned-lease sweep found a pending workspace export for the lease. It could not preserve the workspace, because `preserveNativeFailedWorkspace` requires `terminal_failure`. So the lease stayed `active`, and 16 later runs for the task were cancelled as `workspace_busy`. Three more runs on the same instance were stuck in the same state. A board Stop on the failed run moved the coordinator to `terminal_failure`, and the sweep then released the lease within about a minute. **Expected behavior** A bootstrap retry that cannot get its task lock back settles within a bounded number of recovery passes. The coordinator reaches `terminal_failure`, the board gets a reconciliation action, and the existing orphaned-lease sweep can preserve the workspace and release the sandbox lease. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Fail a native remote run before provider work, so its coordinator is `retryable_failure` with `recoveryMode: bootstrap_retry`. 2. Move the task's `executionRunId` to a newer run for the same task, or clear it. 3. Run `claimNativeRestartRecoveries` for the failed run. 4. Before this change, it returns `blocked` with no `retryAt`, and the coordinator stays `retryable_failure` on every pass. The new tests in `native-remote-retry-admission.test.ts` reproduce this. **Paperclip version or commit** Observed on a hosted deployment. Reproduced in tests on `master` at `10a7d039c8e`. Related: #19190 (a `session.open` model rejection no longer schedules a doomed bootstrap retry), #19131 (preserve superseded observed workspaces) and #19281 (release the leases of a cancelled legacy run). None of them changes this admission path. ## What Changed - **Restart recovery (`server/src/services/native-runtime/native-restart-recovery.ts`)**: a new condition, `lockLostBootstrapRetry`, matches a failed run whose coordinator is `retryable_failure` with `recoveryMode: bootstrap_retry` and whose issue lock is not on the run. - A newer run for the task: the existing superseded check now covers this case too. It defers with `native_retry_source_superseded` as permanent, so admission is exhausted at once. - No newer run (the lock was released): recovery defers with `issue_execution_lock_changed` through the existing `deferRemoteRetry`. That path persists a deadline, backs off and exhausts after the system recovery budget. - When admission is exhausted, the existing hold path writes `terminal_failure` / `native_restart_recovery_blocked`, keeps the provider evidence and creates the board reconciliation action. This PR adds no new terminal path. - A bootstrap retry that still holds its own lock is unchanged. The exact-checkpoint remote retry path is unchanged. - **Docs (`doc/execution-semantics.md`)**: the bootstrap retry section now states the lock-lost rule. ## Verification - New test `settles a %s bootstrap retry that lost its task lock instead of re-checking forever` in `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-remote-retry-admission.test.ts`, for the `superseded` and `released` cases. The fixture is a genuine pre-provider failure: a `session.open` rejection with no session checkpoint, no runner checkpoint row and no provider evidence. - On `master` without the fix, both cases fail: recovery returns `blocked` without a deadline, and the coordinator stays `retryable_failure`. - With the fix, `superseded` settles on the first pass, and `released` settles after `SYSTEM_RECOVERY_MAX_RETRIES` deferred passes. Each deferred pass persists its `nextAttemptAt`. Both end in `terminal_failure` with one board recovery action, and later passes open no transaction. - `npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-remote-retry-admission.test.ts` (from `server/`): 92 passed. - Related suites, each run on its own with exit code 0: `native-ingress-bootstrap-retry`, `native-startup-retry`, `native-scheduled-resume-lock`, `native-restart-recovery-isolation`, `native-runner-restart-recovery`, `native-runner-restart-preparation`, `native-runner-restart-diskless`, `native-warm-transition-restart`, `native-controller-recovery`, `native-failed-workspace-recovery`, `native-session-resumption`, `native-startup-cleanup-recovery`, `heartbeat-observed-workspace-preservation`, `heartbeat/recovery`, `runtime-selection`, `remote-workspace-migration` and `native-session-executor` (1,149 tests). Two other suites each had one local failure that this change does not cause: - `heartbeat-process-recovery`: "redacts opaque environment-bound credentials from Sentry diagnostics" fails the same way on this machine without the change. - `chat-channels.integration`: "settles a shared-endpoint accepted-response backlog without retrying its own locks" failed once under full-suite load. It passes alone, with and without the change. - `pnpm run typecheck` in `server/`: passed. ## Risks - Low to medium. The change only affects failed bootstrap retries whose lock is not on the run. Before this change, such a retry could never run, so no working path is removed. - A released lock that comes back to the same run during the backoff still resumes normally, because the condition reads the current lock on each pass. - When the retry settles, the task gets a board reconciliation action. Before this change, the task was silently stuck behind `workspace_busy`. - No migration and no API change. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, code search, test runs), extended thinking, and a read-only investigation subagent for the root cause. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
55389554c2 |
fix(runner): paginate workspace discovery before journal persistence (#19311)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native agents discover reusable workspaces through `list_workspaces`. > - The tool returned every authorized workspace in one result. > - A large inventory exceeded the durable command journal limit. The result stayed pending, and session cleanup blocked the next turn. > - This pull request limits discovery in SQL and returns explicit continuation metadata. > - Agents can inspect every authorized workspace without sending the full inventory in one command. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #15749 introduced the task workspace tools. No duplicate pagination fix was found. **What happened?** A native workspace discovery call returned a multi-megabyte inventory. Persisting its result failed with `command_payload_too_large`. The preceding answer could still be saved, but cleanup retained the unsettled tool call. A later turn failed before provider work with `native_session_cleanup_quarantined`. **Expected behavior** Workspace discovery must return a manageable page. Agents must be able to request the remaining authorized rows. Existing visibility checks and journal integrity checks must stay effective. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create 2,000 task-selectable workspaces with ordinary repository paths. 2. Call `list_workspaces` from an admitted native run. 3. On the old code, the real API regression returns 869,781 bytes. The command journal allows about 510 KiB. 4. On the repaired code, follow `nextCursor` to inspect all rows. Pages contain at most 100 rows and fit within 128 KiB. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on source commit `7351a9d74f` before the repair. **Deployment mode** Isolated source checkout with real PostgreSQL and authenticated native agent APIs. Hosted deployment and incident recovery remain separate. ## What Changed - Validate workspace list limits and UUID cursors with a JSON Schema pattern supported by strict validators. Return `workspaces`, `limit`, `returnedCount`, `hasMore`, and `nextCursor`. - Apply company, visibility, lifecycle, and cursor conditions before the SQL limit. Order pages by workspace ID. Fetch one extra row to detect continuation without a count query. - Fit encoded pages within 128 KiB, including JSON escaping and Unicode. If one summary cannot fit, return explicit string previews with `truncatedFields`. The authorized detail API retains its full record. - Keep existing unpaged summary callers on their array response and recent-use order. - Update the native tool descriptor, generated contracts, catalog fixture, and execution documentation. - Add regression coverage for large inventories, complete pagination, stable pages, private and foreign rows, invalid inputs, and legacy summary behavior. Add an opt-in two-turn live Codex acceptance check. ## Verification - Red before repair: `task-workspace-api.test.ts -t "pages a large authorized workspace inventory"` failed because the result was 869,781 bytes instead of below 128 KiB. The transport regression also failed at 2,284,671 bytes. - Green after repair and review changes: 120 tests passed across the workspace API, transport, routes, native authority, coordinator, historical-question, and Codex vertical-slice suites. They cover complete discovery, byte-sized pages, oversized individual summaries, full detail retrieval, private/foreign/lifecycle exclusions, and strict schema compatibility. - Journal safety: two focused durable control-plane tests passed. Oversized result rejection and lossless valid result delivery remain effective. - Tool catalog and reconciliation: 30 tests passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed again on final commit `bc10880da6`. Server typecheck also passed after the review changes. The original affected suites passed on the rebased first commit (31 tests), and the expanded review regression set passed afterward (120 tests). - Real provider acceptance passed again on final commit `bc10880da6`: local macOS arm64, rebuilt native Runner, `gpt-6.1-sol`, high effort, per-turn lifecycle, and 2,000 persisted workspaces. Both turns succeeded. Persisted call inputs and results prove that the second page uses the first result’s cursor, both calls succeed, their IDs do not overlap, and the encoded results stay within 128 KiB. The second turn kept the provider conversation and file. Both task locks were clear after completion, and no recovered execution failure was recorded. Duration: 166.92 seconds. - Full local `pnpm test:run` stopped in the chat shard: 330 tests passed and one Slack registration test failed with `socket hang up`. That exact test passed in isolation without changes, and the final-head CI chat shards passed. A broader local managed-Slack follow-up produced no result after about eight minutes and was interrupted; it is not counted as a pass. The original full-suite failure remains recorded. - The first CI head failed native tool-schema compilation because strict validators did not recognize `format: uuid`. The revised descriptor uses a UUID pattern. The previously failing coordinator, native vertical-slice, authority, and history suites now pass locally. The stronger live cursor-receipt acceptance check passed. Final-head CI completed on `bc10880da6`: 57 checks passed and five optional checks were skipped, with no failures or pending checks. Greptile reviewed that commit at 5/5; both prior findings are resolved. - Dependency cost: paged discovery runs the existing visibility-scoped summary query with an ID cursor and at most 101 returned rows. It adds no count query, filesystem scan, provider call, or background worker. ## Risks - Native `list_workspaces` now returns a page object instead of an array. Individual summaries can be explicit previews when a single record exceeds the byte budget. Its advertised descriptor and generated contracts change together. Agents must follow `nextCursor` until null for a complete inventory. - Each page rechecks current visibility. Concurrent insertions, deletions, or access changes require a fresh scan when a complete point-in-time inventory is needed. - No migration or journal-limit change. An existing cleanup quarantine still requires normal recovery after deployment; this PR does not bypass it. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, shell tools, code editing, and test execution. The exact served model revision and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
a695398052 |
fix(server): preserve inactive rebase bookmarks in workspace snapshots (#19310)
Preserve a validated standalone REBASE_HEAD and its commit without changing the source workspace. Keep active Git operations, unmerged indexes, invalid markers and concurrent changes blocked. Verified 156 affected tests, workspace typecheck and build. All hosted CI checks passed, and Greptile scored the exact head 5/5 with no unresolved threads. The bounded full local suite stopped during its fifth chat shard; this incomplete result is recorded in the PR. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5de779848b |
fix(recovery): save a reassignment-stopped writer's files from its stopped reusable sandbox (#19304)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A remote task workspace stays held by its last writer run until that writer's files are saved > - A reassignment stops the old owner's run. The stopped writer still holds the workspace with unsaved files. > - When the run used a reusable (warm) sandbox, the stop leaves its lease `released` under the reusable policy, with a stop-and-retain receipt > - Cancelled-workspace preservation only admitted `active` or `ephemeral` sources. It never recorded the save for this stopped writer, so no workspace recovery ran, and the hold stayed forever > - The new owner waited, then failed setup after the one-hour cutoff with "The workspace still has an unfinished writer or save operation" > - This pull request admits the stopped reusable source, so Paperclip saves the stopped writer's files and releases the hold. A waiter keeps waiting while that save is in progress. > - The benefit is that a reassigned task continues with the old owner's saved work, and the new owner does not fail setup ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19285 (parks a waiter behind an ended writer). Refs #19074, #18820. **What happened?** A board user reassigned a task during a native run on a reusable sandbox. The old run was cancelled with `issue_reassigned`. Its sandbox was stopped and its lease was released under `reuse_by_environment`. The workspace still named the stopped run as its dirty writer. No save operation and no workspace recovery action were ever recorded for that run. The new owner's runs were cancelled `workspace_busy` repeatedly. After more than an hour, a new run failed setup: "The workspace still has an unfinished writer or save operation." **Expected behavior** Paperclip saves the stopped writer's files from its stopped sandbox within a bounded time and releases the hold. The new owner waits for that save and then continues. If the save cannot finish, its retries end with a named board recovery action. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Give a native run a prepared remote workspace on a lease with policy `reuse_by_environment`. 2. Stop the run (for example by reassignment), so the lease is stopped and released with a stop-and-retain receipt. 3. Run cancelled-workspace preservation. Before this fix, it records nothing, and the writer hold stays. ## What Changed - `native-failed-workspace-recovery.ts`: Cancelled-workspace preservation (the delivery worker and the startup scan) now admits a `released` reusable lease with a stopped termination receipt and a stop-and-retain receipt. - `preserveNativeFailedWorkspace` retains such a reusable source only with the exact confirmed stop-and-retain receipt, and only while the workspace is still bound to that writer (`preparedRemoteWorkspaceSource`). Otherwise it writes nothing. - `remote-workspace-writer-hold.ts`: For an ended writer, the holder cutoff now uses the latest progress of an in-progress save of that writer's retained files (a workspace recovery that is not complete, exhausted, or recovered). Reservation and the parked `workspace_busy` wait both read this rule. A waiter waits for the save instead of failing setup. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: Documents the stopped reusable source and the save-progress cutoff. ## Verification - Red before the fix, green after: - `npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-cancelled-workspace-preservation.test.ts` — new cases "preserves a reassignment-stopped writer's files from its stopped reusable sandbox" (worker and startup scan) failed before the fix: no `workspaceRestoreRecovery` was recorded. - `npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-remote-workspace-busy.test.ts` — new cases "keeps a waiter parked while an ended writer's save is in progress" failed before the fix: the parked retry was released past the cutoff. - Safety cases: - A reusable source without a confirmed stop, a workspace now owned by another writer, and an already saved workspace are not retained, and the run row does not change. (The writer and saved cases fail if the new guard is removed.) - Preservation does not replay the stopped run, does not create a wake, keeps the stop receipt and lease policy unchanged, and keeps the writer hold until the save publishes. - An exhausted or complete save does not extend the cutoff. The existing past-cutoff test (no save in progress) still fails setup and keeps the held files. - Related suites: workspace recovery, remote workspace reservation, native workspace reconstruction, native failed-workspace recovery, legacy workspace restore recovery. - Not verified on staging: this change is not deployed. The staging task needs this fix deployed. Then the preservation worker records the save, workspace recovery saves the files, and the waiting owner continues. ## Risks - More cancelled runs are now admitted for preservation. The retention guard requires the exact stop-and-retain receipt and the workspace bound to this writer, so a reusable sandbox that another run resumed or that no longer holds unsaved work is not retained. - A stopped reusable source stays `reuse_by_environment` while Paperclip saves it. This matches the existing retention path for reusable native sources. - The writer-hold read adds one indexed query (`issue_recovery_actions_source_run_idx`) for an ended writer only. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use (shell, code editing, test execution) in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7351a9d74f |
fix(native): restore retired backups after warm lease handoffs (#19299)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and keeps their work across turns. > - A native session can keep the same sandbox through several warm lease handoffs. > - Each handoff keeps the old lease row and records matching receipts on both owners. > - The retired-backup guard required exactly one row for a provider allocation. > - That rule rejected valid history after Paperclip destroyed the sandbox. > - This change uses the existing handoff proof to select the final owner. > - A verified backup can then restore without discarding ownership checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19208. **What happened?** A follow-up received a new sandbox after its old sandbox was destroyed. The old allocation had a normal warm lease handoff. Both lease rows remained in PostgreSQL. The guard rejected them with `runner_harness_state_mismatch: backup_without_reusable_lease`. Its later same-run retry failed with `native_remote_recovery_lease_mismatch`. **Expected behavior** Restore the verified backup when one final owner has a valid destroyed receipt and every earlier owner has a matching handoff receipt. Keep uncertain ownership blocked. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Complete a native warm turn. 2. Hand the reusable sandbox to another turn. 3. Complete that turn and save its backup. 4. Close the workspace and destroy the sandbox. 5. Send a follow-up. The new allocation must restore the saved session. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced in the PostgreSQL regression on the parent of this change. The affected deployed build also contains #19208. ## What Changed - Select the single final lease owner. Validate all predecessor rows with `retiredReusableLeasePredecessors`. - Keep the destroyed receipt, exact backup stamp, and newer-provider-work checks. - Add database regressions for one and three handoffs. Reject missing or changed receipts, an active predecessor, missing history, an unrelated owner, a stopped source, another backup, and later provider work. - Document the valid lease-history shape. ## Verification - Red before the source change: the two valid-handoff cases returned false. The other 16 database cases passed. - Green after the change: all 18 database cases passed. They also passed on current head `d16e098b8c2e6c0dda70984c1df21e3dc792ab34`. - Command: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-retired-backup-source.integration.test.ts`. - The database, executor, retry-admission, and lease suites passed: 4 files, 1,308 tests. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. The build stamp names head `4ee733c3a979436196522f36537ff182e9df5398`. The full local suite stopped in chat shard 3 after a 15-second timeout in `materializes direct external-chat finals once and accepts the next turn without agent bookkeeping writes`. Earlier shards passed 702 cases; that shard passed 303 other cases. The isolated test passes on this branch and unchanged master `10a7d039c8efeac0fd655c24970df5ae3658414b`. All current-head CI chat shards also passed. The earlier full-suite attempt remains failed; its timeout cause is not established. No test or timeout was changed. CI is waiting for its last Runner job. - Current head `d16e098b8c2e6c0dda70984c1df21e3dc792ab34` removes four comment lines from the previously tested head. Its 18 database cases passed. Greptile reviewed this head at 5/5 with no actionable findings: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19299#issuecomment-6665446098. CI remains pending. - Live inspection found the matching predecessor/successor receipts and the final owner's destroyed receipt. This was read-only evidence from the affected build. - A live provider run at the fixed revision has not been exercised. Local Daytona credentials and an immutable test image are unavailable. No deployment or original-task retry is claimed. - Initial wider tests could not resolve the unbuilt plugin SDK. The SDK build is now available. A sandboxed database launch could not bind loopback; the same regression passed with the disposable database outside that restriction. ## Risks - A wrong owner could allow an old backup to rewind a session. The shared validator must account for every lease row and match both sides of each handoff. - Live, unrelated, incomplete, or conflicting history stays blocked. The existing backup integrity and provider-progress checks remain. - No migration, permission, model, trust, timeout, or retry-policy change is included. - The original task still needs the fixed build and normal recovery. Hosted acceptance remains unverified. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, code execution, and tool use. The session does not expose the exact model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
10a7d039c8 |
fix(dispatch): keep a workspace wait parked while an ended writer's save settles (#19285)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A run that finds its task workspace held by another run waits as a `workspace_busy` scheduled retry. #19143 keeps that wait as one parked retry while the holder is live. > - A remote task workspace stays held by its last writer run until the writer's save and sandbox release settle. This hold continues after the writer run ends, for example when a reassignment stops the writer. > - The parked-wait check counted only a `running` holder. For an ended writer whose save had not settled, it released the waiter at each due check. Preparation deferred again, cancelled the run, and created a new retry run. > - After a mid-run reassignment, the new owner got five cancelled `workspace_busy` runs in eleven minutes, and the task did no work. > - This pull request makes the parked wait use the same writer-hold rule as workspace reservation, so the waiter stays parked until the hold releases. > - The benefit is one durable wait, one start when the hold releases, and no churn of cancelled runs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19143 (parks a workspace-busy wait). Refs #19184 (releases a recovered hold for a new assignee after reassignment). **What happened?** A board user reassigned a task in the middle of a run. The old run was cancelled with `issue_reassigned`. The new assignee's runs were each created, started and cancelled with `workspace_busy`: "Shared execution workspace is busy: run … ended, but its workspace save has not settled". This repeated every 1–2 minutes (five cancelled runs in 11 minutes). Every cancellation named the stopped run of the previous assignee as the holder. The new assignee's other tasks were not the holder. **Expected behavior** The reassigned task waits as one parked retry. It starts once when the stopped writer's save and sandbox release settle. The wait stops at the one-hour holder cutoff. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Give a task a remote execution workspace whose writer run has ended, but whose save has not settled (`writerRunId` set, `dirty: true`). 2. Wake the task's assignee. The run defers with `workspace_busy` and schedules a retry. 3. Make the retry due and promote scheduled retries. Before this fix, the retry is promoted and dispatched, defers again, and creates another run. ## What Changed - New `server/src/services/remote-workspace-writer-hold.ts`: `readRemoteWorkspaceWriterHold` holds the rule for who holds a remote workspace (a running writer, or an ended writer whose save or sandbox release has not settled). The code is moved from `reserveRemoteWorkspace` without a behavior change. - `reserveRemoteWorkspace` uses that function. It throws the same errors as before. - `parkWorkspaceBusyRetryInTx` (from #19143): when the recorded holder is not running, it reads the same hold for the waited execution workspace. If the recorded holder is an ended writer that still holds it, the retry stays parked. The cutoff clock starts at the writer's end, the same value that reservation measures. Earlier waiters keep their arrival order. - New `WORKSPACE_BUSY_SETTLING_RECHECK_MS` (60 s). Settling has no single completion point that can wake the waiter, so a wait behind a settling writer re-checks every minute. Each check creates no run. In the promotion transaction it reads the workspace, the writer run, its task, and the writer's leases (one row per sandbox lease of that run). The checks last only while the wait exists, up to the one-hour cutoff. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: documents the parked wait behind a settling writer. ## Verification - Red before the fix: `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-remote-workspace-busy.test.ts`. The two new tests failed: the due retry was promoted (`expected [ … ] to not include '<retry id>'`). - Green after the fix, with: - `parks one waiter while an ended writer's save settles, then admits it once the hold releases`: three due checks keep one parked run, each re-check is bounded by the writer's end plus one hour, there is one `workspace_busy` cancellation in total and no new retry run. After the hold releases, the next check promotes the same run. - `stops parking behind an ended writer once its unsettled save reaches the holder cutoff`: parked before the cutoff, promoted after it (preparation then fails with the existing unfinished-writer error). - Existing suites pass: `heartbeat-workspace-busy.test.ts` (live-holder parking, arrival order, stop, workspace move), `modules/run-dispatch`, `remote-workspace-reservation.test.ts`, `remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts`, `isolated-remote-workspace-source.test.ts`, `heartbeat/workspace-preparation.test.ts` (476 tests in all). - `tsc --noEmit` for `server` shows no errors in the changed files. - Not done: a live run on staging. The fix is not deployed. ## Risks - Low. Parking applies only to a retry that recorded a `workspace_busy` wait on an execution workspace whose recorded writer is that holder. If the hold settles, moves to another run, or the task changes workspace, the retry is released to normal dispatch as before. - The wait stays bounded by the existing one-hour holder cutoff from the writer's end. After that, preparation fails as before. A user can still stop the parked run. - One writer per workspace is unchanged. Reservation still decides admission with the same rule. - The one-minute re-check runs only while a wait exists. It is not idle polling. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser reads of staging diagnostics). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
b05d3db2b3 |
fix(recovery): continue a pre-turn interrupt after recovery, not after the destroy (#19292)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A board user can interrupt a native run with a comment. The next turn should start soon after the run stops > - When the stop leaves sandbox files unsaved, recovery saves them, re-stops the sandbox, and then queues the destroy for an ephemeral lease > - #19224 kept the verified stop on that lease as `workspaceRecoveryCleanup.stopReceipt`, and taught the continuation gates to accept it > - One gate was missed: `acknowledgedNativeStopExecutionHasStopped`. An interrupt that lands before the provider turn opens leaves no gating hold, so the saved comment goes through this gate, not through the explicit continuation gate > - That gate still wanted the raw `remoteExecutionTermination` receipt, so the comment waited about 5 minutes for the destroy retry > - This pull request lets that gate accept the carried-forward stop receipt too > - The benefit is that an interrupt during startup continues right after recovery, as #19224 intended for every lease policy ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19224 Refs #19206 **What happened?** On hosted staging, an `interrupt: true` comment reached a native run of an ephemeral-lease agent while the run was still in startup (the provider pack upload). The run stopped before any provider turn. Recovery saved its files at once. The follow-up turn started about 6 minutes after the interrupt. The stopped run's lease was released by `pending_cleanup_retry`, and the follow-up started 2 seconds later. Agents whose interrupt landed after the provider turn opened continued in 30 to 50 seconds on the same build. **Expected behavior** The saved comment starts a new turn right after recovery saves the files and the sandbox is stopped. The destroy of a stopped sandbox is cleanup and must not hold the next turn. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use an agent whose sandbox lease is ephemeral (destroy after each turn). 2. Post an `interrupt: true` comment while its native run is still starting, before the provider turn opens. 3. Let recovery save the files. See the follow-up start only after the destroy retry releases the lease. **Paperclip version or commit** Hosted staging at `e37ab23d` (includes #19206 and #19224). ## What Changed - `server/src/services/acknowledged-native-stop.ts`: `acknowledgedNativeStopExecutionHasStopped` accepts a remote lease that has `hasRemoteTerminationReceipt` or `hasRecoveredCleanupStopReceipt`. Before, it accepted only the first one. - `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts`: new regression for a pre-turn interrupt on an ephemeral lease. Recovery completes, the destroy is queued, and the saved comment is handed to `resumeRemoteStopComments` twice. With a verified carried stop, exactly one turn starts while the lease is still `pending_cleanup`. Without the stop receipt, the comment stays deferred and no turn starts. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: one sentence that extends the #19224 paragraph to the pre-turn Stop case. ## Verification - Red before the fix: `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts -t "starts the interrupt redirect once after recovery"` failed the `verified-stop` case with `expected [] to have a length of 1 but got +0`. The `no-stop-receipt` case passed. - Green after the fix: the same command passes both cases. - `npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts`: 382 passed. - Related suites pass: `acknowledged-native-stop`, `explicit-native-continuation`, `heartbeat/run-control`, `heartbeat/recovery`, `heartbeat/native-stop-evidence-read`, `native-session-executor`, `heartbeat-observed-workspace-preservation`, `native-startup-cleanup-recovery`, `execution-control-work`. Two `run-control` cases timed out at 30 s under parallel load and passed when run alone. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passes. - Not done: a live re-run on staging. This change is not deployed. ## Risks - Low risk. `hasRecoveredCleanupStopReceipt` is the same check #19224 added to the other gates. It is true only for a lease whose recovery cleanup belongs to its own run, which was released, and whose carried stop receipt matches the company, run, lease, provider, and provider lease id. A lease without that receipt still blocks. - The no-replay hold is unchanged. The successor still goes through ordinary admission with all task gates. The test calls the resume twice and sees one turn only. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser reads of staging). Extended reasoning was used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
6293e581f6 |
fix(recovery): resume cancelled workspace retries from verified waits (#19276)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A shared workspace can make a run wait before it calls a provider. > - The scheduler saves a retry for that wait. > - The control plane can cancel the retry while it is still queued. > - Recovery then asks for a process stop receipt for a run that never claimed execution. > - This pull request verifies the retry and its exact workspace-wait parent before it accepts a later user instruction. > - The benefit is that Retry and saved messages can continue through normal admission without replaying old work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13640 and #15483. Related fixes: #18838 covers dispatcher cancellation codes; this change covers a system-cancelled scheduled workspace retry. Related open PR #15383 covers claimed conversation-adapter preparation. This change requires an unclaimed retry with no run profile or owner. **What happened?** A scheduled workspace retry was cancelled before runtime selection. The run retained an expected system cancellation and a `startupCancellation.beforeNativeSelection: false` marker. It had no start timestamp, execution stage, run profile, controller, process, lease or provider events. Recovery recorded an unknown-action hold. A later user message and Retry could not pass that hold. **Expected behavior** A later authorized instruction can start a fresh turn when the saved retry and its exact parent prove that no provider work started. Missing or conflicting evidence must retain the hold. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Record a terminal workspace wait before provider dispatch, with `executionRecovery.kind: workspace_wait` and `providerWorkStarted: false`. 2. Save a scheduled retry for that same company, task and agent. 3. Cancel the retry through the control plane before it claims execution. 4. Send a new user message or request Retry after the cancellation. 5. On the base commit, admission returns no continuation. With this change, normal admission creates one fresh successor. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced in source based on master at `499712c68b3ca95801b6114d5f2f0f0ea6759318`. **Deployment mode** Source checkout with isolated embedded PostgreSQL. Hosted rollout and a real provider run remain to be verified after merge. ## What Changed - Extend the existing cancelled-startup proof with one source-bound workspace-retry case. Require the canonical retry parent and reason to match the saved context. - Verify the parent's company, task, agent, time order, immutable Runner claim and typed workspace-wait record. Reject runtime, process, lease, coordinator, result and output evidence on either run. - Keep validation of the full saved result in the database predicate. The bounded execution projection can add empty receipt fields without changing eligibility. - Reuse the existing admission, Retry and deferred-message paths. Preserve cancelled history and unknown action outcomes. Keep permission, Stop, budget and recovery-limit gates. - Add 23 regression cases, including heartbeat message and Retry admission, concurrent saved-message recovery, and 19 conflicting-evidence cases. Document the contract. The cancelled-startup service owns this proof. No provider protocol, schema, UI or shared contract changes. Reads use exact run IDs and return only narrow metadata. The new reads occur only for a cancelled, unstarted Runner retry candidate. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/services/explicit-native-continuation.test.ts src/services/legacy-execution-recovery.test.ts src/services/execution-blocker-read.test.ts src/services/task-retry.test.ts` — 452 passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm build` — passed. - `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs` and `git diff --check` — passed. - Local diff review and secret/private-context scan — passed. Test identities are synthetic. - Regression history: the original positive case failed on unchanged source while 11 negative guards passed. Initial test fixtures then exposed ownership/contract constraints and a missing saved-wake envelope; the fixtures now use valid persisted shapes. The heartbeat Retry test exposed extra keys in the bounded evidence projection. Full-record validation now runs in SQL, and both assembled heartbeat paths pass. The unknown action outcome stays unchanged. - Platform: macOS arm64, Node 25.6.1, pnpm 9.15.4. Tests use real isolated PostgreSQL. They stop at admission and do not call a live provider. - Exact-head GitHub CI: 54 successful checks, 3 skipped, no unfinished or failed checks. Greptile scored `cfbf55cea68e3c69f65f50afcba98f775fa6fa3d` 5/5, with no actionable findings and no review threads. - The full repository `pnpm test:run` was not run locally. A previous full run in this repair effort stalled and was stopped after 2h45. The four complete affected suites pass; full PR CI must pass before merge. ## Risks - False admission could allow work before a predecessor is safe. The proof fails closed on missing parent records, different ownership, a changed retry binding, later parent completion, restore obligations, any execution resource, or any provider/output evidence. - This deliberately covers only system-cancelled, unclaimed workspace retries. Other cancellations retain their current reconciliation path. It does not grant automatic replay, certify unknown external writes, or reset exhausted recovery limits. - No migration. Verify the serving version and an existing saved-message continuation after deployment. ## Model Used - OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, xhigh reasoning, through the Codex harness in T3 Code. Used code editing, shell tools and test execution. The harness does not expose its context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
499712c68b |
fix(runner): restore cold state before inspecting completed handoffs (#19254)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native Runner saves provider sessions and controller state across turns. > - A completed warm handoff leaves a receipt in the controller journal. > - A later cold continuation must restore external Runner state before it can inspect that receipt. > - The transport read the missing physical file before it called the restore hook. > - This pull request prepares admitted external state before that inspection for completed handoffs. > - Live Runner adoption and pending transitions retain their existing ownership checks. The provider thread can continue after a cold restore. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #19225 and #19157. This fix changes the shared transport read order. It does not depend on the open source-reconciliation extension in #19157. **What happened?** A cold continuation after a completed warm handoff could fail with `runner_remote_state_unavailable`. The saved controller journal was valid. The physical Runner state was absent because its restore hook had not run yet. A later automatic reattachment could then fail an allocation identity check. **Expected behavior** Restore admitted external state before inspecting a completed handoff. Retain the original provider thread. Refuse a denied restore or foreign session without starting provider work. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a Codex session and complete a warm handoff to a second run. 2. Suspend the session and retain the controller journal and provider backup. 3. Start a third run with no physical Runner state until the external preparation hook restores it. 4. Read the retained thread. Before this fix, the read fails before preparation. ## What Changed - Prepare external Runner state before inspecting a completed warm-handoff receipt. - Keep live Runner adoption, pending attachments, and active warm transitions on the existing exact-state path. - Add a real Runner and controlled Codex regression for successful restore, denied restoration, and a foreign restored session. - Document the cold-continuation order in the execution contract. ## Verification - Red: the new real-process regression fails on unpatched source because resume reads the absent `runner-state.json` before preparation. - Green: all three new cases pass. The restored thread keeps its identity. The controlled provider starts one thread and resumes it once. No turn is replayed. - Adjacent safety suites: 60 cases passed across warm attachment, interrupted attachment recovery, suspension, and cold restore. The new foreign-session case also passes separately. - Runner TypeScript and generated protocol checks passed. - Full workspace typecheck and build passed. Runner TypeScript checks passed again after the live-adoption guard. The full local test command remains in progress; all required CI test jobs passed on the current head. - The first CI run found two live-adoption regressions: an already completed staged handoff must not restore a backup while its Runner is live. The guard now excludes live adoption. All six cases across cold restore and staged handoff pass locally. The original CI failure remains recorded in run 42047027346. - Greptile reviewed the corrected head `f33a041c8902c39ca52b995d53128fc23b0b5499` at 5/5. There are no review threads or findings. All current-head CI gates passed. - Live staging verification remains pending normal deployment. No pinned serving image or bulk migration is part of this PR. ## Risks The change calls an existing external preparation hook earlier for completed handoffs. That hook must remain idempotent and must enforce restore authority. Live adoption, pending attachments, and active transitions do not gain this earlier call. The negative regressions assert that a refused restore and a foreign session start no provider work and do not change the authority journal. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The host does not expose the exact serving model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
e37ab23dbc |
fix: hold an agent's new work while its provider usage limit is active (#19246)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Routine-driven agents run on the native Runner through ACP harnesses such as Claude > - When the agent's provider account runs out of allowance, every new wake for that agent fails the same way > - The ACP harness reported the exhausted allowance as a generic "terminal limit failure" with an `unknown` category, so Paperclip could not tell it from a context or turn limit > - Paperclip recorded a reset time only for the failing run's own startup retry; other wakes of the same agent kept dispatching, each spent about two minutes on workspace setup, and then failed > - This pull request classifies the limit, keeps its reset time, and holds the agent's new work until that reset > - The benefit is that a limited agent stops burning runs, shows a clear "waiting for usage limit reset" state with a time, and resumes its queued work after the reset ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13148 Refs #13379 **What happened?** A routine-driven Claude agent on the native Runner failed 29 times in about 15 hours. 20 runs failed with `native_provider_terminal_failed` and "ACP agent reported a terminal limit failure." The recorded provider failure had category `unknown`. 6 runs failed with `provider_session_open_rejected`. Their `session.open` result is `command_execution_failed` with classification `provider_rate_limit`, and the provider failure is HTTP 429 `rate_limit` ("would exceed your account's rate limit"). The startup retry of one such run recorded a cooldown until one hour later. A new wake for a different task of the same agent dispatched 16 minutes later, spent two minutes on workspace setup, and failed with the same 429. Separately, 4 runs failed with "Project authentication conflicts with this agent's managed AI connection". That message did not say which file or setting conflicted. The same message was also shown when the check could not finish. **What did you expect?** A provider usage limit is classified distinctly. Paperclip records the reset time when the provider reports one. New work for that agent waits for the reset with a visible reason. Queued work resumes after the reset, and no doomed run starts. A configuration conflict is reported only when one is found, and the message names the file to fix. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use a native Runner agent with a Claude ACP harness whose account is rate limited or out of usage. 2. Let a routine or assignment wake the agent on several tasks. 3. See each run fail with a generic terminal limit failure or a `session.open` rejection, and see new runs keep starting. ## What Changed - Runner: The ACPX turn now receives the typed AIR session failure (`onTerminalSessionFailure`) through the runtime host and the ACPX port. The sidecar adds the provider's title to the provider failure message. Only a rate-limit or quota title becomes `rate_limit` or `quota_exhausted`. Context, turn and configured budget limits stay `unknown`. The failure details stay private. - Server: A native `turn.failed` with a `rate_limit` or `quota_exhausted` provider failure is now `native_provider_usage_limit`, the same code as the Codex usage-limit terminal. - Server: `agentProviderLimitCooldown` (extracted from the startup retry) also reads a reset clock in the provider's wording, such as "resets 2am (UTC)". The clock parser moved from the recovery service to `provider-quota-reset.ts` without changes. - Server: New `heartbeat/provider-limit-wait.ts`. Before any workspace or provider work, a queued run for an agent with an active provider limit is cancelled as `provider_limit_wait`. The run records the reset time, whether the provider reported it, the category and the run that reported the limit. Paperclip schedules one retry of the same wake at the reset through the existing AI connection wait lane. That lane does not consume the failure retry budget. Manual runs, recovering runs, conversation turns and pool-routed connections are not held. - Server: The execution projection shows "Waiting for usage limit reset" with the reset time and the next step. - Server: Only a found project authentication conflict is a configuration failure. Its message names the project file and the settings to remove. A check that cannot finish (timeout or another exit code) is now an ordinary failure, not a configuration conflict. - Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the agent-level limit wait. ## Verification Red before the fix, green after: - `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-provider-limit-wait.test.ts`: An automation wake after a 429 `session.open` rejection dispatched the adapter before the fix. Now the run is cancelled as `provider_limit_wait` and a scheduled retry exists at the reset. After the reset passes, the retry is promoted and the work succeeds. A manual run, a later success, expired evidence and an unclassified terminal still dispatch. - `native-startup-retry.integration.test.ts`: "reads the reset clock from an ACP terminal limit failure's provider wording" (it fell back to one hour before). - `native-session-executor.test.ts`: An ACP `turn.failed` with a typed `quota_exhausted` or `rate_limit` failure is a usage-limit terminal; `unknown` is not. - `packages/paperclip-runner/src/drivers/provider-failure.test.ts`: A typed AIR limit title is kept and classified; context, turn and budget limits are not; details do not leak. - `execution-projection.test.ts`, `ai-connections.test.ts`: The wait label, and conflict versus unfinished check. - Safety cases: `runtime-host.test.ts` and `codex-runtime-adapter.test.ts` forward the callback. The existing startup retry, provider capacity, recovery classification, legacy reconciliation, retry scheduling and execution configuration suites pass. Commands: - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-provider-limit-wait.test.ts src/__tests__/ai-connections.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/ src/services/recovery/ src/services/execution-projection.test.ts src/services/legacy-execution-recovery.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-execution-configuration.test.ts` - `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/drivers/provider-failure.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/runtime-host.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/codex-runtime-adapter.test.ts src/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.test.ts` - `tsc --noEmit` for server and paperclip-runner; the ACPX sidecar and provider-failure contract checks pass. I did not run a live provider limit on staging. The live evidence is the staging run records for the affected agent, which I read only. ## Risks - The limit evidence is per agent, not per account. If the board changes the agent's AI connection, automatic wakes can still wait until the old reset (at most one hour when no reset was reported, and at most one day). A manual run is not held, and one successful run clears the evidence. - A new wake that arrives during a limit is now cancelled and retried at the reset, instead of failing. The task stays in its status, and the run shows the reset time. - The Runner change takes effect when the provider pack is rebuilt and deployed. Until then, the server still holds new work using the existing `rate_limit` evidence from `session.open` rejections. - A turn terminal with a typed rate limit or quota is now `native_provider_usage_limit` instead of `native_provider_terminal_failed`. Both are terminal and board-owned. The recovery text now asks the board to restore provider usage capacity. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser reads of staging run records) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d0afeacdd5 |
fix(remote-workspaces): keep retained runner state when replacing a retired root (#19251)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Remote workspaces save a task's files as snapshots. Runtime state under `.paperclip-runtime` is never in a snapshot, because it belongs to the sandbox > - #19231 lets a parent task on a retained sandbox restore newer child work over its own retired workspace root > - That replace removed the whole retired root, including the parent's retained runner session state under `.paperclip-runtime/paperclip-runner/` > - The parent's native continuation then reads that runner state on the resumed sandbox, cannot find it, and fails with `runner_remote_state_unavailable` > - This pull request moves the retired root's runtime state into the restored root before it removes the retired root > - The benefit is that delegating parents on retained sandboxes continue their session with the children's saved work ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19231 **What happened?** After #19231, a parent task on an agent with a retained sandbox delegates two subtasks. Both subtasks finish. The parent's wake run now restores the newer saved work successfully, but the run fails right after with `runner_remote_state_unavailable: exit=1 timedOut=false`. The run error code is `native_continuation_requires_reconciliation` and the task becomes `blocked`. In one staging wave, 4 of 4 such parents failed. Root cause: the native continuation on a resumed sandbox reads `<remoteCwd>/.paperclip-runtime/paperclip-runner/sessions/<session>/runner/runner-state.json`. Snapshots exclude `.paperclip-runtime`, so the restored root has only the new restore receipt. #19231 parked the retired root and then removed it, so the runner state was removed too. **Expected behavior** The restored root has the newest saved files and the sandbox's retained runtime state. The parent's continuation reads its runner state and continues. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Prepare a remote workspace on sandbox A. Write files and runner state under `.paperclip-runtime/paperclip-runner/`. Save. 2. Make a second run the writer on sandbox B. It restores, writes new files, and saves. 3. Make a third run the writer on sandbox A again and prepare. The restore replaces the retired root. 4. Read the runner state with `readRemoteRunnerState`. Before this change, it fails with `runner_remote_state_unavailable: exit=1 timedOut=false`. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `26391707fb`, which includes #19231. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/remote-workspace-transport.ts`: before it removes the retired root, the restore script moves each entry of the retired `.paperclip-runtime` into the restored root's `.paperclip-runtime`. It does not move `workspace-ready.json`, `workspace-restored.json`, or `workspace-snapshots`, and it does not replace an entry that already exists. The move is a rename, so it keeps sockets and large session state. The script also finishes an interrupted carry when the same restore repeats. Only an authorized replace with that restore identity creates the `<root>.retired-<identity>` path. - `server/src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts`: the retained-sandbox regression now writes parent runner state, restores newer child work, and reads the state with the same `readRemoteRunnerState` call that the continuation uses. It also covers an interrupted carry on a repeated restore. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document that runtime state moves with the restored root. ## Verification - Red before the fix: `npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts -t "retired root"` failed in the `own retired root`, `own restored root`, and `read-only folder` cases with `Error: runner_remote_state_unavailable: exit=1 timedOut=false`. This is the same error as the staging failure. - Green after the fix: all nine cases pass. The continuation read returns the parent's runner state. The old `workspace-ready.json` is gone and the new restore receipt is present. A repeated restore finishes an interrupted carry and removes the retired root and its stale files. - `npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts src/services/remote-workspace-transport.test.ts src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts`: 250 passed. - Staging evidence (read-only): the failed parent wake run recorded a succeeded `remote_workspace_restore` at the parent's own provider lease, and then failed in the runner-state read. - I did not run a live staging run. This PR does not deploy. ## Risks - Runtime state from the retired root now persists into the restored root. The state is the sandbox's own state for this workspace path, which is the same state that a same-allocation reuse keeps. - If the restored root already has an entry with the same name, the old entry is not moved and is removed with the retired root. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic. It used tool use for code search, shell, test runs, and read-only staging inspection in the browser. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
03abe1f1a1 |
fix(native): keep the transport cause on a closed notification stream failure (#19240)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native runs read provider events from a shared session notification stream (Codex, OpenCode and ACPX drivers use it) > - When that stream closes, the driver fails the session with `notification_transport_failed` > - The run error was only "Provider notification transport failed closed." The real cause was only in a diagnostic event > - In a staging soak, many runs on OpenRouter and Grok agents showed this error. Operators read it as a provider fault. The diagnostic events showed a host-side cause: a stopped sandbox plugin worker ended remote runner supervision > - This pull request keeps the redacted, bounded cause on the terminal failure message, and does not name the provider > - The benefit is that a failed run shows why it failed, so operators do not chase the wrong provider ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Native runs failed with `native_provider_terminal_failed` and the error "Provider notification transport failed closed." The run did not show a cause. All failures in one cluster happened inside one minute, on several agents and models (OpenRouter DeepSeek, Grok). Each run's `harness.diagnostic` event had the real cause, for example `runner_process_termination_unconfirmed: runnerd process supervision failed: Cannot call "environmentExecute" — worker for "<plugin>" is stopped`, or `native_adopted_runner_identity_unverifiable: runner liveness could not be revalidated`. The sandbox duplex transport reported a `provider_exit` loss about 30 seconds before (the read-only process probe budget). **Expected behavior** The terminal run error keeps the redacted cause. It does not blame the model provider when the cause is host-side runner supervision. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a native Codex-protocol session and start a turn. 2. Make the notification stream throw (for example, a supervision error). 3. Read the `session.failed` and `turn.failed` messages. Before this change they are the bare generic text. ## What Changed - `codex-session-notifications.ts`: the `notification_transport_failed` terminal message is now `Notification transport failed closed: <cause>`. The cause is redacted first, then whitespace is collapsed and it is bounded to 1,000 characters. The `Error: ` prefix is removed. The code and `recoverable: false` do not change. - New regression in `codex-protocol-integrity.test.ts`: one `session.failed`, the cause and code are present, the secret is redacted, the length is bounded, and `turn.failed` has the same message. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: an additive note that this failure can come from host-side runner supervision, and that the message keeps the redacted cause. ## Verification - Red: before the fix, the new test failed: `expected 'Provider notification transport faile…' to contain 'runner_process_termination_unconfirmed'`. - Green: `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/drivers/codex/ src/conformance/local-provider-fault-matrix.test.ts src/native-session-runtime.test.ts` (565 passed). - `npx tsc --noEmit -p packages/paperclip-runner/tsconfig.json`: no new errors. The existing `src/eval/workflow-harness.ts` errors come from an unbuilt workspace package. - Staging evidence was read with read-only GETs only (run, events). ## Risks - Low risk. Only the message text changes. The failure code, `recoverable: false`, and the safe-replacement rules do not change. The server matches on the code, not on the message. - This PR does not add a retry in the same turn. Runner termination is unconfirmed when supervision is lost. A retry or replacement could start a second executor. The remote process probe already retries read-only checks inside a 30-second budget. Recovery stays with the existing ownership and recovery checks. - The cause text can include a plugin id. It goes through the existing provider-diagnostic redaction. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser reads) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
e8163fc860 |
fix(remote-workspaces): restore newer saved work over a retained sandbox's own retired root (#19231)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Remote workspaces save a task's files as snapshots and restore them on the sandbox that runs the next turn > - A parent task can delegate subtasks. The subtasks inherit the parent's workspace, run on their own sandboxes, and save newer snapshots > - When the parent wakes on its retained (warm, reused) sandbox, its earlier workspace root is still on that sandbox at the same published path > - The restore refused that root with `reason=occupied_root`, so the parent run failed at setup and the task became blocked with a board recovery action > - This pull request lets the restore replace that root only when the server proves it is the workspace's own earlier, fully saved allocation on this sandbox > - The benefit is that a delegating parent on a retained sandbox continues with the children's saved work, and unknown occupants are still refused ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A parent task on an agent with a retained sandbox delegates two subtasks to other agents. Both subtasks finish. The parent's wake run fails before the provider starts with `remote_workspace_restore_failed: step=sandbox_restore; ... stage=inspect_root reason=occupied_root`. The task becomes `blocked` with a stranded-work recovery action. Parents on agents with ephemeral sandboxes complete in the same wave. Root cause: the subtasks inherit the parent's execution workspace. Each subtask becomes the writer at a new epoch on its own sandbox, restores at the same published directory name, and saves a newer snapshot. The workspace location then points at the last subtask's sandbox. The parent's wake run gets a lease on its retained sandbox, so preparation is not "same allocation" and must restore the newer snapshot. The target path on the retained sandbox still holds the parent's epoch-1 root, which has a preparation receipt (`workspace-ready.json`) and no restore receipt. The restore script refuses any occupied root that is not the same restore, so it fails with `occupied_root`. A warm reuse cannot just keep the old root, because the snapshot is newer. **Expected behavior** The parent restores the newest saved work (its own files plus the children's results) into its published root and continues. A foreign or unknown occupant is still refused. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Prepare a remote workspace on sandbox A, write files, and save (final boundary). 2. Make a second run the writer on sandbox B. It restores, writes new files, and saves. 3. Make a third run the writer on sandbox A again (same provider lease id, new lease row) and prepare. 4. Before this change, step 3 fails with `stage=inspect_root reason=occupied_root`. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `47027e7ba5`. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/remote-workspaces.ts`: add `isRetiredOwnAllocation`. It reads this workspace's snapshot and restore operations recorded at the same environment, provider lease id, and root path. It returns true only when every such use is from an earlier epoch than the current writer, the last use ended in a succeeded `final` save with quiesced save work (`unknown=false`, no active invocations), no other save in that epoch is newer or unsettled, and the saved snapshot is committed or later. Preparation passes the result to the restore as `replaceRetiredRoot`, and only when there is no migration and the authority is clean. - `server/src/services/remote-workspace-transport.ts`: the restore script accepts `replaceRetiredRoot`. In that mode it replaces an occupied root only when the root carries a well-formed Paperclip receipt (`workspace-ready.json` or `workspace-restored.json` with a 64-hex identity). It parks the old root at `<root>.retired-<identity>`, publishes the restored folder, rolls the old root back if the publish rename fails, and then removes the parked copy. A repeated restore with the same identity adopts the published folder and removes any parked copy left by an interrupted attempt. Without a receipt, the script still fails with `reason=occupied_root`. `replaceRetiredRoot` and `allowEmptyRoot` cannot be combined. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the rule. - `server/src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts`: add a red/green regression and the safety cases. ## Verification - Red before the fix: `npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts -t "retired root"` failed in the `own retired root` case with `remote_workspace_restore_failed: step=sandbox_restore; remote_workspace_operation_failed: operation=restore exit=1; remote_workspace_restore_failed: stage=inspect_root reason=occupied_root`. This is the same cause text as the staging failure. - Green after the fix: all six cases pass: - `own retired root`: the parent restores on its retained sandbox. The root has the parent's file and the child's file, the parked and staging folders are removed, and the authority records the parent's lease. A repeated preparation (lost reply) keeps the parent's new unsaved edits. - `own restored root`: an occupant with a restore receipt from a different preparation is also replaced. - `receipt missing` and `forged receipt`: the occupant is refused with `occupied_root`, and its files stay. - `later allocation`: a later use of that root on that sandbox without a final save is refused. - `never saved here`: a different sandbox with an unknown folder at that path is refused. - `npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts src/services/remote-workspace-transport.test.ts src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts`: 247 passed. This includes the existing `occupied root` cold restore case, which is still refused. - `tsc --noEmit` shows no errors in the changed files. The local tree has unrelated errors from unbuilt workspace packages. - I did not run a live staging run. Staging is read-only for this work, and this PR does not deploy. ## Risks - The replaced root is removed after the publish. The server proof states that its content is in the saved lineage. If a process wrote to that root after its final save and outside a Paperclip run, those writes are lost. The same assumption applies when authority moves to another allocation today. - The proof uses operation records that have `exportCleanup` location metadata. Older records without that metadata do not qualify, and those cases still fail closed with `occupied_root`. - A warm runner process that kept an open working directory in the old root sees a removed folder. This is not verified live. The new turn is given the published path, which holds the restored files. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic. It used tool use for code search, shell, test runs, and read-only staging inspection in the browser. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
47027e7ba5 |
fix(routines): retain authenticated agent responsibility on creation (#19222)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Routines save work for later execution under a responsible person's authority. > - An agent can create a routine through its normal REST or native API tools. > - The create route kept the agent creator but dropped the authenticated responsible user. > - The service then selected a parent task's user or a company default, even when the source run had a different user. > - This pull request passes the authenticated responsible user separately from creator attribution. > - Future automatic runs then use the authenticated responsible user saved in the routine revision. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An authenticated native agent created a routine without a parent task. The stored responsible user became a different company owner. An unrelated parent task could also replace the authenticated user. The defect changes the identity saved for future automatic work. **Expected behavior** Creation must use the server-resolved responsible user from the authenticated run or API key. The agent remains the creator. A person who clicks Run now still supplies that manual run's identity. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create an active company member and a different company owner. 2. Initialize a native agent run with the member's identity. 3. Use `call_api` to create a paused, self-assigned routine without a parent. 4. Read the routine and its first revision. Before this fix, both use the company owner. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master `56517dda6c5b32bc901b7dbf1605eaaa041c5fba`. **Deployment mode** Local source integration with real HTTP routes, agent authentication, native tool authority, and embedded PostgreSQL. No provider turn is needed for the reproduction. Related work: [#19128](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19128) adds board controls for saved responsibility. [#15207](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15207) repairs synthetic identities from built-in installers. Neither fixes this authenticated create path. ## What Changed - Pass the authenticated agent's responsible user as a separate internal actor field. - Select the board user first, then the agent’s server-resolved responsible user, before the existing parent and company fallback. - Keep creator attribution, initial revision attribution, manual dispatch identity, and existing records intact. - Add real native API, HTTP, and PostgreSQL regressions for identity selection, replay, client spoofing, stale claims, revoked membership, cancellation, cross-company calls, API keys, and fallback behavior. - Document the creation and manual dispatch identity rules in the execution contract. Correct the obsolete responsibility sentence in the agent access map. - Make the existing live-retry route fixture wait for its committed comment’s durable wake before draining. Keep all process and saved-owner assertions. ## Verification - Captured a failing native `call_api` test before changing production code. The persisted responsible user was the unrelated company owner. - The same real route and database boundary passes after the fix. - Initial affected routine and identity checks: 131 passed. The existing pending-AI-card fence also passed. - Follow-up routine checks: 118 passed. The owning scheduled-retry suite passed all 31 tests. - Initial CI serialized shard 7/9 failed with a `23503` wake-to-agent foreign key error during test cleanup. A controlled real-route/PostgreSQL pause reproduced that exact error on unchanged base `56517dda6c`. The drain returned before the route registered its deferred comment wake. The same pause passed after the fixture waited for the actual commentId’s durable wake receipt. The original failure is preserved. - Affected server typecheck after the fixture query change: passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - `pnpm test:run`: still running as supporting coverage. The worktree changed during the run: map cleanup, then the six-line fixture wait. Production and routine-test files stayed unchanged. This is mixed-working-tree coverage, not an immutable full-suite pass for a commit. Exact next-head CI remains required. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check`: passed. - Exact head `a12e3f6c42b8ad5826fd58faa3cd9553ea251e09`: all CI gates passed. Greptile and the native substantive review both gave 5/5 with no open findings. The native reviewer did not run tests or exercise shadow-mode authorization. - Live provider execution remains unverified. This change does not grant access to another person's AI account. ## Risks New agent-created routines now use their authenticated responsible user before a parent or company default. This is the intended behavior change. The service keeps its fallback when no bound identity exists. Missing agent-key identity still fails authentication. Missing personal AI configuration still blocks execution. Existing routines, revisions, tasks, grants, and manual dispatch behavior do not change. The fixture waits for a persisted wake record before draining; its original live-process and saved-owner assertions remain. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The host did not expose the context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
3a090b815b |
fix: retain native checkpoint ownership through warm close (#19225)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A native warm session must save its checkpoint under its exact coordinator owner. > - A failed turn can return an accepted result before that checkpoint is saved. > - The executor stopped renewal and released the owner before the managed session closed. > - The backup owner guard then refused the uncommitted, released owner. A failed close could remain in the warm session map. > - This pull request keeps the claim and its existing renewal through checkpoint, close and instruction collection. > - The benefit is a valid checkpoint owner and one fenced release after the work joins. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19208, #19206 and #14695. Those fixes cover a destroyed backup source, Stop before a provider session opens, and retained agent-file ownership. They do not change this checkpoint ownership order. **What happened?** A failed warm turn accepted its result. Its coordinator reached `workspace_finalizing`, with a result ID and no lease owner. Managed close then called the durable checkpoint writer. The writer correctly refused this state with `native_harness_storage_owner_missing`. The failed close could remain for the next fresh session to retire. **Expected behavior** The current claim and renewal remain valid until the required checkpoint, close and instruction collection join. Cleanup stops and joins renewal, then releases only that exact claim. A changed owner is not cleared. An earlier error keeps its identity. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run the new real-Postgres regression against the base commit. 2. Complete a structured failed warm turn through the normal control-plane result producer. 3. Let the actual managed-session close call its production checkpoint callback. 4. Observe the missing-owner refusal after coordinator release. **Paperclip version or commit** Base: `56517dda6c`. The native ownership order also exists on the earlier failing revision. **Deployment mode** Native warm execution with durable harness storage and a managed remote workspace. ## What Changed - Join warm checkpoint, managed close and instruction collection before coordinator release. - Keep the existing lease renewal active through that work. Stop and join it before release. - Run the same fenced release after a checkpoint or collection error. Preserve the initiating error unless restart detachment has won. Keep the typed restart outcome and changed-owner fences. Attach only closed cleanup-failure flags. - Add real-Postgres ownership, delayed-renewal, error, retry and denial cases. Route the managed-session regression through the existing artifact-equipped native test lane. Update the continuity test for the retained claim. Document the active renewal lifetime. ## Verification - Red: the producing coordinator had an accepted result, `phase=workspace_finalizing` and `leaseOwner=null` at managed close. The production checkpoint callback refused it with `native_harness_storage_owner_missing`. - Green: all 9 real-Postgres regression cases pass. They cover a real 20-second renewal tick, a failed checkpoint, one force-fresh successor, and wrong-boot and changed-owner denial. Actual restart detachment wins even when checkpoint and joined renewal-stop both reject. The replacement claim remains unchanged. No new provider turn or cancellation receipt is created. A private canary does not enter the closed diagnostic flags or an error cause. - The executor, restart-recovery and heartbeat compatibility suites pass: 1,259 tests, with 20 gated skips. The container-enabled continuity case was not run locally. Its 21-second timer check remains. It now requires the exact claim during `hasChanges()` and checks release after the joined work. - All 39 shard-routing and combined-coverage tests pass. The new regression runs in the existing native lane with the required Runner artifact. - Final local head `0edcc37f35` passes `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and the 9-case regression. The earlier broader compatibility run used identical source bytes. A separate earlier repo-wide local suite on `6cdd68e915` ended with exit 1. Its general-server stage had one GitHub enrollment acknowledgement failure, 31,469 passing tests and 215 skipped tests. That acknowledgement failure reproduced in one narrow run on the same old tree. It is not an established flake or proven caused by this fix. Later repository stages did not run. No duplicate broad suite or full local pass is claimed. - The first published head failed review for detach-error precedence and the old continuity assertion. Its server shard also failed because the new test lacked a Runner daemon in the general lane. Those failures remain recorded. This candidate fixes their causes. Both exact-head reviews are now 5/5. The hosted native-server lane ran all 9 new ownership tests successfully. One unchanged tool-gateway rate-rule test failed in the first current-head CI run. It passed previously and passed locally, both narrowly and in its full 183-test file. The single same-head failed-job rerun passed. All current-head hosted gates are clean. The initial failure remains recorded; no test assertion was weakened. - The provider transport is an in-memory fixture. The managed wrapper, production checkpoint callback, control-plane result and Postgres ownership are real. No paid provider or live remote process is exercised. This does not prove a deployed recovery or a remote stop receipt. ## Risks - A slow required checkpoint extends the lifetime of the existing active renewal. Its cadence stays at 20 seconds for remote claims and 5 minutes for local claims. It runs only while the admitted checkpoint, close and collection remain active, then stops and joins on completion or unwinding. The tests observe a real remote renewal tick. No idle timer, new retry budget or new worker is added. - The release still checks company, task, run, owner, attempt, boot, PID, process start and expiry. Restart detachment retains its recovery owner. - The storage owner guard is unchanged. No migration, permission, provider setting or deployment change is included. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, `gpt-6.1-sol`, with reasoning, source inspection, local code execution and read-only staging metadata. Context window and reasoning effort are host-managed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
b8e8ab4641 |
fix(recovery): continue saved input after a recovered sandbox stops, not after its destroy (#19224)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A board user can stop or interrupt a native run and send a message for the next turn > - When the stop leaves sandbox files unsaved, automatic recovery saves them, re-stops the sandbox, and the saved message continues > - For agents whose sandbox is destroyed after each turn (an ephemeral lease), recovery then queues the destroy. That step removed the lease's stop receipt > - The continuation gate waits for a stop receipt, so the message waited for the destroy and its cleanup retry, about 5 to 8 minutes > - Agents with retained sandboxes continued within seconds, so the delay looked agent specific > - This pull request keeps the verified stop on the cleanup lease and lets the continuation and the next remote writer accept it > - The benefit is that a redirect, Retry or interrupt continues right after its files are saved, for every lease policy ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19206 **What happened?** On hosted staging, a Stop or `interrupt: true` comment on a native run left a follow-up turn that started 5 to 8 minutes later for some agents, and 25 to 40 seconds later for others. The slow agents use ephemeral sandbox leases. In each slow case, the stopped run's lease was released by `pending_cleanup_retry` about 5 minutes after recovery, and the saved message started one second later. The fast agents use retained leases, which recovery releases at once. **Expected behavior** The saved message continues right after recovery saves the files and the sandbox is stopped. The destroy of a stopped sandbox is resource cleanup and must not hold the next turn. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use an agent whose sandbox lease is ephemeral (destroy after each turn). 2. Interrupt or stop its native run so that recovery must save the sandbox files. 3. Post a message. See the follow-up start only after the sandbox destroy finishes. **Paperclip version or commit** Hosted, at `56517dda`. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.ts`: `scheduleRecoveredWorkspaceCleanup` keeps the verified stop receipt as `workspaceRecoveryCleanup.stopReceipt` when it queues the destroy. - `server/src/services/remote-execution-termination.ts`: new `hasRecoveredCleanupStopReceipt(lease)`. It is true only when the lease has recovery cleanup for its own run, was released, and the carried receipt matches the lease, run, provider and provider lease id. - `server/src/services/explicit-native-continuation.ts`: the `remote_cleanup` gate accepts that receipt. - `server/src/services/execution-blocker.ts`: `hasPendingRunCleanup` ignores a lease with that valid receipt, so a saved native interrupt send (and Retry or fresh-workspace checks) does not wait for the destroy. Other cleanup holds are unchanged. - `server/src/services/remote-workspaces.ts`: the next remote writer accepts that receipt for the ended writer's lease. - `server/src/services/execution-blocker.ts` (from #19206 review, not in the merged head): pre-turn evidence uses the exact startup lifecycle event list, so turn-scoped events such as `workspace.diff.recorded` count as provider work. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describes the rule. ## Verification - Red before the fix, green after: `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts -t "admits the interrupt redirect"`. An interrupted native run with recovered files and a queued destroy blocked the user message with `remote_cleanup` before the fix. After the fix the message is admitted. A lease without the stop receipt, or with a receipt for another run, still blocks with `remote_cleanup`. The test runs the same input as a plain message and as a saved native interrupt send (`queuedCommentInterruptId`); `hasPendingRunCleanup` was true before the fix and blocked the interrupt send with `cleanup_pending`. - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspace-reservation.test.ts -t "ended writer"`: the next writer reserves the workspace from an ended writer whose recovered lease awaits destroy; a missing or foreign receipt still blocks. Removing the new branch fails the positive case. - Updated `saves the authoritative remote workspace after native failed ...`: Retry now continues before the destroy, and the cleanup lease carries the stop receipt for its run and lease. - `workspace-recovery.test.ts -t "provider work cannot be excluded"` includes `workspace.diff.recorded` as provider work. - Related suites pass: `workspace-recovery.test.ts`, `explicit-native-continuation.test.ts`, `remote-workspace-reservation.test.ts`, `remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts`, `remote-workspace-lifecycle.test.ts`, `task-retry*.test.ts`, `native-cancelled-workspace-preservation.test.ts`, `workspace-recovery-source.test.ts`. `cd server && npx tsc --noEmit` passes. - Hosted evidence (read only): slow cases have ephemeral leases released by `pending_cleanup_retry` about 5 minutes after `issue.workspace_recovered`, with settlement one second later. Fast cases have retained leases released by recovery. ## Risks - Low to medium. The next turn can start while the old stopped sandbox is still being destroyed. The receipt proves that the sandbox was stopped after the files were saved, and an ephemeral successor uses a new sandbox. A destroy failure stays with the existing cleanup retry. - Leases without the carried receipt behave as before. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use and code execution in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
beb73381ca |
fix(native): let a Stop before the provider session opens continue once (#19206)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A remote task restores its saved workspace into a sandbox before the agent starts. > - When that restore fails, the run records only `remote_workspace_operation_failed: operation=restore exit=1`. > - The run then fails as `setup_failed`. No retry starts, and a `blocked` task gets no recovery action. > - An operator cannot tell which step failed, and nobody owns the next step. > - This pull request makes the sandbox scripts name their failed step in a closed grammar, and it gives a restore failure a bounded retry or a named board recovery action. > - The benefit is a visible cause and a clear owner. Saved work stays protected. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19152 and #19187. Those changes name copy-back (save) failures. Refs #18852 and #19195. Those changes added the bounded bootstrap retry that this change reuses. **What happened?** A board reply woke an agent on a `blocked` parent task. The run failed during setup 13 seconds later. The only run event was `remote_workspace_operation_failed: operation=restore exit=1`. The run had no workspace operation row. The task stayed `blocked`, and its recovery actions showed `active: null`. The same opaque family also appeared for workspace preparation (`exit=1` only). **Expected behavior** The run names which restore step failed, without command output or paths. A failure before provider work uses a bounded retry when a retry can help. Otherwise, and when the retry budget is spent, the board gets a named recovery action. The saved version is never changed or overwritten. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Save a remote workspace, then start a new run on a different allocation. 2. Put a folder at the published workspace path in the sandbox before restore. 3. Observe that the base code records only `operation=restore exit=1`, then `setup_failed`, with no recovery action for a `blocked` task. **Paperclip version or commit** Base: `87dfba6818`. **Deployment mode** Legacy runtime with sandbox (Daytona) remote workspace storage. ## What Changed - The prepare, repository, and restore sandbox scripts track their current stage. On failure they print `remote_workspace_<op>_failed: stage=<stage>` plus closed fields: `reason=` (the script's own snake_case refusal), `archive=` (the archive helper's fixed reason), `code=` (errno), `disk=full`, `git=` (a fixed label chosen from Git output), and the existing `exit`/`signal`/`program` fields. - The server accepts that text only when it matches a strict grammar for the same operation. Other output is dropped, as before. - Provider refusals during the restore upload and restore command are recorded by closed labels, like copy-back. - A failed saved-workspace restore raises `RemoteWorkspaceRestoreError` with the server step (`snapshot_lookup`, `snapshot_download`, `sandbox_restore`). It is retryable only when the owner re-reads the same writer, epoch, and saved version with no unsaved work, and the sandbox did not name a refusal reason. - Setup failure handling classifies a pre-dispatch legacy restore failure as `remote_workspace_restore_failed`. A retryable failure uses the existing bounded bootstrap retry. A non-retryable or exhausted failure records a board-owned recovery action with the redacted cause, when stranded-work recovery does not scan the task status (for example `blocked`). - Stranded-work recovery gets a named notice for this code. Generic continuation recovery does not grant it a second budget, and legacy reconciliation does not invent provider actions for it. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` documents the contract. ## Verification - Red: the new transport tests failed on the base code with `remote_workspace_operation_failed: operation=restore exit=1` (and the same for prepare and repository). The new completion tests failed because the run became `setup_failed` with no retry and no recovery action. - Green: `npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspace-transport.test.ts src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts src/services/legacy-execution-recovery.test.ts src/services/recovery src/services/remote-workspace-save-concurrency.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-workspace-finalizer-failure.test.ts src/__tests__/native-workspace-finalization-work.test.ts` passes (563 tests). - The transport tests use real sandbox commands. They prove an occupied folder reports `stage=inspect_root reason=occupied_root` and keeps its files. They prove a wrong manifest reports `stage=extract archive=manifest_mismatch`. They prove a missing branch reports `stage=checkout_branch`, and a changed origin reports `stage=verify_origin`. Forged output with a path is dropped. - The real-PostgreSQL cold-restore test proves an occupied root gives a non-retryable `sandbox_restore` failure and keeps the unknown files. - The completion tests cover retried, exhausted, refused, post-dispatch, and `in_progress` cases. - `tsc --noEmit` for the server reports no errors in the changed files. ## Risks - A retry keeps the same restore path. If the cause is deterministic but unnamed, the run uses its two retries before the board action. Named refusals skip the retries. - The board action is recorded only for statuses that stranded-work recovery does not scan, and only when no other action is active. This prevents a second recovery identity for one failure. - Script stderr grammar is new. Old sandboxes run the script that the server sends, so no runner update is necessary. - No migration, deployment, or credential change. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, through Claude Code with tool use, code execution, and browser tools for read-only staging evidence. Context window and reasoning mode are host-managed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
f5891564ec |
fix(recovery): continue from a retired sandbox's backup and hand spent export repairs to the board (#19208)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native tasks keep a warm sandbox and a verified per-turn backup of the provider session. > - Recovery holds stop a task when continuation is not safe. They must have a next action and an owner. > - In a staging soak, two kinds of held tasks could not move forward. Users followed the product's own instruction, and nothing changed. > - First, a reply to a task whose warm sandbox Paperclip had already destroyed failed every time. The label then said "Send a message to continue" again. > - Second, an exhausted system workspace repair stayed active and system-owned for hours. The board saw no owner, and a reply started nothing. > - This pull request lets a reply continue from the backup when the source sandbox is provably gone, and hands a spent system repair to the board with a named Retry. > - The benefit is that productive work always has a next action that can succeed, and nothing replays or runs twice. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** (a) A native warm task ran one successful turn. A later legacy follow-up retired the warm sandbox lease. The next user reply got a new sandbox (`created` lease). The executor found a verified backup but no reusable lease, so it threw `runner_harness_state_mismatch: backup_without_reusable_lease`. The run retried on the restart-recovery path, failed `native_remote_recovery_lease_mismatch`, and ended as `native_continuation_requires_reconciliation`. Workspace recovery then said "Saved work recovered. Send a message to continue." Each new reply repeated the same failure. (b) A run failed `native_workspace_sync_out_retry_exhausted`. System workspace recovery used its 6 bounded attempts and became `exhausted`. The recovery action stayed `active` with `ownerType: system`. The UI hides system-owned recovery actions, so the board saw no action. Nothing ran for more than two hours. **Expected behavior** (a) When Paperclip destroyed the source sandbox and no provider work followed the backup, the reply continues once from the backup. Ambiguous states still fail closed. (b) When the bounded budget is spent, the action names a board owner and a Retry action that can progress it. **Steps to reproduce** (a) Finish a warm native turn. Retire its reusable lease through obsolete-lease cleanup. Send a reply. The new run gets a `created` lease and fails `backup_without_reusable_lease`. (b) Let system workspace recovery reach its deadline or retry limit. Read the recovery action. It is still `ownerType: system`. Related merged work checked first: #19145, #19184, #19187, #19189, #19190, #18943 (added the guard for migrated sessions). Open recovery PRs (`gh pr list --search recovery --state open`) do not touch these paths. ## What Changed - `native-retired-backup-source.ts` (new): `retiredSourceAuthorizesNativeBackupRestore` decides whether a created lease may restore the backup. All must be true: the backup's source lease is `expired` or `failed`; it has a provider termination receipt with state `destroyed`; its `nativeHarnessBackup` stamp names this exact manifest SHA-256, session and runner instance; exactly one host lease maps to the provider allocation; and no provider durable event for the session was recorded after the backup completed. The provider event type set moved here and the executor imports it. - `native-session-executor.ts`: `shouldRestoreNativeHarnessBackupIntoSandbox` accepts `retiredSourceContinuation`. A created lease with a configured reusable lease evaluates it, beside the existing migrated-session path. The restore uses the existing verified restore and stamps the new lease. - `system-recovery.ts`: `updateSystemRecovery` moves an `exhausted` action to `ownerType: board` and writes a next action and workspace recovery message that name the attempt count, the last failure code, and **Retry recovery**. Retry (`requestWorkspaceRecovery`) already starts a new bounded generation and returns ownership to the system. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: documents both rules. ## Verification - Red before the fix, green after: - `npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts -t "restores a warm backup into a created lease only when"`. Before: the destroyed-source case rejected with `runner_harness_state_mismatch: backup_without_reusable_lease`. After: it restores the runner state and provider home into the new sandbox and stamps the new lease. - `npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts -t "hands an exhausted system export repair"`. Before: `exhausted` with `ownerType: "system"`. After: `ownerType: "board"`, the blocker says Retry recovery and never says "send a message", no provider run or lease resume happens, and Retry starts one new system generation. - Safety cases (fail closed): a stopped (not destroyed) source, a stamp for another checkpoint, provider work after the backup, a still-reusable `released` lease, a missing receipt, and two host leases for one allocation. These run in the executor test and in `native-retired-backup-source.integration.test.ts` against embedded Postgres. - Related suites pass: `workspace-recovery.test.ts`, `system-recovery-state.test.ts`, `native-session-executor.test.ts`, `task-retry.test.ts`, `explicit-native-continuation.test.ts`, `workspace-recovery-source.test.ts`, `native-workspace-export-retry.test.ts`, `native-remote-retry-admission.test.ts`, `native-workspace-warm-reuse.test.ts`, `native-workspace-sync-retention.test.ts`, `heartbeat-observed-workspace-preservation.test.ts`, `execution-control-work.test.ts` (2,224 tests). - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` passes. - Not done: a live run against staging. Staging access was read-only. The staging evidence is the run event timeline described above. ## Risks - (a) A backup restore after a lost sandbox could rewind a session if newer provider state existed. The predicate requires a provider `destroyed` receipt and no provider event after the checkpoint. A stopped sandbox, a pending cleanup, or a still-reusable lease still fails closed with the old error. - (a) The event-time check can fail closed if a late event from the backup turn is written after the checkpoint time. That keeps the old behavior; it never authorizes a restore. - (b) The action's next action text stays as the exhausted message while a later Retry generation runs. The task blocker shows the live workspace recovery message first, so users see "Recovering saved work…" during that time. - Not changed: when the predicate fails closed, the run still follows the existing reconciliation path. That path can still end with the "Send a message to continue" receipt. That residual is narrower now and needs a separate change to the workspace recovery receipt. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic. Agentic coding with tool use (shell, file edits, read-only browser inspection of staging). Default context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
2ce5f03cd8 |
fix(workspaces): name remote restore failures and leave a board recovery action (#19207)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A remote task restores its saved workspace into a sandbox before the agent starts. > - When that restore fails, the run records only `remote_workspace_operation_failed: operation=restore exit=1`. > - The run then fails as `setup_failed`. No retry starts, and a `blocked` task gets no recovery action. > - An operator cannot tell which step failed, and nobody owns the next step. > - This pull request makes the sandbox scripts name their failed step in a closed grammar, and it gives a restore failure a bounded retry or a named board recovery action. > - The benefit is a visible cause and a clear owner. Saved work stays protected. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19152 and #19187. Those changes name copy-back (save) failures. Refs #18852 and #19195. Those changes added the bounded bootstrap retry that this change reuses. **What happened?** A board reply woke an agent on a `blocked` parent task. The run failed during setup 13 seconds later. The only run event was `remote_workspace_operation_failed: operation=restore exit=1`. The run had no workspace operation row. The task stayed `blocked`, and its recovery actions showed `active: null`. The same opaque family also appeared for workspace preparation (`exit=1` only). **Expected behavior** The run names which restore step failed, without command output or paths. A failure before provider work uses a bounded retry when a retry can help. Otherwise, and when the retry budget is spent, the board gets a named recovery action. The saved version is never changed or overwritten. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Save a remote workspace, then start a new run on a different allocation. 2. Put a folder at the published workspace path in the sandbox before restore. 3. Observe that the base code records only `operation=restore exit=1`, then `setup_failed`, with no recovery action for a `blocked` task. **Paperclip version or commit** Base: `87dfba6818`. **Deployment mode** Legacy runtime with sandbox (Daytona) remote workspace storage. ## What Changed - The prepare, repository, and restore sandbox scripts track their current stage. On failure they print `remote_workspace_<op>_failed: stage=<stage>` plus closed fields: `reason=` (the script's own snake_case refusal), `archive=` (the archive helper's fixed reason), `code=` (errno), `disk=full`, `git=` (a fixed label chosen from Git output), and the existing `exit`/`signal`/`program` fields. - The server accepts that text only when it matches a strict grammar for the same operation. Other output is dropped, as before. - Provider refusals during the restore upload and restore command are recorded by closed labels, like copy-back. - A failed saved-workspace restore raises `RemoteWorkspaceRestoreError` with the server step (`snapshot_lookup`, `snapshot_download`, `sandbox_restore`). It is retryable only when the owner re-reads the same writer, epoch, and saved version with no unsaved work, and the sandbox did not name a refusal reason. - Setup failure handling classifies a pre-dispatch legacy restore failure as `remote_workspace_restore_failed`. A retryable failure uses the existing bounded bootstrap retry. A non-retryable or exhausted failure records a board-owned recovery action with the redacted cause, when stranded-work recovery does not scan the task status (for example `blocked`). - Stranded-work recovery gets a named notice for this code. Generic continuation recovery does not grant it a second budget, and legacy reconciliation does not invent provider actions for it. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` documents the contract. ## Verification - Red: the new transport tests failed on the base code with `remote_workspace_operation_failed: operation=restore exit=1` (and the same for prepare and repository). The new completion tests failed because the run became `setup_failed` with no retry and no recovery action. - Green: `npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspace-transport.test.ts src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts src/services/legacy-execution-recovery.test.ts src/services/recovery src/services/remote-workspace-save-concurrency.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-workspace-finalizer-failure.test.ts src/__tests__/native-workspace-finalization-work.test.ts` passes (563 tests). - The transport tests use real sandbox commands. They prove an occupied folder reports `stage=inspect_root reason=occupied_root` and keeps its files. They prove a wrong manifest reports `stage=extract archive=manifest_mismatch`. They prove a missing branch reports `stage=checkout_branch`, and a changed origin reports `stage=verify_origin`. Forged output with a path is dropped. - The real-PostgreSQL cold-restore test proves an occupied root gives a non-retryable `sandbox_restore` failure and keeps the unknown files. - The completion tests cover retried, exhausted, refused, post-dispatch, and `in_progress` cases. - `tsc --noEmit` for the server reports no errors in the changed files. ## Risks - A retry keeps the same restore path. If the cause is deterministic but unnamed, the run uses its two retries before the board action. Named refusals skip the retries. - The board action is recorded only for statuses that stranded-work recovery does not scan, and only when no other action is active. This prevents a second recovery identity for one failure. - Script stderr grammar is new. Old sandboxes run the script that the server sends, so no runner update is necessary. - No migration, deployment, or credential change. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, through Claude Code with tool use, code execution, and browser tools for read-only staging evidence. Context window and reasoning mode are host-managed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
ea42a2e417 |
fix(recovery): coalesce duplicate legacy no-replay holds (#17055)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Recovery records keep uncertain execution outcomes from being replayed. > - A settled record can still block replay while it waits for a verified decision. > - Repeated scans can create more settled records for the same failed execution. > - Resolving only one duplicate leaves the task behind another hold. > - This pull request retains the settled hold and applies one verified decision to its exact duplicates. > - The task can continue through the existing delivery path without creating another delivery owner for each duplicate. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #14600. This change addresses duplicate settled holds and their same-source resolution. The visibility and other deferred-wake paths remain outside this change. Related: #10011 handles unchanged active incidents. This patch handles settled no-replay records. #15285 covers missing reconciliation input. #17031 covers a handoff to a new task owner. External-adapter continuation is covered separately by #15982. ## What Changed - Retain a resolved legacy no-replay decision when a later scan finds the same company, task, cause, fingerprint, and source run. - After a verified reconciliation, resolve duplicate records that also match the selected action's kind. Keep the selected action as the delivery owner for this group. Record the merged action IDs in the activity log. - Preserve independent workspace and system recovery records, existing reconciliations, and records for other sources. - Add PostgreSQL regression tests for repeated scans, historical duplicates, delivery count, repeated resolution, scope boundaries, simultaneous resolutions, and rejected reconciliation rollback. - Update the execution semantics and recovery maps. This patch has no schema migration or adapter-specific code. ## Verification Current head: `3c84bc89325d40bfdda5d28f24ed2fb67d48756c`. It merges `master` at `043f2514e67c50320433a0013fb228a75a51325c` without rewriting the existing commits. The only conflict was in `markExecutionReconciliation`. The resolution retains the upstream transaction and all three queue notifications. Source, sibling, and audit writes use the same transaction. The final merged tree passed: ```sh pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts server/src/services/legacy-execution-recovery.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts server/src/__tests__/execution-control-work.test.ts --maxWorkers=1 # 549 passed; zero skipped pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit # exit 0 node scripts/check-maps.mjs # passed: 35 areas, 191 capability IDs git diff origin/master --check # passed ``` Three new cases add real PostgreSQL and HTTP-route evidence. Two resolution requests target different duplicate holds while both wait on database locks. They leave one continuation owner, one coalescing audit record, and one queued successor. A live-provider rejection leaves all records unchanged. A checkout rejection after reconciliation writes rolls back the source, siblings, and audit row. The fixture occupies the dispatch slot, so no external model provider runs. The new contention case was also run with only `execution-recovery-resolution.ts` replaced by its parent revision at `65f59e339a9fb6e0635bcbd8c36791bd610326a6`. It failed with two continuation owners instead of one. The source was restored byte-for-byte, and all three new cases passed again before the merge. The final four-suite run above validates the merge with the upstream notification changes. The original positive regressions also failed on that parent revision: three scan-and-settle cycles left four records instead of one, and resolving one historical hold left its two duplicates unreconciled. The scope matrix covers company, task, kind, cause, fingerprint, source run, replay state, protected recovery records, and prior reconciliation. Fresh-checkout collection initially failed because plugin SDK build outputs were absent. After building them, PostgreSQL startup exposed native library symlinks missing from an installation with scripts disabled. The package's symlink setup resolved that failure. The standard server typecheck attempt started a Rust vendor prerequisite build and was stopped; direct TypeScript checking passed. These failed or incomplete attempts are not counted as passes. Full repository build, recursive typecheck, and CI were successful on the earlier `08e5c0285` revision ([CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39541949702)). They are historical evidence, not results for this merge. The current local proof is the four suites and checks listed above. Full upstream CI for the merge is pending. Greptile reviewed `3c84bc89325d40bfdda5d28f24ed2fb67d48756c` with 5/5 confidence and no actionable findings; that source review is separate from test execution. ## Risks - A match that is too broad could clear an independent hold. Tests cover company, task, kind, cause, fingerprint, source run, replay state, workspace recovery, system recovery, and prior reconciliation boundaries. - The existing issue-lock transaction covers the selected action and its duplicates. The patch does not create a new lock or an automatic retry path. - The patch does not infer that a network or provider failure means no action occurred. Existing reconciliation validation still checks the source, owner, stopped processes, leases, and observed action outcome. - Previously reconciled records and their delivery state remain unchanged. This patch prevents new duplicate delivery owners when it resolves unreconciled duplicates. It does not migrate every historical delivery record. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with the implementation, tests, and review. It used repository tools and code execution. The exact runtime model ID, context window size, and reasoning setting are not exposed in this session. An independent AGY review also ran; its provider model ID was not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with the available version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have linked the existing issue with `Refs #14600` - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task IDs or instance details - [x] I have run the focused tests locally and they pass; full upstream CI is pending for the final merge - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Rockiez <7697772+Rockiez@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
87dfba6818 |
fix(native): retry an unpublished accepted task reply durably instead of dropping it (#19200)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - A native run commits its status decision and its final reply comment
in separate steps
> - Background presentation recovery publishes an accepted reply when
the live path does not record one
> - That worker dropped the run after one refused attempt and only threw
on an error, with no record on the run
> - A task could then show done while the user never saw the answer,
until an unrelated wake reloaded the queue
> - This pull request makes the publication of an accepted ordinary task
reply durable, bounded, and recorded
> - The benefit is that a task cannot close silently without its answer
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #19130 (verify requested publication at finalization, for
documents), #19183 (deliver messages saved while a native run
finalizes), #19186 (stale owner done). This change does not duplicate
them. It covers the final reply comment.
**What happened?**
A native run accepted a result with disposition `done`. The status
decision set the task to done. The accepted final reply was not
published as a task comment. The run had no publication record (no
`run.presentation.resolved` event and no `presentationDecision`). The
reply was published by background recovery 58 minutes later, after an
unrelated wake reloaded the presentation queue.
**Expected behavior**
The accepted reply is published promptly. A refused or failed attempt is
retried with backoff and never posts twice. If publication fails
permanently, the run and the task show a named failure with an owner.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Commit an accepted native task result with disposition `done`, with
the final reply not yet visible to presentation recovery.
2. Run the native response presentation worker check once. The attempt
is refused.
3. On `master`, the worker returns `null` and drops the run. Nothing
records the attempt. Nothing retries it until another notification for
that scope.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
037c58bb22 |
fix(daytona): keep the provider auto-stop strictly after the warm runner idle window (#19199)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A warm remote agent keeps its sandbox running after a turn. The host keeps a warm runner for an idle window (`runnerIdleTimeoutMs`, or the agent's `idleTimeoutMs`) > - The Daytona provider also stops an idle sandbox after `autoStopInterval` minutes. The default is 15 minutes > - On staging, the warm idle window was 900,000 ms (15 minutes). The two windows were equal > - A follow-up turn at the end of the warm window resumed a sandbox that Daytona was stopping. Daytona refused the resume in about 4 seconds, and the run failed at setup > - #19195 added a bounded retry for that refusal. It did not remove the cause > - This pull request makes the two windows non-overlapping by construction. Daytona derives its auto-stop for a warm reusable sandbox from the same warm idle value that the host uses > - The benefit is that a follow-up inside the warm window always finds a running sandbox, and idle sandboxes still stop ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19195 (bounded retry for a refused resume; this change removes the common cause). **What happened?** On a staging soak, three follow-up runs failed at setup with a refused sandbox resume. Each resume began 15 minutes 8 to 25 seconds after the previous turn released the sandbox. The warm idle timeout was 900,000 ms. Daytona's default `autoStopInterval` is 15 minutes. Nothing in the code kept these two values apart. **Expected behavior** A reusable sandbox that keeps a warm runner must not auto-stop inside the warm idle window or at its edge. The provider backstop must fire after the host's own idle handling, with a margin. Idle sandboxes must still stop. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Configure a Daytona sandbox environment with `reuseLease` and a warm runner with `runnerIdleTimeoutMs: 900000` (or an agent with `lifecycleMode: warm`, `idleTimeoutMs: 900000`). 2. Run a turn. Do not set `autoStopInterval`. 3. Before this change: the sandbox is created with `autoStopInterval: 15`, equal to the warm window. A follow-up near minute 15 races the provider stop. **Paperclip version or commit** `c656b95b6b` (current `master`). ## What Changed - Daytona plugin (`plugin.ts`): add `effectiveAutoStopIntervalMinutes`. For a reusable lease that keeps a warm runner, the effective auto-stop is at least `ceil(warm idle / 1 min) + 5` minutes. The plugin applies the floor only when the host forwards `warmRunnerIdleTimeoutMs`, or when the environment itself selects `runnerLifecycleMode: warm`. An explicit `0` (disabled), a longer configured value, `inherit` with a per-turn agent, per-turn, and non-reusable sandboxes keep the configured value. - Daytona plugin: use the effective value at sandbox creation. On resume, raise a shorter auto-stop on an existing sandbox. This update is best effort and bounded to 5 seconds; the #19195 retry still covers a refusal. The stale-handle refresh threshold keeps the configured interval, so a cached handle is not trusted for longer before the provider confirms the new interval. The warm window is not written to the saved normalized config. - Host (`runner-environment-lifecycle.ts`): add `resolveWarmRunnerIdleTimeoutMsForRun`. It returns the run's effective warm idle window (environment `runnerIdleTimeoutMs`, else the agent `idleTimeoutMs`) for a warm `paperclip_runner` sandbox run. It shares the lifecycle-mode resolution with `resolveRunnerEnvironmentForRun`. - Host (`environment-run-orchestrator.ts`, `environment-runtime.ts`): pass that value as `warmRunnerIdleTimeoutMs` to the sandbox-provider driver on acquisition and on remote recovery resume. The driver adds it to the provider worker config only. Lease identity, reuse matching, and lease metadata are unchanged. - Daytona manifest: describe the warm floor on `autoStopInterval`. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the contract. ## Verification - Red (before the fix, same tests, with the floor disabled): 5 failures in `plugin.test.ts` "warm idle window versus Daytona auto-stop". The staging case failed with `expected 900000 to be greater than or equal to 1200000`. The resume case failed because `setAutostopInterval` was not called. - Red (host): the new `environment-runtime.test.ts` case first failed because the provider worker config had no `runnerIdleTimeoutMs`. The service wrapper dropped the field. The fix forwards it. - Green: `npx vitest run --config vitest.config.ts` in `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona`: 563 passed. This includes a setter that never settles (resume completes after the 5-second bound) and `inherit` with no forwarded window (explicit `autoStopInterval: 2` stays 2). - Green: `npx vitest run src/services/runner-environment-lifecycle.test.ts src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts src/__tests__/environment-run-orchestrator.test.ts` in `server/`: 242 passed. This includes recovery resume forwarding the admitted warm window. - The regression tests assert the relationship `autoStop >= warm idle + margin` for several warm windows (125 s, 300 s default, 900 s, 1,800 s) and for an explicit `autoStopInterval: 15`. They are not constant checks. - `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs` passes. `pnpm typecheck` in the Daytona package passes. ## Risks - A warm reusable Daytona sandbox now stays running up to the warm window plus 5 minutes after its last activity, instead of 15 minutes. With a 15-minute window this is 20 minutes. Cost is bounded and idle sandboxes still stop. - The resume-time `setAutostopInterval` call is best effort. If it fails, the old interval stays and the #19195 retry still applies. - Other providers are unchanged. They receive one extra host-owned config key (`warmRunnerIdleTimeoutMs`) only for warm `paperclip_runner` runs, and they ignore unknown keys. - No lease identity change, so existing retained sandboxes are still reused. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, test execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
c656b95b6b |
fix(environments): retry a refused sandbox resume with the bounded bootstrap budget (#19195)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - A warm remote agent keeps its sandbox after a turn, so a follow-up
turn resumes the same sandbox and its files
> - The sandbox provider auto-stops an idle sandbox (Daytona: 15 minutes
by default). The warm native idle window is also 15 minutes
> - A follow-up that reaches the sandbox during that stop gets a
provider refusal. The host keeps the sandbox ("the lease was preserved
and no replacement was created"), which is correct
> - But setup then records a generic `setup_failed`. No retry is
scheduled, no cause is recorded, and the reply that woke the agent is
effectively dropped
> - This pull request gives that refusal its own failure code and routes
it through the existing bounded bootstrap retry. The retry resumes the
same recorded sandbox
> - The benefit is that a follow-up continues a few seconds later on the
same saved sandbox, instead of stopping the task with no next action
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #18852 (the bounded bootstrap retry that this change reuses).
Related: #19152 and #19187 (copy-back causes), #19178 (Daytona
errored-sandbox recovery before stop-only cleanup), #19182 and #19180
(recovery holds). This change does not overlap with them: they cover
cleanup, copy-back, and recovery after a run. This change covers a
resume refusal before provider work starts.
**What happened?**
On a staging soak, two follow-up turns failed at setup after a
successful first turn:
- A board reply woke the agent. The run failed after 4.9 seconds with
`setup_failed`: `Reusable sandbox lease "…" could not be resumed; the
lease was preserved and no replacement was created.` The issue stayed in
review with no recovery action. The reply was not delivered.
- An earlier run on another task failed with the same message.
Both resume attempts started 15 minutes 8–25 seconds after the previous
turn released the sandbox. The first turns used `keep_running` with a
warm idle timeout of 900,000 ms. The Daytona default `autoStopInterval`
is also 15 minutes. So the resume reached the sandbox while the provider
was stopping it. The provider refused within seconds; this was not a
long resume timeout. The provider cause was not recorded, so this timing
is the strongest evidence. The exact provider state remains an
inference.
**Expected behavior**
A refused resume before provider dispatch is a temporary infrastructure
condition. The host retries it with a small, bounded budget. Each retry
resumes the same recorded sandbox. A refusal does not prove that the
sandbox is lost, so the host never destroys it or creates a replacement.
Only an explicit provider not-found or a workspace identity mismatch
with a verified backup permits replacement (unchanged). The run records
why the provider refused, without provider text.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run a warm remote turn that keeps its sandbox.
2. Make the provider's `environmentResumeLease` throw a non-transient
error (for example, a 400/409 while the sandbox stops).
3. Wake the agent with a reply.
4. Before this change: the run fails with `setup_failed`, no retry is
scheduled, and the error has no cause.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Seen on staging at `5b99bdae`. The touched code is unchanged on current
`master` (`f7a4c5678f`).
## What Changed
- Move `ReusableSandboxResumeError` to
`server/src/services/reusable-sandbox-resume-error.ts` (re-exported from
`environment-runtime.ts`). Give it the code
`reusable_sandbox_resume_failed`.
- Add the provider refusal to the error message by closed labels only:
`(cause=<label> status=<http> code=<errno>)`. The labels come from the
existing transport classifier, now exported as
`sandboxProviderFailureLabel`. Provider text, paths, and IDs are never
copied.
- Carry the provider status across the plugin worker RPC. A JSON-RPC
error has only a message and a numeric RPC code. The worker host now
attaches a validated `paperclip/environment-resume-error/v1` envelope
(HTTP status and an allowlisted errno only) to `environmentResumeLease`
failures. The host re-validates it and adds it to the recorded cause.
- In setup-failure settlement, find this error through the orchestrator
wrapper. Record `reusable_sandbox_resume_failed` only when provider
dispatch did not start and the run has no native session or runner
identity (the same guard as `remote_workspace_prepare_timeout`).
- Add the code to `isTransientWorkspacePreparationCode`. The existing
scheduler then gives two retries (30 s, 60 s) with its issue gate, Stop,
pause, and dependency checks.
- Exclude the code from generic continuation recovery and from legacy
reconciliation (no unknown provider actions; bootstrap evidence proves
none started), like the template.
- Add a specific stranded-recovery notice: "Saved sandbox could not be
resumed".
- Document the contract in `doc/execution-semantics.md`.
## Verification
- Red (before the fix, same tests): 6 failures. The `fresh` case
recorded `setup_failed` and did not schedule a retry. The error had no
cause. Legacy reconciliation held the run. Generic recovery granted
another budget.
- Green: `npx vitest run src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts
src/services/legacy-execution-recovery.test.ts src/services/recovery/
src/__tests__/heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts
src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts
src/services/remote-workspace-transport.test.ts
src/services/heartbeat/retries.test.ts` (in `server/`): 619 tests pass.
Also `src/services/recovery/stranded-notice` and
`src/services/remote-workspace*`: 411 pass.
- Safety regressions:
- `run-completion.test.ts`: only a pre-dispatch legacy failure with no
native identity gets the code and a retry. `started`, `retained`
(native), and an untyped copy of the message stay `setup_failed` with no
retry. The recorded error contains the closed cause and not the provider
path.
- `heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts` (real PostgreSQL): two concurrent
schedulers across a restart create exactly one successor per attempt.
The budget ends after two attempts. Stop, pause, and a new dependency
cancel the scheduled retry. Generic stranded recovery creates no extra
run after exhaustion.
- `packages/plugins/sdk/tests/environment-resume-error.test.ts`: through
the real worker RPC, the `JsonRpcCallError` has no status, and the
envelope gives 409 and the errno. Provider text does not cross. Other
methods get no envelope. Malformed envelopes are rejected.
- `environment-runtime.test.ts`: a throwing resume still preserves the
exact lease. The runtime does not call destroy or acquire. The resume
throws a `JsonRpcCallError` whose message has no status. The thrown
message names `cause=provider_error status=409` from the envelope, and
not the provider text.
- `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs` passes. `git diff --check`
passes.
- Not verified: a live staging run at this revision. The original tasks
were not retried. This PR is not deployed.
## Risks
- Low. The change affects only runs that fail with this typed error
before provider dispatch. Each retry resumes the same lease and inherits
the source wake context, so a reply is delivered once and no second
executor starts.
- If the provider cannot start the sandbox for longer than about 90
seconds, the two retries end and the task gets the specific recovery
notice. The sandbox and its saved files are kept.
- The error message now has a parenthetical cause before the semicolon.
No code parses this message.
- An issue in review does not get the immediate stranded notice
(unchanged existing behavior). The retry, not the notice, delivers the
reply in that case.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with
tool use (shell, file edits, browser reads of staging diagnostics).
Extended reasoning enabled.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
245b4d3b79 |
Preserve cancelled workspaces after controllerless Stop (#18820)
Admit cancelled workspace preservation after an audited Stop acknowledgement when no live controller received an interrupt. Retain the strict dispatched receipt for provider termination and operator handoff. Existing source, lease, coordinator and result ownership checks remain enforced. Validated with complete Stop/preservation suites (134 tests), real-file recovery, workspace typecheck and build, and green hosted CI. Greptile and Paperclip both reviewed the exact head at 5/5 with no unresolved findings. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
3b17b5ce15 |
fix(native): keep a reassigned-away run from closing the new owner's task (#19186)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A native agent run reports "done" in an accepted result. A finalizer then decides the task status. > - The board can reassign a task while the run is in flight. The old run is cancelled, but its accepted result still goes to the finalizer. > - The finalizer did not check who owns the task now. The old owner's "done" closed the task of the new owner. > - The new owner never did the work, and the task shows done with no reply from the current owner. > - This pull request makes a done report apply only when the reporting run's agent still owns the task. > - The benefit is that reassignment keeps its meaning: the new owner keeps the open task, and the old result stays as history. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** On a hosted staging instance, agent A started a native run on a task. Agent A finished the work and submitted a "done" result. Then the board reassigned the task to agent B, and Paperclip cancelled agent A's run with `issue_reassigned`. About 45 seconds later, the native finalizer committed agent A's done decision with reason `completion_claim_policy_accepted`. The task became done. Agent B's runs were then cancelled because the task was terminal. Agent B never worked on the task. **Expected behavior** A done report from a run that no longer owns the task must not close the task. The accepted result stays as history. The task status stays as it is for the current owner. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Assign a low-risk native task to agent A and start a run. 2. Submit a done result for the run. 3. Reassign the task to agent B before finalization. 4. Finalize the run. Before this change, the task becomes done. **Paperclip version or commit** Observed on staging at `b9fbbf8d30`. Reproduced on `master` at `06826915d7`. Related: #19130 adds a publication check for requested documents at finalization. It does not check task ownership. ## What Changed - `status-arbiter.ts`: add `ownsNativeTaskCompletion` and `supersedeStaleOwnerCompletion`. A done decision from an agent that is not the current assignee (another agent, a user, or nobody) becomes `preserve` with reason `completion_owner_superseded` and no effects. Other decisions do not change. This is the same ownership rule that the provider-failure path already uses (`ownsProviderFailureDecision`). - `native-run-finalizer.ts`: apply the rule after arbitration and before the deliverable check. Conversation tasks keep their existing path. - `native-status-reassessment.ts`: apply the same rule, so new evidence from a reassigned-away run cannot close the task later. - The status committer does not change. A reassignment during finalization already increments `statusVersion` (migration 0358). The committer then replans, and the retry applies the new rule. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describe the rule next to the existing "a late finalizer cannot change a reassigned task" statement. ## Verification New file `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-stale-owner-completion.test.ts`. It uses embedded PostgreSQL, the real coordinator store and the real finalizer. - Control: the owning run's done result closes the task with `completion_claim_policy_accepted`. - Reassigned before finalization: the task stays `in_progress` with agent B. The decision is `completion_owner_superseded`. The accepted result row is unchanged. - Reassigned after arbitration and before the status commit: the commit replans and the task stays `in_progress`. - Reassessment control: later approved evidence closes the owner's task with `decision_superseded_by_new_evidence`. - Reassessment after reassignment: later approved evidence from the old run does not close the task. The decision is `completion_owner_superseded`. This case fails when the reassessment rule is disabled. - Pure policy cases: another agent, a board user and no assignee all preserve status. A non-done decision passes through. Red before the fix (same tests, fix not applied): ```sh cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-stale-owner-completion.test.ts # Tests 2 failed | 1 passed — both reassignment cases: expected "in_progress", received "done" ``` Green after the fix: ```sh cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-stale-owner-completion.test.ts # Tests 10 passed cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/paperclip-control-plane-port.test.ts \ src/services/native-runtime/native-completion-feedback.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-deliverable-feedback.test.ts \ src/services/native-runtime/native-skill-test-status.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-routine-status.test.ts \ src/__tests__/native-status-arbiter-corpus.test.ts src/__tests__/native-status-reassessment-work.test.ts \ src/services/native-runtime/agent-chat-response-recovery.test.ts src/__tests__/native-run-projection-work.test.ts \ src/services/native-runtime/task-reassignment.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-provider-failure.integration.test.ts # 11 files, 614 tests passed ``` I did not run the full `pnpm test:run`, `pnpm -r typecheck` or `pnpm build` locally. CI runs them. ## Risks - A native run that reassigns its own task to a user or to another agent, and then reports done, no longer closes the task through arbitration. The status that the agent set through the API stays. This matches the existing provider-failure ownership rule. - A native run on a task with no assignee cannot close it through arbitration. Native task runs start from an assignment, so this is not expected in normal use. - Review runs and conversation tasks keep their existing paths. Review outcomes already preserve status before this rule. - No schema change and no migration. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Provider: Anthropic. Model: Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), in the Claude Code agent harness. - Capabilities used: tool use, shell and code execution, repository search, browser reads of staging, and extended reasoning. - The model wrote the change, the tests and this description. A human requested the fix. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
f1516e8009 |
fix(native): stop a session.open model rejection instead of a doomed bootstrap retry (#19190)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native Runner runs start a provider session with the `session.open` command before any prompt > - A definite `session.open` rejection is treated as a pre-session failure and gets a bounded same-run bootstrap retry > - The runner also reports a closed classification. Two classifications say that the provider cannot run the selected model: `requested_model_unsupported` and `grok_model_mismatch` > - Paperclip ignored that classification. It scheduled a retry that must fail the same way. On a remote sandbox with a retained runner PID, the due retry entered restart recovery. Restart recovery has no checkpoint for a bootstrap retry, so it failed closed as `native_restart_recovery_blocked` / `ambiguous_remote_recovery_evidence` > - The task then stayed `blocked`. The recovery actions settled as no-replay holds, so no active action told anyone to change the model, and the parent task stalled too > - This pull request classifies those two definite rejections as the existing `native_provider_model_rejected` failure > - The benefit is a terminal failure on the first attempt, an accurate error, and an active board recovery action that names the next step: choose a supported model ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** On a hosted staging instance, a Grok agent run failed at `session.open`. The runner log said `ACPX sidecar command session.open was rejected (retryable=false, classification=grok_model_mismatch)`. Paperclip recorded `recoveryMode: "bootstrap_retry"` and scheduled a same-run retry 30 seconds later. The run had a remote sandbox and a recorded sandbox PID, so the due retry went to restart recovery. Restart recovery found no checkpoint and no provider events and failed closed with `ambiguous_remote_recovery_evidence`. The run ended as `native_restart_recovery_blocked`. The task stayed `blocked` with no active recovery action for more than one hour. Its parent task stayed blocked on it. **What did you expect to happen?** The selected model cannot start, so a retry cannot succeed. The run should fail once with the model-rejection error. The task should show the existing "choose a model" action, owned by the board, until someone changes the model and retries. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a native run whose `session.open` command fails with `classification=grok_model_mismatch` (or `requested_model_unsupported`). 2. Read the `native_run_finalizations` row. Before this change it is `retryable_failure` with `recoveryMode: "bootstrap_retry"` and a `nextAttemptAt`. 3. On a remote sandbox run with a recorded PID, the due retry enters restart recovery and fails as `native_restart_recovery_blocked`. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `f5f5184f23`. Related: #18910 routes due remote retries with a retained PID to restart recovery. #18908 continues verified failed native preparation. Open PRs #19177, #19180, #19182 and #19184 change no-replay hold settlement and workspace hold release. They do not change this classification. This PR does not duplicate them. ## What Changed - `nativeSessionFailureSourceCode` (`server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.ts`) returns `native_provider_model_rejected` for a definite `session.open` failure or rejection whose runner classification is `requested_model_unsupported` or `grok_model_mismatch`. Other definite `session.open` rejections still return `provider_session_open_rejected` and keep the bounded startup retry. An indeterminate `session.open` outcome stays `native_session_interrupted`. - `native_provider_model_rejected` is already a permanent failure. The run stops on the first attempt with no `nextAttemptAt`, so it never enters the restart-recovery retry path. - When no provider session exists, the coordinator `nextAction` and the board recovery action `nextAction` say: choose a supported model for this agent, then retry the task. - The existing product paths for `native_provider_model_rejected` apply: the task presentation shows `choose_model`, and the recovery service treats it as `configuration_incomplete`. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the rule under "Native provider model capacity". ## Verification Red before the fix (new test, unchanged production code): ```sh cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-startup-retry.integration.test.ts # Tests 2 failed | 21 passed # failureCode: native_session_interrupted, phase: retryable_failure, recoveryMode: bootstrap_retry, # nextAction "Retry provider bootstrap on this same run ..." - the same record seen on staging ``` Green after the fix: ```sh cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-startup-retry.integration.test.ts # Tests 23 passed cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts \ src/services/native-runtime/native-startup-retry.integration.test.ts src/services/task-interruption-presentation.test.ts # Test Files 3 passed, Tests 1186 passed pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck # exit 0 ``` The new integration cases use embedded PostgreSQL and the real executor failure path. For both classifications they check: - coordinator `terminal_failure`, `failureCode: native_provider_model_rejected`, `nextAttemptAt: null`, attempt 1 - run `failed` with `errorCode: native_provider_model_rejected` - task `blocked`, execution lock released - an `active` board recovery action with cause `native_provider_model_rejected`, return owner set to the agent, and the choose-model next action - `settleUnrecoverableExecutions` leaves the action `active`, so it does not become a silent no-replay hold - `claimNativeSessionResumptions` claims nothing, so there is no second executor The unit test also checks that `session_ensure_failed` keeps its bounded retry and that an indeterminate model rejection stays unclassified. A live Grok run with a mismatched model was not run. The failure record in the test matches the staging record field by field. ## Risks - Low risk. The change adds two closed runner classifications to an existing permanent failure code. Other `session.open` rejections keep their current retry. - A model mismatch that a retry could fix would now need an explicit retry. The runner already marks these rejections `retryable=false`. - This PR does not change restart recovery. A remote bootstrap retry with a retained sandbox PID for other `session.open` causes can still fail closed as `ambiguous_remote_recovery_evidence`. That needs a separate change with remote stop evidence. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser reads of the staging API). It did the investigation, code change, tests and PR text. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
46a50a3bdd |
fix(recovery): release a recovered workspace hold for the new assignee after reassignment (#19184)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - When a board user reassigns a task in the middle of a run, Paperclip
stops the old run and saves its sandbox files (copy-back).
> - If copy-back fails at the stop, Paperclip records a
file-preservation hold for the stopped run. The hold blocks all
execution on the task until the files are recovered.
> - The new assignee's wakes were already queued. The final dispatch
gate saw the hold and cancelled them.
> - Automatic recovery then saved the files. But the hold stayed
effective for the new assignee: explicit continuation accepts only the
stopped run's own agent, so no message, Retry or stranded-work sweep
could start the new assignee.
> - The task stayed `in_progress` with no run, no wake and no active
recovery.
> - This pull request releases a recovered file-preservation hold for a
different current owner.
> - The benefit is that a reassigned task continues with its new owner
after its files are safe, with no manual action.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A board user reassigned a running native task from agent A to agent B
and posted a comment. A's run ended `cancelled` / `issue_reassigned`.
Copy-back was still in progress, so B's first run was cancelled
`workspace_busy`. Paperclip then recorded a resolved no-replay hold
(`native_continuation_requires_reconciliation`, fingerprint
`native-workspace:<A run>`). The final dispatch gate cancelled B's two
queued runs with `execution_reconciliation_required` ("Recovering saved
work…"). Automatic recovery then saved the files
(`workspaceRecovery.status = recovered`, `workspaceRepairRequired:
false`). The blocker still said "Saved work recovered. Send a message to
continue." with `canContinue: false`. The task stayed `in_progress` with
no run for hours. Two hosted reproductions had the same shape. A sibling
reassignment without a copy-back failure recovered normally.
**Expected behavior**
After the saved-file receipt verifies, the new assignee continues. The
hold must still block every executor while the files are not recovered.
The stopped run's own agent keeps its no-replay hold.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Start a native run on a task with a retained sandbox.
2. Reassign the task to another agent while the run executes, so that
copy-back records a `workspaceRestoreRecovery` hold.
3. Let automatic workspace recovery finish.
4. Before this change, `getExecutionBlocker` still returns the hold for
the new assignee, and the stranded-work sweep queues nothing.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`b9fbbf8d30` (also seen on `818d2bb6`).
**Deployment mode**
Hosted, PostgreSQL. The test uses embedded PostgreSQL.
Related open pull requests (checked; none covers this path): #19177
(board reconciliation of sibling holds), #19169 (disposition repairs
behind a cancelled blocker), #19143 (park a workspace-busy wait), #19149
(interrupt stop identity).
## What Changed
- New `restoreHoldReleasedForCurrentOwnerPredicate`
(`server/src/services/execution-blocker.ts`) is a SQL predicate. It
matches a file-preservation hold (`workspaceRestoreRecovery`, not
`restore_unsafe_archive`) when all of these are true:
- the stopped run is terminal and finished;
- the task has an agent assignee, and that agent is not the stopped
run's agent;
- the stopped run's agent is not the current review participant;
- `completedWorkspaceRecoveryCondition` is true for the hold: completed
system recovery, `workspaceRecovery.status = recovered`, succeeded
preservation operations bound to this hold, and the `workspace_finalize`
receipt;
- every saved operation is a copyback into the task workspace
(`workspace_recovery`). A snapshot-only save keeps the hold, because the
new owner's ordinary turn does not attach snapshots.
- The predicate is wrapped in `coalesce(..., false)`. Its negation
therefore cannot hide an unrelated hold through NULL JSON reads.
- The proof is the durable completed-recovery receipt. It does not read
live workspace authority (epoch, writer, snapshot), so reuse of the
workspace by the new owner cannot re-arm the hold.
- `getExecutionBlocker` excludes matching holds from both the
file-preservation query and the general blocker query. There is no scan
limit and no extra query per hold.
- `admitExplicitNativeContinuation` excludes the same holds from its
source checks. A released hold therefore cannot reject a new owner's
message with "owner changed".
- `completedWorkspaceRecoveryCondition` also accepts a SQL expression
for the run id. Its behavior is unchanged.
- The hold row, its `automaticRecovery.replay = "blocked"` evidence and
its status are not changed. If the task returns to the stopped run's
agent, the hold applies again.
- `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the rule next to the existing
"Reassignment does not discard the stopped run's files" sentence.
## Verification
New test in `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts`: `hands a
reassigned task to its new assignee once the previous owner's files are
recovered`. It uses the real retained-workspace recovery, embedded
PostgreSQL and the real stranded-work sweep. It builds the incident
shape: a cancelled `issue_reassigned` source run, a resolved no-replay
hold, a new assignee, and that assignee's gate-cancelled run.
- Before recovery, the blocker holds the new owner
(`workspaceRepairRequired: true`).
- After recovery, the blocker is `null`. The sweep creates exactly one
pending turn for the new owner. That turn is not a retry of the stopped
run. A second sweep adds no turn.
- The hold row keeps `status: resolved`, `outcome: blocked` and `replay:
blocked`.
- Live repair evidence on the stopped run is then changed, so
`hasVerifiedWorkspaceRepair` returns false (as after a remote reuse).
The blocker stays `null`.
- After a reassignment back to the stopped run's agent, the hold applies
again.
- An unrelated reconciliation hold for the same stopped run, without
file evidence, still blocks the new owner.
- New test `keeps a snapshot-only recovery held for a new assignee`: the
snapshot-only save does not release the hold. This test fails against
the first revision of this pull request.
Red before the fix (test kept, `execution-blocker.ts` restored from
`master`):
```
cd server && npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts -t "hands a reassigned task"
AssertionError: expected { …(13) } to be null (blocker: "Saved work recovered. Send a message to continue.", canContinue: false)
```
With only the blocker assertion removed, the sweep also failed:
`expected [] to have a length of 1 but got +0`.
Green after the fix: 1 passed.
Related suites, all pass (991 tests): `workspace-recovery`,
`execution-blocker-read`, `legacy-explicit-continuation-recovery`,
`workspace-restore-reconciliation`, `native-failed-workspace-recovery`,
`workspace-restore-repair-route`, `execution-projection-recovery`,
`heartbeat-undispatched-execution-wait`,
`issue-update-comment-wakeup-routes`,
`heartbeat-observed-workspace-preservation`,
`native-workspace-reconstruction`, `explicit-native-continuation`.
Not run: a live run on a deployed instance. The hosted incident tasks
are not recovered by this pull request until it is deployed.
## Risks
- A new owner can start after the files are recovered, while the stopped
run's action outcomes stay unknown. This matches the existing rule for
holds without a workspace: Paperclip does not create those holds for a
reassigned task. The new owner gets a fresh turn, not a replay.
- The hold still blocks every executor until the exact receipt verifies,
so there is no second executor on the workspace during copy-back.
- Other execution holds (non-workspace holds recorded before a
reassignment) keep their current effect. This change does not alter
them.
- A reassignment after a snapshot-only save still needs a board action,
as before. That path is not changed here.
- The release is one correlated `exists` in the existing blocker
queries. Its subqueries use primary keys and the run and issue indexes.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, with tool use
and code execution in Claude Code.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
8c062fa481 | fix(native): deliver plugin VM Runner usage to Core (#19162) | ||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
512fbea0bb |
fix(native): deliver messages saved while a native run finalizes (#19183)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A user can reply on a task while the agent's run is still finishing > - A remote native run first commits its result and its status decision (for example `done`). Then its sandbox environment settles (harness backup, warm retention). > - A message that arrives after the final turn took its input is saved as a deferred receipt behind that run > - The saved-message recovery path holds the receipt while the source run still owns its environment lease or its workspace copy-back owner > - Nothing notified that path when the lease or the owner settled, so the messages waited for an unrelated company event > - This pull request notifies the existing deferred-receipt work when a run's environment lease settles or its workspace finalization owner is released > - The benefit is that messages sent while a run finalizes are delivered once, soon after the run settles, and a task closed in that window is reopened for them ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A user posted three plain comments on a task while the agent's remote native run was finalizing. The final turn had already called its finish tool. The comments were saved in one deferred receipt. The run then committed `done` and its status became `succeeded`. No follow-up run started. The task stayed `done` with three unanswered requests. About 20 minutes later, an unrelated event in the same company woke the deferred-receipt worker, and the messages were delivered. **Expected behavior** A message that arrives after the last turn took its input, but before the run releases, gets one follow-up turn as soon as the run settles. If finalization marked the task `done` in that window, the task is reopened for the message. Messages that the finished turn already consumed are not replayed. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a native run with a remote (sandbox) environment. 2. After the agent calls its finish tool, post a user comment on the task. 3. Let finalization commit `done` and project the run as `succeeded`. 4. Observe that the comment's deferred receipt stays `deferred_issue_execution` after the environment lease settles. **Root cause** A remote native run is finished by native finalization, which projects the terminal status. The in-process run completion (`releaseIssueExecutionAndPromote`) does not run for it. Its saved messages depend on the stranded-queue sweep in `resumeDeferredExecutionReceipts`, which calls the release with `resumeStrandedQueue`. That release correctly waits while `hasPendingRunCleanup` is true (an unsettled environment lease or a workspace finalization owner). Finalization notifies the deferred-receipt worker when it projects the run, but the cleanup is still pending at that time. The worker then drops the entry. Lease settlement and owner release did not notify the worker again. Refs #19122 (saves a redirect sent while a stopped run settles; this change reuses the same deferred-receipt delivery path for normally completing runs). ## What Changed - `environmentService.releaseLease` notifies deferred-execution work for the company when a run's lease leaves `active` or `pending_cleanup` (released, retained, or failed). - `environmentService.releaseLeasesForRun` notifies deferred-execution work in the same way. - `withNativeWorkspaceFinalizationOwnership` notifies deferred-execution work when it releases its owner. - Delivery uses the existing path: `resumeDeferredExecutionReceipts` → stranded-queue release → deferred wake promotion (with the existing reopen rule for user messages). No new delivery mechanism. - New regression in `deferred-execution-receipt-work.test.ts` with the real deferred-receipt worker, the real release adapter, and the real lease service. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: one additive paragraph for messages sent while a run finalizes. ## Verification - Staging evidence (read-only): the task's saved queue held the three comments as one `deferred_issue_execution` receipt after the run succeeded. The run had no `run succeeded` lifecycle event (it was finished by native finalization, not run completion). The receipt was promoted about 20 minutes later with `reopenedFrom: done` by the same recovery path. - Red before the fix: the new test failed with `expected null to be truthy` (the receipt stayed deferred with no run after the lease settled). - Green after the fix: `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/deferred-execution-receipt-work.test.ts -t "finishing native run"`. - Safety cases in the new test: - The receipt stays deferred while the environment lease is active (cleanup holds still apply). - After settlement, exactly one run carries both messages in order, and the done task is reopened once. - A second settlement signal does not deliver the messages again. - Related suites: `deferred-execution-receipt-work`, `environment-service`, `environment-cleanup-work`, `native-environment-settlement-work`, `idle-sleep-safety`. - Not done: a live staging reproduction at the fixed revision. Deployment is out of scope. ## Risks - The deferred-receipt worker reloads the company's deferred receipts after each run lease settlement. Each reload is bounded and runs only when deferred receipts exist. The notification is transactional, so a rolled-back release does not wake the worker. - Low risk: no schema change, no API change, and no change to admission or reopen rules. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser for read-only staging diagnostics). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
06826915d7 |
fix(dispatch): park a workspace-busy wait instead of recreating runs (#19143)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Child tasks can reuse their parent's execution workspace. Only one run at a time may write in a shared sandbox workspace. > - A run that finds the workspace held by another live run waits with a `workspace_busy` scheduled retry. > - That wait cancelled the run and created a new retry run every 60–120 seconds, until the holder ended. Each check made one cancelled run record. > - Three sibling tasks that waited for a parent made 15 cancelled runs in 13 minutes. They also got the workspace in random order, not in arrival order. > - This pull request keeps the waiting run as one parked retry while its holder is live, and wakes it when the holder ends. > - The benefit is a clean run history, a prompt handoff, and fair arrival-order access to a shared workspace. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18691 (the workspace wait for a live holder). Refs #19075 (sends a stopped writer with a pending save into the same wait). Refs #12587 (an earlier proposal about fairness for this retry). **What happened?** A parent task delegated three subtasks that inherit its execution workspace. Each subtask run was created, then cancelled with `workspace_busy` ("Shared execution workspace is busy: run … is still running"), then created again about every 1.5–2 minutes. One subtask got 8 cancelled runs, one got 5, and one got 2. Every cancellation named a holder that was really running: first the parent run, then the sibling that got the workspace. So serialization was correct. The cost was the churn of run records, and the subtask that waited first ran last. **Expected behavior** A run that needs a busy shared workspace waits as one durable record. It continues when the holder finishes. Siblings that wait for one workspace get it one at a time, in arrival order. Two writers never share the workspace, and the user can still stop a waiting run. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Bind two or more issues to one shared execution workspace in a sandbox environment. 2. Keep a run live on one issue (the holder). 3. Wake the other issues. Before this change, each due check promotes the retry, cancels it with `workspace_busy`, and creates a new retry run. After this change, the retry stays parked until the holder ends. **Paperclip version or commit** Observed on staging at `53735db7`. The code is unchanged on `master`. ## What Changed - `finalizeWorkspaceBusyDeferral` records `contextSnapshot.workspaceBusyWait` = `{ key, holderRunId, waitingSince }`. The key is `execution:<id>` or `project:<id>`. `waitingSince` carries over when the run defers again for the same workspace. - New `server/src/modules/run-dispatch/adapters/workspace-busy-wait.ts`: - `parkWorkspaceBusyRetryInTx` runs in the scheduled-retry promotion transaction, after the existing gate allows the retry. If the recorded holder is still running and is not stale, or an earlier waiter for the same workspace is still scheduled, queued, or running, the retry stays `scheduled_retry`. Only its deadline moves. It does not create a run, an event, or a wake. The fallback deadline is 5 minutes, and never later than the holder's one-hour stale point. - `wakeWorkspaceBusyWaitersInTx` runs in the transaction that ends a running run (`writeRunStatus`). It makes due the retries that wait for that run, and the retries that wait for the same workspace as that run. It registers the scheduled-retry dispatch notification before the write. - `WORKSPACE_BUSY_HOLDER_STALE_AFTER_MS` moves to the run-dispatch domain, so the deferral gate and the parked check use one value. `heartbeat/retries.ts` exports it again. - A retry without a recorded wait (for example, a retry from before this change) keeps the old behavior. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the parked wait. ## Verification - Red before the fix, green after (`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-busy.test.ts`, "reused shared execution workspace in a sandbox"): - "waits on a live holder in one parked run, then runs once when the holder ends": before, the retry was promoted while the holder was live. After, it stays parked through due checks at +1 s, +10 min, and +30 min. Ending the holder makes it due at once. It runs exactly once, and there is only one `workspace_busy` cancellation. - "hands the workspace to three waiting siblings in arrival order, one writer at a time": before, nothing woke the waiters when the holder ended. After, exactly one waiter is admitted per handoff, in arrival order. Each runs once, and there are 3 cancellations in total (one first deferral for each sibling). - "still lets the user stop a parked waiter": before, the waiter was promoted while the holder was live. After, Stop cancels the parked retry, and nothing brings it back. - Safety case (green before and after): "lets a stale holder reach the existing quiet-holder failure instead of parking forever". - `npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-busy.test.ts`: 35 passed. - `heartbeat-remote-workspace-busy`, `heartbeat-retry-scheduling`, `src/modules/run-dispatch`, `heartbeat/retries.test.ts`, `execution-projection.test.ts`: 266 of 267 passed. The one failure, "records pre-provider quota rejection…", is a timing flake on a loaded machine and passes when it runs alone. It does not use this path. - `tsc --noEmit` reports no errors in the changed files. - Staging evidence was read only. This change is not deployed. ## Risks - One extra indexed `SELECT … FOR UPDATE` on `scheduled_retry` rows when a running run ends. The update and the notification happen only when waiters exist. - If an earlier waiter stays queued for a long time (for example, its agent is paused), later waiters for the same workspace wait behind it. Each check is a deadline update, not a run. The fallback check runs every 5 minutes. - A remote writer that has ended but has not finished its save (#19075) is not parked, because its run is no longer `running`. Such a wait can still make a small number of deferrals until the save settles. - Low migration risk: no schema change. Old retries without the new context key keep the old behavior. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use (shell, file edits, browser read of staging run records) in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
5fdfd3f17a |
fix(recovery): bound repeated saved-record response bodies (#19168)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent tasks and their saved execution history. > - A continuation carries completed API receipts to prevent duplicate work. > - Repeated saves can copy large record bodies into each new provider prompt. > - The resulting command can exceed the durable PRP frame limit before useful work starts. > - This change projects large successful saved-record responses as compact references. > - The original receipts and authenticated user direction remain available. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A task with many saved document and comment responses can fail with `command_payload_too_large`. Same-run recovery can then show a runner identity failure that hides this first cause. Completed response bodies repeat content already stored in task records. **Expected behavior** Continue from saved records with completed-action evidence that fits the runner command. Keep user messages, answers and approvals intact. Keep the full original receipts. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Save 39 successful document, comment and task-write responses in a run's API receipt ledger. 2. Give each response a large record body. 3. Build and render a continuation, then queue it through the real durable PRP journal. 4. Before this fix, the regression throws `command_payload_too_large` with a 4.2 MB prompt. Related work: #16980 pages oversized assigned tool results. This change addresses earlier response bodies repeated in a later continuation. It does not change tool-result paging or protocol limits. ## What Changed - Project response data over 4 KiB for three known successful record-write operations. Keep record, revision and status metadata, HTTP outcome, receipt identity and a data digest. - Keep small, failed, unknown, mismatched and foreign-company results in their existing form. - Explain the reference format in shared prompt guidance and the execution contract. - Add database and real-journal regression coverage. Verify the original receipt ledger remains unchanged. The continuation service owns the projection. The shared adapter helper only explains the reference to native and legacy prompt consumers. There are no new dependencies, provider calls, timers or background scans. ## Verification - The unfixed database regression fails at the real PRP command limit with `command_payload_too_large`. - Continuation builder, native execution input and native continuation suites: 118 tests pass. - Shared prompt consumers: 142 tests pass. - Module boundaries and diff whitespace checks pass. - Greptile: 5/5 on `8109e7361c5b5e38f9aad35af9bf4ad7bdc5f338`, with no unresolved review threads. All CI checks pass. - Full workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`: passed. - Hosted verification: pending deployment. The source fix does not itself resume the affected hosted task. Local setup failures remain accounted for: the fresh checkout lacked an ignored root SDK link and embedded PostgreSQL library symlinks after an offline install that skipped lifecycle scripts. The maintained workspace-link helper, SDK build and platform hydration script repaired those prerequisites. A later test expectation assumed JSON insertion order across PostgreSQL JSONB; it now checks the digest against the unchanged stored receipt. These failures did not change runtime limits or recovery guards. ## Risks Large responses from these three successful operations now use explicit saved-record references in continuation context. Agents must read the record or source receipt when full content is needed. This is not a universal prompt-size limit: user history, unknown operations and other inputs retain their existing representation. No migration, permission, credential, provider-stop or replay policy changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`), xhigh reasoning, through Codex in T3 Code. Used for investigation, implementation and local verification. No subagents. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked existing issues or described the issue in-PR following the issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task id - [x] I have run the targeted tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added tests and updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open findings - [x] I will address review comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
737db73275 | fix(native): measure resumed run usage from the prior run's total (#19161) |