mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-08 00:54:38 +02:00
5da649986016e4010da8156f83f5bfc9c0128be4
1608
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Dotta
|
5da6499860 |
fix(connections): reuse one-time cloud enrollment (#12891)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Managed connections let agents use provider credentials without exposing those credentials to the control plane UI > - A self-hosted instance must first establish a trusted credential destination with Paperclip Cloud > - The GitHub connection flow repeated that trust decision before provider consent > - The local setup route also lost step 2 after enrollment and could display the PAT identity defaults before enrollment > - This pull request makes enrollment a one-time instance decision and sends later provider starts directly to provider consent > - The benefit is a shorter flow with one clear Paperclip approval and no required service restart ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12843. Companion Cloud change: [paperclipai/paperclip-cloud#391](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/pull/391). ## What Changed - Made `stage=setup` authoritative during initial route hydration and enrollment return. - Added a contained one-time enrollment screen with provider-specific copy. - Accepted a provider `authorizationUrl` from Paperclip Cloud only when it matches the exact GitHub or Google OAuth endpoint. - Preferred the direct provider URL while retaining the legacy confirmation URL fallback. - Preserved the company-bound identity and agent-access draft across the full-page enrollment callback, including cold company-context hydration. - Kept GitHub defaulted to “My GitHub account” and “Any agent,” including before Cloud advertises the managed method. - Updated GitHub identity and agent-access copy for responsible-person and dedicated-agent behavior. - Labeled the provider action “Continue to GitHub.” - Added parser, routing, cold-hydration, access-restoration, visibility, fallback, defaults, and copy tests. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/paperclip-cloud-connector.test.ts ui/src/pages/apps/AppsConnect.test.tsx` (114 tests passed) - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - Live browser proof used a new data directory on `127.0.0.1:3117` and the exact Cloud PR revision on staging. - The fresh flow selected “My GitHub account” and “Any agent,” showed one enrollment approval, returned to local step 2, and connected GitHub without a second Paperclip confirmation or login. - The connected screen showed one selected repository, a long-lived token, installation metadata, a successful access refresh, and healthy webhook delivery. - Gmail on the same instance went directly to Google consent without another Paperclip approval. - Restarting the same data directory preserved enrollment. A second new data directory required exactly one new approval. - A final fresh-data-dir rerun selected a dedicated GitHub identity for Ada before enrollment, approved the instance once, returned to step 2, retained Ada after a Back check, connected directly through GitHub, and finished with “Used only by Ada,” one selected repository, and a long-lived token. - Port 3100 remained untouched throughout the proof. ## Risks - The new Cloud field is additive and restricted to the exact GitHub and Google OAuth origins and paths, with no embedded credentials or URL fragment. - An older Cloud response still works through `confirmationUrl`. - A self-hosted instance still requires one signed Cloud enrollment. Managed Cloud instances do not render the enrollment screen. - Provider authentication and consent remain mandatory after instance enrollment. - No schema migration is included in this pull request. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, `gpt-5.6-sol`, extended reasoning, tool use, code execution, browser control, and multi-file repository editing. The context window size was not provided. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
bcc6fe7a44 |
fix(runner): restore multi-turn remote sessions (#12840)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - The runner executes agent turns on local and remote providers. > - A remote per-turn session must save its state before Paperclip releases its sandbox. > - The session runtime returned after 100 milliseconds while the remote checkpoint still ran. > - The next turn also checked the local state path instead of the verified remote backup. > - This pull request waits for the bounded remote close and accepts only a verified suspended backup. > - The benefit is reliable multi-turn execution without weaker identity checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A successful remote agent turn released its sandbox before the runner saved the verified continuation backup. The next turn failed with `runner_state_identity_mismatch`. **Expected behavior** Paperclip must finish the bounded remote checkpoint before it releases the sandbox. A later turn must validate and restore the digest-matched suspended backup. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a native ACPX Claude Plan test in a non-reusable Daytona sandbox. 2. Reject the first plan to start a second turn. 3. Observe that the second turn fails before provider execution. **Paperclip version or commit** The failure reproduced at `13775a90b078ff64872f50961ea1b83d575e7bc6`. **Deployment mode** GitHub Actions with a Daytona sandbox. ## What Changed - Wait for the internally bounded remote runner close and checkpoint before the host returns. - Preserve the existing short cleanup bound for other providers. - Validate remote continuation lifecycle from a complete digest-verified backup when local runner state is absent. - Keep corrupt, non-suspended, mismatched, and unverified state fail-closed. - Make native Plan completion and accepted-Plan wake prompts deterministic. ## Verification - A prior 45-cell local campaign passed 44 cells. The only failure was the OpenCode Plan prompt variance fixed here. - A focused OpenCode local Plan rerun passed. - ACPX Claude Daytona message and question cells passed. - Focused regressions cover delayed checkpoint close and verified remote backup lifecycle. - GitHub Build and the focused ACPX Claude Daytona Plan cell will validate this exact head. ## Risks Remote runnerd sessions now wait for their internally bounded close/checkpoint path before returning; generic provider cleanup retains the existing 100 millisecond bound. Durable run success still cannot be reversed. The environment release guard still blocks sandbox destruction when no verified backup stamp exists. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5.6, extended reasoning, with code execution and GitHub Actions inspection. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open findings - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
0ffc091473 |
feat(connections): add durable GitHub identities and webhooks (#12843)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents need source control access for repository work > - A shared token cannot preserve the responsible person's identity or an agent's dedicated identity > - GitHub App tokens also need durable refresh, repository access checks, and webhook delivery > - Paperclip already has managed connections, encrypted grants, run secret leases, and merge-confirmation behavior > - This pull request extends those systems with GitHub identities instead of adding a parallel credential system > - The benefit is durable GitHub access with explicit identity, repository, runtime, and webhook boundaries ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue describes this connection change. This description follows the feature request template. **Subsystem affected** Connected Apps, connection grants, secret resolution, native Git runtime setup, webhook processing, and the Apps UI. **Problem or motivation** Users need to connect GitHub once and let agents use the correct GitHub identity. A run should use a dedicated agent account when one exists. Otherwise, it should use the responsible person's account. The connection must survive token expiry, repository access changes, and temporary instance downtime. **Proposed solution** Add user-owned and agent-owned GitHub grants to the existing connection model. Resolve one identity for MCP, Git, `gh`, health checks, and webhook bindings. Store provider tokens in the existing encrypted secret system. Refresh expiring token pairs under the existing lease and compare-and-swap path. Register signed Cloud webhook bindings and process normalized pull request and installation events through a durable local inbox. **Alternatives considered** An organization-wide GitHub token would lose person and agent attribution. Environment variables alone would bypass the managed connection and grant model. A new GitHub-only credential store would duplicate the existing secret and access systems. GitHub App installation tokens and private-key custody remain outside this first version. **Roadmap alignment** This change implements the Connected Apps direction. It also extends the shipped MCP Tool Gateway, per-agent secret access, and action-attribution systems. It does not add a repository catalog. The open repository catalog work in [#11234](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/11234) is related and complementary. ## What Changed - Added agent-owned connection grants and a per-agent credential policy with company and subject constraints. - Added a managed GitHub App method while keeping the personal access token method as an advanced fallback. - Added durable access-token and refresh-token handling with proactive rotation and one automatic recovery after a provider `401`. - Added GitHub identity and installation summaries without storing repository-name lists. - Added signed Cloud webhook binding, event lease, acknowledgement, local idempotency, pull request merge processing, and installation access handling. - Added one identity resolver for MCP, native Git, `gh`, checkout, health checks, and webhook bindings. - Added a class-3 run projection for `GH_TOKEN`, `GITHUB_TOKEN`, a `github.com`-only credential helper, SSH-to-HTTPS rewrite, and GitHub noreply commit attribution. - Added personal and dedicated-agent setup choices plus identity, repository, continuity, and webhook status in the Apps UI. - Added schema migrations, tests, and connection documentation. ## Verification - The current head is fully green in GitHub CI, including build, typecheck, all serialized/general server shards, all browser shards, policy, canary dry run, review, and security checks. - Live staging proof completed with a non-expiring GitHub App user token, selected-repository installation, repository add/remove refresh, managed MCP, native `gh`, HTTPS clone/push/delete, GitHub noreply commit attribution, signed merged-PR webhook acceptance, durable Cloud-to-instance delivery, and installation-access event processing. Temporary branches and temporary repository access were removed afterward. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed before and after the rebase onto `origin/master`. - `pnpm build` passed. - The focused connector suite passed 285 tests after the rebase. - The full stable suite passed 5,790 tests and failed 22 tests across 8 general server files. The failures reproduced as shared-runner environment issues. They included `/tmp` versus `/private/tmp`, closed database connections, and invalid high ephemeral ports. The focused connection tests pass in isolation. ## Risks - Migrations add agent grant subjects and a durable connection-event inbox. Migration numbering and safety checks pass. - A raw GitHub user token enters the agent process for Git and `gh`. Per-tool Ask-first controls cannot limit those shell operations. The UI warns users about this boundary. - GitHub App user tokens can be non-expiring. Paperclip performs a continuity check every 30 days, but provider revocation still requires a reconnect. - The webhook path accepts only signed and bounded payloads. It stores a minimal normalized record and no raw provider payload. - GitHub repository permissions remain authoritative. Removed access can make a cached repository count temporarily stale, but runtime access fails immediately. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, `gpt-5.6-sol`, extended reasoning, tool use, code execution, browser control, and multi-file repository editing. The context window size was not provided. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
263f181fed |
fix(runner): complete live hot restart adoption (#12852)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip Runner owns durable provider sessions and streams their work to the control plane. > - Pull request #12845 added native restart recovery for live and dead local runners. > - A real browser test found three live-adoption gaps after that pull request merged. > - Lazy runner process ownership was not always stored before restart. > - The old controller did not release its PRP authority without closing the provider turn. > - Reconnect events could arrive before the active provider turn was restored. > - This pull request closes those gaps and proves the same turn completes after a UI hot restart. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12845 Related search results: #12646 covers indeterminate command results after a runner restart. It does not cover controller adoption or active-turn rebinding. No open duplicate pull request was found. ## What Changed - Store lazy runnerd process ownership after provider session creation, read, and resume. - Detach native PRP controller authority during coordinated hot shutdown. Keep the live provider turn running. - Restore the exact checkpointed provider session when bounded PRP identity events have been compacted. - Restore the active provider turn before reconnect events are replayed. This prevents `turn_binding_mismatch`. - Keep exact live ownership by the current controller out of generic orphan recovery. - Add driver, transport, and server regression tests for these paths. ## Verification - Ran 12 Codex driver lifecycle tests. - Ran 53 runnerd transport tests. - Ran 143 recovery and orphan-reaper server tests. - Ran all 8 real-process restart recovery scenarios. - Ran all 96 existing runner E2E unit tests. - Ran runner TypeScript typecheck. - Ran server TypeScript typecheck. - Ran the migration replay test and migration safety checks. - Tested the board UI on an isolated local instance. A real local Codex-backed turn entered a 120-second terminal wait. The UI `Restart now` action replaced the server and kept the same runner PID, process start time, run ID, native session ID, runner ID, provider session ID, and active turn. The original turn then completed. - Confirmed one heartbeat run, no retry row, one result, one proposed-result event, one terminal event, no protocol errors, no active recovery state, and no surviving runner or provider process. ## Risks - A live runner can continue provider work while no server owns the control route. Recovery fails closed when the process fingerprint or durable identity is ambiguous. - Provider identity can be restored from the database only for an exact verified adoption claim. An authenticated live `session.snapshot` validates that identity before the driver can resume. - The new detach path applies only to native sessions that expose restart detachment. Other adapters keep their existing shutdown behavior. - This follow-up does not change the database migration or `package.json`. The migration in #12845 remains replay-safe through `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` and its embedded-Postgres idempotence test. The dedicated real-process command remains in `doc/DEVELOPING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex based on GPT-5. The exact serving build and context-window size are not exposed. The run used extended reasoning, repository tools, shell execution, and in-app browser automation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
7b094724e6 |
fix(runner): recover native sessions across restarts (#12845)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Paperclip Runner keeps durable run and provider state outside one server process. > - A server restart can leave that runner alive or can interrupt it after a provider checkpoint. > - The old startup path used handoff intent and PID evidence, but it did not reconstruct native ownership. > - That gap could block the issue, create a replacement run, or start duplicate provider work. > - This pull request adds durable same-run recovery for coordinated and uncoordinated restarts. > - The benefit is exact recovery of the run, runner, session, provider, steering, and finalization state. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #9628. That pull request added earlier local-adapter hot-restart work. This change adds native PRP authority reconstruction and same-run provider resume. Refs #10935. That pull request handles missing hot-restart snapshots. This change also supports hard restarts with no snapshot. Refs #11624. That pull request prevents unsafe retry after an adopted legacy process exits. This change reconciles native terminal evidence before provider recovery. Refs #12070. That pull request improves process liveness checks. This change also binds recovery to a process-start fingerprint and fails closed on ambiguity. **What happened?** The server could record hot-restart intent, but startup did not rebuild native runner ownership. A live runner could not re-register its PRP authority. A dead runner could not resume the exact native and provider session on the same heartbeat run. Generic recovery could then block the issue or create replacement work. **Expected behavior** A live native runner must reconnect with the same PID and logical identities. A dead runner must resume the same durable session and heartbeat run with only a new operating-system PID. A proposed or terminal result must finalize once before any provider turn starts. Ambiguous process or session evidence must stay blocked without a signal or duplicate spawn. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a Paperclip Runner heartbeat and wait for an active provider turn. 2. Restart only the Paperclip server, with or without a hot-restart marker. 3. Observe that the old startup path does not reconstruct the native control-plane authority. 4. Kill both the server and runner after a provider checkpoint. 5. Observe that the old path cannot resume the exact native session on the original heartbeat run. **Paperclip version or commit** The defect was reproduced from commit `1991f31fd53e7f7794d5c2e4b93be384ade2b41d`. This branch is rebased onto the current `master`. **Deployment mode** Local development and self-hosted server deployments that use the local Paperclip Runner. ## What Changed - Added correlated hot-restart requests and version-compatible native handoff fields. - Added controller boot identity, process-start identity, controller generation, recovery state, request id, and bounded history to the native finalization ledger. - Added transactional recovery claims for live-runner reattach, dead-runner resume, and incomplete bootstrap. - Added fail-closed ownership takeover rules and process identity validation. - Added live runner adoption to the local runner transport without a duplicate spawn. - Added same-run provider checkpoint resume and legacy retry-row compatibility. - Reconciled proposed and terminal results before runner or provider recovery. - Bound the HTTP and PRP listener before startup recovery and delayed scheduling and generic reapers until classification completes. - Added restart-aware health diagnostics, run-log recovery transitions, durable runner diagnostics, and bounded shutdown finalizer draining. - Moved restart-survivable diagnostics into runner-owned, pre-redacted bounded writes; raw stdout and stderr are never persisted. - Added process-start fencing for controller, runner, and provider PIDs; startup classifies every candidate without an implicit cap. - Added crash-recoverable, contention-safe development restart-request coordination and failed-startup listener cleanup. - Added a credential-free real-process restart suite for eight restart, scale, and identity scenarios. - Documented native restart operation, persistence, diagnostics, and verification. ## Verification - The documented native restart commands passed. They ran eight real-process/database recovery scenarios and the live runner adoption transport test. - Native executor tests passed: 111 tests. - Heartbeat recovery tests passed: 124 tests. - Hot restart, health, and shutdown tests passed: 52 tests. - The broader affected server suite passed: 350 tests. - Focused native recovery and startup tests passed: 49 tests. - Runner transport and control-plane tests passed: 63 tests. - Runner-owned diagnostic tests passed for write-time bounding, credential redaction, private file modes, and raw stream non-persistence. - Development restart coordination tests passed: 11 tests. - Database migration checks and the partial-application/replay regression test passed. - Server, database, and Paperclip Runner typechecks passed. - `git diff --check` passed. - Full Paperclip PR CI passed, including build, canary, all five general server shards, all five serialized server shards, all three browser E2E shards, workspace suites, and release-registry verification. - Greptile completed at 5/5 with no outstanding findings, recommendations, follow-ups, or open review threads. ## Risks - Moderate risk. This changes startup ordering and ownership transfer for active native runs. - The migration adds nullable columns and does not rewrite existing rows. - Recovery fails closed when process or durable session identity is incomplete or contradictory. - The first implementation supports the local Paperclip Runner. Remote targets keep their existing behavior. - The real-process suite covers cleanup and asserts that no runner or provider process survives each test. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. The runtime did not expose a more specific model revision or context-window size. Repository editing, shell execution, database tests, and real-process test execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
bf95a7eae2 |
fix(ui): stabilize active-run steering queue (#12834)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The issue detail page shows a live agent run and accepts follow-up instructions. > - A follow-up must stay in a stable queue until the user sends, reorders, or removes it. > - Native runners can receive a steering event in the active run. > - Legacy runners must interrupt the active run and start a follow-up run. > - The current UI moved comments between the queue and the transcript and could show duplicate text or ambiguous chronology. > - This pull request makes the queue projection durable, keeps each message in one clear place, and labels when queued input was actually steered or delivered. > - The benefit is predictable steering with stable ordering, no duplicate messages, and visible causal timing. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11374. Refs #12591. **What happened?** During an active run, a new follow-up could first appear as a transcript bubble and then move into the steering queue. After a steer or remove action, it could appear again. Progress text could also repeat the final response text. Once consumed, a queued bubble displayed only its original submission time even though it moved to its later causal slot, and a native run split by steering looked like two unrelated runs. **Expected behavior** An active-run follow-up must appear in the queue immediately. A native steer must move it once into the active run. A legacy interrupt must move it once into the follow-up run. A removed item must stay removed. Progress text that is identical to the final response must appear once. Consumed follow-ups must show both queue and steer/delivery times, and post-steer native segments must identify themselves as continuations of the same run. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a long-running task. 2. Send two or more follow-up messages while the agent is active. 3. Reorder the messages and remove one message. 4. Send the first queued message as steering. 5. Observe the queue and transcript during and after both runs. **Paperclip version or commit** The problem reproduced on commit `da1e40302`. **Deployment mode** Local development with the embedded database. ## What Changed - Project queued comments into the steering well for native and legacy live runners. - Send native steering to the active run and use interrupt-and-follow-up for legacy runners. - Keep optimistic queue order stable across refreshes and roll back failed actions. - Remove discarded comments from the transcript cache and keep them removed when the queue becomes empty. - Collapse only the final progress occurrence matching the durable response, including across steered transcript segments. - Show `Queued … · Steered …` for same-run input and `Queued … · Delivered …` for successor-run input at their causal positions. - Label settled and live post-steer segments `Continued after steering` and time them from the steer boundary. - Add regression tests for queue display, steering, fallback interrupt, reorder, remove, rollback, duplicate text, causal timestamps, and live/settled continuation headers. ## Verification - Ran the final focused steering/chronology UI suite with 233 passing tests. - Ran the activity-service regression suite with 5 passing tests. - Ran the broader queue-focused UI suite with 298 passing tests before the final chronology refinement. - Ran `pnpm -r typecheck` successfully. - Ran `pnpm build` successfully. - Ran `pnpm check:token-gates` successfully. - Tested native steering in a real browser with a 90-second baseline wait and a three-second steering correction. - Confirmed that the old final response did not appear before the steered response. - Tested three queued messages in a real browser. - Confirmed that reorder changed delivery order and that the removed message was never sent or shown again. - Tested a legacy runner in a real browser. - Confirmed that it used the interrupt fallback and showed the follow-up once. - Reloaded a saved mixed-steer/successor-run thread and confirmed the causal timestamps and continuation header render in the correct positions. - The complete macOS suite reaches five unrelated platform assertions in workspace-runtime tests. Two compare `/var` with `/private/var`. Three require Linux `/proc` listener data. GitHub Actions provides the authoritative Linux run. ## Risks - Low risk. The change is limited to issue-chat queue projection and transcript presentation. - The server run-history API adds only a read-only `contextIssueId` projection; the database schema does not change. - Optimistic actions restore the prior UI state when a request fails. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex with GPT-5, extended reasoning, browser automation, shell tools, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
b84964e5a2 |
fix(runner): stabilize local paid E2E recovery (#12836)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paid runner E2E tests verify the complete runner, control-plane, and UI path. > - A server restart could load a fresh task page while Playwright still waited on an unsettled Vite navigation lifecycle. > - The current server also ignored the isolated Vite cache path and skipped Vite's per-request HTML transform from the known-green runner snapshot. > - A one-cell paid run then exposed that download-artifact v8 removes the artifact-name directory for one pattern match. > - This pull request restores the Vite contract, proves a fresh document after restart, and accepts only the exact singleton artifact layout. > - The benefit is reliable local runner qualification without weaker UI, source, or artifact checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12769 Refs #12828 Refs #12829 Refs #12833 **What happened?** The structured-question restart test could time out after the replacement server returned the task route and rendered the durable pending interaction. A focused one-cell rerun passed the paid test but failed aggregation because download-artifact v8 flattened its single artifact. **Expected behavior** The test must prove that a new document loaded after the server restart and that the same pending interaction survived. The aggregate must accept the exact documented singleton download layout while it continues to reject ambiguous or foreign artifacts. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run the local ACPX-Codex structured-question restart-resume cell. 2. Restart the isolated server while the question waits for an answer. 3. Observe that the route and task UI can reload before Playwright settles the navigation promise. 4. Run a paid campaign with one selected cell. 5. Observe download-artifact v8 extract the sole campaign directory directly into the requested path. **Paperclip version or commit** The local campaign reproduced the navigation failure at `3586956a1b794b3cb4a9c5f57ffb7355e2b0c46d`. The one-cell aggregate reproduced the singleton layout at `f487660c0a06ba06ca140b57386f21ed39f13120`. This fix is `de4ccceff453a4b39436bf9a2eb8f03924151af7`. **Deployment mode** Local development and paid GitHub Actions. **Installation method** Built from source. **Agent adapter(s) involved** ACPX-Codex. The Vite and aggregate fixes are provider-neutral. ## What Changed - Prove a new post-restart browser document with an in-memory sentinel. - Tolerate only Playwright's navigation timeout before the exact UI and API checks run. - Honor `PAPERCLIP_VITE_CACHE_DIR` in the embedded Vite server. - Limit dependency optimization to the real UI entry. - Run `vite.transformIndexHtml` for each request while caching only the branded source template. - Accept download-artifact v8's flattened layout only for one expected cell with one unique recognized campaign. - Keep source SHA, source ref, workflow URL, execution ID, attempt, and unexpected-entry validation. - Add focused positive and negative regressions for Vite rendering and singleton artifact selection. ## Verification - Exact 45-cell local campaign https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/33888939013 passed 44/45. Its only failure was the post-restart navigation false negative fixed here. - Exact focused rerun https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/33891207957 passed the ACPX-Codex restart cell first attempt with the same session, two durable runs, the terminal marker once, and cleanup complete. - The focused Vite renderer suite passed 2/2 tests. - The focused rerun-artifact selector suite passed 12/12 tests. - Prettier and `git diff --check` passed. - An exact-head 45-cell confirmation is pending. ## Risks Low to medium risk. The Vite change restores known-green per-request transforms and isolated cache behavior. It can affect all development UI loads. The paid matrix and ordinary CI will verify that behavior. The singleton selector remains fail-closed for ambiguous layouts and validates every result source. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, `gpt-5.6-sol`, extended reasoning, tool use, code execution, and parallel focused agents. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
184b014c25 |
feat(telemetry): add the agent.task_run event and emit it at every terminal run transition (#12809)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip records agent run outcomes through telemetry and run lifecycle services > - Terminal run transitions need one consistent event for outcome analysis > - The current paths do not report every terminal transition through one event > - This pull request adds the agent.task_run event and emits it at each terminal transition > - The benefit is complete run outcome data without exposing raw task identifiers ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Paperclip telemetry reports agent activity, but it does not report every terminal task run through one event. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting (multiple of the above): packages/shared telemetry and server run lifecycle services. **Current behavior** Several run paths write a terminal status without a matching agent.task_run telemetry event. **Proposed behavior** Each terminal run transition emits one agent.task_run event. The event records the terminal state and uses the existing pseudonym helper for the optional task identifier. **Reason and benefit** Complete terminal-run data helps operators measure agent outcomes. The pseudonym helper prevents the raw task identifier from leaving the installation. **Breaking changes** None. The change adds an event and keeps existing event behavior compatible. ## What Changed - Add the agent.task_run telemetry contract and client helper. - Reuse the existing pseudonym helper for the task identifier. The helper hashes the identifier with a per-installation salt and returns 16 hexadecimal characters. The raw identifier never leaves the installation. Existing identifiers do not move. - Emit one event from each legacy, native, recovery, and issue terminal transition. - Keep emissions outside database transactions and make delivery best-effort. - Add regression tests for event shape, hashing, terminal transitions, and emission failures. - Document the event and its privacy rule in the telemetry data contract. ## Verification - `npx tsc --noEmit` in `server/` passes at the submitted commit. - The pull-request CI suite must pass. CI is the authority because local Vitest has a known dependency artifact. - The added regression tests cover event output shape, per-installation hash divergence, raw identifier handoff, omitted identifiers, and non-throwing emits. ## Risks - A missed terminal path could reduce event coverage. - Telemetry delivery remains best-effort and cannot change run finalization. - The pseudonym helper uses installation-specific state, so identifiers differ between installations. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, tool use and code execution. Context window details were not provided. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I have addressed all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7dfc769f3b |
fix(server): honor proxy trust for forwarded host (#12832)
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
af3023f1e3 |
fix(runner): repair paid provider startup paths (#12769)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents that perform work. > - Paperclip Runner connects durable task runs to local provider processes. > - The full-stack paid matrix exposed failures after the runner integrity repair. > - Verified JavaScript entrypoints lost their relative module graph when Linux executed them through descriptor paths. > - Returned provider startup errors also remained pending and became indeterminate after recovery. > - Sparse Codex tool lifecycle events lost the `write_document` identity before task transcript projection. > - This pull request repairs those three boundaries and makes the structured-question fixture deterministic. > - The benefit is repeatable provider startup, exact failure replay, and correct inline Plan placement. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12721 and #12700. **What happened?** The paid runner matrix failed ACPX and OpenCode startup before provider session creation. The runner journal then replaced the original startup error with an indeterminate recovery result. Native Codex saved a Plan but rendered it only as a fallback card. A legacy Claude waiting reply could also echo the reserved terminal marker before the answer arrived. **Expected behavior** Verified JavaScript providers must start from immutable descriptor-backed artifacts. Returned startup failures must persist as terminal failed command results. Native tool lifecycle updates must preserve the `write_document` boundary. Pre-answer fixture output must not contain the reserved terminal marker. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run the local provider cells in the Runner Full-Stack E2E workflow. 2. Observe ACPX and OpenCode fail during `session.open` before provider execution. 3. Observe recovery report `execution_indeterminate` instead of the original startup error. 4. Run the native Codex Plan cell and observe the fallback Plan card after the tool activity row. 5. Run the legacy Claude structured-question resume cell and observe an early marker echo in waiting prose. **Paperclip version or commit** `0f9452101740835ce0b1488a204bf48acd5bafc3` **Deployment mode** Local development with the paid GitHub Actions acceptance workflow. ## What Changed - Bundle the ACPX sidecar and OpenCode proxy as self-contained Node ESM entrypoints before hashing and verified descriptor launch. - Anchor ACPX dynamic provider package resolution at a controller-derived provider-pack root and keep that root out of the provider child environment. - Persist executor-returned startup errors as redacted durable failed command results while retaining indeterminate recovery for true process death. - Coalesce sparse native tool items by stable ID so a late `write_document` name, input, and result reach the transcript boundary once. - Forbid the structured-question fixture from spelling or announcing its reserved terminal marker before the user answers. ## Verification - Rust and TypeScript regression tests cover durable failed replay, true crash ambiguity, bundle closure, package-root derivation, environment filtering, exact Codex tool lifecycle coalescing, and prompt determinism. - Local execution is intentionally limited to formatters and static diff checks. GitHub Actions will run tests, type checks, builds, and security checks. - After ordinary CI is green, scoped paid cells will validate one ACPX launch, one OpenCode launch, native Codex Plan projection, and legacy Claude structured resume before a complete matrix rerun. - Prior failing matrix: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/33682434315 ## Risks - Bundling changes the bytes covered by provider launch hashes. Provider-pack generation already hashes the final built files. - ACPX still loads qualified provider packages dynamically. The controller supplies a normalized package root, while existing version, digest, path, and descriptor checks remain active. - Durable `failed` is terminal. Replays return the same redacted result and do not execute the provider effect twice. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex based on GPT-5 with agentic reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, Git, parallel subagents, and GitHub Actions coordination. The exact deployed snapshot and context-window size are not exposed to this task. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked related public work or described the bug in this PR - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass (intentionally deferred to GitHub Actions) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] No documentation change is required for this runtime repair - [x] I have considered and documented the risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
54dd0f4868 |
feat(agents): grant new agents hire permission by default (#12814)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agent permissions control which agents can create or hire other agents (`canCreateAgents`) > - Today only CEO-role agents get this permission by default; every other agent starts without it > - Teams that want agents to delegate and build out their own teams must flip the toggle on each hire, and most operators want delegation to work out of the box > - This pull request makes `canCreateAgents` default to enabled for new standard-trust agents, while low-trust agents keep a disabled default > - The benefit is that agent teams can grow without per-agent permission toggling, while low-trust containment and checkout protection stay intact ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related (not fixed by this PR): #8064 also decouples an authority from `agents:create`. **Subsystem affected** Server agent permissions (`server/src/services/agent-permissions.ts`), authorization (`server/src/services/authorization.ts`), the shared `agentPermissionsSchema` validator, and the UI trust-preset helper. **Problem or motivation** New agents cannot hire other agents unless an operator enables `canCreateAgents` on each one. Only CEO-role agents get the permission by default. This blocks delegation-by-default workflows. Operators must toggle the permission for every hire. **Proposed solution** Default `canCreateAgents` to `true` for newly created agents. Apply and persist the default at creation only. Stored rows without an explicit value stay fail-closed at read and enforcement time. Keep the default at `false` when the agent's permissions record marks it low-trust (the `low_trust_review` preset or a trust boundary). Explicit values always win. Decouple `tasks:manage_active_checkouts` from `canCreateAgents` so the default-on flag does not let a peer agent write over another agent's checked-out issue. **Alternatives considered** Granting the default only at the route layer would leave stored rows and enforcement out of sync. Keeping the checkout authority coupled to `canCreateAgents` would void the active-checkout write protection once the flag is default-on. A per-company setting adds configuration surface without a clear need; explicit per-agent overrides already exist. **Roadmap alignment** Governance and trust-preset work already separates standard-trust from low-trust agents. This change follows that line: capability by default for standard trust, containment by default for low trust. ## What Changed - `normalizeAgentPermissions` now takes a `create`/`stored` context. Creation writes get the new default: enabled unless `permissionsImplyLowTrust()` detects the low-trust review preset or a trust boundary. Stored rows without an explicit value normalize to disabled (fail-closed). The role parameter is gone. - `agentPermissionsSchema` no longer injects `canCreateAgents: false` when the field is omitted. The server-side default applies instead. - `authorization.ts` normalizes raw agent rows for `agents:create`, so enforcement matches what the API reports for legacy rows. - `tasks:manage_active_checkouts` no longer rides on `canCreateAgents`. CEO role, explicit grants, and the manager chain remain the paths. - `agents:create` is denied outright inside any resolved low-trust execution context (agent, project, issue, or run policy). The default-on flag can never reach the legacy creator allow there. - The UI trust-preset helper sets `canCreateAgents: false` when an agent is switched to the low-trust preset, instead of carrying the old value forward. - `doc/CLI.md` describes the new default for `teams install`. - Tests pin the default matrix (standard, low-trust, explicit overrides) on the server and in the UI helper. ## Verification - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/agent-permissions-service.test.ts src/__tests__/agent-permissions-routes.test.ts src/__tests__/low-trust-red-team-routes.test.ts src/__tests__/authorization-service.test.ts` — 143 tests pass. - Broader sweep: 18 suites that touch `canCreateAgents` (hire, pending-approval, teams catalog, portability, built-in agents, plugin-managed agents) pass locally. - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/lib/trust-policy-ui.test.ts src/components/TrustPresetSection.test.tsx src/pages/NewAgent.test.tsx src/pages/Agents.test.tsx` — passes. - Typecheck is clean for the changed files in `packages/shared`, `server`, and `ui`. ## Risks - Behavioral shift: agents created after this change persist `canCreateAgents: true` unless low-trust. Pre-existing agents keep their stored value. Legacy or malformed permission records without an explicit value stay fail-closed at read and enforcement time; they never gain the authority retroactively. - Low-trust runs can no longer create agents at all, even when the agent carries an explicit `canCreateAgents: true`. Before this change, that combination could hire. The red-team suite and a new authorization test pin the denial. - Narrowing: a non-CEO agent with `canCreateAgents: true` loses implicit `tasks:manage_active_checkouts`. The manager chain and explicit grants still provide it. This narrowing is deliberate; without it, the default-on flag would let any peer bypass active-checkout write protection. - No migrations. No API shape changes. Low-trust defaults are covered by the red-team regression suite. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), Anthropic — via Claude Code CLI with extended thinking and tool use (code search, editing, local test execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
MagnusandAndrew Aymeloglu
|
b98badb246 |
fix(recovery): exclude hidden issues from stranded recovery and continuation wakes (#5648)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The recovery subsystem watches assigned issues and re-wakes an agent whose run ended without finishing the work > - Intake can hide a duplicate issue by setting `hiddenAt` while leaving its status and assignee in place > - The stranded-issue query and the terminal-run cleanup both ignore `hiddenAt`, so a hidden issue is re-woken on every cycle > - Nothing on the board shows the hidden issue, so the repeated wakes have no visible cause > - This pull request adds a hidden-issue guard to both predicates and a test for each > - The benefit is that hiding an issue stops recovery work on it, with no other change in behavior for visible issues ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** When intake marks an issue as a duplicate it sets `hiddenAt` but leaves the status at `todo` or `in_progress` with the agent still assigned. The stranded-issue recovery timer selects that issue on every tick and queues an `issue_continuation_needed` wake for it. The agent's run on the hidden issue fails or is cancelled, the terminal-run cleanup queues immediate recovery for the same issue, and the cycle repeats indefinitely. Hidden issues are invisible on the board, so nothing a person can see explains the wakes. **Expected behavior** A hidden issue is never a recovery candidate. Stranded-issue reconciliation skips it, and a failed, timed-out or cancelled run on it releases the issue without queuing a continuation. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Assign an issue to an agent and leave it `in_progress`. 2. Hide the issue (set `hiddenAt`, for example by marking it a duplicate through intake) without changing its status or assignee. 3. Let a run on that issue fail, or wait for the stranded-issue recovery timer. 4. Observe a new `issue_continuation_needed` heartbeat run queued for the hidden issue on every cycle. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `master` when this PR was opened (May 2026). The two predicates are unchanged on current `master`; this branch is rebased onto it. **Deployment mode** Not deployment-specific: both guards are in the server's recovery and heartbeat services and apply in every mode. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/recovery/service.ts`: `isNull(issues.hiddenAt)` added to the `reconcileStrandedAssignedIssues` candidate query, so hidden issues never enter the stranded set. - `server/src/services/heartbeat.ts`: `!issue.hiddenAt` added to `issueNeedsImmediateRecovery`, so terminal-run cleanup releases a hidden issue instead of queuing a continuation. - `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts`: one test per guard. A failed run on a hidden issue queues no recovery run, and a hidden stranded issue is left out of reconciliation. ## Verification - `heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` covers both guards; CI runs it against embedded Postgres. ## Risks Low. Both changes narrow an existing predicate to exclude rows that already carry `hiddenAt`; visible issues take exactly the path they take today. A hidden issue that genuinely needs recovery would have to be unhidden first, which matches how hidden issues behave everywhere else in the board. ## Model Used The original two-line fix was authored by @im0xMagnus. The rebase onto current `master`, the two regression tests, and this description were produced with Claude (claude-fable-5-1, extended thinking, tool use) driven by a Paperclip maintainer through Prospector's triage flow. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Andrew Aymeloglu <aaymeloglu@gmail.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f449b05bc5 |
feat(apps): unify permissions and action testing (#12802)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for companies that use AI agents. > - Apps give humans and agents controlled access to external services. > - The existing app detail flow split permissions, tests, setup, and activity across separate pages. > - The split made access rules harder to understand and made reconnect work hard to find. > - New write actions also defaulted to Ask first, which did not match the intended connection policy. > - This pull request combines permission control and action testing, removes the setup page, and moves connection activity into Audit. > - The benefit is one clear place to configure, test, reconnect, and review each app. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The installed app Permissions, Test, Setup, and Activity views. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting. This change updates the React UI, shared app defaults, server permission behavior, tests, smoke scripts, and connection documentation. **Current behavior** App access and action testing use separate pages. The app detail view also links to a setup page after installation. Connection activity uses a separate tab. New write actions default to Ask first. **Proposed behavior** Permissions uses the connection access language from the initial flow. It includes searchable Read and Write sections, a three-state permission control, and a Test dialog for each action. Reconnect appears below a Needs attention header on Permissions and Review. Old Setup and Test links redirect to Permissions. Old Activity links redirect to the filtered company Audit feed. New write actions default to Allowed. **Reason and benefit** A person can understand and test app access without moving between several pages. Reconnect work stays visible where the person reviews the connection. Audit events use one consistent feed and filter model. New connections have the intended default policy. **Breaking changes** The Setup, Test, and app Activity tabs are removed. Existing deep links redirect to their replacement pages. Existing saved action permissions do not change. Only defaults for new write actions change. **Additional context** This builds on the managed app connection work in #12728. A search found no duplicate open pull request or issue. ## What Changed - Combined action testing with Permissions. - Added searchable Read and Write action groups. - Added Off, Ask first, and Allowed controls with tooltips. - Added an action Test dialog with agent selection, arguments, and formatted results. - Removed the installed-app Setup and Activity tabs. - Added reconnect guidance to Permissions and Review when a connection needs attention. - Routed connection activity into the company Audit feed and preserved the Apps & tools filter in streamlined Audit. - Moved connection removal to the Connectors-page management menu. - Made new write actions default to Allowed across connection creation paths. - Updated regression tests, browser suites, smoke scripts, and connection documentation. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/app-definitions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/generic-mcp-connection.test.ts server/src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts ui/src/components/AppConnectionSidebar.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/AppDetail.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/AppNotConnected.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/AppsConnect.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/Browse.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/Connections.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/composio-services.test.ts ui/src/pages/audit/AuditFeed.test.tsx ui/src/pages/tools/PasteConfigTab.test.tsx` (517 tests passed) - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/apps/app-detail/TestPanel.test.tsx ui/src/pages/audit/AuditHub.test.tsx ui/src/pages/audit/AuditFeed.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/AppDetail.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/Browse.test.tsx` (96 tests passed) - Targeted Playwright verification for connection removal, rename on Permissions, inline action testing, and Smoke Lab Audit evidence (5 flows passed) - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - `pnpm test:run` completed with 5,755 passing tests and 20 unrelated macOS harness failures. The failures use `/tmp` versus `/private/tmp`, invalid ports above 65535, and workspace fixtures outside this change. ## Risks - Low migration risk. This change has no database migration. - Old app-detail URLs depend on redirect compatibility. - New connections grant write actions by default. Finalization remains configure-authorized and audited, Ask first and Off remain available per action, and existing connections keep their saved policy. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected - check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5`. The client does not expose the context-window size. The model used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
505e7b40fc |
fix: guard listComments against non-UUID afterCommentId to prevent 500 errors (#8695)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is an open-source app for managing AI agents > - The issue history subsystem stores comments per issue, with cursor-based pagination via the `after` query parameter > - `GET /issues/:id/comments?after=<commentId>` looks up the anchor comment by UUID to get its created_at timestamp > - When agents store an incorrect or truncated comment ID (e.g. `670427ab` instead of `670427ab-e0ae-4a54-959e-2b13a2e33d14`), Postgres throws `invalid input syntax for type uuid` before the anchor-not-found guard can execute > - This surfaces as an unhandled 500 and causes agents to fail when doing incremental comment reads on any issue > - This pull request adds a UUID validation guard in `listComments` using the already-imported `isUuidLike` helper > - The benefit is that invalid cursors get a clean empty-array response instead of a 500, matching what already happens when a valid UUID simply isn't found ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #2612 (a different 500 on the same `after=` cursor path, fixed earlier; this PR covers the malformed-cursor case that remains). **What happened?** `GET /issues/:id/comments?after=<value>` returns a 500 when `after` is not a UUID. The route trims the query value and passes it straight to the anchor lookup, so Postgres raises `invalid input syntax for type uuid: "670427ab"` before the anchor-not-found guard can run. Any agent that stored a truncated or malformed comment ID as its pagination cursor gets stuck in a 500 loop on that issue. **Expected behavior** A cursor that cannot name a comment behaves like a cursor that names a missing comment: the endpoint returns `[]`. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Pick any issue id on a running instance. 2. Call `GET /api/issues/<issue-id>/comments?after=670427ab` (8 hex characters instead of a full UUID). 3. Observe a 500 with `PostgresError: invalid input syntax for type uuid: "670427ab"`, where a full-but-unknown UUID such as `00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000` returns `[]`. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at the time this PR was opened (June 2026). The `listComments` anchor lookup in `server/src/services/issues.ts` is unchanged on current `master`, so the failure still reproduces there. **Deployment mode** Local dev (`pnpm dev`). Not deployment-specific: the failure is in the server's comment-listing service, so it reproduces in every mode. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/issues.ts` — added `if (!isUuidLike(afterCommentId)) return [];` guard in `listComments` before the DB anchor lookup, using the already-imported `isUuidLike` helper ## Verification ```bash # Start the dev server pnpm dev # Pass a truncated UUID — should return [] instead of 500 curl -s "http://localhost:3100/api/issues/<any-valid-issue-id>/comments?after=670427ab" # Expected: [] # Pass a valid full UUID that doesn't exist — should also return [] curl -s "http://localhost:3100/api/issues/<any-valid-issue-id>/comments?after=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" # Expected: [] # Pass a valid full UUID that exists — should return comments after that cursor curl -s "http://localhost:3100/api/issues/<any-valid-issue-id>/comments?after=<real-comment-uuid>" # Expected: array of comments ``` ## Risks Low risk. The change only adds an early-return guard for values that are provably invalid UUIDs. The code path for valid UUIDs is unchanged. The existing behavior for anchor-not-found (returning `[]`) is preserved for invalid UUIDs, which is the correct semantic (cursor not found → no comments after it). ## Model Used Claude Sonnet 4.6 (`claude-sonnet-4-6`) via Paperclip CTO agent, tool use + code execution mode, 200K context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip CTO <cto@paperclip.ai> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Andrew Aymeloglu <aaymeloglu@gmail.com> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
333abdd2c2 |
test(plugin-worker): remove the wall-clock race from the duplex buffered-replay tests (#12799)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The plugin worker manager runs agent plugin workers through duplex
channels.
> - The duplex buffered-replay tests check data that arrives before a
listener attaches.
> - The tests used a fixed 60 ms sleep as the barrier for worker output.
> - Worker startup and output latency can exceed that delay under load.
> - This pull request uses a worker exit frame as a deterministic
barrier.
> - The benefit is stable test results without a product code change.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
The duplex buffered-replay tests used a fixed 60 ms sleep before they
attached a data listener. Under load, worker output could arrive after
the sleep. The tests then saw a partial buffer and failed.
**Expected behavior**
The tests must wait until the worker sends all three data frames before
they inspect the pre-bind buffer.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run npx vitest run src/__tests__/plugin-worker-manager-duplex.test.ts
in the server package.
2. Add a 200 ms or 800 ms delay to the worker fixture emit path.
3. Repeat the test run and observe the old fixed-sleep barrier fail
intermittently.
**Paperclip version or commit**
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
5f87090894 |
Make managed Cloud OAuth handoffs invisible (#12790)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Apps let people give agents governed access to external providers > - Paperclip Cloud brokers shared provider authorization for managed stacks > - The managed flow sent the browser through a confirmation page after the tenant had already prepared sign-in > - A lost confirmation response could also show an expired-session error before the provider page opened > - This pull request adds an opaque handoff contract and one shared tenant coordinator > - The benefit is a direct and recoverable transition from Paperclip to every Cloud-brokered provider ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A managed Paperclip Cloud connection opened the Cloud confirmation route. A response-loss race could show an expired-session error while the authorization still continued. **Expected behavior** The current Paperclip loading state must stay visible while the tenant exchanges an opaque session. The browser must then open the provider directly. Self-hosted and direct OAuth must keep their existing behavior. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open Apps on a Paperclip Cloud stack. 2. Start a managed provider connection. 3. Select Continue to sign in. 4. Observe that the browser visits the Cloud confirmation route before it reaches the provider. **Paperclip version or commit** `b872cd3d1b404bdaff70af493a2973ceb7e5d6ec` **Deployment mode** Paperclip Cloud hosted stack. No related open issue or pull request was found in the repository search. ## What Changed - Add a backward-compatible opaque Cloud handoff to the shared OAuth start contract. - Validate the Cloud descriptor on the server and expose no browser-selected endpoint. - Exchange managed handoffs through one fixed same-origin route in every Apps OAuth launcher. - Keep dialog popups reserved before asynchronous work and retain the tenant loading state. - Add recent-login resume storage, bounded retry behavior, terminal tenant errors, tests, and Storybook states. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - Focused connector and UI suites: 184 passed and 202 skipped. - `pnpm build` - `pnpm build-storybook` - The full local suite reached one unrelated macOS path-alias failure. The untouched test expected `/var/...` and received the equivalent `/private/var/...`. The same test reproduces in isolation. ## Risks - A malformed managed descriptor now fails closed in Paperclip instead of opening a URL. - A legacy Cloud deployment can omit the descriptor. Paperclip then uses the existing validated confirmation URL. - Direct provider OAuth and self-hosted flows do not receive a handoff and remain unchanged. - Rollback is a normal revert of this commit because the contract is optional and backward compatible. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex with GPT-5.6, reasoning mode, tool use, code execution, and browser verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
66ea41812d |
test(server): make the instance settings route suite deterministic under CPU contention (#12789)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip tests its server routes with mocked services and database calls > - The instance settings route suite reset and reloaded its module graph before each test > - Two concurrent module imports could bind a route to the real service module under CPU contention > - The task-drain overlap test also relied on a fixed delay and operating system request order > - This pull request loads the mocked graph once and waits for real events that prove request order > - The benefit is a deterministic 48-test suite with no production code change ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The instance settings route suite failed intermittently under CPU contention. A request that expected a 200 or 403 response sometimes received 500. The failing test changed between runs. **Expected behavior** The suite must use the configured service mocks for every test and must produce the expected response on every run. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/instance-settings-routes.test.ts` many times in parallel on a busy host. 2. Compare the result with the same command on the base branch. 3. Observe intermittent 500 responses on the base branch and stable results on this branch. **Paperclip version or commit** Commit `02ae87010e621cf46bfbdf0d48b6f73887448a83`. **Deployment mode** Local dev (`pnpm dev`). The change affects tests only. **Installation method** Built from source. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific (core bug). **Database mode** Not database-related. The test uses a mocked database layer. **Access context** Not applicable. **Node.js version** The CI environment runs the repository-supported Node.js version. **Operating system** Linux in continuous integration. **Relevant logs or output** The base branch reproduced `expected 500 to be 200` and `expected 500 to be 403` under parallel contention. **Relevant config (if applicable)** Not applicable. **Additional context** The branch loads the mocked module graph once per suite, restores mock behavior before each test, waits for the real transaction events, and sends the DELETE request after the POST holds the transition queue. ## What Changed - Load the mocked instance settings module graph once for the suite. - Restore each mock implementation before every test. - Wait for two real transaction events instead of a fixed 30 millisecond delay. - Send the overlapping DELETE request after the POST proves that it holds the transition queue. - Keep the test count at 48 with no skipped tests. ## Verification - Run `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/instance-settings-routes.test.ts`. - Confirm that all 48 tests pass. - Run the 20-way parallel contention differential. - Confirm that the base arm passed 18 of 20 runs and reproduced two failures. - Confirm that the branch arm passed 20 of 20 runs, with 48 tests in each run. - Confirm that `git status --porcelain` is clean at the submitted commit. ## Risks Low risk. The change affects one test file and does not change production code, route behavior, database schema, or public API behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, current deployment, tool use and code execution enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
b872cd3d1b |
test(server): select exposure reservation host ports at run time (#12783)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The server manages runtime exposure and host port leases for workspace services > - This test suite used fixed host port pairs inside the Linux ephemeral port range > - An unrelated short-lived socket could take one pair and cause a false test failure > - This pull request selects free host port pairs at run time and starts above the low lease lane > - The benefit is a more stable test suite with the same deterministic allocator checks ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The runtime exposure reservation test suite used two fixed app and HMR port pairs. These ports sit inside the Linux ephemeral port range. An unrelated socket could use a pair during the test, and the guest bind could fail with `EADDRINUSE`. **Expected behavior** The suite must select two free app and HMR port pairs before each test. It must avoid the low lease lane that a live instance can own without a listener. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-exposure-reservation.test.ts`. 2. Start another process that briefly uses one fixed test port. 3. Observe that the guest bind can fail even when the allocator works correctly. **Paperclip version or commit** `c982003e00f4e8a325bafec3af4ddb113c0c1f8a` **Deployment mode** Local dev test run. **Installation method** Built from source with pnpm. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific. This change tests the runtime exposure allocator. **Database mode** Not database-related. ## What Changed - Select two free app and HMR port pairs in `beforeEach`. - Start the scan 500 ports above the runtime exposure range minimum. - Keep the synthetic host stub limited to the selected pairs. - Keep all seven test cases and the existing lifecycle coverage. ## Verification - Run `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-exposure-reservation.test.ts`. - Run `npx vitest run server/src/services/workspace-runtime-exposure.test.ts`. - Run `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit`. - Confirm the full CI suite reaches a terminal green state. ## Risks Low risk. This change updates one test file and does not change production code. A port can still become busy after discovery and before the guest bind; the test documents this remaining race. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 (`gpt-5`), tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
0cf06c8fa1 |
test(server): make secret write-serialization tests deterministic (#12781)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip stores and controls secrets through server services > - The secret service tests check that concurrent writes use one lock at a time > - Fixed sleep times do not prove that a provider write started or stayed queued > - This pull request uses provider-write signals and measured waits to test lock behavior > - The benefit is stable test results and stronger detection of lock failures ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The secret write-serialization tests used fixed 20 ms sleeps. The sleeps sometimes ran before a provider write or after a queued write entered. The tests then failed or missed a broken lock. **Expected behavior** The tests must wait for real provider-write events and must detect a queued write that enters before the first write finishes. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/secrets-service.test.ts`. 2. Repeat the test file under sustained load. 3. Remove the write lock and run the concurrency tests. 4. Observe intermittent timing failures or missed lock failures. **Paperclip version or commit** `13bff0adee0216ee9ec67c843e9ead94aa788c68` **Deployment mode** Local dev (`pnpm dev`) **Installation method** Built from source (`pnpm dev` / `pnpm build`) **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific (core test) **Database mode** Not database-related **Additional context** This pull request changes tests only. It does not change production code. ## What Changed - Wait for a deferred signal when the first operation reaches its provider write. - Measure an uncontended provider-write duration and use a safety multiple for the queued-write check. - Release the test gate in a `finally` block so failed assertions do not leave a write active. - Throw when the measurement helper does not observe the provider write. ## Verification - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` reports no errors in the changed file. - `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/secrets-service.test.ts` passes 90 of 90 tests. - The engineer ran the test file five times under sustained load, and all runs passed. - Full CI must pass after this pull request starts. ## Risks Low risk. The change affects test code only. The measured wait can expose a real lock regression, but it does not change runtime behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, tool use and code execution. The exact context window and reasoning mode are not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
db4eeb1688 |
fix(server): validate project goal ids exist and belong to the company (#12779)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Projects can link to goals, through the `goalIds` list or the legacy
`goalId` field. The project service writes those links on create and
update.
> - The service never checked the goal ids. A nonexistent id died at the
`projects.goal_id` foreign key as an opaque 500, and the caller got no
actionable feedback — observed live on 2026-09-03, where one caller
retried the same bad id four times.
> - The foreign key also only proves a goal exists, not who owns it. A
goal id from another company linked silently on a multi-company
instance.
> - This pull request asserts every resolved goal id exists under the
caller's company before any write, and rejects with a 422 that names the
unknown ids.
> - The benefit is a clear, actionable client error instead of a 500,
and no cross-company goal links.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
`POST /companies/:companyId/projects` with a `goalIds` entry that does
not exist fails with an internal error: `insert or update on table
"projects" violates foreign key constraint
"projects_goal_id_goals_id_fk"`. The caller sees a 500 and retries. A
goal id that exists but belongs to a different company is accepted and
linked.
**Expected behavior**
The request fails fast with a 422 that names the unknown goal id(s).
Goals from other companies are rejected the same way. Valid links behave
exactly as before.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Create a company and no goals.
2. `POST /companies/:companyId/projects` with `{ "name": "Rocket",
"goalIds": ["<any-uuid>"] }`.
3. Before this change: 500 from the foreign key. After: 422 naming the
id.
**Deployment mode**
Any; observed on an authenticated public deployment.
## What Changed
- `assertGoalsBelongToCompany` in the project service: one query for the
resolved ids scoped to the company; unknown ids produce `unprocessable`
(422) with the ids in the message and details
- called on create (before the project row insert, so no partial writes)
and on update (scoped to the existing project's company); both `goalIds`
and the legacy `goalId` field flow through the same resolution
- new embedded-Postgres test file: valid link, nonexistent id on create
with no partial insert, legacy field, another company's goal on create,
and a foreign-goal update that leaves existing links unchanged
## Verification
- `pnpm vitest run src/__tests__/project-goal-validation.test.ts` — 5
passed
- adjacent suites (`project-icon-persistence`,
`project-shortname-resolution`, `issue-goal-fallback`,
`project-goal-telemetry-routes`, `heartbeat-referenced-projects`,
`projects-list-archived-routes`) — 35 passed
## Risks
- Low risk. One extra indexed select per create/update that carries goal
ids. Requests that previously 500ed now 422; requests that silently
linked a foreign goal now fail — both are corrections, not regressions.
- Existing rows with foreign links (written before this check) are
untouched; only new writes validate.
## Model Used
Claude Fable 5 (claude-fable-5) via Claude Code, extended thinking with
tool use.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above (none found for goal-id validation)
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (doc
comments; no user-facing docs affected)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
|
||
|
Devin Foley
|
2177b85eb5 |
fix(server): retry cloud-tenant auth sync once on a dropped DB connection (#12773)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Managed-cloud deployments authenticate tenant requests through trusted headers. The middleware syncs the tenant's user, company, and membership rows on the way through. > - Pooled Postgres endpoints sometimes close an established connection under an in-flight query (pooler recycle, compute suspend). The driver reconnects on the next query, but the statement on the wire fails. > - In this path a single dropped statement fails the whole request with a 500. This happened live on 2026-09-03: the idempotent company bootstrap insert died with `write CONNECTION_CLOSED`. > - This pull request retries the actor resolution exactly once when the error chain carries a postgres.js closed-connection code. The sync is idempotent end to end, so the replay is safe. > - The benefit is that a routine pooler blip no longer fails an authenticated request on the entry path. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A cloud tenant request hit the trusted-header authentication middleware while the pooled Postgres endpoint closed the connection mid-query. The insert failed with `write CONNECTION_CLOSED <host>:5432` wrapped in a `Failed query: insert into "companies" …` error, and the request failed. **Expected behavior** The driver reconnects on the next query, and every statement in the tenant sync is idempotent (upserts, on-conflict inserts, deletes; the write debounce records only after the full sync succeeds). One in-request retry should absorb the blip and serve the request. Non-transient failures must keep failing fast. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run an authenticated public deployment against a pooled Postgres endpoint. 2. Have the pooler close the connection while the middleware's tenant sync insert is on the wire. 3. Before this change the request fails with a 500; after it the retry serves the request. **Deployment mode** Authenticated public (managed cloud), external pooled PostgreSQL. ## What Changed - `resolveCloudTenantActor` now delegates to the (unchanged) resolution body through `retryOnTransientDbConnectionError`, which retries exactly once on a transient closed-connection failure - `isTransientDbConnectionError` walks the error `cause` chain (drizzle wraps the driver error) for the postgres.js codes `CONNECTION_CLOSED`, `CONNECTION_ENDED`, `CONNECTION_DESTROYED`; both helpers are exported for tests - New unit test file `cloud-tenant-transient-db-retry.test.ts`: detection matrix (including a `23505` staying non-transient), retry-once-then-succeed, no-retry on non-transient, propagate-on-second-failure ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run src/__tests__/cloud-tenant-transient-db-retry.test.ts` — 5 passed - `pnpm vitest run src/__tests__/cloud-tenant-company-provisioning.test.ts` — 7 passed against embedded Postgres, driving the real resolution path through the new wrapper ## Risks - Low risk. The retry is bounded to one attempt, gated on three explicit driver codes, and wraps an operation that is already idempotent by design. Every other failure propagates unchanged. - A genuinely down database now fails after two attempts instead of one — a few milliseconds of added latency on an already-failing request. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (claude-fable-5) via Claude Code, extended thinking with tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above (none found for connection-retry work in this path) - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (doc comments; no user-facing docs affected) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9dd6526b47 |
fix(security): harden privileged server boundaries (#12776)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The server controls secrets, host files, outbound requests, and workspace commands > - A red-team review found cases where restricted callers could cross these trust boundaries > - These cases could expose credentials or let untrusted input reach privileged resources > - This pull request applies least-privilege checks at each affected server boundary > - The benefit is safer agent execution without changing the private-instance bootstrap contract ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Several server paths used authorization, redaction, or content-delivery rules that were too broad. Restricted agent keys could obtain company-level operational data. Some adapter and instruction paths could reach server-owned network or file resources without the required owner approval. **Expected behavior** Paperclip must redact credential values, enforce restricted-key scopes, guard outbound network access, prevent same-origin script execution, and reserve host-level file and command controls for authorized operators. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Configure an authenticated development instance at the parent commit. 2. Exercise the affected APIs with a restricted agent key or a non-instance-admin company user. 3. Observe that the parent commit returns privileged data or accepts a privileged operation. 4. Repeat on this branch and observe a redacted response, a safe download, or an HTTP 403 response. **Paperclip version or commit** The findings reproduce from commit `39898ab22` and are fixed by this pull request. **Deployment mode** Authenticated self-hosted server and local development modes. **Installation method** Built from source with pnpm. ## What Changed - Redact generic secret `value` and `token` fields recursively in structured logs. - Classify exact and separator-suffixed `KEY` environment names as secrets in company exports. - Limit restricted self-identity responses and protect company run, log, and secret catalog APIs. - Route HTTP adapter requests through DNS-pinned SSRF protection with exact private-origin allowlisting. - Download HTML, SVG, and other script-capable assets with `nosniff` and a sandbox CSP. - Require instance-admin access for external instruction roots and exports that read them. - Block agent-authenticated host command persistence across supported workspace runtime shapes. - Apply the central runtime-management decision before workspace command controls. - Keep the documented first-user instance-admin claim contract unchanged. - Add regression tests and server-owner configuration documentation. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passes. - The Node 24 remediation suite passes with 365 tests. It skips 25 environment-gated tests. - `pnpm build` passes under Node 24. - `git diff --check` passes. - The full local runner reaches known macOS-only general-server harness failures before the serialized route lane. The Linux PR matrix is the authoritative full-suite gate. ## Risks - Restricted agent keys now receive HTTP 403 responses from company-wide run, log, and secret catalog endpoints. - Script-capable assets now download instead of rendering inline. - External instruction roots now require instance-admin access. - Private HTTP adapter endpoints now require an exact origin in `PAPERCLIP_HTTP_ADAPTER_PRIVATE_ENDPOINT_ALLOWLIST`. - Public HTTP adapter endpoints remain enabled. Redirects and metadata or link-local targets remain blocked. - No database migration is required. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The exact serving snapshot and context-window size are not exposed. The model used tool-enabled reasoning, repository access, code execution, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
31a63638ac |
fix(agents): redact plaintext env values in agent read and mutation responses (#9860)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agents are configured through `adapterConfig`, whose `env` block
holds the credentials an agent needs to talk to its provider (API keys,
tokens, and similar)
> - Those bindings come in several shapes: a legacy bare string, `{
type: "plain", value }`, and the indirection forms `{ type: "secret_ref"
}` / `{ type: "user_secret_ref" }`
> - Every endpoint that serializes an agent returned `adapterConfig` as
stored, so every `plain` binding was returned verbatim in the API
response
> - That means any caller able to read an agent — including the agent
itself via `GET /api/agents/me` — received live credentials in
plaintext, and those values then propagate into client state, logs, and
network traces
> - The exposure spans three response families that share no common
serializer: the single-agent detail reads, the company agent-list read,
and the create/update/lifecycle routes that echo the stored row straight
back
> - This pull request routes all three through one presenter that
redacts `plain` env bindings, so the leak is closed server-side and
cannot be bypassed by the caller
> - The benefit is that agent credentials stop appearing in API
responses while `secret_ref` indirection continues to work unchanged
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public upstream issue exists for this, so the underlying bug is
described inline below following
`.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml`.
**What happened?**
Every endpoint that serializes an agent returned the full plaintext
value of each `adapterConfig.env` entry whose `type` was `"plain"` (and
each legacy bare-string binding). Any actor authorized to read an agent
received that agent's live credentials in the response body. Three
distinct response families were affected:
- **Single-agent reads** — `GET /api/agents/{id}` and `GET
/api/agents/me`, via `buildAgentDetail`.
- **Company agent list** — `GET /api/companies/{companyId}/agents`,
which serializes rows directly and therefore does not inherit any fix
applied to `buildAgentDetail`. Callers that pass the configuration-read
check received unredacted rows for every agent in the company in a
single request, making this the broadest of the three.
- **Mutation responses** — agent create, `PATCH /api/agents/{id}`, and
the `pause` / `resume` / `clear-error` / `approve` / `terminate` routes,
each of which echoes the stored row back to the caller.
**Expected behavior**
Read endpoints should never emit stored plaintext credentials. `plain`
bindings should be replaced with a redaction sentinel before
serialization, while `secret_ref` and `user_secret_ref` bindings — which
contain no secret material — pass through untouched.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Configure an agent with an `adapterConfig.env` entry such as `{
"OPENAI_API_KEY": { "type": "plain", "value": "sk-example" } }`.
2. Call `GET /api/agents/{id}` (or authenticate as that agent and call
`GET /api/agents/me`).
3. Observe `sk-example` returned verbatim in the response body.
4. Call `GET /api/companies/{companyId}/agents` as a
configuration-reading caller and observe `sk-example` returned verbatim
for that agent alongside every other agent's credentials.
5. Call `PATCH /api/agents/{id}` with any unrelated field (for example
`{ "title": "Renamed" }`) and observe `sk-example` returned verbatim in
the mutation response.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Reproduced on `master` at `f12bb27b`.
**Deployment mode**
Self-hosted / local development server.
## What Changed
- `server/src/redaction.ts`: adds `redactAgentAdapterConfig`, which
rewrites every bare-string or `{ type: "plain", value }` env binding to
`{ type: "plain", value: "***REDACTED***" }` and passes `secret_ref` /
`user_secret_ref` bindings through unchanged. Reuses the existing
`REDACTED_EVENT_VALUE` and `isSecretRefBinding` /
`isUserSecretRefBinding` / `isPlainBinding` helpers — no new
dependencies.
- `server/src/redaction.ts`: `env` is destructured out and sanitized
only by `redactAgentEnvBinding`, while the remaining adapter keys go
through `redactEventPayload`. Previously the already-redacted `env` was
passed back through `sanitizeRecord`, so each binding was processed
twice — safe only because the sentinel is a fixed point of that second
pass. The two paths are now disjoint, making the invariant structural
rather than coincidental.
- `server/src/routes/agents.ts`: `buildAgentDetail` applies
`redactAgentAdapterConfig` before serialization, so `GET
/api/agents/{id}` and `GET /api/agents/me` both redact at the response
layer. Restricted views inherit the same protection.
- `server/src/routes/agents.ts`: adds `redactAgentRowForResponse`, the
single presenter for every response that emits a raw agent row, and
applies it to the company agent-list route and to the create / update /
pause / resume / clear-error / approve / terminate routes. It composes
with `redactForRestrictedAgentView` rather than replacing it: that
helper is an authorization filter (blank the whole config for low-trust
actors), this one is secret hygiene (mask values for every actor scope),
and the two invariants stay independent. `buildAgentDetail` now
delegates to the same presenter instead of inlining the call.
- `server/src/routes/agents.ts`: adds `restoreRedactedAgentEnv` on the
PATCH path so a client that round-trips a redacted detail response back
through `PATCH /api/agents/{id}` does not zero out stored values —
redacted-sentinel entries matching an existing key are restored from
storage.
## Verification
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit` — clean.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run
agent-permissions-routes.test.ts` — 57 tests pass.
- Adjacent suites (`redaction`, `agent-adapter-validation-routes`,
`agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes`, `agents-pending-approval-config`,
`agents-service-secret-bindings`, `built-in-agent-routes`,
`plugin-managed-agents`, `agent-skills-routes`) — 8 files, 72 tests
pass, no regressions.
- Both new route tests were confirmed to **fail** with the route changes
reverted and pass with them applied, so they genuinely pin the behaviour
rather than passing incidentally.
Tests added:
- `server/src/__tests__/redaction.test.ts`: covers legacy-string, `{
type: "plain" }`, `secret_ref`, and `user_secret_ref` bindings,
asserting the plaintext value never appears in the serialized result;
plus coverage that non-env adapter keys are still sanitized, that env
binding shapes survive intact, and that configs with no `env` block are
handled.
- `server/src/__tests__/agent-permissions-routes.test.ts`: `GET
/api/agents/{id}` asserts redaction rather than plaintext passthrough;
new `GET /api/agents/me` redaction test across the same binding shapes;
new test asserting the `PATCH` round-trip preserves stored values; new
test asserting the board `GET /api/companies/{companyId}/agents`
response redacts every binding shape; new test asserting a mutation
response redacts rather than echoing the stored plaintext.
No real secret values appear in any test, fixture, or commit message.
## Risks
- **Behavioral change for API consumers.** Any client that read a
plaintext credential out of an agent detail, agent-list, or mutation
response will now receive `***REDACTED***`. This is the intended
security fix, but it is a breaking change for such consumers, which must
move to `secret_ref` indirection.
- **Mutation responses are redacted too.** Callers that previously
relied on a create or update response to echo back the credential they
had just written must now read it from their own request. This is
consistent with the `restoreRedactedAgentEnv` round-trip path, which
already assumes the client holds a redacted copy.
- **Round-trip data loss, mitigated.** A client that GETs an agent and
PATCHes the object straight back would otherwise persist the sentinel
over the real value. `restoreRedactedAgentEnv` restores redacted entries
from storage; the round-trip is covered by a regression test. A PATCH
that *intentionally* sets a value literally equal to the sentinel is not
distinguishable and would be treated as "unchanged" — an acceptable
trade-off given the sentinel is not a plausible credential.
- **No migration.** Stored data is untouched; redaction happens purely
at serialization time, so the change is fully reversible by revert.
- **Overlap with existing PRs** — see the duplicate-search note below.
Maintainers may prefer to consolidate rather than merge this in
isolation.
## Model Used
Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`), extended thinking enabled, with
tool use and local test execution.
## Duplicate search
Searching open and closed PRs for prior art surfaced several overlapping
efforts against the same defect. Linking them for maintainer triage — I
am not claiming this PR supersedes them, and consolidation may well be
preferable:
- #9823 — `fix(security): redact adapterConfig secrets on all agent read
endpoints` (closest overlap)
- #8779 — `fix(server): redact agent config secrets in read and mutation
responses`
- #8330 — `fix(server): redact adapterConfig.env for cross-actor agent
reads`
- #4856 — `fix(server): redact adapter env secrets in agent API
responses`
- #4763 — `fix(server): redact adapter_config secrets in agent detail
responses`
- #1839 — `fix: redact secret env vars from agent API responses`
- #4967 — `fix(routines): redact adapterConfig.env in GET
/api/routines/{id}` (same class, routines surface)
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I searched the GitHub PR list (open and closed) for similar or
duplicate PRs and linked them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [ ] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id — **not met**: the branch and title carry an
internal ticket id. Renaming the branch would invalidate this PR; happy
to reopen from a clean branch if maintainers prefer.
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no
user-facing docs affected)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups —
the one P2 (env entries processed twice) is addressed above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Glover <5413384+glovario@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Aymeloglu <aaymeloglu@gmail.com>
|
||
|
Devin Foley
|
174e35a144 |
fix(server): stop paging Sentry for supervised boot races in managed cloud (#12772)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The server refuses to boot when its database is not migrated, or when an authenticated public deployment has no `DATABASE_URL`. These refusals are deliberate and correct. > - In managed cloud, a supervisor creates each stack, migrates its fresh database, applies configuration, and restarts the app. The app container often boots before those steps finish. > - Each early boot hits one of the two refusals, exits, and captures the refusal to Sentry. One fleet build batch produces hundreds of identical expected events. Real errors get buried. > - This pull request classifies exactly those two refusals as expected transients when `PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_API_ORIGIN` marks a supervised deployment, and skips only the Sentry capture for them. > - The benefit is a clean error signal: expected provisioning noise stops, and every real failure still reports. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A managed-cloud stack boots its app container before the supervisor migrates the empty database or finishes applying configuration. The container refuses to start, crash-loops briefly, and converges after the supervisor restarts it. Every refused boot sends an error event to Sentry. A batch of new stacks produces hundreds of these expected events. **Expected behavior** The refusal logs and exits nonzero, so the supervisor can act. Sentry receives no event for an expected provisioning transient. Sentry still receives events for real failures: schema drift, malformed configuration, and every refusal outside managed cloud. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Set `PAPERCLIP_MIGRATION_AUTO_APPLY=false`, `PAPERCLIP_MIGRATION_PROMPT=never`, `SENTRY_DSN`, and `PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_API_ORIGIN`. 2. Point `DATABASE_URL` at an empty database and start the server. 3. The server refuses to start. Before this change it also captures the refusal to Sentry on every boot. **Deployment mode** Authenticated public (managed cloud). ## What Changed - New `server/src/startup-refusals.ts`: a `StartupRefusalError` class for refusals whose remedy belongs to the deployment supervisor, `migrationRefusalError()` to classify a pending-migrations refusal (zero applied migrations = never migrated = supervised transient; any applied history = drift = plain always-reported `Error`), and `shouldReportStartupFailure()` for the capture decision. - `server/src/index.ts`: the pending-migrations refusal uses the classifier; the missing-`DATABASE_URL` refusal under the authenticated-public contract becomes a `StartupRefusalError` (the malformed-URL refusal stays a plain `Error`); the startup crash handler consults `shouldReportStartupFailure()` before `captureException`. Logging and the nonzero exit are unchanged. - New `server/src/__tests__/startup-refusals.test.ts` covering the classification and decision matrix, including the unchanged self-hosted paths. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run src/__tests__/startup-refusals.test.ts` — 7 passed. - Review the decision matrix in the test file: refusals report when `PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_API_ORIGIN` is absent or blank; non-refusal errors and non-`Error` throwables always report; drift always reports. ## Risks - Low risk. The change only skips a Sentry capture in one narrow, marker-gated case. Boot behavior, logging, and the exit code do not change. - Self-hosted deployments do not set `PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_API_ORIGIN`, so their reporting is unchanged, and the tests pin that. - A supervised deployment with a genuinely stuck migration runner loses per-boot Sentry events for that stack. The supervisor's own health checks and monitoring own that signal, and the container logs still carry the refusal. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (claude-fable-5) via Claude Code, extended thinking with tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above (none found for startup Sentry suppression) - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (module doc comment; no user-facing docs affected) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above |
||
|
DottaandCodex
|
0798c77fde |
Secure Cloud canonical runtime identity (#12766)
Accept and persist Cloud-signed canonical runtime identity before activation, then route absolute self-URLs through the durable runtime identity provider. Co-Authored-By: Codex <codex@openai.com> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
1d493eb62a |
test(heartbeat): drain in-flight runs before native-isolation TRUNCATE (#12751)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip runs agent heartbeats and stores their run state in a database > - The direct-adapter native-isolation tests start heartbeat runs and then clear database state > - A terminal run status does not prove that its background database work has stopped > - The teardown can then deadlock with a live run during PostgreSQL `TRUNCATE` > - This pull request drains active runs before teardown and adds a guard for queued or running runs > - The benefit is stable test teardown without a production code change ## Linked Issues or Issue Description This change fixes an intermittent test deadlock in the direct-adapter native-isolation suite. **What happened?** The test teardown could run PostgreSQL `TRUNCATE` while a heartbeat execution still held a write transaction. PostgreSQL then returned error `40P01` during some test runs. **Expected behavior** The test teardown must wait until all heartbeat executions finish before it clears the test database. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-direct-adapter-native-isolation.test.ts` repeatedly. 2. Run the suite against PostgreSQL-backed native isolation. 3. Observe intermittent deadlock error `40P01` during teardown. **Paperclip version or commit** Commit `57515726d3ef45a07df9b5ee2dfaf7d108556478`. **Deployment mode** Built from source with the native-isolation test suite. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific. The test covers the direct adapter path. **Database mode** External PostgreSQL used by the native-isolation test suite. **Additional context** Related prior attempt: [#12715](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12715). This pull request starts from current `master` and does not depend on that pull request. ## What Changed - Drain active heartbeat run executions before `afterEach` runs `TRUNCATE`. - Assert that no heartbeat run remains `queued` or `running` before teardown. - Drain active executions before `afterAll` removes the temporary database. - Create one shared `heartbeatService` instance in `beforeAll` so the drain tracks the test runs. ## Verification - Run `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-direct-adapter-native-isolation.test.ts` 20 times. All 20 runs pass. - Run the target suite with `server/src/__tests__/native-run-finalizer.test.ts`. Both files pass with 19 tests. - Run `tsc --noEmit`. The branch adds no new error compared with `master`. - Run the pull request checks after GitHub starts them. ## Risks Low risk. The change affects one test file and no production code. The added drain can expose an incomplete test run before teardown, which is the intended guard. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5. Exact runtime model ID: GPT-5. The context window is not exposed to this agent. The model used tool calls and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
scotttong
|
597fd63b61 | feat(ui): add streamlined navigation foundation (#12746) | ||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
9064cfd09e |
feat(codex-local): give each Codex account its own home and path secret (#12709)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for companies that use AI agents for work > - Local adapters connect Paperclip agents to provider command line tools > - The Codex adapter stores login data in a shared company home > - A shared home cannot keep credentials for more than one Codex account > - This pull request gives each account a safe home and a matching company secret > - The benefit is that one company can use multiple Codex accounts at the same time ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** A company can hold only one Codex subscription credential because device login uses one shared home. A second account cannot log in without replacing or conflicting with the first credential. **Proposed solution** This change validates the vendor account identifier, stores each credential in its own home, and creates a company secret that points to that home. Repeat login calls return success when the matching secret already exists. **Roadmap alignment** The change supports the roadmap goal for centrally managed secrets with scoped access and audited resolution. **Additional context** The security review returned approve with no blocking finding. The branch adds shared account-handle validation and tests for device login and the Codex local adapter. ## What Changed - Add strict allowlist validation for Codex account handles. - Store each Codex account credential in a separate home under the Codex cache root. - Verify that the resolved account home stays inside the cache root. - Create the `CODEX_HOME_<handle>` company secret for each account. - Keep repeat and concurrent login calls safe and idempotent. - Add shared helper and route, adapter, and validation tests. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local test` passes with 343 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server test src/__tests__/agent-device-login-routes.test.ts` passes with 25 tests. - The adapter suite passes with 23 tests. - The shared package and Codex adapter typechecks pass. - Continuous integration must pass on every check before merge. ## Risks The account handle becomes part of a directory path and secret name. The strict allowlist and root containment check reduce path traversal risk. Existing single-account homes remain unchanged unless a new device login creates an account-specific home. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 (exact runtime model ID: gpt-5), with tool use and code execution. The runtime context window is not exposed in this run. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Michael NguyenandPaperclip
|
dfdfc8664e |
feat(claude-local): add Claude Fable 5.1 support (#12730)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Claude local adapter lets operators select a Claude model for an agent. > - Claude Fable 5.1 was absent from the adapter model lists. > - The adapter runtime also used a Claude Code build that rejected Fable 5.1. > - This pull request adds the direct Anthropic ID and the AWS Bedrock inference profile ID. > - It also updates the Claude ACP runtime and keeps the Paperclip usage and isolation patches. > - The benefit is that operators can select and run Claude Fable 5.1 through the Claude adapter. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #8810. That issue covers related model ID handling. This change does not change provider-prefixed model IDs. **Agent or provider** Claude Code through the built-in `claude_local` adapter. The requested model is Claude Fable 5.1. **Why this adapter is useful** Operators can use Fable 5.1 without entering an undocumented model ID. The configured model also reaches both supported Claude execution lanes. **How the agent is invoked** The CLI lane sends `--model claude-fable-5-1`. The ACP lane sends `ANTHROPIC_MODEL=claude-fable-5-1` to `@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp`. **Are you willing to implement it?** Yes. This pull request includes the implementation and tests. **Additional context** Claude Code 2.1.232 rejected Fable 5.1 and required version 2.1.251 or newer. ACP package 0.73.0 includes Claude Code 2.1.257. The update keeps Paperclip's usage metadata and isolated-context behavior. ## What Changed - Added `claude-fable-5-1` to the direct Claude fallback list. - Added `us.anthropic.claude-fable-5-1` to the AWS Bedrock list. - Kept the existing default model at the first position in each list. - Updated the Claude ACP dependency from 0.70 to 0.73. - Carried the Paperclip usage and isolated-context changes into the 0.73 patch. - Added a Claude Code 2.1.251 minimum-version preflight for Fable 5.1 when using the standard `claude` executable, surfaced in both adapter Test and execution. Explicit custom wrappers retain their existing compatibility contract. - Kept local adapter Tests from executing caller-selected binaries: when runtime `PATH` selects a different Claude executable than the trusted probe, the Test warns and defers the authoritative version check to execution instead of approving or rejecting the alternate installation. - Added tests for model listing, discovery deduplication, Bedrock filtering, model pass-through in both execution lanes, old-CLI rejection before launch, custom-wrapper compatibility, and local runtime-PATH mismatch handling. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/execute.remote.test.ts packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/test.remote.test.ts packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/test.probe.test.ts packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/acp.test.ts server/src/__tests__/adapter-models.test.ts` (72 tests passed) - `node --test scripts/acpx-patch-packaging.test.mjs` (13 tests passed) - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - A local Paperclip agent run completed with `usageJson.model` set to `claude-fable-5-1` through ACP 0.73.0 and its bundled Claude Code 2.1.257. - `pnpm test:run` completed 5,638 passing tests and 24 skipped tests. It also found 24 failures in unrelated workspace-runtime, path-canonicalization, and runtime-exposure tests on macOS with Node 26. These failures do not touch this diff. Clean pull request CI is the final full-suite gate. ## Risks - The ACP dependency update can change Claude runtime behavior outside model selection. Focused ACP tests, the full typecheck, the production build, and a real local Fable run reduce this risk. - The 0.73 patch must stay aligned with the installed ACP version. Dependency-resolution CI verifies the manifest and patch pair. - Fable 5.1 adds a short `claude --version` preflight to standard CLI-lane Tests and runs. The result is intentionally not cached so an in-place Claude Code upgrade takes effect without restarting Paperclip. Explicit custom wrappers are not version-probed because their output and compatibility contract can differ from the standard executable. - Local Tests preserve the existing deny-by-default probe boundary and do not execute a binary selected by caller-controlled `PATH`. A mismatched runtime binary produces an explicit warning without blocking an otherwise valid setup; execution independently validates the actual runtime-selected CLI before launch. - The AWS Bedrock identifier differs from earlier IDs because Fable 5.1 has no `-v1` suffix. The model-list test locks this exact value. - There is no schema change or migration. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used Provider: OpenAI. Model: GPT-5 Codex. The host did not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. Capabilities used: agentic reasoning, repository editing, shell execution, web research, and local runtime verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
0f94521017 |
fix(runner): restore local session and task integrity (#12721)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for agents that perform work. > - Paperclip Runner connects durable provider sessions to individual task runs through PRP. > - Provider continuity and per-run authority are different lifetimes. > - The existing implementation mixed those lifetimes and lost event metadata between provider frames, runnerd, persistence, API sanitization, and the task thread. > - That caused failed continuation, missing progress and Plans, duplicate replies, hidden failures, and unsafe recovery. > - This repair gives every heartbeat fresh authority, preserves qualified provider-session continuity, and restores one lossless presentation path without changing direct adapters. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A second native heartbeat could reuse tickets, leases, command receipts, sequence state, and run identity from the first heartbeat. Provider phase and item identity could be lost before the UI read them. Redaction could corrupt protocol discriminators while still missing malformed credential tails. The task thread could fold progress into the final response, hide failures, or show more than one final answer. Native Codex also exposed approval modes that do not yet have a durable approval bridge. **Expected behavior** Each heartbeat uses a new PRP authority epoch. Codex and OpenCode preserve exact qualified provider sessions; ACPX emits an explicit continuity event when its qualified process-replacement policy is used. Every accepted provider event is presented, classified as internal, or surfaced as unsupported. The task page shows chronological progress, reasoning summaries, activity, Plans, interactions, terminal failures, and exactly one final reply. Direct adapters retain their existing path. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Enable the unified experimental Paperclip Runner setting. 2. Create a local native Codex, OpenCode, ACPX Claude, or ACPX Codex agent. 3. Run response, Plan, structured-question/resume, restart, cancellation, and failure scenarios. 4. Reload the task while active, waiting, failed, and settled. 5. On the old implementation, observe stale run authority, missing classifications, incomplete output, or duplicated/folded replies. **Paperclip version or commit** The repair is based directly on `master` at `87d05e194b643810d16d20612115acd01d735d43`. **Deployment mode** Local development with the embedded database. Related work: Refs #12616, #12646, #12666, #12685, and #12700. ## What Changed - Rotates PRP control-plane, outbox, ticket, lease, command, receipt, and sequence authority for each heartbeat while carrying forward only a validated provider-session identity. - Reads `control-plane-state.json`, validates both durable schemas and lifecycle values, resumes coherent current runs, archives qualified settled authority, and quarantines malformed or mismatched scoped state without moving ambiguous live legacy state. - Preserves Codex provider phase and stable item identities so commentary remains progress and only `final_answer` becomes final. - Adds raw OpenCode HTTP/SSE boundary coverage and canonical reasoning lifecycle mapping. - Makes ACPX normalization lossless for visible reasoning, tool lifecycle metadata, stable bounded identities, Plan revisions, structured requests, failures, and qualified process replacement. Only the compatible terminal assistant message is promoted as final. - Applies schema-aware redaction before generic JWT-shaped detection and scans every diagnostic string leaf. Malformed raw/escaped quoted credential tails are redacted in both server and durable Rust state. - Restores snapshot-style chronological task presentation, expandable tool activity, inline Plan cards, visible waiting/resume/cancel/failure states, and exactly one final answer. - Makes `never` the only qualified native Codex permission mode and rejects unsupported persisted native modes with remediation. OpenCode and ACPX policies remain intact. - Keeps the unified experimental Runner setting as the only enablement flag. Onboarding and direct Codex, Claude, and OpenCode stay on their legacy execution/finalization paths. - Adds cross-language goldens, authority/recovery/fault coverage, exact response/count assertions, and native plus legacy acceptance scenarios. ## Verification - Pull-request GitHub Actions run Rust formatting/tests, TypeScript checks, server/UI tests, builds, protocol drift checks, browser E2E, and security scans. - A separate workflow-only validation ref is pinned directly on this PR head and runs the 35-cell paid local matrix: three core scenarios plus structured-question resume and restart/resume for native Codex, native OpenCode, ACPX Claude, ACPX Codex, and direct Codex/Claude/OpenCode. Run: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/33682434315 - Acceptance requires exact single visible replies, monotonic sequences, matching envelope discriminators, one semantic terminal, one run terminal, no unresolved interaction, no duplicate mutation, no secret leakage, provider continuity, and zero native rows for direct adapters. - Per maintainer direction, tests are running in GitHub Actions rather than on the slower local host. Only formatters and static diff checks were run locally. ## Risks - Recovery from old or partial filesystem state is sensitive. The repair fails closed, preserves active or unverifiable authority, and quarantines only state whose scoped ownership is safe to move. - Provider event formats can change. Closed validators and boundary goldens turn new or malformed events into visible diagnostics instead of silent drops. - Shared task presentation could affect direct adapters. Runtime-fact gating plus the direct-adapter matrix protect the existing path. - Managed and remote providers are not qualified here. Shared code continues to compile and fail safely, but live qualification is deferred. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex based on GPT-5. The exact deployed snapshot and context-window size are not exposed to this task. It used agentic reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, Git, parallel subagents, and GitHub Actions. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass (intentionally deferred to GitHub Actions) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] The paid local-provider matrix is green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
87d05e194b |
feat(work-products): add rich cards and run artifact inventory (#12717)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for AI-agent companies. > - Agent outputs must remain visible after a run and easy to inspect from a task. > - The thread and artifact inventory need one consistent rich-card vocabulary. > - Run uploads also need durable artifact registration and producing-run context. > - Reviewers need deterministic examples for each rich-card kind and state. > - This pull request adds the shared presentation, registration, inventory, and Storybook review coverage. > - The benefit is a complete output path that reviewers can inspect without seeded data. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** This change improves work-product presentation in task threads and the task Artifacts tab. **Subsystem affected** The change affects shared work-product contracts, the runner diff path, server attachment and work-product services, GitHub metadata refresh, the React board UI, and Storybook. **Current behavior** The thread used generic cards. Some files uploaded by a run existed only as message attachments. The Artifacts tab showed a flat list without run context or filters. Storybook showed only one resting card per kind. **Proposed behavior** The thread uses rich cards for supported work-product types. Each run-produced file registers one attachment-backed artifact work product. The Artifacts tab groups outputs by run and supports filters. Storybook shows every kind and requested state, PR lifecycle states, stats variants, truncation, mobile layout, and message-tail media. **Reason and benefit** Users can identify outputs quickly. Reviewers can inspect all card permutations without creating task data. **Breaking changes** None. The metadata fields and automatic artifact registration are additive. Existing attachments and work products keep their current behavior. ## What Changed - Added a shared rich work-product card with kind-specific content and a compact inventory variant. - Added pull-request and commit diff metadata plus bounded GitHub state refresh. - Added media strips and typed file chips to message-tail attachments. - Registered each run-produced attachment as an artifact work product in the same server transaction. - Grouped task artifacts by run with agent and timestamp headings. - Added type and run filters, image thumbnails, compact cards, and a company Artifacts link. - Added a Storybook kind-by-state matrix with stats variants for all eight visual kinds. - Added PR open, draft, merged, and closed examples, long-title truncation, an exact 375-pixel viewport, and message-tail overflow coverage. - Closed reconciled runtime work products when the linked runtime stops or disappears, so the card shows `Stopped` instead of `Unhealthy`. ### Screenshots Before: one resting card per kind.  After: the kind and state matrix.  After: message-tail media at 375 pixels.  [Open the Storybook evidence viewer](https://pages.paperclip.ing/rich-work-product-storybook-20260902/). The earlier artifact inventory comparison remains available in the [artifact inventory viewer](https://pages.paperclip.ing/rich-artifacts-inventory-proof-20260902/). ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - `pnpm build-storybook` passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/work-product-runtime-reconciliation.test.ts` passed with 5 tests. - Chromium visual checks passed at desktop and 375-pixel widths. - All 30 latest-head GitHub checks passed. One unrelated annotation test was flaky and passed on its single retry. - Greptile passed at 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. ## Risks - Low risk. The Storybook change adds review fixtures only. The runtime fix changes read-time reconciliation without database writes. - The matrix is intentionally large so every permutation stays visible in one review surface. > I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This work does not duplicate planned core work. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex with GPT-5 and GPT-5.6-sol across this pull request. Reasoning, tool use, and code execution were enabled. The context-window size is not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My public branch name describes the change and contains no internal task id - [x] I have run tests locally and the changed-path tests pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8c3b8c432a |
Simplify app connections and enable managed Google access (#12728)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Apps subsystem gives humans and agents governed access to external tools. > - The current connection flow hides Apps behind an experimental gate and repeats setup text. > - Google sharing choices and generic MCP permissions do not use one consistent opening model. > - Self-hosted installs also need a safe default origin for managed OAuth without a manual config file. > - This pull request makes Apps available, simplifies connection setup, and applies one governed permissions model. > - The benefit is a shorter connection flow that works on a clean self-hosted install. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** This improves the Apps connection setup flow, managed Google connection flow, generic MCP connection flow, navigation, and runtime origin discovery. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting. This changes `ui/`, `server/`, `packages/shared/`, connector documentation, and browser tests. **Current behavior** Apps require an experimental switch. Setup pages repeat titles and explanatory copy. Connection names require manual input. Google credential sharing does not always offer both personal and organization access. Generic MCP providers do not start with the same permission choices. Managed OAuth needs a public URL setting even when the request already has a safe HTTPS origin. **Proposed behavior** Apps are available by default. Setup asks only for required permissions and sharing choices. Paperclip creates conflict-free connection names. Google apps and generic MCP providers use the same human and agent access model. Managed OAuth derives a validated same-origin HTTPS URL when no explicit public URL is set. **Reason and benefit** A clean self-hosted install can connect a managed Google app without hidden setup. Humans can share a service account with their organization. The shorter flow reduces duplicated choices and setup errors. **Breaking changes** The Apps experimental switch is removed. Existing connection APIs remain compatible. New connections can receive a numeric suffix when a name already exists. No duplicate or related public issue was found. ## What Changed - Removed the Apps experimental gate and the breadcrumb that leaves the Apps section. - Simplified all connection setup pages and moved optional provider requirements into one small link. - Added consistent human and agent access choices for Google apps, Zapier, and generic MCP connections. - Added organization sharing to Google Workspace credentials while keeping personal access available. - Generated connection names automatically and resolved name conflicts with numeric suffixes. - Derived a validated public HTTPS origin from the request for config-free managed OAuth. - Updated connector contracts, tests, browser coverage, and authoring documentation. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/generic-mcp-connection.test.ts` (273 passed) - Targeted UI/service regression suite (308 passed) - Six targeted Playwright connection journeys on a fresh onboarding instance (6 passed) - Fresh-install browser proof through Tailscale HTTPS: enrolled with Paperclip Cloud, connected managed Google Drive, and completed a real read operation. - [Exact-head CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/33669760711): all 23 matrix jobs passed, including build, typecheck, server, serialized, canary, and all browser shards. - Greptile 5/5 on `0ae2a859f269984ee950d0af231a5b09a06f3dfd`, with no unresolved review threads. ## Risks Apps are now visible to all operators. The removed experimental flag no longer hides unfinished app definitions. Managed Google availability still depends on the Cloud profile rollout and active instance enrollment. Automatic conflict handling changes only the display name of a newly conflicting connection. > I checked [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md). MCP Tool Gateway and Apps are shipped. Connected Apps is planned, and this change improves the existing shipped connection flow. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with reasoning, browser control, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
fdf8c8464d |
feat(runner): add managed provider backends (#12699)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Paperclip Runner provides durable, provider-neutral agent execution. > - The current stack supports qualified local providers but omits the managed provider paths from the integration branch. > - Claude Managed Agents and AWS AgentCore need explicit profile qualification, durable recovery, usage accounting, and cleanup controls. > - This pull request adds those managed backends as the third part of the Runner parity stack. > - The benefit is managed execution without weakening the default-off Runner rollout gate. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting: Runner, server orchestration, database profiles, CLI, and adapter configuration UI. **Problem or motivation** The current Runner stack cannot select or execute the managed Claude Agents API or AWS Bedrock AgentCore Harness backends. It also lacks qualified profile storage and recovery checks for those remote resources. **Proposed solution** Add qualified managed and remote profiles, API and CLI management, exact provider selection, durable lifecycle handling, cumulative usage accounting, bounded cleanup, and retention acknowledgement. Keep `enableNativeRunner` default-off. **Alternatives considered** A direct copy of the old integration branch was rejected because its provider contracts, model values, credential flow, and migration history no longer match the current base. A single large parity pull request was also rejected because stacked review keeps each subsystem bounded. **Roadmap alignment** This continues the existing Runner architecture and rollout work. It does not introduce a separate execution system. **Additional context** This pull request is based on the merged #12691 and #12685 stack. It also closes the delayed security-review findings reported on #12691 by binding qualified ACPX and OpenCode launch artifacts to the bytes actually executed. A GitHub search for managed agent, AgentCore, and Claude managed work found no duplicate public issue or pull request. ## What Changed - Add Claude Managed Agents and AWS AgentCore provider executors to runnerd. - Add qualified managed and remote profile storage, routes, OpenAPI contracts, CLI commands, and migration 0237. - Validate profile ownership, enabled state, exact qualified revision, model, agent version, and secret binding before persistence and recovery. - Persist durable provider session and owned skill state for restart-safe cleanup. - Reconcile uncertain create responses and delete remote sessions before owned skills. - Track cumulative provider usage and enforce positive session spend caps. - Recover interrupted AgentCore usage at the next turn boundary by charging the prior invocation ceiling exactly once; keep the session gated until an explicit monotonic budget raise. - Isolate AgentCore AWS configuration from host profiles and credential-process/SSO configuration while preserving workload identity. - Require OpenCode 1.18.17 and fixed build-owned provider-pack artifact paths; remove the ambient executable override. - Snapshot and content-verify ACPX and OpenCode commands, scripts, and provider executables before launch. Linux executes sealed inherited descriptors; macOS uses authenticated private snapshots with retry-safe rematerialization at the spawn boundary. - Persist canonical ACPX and OpenCode launch-profile digests, reject drift across fresh recovery, and make recovery failures sticky. - Close and journal unsafe ACPX active-turn recovery before any provider bootstrap or reconnect. - Add managed provider fields to the Runner configuration UI and permission projection. - Preserve the default-off `enableNativeRunner` experimental flag. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - Focused managed server, database, CLI, Runner TypeScript, Rust, Claude, AgentCore, ACPX, OpenCode, process-supervisor, and durable-recovery tests passed. - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib --locked` (160 tests) - `cargo check --workspace --all-targets --locked` - Native Codex integration tests passed (60 tests); native provider tests passed (7 tests); server native-runtime tests passed (87 tests). - Verified-launch replacement, nested-spawn retry, exact-version, profile-drift, sticky-failure, and no-bootstrap active-recovery tests passed. - `git diff --check` - The PR changes 91 files. `pnpm-lock.yaml` is unchanged. The Rust workspace lockfile adds the approved `rustix` dependency used for safe descriptor handling while `#![forbid(unsafe_code)]` remains enabled. ## Risks - The provider APIs can change while they are in beta. Exact qualification and fail-closed recovery checks limit drift. - Remote cleanup can fail after a partial create. Durable ownership inventories and retry-safe deletion preserve recovery state. - Migration 0237 adds profile tables. The generated migration and snapshot pass the repository migration checks. - Managed execution can incur provider cost. Positive default spend caps and explicit retention acknowledgement limit accidental use. - An interrupted AgentCore invocation without final metadata is conservatively charged to its active session ceiling. This can overstate cost, but cannot undercount it; later work requires an explicit budget increase. - Linux qualified launches use sealed memory descriptors. macOS lacks executable-descriptor APIs, so the runner uses owner-only private snapshots and minimizes linked-path lifetime; hostile same-UID processes remain outside the documented local-host trust boundary. - The global Runner feature remains default-off. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with tool use, code execution, and subagent review. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
84bedd4ca1 |
feat(runner): activate qualified OpenCode and ACPX providers (#12691)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip Runner is the experimental native runtime for governed agent work. > - The runtime contracts already describe Codex, OpenCode, and ACPX providers. > - The merged control plane still rejected OpenCode and ACPX for new runner agents. > - Runnerd also selected only the Codex provider implementation. > - This pull request activates the qualified OpenCode and ACPX paths from the form to runnerd. > - The benefit is one durable runner path with provider-specific permissions and recovery. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12685 **Subsystem affected** This change affects the runner package, server orchestration, adapter configuration, and UI configuration. **Problem or motivation** Paperclip Runner stores provider contracts for OpenCode and ACPX. New agents cannot select those providers. Runnerd cannot execute those stored provider descriptors. The UI also shows only Codex. **Proposed solution** Accept the qualified OpenCode 1.18.17 profile and the fixed ACPX Claude and Codex profiles. Route them through runnerd. Keep provider selection, model selection, permissions, credentials, events, and recovery inside closed provider-specific boundaries. **Alternatives considered** One option was to keep the contracts dormant. That option leaves stored configuration and runtime behavior out of sync. Another option was to enable every ACPX agent. That option is not safe because Pi does not yet have the same verified launch path. **Roadmap alignment** This change supports the completed cloud and sandbox agent milestone. It also supports self-healing runs and governed agent execution. It does not add a new roadmap surface. ## What Changed - Add one server profile resolver for Codex, OpenCode, and qualified ACPX descriptors. - Keep `adapterConfig` as the provider and permission authority for fresh runs. - Add Paperclip Runner provider, ACPX agent, and provider-specific permission controls to the UI. - Reset the model to a compatible qualified value when the provider changes. - Route Codex, OpenCode, and ACPX through the durable runnerd provider selector. - Add a durable ACPX executor with bounded state, recovery, events, tool receipts, and identity checks. - Remove Codex labels from OpenCode events, results, evidence, and recovery diagnostics. - Pass only provider-specific credential names to child processes. - Keep ACPX Pi unavailable and reject it before process launch. - Keep the existing Paperclip Runner experimental flag unchanged. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/paperclip-runner/src/backends/native-backend-factory.test.ts packages/paperclip-runner/src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts packages/adapters/codex-local/src/ui/build-config.test.ts ui/src/adapters/codex-local/config-fields.test.tsx server/src/__tests__/adapter-registry.test.ts server/src/__tests__/adapter-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-adapter-validation-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts server/src/services/native-runtime/runtime-mode.test.ts server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts server/src/services/heartbeat-runner-provider-config.test.ts` - The focused TypeScript, server, and UI suites passed 274 tests. - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --test native_provider_backend` - The executable native provider integration suite passed 4 tests. - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib` - The Rust unit suite passed 91 tests. - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm build` - `git diff --check codex/runner-parity-task-runtime...HEAD` ## Risks - This changes provider process selection and durable recovery. The experimental flag still gates every fresh Paperclip Runner run. - OpenCode requires a model in `provider/model` form and stays pinned to version 1.18.17. - ACPX accepts only exact Claude and Codex profile versions and models. Pi stays unavailable. - ACPX steering stays unavailable and reports that limit through the driver capabilities. - Child processes receive explicit environment allowlists. They do not inherit the full server environment. - This pull request has no database migration. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with tool use, code execution, and subagent review. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
72b9f92d76 |
fix(runner): restore task runtime parity (#12685)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The task view shows a running agent and lets an operator guide that agent. > - The merged runner stack lost parts of the accepted task experience. > - Native event errors could hide current reasoning from the operator. > - Queued message steering had no server route on `master`. > - This pull request restores the task-runtime behavior and keeps the runner experimental gate. > - The benefit is a visible and steerable native run with durable fallback behavior. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The task view could stop showing current runner reasoning. The steering action also failed because the server route was absent. Runner instruction files were not declared as supported. **Expected behavior** The task view must show current provider activity. It must use the live log when durable native events are empty or unavailable. The operator must be able to steer a queued message into the active native turn. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Enable the Paperclip Runner experimental setting. 2. Start a native runner task. 3. Open the task view while the run emits reasoning. 4. Queue a message and select the steering action. **Paperclip version or commit** The regression reproduces on `24a674f8858060e77ea1beb50689d26473e91431`. **Additional context** Related closed work: Refs #12592. ## What Changed - Restored the queued-comment steering route for active native sessions. - Added durable and queue-bound steering acknowledgements for safe retries. - Restored runner instruction bundle support. - Added live-log fallback when native events are empty or unavailable. - Restored the compact live reasoning ticker in the task view. - Added a visible temporary-unavailable state when both activity sources fail. - Kept the unified Paperclip Runner experimental gate unchanged. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm build` - Seven focused test files passed with 140 tests. - The final steering regression file passed with 12 tests. - The broad local test run reached unrelated workspace, port, and shared database failures. The changed-area tests remained green. ## Risks - The steering route changes queue and run records in one transaction. Tests cover stale targets, unavailable sessions, lost responses, and wrong-queue acknowledgements. - Native events remain the primary transcript source. The live log is used only when event data is absent or its poll fails. - The experimental gate still hides and rejects the runner when the setting is off. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with tool use, code execution, and subagent review. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — no documentation change is required for this regression repair - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
b4f302d040 |
feat(grok-local): copy a refreshed sandbox credential back to the host (#12696)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip runs agents through provider-specific adapters in local and remote environments > - A remote Grok run can refresh its credential inside its sandbox > - The host copy can become stale when teardown discards that refreshed credential > - This pull request copies the refreshed credential back through a locked, fail-closed teardown path > - The benefit is that later Grok runs can use the refreshed host credential without another login ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #12618 **Agent or provider** Grok local adapter. **Why this adapter is useful** A remote Grok run can refresh its access token during a run. Copying the refreshed credential back to the host keeps later runs ready to use. **How the agent is invoked** Paperclip invokes the Grok local adapter through its remote subscription run path. The adapter stages the company Grok home as a sandbox asset. The change adds a copy-out step on the teardown path. ## What Changed - `grok-auth-merge-decision.cjs` adds a host predicate in its own process. It compares the whole `<issuer>::<uuid>` identity key of the two files. It reads `expires_at` as an ISO-8601 string, an epoch-seconds number, or an epoch-milliseconds number. It exits 10 to use the source, 20 to keep the destination, 21 when the expiry shape is unreadable, and 22 when the source expiry sits more than 400 days after the host clock. It fails closed in every unclear case: an unusable side, a different identity, an absent expiry, a tie, an unreadable expiry, and an implausible expiry all keep the destination. - `grok-auth-merge-decision.ts` adds a wrapper that runs the predicate and maps the exit code to a typed result. - `grok-auth-copyback.ts` adds `copyBackGrokAuth({ hostHomeDir, readSandboxAuth, log, env })`. It locks on `hostHomeDir` with `withDirectoryMergeLock`, stages the sandbox bytes into a private `0600` temporary file, runs the predicate, and installs the file with an atomic rename in the same directory. It keeps no backup of the displaced credential. It leaves no temporary file on the success path, the keep path, or an error path. On an error it logs the `errno` code only, then re-throws. - `execute.ts` adds a `restore` callback to the Grok `home` asset. The callback takes the destination from `resolveManagedGrokHomeDir(process.env, agent.companyId)`, never from `env.GROK_HOME`. A copy-out failure does not fail the run. - `package.json` updates the `build` script to copy `grok-auth-merge-decision.cjs` into `dist/server/`, because `tsc` does not copy a `.cjs` file. **The credential shape this predicate reads** A redacted sample of a real vendor credential answered four structural questions. The answers hold no credential bytes, no account identifier, no file path, and no timestamp value. 1. `expires_at` is present. 2. `expires_at` sits inside the value object, under the `<issuer>::<uuid>` key. It is not a top-level field. 3. `expires_at` is an ISO-8601 string. It carries UTC time with a trailing `Z` and six fractional-second digits. 4. A normal run rewrites `auth.json`. The value object carries a `refresh_token` next to `expires_at`, so the client refreshes the access token and rewrites the file. ## Verification - [x] `pnpm vitest run packages/adapters/grok-local` — 114 tests in 12 files pass. - [x] `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-grok-local typecheck` — clean. - [x] `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-grok-local build` — succeeds, and `dist/server/grok-auth-merge-decision.cjs` exists after the build. - [x] Continuous integration is green on every check. ## Risks The predicate keeps the host credential when identity, expiry, file access, or freshness data is unclear. The copy-out path can log an error and leave the run successful when it cannot install the refreshed credential. The atomic rename and directory lock protect the host file from partial writes and concurrent copy-out actions. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5, current deployment. The exact runtime version and context window are not exposed to this agent. The model used tool calls and code inspection. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8f9f850c20 |
fix: limit plan-to-auto transition to plan confirmation (#12695)
<!-- This pull request uses ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English. --> ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The issue thread controls plan review and agent work modes. > - A user can accept a full plan or confirm a smaller checkbox action. > - Only full plan acceptance must start automatic agent work. > - The current transition did not check the interaction kind. > - This pull request limits the transition to an accepted plan confirmation. > - The benefit is a safe and clear start of agent work after plan approval. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An accepted confirmation that targeted a plan could change an issue from planning mode to standard mode. This included a checkbox confirmation. A checkbox action is not approval of the full plan. **Expected behavior** Only acceptance of a current full-plan confirmation starts automatic agent work. Other interaction kinds and rejected confirmations keep the current work mode. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Put an issue in planning mode. 2. Create a checkbox confirmation that targets the current plan revision. 3. Accept the checkbox confirmation. 4. Observe that the issue enters standard mode before this fix. **Paperclip version or commit** The problem was present on `master` before this change. **Deployment mode** The problem is in the core server logic and is not deployment-specific. ## What Changed - Require a full `request_confirmation` interaction before plan acceptance starts automatic work. - Add service tests for acceptance, rejection, stale interaction kinds, and unchanged standard-mode behavior. - Check the route activity log for the planning-to-standard mode change. - Document the plan acceptance transition in the V1 contract. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts` passes 140 tests. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passes. - `pnpm build` passes. - `pnpm test:run` was also started. Unrelated workspace-runtime tests failed because fixed local runtime ports were occupied or offset on the shared host. The same failures reproduce alone. The changed test files pass alone. ## Risks - Risk is low. The change adds one interaction-kind guard to the existing transition. - A full accepted plan confirmation still changes planning mode to standard mode and an eligible review issue to todo in one transaction. - Checkbox confirmations, questions, rejection, and standard-mode issues keep their previous behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5, reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The runtime does not expose the exact model suffix or context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4b6de5327e |
Remove cheap model profiles (#12683)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents that use different model providers and adapters. > - Paperclip must keep agent execution rules clear and predictable. > - The cheap-model profile added a second execution mode across adapters, task recovery, APIs, and the UI. > - That mode increased configuration and recovery complexity. > - This pull request removes the cheap-model profile as a product feature. > - The benefit is one model-selection path for normal work and recovery work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** This change simplifies model selection across agent configuration, task execution, recovery, and adapter capabilities. **Current behavior** Paperclip exposes cheap-model profiles in adapter metadata, agent runtime configuration, task overrides, recovery rules, APIs, and the board UI. Recovery work can select a different model profile from the agent's configured model. **Proposed behavior** Paperclip uses the agent's configured model for normal work and recovery work. Status-only recovery stays limited to coordination work. The API rejects legacy model-profile configuration. A migration removes stored model-profile values from existing agent, issue, and historical revision records. **Reason and benefit** One model path reduces configuration, API, UI, and recovery complexity. It also prevents status recovery from becoming a separate product-level model-routing feature. **Breaking changes** This change removes model-profile fields and adapter capability metadata. Existing stored model-profile values are removed by an idempotent migration. The validators reject new legacy profile values with clear errors. ## What Changed - Removed model-profile types, adapter capabilities, API fields, and model selection logic. - Removed cheap-model controls from agent and task UI surfaces. - Kept status-only recovery limited to coordination context while normal continuations use the configured agent model. - Added an idempotent migration that removes stored model-profile values from agents, issues, and configuration revisions without changing issue update timestamps. - Updated tests and product documentation for the single-model behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` passes. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passes. - `pnpm build` passes. - `pnpm test:run` completed with 5,607 passing tests and 8 environment-sensitive failures in unrelated fixed-port and database-deadlock suites. The same failures repeated in an isolated rerun. CI is the final clean-room result. ## Risks - This is an intentional breaking change for clients that send model-profile fields. - The migration changes legacy agent, issue, and configuration-revision JSON. It is idempotent and preserves unrelated fields and issue update timestamps. - The change is cross-cutting because the removed feature existed in adapters, shared contracts, the server, plugins, and the UI. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex with `gpt-5`. Reasoning and tool use were enabled. The runtime did not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
1ab159d3a7 |
feat(apps): consolidate connector management (#12684)
Completes the post-managed-OAuth connector lifecycle, Paperclip Cloud provisioning defaults, governed test flows, and consolidated Apps UI.\n\nCo-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
141f202e40 |
Clean up experimental settings features (#12681)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app that people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Instance settings control optional product features and developer tools. > - The experimental settings page mixed active experiments, internal tools, and old recovery controls. > - Some workspace links also used the selected company instead of the workspace owner. > - These problems made settings hard to scan and could send users to the wrong company route. > - This pull request removes old controls, groups developer settings, and resolves workspace links from workspace data. > - The benefit is a smaller settings surface and correct workspace navigation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** This improves the instance experimental settings page, task watchdog controls, dependency wake recovery, and execution workspace routes. **Current behavior** The settings page shows old recovery controls and mixes product experiments with internal developer settings. Task watchdogs require an extra feature flag. Some direct workspace links use the current company prefix instead of the company that owns the workspace. **Proposed behavior** Remove the old task recovery experiment and its unused API surface. Make task watchdog controls available without the removed flag. Put worktree execution and managed environment controls in the developer section. Resolve direct workspace links from the workspace owner and reject a company prefix that does not own the workspace. **Reason and benefit** The smaller settings page is easier to understand. The server keeps only the dependency wake backstop that it still uses. Workspace links open under the correct company route. **Breaking changes** This removes the experimental issue graph recovery preview and run endpoints. It also removes the task watchdog feature flag. Task watchdog data and dependency wake behavior remain available. ## What Changed - Removed the old task watchdog and issue graph recovery feature flags. - Removed the old issue graph recovery preview, run controls, API contracts, and unused recovery implementation. - Kept resolved dependency wakes as the scheduler backstop. - Grouped product experiments and Paperclip developer settings on the instance settings page. - Made task watchdog controls available without an extra experimental flag. - Added owner-aware redirects and company checks for execution workspace routes. - Hid the false stopped-state badge while a workspace has no active runtime state. - Updated focused server and UI tests for the new behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - `pnpm test:run` completed with 5,620 passing tests and four failures in unchanged workspace runtime port tests. The same four failures repeat when the two files run alone. - The complete GitHub CI matrix passed, including all server, serialized server, build, canary, and end-to-end jobs. ## Risks - Clients that call the removed experimental recovery endpoints must stop calling them. - The route checks depend on workspace detail access. An unknown or cross-company workspace returns the global not-found page. - There are no database migrations, lockfile changes, workflow changes, or design image changes. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. The exact deployment ID and context window are not exposed. Reasoning, tool use, and code execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
ed3559dd21 |
feat(server): split the Sentry DSN into front-end and backend variables (#12678)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip reports server and browser errors through optional Sentry monitoring > - One environment variable sends both error types to one Sentry project > - Operators need separate control for browser and server error data > - This pull request adds specific variables and keeps the existing variable as a fallback > - The benefit is separate monitoring without breaking current deployments ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The Sentry configuration for server and browser monitoring uses one environment variable. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting (multiple of the above) **Current behavior** `SENTRY_DSN` supplies the server and browser clients. Both clients therefore report to the same Sentry project. **Proposed behavior** `SENTRY_DSN_FRONTEND` supplies the browser client. `SENTRY_DSN_BACKEND` supplies the server process. `SENTRY_DSN` remains a fallback for either component. **Reason and benefit** Operators can send browser and server errors to separate Sentry projects. Operators can also activate only one component. **Breaking changes** None. Existing deployments can continue to use `SENTRY_DSN`. ## What Changed - Add `resolveSentryDsns(env)` and use it in the server and browser configuration paths. - Add precedence, empty-string, fallback, and route tests. - Update the README, observability guide, and stale code comments. - Log one warning when the server uses the legacy fallback without exposing a DSN value. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run --project server sentry-dsn` — 8 tests pass. - `pnpm vitest run --project server auth-routes` — 21 tests pass. - The earlier run of the three targeted suites passed 40 tests. - `tsc --noEmit` passes for the files in this diff. - All required GitHub Actions checks pass, including the full continuous-integration suite. ## Risks The main risk is an incorrect environment variable precedence rule. Unit tests cover specific values, empty strings, and legacy fallback behavior. The existing `SENTRY_DSN` path remains compatible. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex — GPT-5, current runtime, tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
86ebdf842e |
fix(runner): keep agents running when app connections expire (#12670)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents can receive governed access to connected apps through the runtime MCP gateway. > - A connected app can become unavailable when its sign-in expires or its health state needs attention. > - The native runner treated that optional app state as a fatal runtime setup error. > - One unavailable app could therefore stop all unrelated agent work. > - This pull request removes the fatal dependency and keeps the available app assignment immutable. > - The benefit is that an agent can continue its work while the stream tells the user which app needs reconnection. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An agent could not start a native run when one assigned app connection was disabled, degraded, failed, or missing its secret. Runtime context creation or MCP delivery threw an error before the agent could do unrelated work. **Expected behavior** The run must continue without the unavailable app. Healthy assigned apps must remain available. The stream must explain which app needs reconnection. A changed assignment must not give a native run new access after its immutable context is captured. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Assign an MCP app connection to a Paperclip Runner agent. 2. Set the connection to a state that needs attention, such as `degraded`. 3. Start a task run for that agent. 4. Observe that native runtime setup fails before the agent starts. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced from `ee2a19062`. The branch is rebased on `dda4dff64`. **Deployment mode** Local development from source with embedded Postgres. No matching public issue or open pull request was found in the GitHub search. ## What Changed - Filter unavailable assigned app connections from the immutable native runtime MCP snapshot. - Keep healthy assigned connections and their tools in the snapshot. - Replace the fatal native MCP availability check with an optional stream warning callback. - Withhold MCP delivery when the current assignment digest does not match the captured native context. - Prevent a warning delivery failure from stopping the agent run. - Add regression tests for disabled, degraded, mixed healthy and unavailable, and assignment-drift cases. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/native-runtime/runtime-context.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-runtime-mcp-servers.test.ts` passes with 8 tests. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passes. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passes. - `pnpm build` passes. - `pnpm test:run` was attempted. Unrelated workspace runtime and port-exposure tests failed on this macOS host. The same files also failed when run without the changed MCP tests. The changed MCP tests remained green. Clean GitHub CI is the final full-suite check. ## Risks - Low migration risk. This change has no schema or API contract migration. - An unavailable app is absent from the run MCP surface until it is reconnected and a later run captures it again. - Assignment drift fails closed. The agent keeps running, but the changed gateway is not delivered. - This pull request does not auto-block the issue before the agent decides that the app is required. It emits reconnect guidance in the stream. The existing connection-request interaction remains the path for a required app. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, `gpt-5.6-sol`, with high reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser automation. The runtime did not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
14c7efa068 |
fix(workspaces): enable UI hot reload by default (#12612)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Managed worktrees can run a Paperclip development server for each task > - The managed runtime used the built UI when its service did not set the UI development middleware option > - This made new UI source changes require a manual build instead of a hot reload > - The runtime must supply the development default while it must keep an explicit operator choice > - This pull request enables the UI development middleware for new managed Paperclip development services > - The benefit is that UI edits appear in the managed worktree browser without a manual build ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A new managed Paperclip development worktree served the built UI by default. An operator had to set `PAPERCLIP_UI_DEV_MIDDLEWARE=true` before UI source changes could hot reload. **Expected behavior** New managed Paperclip development worktrees must enable the UI development middleware by default. An explicit `PAPERCLIP_UI_DEV_MIDDLEWARE=false` value must continue to disable it. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a managed Paperclip development service without `PAPERCLIP_UI_DEV_MIDDLEWARE`. 2. Open its UI. 3. Change a UI source file. 4. Observe that the browser does not receive the change until the UI is built again. **Paperclip version or commit** This was reproduced on `317394456` from `master`. **Deployment mode** Local development with a managed worktree runtime. ## What Changed - Set `PAPERCLIP_UI_DEV_MIDDLEWARE=true` for managed `paperclip-dev` services when the service does not set a value. - Keep explicit service values, including `false`. - Add a regression test and document the default and the opt-out. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts -t "enables UI dev middleware by default"` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - `pnpm test:run` completed with 5,397 passing tests. Four existing runtime-port tests could not use ports `42000` and `52000` because a live managed runtime owns those ports on this host. The new regression test passed separately. ## Risks - Risk is low. The change applies only to managed services named `paperclip-dev`. - A service can keep the built UI by setting `PAPERCLIP_UI_DEV_MIDDLEWARE=false`. - There is no database or API contract change. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, `gpt-5.6-sol`, hosted Codex context window, high reasoning, tool use, code execution, and multi-file repository editing. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
ee2a190626 |
Unify Paperclip Runner experimental controls (#12666)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip Runner is an experimental execution adapter. > - The adapter and its required sandbox ingress had separate settings. > - A user could enable one setting and still have an unusable runner configuration. > - The runtime already makes one durable native or legacy decision for each run. > - This pull request uses that runtime decision for ingress authorization. > - The benefit is one clear opt-in with safe recovery for existing native runs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** This improves the experimental settings and transport authorization for Paperclip Runner. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting. This change affects the React settings UI, shared settings contracts, adapter utilities, and server runtime selection. **Current behavior** Settings shows separate Paperclip Runner and Runner Preview Ingress controls. A user can enable the runner but leave required sandbox ingress disabled. **Proposed behavior** Settings shows only Paperclip Runner. Its native runtime decision also authorizes provider WebSocket ingress when the execution target requires it. A persisted native run keeps its recovery transport after the setting is disabled. **Reason and benefit** Paperclip Runner is one experimental capability. One opt-in removes an invalid partial configuration and makes the rollout boundary easier to understand. **Breaking changes** The Runner Preview Ingress card is removed. The old `enableRunnerPreviewIngress` key remains accepted in stored settings and managed configuration, but it has no server runtime effect. The public adapter-utils input remains compatible through a deprecated alias. **Additional context** Refs: #12638, #12641, #12656. ## What Changed - Removed the separate Runner Preview Ingress card from Experimental Settings. - Made resolved native runtime selection authorize required provider ingress. - Preserved ingress recovery for persisted native runs after the rollout flag is disabled. - Kept the old settings key and adapter-utils input as deprecated compatibility contracts. - Added focused UI, runtime policy, transport, stored-settings, and managed-config regression tests. - Updated deployment documentation and feature descriptions. ## Verification - GitHub Actions will run typecheck, tests, build, policy, and browser shards. - Focused tests cover the single settings control, runtime authorization, fail-closed transport selection, the deprecated public input, and old managed configuration. - No local tests were run, per the maintainer request to use GitHub Actions for verification. - `git diff --check` passes. ## Risks Low to moderate risk. The effective ingress gate changes from a separate stored flag to the resolved native run decision. Fresh runs still require `enableNativeRunner`. Persisted native runs remain recoverable. Legacy adapters never receive ingress authorization. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
1955b0e2d8 |
Gate Paperclip Runner setup behind an experimental flag (#12656)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent adapters control how Paperclip starts and resumes an agent runtime. > - Paperclip Runner is an experimental Rust runtime and must stay opt-in. > - The server already rejected new runner selections when the flag was off. > - Some setup and onboarding views did not enforce the same boundary. > - This pull request exposes the existing flag and applies it to every new setup path. > - The benefit is a safe rollout with unchanged legacy onboarding and recoverable existing native runs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** This improves experimental adapter selection in Settings, onboarding, new-agent setup, invite setup, and company import. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting: the React UI and the server onboarding seed service. **Current behavior** The server defaulted Paperclip Runner to off, but Settings did not expose the flag. First-run onboarding could show the runner after opt-in. A direct new-agent URL and some setup pickers could also reveal native runner configuration before the availability check completed. **Proposed behavior** Settings has a default-off Paperclip Runner toggle. Explicit agent configuration shows the runner only after the server reports that the flag is enabled. First-run and invite onboarding always use legacy adapters. Existing native agents and runs remain readable and recoverable. **Reason and benefit** This keeps the experimental runtime out of normal onboarding. It also gives administrators one clear opt-in before users can create a native runner agent. **Breaking changes** None. Legacy adapter selection and execution stay unchanged. Existing native records remain available. ## What Changed - Added the Paperclip Runner opt-in to Experimental Settings. - Refreshed adapter availability after the setting changes. - Kept UI and server-seeded onboarding on legacy adapters. - Made native runner choices fail closed in new-agent, invite, and import setup. - Preserved edit and recovery behavior for existing native agents and runs. - Added focused regression tests for flag-off and flag-on behavior. ## Verification - GitHub Actions will run the repository test, typecheck, build, and policy gates. - Focused tests cover Settings, onboarding, agent creation, invite setup, import setup, and server-seeded onboarding. - No local test suite was run, per the maintainer request to use GitHub Actions for verification. - `git diff --check` passes. ## Risks Low risk. The change narrows new adapter selection only. The server remains the final enforcement point. Existing native records do not depend on the current flag value for read or recovery behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
1ed29abaa6 |
fix(runner): harden dormant provider boundaries (#12654)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip Runner currently enables only the Codex production path. > - The package also contains dormant OpenCode and ACPX provider boundaries. > - Dormant boundaries must still fail safe before later activation work. > - Provider children must not inherit unrelated server secrets or host homes. > - Permission defaults must require interaction instead of broad automatic approval. > - This pull request hardens those boundaries without activating them. > - The benefit is a safer base for later provider-specific runnerd work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** This improves the inactive OpenCode and ACPX provider boundary in Paperclip Runner. **Subsystem affected** The adapter permission contract, Runner provider environment, and native execution input builder. **Current behavior** Dormant OpenCode code can inherit the full server environment. Its default permission mode allows operations. ACPX also defaults to broad approval. The provider guard can accept inherited object property names. **Proposed behavior** Use exact provider identifiers. Use interactive defaults. Allow only required OpenCode environment keys. Reject invalid proxy permission modes. **Reason and benefit** This reduces accidental authority and secret exposure before future provider activation. **Breaking changes** No production provider is activated. Codex runtime selection and Codex credential-home discovery do not change. Dormant OpenCode and ACPX callers that omit permission modes now receive safer defaults. ## What Changed - Change dormant OpenCode and ACPX permission defaults to interactive modes. - Reject prototype property names as provider identifiers. - Default dormant ACPX input to the qualified Codex agent profile. - Add an explicit OpenCode runner environment allowlist. - Exclude host homes, server credentials, database values, and Node injection options. - Add a fail-closed OpenCode proxy permission parser. - Add focused tests for defaults, filtering, and invalid values. ## Verification GitHub Actions must run: - Adapter utility tests. - Paperclip Runner tests, type checks, and build. - Server native runtime tests. - Repository test, type-check, build, policy, and security gates. No local test command was run. The repository owner requested GitHub-only verification. ## Risks Future OpenCode credential providers must add required variables to the allowlist through review. The safer defaults can pause dormant internal scenarios that relied on implicit broad approval. Production Codex behavior is unchanged. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with the GPT-5 agent model. The work used high reasoning, repository inspection, tool use, and parallel security review. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
131f5c4065 |
feat(runner): add administration and observability (#12641)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Administrators need bounded controls for experimental native execution. > - The lower stack adds remote Codex execution and the task workspace. > - Operators need to configure Codex safely and inspect provider traces. > - Unsupported providers must not appear as runnable choices. > - This pull request adds Codex-only administration and observability. > - The benefit is a default-off operational surface for production diagnosis. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12640. Refs #12616. Refs #12352. **Subsystem affected** Agent configuration, instance experimental settings, run ledger, provider trace inspector, and administrator actions. **Problem or motivation** The native runner lacks one safe operator surface for Codex permissions, lifecycle, raw trace capture, and run inspection. The integration branch also contains provider choices that the production backend cannot execute yet. **Proposed solution** Expose only the qualified Codex controls. Keep Paperclip Developer Mode and runner preview ingress off by default. Gate raw trace actions by administrator access and existing trace authorization. **Alternatives considered** Exposing unfinished providers would create configurations that fail at runtime. Always-on tracing would increase sensitive data and storage risk. **Roadmap alignment** This work supports governed Cloud and Sandbox agents and production diagnostics. ## Stack - Base PR: #12640. - Lower PRs: #12639 and #12638. - This PR contains only its 54-file administration and observability delta. - This is the final feature PR in the Codex production stack. ## What Changed - Added Codex-only Paperclip Runner permission and lifecycle controls. - Added bounded warm idle configuration. - Kept the provider field fixed to Codex. - Added administrator-only one-run raw trace requests. - Added a persistent future-run raw trace toggle. - Added trace status, metadata, ledger, and canonical runner inspection. - Added JSON-RPC request-origin grouping and finalization lineage. - Restored the stateful PRP transcript parser and focused projection tests required by trace inspection. - Added default-off Paperclip Developer Mode. - Added Honeycomb run links for authorized developer mode. - Disabled the legacy operational skill for `paperclip_runner`. - Did not expose OpenCode, ACPX, Pi, Claude Managed, or AWS runner choices. - Did not change migrations, workflows, dependencies, or `pnpm-lock.yaml`. ## Verification - GitHub Actions will run UI tests, server tests, repository typecheck, build, browser tests, security, and policy gates. - Tests cover Codex configuration defaults and bounds, administrator trace actions, persistent settings, ledger inspection, trace lineage, and Honeycomb links. - Existing server trace authorization and retention tests remain the backend authority. - Local tests were not run. The requested verification policy uses GitHub Actions for this series. - `git diff --check runner/task-workspace-experience...HEAD` passes. - The delta contains 54 files. ## Risks - Raw provider traces can contain sensitive provider data. - Existing server authorization controls access, reveal, download, retention, and deletion. - The UI gates trace actions by administrator access and developer mode. - All new instance settings remain off by default. - Fresh Paperclip Runner configuration remains Codex-only. - Direct adapters and legacy task behavior do not change in this PR. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5.6. The work used high-reasoning agent mode, repository tools, GitHub tools, and parallel code-audit agents. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with Fixes: / Closes / Refs OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
0a422fda52 |
feat(runner): add remote execution substrate (#12638)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip Runner gives native runs a durable and governed execution path. > - The current native path runs on the control-plane host. > - Remote environments need an authenticated execution-target contract. > - The contract must not change direct adapters or enable new runtimes by default. > - This pull request adds the remote execution substrate and Daytona ingress. > - The benefit is a bounded base for later remote runner transport work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12616. Refs #12352. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting. This change touches runner transport, server orchestration, plugin contracts, and shared settings. **Problem or motivation** Native execution cannot resolve an authenticated runner ingress through a remote environment. The server also lacks one provider-neutral contract for remote execution targets. **Proposed solution** Add a default-off runner preview ingress capability. Add transport-neutral runner connectivity. Add remote execution target and lifecycle handling. Add a Daytona ingress implementation with redacted credentials. **Alternatives considered** A provider-specific server path would duplicate orchestration and authorization. A public endpoint without an environment contract would weaken the trust boundary. **Roadmap alignment** This work supports the Cloud and Sandbox agents milestone. It also supports self-healing runs and governed tool access. ## What Changed - Added execution-target traits for local, SSH, and sandbox environments. - Added plugin RPC contracts for runner ingress endpoints. - Added authenticated Daytona preview ingress. - Added transport-neutral PRP outbound connections. - Added remote runner artifact verification and fail-closed provider selection. - Added bounded native session resume, cancellation, and lifecycle recovery. - Preserved Codex-only selection for fresh experimental runner starts. - Preserved all direct adapter execution and finalization paths. - Removed stale Pi provider-pack requirements that security review rejected. - Kept the rollout controls off by default. - Did not change pnpm-lock.yaml, Cargo, database migrations, or GitHub workflows. ## Verification - GitHub Actions will run the repository test, typecheck, build, security, and policy gates. - Focused tests cover ingress validation, redaction, execution targets, remote lifecycle, cancellation, resume, and legacy adapter selection. - Local tests were not run. The requested verification policy uses GitHub Actions for this series. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` passes. - The diff contains 52 files. ## Risks - Remote execution crosses a trust boundary. - The implementation validates target capabilities, artifact digests, provider-pack pins, and connection metadata. - The feature remains default-off. - Fresh native selection remains Codex-only. - Existing direct adapters remain on the legacy path. - This PR does not yet make remote Codex runnable. The next PR adds the Rust WSS and TLS transport. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5.6. The work used high-reasoning agent mode, repository tools, GitHub tools, and parallel code-audit agents. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with Fixes: / Closes / Refs OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
51ad751e0b |
feat(runner): integrate Codex native execution (#12616)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane for teams of AI agents. > - Agent runs currently use direct adapters and their established finalization paths. > - The new runner package needs one production integration before it can execute a real provider through the server. > - That integration must not change direct adapters or expose unsupported providers. > - The rollout must also preserve native runs that were already recorded when the feature flag changes. > - This pull request adds a default-off, Codex-only native execution path and its authority boundary. > - The benefit is a recoverable production vertical slice with explicit compatibility guards. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting server orchestration and adapter selection. **Problem or motivation** The runner package exists, but the server cannot yet start and recover a governed Codex run through it. A careless integration could also route existing direct adapters into the native runtime or lose cancellation and finalization state. **Proposed solution** Add a hidden `paperclip_runner` adapter for Codex. Keep it behind the default-off instance flag. Bind native execution, resume, cancellation, semantic tool authority, and finalization to the recorded company, issue, run, and coordinator identities. Leave every direct adapter on its existing path. **Alternatives considered** A multi-provider launch was rejected because only Codex has the complete production bridge in this series. Replacing direct adapter execution was rejected because the runner remains experimental. **Roadmap alignment** This work supports governed tool access, action attribution, and self-healing runs. It keeps the integration narrow and default-off. ## What Changed - Add the Codex-only native session executor and persisted resumption path. - Add run-scoped semantic tool projection, authorization, receipts, and idempotency. - Add audited native cancellation with durable issue and coordinator binding. - Add result fencing so a recorded result cannot reacquire the provider and run twice. - Reject fresh runner starts when the rollout flag is off while preserving recorded native recovery. - Keep direct adapters outside native status, cancellation, record creation, and finalization. - Add focused conformance, recovery, cancellation, status, portability, and compatibility coverage. ## Verification - GitHub Actions is the authoritative test environment for this large stack. - The PR policy and lightweight stack checks run while this is a middle PR. - The full required suite runs when this PR becomes the lowest unmerged or top PR. - Greptile will review this exact delta after the branch is pushed. ## Risks - The main risk is routing a legacy adapter into native execution. Runtime selection and heartbeat tests cover that boundary. - The next risk is stale or cross-company cancellation. Durable binding checks and transactional audit persistence cover it. - The adapter remains hidden and default-off. Only Codex is admitted. - There are no database migration, lockfile, or GitHub workflow changes in this PR. ## Stack 1. [Runner package, SDK, and developer tools](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12608) 2. This PR: Codex production server integration 3. [Provider-neutral task-thread UI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12617) ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5, extended reasoning, repository tools, and parallel review agents. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Dotta
|
560e7e48b5 |
feat(runner): add SDK and developer tooling (#12608)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The runner package already provides the production protocol and execution spine. > - Contributors still need stable SDK surfaces, deterministic test tools, and local inspection tools. > - Those surfaces share generated contracts and must change as one package boundary. > - This pull request adds the package-local SDK, labs, examples, and drift checks. > - The benefit is a reviewable developer platform that does not change application execution selection. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** `packages/paperclip-runner` — runner SDK, conformance tools, and developer tooling. **Problem or motivation** The production runner spine is present, but package consumers cannot build deterministic integrations, inspect sessions, or verify provider-neutral behavior through supported surfaces. **Proposed solution** Add browser, React, standalone, live-session, scenario, conformance, and evaluation surfaces. Add generated contract inventories and package-local verification scripts. Keep production application routing unchanged. **Alternatives considered** We considered splitting each generated catalog, SDK surface, and demo into separate pull requests. Those changes share exports, fixtures, and drift gates. Splitting them would create intermediate package states that do not build. **Roadmap alignment** No overlapping item appears in `ROADMAP.md`. This work extends the runner package that is already on `master`. ## What Changed - Add browser, React, standalone, live-session, and issue-thread SDK surfaces. - Add deterministic mock control-plane, scenario, conformance, replay, and evaluation tools. - Add bounded Codex, OpenCode, and ACPX development transports and fixtures. - Keep deferred managed-provider execution fail-closed. Persisted compatibility data remains readable. - Add generated capability inventories with their source files and drift checks. - Add examples, package documentation, browser checks, and clean-consumer checks. - Preserve the reviewed protocol bounds, replay compatibility aliases, process environment isolation, and semantic redaction limits. - Update the ACPX package patch that the existing workspace patch registry already tracks. - Do not change `pnpm-lock.yaml`, repository workflows, server runtime selection, or the application UI. ## Verification GitHub Actions is the verification authority for this pull request. The repository CI, package TypeScript and Rust checks, package tests, generated-output drift checks, browser checks, security scans, and Greptile review must pass on the exact head. Local test suites were not run because this series uses parallel GitHub Actions for verification. ## Risks This is a large greenfield package change. The main risks are public export drift, generated-output drift, and optional React consumer compatibility. Package boundary checks, clean-consumer checks, and browser tests cover those risks. Production adapter selection and server execution are outside this pull request. ## Stack 1. **This PR:** runner SDK and developer tooling. 2. [Codex production server integration](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12616). 3. [Provider-neutral task-thread UI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12617). ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, high-reasoning mode, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the feature request template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
