Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
1477d1ecea test: remove the no-op sequential describe modifier (#15286)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Paperclip runs the server and runner test suites with Vitest.
> - Vitest 5 removes the deprecated `describe.sequential` property, so
the pending Vitest 5 upgrade fails the type-check and test jobs.
> - `describe.sequential` only changes behaviour inside a
`describe.concurrent` suite, or when `sequence.concurrent` is on.
> - This repository has neither, so the modifier changed nothing at run
time.
> - The benefit is that the Vitest 5 upgrade can land, and the test
files lose a modifier that did no work.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #12969

## What Changed

- Replace every `describe.sequential` use with a plain `describe` call.
- Drop the `{ concurrent: false }` suite option from the two runner test
files.
- Add a comment to `server/vitest.config.ts` that records why these
suites must run one test at a time.
- Leave the package manifests and the lockfile unchanged.

## Why the modifier did nothing

The Vitest documentation states that `describe.sequential` is useful to
run tests in sequence inside a `describe.concurrent` suite, or with the
`--sequence.concurrent` option. `sequence.concurrent` defaults to
`false`.

This repository satisfies neither condition:

- No test file uses `describe.concurrent`, `it.concurrent`, or
`test.concurrent`.
- `server/vitest.config.ts` sets `sequence.concurrent: false`, with
`maxWorkers: 1`, `maxConcurrency: 1`, and `isolate: true`.
- `packages/paperclip-runner/vitest.config.ts` sets no `sequence` block,
so the `false` default applies.

`packages/db` and `cli` already run the same embedded-Postgres suites
with a plain `describe`, and those jobs are green. The server package
was the only outlier.

The modifier did carry one real piece of knowledge: these suites need
their tests to run one at a time. The new comment in
`server/vitest.config.ts` records that reason next to the setting that
enforces it.

## Verification

- `git grep` for `describe.sequential` returns nothing outside
`node_modules`.
- The author ran the changed server test files under the installed
Vitest 4, and the results match the results without this change.
- Two very large embedded-Postgres test files exceeded the author's
local memory limit, so the CI test jobs cover those two.
- The two changed runner test files have pre-existing local failures
caused by a missing Rust toolchain and a missing global `pnpm` binary.
The failures are identical with and without this change.
- The author type-checked the changed files and found no new error.
- CI must pass the typecheck, build, server test, and runner verify
jobs.

## Risks

- Low risk. Suite execution stays serial, because the Vitest config
enforces it.
- The change adds no dependency and changes no package manifest or
lockfile.
- A future change that turns `sequence.concurrent` on would break these
suites. The new config comment warns against it.

## Model Used

- Claude Sonnet 5 — code edits and local verification.
- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 — the earlier revision of this branch.

## Test plan

- [x] Every CI check reaches a terminal green state. A pending or queued
check is not a pass.
- [x] The `Typecheck + Release Registry` job passes. This change must
not introduce a type error.
- [x] The `Build` job passes.
- [x] The server test jobs and the runner verify jobs pass.
- [x] Greptile re-reviews this commit set and posts a passing verdict.
The dependabot waiver does not apply to this pull request.
- [x] `mergeable` reads `MERGEABLE` as a terminal value.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have linked the related public issue with `Refs: #12969`
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-Authored-By: Priya Raman <priya.raman@paperclip.ing>

---------

Co-authored-by: Priya Raman <priya.raman@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: nickyleach <331803+nickyleach@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-06 07:19:15 -07:00
Jannes StubbemannandClaude Opus 4.8 606e74d11f cloud_tenant: company-scoped tenants, never instance-admin (#7525)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies, and a
single server instance can host many companies.
> - The auth middleware (`server/src/middleware/auth.ts`) supports a
`cloud_tenant` mode where a trusted hosting proxy injects per-request
identity headers, designed originally for one-deployment-per-tenant
setups.
> - In that original setup, granting every cloud tenant the
`instance_admin` role was harmless; on a **shared, multi-tenant pool**
it means any paying tenant is admin of the whole instance and can reach
every other tenant's data.
> - A tenant only needs to own its own company — which it already gets
via the company membership the same code path upserts — so
instance-level admin is never appropriate for `cloud_tenant` actors.
> - This PR removes the `instance_admin` grant from the cloud-tenant
path and pins `isInstanceAdmin: false` on the resolved actor.
> - Greptile review then surfaced a follow-up gap: deployments that ran
the pre-hardening build still have stale `instance_admin` rows in
`instance_user_roles`, which other lookups (BetterAuth session path,
board API keys, and the authorization service's own DB re-check) would
still honor.
> - The follow-up commit closes that gap by purging stale rows at the
cloud-tenant auth boundary and by teaching the authorization service
that `cloud_tenant` actors are never instance admins.
> - The benefit is that shared-pool hosting becomes structurally safe:
tenants are company-scoped owners, never instance admins — including on
deployments upgrading from the older behavior.

## Linked Issues

- Refs #966 — managed SaaS multi-tenant hosting is the deployment shape
this hardening protects.
- Refs #5015 — same problem space: instance-admin-scoped credentials are
too broad for multi-company instances; tenants need company-scoped
access.

Neither issue is fully closed by this PR; it removes the instance-admin
grant from the `cloud_tenant` trusted-header path specifically.

## What Changed

- `server/src/middleware/auth.ts`
- Removed the `instanceUserRoles` insert that granted every cloud tenant
`instance_admin`; `resolveCloudTenantActor` now returns
`isInstanceAdmin: false` (was `true`).
- `resolveCloudTenantActor` now **deletes** any stale `instance_admin`
row for the authenticated tenant user on every trusted-header request,
so grants left behind by pre-hardening deployments are purged at the
source (closes the Greptile P2: stale rows could otherwise re-elevate
the user via the BetterAuth session path, board API keys, or the
authorization service).
  - The function is `export`ed so it can be unit-tested directly.
- `server/src/services/authorization.ts`
- `authorizationService` previously re-checked `instanceUserRoles` from
the DB regardless of the actor flag, which would have elevated even
hardened `cloud_tenant` actors while a stale row lingered. Actors with
`source === "cloud_tenant"` are now never elevated to instance admin;
other board actors keep the existing lookup.
- `server/src/services/authorization.ts` +
`server/src/middleware/auth.ts` (follow-up commit `dc57a71c7`)
- CI on the merge ref surfaced that elevation removal alone strands real
cloud tenant users: board actors only ever reached `issue:read` /
`issue:mutate` through instance-admin elevation (`permissionForAction`
maps both to no grant key). `decide()` now grants `cloud_tenant` actors
with an **active membership in the resource company** the same read
surface as a same-company agent (`agent:read`, `company_scope:read`,
`issue:read`, `project:read`) plus `issue:mutate` for non-viewer members
— cross-company access stays denied (new `allow_company_member` reason).
- `resolveCloudTenantActor` seeds the standard role-default permission
grants (`ensureHumanRoleDefaultGrants`) so granted actions (e.g.
`tasks:assign`, `agents:create` for owners) work without elevation.
- Master-side route tests that stubbed cloud tenant actors with
`isInstanceAdmin: true` now seed a real membership and assert under the
hardened contract (`issue-identifier-routes`,
`multilingual-issues-routes`, `issue-comment-redaction`).
- Tests
- `server/src/middleware/cloud-tenant-actor.test.ts` (new): cloud tenant
is never instance-admin, is scoped to exactly the one company from its
stack, still upserts user/company/membership, purges stale
`instance_admin` rows, returns null without the server token, and maps
non-owner stack roles without elevating.
- `server/src/__tests__/auth-session-route.test.ts`: end-to-end
middleware regression — a user with a stale `instance_admin` row stops
being elevated via the session path once they authenticate through the
cloud-tenant path (with a control assertion showing the pre-purge
elevation).
- `server/src/__tests__/authorization-service.test.ts` (embedded
Postgres): a `cloud_tenant` actor with a stale `instance_admin` row in
the real DB cannot cross company boundaries, while a `session` actor
with the same row still resolves `allow_instance_admin`.

## Verification

Run from the repo root after `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`:

```bash
cd server
npx vitest run src/middleware/cloud-tenant-actor.test.ts src/__tests__/auth-session-route.test.ts
# 9 tests passed
npx vitest run src/__tests__/authorization-service.test.ts
# 16 tests passed (embedded Postgres)
pnpm typecheck
# clean
```

Also ran the broader auth-related suites locally (`auth-routes`,
`authz-company-access`, `better-auth`, `adapter-routes-authz`,
`express5-auth-wildcard`): 8 files, 58 tests, all passing.

## Risks

- **This touches authentication and authorization paths directly.**
Mistakes here are security bugs in both directions; review accordingly.
- **Behavioral change for existing `cloud_tenant` deployments:** tenants
that previously (incorrectly) had instance-admin lose it — including the
ability to see/manage other companies on the instance. This is the
intended hardening, but any single-tenant deployment that relied on the
cloud-tenant identity for instance administration must provision a
separate admin identity.
- **The purge is destructive by design:** if an operator's
instance-admin identity is *also* provisioned through the cloud-tenant
headers (same user id), its `instance_admin` row will be deleted on the
next trusted-header request. Operators should hold admin through a
non-cloud-tenant identity.
- **Residual gap (documented, not fixed here):** a deployment that ran
the old cloud_tenant build and then *disabled* cloud-tenant mode keeps
stale rows until the affected user re-authenticates through the cloud
path. A data migration was considered and deliberately avoided: there is
no reliable SQL predicate for "cloud-tenant-provisioned user" (no source
column), so a migration risks deleting legitimate admins.
- No schema or migration changes; no UI changes.

## Model Used

- Claude Fable 5 (claude-fable-5, 1M context), extended thinking + tool
use, via Claude Code — this revision; original PR authored in an earlier
Claude Code session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above (none duplicate this; related issues Refs #966 / #5015 are
linked in the issue section)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots (no UI changes)
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no
existing docs reference `cloud_tenant` mode)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 17:59:32 -07:00
Dotta 4c47eb46c3 [codex] Add multilingual issue preservation coverage (#6069)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for autonomous companies.
> - Agents and board operators coordinate through company-scoped issues,
comments, documents, and heartbeat wake payloads.
> - Chinese, Japanese, and Hindi text needs to survive the full issue
lifecycle without normalization or prompt serialization damage.
> - The riskiest paths are board issue creation, server
issue/comment/document round-tripping, and scoped wake prompt rendering.
> - This pull request adds focused regression coverage across those
surfaces.
> - The benefit is higher confidence that multilingual operators and
agents can create, search, comment on, complete, and wake on issues
using non-Latin text.

## What Changed

- Added adapter-utils wake payload and prompt rendering coverage for
Chinese, Japanese, and Hindi issue/comment text.
- Added UI New Issue dialog coverage proving multilingual title and
description text is submitted unchanged.
- Added server route coverage that round-trips multilingual issue text
through create, search, comments, documents, completion comments, and
heartbeat context.
- Addressed Greptile feedback by using a typed storage mock and
splitting the server route integration path into smaller ordered
assertions.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/multilingual-issues-routes.test.ts`
- Result: 3 test files passed, 51 tests passed.

## Risks

- Low risk: this PR adds regression coverage only and does not change
runtime behavior.
- The new server test uses embedded Postgres support and skips on
unsupported hosts using the existing helper pattern.
- No migrations are included.
- No `pnpm-lock.yaml` changes are included.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected - check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 based coding agent, with shell, git, Vitest, and
GitHub connector/CLI tool use.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-05-15 12:49:57 -05:00