mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-13 15:55:46 +01:00
5e2243f081726b995f120a78f9b159596d7dcbae
9
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
a0ac81e114 |
fix(ui): show task image results in compact thumbnail grids (#19626)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task feeds show agent messages, documents, and files in time order. > - Each image currently uses a full feed card. > - A turn with seven screenshots makes the conversation hard to scan. > - This pull request groups adjacent images from the same run in a compact grid. > - Users can scan the results and open each image in the existing gallery. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Image results in task history and the live task feed. **Current behavior** Each image uses a separate full-width card. Native image upload receipt messages can also separate related screenshots. **Proposed behavior** Adjacent images from one run share a wrapping thumbnail grid. New image results join the grid. Documents, video, and authored messages keep their positions. The grid opens the existing gallery. **Reason and benefit** Users can see a batch of screenshots without scrolling past one large card for each file. **Breaking changes** The feed layout changes. The stored comments, files, APIs, and permissions do not change. Related public work: Refs #17228. Refs #8785. Refs #7667. These changes supplied the artifact cards and media gallery that this pull request reuses. ## What Changed - Add one image grouping function for settled history, turn history, and live results. Group only images with the same known run. Keep the first row key and each image key when results arrive. - Add a token-based grid that reuses the media artifact cards and image gallery. - Add an optional typed attachment-preparation marker to file registration and chat-file reuse. Preserve the marker through comment normalization. Use it with matching image, author, and run links to hide generated receipts. Keep the exact historical sentence as a fallback for old receipts. - Add nine production component stories with seven sample-account screenshots. Cover mobile, Classic, mixed results, single images, missing images, streaming, gallery navigation, and the complete feed projection. - Add grouping and production-feed regressions. Add 18 browser cases across light and dark themes. - Improve contrast for the shared fallback label and gallery counter after the accessibility checks found low contrast. - Match alternate original-image paths when opening the gallery. Keep a separate Open original link beside Download in the gallery. - Record the feed layout in DESIGN.md. ## Verification - Final qualification at `09b12381ce85bee6593050bd8a2fa18cbe2c45a6`: [required CI passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42317080212/job/128237094513), including typecheck, build, all test lanes, E2E, and verify. The snapshot has 58 successful check runs, three conditional skips, one neutral advisory job, and a successful legacy Snyk status. No pending or failed checks remain. Greptile and Paperclip Review both score this exact head 5/5; all review threads are resolved. - Current-head local checks: 544 focused UI tests passed across 11 files, with one existing skip. UI/shared typechecks and token gates pass. All 18 focused Storybook browser cases passed after the CSS merge, with retries disabled. - Two database integration cases verify file registration and chat-file reuse receipt markers. All 52 issue-validator tests and six upstream default-model tests passed. - Regressions failed before the fixes for unknown-run grouping, receipt wording, and authored progress text with an image. The repair uses a typed receipt marker and requires matching author, attachment, image, and run links before hiding a generated receipt. All five review findings are resolved. - Browser checks cover loaded images, wrapping columns, overflow, missing-image fallback, streaming stability, keyboard gallery navigation, original-file links, and downloads. Fixtures use production renderers. These checks do not prove deployed persistence or provider behavior and do not compare visual baselines. - Local limits: the preflight helper could not finish because Cargo was absent. The earlier low-memory server typecheck and dependency-free selector did not replace final-head CI. The now-passing final CI supplies broad typecheck, build, server, Runner, and E2E coverage. - Prior independent CI failures remain recorded: one Slack timer case passed a single diagnosed rerun; its exact timer cause was not proved. A later chat shard lost its self-hosted runner without a test assertion failure. The current revision passes that shard and all applicable gates. Master conflict resolution retained both image-grid and patch CSS rules. ## Risks - Images without a run ID remain separate. Messages and other resource types end each batch. - Receipt suppression requires a matching preparation marker or the exact legacy sentence, plus matching attachment, image work product, run, and author. Tests preserve human messages and native progress text with attachments. The optional marker uses existing JSON metadata and needs no database migration. - Shared gallery and fallback text now have stronger contrast. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6, through Codex. The agent used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser tests. The runtime did not expose a more specific model ID or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
22281d4b3a |
feat(task-chat): approve harness-proposed plans (Codex plan mode, Claude ExitPlanMode) (#19291)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run through the native runner. Codex and Claude Code each have their own plan mode, and each produces a proposed-plan document. > - Paperclip already has a planning work mode, an issue `plan` document, and a `request_confirmation` approval gate for plans. > - These parts were not connected. The Codex proposed-plan item was transcript text only. The server path never put Codex into plan mode. Claude was never put into plan mode, and its ExitPlanMode plan was dropped. A planning run could close its task as done with no approval. > - This pull request turns a harness's own proposed plan into the issue's Plan document and the existing approval gate, for Codex and Claude. > - The benefit is that users approve or send back the agent's real plan from the task chat. Approve resumes the agent. Request changes sends the reason back to the agent. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 **Subsystem affected** Native runner provider events (Codex and ACPX Claude), the runner Codex provider (Rust), server native plan synchronization, and the task chat UI. **Problem or motivation** Codex and Claude both produce a proposed-plan document in their native plan mode. Paperclip did not use it. In live tests on the server path, a Codex planning run was not in Codex plan mode, saved its own `implementation-plan` document, and marked the task done without approval. Claude planning runs were not in Claude plan mode, and the ExitPlanMode plan text never reached Paperclip. **Proposed solution** Add a canonical `plan.proposed` event for a harness's proposed plan. Put Codex and Claude into their native plan mode for planning runs. Save a completed proposal as the issue `plan` document with the existing `request_confirmation` gate. Agents can also propose a plan on a standard task; the work mode stays standard. **Alternatives considered** Reuse `plan.updated`. Its schema is the within-turn checklist and is not the durable Plan document, so a separate event keeps the two clear. Stronger prompt text without native plan mode. Live tests showed that the model kept its own document workflow. **Roadmap alignment** This reuses the issue plan document, planning work mode and approval gate that already exist. It adds one canonical provider event. ## What Changed - `packages/paperclip-runner/protocol/schemas/*`: add the `plan.proposed` event (`paperclip.plan.proposed.v1`: `proposalId`, `status`, `markdown` up to 60k characters, `source`). Regenerate the schema bundle, validators and manifest. - `packages/paperclip-runner/src/provider-events.ts`: map the Codex `plan` item and a `<proposed_plan>` block in a completed Codex message to `plan.proposed`. Add `claudePlanProposalEvent`. - `packages/paperclip-runner/runner/crates/runner-core/src/codex_provider.rs`: send Codex's native `collaborationMode: plan` on `turn/start` for a read-only (planning) Codex run. Before this change the server path never sent it. - `runner-core/src/acpx_event_payload.rs`: admit `plan.proposed` as ACPX rich display activity. - `drivers/acpx/codex-runtime-adapter.ts`: set Claude Code to native plan mode for a read-only run. Capture Claude's ExitPlanMode plan from its permission request, record it, and decline the native "Ready to code?" prompt. - `drivers/acpx/codex-acpx-driver.ts`, `cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.ts`: emit the captured proposal as a rich event. Complete that turn instead of reporting it as cancelled. - `backends/codex-native-backend.ts`: per-harness plan-mode instructions, and a short opt-in hint for Claude on standard tasks. - `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.ts`: synchronize a completed `plan.proposed` into the `plan` document and a `request_confirmation` in planning and standard mode. Do not change the issue status during the run (that revoked the run's lease). The run finalizer turns the pending confirmation into the review wait. - `server/src/services/heartbeat-run-summary.ts`: keep a `<proposed_plan>` block out of the posted reply. - UI: new `plan_proposal` provider family. The task chat shows a live "Writing plan" card while a proposal streams and a one-line record when it completes. Resolved plan reviews keep a receipt ("Approved Plan v1", "Requested changes to Plan v1: reason"). Plan previews skip section headings. - Storybook: `Tasks and conversations/.../Task chat/Proposed plan approval` shows the journey. - `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`: describe harness-proposed plan approval. ## Verification - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib` (new: `read_only_codex_turns_use_native_plan_collaboration_mode`) - `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/provider-events.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/codex-runtime-adapter.test.ts` - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/native-plan-proposal-sync.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-summary.test.ts` - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/components/transcript/native-run-events.test.ts src/components/task-chat` - Live test on a local worktree instance with real harnesses: - Codex (`gpt-5.6-sol`), planning task: Codex asked one question, then produced a native plan item. The task showed Plan v1 with Approve plan / Request changes and moved to in review. Approve changed the work mode to standard. Codex then implemented the plan and its tests passed. - Codex, Request changes with a reason: Codex woke in planning mode and produced Plan v2 that includes the change. - Claude (`claude-opus-5-5`), planning task: Claude was in plan mode. ExitPlanMode became Plan v1 and the turn completed. Approve resumed Claude in standard mode, and Claude implemented the plan. - Claude, standard task that asks for a plan first: Claude stopped before code changes and asked for plan approval. The work mode stayed standard. - Storybook: open `Proposed plan approval` and check each stage. ## Risks - Codex planning runs now really use Codex plan mode on the server path. Codex can ask a clarifying question before it proposes. This matches Codex plan mode. - Claude planning runs now use Claude plan mode. A declined ExitPlanMode ends the Claude turn; the runner reports it as completed. Claude's tool row for that request records a rejection from Claude's side. - Codex does not stream the proposed plan on the server path yet, so the live card shows a placeholder until the plan completes. - A `<proposed_plan>` block in any completed Codex message on a standard task now asks for approval. This is the documented opt-in path. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser). Long context. No extended thinking mode was used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d361f92071 |
feat(task-chat): show harness status notices as chips, out of the answer (#19267)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run through the native runner. The runner turns harness events from Codex and Claude into canonical provider events, and the task chat shows them. > - Harnesses report their own lifecycle: context compaction, retries, model fallback, and warnings. Paperclip lost or mangled these reports. > - Claude (claude-agent-acp 0.73) sends compaction, model-fallback and warning banners as ordinary message text, so "Compacting..." ended up inside the agent's answer and the issue comment. > - Codex sends `error` with the text in `error.message` and a `willRetry` flag. Paperclip read `params.message`, so every Codex error said "Provider notice", and every retry looked fatal. > - This pull request keeps these reports out of the answer and shows them as small status chips between the turn's activity. > - The benefit is that users can see why an agent paused, retried or forgot earlier context, and the answer text stays clean. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Native runner provider-event mapping (TypeScript driver, ACPX sidecar and Rust runner-core) and the task chat transcript. **Problem or motivation** Claude status banners are mixed into assistant answer text. Codex error notices lose their message and their retry state. The task chat hid all of these notices, and settled turns stripped every provider notice. **Proposed solution** Classify Claude banners as provider notices at the ACPX boundary. Map Codex `TurnError` fields and `willRetry` correctly. Render status notices as inline chips. A retry chip fades after later provider work. A final error shows the real provider message. **Alternatives considered** Patch claude-agent-acp to tag banners in `_meta`. ACPX keeps only `origin`, `kind` and `source` from `_meta`, and other sessions own the ACPX `_meta` passthrough work. Banner chunks already have no `messageId`, and model output always has one, so the classification needs no adapter patch. **Roadmap alignment** This makes existing harness signals visible. It adds no new protocol schema. It uses the existing `paperclip.provider.notice.v1` `category` and `details` fields. ## What Changed - Codex `error` notifications (TypeScript `provider-events.ts` and Rust `runner-core/src/provider_events.rs`): read `error.message`, map `willRetry: true` to a recoverable `provider_retry` notice, keep category `error` for a final error, and add the `CodexErrorInfo` kind, HTTP status, and the "Reconnecting... n/m" attempt count as notice details. Retries in one turn share one notice id. - New `claude-status-banners.ts`: classifies the claude-agent-acp compaction, model-fallback and SDK informational banners. A chunk must have no `messageId` and match a known banner exactly. - ACPX sidecar and the TypeScript ACPX driver emit these banners as `provider_notice` events instead of answer text. Compaction start and end share one notice key and carry a `Phase` detail. - Rust runner-core accepts an optional `noticeKey` and bounded `details` on ACPX `provider_notice` events. - UI: new `TaskChatStatusNotice` chip and `status-notice-presentation.ts`. Status notices become top-level timeline rows, render as chips wherever protocol cards render, and stay visible in settled (historical) turns. Generic warnings stay hidden as before. - New tokens `--tc-status-notice-warning-*` in `ui/src/index.css`. - Storybook story `Tasks and conversations/.../Task chat/Status notices` with eight states. - `doc/run-log-events.md`: describes the status notice categories. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/task-chat src/components/transcript` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/provider-events.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/claude-status-banners.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/codex-acpx-driver.test.ts src/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.test.ts` - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib provider_events` and `--test acpx_provider_events` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - Storybook: open `product-task-chat-status-notices--all-states-gallery`. - Live test-drive on an isolated worktree instance: - Codex (gpt-5.6-sol, app-server 0.160): a local pass-through proxy in front of the real OpenAI API cut the first two response streams. Codex ran its own retries. The chat showed an amber "Reconnecting" chip live, then "Recovered after retry" once work continued. With every stream cut, Codex made five retries and then sent a final error with the real message. - Claude (claude-haiku-5-5 through claude-agent-acp 0.73): a long reading task triggered Claude's own auto-compaction twice. The chat showed "Compacting context…" live and "Context compacted" afterwards. The final answer and the issue comment contained no compaction text. - Not verified live: model fallback and Claude informational banners. They need a model refusal or a blocking hook. Unit tests cover them. ## Risks - Low to medium. A Claude model message that is exactly a banner text and has no `messageId` would become a notice. Model output from claude-agent-acp always carries a `messageId`. - Older stored Codex `error` notices (category `error`, not recoverable) now render as a red row instead of being hidden. - Claude retries (`api_retry`) are still not visible. claude-agent-acp reports them only to clients that negotiate session-failure records, and ACPX drops `_meta`. This is a follow-up that depends on the ACPX `_meta` passthrough work. - On a failed Codex turn the thread collapses to a summary, so the red row does not show there. The existing task banner already shows the real provider message. - Some local suites failed on this machine. They do not touch the changed code: Cursor Cloud staging-custody tests, the ACPX Claude dependency-graph pin test (a timeout), and the Rust `task_memory` monitor tests. CI is the reference for these. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use, code execution and browser automation. Default context window. Extended reasoning was not enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Refs paperclipai/paperclip#19252 (plan card precedent). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
c6996799c4 |
feat(task-chat): show an inline diff for every file edit (#19269)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The task chat shows what an agent did during a run, including each tool call > - Codex and Claude both report the patch for every file edit, but Paperclip dropped it. Claude's ACP `diff` content was never read. The Codex `fileChange` item became a generic item with no patch. Codex `turn/diff/updated` had no native-runner mapping > - A reviewer could not see what an agent changed without opening the workspace > - This pull request carries a bounded patch on each edit call and shows it in the edit row. Each turn that changed files ends with a "Changed in this turn" card > - The benefit is that a reviewer can check every change in the conversation, with the same view for Codex and Claude ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 (precedent: canonical `plan.updated` events as a docked plan card). **Subsystem affected** Paperclip runner (Rust and TypeScript canonical event mapping), PRP provider-event schema, and the task-chat UI. **Problem or motivation** Edit rows say "Edited a file" with no content. Claude Edit/Write `diff` content is lost after the ACPX sidecar. The Codex native runner drops `fileChange.changes` and `turn/diff/updated`. The existing workspace-changes card showed a raw text patch in a dialog, and only on the in-process Codex path. **Proposed solution** Add an optional, bounded `fileChanges` list to `paperclip.tool.execution.v1`. Fill it from Codex `fileChange` items and Claude ACP `diff` content. Map Codex `turn/diff/updated` to `workspace.change.updated` on the native runner. In the UI, show `+N −M` on each edit row, open a compact colored diff, and end the turn with the change set. **Alternatives considered** A runner-side git diff at turn end. It needs workspace access and extra cost on every turn. The harness patches are already available. For Claude, the UI builds the turn card from the edit rows instead of new per-turn runner state. ## What Changed - Protocol: optional `fileChanges[]` on `toolExecution` in `provider-event.schema.json`, with the regenerated schema bundle, validators and manifest. Paths are workspace-relative. A patch is at most 32 KiB, and a call has at most 32 files. - Runner (Rust): new `tool_file_changes.rs`. A Codex `fileChange` item now also emits `tool.execution.*` with `fileChanges`; the native item event stays for the recovery and progress projections. `turn/diff/updated` becomes `workspace.change.updated`. `normalize_acpx_tool_call` re-validates the sidecar's `fileChanges`. `normalize_codex_notification_in` resolves absolute paths against the session cwd. - Runner (Rust): `has_bounded_rich_display_shape` accepts schema-valid workspace diffs. Without this change, durable storage cut each patch string to a 4 KiB preview. Patches use the uncapped secret redactor. - Runner (TS): new `tool-file-changes.ts`. The ACPX sidecar computes `fileChanges` from ACP `diff` content with the working directory. The in-process Codex and ACPX mappers do the same, with an optional `context` argument. - UI: new `TaskChatDiffView` (colored rows, hunk labels, a height cap, "Show N more lines"). Edit rows show counts and the diff. Collapsed activity groups show edit totals. The workspace card is now "Changed in this turn", with in-place per-file diffs, and it sits at the end of the turn. When a harness sends no whole-turn diff (Claude), the card is built from the edit rows. A change set is marked complete when its run ends. - UI: `native-run-events.ts` maps `workspace.change.updated` and attaches each edit's latest patch to its row (the `diff` transcript entries now carry `toolUseId`). - Design tokens: `--diff-add-*`, `--diff-remove-*` and `--sz-edit-diff-max-h` come from the status icon hues. - Storybook: `Tasks/Edit diffs` story. Docs: `doc/run-log-events.md`. ## Verification - Real runs on a local instance (`test-drive`, native runner): - Codex (`gpt-5.6-sol`): the "Applied a patch" rows show `+9` and `+35 −2` with their diffs. The turn ends with "Changed in this turn", 2 files, `+42`, from `turn/diff/updated`. - Claude (`claude-opus-5-5` via ACPX): the Write and Edit rows show `+5`, `+14 −1` and `+9` with correct hunks. The turn card is built from the edit rows. - Codex model note: with `gpt-5.4`, pinned Codex 0.160 reports "model metadata not found". The model then wrote files through the shell, so no `fileChange` items occurred. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: all gates clean. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/task-chat src/components/transcript src/adapters`: 1073 passed. - `packages/paperclip-runner`: `vitest run src/provider-events.test.ts src/tool-file-changes.test.ts src/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.test.ts` passed. `check:protocol-types` and `check:protocol-manifest` match. - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib provider_events tool_file_changes`: passed. `cargo fmt --check`: clean. - Storybook: open `Tasks and conversations/…/Tasks/Edit diffs`. ## Risks - Larger payloads: an edit call can carry up to 96 KiB of patch in Rust, and the sidecar keeps 48 KiB under its 128 KiB frame. Above the budget, a file keeps its counts and drops its patch (`diffTruncated`). - Redaction: each patch goes through the shared secret redactor. Before this change, a 4 KiB preview cap also applied. - Claude turn card: it joins each edit's patch in order. It is not a net diff. For a file the turn created, the counts are net and exact. For an existing file, the counts are summed over its edits. - The workspace card moves to the end of the turn. One adapter test changed to match. - Local only: four Linux cgroup `task_memory` Rust tests fail on macOS. They do not touch these modules. ## Model Used Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with tool use (shell, browser and file editing) and a long context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
b0fa2ef9bf |
feat(task-chat): show web searches, model switches, waits and verification checks as dedicated rows (#19262)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run through the native runner. The runner turns harness activity into typed canonical events such as `research.*`, `model.route.changed`, `wait.*` and the run's own verification checks. > - The task chat flattened these events into generic tool rows. A web search showed as "Ran Research eventType: research.started, summary: …". The run's verification checks were dropped completely. > - Live tests found a second break: the Rust runner core forwarded Codex `webSearch` items without their query, action or results. The canonical `research.*` events therefore had `query: null`. > - This pull request keeps the full payload for these families (as #19252 did for plans), adds small dedicated rows, and keeps the web-search fields through the durable runner. > - The benefit is that users see what the agent searched for, which model actually ran, how long a wait lasts, and whether each check passed, without opening the run log. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 (same pattern for the plan card) **Subsystem affected** Task chat activity rows (UI), the native run-event transcript mapping, and the Rust runner core Codex normalizer. **Problem or motivation** Provider activity that the runner already maps to canonical events reaches the task chat as unreadable generic rows. Verification checks never appear. For Codex, the web-search query and action are lost before they reach the canonical event. **Proposed solution** Keep `research`, `model_identity`, `artifact`, `review` and `wait` events as `provider_activity` entries with their full payload. Project the runner's `verification` items as a new `verification` family. Render dedicated rows: a web search with its quoted query and source-domain chips, a model switch as `from → to · reason`, a wait with a live countdown, and green/red check lines. Keep bounded web-search and sleep fields in the Rust normalizer. **Alternatives considered** A separate "Checks" block beside the final answer. We kept the checks in the activity group, because the group summary already leads with "Check failed" when a check fails. ## What Changed - `ui/src/components/transcript/native-run-events.ts`: keep research, model, artifact, review and wait events as `provider_activity` with the full payload. Map `item.completed` items of kind `verification` to the new `verification` family. Context, hook, safety and delegation stay on the generic path, because other work items own them. - `packages/adapter-utils/src/types.ts`, `ui/src/components/task-chat/task-chat-model.ts`, `ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.ts`: add the `verification` provider-activity family. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/task-chat-activity-presentation.ts`: add labels: "Searched the web “query”", "Opened a web page host/path", "Switched models a → b · reason", "Waiting 30s" / "Waited 30s", and "Check passed" / "Check failed" / "Check not run". - `ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatRunnerActivityGroup.tsx` and `TaskChatProtocolActivityRow.tsx`: show up to three source-domain chips under a finished search, a live countdown for a running wait, and a check line with a tinted icon and its detail. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/completed-activity-summary.ts`: the group summary leads with "Check failed" when a check fails, and says "Switched models" for a reroute. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/transcript-adapter.ts`: verification detail keys, and a `startedAt` timestamp that stays across lifecycle merges (used by the countdown). - `packages/paperclip-runner/runner/crates/runner-core/src/provider_events.rs`: keep bounded `query`, `action` and http(s) `results` for Codex `webSearch` items, and `durationMs` for `sleep` items. Other item types do not change. - `ui/storybook/stories/tasks/task-chat-provider-activity.stories.tsx`: new story. Its fixtures are persisted run events that go through the production transcript path. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/transcript src/components/task-chat src/components/TaskChatThread.test.tsx src/adapters/paperclip-runner src/lib`: 275 files and 3669 tests pass. - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core`: all tests pass, including the new `keeps_bounded_web_search_and_sleep_identity`. - UI typecheck is clean. `pnpm check:token-gates` is clean. `cargo fmt --check` is clean. - Storybook: open "Tasks and conversations / … / Task chat / Provider activity". It shows a settled run, a live search, a live wait countdown and a narrow layout. - Live test on a local worktree instance with a real Codex agent (gpt-5.6-sol, Codex app-server 0.160). The task asked for a web search, a parser with tests, a pause, and two checks. The task chat showed "Searched the web “ISO 8601 week date first week Thursday conversion calendar date”" and two green check rows ("node --test week-date.test.js · 8 tests passed; 0 failed.", "node --check week-date.js"). The group summary read "Ran checks". Before the runner fix, the same search had `query: null`. Not verified live: - The source-domain chips. Codex 0.160 sends `results: null`, because it keeps search results on the server. The chips appear only when a provider reports sources. Unit tests and the story cover them. - The wait countdown and the model-switch row. In the live run Codex paused with a shell `sleep`, not a native `sleep` item, and no reroute occurred. Unit tests and the story cover both. - Claude. Its WebSearch and WebFetch calls arrive as generic tool executions, because ACPX drops the tool metadata. They show as tool rows, as before. The ACPX `_meta` work is separate. ## Risks - Low risk. The change only affects how canonical events display. The generic path stays for the families that this PR does not change. - The Rust normalizer now persists the web-search query and the source URLs/titles in the run events. This data was already intended for the canonical `research.v1` event, and it is bounded (4,000 characters per text field, 64 results, http(s) URLs only). - A search that Codex reports with `action: other` and no query shows as "Searched the web" with no subject. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edit, browser automation) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Dotta
|
46760cc588 |
fix(chat): honor dismissal for all composer requests (#17218)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task conversations show requests in the feed and above the message composer. > - Earlier fixes kept dismissed questions in history, but excluded completion reviews and other request kinds. > - Closing those forms left a pending badge, and the server could still demand a response. > - This pull request saves human dismissal and removes the request from composer reminders and ordinary completion gates. > - People can continue the conversation and reopen the request from history. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related work: #15229 and #15392. **What happened?** Dismissing a completion review closed its form but left it counted as pending. It could return after reload, block a retry, or cause the agent to demand another response. Raw runtime requests could also lose their only usable control when dismissed. **Expected behavior** Dismissal leaves an accessible request in the feed and clears the composer form and pending count. It persists after reload. It does not submit an answer, approve an action, or wake the agent. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a task with a pending completion review or another composer request. 2. Dismiss the request, then reload the task. 3. Check that the composer stays clear and the feed entry can reopen the request. ## What Changed - Add nullable dismissal fields and a human-only dismissal endpoint with company, private-task access, resolver, and locked review-policy checks. - Persist saved-request dismissal on the server. Keep browser persistence for raw runtime requests and existing question dismissals. - Keep confirmations, choices, item verdicts, suggested tasks, and runtime requests accessible in the feed. - Exclude dismissed ordinary requests from completion and retry gates. Tell agents not to repeat deferred requests. - Preserve tool, secret, connection, plan, company-policy, and configured review authorization gates. Expire deferred non-question requests when their task completes. - Preserve the selected form when another dismissal finishes saving. Keep reopened reviews visible through delayed comment refreshes. - Add a completion-review Storybook test drive and update design, API, database, and capability documentation. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. The final UI changes also passed the UI typecheck. - `pnpm build`: passed. The final UI changes also passed the UI production build. - Focused UI and transcript tests: 550 passed across nine files after merging the current base branch. - Focused database, completion, and prompt tests: 105 passed across three files, including two review-policy regressions that failed before the fix. The tests reject a review requester excluded by current policy, preserve the pending gate on denial, and permit an independent reviewer to defer the request. - Route regression suite: 81 passed, including denial before reading or mutating a private-task request. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: passed. - Map and Storybook structural checks: passed; 30 map/catalog script tests passed. - Browser: used the production task-thread components in the completion-review fixture. Dismissed, reloaded, reopened from the feed, and dismissed again. No pending badge or composer takeover remained. Story callbacks simulate API saves; separate server tests cover persistence and permissions. - `pnpm test:run`: stopped after the general-server group reported one failure in `workspace-runtime.test.ts`: "returns a bounded structured conflict and exposes only same-company workspace references". The same test passed in isolation (1 passed, 178 skipped). The cause of the full-suite failure is not established. The full PR CI suite subsequently passed on e243cbb001; its two authorization review findings are fixed in |
||
|
TonioandClaude Fable 5.1
|
341b622604 |
feat(ui): Artifacts V1 behind an experimental setting — Artifacts page, panel tab and task thread (#17228)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents produce artifacts: documents, files, pictures, video and links. The app shows them on the Artifacts page, in the right panel's Artifacts tab and in the task thread > - The artifact directions lab (#17213) settled a presentation for those surfaces, MVP V1, drawn from the PCLP-Core mocks. It is a reference, not product code > - Shipping it means product components on product data, token-only, behind a switch, one surface at a time, so the current presentation stays the default until the new one has been used > - This pull request adds the switch (Settings > Experimental > Artifacts V1), the `--artifact-*` tokens, the V1 primitives as product components, and the V1 presentation on all three surfaces behind the switch: the Artifacts page, the panel's Artifacts tab and the task thread > - The benefit is the redesign in the product, reversible by one setting, with every existing behaviour of those surfaces kept ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. This section follows the feature request template; the plan is `doc/plans/2026-10-22-artifacts-mvp-v1.md`. **Subsystem affected** The web UI (`ui/`): the Artifacts page, the right panel's Artifacts tab and the task thread. The experimental settings contract in `packages/shared` and `server` gains one boolean. **Problem or motivation** The three artifact surfaces grew separately and their artifact presentation is dated and inconsistent. The lab produced a measured direction; nothing in the product uses it yet. **Proposed solution** An experimental setting, `enableArtifactsV1`, default off, with the same plumbing as the other experimental settings. Product primitives under `ui/src/components/artifacts/v1` (kind helpers and adapters, the sheet and print artwork, the stack, the page tiles with the Paper Mono pill, the row the panel and thread will share), driven by `--artifact-*` tokens in `index.css` with light and dark values. With the setting on: the Artifacts page shows one row of views (Tasks, All files, Images, Videos, Documents, Text, Files) and the V1 tiles, a task with several artifacts as a stack whose newest artifact is the first page, everything else as single tiles; the panel's Artifacts tab is one flat list of V1 rows, newest first, with the expandable rows (Markdown review surface, document annotations, deep links) keeping their behaviour behind the row as their face; the thread shows a message's files as rows under its footer and registered deliverables and documents as one row each. The hover movement respects reduced motion. **Alternatives considered** Replacing the current cards outright: no fallback and three surfaces to land at once. Mounting the lab's components: they are typed on lab fixtures and keep lab-local tokens, which the token gates reject. The primitives were ported instead and the lab stays a reference. **Roadmap alignment** Supports the "Artifacts & Work Products" theme in `ROADMAP.md`. Presentation only; no data model change. **Additional context** No new API fields: the tiles show title, identifier, count and "Updated …"; rows take sizes from the work-product and attachment payloads; a picture's aspect ratio comes from the loaded image, 4:3 until it loads. The plan records what each surface keeps and what it drops (run sections in the panel; the "Images · N / Files · N" labels and the four-up grid in the thread). ## What Changed - Add the `enableArtifactsV1` experimental setting: shared type, validator and feature catalog, server defaults and managed keys, the `useArtifactsV1Enabled` hook, and the Settings > Experimental toggle (in its alphabetical place). - Add the `--artifact-*` tokens and the Artifacts V1 component rules to `ui/src/index.css`: light values on `:root`, dark overrides, and the hover movement under `prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference`. - Add `ui/src/components/artifacts/v1/`: `kinds.ts` (kind treatment, labels, glyphs, the server's media-kind rule, adapters from `CompanyArtifact`), `geometry.ts` (the measured constants), `when.ts`, `ArtifactSheet`, `ArtifactPrint`, `ArtifactStack`, `ArtifactFront`, `ArtifactTile` (stack and single tiles, caption, grid), `ArtifactRow` (the row and its inline group), `ArtifactsV1Filters`, with the mock's SVG assets. - Wire the Artifacts page: with the setting on, the toolbar's filter row becomes the V1 views and the grid renders V1 tiles; the toolbar takes an optional `filters` row for this. The old cards and kind filters stay the default. - Wire the panel's Artifacts tab (`IssuePropertiesArtifactsTab`): with the setting on, one flat list of V1 rows, newest first; `DocumentRow` and `MarkdownWorkProductRow` take a `face` render prop so the V1 row fronts their unchanged expansion, review and deep-link behaviour; `PanelFileRow` opens attachments and attachment-backed work products the way the shipped card does (gallery, text tab, new tab) with open and download beside the name; other work products are a link row with their status. - Wire the task thread: `TaskChatBubble` hangs a message's files under its footer as V1 rows inline (pictures and video to the gallery, text to a text tab, files to a new tab) in place of the media grid and file chips; `TaskChatProtocolCard`'s resource rows render deliverables, documents and attachments as one V1 row each, opening where the card did. - `ArtifactRow` keeps trailing controls beside its own control (no nested interactive elements) and can be a link, an in-app anchor, a new-tab anchor or a button; adapters read work products, documents, attachments and message references. - Add a catalogued Storybook story, `Components/Artifact V1 primitives`, under `documents-artifacts`, on fixtures. - Add tests: the primitives (kinds, dates, print fitting, tiles, rows), the hook, the Artifacts page, the panel's Artifacts tab, the task-chat bubble and the protocol card, each with the setting on and off; the settings page and server tests list the new key. - Add `doc/plans/2026-10-22-artifacts-mvp-v1.md`. ## Verification - Run `cd ui && pnpm typecheck`: the Storybook catalog accepts the new story, and `tsc -b` is clean apart from the five pre-existing `PluginOrganizationSwitcher` errors. - Run `pnpm check:token-gates` and `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`: clean. - Run `cd ui && npx vitest run src/components/artifacts src/components/issue-properties src/components/task-chat/TaskChatBubble.test.tsx src/components/task-chat/TaskChatBubble.artifactsV1.test.tsx src/components/task-chat/TaskChatProtocolCard.test.tsx src/components/task-chat/TaskChatProtocolCard.artifactsV1.test.tsx src/pages/Artifacts.test.tsx src/hooks/useArtifactsV1Enabled.test.ts src/pages/InstanceExperimentalSettings.test.tsx`: the suites pass (151 tests in the last run). - Run `cd packages/shared && npx vitest run src/feature-catalog.test.ts` and `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/instance-settings-service.test.ts`: pass. - Manual: open Settings > Experimental, turn on Artifacts V1. On the Artifacts page the view row reads Tasks, All files, Images, Videos, Documents, Text, Files; tasks with several artifacts show as stacks, hovering fans the pages and lifts the artwork (not under reduced motion); Images shows single tiles with bordered prints. Open a task's Artifacts tab: one list of rows, newest first; a Markdown work product still expands into its review surface, a document still opens in its tab. In the thread, a message's files sit under its footer as rows. Turn the setting off: everything returns to the current presentation. - Storybook: `Tasks and conversations / Documents, attachments, and work products / Components / Artifact V1 primitives`. - Not run: the full `pnpm test:run` and `pnpm build` (CI runs them), and a browser pass against a dev instance with real artifacts on the three surfaces; that pass is the remaining step before this leaves draft. ## Risks - Off by default; with the setting off, the only changes on a product path are an optional `filters` prop on the toolbar, an optional `face` prop on two panel rows, a read of the setting in the bubble and the protocol card, and the new token declarations. - With the setting on, the Artifacts page's view tabs set two URL parameters (`groupBy`, `kind`) at once; the group-by menu and search are unchanged. - A picture with unknown dimensions renders at 4:3 until it loads, then the print refits once; the frame's height is fixed so nothing below it moves. - About thirty new `--artifact-*` tokens, namespaced and documented in place. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5.1 by Anthropic, model ID `claude-fable-5-1`, used through Claude Code in the desktop app. Extended reasoning was on. Capabilities used: tool use (shell, file edits, a headless Playwright browser for the lab's measurements, the Figma MCP server for the mocks during the lab work) and image input. The context window is the Claude Code session's; its exact size is not surfaced to the session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above (#17213 is the lab this builds on) - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (the suites listed above; CI runs the full set) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (the plan document; no command or product behaviour changes outside the setting) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
87d05e194b |
feat(work-products): add rich cards and run artifact inventory (#12717)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for AI-agent companies. > - Agent outputs must remain visible after a run and easy to inspect from a task. > - The thread and artifact inventory need one consistent rich-card vocabulary. > - Run uploads also need durable artifact registration and producing-run context. > - Reviewers need deterministic examples for each rich-card kind and state. > - This pull request adds the shared presentation, registration, inventory, and Storybook review coverage. > - The benefit is a complete output path that reviewers can inspect without seeded data. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** This change improves work-product presentation in task threads and the task Artifacts tab. **Subsystem affected** The change affects shared work-product contracts, the runner diff path, server attachment and work-product services, GitHub metadata refresh, the React board UI, and Storybook. **Current behavior** The thread used generic cards. Some files uploaded by a run existed only as message attachments. The Artifacts tab showed a flat list without run context or filters. Storybook showed only one resting card per kind. **Proposed behavior** The thread uses rich cards for supported work-product types. Each run-produced file registers one attachment-backed artifact work product. The Artifacts tab groups outputs by run and supports filters. Storybook shows every kind and requested state, PR lifecycle states, stats variants, truncation, mobile layout, and message-tail media. **Reason and benefit** Users can identify outputs quickly. Reviewers can inspect all card permutations without creating task data. **Breaking changes** None. The metadata fields and automatic artifact registration are additive. Existing attachments and work products keep their current behavior. ## What Changed - Added a shared rich work-product card with kind-specific content and a compact inventory variant. - Added pull-request and commit diff metadata plus bounded GitHub state refresh. - Added media strips and typed file chips to message-tail attachments. - Registered each run-produced attachment as an artifact work product in the same server transaction. - Grouped task artifacts by run with agent and timestamp headings. - Added type and run filters, image thumbnails, compact cards, and a company Artifacts link. - Added a Storybook kind-by-state matrix with stats variants for all eight visual kinds. - Added PR open, draft, merged, and closed examples, long-title truncation, an exact 375-pixel viewport, and message-tail overflow coverage. - Closed reconciled runtime work products when the linked runtime stops or disappears, so the card shows `Stopped` instead of `Unhealthy`. ### Screenshots Before: one resting card per kind.  After: the kind and state matrix.  After: message-tail media at 375 pixels.  [Open the Storybook evidence viewer](https://pages.paperclip.ing/rich-work-product-storybook-20260902/). The earlier artifact inventory comparison remains available in the [artifact inventory viewer](https://pages.paperclip.ing/rich-artifacts-inventory-proof-20260902/). ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - `pnpm build-storybook` passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/work-product-runtime-reconciliation.test.ts` passed with 5 tests. - Chromium visual checks passed at desktop and 375-pixel widths. - All 30 latest-head GitHub checks passed. One unrelated annotation test was flaky and passed on its single retry. - Greptile passed at 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. ## Risks - Low risk. The Storybook change adds review fixtures only. The runtime fix changes read-time reconciliation without database writes. - The matrix is intentionally large so every permutation stays visible in one review surface. > I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This work does not duplicate planned core work. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex with GPT-5 and GPT-5.6-sol across this pull request. Reasoning, tool use, and code execution were enabled. The context-window size is not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My public branch name describes the change and contains no internal task id - [x] I have run tests locally and the changed-path tests pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
39206c0096 |
feat(ui): complete the task workspace (#12640)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The task page is the main place where people guide and review agent work. > - Native runner events already project into the existing task chat on the lower stack. > - The larger task workspace must support those events without breaking direct adapters. > - Legacy questions, final replies, empty transcripts, and classic controls must keep their behavior. > - This pull request completes the provider-neutral task workspace experience. > - The benefit is one coherent task surface for native and direct execution paths. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12639. Refs #12617. Refs #12352. **Subsystem affected** Task chat, task detail, side panels, interaction forms, and transcript presentation. **Problem or motivation** The task page does not provide one complete workspace for live activity, plans, questions, queued guidance, files, and documents. Earlier native UI work also exposed compatibility risks in legacy question and reply paths. **Proposed solution** Add the task workspace components and provider-neutral protocol presentation. Keep runner-only controls behind runtime facts. Preserve all direct-adapter composer, transcript, interaction, and finalization behavior. **Alternatives considered** A separate runner page would duplicate task behavior. Replacing legacy transcript logic would create unnecessary adapter regressions. **Roadmap alignment** This work supports the unified task experience and the Cloud and Sandbox agents milestone. ## Stack - Base PR: #12639. - Lower PR: #12638. - This PR contains only its 119-file UI delta against `runner/remote-wss-transport`. - The next stack PR adds administrator and observability controls. ## What Changed - Added a reusable task workspace side panel for files and documents. - Added provider-neutral cards for tools, plans, questions, protocol activity, and progress. - Added queued guidance and richer composer state. - Added compact and expanded interaction presentation. - Added live activity, thinking, usage, recovery, and final reply presentation. - Added document annotations and task deep links. - Added bounded question validation and response handling. - Preserved native runner event projection from master. - Preserved legacy channel-less replies and explicit final reply precedence. - Preserved direct-adapter and classic-interface controls. - Did not change server execution selection, Rust code, migrations, workflows, or `pnpm-lock.yaml`. ## Verification - GitHub Actions will run UI tests, repository tests, typecheck, build, browser tests, security, and policy gates. - Tests cover active, settled, empty-transcript, interaction, queued-message, plan, question, file, document, and classic-interface states. - Compatibility tests cover direct adapters and native runner projection together. - Local tests were not run. The requested verification policy uses GitHub Actions for this series. - `git diff --check runner/remote-wss-transport...HEAD` passes. - The delta contains 119 UI-only files. ## Risks - This is a large task-page change. - Most files are new focused components and tests. - Shared transcript code keeps the lower native projection and legacy direct-adapter fallbacks. - Runner-only controls use adapter and runtime facts. - No execution path or rollout flag changes in this PR. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5.6. The work used high-reasoning agent mode, repository tools, GitHub tools, and parallel code-audit agents. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with Fixes: / Closes / Refs OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
